Thursday, January 18, 2024

Why Do We Have a Terror Group That Only Targets Iran on the List of Foreign Terrorists, But Not the Houthis - Daniel Greenfield

 

by Daniel Greenfield

The terror list is being abused to do favors for Iran rather than to protect America.

 


The list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations is serious because it makes funding them into a crime. Not every terrorist organization in the world is on there.

As I recently wrote in, “A Christmas Genocide in Nigeria”, the Obama administration had resisted adding Boko Haram to the FTO list despite their horrifying massacres of Christians and bombings of churches. Obama’s people had argued that the Islamic terrorist group was a local problem and there was no reason to add it.

Similar debates took place over Jihadists in Somalia.

The Trump administration added the Houthis in Yemen to the FTO list only to have Biden take them off. In response to the Red Sea attacks, the administration still won’t put the Houthis on the FTO list only on the much weaker SDGT list which doesn’t criminalize funding them.

But here’s something funny. Jaysh al-Adl is on there.

Jaysh al-Adl may not ring any bells. And it shouldn’t. Until recently it hardly ever showed up in the news.

And with good reason.

Jaysh al-Adl is a Sunni Jihadist group that focuses all of its energies on attacking Iran. It was recently in the news because Iran decided to bomb what it claimed were some of its bases in Pakistan. (And Pakistan then responded by bombing some other Baloch nationalist groups operating out of Iran. There’s a lot of backstory to this, but frankly it doesn’t matter all that much to us.)

I’m not proposing that we throw Jaysh al-Adl a birthday party and bake a cake, but why is it on our FTO list when terrorists who actually are attacking Americans aren’t?

Jaysh al-Adl was added in 2010 during the Obama administration. Obama had begun secret backchannel talks with Iran in 2009 which included demands for “confidence-building measures”.

In November 2010, the State Department sanctioned a Pakistan-based militant group, called Jundullah, which had attacked Shiite mosques and military installations in eastern Iran, killing hundreds.

Iranian officials, including Mr. Khamenei, had accused the Central Intelligence Agency of supporting the organization, which Washington denied. Blacklisting Jundullah was a way to confront a terrorist organization and signal positive intentions by the White House, current and former U.S. officials said.

“We wanted to say, ‘If there’s openness on your part, there’s openness on ours,’” said a former senior administration official involved in the decision.

Jundullah is Jaysh al-Adl.

The confidence-building measures have failed badly. So why Jaysh al-Adl still on there? If we’re going to list every Islamic terror group in the world, great. But right now the Biden administration still refuses to list the Houthis but is keeping a group on there only as a favor to Iran.

Much like the battles over listing Boko Haram, it feels like the FTO list has been used to offer gestures to terror states while refusing to list actual dangerous terrorist groups.

The terror list is being abused to do favors for Iran rather than to protect America.


Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/why-do-we-have-a-terror-group-that-only-targets-iran-on-the-list-of-foreign-terrorists-but-not-the-houthis/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

UN: No indication Hamas was building elaborate tunnel system - Mike Wagenheim

 

by Mike Wagenheim

“To think that the U.N. had any understanding of what was…any information about those operations, I think, is: No is clearly the answer for that,” said a U.N. spokesman.

 

Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant tours the largest-ever Hamas attack tunnel uncovered by the IDF, December 2023. Photo by Ariel Hermoni/Israeli Defense Ministry.
Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant tours the largest-ever Hamas attack tunnel uncovered by the IDF, December 2023. Photo by Ariel Hermoni/Israeli Defense Ministry.

Despite the presence of a Hamas terror tunnel system in the Gaza Strip now thought to be larger in scale than the London Underground, the United Nations insists it had no idea the tunnels were being built.

Asked on Wednesday whether, given the United Nations’ sizable presence in Gaza via a variety of agencies, there had been any indication to the global body that tunnels were being constructed underground, a spokesman for U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said, “No is clearly the answer for that.”

Spokesman Stephane Dujarric told reporters that “it seems to me that all this infrastructure was built in a highly secretive way.”

However, officials from the U.N. Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) sounded the alarm on the presence of tunnels under U.N. facilities twice in 2017, and again in 2021 and 2022. 

UNRWA alone has 13,000 employees in over 300 facilities across Gaza. At least a dozen other U.N. agencies operate in Gaza. It has been well documented that many U.N. employees in Gaza have professional and personal ties to Hamas.

Still, Dujarric insisted that the United Nations was unaware of the sophisticated labyrinth of tunnels being dug and fortified throughout Gaza.

“I mean, just to see it as an observer, to think that the U.N. had any understanding of what was…any information about those operations, I think, is: No is clearly the answer for that,” he said.

A senior official from the World Health Organization also insisted that none of its staffers saw any evidence of a Hamas presence at Gaza’s Al Shifa Hospital, despite video footage showing terrorists whisking hostages into the facility on Oct. 7 with no pushback from hospital staff.


Mike Wagenheim

Source: https://www.jns.org/un-no-indication-hamas-was-building-elaborate-tunnel-system/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iranian proxies stepping up their drone attacks in war with Israel - Ruth Marks Eglash

 

by Ruth Marks Eglash

Terror groups are increasingly using drones in their war against the Jewish state


 

JERUSALEM – Beginning Oct. 7, when Hamas terrorists used remote controlled drones to disarm tanks and knock out surveillance cameras during its surprise attack on Israel, through to last week, when a Hezbollah drone from Lebanon landed directly in an army base in northern Israel, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly becoming part of the weapons arsenal used by Iranian-backed non-state players in their war against the Jewish state.  

While Israel has in place what it calls "an aerial defense array" – used multiple times over the past three months to thwart "hostile aircraft" from Gaza and Lebanon – as UAVs become easier to obtain, manufacture, enhance and weaponize, Israel, as well as other countries around the world, are racing to contend with an ever more lethal form of combat that is already outpacing existing military defense systems.  

"The Israeli – and the U.S. – militaries have been using drones for a long time, especially in counterterrorism, for intelligence gathering or for precision strikes in order to distinguish between civilians and fighters," Dr. Liran Antebi, program director of advanced technologies and national security at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, told Fox News Digital.  

US IMPOSES NEW ROUND OF SANCTIONS ON NETWORK INVOLVED IN IRAN’S DRONE PRODUCTION

Xtend Drones

Xtend’s Griffon Counter UAVs, with speeds of up to 93.1 miles per hour, and AI technology are being used by the IDF to identify and kill rogue drones. (Extend.) (Xtend)

"However, what was once the silver bullet used by democracies in counterterrorism and to act in more ethical ways, is now in the hands of terrorists or non-democratic states and is being used in the opposite way," she said. 

According to Antebi, ISIS was already a huge fan of UAVs when it waged jihad in Iraq and Syria a decade ago. Now, more sophisticated, and much more lethal armed drones, are taking center stage in global conflicts, most recently in the ongoing Ukraine-Russia war. In some cases, Russian soldiers have used military grade UAVs, including those created by Iran, to strike right in the heart of civilian populations.  

In response, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently declared a plan to produce a million drones this year to fight back against Russia. And Russia, according to reports, is also increasing its drone stocks, including stepping up purchase of the Iranian-designed Shahed 136 suicide drone, a move that could have direct impact and increase the capabilities of groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah, as well as the Houthi terror group in Yemen, which is also considered a proxy of Tehran.   

"While Israel is considered one of the world’s leaders in producing and using high-quality drones and UAVs, as well as a leading country in the field of counter systems to fight against those technologies, it has not been very effective at implementing those defense mechanisms," Antebi said, using Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack as an example.  

IRAN PRAISES HOUTHI PROXY GROUP RAIDING US MILITARY ASSETS, ISRAEL: 'SUPPORT TO THE RESISTANCE FRONT'

Firefighters Kyiv Ukraine Russia war Iran strike

Firefighters help a local woman evacuate from a residential building destroyed by a Russian drone strike, which local authorities consider to be Iranian-made Shahed-136, in Kyiv, Oct. 17, 2022. (Reuters/Vladyslav Musiienko)

She said that since the start of the current Gaza war, Hamas, Hezbollah and even the Houthis, had used all manner of UAVs to strike Israel, ranging from enhanced "off-the-shelf" drones to more sophisticated military-grade UAVs, capable of dropping bombs or of self-exploding.  

"What we have not seen yet in our arena are the larger UAVs capable of launching missiles, which we know Iran is already producing," Antebi said. "We also haven't seen any FPV (first person view) drones yet, which we also know are being used in Ukraine."  

Unlike ordinary drones, which are operated using a mobile phone or tablet and can be easily tracked using existing defensive technology, FPVs are operated with VR goggles and are much more difficult to detect and intercept.  

Tal Mimran, from the Cyber Security Research Center in the Faculty of Law at Hebrew University, told Fox News Digital, that the use of armed drones, even the simplest ones, by non-state actors was a game-changer for Israel – as well as for other Western democracies with conventional armies bound by international law. 

"When we think of an army like the U.S., Israel, the U.K., a drone is a technical weapon that is used alongside more significant tools such as airplanes or helicopters, but when it comes to a weaker state, and specifically non-state actors, it is a strategic change," he said, adding that Iran’s training of terror groups in the art of drone warfare was "closing the gap between Israel and rogue groups such as Hamas or Hezbollah."  

ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR: IDF UNCOVERS EVIDENCE OF HAMAS DEVELOPING PRECISION MISSILE CAPABILITIES WITH IRAN'S HELP

Houthi rebels

Houthi security troops ride a vehicle after guarding a gathering for an address by the group's leader inside Al-Sha'ab Mosque on Nov. 14, 2023 in Sana'a, Yemen. (Mohammed Hamoud/Getty Images)

While Israel has in place a multibillion-dollar rocket and missile air defense system designed to respond to attacks on multiple fronts and which can easily take down the relatively crude rockets lobbed by Hamas, the midrange rockets and missiles possessed by Hezbollah and even the longer-range ballistic missiles fired in recent weeks by the Houthis from Yemen, smaller, more nimble threats from armed or exploding drones are still a challenge.  

"Israel deals very well with a missile spread and the Iron Dome can intercept some of the drones," said Mimran. "But there is no doubt this is a game changer." 

Already, the situation appears to be changing. Earlier this month, for the first time, the Israeli army said that it used an advanced drone in a precision strike against a Hamas target inside Gaza. Until now, Mimran said the military had refrained from using offensive drones to fight Hamas, even though they had been used on the northern front, in Lebanon and Syria. But that approach might change if the northern front opens up.

Iranian Shahed drone in flight

Iran showed video of a Shahed drone in flight, Feb. 24, 2023. (IRINN via AP)

"We might see new things that we haven't seen until now," said Mimran, referring to Israel’s capability of sending a "swarm of drones" with technology developed by Israeli defense company Elbit. It is also very possible, he added, that Hezbollah too has the capacity of sending hundreds, if not thousands, of drones at one time "creating chaos like we have never seen before in these parts."  

Aviv Shapira, co-founder and CEO of Xtend, a company developing drones for the defense market, said it was just a matter of time before the threat of drones became global. 

HEZBOLLAH CLAIMS IT DOESN'T WANT EXPANDED WAR WITH ISRAEL AFTER LAUNCHING DRONE ATTACK ON ISRAELI ARMY BASE

Rockets are launched against Israel from Gaza

Rockets are fired toward Israel from the Gaza Strip, as seen from southern Israel, Oct. 23, 2023. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

"It will happen all over the world and right now, no one knows how to deal with it," said Shapira, whose company began developing racing drones for the gaming industry but was soon commissioned for military purposes. "In the U.S. there are so many anti-terror measures in place, but now it is possible for anyone to suddenly take a drone, without a radio [and therefore not trackable] and use it in an attack."  

He said that until now, defense companies were focused on developing advanced cyber measures to counter armed drones, but as tethered or pre-programmed UAVs become more common, there was a need for a new type of defense systems.  

"The problem is that you don’t know where these drones are coming from because they are so small and they cannot be stopped with jamming devices," said Shapira, whose company worked with the Israeli army to tackle the previous Hamas threat of incendiary balloons and kites that were causing havoc a few years ago.  

IRAN, RUSSIA, SLAM US-UK JOINT STRIKES ON YEMEN’S HOUTHIS, WARN OF ‘INSTABILITY IN THE REGION’

Smoke rises after a rocket fired from the Gaza Strip hit a house in southern Israel

Smoke rises after a rocket fired from the Gaza Strip hit a house in Ashkelon, southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. (AP)

"These drones don’t have radio communications, so the only way to mitigate this problem is to physically intercept them," he said. "That means either shooting them down, using laser or technology like we have developed, which involves a high-speed drone that catches other drones with a net"  

According to Shapira, Xtend’s Griffon Counter UAV, with speeds of up to 93 mph, flies faster than any other drone currently available and can be programmed to operate autonomously, using AI, to identify a "rogue drone and kill it." 

And, he added, the technology is so simple to use that it does not require a soldier or extensive training, but anyone can learn to operate it in less than 30 minutes.  

However, Antebi, who is also a researcher of advanced technologies in warfare, warned that the development of all new technologies – defensive or offensive – ran the risk of having a "boomerang effect."  

"There are a lot of startups and technology companies creating amazing technologies that can change the world for good, but we also have to be aware that the bad guys also want to use those technologies and they are capable of using them for bad," she said.  


Iran military parade

An Iranian military truck carries surface-to-air missiles past a portrait of Iran's supreme leader during a parade on April 18, 2018, in Tehran. (Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

For Mimran, a broader concern, particularly in terms of drone warfare, is that currently there are no international guidelines, regulations or benchmarks.  

"While there have been some global campaigns aimed at trying to ban the use of drones in wars," he said. "The ideological gaps between the West and the rest of the world are becoming so large that there is no way for the international community to sit together and think of appropriate regulation or rules of the game for this kind of weapon."  


Ruth Marks Eglash is a veteran journalist based in Jerusalem, Israel. She reports and covers the Middle East and Europe. Originally from the U.K, she has also freelanced for numerous news outlets. Ruth can be followed on Twitter @reglash

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/world/iranian-proxies-stepping-drone-attacks-war-israel

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Pakistan conducts retaliatory military strikes against Pakistani terrorists operating in Iran - Elizabeth Pritchett

 

by Elizabeth Pritchett

The strikes come two days after a Iranian bombing on Pakistani soil left two young children dead


 

Pakistan conducted a series of military strikes Thursday morning against insurgents operating in Iran in response to a deadly bombing in the southwestern Pakistani province of Baluchistan on Tuesday.

The Pakistan Armed Forces completed a "series of highly coordinated and specifically targeted precision military strikes" against Pakistani terrorists in Iran's Siestan-o-Baluchistan province as part of an intelligence-based operation named "Marg Bar Sarmachar," Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced.

The strikes were described as successful by the MoFA and left a "number of terrorists" dead.

"Over the last several years, in our engagements with Iran, Pakistan has consistently shared its serious concerns about the safe havens and sanctuaries enjoyed by Pakistani-origin terrorists calling themselves *Sarmachars* on the ungoverned spaces inside Iran," the MoFA said, adding that it has shared "multiple dossiers with concrete evidence of the presence and activities of these terrorists."

PAKISTAN WARNS OF 'CONSEQUENCES' AFTER IRAN'S DEADLY BOMBING KILLED TWO CHILDREN

Pakistani Air Force jets

Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced military strikes were conducted in Iran Thursday morning in response to a deadly bombing on Pakistani soil Tuesday that left a 6-year-old girl and an 11-month-old boy dead. (ASIF HASSAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Pakistan said the "lack of action" on its "serious concerns" caused the "Sarmachars" to kill innocent Pakistanis without consequence, which ultimately prompted the strikes on Thursday after credible intelligence reports revealed impending large scale terrorist activities. 

While the country said it "fully respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity" of Iran, it cannot compromise the security or national interest of Pakistan.

"This action is a manifestation of Pakistan’s unflinching resolve to protect and defend its national security against all threats," the announcement read. "The successful execution of this highly complex operation is also a testimony to the professionalism of the Pakistan Armed Forces. Pakistan will continue to take all necessary steps to preserve the safety and security of its people which is sacrosanct, inviolable and sacred."

Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs described Iran as a "brotherly country" and said the Pakistani people hold "great respect and affection for the Iranian people."

"We have always emphasized dialogue and cooperation in confronting common challenges including the menace of terrorism and will continue to endeavor to find joint solutions," the MoFA said. 

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

 

Elizabeth Pritchett

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/world/pakistan-retaliatory-military-strikes-against-pakistani-terrorists-operating-iran

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

House approves resolution condemning Biden border policies with Democratic support - Ben Whedon

 

by Ben Whedon

The vote came the same day that House Speaker Mike Johnson met with President Joe Biden and subsequently indicated that his position had not changed on the need for immediate border security measures.

 

The House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a resolution condemning President Joe Biden's handling of border security amid an unprecedented surge in illegal crossings.

The lower chamber approved the resolution in a 225-187 vote which included the support of 14 Democrats, The Hill reported. The move follows a congressional visit to border jurisdictions at the beginning of the year.

The vote came the same day that House Speaker Mike Johnson met with President Joe Biden and subsequently indicated that his position had not changed on the need for immediate border security measures. Johnson declared after the meeting that he had insisted on imposing "substantive policy change" to address the influx.

"We documented 64 instances where the president took executive action or his agencies took action to create the current catastrophe that we have at the border. It's a national security and humanitarian catastrophe, and I articulated that to the president in the meeting," Johnson told reporters.

In the Senate, lawmakers have moved to craft an agreement to trade border security concessions for aid to Ukraine for its war with Russia, though the reported terms have drawn scrutiny from conservatives for being to favorable to the Democrats.


Ben Whedon is an editor and reporter for Just the News. Follow him on X, formerly Twitter.

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/congress/house-approves-resolution-condemning-biden-border-policies-democratic-support

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Top Israeli figure says Hamas spending on tunnel system deprived Gazans of much needed aid - Charlotte Hazard

 

by Charlotte Hazard

Oren said that civilians in Gaza are not allowed to go into the tunnels for protection, all while Hamas uses them during the war.

 

Israel's former top diplomat to the United States says Hamas victimized the Palestinian people for years by diverting money to build a massive tunnel and bunker system for war rather than spending it on needed infrastructure like schools and hospitals.

Former Ambassador Michael Oren told Just the News that Hamas has continued to hurt its own Palestinian people by not allowing civilians to use the tunnel network for safe harbor during the ongoing war.

"We now know how much money went into these tunnels and bunkers," Oren told the John Solomon Reports podcast on Wednesday. "Enough to build dozens and dozens of schools. Dozens and dozens of hospitals.......while the people of Gaza were left destitute."

According to a recent report from The New York Times, the Israeli Defense Forces discovered that the tunnel network Hamas has in Gaza is between 350 and 450 miles long. 

This is a lot longer than the original assessment which was only 250 miles. 

"Think about this," Oren said. "We're talking miles of tunnels. Some are going down seven stories. Hundreds of feet with elevators. So this is a massive military challenge and would be in any circumstances."

Oren said that civilians in Gaza are not allowed to go into the tunnels for protection, all while Hamas uses them during the war. 

"You could have fit the entire population of Gaza into these tunnels, but they don't let a single civilian in,"  he said. "Not one."

The Times of Israel reports that since the discovery of these tunnels, the IDF has been trying to destroy them.

Oren said that Gaza civilians not being let into the tunnels is just another example of Hamas using innocent people as human shields. 

"Think about that," he said. "How cynical that is. How barbaric. Because they want Israel to kill the people, the human beings behind whom they use human shields. So that Israel will be condemned as war criminals and the world would impose a ceasefire, which means Hamas wins."

An official told The Times of Israel that these tunnels could take a long time to destroy, because they have to be checked for hostages or booby traps. 

"The criticism outside of Israel is that we're using too much power," Oren said. "The criticism in Israel is that we're not using enough power and we're losing soldiers in an effort to reduce Palestinian casualties. That's very unpopular in the State of Israel."

 
Charlotte Hazard

Source: https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/wedtop-israeli-figure-says-hamas-spending-tunnel-system-deprived-gazans

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Canada’s Terror TV - Lloyd Billingsley

 

by Lloyd Billingsley

Long past time for Canadians to push back.

 


[SPECIAL JANUARY PROMOTION: Spend $50+ In The FPM Store And Receive A Free Copy Of “Final Battle” By David Horowitz.]

Our intrepid colleague Christine Williams recently exposed “Free Palestine TV,” an outlet “established by a global coalition of terror activists is operating and fundraising in Canada, assisted by a global coalition of radical activists and violent extremists from designated terrorist organizations.”

Christine also exposed FPTV director Laith Marouf, a Trudeau crony who wants to treat “Jewish white supremacists” with “a bullet in the head” and calls Jews “loud-mouthed bags of human feces.”  This guy probably never met anybody like this writer’s Jewish neighbors and schoolmates in Windsor Ontario.

When our family moved there in the 1950s, the neighborhood had no public swimming pool and kids sought relief by running through lawn sprinklers. The Silver family, two doors down on McKay Ave., duly assembled an above-ground “doughboy” pool and invited all kids on the block. That sure felt good on hot summer days.

On cold winter days, Mrs. Silver drove me to Glenwood Public School along with her own children Ron and Sandra. There was never any anti-Jewish sentiment at the school, and if there had been, polyglot principal Norton Mansfield would been all over it in a second.

Glenwood student Jeff Mandel was something of a joker, but also athletic. He joined in games of British Bulldog and played defensive line for the AKO Fratmen of the Canadian Junior Football league. Isaac Novak was a fantastic baseball pitcher. He reportedly declined to pitch a game on Yom Kippur, but that is the only controversy I recall about Izzy.

I remember the Haddads, Christian Arabs, but I don’t recall any Arab-language magazine such as Al-Forquan calling for the killing of Jews as part of a “sacred duty of jihad.” There was never anything like that in the Windsor Star or any of the Detroit newspapers.

I don’t recall anybody like “Windsor man” Habibullah Ahmadi, 21, murdering a 75-year-old grandmother like Anne Widholm, out for a walk after church. Ahmadi beat the frail woman into coma, inflicting the worst skull fractures Dr. Balraj Jhawar had ever seen in Windsor, and she died more than a year later.

I don’t recall any murder case where an adult suspect’s booking photo was never released. I don’t recall a murder case where news reports included no information about the suspect, and no interviews with family, friends or co-workers. I don’t recall any murder trial in which the judge ignored the basic question of motive.

Habibullah Ahmadi could have sought combat with a man his age in one of Windsor’s many bars. By all indications, he wasn’t up to such a challenge. In Windsor, they have several colorful names for such people.

Windsor is home to the Sandwich Baptist Church, the oldest active black church in Canada, built by runaway slaves in 1847. As it turns out, beyond his hatred of Jews, the very pale Laith Marouf has a problem with people of darker skin shade.

“Colin Powell, the Jamaican house-slave of the Empire who extinguished the lives of millions of people with his lies, died a painful death unable to breath (sic),” read one of his tweets. “If there was any good that came from this pandemic, it would be his death on the birthday of the prophet of Islam.” Marouf is also on record that “Frogs have much less IQ than 77, and French is an ugly language.” This guy is a veritable equal-opportunity hater.

In 2009, Marouf was barred from re-entering Canada, and he scored money from the government for, yes, an anti-racism program. So no surprise that under former blackface performer Justin Trudeau, the racist anti-Semite is able to establish “Free Palestine TV.” I can’t recall anything like that in Windsor, and there’s something I forgot to tell you.

My uncle, James Richard Billingsley, was wounded twice in WWII, once by a Nazi sniper. Uncle Jim fought with Canada’s Eight Reconnaissance Regiment, the outfit that liberated the Westerbork transit camp that sent thousands of Dutch Jews to Auschwitz and Sobibor. The 876 remaining inmates were glad to see the Canadians, who had been in the fight from the start.

People have a right to wonder if anyone in Laith Marouf’s family played a role in taking down the National Socialist regime.  On the other hand, Marouf’s hateful rhetoric sounds a lot like the Nazis who ran the camps, part of Hitler’s “final solution” to kill off the Jews.

Uncle Jim and his fellow WWII vets would be surprised to see someone promoting the same genocidal quest on television in Canada. That calls for pushback and here’s something the people might try.

Set up a pay-per-view event with Laith Marouf to thrash out the issues one way or another. It would be interesting to see who answers the call.


Lloyd Billingsley is the author of Yes I Con: United Fakes of America, Barack ‘Em Up: A Literary Investigation, Hollywood Party, and numerous other works.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/canadas-terror-tv/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Gallant: Unless Hamas is destroyed, we will not be able to live in Israel - Akiva Van Koningsveld

 

by Akiva Van Koningsveld

Earlier this week, the Israeli defense minister signaled the impending end to heavy combat operations in Gaza.

 

The destruction left in the wake of Oct. 7, when Hamas terrorists infiltrated the Gaza border in southern Israel, and wreaked havoc on the residents of Kibbutz Be'eri, Oct. 22, 2023. Photo by Chaim Goldberg/Flash90.
The destruction left in the wake of Oct. 7, when Hamas terrorists infiltrated the Gaza border in southern Israel, and wreaked havoc on the residents of Kibbutz Be'eri, Oct. 22, 2023. Photo by Chaim Goldberg/Flash90.

The Israel Defense Forces will keep fighting in the Gaza Strip until Hamas’s “significant military and governing capabilities” are eliminated and the 130-plus hostages held captive by the terror group are returned, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said on Wednesday, mere days after announcing a significant reduction in military operations in Gaza.

“If the fate of Hamas is not complete dismantlement, we will not be able to live in the State of Israel,” Gallant told members of the Israeli Navy’s Shayetet 13 naval commando unit at a base in Atlit, near Haifa.

“The end of this war—whenever it may be—will be based on our achievements. This will include destroying Hamas’s ability to operate with military and governing capabilities. We will maintain freedom of operation,” said Gallant, according to a statement from his office.

“In northern Gaza, we are dismantling their capabilities, dismantling their battalion frameworks. This enables an IDF brigades to maneuver from place to place: Beit Lahiya, Beit Hanoun and Jabalia,” he continued.

“The same goes for areas in the center of the Gaza Strip, and we will achieve this in Khan Yunis as well. In Khan Yunis, we operate in a different way…. There, we focus on reaching Hamas’s leadership and on the hostage issue,” he added.

Moreover, he continued, Israel has “no right” to stop fighting until the hostages are freed, and “the only way to bring them back is via military pressure, because Hamas only responds to the use of force.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to the country’s south on Wednesday, where he visited troops at the Nevatim Air Force Base, where F-35 squadrons are stationed.

“The war is continuing, and it will continue until the end, until we achieve all of its goals: returning the hostages, eliminating Hamas and ensuring that Gaza never again constitutes a threat to Israel,” the premier reiterated during a meeting with the 116th “Lions of the South” Squadron.

“Let nobody misjudge us: We will continue to fight on land, at sea and in the air until total victory,” said Netanyahu, according to his office.

 


Earlier this week, Gallant signaled the impending end to heavy combat operations in the southern and northern parts of the Gaza Strip.

“The intensive maneuvering phase in the north of the Gaza Strip has ended, and in the south, it will also end soon,” Gallant said during a press conference on Monday evening.

“Some three months ago…we specified the stages of implementation and made it clear that the intensive maneuvering phase will last for approximately three months—in the north of the Gaza Strip, this phase has concluded,” the defense minister said.

The announcement came a day after the 36th Division, the IDF’s largest regular-service armored division, which includes the Golani Infantry Brigade, left Gaza for rest and training.

On Tuesday, the IDF announced that the undercover counterterror Duvdevan Unit would also leave the Strip and redeploy to its regular location in Judea and Samaria.

“At this stage, three divisions are operating in Gaza. One division is fighting in the north of the Strip and carrying out raids to counter terrorism,” IDF Spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari confirmed during a press briefing on Wednesday night.

“A second division is holding the corridor that separates northern Gaza from southern Gaza; this division fights in the center of the Strip and carries out operational activities. The third division—with the broadest range of forces—is fighting in the Khan Yunis area,” said the spokesman.

In some cases, the IDF has decided to reduce the amount of military force in the interest of “security and achieving a better mission,” Hagari claimed.

He noted that Israeli troops were still expanding their operation in the southern Hamas stronghold, killing more than 30 terrorists in “heavy fighting” during the past day alone.

As Hagari spoke on Wednesday night, the IDF cleared for publication of the name of an additional soldier killed in action in Gaza.

Staff Sgt. Oriya Ayimalk Goshen, 21, from Jerusalem, of the Givati Brigade’s reconnaissance unit, fell in battle in the south of the Strip, the military said.

Meanwhile, a viral Hamas propaganda video shared on social media on Wednesday showed over a dozen armed operatives of the terror group roaming the streets of Gaza, praying and screaming “Allahu akbar” (Allah is the greatest).

The undated clip was filmed in areas of the Strip from which Israeli forces had previously withdrawn, accordging to Yoni Ben Menachem, a veteran Arab affairs and diplomatic commentator for Israeli radio and television.

 

Akiva Van Koningsveld

Source: https://www.jns.org/gallant-unless-hamas-is-destroyed-we-will-not-be-able-to-live-in-israel/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

How the Media Reported on Two Terrorists Who Worked as Journalists - Hugh Fitzgerald

 

by Hugh Fitzgerald

Not one news agency reported on the evidence provided by the IDF.

 


[SPECIAL JANUARY PROMOTION: Spend $50+ In The FPM Store And Receive A Free Copy Of “Final Battle” By David Horowitz.]

On January 7, media outlets widely reported that Israel had killed two Palestinian “journalists” in Gaza.

The two “journalists” were freelancers, both working for Al Jazeera: Hamza Al-Dahdouh and Mustafa Thuraya. The former was the son of Wael Al-Dahdouh, chief among  the Arab journalists reporting from Gaza for Al Jazeera, and the stories about his death made sure to emphasize that he had followed in his father’s footsteps as a journalist.

More on the media’s coverage of the deaths of these “journalists” who, it turned out, were also terrorists, with Al-Dahdouh belonging to Hamas and Thuraya belonging to Palestinian Islamic Jihad, can be found here: “Media Ignore Evidence Showing Slain Gaza “Journalists” Were Terrorists,” by

The stories about the deaths of Al-Jazeera’s freelancers Hamza Al-Dahdouh and Mustafa Thuraya, who had also been an AFP contributor, were almost identical: All highlighted the fact that the former was the son of Wael Al-Dahdouh, the Qatar-based TV station’s renowned chief correspondent in Gaza.

The stories focused on the personal tragedy of the father, who had lost his immediate family in the war but continued reporting from the field under dangerous conditions.

Media also quoted Al-Jazeera’s condemnation of the deliberate Israeli “targeting” of journalists and mentioned the number of journalists killed so far in the war according to the flawed data of the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).

Israel does not deliberately target journalists. Let’s remember what happened when the IDF was initially accused of the deliberate killing of the journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, who had been hit while standing near to where a firefight between the IDF and Hamas terrorists was taking place. The IDF investigated, and concluded that an Israeli soldier had shot Abu Akleh, but not intentionally. The American government did its own investigation, and concluded that the Israelis were telling the truth. The Arabs, of course, continue to insist that her death was a deliberate murder.

No media outlet, however, bothered to update or correct their report when on January 10, the Israeli army released evidence proving Al-Dahdouh and Thuraya had been terror operatives.

After the international media had published their sorrow and pity for the two “journalists” killed by the mad-dog Israelis, the IDF provided proof that both men had belonged to terrorist groups. After all, it is possible to be both a journalist and a terrorist; they are not mutually exclusive. But then something strange happened. The media for the most part simply ignored the evidence presented by the IDF, and did not correct their original story about two “journalists” being deliberately murdered….

On X, Emanuel Fabian of the Times of Israel posted the following:

The IDF says two Al Jazeera journalists targeted in an airstrike on Sunday in southern Gaza’s Rafah, were members of terror organizations in the Gaza Strip. The strike was carried out after the IDF said it spotted a terror operative piloting a drone, and subsequently hit a car they were in. Hamza Wael Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera’s Gaza correspondent Wael Dahdouh, and Mustafa Thuria, a video stringer for AFP who was also working for Qatar-based television, both died in the strike. The IDF says its intelligence confirms both are members of Gaza-based terror groups and were “actively involved in attacks against IDF forces.” It says Thuria was identified by a document found by troops in Gaza as a member of Hamas’s Gaza City Brigade, serving as a deputy squad commander in one of the battalions. Dahdouh, according to the IDF, is a member of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. It says documents recovered by troops in Gaza reveal he served in Islamic Jihad’s electronic engineering unit, and previously was a deputy commander in the Zeitoun Battalion’s rocket firing force. The IDF attaches a copy of the document showing Dahdouh was a member of Islamic Jihad’s electronic engineering unit.

The IDF had documents showing that Dahdouh was not just a low-level operative in Palestinian Jihad, but a very important one: he was in the PIJ’s electronic engineering unit; before that, he had been the PIJ’s deputy commander in the Zeitoun Battalion’s rocket-firing force. How did the IDF know this? It had found documents identifying Dahdouh in both roles in documents it discovered in one of the PIJ hideouts it raided.

AP’s report also included an emotional-collegial touch:

Palestinian journalists have played an essential role in reporting on the conflict for local and international media outlets, even as many have lost loved ones and been forced to flee their own homes because of the fighting….

Even though AP knew, by the time it published the paragraph above, that Israel had presented irrefutable evidence that Dahdouh and Thuraya had both belonged to terrorist groups, it continued to discuss them as innocent “Palestinian journalists.”

The New York Times and Washington Post emphasized Al-Dahdouh’s family tragedy.

 

 

 

Both stories still say that the Israeli army did not immediately respond to requests for comment….

But once the IDF provided its documentary evidence of the terrorist roles of Hamza Al-Hamdouh and Mustaf Thuraya, both the Times and the Post ought to have corrected their previous stories in light of this new information. Instead of doing so, they chose to blame the IDF for not “immediately responding” to requests for comment, as if that somehow meant that the IDF had lost its right to be heard later, after it had conducted its usual thorough investigation, based on the documents that the soldiers found, of the terror links of both “journalists.” This is, of course, unconscionable nonsense.

Indeed, after the IDF announced that the son had been an Islamic Jihad terrorist, the writers could have discovered that the apple didn’t fall far from the tree, albeit in a different sense: Before he became a journalist, the father had been imprisoned in Israel for terrorist activity. According to an Israeli security source, he was affiliated with Islamic Jihad.

But the Washington Post story, and that of The New York Times, were not updated.

The same applies to CNNABC NewsBBC, and many others. They echoed the tragic human angle or Al-Jazeera’s claims but failed to update their stories or publish new ones when the new information came to light….

In other words, all of those major sources of news — the giants of journalism — stuck with their original misleading story about innocent “journalists” being killed, and refused to publish a correction, based on documents made public by the IDF, that identified Thuraya as a member of Hamas and Dahdouh as a member of Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

The two main news agencies AP and Reuters, the major broadcasters BBC, CNN, and ABC News, and the two most important American newspapers, The New York Times and The Washington Post, all failed to correct their initial accounts about the deaths of the “journalists” Thuraya and Hamdouh. None of them reported on the documentary evidence provided by the IDF about these two terrorists who, incidentally, were also working as freelance journalists.

The question is why? Alas, we all know the answer to that.


Hugh Fitzgerald

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/how-the-media-reported-on-two-terrorists-who-worked-as-journalists/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Wednesday, January 17, 2024

Blinken: Hey, You Know What Would Fix This Problem? A Palestinian State - Robert Spencer

 

by Robert Spencer

The same failed “solution” is offered over and over again.

 


[SPECIAL JANUARY PROMOTION: Spend $50+ In The FPM Store And Receive A Free Copy Of “Final Battle” By David Horowitz.]

As hard as it is to believe, Secretary of State Antony Blinken was absolutely serious when he recently called yet again for the creation of a Palestinian state and promised that it would be the magic solution that would finally bring peace to the region. Get in line, Mr. Blinken. You’re only about the ten millionth person to make this confident recommendation, and to demonstrate that you haven’t learned the most basic and obvious lessons from what has happened to Israel ever since the Arabs rejected the first offer to create a Palestinian state back in 1947.

The Jewish Press reported Wednesday that Blinken said at a press conference about his latest trip to Israel: “We continue to discuss how to build a more durable peace and security for Israel within the region. As I told the prime minister, every partner that I met on this trip said that they’re ready to support a lasting solution that ends the long-running cycle of violence and ensures Israel’s security. But they underscored that this can only come through a regional approach that includes a pathway to a Palestinian state.”

Well, great. There’s just one problem: This “lasting solution” has been offered to the Palestinians numerous times, and they have always rejected it. Not only has it never worked, but it never will work, as it fails to take note of one of the most important elements of the conflict.

Oblivious to these facts, Blinken plowed on: “In today’s meetings I was also crystal clear: Palestinian civilians must be able to return home as soon as conditions allow. They must not be pressed to leave Gaza. As I told the prime minister, the United States unequivocally rejects any proposals advocating for the resettlement of Palestinians outside of Gaza, and the prime minister reaffirmed to me today that this is not the policy of Israel’s government.” As far as Blinken was concerned, that left the Palestinian state as the only other option: “To make this possible, Israel must be a partner to Palestinian leaders who are willing to lead their people in living side by side in peace with Israel and as neighbors. And Israel must stop taking steps that undercut Palestinians’ ability to govern themselves effectively.”

Blinken didn’t explain what “steps” Israel has taken to “undercut Palestinians’ ability to govern themselves effectively.” Mahmoud Abbas has done that well enough by himself; he is now 88 years old, and is in the eighteenth year of his four-year term as president of the Palestinian Authority. Then there are the Hamas top dogs Ismail Haniyeh, Khaled Mashal, and Mousa Abu Marzouk, who have become billionaires by siphoning off aid money the witless Western left has sent to the Palestinians.

Even worse, which Palestinian leaders are “are willing to lead their people in living side by side in peace with Israel and as neighbors”? Is there even one? Blinken didn’t offer any names, and if he had been asked, he wouldn’t have been able to come up with one unless he had resorted to lying. Arab intransigence has been clear from the beginning of the conflict: back on November 29, 1947, the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 181, calling for the creation of an Arab state and a Jewish state in Palestine. The Arabs had rejected it immediately. Neither Biden nor Blinken, nor anyone else who still advances the “two-state solution” and Resolution 181 as the only path to peace for both Israelis and Palestinians, ever seems to ponder why so many years have gone by since Resolution 181 was originally passed without ever being implemented even for a single day. They don’t seem to regard the seven decades of its not being in force as any indication that maybe it isn’t the path to peace after all. There has been no indictment of its status as the “lasting solution that ends the long-running cycle of violence and ensures Israel’s security.”

What Biden, Blinken, and the rest of the foreign policy establishment fail to realize, or refuse to realize, is that the UN partition plan failed for one reason only: The Muslim Arabs of Palestine and the surrounding Arab countries will never accept a Jewish state, even if it were the size of a postage stamp. As The Palestinian Delusion shows, that refusal is rooted in Islamic concepts and commands, most notably the Qur’anic command to “drive out those who drove you out” (2:191) and its underlying assumption that any land that has been ruled by the Muslims at any time belongs to the Muslims forever and can never be ruled by anyone else. If a Palestinian state ever were established, it would quickly become a jihad terror base, as did Gaza when the Israelis withdrew from it.

Those who tout the two-state solution today seem to think that somehow, in the decades since the tumultuous period following the end of World War II, this situation has changed. But it has not, and it will not. Islam is still Islam. Its Qur’an has not changed; neither has its theology. The imperatives that led the Muslim Arabs to reject a two-state solution in 1947, and to go to war to destroy the nascent Jewish state in 1948, still exist and are still believed by millions of Muslims worldwide. It is only by ignoring this, or by remaining in blissful willful ignorance of it, that diplomats and kings and presidents and pretend presidents such as Old Joe Biden could ever have thought that a negotiated agreement can be hit upon that would enable Israelis and Palestinians to lay down their arms and live side by side in peace.

That is not to say that the Israeli-Palestinian problem cannot be managed such that there is a minimum of bloodshed on both sides. But to think that a peace accord can be hit upon that will induce Muslims in the Middle East and around the world to give up Islam’s doctrines of jihad, its deeply rooted anti-Semitism, and its supremacist political ideology is a position that could only be held by the willfully ignorant and historically uninformed. Of course, they’re the people running Washington.


Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 26 books including many bestsellers, such as The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), The Truth About Muhammad and The History of Jihad. His latest books are The Critical Qur’an and The Sumter Gambit. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/blinken-hey-you-know-what-would-fix-this-problem-a-palestinian-state/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter