Saturday, November 9, 2024

Why Israel Was Right to Ban UNRWA - Hugh Fitzgerald

 

by Hugh Fitzgerald

What will it take to shut it down?

 


[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]

First, let’s be clear. The 92-10 vote in the Knesset in favor of banning UNRWA from operating inside Israel does not prevent UNRWA from working inside Gaza. UNRWA staff can still enter Gaza from Egypt, or from the Mediterranean.

Second, this ban does not go into effect for three months. During that time, it should be possible to find alternative agencies to take over UNRWA’s role in distributing humanitarian aid, providing medical personnel, and staffing schools where the teaching is not a vehicle for pro-Hamas propaganda that poisons the minds of young Gazans.

Third, there is solid evidence that nearly two dozen UNRWA staffers, including officials, took part in the October 7 atrocities — the torture, rape, and murder of Israelis — and that more than 450 UNRWA staff are members of “terrorist organizations,” that is, mainly members Hamas but also of Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

Fourth, UNRWA staffers who are not members of Hamas overwhelmingly declare their support for the terrorist group.

Fifth, the IDF has found that hundreds of UNRWA buildings — especially schools, but also hospitals — have been used by Hamas to store weapons and rocket launchers, and to hide its fighters.

Sixth, Hamas built its headquarters directly underneath UNRWA headquarters in Gaza. UNRWA claims, with an air of injured innocence, that it had no idea that it was sitting on top of Hamas’ headquarters. How likely is that?

More on UNRWA and Hamas, and Israel’s decision to ban UNRWA from operating in the country, can be found here: “Israelis Defend UNRWA Ban Amid US Rebuke, Say School Kids Better Off Without Agency’s ‘Poisonous Influence,’” by Debbie Weiss, Algemeiner, October 29, 2024:

Israel’s decision to ban the United Nations agency responsible for Palestinian refugees and their descendants from operating in the country was necessary given the organization’s ties to the Hamas terror group and “poisonous influence” in the Middle East, according to an expert and Israeli officials, who argued that concerns over the move are overblown.

The US blasted its ally Israel for passing legislation on Monday that bans the the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) from operating within Israeli territory and prohibits any Israeli authority from engaging with the agency.

The two laws passed overwhelmingly in Israel’s parliament, known as the Knesset, amid mounting revelations of UNRWA staff involvement in the Hamas-led massacre across southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. The legislation will close UNRWA’s operations in Jerusalem, where it services hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with education, health, and other aid. It will also limit the agency’s operations in Gaza and the West Bank, which relies on cooperation from Israeli authorities.

The Biden administration said it was “deeply troubled” by the move.

“Implementing the legislation risks catastrophe for the more than 3 million Palestinians who rely on UNRWA for essential services, including health care, and primary and secondary education,” the US State Department said. “We urge the government of Israel to pause and further consider implementation of this legislation to ensure UNRWA can effectively carry out its mission and facilitate humanitarian assistance.”

Marcus Sheff — CEO of the NGO IMPACT-se, which examines anti-Jewish and anti-Israel content in UNRWA’s educational materials — noted that numerous UNRWA-employed teachers were directly involved in the Oct. 7 massacre, while many others “openly celebrated it.” He cited a Wall Street Journal report from earlier this year that found that 23 percent of UNRWA’s male employees have ties to Hamas, a higher percentage than the average of 15 percent for adult males in Gaza. A further 10 percent of UNRWA’s school principals in Gaza and their deputies were leaders in Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad, another terrorist group….

Nearly one-quarter of UNRWA’s male staff “have ties to Hamas,” which is a far greater percentage than in the Gazan male population as a whole. Ten percent of school principals and their deputies were not just members of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, but leaders in both terror groups. That explains why schools were so easily taken over by Hamas and PIJ, with the pupils subject to endless anti-Israel propaganda, and the buildings themselves used to hide Hamas’ weapons and men.

Fully one-fifth of the Arab students in east Jerusalem who had previously attended UNRWA schools have now chosen to attend Israeli state schools, where the curriculum is not full of anti-Jewish propaganda, but follows the curriculum in Arab-Israeli schools.

Those named are a window onto the world of UNRWA staff who were also Hamas members and murderers. The Hamas commander in Lebanon was also the chairman of UNRWA’s teachers’ association. An UNRWA teacher boasted of the Israeli woman he took hostage on October 7. An UNRWA social worker was caught on CCTV footage dragging the body of a murdered Israeli and stuffing it into an UNRWA vehicle. There are, according to the IDF, at least 450 UNRWA staffers in Gaza, at every level, who are also members of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

Of the hundreds of millions of refugees created by conflicts since World War II, only one group — Palestinian Arab refugees — are uniquely allowed to pass on their refugee status to their children, grandchildren, and so on, making that status an heritable trait. No other group of refugees is similarly treated. Henry Kissinger was a “refugee from Germany.” His son David, born in New York, is not. Vladimir Nabokov was a “refugee from Russia.” His son Dmitri, born in Berlin, was not. And at the UN, there is one agency to handle aid for all refugee populations put together, with the exception of the Palestinian Arabs, who have another, separate agency — UNRWA — to cater to the needs of an ever-expanding number of Palestinian” refugees.”

How many UNRWA staffers must be identified as members of Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad — their names found by the IDF on membership lists of these terror groups before UNRWA is shut down in Gaza? How many UNWRA schools or hospitals need be discovered to have been hiding Hamas weapons and men before UNRWA is shut down in Gaza?

How many UNRWA teachers and social workers must be caught on camera dragging Israeli corpses or boasting of Israeli hostages they took before the world will acknowledge that Israel has not just a right, but a responsibility, to shut down UNRWA in Gaza and call for a new agency to deliver aid to its civilians?


Hugh Fitzgerald

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/why-israel-was-right-to-ban-unrwa/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel rejects 'biased' warning of famine in Gaza from Famine Review Committee - Reuters Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Reuters Jerusalem Post Staff

With some critics decrying a starvation tactic in north Gaza, Israel's main ally the US has set a deadline within days for it to improve the humanitarian situation.

 

Trucks containing humanitarian aid from Jordan and international communities transfers into the northern Gaza Strip, October 22, 2024 (photo credit: IDF SPOKESMAN’S UNIT)
Trucks containing humanitarian aid from Jordan and international communities transfers into the northern Gaza Strip, October 22, 2024
(photo credit: IDF SPOKESMAN’S UNIT)

Israel rejected on Saturday a group of global food security experts' warning of famine in parts of northern Gaza where it is waging war against Hamas.

"Unfortunately, the researchers continue to rely on partial, biased data and superficial sources with vested interests," the military said in a statement.

The independent Famine Review Committee (FRC) said on Friday in a rare alert that there was a strong likelihood of imminent famine in parts of north Gaza with immediate action required from the warring parties to ease a catastrophic situation.

Israel's military said it had increased aid efforts including opening an additional crossing on Friday.

39,000 trucks carrying over 840,000 tons of food

In the last two months, 39,000 trucks carrying more than 840,000 tons of food have entered Gaza, it said, and meetings were taking place daily with the UN which had 700 trucks of aid awaiting pickup and distribution.

Unloading of humanitarian aid destined for the Gaza Strip, transported via the maritime route from Cyprus to the Port of Ashdod. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)Enlrage image
Unloading of humanitarian aid destined for the Gaza Strip, transported via the maritime route from Cyprus to the Port of Ashdod. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

In a joint statement, the Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) and the IDF announced on Saturday afternoon that 11 humanitarian aid trucks entered the Jabalya and Beit Hanoun areas in northern Gaza on Thursday.

The trucks, containing food, water, and medical equipment, were reportedly brought to the distribution centers for the remaining population in Jabalya and Beit Hanoun.

With some critics decrying a starvation tactic in north Gaza, Israel's main ally the US has set a deadline within days for it to improve the humanitarian situation or face potential restrictions on military cooperation.


Reuters Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-828255

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Outrage, focus on Muslim migrants after Amsterdam ‘pogrom’ - Canaan Lidor

 

by Canaan Lidor

Some Dutch officials said that the attacks were due to unchecked immigration from the Middle East, while others avoided the subject of the attackers' identity.

 

Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof addresses journalists on the clashes that erupted after a Europa League football match between Ajax Amsterdam and Maccabi Tel-Aviv in Amsterdam overnight, on the sidelines of an Informal Meeting of Heads of State or Government of the European Union in Budapest, on Nov. 8, 2024. Photo by Ludovic Marin/AFP via Getty Images.
Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof addresses journalists on the clashes that erupted after a Europa League football match between Ajax Amsterdam and Maccabi Tel-Aviv in Amsterdam overnight, on the sidelines of an Informal Meeting of Heads of State or Government of the European Union in Budapest, on Nov. 8, 2024. Photo by Ludovic Marin/AFP via Getty Images.

Amsterdam police detained 62 people in connection with a series of antisemitic assaults against Israeli soccer fans, which resulted in five moderate injuries and about 20 to 30 minor ones, in the Dutch capital, the city’s prosecutor RenĂ© de Beukelaer said at a Friday press.

The five injured people were treated in the hospital and discharged, De Beukelaer said during the briefing with Femke Halsema, the Amsterdam mayor. 

Witnesses described about 100 men, whom they described as Arabs, assaulting Israelis in a coordinated manner on Friday morning. The country’s largest-scale antisemitic incident in decades has shocked many Dutchmen and especially Jews and Holocaust survivors, who said that it is a reminder of what led up to the Holocaust.

The Nazis occupied the Netherlands in May 1940. Less than a quarter of Dutch Jews survived the Holocaust, and the country has many Holocaust memorials, including a museum in the former home of Anne Frank, which is one of the nation’s most visited sites.

Friday’s incidents prompted Israel to send two airplanes to evacuate its citizens from Amsterdam, and the Israeli government told Israelis in the city to remain in their hotels and to remove signs that could identify them as either Jews or Israelis. The attacks also generated an international uproar, including by King Willem-Alexander, the Dutch ceremonial head of state.

“We must not look away from antisemitic behavior on our streets,” the king stated. “History has taught us how intimidation goes from bad to worse, with horrific consequences. Jewish people must feel safe in the Netherlands, everywhere and at all times. We embrace them all and hold them close.”

Israeli President Isaac Herzog stated that Willem-Alexander told him that “we failed the Jewish community of the Netherlands during World War II, and last night we failed again.”

“We see with horror this morning, the shocking images and videos that since Oct. 7, we had hoped never to see again: an antisemitic pogrom currently taking place against Maccabi Tel Aviv fans and Israeli citizens in the heart of Amsterdam, Netherlands,” the Israeli president added in his own statement.

Gideon Sa’ar, Israel’s incoming foreign minister, and Amir Ohana, the Knesset chair, flew to Amsterdam on Friday to help the embassy coordinate efforts to evacuate Israelis who decided to cut their stays short in the Netherlands.

Femke Halsema
Amsterdam Mayor Femke Halsema speaks at a press conference about antisemitic violence in her city on Nov. 8, 2024. Photo courtesy of the Municipality of Amsterdam.

Amsterdam police chief Peter Holla said that 800 officers had been deployed nationwide to prevent attacks on Israelis or Jews ahead of the events in recent days. He noted that before the incidents on Thursday night, there had been “small upheavals” involving Maccabi supporters, who he said had removed a Palestinian flag from a building facade and had “destroyed a taxi.”

A journalist asked at Friday’s joint press conference about the alleged provocations. “There can be no excuse for what happened,” the mayor said.

The incidents, which followed a match between the Ajax soccer club and Maccabi Tel Aviv, also drew a response from French President Emmanuel Macron, whose country is home to Europe’s largest Jewish community. France has also experienced a lot of antisemitism in recent months, and Israeli companies were banned recently from a defense fair in the country.

“The violence against Israeli citizens in Amsterdam recalls history’s darkest hours,” Macron stated. “I strongly condemn it and express my sympathy for the injured. France will relentlessly continue to fight against heinous antisemitism.”

Dick Schoof, the Dutch prime minister, called the incidents “utterly outrageous and abhorrent antisemitic attacks on Israeli citizens in Amsterdam.”

Christians for Israel, an international organization based in the Netherlands, lowered the large Israeli flag, which flies atop its Nijkerk headquarters, to half-mast in solidarity with those attacked.

“Last night’s attack chillingly echoes the events of Kristallnacht,” wrote Frank van Oordt, the group’s director. That such a violent hunt for Jews could occur again in 2024 in our capital city is both incomprehensible and unacceptable.”

Halsema, the Amsterdam mayor, said that “we have seen an outburst of antisemitism tonight, and it is very unlike Amsterdam.”

“Telegram groups where a Jew-hunt is being discussed,” she said. “It’s so shocking. I am furious and I’m expressing, in the city’s name, the harshest condemnations over what happened.”

“I’m ashamed of the behavior of rioters and criminals,” she added.

A journalist asked at the press conference if Halsema had a comment on the accounts of victims, who said that all of the perpetrators looked Middle Eastern.

“This is an issue that needs to be researched. The background and ethnicity of people, that’s not something I can comment on right now, nor do I want to,” she said. (Halsema is a former leader of D66, a pro-immigration, left-leaning party.)

Geert Wilders, leader of the largest political party in the Netherlands, the Party for Freedom, which is right-leaning, showed no such reservations.

In a series of furious posts on social media, Wilders, a strident critic of immigration and Islam, referenced the alleged ethnicity of the perpetrators repeatedly.

“A pogrom in the streets of Amsterdam. We have become the Gaza of Europe. Muslims with Palestinian flags hunting down Jews. I will not accept that. Never,” he wrote. “The authorities will be held accountable for their failure to protect the Israeli citizens. Never again.”

“We weren’t allowed to speak of Islam as the source of antisemitism, and they didn’t deport criminals. Now we have Jew hunts in Amsterdam,” he added in another post.

Wilders, a passionate supporter of Israel whose party is a senior coalition member, called for the perpetrators to be deported.

The incident, which happened shortly before the anniversary of the Nov. 9-10, 1938 Nazi pogrom called Kristallnacht, comes amid polarizing debate in Europe about Muslim immigration.

In September, Marjolein Faber, the minister of asylum and migration who is part of Wilder’s party, unveiled a plan that she called “the strictest asylum policy ever.”

“We need to change course,” she said. “We are taking measures to make the Netherlands as unattractive as possible for asylum seekers.”

The Party for Freedom received the highest number of vote in the 2023 elections, amid widespread dissatisfaction with mass immigration, primarily from Muslim countries.

On Sunday, an overwhelming majority of lawmakers in the lower house of Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, passed a resolution that for the first time named Muslim antisemitism as a driver of that phenomenon.

Yanki Jacobs, a prominent Dutch Chabad rabbi from Amsterdam, urged Muslim community leaders to speak out against the assaults. “I think at this moment, Muslim faith leaders need to condemn this vocally,” he told JNS. “I will be asking them to do so today.”

The incidents in Amsterdam prompted a slew of condemnations from Jewish organizations.

Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center in Jerusalem, expressed “profound concern and solidarity with the victims of
last night’s unprovoked attack on Jews.”

“Antisemitism cannot be thwarted by words alone,” stated Dani Dayan, Yad Vashem’s chair. “We call upon world leaders to recognize and take immediate and decisive action to fight against antisemitism and hate before the disease metastasizes to catastrophic proportions. History has shown us that we cannot afford to be complacent in the face of antisemitism.”

Ronald S. Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress, stated that the “unprovoked violence—resulting in serious injuries and reports of missing persons—has not only shaken the Israeli and Dutch Jewish communities but underscores the global resurgence of antisemitism that continues to metastasize across societies worldwide.”

“We are horrified by the organized and vicious antisemitic attack on Israelis in Amsterdam,” the Orthodox Union stated. “Coming days before the anniversary of Kristallnacht, it is time for world leaders and individuals of conscience to recognize that brazen attacks against Jews is what protestors are calling for when they chant ‘globalize the intifada.'”

The Jewish Federations of North America stated that it is “horrified and outraged at the hate-filled antisemitic attacks in Amsterdam, in which anti-Israel mobs terrorized and beat Israelis and Jews trying to enjoy a soccer game.”

“This modern-day pogrom, just two days before the anniversary of Kristallnacht, should make it clear that the entire world must act now to condemn and prosecute to the fullest all the perpetrators and take every necessary step to protect the Jewish community,” the Federations said. ” We are in close contact with our partners in Israel and The Jewish Agency for Israel as we continue our commitment to the security of Jewish communities around the world.”

The Center for Information and Documentation on Israel, or CIDI, called for “concrete measures” to be taken to prevent such events from recurring.

The Combat Antisemitism Movement warned that tolerating such incidents would cause Jews to leave Europe. “Europe should remember this: Jews won’t wait around like they did in 1939. They’ll leave, leaving you to deal with the extremism that has been allowed to fester,” Sacha Roytman Dratwa, the group’s CEO, wrote.


Canaan Lidor

Source: https://www.jns.org/outrage-focus-on-muslim-migrants-after-amsterdam-pogrom/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Peace in the Middle East: The First Step - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

It is crucial to recognize that the core ideological mission of the Iranian regime — using religion as a pretext to seize power by force — is deeply ingrained and is not going to change.

 

  • Over the decades, Iran's regime has embedded itself deeply within the region's crises, stoking unrest and sponsoring terrorism. If the Middle East is to see any genuine peace and stability, a transformation of Iran's regime is essential.

  • Without addressing the regime at the core, these threats will only intensify, especially when Iran acquires nuclear weapons... weeks away.

  • Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution orchestrated by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Israel has been regarded as a cancerous tumor to be wiped off the map.

  • [O]nly Israel has demonstrated the courage and determination to confront the Iranian regime head-on, recognizing it as the "tumor" that fuels much of the region's instability.

  • It is crucial to recognize that the core ideological mission of the Iranian regime — using religion as a pretext to seize power by force — is deeply ingrained and is not going to change. For years, Iran's regime has not only been attacking its own citizens, especially women, and it has even been executing children. In the first six months of 2024 alone, "Iranian authorities executed 249 people" and an additional 166 people just in October.

  • A regime that treats its own people this way is not likely to treat anyone else any better.

  • The system in Iran was founded on principles aimed at "exporting the revolution" and imposing an Islamist governance structure across other nations. This ideological commitment is even enshrined in Iran's constitution...

  • Notably, during significant waves of protests in recent years, the Obama and Biden-Harris administrations remained silent, offering no substantial support to the people risking their lives for freedom.

  • Often, Western countries have chosen to overlook Iran's human rights abuses and advances in military power: they might interfere with profitable trade.

  • If these Western nations lack the will to fight the Iranian regime directly, then they should, at the very least, provide Israel with the necessary support — economically, militarily and politically. This is not an act of charity: supporting Israel in its mission serves their own interests.

  • Can the West set aside its hypocrisy long enough to stand with Israel in confronting Iran — this source of terror to them as well? If they cannot summon the nerve to act directly, then the least they can do is back those who do.

Over the decades, Iran's regime has embedded itself deeply within the region's crises, stoking unrest and sponsoring terrorism. If the Middle East is to see any genuine peace and stability, a transformation of Iran's regime is essential. Pictured: Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' Aerospace Force Amir Ali Hajizadeh look on as a Jihad missile is displayed at a parade in Tehran on September 21, 2024. (Photo by Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

To embark on the path toward sustainable peace in the Middle East, it is essential to confront a fundamental truth: without addressing a crucial first step, peace across the region will remain nothing more than an illusion. This first step lies in directly confronting and ultimately changing the root cause of much of the ongoing conflict, violence, and terrorism — namely, the Islamist regime in Iran.

Over the decades, Iran's regime has embedded itself deeply within the region's crises, stoking unrest and sponsoring terrorism. If the Middle East is to see any genuine peace and stability, a transformation of Iran's regime is essential.

For nearly forty years, the clerical establishment in Iran has perpetuated chaos by hiding behind a network of militias, terror groups and proxies. These groups, fueled by the Iranian regime, have not only sustained violence within the region but have also exported it worldwide. This network of terror has become a vast and complex threat, continuously multiplying and growing in strength and influence. Without addressing the regime at the core, these threats will only intensify, especially when Iran acquires nuclear weapons, which are, according to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in July, weeks away.

Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution orchestrated by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Israel has been regarded as a cancerous tumor to be wiped off the map. The message has been "Death to Israel" and "Death to America." As The Atlantic noted, "When Iran Says Death to Israel, It Means It."

Among all the nations affected by Iran's expansionist and violent ideology, however, only Israel has demonstrated the courage and determination to confront the Iranian regime head-on, recognizing it as the "tumor" that fuels much of the region's instability.

Israel's mission does not stop there. Israel is also fighting Iran's proxies, Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Houthis. This dual approach targets both the root and its extensions — the entire problem — rather than merely containing parts of it.

If Israel's allies would support this courageous mission instead of abandoning Israel, the region could see a quicker resolution to the Iranian threat, benefiting all those under its shadow.

It is crucial to recognize that the core ideological mission of the Iranian regime — using religion as a pretext to seize power by force — is deeply ingrained and is not going to change. For years, Iran's regime has not only been attacking its own citizens, especially women, and it has even been executing children. In the first six months of 2024 alone, "Iranian authorities executed 249 people" and an additional 166 people just in October.

A regime that treats its own people this way is not likely to treat anyone else any better.

The system in Iran was founded on principles aimed at "exporting the revolution" and imposing an Islamist governance structure across other nations. This ideological commitment is even enshrined in Iran's constitution, which states:

"The constitution provides the necessary basis for ensuring the continuation of the revolution at home and abroad. In particular, in the development of international relations, the constitution will strive with other Islamic and popular movements to prepare the way for the formation of a single world community."

This radical ideology, foundational to its governance and ambitions, leaves little room for hope that the regime will self-reform or abandon its aspirations to dominate.

For decades, the Iranian people have yearned for change, courageously rising against the regime time and again. Yet, each time, the regime has met their demands for freedom with brutal crackdowns, deploying force to crush protests, imprisoning, torturing, and even killing those who dared to defy its rule. Iran has also, according to Amnesty International, poisoned thousands of schoolgirls with toxic gas, accompanied by calls for all schools, especially girls' schools, to be closed down.

Sadly, all these brave struggles for liberation often go unnoticed or unmentioned by major global powers. Notably, during significant waves of protests in recent years, the Obama and Biden-Harris administrations remained silent, offering no substantial support to the people risking their lives for freedom. This lack of international support has only emboldened Iran's regime, deepening the disillusionment of those within the country who seek freedom.

Now, Israel — a small but determined state — has taken on the colossal task of tackling what has been a forty-year nightmare of oppression for the people of Iran, the broader region, and even the world. Israel's commitment to confronting Iran is not only monumental but profoundly moral. Iran, its allies and its proxies will stop at nothing to destroy Israel. Israel's stand is therefore a significant moral statement against tyranny and terror. Israel's courage to face this "evil" is precisely what the Iranian regime fears most: it represents a force of resistance that challenges its ideological and military grip on power.

Western powers -- in their rhetoric — frequently champion democracy, human rights and justice. Yet, when it comes to confronting Iran — the root of most of the terrorism and violence in the region — they have shied away from taking bold action. Often, Western countries have chosen to overlook Iran's human rights abuses and advances in military power: they might interfere with profitable trade.

If these Western nations lack the will to fight the Iranian regime directly, then they should, at the very least, provide Israel with the necessary support — economically, militarily and politically. This is not an act of charity: supporting Israel in its mission serves their own interests.

Can the West set aside its hypocrisy long enough to stand with Israel in confronting Iran — this source of terror to them as well? If they cannot summon the nerve to act directly, then the least they can do is back those who do.

 
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a scholar, strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated analyst, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on the US Foreign Policy and Islam. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21104/middle-east-peace

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'We were ambushed': Pogrom in Amsterdam wounds several - Shir Perets, Mathilda Heller, Denielle Greyman-Kennard

  by Shir Perets, Mathilda Heller, Denielle Greyman-Kennard

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has sent two emergency flights to evacuate Israelis from the city.

 

Pro-Palestinians demonstrate at Amsterdam's Anton de Komplein square ahead of the UEFA Europa League football match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv on November 7, 2024.  (photo credit: JEROEN JUMELET/ANP/AFP via Getty Images)
Pro-Palestinians demonstrate at Amsterdam's Anton de Komplein square ahead of the UEFA Europa League football match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv on November 7, 2024.
(photo credit: JEROEN JUMELET/ANP/AFP via Getty Images)

Following violent attacks against Maccabi Tel Aviv fans following a soccer match between Maccabi and Ajax on Thursday evening, Israel's Foreign Ministry confirmed that all Israelis had been contacted, according to Ynet.

While police initially said they were investigating reports of abductions during the attacks, all missing Israelis have now been accounted for. 

Local authorities and Israel's Foreign Ministry have reported that ten Israelis have been injured so far in the pogrom, with consul members currently searching hospitals.

Authorities say that the situation has calmed down over the last hour, and Israelis have been instructed to shelter in place. A Dutch police spokeswoman said 62 have been arrested so far.

Before the pogrom, Sky News reported while citing social media footage, a small group of Maccabi fans were seen taking down a Palestinian flag.

Footage circulating on social media has shown fans being beaten, chased with knives, and narrowly avoiding being hit by vehicles. Eyewitnesses told StandWithUs that they had seen attempted stabbings, people thrown in a river, with extremists beating and spitting on Israelis. Dutch riot police were sent in to respond to the attackers.

According to Maariv, there has been at least one attempt at kidnapping an Israeli, and many have barricaded themselves in stores and buildings.

Israel’s embassy in the Netherlands is working to relocate Israelis to a safe location.


Shir Perets, Mathilda Heller, Denielle Greyman-Kennard

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-828103

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

FEMA whistleblower alleges agency official told relief workers to skip pro-Trump houses - Misty Severi

 

by Misty Severi

The employees were allegedly told in late October that they should skip houses of Trump supporters when canvassing in Lake Placid, Florida. At least 20 houses were reportedly skipped over the guidance, and therefore were not given the opportunity to qualify for FEMA assistance.

 

A Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) whistleblower on Friday filed a complaint that alleged that an agency official in Florida told disaster relief workers to skip houses that had pro-Donald Trump signs in the aftermath of Hurricane Milton.

The employees were allegedly told in late October that they should skip houses of Trump supporters when canvassing in Lake Placid, Florida. The guidance was allegedly communicated both verbally and in group chat messages, according to the Daily Wire, though the messages have since been deleted.

At least 20 houses were reportedly skipped over the guidance, and therefore were not given the opportunity to qualify for FEMA assistance. The whistleblower's allegations were confirmed by multiple federal employees, the outlet reported.

The guidance was allegedly given to a group of Department of Homeland Security volunteers who were part of a surge capacity force team. The employees offered to help FEMA with its disaster relief in the wake of two major hurricanes.

“I know they’re short-staffed, I thought we could go help and make a difference,” one of the employees said. “When we got there we were told to discriminate against people. It’s almost unbelievable to think that somebody in the federal government would think that’s okay.” 

The employee added that it felt wrong to discriminate against people who needed assistance, regardless of political affiliation or race.

“This behavior raises significant concerns of discrimination against United States citizens because of their political views,” a copy of the complaint obtained by The Daily Wire said. “These actions not only undermine the integrity of our agency and create a hostile work environment for those who may hold differing political beliefs but they also threaten the very democracy of our country.” 

A FEMA spokesperson said the person who was responsible for the order has been removed from their post, and that the staffer did not have the authority to issue the guidance and was not told to do so. 

“While we believe this is an isolated incident, we have taken measures to remove the employee from their role and are investigating the matter to prevent this from happening ever again,” the spokesperson told the outlet. "We are reaching out to the people who may have not been reached as a result of this incident. This is a matter that we take extremely seriously and we are doing everything we can to make sure all survivors receive support from FEMA."

"To date, we have helped over 365,000 households impacted by both Hurricanes Helene and Milton in the state of Florida and have provided over $898 million in direct assistance to survivors," they added.

Florida GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis on Friday ordered an investigation into the incident.

 
Misty Severi is an evening news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage.

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/fema-whistleblower-alleges-agency-official-told-relief-workers-skip-pro

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Islamism, the West and Human Rights - Nils A. Haug

 

by Nils A. Haug

The intent of jihadi state actors .... in their own words, appears to be the imposition of Sharia law and Islamic dominance over the world.

 

  • Sharia tenets – which have views of human rights, justice, mercy and compassion that differ from those of the West -- can appear alien to Judeo-Christian precepts. Sharia, in usage, often appears to contravene the basic humanistic values of the West.

  • The outcome is that, in application, the moral laws of each tradition -- that of the Torah as opposed to that of Sharia -- which prescribes harsh punishments, such as amputation for theft; death for leaving Islam (apostasy) or blasphemy, or being stoned to death for adultery, which can include having been raped -- are consequences inimical to Western ideas of justice, mercy and human rights.

  • By practicing a different faith, those who do not subscribe to Sharia are "disbelievers" (infidels), deemed to be in breach of "The Path" and consequently subject to a penalty of conversion, subjugation or death.

  • This is particularly true for Jews and Christians, who were offered opportunities to accept the gift of Islam but ungratefully declined.

  • "Slay the infidels wherever you find them..." — Qur'an, Sura 9:5.

  • The concept of universal human rights might seem quite strange to Islamists.

  • The intent of jihadi state actors .... in their own words, appears to be the imposition of Sharia law and Islamic dominance over the world.

  • That is why textual originalism in the interpretation of US Constitutional law is of particular concern to jurists. Emphasis on the original intent of the writers of the US Constitution rather than the fluctuating views of a succession of lawyers is of prime importance.

  • Reinterpreting the US Constitution can easily become like the children's game of "telephone": after a few migrations, the original intent of the founders could well become unrecognizable.

  • Western leaders find it difficult to regard religiously powered radicalism with the weight it deserves. "[I]t's precisely because it's religiously grounded that such radicalism is exceptionally dangerous." — George Weigel, First Things, January 31, 2024.

  • British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, during World War II, said in the House of Commons on June 18, 1940: "If we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age."

  • Although Churchill's statement also applies to Western nations at this time, Israel has been largely alone in the fight to preserve the West's Judeo-Christian ideals. It would be to the West's advantage for other nations to join Israel in this noble task.

The Torah's ethical and moral laws, which became known to the world as Moses' Ten Commandments, founded the West's moral-ethical precepts on which its laws and judicial concepts such as justice and mercy are based. This development is reflected in the United States' founding documents, as well as England's Magna Carta of 1215, among others. The concept of universal human rights might seem quite strange to Islamists. (Image source: iStock/Getty Images)

The Torah's ethical and moral laws, which became known to the world as Moses' Ten Commandments, founded the West's moral-ethical precepts on which its laws and judicial concepts such as justice and mercy are based. This development is reflected in the United States' founding documents, as well as England's Magna Carta of 1215, among others.

The opening paragraph of America's 1776 Declaration of Independence, for instance, refers to "the laws of nature" and "nature's God." From this assertion, the imperative of a sound ethical, moral and religious foundation for America's values was established. According to America's founding fathers, therefore, the laws of Moses – those moral codes collectively referred to as the natural law – underpin the value-based Western order.

The moral components of the laws given to Moses, says American scholar Leon Kass, are "an orienting aspirational guide for every Israelite and every human heart and mind." Adoption of Mosaic codes thus gives advent, in the West, to civilization as distinguished from barbarism. In terms of religion, the Jewish people generally value the underlying importance of the Torah to their community.

The emphasis on ethical and moral parameters might disturb many in the West, particularly those who hold a secular or atheistic worldview. Social unrest can take place, but the West has an obligation to protect its core principles of upholding the values of civilization.

Islamic values have not come from the West. They originated from the Quran and the Hadith -- the sayings and actions of Mohammed. Both works form the bases of Sharia, Islamic law. Sharia law in application can have severe moral and ethical requirements contrary to Western concerns of justice.

Sharia tenets – which have views of human rights, justice, mercy and compassion that differ from those of the West -- can appear alien to Judeo-Christian precepts. Sharia, in usage, often appears to contravene the basic humanistic values of the West.

The outcome is that, in application, the moral laws of each tradition -- that of the Torah as opposed to that of Sharia -- which prescribes harsh punishments, such as amputation for theft; death for leaving Islam (apostasy) or blasphemy, or being stoned to death for adultery, which can include having been raped -- are consequences inimical to Western ideas of justice, mercy and human rights.

The result of ethical and religious difference is seen in the motivation of the two primary combatants of the Gaza War, begun on October 7, 2023. Human Rights Watch released a report, stating that "Hamas-led armed groups committed numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity against civilians during the October 7 assault on southern Israel," and that Hamas had engaged in a "systematic" assault against civilians.

Unsurprisingly, these findings were rejected outright by Hamas, whose spokesman, Gazi Hamad, justified the killing of civilians: "Israel has no right to exist in this region." In other words, Israel must be eliminated, whatever the cost."

By practicing a different faith, those who do not subscribe to Sharia are "disbelievers" (infidels), deemed to be in breach of "The Path" and consequently subject to a penalty of conversion, subjugation or death:

"So, when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds." – Qur'an 47:4 (Sahih Translation).

This is particularly true for Jews and Christians, who were offered opportunities to accept the gift of Islam but ungratefully declined.

On January 4, 2024, Abu Hudhayfa al-Ansar, spokesman for the jihadist Islamic State - an offshoot of the transnational radical movement, Muslim Brotherhood (of which Hamas is a branch), called on devotees around the world to carry out mass slaughter. He said this would be vengeance for the people of Gaza:

"Oh lions of Islam, hunt your prey — the Jews, Christians, and their allies — in the streets and alleyways of America, Europe, and the world. Break into their homes, kill them, and torment them in every way you can."

This is precisely what took place in Israel on October 7, 2023, without mercy of any kind. Validation as found in the Quran's many verses urging the death of those who decry the core Islamic declaration: "There is no God but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet." Sura 9:5 reads, "Slay the infidels wherever you find them..."

The de facto leader of Al-Qaeda, Salem Al-Sharif, on July 16, 2024, wrote in his essay, "This Is Gaza: A War Of Existence, Not A War Of Borders" that Muslims should not take civilians as prisoners, as Hamas did on October 7. "Islam," he said, "tells us killing takes precedence over taking prisoners." In other words, they should not bother to kidnap hostages but simply kill them.

The recently assassinated leader of Hamas, Yahya Sinwar, said, "We will tear down the border and we will tear out their hearts from their bodies [and] eat their livers." Of the 101 Israeli hostages still being held by Hamas, only 51 are thought to be still alive.

The intent of jihadi state actors, such as Iran, Syria and Iraq, and non-state actors such as Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban, Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah, in their own words, appears to be the imposition of Sharia law and Islamic dominance over the world. "Iran's main goal," wrote the Middle East scholar Neville Teller: "Destroy the world as we know it, impose Shia Islam globally."

These groups seek to entrench Islamic law, often upon an unwilling populace and subjugate them to a life under the constant threat of penalty. Meanwhile, Hamas's political elite in Qatar, Lebanon, Turkey and elsewhere, became exorbitantly wealthy, enjoying comforts unavailable to the general population.

The concept of universal human rights might seem quite strange to Islamists. Sourced from the tradition of Moses' Commandments, articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights form the basis for international humanitarian law which in turn defines parameters of just-war and armed conflict. The precepts of Islamist fundamentalism are equally foreign to Westerners who live by the humanitarian values and principles of the Western democratic tradition, as founded on the Torah.

Establishing humanitarian values provides rights and obligations. Without this basis, the influence of ethics that include relativism and subjectivity, will temper the objective authority necessary for wide acceptance. That is why textual originalism in the interpretation of US Constitutional law is of particular concern to jurists. Emphasis on the original intent of the writers of the US Constitution rather than the fluctuating views of a succession of lawyers is of prime importance.

The reasoning is that there should not be a compromise on foundational truths, despite a diversity of moral and ethical convictions and a fickle social popularism. Reinterpreting the US Constitution can easily become like the children's game of "telephone": after a few migrations, the original intent of the founders could well become unrecognizable. Concessions could open a "Pandora's Box" of competing ideologies all striving for prominence. To avoid the relaxing of established human rights through fashionable ideologies is the task of the US Commission of Unalienable Rights.

In 2020, and on behalf of the Commission, former Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, declared the Commission's purpose was to "Ground our discussion of human rights in America's founding principles" -- those derived from the Judeo-Christian moral and ethical order, rather than those which might vary according to the spirit of the times.

This would be a concerning maneuver, yet US Secretary of State Antony Blinken made exactly those proposals at the most recent meeting of the Commission: he concealed, in his terminology, tenets of identity politics relating to race, gender and the like. It seems politicians cannot refrain themselves from manipulating foundational dogma for their own purposes.

Refutation of traditional human rights principles results in situations like that of September 11, 2011 in the US, and of October 7, 2023, in Israel. Free from all civilized constraints, yet averring religious convictions, Hamas revealed the malevolent spirit of their motivation: jihad, based on Sharia. Considering themselves independent of Western conventions of war and human rights, they had no hesitation in slaughtering civilians, without mercy.

Ideologies of holy war and martyrdom are underpinned by Sharia. Islamic jihadists believe they are doctrinally permitted to sow terror, death and destruction among non-Muslims wherever they operate, while ultimately aiming for the "Great Satan" (the United States) and Europe. To varying degrees, all Western -- and even some Muslim nations, such as the captive citizens of Iran -- are adversely impacted by jihadists seeking global domination over their religion and its Sharia laws.

While much of the West bemoans the increase in Islamist radicalization, they pay lip-service to "multiculturalism"; to increased military budgets; and to preparedness, despite looming internal and external conflicts. This is particularly true of Europe, which relies on the US, through NATO, to carry much of the burden for its military defense.

A pertinent reason for the wilfull "blindness" of the US and other major Western powers towards religious extremists, and their aberrant values, is that the West's foreign policies are based on an outlook which George Weigel refers to as "rationalist secularism." Western leaders find it difficult to regard religiously powered radicalism with the weight it deserves. Weigel concludes: "it's precisely because it's religiously grounded that such radicalism is exceptionally dangerous."

Iran and its proxies -- Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad -- and other Islamists are fully grounded in religious dogma, hence their glorification of a martyrdom that anticipates lofty rewards in the life hereafter. The late Fr. Richard J. Neuhaus, remarked about such an outlook:

"[W]e think it true to say that politics is, in largest part, an expression of culture, and at the heart of culture is religion."

Inevitably, the two major monotheistic religions of the world collide over issues of legitimacy (the biblical Creator or Allah), justice and other values (the Torah or Sharia), and transcendent truth (Judeo-Christianity or nihilist Islamism). On October 7, 2023, the confrontation between these two opposing worldviews was once again demonstrated in earnest with Israel not only as the focal point, but as a crucible for testing the resolve of Western powers in safeguarding their traditional values, culture and society.

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, during World War II, said in the House of Commons on June 18, 1940:

"If we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age."

Although Churchill's statement also applies to Western nations at this time, Israel has been largely alone in the fight to preserve the West's Judeo-Christian ideals. It would be to the West's advantage for other nations to join Israel in this noble task.


Nils A. Haug is an author and columnist. A trial lawyer by profession, he is member of the International Bar Association, the National Association of Scholars, the Academy of Philosophy and Letters. Retired from law, his particular field of interest is political theory intersecting with current events. He holds a Ph.D. in Theology (Apologetics). Dr. Haug is author of 'Politics, Law, and Disorder in the Garden of Eden – the Quest for Identity'; and 'Enemies of the Innocent – Life, Truth, and Meaning in a Dark Age.' His work has appeared in First Things Journal, The American Mind, Quadrant, Minding the Campus, Gatestone Institute, Anchoring Truths, Jewish Journal, and elsewhere.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21088/islamism-west-human-rights

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Judea and Samaria leaders hail Trump, eye sovereignty push - Josh Hasten

 

by Josh Hasten

Donald Trump's victory on Nov. 5 was widely welcomed in the area's Jewish communities.

 

A view of Efrat's Dagan (foreground) and Tamar (background) neighborhoods, near Bethlehem in Judea and Samaria, Nov. 10, 2020. Credit: Gershon Elinson/Flash90.
A view of Efrat's Dagan (foreground) and Tamar (background) neighborhoods, near Bethlehem in Judea and Samaria, Nov. 10, 2020. Credit: Gershon Elinson/Flash90.

Leaders and activists across the Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria were nearly unanimous in their response to the outcome of the U.S. presidential election: the defeat of Democratic candidate Kamala Harris by Republican contender Donald Trump.

Israel Ganz—head of the Binyamin Regional Council and Yesha Council chairman—celebrated with his staff by taking part in a festive toast at the Psagot Winery, as it launched a new special edition of “Trump” wine.

A new special edition of “Trump” wine launched by the Psagot Winery, Nov. 7, 2024. Photo: Courtesy/Psagot Winery.

“Trump’s victory is a great opportunity for the United States, Israel and the global community towards stability and eradication of the axis of evil that threatens the countries of the free world,” Ganz told JNS. ”The key is to radically change the policy of the previous administration in relation to Judea and Samaria; remove the sanctions [on Jews]; and apply Israeli sovereignty to this area, which is both geographically, strategically and biblically the essence of the land of Israel.” 

Ganz added that Trump’s win “will send a message of moral clarity to the world and a message to Iran and the entire axis of evil that it is no longer possible to destroy the State of Israel or place it within narrow, indefensible borders.”

Yaakov Berg, CEO and owner of the Psagot Winery, stated: “Especially in these complex days when the State of Israel is still fighting its enemies and losing its finest sons, we thought it was fitting to celebrate the victory of a true friend and lover of Israel, President Trump. We all pray that his victory will bring closer our complete victory over our enemies and the swift return of our sons and daughters to their homes.”

Attorney Marc Zell, a resident of Tekoa in Gush Etzion who serves as chairman of Republicans Overseas Israel, told JNS, “In the previous Trump administration, the secretary of state [Mike Pompeo] stated unequivocally that Jewish presence, settlement and development in Judea and Samaria is both legal and appropriate. The Harris-Biden-Obama administration rescinded this policy and reverted to the Obama-Biden administration policy, which treated Jewish presence in Judea and Samaria as an obstacle to peace and ‘illegitimate.’ This will likely change dramatically during the coming Trump administration—for the better.”

Zell explained, “This will mean that Jewish settlements will no longer be out of bounds for U.S. government officials and CODELS [Congressional Member Delegations], among other things. Also, the second Trump administration will not put pressure on the Israeli government to restrict the expansion or establishment of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria.” 

Zell also said he believes that the new administration “will likely repeal Biden’s Executive Order 14115 of Feb.1, 2024 which empowers the president to impose sanctions on foreign persons, including dual U.S.-Israeli nationals, who actively oppose the administration’s two-state-solution policy in Judea and Samaria.”

Zell and a group of attorneys have initiated litigation in a Texas federal court, seeking an injunction prohibiting the administration from involving the executive order. 

However, he said, “That litigation will likely become moot once Trump takes office on Jan. 20, 2025.”

Yossi Dagan, head of the Shomron Regional Council, told JNS, “I congratulate Donald Trump on his election as president of the United States and wish him success in his position. President Trump proved during his previous term that he is a true friend of the State of Israel and of the communities in Judea and Samaria, and we hope that he will again continue the support and recognition of our right to the land of Israel.”

Dagan added, “The time has come to deepen support for Judea and Samaria, expand construction and pave the way towards a vision of full sovereignty. However, the ball is always in Jerusalem’s proverbial court. Our expectations and demands are directed solely at Israel’s prime minister, who has the duty and prerogative to build this country. I’m sure it will be much easier with such a supportive administration in the United States.”

Jewish Community of Hebron Director of International Affairs Yishai Fleisher told JNS, “The Trump victory will have an impact on the progress of Jewish life in Judea and Samaria, as well as in ancient cities like Hebron. This sends a signal to jihadists that they will once again be demonetized and that their path will not lead to success. It also sends a signal to the Jewish state that that our rights in the heartland will be recognized.”

Fleisher added, “The long efforts to resettle the ancestral homeland have made it clear that Jews intend to live here forever. However, the so-called Palestinian movement has eroded the clarity of Jewish rights in this land. Therefore, when Palestinianism is demoted, demonetized and exposed for the jihadist front that it is, Jewish rights can be reaffirmed.”

He went on: “The Trump administration must also recognize that the fight against global progressivism and global jihadism is at its doorstep on American campuses. It must strive to reclaim the minds of the next generation from Iranian, Chinese, Russian and Palestinian manipulation techniques that have infected these campuses. There is much to be done in the next four years, and we thank God for this opportunity. We are preparing ourselves for the challenge of engaging in many efforts to make the world a better place.”

The Sovereignty Movement, led by Nadia Matar and Yehudit Katsover, expressed equal satisfaction. A statement it released read, in part: “The Sovereignty Movement congratulates the American people on their election of Donald Trump as the 47th president of the United States in light of his blessed standing alongside Israel and his achievements and blessed actions on behalf of Israel in the past: moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights and his recent statements that the two-state solution would lead only to bloodshed.

“This election expresses the American nation’s positioning itself on the right side of history, the axis of good, standing resolutely and courageously against the axis of evil and standing with the State of Israel.

“The Sovereignty Movement wishes the 47th president of the United States, Donald Trump, that in his new term he will be privileged to spearhead among the nations the necessary, just and historic recognition of Israel’s sovereignty over its land in its entirety.”

Ari Abramowitz, activist, podcaster and co-founder of the Arugot Farms in eastern Gush Etzion, told JNS about his reservations.

“I’m happy about Trump’s victory; very happy,” he said. “In some ways, my concern is exactly how happy I am. I say this is because one of our greatest vulnerabilities here in Israel is not our enemies; it’s our friends.  

He explained, “Ultimately, it’s up to us to determine if we will take advantage of the new administration to charter a new, healthy, mutually respectful relationship with a friend and ally, or whether we will allow ourselves to fall, yet again, into an unhealthy, codependent relationship.” 

He concluded: “There’s no question that Trump’s presidency has the potential to be a tremendous blessing for Judea, Samaria and all of Israel.  We won’t be facing imminent arbitrary unjust sanctions; nor will we be imminently threatened with the unilateral establishment of an independent Palestinian terror state in our heartland. I just hope that we’ve learned our lesson as a nation, and we engage the new administration with a clear understanding not only of their value to us, but even more so, our value to them.”  


Josh Hasten

Source: https://www.jns.org/reactions-in-judea-and-samaria-to-u-s-election-results/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

What Hides Behind the FBI’s Allegations of Election Interference - Mike Robertson

 

by Mike Robertson

Why does the FBI and others focus on Russia’s alleged interference efforts, paying less attention to other dangerous actors like China and Iran?

 

The 2024 landmark election has concluded with a resounding victory for the Grand Old Party. With the newly acquired Republican majority in Congress and Donald Trump as President-elect, the United States is facing a pivotal moment that promises to bring long-awaited changes.

Interference Anxiety

In the months and days leading up to the election, the outcome was far from certain. Polls showed a dead heat between Trump and Harris, with only a marginal difference, and even prominent pundits were unable to predict a winner. Having experienced election interference controversies in 2016 and 2020, Americans were fearful that this year’s voting process would be marred by similar issues. This anxiety was further fueled by numerous statements from high-ranking politicians and government agencies alleging attempts to influence the presidential election.

Back in May, Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, claimed that the 2024 election would likely be the most targeted by malicious foreign actors in American history. He warned that our adversaries would be increasingly aggressive and sophisticated in their influence operations.

Despite the committee hearing’s broad examination of foreign actors’ potential election interference, the discussion was largely focused on Russia’s efforts. Such reasoning raises questions as the 2016 allegations on Russia-Trump connections turned out to be baseless. Furthermore, a thorough investigation on Putin’s meddling found there was little or no real effect. Considering Russia’s significantly diminished capabilities following its troubled invasion of Ukraine and the technological and financial limitations imposed by sanctions, it’s possible that Russia’s potential is overestimated.

Later, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) together with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) issued numerous statements about suspicious online activity aimed at soiling the Democrat party’s presidential effort. In September and October those claims concerned controversial videos soiling particular candidates and raising issues like illegal voting. Specifically, they accused Tim Walz of sexual misconduct and showed non-citizens casting early votes. According to authorities, the content used either fabricated information or deepfake technologies. The videos allegedly originated from Russia-linked actors.

A day before the general election, November 4, a joint statement from the FBI, and the ODNI, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) reported on detecting influence operations aimed to undermine public confidence in voting integrity. Just like months before, Russia was declared the most active threat.

One-Sided Threat

Now, when the pivotal election has resulted in a win for the country-saving force, the consistent accusations of meddling look more unusual than before. Certainly, these warnings played an important role hours before the decisive voting and encouraged people to go to polling places and cast a vote in person. However, there is a strong feeling that something is wrong.

Suddenly, it raises concerns about why government agencies doubled down on interference allegations? Why does the FBI and others focus on Russia’s efforts, paying less attention to other dangerous actors like China and Iran? These adversaries of ours are actually mentioned in numerous reports, but still their activities seem to be lacking thorough investigation.

On November 3, Tulsi Gabbard (now officially a Republican), accused the FBI of covering the Iranian interference efforts—a prominent GOP female politician claims Tehran attempted to undermine Trump’s campaign by cyber and information operations, and the responsible American agencies did insufficient work (if any) to investigate.

This year, the FBI, top Democrat lawmakers, and mainstream media sounded the alarm over Russia’s meddling, often exaggerating its significance while devoting less attention to equally pressing threats from other countries. One possible explanation for this disparity is that the controversy surrounding Russian interference, which has been extensively discussed since 2016, has become a more familiar and tangible concern than the less visible efforts of China and Iran. It’s possible that the widespread perception that Russia’s malicious activities are intended to support Trump has become an ingrained narrative, an idea which has been refuted many times now.

What the Meddling Accusations Really Hide

One might think that constant warnings and reports on interference are not meant to strengthen the election integrity. It looks as if somebody relentlessly wants us, the people, to believe the voting could have been compromised because of foreign actors’ activities. In that case, those who spread the “meddled election” narrative might mean the outcome of the vote is wrong and the winner is wrong too.

The 2024 Democrat campaign proved to be too aggressive toward both the GOP standard-bearer and his supporters. Recall the terrible “Nazi” and “garbage” rhetoric that is openly offensive and discriminatory. Ironically, that all comes from the party claiming it is dedicated to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ideas. Harris’s overwhelming confidence in success, with unbelievably massive financial capabilities of $1 billion received donations, endorsements from top-tier artists as well as media and tech corporations, and still the Dems suffered a devastating defeat.

After having created a virtual sense of landslide victory among supporters, the Democrats failed to change the reality, where at least half the country voted Republican. There is a feeling that Harris’s HQ was fooled by its own rhetoric, underestimating the level of support for Trump. However, when reality defies expectations, it can be difficult to accept what you have been relentlessly denying. Maybe this is the real reason the Democrat-supportive FBI and other agencies made consistent claims on the election interference to lay the groundwork for one more explanation why the things went wrong and the voting proved America is tired of that kind of BLUE and now has drastically turned RED.

Tim Evanson, CC BY-SA 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode.en>, via Wikimedia Commons

Image: Tim Evanson, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons, unaltered.

 
Mike Robertson

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/11/what_hides_behind_the_fbi_s_allegations_of_election_interference.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter