by Ruthie Blum
At Tel Aviv University on Monday,
Baroness Caroline Cox, a cross-bench member of the British House of Lords, gave
a talk sponsored by the Yuval Ne'eman Workshop for Science, Technology and
Security and the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies, run by Martin
Sherman.
A passionate defender of human rights
and the rule of law, Cox has spent the bulk of her career fighting forces that
threaten to undermine Western democracy in general, and that of her country in
particular. The focus of her lecture was the spread of political Islam in the
U.K. and Africa, a phenomenon that has taken up much of her parliamentary and
humanitarian work.
Though her pro-Israel positions are
well-known (she is a co-founder of the One Jerusalem organization and
co-president of the Jerusalem Summit), she purposely left the Jewish state out
of the discussion. Nevertheless, she made a point of mentioning the symbolic
relevance of her topic to the timing of her speech, which happened to fall on
Holocaust Remembrance Day.
Her message was that jihad is being
waged through an Islamist infiltration of the political, cultural, legal and
economic systems of non-Muslim countries. It is being accomplished, she said, by
pushing to have Shariah law written into, if not replace, the law of the land;
by manipulating democracy to destroy it; by investing in educational
institutions and making it impossible for anyone to criticize their teachings;
and -- as in the case of African countries -- by preventing anyone who does not
convert to Islam from getting a job or receiving government aid, including food
for starving children.
The list goes on, and it is as ugly
as the honor killings and female genital mutilation practiced by Shariah-abiding
citizens and accepted by Western apologists. Even more shocking is the extent to
which Britain has willingly resigned itself to this barbarism. Indeed, recounted
Cox, the situation is so "schizophrenic" that while bigamy is prohibited in the
U.K., polygamy among its Muslim citizens is accepted as a religious-cultural
norm.
This, she explained, is not only
dangerous for Britain; it is devastating for Muslims seeking the protection of
British law. They are abandoned by the system in the name of diversity, and sent
to Shariah courts to settle their issues.
Shariah, thus, is managing to thrive
in the U.K., thanks to concessions made by the establishment to an ever-growing
Islamic population. And it's no wonder, with Muslim men being left to marry
multiple wives with whom they sire dozens of children.
Admitting that educating and rallying
her peers and the public against this crack in civilized society is a Sisyphean
task, she concluded by urging that we all tell ourselves, "I cannot do
everything, but I must not do nothing."
Such an appeal often falls on deaf
ears. Ignorance is partly to blame. Then there's the fear -- of being accused of
Islamophobia on the one hand, and of violent repercussions on the other. It is
far easier to empathize with the enemy and confront a less daunting
culprit.
Which brings us, of course, to
Israel.
One key element of global jihad is
propaganda aimed at turning lies into truth and vice versa. Trained by the
Soviets masters of this art, Arab-Muslim apparatchiks have taken it to a whole
new level. Their success lies in their two-pronged self-portrayal as downtrodden
victims of Western imperialism and as destined victors against the "infidels."
Chief among these are the "Great Satan" (America) and the "Small Satan"
(Israel).
That Europe's response is to sell its
soul to appease the beast is bad enough. But when the administration in
Washington follows suit, the sense among the sane is that even science fiction
couldn't do justice to the horror of it all.
Yes, President Barack Obama is
looking the other way during bogus negotiations with Iran, thereby enabling the
Islamic republic to develop nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, Secretary of State John
Kerry is blaming Israel for not acting in a similar fashion with the Palestinian
Authority.
Not only has Kerry chided Israel on
several occasions for its inability to persuade the PA to engage in peace talks
toward the establishment of a Palestinian state, but he has made public
statements to that effect. Buoyed by the moral relativism that the State
Department has been applying to "both sides," the PA signed a treaty with Hamas.
Fuming, Kerry outdid himself on
Friday. During a closed meeting of the Trilateral Commission -- a tape of which
was obtained and released by the Daily Beast -- Kerry told officials from
Europe, Russia and Japan that in the absence of a two-state solution, Israel
"winds up either being an apartheid state with second-class citizens, or it ends
up being a state that destroys the capacity of Israel to be a Jewish
state."
Though Kerry now says he regrets
using the word "apartheid," it was no mere slip of the tongue. Rather, it
revealed the depth of his hostility to Israel. It also served as proof of the
power of propaganda. When repeated often enough, such a blatant falsehood can
even roll easily off the lips of the world's highest-ranking
diplomat.
Baroness Cox would not be the least
bit surprised.
Ruthie Blum is the author of "To Hell in
a Handbasket: Carter, Obama, and the 'Arab
Spring.'"
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=8209
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment