Thursday, December 30, 2021

Soccer fans filmed singing about killing Jews in Belgium - Cnaan Liphshitz/JTA

 

by Cnaan Liphshitz/JTA

Dozens of soccer fans chant about support for Hamas, gassing and burning Jews.

Dozens of soccer fans in Antwerp, Belgium, were filmed giving Nazi salutes while chanting about Hamas and gassing and burning Jews.

Police are investigating the videos, which appeared on social media earlier this week. The incident appeared to have taken place at or outside Café Stadion, a restaurant near a soccer stadium.

The men chanted: “My father was in the commandos, my mother was in the SS, together they burned Jews ’cause Jews burn the best,” as well as “Hamas, Jews to the gas” while making the Nazi salutes. They appear to be fans of the Beerschot soccer team of Antwerp, the Gazet van Antwerpen reported.

Such soccer chants occur regularly in Europe, and in the Netherlands and Belgium especially, ahead of matches between teams that fans of rival soccer clubs label as “Jewish.” Sometimes, as in the case of the Ajax team of Amsterdam, supporters of those teams call themselves and their teams Jewish.

But in recent years, these soccer chants increasingly have been occurring also outside the context of sports, including at a graduation party of high school students in the Netherlands in 2016.

Separately, the ethics board of the Royal Belgian Soccer Association last week fined the Club Brugge Belgian soccer team to the tune of $2,226 for chants heard at three recent matches. Fans of Brugge shouted “Whoever doesn’t jump is a Jew,” as they sprang up and down during the matches.

 

Cnaan Liphshitz/JTA 

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/319586

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

If Israel strikes Iran, Hezbollah’s Nasrallah will obey Iranian orders - Yaakov Lappin

 

by Yaakov Lappin

A highly religious man, Hassan Nasrallah should be expected to follow through on the orders of the Iranian “mothership,” which is not only the source of Hezbollah’s radical Shi’ite Islamist ideology, but also its funding and force build-up. Analysis.

While Israel has refrained from publicly setting clear red lines to act as precise markers for a threshold that, if surpassed by Iran’s nuclear program, would trigger an Israeli attack, it is clear that Jerusalem has been sending warning signals about Iran’s approach towards the danger zone.

These warnings appear, in part, to be growing louder in the vacuum left behind of a lack of a credible American military threat in the event of an Iranian decision to break out to a nuclear weapon, and Washington’s priority of pivoting towards superpower competition with China and Russia.

As Israel’s warning grows louder, and Iran’s nuclear program continues to make progress — particularly in the area of uranium enrichment, and the centrifuges that enable it — it is natural to wonder about the multiple scenarios that a theoretical Israeli future strike could lead to.

History has demonstrated that the course of wars is not deterministic, and the question of what would follow an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear sites is no different.

However, some contingencies appear to be more likely than others. The Israel Defense Forces, in its stepped-up planning for contingencies, must build up its readiness for them all, and particularly for the most severe one.

The key question is whether Hezbollah’s Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah will launch a full-scale assault on Israel from Lebanon if he receives the order from Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei to do so.

Screenshot of Nasrallah Facebook page
courtesy of MEMRI

In light of the fact that Hezbollah poses the number one conventional military threat to Israel today, and that any multi-front conflict would be dominated by the Lebanese arena due to Hezbollah’s enormous arsenal of projectiles, this question is a top priority issue for the Israeli defense establishment’s planners.

It is impossible to imagine a scenario in which Nasrallah would reject an Iranian directive to act in retaliation. The next question centers around the scope of that retaliation. Should Iran instruct Hezbollah to enter into a full-scale conflict with Israel, it would be difficult to imagine Nasrallah turning this down as well.

A highly religious man, Nasrallah should be expected to follow through on the orders of the Iranian “mothership,” which is not only the source of Hezbollah’s radical Shi’ite Islamist ideology, but also its funding and force build-up.

After all, it was Iran that sent Hezbollah into the bloody battlefields of Syria for years. Any hopes that Nasrallah would limit Hezbollah’s response to an Israeli attack on Iran should therefore not guide Israeli policy, planning or resource allocation.

It is difficult to gage how seriously Khamenei is taking current Israeli threats about the consequence of further nuclear progress — but as Israel continues to enhance its long-range military capabilities, and its readiness for full-scale conflict with Iran and all of its proxies simultaneously, Jerusalem’s posture in Iranian eyes will be more difficult to dismiss.

The IDF has received billions of shekels to improve its Iran strike capabilities, and the Israeli Air Force has placed this capability at the top of its entire agenda for the year 2022.

What the IAF is also doing is planning how it will be able to engage Iran and its proxies across Lebanon, Syria, western Iraq and elsewhere. The IDF’s ground forces, meanwhile, are focusing their war training on the Lebanese arena, which would suffer unprecedented levels of Israeli firepower in the event of general conflict, taking Lebanon decades back in time.

Despite the high-pressure messaging, the decision junction is not yet imminent. Although Iran has made great progress on amassing fissile material, it is still more than a year away from completing other aspects needed for nuclear weapons, such as having a proven nuclear explosive mechanism, and being able to place it on a missile warhead.

Still, the fissile material stockpiling is the most challenging aspect of building the bomb, and Iran’s progress, in addition to its build-up of technological knowledge, is alarming.

Since the Iranian nuclear program is the only threat that could prove existential if left unchecked, it is the number one priority for the Israeli defense establishment, overtaking the threat posed by Iran’s regional entrenchment program, which is the target of an extensive Israeli grey zone “lawnmowing” campaign, particularly in Syria.

Building an updated long-range Iran strike option is not something the IAF will do overnight, but the project has certainly begun in earnest.

The mammoth planning has to take into consideration highly complex aspects, including intelligence, the right choice of ammunition, the right combination of jets and refueling configurations, as well as pilot training. There can be no comparison with closer missions that the IAF is used to undertaking.

Former IAF Commander Maj. Gen. (res.) Eitan Ben Eliyahu provided a glimpse into this planning, telling Army Radio last Tuesday, “We’re talking about something practical. This isn’t about just one specific target – the IAF must be used to operating at distances of 2,000 kilometers. This is a whole ensemble of flight technique and operational planning. One must know emergency airfields for landing on the way, and how to manage fuel differently.”

 

Yaakov Lappin is a military and strategic affairs analyst who writes for JNS and is a BESA Center associate. He specializes in Israel's defense establishment, military affairs, and the Middle Eastern strategic environment.

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/319462

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel to transfer 100M NIS to PA, grant VIP entry permits - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

Hat tip: Dr. Carolyn Tal 

Gantz vows 'confidence-building' package for Palestinian authority include cash transfers, status approvals for thousands of Palestinians.

 

Gantz and Abbas
Gantz and Abbas                                            Photo: Avraham Shoshani Flash90                       

Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz approved a number of measures to benefit the Palestinian Authority, following his meeting with Palestinian Authority chief Mahmoud Abbas.

The benefits package, which the Defense Ministry described as a series of “confidence-building measures,” includes advances for tax payments collected by Israel on the PA’s behalf, amounting to 100 million shekels and status approvals on a humanitarian basis for 6,000 residents of Judea and Samaria, and an additional status approval for 3,500 Gaza residents.

Furthermore, the package includes approval for 600 entry permits for Palestinian businessmen, and 500 additional permits for business people to enter Israel with their vehicles, and dozens of VIP permits for senior PA officials.

During the meeting with Abbas, Gantz offered a number of economic benefits for the PA, including the possible reduction of fees for purchases between Israel and the PA, easing import conditions at the Israel-Jordanian border - which also serves the PA - and other measures which could increase revenue to the PA by hundreds of millions of shekels annually.

Gantz hosted Abbas at his home in Rosh Ha'Ayin Tuesday evening, with Prime Minister Naftali Bennett's approval. The meeting marked Abbas' first public visit to pre-1967 Israel since 2016.

The meeting was also attended on the Israeli side by the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, Maj. Gen. Ghasan Alyan. On the Palestinian Arab side, it was attended by PA “civil affairs minister” Hussein al-Sheikh and the head of the Palestinian security services, Majed Faraj.

Gantz previously met with Abbas in August to discuss measures to strengthen the PA's economy. Following the meeting, Israel agreed to loan the PA 500 million shekels.

 

Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/319470

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

No Wonder Why People and Businesses Are Dumping California - Larry Elder

 

by Larry Elder

The loss of personal and economic freedom.

 

 

A recent study by the Cato Institute, the libertarian think tank, ranked California 48th out of the 50 states in personal and economic freedom. The study also examines fiscal policy and regulatory policy. For the first time, California's population decreased last year, resulting in the loss of a congressional seat. In the third quarter of this year, 150,000 more people on average left the state versus 60,000 net departures in the first quarter of last year. Between March 2020 and September 2021, there has been a 38% decrease in new arrivals. California has 58 counties, and new arrivals fell in every single one.

As to the loss of personal and economic freedom, consider the following examples.

As of the end of 2021, a publicly held company headquartered in California must have between one and three female board members, depending upon its size, or face a fine of $100,000. Proponents insist that female membership on boards of directors increases profits. One wonders why companies do not simply sack their male members in favor of an all-female board.

The California Department of Education has proposed an "equitable math" framework. California Political Review says the framework "promotes the concept that working to figure out a correct answer is an example of racism and white supremacy invading the classroom."

As of January 1, 2022, California's new bacon law is scheduled to take effect. According to the Associated Press: "Put simply, the law requires that breeding pigs, egg-laying chickens and veal calves be given enough space to stand and turn around. For pigs, that means they no longer can be kept in narrow 'gestation crates' and must have 24 square feet of usable space." Producers predict shortages and more expensive bacon and pork products.

In October, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, to continue the fight against "climate change," signed a bill to eliminate gasoline powered lawn mowers and leaf blowers. Never mind that a spokesperson for the National Association of Landscape Professionals said a three-person landscaping crew will need to carry 30 to 40 fully charged batteries to power its equipment during a full day's work. "These companies," said the spokesperson, "are going to have to completely retrofit their entire workshops to be able to handle this massive change in voltage so they're going to be charged every day."

Then there's the new law requiring large toy stores to set up "gender neutral" toy sections. Evan Low, the California Democratic Assemblyman who co-authored the bill said: "We need to stop stigmatizing what's acceptable for certain genders and just let kids be kids. My hope is this bill encourages more businesses across California and the U.S. to avoid reinforcing harmful and outdated stereotypes."

Meanwhile, as Democratic lawmakers protect children from harmful and outdated stereotypes, many kids educated in California public schools cannot read or perform math at state levels of proficiency, standards that are not particularly high. In 2019 barely half of kids in public schools were reading-proficient, while only 40% were math-proficient.

California's jobless rate, 7.3%, ties with Nevada's for last place. By contrast, Texas and Florida clock in at 5.4% and 4.6%, respectively. UCLA economist Lee Ohanian co-authored an August 2021 report on the tax and regulatory policies causing businesses to ditch California at an unprecedented rate. The report found: "Unless policy reforms reverse this course, California will continue to lose businesses, both large established businesses, as well as young, rapidly growing businesses, some of which will become transformational giants of tomorrow."

California policies are expelling rich high-profilers. Elon Musk, currently the richest man in the world, is relocating his Tesla headquarters from California to Texas. Musk, who says he will pay $11 billion in taxes this year, had already moved his residence from Los Angeles to Austin. In a population of almost 40 million Californians, 1% of taxpayers account for nearly half of the state's income tax revenues.

And Musk, the biggest of the one-percenters, just walked.

 

Larry Elder

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/no-wonder-why-people-and-businesses-are-dumping-larry-elder/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Wednesday, December 29, 2021

Lebanon: Do Not Let the Palestinians Destroy Our Country - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

With all this clarity on the part of the Lebanese, it remains to be seen whether international bodies will themselves speak out to prevent another catastrophe in Lebanon carried out by a Palestinian terrorist group.

  • A growing number of people in Lebanon fear that... Hamas could drag Lebanon into another war with Israel -- as Lebanon's Hezbollah terrorist militia, backed by Iran, has done for the past three decades.

  • The fears of the Lebanese are well-grounded in reality.

  • Since 2007, Hamas has fired thousands of rockets at Israel from the Gaza Strip, triggering military confrontations that have wreaked havoc on the lives of Palestinians living there.

  • The Lebanese are making it clear that they do not want Hamas -- or any other Palestinian group -- to drag them into another war with Israel. They are saying that they are done with decades-long Palestinian efforts to transform Lebanon into a war zone.

  • With all this clarity on the part of the Lebanese, it remains to be seen whether international bodies will themselves speak out to prevent another catastrophe in Lebanon carried out by a Palestinian terrorist group.

A growing number of people in Lebanon are concerned that Hamas could drag Lebanon into another war with Israel. The fears of the Lebanese are well-grounded in reality. On December 10, a Hamas warehouse filled with munitions exploded in the Burj Shemali Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon. Pictured: The shattered windows and blackened walls of a mosque damaged by the explosion in the Burj Shemali camp. (Photo by Mahmoud Zayyat/AFP via Getty Images)

It appears that the Palestinians are determined to continue their fight against Israel until the last Arab. For decades, the Palestinians have used Israel's neighboring countries, especially Jordan and Lebanon, as launching pads for various types of attacks against Israel.

In the 1960s, '70s and '80s several Palestinian groups, including Fatah and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), set up military training bases in Jordan and Lebanon to launch attacks on Israel.

The Jordanians and Lebanese ended up paying a heavy price for hosting these groups and allowing them to use their territory to plan and carry out attacks against Israel.

In 1970, the Jordanians, after severe clashes, expelled the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) from the kingdom. The violent confrontations, referred to as Black September, came after the PLO set up military bases and actually created a state within state in the kingdom.

When the PFLP then hijacked three civilian aircraft in September of 1970, and forced them to land in the Jordanian town of Zarqa, where they took foreign nationals as hostages and later blew up the planes in front of the international press, the late King Hussein of Jordan ordered his army to expel the PLO from the kingdom.

They then moved to Beirut, where the PLO leaders and their armed forces also brought disaster to the Lebanese people, especially during the Lebanon Civil War.

In 1982, when the Israeli army invaded southern Lebanon to destroy the PLO's military infrastructure and stop terrorist attacks against Israel, the PLO was also forced out of Lebanon.

"Large areas of the once beautiful and prosperous city [Beirut] have been reduced to rubble by seven years of unrest and civil war sparked by Mr. Arafat's presence," a BBC dispatch reported.

A growing number of people in Lebanon fear that history is about to repeat itself. They are concerned that Hamas could drag Lebanon into another war with Israel -- as the Hezbollah terrorist militia, backed by Iran, has done for the past three decades.

Their fear comes against a backdrop of reports that the Iranian-backed Palestinian Hamas group has set up a new military unit in Lebanon for launching attacks against Israel. According to the reports, the unit launched its first rocket attack on Israel during the Israel-Hamas war in May 2021.

Hamas's secret build-up of forces in Lebanon has grown over the years to have hundreds of operatives working for its "Construction Bureau," responsible for building and developing military capabilities on Israel's northern border, according to a report by the ALMA Research Center, dedicated to researching the security challenges on Israel's northern border.

The "Construction Bureau," the report reveals, operates several departments: the manufacturing department, military intelligence, instruction and training, communications, finance, planning, logistics, security, and foreign relations. The "Construction Bureau" also has two units with hundreds of operatives in Lebanon. The units engage in recruiting operatives, conducting training, and special courses (snipers, anti-tanks, attack drones, etc.). The units also develop and manufacture weapons (rockets, attack drones, miniature submarines), establish operation squads, and prepare operational programs.

On December 10, the fears of the Lebanese proved justified when a Hamas warehouse filled with munitions exploded in the Burj Shemali Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon.

The state-run National News Agency reported an unspecified number of deaths. The explosion was reportedly caused by a fire that broke out near a mosque and later spread to an arms depot belonging to Hamas. The explosion, according to some reports, injured dozens of people and killed a senior member of Hamas, Hamza Chahine, responsible for recruitment for the local branch of the group.

Several Lebanese expressed deep concern over the explosion and warned that the presence of armed Palestinian groups in Lebanon would have devastating repercussions on the country. Prominent Lebanese journalist Rafik Khoury wrote:

"Palestinian weapons no longer have a role in Lebanon in the sense that they did in the 1960s of the last century: the practice of armed struggle to liberate Palestine from southern Lebanon. It was a role that led to the devastating Lebanon [civil war] and the bragging of Yasser Arafat that he 'ruled' Lebanon. It also led to the Israeli invasion and the expulsion of the PLO and its leaders to Tunisia and other capitals under American and French supervision."

Khoury pointed out that the Palestinians used to say that "the road to Palestine passes through all Arab capitals and overthrowing their regimes."

It is no secret, he said, that Hamas is working to inherit the role of the PLO in Lebanon as a dominant armed group. "After more than half a century, Hamas is repeating the experience of Fatah [the largest PLO faction] and the mistakes and the disasters in Jordan and Lebanon," Khoury added.

Lebanese international relations expert Khaled El-Ezzi said that Hamas has a powerful presence in Palestinian refugee camps in southern Lebanon, which is under the control of Hezbollah.

El-Ezzi noted that Hamas is "directly affiliated" with Iran and that its leaders have strong relations with Hezbollah.

Senior Hamas officials, he revealed, have offices and residences in the southern suburb of Beirut, known to be a Hezbollah stronghold. According to El-Ezzi:

"The explosion [at the Hamas warehouse] constituted a flagrant violation of Resolution 1701 issued by the United Nations after the 2006 war because the refugee camp is located under the authority of UNIFIL [United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon], and the storage of weapons in the camp means that there is a Lebanese party that helped Hamas to do so."

The head of the Lebanese Change Movement party, Elie Mahfoud, said that Hamas has gunmen in several refugee camps in Lebanon and they "receive orders from Hezbollah to carry out acts of sabotage outside the camps."

Lebanese writer Khairallah Khairallah said that the explosion at the weapons depot shows that Hamas has taken it upon itself "to distort the image of the Palestinian people."

The explosion, Khairallah pointed out, occurred hours after the visit of Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid to Cairo, where he discussed with senior Egyptian officials the issue of the reconstruction of the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

"Egypt is playing a positive and commendable role of a humanitarian nature in sparing the people of Gaza more suffering, misery, and destruction," Khairallah wrote.

"Wherever Hamas is found, there is devastation. Why does it store weapons and explosives in Lebanon?... It is surprising that Hamas insists on storing weapons and ammunition in southern Lebanon, taking advantage of the absence of the Lebanese state in the Palestinian camps.... But what can one do with a movement belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood that does not care about what happened to the Palestinians in Gaza... Hamas eliminated the Palestinian national project. It practically eliminated the independent Palestinian decision and turned Gaza into an Iranian missile base... Hamas wants to rewrite the history of Palestine and link it to the Iranian interest. It does this through its practices in Lebanon. It even ignores the fact that Lebanon is in a state of a bankruptcy and suffering from the chaos of weapons."

Lebanese newspaper editor Bechara Charbel said that the Palestinians have lost a moral argument by insisting on their own armed presence in the camps and not entrusting their security to the Lebanese army.

According to Bechara, Hamas's military presence in Lebanon does not serve to support Labor Minister Mustafa Bayram's recent decision to allow Palestinians to work in professions that were prohibited to them. The decision relaxes restrictions on Palestinians, enabling them to work in trade union-regulated professions including law, engineering, and medicine. These professions were limited to Lebanese nationals only.

"Those sympathetic to the cause of the Palestinians and their humanitarian situation will not be convinced of the necessity of facilitating their lives in Lebanon," he emphasized.

"It is unfortunate that Hamas is repeating the mistakes of the PLO in using Lebanon as a platform. It is not acceptable for Hamas to be active militarily in Lebanon, training elements and storing ammunition, considering itself above any consideration of the Lebanese state, just because it is an ally of Hezbollah and part of the Iranian axis. The Palestinian organizations did not learn from the bitter lessons they received, whether during their disastrous involvement in the Lebanon wars, or while the refugee camps endured the hardship of the siege imposed on them by the Syrian regime."

The fears of the Lebanese are well-grounded in reality.

Since 2007, Hamas has fired thousands of rockets at Israel from the Gaza Strip, triggering military confrontations that have wreaked havoc on the lives of Palestinians living there.

The Lebanese are making it clear that they do not want Hamas -- or any other Palestinian group -- to drag them into another war with Israel. They are saying that they are done with decades-long Palestinian efforts to transform Lebanon into a war zone.

With all this clarity on the part of the Lebanese, it remains to be seen whether international bodies will themselves speak out to prevent another catastrophe in Lebanon carried out by a Palestinian terrorist group.

  • Follow Khaled Abu Toameh on Twitter

 

Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18080/lebanon-palestinians

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Immigration Tops U.S. Births for the First Time - Daniel Greenfield

 

by Daniel Greenfield

The pandemic made us an even lonelier nation.

 


There is both bad news and good news for Planned Parenthood these days. Even while abortion made a brief stop once again at the Supreme Court, its numbers are dropping.

A few years ago, abortion hit its lowest rate since it was legalized. The drop in abortion rates parallels the fall in birth rates. Both stem from a decline in pregnancies.

America isn’t becoming more moral, only more lonely.

A recent New York Times headline declared, “The Married Will Soon Be the Minority”. But it’s not just the married, but anyone in a relationship or who is connected to other people.

Marriage rates hit an all-time low around the same time, with the single population rising sharply. But the singles weren’t just postponing marriage in favor of extended relationships, because there was also a sharp drop in the rates of physical intimacy between men and women.

Americans were becoming more lonely even before the pandemic. The arrival of the pandemic divided families, cut off grandparents from grandchildren, parents from adult children, children from other children, and made the country an even more lonely and isolated place.

Over the pandemic year, the nation’s population grew by only 0.1%. According to the Census Bureau, that was “the lowest rate since the nation’s founding.” Its estimate also showed that for the first time "net international migration... has exceeded natural increase for a given year."

America’s population has been declining for a while, but the pandemic was particularly catastrophic with international migration easily topping excess births at 244,622 to 148,043.

The demographic snapshot of a society coming apart, the familial, civic, and cultural bonds between Americans dissolving even as growth comes from mass migration is a familiar story from Europe. Internally and externally, we are becoming a society in name only, linked by the legal technicalities of a vast bureaucracy and a disposable multinational consumer culture.

To understand the wave of wokeness and other political cults consuming our civic culture, we need only observe that a third of Americans now have no religion: a number that has doubled in under 15 years. Growing numbers have no family, no children, and little more than their jobs.

And that is why we have open borders. Someone has to fill all those jobs. Generations of Republican leaders defined America as a place where people came to work. Every illegal alien at the border was evidence that our way of life worked at least insofar as economics went. Likewise it appeared that our culture worked because it was so popular around the world.

Cold War logic reduced America to a marketplace. If the country passed the rigorous test of the market, then the rest was bound to fall into place. But after the Cold War came and went, mass migration and mass culture continued to hollow out the country. Free enterprise is vital to a free society, but it isn’t, for most people, the thing that gives them meaning and purpose.

A nation cannot exist as nothing more than a series of workplaces and stores in which tokens earned at the former are then spent at the latter. Mistaking the economic machinery for a nation  is the fallacy of assuming that man is nothing more than the sum of his biological systems.

What happens to a society whose people have no reason to go on beyond their set routines interspersed with bouts of hedonism? What happens to a nation that loses its soul?

Europe had answered that question a generation or two before we did. Unfortunately we did not pay attention to the answer. America lasted longer because we retained our convictions of exceptionalism, our faith and our family ties longer than Europe did. But with every passing year the cities of the New World with their hipster elites and multicultural labor forces, and subsidized dying rural areas, resemble the decadence of the Old World that their ancestors once escaped.

The restrictions of the pandemic made sense to those elites in exactly the way that it infuriated the rural and working classes. Lockdowns, remote meetings, and masks allowed the elites to retreat further behind a digital iron curtain, serviced by unobtrusive servants, real and virtual, AI and gig workers, freed from having to even leave their apartments to enjoy the pleasures of life.

It never occurred to them, and still doesn’t, that most people don’t want to live that way.

Beyond the now famous population crash in New York and California, and the population rise in Texas and Florida, is the fact that the highest percentage population growth took place in Idaho, followed by Utah and Montana, while the largest percentage losses were suffered by Washington D.C., New York, and Illinois. Some of those numbers can be explained by people from the latter places making their way to the former. But that does not explain all of it.

Americans are experiencing an internal migration and counter-migration, traveling to city-states like New York City and Los Angeles County for economic purposes, and leaving them in pursuit of meaningful connections and a different way of life. It’s why one of the underreported stories in the nation’s demographics has been the black population leaving New York City for the South.

Behind the statistics, the columns of black numbers on white paper, is a spiritual crisis that is much more difficult to fit between the narrow lines of government statistical forms.

A nation needs vertical and horizontal connections, people to other people, and to something above them, a sense of awe and destiny, and without them it withers and dies. The pandemic reaffirmed to many elites their conviction that there are no meaningful connections, that other people are threats and irritants, and that man is just an intelligent ape existing on the random sufferance of a cruel universe that can blot all of us out in a single instant.

It is not at all irrational for anyone living with the conviction of fragility and meaninglessness to panic at the pandemic, global warming, or the threat of nuclear war. If the only order in the universe comes from the arrangement of its underlying forces, then doom is only a matter of time. And the only way to contain the catastrophe is by imposing a totalitarian order.

There is little room in this gloomy universe for the future. That’s why the hipster elites, in between Uber trips to bars and eateries, avoid human connections, escape into digital carpe diems, and reject the idea of having children because they don’t expect mankind to survive global warming, or of whatever crisis comes next to justify their lack of faith in the future.

Their needs, for clean floors, for customer service, or takeout, can be met by a disposable labor force in America or in China. Natural population growth just hastens the apocalypse anyway.

Against this tide of elite despair which permeates the culture that they produce and that has been all but written into law, some cultural resistance continues. Every child born is itself a form of resistance to this elite vision of a cold universe and its even colder technocratic counterparts on this world which would raise children in digital wombs to grow up to be the last of their kind.

In this generation, for the first time in our nation’s history, most Americans have abandoned hope that the future will be better. The low birth rates, the lack of relationships, and the social collapse are all the fruits of the same poisoned tree. Defeating that defeatism will not be easy and our leaders have offered little more than shopworn cliches as the nation’s culture declined.

But despair is not inevitable. It’s the vacuum that forms when there is nothing left to believe in.

Globalization atomizes us. It breaks us up into discrete and isolated groups in the name of diversity, in the name of progress, and in the name of making us more manageable. Fragmented people have less to aspire to beyond their creature comforts. They are easier to soothe with an expansion of the welfare state, a new hate object and smartphone model.

The alternative is to rebuild those connections that make life meaningful, national and familial, and without which nations turn childless and are easily swamped by mass migration.

The Left didn’t just open up the borders around the body of our nation, it hollowed out its soul. A lonely nation of isolates wrapped in their digital cocoons is easy prey for technocratic globalism.

These latest numbers are a warning sign that America is much closer to becoming Europe than we thought. To defeat the threat of demographic replacement and illegal migration, we have to build walls not only around our borders, but around our culture, our communities and our families. We have to not only fight against what we don’t want, but to fight for what we do.

 

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/immigration-tops-us-births-first-time-daniel-greenfield/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Two COVID Questions Before the Court - Rob Jenkins

 

by Rob Jenkins

No rational argument exists for federal mandates.

The Supreme Court has agreed to take up two vaccine mandate cases -- the one involving OSHA and the one for health care workers (CMS).     

A third mandate, aimed at federal contractors, remains in a kind of legal limbo. The temporary injunction granted by a Georgia judge was recently upheld by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Whether that decision will also be appealed to SCOTUS, and if so whether they will agree to hear it, remain to be seen.     

However, according to Jenin Younes, an attorney with the New Civil Liberties Alliance and charter member of Team Reality, “It is likely that whatever decision [the court] makes about [the first two] mandates will affect the contractor one as well, since the principles are similar.”   

So the importance of the upcoming arguments against the OSHA and CMS mandates cannot be overstated. They will almost certainly be for all the marbles.     

Far be it from me to tell lawyers things they already know, much less what they ought to say or do. But you’ll have to forgive me if, after the ObamaCare and Obergefell fiascos, I’m not exactly brimming with confidence in our side’s ability to make winning arguments before the nation’s highest court.    

It seems to me there are essentially two questions before the Court: Whether the federal government has the authority to mandate any vaccines, and if so, whether they have the authority to mandate these particular “vaccines” (hereafter referred to more accurately as “injections”).

The answer to the first question, I believe, is “maybe” or “it depends” -- although there is, in fact, no precedent for such federal mandates. The two examples the pro-mandate forces like to cite are both problematic for them, in different ways.     

The first is the 1905 Supreme Court decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, in which the Court said the state could require citizens to take the smallpox vaccine.   

That case poses at least two problems for mandaters. First, it involved a state mandate, not a federal one. Second, it upheld a law duly passed by the legislature -- not an executive edict.   

So Jacobson isn’t really a “precedent” at all, as it deals with a very different set of questions.     

The other “precedent” often mentioned is the fact that, during the American Revolution, George Washington ordered his troops to be inoculated with a new smallpox vaccine.    

Again, this is hardly the same thing. It applies to a relatively small group of people -- soldiers -- not to the general population. Moreover, the individuals in question, by virtue of enlisting, had already voluntarily placed themselves under the full and undisputed authority of their military commander.    

In contrast, the vast majority of those affected by the Biden administration’s mandates have never ceded that kind of authority over their personal lives to the federal government. So there really is no precedent.     

And yet precedent is not everything. New circumstances call for new responses, new court rulings, new laws. I’m sure we can all envision a public health crisis in which the federal government might need to step in -- where a genuinely deadly virus is rampaging across the country, killing 20-30 percent of the population, including children.     

If a vaccine existed that could stop such a virus in its tracks, we would all want everyone to take it and would probably feel the government was justified in making them -- although, in a situation like that, the government probably wouldn’t have to. Everyone would be lining up.    

Thus, the second question before the court is this: Does COVID-19 constitute that kind of emergency? And the answer is very clearly, “No.” Not even close.     

Throughout this “pandemic,” sensationalistic case counts have been grossly exaggerated by mass testing on a scale never seen, using faulty, ill-suited tests, absurdly amplified, yielding an unacceptable percentage of false positives. Hospitals have obscene financial incentives to identify “COVID patients” and to blame the virus for as many deaths as possible, even in cases where it clearly played no role.    

The “shocking” case and death statistics, in short, are fraudulent. This could easily be demonstrated to the court using the government’s own documents. But even accepting their outlandish numbers, COVID still doesn’t approach the kind of nightmare scenario described above. It hasn’t even killed one-quarter of one percent of the population, much less 20 or 30 percent (and hardly any children).    

Moreover, the “vaccines,” in this case, are not really vaccines as we have always understood them. That can easily be deduced from the mere fact that the health authorities had to change the longstanding definition of “vaccine” in order to include these injections.     

They do not, we now know, prevent people from becoming infected. They do not stop the transmission or arrest the spread of the virus. As a number of reputable scientists have argued, they might even be making things worse, through Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) and/or Original Antigenic Sin (OAS).     

About the best we can say is that they might provide some personal protection against severe illness -- although, as efficacy continues to wane, we may soon find they don’t even do that, anymore.    

Given these facts -- and they are facts, which a highly paid team of lawyers ought to be able to dig up easily and document thoroughly -- no rational argument exists for federal mandates. There is no pressing health emergency worthy of turning the Constitution on its head, and even if there were, the measures the government has attempted to impose thus far would do nothing to alleviate it.   

These arguments strike me as simple, obvious, straightforward, well-supported by evidence, and utterly compelling -- in short, clear winners. I just hope and pray our side doesn’t screw them up, perhaps by being too clever by half.   

Image: Picryl

 

Rob Jenkins

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/12/the_two_covid_questions_before_the_court_.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

There are indications that the Chinese military has serious problems - Andrea Widburg

 

by Andrea Widburg

It’s still a ferocious force, simply because it’s huge, but there are personnel and structural problems that will affect its fighting abilities.

Xi Jinping has been doing a great deal of saber-rattling of late, threatening both Australia and Taiwan.  China has also been building islands in the South China Sea, flying hypersonic weapons, stealing and illegally buying vast amounts of military technology, and overtly working to make its military more manly, even as the U.S. military deals with maternity flight suits and the needs of the so-called transgender troops.  Nevertheless, when all is said and done, a military is only as good as the people doing the fighting, and there are indications that China has a problem in this area.

The Epoch Times recently published an article entitled "Corruption Wears Down Chinese Military's Combat Effectiveness," a problem that marches hand in hand with a lack of battle experience:

Corruption is a widespread phenomenon in China's military where officers, including generals, have relied not on their duration of service or military prowess to rise in the ranks but rather bribery and connections.

Experts commented that a lack of competent leaders now threaten to be severely detrimental to China's war-fighting capabilities.

Another problem for the Chinese military is that, as in England of old, members of the upper classes don't earn their commissions; they buy them:

"A commander from a military district bribed Xu Caihou [then vice chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC)] 20 million yuan ($3.14 million) for a senior position. Xu then promoted this one, rather than another commander who just bribed him 10 million yuan ($1.57 million)," Major General Yang Chunchang said [in 2015].

In the Chinese military, there's only one general who has real combat experience. Li Zuocheng, 68, served in the Vietnam War in 1979 as the director of a company consisting of about 100 soldiers. Li is the chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the CMC.

Thus, for all the snazzy uniforms and drills we see when the Chinese military puts on a parade in Beijing, it's possible that the people in charge are just big, rich boys playing with toy soldiers.


Image: China's 2019 anniversary parade.  YouTube screen grab.

Xi has apparently been trying to clean up the military, according to the article, for he's fired several high-level officers over the past few years.  The same article details myriad instances over the past four years of efforts to purge the military of corrupt officers.  That may be impossible, though:

"The Chinese military has become a puddle of mud, without combat effectiveness," Luo Yu, son of former revolutionary Chinese Gen. Lou Ruiqing, told The Epoch Times on Nov. 14, 2017. "No Chinese official or officer isn't involved in bribery, it's a systematic problem.

"There's no way to stop the corruption in the Chinese military."

The Epoch Times, which is openly hostile to the Chinese communist regime, is not the only one reporting on this corruption.  As far back as 2012, Foreign Policy wrote, "The institution is riddled with corruption and professional decay, compromised by ties of patronage, and asphyxiated by the ever-greater effort required to impose political control."  With Xi having consolidated even more power since then, that asphyxiation must have increased.

Then, in 2018, the Rand Blog pointed out the same problem the Epoch Times article noted, which is that the Chinese military is woefully lacking in combat experience.  (Hat tip: Will O'Toole.)

Today, China's military has an increasingly impressive high-tech arsenal, but its ability to use these weapons and equipment remains unclear. There are reasons to be skeptical. The People's Liberation Army (PLA) struggles under the legacy of an obsolete command system, rampant corruption, and training of debatable realism, among other issues. President Xi Jinping, the chairman of the Central Military Commission, has directed major efforts to address each of these defects and improve the military's ability to fight and win wars. Since 2016, these organizational and other reforms have gained momentum.

It's hard to believe that the chaos of 2020 and 2021 will have improved the military's corruption and inexperience.

For all that, only a fool would underestimate the risks that the Chinese military presents to Taiwan, Australia, and others in the free world.  For one thing, it's probably got missile launchers arrayed on cargo ships throughout the world.  For another thing, as the Battle of the Chosin Reservoir showed, if you hand enough peasants a gun, even if they're wearing cotton shoes and jackets in sub-zero temperatures, their sheer mass can wear down a better trained and better equipped military.

Nevertheless, it's as problematic to overestimate a military's strength as it is to underestimate it.  While the latter can lead to disastrous military defeats, the former can lead to bad, even dangerous, political decisions taken from a sense of military inferiority.

 

Andrea Widburg

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/12/there_are_indications_that_the_chinese_military_has_serious_problems.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Do Democrats Want to Build Back Better, or Do They Want a Coup? - E. Jeffrey Ludwig

 

by E. Jeffrey Ludwig

It sure looks like a coup.

In a recent article, the brilliant commentator Victor David Hanson asks, "What is behind recent pessimistic appraisals of democracy's future from Hillary Clinton, Adam Schiff, Brian Williams, and other elite intellectuals and media personalities?"  His answer to this question is "that the left expects to lose power over the next two years[.]"

Perhaps — but on the other hand, maybe the leftists' "pessimistic appraisals" are more of a verbal ploy to suggest they are concerned about democracy when in actuality they are participating in an attempt to enact a coup against democracy, against our beloved republic.  Declining poll numbers will affect only those old-fashioned Democrats who still believe in the relevance of the vote.  

Today, sadly and horrendously, we seem to be on a different trajectory.  Through a number of pressure points, the left is trying to overwhelm and subvert constitutional checks and balances, basic ideas of fairness, historical understandings of things like voter rights and equality of opportunity (which is not and should never be equality of outcomes), law and order, the public weal in protecting against theft and bodily harm, and responsible conduct as the sign of a good citizen.  Now massive mail-in schemes, elimination of voter ID, federal control of even local elections, extended periods of time for voting, and ballot-harvesting are high on the list of Democommie priorities.  Their priorities are clearly not about fairness, but about corrupt manipulation of our nation's voting priorities as a free society.

For the first time in my lifetime, the military leadership has publicly shown partisanship toward the Democrats.  General Milly, head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), apologized after walking with President Trump following rioting in Washington, D.C. and later said he wants to look at his own "white rage."  Is it appropriate for the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to make comments like these? Those comments themselves are suggestive of a coup.

In the so-called Build Back Better (BBB) legislation, the leftist cult now in power (albeit marginally) wants to double the size of the IRS by adding 86,000 agents.  The net result of this incredible increase is not to increase oversight, but to weaponize the IRS as an instrument of public intimidation.  Just as conservative political organizations were targeted by the IRS during the Obama administration, the present desired expansion will allow for more harassment and fines of individuals in our new surveillance society.  Does anyone really think surveillance of individuals in our society and world is just paranoia?  Haven't we seen, if we message a friend on Facebook or in an email about looking for insurance, that, suddenly, ads for insurance start appearing on our Facebook accounts?  The surveillance society is already here.  It's just a question of the extent to which that expertise will be applied to monitoring our daily lives.  The doubling of the IRS, I propose, is a giant step toward extending the surveillance state.

Even certain conservative voices that oppose this expansion of the IRS fail to perceive the coup implications of this legislation.  Instead, they project a cost-benefit analysis of the increased size.  In doing so, they (rightly) conclude that the increase in size is unwise because of the excessive costs to taxpayers in terms of dollars spent on tax professionals and time spent filling out taxes and the burdensome additional layers of tax complexity that will be established.  However, the cost-benefit objectors do not understand the more extreme implications of such an expansion.

About two months ago, Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) went farther in his critique of this provision of BBB and pointed out that more stringent oversight by IRS would overwhelmingly impact those who earn $100,000 a year or less.  He called this oppression a "shakedown."  But worse, this provision is an important instrument of a coup, as it would extend the police power of the federal government exponentially. The trajectory and momentum of this administration are to take over our lives with unprecedented loss of freedom.

A cautious reader of this analysis might think, "Why would expansion of the federal government by the Democrats necessarily be a coup?  There are regular shifts in power between the two parties in the three branches of government, so expanding or over-reaching with federal authority and power should not be discerned as a Democrat coup."  In one sense, this is accurate, and it would explain why there is not more vigorous resistance to and denunciation of the Democrats by the Republicans.  As Democrats push hard for moving to ever more tyrannical extensions of federal power, the Republicans in political office will also enjoy some of that excess power over the citizens.  However, since the vast expansion of federal authority began with Pres. Woodrow Wilson and Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt, the federal agencies and bureaucracies attract generations of people who see their jobs as more beholden to Democrats than to Republicans.  Thus, being the basis of their livelihoods, our administrative state — the federal bureaucracy — remains an entrenched bastion of Democratic support despite changes in legislative or executive authority.  Whether we call it the bureaucratic state or the Deep State, common sense would dictate that its inherent allegiance is to the Democrat party, which spawned this ever growing, ever more entrenched apparatus that has become a "branch" of our government.

The Dept. of Justice now alerts us to the threat of domestic terrorism that may be operating or at least burgeoning in the expression of parents at school board meetings protesting Critical Race Theory and anti-family sexual agendas across the land.  This attempt to, at the very least, stigmatize those parents who speak out is more than a nuisance and unwanted presentation.  It is belligerent and harassing of parents and a denigration of the First Amendment.  New laws to extend free pre-K and pre-pre-K (three- and four-year-olds) are on the table, financed by and thereby controlled by the federal government.  The opportunity to advance secular humanism and cultural Marxism even more (we are already in a radical moral decline) will clearly be advanced if these "helpful" pieces of legislation are passed.  

The intrusions of federal power and authority in our lives are being pushed forward to a degree that can only be characterized as a coup.  The Dems are no longer willing to live with a tension between big government and the rights of states and individuals; rather, they want to enforce federal power as decisive in that tension and thereby sabotage the idea of individual responsibility as an end in itself, which understanding is the basis of a free society based on natural rights.

 

E. Jeffrey Ludwig

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/12/do_democrats_want_to_build_back_better_or_do_they_want_a_coup.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

As I was saying back in 2013... - Melanie Phillips

 

by Melanie Phillips

Hat tip: Dr. Jean-Charles Bensoussan 

But the west still refuses to acknowledge the apocalyptic religious cult running Iran

 

Question Time panel, June 20 2013. With Russell Brand, Tessa Jowell, Boris Johnson, Ed Davey and me

In June 2013, I provoked uproar on BBC TV’s Question Time show. This was because, in a discussion about the atrocities in Syria, I said that Iran was actually the real issue and that it should be neutralised because its regime posed the greatest danger in the world to the west. 

As certain members of the audience shouted in outrage, I told them that the reason the Iranian regime was so dangerous was that it was dominated by members of the Shia Muslim “Twelver” sect, who believed that if they brought about the apocalypse they would bring to earth the Shia “messiah”, the Twelfth Imam (also known as the “Hidden Imam”). 

This provoked even more apoplexy. Members of the audience shouted that I had merely exposed my ignorance and had no idea what I was talking about — a view endorsed by a fellow panel member that evening, one Boris Johnson, who was then Mayor of London. He told the audience that he disagreed with everything that I had said, and that Iran posed no threat to anyone in the world. Thus spoke the man who would go on to become Britain’s Foreign Secretary and then Prime Minister. You can watch that show here.

Earlier this month, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander, General Esmail Qaani, said in a speech on Iranian TV that gone were the days of “hit and run” when the enemies of Islam and the Iranian Revolution could do as they pleased in the world; now they must prepare to “take a beating”. 

He said that the US still had time to choose to withdraw from the region of its own accord, lest it be driven out like it was from Afghanistan. He warned that if the Americans made “the slightest mistake” they would be “punched in the mouth so hard that their teeth will shatter”. And then, as recorded and translated here by MEMRI, he said this: 

With the help of the Lord, this path of the martyrs will conquer all the relevant targets, one phase at a time, and as I have said, it will reach the final goal of establishing the global rule of the Hidden Imam. Inshallah.

So exactly as I told that jeering BBC audience eight and a half years ago, the reason the Iranian regime is uniquely dangerous is that it believes itself to be acting in pursuit of a divine and supernatural goal — to bring the Twelfth or “Hidden” Imam down to earth, which will require the conquest of the world to establish his rule. 

In other words, the Iranian regime is not, as the US, UK and EU repeatedly tell themselves, composed of rational individuals with whom the west can negotiate to arrive at a compromise. It is run instead by apocalyptic fanatics who, although able to strategise like chess grand-masters in their steady manoeuvring towards their infernal goal, are as immune to reason as the members of any brainwashed cult. 

Moreover, General Qaani spelled out what the US, UK and EU also seek to deny — that while Israel is Tehran’s first target, the regime intends to destroy all its enemies 

one phase at a time.

As the crowd screamed in response to his words: 

“Allah Akabar! Allah Akabar! Allah Akabar! Khamenei is the leader! Death to those who oppose the Rule of the Jurisprudent! Death to America! Death to England! Death to the hypocrites and infidels! Death to Israel!”

These are the individuals who the Biden administration think don’t mean what they say about building nuclear weapons and whom it thinks it can buy off by throwing money at them; and this is the agenda the Biden administration will empower by doing so.

 

Melanie Phillips

Source: https://melaniephillips.substack.com/p/as-i-was-saying-back-in-2013

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter