Saturday, June 21, 2025

Thank You Mr. President, Thank You America, Thank You Israel - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

The time for appeasement is over. For this, we owe our gratitude to three pillars: Trump, the USA under his leadership, and the brave people of Israel who refuse to be victims.

 

  • This tiny country [Israel], by itself, has begun putting an end to a "forever war" that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been waging on the West for 46 years. The potential success of such a David-vs-Goliath endeavor would not be possible without the strength, determination, and leadership of US President Donald J. Trump.

  • America finally has a president willing to act against terrorism.

  • This moment also makes clear that Trump's actions are not provoking World War III, they are preventing World War III – which Iran has been threatening for almost half a century.

  • Now, once again, when Israel needs a true ally — not just someone to offer sympathetic words then threaten to withhold weapons — Trump has offered consistent support. "Israel has to do what they have to do," he said.

  • This kind of Churchillian clarity does not cause chaos—it stops it, just as the allies stopped it in the last century in Germany and Japan. Trump and Netanyahu deserve the Nobel Peace Prize for taking one of the world's greatest terrorist states off the table.

  • This kind of Churchillian clarity does not cause chaos — it stops it, as the WWII allies did in the last century in Germany and Japan. Trump and Netanyahu deserve the Nobel Peace Prize for taking one of the world's greatest terrorist states off the table.

  • Strength does not invite war—it deters it. "When people see a strong horse and a weak horse," observed the late esteemed psychologist, Osama bin Laden, "they will naturally want to side with the strong horse." The Middle East is safer today not because of handshakes and summits and signed pieces of paper that usually one side disregards.

  • Russia disregarded the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, under which Russia, the United States and Ukraine agreed that Ukraine's borders would be respected in exchange for giving up the nuclear weapons it had at the time. And half a ton of documents showed that Iran had been cheating on its JCPOA "deal."

  • The Middle East is safer today because Israel struck after... Israeli intelligence determined that Iran was on the brink of assembling a bomb -- and because the United States stood behind Israel.

  • To those who still criticize, who still think diplomacy alone can solve everything, the answer is simple. As the great Secretary of State George Shultz noted, "Negotiations are a euphemism for capitulation if the shadow of power is not cast across the bargaining table" -- in short, diplomacy works best when the enemy knows that it is backed up by force. Iran's leaders did not take Trump's 60-day warning seriously, probably because they did not believe he and Netanyahu had the courage to act. They also may be assuming that they can absorb a few blows and build back their nuclear weapons program after that – and precisely why it is crucial to destroy Fordow: to make sure no one can resuscitate it later.

  • The time for appeasement is over. For this, we owe our gratitude to three pillars: Trump, the USA under his leadership, and the brave people of Israel who refuse to be victims.

What the world witnessed this past week was not merely a military operation. It was the courageous act of a free nation — Israel — taking one of the bravest and most humane steps in recent memory to stop evil in its tracks. This tiny country, by itself, has begun putting an end to a "forever war" that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been waging on the West for 46 years. The potential success of such a David-vs-Goliath endeavor would not be possible without the strength, determination, and leadership of US President Donald J. Trump. Pictured: Israel Air Force F-15 fighter jets. (Photo by IDF Spokesman's Office)

What the world witnessed this past week was not merely a military operation. It was the courageous act of a free nation — Israel — taking one of the bravest and most humane steps in recent memory to stop evil in its tracks. This tiny country, by itself, has begun putting an end to a "forever war" that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been waging on the West for 46 years. The potential success of such a David-vs-Goliath endeavor would not be possible without the strength, determination, and leadership of US President Donald J. Trump.

While many global leaders have stood by passively, hedging their words and calling for "restraint," Trump showed what true leadership looks like. He did not waver. He did not equivocate. He supported Israel in its fight on behalf of all of us in the Free World -- not just in words, but in action, strategy, and unwavering moral clarity.

Israel's bold, precise strikes on Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure were not acts of aggression -- they were acts of self-defense needed to protect the country's existence after hearing from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that, contrary to the claims -- twice -- of US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that Iran was not working on a bomb. If you are not working in a bomb, you do not need a Fordow uranium enrichment site.

Either Gabbard's information was worthless or she was lying to the public to promote a pacifist ideology. Either reason does not exactly inspire confidence. Israel had suffered the unspeakable horror of October 7, when Hamas terrorists, funded and armed by Iran and Qatar, invaded Israel and massacred civilians in cold blood. What other nation on earth would be told to "show restraint" after such a barbaric attack? Did the United States advocate "showing restraint" after 9/11? Yet, that is what most so-called Western leaders have done — telling Israel to have a cease-fire, hold back, limit its response, avoid "escalation." As if the original atrocity was not escalation enough.

Trump, to his immense credit, and contrary to the Biden administration, did not join that cowardly chorus. Instead, he did what only a true friend and a great leader would do: he stood by Israel -- a country the size of New Jersey being attacked on seven fronts -- with conviction and clarity.

While others tried to soften their language, Trump said after Israel's initial air strikes, said that the Israeli operation was "excellent." He reminded the world that he had given Iran 60 days -- a generous chance -- to stop advancing toward nuclear weapons. Iran refused the opportunity. Instead of pretending otherwise or hiding behind bureaucratic platitudes, Trump spoke plainly and powerfully: "They got hit hard... More to come."

Contrast this to the usual diplomatic playbook. How many world leaders immediately ran to the podium after the Hamas invasion in 2023 to pressure Israel to de-escalate and pretended that peace can be achieved by pacifying terrorists and tyrants? Whether such an approach is bad or good is immaterial: it does not work. How many of these politicians care more about being praised by the New York Times than about the future of their countries and the free world? These politicians probably imagine they are projecting virtue; in reality, they are simply projecting cowardice, while enabling violence and tyranny.

Those politicians seem concerned only with appearing "balanced," even when one side is clearly the aggressor and the other, the victim. Trump never fell into that trap. He made it clear that supporting Israel's right to defend itself is not just a strategic choice — it is a moral obligation.

Even in his first term, Trump showed backbone that must have maddened his detractors. He charted a course of unapologetic strength and moral clarity. He pulled the US out of the disastrous 2015 JCPOA Iran "nuclear deal," which was set to legitimize Iran's acquiring nuclear weapons in October 2025. He ordered the killing of Iran's leading terrorist, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Major General Qasem Soleimani. Trump defeated Islamic State in Syria in a matter of weeks, moved the U.S. Embassy in to Jerusalem, Israel's rightful capital; then he brokered the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations.

Now, once again, when Israel needs a true ally — not just someone to offer sympathetic words then threaten to withhold weapons — Trump has offered consistent support. "Israel has to do what they have to do," he said.

When Iran, in its predictable fury, launched hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones at Israel, the United States military — under Trump's leadership — has helped to intercept some of them. This is what real partnership looks like. Not lectures, not empty statements, but coordinated defense and mutual trust. Iran's hegemonic threats are failing because of the strength and cooperation between Israel and a United States, led by Trump. America finally has a president willing to act against terrorism.

This moment also makes clear that Trump's actions are not provoking World War III, they are preventing World War III – which Iran has been threatening for almost half a century. All that time, Iran has been on a path of escalation — arming terrorist proxies, developing for nuclear weapons, targeting U.S. troops in the Middle East more than 350 times just in the last five years and promising "Death to America" and genocide for Israel.

If the world had remained paralyzed by fear and indecision, if Israel had been pressured into backing down, the consequences could have been catastrophic: a green light for terrorists and aggressors to keep on going. Instead, Trump drew a red line — and when Iran's leadership crossed it, they paid the price.

This kind of Churchillian clarity does not cause chaos — it stops it, as the WWII allies did in the last century in Germany and Japan. Trump and Netanyahu deserve the Nobel Peace Prize for taking one of the world's greatest terrorist states off the table.

Strength does not invite war—it deters it. "When people see a strong horse and a weak horse," observed the late esteemed psychologist, Osama bin Laden, "they will naturally want to side with the strong horse." The Middle East is safer today not because of handshakes and summits and signed pieces of paper that usually one side disregards.

Russia disregarded the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, under which Russia, the United States and Ukraine agreed that Ukraine's borders would be respected in exchange for giving up the nuclear weapons it had at the time. And half a ton of documents showed that Iran had been cheating on its JCPOA "deal."

The Middle East is safer today because Israel struck after the IAEA admitted that Iran had been in breach of its nuclear non-proliferation obligations and because Israeli intelligence determined that Iran was on the brink of assembling a bomb -- and because the United States stood behind Israel.

To those who still criticize, who still think diplomacy alone can solve everything, the answer is simple. As the great Secretary of State George Shultz noted, "Negotiations are a euphemism for capitulation if the shadow of power is not cast across the bargaining table" -- in short, diplomacy works best when the enemy knows that it is backed up by force. Iran's leaders did not take Trump's 60-day warning seriously, probably because they did not believe he and Netanyahu had the courage to act. They also may be assuming that they can absorb a few blows and build back their nuclear weapons program after that – and precisely why it is crucial to destroy Fordow: to make sure no one can resuscitate it later..

The time for appeasement is over. For this, we owe our gratitude to three pillars: Trump, the USA under his leadership, and the brave people of Israel who refuse to be victims.

In a world increasingly dominated by appeasers, enablers and cowards, thank heaven for those who still have the courage to stand tall and fight evil. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, America. And thank you, Israel. May God bless you in this just and noble fight.

 

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21693/thank-you-trump-america-israel

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'Jews Not Allowed': The Attempted Erasure of an Ancient People - Nils A. Haug

 

by Nils A. Haug

It's a very dark time for Jews in many parts of the Diaspora

 

  • For those Jewish scholars and experts from abroad, often invited by the local community in Australia to visit and share their views and expertise, there is news: you might not be permitted to enter Australia. Your visa, even if approved at some earlier stage, could be revoked and you might be silenced.

  • If, however, you are a dedicated Palestinian from Gaza, you are most likely welcome in Australia -- little vetting required.

  • In France, Jew-hatred is on the rise again.... French President Emmanuel Macron, possibly to please his growing Muslim constituency, intended to recognize "steps toward" a borderless, atrociously governed, terrorist State of Palestine – contrary to the interests of Israelis, the Middle East, and especially the Palestinians.

  • "If France is really so determined to see a Palestinian state, I've got a suggestion for them: Carve out a piece of the French Riviera, and create a Palestinian state. They're welcome to do that... but they're not welcome to impose that kind of pressure on a sovereign nation." — US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, i24 News, June 1, 2025.

  • Are Macron's government and others not only denying Israel, and its majority Jewish population, the necessary arms to defend itself, but also seeking to recognize a hostile Islamist state inside another country's borders? What is the word for "chutzpah" in French?

Australian Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke (pictured) revoked the entry visa for Hillel Fuld, an American-Israeli tech columnist and advisor to Google and Microsoft, who was scheduled to speak in front of thousands of people at a fundraising event for Australian Friends of Magen David Adom (the official Israeli ambulance and medical emergency service devoted to saving lives of all people). Burke gave as his reason for revoking Fuld's visa a false accusation of "'islamophobia rhetoric' which risked inciting discord against Australia's Muslim population." (Photo by Hilary Wardhaugh/Getty Images)

Pro-Palestinian activists at Sydney University, Australia, a recent investigative report revealed, have been freely disrupting university lectures, shouting antisemitic slogans and carrying banners declaring "Jews not allowed." According to the report:

"Jewish workers and students experienced antisemitism daily whilst on campus, creating a workplace of fear, anxiousness and a fear of retribution towards Jewish workers and students because they were Jewish people."

As has become typical in the West, the report's recommendations were ignored and a full investigation of the university not undertaken.

For those Jewish scholars and experts from abroad, often invited by the local community in Australia to visit and share their views and expertise, there is news: you might not be permitted to enter Australia. Your visa, even if approved at some earlier stage, could be revoked and you might be silenced. The governing leftist Labor Party may not want you there.

If, however, you are a dedicated Palestinian from Gaza, you are most likely welcome in Australia -- little vetting required. So, come join the many thousands who are there already. Come create your very own "private Idaho," just as many of your fellow Islamists have already done in Europe.

Scheduled to speak to thousands of people at a fundraising event in June for Australian Friends of Magen David Adom (the official Israeli ambulance and medical emergency service devoted to saving lives of all people), Hillel Fuld had his visa revoked at the last minute. Fuld, an American-Israeli who describes himself as "a proud Zionist, a tech columnist, advisor to Google and Microsoft, and a father of five," has over the past 20 months posted on his X and LinkedIn accounts commentary about Hamas's war on Israel.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, "responsible for importing thousands of Gazans to Australia without adequate security checks," gave as his reason for revoking Fuld's visa a false accusation of "'islamophobia rhetoric' which risked inciting discord against Australia's Muslim population."

Fuld, therefore, was supposedly a "threat to the 'health, safety or good order' of Australians."

Over the past few weeks in Australia, the following incidents against Jews were reported without much consequence:

In the overall scheme of things, these events might seem trivial. Jews, regrettably, are often the "canary in the coalmine" – meaning, how Jews as a defenseless minority in the diaspora are treated, portends escalating future actions not only against them but other minorities, and eventually all citizens.

With Fuld, the issue is the curtailment of freedom of speech. Facts are denied a platform, in order to make space for alternative narratives that suit the prevailing political trend. This issue should be of concern to all citizens.

More than a decade back, Charles Small noted about the US:

"Anti-Semitism is a deep, deep hatred, and once we permit this hatred to exist or target one group, it'll only be a matter of time before other groups are targeted."

Small was the director of the Yale University Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Antisemitism until it was closed down by the university after only a few years. Small's words in 2012 were far-sighted. A decade or so later, we see widely-supported, violent anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist events at Harvard, Yale and University of Pennsylvania, among others institutions (see Appendix). Columbia University, Northwestern University, Portland State University, UC Berkeley, and the University of Minnesota are currently under federal investigation.

In France, Jew-hatred is on the rise again. In early June, French dockworkers prevented a shipment of military goods destined for Israel, intended to assist it surviving an onslaught of jihadists from Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Iran and its own West Bank. French President Emmanuel Macron, possibly to please his growing Muslim constituency, intended to recognize "steps toward" a borderless, atrociously governed, terrorist State of Palestine – contrary to the interests of Israelis, the Middle East, and especially the Palestinians. To justify his actions, and Macron has been lobbying other European nations to follow suit.

Meanwhile, Macron intimated that he would shortly make a decision "whether to implement 'concrete measures' against Israel because of the war against Hamas" – never mind that the war was initiated by Hamas, not Israel.

Coming from the famed land of "liberty, equality and fraternity," these things can only be seen as an example of unapologetic Jew-hatred from a major EU power, itself infiltrated by jihadists. Macron apparently decided that now would be the perfect time for a re-run of the anti-Semitic Dreyfus Affair 130 years ago, in which a loyal Jewish officer, Captain Alfred Dreyfus, was unjustly charged with treason and sentenced to life imprisonment on Devil's Island, a decision overturned only years later.

Even though the Dreyfus Affair was considered "a watershed event in the history of European anti-Semitism," and France during World War II was occupied for years by Nazi Germany and partly governed by the collaborators of the Vichy government, nothing, it seems, has been learned. The French Vichy government, under Marshall Philippe Pétain and Pierre Laval, was responsible for the deportation of over 76,000 Jews from France to German death camps. Only 2,500 survived.

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee immediately responded to Macron's proposal:

"If France is really so determined to see a Palestinian state, I've got a suggestion for them: Carve out a piece of the French Riviera, and create a Palestinian state. They're welcome to do that... but they're not welcome to impose that kind of pressure on a sovereign nation."

Are Macron's government and others not only denying Israel, and its majority Jewish population, the necessary arms to defend itself, but also seeking to recognize a hostile Islamist state inside another country's borders? What is the word for "chutzpah" in French?

European leaders like Macron, from nations such as Norway, Ireland, and Great Britain, who consider a "two-state solution" a pathway to peace, evidently wish to reward Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Iran for the massacres of October 7, 2023 – the worst crime against Jews since the Holocaust. A two-state "solution" is a certain way to revive Hitler's "final solution" to the existence of Jews – as well as erasing Israel and its Jewish inhabitants.

Assimilation in other countries will not help the Jews, as they discovered to their horror during Europe's fascist era, when they lost more than six million of their people, and would have lost more were it not for the heroic actions of Raoul Wallenberg, Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Oskar Schindler, Denmark's King Christian X and many others less known. They risked, and some even sacrificed, their lives rather than to submit to a massive injustice -- which other politicians and leaders seem all too willing to impose on Jews now.

The harsh reality is that much of the world thinks the worst of Jews – for no rational reason whatsoever. This psychopathology seems to conclude that it is actually morally and spiritually superior to eradicate a people and their religion in a genocide.

Why else would millions continue to be murdered, raped, and tortured in Sudan and Nigeria, for instance, without much comment from the mainstream media, and the dedicated Western pro-Palestinian demonstrators? Why is only Gaza, and by implication Israel's supposed culpability, the world's main focus?

Beth Kuhel comments:

"While civil wars have displaced over 10 million in Sudan, where mass rape, ethnic cleansing, and child slavery have returned to Darfur — Western students chant that Israel is the world's greatest evil."

The battle over Israel's survival and that of the Jewish people, appears to be a spiritual battle fought, as always, in the physical realm. The Israelis of today, like the Israelites of antiquity, probably need to be prepared to fight continually for their land, their people and the acceptance of their holy book, the Torah, the first five books of the Old Testament. The shocking failures of October 7, 2023, however, cannot be allowed ever to happen again – and Israel's putative allies cannot be relied on.

Israel, despite the odds, will prevail. "No weapon that is fashioned against you shall succeed," proclaimed Isaiah, "and you shall refute every tongue that rises against you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord and their vindication from me, declares the Lord."

Believe it.

Nils A. Haug is an author and columnist. A Lawyer by profession, he is member of the International Bar Association, the National Association of Scholars, the Academy of Philosophy and Letters. Dr. Haug holds a Ph.D. in Apologetical Theology and is author of 'Politics, Law, and Disorder in the Garden of Eden – the Quest for Identity'; and 'Enemies of the Innocent – Life, Truth, and Meaning in a Dark Age.' His work has been published by First Things Journal, The American Mind, Quadrant, Minding the Campus, Gatestone Institute, National Association of Scholars, Jewish Journal, James Wilson Institute (Anchoring Truths), Jewish News Syndicate, Tribune Juive, Document Danmark, and many others.


Appendix (Generated by Perplexity AI)
Universities in the US with recent histories of antisemitism

Universities Under Federal Investigation (2024–2025)

The US Department of Education launched Title VI civil rights investigations into five universities for "widespread antisemitic harassment" following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack. These universities are:

  • Columbia University
  • Northwestern University
  • Portland State University
  • University of California, Berkeley
  • University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

These investigations were prompted by complaints of institutional indifference and failure to protect Jewish students during and after campus protests.

Campuses with High Numbers of Reported Incidents

According to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and Hillel International, the following universities recorded the highest numbers of antisemitic and anti-Israel incidents in the 2023–2024 academic year:

University

Number of Incidents (2023–2024)

Columbia University

67

University of California, Davis

42

University of California, Los Angeles

41

University of Michigan

40

Harvard University

39

Rutgers University, New Brunswick

38

University of California, Berkeley

36

University of Minnesota

34

Stanford University

33

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

32

These ten institutions accounted for 15% of all campus incidents tracked nationwide.

Notable Recent Incidents and Trends

  • Columbia University: Faced intense scrutiny after encampments and protests, leading to police intervention and over 1,000 arrests. The university recently ousted three deans over internal messages echoing antisemitic tropes, and federal funding was cut due to continued inaction in protecting Jewish students.
  • UC Berkeley: Subject to lawsuits and federal complaints alleging a hostile climate for Jewish students, with accusations of police inaction during antisemitic assaults and demonstrations.
  • Northwestern University: Despite administrative claims of improvement, a recent poll found 63% of Jewish students still see antisemitism as a serious problem. The university was previously censured by lawmakers for inadequate response to antisemitic incidents during pro-Hamas demonstrations.
  • University of Minnesota: Under investigation for its handling of antisemitism amid repeated pro-Palestinian protests and reported harassment of Jewish students.
  • Portland State University: Investigated after student protests over the Gaza war and reports of both antisemitism and Islamophobia, including a library occupation that ended in a violent standoff.

Other Identified "Hotspots"

Past and recent research identifies additional campuses with persistent or acute antisemitism, including:

  • CUNY-Brooklyn
  • University of California campuses
  • Rutgers University
  • University of Illinois
  • University of Wisconsin

Hostility in these locations is often driven by a combination of anti-Israel sentiment and traditional antisemitic tropes, with the presence of active groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) being a strong predictor of a hostile climate.

National Context and Trends

  • In the 2024–2025 academic year, over 2,000 antisemitic incidents were tracked on US campuses, marking a 700% increase from 2022 to 2023.
  • Antisemitic incidents on campuses accounted for 18% of all such incidents nationwide in 2024.
  • The states with the highest number of incidents were New York, California, and New Jersey.

Summary

Columbia University, Northwestern University, Portland State University, UC Berkeley, and the University of Minnesota are currently under federal investigation for their recent histories of antisemitism. Additional universities—including several University of California campuses, Harvard, Rutgers, University of Michigan, and others—have been identified as hotspots for antisemitic incidents in the past year. The surge in incidents is linked to heightened tensions following the Israel-Gaza conflict and has prompted calls for stronger institutional accountability and federal oversight.


Nils A. Haug

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21681/jews-not-allowed

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

As Western nations back Israel, Iran threatens to close Strait of Hormuz, upend global economy - Nicholas Ballasy

 

by Nicholas Ballasy

The strait, between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, provides the only water passage from the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea

 

Iran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz as the U.S. and other Western nations coalesce around Israel in the Middle East battle is raising concerns about such a move disrupting the entire global energy market and possibly sending oil prices as high as $130 a barrel.

"Iran reserves the right to close the Strait of Hormuz if the United States joins Israel in military action against the Islamic Republic," Ali Yazdikhah, a member of parliament in Iran, said Thursday.

The strait, between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, provides the only water passage from the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea and is one of the world's key import-export channels. 

Iran produces roughly 6% of the world's oil and natural gas supply. It is the world's ninth-largest oil producer and the third-largest natural gas producer. 

The threat by Iran comes about one week after Israel launched missile strikes on Iran, amid the United States' failing effort to get Tehran to agree to a deal in which it would stop enriching uranium for a nuclear weapon. 

Iran responded to Israel's attacks with its own air strikes, as Trump seemed to go back and forth on whether to provide military support for Israel and its efforts. 

However, Trump on Thursday said through White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt that he would decide within two weeks whether to provide such support.

Days earlier, world leaders, including Trump and those from England and France, signed a statement saying Israel had a right to defend itself and that Iran was a source of terror that should not have a nuclear weapon.

 JP Morgan has predicted oil prices could reach $120-$130 a barrel if Iran shuts down the strait.

"Markets maintained a tenuous holding pattern this week as investors monitor the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel. Oil (+3.6%) prices topped $78 per barrel for the first time since January amid fears of war escalation in the Middle East, with ongoing concerns about flows from Iran and threats to vessel traffic in the Strait of Hormuz," said a JP Morgan analysis on Friday. 

"While markets are on edge, it seems like crude prices have some more room to rise before they start to cause real friction for the U.S. economy," the analysis also said.

If Iran closes the strait, countries worldwide would have to pay higher prices on the global market because there would be less oil, and those prices could likely be passed off to consumers. But Iran could also suffer financially because its oil would no longer be available for sale.

Oil prices increased by about 3% on Thursday as the Israel-Iran conflict continues. However, they dropped on Friday, after Trump said there is a chance Iran might come to the table to negotiate. 

Citi analyst Spiro Dounis said that "disrupting oil supply isn’t in the interest of either Iran or the U.S.,” according to Yahoo! News. 

"If Iran’s 1.1 million barrels per day of oil exports were halted ... Brent prices would only rise to around $75–78 per barrel — offering limited upside from current levels," he also said.

 

Nicholas Ballasy

Source: https://justthenews.com/nation/economy/irans-threat-close-strait-hormuz-could-lead-oil-prices-rising-130-barrel

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The IRGC terrorist who helped orchestrate Hamas's Oct. 7 massacre: Who was Saeed Izadi? - explainer - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

Izadi was one of the few who knew in advance about Hamas's attacks in southern Israel on that day.

 

Profile of IRGC terrorist Saeed Izadi released by the IDF on June 21, 2025.
Profile of IRGC terrorist Saeed Izadi released by the IDF on June 21, 2025.
(photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

 

Palestine Corps Commander Saeed Izadi of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) was announced dead by the IDF and Defense Minister Israel Katz on Saturday.

Izadi was killed in a strike by IAF fighter jets in Qom, a city south of the Iranian capital, Tehran. He reportedly assisted in the Palestinian terrorist organizations Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad financially, and specifically in arming them for their massacres and terrorist attacks in southern Israel on October 7, 2023, the IDF said. The military added that he was also one of the few who knew about Hamas's plans for that day in advance.

Iranian weapons smuggling and training Palestinian terror groups were done under Izadi's watch, in both the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Iranian funding for Hamas also increased under his watch.

Izadi was charged with organizing cooperation and coordination between Palestinian terrorist organizations, the Lebanon-based Hezbollah terrorist organization, and Bashar Al-Assad's regime in Syria while the former Syrian president was in power, seeking to build a "resistance axis" inspired by the plans of killed IRGC commander Qassem Soleimani, according to the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center (ITIC). He also coordinated cooperation between senior commanders of the IRGC and the Islamic Republic with key Hamas officials.

He was well-regarded by the Islamic Republic as an "expert" on the Palestinian issue.

 A toy lies in front of a house in Nir Oz ahead of the first demolition of a building since the October 7 massacre, to make way for the rebuilding and renewal of the kibbutz, in December (credit: STOYAN NENOV/REUTERS)
A toy lies in front of a house in Nir Oz ahead of the first demolition of a building since the October 7 massacre, to make way for the rebuilding and renewal of the kibbutz, in December (credit: STOYAN NENOV/REUTERS)

Networking the numerous Middle Eastern terrorist organizations

Recovered Hamas documents also revealed issues that arose for Izadi to connect the numerous terror organizations together. For example, power struggles had arisen in the Gaza-based terror group between those who wanted closer ties to Iran and those who opposed the Islamic Republic's influence in the region.

Izadi was also responsible for directing Hamas forces who operated in Lebanon, the IDF added.

An assessment conducted by the ITIC revealed that Izadi had further plans to focus on terror attacks from within Israel while operating from Iran. This included assassination attempts on senior Israeli officials "in revenge for the damage to 'resistance axis' organizations and the Israeli strike on Iran in October 2024," the organization said.

A statement by the IDF revealed that Izadi had also planned on executing a multi-front attack against the Jewish state, which would have included missile attacks by the Islamic Republic in conjunction with its proxies, while the second stage would have been an invasion of the country by thousands of terrorists from Lebanon, Syria, Gaza, and the West Bank.


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-858462

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump's Churchillian Decision: Eliminating Iran's Nuclear Sites Means No One Can Use Them Later - Lawrence Kadish

 

by Lawrence Kadish

"We shall export our revolution to the whole world. Until the cry 'There is no god but Allah' resounds over the whole world, there will be struggle." — Quoted on p. 42 of Shireen T. Hunter's The Foreign Policy of Iran: Ideology and Pragmatism (Praeger, 1984).

 

 

President Donald J. Trump has a problem. If he leaves Iran's major nuclear research and centrifuge sites, such as the Fordow uranium enrichment plant or Natanz, under their protective mountains, the countless centrifuges sheltered there will remain a permanent temptation -- an "attractive nuisance" -- for the Iranian regime to resurrect to terrorize its neighbors with again.

What Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appears to want -- and what Iran's regime has said it wants since the Islamic Republic's founder Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini put it in 1979 – is:

"We shall export our revolution to the whole world. Until the cry 'There is no god but God' resounds over the whole world, there will be struggle."
— Quoted on p. 42 of Shireen T. Hunter's The Foreign Policy of Iran: Ideology and Pragmatism (Praeger, 1984).

To accomplish this, Iran's regime has for decades been building up its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs as a way of securing their permanent rule. They appear to have calculated that if Iraq's Saddam Hussein or Libya's Muammar Gaddafi or the leadership of had possessed nuclear weapons, they would still be ruling their countries. The Iranian regime seems to have concluded that the reason for their fall was that they either never had nuclear weapons, with Gaddafi foolishly allowing his nuclear program to be dismantled. To the ayatollahs, their nuclear and ballistic missile programs appeared to be their "insurance policy" allowing them to stay in power - as well as "resounding over the whole world."

Trump offered Iran's leadership 60 days to give up their nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles programs peacefully "before there is nothing left." Iran repeatedly declined. On the 61st day, Israel took Iran's threat to its existence ("Death to Israel") -- and to that of the US ("Death to America" as a policy) -- into its own hands, and began implementing the "nothing left" part of Trump's request.

Apparently now -- after being battered by Israel as well as battering Israel, a country the size of New Jersey (roughly 22,00 sq.km.) with hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones -- Iran has signaled it wanted to "negotiate" again -- a claim later denied. According to the Iranian mission to the United Nations, "No official has asked to 'grovel' at White House gates."

Trump invited Iran's leadership to the White House to talk, an offer also declined.

Trump, on social media, asked Iran for "Unconditional surrender!" and said, "No more. Then we go blow up all the, you know, all the nuclear stuff that's all over the place there."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu flatly stated that he had no interest in "fake talks":

"They want to continue to have these fake talks in which they lie, they cheat, they string the U.S. along. And, you know, we have very solid Intel on that. They want to keep on building their nuclear weapons and building their mass ballistic missile arsenal, which they're firing at our people. They want to continue to create the two existential threats against Israel while they're talking. That's not going to happen."

The Iranian regime has been talking for 46 years, and for most of them have been building their nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs, including working toward intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). ICBMs are exactly what they say they are: intercontinental. They are not needed either for "civilian nuclear energy" or for launching at Israel. They are intended for launching at the United States. If Iran, according to Israeli reports, has been manufacturing 300 ballistic missiles a month, in a year that is 3,600, and in ten years Iran would have 36,000 -- with some of them carrying nuclear warheads.

Netanyahu reminded the US administration, "Today it's Tel Aviv, tomorrow it's New York. I understand America First, but I don't understand America Dead."

Iran has not spent years been building up its influence in South America – especially Brazil, Venezuela and Cuba -- for a chain of beach resorts. The US Monroe Doctrine (1823), warned that foreign powers, at that time European, "were obligated to respect the Western Hemisphere as the United States' sphere of interest."

Iran began its 1979 Islamic Revolution kidnapping and holding hostage the staff of the US Embassy for 444 days, until the election of President Ronald Reagan induced their release. Iran then proceeded to kill countless Americans over the years -- from 241 US service members during the Iran-directed bombing of the US Marines barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, in 1983; to the 9/11 attacks; to planned assassinations of US officials, including Trump, as well others in the US, to name just a few.

At the moment, Trump says he has "not decided what to do about Iran."

The nuclear sites Iran has built deep underground could either be destroyed with "bunker-buster" bombs from the air, or with Israel's special forces troops on the ground. If the electricity could be cut, the centrifuges would be inoperable. What is unclear is: is it possible to verify with certainty that the power to the centrifuges is cut, and, if the electricity could be restored at some future date, would the centrifuges then be operable again?

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, a pastor, suggested to Trump that this moment was what God had saved him for:

"God spared you in Butler, PA to be the most consequential President in a century—maybe ever."

Trump's decision will not only change the future of Iran and the Middle East, it could deter other adversaries of the West -- Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea -- and possibly even quiet the subversive voices at home. Trump needs to Make Persia Great Again! This is, as Huckabee suggested, why Trump was spared: to create a great, new, truly peaceful Middle East, allied with the US, hopefully forever.


Lawrence Kadish serves on the Board of Governors of Gatestone Institute.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21692/eliminating-iran-nuclear-sites

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran liable for bombing Soroka hospital, but its weapons aren’t ‘smart’ enough to aim that well, experts say - Andrew Bernard, Vita Fellig

 

by Andrew Bernard, Vita Fellig

“The fact that Iran is knowingly firing inaccurate ballistic missiles at cities gives you a good idea of where their intentions lie,” Ryan Brobst, of FDD, told JNS.

 

Smoke rises from the scene where a ballistic missile fired from Iran hit and caused damage at the Soroka Medical Center in Beersheva, Israel, on June 19, 2025. Photo by Dudu Greenspan/Flash90.
Smoke rises from the scene where a ballistic missile fired from Iran hit and caused damage at the Soroka Medical Center in Beersheva, Israel, on June 19, 2025. Photo by Dudu Greenspan/Flash90.

 

The Iranian regime is being widely accused of war crimes after it fired a missile at Soroka Medical Center in Beersheva, in southern Israel, on Thursday, with many noting a double standard, in which Israel is decried for pursuing terror sites embedded intentionally in Gazan hospitals, but global organizations have yet to condemn Iran.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said at the hospital that “we are hitting nuclear targets and missile targets precisely, and they are hitting the pediatric ward of the hospital. That says it all.” On a visit to the hospital, Israeli President Isaac Herzog called the attack “a war crime.”

“Iran is indiscriminately targeting civilian populations and trying to kill Jews,” stated Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.). “It’s unconscionable and speaks volumes to their depraved inhumanity.”

Rep. Abe Hamadeh (R-Ariz.) stated that “the Iranian regime’s deliberate attack on an Israeli civilian hospital is despicable.”

Experts told JNS that Iran is accountable for attacking the hospital, but that its missiles aren’t “smart” enough to actually aim at a specific building from that far away.

“It’s unclear what exactly Iran was targeting, because we know their ballistic missiles have demonstrated significant levels of inaccuracy,” said Ryan Brobst, deputy director of the military and political power center at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

“It was certainly more than just superficial damage to the hospital, but the fact that Iran is knowingly firing inaccurate ballistic missiles at cities gives you a good idea of where their intentions lie,” Brobst told JNS. 

Militaries, like Israel’s, try to reduce civilian casualties, but “Iran doesn’t seem to have made any effort to do so,” he said. “While targeting military infrastructure is on its face legal, doing so without regard for civilian casualties is potentially not legal under the laws of war and laws of armed conflict.”

Sam Lair, a research associate at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, told JNS that Iranian missiles appear to have a “circular error” probability of about three-quarters of a mile. That means “if you draw a radius around a desired target, half of the missiles that you fire will fall into that and then 90% of the missiles would fall within two circular error probables,” he said.

“If you’re using missiles with this type of capability to attack targets in dense urban areas, you’re rolling the dice that you’re going to hit non-combatants,” Lair said.

Annika Ganzeveld, Iran team lead for the American Enterprise Institute’s critical threats project, told JNS that the Islamic Republic has claimed that some of its missiles have a circular error probability of about 165 feet, and others of 350 to 1,000 feet. 

“The Iranians themselves are claiming that they have these very small margins of error, and we have seen some direct impacts. It is possible that Iran is getting some through and that these are getting to the target,” Ganzeveld said.

“With the hospital today, the Iranians have claimed that they were targeting an Israeli C2 and intelligence headquarters nearby it,” she said. “It’s very difficult to tell whether they were actually targeting that alleged military headquarters, or if they were targeting the hospital.”

Gerald Steinberg, founder of NGO Monitor, posted a screen capture of a New York Times headline stating, “Israel says Iranian missile strikes major hospital,” which he called a “clown show.”

“The missile hit was clearly shown on live video, as was resulting destruction,” he wrote. “No justification for the ‘Israel says’ caveat. Those responsible for this headline, and all the others like it, should be helped out the door and to a different career track.”

Steinberg told JNS that the Times headline is part “of a clear pattern of negatively singling out Israel among many Times staff.”

“When Hamas or allied NGOs make false allegations about Israel, or casualty claims in Gaza, these are often repeated in the Times without the caveat of ‘Hamas says,’” he said.

Reporters, opinion writers and editors at the Times “openly display a mix of snarky bias and shallow understanding,” he told JNS. “The result is a corporate spin that leads to headlines that tell the reader to discount anything that would justify Israel’s response to deadly attacks like today’s.”

New capabilities?

Danny Danon, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, told JNS that Iran “has amassed a sophisticated and dangerous arsenal of ballistic missiles and drones” and its attack on Soroka hospital “was deliberate and indiscriminate, an attempt to maximize civilian casualties.”

“Cluster munitions are designed to spread multiple explosions over a wide area, but Iran did not aim this weapon at a military base. It deliberately fired these munitions at civilians,” he said. “Iran’s intentions could not be clearer. Bloody murder.”

During Iran’s missile strike last year, the regime targeted Israeli military sites. “All of Israel is a legitimate target for the Iranian regime—schools, hospitals and communities,” he said of the current Iranian attacks.

The envoy told JNS that the silence at the United Nations about Iran’s attacks “has been deafening, and it is appalling that there hasn’t been clear and loud condemnation of the Islamic Republic’s attempt to kill Israeli civilians.”

“This points to the glaring hypocrisy of the United Nations that rushes to condemn Israel at any given moment and before all the facts are in place, but with other states, like the Islamic Republic and its indiscriminate attacks on Israeli civilian population centers, there is much more hesitation,” he said.

Military experts told JNS that more Iranian missiles appear to be striking Israeli territory without being shot down.

“It’s hard to say whether that’s an issue of Israel running low on interceptors, or whether that is Iran using more advanced munitions—new types of missiles that have a more advanced capability to get through air defenses,” Ganzeveld, of AEI, told JNS.

Israel has said that it eliminated about two-thirds of Iran’s missile launchers, which Ganzeveld said is important. “Even if Iran has thousands of ballistic missiles, or hundreds of ballistic missiles, left in its stockpile, those missiles aren’t really effective if Iran doesn’t have the launchers from which it can launch them at Israel,” she said.

“It seems that the Israel Defense Forces is very much prioritizing knocking out those launchers,” she added. “If Iran doesn’t have the launchers from which you can launch the missiles, then the number of missiles it has isn’t really going to matter, because it won’t be able to launch them.”

Brobst, of FDD, said that Israel might be saving its Arrow interceptors for ballistic missiles that appear headed to certain targets, if it is running low on interceptors. That would mean that it would let “others continue on and hit, which could lead to a higher rate of civilian casualties,” he told JNS.

“It’s unknown exactly what Israel’s Arrow stockpiles are, but it’s not surprising that they might be running low after intercepting so many incoming missiles,” he said.

Lair, of the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, told JNS that it has always “bedeviled missile defense” that “interceptors are vastly more expensive to produce than missiles.”

“This has always been true, just because the technology is more complicated. That means that the Iranians probably have more missiles than Israel has interceptors,” he said. 

Interceptors don’t always work, which is why one can see videos of Iron Dome intercepts, in which “you’ll see multiple interceptors go up to get one missile,” Lair said. “On some level, it is kind of a matter of time before Israel runs out.”

“Will Iran be able to ride this out long enough to the point where they more or less exhaust the Israeli interceptor magazine?” Lair said. “That’s where we would see an inflection point in terms of the kind of coercive violence that the Iranians would be able to start delivering against Israel.”

But Iran has a “command and control problem,” according to Lair.

Israel wiped out the “higher echelons” of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on the first night of the attacks, which made it very hard for Iran to coordinate a response. “Similarly, Israel was very aggressive in suppressing that first line of Iranian missile bases,” Lair said. “That seriously inhibited Iran’s ability to generate strikes initially.”

“It’s so disorganized. There’s less of an understanding of who’s in charge,” he said of Tehran. “But also the Israelis are being very effective at destroying launchers, and this is all derived from their ability to control the airspace.”


Andrew Bernard, Vita Fellig

Source: https://www.jns.org/iran-liable-for-bombing-soroka-hospital-but-its-weapons-arent-smart-enough-to-aim-that-well-experts-say/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iranian ballistic missile damages oldest, second oldest mosques in Haifa - Yuval Barnea

 

by Yuval Barnea

Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said that the attack had injured the Muslim clerics who were in Al Jarina Mosque at the time.

 

Impact site following Iranian missile strike on downtown Haifa, next to the 300-year-old Zahir al-Umar Mosque, June 20 ,2025.
Impact site following Iranian missile strike on downtown Haifa, next to the 300-year-old Zahir al-Umar Mosque, June 20 ,2025.
(photo credit: IDF HOME FRONT COMMAND)

 

An Iranian missile strike, which hit Haifa on Friday afternoon, damaged the city's oldest and second-oldest mosques as it struck Haifa's downtown.

The strike damaged the Masjid Al-Saghir, built in 1761 by Zahir al-Umar, and the Al Jarina Grand Mosque of Haifa, built in 1775 but enlarged by the Ottoman Empire in 1901.

President Isaac Herzog took to X to condemn the "outrageous attack" on "a city that stands as a symbol of coexistence between Jews, Muslims, Christians, Druze, Circassians, and Bahá’ís."

"They try to kill Israelis of all faiths—Muslims included. We will defend all Israelis. All faiths included," he said.

Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar accused the Iranian regime of targeting the historic mosques and the Wadi Nisnas neighborhood. He informed the public that the attack had injured the Muslim clerics who were in Al Jarina Mosque at the time.

"The Iranian regime is targeting Muslim, Christian, and Jewish civilians, as well as civilian sites. These are war crimes," Sa'ar said.

The two mosques represent some of the oldest buildings in Haifa and date back to the founding of the modern city by the Ottoman governor of the Galilee, Zahir al-Umar, who is responsible for the rebuilding and fortifying multiple modern cities across the Galilee, including Haifa, Acre, Nazareth, Tiberias, and numerous smaller villages in the region.

Later on Friday, Sa'ar arrived at the scene of the damage to the mosque and gave a statement to foreign press.

 Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar gives a statement to foreign press at the scene of damage to a mosque in Haifa, June 20, 2025. (credit: ERAN YARDENI)
Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar gives a statement to foreign press at the scene of damage to a mosque in Haifa, June 20, 2025. (credit: ERAN YARDENI)
“We see here once again the results of the Iranian strategy. The Iranian regime is deliberately targeting civilian population centers. Therefore, you can see that a pure civilian area was hit here. Specifically, in that case, a mosque," Sa'ar said.

"It's a war crime. This is clear, because according to international law, you cannot target civilian population centers. But it is also a mistake because the root of it is a lack of understanding of the Israeli society. The Israeli society is strong. It strongly supports our operation in Iran. They all want to remove the double existential threat - the nuclear threat and the missile threat. Therefore, we will continue our operation and will not stop for even one minute before we will achieve our goals," he concluded.


Yuval Barnea

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-858440

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israeli Navy strikes Hezbollah terror site in Southern Lebanon - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

The site was being used to facilitate attacks against Israeli civilians.

 

An Israeli Navy vessel off the Israeli coast near Rosh Hanikra and the Lebanese border, May 4, 2021. Photo by Jamal Awad/Flash90.
An Israeli Navy vessel off the Israeli coast near Rosh Hanikra and the Lebanese border, May 4, 2021. Photo by Jamal Awad/Flash90.

 

An Israeli Navy vessel attacked infrastructure belonging to Hezbollah’s elite Radwan Force overnight Friday, targeting a site near Naqoura in southwestern Lebanon, the Israel Defense Forces said.

The operation was based in part on intelligence gathered during the interrogation several weeks ago of a captured Hezbollah operative, according to the military.

The site was being used to facilitate terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians and was a clear violation of understandings between Israel and Lebanon, the army said.

“The IDF will continue to act to eliminate all threats to the State of Israel,” the military said in a statement.

Earlier Friday, the IDF killed the commander of Hezbollah’s firepower array in the Litani sector, in the Chabriha area north of Tyre in southwestern Lebanon.

During the war with the Iranian-backed group, terrorist Mohammad Khadr al-Husseini “advanced numerous attacks toward Nahariya, Haifa and additional cities within Israeli territory,” the IDF said.

Al-Husseini was recently involved in efforts to rebuild Hezbollah’s artillery forces, the army added.

The Israeli Air Force on Friday conducted strikes on Hezbollah terror sites in Southern Lebanon, targeting rocket and missile launchers as well as weapons storage facilities.

According to the IDF, Hezbollah has been attempting to reestablish its presence and operations at these locations.

Earlier in the day, Defense Minister Israel Katz warned Hezbollah against joining Iran’s aerial war against the Jewish state.

“The Hezbollah Secretary-General [Naim Qassem] has not learned the lessons of his predecessors and is threatening to act against Israel at the direction of the Iranian dictator,” Katz tweeted, referring to past chiefs of the terrorist organization who were slain by the Israeli Air Force in September and October 2024.

“I advise the Lebanese proxy to be cautious and understand that Israel has lost patience with terrorists who threaten it. If there is terrorism—there will be no Hezbollah,” the minister wrote.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/israeli-navy-strikes-hezbollah-site-in-southern-lebanon/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter