by symposium
Jerry Philipson writes:
The relative lull has been shattered.
On  April 7 an anti-tank missile was fired by Palestinians from Gaza at an  Israeli school bus, severely injuring a 16 year old boy. Forty  schoolchildren had just got off the bus or else the toll would have been  much higher. The Palestinians from Gaza who fired the long-range  missile could not have known that the schoolchildren had exited. It was  the first time an anti-tank missile has been used against a civilian target, and a school bus at that.
On  March 23 a bomb was set off at a crowded bus station in Jerusalem by  Palestinians from Gaza, killing one person and wounding 39 others. The number of dead and wounded could easily have been much higher.
On March 11 Palestinians from Gaza slaughtered an Israeli family  as they slept, a father and mother in their mid 30's and three children  aged 11, 4 and three months. The father and three month old had their  throats slit and the others were stabbed to death.
Throughout  the month of March right up to the present time Palestinians from Gaza  have been firing large numbers of rockets into Israel in an effort to  murder, maim and terrorize as many Israelis as possible. Many of the  rockets have exploded in populated areas and caused significant property  damage in addition to the human cost. A high and growing percentage of  the rockets used are grad rockets. Grad rockets have multiple warheads, a  range of 25 kilometers and are lethal killing machines.
There  was a lull in fighting prior to these atrocities taking place but only  in relative terms. At no point since the end of the war in Gaza in 2009  has Israel been free from attack, have Israeli civilians been able to  feel safe and secure in their homes and communities. The attacks have  increased in frequency, intensity and lethality since early March  however and Israel has had to increase its military response  accordingly, which accounts for the rise in fighting and the lull being  shattered.
It's  as if Palestinians at the behest of their Iranian masters have decided  to try and provoke Israel into retaliating on a massive scale  to defend and protect Israeli civilians the way it did in 2008. This is  entirely possible given the byzantine world of Middle East politics,  the de facto disavowal of Israel by President Obama and the United  States and its obvious reluctance to come to Israel's assistance and the  sense of opportunity and of a  moment in time this has given to those who would destroy her. Israelis  have held back but the time is fast approaching when they will no longer  be able to do so.
The  lull has been shattered alright. What can make the atrocities and the  fighting permanently stop? Palestinians and the rest of the Arab/Islamic  world have got to recognize and accept the legitimacy and existence of  Israel, stop trying to murder, maim and terrorize Israelis and allow  them to live in peace and security and stop trying to destroy the Jewish  state.
Good  luck with that...it's just not going to happen, not in the foreseeable  future anyway. Since Palestinians and the rest of the Arab/Islamic world  are consumed by anti-Semitic and anti-Israel beliefs and feelings and  are intractable in their animus the atrocities and the fighting are  going to go on and on and on.
With a relative lull once in awhile.
Blame  the Palestinians. Blame the rest of the Arab/Islamic world. Blame Islam  most of all. Don't blame the Israelis though. They're just trying to  survive.
Leo Rennert writes:
The April 9 print edition of the Washington Post features a brief article by Jerusalem correspondent Joel Greenberg, with a headline reading, "10 die in Gaza strikes after bus attack."
Here's Greenberg's lead:
"Israeli strikes in the Gaza Strip on Friday killed 10 Palestinians, including a woman and her 21-yearold daughter, medical officials said, in continuing exchanges of fire a day after a missile attack on an Israeli school bus that wounded two people, including a 16-year-old boy."
There are shadings and spins in this sentence that bear a few comments.  To wit:
--When  it comes to accounting for this exchange of fire, when Palestinians are  killed it's due to "Israeli" strikes.  But when an Israeli school bus  is hit, it's just due to "a missile atack" -- without any identification  of the actual perpetrators of the attack.  Hamas nicely gets a pass..
--Also,  when it comes to identifying Palestinian fatalities, Greenberg goes out  of his way to report that they included a woman and her 21-year-old  daughter but fails to report that quite a few of these fatalities also  were Hamas terrorists.  There's a moral difference between one side  trying to hit terrorist targets and the other side trying to hit  civilian targets.  But this escapes Greenberg's reporting.
Which brings me to Greenberg's second paragraph, which reads as follows:
"Israeli aircraft and tanks fired at targets in the Palestinians enclave, and militants launched mortar rounds and rockets at Israel. Fourteen Palestinians have been killed and dozens wounded since Thursday's bus attack. It is the worst flare-up of violence since an Israeli offensive in 2009 against the militant Islamist group Hamas, which controls Gaza."
Greenberg  has Israeli aircraft and tanks firing "at targets" in Gaza.  But Israel  wasn't firing at random as some Palestinian "targets."  It was firing  at terrorist infrastructure and terror cells.  In Greenberg's reporting,  the actual objective and execution of Israeli fire are totally  missing.  Which again gives Hamas a pass
And  when it comes to the other side of this exchange of fire, it's  "militants" -- an Orwellian euphemism for terrorists -- who fire "at  Israel."  But Hamas wasn't just firing "at Israel."  It was deliberately  firing at Israeli civilians.  Again, this lets Hamas, as a terrorist  group using terrorist tactics, off the hook.  It puts Hamas on the same moral plane as Israel -- Israel fires at Gaza; "militants" fire at Israel.  Perfect equivalence!
Finally, Hamas makes a belated appearance at the end of the second paragraph, but not as the aggressor -- only as the target  of an Israeli offensive in 2009.  No mention that this offensive was  designed to halt tens of thousands of rocket barrages fired against  Israeli population centers by Hamas and other terrorist groups.  If  there was a huge flare-up of violence in 2009, it was only Isrel's  doing, according to Greenberg.
What  gets totally lost in Greenberg's writing is that Hamas, before and  after its violent takeover of Gaza, has been the aggressor, using  ever-more accurate missiles to hit Israeli civilians, while Israel, at  the receiving end of such attacks, is exercising its right of  self-defense, making every effort to target terrorists -- a constraint  made all the more difficult by Palestinian terrorists who hide and among  non-combatants and use Gaza civilians as human shields.
No such distinction distinguishes Greenberg's writing.  And yet, it's the crux of what really is goes on.
                                                       Original URL: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/04/attacks_from_gaza_escalate.html
symposium
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment