Saturday, October 4, 2025

Israel to implement first phase of Trump plan to end Hamas war - Charles Bybelezer, Amelie Botbol

 

by Charles Bybelezer, Amelie Botbol

Jerusalem is readying for “the immediate release of all hostages” from Gaza, Prime Minister Netanyahu's office announced.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Sept. 29, 2025. Photo by Avi Ohayon/GPO.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Sept. 29, 2025. Photo by Avi Ohayon/GPO.

 

Israel is preparing to implement the first phase of U.S. President Donald Trump’s plan to end the war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, which includes “the immediate release of all hostages,” the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem announced overnight Friday.

“We will continue to work in full cooperation with the U.S. president and his team to end the war in accordance with the principles set forth by Israel, which are consistent with President Trump’s vision,” the statement added.

The decision followed Hamas’s response earlier on Friday to the American proposal. The Palestinian terrorist group said it “appreciates the Arab, Islamic and international efforts” behind the peace plan Trump unveiled on Sept. 29.

Hamas said it accepts parts of the plan, including the release of all 48 remaining hostages—20 of whom are believed to be alive—under the formula outlined by Trump, “provided the field conditions for the exchange are met,” as part of ending the war.

The Islamist group expressed its “readiness to immediately enter into negotiations through the mediators to discuss the details of this agreement.”

While Hamas also claimed a willingness to hand over the administration of the Strip to a “Palestinian body” based on “Palestinian national consensus, and Arab and Islamic support,” it said that “other issues,” such as the core element of disarmament, “are linked to a comprehensive national position and based on relevant international laws and resolutions.”

IDF halts offensive operations

In response, the Israel Defense Forces has been instructed to halt offensive operations in Gaza.

Army Radio reported Saturday that the order calls for IDF operations to be reduced to “a minimum,” with ground troops confined to defensive maneuvers.

Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir convened a situation assessment on Friday night, the military said. Following the meeting, and “in accordance with the directives from the political echelon,” he ordered preparations to implement Trump’s plan for the release of the captives.

“At the same time, it was emphasized that the safety of IDF troops is a top priority and that all capabilities will be allocated to the Southern Command to ensure their protection,” the military said in a statement.

Zamir stressed the need for “high alertness and vigilance” and reinforced the requirement for rapid response to neutralize any threat, the IDF added.

On Saturday, the military warned Palestinians against returning to evacuated areas, with Arabic-language spokesman Col. Avichay Adraee saying such a move would place them in “extreme danger.”

“For your safety, avoid returning north or approaching areas where IDF troops are operating anywhere in the Strip—even in its southern part,” he said.

Trump presses deal

On Friday, Trump said that he believes Hamas is “ready for a lasting peace,” and therefore, “Israel must immediately stop the bombing of Gaza, so that we can get the hostages out safely and quickly.

“Right now, it’s far too dangerous to do that. We are already in discussions on details to be worked out,” he continued. “This is not about Gaza alone. This is about long-sought peace in the Middle East.”

Hours later, Trump released a video statement in which he confirmed that Washington was waiting to get “the final word down,” while adding he “look[s] forward to having the hostages come home to their parents.

“This is a very special day, maybe unprecedented,” said Trump. “We were given a tremendous amount of help. Everybody was unified in wanting this war to end and seeing peace in the Middle East, and we’re very close to achieving that.”

Israel’s Kan News public broadcaster reported on Saturday that Jerusalem’s negotiating team is preparing for talks on implementing the peace plan. The report said Israeli security officials are compiling a list of Palestinian prisoners who could be released in exchange for the hostages.

U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, together with former White House senior adviser Jared Kushner, were scheduled to travel to the region this weekend to help broker negotiations in Egypt.

Hostage families cautiously optimistic

“Things are going in the right direction, but we must show cautious optimism,” Ruby Chen, the father of Israeli-American hostage Sgt. Itay Chen, whose body is being held in Gaza, told JNS on Saturday.

Itay, from Netanya, was stationed at the Nahal Oz army base as part of a tank unit when Hamas terrorists captured him along with three other soldiers during the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre.

The IDF notified his father in March 2024 that Chen had been declared dead, but Hamas has refused to confirm it holds his remains or provide any physical evidence of the soldier’s fate.

“President Trump understands that we need everybody out; it’s the way to put an end to this humanitarian crisis and start our rehabilitation,” Ruby Chen said.

“The response of Hamas isn’t 100% positive. We need to see how things turn out. We don’t plan anything. When things happen, they’ll happen,” he added.

The Hostages and Missing Families Forum Headquarters said on Saturday that “we are in decisive days for a deal” and urged Israelis to gather at Tel Aviv’s “Hostage Square” that evening in a show of support.

“This is the moment for all of Israel to stand together and demand loudly: Do everything possible to bring our brothers and sisters home,” the statement added.

Hanna Cohen, aunt of murdered hostage Inbar Haiman, the only female still held in Gaza, told JNS on Saturday that the people of Israel are anxiously awaiting the return of the captives.

“I am very happy and grateful to President Trump for the efforts made to bring everyone home. The fact that he mentioned on Friday a woman being held warmed our hearts,” Cohen said. “He knows there is a woman in captivity who must be brought home as soon as possible.”

Haiman, 27, was abducted by Hamas on Oct. 7 from the Supernova music festival near Kibbutz Re’im. In December 2023, the IDF confirmed that she had been killed in captivity.

“We are waiting. Hamas is a terrorist organization, and we expect to face more terror,” Cohen said. “Inbar’s parents and I are always in touch and fighting side by side. We are waiting for Inbar. We are ready to receive her and give her the respect she so greatly deserves.

“We have fought a bloody war for two years that cost us our health,” she continued. “We turned from healthy people into mentally and physically unhealthy ones. We never stopped believing for a moment that Inbar would come home. We never stopped fighting for her, and we pray that we will see results soon, in a very loving way,” she added.

Behind the scenes in Jerusalem

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened a ministerial meeting on Friday night, attended by Defense Minister Israel Katz, Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and senior defense officials.

Channel 12, citing sources close to the prime minister, said Netanyahu did not view Hamas’s response to the plan favorably, considering it a conditional acceptance.

Nevertheless, the premier wants to quickly advance the first phase of the deal to release the hostages within 72 hours, particularly as Trump has already pressed Jerusalem to curb military operations in Gaza.

The Israeli government is also eager to set a timeline to resume IDF operations if Hamas reneges or attempts to delay the process.

A senior political source told Channel 12 on Saturday that officials in Jerusalem believe hostages could be returned within days. The source said the Arab world was on edge over the prospect of Israel completing its operation in Gaza City and exerted heavy pressure on Hamas.

“Alongside the tremendous pressure from Trump, a renewed framework emerged that guarantees the release of hostages above all,” he said.

He called the development “a tremendous achievement for the prime minister and for Israel, in which all the living hostages and the bodies are received in exchange for a set number of prisoners, as part of a tactical withdrawal, while IDF forces remain deep inside the Strip.”

On coordination with Washington, the official stressed that “everything was planned, there were no surprises. Everything was discussed and agreed upon in advance.” He said that Netanyahu spoke with Trump on Friday before the president’s statements and is working with him in close coordination.

The source revealed that an Israeli delegation will head to Egypt on Sunday or Monday to discuss the “technical details.”

According to Israel Hayom, the talks will be conducted in two stages. The first stage is expected to include a ceasefire, a phased IDF withdrawal from Gaza in parallel with the release of hostages, the release of Palestinian terrorists imprisoned in Israel and the reopening of supply routes throughout the Strip.

If the first stage is completed, a second phase will follow, involving a conference in Europe with the participation of additional international actors. This stage would aim for a final agreement to end the war and rebuild Gaza. Key issues would include the transfer of governance from Hamas to another entity, the exile of its leadership and the demilitarization of the enclave.

The report cited diplomatic officials expressing skepticism about the mediators’ ability to “deliver,” noting that Hamas had introduced numerous obstacles in its response and was expected to harden its positions under the cover of a ceasefire.

Meanwhile, a senior Hamas official told AFP on Saturday that Cairo will organize a summit of Palestinian terrorist factions to determine a path forward.

The official said Egypt will host an “intra-Palestinian dialogue on Palestinian unity and the future of Gaza, including the administration of the Gaza Strip.”

Danny Zaken contributed to this report.


Charles Bybelezer, Amelie Botbol

Source: https://www.jns.org/israel-preparing-to-implement-trump-plan-including-immediate-release-of-all-hostages/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF uncovers Hamas weapons tunnel beneath hospital complex in Gaza City - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

IDF and ISA reveal: Underground tunnel route was located adjacent to the Jordanian Hospital in Gaza City, within it a weapons manufacturing workshop.


 

During a precise activity in southern Gaza City, troops from the 36th Division and the ISA, under the guidance of the Intelligence Directorate and in cooperation with the Yahalom Unit, located a tunnel shaft adjacent to the Jordanian Hospital complex that led to an underground workshop used for manufacturing weapons.

The tunnel route is part of a Hamas terrorist organization military outpost which, according to intelligence indications, was occupied by the organization’s platoon and company commanders. It is approximately 1.5 kilometers long, and contains manufacturing rooms, meeting rooms and senior officers’ quarters.

In addition to the tunnel route located near the Jordanian Hospital, IDF troops located another tunnel shaft beneath Hamad Hospital in Gaza City.

"The Hamas terrorist organization operates systematically within hospital complexes, exploiting humanitarian facilities for military purposes," the IDF stressed. "For years the terrorist organization has built an underground system beneath hospitals across the Gaza Strip, used to manufacture weapons and to conduct combat operations."

"The activity of the Hamas terrorist organization adjacent to the Jordanian Hospital occurred without the involvement or knowledge of the Jordanians.

"IDF troops in the area continue to operate to map out the underground infrastructure that was located, and are expanding their activities to additional sites where there are indications of terrorist activity."

Map of the Hamas tunnel complex
Map of the Hamas tunnel complexIDF spokesperson

Hamas tunnel near Gaza City's Jordanian Hospital
Hamas tunnel near Gaza City's Jordanian HospitalIDF spokesperson

Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/415779

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF shifts to solely defensive operations in the Gaza Strip - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

Gaza City will remain under siege, but the IDF will not move from the lines it has already reached, N12 reported.

 

Israeli soldiers enter Gaza at the border as seen from Israel, October 3, 2025
Israeli soldiers enter Gaza at the border as seen from Israel, October 3, 2025
(photo credit: REUTERS/AMIR COHEN)

 

The IDF shifted from offensive to only defensive maneuvers in the Gaza Strip, Israeli outlet N12 reported on Saturday.

Gaza City will remain under siege, but the IDF will not move from the lines it has already reached. 

A senior Israeli official confirmed to N12 that the political echelon “instructed the IDF to move to defensive activity only in the Strip and to stop the operation to capture Gaza City.”

IDF's Arabic-language Spokesperson Avichay Adraee stated that the area north of Wadi Gaza is still considered an active combat zone in a statement on X/Twitter.

IDF still considers areas of Gaza an active combat zone

“For your safety, avoid returning north or approaching areas where IDF forces are operating anywhere in the Strip — including its southern regions,” the statement reads.

On Friday evening, IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir instructed the military to prepare for the release of the hostages.

In a statement, the IDF said that it will transfer a majority of its manpower to the  Southern Command to ensure the protection of Israeli troops.

The Prime Minister's Office said that it would work to implement the first stage of Trump's plan to facilitate the immediate return of the hostages. 

“In light of Hamas’s response, Israel is preparing for the immediate implementation of the first stage of President Trump’s plan for the immediate release of all the hostages. We will continue to work in full coordination with the president and his team to bring the war to an end in accordance with the principles set by Israel, which are consistent with President Trump’s vision," a statement from the Prime Minister's Office read. 

Despite Israeli media's reports that the IDF moved to defensive operations, Reuters, citing Gazan authorities, reported that Israel struck multiple targets in the Gaza Strip on Saturday.

Israeli fire killed six people across the Gaza Strip, the Gazan Strip's authorities said. One strike killed four people in a house in Gaza City, while another killed two others in Khan Younis in the south, medical workers and Gazan authorities said.


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-869370

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Is Egypt on a collision path with Israel? - Natan Galula

 

by Natan Galula

Egypt views Israel as an “imperialist” state looking to expand its territory, Ruth Wasserman Lande tells JNS • “Antisemitism and Islamism are part of the collective identity of Egypt,” Egyptian-born Khaled Hassan stresses.

 

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. Source: Kremlin.ru.
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. Source: Kremlin.ru.

 

“Egypt is acting as though it is preparing for war with Israel,” but this needs to be put in the right context Ruth Wasserman Lande, a former Israeli deputy ambassador to Egypt, told JNS on Thursday.

Egypt has built up its military presence in the Sinai Peninsula with tunnels, storage facilities, manpower and equipment “far beyond” the terms of its 1979 peace treaty with Israel, said Wasserman Lande, a senior research fellow at the Misgav Institute for National Security and Zionist Strategy.

Furthermore, Cairo has recently conducted a joint naval drill with Ankara, the first such exercise after a 13-year hiatus, the Arab affairs expert added.

This latest development is “very worrying, because it doesn’t make sense for Egypt to attack Israel on its own, but it is feasible to do so with Turkey,” Wasserman Lande said.

The actions of both Muslim countries establish the conditions for casus belli, which consist of war declarations, intent and military capability, albeit Egypt is a little far behind with regard to the latter, she noted.

“The Egyptian [anti-Israel] declarations are getting worse by the day,” Wasserman Lande said.

Egypt moreover hosts senior Hamas officials in its territory, a fact that goes under the radar in the media, she continued. The two even made a pact before Oct. 7, 2023, that the terrorist group will not target Egypt or cooperate with Islamic terrorist cells inside Egyptian territory, while Cairo will overlook weapons smuggled into Gaza, she added.

However, Wasserman Lande cautioned against framing Egypt as warmongering, which could instigate further antagonism between the two peace partners.

She said that Cairo has an irrational view of Israel as a threat to its national interests; it distrusts the Jewish state, fearing its alleged “imperialist” aspirations in the region. Cairo particularly distrusts the current Israeli government, she continued. While Egypt saw other Israeli governments in a negative light, it “takes very seriously” many of the “blunt” statements made by certain members of this coalition, the expert said.

The Hamas-led invasion and massacre in Israel’s northwestern Negev on Oct. 7, 2023, has only made matters worse, Wasserman Lande added, with Cairo believing that Jerusalem seeks to move the Gazans into Egypt.

These fears are unfounded, she said. Relocating Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Egypt would simply move the problem “from one border to another,” she stressed.

In addition, Israel has no interest in destabilizing the Egyptian administration via the Palestinians, “despite the fact that it’s very far from perfect, as articulated above,” Wasserman Lande said.

Much to lose

Edy Cohen, orientalist and research fellow at the Israel Center for Grand Strategy (ICGS), believes that chances for war are low.

Speaking with JNS on Friday, he said that the circumstances in the wake of Oct. 7 have increased the pressure on Egypt to exacerbate its rhetoric against the Jewish state, but that it still has much to lose from breaking the peace deal.

He noted that the Arab world looks up to Egypt—a military power with more than a million soldiers—to lead efforts to protect the Palestinians.

“The entire Arab world was surprised that Egypt allowed the Israel Defense Forces to enter Rafah. There was an expectation that the Egyptians would prevent this from happening,” Cohen said about Israel’s military operation in May 2024, in the southern Gaza Strip bordering Sinai.

Israel’s recent $35 billion natural gas export deal with Cairo , the largest in the former’s history, is another point of contention in the Arab world, which charges Egypt with being “Israeli collaborators,” he continued.

When Israel carried out an airstrike against senior Hamas officials in Qatar last month, “the die was cast,” Cohen said.

Shortly afterward, President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi delivered an address at the Arab-Islamic summit in Doha on Sep. 15 in which he referred to the Jewish state as an “enemy,” marking the first time that Egypt’s head of state used such language since 1977.

El-Sisi moreover issued a warning to the Israeli public. Israel’s actions are undermining “existing peace accords with the nations of the region,” he said.

The “consequences [will be] severe,” he continued. “This is a price we will all pay, without exception. Therefore, do not allow the peace efforts of your predecessors to be in vain, for a time will come when remorse is utterly futile.”

Faith and Islam

Cohen mentioned two other factors that are driving Egypt’s escalation of the situation. With an external debt of $160 billion, Cairo is dependent on Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates for bailouts, he noted.

However, during U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest visit to Doha, this financial channel was cut off. “This is why el-Sisi delivered a militant speech, to portray himself as Qatar’s protector,” Cohen said.

The second factor is the daily incitement in the government-controlled Egyptian media against Israel, constantly referred to as “the enemy,” the expert stressed.

In the past, the Lebanese-born Cohen accused Egypt of being “the most antisemitic country in the Arab world.” He told JNS, “The Egyptians view us as their enemies.”

Wasserman Lande raised the alarm about Egyptian incitement as well. In a Knesset deliberation about the security situation on the Egyptian border held in March, Wasserman Lande said that Egypt has been indoctrinating its citizens to hate Israel for more than four decades. “Despite not being a democracy,” she said at the time, “a population of 110 million has a [huge] impact on the country’s decision makers.”

She outlined the “Egyptian mindset,” which is heavily based on faith. “Egypt is not an Islamist state, even to the contrary, it fears radical political Islam, and actively clamps down on it; and yet faith and Islam are fundamental for every Egyptian,” Wasserman Lande remarked.

Despite outlawing the radical Sunni Muslim Brotherhood, “Islamist ideology does exist in Egypt,” Wasserman Lande told JNS on Thursday. “And there is a certain degree of infiltration of that ideology into the military and into decision-making circles in Egypt.

“The nucleus of decision-making, however, is not Islamist at all,” she said.

Collision path

Egyptian-born counter-terrorism researcher Khaled Hassan, a member of the board of Secure Canada (formerly the Canadian Coalition Against Terror) and a council member of President Herzog’s Voice of the People Initiative, is convinced that Egypt is on the path of collision with Israel.

“Antisemitism and Islamism are part of the national collective identity of Egypt and have been since the 1950s,” Hassan told JNS over the phone from his London home last week.

Israelis are wrong to infer from Egypt’s battle against Islamist terrorist groups that it itself is not motivated by an Islamic worldview, Hassan said.

“The Muslim Brotherhood threatens the military rule of Egypt and definitely threatens the people, but when it comes to Israel there is a huge [ideological] alignment,” he said.

“The Egyptian Army has a history of embracing jihad against Israel. It was the one to engineer the concept of ‘fedayeen’ [to its troops] during the [1967-1970] War of Attrition. They would carry out suicide missions against Israelis knowing that they are going to die,” he relayed.

He stressed that the bellicose rhetoric coming out of Egypt in recent months has reached levels not recorded since before the 1967 Six Day War.

“No one in Egypt now is talking about anything other than war with Israel,” he said. “You see it in the media, you see it in officials’ statements, you see it in President el-Sisi’s recent statement in Doha. … He never called any other state an enemy. He never called Ethiopia an enemy, despite the conflict over the Blue Nile. He never called Turkey an enemy, despite the conflict over Libya. He never called any other country ‘the enemy’ except for Israel.” 

Hassan gave an example of Diaa Rashwan, the head of Egypt’s State Information Service (SIS), the state’s official public relations apparatus under the auspices of the presidency, who said on Sept. 4 that the distance from Egypt to Tel Aviv “does not exceed 100 kilometers”—alluding to the ease with which Egyptian forces could sweep into Israel.

“I have been worrying about this for months, actually years now,” Hassan said. “Every army, every militia, every terrorist group that said it will one day have war with Israel, and made it an essential part of their ideology, has eventually gone to war with Israel. You can see this with Hezbollah, Iran, Hamas, the Houthis; all of them have said for many years that a war between them and Israel is coming and that they will at some point, eventually, try to erase Israel.

“And sadly, this is the ideological base of the Egyptian Army. They believe that this war is coming. Whether it’s in a year, in two years, or 10, they believe that this is coming, and they’re preparing for it.”

Egypt’s regional power push

Ben Tzion Macales is a geo-analyst who offers analyses of satellite imagery on social media. Speaking with JNS on Wednesday, he said that Egypt’s armored deployment along the border with Israel amounts to two battalions composed of about 50 tanks coupled with several armored personnel carriers, with most of these stationed off Rafah.

“Under no circumstances is this sufficient for an incursion but more to spatial defense,” Macales said. This aligns with Egypt’s declared goal to prevent Gazans from entering its territory, he added.

From a broader strategic perspective, however, Egypt’s bolstering of military infrastructure in the western part of Sinai is a cause for concern, he stated.

“Part of the infrastructure includes new headquarters, larger bases spread over a wider region and the construction of a tunnel system for storing weapons, personnel, fuel, etc. for times of emergency,” Macales said.

He went on to say that a similar array of infrastructure has been built east of Cairo, along the route to the Suez Canal, with a new radar system and tunnels.

“We don’t know the strategic purpose of this military array on both sides of the Canal, but it should concern us.” Egypt has also been fortifying its borders with Libya and Sudan, he relayed.

Macales added that while Egypt has ongoing conflicts or disputes with Sudan, Libya and Ethiopia, it makes sense from a strategic perspective to model its military after the strongest military in the region—the IDF—in an attempt to become a prominent regional power.

In September, Axios reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked the Trump administration to press Egypt to “scale down” its Sinai operations, speaking during Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s most recent visit to Jerusalem.

Netanyahu presented him with a list of activities in the Sinai Peninsula that constituted “substantial violations” of the 1979 peace treaty, according to the report.

Just rhetoric?

Wasserman Lande told JNS that the cessation of operations by the U.S.-led international force in the Sinai Peninsula is a great cause for concern.

According to Israel Hayom, the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO), the body entrusted with overseeing the terms of the Israel-Egypt peace deal, has stopped carrying out reconnaissance flights over Sinai or inspecting the contents of the tunnels in the peninsula ever since the Oct. 7, 2023, attack.

Wasserman Lande said that to prevent the situation from deteriorating further, the Americans, as guarantors of the peace treaty, must reinstate the mechanism of the MFO effective immediately. Moreover, Israel must insist that military presence in Sinai that exceeds the 1979 terms be dispersed, she added.

Additionally, to calm things down, the highest echelons in Israel must inform the Egyptians that Jerusalem has no interest in relocating Gazans to Egyptian territory. However, “it is an Israeli interest to have them potentially move via Egypt into third countries, with full Egyptian coordination and supervision that they don’t remain in Egypt,” the expert continued.

Lastly, “Israel must demand that the indoctrination of the Egyptian public [against Israel] ceases. This must be demanded by Israel without any concessions,” Wasserman Lande stressed.

Cohen enumerated five reasons why an Egyptian offensive is unlikely.

First, under the U.S. Arms Export Control Act, misuse of U.S.-delivered weapons can lead to suspensions and cancellations of further deliveries, which would harm systems requiring regular maintenance. Much of Egypt’s U.S.-made military equipment would be less effective if this were implemented.

Second, Egypt receives more than a billion dollars annually from the U.S. thanks to the 1979 peace deal. War would cut this revenue stream, to the detriment of debt-laden Egypt.

Third, the American role in the supervision of the peace deters Egypt from breaking it.

Fourth, war would further strain Egypt’s shattered economy.

An fifth, the Egyptian Armed Forces have not fought a real war since 1973. Despite its “propaganda videos,” Egyptian soldiers are largely inexperienced, Cohen said.

The orientalist stressed, however, that after Oct. 7, no one can be certain about the future. “Threats with words can lead to threats with guns,” he said.

Hassan noted that Israel had recently begun to take “practical steps” against the peace treaty violations. Decisionmakers in Jerusalem have brought up the topic with Washington, and the IDF has openly commented on the repeated drone incursions from Sinai into Israel, he said.

But, he warned, while “Israel is taking the threat seriously, it is not taking it seriously enough.” The defense establishment still seems to dismiss Egypt’s threats as “just rhetoric that won’t materialize.”

Israel’s top security personnel have built up an assumption that “Egypt will never go to war against Israel because it would mean that Egypt would be destroyed …, [so] they start dismissing actual threats, saying, ‘This will never happen, everything is OK,’” Hassan said—“which is very similar to the ‘conception’ Israel had before the Yom Kippur War.


 Natan Galula

Source: https://www.jns.org/is-egypt-on-a-collision-path-with-israel/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Lebanon: The Republic of Impunity - John Smith

 

by John Smith

Nothing more clearly illustrates this than Riad Salameh, the former central banker, handing over $14 million in cash as bail on wildly reduced corruption charges.

 

The $14 million bail of Riad Salameh, Lebanon’s disgraced central banker, should have been a moment of reckoning. Instead, it proved what most Lebanese already knew: in Beirut, even justice is for sale. Bags of cash bought him freedom, while politicians and judges bought themselves silence. The case exposes a judiciary not failing, but functioning exactly as designed—to shield the powerful, punish the weak, and keep Nabih Berri’s corrupt order intact.

A governor in the dock

Salameh was once feted in Paris and Washington as the miracle worker of Beirut. For three decades, he ran Banque du Liban, praised for stability in a country otherwise defined by chaos. But beneath the surface, he presided over a financial edifice that resembled a Ponzi scheme, keeping dollars flowing in while politicians drained them out. When the system collapsed in 2019, ordinary Lebanese were locked out of their deposits, while the politically connected spirited their fortunes abroad.

Image created using AI.

International patience eventually snapped. In August 2023, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned him under Executive Order 13441, accusing him of corrupt practices that “contributed to the breakdown of the rule of law in Lebanon.” Britain, Canada, and many in the EU quickly followed with their own sanctions. Lebanese prosecutors piled on charges of money-laundering, illicit enrichment, forgery, and criminal conspiracy.

If convicted, Salameh faced years in prison. Bail was supposed to be a procedural guarantee—not a golden escape hatch.

The puzzle of $14 million

Initially set at $20 million, Salameh’s bail was mysteriously reduced to $14 million. Even so, it remained the largest in Lebanese history. The shock was not just the number, but the method. Under sanctions, with frozen accounts and asset seizures, how could Salameh produce $14 million in hard currency?

The answer played out in broad daylight. According to multiple reports, his lawyer, Mark Habka, arrived at the courthouse with bags of cash stacked high enough to buy his client’s freedom. Judges did not ask for proof of origin or legality. They simply nodded it through, laundering impunity in public view.

The irony was brutal. Millions of Lebanese still queue for meagre withdrawals of $400 a month from frozen accounts. Yet their former central banker could, from his cell, marshal $14 million in cash. The contrast illustrated Lebanon’s two-tier system: impoverishment for the many, impunity for the few.

For a man already prohibited from dealing in U.S. dollars to produce $14 million in cash for bail—what does that say about the credibility of U.S. sanctions enforcement in Lebanon? And why should those who facilitated this transaction—the lawyer who carried the bags, the judges who accepted them, and the political patrons who shielded it—not also be held responsible for potentially violating U.S. sanctions? For Washington, the message could not be clearer: Lebanon’s courts answer not to law, but to money and power.

Following the money

Where did the money come from? Those familiar with Salameh’s methods point to the offshore labyrinth European prosecutors have been unraveling for years. Transfers through HSBC Private Bank Suisse, Panama, and BVI shell companies, and real-estate vehicles in Paris and Munich, all of which feature in files obtained by Swiss NGO Public Eye. Watchdogs have documented how Geneva bankers ignored red flags for over a decade. Lebanese banks, many tied to political families, are suspected of facilitating discreet transfers under the guise of “investment dealings.”

The message was clear: the system that collapsed in 2019 still works—for those who built it.

Prosecutors’ discretion

And it’s here that the role of the judiciary comes into focus. Prosecutor General Judge Jamal al-Hajjar narrowed the case to a single embezzlement charge, precisely the one in which bail could be granted. More serious accusations of money-laundering and illicit enrichment, backed by international evidence, were left to languish.

Selective justice is no accident. It reflects a calculation: pursue just enough to quiet public outrage, but never so much that elite privilege topples. Though a Sunni by confession, al-Hajjar clearly takes his cues from Nabih Berri’s Amal Movement — a reminder that sectarian labels often mask deeper loyalties of patronage.

Under his watch, Berri’s Amal movement appointed judges are allowed wide latitude to operate unchecked. One example is Judge Zaher Hamadeh, once the Public Prosecutor at the Beirut Court of Appeal and now promoted as chief prosecutor in the South. He is notorious for abusing his office with partisan zeal for the Amal Movement.

Enter Nabih Berri

If one man epitomizes Lebanon’s system, it is Nabih Berri, Speaker of Parliament for more than three decades. A warlord-turned-statesman, he has mastered the art of balancing sectarian spoils with political survival. Salameh has long been among his confidants.

Berri’s fingerprints are all over the outcome in Salameh’s case. Judges answer to political patrons; prosecutors follow cues from above. Few doubt that the Speaker leaned on the system to ensure his old friend was spared humiliation. Protecting Salameh was not loyalty but survival. For Berri knows that if Salameh ever spoke freely, the Speaker’s own empire of corruption could collapse overnight.

Salameh was the treasurer of the political class, the man who conjured dollars from thin air to finance decades of patronage. He knows which ministers parked fortunes in which Swiss accounts, which banks facilitated which transfers, and how the pyramid of “financial engineering” kept the system afloat. If compelled to talk, he could sink half the establishment. Better, then, to keep him comfortable — and quiet.

A fragile façade of legality

Salameh’s release was dressed up as legality: bail, conditions, and a one-year travel ban. But the symbolism of his exit told the real story. An armed convoy whisked him away like a head of state, not a defendant.

International observers were aghast. American and European officials privately fumed that their painstaking sanctions were being undermined by Lebanese courts. But few were surprised. The case laid bare the structural reality: Lebanon’s judiciary is not an independent arbiter, but an extension of political power.

The cost of complicity

For Lebanon, the consequences are dire. Public trust in institutions, already shattered, sinks further. The bail affair signals to ordinary citizens that justice is not merely absent but hostile to their plight. Foreign investors, meanwhile, read it as confirmation that reforms are a mirage. Aid, reconstruction, and debt relief will remain hostage to credibility—and credibility is precisely what Lebanon lacks.

For Salameh, the bail was more than freedom. It was a tacit bargain: silence in exchange for protection. As long as he keeps the secrets of the ruling class buried, the class will shield him.

The bottom line

Lebanon’s tragedy is not only economic collapse but the capture of every institution by those who profited from it. Salameh’s $14 million bail crystallizes that truth.

In any normal country, the arrival of sacks of dollars in a courthouse would trigger arrests. In Lebanon, it bought a procession of bodyguards, a signed release, and a smirk at the system’s collapse. The delivery of bail was not merely a transaction; it was a declaration that power still buys impunity.

As one senior U.S. official put it: “Nabih Berri has been a central protector of Lebanon’s corrupt order for decades. If accountability is the goal, he cannot remain untouchable.”

If Washington and its partners are serious, they must widen the sanctions net. Riad Salameh is already designated. But the people involved in Salameh’s walking out of court after handing over $14 million should be next. All of them facilitate corruption and obstruction of justice. Until that happens, the message remains clear: in Lebanon, corrupt money is not hidden in offshore accounts. It is wheeled openly into court, one bag at a time. 


John Smith

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/10/lebanon_the_republic_of_impunity.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Evil Intent to Destroy Israel - Nils A. Haug

 

by Nils A. Haug

Despite much of the world harboring animosity towards the Jews, possibly out of envy for having had the audacity, through hard work, to do so well -- who else has turned deserts and malaria swamps into a thriving state? -- the Jews and their ancestral homeland of Israel shall survive.

 

  • Raging against Israel are those hypocritical, self-righteous, self-seeking, egocentric, cowardly leaders: Emmanuel Macron (France), Keir Starmer (UK), Anthony Albanese (Australia), Mark Carney (Canada), Pedro Sanchez (Spain) and their ilk, seemingly without an ounce of integrity between them, supporting an avowed genocidal death cult that publicly expresses the desire to murder all Jews, Christians, and other "infidels," and take down the West.

  • If you do not want to fight the invasions in your own countries, at least stand aside and do not obstruct someone else doing it for you. These feckless so-called leaders even fail to protect their own Jewish citizens from domestic terror. By so acting, and by legalizing Islamic Sharia law, they are oozing toward complete submission to the Islamist hordes they have encouraged to reside in their midst. In this way, as Trump cautioned, they are actively destroying their own nations and Western civilization itself.

  • Sadly, suicidally, it is also about appeasing their radical Islamist voters – who will probably reciprocate, as Trump noted, by wanting more.

Raging against Israel are those hypocritical, self-righteous, self-seeking, egocentric, cowardly leaders: Emmanuel Macron (France), Keir Starmer (UK), Anthony Albanese (Australia), Mark Carney (Canada), Pedro Sanchez (Spain) and their ilk, seemingly without an ounce of integrity between them, supporting an avowed genocidal death cult that publicly expresses the desire to murder all Jews, Christians, and other "infidels," and take down the West. Pictured: Starmer meets with Macron on July 10, 2025 in London. (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

There are no longer gray areas in the implied intent of major Western nations, such as France, Spain, Portugal, Canada, the UK, Australia and others, to isolate or destroy Israel.

Hamas and associated jihadist murderers are not Israel's primary enemies; rather, Israel's real enemies are its purported allies -- those Western powers seeking its demise by legitimizing a terror-dominated Palestinian state alongside, and within, the borders of the world's only Jewish homeland. Ironically, these are the countries Israel is defending as it fights a seven-front war, sacrificing nearly a thousand of its heroic soldiers. Israel is defending these Western nations against an invasion that President Donald J. Trump clearly warned is "not sustainable":

"You're destroying your countries.... Europe is in serious trouble. They've been invaded by a force of illegal aliens like nobody's ever seen before. Illegal aliens are pouring into Europe, and nobody's doing anything to change it, to get them out. It's not sustainable. And because they choose to be politically correct, they're doing just absolutely nothing about it....

"Now they want to go to Sharia law, but you're in a different country, you can't do that. Both the immigration and their suicidal energy ideas will be the death of Western Europe if something is not done immediately. This cannot be sustained. What makes the world so beautiful is that each country is unique, but to stay this way, every sovereign nation must have the right to control their own borders.... as we do now, and to limit the sheer numbers of migrants entering their countries and paid for by the people of that nation that were there and that built that particular nation at the time. They put their blood, sweat, tears, money into that country, and now they're being ruined....

"Proud nations must be allowed to protect their communities and prevent their societies from being overwhelmed by people they have never seen before with different customs, religions, with different everything. Where migrants have violated laws, lodged false asylum claims or claimed refugee status for illegitimate reasons, they should, in many cases, be immediately sent home. And while we will always have a big heart for places and people that are struggling and truly compassionate, answers will be given. We have to solve the problem and we have to solve it in their countries, not create new problems in our countries."

With Europe's major powers recognizing an independent Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly on September 23; and with the burden of sanctions to various degrees, coupled with a ban or restrictions on sales of weapons and munitions by hitherto allies, Israel stands almost alone -- except for the current US administration.

Raging against Israel are those hypocritical, self-righteous, self-seeking, egocentric, cowardly leaders: Emmanuel Macron (France), Keir Starmer (UK), Anthony Albanese (Australia), Mark Carney (Canada), Pedro Sanchez (Spain) and their ilk, seemingly without an ounce of integrity between them, supporting an avowed genocidal death cult that publicly expresses the desire to murder all Jews, Christians, and other "infidels," and take down the West.

Israel faces enemies from all fronts, not excluding many Israelis. Who stands against Israel's leaders and elected government? Large numbers of mainly leftist-elitist Jews, both in Israel and in the diaspora, who seek to topple Israel's duly elected government, while thousands of able draft-age haredi men males of the refuse to join the military – at a time when hundreds of their compatriots have been killed to protect them, their families, and the nation itself.

Islamists around the world in the millions seek Israel's death and destruction; Western leaders do not care if Israel survives or not – and from their recent actions apparently would prefer if it did not. Western leaders, from their actions in selling out Israel's security to its enemies, look as if they do not care if any Jews survive. After all, Europe has few Jews (0.2% of the continent's population) in the overall scheme of things.

Rather than supporting Israel as it fights not only for its own survival but to defend the values of the West, Macron, Starmer, Sanchez, Carney, Albanese and Co. vote for a Palestinian state within Israel – to the detriment not only of Israel's safety and security, but their own. If you do not want to fight the invasions in your own countries, at least stand aside and do not obstruct someone else doing it for you. These feckless so-called leaders even fail to protect their own Jewish citizens from domestic terror. By so acting, and by legalizing Islamic Sharia law, they are oozing toward complete submission to the Islamist hordes they have encouraged to reside in their midst. In this way, as Trump cautioned, they are actively destroying their own nations and Western civilization itself.

The forthright journalist Melanie Phillips queried: "Are these people wicked or just very, very stupid?" Initially, fair-minded people gave these "leaders" the benefit of the doubt. However, with their recent actions against Israel on the world stage, it has become obvious that they cannot simply be written off as stupid or naive. Some are highly educated and intelligent. The only explanation is that they possibly do have evil intent. They did not even bother to make their recognition of a non-existent Palestinian state conditional on Hamas releasing the hostages.

At best they might be regarded as worthless. A supine NATO does not even appear willing to invest anything other than pious words into helping Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky oppose Russia's outright acts of war against Estonia, Denmark and Poland. Their actions are probably designed, as in World War II, just to hunker down against adversaries and appease domestic Islamists, even though these newcomers to Europe have publicly sworn to murder Jews and burn them alive if possible – just as Hamas did to not only to Jews but also to Arabs and others on October 7, 2023.

Insofar as Jews are concerned, the upshot of the compromised consciences of these major European leaders is that, as Israel's Diaspora Affairs Minister Amichai Chikli made clear:

"The streets of Europe are once again not safe for Jews. Many of its leaders, instead of showing courage, show cowardice. Instead of standing with the truth, they stand with Palestinian propaganda falsehoods. Instead of standing with those who were attacked, they stand with those who launched a barbaric assault."

Naturally, Hamas and other Islamist fanatics are overjoyed at the UN resolution recognizing their terror state of Palestine as independent. In this way they have, in the main, achieved their aims and been rewarded for the murderous onslaught on October 7, murdering defenseless babies, boys, girls, the elderly and infirm, while carting others off to tunnel dungeons as hostages and playthings. The message sent to the terrorists is: Terrorism works, so keep doing it!

"The Palestinian national movement, Fatah and Hamas wings alike, largely has shown itself to be committed to Israel's debilitation and destruction, not to a peaceful two-state solution," notes Israeli columnist David M. Weinberg.

Whereas the Western leaders in question could, once upon a time, be excused as having a degree of "moral ambiguity," this excuse can no longer apply. Obviously, they are not honest brokers. "They want a Palestinian state," wrote Israeli political analyst Avi Abelow in a September 22 column, "not because they care about Arabs, but because they can't stand a proud, strong Jewish state that defends itself."

Turning to address Starmer, Albanese and Carney, Abelow scathingly writes:

"Thank you for making it crystal clear that the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia now stand with a genocidal death cult. That they reward the barbaric atrocities of Oct. 7, 2023, with diplomatic prizes. That morality, memory and justice have been officially sacrificed on the altar of Jew-hatred, woke politics and Islamic appeasement.

"Let's stop pretending this has anything to do with peace, rights or law. Starmer's plan is not about 'justice.' It's not about a 'two-state solution.' It's not even about Palestinians. It's about one thing only: Punishing the Jewish people for surviving."

Sadly, suicidally, it is also about appeasing their radical Islamist voters – who will probably reciprocate, as Trump noted, by wanting more.

Despite much of the world harboring animosity towards the Jews, possibly out of envy for having had the audacity, through hard work, to do so well -- who else has turned deserts and malaria swamps into a thriving state? -- the Jews and their ancestral homeland of Israel shall survive.


Nils A. Haug is an author and columnist. A Lawyer by profession, he is member of the International Bar Association, the National Association of Scholars, the Academy of Philosophy and Letters. Dr. Haug holds a Ph.D. in Apologetical Theology and is author of 'Politics, Law, and Disorder in the Garden of Eden – the Quest for Identity'; and 'Enemies of the Innocent – Life, Truth, and Meaning in a Dark Age.' His work has been published by First Things Journal, The American Mind, Quadrant, Minding the Campus, Gatestone Institute, National Association of Scholars, Jewish Journal, James Wilson Institute (Anchoring Truths), Jewish News Syndicate, Tribune Juive, Document Danmark, and many others.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21928/intent-to-destroy-israel

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

A Renewed Iranian Push for the Nuclear Bomb - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

The regime looks at North Korea and sees a model: once Pyongyang secured a nuclear arsenal, its survival was effectively guaranteed.

 

  • The Iranian regime is once again racing to acquire nuclear weapons. In doing so, it is turning to Russia and almost certainly looking toward China and North Korea for support. This is an immediate and existential threat to the United States, Israel, and the Free World.

  • Tehran's repeated denials are lies, masking a clear and urgent drive to obtain nuclear capability as quickly as possible.

  • Another urgent question: What would prevent Russia from going beyond civilian cooperation and helping Iran directly in its quest for a nuclear weapon?

  • If Russia feels cornered by the West over Ukraine, it may see Iran's nuclear ambitions not as a liability but as a useful bargaining chip and a means to complicate U.S. and Israeli security calculations.

  • For Iran, the shortcut to a nuclear bomb would not be to build everything from scratch, but to leverage these relationships, just as North Korea once did with Pakistan.

  • The regime looks at North Korea and sees a model: once Pyongyang secured a nuclear arsenal, its survival was effectively guaranteed.

  • On top of this strategic calculation is the regime's enduring ideological goal of wiping Israel off the map. For Tehran, even a single nuclear bomb would carry enormous symbolic and strategic weight.

  • The United States, Israel, and Europe must not underestimate this danger.

  • Iran's regime is racing against time, determined to achieve a capability that will guarantee its survival, give it leverage over its enemies, and help export its revolution.

The Iranian regime is once again racing to acquire nuclear weapons. In doing so, it is turning to Russia and almost certainly looking toward China and North Korea for support. This is an immediate and existential threat to the United States, Israel, and the Free World. Pictured: Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian looks on as a 'Qasem Soleimani' missile is displayed during a military parade in Tehran, on September 21, 2024. (Photo by Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

The Iranian regime is once again racing to acquire nuclear weapons. In doing so, it is turning to Russia and almost certainly looking toward China and North Korea for support. This is an immediate and existential threat to the United States, Israel, and the Free World.

Tehran's repeated denials are lies, masking a clear and urgent drive to obtain nuclear capability as quickly as possible.

Earlier this week at the United Nations General Assembly, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian declared that Iran will "never seek to build a nuclear bomb." Iran's actions, however, contradict these words. On September 26, Tehran signed a staggering $25 billion nuclear agreement with Russia to construct four nuclear power plants in southern Iran.

Officially, this deal is being presented as an energy project to expand Iran's civilian nuclear capacity and produce 5 GW of electricity. Unfortunately, given Iran's long history of deception and concealment regarding its nuclear program, it would be naïve to accept this explanation at face value.

The reactors and the infrastructure that come with these projects could easily be diverted toward dual-use technologies, laying the groundwork for enrichment or fuel-cycle capabilities that could serve a weapons program.

The timing of the agreement is also telling. It comes just months after Iran signed a 20-year strategic partnership treaty with Moscow, which includes sharing defense cooperation and nuclear technology. The trajectory is clear: Iran and Russia are deepening ties in ways that serve both their geopolitical and military objectives.

Another urgent question: What would prevent Russia from going beyond civilian cooperation and helping Iran directly in its quest for a nuclear weapon? Iran has already supplied Russia with missiles and drones for its war in Ukraine and played a vital role in sustaining Moscow's battlefield capabilities. Russia, in turn, has every reason to reward this loyalty. Whether through technology transfer or covert shipments of sensitive materials, Russia has the capacity and the incentive to assist. If Russia feels cornered by the West over Ukraine, it may see Iran's nuclear ambitions not as a liability but as a useful bargaining chip and a means to complicate U.S. and Israeli security calculations.

Iran's outreach is not limited to Russia. The regime has been increasingly strengthening ties with China and North Korea, both nuclear states with long histories of resisting Western pressure. China has consistently positioned itself as Iran's economic lifeline, buying its oil, shielding it diplomatically at the United Nations, and engaging in selective military cooperation.

North Korea, for its part, has already served as a nuclear and missile partner for rogue regimes; its clandestine networks remain an attractive option for Tehran. The sight of these regimes aligning more closely at events such as joint military parades in China points to the emergence of an authoritarian bloc that could cooperate informally on nuclear proliferation. Even if there is no formal pact, the risk of quiet exchanges of expertise, material, or designs is very real. For Iran, the shortcut to a nuclear bomb would not be to build everything from scratch, but to leverage these relationships, just as North Korea once did with Pakistan.

Iran's urgency has only grown in the wake of U.S. and Israeli strikes on its nuclear and military sites earlier this year. Those strikes were a sobering reminder to Tehran that its ambitions are vulnerable, its facilities penetrable, and the US and Israel are willing to act militarily when intelligence points to advancing nuclear work. The regime looks at North Korea and sees a model: once Pyongyang secured a nuclear arsenal, its survival was effectively guaranteed. The Iranian regime, facing both external pressure and internal unrest, is desperate for a shield that will deter attacks and preserve the ruling system. On top of this strategic calculation is the regime's enduring ideological goal of wiping Israel off the map. For Tehran, even a single nuclear bomb would carry enormous symbolic and strategic weight.

The United States, Israel, and Europe must not underestimate this danger. The strategy should rest on two main pillars: unrelenting economic pressure and the credible threat of military action. Iran's economy remains fragile, heavily dependent on oil exports. Cutting off this revenue stream — through tighter sanctions, rigorous enforcement, and interdiction of illicit oil sales — would severely constrain the regime's ability to fund both its domestic repression and its nuclear program. At the same time, Iran must be made to believe that pursuing a nuclear weapon will invite devastating consequences. Public statements should leave no ambiguity: if intelligence shows that Iran is again advancing its nuclear program, strikes will follow. The credibility of this threat is critical: it forces Tehran to weigh the risks of moving forward.

Despite its harsh rhetoric, the regime is not immune to pressure. Beneath the surface, it is vulnerable. The Iranian population is restless, discontented with a stagnant economy, rampant corruption, and lack of freedoms. Inflation and unemployment fuel resentment, and many citizens are already embittered by the regime's prioritization of foreign adventurism over domestic welfare. A military confrontation that exposes the regime's weakness or causes significant damage could trigger unrest on a scale that the leadership fears. This is precisely why maintaining a mix of economic isolation and military deterrence is the most effective strategy: it exploits the regime's weaknesses while holding back its ambitions.

The Iranian regime is desperately seeking nuclear weapons, and turning to its authoritarian partners — Russia, China, and North Korea — to make this a reality. Iran's regime is racing against time, determined to achieve a capability that will guarantee its survival, give it leverage over its enemies, and help export its revolution. The West cannot afford complacency. Economic pressure must be tightened, the military option must remain visible, and intelligence must be vigilant. Iran's ambitions are clear. The danger is growing. What happens next will have profound consequences not only for Israel and the United States, but for the stability of the entire Free World.


Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21949/iran-push-nuclear-bomb

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Left’s Political Playbook (Bonus Track): Redefining Words and Standards - Thaddeus G. McCotter

 

by Thaddeus G. McCotter

The left twists language to stifle dissent—redefining “tolerance” into intolerance and branding free speech as hate speech to advance its agenda.

 

Last week, I wrote about the left’s playbook of projection and deflection, wherein they ascribe their own sins unto their victims. This week, let us examine how the left tries to advance its radical agenda by redefining words and standards. Today’s case study: free speech.

While the First Amendment of the United States Constitution recognizes and protects the God-given right to free speech, there has always been a reasonable, popular consensus that there exists material not suitable for young, impressionable children and that, alternatively, for adult consumption, cannot be banned. The left is endeavoring to rend this consensus.

Presently, the left equates the removal of age-inappropriate materials that sexualize children from public schools as “censorship.” As readers of last week’s article will recognize, such is a deflection and a projection from the fact the left has for years been banning, eliminating, and re-editing all manner of media, usually by “dead white European males” (though certainly not exclusively), from curricula for being contrary to the dictates of their “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” (DEI) secular religion.

While one might expect leftists to recognize their own mendacity and hypocrisy, one would be sorely mistaken. For the left is both benighted and buoyed in their self-delusions by their ideology, one that has engaged in a long-running war on language. Believing that redefining the language will refashion reality, the left weaponizes the language to advance its political agenda, providing a word with a meaning antithetical to its original popular understanding—often in combination with replacing an existing objective standard with a new subjective one. These weaponized, twisted terms and standards are designed to deceive both the general population and the left itself—in short, turning their black hats into white hats in the distorted funhouse mirror of their minds.

Building upon Steven Soukup’s exceptional American Greatness piece, “The Left’s Repressive Tolerance,” let us ponder how the left has come to redefine this term.

In his 1965 essay “Repressive Tolerance,” Herbert Marcuse brazenly proclaimed the left’s plan to twist the language and the concept of objective standards for free speech beyond all recognition. Bluntly, in the hands of Marcuse and his fellow leftists, “day is night as dark is light and wrong is right,” and tolerance is perverted into intolerance.

Under the constitution, tolerance is tantamount to “live and let live.” Regarding free speech, in sum, one need not agree or even listen to another but must tolerate the other’s right to speak. The more free speech the merrier, as it were—unless one were a leftist who, unable to convince the public of the rectitude of their cause (because it is non-existent), believes that stifling other views will allow their genius to persuade the populace to support their radical agenda.

Thus, the objective standard of content neutrality undergirding tolerance for all manner of free speech must be jettisoned, and a subjective standard must be substituted (though duplicitously not expressed in such honest terms). For, as Marcuse asserts, “This sort of tolerance strengthens the tyranny of the majority against which authentic liberals protested.”

How so?

“The political locus of tolerance has changed: while it is more or less quietly and constitutionally withdrawn from the opposition, it is made compulsory behavior with respect to established policies. Tolerance is turned from an active into a passive state, from practice to non-practice: laissez-faire the constituted authorities. It is the people who tolerate the government, which in turn tolerates opposition within the framework determined by the constituted authorities.”

Cutting through the cant, Marcuse and his fellow travelers disliked modern society; ergo, the objective standard is out of the Overton window and his subjective assessment will now dictate your right to free speech. Why?

First, the left thinks other people are problematic morons:

“The toleration of the systematic moronization of children and adults alike by publicity and propaganda…are not distortions and aberrations, they are the essence of a system which fosters tolerance as a means for perpetuating the struggle for existence and suppressing the alternatives.” [Emphasis mine.]

Aye, there’s the rub and reason number two: Marcuse and the left are upset that their voices are being ignored—granted, they are being ignored by sane people, but that is lost upon the left. Ergo, folks need to shut up and listen and submit to the left’s demands, lest a feckless, fascist-abetting humanity squander the opportunity to improve their lot in life:

“…promulgated, practiced, and defended by democratic and authoritarian governments alike, and the people subjected to these governments are educated to sustain such practices as necessary for the preservation of the status quo. Tolerance is extended to policies, conditions, and modes of behavior which should not be tolerated because they are impeding, if not destroying, the chances of creating an existence without fear and misery.”

Per Marcuse and his ilk, your God-given right to free speech must be repressed so you can be herded into an existence without fear and misery, like the workers’ paradise of the Soviet Union or Pol Pot’s Cambodia.

Patently, Marcuse’s “repressive tolerance” is tantamount to “perverting tolerance.” Non-leftist thought will not be tolerated and will be silenced (i.e., “repressed”). This is Marcuse channeling his inner totalitarian to put his own verbose sophist pillows on the threadbare intellectual chair of Rousseau’s civil religion:

“The conclusion reached is that the realization of the objective of tolerance would call for intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed. In other words, today tolerance appears again as what it was in its origins, at the beginning of the modern period—a partisan goal, a subversive liberating notion and practice. Conversely, what is proclaimed and practiced as tolerance today is in many of its most effective manifestations, serving the cause of oppression.”

Oh, and the reward for being “forced to be free?” As if regressing from corrupting civilization into noble savagery and socialism progressing into communism, repressive tolerance will one day magically morph into “liberating tolerance,” whereby everyone in the world will agree with Marcuse and the left, so everyone will have free speech and tolerance again. No, really….

For the record, Marcuse is up front about why he feels entitled to destroy your rights:

“The author is fully aware that, at present, no power, no authority, no government exists which would translate liberating tolerance into practice, but he believes that it is the task and duty of the intellectual to recall and preserve historical possibilities which seem to have become utopian possibilities—that it is his task to break the concreteness of oppression in order to open the mental space in which this society can be recognized as what it is and does.”

Succinctly, this academic believes one can only open a mind by closing it first. Is there any greater explanation and, yes, indictment of modern academe? How Allan Bloom was so prescient back in the day….

So, here, in all its hubristic duplicity and imbecility, is the left’s stance on free speech: projection and deflection; substituting a subjective standard for an objective standard; the perversion of the term “tolerance”; and the rationalization for not only censorship but also cancel culture and worse for dissenting opinions and people. Frankly, Marcuse and the left’s idea of tolerance is intolerance—shut up and listen, or else.

Now, you can see why the left calls non-leftists “fascists” and “Nazis” and why any dissenting opinions from leftist doctrine are deemed “hate speech.” Simply, the left aims to repress your right to free speech to control the public discourse and agenda, and feels justified in so doing because you are a cog in the regime’s machine.

Perhaps, then, it is also because this diabolical distortion of “tolerance” and the subjective standard, which both allows its twisting into “intolerance” and rationalizes away the repression required to enforce it, that renders leftists susceptible to “justifying” and indulging their “rage” with violence?

While there are more strategies and tactics to be explored within its pages, suffice it to once more note that, if unchecked, the postmodern left’s playbook could become Western civilization’s suicide note.

***

An American Greatness contributor, the Hon. Thaddeus G. McCotter (M.C., Ret.) served Michigan’s 11th Congressional District from 2003-2012, He served as Chair of the Republican House Policy Committee and as a member of the Financial Services, Joint Economic, Budget, Small Business, and International Relations Committees. Not a lobbyist, he is also a contributor to Chronicles, a frequent public speaker and moderator for public policy seminars, and a co-host of “John Batchelor: Eye on the World” on CBS radio, among sundry media appearances.


Thaddeus G. McCotter

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/10/04/the-lefts-political-playbook-bonus-track-redefining-words-and-standards/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter