Saturday, January 13, 2024

Measuring Decline in Real Time: America’s $34 Trillion National Debt - Thaddeus G. McCotter

 

by Thaddeus G. McCotter

The political truism remains valid: politicians spend other people’s money to get votes. Unless and until the citizenry decides to vote against such candidates, the spending spree will proceed.

 

 

During the founding of the American Republic’s revolutionary experiment in self-government, its architects looked to antiquity for guidance.  The Athenian city-state and the Roman republic provided instructional inspiration and cautionary tales.

At their peaks, both Athens and Rome possessed many virtues, principles, and practices worthy of emulation by new generations of free peoples.  Yet both civilizations declined and fell.  Practical people, America’s founders sought to build upon the proven foundations of antiquity’s achievements while remaining cognizant of and determined to avoid the pitfalls that led to the collapse of both, notably the cultural declines that enervated their capacities to avoid their demises.

Still, they understood there was only so much one generation—even the founding one—could do to promote and protect the new republic from the fates of Athens and Rome.  As Ben Franklin cautioned Elizabeth Willing Powel and future generations at the time: “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Today, it is commonly understood among the citizenry how the federal government measures everything in monetary amounts.  The extent or dearth of political “effectiveness,” “leadership,” “progress,” and “compassion”—all are “evidenced” and measured by the amount of money spent (and/or taxed and raised) for an undertaking.  The citizenry is far less aware that we can measure America’s decline in real time.

Last April, I wrote about our nation’s $31.5 trillion national debt, and the dire consequences it will wreak.  Less than a year later, our revolutionary experiment in self-government has amassed a $34 trillion national debt, and every sign points to this astronomical debt—and our cultural abasement—accelerating.

Per Breitbart:

The national debt eclipsed $34 trillion several years sooner than pre-pandemic projections.  The Congressional Budget Office’s January 2020 projections had gross federal debt eclipsing $34 trillion in fiscal year 2029…

“So far, Washington has been spending money as if we had unlimited resources,” said Sung Won Sohn, an economics professor at Loyola Marymount University.  “But the bottom line is there is no free lunch,” he said, “and I think the outlook is pretty grim.”

The political truism remains valid: politicians spend other people’s money to get votes.  Unless and until the citizenry decides to vote against such candidates, the spending spree will proceed.  True, many voters decry the national debt, and this causes many politicians to vow to reduce the debt.  But whether such vows are sincerely held or lip service, one stark fact remains: both Republicans and Democrats are talking about reducing by billions a national debt in the trillions.  There is no politically palatable plan anywhere to systematically eliminate the national debt altogether, as it grows all the while.  Bluntly, despite its unconscionable immensity, the national debt has yet to make life palpably painful for voters.  Ergo, the deeper question arises: Why doesn’t dumping this crushing debt burden on future generations constitute an intolerable situation for today’s generation of Americans?

It is due to the decline of American culture—again, one we can measure in real time with every dollar—that our national debt bloats.

There was a cultural shift caused by the advent of credit, wherein Americans became increasingly inured to carrying massive levels of personal debt.  Past generations of Americans raised to save money before spending it would be revulsed by the current “joke” that a “winner” is someone who dies in debt and screws their creditors.  Little wonder, then, that most Americans today don’t blanch at the fact that the national debt equates to roughly $100,000 per citizen.  Of course, if living in personal debt was no longer a cause of concern, it would be even less of a concern to citizens if the abstract Leviathan in Washington (and its smaller siblings in state capitols) carried debts, no matter how massive.

Within this mindset, one can see parallels between the cultural declines and ultimate demise of Athens and Rome and our own perilous position.  A declining culture is bent upon immediate gratification, believes itself entitled to the fruits of other people’s labors, and considers following moral, ethical, and legal precepts as being for suckers, especially if they bar the indulgence of selfish whims and desires.

In essence, it is a solipsistic sense of living solely for the present.  The devolution of courage into contentment, duty into indulgence, sacrifice into avarice—all abet the transmogrification of a virtuous republic seeking to form a more perfect union into a venal cauldron of self-entitled mendicants demanding the satiation of their sundry desires.  Or, as Franklin might have understood it: one’s pursuit of happiness has trampled one’s duty to form a more perfect union.

In this cultural decline, a cruel, patent irony exists: this generation of Americans has not been spoiled by their success; they have been spoiled by other generations of Americans’ success.

So, here we are.  But where will we be?

Again, Breitbart:

When it could turn into a more dire situation, is anyone’s guess, says Shai Akabas, director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, “but if and when that happens, it could mean very significant consequences that occur very quickly.”

“It could mean spikes in interest rates.  It could mean a recession that leads to lots more unemployment.  It could lead to another bout of inflation or weird going on with consumer prices – several of which are things that we’ve experienced just in the past few years,” he said.

Akabas said, “There is growing concern among investors and rating agencies that the trajectory we’re on is unsustainable – when that turns into a more dire situation is anyone’s guess.”

At the present pace, based upon the fates of Athens and Rome, we can hazard an educated guess.  As our culture continues to degrade, the citizenry and politicians will kick the can down the road to civilizational decline until our cancerous $34 trillion national debt consumes our revolutionary experiment in self-government.  Best not to contemplate the gory details.

Is the die cast?  Is there a chance Americans will awaken and address the existential threat of the national debt?  You can measure those odds in real time, too.

An American Greatness contributor, the Hon. Thaddeus G. McCotter (M.C., Ret.) represented Michigan’s 11th Congressional district from 2003-2012, and served as Chair of the Republican House Policy Committee. Not a lobbyist, he is a frequent public speaker and moderator for public policy seminars; and a Monday co-host of the “John Batchelor Radio Show,” among sundry media appearances.


Thaddeus G. McCotter

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/01/13/measuring-decline-in-real-time-americas-34-trillion-national-debt/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

 

 

 

Thursday, January 11, 2024

Biden ‘Saves’ Democracy by Destroying it - Victor Davis Hanson

 

​ by Victor Davis Hanson

The Left is creating historic, anti-democratic precedents that will someday boomerang should Republicans win the November election and follow the new Democrat model of extra-legal politics.

 

When faced with the possible return of President Donald Trump, the current agenda of the Democratic Party is summed up simply as “We had to destroy democracy to save it.”

The effort shares a common theme: any means necessary are justified to prevent the people from choosing their own president, given the fear that a majority might vote to elect Donald Trump.

Sometimes the anti-democratic paranoia has been outsourced to state and local officials and prosecutors to erase Trump from the primary and likely general election ballots as well.

One unelected official in Maine, Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, is a Democrat, an official never elected by the people, and a non-lawyer rendering a legal edict. Yet she has judged Trump guilty of “insurrection.”

And presto, she erased his name from the state’s ballot.

Yet Trump was never charged, much less convicted, of “insurrection.”

The statute Bellows cites is a post-Civil War clause of the 14th Amendment. It was passed over a century and a half ago. It was never intended to be used in an election year by an opposition party to disbar a rival presidential candidate.

In the earlier case of Colorado, the all-Democrat Supreme Court, in a 4-3 vote, took Trump off the ballot.

In sum, just five officials in two states have taken away the rights of some 7 million Americans to vote for the president of their choice.

Note that Trump continues to lead incumbent Joe Biden in the polls.

Sometimes, indictments are preferred to prevent Americans from voting for or against Trump.

Currently, four leftist prosecutors—three state and one federal—have indicted Trump.

They are petitioning courts to accelerate the usually lethargic legal process to ensure Trump is tied up in Atlanta, Miami, New York, and Washington, D.C., courtrooms nonstop during the 2024 election cycle.

Their aim is to keep Trump from campaigning, as he faces four left-wing prosecutors, four liberal judges, and four or five overwhelmingly Democratic jury pools.

Yet all the indictments are increasingly clouded in controversy, if not outright scandal.

Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis campaigned on promises to get Trump. She now faces allegations that she outsourced the prosecution to an unqualified personal injury lawyer—her current stealth boyfriend who was paid handsomely by Willis’s office and traveled on pricey junkets with her.

New York partisan attorney general Letitia James likewise sought office on promises to destroy Trump.

She preposterously claims Trump overvalued his real estate collateral to a bank. Yet it eagerly made the loan, profited from it, and had no complaints given that Trump paid off the principle and interest as required.

Manhattan prosecutor Alvin Bragg is even more desperate. He is now prosecuting Trump for campaign finance violations from nearly a decade ago, claiming a nondisclosure agreement with a purported sexual liaison somehow counts as a campaign violation.

Federal special prosecutor Jack Smith claims Trump should be convicted of improperly removing classified documents after leaving office. In the past, such disagreements over presidential papers were resolved bureaucratically.

Joe Biden, for example, improperly took out classified files after leaving the Senate and vice presidency and stored them in unsecure locations for over a decade.

All of these prosecutors are unapologetic anti-Trump progressives.

Some have communicated with the White House legal eagles, even though Joe Biden is likely to face Trump in the November election.

Some prosecutors are themselves facing controversies, if not scandals. Some wish to synchronize their drawn-out investigations and indictments to hinder the Trump reelection effort.

At other times, the effort to neuter Trump is waged by his rival Biden himself.

He has hammered Trump as an insurrectionist and guilty of a number of egregious crimes against democracy—even as Biden’s own Attorney General has appointed a special counsel to try Trump on just those federal charges concerning the January 6 demonstrations, a dead horse that Biden periodically still beats to death to scare voters.

Biden periodically smears half of America who supported or voted for Trump as “ultra-Maga” extremists and “semi-fascists” who would destroy democracy.

Yet the more Biden and the Left weaponize the judicial system to prevent Trump from running, and the more Biden screams and yells that Trump supporters are anti-American and anti-democratic, the more Trump soars in the polls while Biden sinks.

The left privately knows that its historically unprecedented strangulation of democracy is increasing Trump’s popularity. But like an addict, it cannot quit its Trump fix.

In sum, the Left is creating historic, anti-democratic precedents that will someday boomerang on Democrats should Republicans win the November election and follow the new Democrat model of extra-legal politics.

Democrats are tearing apart the country in a manner not seen since the Civil War era—apparently convinced democracy cannot be trusted and so itself must be sacrificed as the price of destroying Donald Trump.


Victor Davis Hanson

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/01/11/biden-saves-democracy-by-destroying-it/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Words They Left, For Those They Left Behind - Hugh Fitzgerald

 

​ by Hugh Fitzgerald

More than 20,000 Israelis have given what Lincoln called “the last full measure of devotion.”

 


[SPECIAL JANUARY PROMOTION: Spend $50+ In The FPM Store And Receive A Free Copy Of “Final Battle” By David Horowitz.]

A story about several of the young Israel soldiers who have died in this war, defending their land and their people, has been posted here: “We Will Remember Each Israeli Soldier; Their Story Continues Our Journey,” by Pini Dunner, Algemeiner, January 5, 2024:

On October 7th, 19-year-old Corporal Naama Boni was serving in the 77th Armored Corps Battalion of the IDF. It was 7:00 am, and she was standing guard at the entrance of the Zikim military base just north of Gaza, soon after it had come under intense rocket fire.

“Suddenly, out of nowhere, dozens of Hamas fighters arrived at the base, on motorcycles, trucks, and tractors, armed with high-caliber rifles and RPGs. Minutes earlier these terrorists had broken through the Gaza-Israel barrier and raced toward the base, intending to take it over and murder all the soldiers stationed there.

“Naama called for reinforcements and was quickly joined by three soldiers who rushed to the gate without their uniforms on, and also by a member of the 13th Battalion of the Golani Brigade who had been stationed at the rear of the base. In the fierce exchange of fire that followed, Naama was wounded, as was her Golani colleague, and they both sought cover.

“It was at this point that Naama messaged her family. “I care deeply for all of you,” she texted. “I have a head injury, and a terrorist nearby might start shooting at me. I am now with an injured soldier from the Golani Brigade, and no reinforcements are available.”

“Soon afterward, she texted again: “There is a terrorist here who won’t go away. I can hear someone screaming, and it looks like someone has been killed.” That was her last text. Naama’s body was discovered later that day, when the invading terrorists were all finally killed.

“Naama’s text messages — which went viral after being shared by her family a few days after she was killed — struck a chord in Israel and around the world, giving human depth and background to Naama’s photo and name that initially appeared in the media after her death was announced.

“Since then, dozens of other similar stories have emerged. On December 3rd, 22-year-old Major General [sic] Ben Zussman, entered a building in Gaza with his unit. Inside they encountered Hamas terrorists, who began firing their weapons. In the ensuing gun battle, Ben lost his life, along with four of his comrades. The following week, Ben’s parents revealed a letter he had written to them, to be opened only if he became a casualty of war.

“I am writing this message to you on the way to the base,” his letter began. “If you are reading this, something must have happened to me.” What followed was both poignant and heartbreaking. “As you know, there is probably no one happier than me right now. I had the privilege of fulfilling my dream and vocation and you can be sure that I am looking down on you and smiling. I will probably sit next to Grandpa.” Finally, he added that if “God forbid” his family had to sit shiva for him, “make sure it is a week of friends, family and fun.”…

This was Ben Zussman’s valediction, forbidding mourning.

Adi Leon, an IDF Staff Sergeant of 20, also left a letter for his family. They received it after he was killed in a gun battle on October 31st, the first day of the ground incursion into Gaza. “I go out to fight this war with the knowledge that I am not certain I will return, but I believe with a full heart in what I am doing. We do not have another land, and now it is my turn to protect it and to avenge all the civilians and soldiers, the children, the elderly, and all the women who were defenseless in the face of the onslaught by Hamas. This is the education that my parents gave me. In this I believe. I hope I will be remembered. Adi.”

The letter gained widespread attention and was quoted by President Isaac Herzog. That same week, Adi’s aunt shared his favorite chocolate cake recipe, and that went viral too; people everywhere are now baking Adi’s cherished cake, with some even sending them to soldiers on the front-lines as a tribute to his memory…

Naama Boni, Ben Zussman, and Adi Leon are three of the IDF soldiers who died defending their land and their people, in this, Israel’s latest war of self-defense against a satanic enemy. There have been more than 20,000 Israelis who, in the four wars of survival fought by the Jewish state in 1948, 1967, 1973, and 2023, and in the half-dozen campaigns waged against terrorists, gave willingly what Lincoln called “the last full measure of devotion.” So far in this war, 170 Israeli soldiers have died in Gaza. More than 300 others were surprised by Hamas operatives and cut down in Israel on October 7. Many of those soldiers killed in Gaza have left behind words for those they left behind. I’d like to read them all.


Hugh Fitzgerald

Source:https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-words-they-left-for-those-they-left-behind/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Is Qatar, That Built Hamas's Empire of Terrorism, An Honest Broker? - Bassam Tawil

 

​ by Bassam Tawil

If Hamas released the hostages and laid down its weapons, the war would end tomorrow. However, with Biden and Blinken handling both Iran and Hamas's patrons in Qatar with kid gloves, Doha and Tehran have no reason whatever to stop it.


  • If the ruler of Qatar really wanted to end the hostage saga, all he has to do is issue an ultimatum to Hamas that if the hostages are not released within, say, 48 hours, he will expel all the Hamas leaders who are still in Qatar and stop funding and providing political support to the group. Arab dictators are not known to be merciful toward those who defy them.

  • Apparently, Qatar does not feel that it is under any pressure from the Biden administration to end the ordeal of the hostages.

  • If Hamas released the hostages and laid down its weapons, the war would end tomorrow. However, with Biden and Blinken handling both Iran and Hamas's patrons in Qatar with kid gloves, Doha and Tehran have no reason whatever to stop it.

If Hamas released the hostages and laid down its weapons, the war would end tomorrow. However, with President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken handling both Iran and Hamas's patrons in Qatar with kid gloves, Doha and Tehran have no reason whatever to stop it. Pictured: Blinken and Qatar's Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani at a press conference in Doha on January 7, 2024. (Photo by Karim Jaafar/AFP via Getty Images)

The Biden administration is evidently continuing to pretend that Qatar, the Gulf state that funds and sponsors Hamas, is an honest broker in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Qatar, in addition to the billions of dollars it has been pouring on Hamas, is still hosting several leaders of Hamas, the Palestinian Islamist terror group, whose members, on October 7, 2023, beheaded, raped, tortured, burned alive more than 1,200 Israelis and kidnapped hundreds more.

Not only is Qatar far from being a neutral mediator, it is massively biased in favor of Hamas and other Islamist terror groups, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria.

Qatar's Al-Jazeera Arabic-language television channel has long served as a central platform for actively promoting the messages of Hamas and other Iranian terror proxies in the Middle East.

In addition, Al-Jazeera has refused to broadcast interviews with Palestinians in the Gaza Strip who are critical of Hamas. In one instance, an Al-Jazeera correspondent in the Gaza Strip interrupted a live interview with a wounded Palestinian who was complaining that Hamas terrorists were hiding among civilians "instead of in their tunnels."

On January 7, exactly three months after the Hamas atrocities, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Qatar where, he said, he "discussed ongoing efforts to better protect civilians in Gaza and to get more humanitarian assistance to them, and to get the remaining [Israeli] hostages out and home with their loved ones."

Qatar, Blinken added, "was instrumental in the negotiations that led to the simultaneous release of more than 100 hostages, including American citizens."

Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, on the other hand, said during a joint press conference with Blinken: "Our main target purpose is the stop of this [Israel-Hamas] war and to avoid a bigger escalation in the region. We believe that the solution is to stop this war in Gaza."

Did he mean before more of his clients got killed?

Prior to his meeting with Blinken in Doha, the Qatari prime minister reportedly told the family members of six US and Israeli hostages that the killing of senior Hamas official Saleh al-Arouri in Beirut on January 2 has made efforts to secure a new deal more difficult.

Or was that just the most convenient pretext at hand?

Al-Arouri, one of the founders of Hamas's military wing, was responsible for several terrorist attacks against Israelis over the past decade – so much so, that the US had offered a $5 million reward for information leading to his arrest.

Since Hamas's October 7 assault on Israel, US President Joe Biden and other senior US officials have talked to Qatar's ruler, Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani, and other top officials in the Gulf state about the need to secure the release of all the hostages held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

The Biden administration's policy of pleading with Qatar has so far proven partially successful: In October, Hamas did release more than 100 hostages. However, at least 136 hostages, including children, women and the elderly, are still being held by Hamas, most of whose leaders are still based in Qatar despite reports that some had fled and gone into hiding after Israel's Mossad announced that they would be held accountable. Just this week Ismail Haniyeh appeared on TV from Doha.

The Qataris are now pretending that they do not have enough leverage with Hamas because of Israel's alleged assassination of al-Arouri.

The Biden administration is making a colossal mistake by relating to Qatar as an honest broker. Qatar is Hamas and Hamas is Qatar. Without Qatar's political and financial support, Hamas would not have been able to grow and remain in power for the past 17 years.

Biden administration officials appear not to want to know that talking to Qatar is tantamount to talking to Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis.

If the ruler of Qatar really wanted to end the hostage saga, all he has to do is issue an ultimatum to Hamas that if the hostages are not released within, say, 48 hours, he will expel all the Hamas leaders who are still in Qatar and stop funding and providing political support to the group. Arab dictators are not known to be merciful toward those who defy them.

The Qataris, however, have no reason to threaten Hamas: Qatar's leaders themselves are not facing pressure from the Americans and other Western powers. As patrons of the Muslim Brotherhood organization, the Qataris will do their utmost to protect Islamist terror groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah. Their ultimate goal is to spread Islam to all non-Muslims. Qatar, for example, introduced Islam to FIFA World Cup visitors using multiple electronic billboards in public places, like the ones in Times Square. Booklets about Islam were distributed and multilingual male and female preachers explained Islam's religion and "tolerance" to tourists at the Katara Cultural Village Mosque in Doha. Moreover, the hadiths (the words, actions, or habits of prophet Mohammed) were written on the walls of streets to attract non-Muslim visitors.

When the Qatari prime minister states that the killing of Hamas arch-terrorist al-Arouri has made efforts to secure a deal over the hostages more difficult, he is simply seeking an excuse to avoid inconveniencing his client.

According to Hamas, more than 22,000 Palestinians have been killed in the Gaza Strip since the beginning of the war. Why hasn't the death of so many Palestinians made it more difficult to reach a deal over the release of the hostages? Could it be because Qatar's mouthpiece, Al Jazeera, is effectively as much of a terrorist calling for Israel's destruction as are Hamas, Hezbollah, or Qatar's close ally, Iran?

After more than 12,000 Palestinians, including top Hamas military commanders, were killed in the Gaza Strip (again, according to Hamas), more than a hundred Israeli hostages were released. Why did the death of those Palestinians not make it "more difficult" to secure the hostages' release? Is it because Hamas orchestrates having as many of its own civilians killed as possible so that the international community will then blame their deaths on Israel?

Apparently, Qatar does not feel that it is under any pressure from the Biden administration to end the ordeal of the hostages.

Why hasn't the US demanded the extradition of Hamas leaders who are still in Qatar for their responsibility for the murder and abduction of US citizens on October 7?

Instead of removing the US's Al-Udeid Airbase from Qatar, or threatening to do so, instead, the Biden administration in early January quietly reached an agreement that extends the US military presence there for another 10 years. Now that the rulers of Qatar have secured another decade of US military protection for their corrupt regime, they will be even less incentivized to exert pressure on Hamas to release the hostages.

As for the leaders of Hamas, why should they make any concessions as long as Qatar allows them to continue living in their villas and five-star hotels in Doha?

The Qataris (and Hamas) must be amused at the attempts of Republican Senator Joni Ernst (Iowa) and Democratic Sen. Jacky Rosen (Nevada), who sent a letter to Biden asking him to put pressure on Qatar to strong-arm Hamas back to the negotiating table on a new hostage deal. Qatar's ruler has no need to worry: the Biden administration will doubtless ignore the senators' request.

Since 2007, after Hamas toppled the Palestinian Authority in the Gaza Strip and seized full control there, Qatar, together with Turkey, were the only countries to back Hamas. Since then, Qatar has transferred more than $1.8 billion to Hamas. Qatar's former ruler, Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, was the first state leader to visit the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip in 2012. Later, Iran also began funding and arming the terror group.

The relationship between Hamas and Qatar further strengthened in 2008 and 2009, when Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal was invited to attend the Doha Summit, where he was seated next to Qatar's ruler at the time, Emir Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani.

According to the Israeli daily business newspaper Calcalist:

"The Qatari funding for Hamas is divided into two periods. The first, in the years 2007-2014, when the Qatari government financed Hamas as it saw fit, far from any international supervision and control, and the second from 2014 until today when Qatari financing is done in coordination with Israel, the United States and the United Nations. At the same time, independent financing channels operate all the time in Qatar, ignoring the authorities...

"The one who is still assisting in the effort is Iran, which also has good relations with its Qatari neighbor. Qatari money has become synonymous with the building of the terrorist empire of Hamas, which has struck with all its force in Israel."

The Biden administration can perhaps learn from the Arabs how to deal with countries that sponsor Islamist terrorist groups. In 2017, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt severed bilateral relations with Qatar and subsequently banned Qatar-registered aircraft and Qatari ships from utilizing their sovereign territory by air, land, or sea.

The Arab countries cited as the main reason for their actions Qatar's support for terrorism and demanded, among other things, the closure of Al-Jazeera and its affiliate stations; expelling any members of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; cutting off military and intelligence cooperation with Iran; severing ties with terrorist, ideological and sectarian organizations including the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Hezbollah; surrendering all designated terrorists in Qatar, and stopping all means of funding for individuals, groups or organizations that have been designated as terrorists.

Instead of taking a cue from the Arabs, Biden and Blinken chose to coddle Qatar – the same way they catastrophically chose to coddle the Taliban in Afghanistan, Russia, China, Mexico and Iran -- even though it is the sole Arab country that protects the Hamas leaders responsible for the October 7 massacres.

The time to designate Qatar a State Sponsor of Terrorism is long overdue, and to move America's Al-Udeid Air Base to the United Arab Emirates or some other compatible location.

Qatar is not an ally of the US.

If Hamas released the hostages and laid down its weapons, the war would end tomorrow. However, with Biden and Blinken handling both Iran and Hamas's patrons in Qatar with kid gloves, Doha and Tehran have no reason whatever to stop it.


Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20297/qatar-built-hamas-terrorism

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Dutch companies refuse to publish billboards of Israeli hostages - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

​ by Jerusalem Post Staff

The billboard campaign was expected to be launched as part of a multifaceted public relations and diplomacy program surrounding the hearing in the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

 

 Posters designed for the billboard campaign throughout the Netherlands.  (photo credit: LAPAM)
Posters designed for the billboard campaign throughout the Netherlands.
(photo credit: LAPAM)

Companies in the Netherlands refused to publish billboards with pictures of Israeli hostages held by Hamas ahead of Israel's genocide trial at the International Court of Justice in the Hague.

The National Public Diplomacy Directorate, through the Government Advertising Agency, prepared a billboard campaign throughout the Netherlands to raise awareness for the release of Hamas hostages ahead of the trial at The Hague. 

The campaign was expected to be launched as part of a multifaceted public relations and diplomacy program surrounding the hearing in the International Court of Justice in The Hague in which South Africa has accused Israel of committing genocidal acts against Palestinians in Gaza. 

The billboards that were designed for the campaign present different pictures of abductees, mentioning their names and the fact that they are in captivity in Gaza, under the caption “He/She can’t testify today.”

The main message conveyed in these billboards is the fact that 136 kidnapped Israelis are being held captive by Hamas and are unable to testify at The Hague trial. 

The International Court of Justice on the day of the trial to hear a request for emergency measures by South Africa, who asked the court to order Israel to stop its military actions in Gaza and to desist from what South Africa says are genocidal acts committed against Palestinians during the  (credit: REUTERS/THILO SCHMUELGEN)Enlrage image
The International Court of Justice on the day of the trial to hear a request for emergency measures by South Africa, who asked the court to order Israel to stop its military actions in Gaza and to desist from what South Africa says are genocidal acts committed against Palestinians during the (credit: REUTERS/THILO SCHMUELGEN)

These are victims and witnesses to the acts of terrorism and crimes against humanity committed by Hamas, as well as to the war crimes Hamas commits every additional day the hostages are held in Gaza.  

Over ten companies were reached out to, and all refused

Over ten billboard companies were reached out to in The Hague, Rotterdam, and Schiphol Airport, but all of them refused to cooperate with the Government Advertising Agency. 

During the work with one of the billboard companies, the design and message of the sign were approved, but at the last moment, before the signs were supposed to go up on billboards, the billboard company informed the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit that the advertisement was canceled.

This billboard campaign is one of several public diplomacy and awareness campaigns that will take place in Europe over the course of the hearing.

The head of the National Public Diplomacy Directorate, Moshik Aviv, issued a statement saying, “The attempts at silencing the hostages' voices will be answered with a loud voice. Even in front of the court in The Hague, there are those who choose an aggressive and outrageous manner to take down an information campaign on hundreds of billboards throughout the Netherlands, including in The Hague.

The truth will prevail, and the State of Israel will continue to stand up for the justice of its path and tell the whole world the truth. We are running an unprecedented international information campaign. They will not be able to silence us.”

The CEO of the Government Advertising Agency, Moriah Shalom, said, “The publishers' refusal is a severe affront to freedom of expression and Israel's right to speak out in a loud voice against the terrorism that its citizens are suffering from. This is a crude attempt to silence the voices of the Israeli hostages, who were abducted during Hamas's murderous terrorist attack. Their right to be heard is beyond all doubt.”


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-781710

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Report raises questions about Qatar’s knowledge of Oct. 7 attack - JNS

 

​ by JNS

Doha had a lot to gain from the Hamas assault on southern Israel, Western intelligence officers say.

 

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani in Doha, Jan. 7, 2024. Photo by Chuck Kennedy/U.S. State Department.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani in Doha, Jan. 7, 2024. Photo by Chuck Kennedy/U.S. State Department.

Western intelligence officials interviewed by Politico in recent weeks say that Qatar, a longtime patron of Hamas in Gaza, may have had prior knowledge of the Oct. 7 attack on Israel.

“We’re still looking into it,” a top intelligence official from a major European country told the U.S. news site when asked if Doha had advanced information about the mass assault. The source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the issue, added that there was “smoke,” but no smoking gun.

Officials from the Arab Gulf state declined to comment on the article.

Other Western officials indicated that Doha had a lot to benefit from the Oct. 7 attack, principally in derailing U.S.-brokered normalization talks between its rival in Riyadh and Jerusalem.

“It is in Qatar’s interest to put obstacles in the way of the normalization process between Saudi and Israel,” one of the officials said. “Any refitting for the balance of power is going to undermine Qatar’s position as the top diplomatic player that can do everything.”

Qatar is under increasing scrutiny over its ties to the Hamas terrorist group as some U.S. lawmakers urge the Biden administration to toughen its approach to the Arab Gulf state, which recently inked a deal to extend the American military presence at Al Udeid Air Base, southwest of Doha, for another 10 years.

The leadership in Doha supports the Muslim Brotherhood, the Sunni Islamist movement of which Hamas is a branch.

Doha has also played an important role in mediating hostage talks between Israel and Hamas, which resulted in over 100 captives being freed in November. Another hostage agreement is being discussed. The official number of hostages still being held by Hamas is 136, some of whom are believed to have been killed in captivity.

Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani met in Doha on Jan. 6 with the families of Israelis being held hostage by Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

A new Qatari ceasefire proposal would see all hostages held by terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip freed in exchange for a complete withdrawal of the Israel Defense Forces and safe passage for Hamas’s leadership out of the enclave.

The Israeli Security Cabinet met on Wednesday evening to discuss the proposal, under which Jerusalem would allow Hamas leaders to leave for exile in an unnamed country, Channel 13 News reported.

As part of the proposed agreement, the hostages would be freed in several stages, the report added.


JNS

Source: https://www.jns.org/report-raises-questions-about-qatars-knowledge-of-oct-7-attack/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF exposes massive tunnel in Khan Yunis where hostages were held - JNS

 

​ by JNS

More than 300 tunnel shafts were located in the Hamas stronghold in southern Gaza.

 

Israeli forces during Gaza ground operations, Jan. 11, 2024. Credit: IDF.
Israeli forces during Gaza ground operations, Jan. 11, 2024. Credit: IDF.

The Israel Defense Forces expanded its operations in Khan Yunis both above and below ground in the past 24 hours, exposing a vast terror tunnel beneath the southern Gaza City used by Hamas to hold hostages.

“The tunnel was connected to an extensive underground tunnel network beneath a civilian area in the city. Millions of shekels are estimated to have been invested in excavating the tunnel and equipping it with air ventilation systems, electrical supply and plumbing. After investigating the tunnel, it can be confirmed that Israeli hostages had been inside the tunnel,” the IDF said on Thursday morning.

To date, the official number of hostages still being held by Hamas is 136, some of whom are believed to have been killed in captivity. The terror group abducted 240 people during the bloody Oct. 7 rampage across the northwestern Negev in which 1,200 people, mostly civilians, were murdered and thousands more wounded. One hundred and ten hostages, mostly women and children, were released in November as part of a ceasefire agreement.

Hamas’s senior leader in the Strip, Yahya Sinwar, who masterminded the Oct. 7 massacre, is believed to be hiding in the Hamas stronghold of Khan Yunis, where he has reportedly surrounded himself with a large number of living hostages.

More than 300 tunnel shafts have been located in Khan Yunis since the start of the IDF’s ground operation on Oct. 27, some of which lead to significant tunnels, tactical shafts, weapons storage facilities and combat areas, according to the army.

“So far, more than 100 tunnels have been destroyed and put out of use, in which, among other things, terrorists were eliminated,” the army said.

After two weeks of intense fighting, IDF troops on Wednesday gained control over the southern Gaza town of Khirbat Ikhza’a, a strategic focal point of Hamas terrorist activity near Khan Yunis, the military said.

Located less than a mile from the border with Israel, Khirbat Ikhza’a served as the staging area from which Hamas terrorists attacked the communities of Nir Oz, Nirim and Ein Hashlosha on Oct. 7.

Soldiers of the IDF’s 5th Brigade combat team destroyed Hamas infrastructure and killed dozens of Hamas terrorists during “Operation Oz and Nir,” which was launched in late December. In addition, some 40 attack tunnels were discovered and destroyed, the IDF said.

Nir Oz, a once-thriving community of 400 people, was among the hardest hit on Oct. 7. One in every four residents was either killed or kidnapped.


JNS

Source: https://www.jns.org/idf-exposes-massive-tunnel-in-khan-yunis-where-hostages-were-held/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Ray Epps gets probation! So much for the grand 'narrative' of 'insurrection' on January 6 - Patricia McCarthy

 

​ by Patricia McCarthy

The token charges and the slap on the wrist that followed, after what Epps was filmed doing, looks a lot like Epps's role was that of government provocateur.

 

Since that blighted day in 2021, many, many people have come to believe that what happened on Jan. 6, 2021, was a set-up, an event contrived by the FBI, DOJ and democrat radicals like Nancy Pelosi, for example.  

The committee to investigate what happened was a joke, an entirely partisan exercise to take out the most popular president since Ronald Reagan because he was, and remains, a threat to the deep state bureaucracy that actually runs the country.  

The evidence presented was cherry-picked, edited, the witnesses coached. That committee was pure show trial, reminiscent of  Stalin’s style of despotism. It had nothing to do with the truth.  It was all part of the Democrats’ grand plan to destroy Trump.  

Ray Epps’s all too obvious behavior that day was a fly in their ointment that they chose to ignore.

The left with malice aforethought latched on to the word “insurrection” from day one even though not a single protestor was armed.  Only the Capitol police were armed; only the Capitol police killed and injured people that day.  

From day one, the left’s narrative has been a lie carefully calculated to do the most damage to Trump and his supporters.  The public, to this day, has been denied access to the thousands of hours of video but a few documentary films are now available that show the violence of the police; it was the police who fired munitions into the peaceful crowd and it was the police, under-represented as they were, who beat several men and women caught in the crushing crowd.  Four people died, each a peaceful protestor. All the while, Ray Epps was directing people “into the Capitol.”  But he was never arrested or charged with a crime while people who only stood outside have been sent to jail.

Who is Ray Epps?  In the available videos, he is the guy in the red hat seen ordering people into the Capitol the night before and again that day.  

Initially, he was on the “most wanted” list but his name was mysteriously removed a few days later.  Why?  He is all over the videos we have now seen.  His text to his nephew takes credit for “orchestrating” the breach of the Capitol building.  He is seen whispering to one man who then tears down one of the first barriers.  

In short, it is beyond clear that Epps was part of the cabal that planned and executed the event to prevent Vice President Mike Pence from doing what he should have done, Constitutionally, to recount the votes in certain states where fraud was obvious.  

The Democrats could not let that happen.  

They had cheated in numerous ways, from fraudulent mail-in ballots, to voting machine issues, to rule changes, county clerk takeovers, and dropboxes funded by Mark Zuckerberg that we know for sure were stuffed with fake ballots throughout the nation.  

The vote counting was stopped on election night, most likely so additional ballots could be created for Biden.  Some Democrats, such as Time writer Molly Ball, bragged about how they did it as "the conspiracy to save the 2020 election."  They reveled in their cleverness.  There is a wholesale absence of ethics and morality among these leftists, thus a Ray Epps can be central to the crime and escape responsibility because he was working for the Democrats.

Meanwhile, hundreds of people have been charged, convicted and sent to prison for misdemeanors like “parading.”  Many have been held in solitary confinement for months without due process and are being quite literally tortured in a rat- and roach-filled D.C. Gulag and other prisons around the country.   

Matthew Graves, the prosecutor obsessed with punishing grandmothers who showed up that day, just announced he intends to continue targeting anyone who was even near the Capitol that day.  This is the stuff of Mao’s China.  

Biden has transformed the U.S. into a police state, one in which anyone opposing those in power is guilty of a crime. 

But back to Epps.  He was feted on 60 Minutes as if he was some kind of hero who was being unfairly accused of being a “fed.” 

Three years have gone by and he was not charged even though he is easily identified in numerous videos from that day, pretending to be a Trump supporter.  But as evidence of his calculated participation has become clearer and clearer, the DOJ had to make a show of justice being served.    

Epps has been minimally charged and given a sentence of a one-year probation, a $500 fine and 100 hours of community service.  You can be sure he will never bother to do that nor will he be held to it, and it's likely that his government handlers will pay his fine.  This is just a feeble, transparent attempt to pretend he was not one of the perhaps 200 government agents in the crowd that day who instigated the violence. Epps may well have been the leader of the deception on the ground.  He can be seen eventually leaving, followed by four or five of his operatives as the police-generated violence began to calm. 

The so-called Whitmer kidnapping plot has been proven to have been an FBI scam that recruited a group of minimal-IQ losers to participate in a kidnapping plot of the government's making; there is no low to which the FBI will not stoop to for political purposes.  

Michigan juries found a couple of them not guilty but sent a few others to jail. The FBI agents involved?  The head of the Michigan FBI field office who ran the team was promoted to D.C. right before January 6.  The storming of the Wisconsin statehouse was likely a dry run.  There were few charges after the many riots in the summer of 2020 despite billions of dollars in damage to cites throughout the country. Kamala Harris raised money to ensure the bail release of any rioters charged.

In short, this regime advocates for chaos and racial violence.  Ray Epps was clearly working for the government on Jan. 6, 2021.  The fact that there have been no charges against him these past three years until now, despite his obvious leadership participation in driving the lawlessness that day, proves it.

Image: Screen shot from The Hill video, via YouTube

 
Patricia McCarthy

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/01/ray_epps_gets_probation_so_much_for_the_grand_narrative_of_insurrection_on_january_6.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Georgia prosecutor's meeting with Biden officials the latest evidence of WH hand in Trump cases - Steven Richards and Natalia Mittelstadt

 

​ by Steven Richards and Natalia Mittelstadt

The Biden White House had previously worked with the National Archives and FBI to provide “special access” to Trump’s presidential documents.

The special prosecutor in the Fulton County, Georgia case against former President Donald Trump sent an invoice to the district attorney which included charges for meetings with the Biden White House officials, according to court documents, raising questions about the White House's involvement with criminal cases against Trump.

This revelation comes after Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor, and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis came under scrutiny because of the court filings which allege that the two have been engaged in an affair while the DA’s office paid Wade over $650,000 in legal fees since January 2022. 

The new information regarding the White House Counsel meeting with Wade also follows previous reports by Just the News that the Biden White House worked to facilitate “special access” for the FBI to 15 boxes of Trump presidential documents that he had returned to the National Archives. 

The new court filing, which is part of a Georgia case against Michael Roman, a Trump codefendant, shows that the special prosecutor met on at least one occasion with Biden’s White House Counsel. Wade indicated that this meeting was part of his travel to Athens, Ga., on May 23, 2022, according to an invoice that he submitted to the DA’s office. 

“Travel to Athens; Conf with White House Counsel,” the invoice reads. Wade charged the DA’s office $2,000 in attorney’s fees for the work.

The invoices provided in the suit show at least one more meeting with Biden White House staff, on November 18, 2022, that appears to have taken place in Washington, D.C., though there is no record of a visit by Wade in the White House visitor logs.  

“Interview with DC/White House,” the invoice reads. Wade charged another $2,000 in fees for this meeting. 

The November meeting with undisclosed White House staff was held just three days after Trump, the widely anticipated election opponent of Biden, announced that he was running for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination. 

You can read the court filing, which contains the invoices, below: 

Roman’s attorney, Ashleigh Merchant, filed the motion calling for the court to dismiss the criminal charges against her client, arguing that Willis “never had legal authority to appoint the special prosecutor, who assisted in obtaining both grand jury indictments.”

The motion also called for Willis and Wade to be disqualified from office and removed from the prosecution, respectively, because of an “improper, clandestine personal relationship” between the two during the case, according to the filing.

Merchant did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News about the court filings.

Merchant is interested in sealed court records that are a part of the special prosecutor Wade’s divorce, which may shed light on his alleged relationship with Willis. Merchant told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that she reviewed these filings and is asking a judge to unseal the case, arguing that they were improperly sealed.

Wade started his special prosecutor contract with Willis the day before he filed for divorce in Cobb County, Ga., in November 2021, but the filing was improperly sealed, the court document also states.

Willis hired Wade to prosecute Trump, and he has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees from January 2022 through December 2023, according to the court filing.

Willis’ office didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on Wednesday.

Willis spokeswoman Pallavi Bailey said that the district attorney's office would respond to the allegations "through appropriate court filings," The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.

Roman, the former president, and 17 other co-conspirators were charged under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, among other Georgia state counts, for their alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in favor of Trump.

Three former Trump attorneys, Jenna Ellis, Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro, as well as Republican poll watcher Scott Hall, have all pleaded guilty in the case, while all other defendants pleaded not guilty.

The Fulton County case is one of four ongoing criminal cases brought against Trump.

Meetings between White House staff and the Georgia prosecution team shepherding the Fulton County DA’s case would not mark the first time the Biden White House has been involved in an investigation against Trump. 

In the summer of 2022, the Biden White House also facilitated the criminal probe by the Justice Department into his predecessor by waiving executive privilege claims and directly requesting the National Archives to provide the FBI access to documents delivered by Trump to the agency. 

The memos, reviewed by Just the News, showed that President Biden’s then-Deputy White House Counsel, Jonathan Su, worked closely with the DOJ, FBI, and National Archives after former President Trump returned 15 boxes – which contained classified materials – to the Archives and helped facilitate FBI’s access.

The DOJ’s probe into Trump over his alleged retention of classified documents turned into a special counsel investigation and charges for the former President for allegedly mishandling the documents. 

"On April 11, 2022, the White House Counsel's Office — affirming a request from the Department of Justice supported by an FBI letterhead memorandum — formally transmitted a request that NARA provide the FBI access to the 15 boxes for its review within seven days, with the possibility that the FBI might request copies of specific documents following its review of the boxes," National Archivist Debra Steidel Wall wrote to Trump’s lawyers. 

After Wall explained Biden’s role in facilitating access to the documents, she also wrote that he had decided to “defer” to her determination about whether Trump enjoyed executive privilege over the documents. Wall ultimately decided “not to honor” Trump’s claims of privilege and provided the FBI access to the documents. 

The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.


Steven Richards and Natalia Mittelstadt

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/wh-officials-met-ga-special-prosecutor-latest-evidence-biden-intervention

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hunter Biden's art dealer gives latest evidence shredding WH narrative on Biden family finances - John Solomon and Steven Richards

 

​ by John Solomon and Steven Richards

Georges Berges tells Congress he did not communicate with the White House about an ethics agreement for Hunter art sales and that most of the first son's paintings were purchased by Democratic Party donors and at least one political appointee.

 

The Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation, until it wasn't. Joe Biden never met any of the family's business partners or got proceeds from the ventures, until he did. And now there was an ethics agreement to govern Hunter Biden art sales during the Biden presidency until the art dealer in the middle of those sales revealed there wasn't, at least to his knowledge.

Renowned international art dealer Georges Bergès, whose galleries range from Berlin to New York, and represents Hunter Biden as an artist is the latest figure to blast a hole into the Biden White House narrative about the millions the first family has collected. 

No ethics agreement shown to art dealer

According to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, Berges told Congress in a transcribed interview Tuesday that the White House never communicated anything to him about ethics requirements governing Hunter Biden's art sale and that much of the artwork he sold on behalf of the first son went to two Democrat donors.

"Georges Berges testified under oath that he's never communicated with the White House. He didn't know anything about an ethics agreement. So this is another lie that the White House has told the mainstream media and the American people with respect to the Biden family shady business games," Comer told the "Just the News, No Noise" television show Tuesday night.

This revelation came one night before House Republicans are set to hold a markup on a resolution to hold Hunter Biden in contempt of Congress for his failure to appear for the closed door deposition after he was subpoenaed by the Oversight Committee.

Neither the White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre nor spokesman Ian Sams immediately responded to a request for comment from Just the News.

Hunter Biden’s personal attorney, Abbe Lowell, also did not immediately respond.

Comer's committee released highlights of the art dealer's transcribed interview that confirmed Just the News' prior reporting on the art dealings including:

  • Presidential appointee and donor Elizabeth Hirsh Naftali bought Hunter Biden's art work, one piece before she was appointed to a federal commission by Joe Biden and one afterwards;
  • Kevin Morris, another Democrat donor who befriended Hunter Biden and became one of his lawyers, bought artwork too;
  • Biden fund-raiser Lanette Phillips helped arrange the initial relationship between Bergès art gallery and Hunter Biden that led to the sales.

Just the News reported late last year that federal investigators had confirmed that Morris, a respected Hollywood talent lawyer, had bought at least one Hunter Biden painting for more than $47,500 and also loaned the first son more than $5 million since Joe Biden began running for president. 

But, Comer revealed Morris' assistance to Hunter Biden was even larger because Bergès testified that Morris bought closer to $900,000 in paintings from the first son.

"It's very safe to say that your figure on Kevin Morris is probably somewhere around $6 million to Hunter Biden," Comer explained. "So that would include the loans and the artwork and everything else that we know of thus far. Now, Kevin Morris will have an opportunity to come in and explain that."

Morris is slated to be interviewed by Comer’s Oversight Committee in the coming weeks, according to Comer.

New tranche of evidence

Comer also told Just the News that his committee is planning to pursue a new tranche of evidence: all the financial records Hunter Biden turned over in an Arkansas paternity court case that was settled last summer. That case was the source of a portion of the evidence that federal investigators gathered to allege that Hunter Biden engaged in tax evasion. The first son faces nine federal counts in that case now.

Bergès’ lack of knowledge about the ethics agreement previously touted by the White House marks the latest in a series of misleading – or ever-changing – statements by President Biden, his administration, and political allies about the Hunter Biden story, the business dealings of Biden’s relatives, and the president's own personal benefits from the millions in foreign payments the family raked in.

In July 2021, about six months after Joe Biden was inaugurated, then-White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters that there would be an ethics agreement to govern Hunter Biden’s art sales while his father occupied the presidency.

“[A] system has been established that allows for Hunter Biden to work in his profession within reasonable safeguards,” Psaki told reporters at the time.

“But all interactions regarding the selling of art and the setting of prices will be handled by a professional gallerist, adhering to the highest industry standards. And any offer out of the normal course would be rejected out of hand,” she continued.

Biden had never sold a painting at exhibition prior to 2021. Alex Acevedo, 75, the owner of the Alexander Gallery in Midtown Manhattan told The Independent that "anybody who buys the president’s son’s work would be guaranteed an instant profit”, and added that is not entirely owing to Hunter Biden’s talent, saying: “He’s the president’s son. Everybody would want a piece of that." Acevedo also told the newspaper that if Hunter Biden were not the president’s son, his work would likely fetch around $25,000 to $100,000.

Bergès told the committee that a majority of Hunter Biden’s art was purchased by Democratic donors, which Chairman Comer called an “ethics nightmare” in a press release following the gallery owner's sworn testimony on Tuesday.

A pattern of changing the story

Previously, 51 former U.S. intelligence officials signed an open letter warning that the explosion of the Hunter Biden laptop story on the eve of the 2020 presidential election has all the hallmarks of a “Russian information operation.”

Following the election, it was revealed that the FBI had verified the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop as early as November of 2019, according to IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley. But, the damage had already been done.

At least one prominent signatory of the letter, Antony Blinken, now serves in the Biden Administration as the Secretary of State.

Previously, President Biden claimed, misleadingly, that he never met with his son’s business partners. “I did not. And it’s just a bunch of lies. They’re lies. I did not. They’re lies,” President Biden said in response to a question from the New York Post about his contacts with his son’s business associates.

Yet, Just the News has extensively documented meetings that Joe Biden had with his son’s business partners from a variety of foreign countries, including Ukraine, China, and Kazakhstan.

In 2014 and 2015, Hunter Biden organized two dinners with some of his European business associates with his father in attendance. Among Hunter Biden's partners who dined with Joe Biden were Russian oligarch Yelena Baturina, Kazakhstani oligarch Kenes Rakishev, and Burisma executive Vadim Pozharskyi – who functioned as Hunter Biden’s point of contact on the board of the Ukrainian gas company. Pozharskyi even sent an email to the younger Biden thanking him for being able to meet the Vice President the next day in April 2015.

Rob Walker, a longtime Biden family friend and business associate, also told the FBI in an interview that Joe Biden personally attended meetings with Hunter Biden’s partners, including one with China-based CEFC Energy and its top executive, according to testimony by IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley, the agency’s supervisory agent for the Biden case.

President Biden and his allies have insisted that the senior Biden never financially benefitted from any of his family’s business dealings, including those organized by his son, Hunter, or his brother, James.

These denials came to a crescendo when Hunter Biden appeared for a speech outside the U.S. Capitol in December, announcing his decision to defy the Congressional subpoena to appear before the House Oversight Committee and claiming that his father had no “financial involvement” in his foreign business deals.

“Let me state as clearly as I can: my father was not financially involved in my business, not as a practicing lawyer, not as a board member of Burisma, not in my partnership with a Chinese private businessman, not in my investments at home nor abroad, and certainly not as an artist,” Biden told the assembled reporters, his lawyers Kevin Morris and Abbe Lowell in tow.

The documentary evidence keeps mounting despite denials

Yet, the Oversight Committee has uncovered bank records that both Hunter and James Biden sent money to Joe Biden which coincided with payments from Chinese companies.

The records show that at least one payment of $1,380 was sent from Hunter Biden’s Owasco PC to Joe Biden in September 17, 2018, Just the News reported in December. At the time, Hunter Biden’s Owasco PC account was receiving payments from Hudson West III, a joint venture set up with executives from CEFC China Energy—a Chinese company that sent at nearly $5 million to the first son over the course of their partnership.

In addition, a $40,000 check from James Biden to Joe Biden was linked by the Oversight Committee to a larger payment that the President’s brother received from the network of companies connected to CEFC. A Chinese company connected to CEFC sent $5 million in August 2017 to Hunter Biden's company, according to the committee.

Later that month, Hunter Biden wired $150,000 to Lion Hall Group, a company owned by Joe Biden's brother, James Biden, and his sister-in-law Sara Biden, evidence shows. Days later, Sara Biden took out $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall Group and then deposited it into her and James Biden's personal account that same day. The following week, Sara Biden sent a $40,000 check to Joe Biden marked as a "loan repayment,” Just the News previously reported citing the bank records obtained by the committee.

 
John Solomon and Steven Richards

Source: https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/art-dealer-latest-poke-holes-white-house-narrative-biden-family

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter