Wednesday, November 13, 2024

Trump brings deportation chiefs into White House, away from entrenched agencies - Ben Whedon

 

​ by Ben Whedon

His first administration saw internal leaks often frustrate his efforts to apprehend and deport illegal immigrants, but he appears prepared to avoid comparable obstacles by working outside of captured agencies, to some extent.

 

President-elect Donald Trump’s nods for immigration and border-related posts appear to suggest he plans to keep the major-decision making on those issues within the White House rather than in offices of executive branch agencies filled with career government employees. Trump has vowed to pursue the mass deportation of illegal aliens from the country, beginning on his first day. He has cited President Dwight Eisenhower’s "Operation Wetback" as precedent for such an undertaking. 

"When people have killed and murdered, when drug lords have destroyed countries, and now they’re going to go back to those countries because they’re not staying here. There is no price tag," Trump told NBC News last week. Mass deportations enjoy the support of a majority of Americans, according to some surveys. Fifty-four percent of respondents supported mass deportations in a recent Scripps News/Ipsos poll, for example.

His first administration saw internal leaks often frustrate his efforts to apprehend and deport illegal immigrants, but he appears prepared to avoid comparable obstacles by working outside of the traditional agencies, to some extent. Over the long weekend, Trump named former acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Homan to serve as his “border czar,” saying he “will be in charge of all Deportation of Illegal Aliens back to their Country of Origin.”

Immigration hardliner Stephen Miller, moreover, received the nod for deputy chief of staff for policy. Miller was behind many of the Trump administration’s deportation initiatives during his first term in office. Under the Biden administration, he led America First Legal and successfully challenged many of its own initiatives.

Appointments bring deportations to the White House

Homan’s “czar” position is not a standard cabinet post and may often go to administration members holding other jobs. Vice President Kamala Harris, for instance, received the nod from President Joe Biden in 2021, though she insisted border security remained the purview of Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and that she would focus on international efforts to curb migration.

Though ICE is part of the DHS and deportations would typically fall under the DHS secretary’s purview, Homan’s appointment to the “border czar” post will keep him outside of the executive agencies and closer to Trump.

South Dakota GOP Gov. Kristi Noem, moreover, will lead the Department of Homeland Security. An early Trump surrogate, Noem largely fell off the campaign trail after the release of a book in which she described killing her dog. In her second term, Noem deployed the state National Guard to the southern border as part of a broader effort to aid Texas authorities in securing the border amid perceived federal apathy toward the surge in border crossings.

Noem herself has long been called an immigration hardliner in step with Homan and Miller, but their posts in the White House are likely to grant them louder voices on the president-elect’s signature issue. His past experience with DHS on deportations could serve to explain while two of his top immigration figures will be working closer to the Oval Office.

DHS internal resistance

During the first administration, Trump’s deportation efforts were often thwarted by timely leaks from within the DHS under then-Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. Homan’s position outside the agency would conceivably help to insulate Trump’s agenda against such internal leaks.

The president-elect and his supporters have long railed against the so-called “deep state,” asserting that the vast majority of unelected career officials in the executive branch agencies oppose his agenda and either slow-walk his orders or actively obstruct their implementation.

Though dismissed as a conspiracy theory by his opponents, senior DHS officials such as Miles Taylor, the DHS chief of staff, admitted in 2020 that he had penned an anonymous op-ed in the New York Times, entitled "I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration.”

“There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first,” he wrote. The op-ed included scathing indictments of Trump’s personal leadership style and described the efforts of administration officials to constrain his impulses. Taylor notably highlighted instances in which he asserted that Trump’s staffers “knew better” than he did and seemed to celebrate the administration “boxing” Trump into its preferred policy positions on Russia.

“He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior,” Taylor wrote. “But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable. This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.”

Elation among Border Patrol and ICE agents

Should Trump contend with dissident bureaucrats, it seems unlikely they will come from ICE or the Border Patrol, especially in light of Homan’s appointment.

Speaking to Fox News’s Bill Melugin, a number of ICE and Border Patrol officials indicated that Homan’s appointment had led to a surge in morale and prompted some senior officials to reconsider plans to retire or leave the agencies.

"It’s a total 180, troops are finally feeling like the sun is coming out after a very long storm. People are fired up to have support,” one ICE official told Melugin. “It’s amazing because we all became so numb I don’t think we realized how bad until we finally have hope again. Everyone [sic] so happy about Homan's return."

Firing government bureaucrats

Trump, for his part, appears aware of the prospect that DHS officials and other executive agency staffers may attempt to repeat their past efforts and previously unveiled a 10-point plan to combat such actions.

In March of 2023, Trump published an Agenda 47 policy video in which he vowed to reinstate an executive order permitting the president to “fire rogue bureaucrats.” He also vowed mass firings among those agencies to remove “corrupt actors” and to physically separate the Offices of Inspector General from the departments they monitor. 

The plan also included a “major crackdown on government leakers who collude with the media to create false narratives, pressing criminal charges when appropriate.”

Steamrolling through Democratic opponents

Even should Trump overcome internal executive agency opposition, several Democratic states and cities have vowed not to cooperate with federal deportation efforts.

Gov. Maura Healey, D-Mass.; Gov. J.B. Pritzker, D-Ill.; Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif.; and New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, D; have been among the most high-profile voices promising non-compliance, but the efforts to thwart the administration will likely extend to the multitude of sanctuary cities across the nation. Speaking to Fox News, Homan indicated that he would pursue illegal alien arrests and enter those jurisdictions, with or without their help.

“It’d be great to have law enforcement assist ICE,” Homan said. “I’ve seen some of these Democratic governors saying they’re gonna stand in the way they’re gonna make it hard for us.’

 “If you don’t want to help us, get the hell out of the way because I’m gonna do it,” he added. ”If we can’t get assistance from New York City, we may have to double the number of agents that we send to New York City, because we’re gonna do the job.”


Ben Whedon

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/security/wedtrump-brings-deportation-chiefs-white-house-away-entrenched-agencies

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump taps Musk, Ramaswamy to lead Department of Government Efficiency - Ben Whedon

 

​ by Ben Whedon

Trump further dubbed DOGE the potential "Manhattan Project" of the time, asserting that it would work with the Office of Management & Budget to enact major structural reforms in the executive branch.

 

President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday announced that X platform owner Elon Musk and tech mogul Vivek Ramaswamy would lead his planned Department of Government Efficiency to shrink the size of the government.

"I am pleased to announce that the Great Elon Musk, working in conjunction with American Patriot Vivek Ramaswamy, will lead the Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”)," Trump confirmed. "Together, these two wonderful Americans will pave the way for my Administration to dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies - Essential to the 'Save America' Movement."

Trump further dubbed DOGE the potential "Manhattan Project" of the time, asserting that it would work with the Office of Management & Budget to enact major structural reforms in the executive branch.

After purchasing Twitter, Musk slashed the overwhelming majority of the platform's personnel, without substantially interrupting the platform's services. His appointment sets him up for a similar undertaking with the government.

 
Ben Whedon

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/trump-taps-musk-ramaswamy-lead-department-government-efficiency

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Watch: Betsy DeVos joins Trump in support of 'disbanding' the Department of Education - Martha MacCallum

 

​ by Martha MacCallum

Former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos discusses what a second Trump term may mean for U.S. education on 'The Story with Martha MacCallum.'


 

Martha MacCallum

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/video/6364614792112

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Bill to revoke tax-exempt status of terror-supporting NGOs fails to pass US House - Mathilda Heller

 

​ by Mathilda Heller

Opponents of the bill claimed it would have targeted pro-Palestinian organizations that facilitate aid to Gaza.

 

Members of the House of Representatives vote for the third time on whether to elevate House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) to Speaker of the House in the U.S. Capitol on October 20, 2023 in Washington, DC.  (photo credit: CHIP SOMODEVILLA/GETTY IMAGES)

Members of the House of Representatives vote for the third time on whether to elevate House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) to Speaker of the House in the U.S. Capitol on October 20, 2023 in Washington, DC.
(photo credit: CHIP SOMODEVILLA/GETTY IMAGES)

A bill that would have granted the US Treasury the power to revoke the tax-exempt status of non-profit terror-supporting groups failed to pass the House of Representatives on Tuesday.

The bipartisan 'Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act' (HR9495) did not meet the required two-thirds majority to pass. 

256 voted yes, and 145 voted no, meaning the bill was 9 votes short of passing. Of the yes votes, 52 were from Democrats, and 204 from Republicans.

The failure to pass was met by jubilation from opponents of the bill, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) who called it a "significant victory." CAIR had renamed the bill the 'Non-Profit Killer Bill.'

Bill H29495 was sponsored by Rep. Claudia Tenney and cosponsored by two Republican representatives (Rep. David Kustoff and Rep Nicole Malliotakis) and two Democratic Representatives (Rep. Bradley Scheider and Rep. Dina Titus).

 US Representative David Kustoff (R-TN). July 3, 2024. (credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)Enlrage image
US Representative David Kustoff (R-TN). July 3, 2024. (credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)

The first part of the bill would postpone tax filing deadlines for US nationals and their spouses who are unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad or held hostage abroad. 

The second would terminate the tax-exempt status of terrorist supporting organizations. 

Organizations would be considered "terrorist supporting" if they had provided material support to terrorist organizations (as defined in U.S. Code Title 18, section 2339B) within the last three years, beyond a minimal amount.

The bill would have allowed the organization 90 days after being notified with details of its alleged support to either disprove the claim or demonstrate efforts to reclaim any material support given.

Should the organization be designated, its tax-exempt status would be suspended from the date of designation until rescinded.

Rep. Kustoff said the bill was aimed at "dismantling the financial networks of terrorist organizations, including Hamas".

In November, Congressman Jason Smith said that "Tax-exempt charities operating in the United States are providing support, encouragement, and potential financing to Hamas and Hamas-affiliated groups."

Opposition to the bill

The bill was strongly opposed by various individuals and organizations, which claimed that the bill would target pro-Palestinian groups in the US that were facilitating aid into Gaza.

A CAIR-led coalition of over 120 groups signed a letter to the House urging lawmakers against passing the bill, which they claimed would "grant the executive branch extraordinary power to investigate, harass, and effectively dismantle any nonprofit organization - including news outlets, universities, and civil liberties organizations like ours".

 US REP. Rashida Tlaib (left) stands alongside Rep. Cori Bush at a news conference, on Capitol Hill in May 2024, opposing a crackdown on pro-Palestinian protests at college campuses. (credit: Amanda Andrade-Rhoades/Reuters)Enlrage image
US REP. Rashida Tlaib (left) stands alongside Rep. Cori Bush at a news conference, on Capitol Hill in May 2024, opposing a crackdown on pro-Palestinian protests at college campuses. (credit: Amanda Andrade-Rhoades/Reuters)

In a statement sent to the House on Tuesday, Robert McCaw, the government affairs director of CAIR, said "This bill dangerously weaponizes the Treasury against nonprofit organizations and houses of worship - Christian, Jewish, or Muslim - that dare to support Palestinian and Lebanese human rights or criticize Israel’s genocidal actions." 

However, Congresswoman Cori Bush said the bill would have been a "dangerous threat to democracy" and would have given Donald Trump "unprecedented power to shut down any nonprofit or group that he disagrees with."

Rep Jamaal Bowman and Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, like Bush, members of the so called anti-Israel 'Squad,' also said the bill would have led to "dictatorial authoritarianism."


Mathilda Heller

Source: https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-828937

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

CIA official arrested in Cambodia for classified doc. leak on Israel retaliation on Iran - report - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

​ by Jerusalem Post Staff

CIA official Asif W. Rahman held top-secret security clearance and had access to sensitive information, the New York Times reported.

 

The Qader cruise missile is seen during the annual military parade in Tehran, Iran, September 21, 2024. (photo credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)
The Qader cruise missile is seen during the annual military parade in Tehran, Iran, September 21, 2024.
(photo credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)

CIA official Asif William Rahman was arrested by the FBI in Cambodia on Tuesday and charged with disclosing classified documents allegedly showing Israel's retaliation plans against Iran, the New York Times reported on Wednesday. He was brought to a federal court in Guam to face charges. 

Rahman was indicted by a US federal court in Virginia with charges of willful retention and transmission of national defense information, the report said.

According to the New York Times, the documents were prepared by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which analyzes US spy satellite information and photos. 

Reuters reported that the intelligence in the documents was based on satellite imagery from October 15-16, 2024.

CIA official had top-secret security clearance

Rahman worked for the CIA abroad, and according to the New York Times, Rahman held a top-secret security clearance with access to sensitive information, allowing him to handle classified documents and photos. 

The documents were previously circulated on the Telegram app, and US officials said they were unsure where the documents were taken from. 

 Missiles of the kind used during Iran's retaliatory strike on the U.S Ayn al-Asad military base in 2020 are seen on display at Imam Khomeini Grand Mosalla in Tehran, Iran January 7, 2022. (credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)Enlrage image
Missiles of the kind used during Iran's retaliatory strike on the U.S Ayn al-Asad military base in 2020 are seen on display at Imam Khomeini Grand Mosalla in Tehran, Iran January 7, 2022. (credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)

Senior American officials previously voiced concerns in October following the leak of two US intelligence documents that outlined Israel's potential strike on Iran. 

While both the US Department of Defense and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment on the leaked documents, they did not deny their authenticity.

The leak occurred on Friday when the Middle East Spectator Telegram channel claimed it had received documents about Israel’s strike preparations from a source within the US intelligence community. This Telegram channel is known for publishing pro-Iranian propaganda, and its associated Twitter account states that its operators are based in Iran.

Walla contributed to this report. 


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-828951

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Climate scientists say lines between science and advocacy are being blurred and bias normalized - Kevin Killough

 

​ by Kevin Killough

Dr. Matt Wielicki said he was shocked when he read the op-ed in a prestigious journal arguing that objectivity in climate science is problematic. Keeping feelings separate from research, he said, is fundamental to the foundational principles of science.

 

Three climate researchers took to the pages of Nature to argue that objectivity in climate science is problematic, as it gets in the way of their political advocacy, which they argue is too important to deny. Therefore, the values of objectivity in scientific research, the authors argue, should be reconsidered. 

“The public has watched as national and sub-national governments have declared climate emergencies, all the while continuing to grant new permits for the extraction of fossil fuels, seemingly ignoring increasingly urgent scientific messages that this locks the world into passing 1.5 °C of warming above pre-industrial levels by 2030, if not sooner,” the researchers explain. 

While the researchers equate a refusal to stop the production of fossil fuels with ignoring science, energy experts argue these policies will result in enormous economic problems and widespread poverty. The authors of the Nature op-ed, seemingly unaware or unconcerned with the impacts of such policies, argue that it’s unfair to expect climate researchers not to get emotional when governments don’t adopt these policies. 

“Scientists who express their feelings and worries about climate change are often not encouraged by their colleagues and are instead expected to carry on without acknowledging or communicating the continued inadequacy of action required to secure a liveable and sustainable future,” the authors state. 

By just about every measure — including life expectancywealth, and deaths from natural disasters — the human race is doing better than ever. Despite this, the authors appear to believe their fears are based on indisputable facts. 

Climate advocacy versus straight reporting

Dr. Matt Wielicki, former assistant professor in the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Alabama, doubted the authors’ claim that their colleagues are objecting to their climate advocacy. Wielicki left academia in large part because, he says, his views contradicting the climate crisis narrative were met with hostility from the university’s administration. Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry, who also raises doubts about what she calls “climate hysteria,” tells a similar story about her choice to leave academia and pursue a career in the private sector. 

“I've never seen somebody lose a position or have a pile-on online because they're being active on climate. But I've seen that happen to many well distinguished scientists, where they have just the simplest of questions. I think this is the classic projection,” Wielicki told Just the News

Wielicki said he was shocked when he read the Nature piece. He said it’s okay for researchers to have feelings. It’s a part of being human. But keeping feelings separate from research is fundamental to the foundational principles of science, he said. It’s how research is kept free from bias, and during peer review, bias is one of the things reviewers look for. 

“The Nature article is essentially telling scientists that the data isn't important anymore. We know the answer now. It's now stirring up emotion,” Wielicki said. 

Conflicts of interest

The blurring of the line between climate research and political advocacy is becoming more common and raising concerns among other researchers. The highly influential and prestigious U.S. National Academy of Science recently established a committee to examine and further research "attribution science." 

Attribution science is used to determine how much greenhouse gas emissions contributed to specific weather events. Its methodologies were developed to aid lawsuits against large emitters, primarily oil companies. There are dozens of these lawsuits filed by anti-fossil fuel groups and local governments, which critics argue are aimed at advancing an energy transition through the courts, as opposed to legislatures where policymakers would have to contend with voters. 

The NAS committee’s sponsors include the Bezos Earth Fund and Robert Litterman, who is on the board of Climate Central, a climate advocacy group that founded the World Weather Attribution (WWA). The WWA’s purpose is to connect climate change to individual weather events in support of climate lawsuits. Both the WWA and committee are funded by the Bezos Earth Fund

On his “The Honest Broker” Substack, Dr. Roger Pielke, Jr., retired professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder, points out that the committee’s membership also includes Delta Merner, who leads The USC Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists. Its mission is also to help advance climate litigation. 

Pielke writes that the judicial system has a pressing need for expertise, and there’s nothing wrong with advocacy groups organizing experts or creating scientific research in support of litigation. However, he argues, it’s not appropriate for such legal advocates to serve on an NAS study committee that evaluates and legitimizes the information they produce in support of the litigation that these advocates are involved with. 

“The failures of scientific integrity here are profound, obvious and completely out in public,” Pielke writes. 

Losing trust

The scientists defending their emotional research appear to think there’s no legitimate dispute of their fears, but other scientists disagree. 

The authors of the Nature op-ed told The Guardian that they were “mocked and gaslighted” for speaking up about their fears. They claimed “some scientists” ridiculed them for participating in a Guardian survey of climate scientists talking about their mental health issues, such as depression, which they blame on climate change. They don’t provide any details on who these scientists are, what exactly was said to them, or how these criticisms were communicated. But they defend their “strong emotions” as being “vital” to their research on climate change. 

One of the Nature op-ed authors, Dr. Lisa Schipper from the University of Bonn, told the Guardian that due to the “sad destruction of the planet,” she doesn’t have the “choice now to be unemotional about climate change research.” 

Among the things that frighten her, she said, are heatwave deaths, people left homeless by floods, and falling polar bear populations. As Pielke pointed out in a 2022 Substack article, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a consortium of the world’s leading climate researchers, is clear about having no confidence in overall trends in flooding. This also means, Pielke explains, that the IPCC doesn’t have confidence that the frequency or magnitude of flood events can be attributed to climate change. Likewise, normalized U.S. flood damage as a portion of GDP has significantly declined since 1940.

Heatwave deaths are rising, and there’s reason to be concerned. However, as a result of rising temperatures, fewer people are dying from cold events, which are a far larger killer than heat

"Normalization of bias"

Schipper’s claim that polar bear populations are falling isn’t supported by the data. According to a 2021 status report by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Species Survival Commission Polar Bear Specialist Group, polar bear populations have increased as much as 40% since 1960. A 2018 study estimates that polar bear populations increased nearly four-fold since 1950. 

On his “Irrational Fear” Substack, Wielicki argues that the “normalization of bias” in science, as promoted in the Nature and Guardian articles, are eroding public trust in science. 

“This shift away from objectivity in climate science, cheered on by major journals, could take down society’s trust in scientific institutions altogether. It’s time to admit that what’s happening here is not science; it’s faith. Climate science is becoming a doctrine, where questioning is taboo, and faith-based declarations replace evidence-based inquiry. And when we let science become faith, we abandon everything that made it a force for human progress. This isn’t just dangerous for science; it’s dangerous for society,” Wielicki wrote. 


Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/nation/science/climate-scientists-say-lines-between-science-and-advocacy-are-being-blurred-and-bias

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump nominates Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense - Misty Severi

 

​ by Misty Severi

"I am honored to announce that I have nominated Pete Hegseth to serve in my Cabinet as The Secretary of Defense," Trump said in a post to Truth Social. "Pete has spent his entire life as a Warrior for the Troops, and for the Country. Pete is tough, smart and a true believer in America First. With Pete at the helm, America's enemies are on notice - Our Military will be Great Again, and America will Never Back Down."

 

President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday nominated veteran and author Pete Hegseth as the Secretary of Defense for his second administration.

Hegseth, who has spent the past eight years as a host on Fox News' "FOX & Friends Weekend," has been a major advocate for veterans and the military. He also served in the Army National Guard, and served in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

"I am honored to announce that I have nominated Pete Hegseth to serve in my Cabinet as The Secretary of Defense," Trump said in a post to Truth Social. "Pete has spent his entire life as a Warrior for the Troops, and for the Country. Pete is tough, smart and a true believer in America First. With Pete at the helm, America's enemies are on notice - Our Military will be Great Again, and America will Never Back Down."

“Pete Hegseth has been an exceptional host on FOX & Friends and FOX Nation and a best-selling author for FOX News Books for nearly a decade," Fox News said in a comment to Just the News. "His insights and analysis especially about the military resonated deeply with our viewers and made the program the major success that it is today. We are extremely proud of his work at FOX News Media and wish him the best of luck in Washington.”


Misty Severi is an evening news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage.

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/trump-nominates-pete-hegseth-secretary-defense

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

‘It speaks volumes’: Trump names Huckabee US envoy to Israel - JNS

 

​ by JNS

"The days of public daylight between the U.S. and Israel are about to end," stated David Friedman, the former U.S. ambassador to Israel.

 

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee speaks during a press conference at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Jerusalem, August 19, 2015. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.
Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee speaks during a press conference at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Jerusalem, August 19, 2015. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

President-elect Donald Trump announced that the “great public servant, governor, and leader in faith for many years” and “highly respected” Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, will be the U.S. ambassador to Israel during the next administration.

Huckabee “loves Israel and the people of Israel and likewise, the people of Israel love him,” Trump stated. “Mike will work tirelessly to bring about peace in the Middle East.”

A Southern Baptist pastor and governor for more than a decade, Huckabee sought the Republican nomination for president in 2008 and 2016.

A staunch supporter of the Jewish state on biblical beliefs, the former governor has visited Israel many times and led thousands of U.S. Christians on solidarity tours over the past half-century. His first trip to Israel right out of high school was just before the 1973 Yom Kippur War.

Huckabee backed the relocation of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and has worked to fight attempts by the BDS movement to isolate Israel.

In the wake of Hamas’s cross-border terrorist massacre in southern Israeli towns on Oct. 7, 2023, Huckabee led evangelical leaders on a visit to the hard-hit communities along the border with the Gaza Strip.

“After 50 years of coming here, nothing has prepared me for this visit,” he said after walking through the charred remains of a border kibbutz.

He told JNS at the time that the ignorance so many Americans display about the war was a searing indictment of the educational system, which indoctrinates college students with a warped worldview.

In August 2018, Huckabee laid a ceremonial brick at the Israeli city of Efrat in Judea and said he might one day buy a “holiday home” there.

“If President Trump could be here today, he’d be a very happy man,” he stated at the time, standing in front of a red sign that said “Build Israel Great Again.”

The Republican Jewish Coalition is “thrilled” with the nomination.

“As a man of deep faith, we know Gov. Huckabee’s abounding love of Israel and its people is second to none,” the RJC said. “As the Jewish state continues to fight an existential war for survival against Iran and its terrorist proxies, Gov. Huckabee will represent America’s ironclad commitment to Israel’s security with distinction.”

David Friedman, who served as the U.S. envoy to Israel during Trump’s first presidency and was reportedly under consideration for the role again, stated that Huckabee is “a dear friend and he will have my full support.

“Congrats Mike on getting the best job in the world,” Friedman wrote.

“It speaks volumes to the importance and priority that President Trump places on the U.S.-Israel relationship that he selected his ambassador to Israel within one week of his election,” Friedman added. “The selection itself—Mike Huckabee is one of Israel’s greatest friends—tells us that the days of public daylight between the U.S. and Israel are about to end.”


JNS

Source: https://www.jns.org/it-speaks-volumes-trump-names-huckabee-us-envoy-to-israel/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump picks Jewish real estate tycoon Steven Witkoff for Mideast envoy - Jerualem Post Staff, Reuters

 

​ by Jerualem Post Staff, Reuters

Trump also said he will nominate Fox News Channel host Pete Hegseth to be secretary of defense.

 

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Trump holds a rally at Atrium Health Amphitheater in Macon, Georgia (photo credit: BRIAN SNYDER/REUTERS)
Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Trump holds a rally at Atrium Health Amphitheater in Macon, Georgia
(photo credit: BRIAN SNYDER/REUTERS)

US President-elect Donald Trump said on Tuesday he had picked Jewish real estate investor and campaign donor Steve Witkoff to be his special envoy to the Middle East.

As a pro-Israel donor and fundraiser for Trump’s presidential campaign, Trump said in a statement that Witkoff is a "tireless voice for peace."

In an interview with The Bulwark in May, Witkoff explained that he secured “six-figure and seven-figure donations” for the Trump campaign from Jewish donors following Biden’s announcement he’d be pausing weapons shipments to Israel.

In July, Witkoff attended Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech address to Congress, telling Fox News that it “was strong and it was epic to be in that room.”

“It felt spiritual,” he added.

 Rally for Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump, in New York (credit: REUTERS)Enlrage image
Rally for Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump, in New York (credit: REUTERS)

No experience required

Witkoff has no known experience with diplomacy or the Middle East.

Trump also said he will nominate Fox News Channel host Pete Hegseth to be secretary of defense.

"Pete is tough, smart and a true believer in America First," Trump said in a statement.

"With Pete at the helm, America's enemies are on notice - Our Military will be Great Again, and America will Never Back Down," he added.

Hegseth is an Army National Guard veteran and according to his website served in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.


Jerualem Post Staff, Reuters

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-828857

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Stirrings of Realignment Even in California - Edward Ring

 

​ by Edward Ring

Realignment has come to America. If enough people muster the resolve to stay and fight, California may not be far behind.

 

 

The stunning nationwide victory by Republicans is not shared in California. And in what is now the very unlikely event that Democrats take over the House of Representatives, the path to that upset will run through California.

Trying to get a timely indication of how Californians have ultimately voted in close races is a good indication of just how far removed the state’s election bureaucracy has drifted from the rest of the country. If you go to the election results page on the Secretary of State website for California, the first thing you see is the number of days left until voting results will be officially recognized. As of November 11, the number you see in a great big circle at the top of the page is the number 32. A small fraction of the circle’s perimeter is highlighted, indicating the amount of allotted time to count ballots consumed so far. California allows 38 days from the November 5 election until the final certification on December 13, and the ballot processors use every bit of their time.

How is this normal? Why do we accept this?

As of November 11, California still had nine uncalled seats for the U.S. Congress. Democrats have officially won 36, and Republicans won 7. In terms of potential flips among the remaining close races, five are Republican incumbents defending their seats, three are Democrat incumbents trying to get reelected, and one is an open seat previously occupied by a Democrat. A week has passed since the election, and there are nine congressional races in California that remain too close to call. Remember that number and that date. How many of them will the Democrats win?

To fully appreciate the convoluted absurdity that has become the norm in California elections, consider the Secretary of State’s “unprocessed ballots” page. Again, a week after the election, the Secretary of State reports the “cumulative total number of processed ballots” to be 10,728,985, and the “estimated total ballots remaining” to be 4,953,569. It’s a week after the election, and the state hasn’t managed to count nearly five million ballots.

The categories of unprocessed ballots are also revealing. “Vote-by-mail ballots received on or before election day” that remain “unprocessed” total 4,087,113. Included in this category are “vote-by-mail ballots received after [italics added] election day thru E+7/ballots forwarded by other counties,” totaling 243,976, along with 76,764 “provisional ballots,” 372,340 “conditional voter registration ballots,” and 45,278 “other” ballots. “Other” is defined as “unprocessed ballots that are damaged or could not be machine-read and need to be remade, or ballots diverted by optical scanners for further review.”

At the risk of spreading misinformation (or is it malinformation?), there are a lot of ways to find votes in this bizarre melange that masquerades as due process. And even if it’s all legitimate, the definition of legitimacy has been stretched. Corruption, crime, and convoluted laws designed to facilitate favorable vote counts are all “legal” if compliant legislatures and partisan judges say so. At least in other states, this time, Republicans decided to play the game. Early votes, provisional votes, same-day registration, mailed ballots received up to a week after the election—whatever. If those are the new rules, we’ll play. Across most states, the Republicans built a machine to rival the Democrats, and the results made history.

That’s harder to do in California. The odds are too stacked. Unlike in battleground states, only 25 percent of California’s voters are registered Republicans. And unlike in battleground states, almost no money is donated to support Republican candidates in California, because it’s considered a lost cause. Even big Pennsylvania, with 13 million people, is tiny compared to sprawling California, with a population of 39 million. The state’s Republicans are undermanned and underfunded. Worse still, the state’s Republican Party leadership is split between RINOs and MAGAs and largely alienated from its base, which is dominated by MAGAs. As for California’s Democrats, they have armies of public sector union operatives, led by thousands of trained professionals.

These structural disadvantages help explain why in California, where enough independents join with Republicans to reliably deliver 40 percent of the vote to Republican candidates in statewide elections, the state’s congressional caucus in 2022 only included 12 Republicans. In a less gerrymandered fight, with funds and activists available merely in proportion to the statewide support they consistently earn from voters, California’s congressional caucus would include 21 Republicans and control of the US House of Representatives would not hang in the balance.

In the future, however, don’t write off California. The goal remains distant, but the trends are positive. The 2024 election results in California refuted one of the most profound and daunting truisms the Democrats have smugly relied upon for decades: demographics are not destiny. As an unapologetic MAGA Republican, President Trump earned 42 percent of the Latino vote—47 percent of Latino men. California is now 40 percent Latino. That demographic fact used to be claimed as the ultimate advantage favoring Democrats. No more. The right Republican candidate, with the right message, will earn just as many votes from Latinos as they earn from whites. Even in California.

Today, California remains a bastion of blue, but that’s changing. California voters have just rejected initiatives that would have imposed rent control, raised the minimum wage, and made it easier to raise taxes. At the same time, they overwhelmingly approved an initiative that—forgive the oversimplification—makes criminal behavior a crime again. So far, the belated counts coming out of California show Trump gaining 39 percent of the vote. If he maintains this percentage until 100 percent of votes are tallied, he will finish with over 7.0 million votes. This is up from 6.0 million (34 percent) in 2020 and 4.5 million (31 percent) in 2016. It’s too soon to know how California will affect control of the U.S. House of Representatives. But California’s MAGA cohort, 7 million strong, helped deliver Trump’s triumph in the popular vote.

Realignment has come to America. If enough people muster the resolve to stay and fight, California may not be far behind.


Edward Ring

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/11/13/stirrings-of-realignment-even-in-california/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF strikes Hezbollah launchers in Lebanon, Hamas sites in Gaza following attacks on Israel - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

​ by Jerusalem Post Staff

IDF and Shin Bet (ISA) continue targeted Gaza operations against October 7 attackers

 

IDF soldiers operate in the Gaza Strip and southern Lebanon, November 13, 2024. (photo credit: Canva, IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
IDF soldiers operate in the Gaza Strip and southern Lebanon, November 13, 2024.
(photo credit: Canva, IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

The IDF struck dozens of Hezbollah launchers in Lebanon after the terror group launched multiple projectiles into Israel over the last day, the IDF announced on Wednesday.

Hezbollah projectiles were launched at the Nahariya region on Tuesday, killing two. Sirens also sounded in the Tel Aviv and Gush Dan region, but no injuries were reported.

The IDF has been conducting targeted operations in southern Lebanon to dismantle additional Hezbollah terror sites. These defensive and offensive operations have eliminated terrorists, located weapons, and dismantled infrastructure, including underground hideouts and storage.

Additionally, Overnight, the IAF conducted intelligence-based strikes on Hezbollah weapons storage facilities and command centers in the Dahieh area, a key Hezbollah terrorist stronghold in Beirut, where Hezbollah systematically embedded its terrorist infrastructure behind the Lebanese civilian population.

Prior to the strikes, numerous steps were taken to mitigate the risk to civilians, including issuing advance warnings to the population in the area.

Enlrage image

These strikes were a part of the IDF's ongoing efforts to dismantle and degrade Hezbollah's military capabilities, and the IDF is continuing to strike Hezbollah terrorist infrastructure sites in the Dahieh area.

Eliminating October 7 terrorists

In Gaza, with Israel Security Agency (ISA) intelligence, the IDF targeted a Shejaiya terrorist cell. Among those struck was Yasser Ghandi, identified as one of the attackers who breached Israeli territory and participated in the October 7 massacre.

The Israeli Air Force (IAF) hit over 120 Hamas and Hezbollah sites in Gaza and Lebanon in the past 24 hours.


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-828884

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Use ‘upward pressure’ on US Jewish groups ‘hesitant’ to push for release of hostages, families urge - Mike Wagenheim

 

​ by Mike Wagenheim

“There’s not enough acknowledgment that having American hostages in Gaza and having American citizens murdered in Israel … is a national security threat for the United States,” Lihi Moskow said at the Jewish Federations General Assembly in Washington, D.C.

 

Families of hostages who have been held captive in the Gaza Strip since the Hamas terrorist attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, speak at the Jewish Federations of North America’s General Assembly in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 11, 2024. Photo by Mike Wagenheim.
Families of hostages who have been held captive in the Gaza Strip since the Hamas terrorist attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, speak at the Jewish Federations of North America’s General Assembly in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 11, 2024. Photo by Mike Wagenheim.

Family members of those who have been held captive in the Gaza Strip since the Hamas terrorist attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, told a gathering of largely American Jews on Monday that “the most Jewish thing you can do” is speak out on the need for a hostage deal.

With the U.S. presidential election in the rearview mirror and a new government readying to take over, “we need to hear from all sides that this is really important for the Jewish community now,” said Orna Neutra, whose 23-year-old son, Omer Neutra, a native New Yorker, is a hostage in Gaza. “There’s an opportunity now in this transition phase.”

She was one of the relatives of hostages who spoke at a standing-room-only session on Monday morning at the Jewish Federations of North America’s General Assembly in Washington, D.C., taking place from Nov. 10-12.

Neutra told attendees that she has heard from members of the incoming Trump administration who say they can work across the aisle to get a deal done. “This is a bipartisan issue, so you need to do that, and your communities need to continue hearing about this,” she said.

Of the 101 hostages who remain in Gaza, 97 were kidnapped on Oct. 7, and four had been taken captive years before. It is not publicly known how many hostages remain alive.

Lihi Moskow’s first cousin Arbel Yehud, 28, is a hostage, and her 35-year-old cousin Dolev Yehud was killed by Hamas terrorists. She told attendees that there was a “very respectful” relationship between U.S. President Joe Biden and the relatives of hostages in Gaza.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Brett McGurk, the White House point man on the Middle East, updated the families regularly, Moscow said. “On the other hand, we feel that there’s not enough acknowledgment that having American hostages in Gaza and having American citizens murdered in Israel—those 45 Americans murdered—is a national security threat for the United States,” she added.

Seven American citizens remain in Gaza.

“The United States has assumed mostly the role of negotiator or mediator, which is almost like a backseat to Israel,” Moskow said at the event. “It’s been very frustrating because it doesn’t seem that they have a lot of influence or impact on the situation—whether enough pressure is being put on any of the parties to reach a settlement.”

Moskow lamented that the recent U.S. elections put the issue on the back burner for months. “We’re all weary. We’re all tired. This needs to come to an end, and we’re not seeing enough intensity,” she said.

Orna and Ronen Neutra
Ronen and Orna Neutra, whose son Omer is among those still being held captive by Hamas in the Gaza Strip, address the crowd at Kibbutz Re’im on Feb. 28, 2024. Credit: The Hostage and Missing Families Forum.

‘The most Jewish thing you can do’

Dalia Cusnir, who works for the Jewish Agency for Israel, is the sister-in-law of hostages Yair and Eitan Horn. She spoke of her efforts to rescue Ukrainians amid the carnage of the early days of Russia’s invasion and bring them to Israel.

“We did not sit and wait for the government to make decisions. We took action,” Cusnir said. Like fellow hostage family member Jonathan Dekel-Chen, she lightly criticized U.S. Jewry for its hesitance to challenge the Israeli government.

“We need to have a joint call and urge the Israeli government to say that the Jewish community of North America needs a deal, that that’s the only way to bring them back,” Cusnir said. “That’s the only way that we can remain Jewish and maybe start healing from this.”

She added that “a call for a deal is the most Jewish thing you can do.”

Dekel-Chen, father of 35-year-old Israeli-American hostage Sagui Dekel-Chen, echoed Cusnir in response to an audience question about whether it would have a tangible impact if the U.S. Jewish community spoke out.

“My answer to you is it doesn’t matter. Do the right thing,” said Dekel-Chen, a fierce critic of the current Israeli government, who was more measured in his comments on Monday than he has been at times. 

According to him, some North American Jewish organizations “have been resistant to using their voice on behalf of the hostages,” fearful that it will appear as criticism of the government.

“The freeing of hostages is one of the most ancient Jewish imperatives,” he said. He recommended that attendees apply “upward pressure” from the grassroots to such “resistant” Jewish organizations.

 
Mike Wagenheim

Source: https://www.jns.org/use-upward-pressure-on-us-jewish-groups-hesitant-to-push-for-release-of-hostages-families-urge/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

IDF disputes Gaza famine warning - Lilach Shoval

 

​ by Lilach Shoval

Warnings of "catastrophic" food crisis in the Strip draws sharp response from Israeli authorities

 

Trucks with humanitarian aid arrive at the Palestinian side of the Rafah border crossing with Egypt, in the southern Gaza Strip, on Nov. 2, 2023. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90.
Trucks with humanitarian aid arrive at the Palestinian side of the Rafah border crossing with Egypt, in the southern Gaza Strip, on Nov. 2, 2023. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90.

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), the global benchmark for hunger monitoring, has signaled the emergence of “catastrophic” conditions in northern Gaza, warning that famine either exists or is imminent without immediate action. The critical alert, issued Saturday, comes as the United States explicitly warns it might reconsider weapons deliveries if Israel fails to improve humanitarian conditions.

The report describes northern Gaza’s situation as an “emergency,” with more than 130,000 people facing “catastrophic conditions regarding food access,” noting that access to food and health services has plummeted since Israel resumed military operations in the area and ordered civilian evacuation, with aid supplies reportedly stranded in the Jabaliya combat zone. The assessment also documents Israel Defense Forces operations’ impact on medical and civilian infrastructure.

While the report references Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) data indicating October saw the lowest aid delivery since the war began, COGAT officials contest these findings.

“Every IPC forecast to date has proven inaccurate and inconsistent with conditions on the ground, with reports repeatedly predicting decline only to later document improvement,” COGAT maintains. “The researchers unfortunately rely on skewed, incomplete data and sources on the ground with narrow interests. These reports have systematically drawn from organizations with vested interests and partial, imprecise information, severely undermining their reliability. Israel has issued detailed documentation of factual and methodological flaws in previous reports, which remain unaddressed.”

COGAT asserts that there are no aid quantity restrictions and emphasizes the IDF’s extensive efforts to facilitate aid delivery to combat zones.

“IPC reports through October actually showed steady improvement in Gaza’s food security,” COGAT says. “The latest report indicated that conditions as of early October, including in the north, were at their best since the war’s onset. The IDF, via COGAT, regularly evaluates Gaza’s humanitarian situation, including in the north, drawing on multiple sources, including humanitarian organizations active in northern Gaza. We adjust and expand humanitarian response accordingly.

“Aid reaches northern Gaza directly through the east and west Erez crossings, established in May specifically to support northern Gaza. The Erez crossings alone can process over 600 trucks weekly, with capacity for additional coordination, and no aid quantity limits exist. Since early October, northern Gaza has received more than 600 aid trucks, even as the IDF conducts intensive operations against terror organizations embedded within civilian areas.

“To minimize combat impact on remaining civilians, we issued advance evacuation notices southward, coordinated humanitarian team movements, evacuated hundreds of patients and medical staff from northern Gaza hospitals, and delivered hundreds of food, water, and medical supply packages. Over 50,000 liters of fuel and medical supplies reached northern Gaza medical facilities to sustain critical services. Last week, despite intensive operations in Jabaliya and Beit Hanoun, Israel facilitated aid convoy coordination for civilians remaining in combat zones.”

UNRWA Secretary-General Philippe Lazzarini issued a sharp rebuke to Israel following the alert.

“This comes as no surprise. Famine is likely present in northern Gaza—a man-made famine. Israel is wielding starvation as a weapon,” Lazzarini stated on social media.

The alert’s timing coincides with explicit U.S. warnings that failing to improve northern Gaza’s humanitarian conditions could affect weapons supplies to Israel. Reports last week indicated that Secretary of State Antony Blinken expressed dissatisfaction with current measures during discussions with then-Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

Originally published in Israel Hayom.

 
Lilach Shoval

Source: https://www.jns.org/idf-disputes-gaza-famine-warning/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel: The Way Forward - Nils A. Haug

 

​ by Nils A. Haug

Israel's progressives would also have called on the international community to pressure Iran and Qatar, rather than hector their own prime minister. Sadly, these Israelis, some of them in desperation to see their loved ones again, are playing into the hands of Hamas.

 

  • Fortunately for Israel, former US President Donald J. Trump was just re-elected to serve a second term. Within hours, Hamas indicated that now might be a good time to talk about peace. Qatar, perhaps concerned that its days of double-dealing might be coming to an end, announced it would be "stalling" its role as a mediator between the US and Hamas. The landslide victory of Trump in the US election this week appears finally to be restoring deterrence.

  • Israel's society is politically and ideologically split. On one side are Israelis who understandably want their relatives back, and have been hoping for a ceasefire. Sadly, they are probably unaware that Iran, Qatar and Hamas, are loath to relinquish the only bargaining chip they have, and will undoubtedly drag out releasing even one hostage as long as they can.

  • [A]fter 13 months of futile ceasefire negotiations, many Israelis appear to have trouble realizing that if Hamas and its backers, Iran and Qatar, so wished, the hostages would be home by now.

  • If the priority of Israeli progressives were to rescue the hostages, they would demand that Hamas release them. "The slogan for freeing the hostages," wrote British journalist Douglas Murray, "... should never have been 'Being them home.' It should be 'Give them back.' Now."

  • Murray has also noted that for years, the Biden administration has put all its efforts into trying to oust Netanyahu when it would probably have been better off putting all its efforts into ousting the Iranian regime.

  • Israel's progressives would also have called on the international community to pressure Iran and Qatar, rather than hector their own prime minister. Sadly, these Israelis, some of them in desperation to see their loved ones again, are playing into the hands of Hamas. Its leaders must be delighted to see a divided Israel turn against itself. Painfully, Israeli activists are doing damage to both their country and the hostages.

  • Among Israel's most vocal protestors are prominent Israeli politicians, backed -- and some funded -- by the Biden administration. The US appears to desire someone more malleable in Israel's number-one spot: a person, one assumes, willing to do whatever the US dictates.

  • The Biden administration's goal appears to be establishment of a terrorist Palestinian state on Israel's border. In addition, Iran will soon be able to produce nuclear weapons with which to bomb Israel to oblivion. This monumentally destabilizing objective was proposed by the Obama administration in its illegitimate 2015 "Iran nuclear deal," officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. (JCPOA)...

  • As American journalist Daniel Greenfield points out: "The appeasement lobby only has one big idea when it comes to Islamic terrorists and any other enemies: 1. Give them land..."

  • Evidence shows that, unfortunately, this strategy does not work. The failure of the Oslo Accords only emphasizes that fact. The "ceiling" of each offer becomes the "floor" of the next one, as each concession is pocketed in the expectation of more.

  • Meanwhile, in the USA, President-elect Donald J. Trump is already creating seismic global changes within days, long before his inauguration on January 20, 2025.

Fortunately for Israel, former US President Donald J. Trump was just re-elected to serve a second term. Trump is already creating seismic global changes within days, long before his inauguration on January 20, 2025. Pictured from left to right: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, then US President Donald Trump, Bahraini Foreign Minister Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani and UAE Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan at the signing ceremony of the Abraham Accords at the White House on September 15, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Israel, under the heroic but much criticized statesman, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – a leader praised by historian Andrew Roberts as "The Churchill of the Middle East" – appears to have brought threats from Hamas in Gaza, and Hezbollah in Lebanon, under control and can now focus Israel's attention and military forces on other fronts.

Incomprehensibly, at this crucial period in Israel's existence, the chaotic domestic political situation has been cooking up unnecessary problems for the nation's security. Internal turmoil in Israel just serves to stimulate the hope for victory in its enemies, and less hope for the quick release of Israeli and other hostages Hamas is holding. "Hamas," wrote JNS editor-in-chief Jonathan Tobin, "views the unrest inside the Jewish state as an asset."

Fortunately for Israel, former US President Donald J. Trump was just re-elected to serve a second term. Within hours, Hamas indicated that now might be a good time to talk about peace. Qatar, perhaps concerned that its days of double-dealing might be coming to an end, announced it would be "stalling" its role as a mediator between the US and Hamas. The landslide victory of Trump in the US election this week appears finally to be restoring deterrence.

Israel's society is politically and ideologically split. On one side are Israelis who understandably want their relatives back, and have been hoping for a ceasefire. Sadly, they are probably unaware that Iran, Qatar and Hamas, are loath to relinquish the only bargaining chip they have, and will undoubtedly drag out releasing even one hostage as long as they can. Delaying the release of the hostages would also expand the time Hamas has to rearm, regroup and attack Israel again "until it is annihilated", as Hamas senior official Ghazi Hamad announced. The hope seems to be that if they keep making the lives of Israel's Jews miserable enough, they will all finally pack up and leave. They apparently do not know the Jews.

Nevertheless, after 13 months of futile ceasefire negotiations, many Israelis appear to have trouble realizing that if Hamas and its backers, Iran and Qatar, so wished, the hostages would be home by now.

"[A]s long as the hostages are useful to their cause," notes Tobin, "Hamas will hold onto many of them, despite the belief among some Israelis that it is Netanyahu's stubbornness or political ambition that is the obstacle to their freedom."

The real aim of agitators on the Israeli left appears to be the collapse of Netanyahu's elected government, and ousting the prime minister, whom they apparently regard as a destructive, self-serving war-monger. Netanyahu is unfairly deemed responsible for failure to rescue all Gaza hostages by now, despite a total lack of leverage over the situation other than a ceasefire/surrender.

Hamas continues to demand two key concessions: a complete Israeli withdrawal from all of Gaza, and an end to the "blockade." Agreement by Israel would enable Hamas to import weapons again and to maintain its hold on power. Keeping hostages is presumably an ideal way to ensure that Israel will not re-enter Gaza, and jeopardize their safety. Meanwhile, radical jihadists from Hamas's puppet-master, Iran, continue trying to wipe Israel off the map (here and here).

Netanyahu and his government seem determined to protect Israel from repeating the horrors of October 7, 2023. Sadly, this agenda is wrongly seen by many as a lack of concern for rescuing the hostages before they are all murdered or die.

Even before October 7, 2023, agitators were protesting Netanyahu's undisputed electoral victory in what actually appeared an effort to oust him. That seemed the real objective in opposing Israel's badly needed "judicial reform."

If the priority of Israeli progressives were to rescue the hostages, they would demand that Hamas release them. "The slogan for freeing the hostages," wrote British journalist Douglas Murray, "... should never have been 'Being them home.' It should be 'Give them back.' Now."

Murray has also noted that for years, the Biden administration has put all its efforts into trying to oust Netanyahu when it would probably have been better off putting all its efforts into ousting the Iranian regime.

Israel's progressives would also have called on the international community to pressure Iran and Qatar, rather than hector their own prime minister. Sadly, these Israelis, some of them in desperation to see their loved ones again, are playing into the hands of Hamas. Its leaders must be delighted to see a divided Israel turn against itself. Painfully, Israeli activists are doing damage to both their country and the hostages.

Among Israel's most vocal protestors are prominent Israeli politicians, backed -- and some funded -- by the Biden administration. The US appears to desire someone more malleable in Israel's number-one spot: a person, one assumes, willing to do whatever the US dictates. This is probably not the best way to treat an ally. The Biden administration's goal appears to be establishment of a terrorist Palestinian state on Israel's border. In addition, Iran will soon be able to produce nuclear weapons with which to bomb Israel to oblivion. This monumentally destabilizing objective was proposed by the Obama administration in its illegitimate 2015 "Iran nuclear deal," officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action" (JCPOA), the sunset clauses of which guarantee Iran's regime, in just a few years, as many weapons as they can build.

According to Iran's former president, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, all it would take for Iran to obliterate Israel, a country smaller than the state of New Jersey, was one bomb.

Anti-Netanyahu-government agitators, apart from those in the Biden administration, include much of Israel's media. So-called "progressive" political leaders in the US, Canada, the UK, and Europe are apparently more worried about trade than a world upended by an expansionist regime with nuclear weapons.

As American journalist Daniel Greenfield points out:

"The appeasement lobby only has one big idea when it comes to Islamic terrorists and any other enemies: 1. Give them land..."

Evidence shows that, unfortunately, this strategy does not work. The failure of the Oslo Accords only emphasizes that fact. The "ceiling" of each offer becomes the "floor" of the next one, as each concession is pocketed in the expectation of more.

On the pro-Netanyahu end of the spectrum is a sizable group of Israelis and other supporters, acting to preserve the nation against future assaults while fending off attempts to replace the prime minister with one who would surrender to Hamas. The opposition, no doubt, hold to an illusory hope of welcoming the hostages back home. Sadly, only about half the remaining hostages are thought still to be alive.

The hostages seem to have become Hamas's "insurance policy": Israel will not presumably be able to attack Hamas in the future for fear of killing them. It is believed Hamas's late leader, Yahya Sinwar, for his personal safety, surrounded himself with hostages. Sinwar, far from wanting to be a "martyr", prioritized his personal safety as a pre-condition for a ceasefire. Found on his body when the Israelis finally dispatched him was the passport of an UNRWA teacher.

Israel's few international supporters have, in the main, offered erratic or limited assistance while imposing unconscionable conditions. Western leaders, including the US, attempted to micro-manage and constrain Israel's handling of the war, to the extent that without their interference, the Gaza campaign could possibly have been brought to an end months ago. "Do what you have to do," Trump recently told Netanyahu, but, according to one report, he asked Netanyahu to please finish the war by inauguration day, January 20, 2025.

In calls between Netanyahu and Trump, they reportedly "see eye-to-eye on Iran."

The failure for agreeing to a ceasefire appears to lie with Hamas's intransigence, coupled with mixed signals from the Biden administration. By threatening Israel and withholding weapons, the US administration has, ironically, protracted the war and given Qatar, Iran, and its proxies -- Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Houthis – the idea that all they have to do is wait, and the US, by forcing Israel to heel, will hand them a victory.

The Gaza Ministry of Health -- run by Hamas - bewails the large number of alleged civilian casualties in Gaza; a number hugely and falsely inflated. Hamas fails to reveal exactly how many of the casualties were terrorists. Hamas deliberately causes casualties by concealing weapons depots and command centers in the middle of crowded schools, hospitals, and mosques so that Israel will be blamed. This practice, known as "Hamas's CNN strategy," consists of showing dead babies to television crews so the media and international community will force Israel to stop defending itself, supposedly for "humanitarian" reasons.

Israelis demonstrating for Netanyahu's ouster claim that they hold him primarily responsible for intelligence and security shortcomings which enabled the October 7th disaster. Prime ministers, however, are reliant for information on the state's military and intelligence services, which may have failed to provide him with real-time warnings of Hamas's impending attack. The combination of internal forces, aided by Western politicians in their aim to overthrow Israel's democratically elected government, creates discord that plays straight into the hands of Hamas, Hezbollah, Qatar, Iran, and Israel's other enemies. Israel's internal turbulence most likely suits the Biden administration, which has still not acted strongly against the lynchpin of all this devastation, Iran. On the contrary, the Biden administration rewarded Iran with "closer to $60 billion" -- a windfall that Iran's regime must at least partially draw on to finance their wars in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen and Iraq.

In a disrespectful comment implicating Netanyahu and the entire Israeli Knesset (Parliament), the US reportedly described Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant -- who they appeared to consider a compliant potential replacement for Netanyahu -- as the "only adult in the room." That remark came after they had seemingly given up on replacing Netanyahu with former Defense Minister Benny Gantz and, had considered former (briefly) Prime Minister Yair Lipid.

Netanyahu seems determined to protect Israel to the end from future attacks by adversaries, both within and without. Gallant was dismissed from the government earlier this month. "[T]rust between me and the minister of defense has cracked," Netanyahu said.

Lapid, Gantz, Gallant, Biden, Blinken and others in the circle all appear to be like-minded, acting questionably in the interests of Israel's elected government, and arguably against the security of the state itself.

Perhaps Israel's progressives need to be reminded why Israel exists, and why Jews have every right, and every obligation, to defend their community, their nation, and the integrity of their country's borders.

Even before the US election on November 5, Netanyahu had clearly decided to go it alone. He apparently did not inform the US administration about "Operation Grim Beeper," which caused pagers carried by Hezbollah's terrorists to explode; or of the aerial bombardments in Lebanon that that followed it. Netanyahu's actions indicate his distrust of the Biden administration (well-earned). Biden has withheld or slow-walked weapons shipments, and has warned Israel not to "escalate" the situation. Every day since October 8, 2023, however, Hezbollah has bombarded Israel - a country roughly the size of Wales -- with rockets, missiles and attack drones. Netanyahu announced that "No country can accept the wanton rocketing of its cities. We can't accept it either."

Meanwhile, in the USA, President-elect Donald J. Trump is already creating seismic global changes within days (here, here and here), long before his inauguration on January 20, 2025.

"After the terrible massacre on October 7", said a Likud party spokesperson, "we cannot reward terrorism and enable a Palestinian state. Prime Minister Netanyahu has proven over the past 20 years that he is the only barrier to the creation of a terror state between the [Mediterranean] Sea and Jordan."

US President Lyndon Baines Johnson's words on America in his 1965 inaugural speech apply equally to Israel:

"They came here - the exile and the stranger... They made a covenant with this land. Conceived in justice, written in liberty, bound in union, it was meant one day to inspire the hopes of all mankind; and it binds us still. If we keep its terms, we shall flourish."

 
Nils A. Haug is an author and columnist. A Lawyer by profession, he is member of the International Bar Association, the National Association of Scholars, a faculty member at Intercollegiate Studies Institute, the Academy of Philosophy and Letters. Retired from law, his particular field of interest is political theory interconnected with current events. He holds a Ph.D. in Apologetical Theology. Dr. Haug is author of 'Politics, Law, and Disorder in the Garden of Eden – the Quest for Identity'; and 'Enemies of the Innocent – Life, Truth, and Meaning in a Dark Age.' His work has been published by First Things Journal, The American Mind, Quadrant, Minding the Campus, Gatestone Institute, National Association of Scholars, Israel Hayom, Jewish News Syndicate, Anglican Mainstream, Document Danmark, James Wilson Institute, Jewish Journal, and others.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21114/israel-the-way-forward

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter