by Reuven Berko
Hamas and the Palestinian Authority are too busy with their rivalry to truly care about the Palestinian people's welfare • Both are also oblivious to the fact that Middle East geopolitics and global circumstances have marginalized the Palestinian issue.
| 
                                            An anti-Hamas rally in the 
Gaza Strip this week                                                
                                                 
|Photo credit: AFP  | 
Albert Einstein once said that the definition 
of insanity was doing the same thing over and over, and expecting 
different results. This saying, it seems, best depicts the Palestinian 
Authority's relationship with Hamas: The rival Palestinian factions are 
so busy with their internal conflicts and their shared hatred of Israel 
that they are oblivious to the fact that the geopolitical circumstances,
 both in the Middle East and worldwide, have taken a negative turn that 
has undermined the Palestinian cause, while playing in Israel's favor. 
While Hamas and the Palestinian Authority 
remain at loggerheads over control of the Palestinian people, the 
disintegration of Syria, Iraq and Libya has created a humanitarian 
crisis in the Middle East and with it an unprecedented refugee crisis.
The two-pronged threat looming over the Sunni 
countries in the Middle East -- the rise of radical Sunni Islam on the 
one hand and the threat of a nuclear Shiite Iran on the other hand -- 
has dramatically and ominously shifted the pan-Arab balance of power; 
the pro-Palestinian Arab system, meant to provide economic and military 
support to the Palestinian's political and armed struggle against 
Israel, has changed with it.
The changes in the regional priorities and 
interests of countries such as the U.S. and Russia, and the actions of 
rogue organizations operating in the Middle East, have placed solid and 
stable Israel in a strategic position even the Arab countries seek to 
preserve. Many of the Arab nations, some of which are fighting for their
 very survival, are eyeing an alliance with Israel, be it overt or 
covert, and their own strategic considerations far outweigh a 
Palestinian narrative fabricated for the sole purpose of ramming Israel 
and diverting the Palestinian people's attention from the wrongs 
committed by their rulers. 
The chaotic reality overrunning the Arab world
 and the resulting upheaval Europe must deal with have left both 
indifferent to the anachronistic narratives of the "occupation" and 
Palestinian refugees. The regional disaster has dwarfed the Palestinian 
tale into a minor anecdote.
The Palestinian Authority's adamant refusal to
 accept any of the Israeli proposals to reignite the stalled peace 
negotiations gives the impression that it is unaware of the fact that 
the international community has lost interest in the Palestinian issue. 
Hamas' armament efforts in clear preparation 
for the next round of hostilities with Israel suggest its leaders are 
oblivious to the animosity the residents of the Gaza Strip harbor toward
 their regime, as well as to the fact that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey 
and the other Arab and Islamic nations that have so far lent Hamas their
 diplomatic, financial and military support, are facing a host of new 
problems that require their attention, including the threats posed by 
the Islamic State group and Iran's regional ambitions.
Recently, however, it seems the unrest 
sweeping the Palestinian street and the dimmed effect Ramallah's 
manipulation has on key players in the international theater are 
beginning to take its toll on the Palestinian Authority's leadership. 
For a long time, the Palestinians were able to deceive many into 
thinking their issue was at the root of all global unrest, but then came
 the real Middle East tragedy, and the Palestinians' anti-Israeli myth 
was debunked.
In the current climate, it is clear that a 
situation in which Hamas would be able to exploit the Palestinian 
Authority's weakness to overrun Judea and Samaria is a nightmare 
scenario for both Jordan and Israel. Affording the Palestinians 
sovereignty status in the area in any manner that includes control of 
the border crossings and seaports would allow an influx of Islamic State
 terrorists and other radical Islamists into Judea and Samaria, and 
would turn it from the only area in the Middle East that enjoys some 
peace and quiet into a killing field. 
It seems that the current, demilitarized 
situation, in which the Palestinians rule their own territories -- with a
 flag, an anthem and a passport to show for it -- is all they could ever
 hope for. Any change in this status spells a hellish reality for 
Jordan, Israel and the Palestinians themselves, and it can only 
undermine any chance of ever striking peace in the Middle East.
Throughout history, the Palestinians have 
always turned to the Temple Mount in a time of crisis. But not to pray 
-- to use the holy and highly volatile site as a trigger for violence 
and bloodshed. It is one of the oldest tricks in their book, meant to 
cause an overall escalation that would shuffle the deck in their favor 
regardless of the price it would exact in casualties.
Meanwhile, Jordan, the professed protector of 
the Al-Aqsa mosque, is caught in the middle. Under the agreement with 
Israel, Jordan represents Islamic interests on Al-Aqsa, and Amman 
adamantly fights Palestinian attempts to sideline its influence on the 
site and to establish a Palestinian capital in east Jerusalem as part of
 a ploy to undermine Israel's sovereignty in the city. The Palestinians 
are trying to forcibly appropriate the Temple Mount, claiming they 
represent Christian interests in Jerusalem, and asserting that "Jesus 
was a Palestinian" and there was never a Jewish temple in Jerusalem. 
Jordan understands Israel's measures against 
the Islamists in Jerusalem, but faced with its own set of Islamist 
problems at home, and given the millions of refugees on its borders, 
Amman must release anti-Israel statements.
Nevertheless, the facts on the ground, 
particularly Israel's building, have long ago ended the discussion on 
any future division of Jerusalem. Truth be told, the Palestinians have 
no claim on any part of the city. There was never a state called 
"Palestine" and it was never occupied, and neither was the capital it 
never had.
The Palestinian narrative on Jerusalem is 
dissipating. During 2014's Operation Protective Edge in Gaza, Hamas 
fired rockets at Jerusalem's mosques and churches, but somehow, Hamas 
political leader Khaled Mashaal, and Turkish President Recep Tayyip 
Erdogan claim that it is Israel that is threatening the Al-Aqsa mosque. 
With the Islamic State group and Nusra Front 
terrorists indiscriminately targeting mosques all over the Middle East, 
razing them regardless of the harm that comes to their Muslim brethren, 
it is hard to believe the Palestinians are genuinely concerned about 
Al-Aqsa. On the contrary, it appears they are more than willing to risk 
the holy site for their own political gain, making it easier for many to
 believe Israel, the safest country in the Middle East, can protect the 
Al-Aqsa mosque better than any of the other unstable Muslim regimes 
around.
As for the Palestinians, Hamas would rather 
invest in its weapons caches than in the Palestinian people's welfare, 
and what little resources it has are diminishing by the day due to the 
Egyptian crackdown on the smuggling routes from Sinai to Gaza; and the 
Palestinian Authority is plagued by internal strife and discord over its
 future political path, and it is too busy thwarting Hamas' putsch 
attempts to truly care about the plight of the Gazans. 
The situation in the Palestinian Authority and for Hamas
 in Gaza is dire, and global circumstances do not bode well for the 
Palestinian issue.
      Reuven Berko
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=28341
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment