Saturday, September 28, 2024

IDF kills Hassan Nasrallah: Five ways the strike changes Israel's war - analysis - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

The IDF airstrike on Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah weakens Iran’s regional influence and disrupts Hezbollah’s operations.

 

Boys scouts carry a picture of Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in Kfar Melki, Lebanon, September 19, 2024 (photo credit: REUTERS/AZIZ TAHER)
Boys scouts carry a picture of Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in Kfar Melki, Lebanon, September 19, 2024
(photo credit: REUTERS/AZIZ TAHER)

The airstrike on Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut on September 27 is a major game-changer in more than 11 months of war. It has the potential to upset Iran’s plans and weaken Hezbollah. Here are five ways the strike may affect the war and the region.

Iran’s most experienced ally targeted

Hassan Nasrallah was Iran’s most experienced ally in the region. The Hezbollah leader had been key to Iran’s plans in the region for decades. In the last several years, he had grown even more powerful. Iran sought to create a multi-front war against Israel in the wake of the October 7 attack, and Nasrallah helped lead that war.

Nasrallah had grown to become the senior leader of Iran’s numerous proxies. He would often host Iranian officials and would also invite representatives from Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad to Lebanon to coordinate their attacks on Israel. He also sought to muster the Houthis in Yemen to threaten Israel, and he coordinated with Iraqi militias.

The Hezbollah leader had worked with other key Iranian-backed leaders in the region. In recent years, Iran has seen many of them killed, including Qasem Soleimani of the IRGC and Iraqi militia leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis. With those key leaders off the table, Nasrallah was increasingly filling many shoes. Now those shoes are apparently empty.

Hezbollah in disarray

Hezbollah is in disarray. The group has suffered numerous losses to its top leadership in recent days. On September 20, its Radwan force commanders were killed. This represented the loss of 16 key leaders in the terrorist group. In subsequent days, it also lost the head of its drone unit. The loss of Hassan Nasrallah basically cuts the head off the whole organization. It is unclear if Hezbollah had preparations for this scenario.

 A VEHICLE carrying the coffin of a commander from Iraq’s Ktaeb Hezbollah  armed group, who was killed in what the militia called a ‘Zionist attack’ in Damascus on Friday, is seen during a funeral in Baghdad on Sunday.  (credit: THAIER AL-SUDANI/REUTERS)Enlrage image
A VEHICLE carrying the coffin of a commander from Iraq’s Ktaeb Hezbollah armed group, who was killed in what the militia called a ‘Zionist attack’ in Damascus on Friday, is seen during a funeral in Baghdad on Sunday. (credit: THAIER AL-SUDANI/REUTERS)

Hezbollah still has a vast quantity of weapons, including rockets, drones, anti-tank missiles, and precision guided munitions. However, without a clear chain of command or leadership, it will be in chaos and disarray. The group has struggled to respond to Israel’s attacks since the exploding pagers on September 17. It has seen itself suffer one unprecedented blow after another. This keeps the terrorist group off balance.

Hezbollah and Iran now know Israel is serious

Israel’s willingness to call Hezbollah’s bluff and go all in with airstrikes in Beirut illustrates how serious Israel is about achieving its goals in the North. Israel’s cabinet approved adding the goal of returning residents to northern communities to the goals of the war in mid-September. Israel then proceeded immediately to begin cutting Hezbollah into pieces.

Hezbollah did not expect this. It believed Israel would continue to be on the defensive. Hezbollah also likely believed reports in Israel that Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, known for being a hawk on Hezbollah, would be removed. Instead, Gallant has led the body blows that Hezbollah is now suffering.

Hezbollah got complacent and got used to striking at Israel. Now it sees how serious Israel is. However, Hezbollah cannot climb down from the tree. It has claimed it will continue to support Hamas. It can’t stop that support without feeling shame. At the same time, it now doesn’t have strong leadership who can make bold decisions.

Hezbollah expected to dictate the terms to Israel

Hezbollah believed that it was the driving force of this war. It had been attacking Israel for 11 months. It believed that Israel would be pressured into a ceasefire and would then stop fighting in the North. Hezbollah expected that it would keep its arsenal largely intact. It did not expect Israel to force Hezbollah onto the defensive. The group was not ready to go on the defensive and was ill prepared for this kind of war.

Hezbollah had always expected that in any war with Israel it would choose the time and place of the war. It also expected to have the initial initiative. Now its plans have been destroyed, and it has lost so many key commanders that it will take time for it to get back up and sort itself out. Having expected the war to be low intensity and end with a Hezbollah victory, the group’s arrogance appears to have brought it close to ruin.

Hamas and Iran’s other proxies now see Israel’s resolve

Hamas had expected to survive this war and continue to control Gaza. It saw how Israel was fighting a cautious war in Gaza, and it expected that eventually a ceasefire would be forced on Israel. Hamas was happy to see Hezbollah pressuring Israel from the north. For 11 months, Hamas got used to having Hezbollah as a strong ally, able to threaten Israel with 150,000 rockets.

Now Hamas sees that Hezbollah is unable to contend with Israel’s blows. It also sees that Hezbollah’s rocket threat may have diminished. Hezbollah has rarely been able to fire more than a few hundred rockets a day, a lot less than the several thousand that estimates believed Hezbollah could unleash.

Hamas now must wonder if it will soon suffer similar blows to Hezbollah. It has also seen its leadership, such as Mohammed Deif and Marwan Issa, eliminated. Hamas assumed that it could cling to power by simply continuing to exist. Now it has seen Israel’s resolve and has seen its key ally in Lebanon weakened. Hamas must now wonder whether its decision to attack on October 7 has turned into a disaster for it and Iran’s group of proxies in the region.

Instead of an endless threat to Israel, Hamas and Hezbollah have now seen Israel take the initiative.

 
Seth J. Frantzman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-822193

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Senior IAF officers reveal: How the air force took down Nasrallah in Beirut - Amir Bohbot

by Amir Bohbot

"The operation was long-planned and reflects extraordinary collaboration with military intelligence and the Air Force,” Brig.-Gen. Levine stated.

 

THE PILOTS – who put their lives on the line so we, the majority, can sleep safely at night – feel that the country to which they have committed their lives is changing. (photo credit: BOAZ RATNER/REUTERS)
THE PILOTS – who put their lives on the line so we, the majority, can sleep safely at night – feel that the country to which they have committed their lives is changing.
(photo credit: BOAZ RATNER/REUTERS)

Brig.-Gen. Amichai Levine, the newly appointed commander of Hatzerim Airbase, revealed on Saturday that the mission to neutralize Hassan Nasrallah demanded unique, world-class capabilities from the Israel Air Force. The operation required extreme precision to strike a deep underground area while maintaining perfect deception, ensuring that Nasrallah, Ali Karaki, and other senior figures would not detect the attack and escape.

“The operation succeeded perfectly,” Levine said, praising the ground crews and technical teams for their seamless execution. Not only did they ensure the aircraft’s readiness, but they also managed the munitions, which performed flawlessly despite the complex mission conditions. “About a hundred munitions were used, with bombers dropping them every two seconds in perfect precision.”

He also commended the 69th Squadron, known as the “Hammers,” which operates F-15I Ra’am fighter jets and has been involved in notable operations in Lebanon and Syria. The squadron faced scrutiny before the war due to protests against the judicial overhaul, but for 11 months, the squadron’s pilots, both reservists and regulars, have been on continuous alert for missions across the Middle East, ready for future challenges.

When asked about the squadron’s involvement amid the protests over the judicial overhaul before October 7, Levine responded: “The 69th Squadron is a strategic squadron in the air force and has been for decades. It’s responsible for some of the air force’s most critical missions. The squadron’s fighters are diverse in age (up to 50) and profession.

“Half of them are reservists, and roughly half of the fighters who participated in this operation were reservists. No one in Israel should doubt their love for the country, their willingness to sacrifice their lives, and even put their lives on the line for both nearby and distant missions – I think this operation underscores that. For 11 months, they’ve been on alert, flying around the clock, and they’ll continue as long as the war goes on.”

 People and members of the military inspect the site of an Israeli strike in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, September 20, 2024. (credit:  REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)Enlrage image
People and members of the military inspect the site of an Israeli strike in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, September 20, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

The IDF's three goals

“We have three goals: returning the hostages, dismantling Hamas, and ensuring the safe return of northern residents to their homes. The base, squadron and the entire air force are operating powerfully despite the media focus,” Levine stated.

“The separation of the northern and southern fronts is critical to dismantling Hamas and creating the conditions necessary to bring back the hostages,” the brigadier-general said. Yesterday, we executed a historic operation of immense strategic importance. Nasrallah is seen as the most central figure in the Shi’ite axis. This will significantly impact the Middle East and move us closer to achieving our war goals. The operation was long planned and reflects extraordinary collaboration with the Military Intelligence Directorate and the air force. I know all the intelligence officers who contribute incredible capabilities,” he said.

“What was missing before October 7 was initiative and aggressiveness. We still have unfinished business: We need to root out Hamas, and we haven’t brought the hostages home. There are still issues that require our attention,” Levine said.

He further acknowledged Brig.-Gen. Guy Davidson, the outgoing commander of Hatzerim Airbase: “Davidson deserves a lot of credit. Two weeks ago, I received a base that is a well-oiled war machine. But there are many people who deserve recognition for their recent performances: the air force orchestra has been playing in full glory in recent days and weeks. Davidson is certainly one of these key and valued individuals,” he said, adding that “Davidson was my flight instructor many years ago, and I owe him personal credit.”

“The challenge in elimination operations is precise intelligence,” Levine explained. “All agencies need to provide intelligence for every operation. The second challenge is ensuring that the target – Nasrallah, Karaki, and others – does not escape while the planes are en route or the munitions are on their way to the target.

“Each time, this is done creatively and through various methods, relying on ideas from young officers who are given the freedom to think and senior ranks who listen to them. They bring innovative solutions to deceive our enemies, ensuring the target remains stable during execution. Surface-to-air missiles in Lebanon still pose a threat, but we’ve also targeted them. We’ve hit dozens of infrastructure elements of various kinds, including weapons. Hezbollah’s capabilities have been reduced, and it remains a primary focus for the air force.”

Lt. Col. M., commander of the 69th Squadron, shared: “A wide range of crews flew the elimination mission in the Dahiyeh district of Beirut, from ages 23 to 50. This shows how the squadron operates – regular and reserve forces together. The mission was flawless, both in planning, execution, and outcome. Everything went smoothly. We launched a massive strike in the heart of Beirut. There was a sense of pride on a personal level: for the navigator, the crews, the officer whose cousin was killed, and the family.”

 
Amir Bohbot

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-822244

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Inside Israel's operation: Step-by-step breakdown of how Nasrallah was eliminated - Amir Bohbot

 

by Amir Bohbot

According to security sources, the political, intelligence, and operational conditions for Nasrallah's assassination matured by Wednesday.

 

Smoke billows over Beirut's southern suburbs, as seen from Sin El Fil, IAF aircraft (illustration) (photo credit: REUTERS)
Smoke billows over Beirut's southern suburbs, as seen from Sin El Fil, IAF aircraft (illustration)
(photo credit: REUTERS)

In a secret and sophisticated operation, the Israel Defense Forces and Military Intelligence Directorate succeeded in assassinating Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah in the heart of the Dahiya neighborhood in Beirut. Here's how it happened.

Using advanced intelligence and a brilliant deception maneuver that included the Prime Minister's flight to the US, security forces struck the organization's leadership in what is defined as one of the most significant military operations.

Former Intelligence Division Head Aaron Haliva had already considered the option of a targeted assassination of Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah on October 11, based on the intelligence agency’s advanced capabilities.

This capability, built over many years by Military Intelligence, was non-existent during the Second Lebanon War when there was no idea where he was hiding, and the dossier on him was minimal, if not operationally useless.

According to security sources, the political, intelligence, and operational conditions for Nasrallah's assassination matured by Wednesday. Military Intelligence once again recommended action, and the political echelon approved it after being exposed to the intimate and sensitive intelligence collected to close the loop.

 F-35 fighter jet.  (credit: Wikimedia Commons)Enlrage image
F-35 fighter jet. (credit: Wikimedia Commons)

The preparation and decision for the targeted assassination began on Wednesday. The nerve-wracking wait was for precise and high-quality intelligence further to pinpoint the moment of the Hezbollah leadership meeting, showcasing arrogance and disconnect from the IDF’s intelligence and firepower capabilities.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu conveyed business as usual, gave the green light for progress on the ceasefire process, and decided to fly to the US on the "Wing of Zion" aircraft (Israel's version of Air Force One), part of what appears to be a deception maneuver to lull Hezbollah's leadership, who took the bait.

Otherwise, the leadership meeting in an underground headquarters serving as the command center for the Shia organization in the heart of the Dahiya neighborhood in Beirut would not have occurred.

Security consultations took place throughout the flight to the US on the "Wing of Zion" aircraft, with intelligence updates on developments in Lebanon and the readiness of intelligence and the air force to carry out an attack that no one could escape, even in an underground network.

On Thursday night, the cabinet convened for a phone meeting that ended at four in the morning Israel time, nine in New York time. The Prime Minister managed preparations from his hotel room in the US, following consultations with Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi, and Mossad Chief David Barnea. After the professional discussion, Netanyahu and Gallant were authorized to approve the targeted assassination based on incoming intelligence.


Amir Bohbot

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-822219

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

New Report Exposes Faculty-Led Network Fueling Campus Antisemitism, Violence - David Israel

 

by David Israel

[T]he report proclaims that “Since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, antisemitic incidents on US campuses have reached unprecedented levels. Physical assaults on Jewish students have surged by 2500%, while violent threats, including death threats, have risen by 900%.

 

Pro-Hamas rally.

A groundbreaking report released Thursday (How a Faculty Network Fuels Campus Unrest & Antisemitic Violence) highlights the astonishing role Faculty for Justice in Palestine (FJP), a nationwide network of over 100 faculty chapters, plays in escalating antisemitic incidents, fomenting chaos and pushing forward the academic boycott of Israel.

Presented by the AMCHA Initiative, the report proclaims that “Since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, antisemitic incidents on US campuses have reached unprecedented levels. Physical assaults on Jewish students have surged by 2500%, while violent threats, including death threats, have risen by 900%. While attention has largely focused on student-led groups such as Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), AMCHA’s new report – which examined more than 100 US colleges and universities with large Jewish student populations in its analysis – uncovers the direct influential and dangerous role played by FJP in driving this surge.”

The researchers have stated, “Our investigation alarmingly reveals that campuses with FJP chapters are seeing assaults and death threats against Jewish students at rates multiple times higher than those without FJP groups, providing compelling evidence of the dangerous intersection between faculty activism and violent antisemitic behavior. The presence of FJP chapters also correlates with the extended duration of protests and encampments, as well as with the passage of BDS resolutions on their campuses.”

HERE ARE A FEW KEY FINDINGS OF THE REPORT:

  • 57 FJP Chapters Were Established on Campuses Most Popular Among Jewish Students: More than 50% of the 103 schools with the largest Jewish populations established an FJP chapter. The ten schools with the most active FJP chapters were the University of Minnesota, NYU, UC Santa Cruz, The New School, University of Pennsylvania, University of Michigan, Columbia, CUNY, Georgetown, and the University of Chicago. FJP chapters were established in response to a directive from the U.S. arm of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI), a self-described founding member of the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC) which was co-founded by an umbrella group of organizations that reportedly includes Iran-supported Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, both designated by the US State Department as terrorist groups and committed to the destruction of Israel. Nearly 90% of FJP chapters used statements to defend faculty’s right to incorporate pro-Palestinian advocacy and activism into their teaching and research under the mantle of academic freedom.
  • Correlation Between FJP Presence and Violence: Schools with FJP chapters saw a significant increase in physical assaults and threats of violence targeting Jewish students. These campuses experienced a 7.3-fold increase in the likelihood of physical assaults on Jewish students and were 3.4 times more likely to witness death threats and other violent threats compared to campuses without such chapters.
  • Faculty-Prolonged Protests and Encampments: Faculty members affiliated with FJP were implicated in prolonging protests, with such activities lasting 2.5 times longer at schools with an FJP presence. Encampments, when they occurred, were likely to last 4.7 times longer at these campuses. Faculty on campuses with an FJP group were likely to have been involved in 9.5 times more days of anti-Israel protest activities than faculty on campuses with no FJP group.
  • BDS Resolutions and Academic Boycotts: FJP groups played a pivotal role in advancing the BDS movement. Divestment resolutions at schools with FJP chapters were 4.9 times more likely to pass. Moreover, academic BDS demands were nearly 11 times more likely to be included in student demands when FJP chapters were present, suggesting faculty are the primary drivers of academic BDS, with students playing a supporting role.

The researchers warned, “The rise of FJP chapters represents a dangerous new front in the battle against campus antisemitism. Faculty members, empowered by the BDS movement, are using their academic positions to organize against Israel and promote antisemitism (often disguised as anti-Zionism) on a scale we have never before witnessed.”

“While our previous studies found that the presence and number of individual academic boycotters were strongly associated with anti-Zionist expression and acts targeting Jewish students for harm, once launched, the FJP groups, which link faculty to each other and a national and international network with a unity of purpose, took on a life of their own. We found that FJP groups made unique contributions to anti-Zionist expression and acts of antisemitism, above and beyond the contribution of individual boycotters,” added the researchers.


David Israel

Source: https://www.jewishpress.com/news/jewish-news/antisemitism-news/new-report-exposes-faculty-led-network-fueling-campus-antisemitism-violence/2024/09/27/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Key House chairman to ask Congress to repudiate Democrats’ J6 findings in face of new evidence - John Solomon

 

by John Solomon

Probes by Just the News and Congress reverse more than a dozen narratives that Democrats first claimed after the Capitol riots, particularly those aimed at former President Trump.

 

No, Donald Trump didn’t grab the wheel of his presidential limousine and try to commandeer it. Yes, Nancy Pelosi felt responsible for security lapses at the Capitol, including the failure to pre-position National Guard there.

There's no doubt that Trump did in fact order the Pentagon to send troops to secure the capital city ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, certification of electoral votes, but political and military brass declined to do so. And yes, there were both intelligence and security blunders by police that led to the breach of one of America’s most storied buildings.

The last two years of investigations by Congress and Just the News have whipsawed the original, official narrative of what transpired during the Jan. 6 Capitol riots.

Now the man who has helped uncover much of the contradictory evidence, House Administration Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., is planning to ask his colleagues to take the extraordinarily rare step of officially repudiating the December 2022 findings of the Democrat-led House Select Committee to Investigate the Attack on the U.S. Capitol led by Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and ex-Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyoming.

“My intention is to bring the House floor a resolution that lays out all the evidence that we found that contradicts the evidence that they supposedly or the narrative they put in their report because future generations need to know, do not use this document that the select committee produced as any reflection of a historical record,” Loudermilk told the "Just the News, No Noise" television show on Thursday night.

There is no known vehicle in Congress to formally retract an official report from an earlier session of the legislative body, so Loudermilk’s team is aiming to craft legislation that would ask the current members of Congress to repudiate and disown the prior work of the earlier committee.

Such a resolution would single out conclusions and declarations of the Thompson-Cheney driven report -- widely adopted by mainstream media -- that have since been proven false or misleading and highlight the specific evidence that gives a more accurate recounting of what transpired in the days leading up to Jan. 6, during the Capitol breach and afterward.

The goal, Loudermilk said, is to make sure that future generations of Americans know that the Democrat Jan. 6 committee had created a predetermined political story filled with errors and innuendo instead of a neutral presentation of evidence.

“It's a narrative," he said. "It's more fiction than fact, and we can show that through the evidence that we've uncovered.” 

The most recent whipsaw in the narrative occurred last week when Just the News reported that transcripts of bombshell interviews conducted back in 2021 inside the Pentagon revealed that Trump gave clear instructions to military officials brass three days before the Jan. 6 riots to “do whatever it takes” to keep the U.S. Capitol safe, including deploying National Guard or active-duty troops, but top officials chose not to comply because of concerns over politics or optics.

"There is absolutely no way I was putting U.S. military forces at the Capitol, period,” acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told the Defense Department inspector general during a March 2021 interview that poignantly captured the defiance of Trump’s order.

The transcripts undercut the Democrat conclusion that Trump meant for violence to occur at the Capitol while affirming the former president’s long-held claim he authorized up to 10,000 troops to be deployed in advance to protect the Capitol and capital city.

Trump claimed vindication in the release of the new documents while praising Loudermilk. 

“The Deep State chose to disregard my direct authorization of at least 10,000 National Guard Troops to ensure that Washington, D.C., was safe and secure on January 6, 2021,” he wrote on his Truth Social platform. “These Deep State subversives disobeyed the President’s directives, which would have prevented any unrest that day – January 6th, as it is known, would never have taken place.”

A few weeks earlier, Just the News reported that belatedly unearthed video footage of Pelosi exiting the Capitol during the Jan. 6 violence showed the then-House Democratic speaker took direct responsibility for security lapses at the Capitol, including the failure to pre-position National Guard there. It was a visual repudiation of the Democrats’ talking point that they bore no blame for the tragedy that day.

“We're calling the National Guard now?  They should have been here to start out,” Pelosi can be heard saying as she flees through a tunnel under the Capitol on the afternoon of Jan. 6, 2021, as her daughter Alexandra videotaped her for an eventual HBO movie. 

"We will have totally failed. And we've got to take some responsibility," she added in another portion of the tape.

Over the last two years, Just the News uncovered at least a dozen other major revelations that changed the official Jan. 6 narrative in ways big and small. Here are some of them:

Key Democratic witness changed her story

In late November 2023, Just the News reported that one of the Democrats’ key witnesses in the Jan. 6 hearings submitted changes to her original, closed-door testimony before Jan. 6 Select Committee.

Cassidy Hutchinson, the former aide to Trump’s Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, revised her original February 2022 testimony before the committee using what are called errata sheets. 

The document, reviewed by Just the News, was uncovered by Loudermilk’s investigation and shows that Hutchinson made significant, substantive changes to her original testimony.

For example, she changed her infamous story about the "Beast," the presidential limousine, which purportedly involved an incident in which Trump was said to have lunged at the driver in anger after his request to be driven to the Capitol was refused. This is the version of the story that Hutchinson told Cheney at a public hearing in June 2022. This story was not in her original February testimony.

Secret Service directly contradicts presidential limousine story

Even more shockingly, the Secret Service agents in the car with Trump that day told the Democrat J6 committee long before its report was published that Hutchinson's third-hand account was false and did not happen.

In fact, the transcript of the driver’s testimony reviewed by Just the News shows his lawyer complained that his client had offered to testify in July, August and September of 2022, but was “rebuffed” by the committee until November 2022.

Metro D.C. officer caught on videotape claiming “we go undercover as Antifa”

In November, Just the News obtained new footage from an undercover Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer as he worked behind police lines on Jan. 6. The footage was recently turned over to Loudermilk’s committee.

The video shows the officer giving water to his fellow police officers who were suffering from the effects of tear gas, which the Capitol Police had deployed against the pro-Trump protestors.

While helping his fellow officer, the plainclothes, undercover officer told his colleague, “We go undercover as Antifa in a crowd.”

Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz hinted last week it is possible that FBI undercover agents and informants were also in the crowd, though he declined to be more specific until he finishes his investigation.

Government Accountability Office concludes intelligence failures

In February this year, the non-partisan investigative arm of Congress concluded that the Capitol Police, the FBI, and eight other federal agencies had gathered intelligence that certain extremists were planning to commit violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6 but that they failed to adapt security protocols and get threat assessments to key decision-makers.

"Some agencies did not fully process information or share it, preventing critical information from reaching key federal entities responsible for securing the National Capital Region against threats," the Government Accountability Office (GAO) concluded in the February report.

GAO reserved its harshest criticism for the Capitol Police, which is the lead agency in charge of security at the Capitol complex, according to Just the News’ previous reporting. “Capitol Police did not share threat products with its frontline officers," the watchdog concluded, imploring Congress to press those agencies to change failed practices and procedures to avoid a repeat tragedy.

Secret Service missteps put Kamala Harris within yards of a bomb

In July, Just the News reported on two missteps by the Secret Service surrounding Jan. 6: the deletion of Jan. 6-related text messages and the Secret Service’s decision to bring Vice President-elect Kamala Harris within yards of where a pipe bomb was found.

In a letter to two congressional committees last year, the Department of Homeland Security inspector general said that the U.S. Secret Service had informed his office that “many… text messages, from January 5 and 6, 2021, were erased as part of a device-replacement program.”

Most importantly, “The USSS erased those text messages after OIG requested records of electronic communications from the USSS, as part of our evaluation of events at the Capitol,” the letter continued. The Secret Service denied that there was any “malicious" intent behind the deletion, but that it was part of a scheduled “technology system change.”

The same month, Just the News reported that security footage from the Capitol complex shows that the Secret Service brought Vice President-elect Kamala Harris into a garage at the Democratic National Committee on Jan. 6, just yards away from where a pipe bomb was planted the night before by an unidentified subject, who has yet to be found by law enforcement.

Capitol door left unlocked, unguarded

This summer, Just the News obtained footage showing a door on the west side of the U.S. Capitol was left open and unguarded, allowing more than 300 protesters to enter the building during the height of the riot.

The footage shows that the door was unlocked after Capitol Police directed a small number of intruders already in the building towards an emergency door, marked by a sign. After a few of the intruders exit the doors, they remain unlocked, permitting hundreds of protestors to enter the building unchecked with no police presence at the entryway.

After Capitol Police arrived at the doors, they did not block the entryway and rioters continued to flow unimpeded into the building, even as police elsewhere attempted to hold out the mass of protesters.

According to Just the News’ reporting this summer, current and former Capitol Police officers as well as congressional aides briefed on security said the video footage shows a powerful lesson to be learned, since it did not involve a forced breach but rather a fateful decision to move a few intruders through the emergency doors.

Videotape evidence has gone missing

Recently, the congressman leading the House Republican investigation into Jan. 6 told Just the News that tapes of the interviews of key witnesses were not preserved by the Jan. 6 Select Committee, instituted by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi to investigate the riot on that day.

“I wrote a letter to Bennie Thompson asking for them and he confirmed that they did not preserve those tapes. He didn’t feel that they had to,” Rep. Loudermilk, whose subcommittee is investigating the January 6 response and the Democratic committee’s work, told the "Just the News, No NoiseTV show last month. “But according to House rules, you have to preserve any data and any information and documents that are used in an official proceeding.”

Metro Police had plainclothes officers in the crowd, seen exhorting protestors on video

In June, Loudermilk told Just the News that the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department confirmed to Congress that it had plainclothes officers at the Capitol on January 6 and at least one of those officers was caught on video exhorting the crowd.

Loudermilk confirmed that a video leaked to the Rumble video platform was authentic and confirmed that MPD officers were in the crowd. “We know that it is one of their officers and at one point he is encouraging, and it appears he's encouraging, he’s definitely helping people climb the scaffolding, and he's telling them go, go, go,” Loudermilk told the "Just the News, No Noise" television show in June.

You can watch the video here.

Nancy Pelosi's daughter allowed to accompany, videotape her mother during Capitol evacuation

Capitol Police security footage obtained by Just the News in June shows Pelosi, then-House speaker, exited Hollywood-style from the home of Congress that fateful day with her daughter filming her as security officers tried to guide her through a secret safe passage corridor.

The footage, made available by McCarthy and aired for the first time on the "Just the News, No Noisetelevision show on Real America's Voice, provides three different angles of Pelosi's evacuation the afternoon of Jan. 6. Each shows her daughter Alexandra roving around her mother's delegation with a camera as they moved briskly through corridors, led by members of the Capitol Police protective detail.

The video shows Pelosi was not in jeopardy after fleeing the breached Capitol chamber, because the footage shows no protesters or rioters penetrated the evacuation route. Capitol Police confirmed to Congress the woman holding the camera in the footage was Alexandra.

Steven Sund, the former Capitol Police chief, who resigned after the Jan. 6 calamity, said he was deeply concerned that Pelosi's actions that day put an unnecessary strain and created a dangerous distraction for her security detail.

"The protective detail isn't there to protect media. And whoever else was there with her for the sole purpose of videotaping creates a major distraction for the protective detail," he added. "You know, they don't train to protect those additional people."

 
John Solomon

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/diplomacy/sunkey-house-chairman-ask-congress-repudiate-democrats-j6-findings-face-new

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

When the Iranian Regime Intervenes in US Elections - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

That the Iranian regime is meddling in U.S. elections to support the Harris campaign, should serve as a jarring warning that Harris's approach to Iran policy is one that would enable this expansionist regime to keep wreaking horrors on the world

 

  • These remarks highlight Trump's concerns about foreign interference and its potential impact on the integrity of U.S. elections....

  • In the past four years, significant funds, nearly $60 billion, have effectively been given to Iran's mullahs by the Biden-Harris administration.

  • Starting a war against Israel through its proxies Hamas and Hezbollah, closing off the Suez Canal, and firing on US troops in the region more than 150 times just since October was apparently Iran's gracious way of saying thank you.

  • That the Iranian regime is meddling in U.S. elections to support the Harris campaign, should serve as a jarring warning that Harris's approach to Iran policy is one that would enable this expansionist regime to keep wreaking horrors on the world, both by itself and through its proxies, especially after it acquires nuclear capability. Why should Iran's government, which treats its own people atrociously, be expected to treat others any better?

That the Iranian regime is meddling in U.S. elections to support the Harris campaign, should serve as a jarring warning that Harris's approach to Iran policy is one that would enable this expansionist regime to keep wreaking horrors on the world, both by itself and through its proxies, especially after it acquires nuclear capability. Pictured: Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian looks on as a 'Qasem Soleimani' missile is displayed during a military parade in Tehran, on September 21, 2024. (Photo by Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

In a significant move that, since the establishment of Iran's Islamist regime, Iranian leaders have actively extended their influence to support a political party and candidate in a U.S. presidential race. This notable intervention is directed towards aiding the Democratic ticket headed by Vice President Kamala Harris. It is a move that signals that Iran's regime hopes to secure an even deeper geopolitical alignment after the upcoming U.S. elections.

The FBI recently confirmed that information stolen by the Iranian regime agents, through their hacking of Donald Trump's campaign, was disseminated to individuals connected to the Democratic campaign.

In a joint statement released on September 18, the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency revealed that Iranian agents executed a malicious operation, whereby they "sent unsolicited emails to individuals then associated with President Biden's campaign that contained an excerpt taken from stolen, non-public material from former President Trump's campaign as text in the emails." This disclosure only underscores how far-reaching Tehran's cyber capabilities have become.

A particularly striking element of this revelation is the Democratic campaign's silence regarding the stolen information. Despite having received the data that originated from the Trump campaign, the Democratic camp refrained from acknowledging it until the FBI publicly disclosed the fact on September 18. On September 19, the Harris campaign finally responded, pointing out that it had not utilized any materials that Iranian hackers had allegedly collected from Trump's email accounts.

The Trump campaign, swiftly reacting to this news, issued a statement demanding accountability from Harris. Trump's camp stated that she must "come clean on whether they used the hacked material."

On September 18, former Trump took to Truth Social, where he posted a scathing message:

"FBI CAUGHT IRAN SPYING ON MY CAMPAIGN, AND GIVING ALL OF THE INFORMATION TO THE KAMALA HARRIS CAMPAIGN. THEREFORE SHE AND HER CAMPAIGN WERE ILLEGALLY SPYING ON ME."

Trump continued:

"TO BE KNOWN AS THE IRAN, IRAN, IRAN CASE! WILL KAMALA RESIGN IN DISGRACE FROM POLITICS? WILL THE COMMUNIST LEFT PICK A NEW CANDIDATE TO REPLACE HER?"

These remarks highlight Trump's concerns about foreign interference and its potential impact on the integrity of U.S. elections, particularly in relation to candidacy of Harris.

What adds more intrigue to the story is the apparent desire of the Iranian regime to assist the Democratic Party. There appear to be several underlying reasons why Tehran favors a Harris victory.

First, Harris would likely continue the current administration's extremely lenient approach to enforcing sanctions on Iran. Under the current U.S. administration, Iran has been able to sell oil at record levels and engage in lucrative trade with European nations – exponentiating Iran's revenues.

Second, the Iranian regime anticipates that billions of dollars will continue to be released under a Harris administration. In the past four years, significant funds, nearly $60 billion, have effectively been given to Iran's mullahs by the Biden-Harris administration. The windfall has enriched the regime and bolstered both its economic and military capabilities. Iranian leaders see the continuation of this financial flow as critical to their long-term strategy of expanding Iran's influence in the Middle East and beyond.

Starting a war against Israel through its proxies Hamas and Hezbollah, closing off the Suez Canal, and firing on US troops in the region more than 150 times just since October was apparently Iran's gracious way of saying thank you.

Third, the Iranian regime must be ecstatic over on Harris' reluctance to confront their galloping advancements in nuclear technology. Iran's nuclear program reached its highest level of progress under the Biden-Harris administration. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced in July that Iran's nuclear weapons were only "1-2 weeks away." Iran appears dangerously close to having nuclear bombs with which to do anything the mullahs want.

Fourth, Iran expects that under a Harris presidency, the U.S. will remain passive in response to Tehran's military support for Russia in the ongoing war against Ukraine. From the perspective of the Iranian regime, Harris would similarly ignore Iran's efforts, through its military proxies and terror networks, to annihilate Israel as well as Tehran's rising influence in the US backyard, Latin America, which has increasingly become a geopolitical interest for Iran.

That the Iranian regime is meddling in U.S. elections to support the Harris campaign, should serve as a jarring warning that Harris's approach to Iran policy is one that would enable this expansionist regime to keep wreaking horrors on the world, both by itself and through its proxies, especially after it acquires nuclear capability. Why should Iran's government, which treats its own people atrociously, be expected to treat others any better?

 
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on Islam and US Foreign Policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20971/iran-intervenes-us-elections

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Rape is Resistance and Beepers are Genocide - Daniel Greenfield

 

by Daniel Greenfield

[To anti-Zionists] every Israeli tactic is illegitimate because the cause, a Jewish State, is illegitimate, but no Islamic tactic is ever truly illegitimate because its cause, replacing Israel with an Islamic state, is legitimate.

 

  • Those same organizations [that condemned Israel's exploding pagers] and activists had nothing to say about the Hezbollah rocket attacks on Israeli towns and villages that turned tens of thousands of Jews into refugees in their own country.

  • There is no legitimate way for Israel (or any non-Muslim country) to take out an Islamic terrorist. No amount of warnings, phone calls and dropped leaflets and roof-knocking warning projectiles were enough of a precaution. Even hostage-rescue operations were condemned for killing terrorists who, in the usual Hamas medical department parlance, turned into innocent children.

  • And there's also no such thing as an illegitimate Muslim way to murder Jews.

  • The Democrat political establishment can't seem to get around to condemning the Islamic groups attacking synagogues and marching through the streets praising the rape and murder of Jews.

  • Every Israeli tactic is illegitimate because the cause, a Jewish State, is illegitimate, but no Islamic tactic is ever truly illegitimate because its cause, replacing Israel with an Islamic state, is legitimate.

  • The liberal anti-Israel establishment in D.C., human rights groups and the media have played a cynical game of focusing on Israel tactics as if they actually cared how Israel takes out terrorists, and as if there were any means of taking out terrorists that would win their approval.

  • What makes people cheer for Israel are accomplishments, winning a war in six days, rescuing hostages from Africa, taking out an Islamic nuclear program on July 4th, and detonating the communications devices of a terrorist group responsible for killing Americans.

  • Israel has been held hostage trying to win over those who cannot be won over. Much of the liberal establishment has either become radicalized into permanently opposing Israel or has become complicit with those who do. The only narrative it will accept is the same demands that Israel be dismantled piece by piece and parceled out to Islamic terrorists in exchange for peace.

  • No one cheers weakness, they only respect strength.

  • The only way to win... is to win.

No sooner did the encrypted pagers used by members of Hezbollah begin exploding than human rights experts and the UN began condemning the single greatest targeted attack on a terror group as a violation of international law. Those same organizations and activists had nothing to say about the Hezbollah rocket attacks on Israeli towns and villages that turned tens of thousands of Jews into refugees in their own country. Pictured: A photo taken on September 18, 2024 in Beirut shows the remains of a Hezbollah pager that exploded the day before. (Photo by AFP via Getty Images)

The myth that Israel's tactics, not its existence, is at issue died with the murdered Jewish families on October 7, 2023 and the Hezbollah terrorists taken out by pagers on September 17, 2024.

No sooner did the encrypted communications devices handed out to members of the Islamic Jihadist group begin exploding than human rights experts and the UN began condemning the single greatest targeted attack on a terror group as a violation of international law. Those same organizations and activists had nothing to say about the Hezbollah rocket attacks on Israeli towns and villages that turned tens of thousands of Jews into refugees in their own country.

There is no legitimate way for Israel (or any non-Muslim country) to take out an Islamic terrorist. No amount of warnings, phone calls and dropped leaflets and roof-knocking warning projectiles were enough of a precaution. Even hostage-rescue operations were condemned for killing terrorists who, in the usual Hamas medical department parlance, turned into innocent children.

And there's also no such thing as an illegitimate Muslim way to murder Jews. Oct 7 proved that. Nearly a year later, Islamic groups are still celebrating the orgy of butchery, kidnapping and rape. The Democratic Socialists of America, which boasts 5 allied Members of Congress including Rep. Rashida Tlaib, has taken to arguing in favor of "armed resistance" and Hamas.

More Democrats have taken to social media to condemn a Detroit News cartoon which implied that Tlaib's support for terrorism may have led her to worry about her pager, than two recent Muslim terrorist plots to massacre Jews in synagogues in Las Vegas and New York City. The Democrat political establishment can't seem to get around to condemning the Islamic groups attacking synagogues and marching through the streets praising the rape and murder of Jews.

The liberal establishment accepts the Islamic terrorist cause but rejects the Israeli cause.

That's why when it comes to Islamic terrorism, it emphasizes the cause over the tactics, but when it comes to Israel, it emphasizes the tactics over the cause. Every Israeli tactic is illegitimate because the cause, a Jewish State, is illegitimate, but no Islamic tactic is ever truly illegitimate because its cause, replacing Israel with an Islamic state, is legitimate.

No matter how often the Arab Muslim invaders occupying parts of Gaza and the West Bank pledge their allegiance to terror, we are told that their ultimate cause is just and inevitable. And that the killings, kidnappings and rapes don't truly represent the moral righteousness of it.

While every time Israel takes out a terrorist, the media links it to the Jewish "occupation" of those parts of Israel that the terrorists demand for themselves. Since Israel's existence is wrong, any tactic that it uses to fight the terrorists trying to take it over is a human rights violation.

The Marxist mobs in the street are at least honest about their ideological orientation. They define all Jews living in Israel as "settlers" who are fair game for genocide. Whether Israel takes them out with drone strikes, exploding beepers or Barney songs played on a loop doesn't much matter except as it's useful for propaganda materials calling for the destruction of Israel.

The liberal anti-Israel establishment in D.C., human rights groups and the media have played a cynical game of focusing on Israel tactics as if they actually cared how Israel takes out terrorists and as if there were any means of taking out terrorists that would win their approval. A generation of the Israeli military jumping through every possible hoop has yielded only angrier and more sanctimonious condemnations every time another terrorist bites the dust.

Israel has wasted a lot of the lives of its soldiers and civilians on its side in the hopes of achieving some phantom "purity of arms" that included an extensive approvals process for strikes that crippled its aerial response on Oct 7. Afterward things got better and worse. The pager attack was brilliantly calculated and yet crippled by an obsessive need to take out specific targets rather than inflicting as much damage on the Hezbollah terrorists as possible.

The painstaking efforts to monitor the terrorists to minimize collateral damage and to focus on specific targets did not change the inevitable condemnations that came rolling Israel's way.

The real lesson of the pager attacks was that an innovative Israeli attack on Islamic terrorists will be cheered by the right people and condemned by the wrong ones. Israeli hasbara (public relations) is a fundamentally misguided effort to explain the need for a war whose hand-wringing signals weakness and guilt. What makes people cheer for Israel are accomplishments, winning a war in six days, rescuing hostages from Africa, taking out an Islamic nuclear program on July 4th, and detonating the communications devices of a terrorist group responsible for killing Americans.

No one except the occasional military expert who tours the battlefield is impressed by Israeli restraint. And restraint will win not a single concession from the same establishment that can't bring itself to condemn by name the mobs waving Hamas flags and assaulting Jewish students.

Israel has been held hostage trying to win over those who cannot be won over. Much of the liberal establishment has either become radicalized into permanently opposing Israel or has become complicit with those who do. The only narrative it will accept is the same demands that Israel be dismantled piece by piece and parceled out to Islamic terrorists in exchange for peace.

That the peace has never come, that the negotiations are worthless and that the only product of two generations of concessions is endless war will not change a single mind. Just as the implication of the revelation that Hamas planned to murder Israeli hostages before handing them over in exchange for live Muslim terrorists was hardly even discussed in the media.

After nine months of demanding a deal with Hamas at any cost, the Biden administration has belatedly decided that the terrorist group is not serious about a deal, but that news hasn't changed Kamala Harris's set talking point about the urgent need to end the war and cut a deal. Nor will it change her policy should she be in a position to stop talking and start making the rules.

Israel has been divided by the need to balance winning wars against winning over public opinion, but the public opinion of the establishment was never winnable, and if it is winnable, it can only be won by winning wars. The Biden administration's policymakers will never admit it, but they were far more impressed by the pager attacks than by 9 months of negotiations. The same is more obviously true of Arab-Muslim countries that despise Hezbollah and fear Iran.

No one cheers weakness, they only respect strength.

Israel will never have even the grudging acceptance of those who believe that rape is resistance and beepers are genocide. Accommodating military tactics to their accusations has led to a loop of defeatism that culminated in the deadly infiltration, invasion and massacres of Oct 7. But it can best be a player on the world stage by showing its strength rather than its weakness.

One Pagergeddon was worth a hundred Nova documentaries and exhibitions about the unhappy victims who were assaulted at the music festival to morale, national security and the reputation of a nation built on repudiating the helplessness and victimhood of its long exile.

Oct 7 incited the dark glee of a movement that believes it can taste Israel's destruction. Protestations of innocence and victimhood only feed its triumphalism. What it fears isn't a documentary about the atrocities of Oct 7, but the destruction of its Jihadist armies.

The issue was never Israel's tactics, but Israel's existence. The only way to win... is to win.

 
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20970/beepers-are-genocide

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Startling Metadata Hidden within the Polling: Voters Love Trump - Andrea Widburg

 

by Andrea Widburg

The problem is that voters don’t understand that they love Trump, and the campaign has only a month to make them realize that fact.

 

This past week, American Thinker partnered with Rasmussen polling to look at the battleground states, plus a few blue states in which there seems to be a softening toward Trump as Kamala’s campaign blunders along. What emerged from the ten states (AZ, GA, MI, MN, NC, NM, NV, PA, VA, and WI) was fascinating. In the swing states, Trump and Kamala are close, although Trump seems to be pulling ahead. In the blue states, Trump is closer than one would expect. Most amazingly, voters in all states, often by significant majorities, love Trump; they just don’t know it.

On the kitchen table, bread-and-butter, money-in-the-bank, our-children’s-future issues, people accept the Republican view that Democrats have done a terrible job and that Trump can do a better job. Democrats prevail only on “emotion” issues generated by media hatred and “vibes.” See here, here, here and here.

To win, Trump cannot suddenly retrain voters to like him. Instead, he must tell them, “I’m not going to be your best friend. But I’m going to be your best president. You know that things are deeply wrong in America, you know that I’ve correctly diagnosed what’s wrong, and you trust me to fix it. Vote for me to save yourselves.”

I’ve appended below a chart showing my analysis of the ten-state poll data. Here’s a link to a bigger version of the chart.


Most obviously, the chart is a sea of red. In a sane world, anchored to reality, the 2024 election should be a Trump blow-out.

The left column lists the pertinent questions that were asked of those polled (a mix of Democrats, Republicans, and Others, reflecting each states’ turnout in 2024).

Block one asks voters whether they’re voting for Kamala or Trump. Blue-colored answers show Kamala winning, red answers show Trump winning, and white answers show a tie.

Block two is the issues that matter most to voters. The number one issue is the economy, and the most common number two issue is the border. Abortion is the next most common issue. (There were other issues in the poll, but these were almost invariably the top three.)

The economy is a red issue because Kamala is the incumbent. If voters are concerned about the economy, it means that they think the current situation is lousy, favoring the opponent (Trump). The same rationale applies to the border. Abortion, of course, is a blue issue because it’s the only thing Kamala can campaign on.

Block three reflects people’s responses when asked what they want the new president to address first. People across all but the bluest of blue states are concerned about immigration and the economy—which means they want a change from the status quo. Kamala is the status quo, so this favors Trump.

Block four asks voters how favorably they view the candidates and which candidate they think has a better character. This is where nine years of hammering Trump as an awful person is balanced against two frantic months of selling Kamala’s joy.

These sales pitches have worked. Except for Arizona and Georgia, the media have convinced voters that Kamala is a better human being than Trump. Republicans lack time before November to convince voters that Kamala is not joyful and intelligent but is, instead, a dimwitted, hardcore communist.

Block five also reflects media-driven outcomes. It asks voters to say which candidate and party are more likely to be a threat to democracy and which party is more likely to govern tyrannically. Again, this is going to be hard to shift because these are emotional responses.

Block six asks people whether they’re better off now than they were four years ago, whether their children will be better off than they are, whether they feel safer now than four years ago (which encompasses both crime and threats to America as a whole), who is America’s biggest enemy (both foreign and domestic), and which candidate is best equipped to deal with China, Iran, and Russia.

Here’s where the chart goes red. In every state, voters agree by huge margins that they are not better off, that they feel hopeless about their children, and that the world is less safe than it was four years ago. This is as profound an indictment as you will ever see of the current administration.

People agreed that the biggest threats, both foreign and domestic are either China or the Democrat party. Most worry about the Republican party, too, although a bit less, so that’s a win.

The most interesting metric is that when it comes to threats from evil actors overseas, voters overwhelmingly feel that Trump is more capable of handling those potentially existential threats. Only in New Mexico are voters split on whether Trump or Kamala is the better candidate.

Block seven addresses immigration. In every state, voters hate the status quo. By huge margins, all states favor the candidate who wants to deport illegal aliens (Trump) versus the candidate who wants to grant them amnesty (Kamala). By the same margins, they think the Harris-Biden administration has done way too little to stop the flow of illegal aliens and, by that same margin, they think that Trump can fix the problem.

Block eight covers the economy. Except for Minnesota, where there’s a tie, voters overwhelmingly trust Trump more to resolve their economic woes. When they look back on the last 3.75 years, they’re less likely to vote for Kamala.

Block nine, which covers energy policy, is somewhat anomalous. Across the board, voters care more about energy prices than carbon emissions, so I colored it red, because emissions are a Democrat concern. However, even in a few swing states, voters split on whether Trump or Kamala would be better on energy policy.

Block ten—transgenderism—shows that voters across all ten states agreed by blow-out margins that there are only two sexes and that minors should be left alone. That’s a clear red win across the board.

Voters are hurting, and they know it. They also understand that Biden-Harris policies cause this pain.

Democrats are emotionally invested in hating Trump and loving abortion. Some may be swayed by reminding them repeatedly that abortion is a states’ rights issue, but they won’t get that. Moreover, Kamala has tried to address this reality by announcing her goal to end the filibuster. Voila! Abortion is now a federal election issue again. Few hardcore Democrats, unless they’re Jewish, are going to shift.

However, that red chart shows that Trump must make a play for moderate Democrats and Independents. Again, he will not convince them to vote for him, but he needs to remind them that (a) they’re suffering terribly from Harris-Biden policies and (b) that they know he can make their lives better. That’s a winning message that needs to be shouted from the treetops.

 
Andrea Widburg

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/09/the_startling_metadata_hidden_within_the_polling_voters_love_trump.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

New D’Souza film 'Vindicating Trump' imagines how operatives could steal an election - Paul Bond

 

by Paul Bond

D’Souza's interview with former President Donald Trump is woven throughout the film.

 

In a documentary called Vindicating Trump that opened Friday in about 850 theaters nationwide, conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza hired investigators to imagine ways dishonest political operatives might be able to sway an election.

One of their solutions was simple: run blank ballots through a copy machine, or simply purchase thousands of them online, both of which the investigators claimed to do with ease in the film. 

One investigator is seen phoning a voting registration office and asking whether it’s legal to make duplicates of his mail-in ballot, and the voice on the other line says that it is.

Another investigator is shown purchasing 1 million names of registered voters for $35 so he can easily identify likely non-voters whose names and forged signatures could be used on the duplicated ballots.

In an interview with Just the News,  D’Souza called the segment one of the more shocking elements of his new movie.

“We told our investigators, ‘Don’t just tell us you can make ballots, go make ballots. Prove to us these are ballots that can be cast without being detected.’ And they did,” D’Souza said. “It’s mind-blowing, to be honest.”

It’s familiar ground for D’Souza, who previously made 2,000 Mules, a documentary that explored allegations that Democratic operatives were stuffing ballot boxes during the 2020 election in which then-President Donald Trump lost to then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.

D’Souza obtained from state officials video of the alleged ballot-stuffing, but the mainstream media and most government officials dismissed the claims made in the film as unfounded, not significant enough to have mattered or not illegal, given COVID-19 protocols in place at the time that were designed to make voting easier.

Salem Media Group, Inc., the company behind the book and film “2,000 Mules,” in May issued an apology and said it would halt distribution of the film and remove both the film and book from its platforms. It apologized to one voter specifically portrayed as illegally voting whom Georgia officials cleared of wrongdoing.

2,000 Mules was backward-looking, while D’Souza produced Vindicating Trump to be, in part, forward looking.

“The premise is that Democrats are expected to cheat, but they can’t do so in the same way as before because people will be looking for it,” he said. “We have to think like the criminals. We’re not saying it happened, we’re saying it could. My purpose for exposing it is to make it more difficult.”

D’Souza had an additional forward-looking scene in Vindicating Trump whereby actor Nick Searcy plays an “intelligence bad guy” who hatches a plot to assassinate Trump. When the CIA balks, he laments: “Too bad it’s not the 60’s, right?”

D’Souza, who provided a clip of that scene to Just the News, said the scene was filmed prior to the July 13 attempt on Trump’s life, when he was shot in the ear while at a rally in Pennsylvania.

The scenes with Searcy and dozens of other actors are imaginative recreations of what might be going on behind the scenes at media outlets, Democratic headquarters and government agencies, who are portrayed in the movie as colluding with each other to keep Trump from the presidency and elect Vice President Kamala Harris.

“It’s not just interviews and stock footage like the usual documentary, we created an emotional storyline,” D’Souza told Just the News.

Among those interviewed is Trump, and D’Souza said the former president had to delay their meeting at Mar-a-Lago several times, which proved fortuitous, since the two men finally sat down together about 10 days after the first assassination attempt while, without the rescheduling, the interview would have happened prior.

The interview is woven throughout the film, and D’Souza called it “the centerpiece of the movie.”

He added: “I ask Trump somewhat unexpected questions because I want to see the tumblers of his mind work, and give the audience a window into his soul.”

D’Souza also provided Just the News a clip of the Trump interview in which he discusses accusations leveled by his detractors that he represents a danger to democracy.

The film, viewed by Just the News, begins with several celebrities hobnobbing with Trump decades earlier, including Jay Leno, David Letterman and the cast of "Saturday Night Live."

“Politicians and superstars lined up to be photographed with the embodiment of the American Dream. All that changed in 2015 when he crossed the political Rubicon and decided to run for president as a Republican,” D’Souza says in the movie.

In another section of the movie, D’Souza says: “Democrats, including Obama, sought to frame him as a Russian spy, an asset of Putin, a traitor to the United States. Traitors are typically shot or hanged; so this was an attempted political assassination.”

The film also includes a news clip of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. saying on CNN, ”I can make the argument that President Biden is a much worse threat to democracy” than Trump. 

It also includes a clip of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg saying on television: “Seeing Donald Trump get up after getting shot in the face and pump his fist in the air with the American flag is one of the most badass things I’ve ever seen in my life.”

 
Paul Bond

Source: https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/dsouza-new-film-vindicating-trump-focuses-how-operatives-might-be-able-steal

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter