Thursday, March 2, 2023

Probe confirms Capitol Police, feds had intel on Jan. 6 threat but failed to adapt security - John Solomon

 

by John Solomon

"Capitol Police did not share threat products with its frontline officers," the GAO found.

The Capitol Police, FBI and eight other federal agencies gathered intelligence that extremists were planning to commit violence at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 but failed to adequately adapt security or get threat assessments to key decision-makers and frontline officers, the non-partisan investigative arm of Congress concludes in a stinging report that confirmed months of reporting by Just the News. 

"Some agencies did not fully process information or share it, preventing critical information from reaching key federal entities responsible for securing the National Capital Region against threats," the Government Accountability Office concluded in a report this week that immediately renewed questions inside Congress about whether the riot was a preventable attack and why the leadership under then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Leader Chuck Schumer did not accept the Trump Pentagon's offer of National Guard troops for reinforcements.

While GAO faulted all 10 agencies it reviewed, it saved its harshest assessment for the Capitol Police, the lead agency securing the Capitol, and its supervisory Capitol Police Board, for leaving frontline officers unaware of the threat they faced when they went to work on Jan. 6.

"Capitol Police did not share threat products with its frontline officers," the watchdog concluded, imploring Congress to press those agencies to change failed practices and procedures to avoid a repeat tragedy inside the home of America's constitutional republic.

"The Capitol Police and Park Police did not process threat products to include all relevant information, which resulted in incomplete assessments and conclusions in the products. Both agencies, in addition to the Capitol Police Board, also did not share all relevant information internally.

"As agencies continue to uncover lessons learned from the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, it is important that they establish processes to ensure that failures in communicating and sharing important information with those who need it do not happen again."

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), told Just the News on Wednesday night that the GAO aired the sort of meaningful information that the House Democrat-led Jan. 6 committee did not last year and that the Republicans now in the majority intend to force changes to the Capitol security apparatus.

"Some of the police were involved," Norman said during an interview on the "Just the News, No Noise" television show. "Unfortunately, some of the FBI agents were involved. The information they had, they had a blueprint for what was going to happen, and they didn't think about it and look at the consequences."

Former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said in the immediate aftermath he was given information by police that there were intelligence and security failures but Democrats under former Speaker Nancy Pelosi suffocated the release of such information publicly.

"There's no secrets in Washington when you do something really stupid, like they did, like Pelosi did," he said.

"It looks like, at least from first glance, [the GAO] actually are telling the truth for once, which is great," said Nunes, now the CEO of former President Trump's Truth Social platform.

The FBI also was singled out for improvement by the GAO report. "While the FBI identified and shared threat information, it did not process certain referrals from social media platforms according to policies and procedures and, as a result, it failed to share critical information with all relevant partners," the report determined.

The FBI said in a response included in the report that it was not aware of "actionable intelligence" that the Capitol would be subject to a mob attack but that its goal "is always to disrupt and stay ahead of the threat, and we are constantly trying to learn and evaluate what we could have done better or differently, this is especially true of the attack on the Capitol."

The GAO also raised concerns that the Homeland Security Department's Intelligence and Analysis unit may have withheld or mishandled intelligence reporting because of prior criticism of its efforts to assist law enforcement during the summer 2020 Black Lives Matter riots.

"Specifically, after DHS I&A came under scrutiny for compiling intelligence on journalists and non-violent demonstrators in Portland, Oregon in summer 2020, it changed how it identified and reported open source threat information," the report stated.

"Within Open Source Collection Operations, 22 of 24 staff told the DHS Office of Inspector General that the scrutiny they received following the summer of 2020 affected their approach to reporting on the potential violence on January 6. According to the DHS Office of the Inspector General, even though collectors reported seeing violent threats related to January 6, they were hesitant to report the information. One collector stated that collectors were afraid to do their jobs because of the fear of being reprimanded by I&A leadership and concerns about congressional scrutiny."

The report validated months of reporting by Just the News about the details that law enforcement forwarded to Capitol Police as early as a month before Jan. 6, citing several instances surfaced by Just the News stories, including, for example, a tip the Capitol Police received on Jan. 5, 2021, regarding plans to block and confront Democratic members of Congress from entering the Capitol through the tunnel system via the basement of the Library of Congress.

Here are just a few of those Just the News stories:

"Bloody War": Capitol Police warned about violence two weeks before Jan. 6 riot

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/bloody-war-capitol-police-first-warned-about-violence-two-weeks-jan-6-riots

Internal Capitol Police review found sweeping intelligence, security failures during Jan. 6

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/internal-capitol-police-review-found-sweeping-intelligence-security-failures

Capitol Police whistleblower sent scathing letter days after Jan. 6 identifying failures

https://justthenews.com/government/security/capitol-police-whistleblower-sends-scathing-letter-congress-reproving-two

Capitol Police report cites security, intelligence failures under Pelosi leading up to Jan. 6

https://justthenews.com/government/security/capitol-police-report-indicates-january-6-security-failures-happened-under


John Solomon

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/congress/hldcapitol-police-feds-had-intel-jan-6-threats-failed-adapt-security-gao

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Senate unanimously votes to declassify Wuhan lab leak intelligence - Ben Whedon

 

by Ben Whedon

The bill specifically seeks information relevant to the notion that COVID-19 leaked from a lab in Wuhan, the pandemic's ground zero.

 

The Senate on Wednesday unanimously voted in favor of a bill mandating that the Biden administration declassify intelligence materials involving the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Republican Sens. Mike Braun, Ind., and Josh Hawley, Mo., reintroduced the measure following a report from the Department of Energy concluding that the virus was likely the result of a lab leak, the Epoch Times reported.

Hawley celebrated the measure's passage in a Tweet, saying "Tonight the Senate UNANIMOUSLY passed my bill to declassify all the intelligence the government has on #covid origins. Let the people see the truth!"

Formerly maligned as a conspiracy, the notion that the virus spread by way of a leak has increasingly gained traction among major federal agencies, including the DOE and FBI.

The COVID-19 Origin Act of 2023 specifically seeks information relevant to the notion that COVID-19 leaked from a lab in Wuhan, the pandemic's ground zero. The Wuhan Institute of Virology was known to be studying coronaviruses prior to the outbreak.

The bill now will head to the House of Representatives and a Republican majority that is likely to embrace it. 


Ben Whedon is an editor and reporter for Just the News. Follow him on Twitter.

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/senate-unanimously-votes-declassify-wuhan-lab-leak-intelligence

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Months before Fox News, HBO aired voting machine allegations in a documentary. It wasn’t sued - Natalia Mittelstadt

 

by Natalia Mittelstadt

A 2020 HBO documentary highlighted allegations that Dominion voting equipment is vulnerable to hacking.

While Dominion Voting Systems is suing Fox News for $1.6 billion for defamation for reporting on allegations its voting machines were hacked and flipped election results in the 2020 presidential election, the company hasn't taken legal action against HBO for a 2020 documentary detailing the alleged vulnerabilities of its machines.

HBO's "Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America's Elections" includes interviews with politicians, cybersecurity experts and hackers discussing issues with voting machines. Released in March 2020, the documentary is still available to watch on HBO Max.

One of the hackers interviewed, Harri Hursti, successfully hacked a Diebold Election Systems voting machine in a 2005 test and changed the votes in one step without a trace, according to an April 2020 Forbes article about "Kill Chain." 

A 2006 documentary called "Hacking Democracy," which showed Hursti's hack, aired on HBO multiple times, according to the 2006 film's website. The documentary was nominated for an Emmy award in 2006.

Before the documentary's premiere, Diebold asked HBO to pull "Hacking Democracy" from its schedule or, failing that, prominently run a 30-second disclaimer with each airing acknowledging that HBO had not verified the accuracy of the film's claims and referring viewers to a Diebold rebuttal on the HBO website. Diebold said Hursti's purported hack of one of its machines had been proved to be a "complete sham."

Diebold was bought by ES&S in 2009, and then Dominion in 2010. 

"None of the vulnerabilities found by Hursti were ever fixed" after Dominion bought Diebold, wrote Forbes contributor Jody Westby, noting that those "same machines" were "planned for use in 20 states in the 2020 election."

The 2020 documentary covers various ways an election can be tampered with, including machine malfunction, changing votes and voter registration records, and causing issues with voter check-in equipment, according to the Forbes article.

According to Forbes' review of "Kill Chain," former Air Force cyber analyst Jake Stauffer, who tested ES&S and Dominion voting systems for the state of California, says in the film that he found that Dominion's Democracy Suite voting equipment has vulnerabilities that allow for off-line ballot tampering, denial of service attacks, and remote code execution. "How can a vendor sell a voting system with this many vulnerabilities?" he asks.

On Dominion's fact-check page, it cites a claim by the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency that there "is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised" in the 2020 election.

Despite the many allegations of Dominion machines' vulnerabilities leveled in HBO's "Kill Chain," Dominion never filed a lawsuit against HBO.

Dominion declined to comment.

HBO didn't respond to a request for comment.

Meanwhile, in Dominion's ongoing legal battle with Fox News, the media outlet and its parent company Fox Corporation this week filed their opposition briefs to Dominion's summary judgment motion, arguing the plaintiff is attempting to redefine the First Amendment.

"Dominion's lawsuit has always been more about what will generate headlines," Fox News said in a statement Monday, "than what can withstand legal and factual scrutiny, as illustrated by them now being forced to slash their fanciful damages demand by more than half a billion dollars after their own expert debunked its implausible claims.

"Their summary judgment motion took an extreme, unsupported view of defamation law that would prevent journalists from basic reporting and their efforts to publicly smear FOX for covering and commenting on allegations by a sitting President of the United States should be recognized for what it is: a blatant violation of the First Amendment."

Dominion filed its own opposition brief on Monday to a motion for summary judgment filed by Fox News, and responded to the media company's First Amendment claims in a statement.

"Dominion is a strong believer in the First Amendment and its protections," according to Dominion's statement on Monday. "As long-settled law makes clear, the First Amendment does not shield broadcasters that knowingly or recklessly spread lies."

 


Natalia Mittelstadt

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/dominion-sues-fox-news-over-2020-election-voting-machine-claims-not-hbo

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Gain-of-function mystery: Congress probes how feds reviewed dangerous research before pandemic - Greg Piper

 

by Greg Piper

House Oversight wants to know how "potential pandemic pathogen" committee reviewed Wuhan research, if at all. Research kept going during gain-of-function "pause."

Congressional Republicans and scientists are probing what role, if any, a U.S. government committee played in approving taxpayer funding for arguable gain-of-function (GoF) research that preceded the COVID-19 pandemic and the review process before the committee's creation.

The House Oversight Committee and its coronavirus subcommittee asked Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra for "all documents and communications between and among" HHS, the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases concerning a grant to the EcoHealth Alliance, a funding conduit to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

The panels also sought those materials on "any related review by the Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight Framework (P3CO) review board" and "transcribed interviews" with 29 public health and science officials spanning HHS components, among a laundry list of requests in the Feb. 13 letter.

HHS should additionally turn over materials "regarding the formulation, creation, and publication" of two documents: the Oct. 17, 2014 "deliberative process and research funding pause" on select GoF viral research and Dec. 19, 2017 framework for guiding funding decisions on proposed research involving "enhanced" P3s.

 


 

The subject has taken on renewed relevance since a second Department of Energy lab reiterated the first's 2020 conclusion that SARS-CoV-2 most likely leaked from a Chinese lab, which has also been the FBI's assessment "for quite some time," Director Christopher Wray said this week.

The Government Accountability Office also issued a report last month calling on HHS to develop a standard in the 2017 framework to help funding agencies determine what research is "reasonably anticipated" to involve enhanced P3 and thus must be referred to HHS for further review. The report prompted Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) to reintroduce a moratorium on GoF research funding.

NIH officials told GAO the EcoHealth research on bat coronaviruses wasn't covered by the framework because there was no evidence they infected humans and the experiments "were not anticipated to increase the virulence or transmissibility of these viruses in humans."

GAO did not consult EcoHealth on NIH claims that it "did not adequately monitor the activities of its subawardees," the nonprofit said in response to the report. EcoHealth previously shared the record of its 2018 submission to NIH disclosing that WIV accidentally enhanced a bat coronavirus, contradicting an official's claim to Congress that EcoHealth hid the accident for years.

Yale University epidemiologist Harvey Risch pointed Just the News to a mystery about NIH-funded research on bat coronaviruses by University of North Carolina researchers that collaborated with WIV: how the research published in late 2015 and early 2016 escaped the 2014-2017 funding pause.

The Nature Medicine paper "A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence" discloses funding from NIH and EcoHealth among other sources. "Experiments with the full-length and chimeric SHC014 recombinant viruses were initiated and performed before the GOF research funding pause and have since been reviewed and approved for continued study by the NIH," according to the paper.

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences paper "SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence" only mentions federal funding, not EcoHealth. Noting the research was initiated before the pause, it says "Continuation of these studies was requested, and this has been approved by the NIH."

The P3CO committee didn't exist during the funding pause, and a predecessor framework specifically applied to research that could generate "highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses" transmissible to mammals.

HHS didn't answer a request for its response to the Feb. 13 letter or what process, if any, NIH used to approve the continuations. NIH didn't answer queries either.

Just the News reached out to NIH program officers who might have played a role in the approvals at the time. Two emails bounced back, and the other addressees didn't respond. Among the latter is Erik Stemmy, previously identified as EcoHealth President Peter Daszak's NIH handler

The corresponding authors on the papers, Vineet Menachery and Ralph Baric, didn't respond to queries. Both were at UNC at the time, and Baric is known for his direct collaboration with WIV. Menachery, now at the University of Texas Medical Branch, is identified in a recently revealed Slack conversation with another alum of Baric's lab. 

The University of Maryland's Matthew Frieman told Menachery about a "long conversation" with Baric about the latter's in-person meeting with then-NIAID Director Anthony Fauci in February 2020, where Baric discussed "the outbreak and chimeras." Frieman said Baric "wasn't amused" when "I joked about his link to WIV."

 

Greg Piper

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/gain-function-mystery-congress-probes-how-feds-reviewed-dangerous

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The NIH is Spending $241M to Push Ideology and Diversity Over Science - Daniel Greenfield

 

by Daniel Greenfield

Defund the NIH.

 


And you thought the NIH was just bad during the pandemic. Post-pandemic, it’s aiming to wreck medical research for generations by spending $241 million to mandate ideological conformity and diversity over science.

In 2020 the National Institutes of Health created the Faculty Institutional Recruitment for Sustainable Transformation program “to enhance and maintain cultures of inclusive excellence in the biomedical research community.” The program will give 12 institutions a total of $241 million over nine years for diversity-focused faculty hiring. Under the terms of the grants, only candidates who demonstrate “a strong commitment to promoting diversity and inclusive excellence” can be hired through the program. To apply, candidates must submit a diversity statement.

Diversity statements play the same role as expecting Chinese research to quote from Mao’s Little Red Book or Soviet scientists to explain how they incorporate Marxism-Leninism into their work. It’s the bastard child of anti-racism and at its core, it mandates ideological conformity, punishes dissent and original thinking, and treats research as just another organizing point for its extremist creed.

The South Carolina and New Mexico rubrics call for punishing candidates who espouse race neutrality, dictating a low score for anyone who states an “intention to ignore the varying backgrounds of their students and ‘treat everyone the same.’ ” Applicants who are skeptical of DEI programming might choose to describe their commitment to viewpoint diversity. This too runs afoul of the rubrics, which mandate a low score for any candidate who defines diversity “only in terms of different areas of study or different nationalities but doesn’t mention gender or ethnicity/race.”

The rubrics likewise punish candidates for failing to embrace controversial diversity practices. They recommend low scores for candidates who “state that it’s better not to have outreach or affinity groups aimed at underrepresented individuals because it keeps them separate from everyone else, or will make them feel less valued.” These affinity groups exemplify a new kind of segregation, but expressing that view could imperil an applicant’s career.

This is typical of diversity statements whose express goal is to get candidates to disavow any notions of neutrality or equality, and to commit to viewing everything through the leftist lens of identity politics.

And the NIH is spending a quarter of a billion dollars to do this. We’d be better off defunding NIH than allowing it to destroy what’s left of our scientific community.


Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-nih-is-spending-241m-to-push-ideology-and-diversity-over-science/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Former DEA official backs military intervention to address fentanyl crisis - Charlotte Hazard

 

by Charlotte Hazard

"The narco terrorists in Mexico are destroying our country," Maltz Sr. said.

A former Drug Enforcement Agency official has backed use of the U.S. military to combat the mounting crisis of fentanyl within the country.

"The president should immediately declare a national security and public health emergency," former Special Operations Director Derek Maltz Sr. said during a Congressional hearing this week. "Let's make that clear because we have chemical substances all over our streets. These are not overdoses. In my view, fentanyl is a chemical weapon."

"The narco terrorists in Mexico are destroying our country," he continued. "They need to be held accountable, even if it means using our U.S. military."

Maltz told the "Just the News, No Noise" television show on Wednesday that some members of Congress supported military action against organizations pushing fentanyl.

"I know Michael Waltz and Dan Crenshaw are now calling for the use of the military," he stated. "This is not the typical opioid addiction, which is a legitimate issue. And there's so many people that need help. But this is something different. We've never experienced it in the history of the country."

Maltz further advocated a tightening of lawful immigration to limit trafficking operations.

"The kids now in America are on the visas picking up millions of dollars from the cartel operators," he stated. "Let's start looking at shutting down visas. But I don't want to be too optimistic."

Fentanyl is a highly potent narcotic entering the U.S. in ever-increasing volume. Border officials seized a staggering 9,400 pounds of the substance in the last three months of 2022 alone. In all of fiscal year 2022, authorities seized 14,700 pounds of fentanyl.


Charlotte Hazard

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/former-dea-special-operations-director-says-its-time-use-military-stop-fentanyl

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

120 Israeli academics launch petition in support of government's judicial reform - Michael Starr

 

by Michael Starr

The initiative was supported by Professor Yisrael Aumann, who spoke at the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee sessions on the reforms.

 

 Likud Head MK Benjamin Netanyahu speaks with MK Yariv Levin during a vote for the new Knesset speaker at the assembly hall of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, on December 13, 2022. (photo credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)
Likud Head MK Benjamin Netanyahu speaks with MK Yariv Levin during a vote for the new Knesset speaker at the assembly hall of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, on December 13, 2022.
(photo credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)

A petition signed by 120 academics in support of the judicial reform proposed by Justice Minister Yariv Levin was announced on Thursday morning.

The petition's signatories include professors, researchers and administrators from the Weizmann Institute of Science, Technion, Haifa University, Bar Ilan University, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv University and Ben Gurion University.

The initiative was supported by Israel Prize laureate Professor Yisrael Aumann, who spoke at the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee sessions on the reforms. Aumann had pushed for change in the composition of the judge selection committee but had advised against the override clause over concern of checks and balances and separation of powers between authorities.

Balance of power 

This balance of powers between government branches was damaged by the High Court of Justice's 1990s constitutional revolution, argued the petition. The court had gained too many powers, including judicial review of both regular and Basic Laws and increased scope of the reasonableness clause.

 THE HIGH Court of Justice has been a paper tiger in everything concerning the Netanyahu bloc’s interests, says the writer (credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90) THE HIGH Court of Justice has been a paper tiger in everything concerning the Netanyahu bloc’s interests, says the writer (credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)

"It shouldn't be allowed to harm the essential corrective process for the legal system, which in recent years has had the limits of authorities redrawn," said a statement announcing the petition.

Calling for negotiations 

The petition also called for negotiations to create a broad agreement on the reforms, but not to capitulate on the core elements needed for correcting the system.

The signatories noted that there are many more academics that support the reform, and many more would join the petition.

The petitions were expressly in response to previous open letters by academics in opposition to the reforms. On January 24, 185 Israeli legal field academics signed a joint statement, which was preceded by a January 8 letter by eight Israeli university law faculty deans on January 8.

On Wednesday, 740 Israeli opposition activists with six NGOs sent a letter to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, calling for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to be sanctioned for human rights offenses.

The activists asserted that through the judicial reform, Netanyahu was attacking Israel's democratic institutions and seizing control of all branches of government, which was in part motivated by his ongoing corruption trials.

"The bills that PM Netanyahu is promoting will turn the State of Israel into a full-fledged dictatorship, and will abolish all legal protections in Israel for human and civil rights," argued the activists. "We ask you to act without delay to implement the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, on PM Netanyahu as a perpetrator of corruption and serious human rights abuses."


Michael Starr

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-733192

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

No More Mr. Nice Guy - Mark Tapson

 

by Mark Tapson

How Matt Walsh exemplified the Freedom Center’s longstanding strategy.


It’s a tragic statement about the decline of the West that such a thing as a “TikTok influencer” even exists, but transgender actor Dylan Mulvaney, 26, has successfully ridden that train to the notoriety he so clearly craves, with over ten million online followers. His video series titled Days of Girlhood, in which he flounces about in a parody of girlishness so inauthentic that no one would ever mistake it for true femininity, has garnered over a billion views – another sad commentary on our civilization. He has even been invited to the White House for a sit-down interview with alleged President Joe Biden.

Recently Mulvaney posted a video, “Day 335” in his series, in which he flaunted a creepy look featuring heels, a short dress, bright red lipstick, and hair extensions that he couldn’t stop playing with. He declared that he looked so “hot” that he could steal husbands, but reassured his female audience that he would never do that to them because sisterhood or something.

In response, Daily Wire host Matt Walsh, star of the wildly popular documentary about gender madness called What is a Woman? and a fierce activist in the cause of gender sanity, posted a video in which he blasted Mulvaney for what Walsh called the TikToker’s “degrading, woman-faced minstrel show”:

You do not pass as a woman, or at a woman at all, even with fifty pounds of makeup and plastic surgery and clever lighting tricks. Even then, you still cannot escape what you really are and what you will always be…

Your femininity quotient has not increased at a rate commensurate with the loss of your masculinity. You may not be masculine, but you also are not feminine. Instead, you are weird and artificial, you are manufactured and you are lifeless, you are unearthly and eerie…

You’ll never be accepted as a woman by anyone, not even the people who pretend to accept you… Everyone who sees you will see something pitiable and bizarre, something utterly unfeminine in every way…

Check out that video clip from The Matt Walsh Show below, cued up to his segment on Mulvaney:

Needless to say, Walsh’s video predictably triggered those in the pro-trans movement who already considered him a fascist bigot whose rhetoric would cause a literal genocide of trans people. A high percentage of those attacking him seemed to be snobs sneering at Walsh’s high school education and crowing about how their post-graduate credentials in gender theory and queer studies give them the authority to reject biological fact and assert that men can be women. This wasn’t the “win” they thought it was, since it only exposed the intellectual fraudulence of today’s higher education.

But less predictably (or maybe not), he received seemingly as much pushback from fellow conservatives as from the Left. Indeed, for the next several days Walsh was occupied on social media with fending off complaints from the finger-wagging Right that he had been “mean” to Mulvaney in his commentary. He was castigated for his “divisiveness.” He was lectured that his disrespectful approach wouldn’t win us any converts from the gender ideologues. Here is a representative sample:

 


Walsh eventually posted a video response to his conservative critics, in which he stated, in part,

They all agree that I’m right, that what I said is factually correct. But they think it goes too far by saying it out loud. Mulvaney is running around like some cartoon of a woman passing out tampons in the women’s room and meeting with the president to defend the mutilation of children. But I went too far. You see, this is where we differ. Because in the culture war, I don’t think it’s possible to go too far by speaking truth…

You want me to lie to protect the feelings of our enemies. And make no mistake, Dylan Mulvaney is our enemy. He is an open, visible, and active, and passionate advocate for the abuse of children, the war on fundamental truth, and the destruction of human society as we know it. You wish to defeat this man in a way that will not make him feel bad about himself…

I’m not going to protect your feelings any more than I am going to protect his. You are deluding yourself. We got in this position in our culture precisely by valuing politeness over truth.

The other side is not interested in compromise. They want nothing less than your unconditional surrender. We have to meet them with that same energy or we will lose, or continue to lose…

You don’t convince people by being nice. You don’t. At least not on a cultural level. I mean, where did you get this idea? Where did you arrive at this conclusion? That the way to win the culture is being nice. Is that how the left won the culture? Have you been paying attention at all? They have seized hold our society indoctrinating an entire generation and they didn’t do it with niceness. They didn’t win these flies with honey. They did it by being bold and aggressive and by making their opposition’s arguments seen as not only wrong but utterly horrific and insane. That’s how they did it…

We moderate our tone. We seek to kill them with kindness while they recruit legions by doing exactly the opposite. Again I ask you, when will you learn?

Walsh is correct. In an ideal world, Democrats and Republicans would engage each other like Old School gentlemen with civility and mutually respectful debate. Ideally. But the political reality today is that our parties represent two utterly incompatible worldviews; the Left recognizes this and is waging total war, ruthlessly and relentlessly, to eradicate the opposition while the Right clings to the Marquess of Queensberry rules and keeps taking it on the chin.

This is why, when Donald Trump entered the political arena after the failures of a string of conservative leaders like John McCain and Mitt Romney — men who valued noble defeat over ugly victory — he so galvanized the Right and enraged the Left. The enemy was utterly unaccustomed to having a conservative opponent get down in the gutter with them and give better than he got. Trump understood – as Matt Walsh noted in his video – that you have to meet the enemy with the same (or preferably a greater) level of aggression in order to win or be trampled, and he began to make America great again.

As it happens, Matt Walsh’s winning strategy is the same one that the David Horowitz Freedom Center has been using for nearly 35 years. Horowitz came from the radical Left and understands deeply that his former fellow ideologues are not “liberals” who can ever be seduced out of their radicalism by niceness or fair play or polite debate (hence the Center’s tag line: “Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out”). He understands that they need to be confronted by the bare-knuckled truth.

In that sense, Horowitz’s Freedom Center was conceived not as a think tank, but as a battle tank in the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural, and economic foundations are under assault by radical enemies within and without. And the Center has taken the fight to those enemies unapologetically and uncompromisingly ever since.

Originally posted at Culture Warrior.

 

Mark Tapson

Source:https://www.frontpagemag.com/no-more-mr-nice-guy/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Mayor Lori Lightfoot Blames 84% of Racist, Sexist Chicagoans Who Didn’t Vote for Her - Daniel Greenfield

 

by Daniel Greenfield

“I am a black woman — let’s not forget”

 


It’s sad that a 51.2% female city, 29% black and 28% Latino city was so incredibly racist and sexist as to refuse to reelect one of the country’s most inept and obnoxious politicians.

Democratic Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot blamed racism and her gender for her landslide defeat in her re-election bid, as Chicagoans weary of the rising crime on her watch celebrated her fall from “political rock star to rock bottom.”

“I’m a black woman in America. Of course,” she replied when asked by a reporter if she had been treated unfairly.

“I am a black woman — let’s not forget,” Lightfoot, 60, told the New Yorker in a piece that ran Saturday. “Certain folks, frankly, don’t support us in leadership roles.”

Certain folks being most of the voters who picked a black man and a Greek man. Apart from 16% of the voters who picked Lightfoot, the other 84% must be racist sexists.


Daniel Greenfield

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/mayor-lori-lightfoot-blames-84-of-racist-sexist-chicagoans-who-didnt-vote-for-her/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Wednesday, March 1, 2023

Washington Post walk-back on COVID origins epitomizes media fails of Trump, pandemic eras - Nick Givas and John Solomon

 

by Nick Givas and John Solomon

The accelerated unraveling of mainstream media narratives like those surrounding Russiagate, the Hunter Biden laptop and COVID origins has taken a toll on the industry's credibility.

 

It took The Washington Post fewer than 50 words to retract its 2020 attack on Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton's credibility for speculating that the COVID-19 virus emanated from a Chinese lab leak — a theory now deemed credible by the U.S. government. The words spoke volumes more, however, about the traditional media's record of failings during the era of former President Donald Trump and the coronavirus pandemic.

"Earlier versions of this story and its headline inaccurately characterized comments by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) regarding the origins of the coronavirus," the Post declared in an undated correction to a Feb. 20, 2020 article that accused Cotton of spreading a "fringe theory" that had been debunked as a conspiracy.

"The term 'debunked' and The Post's use of 'conspiracy theory' have been removed because, then as now, there was no determination about the origins of the virus," the outlet explained.

In other words, the Post admitted it drew its conclusions in a story and headline before the facts were clear enough to do so. This pattern has repeated itself far too often since Trump walked down the escalator at Trump Tower in 2015 to launch a campaign that turned political convention, Washington elites and the news media upside down. 

Russia collusion was a Watergate-sized scandal, until it turned out to be a Democratic Party dirty trick. The Russians had bounties on the heads of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan, until they didn't. Natural immunity was inferior — and masks superior — in the fight against the coronavirus, until science determined otherwise. The Hunter Biden laptop discovery was Russian interference and election disinformation, until it became a verified source of evidence in the hands of the FBI, well before the 2020 campaign.

The accelerated unraveling of such stories from the mainstream media has taken a toll on the industry's credibility — only about a third of Americans in a Gallup poll trust the media regularly in what is a near-record low. It has, moreover, exposed an unhealthy alliance between government bureaucrats and liberal operatives, pushing storylines to willing recipients despite them being less than accurate, if not entirely untrue, experts said.

"This," said investigative journalist Ashley Rindsberg, "was the media kind of proverbially gearing up for their fight where they say, 'OK, Trump is too far outside of the window of acceptable discourse, so we're gonna have to readjust the standards of journalism, recalibrate it, to meet this the threat.'"

The media "had deemed him a threat ... and that's where the journalistic standards are just tossed out," said Rindsberg, author of "The Gray Lady Winked," a book that exposed decades of failures inside The New York Times. 

There are some small signs the industry has taken stock of its loss of credibility. The Columbia Journalism Review — the industry's scholarly journal — recently published a four-part, 30,000-word series by Pulitzer-winning former New York Times reporter Jeff Gerth exposing breathtaking failures of major journalism institutions.

Even Bob Woodward, the legendary, Pulitzer-winning Watergate journalist whose former partner Carl Bernstein fanned the early flames of Russia collusion, has repudiated his colleagues for taking as gospel the unverified Steele dossier, a product he has labeled "garbage."

Woodward suggested journalism "cheated" the public out of the truth on Russia and urged newsrooms to "walk down the painful road of introspection" with regard to their failures.

The early campaign to discredit any American — even Cotton, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee with access to classified information — who dared question the approved narrative that the COVID-19 virus came from a wet market stands out as the latest and perhaps most powerful example of a media run amok. 

The theory that the virus leaked from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology while it conducted gain-of-function research was long dismissed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He called the lab leak theory a "shiny object that will go away" in emails from April 2020 that were revealed in a January 2022 letter from House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) and House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Leading establishment media outlets uncritically adopted Fauci's position in lockstep. The New York Times, for instance, dismissed Cotton's speculation about a lab leak in February 2020 as a "fringe theory." 

In a social media post, Pulitzer-winning historian Anne Applebaum of The Atlantic likened Cotton’s questioning of the virus’ origin to “Soviet Propaganda" that "tried to convince the world that the CIA invented AIDS."

In April 2020, National Public Radio (NPR) claimed scientists had in fact "debunked" the Wuhan leak theory. In that same month, CNN claimed the lab leak theory was "almost certainly not true." The network assured viewers that Fauci had "crushed" the theory and went on to attack then-President Trump's endorsement of it.

New York Times science and health reporter Apoorva Mandavilli posted a series of tweets in 2021 branding the lab leak theories "racist," ​​​​​reportedly deleting the tweets only after triggering public backlash. 

This week, the long-ridiculed lab leak theory solidified its emerging status as the likeliest explanation for the origins of the virus, with belated official affirmation from a reported Department of Energy classified report and from FBI Director Chris Wray

"The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan," Wray told Fox News.

For his part, Cotton has not forgotten the abuse he took for raising the questions or the mindset of the news media who hijacked the COVID origins debate.

"The media originally labeled anyone who questioned China's official COVID narrative as xenophobic, a conspiracy theorist, and more," he tweeted this week. "They never did apologize for covering up for China. Worse, they're still doing it."

The Washington Post has not responded to a request for comment about its retraction of its characterization of Cotton's comments on the origins of the virus.  

You can follow Nick on Twitter @NGivasDC


Nick Givas and John Solomon

Source: https://justthenews.com/accountability/media/evening-mainstream-medias-top-10-false-narratives-used-gaslight-american

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter