▼

Monday, October 5, 2026

October 7 Was a Slave Raid - Charles Jacob

 

by Charles Jacob

The “context” for October 7 is not Judea, Samaria, or Gaza. It is 14 centuries of jihadist conquests.

 

When the first survivors’ accounts came out of Israel’s kibbutzim, I had the terrible sense that I had heard them before. And I had, in South Sudan.

More than two decades earlier, I traveled to Sudan to witness Christian Solidarity International freed 2,952 black Africans from slavery. My American Anti-Slavery Group had helped raise funds to buy back their freedom.

The freed slaves told us that the raiders came at dawn, screaming “Allahu akbar!” and murdered at will. They gang-raped the women and girls, then dragged them off as captives to use as concubines, domestics, or to sell.

On October 7, 2023, Hamas carried out the same raid.

They came at dawn. They went house-to-house through Be’eri, Kfar Aza, and Nir Oz and murdered families. At the Nova music festival, they hunted and murdered young people in cold blood, ignoring pleas for mercy. They raped and sexually tortured the women and girls. They drove 251 captives back into Gaza. Noa Argamani reported that they used her as a domestic slave. One raider called his parents from a murdered woman’s phone to boast that he had killed 10 Jews with his own hands.

The Jews’ enemies called October 7 a desperate act of “resistance,” but it was a classic jihad raid—an act as old as the conquests throughout Egypt, Persia, India, and North Africa, and as recent as the murderous assaults on Africans in Nigeria and Darfur, and on Alawites, Christians, Kurds, and Druze in Syria.

The same doctrine

Both Hamas and the National Islamic Front regime in Sudan—which carried out the slave raids—are branches of the Muslim Brotherhood. The 1988 Hamas charter calls openly for the worldwide extermination of the Jews in order to destroy the only nation in the Middle East that won back its homeland from jihad conquest. In Europe, only Spain, in recapturing Andalusia, accomplished that.

The ties between jihadists who massacred and enslaved Israelis and those who did it to Africans (and have done it to Middle Easterners and Europeans) are also material. For years, Sudan gave Hamas refuge and served as the corridor for weapons smuggled from Iran’s Islamic regime to Gaza. Strikes attributed to Israel hit weapons convoys on Sudanese soil in 2009 and a munitions factory in Khartoum in 2012. The jihadists who massacred and enslaved Africans helped arm the movement whose men came through the fence on October 7.

“But the occupation”

Before Israel had even identified all its dead, the justifications began. We were told the massacre had a “context.” There was an “occupation,” a “siege,” a “cycle of violence.” A collection of 27 student groups at Harvard declared Israel “entirely responsible” for the atrocity visited upon it.

Ask the people of South Sudan what occupation they were guilty of. Ask the Christians of Nigeria’s Plateau State, nearly 200 of whom were butchered in their villages on Christmas Eve 2023. Ask the Yazidi women sold in ISIS slave markets, or the 21 Copts beheaded on a Libyan beach in 2015. None of them was occupying anybody’s land, and the killers came for them all the same—with the same slogans, the same methods, and the same appetite for captives.

The “context” for October 7 is not Judea, Samaria, or Gaza. It is 14 centuries of jihadist conquests—many of which have also killed and enslaved Muslims who got in the way, as in Nigeria, or who refused to give up their African cultures and become Arabized, as in Mauritania and Darfur.

The institutions looked away again

In the 1990s, I learned that the great human rights organizations knew that Arabs owned black Africans as slaves in Sudan and chose not to make a fuss because the perpetrators were not the white Western villains their constituents want to shame in self-purification rituals that relieve them of their white guilt. For that, they abandon the victims of jihadism.

After October 7, the same institutional reflex kicked in. UN Women took nearly two months to condemn the sexual violence against Israeli women. Prominent human rights groups hurried to put the massacre in “context,” then spent the next three years decrying Israel’s response. Campus activists tore down posters of kidnapped children. For the Dinka of Sudan and the Jews of Israel alike, the lesson was the same: the human rights establishment will not come when you are tortured, killed, or enslaved. Or, as I titled an op-ed I wrote in the Boston Globe in 2002, “Why Israel, and not Sudan, is singled out.”

One jihad

Israel treats October 7 as its own war, a battle over its borders, fought and explained alone. Nigerian Christians do the same. So do Assyrians, Copts, Yazidis, Druze, and Kurds. Each petitions the world separately, and so each is a minority the world can safely ignore. This is a strategic error.

These are not separate wars, but multiple fronts of one. The same doctrine drives the jihadist militias in Nigeria, al-Shabaab in Somalia, the jihadists who massacred Druze and Alawites in Syria, the IRGC and Basij murderers who wiped out tens of thousands of innocent Iranian protesters in two days, and Hamas in Gaza. Taken together, their targets are not a minority at all: they are hundreds of millions of people.

That is why Dr. Walid Phares and I founded the International Freedom Coalition: to bring the peoples under jihadist assault together into one alliance, with one record of atrocities, presented with one voice before Congress, the State Department, the EU, the International Court of Justice, the public, and the press. Israel’s suffering belongs in that record, as does its strength. No nation has done more to show that jihad can be resisted.

Some call October 7 “Israel’s 9/11.” That’s only half right. It was also South Sudan’s, Nigeria’s, and Syria’s. It was the same raid, carried out by the same movement, against another community that was told it stood alone.

Victims of jihadism no longer need to stand alone. 


Charles Jacob

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/10/04/october-7-was-a-slave-raid/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

1 comment:

pierre said...

The North African coast wasz not called The Barbary Coast for nothing frolm the 16th to 19th century when Muslim pirates raided the coasts looking for salves etc just as described in the lucid article. If my history serves me right it was only the British Navy that intervened to clean out the swamp?

Post a Comment