by Gideon Allon and Mati Tuchfeld
Opposition MKs blast Security Council for "dangerous and biased" anti-Israel resolution, blame the government for ignoring warning signs • Meretz leader: Decision targets settlement policy, not Israel • Opposition head calls on PM Netanyahu to resign.
| 
                                            Opposition Leader Isaac 
Herzog (Zionist Union)                                                
                                                 
|Photo credit: Gideon Markowicz  | 
Opposition MKs leveled harsh criticism at the 
U.N. Security Council over the weekend following its decision to adopt 
an anti-Israel resolution
 Friday. At the same time, they blasted the government, saying its 
policies on the Judea and Samaria settlement enterprise resulted in a 
"dark day" for Israel at the U.N. 
Opposition Leader Isaac Herzog (Zionist Union)
 denounced the Security Council, and called on Prime Minister Benjamin 
Netanyahu to resign.
"This has been an extremely difficult evening for Israel, the likes of which we haven't seen in decades," Herzog said Friday.
"I adamantly oppose this decision, which is a 
harsh strategic blow to Israel. The U.S. should have vetoed this 
resolution because it severely undermines Jerusalem, the settlement 
blocs, and Israel's position. This resolution must be fought and … there
 is no doubt that the policies of a different government, a responsible 
and more realistic government, could have prevented this from happening.
 If Netanyahu has a shred of responsibility left, he should turn in his 
keys and understand he can no longer run the affairs of this state." 
Hatnuah Chairwoman Tzipi Livni said the resolution was the result of Netanyahu's "capitulation to the far Right."
She said that "you can blame [U.S. President 
Barack] Obama for this, but many nations supported this resolution," 
including Britain, France, Russia and China -- the other Security 
Council members with veto power.
"We warned, in real-time, that the outpost 
regulation bill would lead to Security Council action. Freezing 
settlement construction would have prevented this vote," she said.
Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid called the resolution "dangerous and biased," saying Israel will not abide by it.
Blasting some in the Left who lauded the vote,
 Lapid said, "I strongly condemn the way in which some in the Left have 
celebrated the fact that Israel was dealt this blow. Patriots do not 
behave this way. Still, this doesn’t take away from the fact that this 
is a very serious thing -- we learned that no country in the world 
agrees with the government."
Former Prime Minister Ehud Barak said, "I 
recommend not dismissing this resolution. This is a humiliating blow to 
Israel and a major failure by Netanyahu."
The Prime Minister's Office blasted Barak, 
tweeting that "he would be wise to remember he was the most failed prime
 minister in Israel's history, whose short term in office included an 
intifada that claimed the lives of over 1,000 people." 
Joint Arab List Chairman Ayman Odeh welcomed 
the U.N. Security Council's vote, saying, "The arrogance of Netanyahu 
and his ministers, the outpost regulation bill, and the theft of 
Palestinian land have led the international community to understand that
 the real peace rejectionist is the Israeli government. Now we have to 
continue working in both the national and international arenas to 
establish a Palestinian state and reach a peace deal that benefits both 
the Palestinians and the Israelis."
Meretz Chairwoman Zehava Galon stressed that 
"the resolution was not aimed at Israel but rather against the 
government's annexation and settlement policy. This resolution is the 
world's way of saying it is fed up with duplicitous Israeli policies -- 
allegedly supporting the two-state solution, while being politically 
obligated to the settlement enterprise." 
Gideon Allon and Mati Tuchfeld
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=39055
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment