Saturday, March 16, 2024

Biden Should be Threatening Qatar and the Terrorists, Not Israel - Bassam Tawil

 

by Bassam Tawil

Instead of pressuring Israel, Biden should be pressuring his friends in Qatar to force their Hamas puppets to hand over the Israeli hostages and surrender. Instead of threatening to cut off weapons supplies to Israel, he should be threatening the leaders of Qatar with the withdrawal of US forces from the country's Al Udeid Air Base

  • Biden's reported threat to halt or suspend US military supplies to Israel if the IDF enters Rafah is what encourages Hamas to continue fighting and reject every proposal to release the hostages. When Hamas leaders hear that Biden is threatening Israel to prevent the IDF from entering Rafah, they must say to themselves: "Why should we make any concessions to Israel? America doesn't want the Israelis to destroy the four remaining battalions. The US administration is opposed to Israel's plan to eliminate Hamas, so let's wait!"

  • A total defeat means the elimination of all of Hamas's battalions. An Israeli victory will never be complete as long as one, or even half, a Hamas battalion remains intact.

  • Biden is actually sending a message to Hamas and Iran's other terror proxies, including Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Houthis, that America is about to throw Israel under the bus. Cutting off US weapons supplies to Israel is the ultimate fantasy of the terrorists.

  • The administration could show impressive leadership and in fact "bring this to an end as quickly as we can" -- not just for Israel but for all in the region who are seeking peace -- by encouraging Israel to take out the terrorists in Rafah without delay.

  • Instead of pressuring Israel, Biden should be pressuring his friends in Qatar to force their Hamas puppets to hand over the Israeli hostages and surrender. Instead of threatening to cut off weapons supplies to Israel, he should be threatening the leaders of Qatar with the withdrawal of US forces from the country's Al Udeid Air Base and to officially designate Qatar as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (for its funding of Hamas, Hizballah, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Al Shabab, Al Nusra Front, among others).

  • This is the way – the only way – to end the war quickly, as well as to send a signal to America's adversaries looking on, that the US is prepared to uphold the values of civilization, not the values of terror.

US President Joe Biden's reported threat to halt or suspend US military supplies to Israel if the IDF enters Rafah is what encourages Hamas to continue fighting and reject every proposal to release the hostages. Pictured: Biden delivers the State of the Union address in the US Capitol on March 7, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

US President Joe Biden will consider conditioning military supplies to Israel if the Israeli army moves forward with a large-scale invasion of the city of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, according to four US officials.

Biden has also told MSNBC that a Rafah operation would cross a "red line," although he balanced that statement with a commitment to support Israel's right to self-defense.

Israeli security sources have revealed that the Iran-backed Hamas terror group has at least four battalions in Rafah. Many of the Israeli hostages kidnapped by Hamas terrorists and other Palestinians on October 7, 2023, are also believed to be held in Rafah.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have succeeded in destroying most of Hamas's battalions in other areas of the Gaza Strip.

Israeli forces have dismantled 17 of Hamas's 24 combat battalions in the Gaza Strip, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on February 4.

"The increasing defeat of Hamas in Gaza is an important achievement for the IDF," said Middle East expert Seth Frantzman.

"Hamas terrorists have lost control of significant areas in Gaza, enabling the dismantling of the terrorist infrastructure the group built up over previous decades. It is essential the IDF be supported in its efforts to prevent further threats by Hamas and other terrorist groups to Israel and the region."

Biden's reported threat to halt or suspend US military supplies to Israel if the IDF enters Rafah is what encourages Hamas to continue fighting and reject every proposal to release the hostages. When Hamas leaders hear that Biden is threatening Israel to prevent the IDF from entering Rafah, they must say to themselves: "Why should we make any concessions to Israel? America doesn't want the Israelis to destroy the four remaining battalions. The US administration is opposed to Israel's plan to eliminate Hamas, so let's wait!"

Asking Israel not to invade Rafah and destroy the Hamas terrorists holed up in the city is akin to requesting that someone running in a marathon stop before reaching the finish line. There is no alternative to a total defeat of Hamas, especially in the aftermath of its October 7 massacre of 1,200 Israelis. A total defeat means the elimination of all of Hamas's battalions. An Israeli victory will never be complete as long as one, or even half, a Hamas battalion remains intact.

According to Brigadier General (res.) Amir Avivi, Chairman and Founder of Israel Defense and Security Forum:

"The Americans should understand the consequences of [Biden's] red line: a guarantee that another October 7 will happen again, that hostages will never come home, that an emboldened Iran will intensify on all fronts and that Hamas-oppressed civilians will suffer indefinitely.

"One of the reasons for this could be President Biden's willingness to avoid dissent at the Democratic National Convention in August, and he is worried about losing the state of Michigan in the coming election as young people and Arab-Americans defect over his Israel policy. Israel has a right to defend itself, he seems to now be saying, but it should stop the war now. President Biden expressed this dichotomous position in his State of the Union address last week and reiterated this point in the MSNBC interview."

On November 25, 2023, Biden was quoted as saying that Israel's goal of eliminating Hamas was a legitimate but difficult mission. "I don't know how long it will take," Biden told reporters.

"My expectation and hope is that as we move forward, the rest of the Arab world and the region is also putting pressure on all sides to slow this down, to bring this to an end as quickly as we can."

Four months later, Biden appears to have changed his mind about obliterating Hamas. His warning to Israel not to enter Rafah implies that the Biden administration actually wants Israel to lose the war against Hamas. This would mean that Hamas will continue to rule the Gaza Strip and plan more October 7-style massacres against Israelis. Hamas official Ghazi Hamad has clearly said that the terror group will repeat the October 7 attack, time and again, until Israel is annihilated.

The most dangerous part of Biden's statements is the threat to suspend or halt US shipments of weapons and ammunition aid to Israel should it proceed with its plans to launch a ground offensive in Rafah, destroy Hamas and release the hostages.

Biden is actually sending a message to Hamas and Iran's other terror proxies, including Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Houthis, that America is about to throw Israel under the bus. Cutting off US weapons supplies to Israel is the ultimate fantasy of the terrorists.

It is no wonder, then, that in their statements, several Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad leaders have been calling for an immediate halt to US weapons shipments to Israel.

The Palestinian terrorists want the Americans to stop supplying Israel with weapons and ammunition because that would facilitate their mission of killing Jews and destroying Israel. The terrorists are angry because they want Israel to be weak and defenseless. Hamas leaders have just one problem with carrying out more October 7-like massacres against Israelis: the US and other Western countries' providing armaments to Israel complicates the terrorists' dream of slaughtering Jews.

"We must teach Israel a lesson," Hamad said.

"The Al-Aqsa Flood [Hamas's name for its Oct 7 invasion of Israel] is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth. Will we have to pay a price? Yes, and we are ready to pay it. We are called a nation of martyrs, and we are proud to sacrifice martyrs."

The Biden administration would see more success if it stopped underestimating such threats from a brutal terror group that has shown itself perfectly capable of the mass murder, rape, beheadings, and burning alive of Israeli civilians. The administration could show impressive leadership and in fact "bring this to an end as quickly as we can" -- not just for Israel but for all in the region who are seeking peace -- by encouraging Israel to take out the terrorists in Rafah without delay.

The administration would also do well to stop the talk about punishing Israel by cutting off military supplies. Instead of pressuring Israel, Biden should be pressuring his friends in Qatar to force their Hamas puppets to hand over the Israeli hostages and surrender. Instead of threatening to cut off weapons supplies to Israel, he should be threatening the leaders of Qatar with the withdrawal of US forces from the country's Al Udeid Air Base and to officially designate Qatar as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (for its funding of Hamas, Hizballah, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Al Shabab, Al Nusra Front, among others).

This is the way – the only way – to end the war quickly, as well as to send a signal to America's adversaries looking on, that the US is prepared to uphold the values of civilization, not the values of terror.


Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20486/biden-should-threaten-qatar

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Schumer trashed for 'disgusting' speech calling on Israel to dump Netanyahu: 'Outrageously inappropriate' - Lindsay Kornick

 

by Lindsay Kornick

Sen. Schumer claimed the Israeli prime minister 'lost his way' in the war against Hamas


 

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., faced online backlash on Thursday after he said Israel should change its leadership amid the country's war with Hamas.

In what was billed as a major speech on a two-state solution, Schumer said on the Senate floor that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu was one of four obstacles to this solution. 

The Senate Majority Leader said he believed that "Netanyahu has lost his way by allowing his political survival to take the precedence over the best interests of Israel."

Along with Netanyahu, Schumer listed: "Hamas and the Palestinians who support and tolerate their evil ways; the radical right-wing Israelis in government and society; [and] Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas" as the other obstacles.

Schumer and Netanyahu together in DC in 2017

Schumer is calling on Israel to hold new elections. Schumer says he believes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has "lost his way" amid the Israeli bombardment of Gaza and a growing humanitarian crisis there.  (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

According to Schumer, who is Jewish, new Israeli elections are "the only way to allow for a healthy and open decision-making process about the future of Israel." He added that he believes a majority of Israelis also recognize a need for change in their government.

ISRAEL'S US AMBASSADOR SLAMS SCHUMER'S 'UNHELPFUL' ANTI-NETANYAHU SPEECH: 'ISRAEL IS A SOVEREIGN DEMOCRACY'

Schumer’s comments were seen by some as a form of "election interference" for calling on Israel to hold new elections to replace Netanyahu.

"This is one of the most disgusting speeches ever given in the Senate. 1) Senators don’t get to pick who foreign democracies elect. This is election interference. 2) Schumer doesn’t understand how Israel is united to destroy Hamas. It’s bigger than Bibi," Fox News contributor Ari Fleischer summarized.

 Former CBS News correspondent Mark Knoller asked, "Would Schumer still feel that way if his relatives were still held by Hamas?"

"For whatever reason (and I suspect it is Cornell West line on many state ballots in Fall) Democrats have concluded that 100% of their Jewish American voters and friends of Israel who are not Jewish will stick w/them regardless if they just attack @netanyahu. That seems…unlikely," conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt wrote.

"This is outrageously inappropriate. Why on earth would any nation want to be an ally of the US today? We treat them far worse than our enemies," columnist and author David Marcus exclaimed.

 

National Review senior writer Dan McLaughlin posted, "Funny how Schumer isn't calling for new elections to replace the leadership of China or Iran."

"When Schumer gives a generally pro-Israel speech but gives it mainly to attack Bibi (for domestic political reasons) and loses the Israeli Ambassador….It shows how incoherent the Dem party’s Israel messaging is," Fox News Radio political analyst Josh Kraushaar noted.

Fox News contributor Marc Thiessen remarked, "Imagine a foreign politician calling on the U.S. to dump Bush a few months after 9/11."

New York Post columnist John Podhoretz joked, "I call for new elections in New York state. Chuck Schumer is a creature of the past. He is an obstacle to peace. Oh wait, that's not how we do things? Sorry."

HOUSE GOP LEADERS CALL SCHUMER'S ISRAEL COMMENTS 'INAPPROPRIATE,’ DEMAND APOLOGY IN IMPROMPTU PRESS CONFERENCE

Schumer gives Senate floor speech critical of Netanyahu

In this image from video provided by Senate TV, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks on the Senate floor at the Capitol in Washington, March 14, 2024.  (Senate TV via AP)

In his reasoning for calling for elections to potentially replace Netanyahu, Schumer said, "He has put himself in coalition with far-right extremists like Ministers Smotrich and Ben-Gvir, and as a result, he has been too willing to tolerate the civilian toll in Gaza, which is pushing support for Israel worldwide to historic lows."

Schumer emphasized that Israel will not be able to overcome such a poor public image. "Israel cannot survive if it becomes a pariah," he said.

Fox News Digital reached out to Schumer’s office for comment.

Fox News' Julia Johnson contributed to this report.

 

Lindsay Kornick

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/media/schumer-trashed-disgusting-speech-calling-israel-dump-netanyahu-outrageously-inappropriate

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Losing control of Gaza: Hamas crackdown on clans, civilians with new intensity - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

It appears now that Hamas is concerned it could be losing a grip on power.

 

Masked Hamas men wave flags during the march in Jabalya refugee camp in North Gaza Strip, October 4, 2002 (photo credit: REUTERS/AHMED JADALLAH)
Masked Hamas men wave flags during the march in Jabalya refugee camp in North Gaza Strip, October 4, 2002
(photo credit: REUTERS/AHMED JADALLAH)

Hamas appears to sense that its rule over Gaza is in jeopardy and is returning to its roots as a thuggish, mafia-like organization, cracking down on Gazans who speak out against it and massacring people seeking humanitarian aid.

It’s important to understand the context. Hamas began as a relatively small organization. Although its ideological roots are in the Muslim Brotherhood and political Islam, its actual early members such as Yahya Sinwar, were killers who emerged in a mafia-like world in places like Khan Yunis.In those days, in the 1980s, when Israel-controlled cities in Gaza, family rivalries used to result in feuds and killings. Later, in the 1990s, there was still a great deal of violence in Gaza between clans. Hamas replaced these groups.

Downing dissent in the Gaza Strip

After 2007, when Hamas brutally banished the Palestinian Authority following its 2006 election, it was quick to put down any dissent. Hamas also benefited from a partnership with international organizations and provided “security” for most internationals and the UN in Gaza.

This meant that Hamas police were seen as the force for “law and order” by international groups. After the October 7 massacre and Israel’s retaliation, Hamas has lost control of some areas of Gaza. However, their plainclothes thugs have returned to many of these areas whenever Israel withdraws, and seek to keep people from speaking out against the terrorist group.
 A general view of a tent camp sheltering displaced Palestinians, who fled their homes due to Israeli strikes, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, January 3, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/SALEH SALEM)Enlrage image
A general view of a tent camp sheltering displaced Palestinians, who fled their homes due to Israeli strikes, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, January 3, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/SALEH SALEM)

 It appears now that Hamas is concerned it could be losing a grip on power. This comes as Israel has sought to enable humanitarian aid to enter Gaza via routes that avoid the Hamas “protection” that takes place in Rafah in southern Gaza. Hamas uses its control over aid to control Gaza.

It appears now that Hamas is concerned it could actually be losing its grip on power as Israel has sought to channel humanitarian aid into enter Gaza via routes that avoid Hamas “protection,” as in Rafah in southern Gaza. Hamas uses its control over aid to control Gaza.

Escalating violence in Gaza

 On Friday, gunmen in Gaza shot at civilians who were trying to obtain aid at the Kuwaiti roundabout which is in the Zeitun area, south of Gaza City. This area is near the Netzerim corridor that is controlled by the IDF. The gunmen operate in the area that is outside of IDF control.

The IDF said that “about an hour before the entry of the aid convoy [on March 14], Palestinian gunmen were seen opening fire in the midst of a crowd of Gazan civilians. We emphasize that IDF forces did not open fire at the aid convoy in Kuwait Square. The IDF is continuing to examine the incident while making strenuous efforts to bring humanitarian aid to the residents of the Gaza Strip, while Hamas terrorists are harming the residents of Gaza and spreading lies with the purpose of blaming the State of Israel.”

It’s not clear if the gunmen who massacred the people near the Kuwait roundabout were Hamas members, but it stands to reason that they were. Hamas is the group that has access to weapons and it is in Hamas’s interest to massacre people.

The Hamas-run health authorities put out claims that Israel was responsible for the “massacre” as it did after  the stampede in late February.

Israel is now facilitating more aid into Gaza by sea via a new artificial pier. This, and another aid corridor for trucks, is supposed to bypass Hamas control. Hamas wants to stop this aid being delivered and also opposes airdrops. Hamas has likely encouraged its contacts in international organizations to issue statements against the airdrops.

A HAMAS CRACKDOWN is also targeting Gazan clans. Reports of an Israeli initiative to work with Gaza clans clearly concerns the terrorist group.

Hamas recently murdered several Gaza clan members to send a mafia-like message against these family-based groups. One victim was a leader of the Doghmush clan, powerful in eastern Gaza, in areas such as Tal al-Hawa and Sabra, according to a report on Ynet. Saleh Doghmush is a leader of the clan, but it was not immediately clear if he was the victim. Hamas has increased its rhetoric against the clans over the last week.

The IDF said last week that “in accordance with government directives, six humanitarian aid trucks containing aid from the World Food Programme (WFP) entered the northern Gaza Strip via the “96th” gate on the security fence last night (Tuesday). This was done as part of a pilot in order to prevent the Hamas terrorist organization from taking over the aid.”

In addition, on Wednesday, the IDF said that ”following IDF and ISA (Shin Bet) intelligence, an IDF aircraft precisely targeted and eliminated a terrorist in Hamas’s Operations Unit in the area of Rafah, Muhammad Abu Hasna. Hasna was a combat support operative in Hamas’s military wing. He was also involved in taking control of humanitarian aid and distributing it to Hamas terrorists.”

These two statements illustrate how Israel is also following developments in Gaza regarding the aid distribution issue. To remove Hamas from controlling Gaza will require removing their control over aid.

Now there are discussions about Israel’s operations in Rafah, which Hamas uses to control aid coming into Gaza. Israel has approved plans for an operation in Rafah, and hostage talks are continuing.

Its recent spate of murders clearly indicates the lengths to which Hamas will go to keep its monopoly on aid distribution, concentrating more on suppressing Gazans than on fighting Israel. 


Seth J. Frantzman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-792203

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

FBI’s Wray Pauses Hunt for ‘Insurrectionists’ to Warn of Actual Terrorist Threat - Robert Spencer

 

by Robert Spencer

Wray is worried about ISIS activity at the border? Really?

 


[Make sure to read Robert Spencer’s contributions in Jamie Glazov’s new book: Barack Obama’s True Legacy: How He Transformed America.]

It turns out that the Biden regime’s open southern border is a national security threat. Why, who could possibly have imagined such a thing?

FBI top dog Christopher Wray recently revealed that the border region was full of “very dangerous threats” and that one of these was a smuggling network linked to the Islamic State (ISIS), which has repeatedly called upon Muslims to attack ordinary Americans in order to “strike terror in the enemies of Allah” (Qur’an 8:60).

Wow, who could ever imagined that opening up the border might make Americans more vulnerable to jihad terrorists? Obviously the FBI didn’t, as for the past three years it has been devoting the bulk of its resources to hunting for “insurrectionists” and the “white supremacists” that Wray and others have repeatedly insisted constitute the greatest terror threat the nation faces today.

The ridiculous claims about “white supremacist terrorists,” as well as the agency’s focus on Jan. 6 “insurrectionists,” were a thinly veiled attempt to criminalize and destroy all political opposition to the Biden regime in the U.S. But now, reality has intruded to the extent that Wray and his henchmen can’t ignore the jihad threat any longer, and with attacks likely in the U.S., he has to pretend he is on top of the situation.

In reality, the FBI has been in denial about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat for years and almost certainly will not be able to stop future jihad attacks in the U.S. because it is still so ideologically blinkered and politicized that it doesn’t even know what to look for.

Nevertheless, Wray did his best to give the appearance of being vigilant under questioning from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) during a hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Monday.

“From an FBI perspective,” said the top FBI apparatchik, “we are seeing a wide array of very dangerous threats that emanate from the border. And that includes everything from drug trafficking — the FBI alone seized enough fentanyl in the last two years to kill 270 million people — that’s just on the fentanyl side. An awful lot of the violent crime in the United States is at the hands of gangs who are themselves involved in the distribution of that fentanyl.”

The threat, however, also includes Islamic State jihadis. Wray continued, “So, I want to be a little bit careful how far I can go in open session, but there is a particular network that, where some of the overseas facilitators of the smuggling network have ISIS ties that we’re very concerned about and that we’ve been spending enormous amount of effort with our partners investigating. Exactly what that network is up to is something that’s, again, the subject of our current investigation.”

Rubio then asked him “to confirm that there is a network ‘we’re concerned about’ that has facilitators involved with ties to ISIS.” Wray responded, “Correct.”

Wray doesn’t seem to have been asked any questions about the larger picture, that is, how we got into a situation in which members of a bloodthirsty jihad terror group that has repeatedly vowed the mass murder of Americans came to be operating in the border area in the first place. The FBI is investigating a situation that the corrupt regime in the White House, a regime that the agency indefatigably supports, has created.

The FBI did all it could to defame and destroy the regime’s chief rival, and the republic itself along with it, by working to criminalize loyal opposition. Not only has there been the ongoing legal persecution of Donald Trump, but there was also the Disinformation Governance Board that would have policed speech that dissented from the leftist establishment’s perspective. The regime sicced the FBI on angry parents protesting at school board meetings, worked with Twitter and other social media giants to silence and deplatform people with opposing views, and even sent spies into Catholic churches.

And now Christopher Wray is worried about ISIS activity at the border? This is a problem that could have been solved years ago, if the FBI hadn’t been weaponized against the political opponents of the Biden regime, and had been focused on actually protecting the American people. That ship, however, has sailed long ago, and no protestations of vigilance to Marco Rubio will change that. If ISIS does strike in the U.S., Christopher Wray and his ilk will bear a great deal of the responsibility for allowing it to happen.


Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 27 books including many bestsellers, such as The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), The Truth About Muhammad and The History of Jihad. His latest books are The Critical Qur’an and Empire Of God. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fbis-wray-pauses-from-hunting-for-insurrectionists-to-warn-of-an-actual-terrorist-threat/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Biden Administration Attacks Democracy Abroad - Thaddeus G. McCotter

 

by Thaddeus G. McCotter

The Biden administration is attacking the democracy of our ally Israel over the war in Gaza and how it is affecting democracy—American democracy, specifically Mr. Biden’s re-election chances.

 

A friend sent me a link that, upon opening it, I initially thought I had been directed to The Babylon Bee. I rubbed my eyes and pored over the blurb again. Amazed, I remembered Mr. Biden’s State of the Union declaration: “What makes our moment rare is that freedom and democracy are under attack at—both at home and overseas at the very same time.”

Of course, I was aware of how Mr. Biden and his leftist supporters have been assiduously attacking American democracy. Indeed, in recounting how the Democratic Party is anything but democratic, Victor Davis Hanson concluded:

The Left talks grandly of ‘democracy dies in darkness’ as Joe Biden beats the dead horse of January 6 to warn that democracy is in its greatest peril. But all such rhetoric is projection. The verbiage masks the most comprehensive effort in modern American history to radically change, destroy, or warp American laws, customs, and traditions for the short-term aim of gaining and retaining political power.

The rationale is that the left is of such superior morality and wisdom that it has the right to violate the Constitution or the hallowed traditions of the country to achieve the higher end of ensuring a progressive agenda.

However, I was unaware of how Mr. Biden and his leftist supporters had been attacking democracy abroad. Of course, I knew the Authoritarian Axis of communist China, Putin’s revanchist Russia, terrorist-state Iran, and the Cuban and Venezuelan dictatorships had been persistently attacking democracy. But none of these rouge states besieging free peoples were the target of the Biden administration’s call for regime change.

The ever so nuanced Biden administration does not seek regime change within a barbarous regime developing nuclear weapons, exporting terrorism, and orchestrating its proxies’ murdering of innocents—a rouge nation like, say, Iran. No, the Biden administration is attacking the democracy of our ally Israel.

This issue is over the war in Gaza and how it is affecting democracy—American democracy, specifically Mr. Biden’s re-election chances.

According to The Times of Israel’s “White House exploring how to force Netanyahu out—report,” which was based upon an earlier piece in New York Magazine, “The Biden Plan to Ditch Netanyahu: The “come to Jesus moment” is already here, according to Israeli and U.S. sources, Mr. Biden has a problem in his Democratic voter base. The crux is that many Muslim-Americans and Jewish-Americans differ on what should happen in Gaza, and substantial numbers of both groups are loyal Democratic voters. This point was forcefully driven home to the Biden team when a large segment of Michigan’s Muslim-American community expressed their opposition to the administration’s Gaza policy by voting “uncommitted” in Mr. Biden’s recent primary.

Never having been accused of being Solomonic, Mr. Biden has decided the way to save himself is to throw the Bibi out with the bathwater. Thus, he and Vice President Kamala Harris have adopted their own version of the leftist trope, “We support the troops but not the war:”

In the event the new American position over Netanyahu remained unclear, Vice President Kamala Harris left no doubts in a Friday interview with CBS News, which asked, ‘Are the Israelis at risk of losing U.S. aid if this continues?’ Harris replied, ‘I think it’s important for us to distinguish, or at least not conflate, the Israeli government with the Israeli people.’

You mean the Israeli voters who elected the Netanyahu government? Or just the Israeli voters who oppose it and agree with the Biden administration? Both? It matters little, for this canard is designed to pacify American Democratic voters.

So, what is this “new American position over Netanyahu?” In many ways, it is the old Obama administration policy of thinly veiled public contempt for the Prime Minister and the subtle undermining of Israeli foreign and domestic policies:

Itamar Rabinovich, a former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. and an authority on the relationship between the two countries, says the White House has been unhappy with Netanyahu for a long time, ‘but now, in my view, they’re even angrier, and they are sharpening the tone. Biden is not coming at him personally, but off the record and in closed meetings, the sentiment is clear. They disagree on many things: on Gaza the day after the war; on the Palestinian Authority; on a return to Israeli-Palestinian negotiations; all very significant issues.’

Methinks the former ambassador spoke too soon. Presently, Democratic politics have spurred Mr. Biden to make a public display of his loathing for Netanyahu and opposition to Israeli policies. Consider Mr. Biden’s allegedly accidental “hot mic” remark that, in his characteristically tone-deaf words, “I told him, ‘Bibi’—don’t repeat this—‘you and I are going to have a come to Jesus moment.’”

Still, political necessity required a pretext to mask Mr. Biden’s problem with his Democratic base. The Biden team could not appear to be saving its political behind by sticking it to our ally. So, what could explain the administration’s pivot (well, its public pivot, anyway) away from the Israeli government? Claim your disinterested, noble motives and project your actual squalid motives onto someone else, namely Prime Minister Netanyahu.

This is something of a pivotal moment,” says Daniel Seideman, an Israeli attorney and expert on the geopolitics of the country. “The danger of regional war is palpable. They are thinking in terms of the Cuban Missile Crisis [or] of 1938. Things are going on that could easily trigger a broader conflict, and preventing that is clearly the administration’s interest—and Netanyahu is not being cooperative.

One supposes “cooperative” would be Prime Minister Netanyahu taking military advice from the Biden administration’s, whose maladministration wrought the deadly fiasco that was the American withdrawal from Afghanistan, or taking strategic advice from a president who, for over half a century, has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy issue.

This is the pretext for the Biden administration’s attack on Israeli democracy, a scant six months after our ally suffered a Hamas terrorist attack that claimed 1,200 Israelis murdered, 250 kidnapped, and scores more raped and tortured:

One Israeli expert frequently consulted by American officials says, ‘I have been asked by a serious administration figure what it is that will force the Netanyahu coalition to collapse. They were interested in the mechanics, what can we demand which will collapse his coalition.’

Through its words, deeds, and leaks, the Biden administration is heralding its continuing attacks upon Israeli democracy, including: trotting out Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-New York) to parrot the president’s calumnies against the Israeli Prime Minister and demand new elections; unilaterally declaring America’s installation of a sea pier for Gaza (which Israel publicly supports); announcing the U.S., Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates air lift without telling Israel; an executive order sanctioning West Bank settlers and their supporters, including Israeli policymakers; and signaling the administration’s receptiveness to recognizing a Palestinian state in Gaza and in the West Bank. With friends like these…

Evidently, the Biden administration is suffering from a bout of cognitive dissonance, letting it be known that they consider Prime Minister Netanyahu an “afterthought,” but at the same time fixating upon his political demise:

An American source familiar with the administration’s thinking says the White House realizes that ‘Netanyahu is in a corner of his own making. He has no room to maneuver. He is screwing us. The politics of this have to completely change, and I think time is running out.’

Seideman says the administration is getting ready ‘to put Netanyahu to the test in ways that have not happened before. ‘Are you with us or are you against us? We’re not going to dictate the result. But if you’re against us, there will be consequences.’

One cannot help but notice how this is far more apt concerning Mr. Biden’s political situation vis-à-vis his Democratic base. Yet, in dumping upon the present Israeli government to improve Mr. Biden’s own political prospects, he and his team are oblivious to the import of what they are citing as Prime Minister Netanyahu’s abysmal approval ratings. Per New York Magazine:

Netanyahu is highly vulnerable at home. For months, he’s faced blistering anger from the family members of the remaining hostages, whose fate he seems ambivalent about at best. A recent poll shows that a majority of Israelis, 53 percent, believe Netanyahu is extending the war so as to ‘survive politically,’ not to defeat Hamas.

Hence, if the Biden team truly believes Prime Minister Netanyahu and his cabinet are irredeemable, warmongering extremists, the situation will soon resolve itself without their election interference. The Israeli voters will do it of their own accord, without them. In fact, given how deftly they have alienated large swaths of their own Democratic Party base, they will likely alienate Israeli voters and boost the Prime Minister’s support, especially as New York Magazine concedes, “there’s not much Biden can do to force him out, but that hasn’t stopped him from trying to undermine Netanyahu politically.”

I’m rubbing my temples now, pondering the administration’s folly, wondering why I clicked that damned link, and praying it was indeed for the Babylon Bee.

An American Greatness contributor, the Hon. Thaddeus G. McCotter (M.C., Ret.) served Michigan’s 11th Congressional district from 2003-2012, and served as Chair of the Republican House Policy Committee. Not a lobbyist, he is a frequent public speaker and moderator for public policy seminars; and a Monday co-host of the “John Batchelor Radio Show,” among sundry media appearances.


Thaddeus G. McCotter

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/03/16/the-biden-administration-attacks-democracy-abroad/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Our Cold and Bloody War with China - Daniel Greenfield

 

by Daniel Greenfield

Peter Schweizer reveals why the powerful turn a blind eye while China kills Americans.

 


[Order Peter Schweizer’s new book, Blood Money: Why the Powerful Turn a Blind Eye While China Kills Americans: HERE.]

In November, Biden and Chinese Communist President Xi met once again, this time at the mansion used for the exteriors of the TV show, ‘Dynasty’, to talk about the relationship between the two countries. And yet all these months after the three hour meeting, nothing changed.

Biden had met with Xi everywhere from the Bay Area to Bali with no result. Why?

In ‘Blood Money: Why the Powerful Turn a Blind Eye While China Kills Americans’, Peter Schweizer, the journalist and investigator behind ‘Clinton Cash’, follows up on his work in ‘Red-Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win’ to expose an entire network of corruption that is not only stealing America’s future, but has also claimed countless lives.

Blood Money is a war story illustrated with the Sun Tzu maxims that drive the larger strategic thinking of the Chinese military apparatus about how to “subdue the enemy without fighting”.

“According to a textbook given to Chinese military officers,” ‘Blood Money’ reveals, Xi is quoted as saying, “Our struggle and contest of power with the West cannot be moderated. It will inevitably be long, complex, and at times extremely sharp.”

Schweizer estimates that “hundreds of thousands of Americans” were killed and millions became “casualties” in the last 5 years as a result of China’s attacks on our “soft underbelly”.

The Cold War with the Soviet Union was a nearly full spectrum conflict in which only direct military attacks, where America would have prevailed, were restricted. The Russian strategy for undermining us depended on finding fifth columnists, fanatical leftists, greedy businessmen, useful idiot liberals, and haters of their own nation, who would help the enemy get inside.

The Chinese Communist strategy depends on the same Americans willing to sell out their country because of greed, politics or the conviction that we are immoral and oppressive.

And since we’re always in the wrong, any enemy opposed to us must be in the right.

China’s decision to build an empire by yoking its economy to ours gave it an advantage that Russia did not have The Russians bought from us, but China sells to us and when it does buy from us, it pays in blood money and acquires Americans willing to lobby against tariffs, for TikTok and, most of all, against standing up for ourselves and against Beijing’s abuses.

‘Blood Money’ chronicles China’s crimes, but, like ‘Red-Handed’, it more importantly chronicles the complicity of the “elites from Silicon Valley to Wall Street” who “benefit from partnerships with Chinese government-linked companies” and don’t want anything to actually change.

Much like the Cold War, we are fighting with both of our hands tied behind our backs, but this time it’s not just the academics and activists and journalists we have to worry about, but a large and influential, and at times even non-ideological class of people, who profit from China.

This isn’t accidental, as Schweizer documents, China has cunningly employed its economic sphere of influence to subvert entire nations, and its political operatives and intelligence services are deeply aware of whose lives they touch and how they can manipulate them.

In recent weeks, TikTok served up a crude example of power, sucking in a generation of kids, and then, at a click, deploying them to threaten members of Congress into backing down. But the People’s Republic of China has more subtle corporate tools of political intimidation.

TikTok is one of the topics that ‘Blood Money’ delves into, but it’s far from the only one. There is hardly a sector of our economy, from manufacturing to agriculture, that China does not touch in one way or another, and what the PRC touches, it also weaponizes and controls. Naive liberals and libertarians thought of free market economics as a liberalizing force. They believed that no country that participated in international trade could help but become more open and free.

The last quarter century shattered that paradigm by showing that international trade rewards loci of control. From its ‘Belt and Road’ strategy’ to its market monopolization, China set out to dominate the loci, to reshape the global economy to flow along its channels on its terms.

‘Blood Money’ examines the ground level impact of everything from the fentanyl mass killing of Americans to the corruption of Washington D.C., from Biden on down, by Chinese interests. And while corruption is nothing new in the Imperial City where every straight tall white stone building conceals dark crooked deeds, but what Schweizer’s book chronicles is more than just corruption.

It’s treason.

From radical leftists fed by funds coming out of China to political figures in the highest halls of power, ‘Blood Money: Why the Powerful Turn a Blind Eye While China Kills Americans’ takes a hard look at ‘cui bono’ or who benefits from a system that allows the enemy to kill our people.

This is a compelling story of a war that for all its insidious brutality and everyday cruelty has hardly been documented. It’s a campaign of warfare which seeks to exploit every social, political and economic weakness, which injects fentanyl into our communities, psychotic behavior into our social media and corrupts every system we have in order to subjugate and destroy us.

China is not a partner, as Biden claims, nor is it merely a rival, as some Republicans insist, ‘Blood Money’ makes it clear that it is an enemy bent on defeating us by any means it can.

And in the grand game of global affairs, that may perhaps even be fair game.

The trouble is not just that China wants to destroy us, but that some Americans want to let it.

To defeat China, we may need to defeat the enemy within. Much as the defeat of the Soviet Union was always rendered incomplete by the collaborators within, so too any defeat of China cannot be considered without including the destruction of its American allies.


Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/our-cold-and-bloody-war-with-china/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hamas: Suddenly Popular in Egypt - Hugh Fitzgerald

 

by Hugh Fitzgerald

Is there something Hamas Nazis did lately that inspired Egyptians?

 


For decades, Hamas was not popular in Egypt. It was seen, rightly, as the local branch, in “Palestine,” of the Muslim Brotherhood. And the Muslim Brotherhood has been fought by every Egyptian regime since that of King Farouk. Gamal Abdel Nasser fought the Brotherhood. After Anwar Sadat, once a Brotherhood supporter, signed the Camp David Accords with Israel in 1979, the Brotherhood called for his overthrow. Sadat crushed the Brotherhood, and for that, he was assassinated in 1981 by the Tanzim al-Jihad, an Islamic group allied to the Brotherhood. Hosni Mubarak also fought the Brotherhood during his 30 years of rule (1981-2011).

After he was overthrown in a popular uprising, a caretaker regime took over, quickly followed by the first truly democratic election in Egypt’s history.  Held in 2012, Mohamed Morsi, a member of the Freedom and Justice Party that was affiliated with the Brotherhood, was elected President. A year later, he was ousted in a coup d’etat by General Abdelfattah Al-Sisi, whose regime has continued to fight the Muslim Brotherhood, and naturally, it has also opposed Hamas. Most Egyptians have been inculcated with the belief that Hamas, as a part of the MB, is a danger to Egypt’s wellbeing. That is, they were ready to believe the worst of Hamas — until the last few months.

More on the sea change in Egyptian popular attitudes toward Hamas since October 7 can be found here: “Egyptians used to hate Hamas. Now they love them.” Elder of Ziyon, March 5, 2024:

The Fikra Forum of the Washington Institute asked Egyptians in November/December what they thought of Hamas after the October 7 massacres.

While we had seen other polls showing broad approval of Hamas’ terrorist attacks in the Arab world, this one is especially interesting because it compares Egyptian attitudes of Hamas after October 7 with their historic disapproval of the group.

The turnround in Egyptian attitudes towards Hamas is stunning.

In 2020, 73% of Egyptians viewed Hamas negatively and 23% positively. That has now flipped to 75% who now approve of Hamas compared to only 21% who disapprove….

Egyptians think that Hamas is the only group that actually risks its members to fight Israel; the other groups are just blowhards. There is no bravery in lobbing rockets from a distance. That is why Hamas is so popular: its willingness for martyrdom in its zeal to murder Jews up close.

The poll also found that 94% of Egyptians don’t believe that Hamas killed civilians on October 7.  This is in line with Palestinian polls that showed that over 90% also don’t believe that Hamas committed any war crimes on that date….

How did Hamas go from being deeply disliked by almost three-quarters of Egyptians, to being applauded by three-quarters of them? In 2020, 73% of Egyptians viewed Hamas negatively and 23% positively. But after Hamas’ atrocities on October 7 and the war with Israel that has followed, everything has flipped. The nearly three quarters of Egyptians who previously had a negative view of Hamas now have a positive view. What happened? On October 7, 3,000 Hamas operatives pushed their way into Israel, where both at the site of the Re’im dance party, and at more than 20 kibbutzim, they managed to rape, torture, mutilate, and murder Israeli men, women, and children. Babies were beheaded; children were burnt alive; girls were gang-raped, tortured, mutilated, and murdered, the breasts sliced off women and used by Hamas “fighters” to play catch, the genitalia were cut off men and their eyes were gouged out; children were murdered in front of their parents, and parents in front of their children. This is what Hamas did. And Egyptians did not recoil from the horror. Instead Hamas’ ability to inflict terrible damage on the Israeli civilians made the group soar in Egyptians’ estimation.

But, some will say, the Egyptians knew nothing about the atrocities. They only claimed to know that Hamas had attacked the IDF. In the poll, 94% of Egyptians said they didn’t believe that there were any Israeli civilians who were attacked on October 7. Don’t take that poll’s results at face value. They are claiming that disbelief because, while they approve of the atrocities, they don’t want the world to know that they do, so it’s best to pretend you “don’t believe” those claims of atrocities.

But the world’s media was focused for weeks on the events of October 7, that is, on the attacks on Israeli men, women, and children. The mainstream media, on television, radio, and newspapers, carried the stories about the atrocities in detail. So did the Arabic-language channels on the BBC, VOA, AFP, DW that were listened to into Egypt. Millions of posts on social media, including those by Hamas members themselves, described the killings of civilians. Pro-Palestinian professors, such as Hamid Dabashi and Rashid Khalidi, exulted in the Hamas killings of civilians.

Here, as one example, is what Khalidi, a professor at Columbia, had to say: “Gaza has been under siege for 16 years. Israel had assumed that it could live a peaceful, quiet life whilst putting its boot heel on the Palestinians in the West Bank and in the Gaza Strip. And sooner or later, that had to explode. Now, it exploded in a particularly ugly fashion, with these massacres; it resulted in the highest death toll among Israeli civilians in the entire history of Israel’s wars, since 1948.”

It was clear to everyone in Egypt, as elsewhere: on October 7, Hamas committed “massacres” of “Israeli civilians.”

It would simply not have been possible for 94% of Egyptians to disbelieve in what was being broadcast repeatedly, all over the world. They did know, and they approved. That’s why three quarters of them now hold Hamas in such high esteem, after years of despising the group because of its affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood.

The moral of this unedifying tale is this: Rape, torture, and murder Israeli civilians to your heart’s content. The Egyptians, and the other Arabs, will love you for it.


Hugh Fitzgerald

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/hamas-suddenly-popular-in-egypt/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Oppenheimer Oversights - Lloyd Billingsley

 

by Lloyd Billingsley

What the Oscar winner conceals is crucial.

 


Last Sunday, Oppenheimer tallied seven Academy Awards, awards, including best director (Christopher Nolan), actor (Cillian Murphy) and best picture, but there’s more to the story that people should know. For all its undeniable artistry – Bruce Bawer called it a “Dishonest Masterpiece” – Oppenheimer is something like those 1960s beach and bikini movies; what they reveal is interesting but what they conceal is crucial. Consider this perspective from one of Oppenheimer’s students.

“As a physics graduate student at Princeton University in the early 1960s, I had occasional interactions with Oppenheimer, who was then the director of the Institute for Advanced Studies,” writes William Happer, emeritus profess of physics at Princeton and a specialist in radiofrequency spectroscopy of atoms and molecules, radiation propagation in the atmosphere, and spin-polarized atoms and nuclei.

According to Happer, Oppenheimer was not very friendly to students but remained a “sympathetic figure.”  Oppenheimer had an “easy act to follow” when he took over from Gregory Breit in 1943, but there is no Gregory Breit character in the movie. Tom Conti plays Albert Einstein but according to Happer, the Manhattan Project was “not the result of a brilliant theory” and not made possible by Einstein’s E = mc² formula. What made it possible, Happer explains, was “a rapid-fire series of accidental experimental discoveries in the 1930s, including a celebrated mistake.”

In 1932, James Chadwick discovered the electrically neutral projectile, the neutron, which could reach the surface of even the most highly-charged nucleus, uranium, with no hindrance from the nuclear charge.  As Happer notes, “It was this accidental discovery that led to the Manhattan Project.” Chadwick, a Nobel laureate for physics in 1936, was part of the Manhattan project and in 1944 lived at Los Alamos with his family. In Oppenheimer, nobody plays Chadwick, hardly the only significant omission.

In the early going, Oppenheimer tells a hostile government committee that his testimony should be understood in the context of his life and work. Context is also important for movies, but Oppenheimer keeps key back stories off the screen.

Viewers see the “Hitler Invades Poland” headline from September 1, 1939, but do not see or hear anything about Stalin invading Poland on September 17, 1939. This joint invasion started WWII and came about because of the Stalin-Hitler pact of August 23, 1939. Viewers see nothing about the Pact, and no headline such as “Stalin Invades Finland,” on November 30, 1939.

Under the Pact, Nazi and Soviet intelligence forces collaborated and Stalin handed hundreds of Jewish Communists over to the Gestapo. Jewish scientists in America would have been aware of that deadly exchange, but not a word in Oppenheimer.

Viewers never learn that for nearly the first two years of the war, the Communist Party USA collaborated with pro-Nazi groups in America and did everything in its power to keep America out of the conflict.  In Oppenheimer, no Communist is asked to account for what he or she did during the Pact, and why they stayed in the Party after many others left, never to return.

Oppenheimer portrays Party members as misguided liberals concerned about the conflict in Spain. Viewers hear about “the brigades” but no character explains that the Abraham Lincoln Brigades were a Communist Party militia that opposed anti-Franco groups such as the Partido Obrero de Unificación Marxista. The POUM fighters included George Orwell, author of 1984, Animal Farm, and Homage to Catalonia.

Inquiries about Oppenheimer’s “left wing” associations fail to note that the Party had an open and secret membership, as Whittaker Chambers detailed in Witness. John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr cite evidence that Oppenheimer was a member of a secret Party unit at UC Berkeley, where his friend Haakon Chevalier, a professor of French literature, was an active Communist. In the movie, Jefferson Hall plays Chevalier, and Oppenheimer resists his request to pass information to the Soviets.

From 1941-1944, Stalin’s top spy in California was Gregory Kheifetz operating undercover as a vice consul in San Francisco. Tasked with obtaining atomic secrets, Kheifetz claimed in a cable that Oppenheimer was one of his recruits. Unfortunately, there is no Gregory Kheifetz character in Oppenheimer.

The film does reveal that Klaus Fuchs (Christopher Denham), present at Los Alamos, was in fact a Soviet spy. So were American Stalinists Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, and Ethel’s brother David Greenglass, was a machinist at Los Alamos. There is no Greenglass character in Oppenheimer. Viewers do not learn that the Communist spies helped Stalin explode his first atom bomb on August, 29, 1949.

By that time, Stalin had taken over Czechoslovakia, held Eastern Europe captive, and launched a purge of writers and artists. Stalin also swung the USSR and captive states back to traditional anti-Semitism, branding Jews “rootless cosmopolitans.” As director Robert Rossen (All the King’s Men) noted in congressional testimony, the defendants in Czechoslovakian show trials were executed “for being Jews and nothing else.”

Stalin died on March 5, 1953. More than 70 years later in 2024, virulent anti-Semitism finds a voice in the American left. Calls to free Palestine “from the river to the sea,” are calls to kill Jews for being Jews and nothing else. Someone should make a movie about it. The struggle against a second Holocaust is the struggle of memory against forgetting.


Lloyd Billingsley is the author of Yes I Con: United Fakes of America, Barack ‘Em Up: A Literary Investigation, Hollywood Party, and numerous other works.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/oppenheimer-oversights/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'Israel not a banana republic': Netanyahu slams Schumer's 'undermining' speech - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

Yair Lapid: Schumer's speech "is proof that, one by one, Netanyahu is losing the staunchest supporters of Israel."

 

Senator Chuck Schumer (photo credit: Courtesy)
Senator Chuck Schumer
(photo credit: Courtesy)

Israel expects US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to "refrain from undermining the Israeli government," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud faction said in a statement on Thursday.

Reacting to Schumer's speech, in which he accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of holding up peace in the Middle East and calling for elections in Israel, the Likud wrote that "Israel is not a banana republic, but a democracy proud of its choice in PM Netanyahu."

Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Herzog posted on X his response to statements by US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

"Israel is a sovereign democracy. It is unhelpful, all the more so as Israel is at war against the genocidal terror organization Hamas, to comment on the domestic political scene of a democratic ally. It is counterproductive to our common goals," Herzog wrote.


Opposition head MK Yair Lapid wrote that Schumer's speech "is proof that, one by one, Netanyahu is losing the staunchest supporters of Israel.

"What's worse is, he is doing it on purpose," the former prime minister charged. "Netanyahu is causing serious damage to the national effort to win the war and maintain Israel's security.

Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid (credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)Enlrage image
Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid (credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)

Former PM Bennett: Israel not a banana republic

Fellow former prime minister Naftali Bennett also sent a statement on the Senate majority leader's speech, stating that he "strongly opposes external political intervention in Israel's internal affairs.

"We are an independent nation, not a banana republic," Bennett wrote.

 

 

"With the threat of terrorism on its way to the West, it would be best if the international community would assist Israel in its just war, thereby also protecting their countries."

Benny Gantz added later on Thursday, "Israel is a strong democracy, and only its citizens will determine its leadership and its future."

Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-792007

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Thursday, March 14, 2024

South African foreign minister: Citizens in IDF to be arrested on return - JNS

 

by JNS

The audience at an African National Congress event reportedly cheered her announcement.

 

Naledi Pandor, the foreign minister of South Africa, said at an African National Congress event earlier this week that South Africa will arrest citizens who serve in the Israel Defense Forces upon their return to South Africa.

Blinken Naledi Pandor
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with South African Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor at the U.S. Department of State in Washington on Sept. 15, 2022. Credit: Freddie Everett/U.S. State Department.

“I’ve already issued a statement alerting those who are South African and who are fighting alongside or in the Israeli Defense Force [sic]; we are ready—when you come home, we will arrest you,” Pandor said to crowd applause, per Israeli media.

South Africa accused Israel of committing genocide in a case it brought before the International Court of Justice, the principal U.N. judicial arm, in The Hague, late last year.

“South Africa has no regrets about becoming the first country to file a lawsuit against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to end its ‘deadly and relentless genocidal bombardment’ of Gaza,” an official South African government publication wrote on Wednesday.

“Over 70 000 have been injured while 10,000 are missing under rubble. This brings the number of civilian casualties to about 110,000, amounting to roughly 5% of Gaza’s 2.3 million population. We will not condone genocide,” Paul Mashatile, deputy South African president, told members of Parliament on Tuesday.

On Wednesday, Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) and Tom Kean (R-N.J.) and 23 other members of Congress wrote a letter to Olaf Scholz, the German chancellor, thanking him “for announcing your country’s intention to intervene on Israel’s behalf as a third party against the accusations of genocide brought up by South Africa in the International Court of Justice.”

“We applaud your decision to stand beside Israel against these
baseless claims made in the international arena by South Africa,” the 25 members of Congress wrote.

“It is crucial that the international community address the misleading, meritless and untruthful nature of South Africa’s accusations, seemingly designed to hinder Israel from acting in selfdefense in response to the heinous terrorist attacks on Oct. 7,” they added. “Unsurprisingly, South Africa’s claim barely acknowledges the atrocities committed by Hamas terrorists, who murdered, decapitated, burned alive and raped over 1,200 innocent men, women and children.”


JNS

Source: https://www.jns.org/south-african-foreign-minister-citizens-in-idf-to-be-arrested-on-return/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter