Saturday, September 2, 2023

Speaker McCarthy headed to Hawaii after House GOP announces disaster response investigation - Charlotte Hazard

 

by Charlotte Hazard

"I'm headed to Hawaii to assess the damage, response, and recovery efforts on the ground from the fire in Maui," McCarthy wrote on X, the platform previously called Twitter.

 

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced on Friday that he is going to Hawaii to examine the damage and recovery efforts following the deadly wildfires in Maui and Lahaina. 

"I'm headed to Hawaii to assess the damage, response, and recovery efforts on the ground from the fire in Maui," he wrote on X, the platform previously called Twitter. "It's clear we need answers into how this tragic fire occurred and what could have been done to prevent it from happening."

The GOP-led House Oversight and Accountability Committee announced earlier this week that it would launch an investigation into the federal government’s response to the wildfires.

“The response by federal, state, and local officials to the catastrophic wildfire in Maui raises serious questions and Americans, especially those impacted by this tragedy, deserve answers,” House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said, according to Yahoo News.

President Biden drew a lot of backlash after announcing his plan to support relief efforts by providing families with a one-time $700 payment, a plan that attracted intense scrutiny following his refusal to comment on the catastrophe while on vacation.

As of now the death toll from the wildfires in Hawaii stands at 115 with many people still missing. 

This incident is the state's deadliest natural disaster since a 1960 tsunami that killed 61 Hawaiians.


Charlotte Hazard

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/speaker-mccarthy-haded-hawaii-after-house-gop-announces-disaster-response

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Booing Biden - Jeff Crouere

by Jeff Crouere

Reflections on how the spectators in South Lake Tahoe greeted America's president.

 


Stepping out to meet reporters during his latest vacation, President Joe Biden was loudly booed by spectators in South Lake Tahoe, CA.

Why was he booed? Maybe it was because of how he has weaponized the justice system to target President Donald Trump and his supporters, such as the January 6th protesters.

It might have been his decision to end our energy independence, declare war on the oil and gas industry, shut down the Keystone XL pipeline, and cause gasoline prices to skyrocket since the end of Trump’s term.

It could relate to his dangerous choice to open the southern border and roll out the welcome mat for millions of illegal immigrants from 160 nations to enter the United States. This could lead to not only economic misery for our country but also a deadly terrorist attack.

Protestors might have booed him for his horrible decision to hastily withdraw from Afghanistan, leaving Americans and courageous interpreters remaining in a country ruled by a theocratic regime of murderers known as the Taliban. In the process, thirteen of our American military service members were killed, and billions of dollars of military equipment were left for the Taliban to use.

Americans are right to boo Biden for his obsession with funding Ukraine at the expense of the American people. He admitted that our country has given more aid to Ukraine than the rest of the world combined. Despite $113 billion in aid given to Ukraine, the war continues with no end in sight.

He should be jeered for what his leftwing Democrats are doing to destroy American cities. The progressive urban leadership in America has created cities filled with crime, filth, drugs, gangs, homelessness, and economic despair. People and businesses with the ability to move are leaving these areas in droves in search of a better quality of life and a chance for economic prosperity.

Catcalls are deserved for the constant push to force masks and COVID-19 vaccines on the American people. Despite multiple court rulings that such mandates are unconstitutional, Biden continues to saddle Americans with incessant rhetoric about vaccines, masks, and the need to follow their unworkable COVID guidelines. Americans must respond to the next round of COVID mandates by following the resolute mantra: resist, defy, and do not comply.

Biden may have been booed because Americans are disgusted with his subservience to communist China and his obsession with the “green agenda.” By forcing Americans to drive electric vehicles and buy electric appliances, costs for the average American will only increase. Additionally, the communist Chinese will be emboldened and given billions of dollars in profits and enormous power over the American people and our economy.

Regarding our economy, Americans have trillions of reasons to heckle Biden. He has increased our federal debt by $5 trillion while burdening our economy with unworkable and inefficient regulations. Bidenomics is an outright disaster, creating higher inflation, higher interest rates, a decline in real wages, a supply chain crisis, and a banking crisis.

Americans are rightfully booing because our costs for groceries, gasoline, and home mortgages are so much higher. Under Biden, the American dream of owning your own home is now out of reach for millions of young couples.

Biden’s selections to his cabinet, administration, and to the federal courts are radical leftists who deserve the jeers of the American people. Americans should also boo Biden for how he has weakened our military with woke policies and woke leaders. We are not meeting our recruitment goals; our ammunition and equipment levels are low, and we are unprepared to confront the severe challenges awaiting us in a dangerous world.

Biden’s future political plans are worthy of the catcalls of Americans, which are as ludicrous as his promises about the benefits of Bidenomics. He intends to run for another term as President; however, Americans know that he does not possess the mental or physical capabilities to serve in the position now. This charade must end, and Biden must submit to a mental competency test or resign. He is not fit to be the President of the United States, and it is obvious to everyone.

The one area that should receive the most boos from Americans involves the decades of corruption committed by Joe Biden and his family. Through influence peddling in countries such as Ukraine and China, Biden has enriched himself and other family members. The evidence House Republican investigators are accumulating regarding crimes committed by the Biden family is overwhelming.

Unfortunately, our country no longer has a justice system that is dependable or fair. It is one-sided and biased. Thus, at the very least, House Republicans should impeach Biden for his corrupt actions as Vice-President.

Boos are deserved for the countless lies Biden has told the American people. These lies date back to his 1988 presidential campaign when he plagiarized speeches from British opposition leader Neil Kinnock and lied about his law school grades.

Today, Biden is repeating lies about everything from how his son Beau died to the extent of a ‘small house fire’ at his Delaware residence. Biden should be booed for having the gall to relate to the wildfire victims in Hawaii by telling a lie about his house fire.

He also should be booed for waiting almost thirteen days to visit Hawaii after the horrific fire, then joking about the “hot ground” where at least 115 victims died and another 388 people remain missing.

Biden should be booed for not visiting the victims of the dangerous train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, and for making only one brief and sanitized visit to our open southern border.

He should be jeered for wasting our tax dollars on his salary as he spends 40% of his time on vacation instead of working on behalf of the American people who are struggling because of his horrific policies.

If there was ever a president who deserved to be booed by the American people, it is Joe Biden.


Jeff Crouere

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/booing-biden/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

This Political Prosecution Scheme is Going To Backfire Hard - Kurt Shlichter

 

by Kurt Shlichter

The Left is celebrating now - but they won't be able to control what they've unleashed.

 


Yuck it up, you morons who think it’s cool to try to frame political opponents because your mug shots are coming soon enough. And maybe not just mugshots. You’ve genuinely screwed yourselves. You can’t control what you have unleashed. And you’re celebrating. You shouldn’t.

I know, I know, you can’t imagine that your decision to take out your political opponents by throwing them in jail will bite you in the Asa. But it will. Hard. And you ought to hope it’s only mug shots. I hope it’s only mug shots, not for your sake, but for my country’s sake. You’ve screwed up my country, and it’s not clear that the wounds you caused are not mortal. This is now a country where we lock up political opponents. I just want to get that out there again, and I want you to understand what has changed. This is now a country where we lock up political opponents. And it’s inevitable that very soon, you’re going to realize that you are some people’s political opponents too.

Some people ask me my legal opinion of these frame jobs masquerading as criminal cases. Well, I have no legal opinion of them because these have nothing to do with the law. When not invented out of whole cloth, they consist of inapplicable statutes stretched tighter than Nancy Pelosi’s lifted and Botoxed face to try to encompass perfectly legal activities by people whose real crime is opposing the ruling class. And the accused aggravated their crimes by having succeeded for a time.

Do you think these laws only go one way? Do you think this precedent can’t be used right back against you and yours? There are a lot of state attorney generals and district attorneys out there in red states, and they are going through their statute books. Conservatives, who tend to be doomers, are fretting because none of these red officials have acted yet. But they will act, all in good time. First, slow, then all at once. That is inevitable. That is the logic of this scenario. You see, all the incentives are to prosecute Democrats in red enclaves for things Democrats did far away. The first red AG or DA who does it is going to be a superstar. And then all the others are going to have to follow along lest they be left behind. Some of them won’t want to. Some of them may have some residual attachment to the law as we once knew it. But their red voters do not, and in the words of Rush – the Canadian band, not the radio legend –  these Republican officials must conform or be cast out.

What they do in retaliation will have the appearance of law but not the substance. In that way, these prosecutions will be exactly like the ones Trump is currently experiencing. They will echo the nonsense of the Trump indictments. Perhaps I will outline it in more detail in a future column, but suffice it to say that when Anthony Fauci and dozens of other bureaucrats are indicted under Missouri’s RICO law based on a conspiracy to violate the civil rights of the citizens of the Show-Me State via their massive COVID fraud, the indicted ones are really going to hope that the aptly-named Fani – because of what she’s full of – Willis‘s ridiculous indictments have already been tossed out by the federal courts.

Oh, this isn’t right or good or anything I wanted. In fact, I have columns going back years warning you about the new rules you decided to play by. But you didn’t listen. It was inconvenient. It was hard actually having to convince lesser people to give you power, so you’ve decided to steal it. Now, of course, you don’t put it that way. You don’t tell yourself that you’re a fascist. But you are. No, you tell yourself this is a necessary exception. You imagine that Donald Trump is some sort of particular case and that after you frame him, we’re just going to go back to business as usual. You really are stupid, or you think we are. Ron DeSantis will be the next special case because he’s practically Hitler, too. Next, Nikki Haley will be Hitler. Then Tim Scott will need to be indicted to keep him from invading Poland.

You’re not putting this genie back in the bottle. Right now, you don’t want it back in the bottle. You think you’ve stumbled on a shortcut to permanent power. You couldn’t just try to beat Trump in an unrigged election. You decided to toss the law out. And you’re too freaking dumb to realize that the only thing protecting you is the law that you just erased. There was a pretty famous movie about a pretty famous guy who you never learned about at the University of College, where you got your degree in Marxist interpretive dance. He had something pretty insightful to say about the law and its purpose and why you need to uphold it.

But the law got in the way of what you really wanted, so you tossed it out, and now there is no law, and there’s nothing for you to hide behind. So, who protects you? I mean, you don’t have guns. You don’t have training. You can’t even do a push-up. There’s just power now, and all you have is the institutional power that is backed up and enforced mainly by, well, people like the ones you want to oppress. And the guys who Oliver Anthony has been talking about who wear a uniform or carry a badge might kill for you and might die for you for a little while. Still, when you send them to butcher their own brothers and sisters, they’re probably going to rethink the direction they’re shooting.

Oh, that’s crazy talk, you say. All through history, no ruling class that tried to clamp down on the masses has ever been overthrown and its members punished. There was nothing about that in the 1619 stuff you learned about in commie school. The law is still going to protect you, and the institutions will still protect you because they’ll still function because you haven’t torn their guts out. Oh, wait, you have.

A reckoning is coming, and you’re too dumb to know it. I guess it’ll be a surprise. You’ll look up and cry that what’s about to happen to you is wrong and that it’s illegal. But I don’t think the enemy you created is going to care very much.

So be it.

Let me get this out of the way now…

I told you so.


Kurt Shlichter

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/this-political-prosecution-scheme-is-going-to-backfire-hard/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Little support among voters for transgender medical procedures on children - The Center Square Staff

 

by The Center Square Staff

State legislatures across the country have debated laws either banning such procedures for minors or preventing such bans from being put in place, with laws varying widely.

 

Few voters think children should undergo transgender interventions even with parental permission.

That's according to The Center Square Voters' Voice Poll of 2,500 registered voters across the U.S., conducted by Noble Predictive Insights. The poll found that 58% of those surveyed are against medical interventions such as gender-changing surgery or puberty blockers for children younger than 18 years old.

There were just 10% who said children should have the ability to undergo these inventions if they choose and another 21% who said children should be able to undergo these interventions, but only with parental permission.

The poll found 62% of men and 54% of women were against gender-changing surgery or puberty blockers for children.

Mike Noble, founder and CEO of Noble Predictive Insights, said it was noteworthy how little public support there is for transgender interventions of minors.

"What's surprising – for how much you hear about it, how much it is in your face – you look at the public opinion data and there's definitely not a majority who are in support of this," Noble said. "Six in ten are saying, 'That's a non-starter.'"

There was support for gender-changing surgery or puberty blockers among those voters who identified themselves as "a strong Democrat." There were 22% of that voting bloc who said children should have the ability to undergo those inventions and another 40% who believe it should be allowed but only with parental permission. Just 23% of "strong Democrats" were against the interventions and another 15% were unsure.

Sixty-four percent of voters who said they had children under the age of 18 said minors should not be having these transgender medical interventions. And 40% of voters who said children should be able to have the medical interventions, with 25% of that group saying it needed to come with parental approval.

"The people who were the least on board were people who had children under the age 18," Noble said. "The ones who are the most supportive are the ones who never had children."

State legislatures across the country have debated laws either banning such procedures for minors or preventing such bans from being put in place, with laws varying widely.

States such as Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Georgia and at least 10 other states have put restrictions in place, with many facing legal challenges.

California is leading a coalition of 20 mostly blue states, including Illinois, Michigan, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Oregon and Washington in opposing such restrictions.

The Center Square Voters' Voice Poll was conducted by Noble Predictive Insights from July 31 to Aug. 3. Unlike traditional national polls, with limited respondent count of about 1,000, Noble Predictive surveyed 1,000 registered Republicans, 1,000 registered Democrats, and 500 independents, culminating in a sample size of 2,500. The margin of error for the aggregate sample was ±2.4%, with each political group independently weighted. For information about the methodology, visit www.noblepredictiveinsights.com.

 
The Center Square Staff

Source: https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/little-support-among-voters-transgender-medical-procedures-children

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Football coach who won Supreme Court case to pray on field returns for first game since 2015 - Joseph Weber

 

by Joseph Weber

Bremerton High School coach Joe Kennedy lost his job in 2015; Supreme Court held in 2022 his practices protected by Constitution

 

The assistant high school football coach in Washington state who lost his job over praying on field with his players after games on Friday night is back on the sideline for the first time since 2015

After Bremerton High School coach Joe Kennedy lost his job over the controversy, the Supreme Court held in 2022 that his practice was protected by the Constitution.

Now, after fighting seven years to be rehired, Kennedy says he's now unsure about whether he still wants the job and that he's uneasy about resuming the post-game prayer, according to the Associated Press

“Knowing that everybody’s expecting me to go do this kind of gives me a lot of angst in my stomach,” he told the wire. “People are going to freak out that I’m bringing God back into public schools.”

The school district placed Kennedy on leave and eventually declined to renew his contract, amid concerned that tolerating his public post-game prayers would suggest government endorsement of religion, in violation of the separation of church and state, the wire service also reports.

He lost at every court level until the merits of his case until last year when the Supreme Court's conservative majority sided with him. Along the way, Kennedy appeared at a 2016 rally for Donald Trump.


Joseph Weber

Source: https://justthenews.com/accountability/cancel-culture/football-coach-who-won-supreme-court-case-pray-field-returns-first

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hanin Ghaddar on Hezbollah's Quandary – More Power but More Hated - Marilyn Stern

 

by Marilyn Stern

Hezbollah is confident in its military strength, but realizes that "in the long run" its power is at risk unless it can provide for the people – which it cannot because "the country is falling apart".

 

Hanin Ghaddar, Friedmann Senior Fellow in the Washington Institute of Near East Policy's Linda and Tony Rubin Program on Arab Politics, spoke to an August 21st Middle East Forum Webinar (video) about the current status of Hezbollah in Lebanon. The following is a summary of her comments:

In the wake of the country's economic collapse in 2019, Hezbollah expanded control over Lebanon's security institutions, state institutions, and financial institutions. Yet, the terror organization also suffered setbacks. Since the 2020 assassination of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Qasem Soleimani, Hezbollah has grown from a Lebanese militia to its current role as Iran's "main regional army." Shifting its financial resources to both "compensate their constituency" and prop up Lebanon's financial institutions strains Hezbollah's budget, particularly since the flow of cash from an Iranian regime constrained by economic sanctions has diminished significantly. Further complicating Hezbollah's position as it struggles to fill the shortfall is that even with the money flowing in from the amphetamine-based drug Captagon and from arms shipments to conflicts in Iraq, Africa, and Yemen, measures are being take to contain Hezbollah as these illicit sources come to light.

Hezbollah has acquired expertise with drones and precision guided munitions and has gained access to state and security institutions beyond Lebanon in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. Despite the increased military know-how, Iran and Hezbollah know that threatening Israel with war is less costly than going to war against it. During the hiatus in the "war between the wars," Hezbollah has focused on strengthening its control of Lebanon's state and financial institutions. Hezbollah, in collaboration with Lebanon's Central bank and private money institutions, financially benefits from the country's cash economy.

In 2018, Hezbollah infiltrated the Lebanese government after winning seats in parliamentary elections and used state institutions to benefit itself, its constituency, and Iran's institutions and budget. After the country's economic collapse in 2019, Hezbollah became "solely responsible" for an increasingly discontented constituency and the organization's allies in Lebanon. The paternalistic narrative propagated among the Shia gained loyal followers, but has since worn thin, as evidenced by Hezbollah's loss in last year's parliamentary elections. This loss has made it more difficult to impose its agenda on the population.

Whereas Hezbollah previously had parliamentary allies, now it cannot unilaterally impose its presidential candidate, Suleiman Frangieh, a Syrian regime loyalist and "Hezbollah Iran puppet," without a parliamentary majority. Instead, Hezbollah is engaged in dealmaking with the Free Patriotic Movement in a bid to install Frangieh as the next president of Lebanon.

 

To maintain its hold on power, Hezbollah has turned its arms against the "disillusioned" Lebanese people, who face two "revelations": (1) The arms Hezbollah intended to use against Israel it instead uses against the Lebanese people as a "political tool," and (2) Hezbollah's narrative that protecting Lebanon's borders necessitated entry into Syria was in fact about protecting the Assad regime. The main shift against Hezbollah occurred in 2019, when the Lebanese people took to the streets to protest government corruption and the sectarianism plaguing their society, not realizing Hezbollah's link to the corruption. Hezbollah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, sent his "thugs" to beat up protesters.

Although the people realized that Hezbollah's main conduit to infiltrate the state institutions is corruption, they attributed the 2020 Beirut port blast to a mistake in a failed system. A judge investigating the blast faced death threats from Hezbollah. During that time, Hezbollah instigated a violent clash in the Christian neighborhood of Tayouneh, where residents killed some Hezbollah members. The organization understands the Lebanese people no longer support it as they did and now consider it an Iranian militia occupying Lebanon.

Hezbollah's increased security actions against the Lebanese people has sparked a backlash against it. Examples include the Chouaya incident two years ago, when residents stopped a Hezbollah vehicle carrying rockets intended for use against Israel; the Haldi incident in which Sunni tribes attacked and killed a Hezbollah member; and the recent Kahale incident where a Hezbollah vehicle that overturned in an accident triggered clashes when the people discovered weapons in it. Hezbollah, for its part, is assassinating Lebanese activists or those who confront the terror group. Although the net result is "outrage" against Hezbollah, the people know they cannot afford a civil war. During the 1975 Lebanese civil war, the opposing sides were equally matched in their capabilities, but Hezbollah's increased power renders it too formidable for its opponents to defeat or seriously challenge it militarily.

Many who vote for Hezbollah do so because they risk losing basic food and necessities at Hezbollah's hands. It is confident in its military strength, but realizes that "in the long run" its power is at risk unless it can provide for the people – which it cannot because "the country is falling apart."

Plans to revise the political structure are stipulated in the Taif Agreement that ended Lebanon's Civil War in 1990 and established the power sharing between Christians and Muslims. Hezbollah's plan is to use the country's demographics to divide the system into three parties by allocating a third to Christians, a third to the Sunni, and a third to the Shia in a dangerous bid to gain more seats in parliament. The move, particularly when "one third of the parliament is represented by [an Iranian] militia," is Hezbollah's method of consolidating its long-term hold on power in Lebanon.

America can take three steps to counter Hezbollah. First, the U.S. can take advantage of the fact that, even though much of the Lebanese army works in concert with Hezbollah, commanders and generals in certain units oppose the terror groups' agenda against the Lebanese people. Such behavior occurred when the army supported the people against Hezbollah in the Tayouneh clash. The U.S. can gain leverage by targeting its aid to those particular units.

Second, the U.S. can rouse opposition to Hezbollah by exposing its use of the Lebanese people as human shields, as when Hezbollah hides its missiles under private homes and schools. Although Hezbollah was popular when it waged war against Israel in 2006, today "everybody wants Hezbollah out." Still, sympathies are complicated because, when Hezbollah is targeted in Lebanon, it retaliates without concern for killing and maiming civilians, and "people don't want to die." Third, although sanctions against Hezbollah are largely ineffective because of the cash economy, enforcing sanctions against its allies in Lebanon's financial institutions, individual financial figures, and the private business sector can be an effective way of restraining it.

Hezbollah's border skirmishes with Israel are Tehran's way of letting Jerusalem know that if it dares to strike Iran, Hezbollah is ready for war. Hezbollah's plan is to consolidate its power financially and maintain its fighters. It succeeds at recruitment because it pays in "hard currency," a change from the loyalty that used to drive the "core of Hezbollah's fighting force." Regardless of the recent maritime border agreement between Israel and Lebanon, which Hezbollah endorsed, the terror group knows that its waning "resistance rhetoric" against Israel further undermines its legitimacy in Lebanon. Hezbollah increased its provocations against Israel by taking advantage of Jerusalem's internal divisions as its government attempts to introduce judicial reforms. Ultimately, neither side can afford a war, but much is dependent on Israel and how it responds to Hezbollah's provocations.

 


Marilyn Stern is communications coordinator at the Middle East Forum.

Source:https://www.meforum.org/64738/hanin-ghaddar-on-hezbollah-quandary-more-power

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

California’s ethnic-studies mandate cannot be fixed - Jonathan S. Tobin

 

by Jonathan S. Tobin

The Jewish groups that welcomed a letter from Gov. Gavin Newsom about avoiding bigotry are betraying the community. The courses are an invitation to antisemitism.

 

Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in a meeting in Sacramento on May 31, 2020. Credit: Matt Gush/Shutterstock.
Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in a meeting in Sacramento on May 31, 2020. Credit: Matt Gush/Shutterstock.

You would think that everyone understands that you can’t defend the Jews while supporting something set up to help promote antisemitism. Yet apparently, that basic truth is being ignored by those who ought to know better.

The Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California (JPAC) has put itself in just such an impossible position. The group, which serves as the body tasked with defending the state’s Jewish community to the government of the nation’s largest state, is stuck in a contradiction.

On the one hand, it knows that it should mobilize whatever influence it has to push back against the way California’s ethnic-studies mandate in the public schools is being used to promote hatred for Israel and antisemitism by left-wing activists who dominate the educational establishment, including school boards and teachers unions.

On the other hand, as a group whose liberal politics tie it to the prevailing orthodoxies on the left that produced this problem, it feels equally obligated to defend the ethnic-studies mandate despite the way it has been used to attack the Jewish community.

JPAC has sought to ameliorate the problems created by the passage of the ethnic-studies mandate by the California legislature in 2021 and the creation of a model ethnic-studies curriculum by the state board of education even before that. But all it has done is to make it even harder to accomplish the one goal that ought to be embraced by those who care about defending both the Jews and core American values of liberty and equality: scrapping the entire program.

The latest twist in this long-running battle concerns a letter that has been issued by the California Board of Education to the 1,037 school districts around the state that, according to the ethnic-studies mandate law, have the authority to come up with their own curricula to implement it. The letter cautions the districts that some ethnic-studies materials that vendors have circulated discriminate against individuals or communities. It also reminds them that their courses should not reflect “bias, bigotry or discrimination.”

JPAC can rightly claim credit for using its political influence to force the board to issue the letter with the approval of Gov. Gavin Newsom. The problem it is trying to address is real. Much of the material is being used in classrooms by radical left-wing groups like the ones promoting “Liberated Ethnic Studies” in districts such as the city of Los Angeles. These curricula are based in critical race theory and promote antisemitism by depicting Jews and Israel as “white” oppressors.

Yet mainstream Jewish groups are still declaring victory. They are acting as if issuing the letter will correct the problematic practices that have cropped up in the last two years as it became clear that the ethnic studies-mandate has been, as some foresaw, an opportunity for leftist educators to use these courses to impose a variant of critical race theory in public schools.

But they’re wrong.

The ethnic-studies programs in California’s schools and those that are being implemented elsewhere in the country do far more harm than good—and not just because activists are trying to hijack them. The courses are the product of an intersectional mindset that inevitably leads to efforts to divide Americans rather than bring them together.

They lend themselves to instructional material that promotes notions about equity, rather than equality. The enshrinement of equity—part of the woke DEI catechism of diversity, equity and inclusion—is a formula for the imposition of quotas and discrimination in favor of some favored groups at the expense of others. And it is no surprise that Jews are always among the losers in that exchange.

Seen in that light, it’s clear that the position of the liberals—like those in JPAC— favors the ethnic-studies mandate but then struggles vainly to ensure that they aren’t being used as a vehicle for antisemites. It’s a contradiction in terms.

Even when urging the board of education to warn against the use of the courses to institutionalize prejudice, JPAC was still advocating for ethnic-studies courses, praising the way they deepen “students’ understanding of American history” but also promote “equity and inclusiveness.”

Some in the Jewish community understand what’s going on. 

The AMCHA Initiative, a group that has been fighting this battle for years, denounced the board’s letter rather than celebrating it, as JPAC did. The group’s director, Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, correctly said it was “too little, too late.” She said Newsom was ignoring the way that school districts were adopting curricula that contained anti-Jewish material, and his effort “serves to dilute rather than reinforce” guardrails against bias, bigotry and discrimination, and “will only confuse school districts about what, exactly, must be guarded against.”

This is a throwback to the start of the battle over ethnic studies in California a few years back when the first drafts for a Model Ethnic Studies Curriculum by the state board of education were proposed. Those documents sought to make the histories, struggles and contributions of Asian, black, Latino and Native American communities an integral part of public education. But they ignored, among others, anything about Jews, Armenians and Sikhs.

Rather than seeking, as they should have, to sink the entire project, JPAC and other liberal mainstream groups doubled down on ethnic studies while trying to “improve” it by ensuring that the model mentioned Jews, too. Their satisfaction over such petty victories didn’t prevent districts like Los Angeles to adopt the “liberated” version of ethnic studies that is so problematic.

Others are fighting back with lawsuits, like the one launched by the public-interest law firm Deborah Project that targets the antisemitic discrimination that is the product of “liberated” ethnic studies. Similarly, the CAMERA media-monitoring organization issued a report demonstrating how the push for ethnic studies is linked to the antisemitic BDS movement.

It was clear from the start that the problem with ethnic studies went beyond whether or not Jews would be included. But the organized Jewish community, which JPAC represents, is far too concerned with staying in sync with its liberal allies to understand that ethnic studies can’t be fixed to make it less antisemitic.

The claims of their advocates notwithstanding, the goal of all these curricula isn’t really to fight racism as it is to enshrine race consciousness at the heart of every discussion and topic.

The Critical Ethnic Studies Association, which was the original driving force behind this program, isn’t interested in celebrating diversity and making sure that the stories of minority groups are added to the traditional narrative of American history. What it wants is to replace the old story of America as having been born in a fight for liberty and seeking—despite problems, and the sin of slavery and racial discrimination—to progress towards freedom for all with one that views it as an irredeemably racist nation.

The point of the curriculum it inspired, even in its revised forms, is not one of inclusion but to indoctrinate all students in the idea of “translating historical lessons and critical race theory into direct action for social justice.” Its purpose is to reinforce a leftist worldview that sees what earlier generations celebrated as the “American creed” of opportunity, meritocracy and liberty as merely a “dominant narrative” that serves white privilege and racism.

Hispanic American history is important, as are the stories about Asians and other groups, including Jews. Still, the schools shouldn’t be setting in motion a destructive competition among groups, in which they each fight to get mentioned.

The emphasis on the racial, religious and ethnic lines that divide us makes race the primary way we all define ourselves rather than as individuals and Americans. It glorifies a struggle for “equity” in which some people will get privilege and power based on their group identity rather than demanding that all are given an equal chance and be judged on their own merits. This hurts everyone, especially minorities, who are being sold a lie that the basic American values of political and economic freedom won’t help them.

Sadly, legacy Jewish organizations are so tied to liberal partisanship and bend their knees to fashionable ideas like DEI and ethnic studies that grant a permission slip to antisemitism as opposed to speaking up against them. They lack the courage to cut loose from their traditional allies and point out that left-wing groups, and those who purport to speak for racial minorities, are seeking to impose DEI and intersectional ideology on the schools, businesses and even the government.

By accepting inadequate half measures to deal with a toxic ethnic-studies problem that can’t be solved by anything other than its abolition, the Jewish establishment has once again betrayed their mandate to oppose Jew-hatred.


Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of JNS (Jewish News Syndicate). He is also a senior contributor to The Federalist and a columnist for Newsweek, as well as a writer for other publications. Follow him on Twitter: @jonathans_tobin.

Source: https://www.jns.org/column/ethnic-studies/23/9/1/315400/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Jordan is behind recent shakeups in the PA, experts say - Mohammad al Kassim

 

by Mohammad al Kassim

The changes also come as a succession battle for the post-Abbas period looms.

 

PA President Mahmoud Abbas. (photo credit: RONALDO SCHEMIDT/POOL/REUTERS)
PA President Mahmoud Abbas.
(photo credit: RONALDO SCHEMIDT/POOL/REUTERS)

Rumors of imminent changes within the Palestinian Authority government continue to swirl, despite official denials from Ramallah.

For more stories from The Media Line go to themedialine.org

News of a possible cabinet reshuffle is neither "new" nor "news," an official in Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh's office told The Media Line.

"The prime minister is continuing with his schedule and it is business as usual," the aide said. "We know that the president wants to make changes. Mr Shtayyeh has offered his resignation in the past but it was declined, so until we hear the news officially, we will go on as usual."

Earlier this month, PA President Mahmoud Abbas fired 12 provincial governors in the West Bank and Gaza Strip in what many say is part of an "overhaul" in personnel in the political and security structure. The shakeup continued some days later with the announcement of the retirement of 35 of his foreign envoys, all of them over the age of 65. 

Experts believe the dismissals are an attempt to promote newer leadership and quell increasing domestic, regional, and international criticism of the PA.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas greets Jordan’s King Abdullah in Ramallah on March 28. (credit: PPO/REUTERS) Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas greets Jordan’s King Abdullah in Ramallah on March 28. (credit: PPO/REUTERS)

Ramallah-based political analyst Esmat Mansour told The Media Line that Abbas’s visit to Jordan contributed to the speed with which he carried out the firings.

“It is not possible for the president to ignore Arab advice, as well as international demands, out of fear for the future and fate of the PA,” Mansour said.

Analysts say the Palestinian leadership is scrambling to appease regional players while satisfying the disgruntled Palestinian street, which sees the PA as ineffective, incompetent, and a tool in the hands of Israel.

“Abbas is trying through these decisions to give the impression that he is still influential and in control of things, and that change comes by his own will and is not imposed on him by anyone,” Mansour said.

As part of the shakeup, Abbas is planning a limited cabinet shuffle in the next few weeks, according to Palestinian media outlets. This may affect the current prime minister.

Ramallah-based political analyst Nihad Abu Ghosh told The Media Line that the PA is facing severe challenges to its political existence, putting its future as a viable political entity into question.

"Abbas recognizes his and the PA’s sinking popularity, and we may be in the process of another wave of changes in the PA," Abu Ghosh said.

He said Abbas hopes that the moves will help calm mounting criticism, at least for now.

"Without the slightest doubt, the Palestinian political system is suffering from a severe crisis because of the failure to hold elections on time and because of the long reign of Palestinian Authority President Abbas in power, despite the end of his term," Abu Ghosh said. 

Abbas, now 87, was elected in 2005 for a four-year term that ended in 2009 and has since then remained in power without any elections being held.

The post-Abbas era

"There is uncertainty about the Palestinian political future in the post-Abbas era. This matter leads to a kind of internal conflict between the centers of power over the caliphate. On the other hand, there is a crisis in the political direction of the Palestinian national project," Abu Ghosh said.

The shakeup comes as Abbas's Fatah party, which runs the PA, grapples with mounting political and economic crises. Many analysts say the Palestinian public is resentful of the PA and of Abbas.

"But all this [shakeup] will not solve the crisis, because the essence of the crisis is in the system as a whole and the lack of presidential and legislative elections," Abu Ghosh said. "There is a whole generation that has not been able to exercise their constitutional right to vote." 

Ramallah-based political analyst Fares Sarfandi told The Media Line that the expected ministerial reshuffle will not affect the prime minister or most government ministries.

"Change will not affect the prime minister, it's not related to the sovereign ministries, but rather some service ministries that have a direct impact on people's lives," he said. "This change is superficial. It will not affect the finance or foreign ministers, for example, who have been in their posts for years."

The latest decisions followed a brief and unannounced visit by Abbas to Jordan, where he met King Abdullah II. 

A Jordanian official in Amman who asked to remain anonymous told The Media Line that Jordan's intelligence and political officials were concerned about the stability of the PA and about the rising violence between Israelis and Palestinians in the West Bank. 

“There are credible reports that Abbas’s control and his inner circle have been compromised,” the official. “We have witnessed a rise in weapons smuggling this year, and the performance of the security apparatus is questionable.” 

According to the source, Jordanian intelligence officials concerned by the increase in violence have been pointing their fingers at the PA governors and top PA security and intelligence officials. 

Violence in the West Bank has risen sharply in 2023. According to officials in Ramallah, at least 220 Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli military, in what the United Nations has described as the deadliest year since the end of the Second Intifada almost 20 years ago. Meanwhile, at least 35 Israelis have been killed by Palestinian attackers during the same period.

The extremist Hamas and Islamic Jihad factions have each claimed responsibility for many of the attacks against Israelis, and both groups have seen their popularity among Palestinians grow rapidly. 

“They are both exploiting the security chaos and trying to capitalize on it,” the Jordanian official said, adding that Jordan considers the situation a threat to its own national security.

“Perhaps it is competing with Fatah in the West Bank, and this is not new, but Hamas has its own crises in Gaza,” Abu Ghosh said.

The Jordanian source said that Jordanian intelligence had expressed concerns about the deteriorating security situation in the West Bank and the growing fear that it may lead to the collapse of the PA. 

The official said it was for this reason that Abbas was “summoned” to Jordan for an urgent meeting. The message to Abbas was clear, that immediate action must be taken before things spiral out of control. 

“Jordan's fear of chaos is understandable, and this is not new. The West Bank is alongside Jordan. It is afraid of chaos, of producing new refugees, or of exporting the Palestinian crisis to Jordan, and this is what Israel wants as well,” Abu Ghosh said. 

Changes within the security services are reportedly already underway. 

The Media Line has learned that Palestinian intelligence services chief Gen. Majed Faraj has been tasked with recommending replacements for many of the current security leaders. 

One of his most important duties is to sift through the top security brass, ensuring that only those with absolute loyalty to Abbas and the officials in charge of their units remain, and not those loyal to previously powerful figures such as Jibril Rajoub, a member of the Central Committee and founder of the Preventive Security Service, or Maj. Gen. Tawfiq al-Tirawi, founder of the General Intelligence Service and former president of the Istiqlal Security University. Both still enjoy widespread support in the security divisions they once directed. 

During a recent meeting between Abbas and the heads of the PA security services, he made his dissatisfaction with their performances known and informed them that change was coming.

Observers expect the possible changes also to affect the heads of the security services.

Sarfandi said Jordan has a "real" and "strong" role to play in protecting the Palestinian Authority.

"There is no doubt that there is concern about the internal situation of the [Palestinian] Authority and fear of its collapse and the spread of chaos," he said. "Jordan is the closest and most capable of preserving the situation in the occupied West Bank. Because if things go into chaos, Jordan will pay the price." 

The changes also come as a succession battle for the post-Abbas period looms. 

"There is a strong struggle over who will succeed the president, and these arrangements may be part of this struggle. This is evident from the marginalization of Jibril Rajoub, for example, and the strengthening of the role of Hussein al-Sheikh [secretary general of the PLO Executive Committee],” Abu Ghosh said.


Mohammad al Kassim

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-757340

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

So Biden won't make Trump's legal troubles an issue in 2024 campaign? - Eric Utter

 

by Eric Utter

An "independent Justice Department"? Biden's "Justice Department" is as independent from his administration as the Waffen-SS was from Hitler's Nazi Party.

 

Cedric Richmond, the co-chair of President Biden's re-election campaign recently said Biden is not looking to make former president Donald Trump's legal troubles central to his 2024 message.

In an interview with ABC This Week co-anchor Martha Raddatz, Richmond stated: "The president has said from the beginning that he wanted an independent Justice Department ... so we're not going to comment.  We're not going to focus on Donald Trump's legal problems.  We will let the justice system take care of what the justice system should take care of."

An "independent Justice Department"?

Biden's "Justice Department" is as independent from his administration as the Waffen-SS was from Hitler's Nazi Party.

On the evening of August 24, as former president Trump's motorcade was arriving at the Fulton County, Georgia, jail for his surrender on trumped up charges related to his alleged attempt to overturn his alleged 2020 election loss in that state, Biden (or more likely his handlers) put out this online and social media appeal for monetary donations: "Apropos of nothing, I think today's a great day to give to my campaign."

That appeal — snarky, vile, mocking, and vaguely threatening — is apropos of everything pertaining to the Biden administration.

Of course the Biden administration isn't "going to focus on Donald Trump's legal problems."  It created them.  Of course Biden will leave it to his Department of Injustice (DOI?) to take care of what he and his administration want to "take care of."

Biden is not looking to make former President Donald Trump's legal troubles central to his 2024 message because his message has already been sent: he wants Trump indicted and in jail.

To Biden, it's simple: no Trump, no issue...and no further message required.

Image: Ethnocentrism via Wikimedia CommonsCC BY-SA 4.0.

 
Eric Utter

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/09/so_biden_wont_make_trumps_legal_troubles_an_issue_in_2024_campaign.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why are Eritreans rioting against their regime in Israel? - Yuval Barnea

 

by Yuval Barnea

Fighting broke out between Eritrean pro-government and anti-government protesters. Could it have been avoided?

 

Eritrean asylum seekers who oppose the regime in Eritrea protest outside a conference of regime supporters in south Tel Aviv, September 2, 2023 (photo credit: ITAI RON/FLASH90)
Eritrean asylum seekers who oppose the regime in Eritrea protest outside a conference of regime supporters in south Tel Aviv, September 2, 2023
(photo credit: ITAI RON/FLASH90)

Over 100 people have been injured during riots in South Tel Aviv after the Eritrean Embassy attempted to hold an event at a local venue.

Protesters claim they had contacted police numerous times to try and prevent the embassy from holding the event.

Fighting broke out between pro-government and anti-government protesters as well as the police, Saturday afternoon.

Eritreans complain of tracking, dispute on refugee status

Anti-government protesters have long complained about the embassy's attempts to monitor and track refugees from Eritrea.

Ongoing disputes with the Israeli government over refugee and asylum status have also been cited by protesters as part of the rationale for the riots.

Police guard while Eritrean asylum seekers who oppose the regime in Eritrea protest outside a conference of regime supporters in south Tel Aviv, September 2, 2023 (credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/FLASH90)Police guard while Eritrean asylum seekers who oppose the regime in Eritrea protest outside a conference of regime supporters in south Tel Aviv, September 2, 2023 (credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/FLASH90)

Eritrean Embassy effects

Last week, the Swiss newspaper St. Galler Tagblatt reported that the Eritrean Embassy had been sending spies disguised as refugees to extort money from refugees.

The paper reported on multiple stories of people who had fled the country being tracked down and threatened to pay back "debts" or "taxes" they owed back home.

One woman, who fled with her young daughter, was sent a picture of her daughter on the way to school tagged with the phrase "we know everything. You have debts in your country!” This is related to the "diaspora tax" levied on citizens living abroad.

The 'North Korea of Africa'

Eritrea has often been called the "North Korea of Africa" for its draconian and totalitarian regime. The country has been ruled by President Isaias Afwerki since the early 1990s when Eritrean gained independence from Ethiopia. Afwerki has imprisoned and killed many of his political opponents.

Conscription into the military is mandatory, with all citizens, men and women, being required to serve. Unlike in Israel, or other countries with mandatory conscription, conscription has been indefinite.

Conscription could be military or civilian but the only way out is for women who marry and have children, sickness, disability, and "good connections" can also be ways to be discharged. The UN has compared this system to forced labor or slavery.

Joanie Margulies contributed to this report.


Yuval Barnea

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-757299

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Thursday, August 31, 2023

James Comer Unplugged: Key lawmaker says Biden most corrupt VP in US history - John Solomon

 

by John Solomon

House Oversight chairman says Biden had no business telling Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his son's company.

 

Months into his wide-ranging investigation of the first family's finances, House Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer has seen enough to convince him that Joe Biden was the most corrupt vice president in history and he believes his Republican colleagues are moving closer to supporting an impeachment inquiry.

In a wide-ranging interview Wednesday with Just the News, Comer said evidence his committee has gathered showed Biden has lied about several key aspects of his family business, when he as vice president abused the power of his office to take son Hunter Biden aboard Air Force Two so he could prospect for foreign business deals and had no business withholding $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees in 2015 to force Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor, who just happened to be probing the Burisma Holdings firm paying the vice president's son.

"Every day the evidence continues to grow that would support impeachment," the Kentucky Republican told the "Just the News, No Noise" television show. "I don't think any vice president in the history of America was more corrupt than Joe Biden. And certainly we're concerned that all the corruption that he benefited from in his family benefited from while he was vice president could have tainted his presidency and made him vulnerable, made our country vulnerable, made him compromised."

As to whether Republicans can muster enough votes on the House floor to approve an impeachment inquiry this fall, Comer said: "Many of us in Congress are already there. We've seen enough. But with respect to my role as chairman, the House Oversight Committee, we're in charge of bringing out all the evidence."

He said his next step was to force the disclosure of the personal bank, credit card and phone records of Joe and Hunter Biden to see how much financial benefit the current president may have derived from his family's foreign exploits. Hunter Biden is quoted in text messages recovered from his laptop that he diverted as much as half of his earnings to his powerful father.

Joe Biden has denied receiving any benefit from his son's businesses, even after emails emerged showing Hunter Biden had paid some of his personal bills as vice president.

"That's why we're continuing this investigation," Comer explained. "And we're going to try to get all the bank records and all the email correspondence that Joe Biden had pertaining to shady business transactions that his family was involved in with foreign nationals."

The chairman also reacted to exclusive reporting by Just the News last week revealing that Joe Biden took the opposite action than was recommended when he threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees to force Ukraine to fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. Biden said he did it because U.S. policy was that Shokin was corrupt.

But State Department records show the U.S. sent a letter to Shokin saying it was "impressed" with his office's work and career State, Justice and Treasury officials had recommended Biden give Ukraine the loan guarantee because Shokin had made adequate progress in fighting corruption and reforming the judicial system.

"With respect to this investigation, there was never any evidence that we can find that would suggest that Shokin was corrupt," Comer said. "The only thing that we could find on Shokin is he was investigating corruption. And he was investigating Burisma, which was a corrupt energy company that Joe Biden's son was getting paid millions of dollars to serve on the board."

Beyond the conflict of interest, Comer said, Biden's intervention in Ukraine appeared to be interference in the internal affairs of another country. 

"I've been studying and we're still studying and doing the research. But I've never found a time when anyone from the United States in a leadership position went to a foreign country and tried to withhold foreign aid in exchange for terminating an individual." he said. "Now I've heard where people will go to foreign countries and say, You're gonna have to reduce your carbon emissions, or you're gonna have to stop selling arms to certain countries that may be trying to attack Israel, or you may need to watch your business transactions with China.

"But never hey, you need to fire your prosecutor who's investigating my son's energy company. That's never happened before. Nor should it ever happen again. And I think when this investigation is over, we're going to pass major legislation that defines influence peddling and bans it forever," he added.


John Solomon

Source: https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/thujames-comer-unplugged-key-lawmaker-says-biden-most-corrupt-vp-us

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Newt Gingrich says House GOP should broaden Biden investigation to include Hillary Clinton and Obama - Charlotte Hazard

 

by Charlotte Hazard

"Obama and Biden both wrote to her fake server which is totally outside the security rules," Gingrich said.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich says that Republicans in the House should expand their Biden investigation to look into other Democrat politicians such as former President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. 

"There's, I think, a second reason for dramatically broadening the investigation," Gingrich said on the "John Solomon Reports" podcast. "I'm working now on a series of articles for the American Spectator – making the case that this is really about the weaponization of government, the collapse of the rule of law and its replacement by the rule of power. And that really involves three principles. It involves Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden."

The National Archives and Records Administration earlier this week acknowledged possessing potentially up to 5,400 emails connected to then-Vice President Joe Biden's pseudonym accounts that he used to forward government information and discuss business with his son, Hunter Biden and others.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has hinted before in recent statements that the House could launch an impeachment inquiry into President Biden as soon as the House reconvenes.

"Remember, when you start getting things like the discovery that Biden wrote under three fake names, Obama by the way also wrote under fake names and of course, Hillary had an entire fake server in her home," Gingrich continued. "Obama and Biden both wrote to her fake server which is totally outside the security rules."

Gingrich explained that the congressional investigations have to go beyond Hunter Biden. 

"I think any investigation has to go way beyond Hunter Biden, who by the standards of corruption is a small fish ... while Obama was president, none of this could have happened without his active knowledge. It's just not possible."


Charlotte Hazard

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/congress/newt-gingrich-says-house-gop-should-broaden-biden-investigation-hillary-clinton

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Lawmakers say a ‘select committee’ on impeachment is a workable option and up to McCarthy - Nicholas Ballasy

 

by Nicholas Ballasy

A "select committee" is not constitutionally required, but GOP lawmakers defer to McCarthy. "I look forward to seeing what he decides but he can pick either one of them and I'm sure it work" said Darryl Issa.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Ca.) told Just the News that forming a select committee on impeachment of President Biden or proceeding directly to an impeachment inquiry are both viable options but the ultimate decision will be made by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

Issa, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, was asked if he prefers a select committee as opposed to an impeachment inquiry overseen by the House Judiciary Committee.

"I trust the speaker to figure out the best team to put together for that inquiry. He can always go to the Judiciary Committee, which is heavy on the impeachment side, but the reality is, the January 6 [select] committee, had it been bipartisan, might well have been as good of a format," he said during an interview on Capitol Hill.

"And the speaker has made it clear that he's returned to regular order. He will do a bipartisan investigation, if anything. So I look forward to seeing what he decides but he can pick either one of them and it would I'm sure it work," he added.

According to the Library of Congress, former President Richard Nixon was "investigated by the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities and by two special prosecutors for activities relating to the obstruction of the investigation of the burglary at the Democratic National Committee headquarters," known as the Watergate scandal. Those investigations preceded Nixon's resignation, but the resignation mooted an actual impeachment.

Unlike President Clinton, Nixon chose resignation rather than facing an impeachment, saying he decided he must resign when he concluded that he no longer had "a strong enough political base in the Congress" to make it possible for him to complete his term of office."

In 1998, the House Judiciary Committee approved three articles of impeachment against Clinton, alleging that President Clinton committed perjury and obstruction of justice. Later that year, after more than 13 hours of debate over two days, the House of Representatives approved two articles of impeachment, charging Clinton with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice. A third charge was added later.

In 1998, Clinton became the second U.S. president to be impeached in the House of Representatives. The U.S. Senate subsequently acquitted Clinton on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. He vowed to fill out his term and in February of 1999, President Clinton was acquitted of the two articles of impeachment. Rejecting the first charge of perjury, 10 Republicans and all 45 Democrats voted "not guilty." On the charge of obstruction of justice, the Senate was split 50-50.

Years later, Clinton called his impeachment "illegitimate" in an interview with NPR's Juan Williams.

A historical analysis published by the National Legal Foundation found "twenty-five cases in which Select Committees (or Special Committees) have been used in impeachment investigations or were proposed to be used."

Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.), a member of the House Armed Services and Foreign Affairs committees, was asked if he thinks a select committee should be formed on impeachment.

"I haven't heard about a select committee yet so I'll have to get the details of how that would work out. Again, it's like anything, the devil is in the details. What I want to see, though, and I've made this abundantly clear, is accountability and transparency," he said.

Mills was also asked if he would want to see the House vote to open an impeachment inquiry. The U.S. Constitution does not require any preliminary investigation or "select committees."

"He needs to go ahead and just move forward and get this done," Mills added. "I'm okay to whatever actually starts getting answers and accountability to the American people."

McCarthy’s office was not available for comment before publication. 


Nicholas Ballasy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/congress/issa-select-committee-impeachment-or-impeachment-inquiry-would-work-mccarthy

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Victor Davis Hanson Video: ‘We Have Never Seen Anything Like This’ - FrontPageMag.com

 

by FrontPageMag.com

Reflections on the rapid decay of America.

 


In this new video, Victor Davis Hanson discusses alarming and pathological current events and ideas, reflecting on the rapid decay of America. Don’t miss it!

 
 

 

FrontPageMag.com

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/victor-davis-hanson-video-we-have-never-seen-anything-like-this/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Human Rights Watch's Jihad Against Israel - Bassam Tawil

 

by Bassam Tawil

Instead of denouncing the Palestinians for using children as combatants, HRW is condemning Israel for defending itself against terrorism.

 

  • [T]he report fails to mention that during this period Israel has faced a massive wave of terrorism sponsored and funded by the Iranian regime and its Palestinian terror proxies, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).

  • One of the cases "investigated" by HRW is that of Mahmoud al-Sadi, 17, reportedly killed by Israeli security forces as he walked to school near the Jenin refugee camp in the northern West Bank on November 21, 2022. Notably, the HRW report does not mention why Israeli troops had entered the refugee camp.

  • The Jenin Battalion terrorists, who are heavily armed, are mostly affiliated with Palestinian Islamic Jihad, an extremist Islamist organization responsible for countless terrorist attacks that have killed and injured hundreds of Israelis in the past few decades. There is no mention of this militia or its activities in the HRW report. Evidently, HRW does not want to the facts to spoil its effort to slander Israelis by depicting them as child-killers.

  • While HRW presents al-Sadi as an unarmed teenage boy, Palestinians posted a photo of him carrying a M-16 rifle. Apparently, for HRW such photos, where Palestinian teenagers are featured brandishing weapons and dressed in military outfits, are irrelevant because they do not serve its anti-Israeli propaganda.

  • Bizarrely, HRW does admit that the remaining three "children" allegedly killed by Israel were involved in terrorist attacks. Yet, as far as HRW is concerned, Israeli soldiers or police have no right to defend themselves when they are attacked with stones, Molotov cocktails, and fireworks. Why? According to the logic of HRW, the perpetrators are "only" teenagers.

  • Does HRW really expect Israeli soldiers and policemen to ask someone who shoots or throws a Molotov cocktail at them how old they are before firing back to defend themselves?

  • Instead of denouncing the Palestinians for using children as combatants, HRW is condemning Israel for defending itself against terrorism.

  • "Israel, with a population of 7.4 million, is home to at least 80 human rights organizations, a vibrant free press, a democratically elected government, a judiciary that frequently rules against the government, a politically active academia, multiple political parties and, judging by the amount of news coverage, probably more journalists per capita than any other country in the world — many of whom are there expressly to cover the Israeli-Palestinian conflict." — The late Robert L. Bernstein, founder and longtime chairman of Human Rights Watch, New York Times, October 19, 2009.

  • "Meanwhile, the Arab and Iranian regimes rule over some 350 million people, and most remain brutal, closed and autocratic, permitting little or no internal dissent. The plight of their citizens who would most benefit from the kind of attention a large and well-financed international human rights organization can provide is being ignored as Human Rights Watch's Middle East division prepares report after report on Israel." — Robert L. Bernstein, New York Times, October 19, 2009.

  • "Human Rights Watch has lost critical perspective on a conflict in which Israel has been repeatedly attacked by Hamas and Hezbollah, organizations that go after Israeli citizens and use their own people as human shields. These groups are supported by the government of Iran, which has openly declared its intention not just to destroy Israel but to murder Jews everywhere. This incitement to genocide is a violation of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide." — Robert L. Bernstein, New York Times, October 19, 2009.

  • "Leaders of Human Rights Watch know that Hamas and Hezbollah chose to wage war from densely populated areas, deliberately transforming neighborhoods into battlefields. They know that more and better arms are flowing into both Gaza and Lebanon and are poised to strike again. And they know that this militancy continues to deprive Palestinians of any chance for the peaceful and productive life they deserve. Yet Israel, the repeated victim of aggression, faces the brunt of Human Rights Watch's criticism." — Robert L. Bernstein, New York Times, October 19, 2009.

  • HRW's ongoing obsession with Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, serves as a reminder that the organization is on the side of the terrorists who appear as committed to killing Americans and other Westerners, as to destroying Israel and killing Jews.

  • The HRW reports are no less dangerous than the non-stop incitement to violence by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad on Al Menar, Al Jazeera in Arabic, or the regimes of Qatar and Iran. Such reports provide ammunition to Iran and its proxies to pursue their murderous campaign against Israel and the West, and reveal that HRW is not all that different from the Palestinian terrorists and their patrons in Iran.

  • Perhaps HRW might issue an apology, write accurate reports and turn its attention to actors that really do abuse human rights?

Human Rights Watch has once again exposed its unvarnished anti-Israel bias with outrageous false allegations. Its report fails to mention that Palestinian terrorist groups recruit teenagers as combatants and send them to kill Israeli civilians and soldiers. For example, Mohammad al-Saleem (pictured), a teenage member of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terrorist group who was killed while attacking Israeli soldiers with incendiary devices. (Image source: NGO Monitor/Abu Ali Express)

Human Rights Watch (HRW) has once again exposed its unvarnished anti-Israel bias by alleging that Israel systematically targets Palestinian children. The outrageous -- and false -- allegation was included in a new report published by HRW on August 28 under the title: "West Bank: Spike in Israeli killings of Palestinian children." The report claims that "the Israeli military and border police forces are killing Palestinian children with virtually no recourse for accountability."

Noting that HRW "investigated four fatal shootings of Palestinian children by Israeli forces between November 2022 and March 2023," the report fails to mention that during this period Israel has faced a massive wave of terrorism sponsored and funded by the Iranian regime and its Palestinian terror proxies, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).

The report also fails to mention that the terrorist groups have been recruiting Palestinian teenagers as combatants and sending them to kill Israeli civilians and soldiers.

It even further fails to mention that more than 30 Israelis have been killed since the beginning of this year in a series of terrorist attacks in Israel and the West Bank. In the past two weeks, Palestinian terrorists murdered a Jewish mother of three and a Jewish father and his son in two separate shooting attacks in the West Bank. HRW did not issue a report about that.

One of the cases "investigated" by HRW is that of Mahmoud al-Sadi, 17, reportedly killed by Israeli security forces as he walked to school near the Jenin refugee camp in the northern West Bank on November 21, 2022. Notably, the HRW report does not mention why Israeli troops had entered the refugee camp.

Were the Israeli soldiers bored and thinking, "Gee, might be fun to go shoot up a few kids today"? No. The Israeli security forces went to the camp as part of a counter-terrorism operation designed to foil attacks by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Jenin refugee camp has long been serving as a hub for Iran-backed Islamist terrorists who see themselves engaged in a Jihad (holy war) to eliminate Israel. Several terrorists who carried out shooting attacks in the West Bank and Israel had come from the camp.

In the past two years, a large militia called Jenin Battalion started operating in the camp. Its members have since carried out constant shooting attacks against Israeli soldiers and civilians. The Jenin Battalion terrorists, who are heavily armed, are mostly affiliated with Palestinian Islamic Jihad, an extremist Islamist organization responsible for countless terrorist attacks that have killed and injured hundreds of Israelis in the past few decades. There is no mention of this militia or its activities in the HRW report. Evidently, HRW does not want to the facts to spoil its effort to slander Israelis by depicting them as child-killers.

The exact circumstances of al-Sadi's death will never be known since he was quickly buried by his family and other Palestinians in the refugee camp. The Israeli army said soldiers who were trying to arrest suspected terrorists had come under fire from Palestinian gunmen. Apparently, al-Sadi was killed in the exchange of gunfire.

While HRW presents al-Sadi as an unarmed teenage boy, Palestinians posted a photo of him carrying a M-16 rifle. Apparently, for HRW such photos, where Palestinian teenagers are featured brandishing weapons and dressed in military outfits, are irrelevant because they do not serve its anti-Israeli propaganda.

Bizarrely, HRW does admit that the remaining three "children" allegedly killed by Israel were involved in terrorist attacks. Yet, as far as HRW is concerned, Israeli soldiers or police have no right to defend themselves when they are attacked with stones, Molotov cocktails, and fireworks. Why? According to the logic of HRW, the perpetrators are "only" teenagers.

Does HRW really expect Israeli soldiers and policemen to ask someone who shoots or throws a Molotov cocktail at them how old they are before firing back to defend themselves? The other three Palestinian teenagers mentioned in the report – Wadie Abu Ramuz, Mohammad al-Saleem, and Adam Ayyad – were not killed while they were sleeping in their beds, on their way to school or to buy bread for their moms.

Abu Ramuz, a resident of East Jerusalem, was fatally shot by police officers as he attacked them with fireworks. Al-Saleem, from the West Bank village of Azzun, was a member of an armed group called Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. He too was killed while attacking Israeli soldiers with incendiary devices. Ayyad, a resident of Dheisheh refugee camp near Bethlehem, was a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist group. Ayyad went into battle intending to die and left a written will in his pocket. "God fulfilled my dream of becoming a martyr," he wrote in the document. "Martyrdom is not only death. It is pride for us and the whole world."

Instead of denouncing the Palestinians for using children as combatants, HRW is condemning Israel for defending itself against terrorism.

"Following a failed campaign by anti-Israel NGOs to get the Israel Defense Forces included on a United Nations blacklist of child rights abusers, HRW makes another attempt with their new report," noted NGO Monitor, a globally recognized research institute promoting democratic values and good governance.

"The HRW report cites several examples of Palestinian minors who were killed, ignoring publicly available evidence of their terror affiliations [and] failing to condemn their participation in violent acts during the time of their death."

Arsen Ostrovsky, CEO of the International Legal Forum, said that "contrary to HRW's malicious lies and gross distortions of truth and law, Israeli security forces only target Palestinian terrorists." He added:

"If HRW truly cared about the welfare of Palestinian children, it would call out Palestinian terror groups for using Palestinian children as human shields, while the Palestinian Authority [headed by Mahmoud Abbas] continues to create a systematic infrastructure of incitement and glorification of violence."

Each time HRW publishes an anti-Israel report, one cannot help recalling the damning criticism against the organization by its own founder and longtime chairman, the late Robert L. Bernstein.

In a 2009 opinion piece in The New York Times, Bernstein lashed out at HRW over its obsession with Israel:

"Israel, with a population of 7.4 million, is home to at least 80 human rights organizations, a vibrant free press, a democratically elected government, a judiciary that frequently rules against the government, a politically active academia, multiple political parties and, judging by the amount of news coverage, probably more journalists per capita than any other country in the world — many of whom are there expressly to cover the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"Meanwhile, the Arab and Iranian regimes rule over some 350 million people, and most remain brutal, closed and autocratic, permitting little or no internal dissent. The plight of their citizens who would most benefit from the kind of attention a large and well-financed international human rights organization can provide is being ignored as Human Rights Watch's Middle East division prepares report after report on Israel.

"Human Rights Watch has lost critical perspective on a conflict in which Israel has been repeatedly attacked by Hamas and Hezbollah, organizations that go after Israeli citizens and use their own people as human shields. These groups are supported by the government of Iran, which has openly declared its intention not just to destroy Israel but to murder Jews everywhere. This incitement to genocide is a violation of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

"Leaders of Human Rights Watch know that Hamas and Hezbollah chose to wage war from densely populated areas, deliberately transforming neighborhoods into battlefields. They know that more and better arms are flowing into both Gaza and Lebanon and are poised to strike again. And they know that this militancy continues to deprive Palestinians of any chance for the peaceful and productive life they deserve. Yet Israel, the repeated victim of aggression, faces the brunt of Human Rights Watch's criticism."

Although Bernstein's criticism was published more than a decade ago, HRW continues to prove that every word he said remains as relevant as ever. HRW's ongoing obsession with Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, serves as a reminder that the organization is on the side of the terrorists who appear as committed to killing Americans (here, here and here) and other Westerners, as to destroying Israel and killing Jews. As the US approaches the 22nd anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, we see ISIS virtually doubling the territory it controls in Mali, in addition to other terror threats.

The HRW reports are no less dangerous than the non-stop incitement to violence by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad on Al Menar, Al Jazeera in Arabic, or the regimes of Qatar and Iran. Such reports provide ammunition to Iran and its proxies to pursue their murderous campaign against Israel and the West, and reveal that HRW is not all that different from the Palestinian terrorists and their patrons in Iran.

Perhaps HRW might issue an apology, write accurate reports and turn its attention to actors that really do abuse human rights?


Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/19938/human-rights-watch-israel

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter