by Dr. Ronen Yitzhak
In June 2006, one of
the world's most infamous terrorists, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was
assassinated. Zarqawi headed al-Qaida's Iraqi branch and was responsible
for dozens of terrorist attacks against Western and Arab targets.
Terrorist attacks,
taking hostages, gruesome beheadings -- such was the norm in post-Saddam
Hussein Iraq. The U.S., which set up the new government in Baghdad,
kept the order and took on the responsibility of training new Iraqi
security forces. The American administration launched a rigorous battle
against Zarqawi-style terrorism, assassinating senior al-Qaida figures
in Iraq, including ultimately Zarqawi himself.
The method of
eliminating terrorist organization leaders is known by anybody working
in Middle East intelligence. It has become acceptable practice in the
Western war against terrorism. For this reason, it is imperative that
Israel adopt such methods here and now. Assassination policy -- or
"targeted killings," as it is called today -- had been part and parcel
of the overall Israeli policy in the war against Palestinian terrorism.
And it is the appropriate, correct way to settle the score with
terrorist leaders.
The policy was adopted
during the government of Prime Minister Golda Meir, after the September
1972 massacre of 11 Israeli athletes in Munich. At Meir's command, the
leaders of the Black September group, which carried out the massacre,
were eliminated, including the organization's commander Ali Hassan
Salameh. As part of the Mossad's Operation Wrath of God, the heads of
Black September were assassinated one by one in different locations
worldwide, over several years, until the organization collapsed --
lacking any leadership -- toward the end of the 1970s.
The effectiveness of
assassinating the leaders of terrorist groups was demonstrated during
the Second Intifada, which claimed more than 1,000 Israeli lives.
Initially, through measured and carefully considered steps, Israel only
assassinated the leaders of Hamas' military wing, the Izzedine al-Qassam
Brigades. But for lack of any other option, and as the pride generated
by terrorism swelled unchecked, Israel did not hesitate to begin
assassinating the leaders of Hamas' political arm as well. Israel ceased
to distinguish between the political and military arms. It held all
leaders of the movement culpable for terrorism, which is precisely how
the founder and spiritual leader of the movement, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin,
was assassinated in March 2004, followed by Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi a
month later.
Despite criticism and
fears that these leaders' assassinations would ignite the Palestinian
street, looking back, such fears proved false. Over time and with the
new Hamas leadership's selection, the prevailing violence actually began
to subside until it stopped altogether about a year later.
The assassination of
Hamas leaders in the Gaza Strip is a necessary measure. It is not an
impossibility that Hamas will step up its terrorist activities and
amplify violence in the West Bank to prove the ineffectiveness of such
policy. But in the long term the ends will justify the means.
Eliminating Hamas' field operatives, or the commanders of its military
arm, will not suffice to overcome the terrorist threat, hence the need
to eliminate the Hamas' leadership, without distinguishing between the
military and political wings.
Only through assassinations such
as these can Israel inflict serious damage, build deterrence, erode
Hamas' people's morale and force them to flee as wanted men.
Assassinations will demonstrate Israel's unwillingness to accept
terrorism, and, following in the footsteps of other countries, Israel
will make it perfectly clear that its goal is to pursue terrorists and
eliminate them, wherever they are.
Dr. Ronen Yitzhak
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=9707
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment