by Yoni Hersch, Mati Tuchfeld, Ilan Gattegno and Israel Hayom Staff
Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Ron Dermer: "Obama gave the Palestinians exactly what they wanted: He gave them the ammunition for a political, diplomatic and legal war against Israel, by not vetoing" • PM Netanyahu stands by strong response to resolution.
Israeli Ambassador to the
United States Ron Dermer
|
Photo credit: EPA |
Anger in Israel over the U.N. Security
Council's anti-settlement vote grew stronger after Israeli Ambassador to
the United States Ron Dermer claimed Monday that the Obama
administration was involved in the resolution's passing at a capacity
beyond its abstention.
"We have evidence for that," Dermer said in a
CNN interview, referring to the Obama administrations' role in driving
the Resolution 2334. "We will present that evidence to the new
administration in the appropriate channels, and then they can decide
whether they want to release it to the public."
Dermer went on to say that "[U.S. President
Barack] Obama gave the Palestinians exactly what they wanted: He gave
them the ammunition for a political, diplomatic and legal war against
Israel, by not vetoing," the resolution.
Pressed about Israel's tough response to the
countries that voted in favor of the resolution, Dermer stated simply
that "Israel is not going to be kicked in the teeth and just not
respond."
While Dermer noted that disagreement over the
settlements is not a new topic, he stressed that Obama brought "the
disagreement between our two governments [over settlements] ... to the
Security Council, something that has not happened in 36 years, since the
days of Jimmy Carter."
Dermer stressed that the resolution, and
Obama's part in it, will make peace more difficult to achieve and will
encourage boycotts against Israel.
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump also spoke
out against the U.N., tweeting, "The United Nations has such great
potential but right now it is just a club for people to get together,
talk and have a good time. So sad!"
At the same time, Obama's Deputy National
Security Adviser Ben Rhodes told Israel's Channel 2 News that, despite
accusations in Israel, "by definition it's not an ambush when President
Obama and Secretary [of State John] Kerry have been saying in hundreds
of conversations and in public comments that Israeli settlement activity
was pushing into the West Bank in a way that was making the two-state
solution unachievable over time."
Rhodes stressed that Obama has been supportive
of the Jewish state, saying, "I think the true face of this president's
support for Israel can be seen in his entire record," going on to
reference the United States' recent $38 billion aid package to Israel.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
rejected claims that his response to the passing of U.N. Security
Council Resolution 2334 against the settlement enterprise has been
overly aggressive. "Israel is a country with national pride, and we will
not turn the other cheek," Netanyahu said
Referring to his decision to withdraw
ambassadors from New Zealand and Senegal and to cancel planned
diplomatic visits, among other things, the prime minister said, "This is
a rational, aggressive and responsible reaction." He said that the
response makes it clear to the world that the U.N. resolution is not
acceptable to Israel.
Speaking at Maalot-Tarshiha in Israel's north,
at the launch of a social and economic development program for the
Galilee, Netanyahu said, "There is continued importance to this
reaction, even if there is another attempt or two to harm us over the
next month. But there is no substitute for a determined response,
because that essentially creates the basis for future treatment -- so
describing our protest as a world war is ridiculous. I say, enough with
these customs of exile. I am telling you that there is no diplomatic
wisdom in obsequiousness. Our relationships with the countries of the
world will not only not be damaged -- they will improve over time,
because the countries of the world respect strong countries that stand
their ground, and they do not respect weak countries that are deferent
and bow their heads."
Energy Minister Yuval Steinitz (Likud) also
commented on the issue, saying, "The difficult resolution approved in
the Security Council is not only against the settlements, it is an
anti-Israel resolution. We are here to build and to be built up. We will
behave responsibly and thoughtfully, and we will consider the steps and
processes. This is our home, our land and our homeland."
However, Opposition Leader Isaac Herzog
attacked Netanyahu, saying, "Only two weeks ago, we heard the prime
minister boast about his excellent foreign relations with various
countries, including in Africa and Asia, and now, before our eyes, there
has been a total collapse of Israeli foreign policy. A collapse upon
which the name of only a single man is signed, and that is Benjamin
Netanyahu."
Yesh Atid Chairman Yair Lapid sent a letter to Knesset
Foreign Affair and Defense Committee Chairman Avi Dichter (Likud)
Monday, saying that the U.N. resolution was "terrible," and that "we
will not fold before the world, rather, we will simply work correctly,
professionally, thoughtfully and in an organized manner, according only
to the national interest."
Yoni Hersch, Mati Tuchfeld, Ilan Gattegno and Israel Hayom Staff
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=39111
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
1 comment:
Dec. 31,2016
What will really be intriguing in the investigations of the Obama administration in the months to come,will be what executive action Obama took,sotto voce,{with his usual dance around Congress & the Constitution} to threaten Israel more imminently. For example: Did Obama ask the JOINT CHIEFS of STAFF for advice on how to intervene against Israel,with U.S. Forces,in case Israel had to use all necessary force against Iran or the Muslim enemies immediately abutting her borders ? What directives did Obama give U.S. Intelligence Chiefs about his "new direction" in dealing with the Jewish State ? How often did Obama ask his rubber stamp Attorney Generals for advice about the best loopholes for circumventing Congress ? Would Obama's bred-in-the-bone Islamic animus against Israel have taken on a more bloody-minded form if not for insurmountable Congressional opposition ? What was behind Obama's frequent interventions in very local jurisdictional & law enforcement issues ? Examples abound. Was Obama a `driving force` behind the constant campaign to discredit and undermine the very idea of local Police intervention, when it appeared to be against the interests of the Democratic Party`s ~core voting demographic~ ? Just like his tactics in co-opting execrable u.n. officials. e.g. the ~Black Lives Matter~ confrontations. Eminences grises, David Axelrod and frequent White House guest,Jesse {Hymietown} Jackson would make interesting witnesses on that score.
We "Ain't seen nuffin' yet!
GOOGLE: Norman L. Roth
Post a Comment