Saturday, October 28, 2017

Muslim Brotherhood Increasingly Isolated across the Middle East - Shahab Moghadam




by Shahab Moghadam

Driven into an unprecedented decline, the Brotherhood is moving out of old strongholds and into Western Europe and the United States.

In a dusty town in the Gharbia governorate on the banks of the Nile, Abdel decided he'd had enough. The longtime Muslim Brotherhood member publicly quit the organization. His October 12 defection marks the latest mid-level leader to leave the organization.

Abdel's decision is part of a larger trend that reaches far beyond the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, with members dissociating themselves from the organization since the 2013 overthrow of the Morsi government in Cairo, helped along by a variety of regional developments that disadvantage the longstanding political movement. 

The situation looked different for the Muslim Brotherhood in 2011, when regional uprisings brought the group in from the cold. The secretive group, founded in 1928, looked to be facing a golden opportunity to step forward from the shadows and participate in the political future of a number of Arab countries, including Tunisia and Egypt. The election of Mohamed Morsi as president of Egypt in the aftermath of the so-called "Arab Spring" initially looked especially promising. Morsi was a longtime Brotherhood leader and enforcer for the organization.
In the half-decade since that historic development, subsequent events have not only thrust the organization out of the halls of power, but driven it, apparently, into an unprecedented decline.

The Muslim Brotherhood survived successive crackdowns by Arab governments only to reorganize in the shadows for decades. However, this time is different, as the internal unity of the group has been shattered by disputes between younger members and the old guard, accompanied by an unheard of number of defections. Almost the entire leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt has been sentenced to life terms in prison by the Sisi government, taking from the group its most experienced organizers and thinkers.

Meanwhile, those who remain outside prison walls are subject to serious restrictions on their ability to regroup in a political capacity. Indeed, it appears that the government in Cairo has learned from the experiences of its predecessors and developed a strategy that prevents a shadowy re-emergence of the Brotherhood. Perhaps only the continued financial support of Qatar is enough to keep the organization from collapsing altogether.

At the same time that Egypt is cracking down on the Muslim Brotherhood in its home, the Saudi monarchy is engaged in a dogmatic war with the group. Using its authority as the custodian of the two holiest sites in Islam, the Saudi government and its religious authorities have been working in recent years to interpret Islamic law in a manner that would take away from the Muslim Brotherhood its theological foundations.

By attempting to cast the Brothers as deviants from true Islam, the Saudis are striking a massive blow to the credibility of the group among the masses. Joining the organization in the kingdom is strictly illegal, and those who do so are subject to prison terms. A major motivation of this aggressive campaign is the Brotherhood's belief that monarchies are inherently un-Islamic and that governments such as that in Riyadh therefore need to be overthrown. This existential threat to the Saudi royals has led to a growing mobilization of the religious clergy in their defense as part of a vigorous effort to strip the Brothers of any credibility or ideological grounding.

In the oil-rich Qatari emirate, meanwhile, the Muslim Brotherhood has played a major role in driving a wedge between Doha and its neighbors. This division became concrete in June 2017, when an "Anti-Terror Quartet" of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the UAE, and others decided to cut diplomatic and commercial ties with Qatar for its support of groups such as the Brotherhood. The hosting of leading Brothers in the emirate's capital, as well as the financing of the group and its current and former offshoots such as Hamas, irked its neighbors to no end and is said to have been a primary motivator of the June declaration. The demands on Qatar that the Anti-Terror Quartet issued prominently featured the Muslim Brotherhood as one of the groups that must be removed from the emir's favor. This demand was of such importance that many experts opined that it looks to be the primary issue in the Gulf dispute.

The government of Sudan, once an ally of the Muslim Brotherhood, is rapidly distancing itself from the group as it cultivates closer ties with its neighbor to the north, Egypt. As the two North African states draw closer, Khartoum appears to have made the strategic decision to jettison its Brotherhood connections, despite the group having played a role in the current regime's assumption of power in 1989. This trend has especially gained steam since the beginning of 2017, as diplomatic ties with Cairo, Riyadh, and even Washington have improved markedly at the expense of the Khartoum government's old alliance with the Brotherhood. In September 2017, the U.S. removed its sanctions on Sudan, which had been in place since the 1990s, thereby acknowledging the change in policy by Osama bin Laden's former hosts. Some even claim that the removal of Sudan from the Trump administration's travel ban was due to Saudi lobbying for its new allies in return for the pivot away from the Brothers. Notably, there was no delegation from the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood invited to attend the congress of Sudan's ruling party, though Rachid Ghannouchi of Tunisia and a senior delegation from Turkey's AKP did attend.

As it finds itself increasingly isolated across the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood has turned to European countries such as Spain as well as the United States across the Atlantic to expand. Police in Catalonia are reported to have noticed and continue to monitor increased Brotherhood activity in the poor Muslim neighborhoods of Barcelona. The Brothers are said to be preaching to Spanish Muslims about the south of Spain, which was once the Muslim province of Andalusia, which has, needless to say, attracted significant scrutiny from regional law enforcement. Front groups across the pond in the U.S. continue to preach similarly radical messages in Muslim communities, using Qatari and Turkish funding to open mosques and related organizations, including some mere miles from Washington, D.C. The Brothers' activities in North America have yet to attract the sustained law enforcement scrutiny that they have in Europe or the decisive action against them that has occurred across the Middle East, and that has led to a doubling down by the organization on its expansion efforts in the U.S.

On the whole, the once-expansionist Muslim Brotherhood is in retreat across the Middle East and North Africa, with the squeeze being put on them even in their onetime strongholds of Qatar and Egypt. However, new offshoots appear to be gaining steam in Europe and North America even as the original branches shrivel, creating potential opportunities for Brotherhood expansion even in this period of challenges for the organization.

Shahab Moghadam

Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/10/muslim_brotherhood_increasingly_isolated_across_the_middle_east.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

The Russian collusion narrative is falling apart. There will be many embarrassed politicians in the near future - John Dietrich




by John Dietrich

Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke claims that one third of the Interior Department’s employees are disloyal to the president. The intel community may contain an even higher percentage of employees who do not want to see the president succeed.

Well, it seems that things are falling apart, the center is not holding. There are those on the left who will not abandon the “dossier” fiasco. As late as Oct. 7, 2017 the Guardian described it as “one of the most explosive documents in modern political history.” This “dossier” was an obvious fraud and no one in the intelligence community believed otherwise. People who claimed it might possibly have value were deceiving the public. They did this because it was the only thing they had to justify an investigation of the Donald Trump campaign. According to the Wall Street Journal, the dossier “became a factor in Obama administration decisions to launch an FBI counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign.”

This batch of memos had circulated through the media and intel community for months when BuzzFeed published the full document in January 2017. As long as it was not public, it could be vaguely referred to in order to support the charge that Trump was owned by the Russians. Once it was published, it became obvious that it was a fraud. This is revealed on the first page. No experienced intelligence officer would classify a Sensitive Source as Confidential. If he did he would be looking for a new job or possibly be behind bars. 

The other implausible claim in the document concerns the “golden shower” allegations. 4Chan, an imageboard website, has claimed responsibility for this hoax. Under the circumstances, 4Chan has as much or more credibility than the former heads of three of the major intel agencies. They have not perjured themselves in front of the U.S. Congress. Their claim is that they mailed this “fanfiction” to Rick Wilson, a noted Never Trumper. They claim that Wilson then gave it to the CIA. In October 2016, Wilson on the Jamie Weinstein Show claimed: “there are some things out there that I think would cause even his most passionate supporters to go, ‘Whoa, wait a minute.'” It appears that he was hinting that he had some privileged information.

This would all be a very humorous incident except for the fact that the “dossier” was used for such a nefarious purpose. Trump’s attorney, Michael Cohen, stated “It’s so ridiculous on so many levels. Clearly, the person who created this did so from their imagination or did so hoping that the liberal media would run with this fake story for whatever rationale they might have.” C. Mitchell Shaw claimed, “the dossier does not read like the product of ‘a former British intelligence operative.’” He continued, “With its bad grammar, poor spelling, and lousy format, the dossier reads much more like what the anonymous 4Chan user claims: a prank that wound up being wildly successful beyond anything its perpetrators could have hoped.” Even Piers Morgan commented, “The moment I heard about it, my gut reaction was that it was utter nonsense.”

Eventually, the details about these memos will be revealed. We live in a new age. Dan Rather found this out when he attempted to pass off a computer generated memo he claimed was created in the 1970s. San Francisco area professor Eric Clanton discover that wearing a mask would not prevent him from being identified when he used a bike lock to assault a man. All of the electronic communications dealing with these memos are available. The chain of acquisition is on the Internet. The only thing lacking is the willingness to find them. Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke claims that one third of the Interior Department’s employees are disloyal to the president. The intel community may contain an even higher percentage of employees who do not want to see the president succeed. They will not be enthusiastic about uncovering information they feel would benefit the president. Perhaps they need a new team to discover the origins of these memos.

Crackas with Attitude” appears to have the aptitude to do the research. This is a British group, and not Russian. They were able to hack into the email accounts of CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Deputy Director Mark Giuliano and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson. When they hacked CIA director Brennan's AOL account, they discovered a number of classified documents which were later published on WikiLeaks as well as the Social Security numbers of more than a dozen top American intelligence officials. The British eventually arrested the 16 year-old youth.

It has now been revealed that the DNC paid Steele for his efforts. The Washington Post reported that, “After the election, the FBI agreed to pay Steele to continue gathering intelligence about Trump and Russia.” It is only a matter of time before all the details of the “dossier” affair are revealed to the public.


John Dietrich is a freelance writer and the author of The Morgenthau Plan: Soviet Influence on American Postwar Policy (Algora Publishing). He has a Master of Arts Degree in International Relations from St. Mary’s University. He is retired from the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Department of Homeland Security.
Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/10/the_russian_collusion_narrative_is_falling_apart_there_will_be_many_embarrassed_politicians_in_the_near_future.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Judo Gold Medalist Faces Anti-Semitic Backlash In Abu Dhabi - Ari Lieberman




by Ari Lieberman


Competition officials refuse to play Israeli national anthem or raise Israeli flag.




The formidable Israeli judo team numbering 12 athletes was forced to contend with a host of indignities at the Abu Dhabi Judo Grand Slam tournament this week. First, Turkish Air inexplicably refused to fly the team to Turkey where they were supposed to pick up their visas in Istanbul and then fly to Abu Dhabi. They were forced to endure a grueling 7-hour waiting period at the airport. The team was then forced to travel to Amman to obtain the requisite entry papers and flew directly to Abu Dhabi via Amman.

Abu Dhabi officials deliberately imposed difficult restrictions on the Israeli delegation to discourage them from attending. But Abu Dhabi officials forgot they were dealing with tough-as-nails Israelis who’ve had to contend with, and triumph over far worse including genocidal Islamists, endless wars, terrorist attacks, drought, semi-arid land, hostile boycotts and massive immigration absorption. Bureaucratic red tape was a cakewalk by comparison.

Despite the fact that they arrived at Abu Dhabi exhausted and haggard from their unnecessarily arduous flight, team members nevertheless quickly scored impressive victories. Israel's Gili Cohen took the bronze medal in Thursday’s women's under-52kg competition. But her Muslim hosts would not allow her to display the Israeli flag on her uniform as all other competing nations are permitted to do. Instead of the flag, the letters “ISR” appeared. But it gets worse, much worse in fact.

Twenty-five year old Israeli judoka Tal Flicker captured the gold, defeating his opponent in the under-66 kilogram category. As he sat at the top spot of the podium reserved for gold medalists, he was forced to watch and listen with a mixture of contempt and disgust as the flag of the International Judo Federation was raised and the IJF anthem played. That’s right, Israel’s Blue and White, with its Star of David could not be displayed and its national anthem, “Hatikva” – The Hope – could not be played. Flicker was seen moving his lips while the IJF anthem was played and later said that he was singing Hatikva. The Israeli spirit could not be broken.

This disgraceful behavior is expected from Abu-Dhabi. The Emirate nation has no ties with the Jewish State and is deeply mired in medieval-like antisemitism and xenophobia. That is the general norm in the Arab world as well as many – though certainly not all – non Arab, Muslim nations.

Abu-Dhabi officials claimed that their odious restrictions on Israeli players were motivated by security concerns but this disingenuous excuse is as lame as they come. All Western nations have become targets of terrorism. France, the UK, Germany, Belgium, Sweden and Spain have been relentlessly attacked by Islamic terrorists. Israel is a relatively safe place to live compared to these nations. No, Abu Dhabi was plainly motivated by something infinitely more nefarious.

The IJF should not escape criticism either. They are equally culpable in this nonsensical charade. This isn’t the first time that an international sporting event hosted by a Muslim nation was disgraced by such infantile and racist behavior. In 2015, Israeli judokas Yarden Gerbi and Sagi Muki competed in Abu Dhabi and captured bronze medals in the women’s under 63-kilogram weight class, and men’s under 73-kilogram weight-class, respectively. They were forced to wear the judo federation's insignia in lieu of their national flag.

If they truly wanted, the IJF could have put a stop to these outrages. There is certainly no shortage of nations willing to provide hospitable venues for IJF sporting events. Had the IJF demonstrated some fortitude, they would have forcefully and unequivocally informed Abu Dhabi that its discriminatory conduct would not be tolerated and that the Grand Slam event would be held elsewhere. But instead, they chose to capitulate to medievalism and base racism. What occurred to the Israeli delegation at Abu Dhabi this week represents true apartheid. There is simply no other way to describe it.

Earlier in the week, IJF president Marius Vizer sent a letter to the event’s organizers demanding that the Israeli delegation “be treated absolutely equally in all aspects,” and further highlighted IJF statutes which he said “clearly provide that the IJF shall not discriminate on the ground of race, religion, gender or political opinion.” Abu Dhabi was unmoved and no effort was made to sanction the Emirate nation.

Arab and Iranian athletes routinely refuse to compete against Israelis. On the rare occasions that they do compete, they often engage in unsportsmanlike conduct. During the 2016 Rio games, Egyptian judoka, Islam El Shahaby, disgraced himself and his country when he refused to bow or shake the hand of Israeli judoka, Or Sasson after Sasson gave the Egyptian a thrashing. In June 2013, in one of the most bizarre incidents of unsportsmanlike conduct, an Egyptian wrestler exhibited traits associated with a rabid dog by biting her Israeli opponent in the back and drawing blood. The Egyptian was suspended while the Israeli, Ilana Kartysh, captured the gold. The list of indignities and outrages are too long to note but international sporting officials continue to look the other way.

There was a time not too long ago when Jews were required to display the Star of David on their clothing as a badge of shame but today the reverse is the case. Israelis and Jews cannot display the Blue and White in most Muslim countries. Prior to 1948, before the Jewish people reclaimed their ancestral homeland, the Star of David was viewed upon by many with disdain and contempt. Today, it is a symbol of success and strength and is a constant reminder of the impotence and failure of Israel’s enemies. 

Ari Lieberman is an attorney and former prosecutor who has authored numerous articles and publications on matters concerning the Middle East and is considered an authority on geo-political and military developments affecting the region.

Source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/268245/judo-gold-medalist-faces-anti-semitic-backlash-abu-ari-lieberman

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

No role for Assad in Syria's future, US top diplomat says - AP and Israel Hayom Staff




by AP and Israel Hayom Staff 

"The reign of the Assad family is coming to an end, and the only issue is how that should be brought about."

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson doubled down Thursday on Washington’s call for Syrian President Bashar Assad to leave power, looking past recent battlefield gains by Assad's Russian-backed forces to insist that "the reign of the Assad family is coming to an end."

Tillerson made the comments after what he called a "fruitful" meeting with U.N. Syria envoy Staffan de Mistura, who later announced plans to resume U.N.-mediated peace Syrian talks on Nov. 28. It will be the eighth such round under his mediation in Geneva since early 2016.

They come despite the fact that Assad’s forces have just in the past year recaptured Syria’s second-largest city and reached the key eastern city of Deir ez-Zour, long under siege from Islamic State fighters.

The top U.S. diplomat used the occasion to reiterate Washington’s longstanding, hardline position against Assad, which has been overshadowed of late by the Trump administration’s focus more on defeating the Islamic State group than on ousting the Syrian leader.

Officials in Damascus could not immediately be reached for comment.

Tillerson also endeavored to play down Iran’s role in supporting Assad.

Syria’s civil war has left at least 400,000 people dead and driven more than 11 million people from their homes, and the United States has been calling for Assad to go nearly from the start of the uprising against him more than six an a half years ago.

But this time, facts on the ground are playing more in his favor than at any time in years.

Reuters
U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson

"The United States wants a whole and unified Syria with no role for Bashar Assad in the government," Tillerson told reporters after the meeting at the U.S. mission in Geneva. "The reign of the Assad family is coming to an end, and the only issue is how that should be brought about."

"We do not believe there is a future for the Assad regime, the Assad family," he said.

Tillerson made similar statements in April – before even greater territorial gains by Assad's forces, prompting the Syrian leader to retort then that the diplomat had been "hallucinating."

De Mistura announced the Nov. 28 date for the resumption of the intra-Syrian talks in an address by video conference to the U.N. Security Council following the Tillerson meeting. He said it was time to move on the political track to end the conflict, saying "now is the moment of truth."

"It would be a mistake by all of us if we think that time is on our side," the special envoy said. "The best way to proceed requires indeed instead an intensified engagement among the key players in support of the Geneva parties."

De Mistura said he would work to move into "real negotiation on a constitution and U.N.-supervised elections" while exploring the issue of governance and terrorism "in parallel" files. He expressed openness to any initiative that contributes to the U.N.-led process in Geneva.

Opposition delegations – which do not include Islamic State or other U.N.-designated terrorist groups – have never spoken directly to Syrian government envoys under de Mistura’s mediation.

Tillerson said any exit of Assad should be done through the Geneva process, but such a departure was not a "prerequisite" for that process to start.

In the past year, Assad’s Iran and Russia-backed forces have recaptured Aleppo, Syria’s second-largest city, and last month they reached the eastern city of Deir el-Zour, which had long been under siege from IS fighters.

Assad’s forces and their allies have been battling Islamic State just as U.S.-backed, Kurdish-led troops have pummeled the U.N.-designated terror group on another front: The Syrian Democratic Forces recently ousted the jihadi group from its so-called capital, Raqqa.

Speaking Thursday with a Russian delegation, Assad said the battlefield gains would pave the way for political progress, and that his government was ready to hasten the pace of national reconciliation.

He said his government would eventually address constitutional reforms and hold parliamentary elections.

Tillerson sought to play down any idea that the Syrian government’s advances might amount to a "triumph" for Iran, which has been a key backer of Assad.

"I see Iran as a hanger-on," Tillerson said. "Iran has not been successful; the Russian government has been more successful. We have had success. I don’t think that Iran should be given credit for the defeat of ISIS in Syria."

Tillerson met with de Mistura during a stop in Geneva on his way home from a trip to the Middle East and South Asia. Officials said Tillerson had initially planned to meet with officials from the U.N. refugee and migration agencies and the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross, but those meetings did not take place during his short visit in Geneva.


AP and Israel Hayom Staff

Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/2017/10/27/no-role-for-assad-in-syrias-future-us-top-diplomat-says/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Thursday, October 26, 2017

Underground in Raqqa - Patrick Cockburn




by Patrick Cockburn

Hat tip: Dr. Jean-Charles Bensoussan

To escape the aerial bombardment, IS decided to disappear underground, digging immense tunnel complexes underneath its two biggest urban centres, Mosul in Iraq and Raqqa in Syria

Shortly before the siege of Raqqa began in June, Islamic State officials arrested Hammad al-Sajer for skipping afternoon prayers. Hammad, who is 29, made a living from his motorbike: he carried people and packages, charging less than the local taxis. IS had arrested him a number of times before – mostly for smoking cigarettes, which were banned under IS rule – but he had always been released after paying a fine or being lashed. Attendance at prayers was compulsory and he had missed the Asr, the afternoon prayer, because a passenger had made him wait while he went into his house to get money for his fare after a trip to Raqqa’s old city. Hammad expected to be fined or lashed, but this time he was sentenced to a month in prison. Except it turned out not to be prison. On his first morning, ‘militants blindfolded us and took us in a vehicle to a place that seemed to be inside the city because it took no more than ten minutes to get there.’

Hammad and the other prisoners, all of them local men, were taken to an empty house. In one of the rooms there was a hole in the floor. Rough steps led down about sixty feet before the tunnel flattened out into a corridor, which was connected to a labyrinth of other tunnels. A fellow prisoner, Adnan, told Hammad that IS had started work on what was effectively a subterranean network a year and a half earlier. In other words, construction began in 2015, after IS’s spectacular run of victories ended and it started its long retreat in the face of Kurdish offensives backed by coalition firepower. To escape the aerial bombardment, IS decided to disappear underground, digging immense tunnel complexes underneath its two biggest urban centres, Mosul in Iraq and Raqqa in Syria, to help it defend itself when the final assaults came.

Few people in Raqqa knew the extent of the excavations going on beneath their feet – not even Hammad, who rode his motorbike around the city every day. The entrances were always in districts from which local inhabitants had fled or been evicted. ‘When we got into the tunnels we were amazed,’ Hammad remembers. ‘It was as if an entire city had been built underground.’ IS must have needed an army of workers to build it – but then there were large numbers of prisoners and jobless labourers to draw on. The prisoners were told as little as possible about what they were doing: anyone who asked a lot of questions was punished. Hammad saw rooms with reinforced concrete walls and ceilings, and what looked like boxes of ammunition piled up on the floor. When he asked about the boxes, he says, one of the guards ‘hit me on my back with a piece of cable and said: “Don’t poke your nose into things. This is not your business. Do your job and keep quiet.”’ The foreign fighters on duty were silent and unapproachable, but some of the guards were locals and occasionally talked to the diggers during the ten-hour working day. ‘Sometimes they joked with us because they were bored and tired,’ he says. One day he asked one of them what all this hard work was for. ‘This great construction will help the lions of the caliphate to escape,’ he said (the ‘lions’ were the IS emirs and commanders). ‘They have a message to deliver to people and they should not die too soon.’

IS officials used prisoners to work on the tunnels when they could, but they also hired labourers. One of these was Khalaf Ali. When IS seized the city in 2014, he was selling cigarettes in the street. ‘I was picked up by some militants who took me to a commander,’ he says. ‘They did not take me to prison, but they confiscated my boxes of cigarettes and said that if I sold cigarettes again, they would put me in prison and I would get thirty lashes.’ He started spending his days in a local square with other unemployed men; they would wait for a car or truck to stop and offer them odd jobs – moving furniture, mending broken doors or windows. In April 2016, Khalaf was sitting in the square with the others when an IS security man said he wanted to talk to them. At first they were nervous, but the official said they could have work if they registered their names at an IS office. When they showed up at 7 a.m. the following day, they were told they had to agree to certain conditions: ‘We must not talk about what we were doing in public as it was one of the caliphate’s secrets and, if we violated this condition, they would kill us as traitors.’ They were blindfolded and driven a short distance to an empty house, where the blindfolds were removed. It wasn’t the house Hammad had first been taken to: here, there were no stairs, just a sloping tunnel about 150 feet long, which took them around sixty feet underground.

‘We entered an area that looked like a residential complex,’ Khalaf remembers. ‘There were many rooms: some under construction, others finished, with concrete walls.’ The labourers used trolleys to move the excavated soil to a certain point in the tunnel, where other men, whom he didn’t know, took charge of moving it up to the surface to be dispersed. The various teams of workers were forbidden to talk to one another. Khalaf’s team was responsible for moving furniture, including sofas and beds, to completed rooms. ‘There was electricity, though not in every room, and the corridor had lights.’ As the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) advanced towards Raqqa and the American bombardment intensified, IS doubled wages from $4 to $8 a day, though money was deducted if the IS officials were dissatisfied with the quality of the work. Once Khalaf asked an IS militant who had first had the idea of building these underground complexes. He was told that it was ‘our brothers in faith’: ‘in Afghanistan,’ the militant said, ‘many attacks were repelled and failed because of the tunnels.’

Hammad and Khalaf, who didn’t know each other, escaped separately from Raqqa during the first weeks of the siege. Hammad fled in the early morning with a group of men, moving from house to house whenever there was a break in the fighting. They took advantage of a tactical retreat by IS fighters to run towards the Kurdish-led forces, stopping every ten minutes to hide behind walls and the wreckage of houses until they reached safety. The SDF questioned them to make sure that they weren’t IS infiltrators, and then took them to a camp for displaced people at Ain al-Issa, north of Raqqa. Khalaf’s journey out of Raqqa was even riskier: after a number of people in his neighbourhood were killed, he and thirty others decided to try to escape from the city guided by SDF radio broadcasts. Even so, Khalaf says, they were sometimes trapped inside a house by the fighting for several days. ‘Finally we fled, but we lost some of our friends,’ he says. ‘We saw their bodies lying there as we ran, but everybody was afraid of snipers so we couldn’t go back for them.’

The siege of Raqqa, a small city on the Euphrates with a population before the war of less than 300,000, has now been going on for four months. IS fanaticism is one reason it hasn’t fallen sooner, but that alone wouldn’t be enough to stop the SDF, with the might of American airpower behind it. The network of tunnels connecting up bunkers, hideouts and hidden escape routes is the key to the resistance. IS fighters are able to move swiftly underground, shifting positions before they can be detected and eliminated by bombing or shellfire. As in Mosul, the only way for the attackers to advance without sustaining heavy losses has been to call in coalition airstrikes so intense that much of the city has already been destroyed. The Kurdish general commanding the SDF, Mazlum Kobane, was quoted on 26 September as saying that his forces now hold 75 per cent of Raqqa, but there are still some 700 IS fighters and 1500 pro-IS militiamen in the city centre. They can probably hold out for weeks or even months, using the same skills in urban warfare that IS demonstrated during the siege of Mosul. A combination of snipers, suicide bombers, mortar teams, mines and booby traps slow down and inflict damage on the enemy. For IS, eventual defeat is inevitable, but they remain dangerous: last month a group of IS fighters in SDF uniforms killed 28 SDF men in a surprise attack.

Still, tactical agility won’t be enough to save the caliphate, which is now being overwhelmed on multiple fronts. Islamic State’s great strength came from the way it combined religious cult and war machine; its weakness was that it saw the whole world as its enemy, which meant that it would always be outnumbered and outgunned. Without allies and dealing only in violence, it led an unlikely alliance of states normally hostile to one another to find common cause against it, and engage in a degree of reluctant co-operation. As IS comes close to losing its power, old rivalries and divisions are beginning to re-emerge – but in a political landscape significantly reshaped by the war with IS.

A decision IS took three years ago – after its columns had won speedy victories over the Iraqi and Syrian armies and captured much of eastern Syria and western Iraq – helped to set the stage for the next phase of the conflict: instead of keeping up the pressure on the demoralised forces of the central governments in Baghdad and Damascus, IS diverted its forces to make war on the Kurds in both Iraq and Syria. In August 2014, it launched a surprise attack on the Iraqi Kurds which almost reached their capital, Erbil, and in September it started a prolonged assault on the Syrian Kurdish city of Kobani. Quite why IS did this remains a mystery: it’s possible that it was acting with the encouragement of Turkey, which was alarmed by the growing strength of the once marginalised Syrian Kurds. Whatever the explanation, the Kurds in both Syria and Iraq unexpectedly found themselves, much to their political benefit, in the front line of an international campaign against IS. The Peshmerga in Iraq and the People’s Protection Units (YPG) in Syria were suddenly awarded support from the most powerful air force in the world. Turkey had been prepared to see Kobani fall to IS, but the city was saved by intense US airstrikes, though 70 per cent of its buildings were left in ruins. The US had been desperately seeking reliable ground troops in Syria and found them in the YPG, which took control of much of the southern side of the Syrian-Turkish border. In Iraq, the Kurds used the defeat of the Iraqi army in northern Iraq at the time of the fall of Mosul to seize the ‘disputed territories’ outside the boundaries of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), thereby expanding the Kurdish-controlled area by 40 per cent.
*
Kurdish leaders in Syria and Iraq have long wondered, mostly in private, whether they would be able to retain their political and military gains once IS was on the road to defeat. Early last year, Muhammad Haji Mahmud, a senior Peshmerga commander, told me that the war with IS had brought great benefits to the Iraqi Kurds: ‘We have become a regular army, rather than a guerrilla force; are supported by US and European air power; can buy weapons openly; and are praised internationally for fighting terrorism.’ His big fear was that the Kurds wouldn’t ‘have the same value internationally’ once Mosul was liberated and IS defeated. Nor did he think they would have the strength to hold onto the disputed territories without international support. In Syria, too, Kurdish leaders worry that they are over-extended and too reliant on the Americans, who may stop supporting them diplomatically and militarily once Raqqa and the last IS strongholds have fallen. Turkish intervention is one threat; another is the Syrian army, which – with Russian air cover – has surrounded IS at Deir Ezzor and will now want to advance to take the oilfields further east. Developments in Iraq and Syria often mirror each other: the Syrian army captured East Aleppo in December 2016 and the Iraqi army took Mosul seven months later. The trend in both Iraq and Syria has been for the military power of the central government to bounce back – which poses a mounting threat to Kurdish separatism.

Now that the outcome of the war with IS is no longer really an issue, the conflict in the region is turning towards confrontation over the powers, and even the existence, of the two Kurdish quasi-states: the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in Iraq, and what the Syrian Kurds call Rojava, in the north-east corner of Syria. In 2012, following the uprisings of the Arab Spring, the Syrian army withdrew from Kurdish cities and towns in the area, and what to all intents and purposes is the Syrian branch of the Kurdistan Workers Party, the PKK, which had been fighting a guerrilla war in Turkey since 1984, took over. As a US military ally against IS from 2014, the Syrian Kurds field an army about 50,000 strong. Their fighters are now moving into eastern Syria, where they will confront advancing troops of the Syrian army. A collision is probable and its outcome uncertain, but for the Kurds it is fraught with danger, since they can’t know what American policy towards them will be under Trump.

However, the first real post-IS crisis for the Kurds has come not in Syria but Iraq. The non-binding referendum on independence for the Iraqi Kurds held on 25 September was opposed by the UN, US, UK, France and Germany as well as by regional powers including Turkey, Iran and Iraq. The last three promised retaliation against the KRG if the vote was held, a threat that its president, Masoud Barzani, interpreted as a bluff. It turned out to be a very real threat and within days of the referendum, Baghdad had closed Iraqi airspace to international flights out of Erbil and Sulaimaniyah. The Iraqi government held joint military manoeuvres with Turkey and Iran and is threatening to take control of the KRG’s borders. The Kurds’ overwhelming vote for their own independent state has had the effect of highlighting the scale of the obstacles to their self-determination. Iran, Turkey and the Iraqi government are now united as never before and in a position to enforce a blockade on the KRG; there is a limit to what the Kurds can do by way of retaliation.

‘The Kurdish leadership in Iraq doesn’t really have any military or diplomatic options,’ says Omar Sheikhmous, a veteran Kurdish leader who believes the KRG has badly overplayed its hand. Barzani’s decision to hold a referendum – driven primarily by intra-Kurdish political divisions – may come to seem a serious miscalculation. Before the poll, Barzani rejected compromise proposals from the US and its European allies while Kurdish leaders underestimated the likelihood of Turkey and Iran following through on threats that had proved hollow in the past. Sheikhmous had warned me before the vote that the Kurdish leadership in Iraq could be about to ‘throw away all they had won over the previous twenty or thirty years’. He compared the referendum with other classic blunders in Iraqi history, such as Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990, when he entirely misjudged how other powers would respond. KRG leaders wrongly believed that Turkey and Iran wouldn’t want to jeopardise their sizeable economic interests in Iraqi Kurdistan by objecting to the vote. But neither Turkey nor Iran can countenance the prospect of independence for Iraqi Kurds since it would inflame their own Kurdish minorities. Turkey’s reaction was especially hostile: the Kurds, ErdoÄŸan said, ‘are not forming an independent state, they are opening a wound in the region to twist a knife in’. Barzani had cultivated good relations with ErdoÄŸan, who now says that the relationship is finished: the KRG, ‘to which we provided all support, took steps against us, it will pay the price’. In future, he says, Turkey will deal only with the Iraqi government. Iraqi Kurds are hoping the US will once again come to their rescue by mediating between them and their opponents: they say the roads into Kurdistan are still open and that nothing has yet changed on the ground. The KRG may survive its present isolation but the risk is growing that the Kurdish quasi-states will go the same way as the caliphate.


Patrick Cockburn

Source: https://www.lrb.co.uk/v39/n20/patrick-cockburn/underground-in-raqqa

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

House approves sanctions on Hezbollah - Elad Benari




by Elad Benari

House of Representatives backs sanctions on Hezbollah as part of effort to take tough line against its chief backer, Iran.


The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday backed new sanctions on the Hezbollah terrorist group, Reuters reported.

The sanctions are part of an effort to take a tough line against Iran, which is Hezbollah's chief backer, without immediately moving to undermine the nuclear agreement signed between the West and the Islamic Republic in 2015.

Three Hezbollah-related measures passed by voice vote, without opposition, according to Reuters. The House will vote on Thursday on another bill, to impose additional sanctions on Iran related to its ballistic missiles program.

The move comes nearly two weeks after President Donald Trump said he would not certify Iran is complying with an international agreement on its nuclear program.

Trump’s action opened a 60-day window for Congress to act to reimpose sanctions on Iran’s nuclear program that were lifted under the agreement, but there has been no move to do so in the House or Senate.

Aides told Reuters that, for now, House lawmakers are focusing on clamping down on Iran in other ways such as the Hezbollah and missile-related sanctions.

The first of the Hezbollah-related measures passed on Wednesday would impose new sanctions on any entities found to support the group, such as by providing weapons to Hezbollah. The second imposes sanctions on Iran and Hezbollah for using civilians as human shields.

The third was a resolution urging the European Union to designate Hezbollah as a terrorist organization. In 2013, the European Union blacklisted Hezbollah's “military wing” as a terrorist organization, while failing to blacklist the group’s political arm as well.

The U.S. named Hezbollah as a foreign terrorist organization in 1997. Earlier this month, Washington offered multimillion-dollar rewards for two of its officials as the Trump administration developed its strategy for countering Iran’s growing regional influence.

“These critical measures will impose new sanctions to crack down on Hezbollah’s financing, and hold it accountable for its acts of death and destruction,” said Representative Ed Royce, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, according to Reuters.

Washington has in the past imposed sanctions on Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and two other members of the organization, for their alleged role in aiding the Syrian government in its crackdown on opposition forces.


Elad Benari

Source: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/237213

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Russian under investigation for bribery by FBI given visa by Obama administration - Rick Moran




by Rick Moran

The coverup continues---

An interesting sidelight to the Russian Uranium One caper was reported by The Hill yesterday, involving a Russian TENEX executive whom the FBI was investigating for bribery and extortion who was granted a visa to enter the U.S. by the Obama administration.

TENEX is an American subsidiary of Rosatom, the company involved in buying an interest in Uranium One.
The records show TENEX executive Vadim Mikerin was engaged in illegal conduct as early as the fall of 2009, yet he was allowed to enter the country by the Obama administration with a L1 temporary work visa when he arrived in December 2011.
Milkerin's visa was renewed in August 2014, just months before he was arrested and charged with extortion, the records show. He and his company applied for the visa in summer 2011, records show.
The lengthy delay is now being investigated by multiple GOP-led congressional committees, one of which sent a letter Tuesday to the State Department and Homeland Security Department demanding answers.
"It is concerning that a suspected criminal was able to apply for and renew a work visa while being under FBI investigation," Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) wrote in the letter.
Officials for the FBI, State and Homeland did not return calls and emails seeking an explanation why Mikerin was granted a visa after the FBI already had evidence he was engaged in wrongdoing.
Officials familiar with law enforcement issues involving visas said it was possible the FBI evidence on Mikerin was not flagged in databases checked by State and Homeland before Mikerin was granted entry.
They added another possibility was that the FBI asked the agencies to allow Mikerin to enter the country so they could monitor his activities as part of a larger counterintelligence operation and detect other possible conspirators.
The latter explanation makes sense. The FBI may have wanted to cast a wider net and believed Mikerin could lead to other co-conspirators. 

But as Andrew McCarthy points out, there was a curious delay between the time the FBI knew that Mikerin was conducting criminal activity in this country and his indictment in 2014.
Even though the FBI had an informant collecting damning information, and had a prosecutable case against Mikerin by early 2010, the extortion racket against American energy companies was permitted to continue into the summer of 2014. It was only then that, finally, Mikerin and his confederates were arrested.
Why then? This is not rocket science. In March 2014, Russia annexed Crimea. Putin also began massing forces on the Ukrainian border, coordinating and conducting attacks, ultimately taking control of territory. Clearly, the pie-in-the-sky Obama reset was dead. Furthermore, the prosecution of Mikerin's racketeering scheme had been so delayed that the Justice Department risked losing the ability to charge the 2009 felonies because of the five-year statute of limitations on most federal crimes.
Still, a lid needed to be kept on the case. It would have made for an epic Obama administration scandal, and a body blow to Hillary Clinton's presidential hopes, if in the midst of Russia's 2014 aggression, public attention had been drawn to the failure, four years earlier, to prosecute a national-security case in order to protect Russia's takeover of U.S. nuclear assets.
The Obama administration needed to make this case go away – without a public trial if at all possible.
Think about this: The investigation of Russian racketeering in the American energy sector was the kind of spectacular success over which the FBI and Justice Department typically do a bells-n-whistles victory lap – the big self-congratulatory press conference followed by the media-intensive prosecutions...and, of course, more press conferences.
Here...crickets.
The cover-up continues today. With Democrats like Hillary Clinton claiming that the entire episode has been "debunked" or that it's a nothingburger, getting to the bottom of this scandal is going to be difficult.

It really is an extraordinary story. A nexus of Russian criminal enterprises, U.S. energy companies, and officials in the Obama administration all conspired to enrich each other by selling off 20% of U.S. uranium access. 

Sounds like a great plot for a movie – except it really happened, and the cover-up continues.


Rick Moran

Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/10/russian_under_investigation_for_bribery_by_fbi_given_visa_by_obama_administration.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Rutgers professor calls Judaism the 'most racist religion' - Garry Willig




by Garry Willig

Professor posts conspiracy theories blaming Israel for 9/11, Jews for Armenian Genocide, and claims the Talmud is a racist text.

Rutgers University announced that it is reviewing the "matter" of a professor who posted a series of anti-Semitic posts on social media.

Michael Chikindas, a microbiology professor at Rutgers’ department of food science and director of the university’s Center for Digestive Health, posted dozens of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories blaming Jews and Israel for many of the world's ills, and even attacked Judaism as "the most racist religion" in the world.

Chikindas' anti-Semitic posts were first reported by the pro-Israel Israellycool blog.

In one post, Chikindas claimed that "Israel is the terrorist country aimed at genocidal extermination of the land’s native population, Palestinians.”

His ire was not limited to Zionists, whom he lumped together with Orthodox Jews as “the best of two forms of racism.” He also blamed Jews for human rights catastrophes, egregiously including the 1915 Armenian Genocide. "We must not forget that the Armenian Genocide was orchestrated by the Turkish Jews who pretended to be the Turks.” 

Chikindas shared numerous anti-Semitic wild conspiracy theories, including theories claiming that Israel was behind the September 11 terrorist attacks, as well as claims that Jews control the Federal Reserve, Hollywood, the “cancer industry,” “pornography,” “sex-trafficking,” and others.

Chikindas denied that he was anti-Semitic in an interview with the Algemeiner Tuesday, arguing that he was one quarter Jewish himself and had a Jewish ex-wife and child.

He further claimed that none of his posts were anti-Semitic and false, and that the Talmud was full of racist statements against non-Jews. In fact, the statements are against idolators or those who persecute the Jews.

Rutgers has announced that it is investigating the matter. University spokesperson Neal Buccino told the Algemeiner: “Professor Michael Chikindas’ comments and posts on social media are antithetical to our university’s principles and values of respect for people of all backgrounds, including, among other groups, our large and vibrant Jewish community. Such comments do not represent the position of the University.”

“The university is reviewing this matter to determine if actions taken in the context of his role as a faculty member at Rutgers may have violated that policy,” he said.


Garry Willig

Source: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/237189

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Obama's felony: 'Sitting' on the ROSATOM nuclear crimes - Mark Langfan




by Mark Langfan

Obama’s “Sitting” on the ROSATOM’s nuclear crimes was an “Obstruction of Congress” felony. In effect, Putin bribed Secretary of State Clinton.

The Preface:

While Federal investigations may have trouble finding specific quid-pro-quos in Russia’s bribing Hillary Clinton, it is now clear that all the key high level Obama administration officials(especially Clinton) knew, as early as 2009, that the Russian government entity ROSATOM’s subsidiaries were actively committing a vast criminal “nuclear kickback” conspiracy in the United States.

New reports have raised legitimate questions about the clear failure of the Obama Administration to inform the CFIUS Federal governmental board, the body that approved the 2010 UraniumOne sale to a Russian controlled corporation, of the Russian “nuclear kickback” case.  However, the more dramatic failure of the Obama Administration was its purposeful neglect in informing Congress of the ROSATOM’s “nuclear kickback” crimes during the ratification hearings for the 2010-11 Russian-American New START nuclear arms treaty.  

In effect, Putin bribed Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State, in a 2-for-1 corruption scandal.  He bought the UraniumOne approval and the New START Treaty ratification with the same Clinton Foundation bribe.  The problem for the all former high level national security Obama Administration officials is that under 18 U.S.C. 1505 it is a federal felony to obstruct or impede either a Congressional “inquiry or investigation” or a “pending proceeding” before a “federal department” due to corruption. Therefore, the Obama Administration’s 2009 failure to properly and fully inform the Senate, and the CFIUS board of ROSATOM’s criminal enterprise in the United States is a big, severe felony crime.

The Factual Background:

There is currently ample open-source evidence to conclude that all the key National Security officials in the Obama Administration (especially Sec of State Clinton) knew as early as 2009 that Vadm Mikerin, a Russian national, and his “higher officials” Moscow backers, were engaged in a vast criminal conspiracy relating to “nuclear kickbacks” and felony violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices act.  Mikerin was a big-wig in ROSATOM.  In 2015, Mikerin pled guilty to the “criminal money laundering conspiracy involving violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,” and was sent to Federal Prison for 4 years.  

According to its website, ROSATOM is the Russian  “State Atomic Energy Corporation.”   The ROSATOM webite continues to state, “ROSATOM is a proponent of the uniform national policy and best management practices in nuclear power utilization, the nuclear weapons industry, and nuclear safety.”  

Did you get that?  ROSATOM a “proponent of the uniform national policy” of the Russian “nuclear weapons industry.”  In the United States, Mikerin set up and ran Tenam which was a subsidiary of Tenex ROSATOM’s foreign trade arm.  So, in 2009 and 2010, Sec. of State Clinton and the entire Obama national security team intentionally and knowingly withheld time-sensitive national security information about the Russian key nuclear-arms corporation while the UraniumOne and New Start treaty were being evaluated by the United States Senate and CFIUS board.
The “Obstruction of Congress” Statute:

18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

Let’s analyze the statute:

I. Whoever

II. A. corruptly, or B. by threats or C. force, or D. by any threatening letter or communication 
III. A. influences, B. obstructs, or  C. impedes or D. endeavors to  1. influence, 2. obstruct, or 3. impede 
IV. A.1. the due and proper administration of the law under which  2. any pending proceeding is being had  3. before any department or agency of the United States, or 
B. 1. the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by  a.  either House, orb. any committee of either House orc. any joint committee of the Congress

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years (not more than 8 years if the offense involves domestic or international terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

Additionally, for the definition of “corrupt” we need to look at the federal bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 201(b), which criminalizes the corrupt promise or transfer of any thing of value to influence an official act of a federal official, a fraud on the United States, or the commission or omission of any act in violation of the official's duty.

Brief Legal Analysis:

First, the CFIUS board evaluating the UraniumOne sale to the ROSATOM subsidiary was clearly “a pending proceeding” “being had before a department or agency of the United States.”  

And, the US Senate’s and even the House of Representatives’ evaluation of the UraniumOne sale and especially of the ratification of the New Start Treaty were clearly a “due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry” “being had” by “either House, or any committee of either House.”  

Secondly, the withholding of the information of  ROSATOM’s “nuclear kickback” conspiracy from both the CFIUS board and the Congress clearly “impeded,” and “obstructed” the “inquiry or investigation” of both the CFIUS board and Congress with respect to UraniumOne and the Congress with respect to the New START Treaty.

Thirdly, the Obama administration officials clearly “corruptly” engaged in these actions because , at a minimum, the intentional failure of the Obama national security officials to inform CFIUS and the Congress was, under 18 U.S.C. § 201(b) “corrupt” because they were clearly actions where the “commission or omission of” the acts were “in violation of the official’s duty.”

Their “Defense” will only sink them further:

A likely defense by the Obama national security officials will be “we withheld the information because if we had divulged the information, CFIUS and Congress would never have let the UraniumOne sale or the New START Treaty pass.”  All they will have proven with this crazy defense is how relevant and vital the information was, and how critical it was to timely inform the FIUS and Congressional Committee’s of the information in the first place.

In short, and in conclusion, the Obama national security team should lawyer-up because they are looking at massive criminal claims coming their way.


Mark Langfan is Chairman of Americans for a Safe Israel (AFSI) and specializes in security issues, has created an original educational 3d Topographic Map System of Israel to facilitate clear understanding of the dangers facing Israel and its water supply. It has been studied by US lawmakers and can be seen at www.marklangfan.com.

Source: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/21172

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Israeli Justice minister: High Court won't decide future of settlement enterprise - Yair Altman and Israel Hayom Staff




by Yair Altman and Israel Hayom Staff

The Justice Ministry "won't allow left-wing organizations to set facts on the ground by dragging the court into the political sphere," Ayelet Shaked says




Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked  
Photo: Oren Ben Hakoon

"The High Court of Justice won't decide the future of the Judea and Samaria settlement enterprise," Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked said Tuesday, adding her officer "will not allow left-wing organizations to set facts on the ground by dragging the court into the political sphere."

Speaking at a Kohelet Policy Forum in Jerusalem, Shaked said that "the Left can't win the election so they [left-wing groups] file hundreds of nuisance petitions with the court every year, effectively waging lawfare against the Israeli government. We won’t be a party to it."

She stressed that the "government aims to bolster the settlement enterprise," adding that when it comes to petitions concerning this issue,

"The State Attorney's Office represents the state – not the personal opinion of an individual attorney, certainly not on an issue that is part of the government's core operations."

The government, Shaked said, "is stable, and it will make it to 2019," when the next general elections are scheduled to take place.

Construction Minister Yoav Gallant, who also addressed the Kohelet forum on Tuesday, slammed the judiciary for trying to "undermine the government."

"The ongoing judicialization [of politics] weakens the political echelon while empowering the bureaucratic echelon, which could eventually undercut democracy," he said.

"Under the current situation, the biggest criminal has the right to voice his position, but the government and its ministers don't have that right. What tools allow judges to know better than military officials?

"The Supreme Court is not free of populism. It's inconceivable that the Supreme Court knows more about security, energy, and housing than the executive branch. The government wants to hit the gas, but the judiciary keeps hitting the brakes," he said.


Yair Altman and Israel Hayom Staff

Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/2017/10/25/justice-minister-high-court-wont-decide-future-of-settlement-enterprise/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.