Saturday, October 12, 2024

Betraying the Free World? - Majid Rafizadeh

 

​ by Majid Rafizadeh

Israel now finds itself fighting for its survival on multiple fronts. Thanks to the seeming lack of support from the Biden administration, Israel alone must fend off Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, the UN, much of Europe, the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court, professionally whipped-up Western university campuses and Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

 

  • The only country in the Middle East consistently pressured to make concessions "to avoid escalation" was the victim of October 7, Israel.

  • The rapacity of Iran's regime, which apparently feels free to launch attacks on U.S. troops at will -- especially after enjoying massive amounts of US generosity -- is breathtaking.

  • The Biden-Harris administration also infused the regime with "closer to $60 billion" -- which most likely funded its militias; its terrorist proxy organizations, such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis; its expansionist agenda as far away as Venezuela, and its oppressive domestic policies, to which, for decade, the U.S. has turned a blind eye. When widespread protests take place in Iran, citizens bravely rise up against the regime, only to be brutally crushed -- without so much as a glance from the U.S.

  • Iran, taking its cue from the Biden-Harris administration's road-siding of Israel, proceeded, not surprisingly, to escalate its campaign against it. If there are no serious consequences, why stop?

  • Israel now finds itself fighting for its survival on multiple fronts. Thanks to the seeming lack of support from the Biden administration, Israel alone must fend off Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, the UN, much of Europe, the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court, professionally whipped-up Western university campuses and Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

  • The dangerous reality that unfolds when a once-reliable ally is abandoned, is that enemies can become increasingly aggressive so long as no one stops them.

  • The message being sent is that allies will be left to fend for themselves, and enemies of freedom and democracy can go ahead and demolish them with impunity.

  • The Free World, once a beacon of security, is left vulnerable, isolated and under siege.

The rapacity of Iran's regime, which apparently feels free to launch attacks on U.S. troops at will -- especially after enjoying massive amounts of US generosity -- is breathtaking. The Free World, once a beacon of security, is left vulnerable, isolated and under siege. Pictured: Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian looks on from the dais, as a Fattah ballistic missile is displayed during at a military parade in Tehran on September 21, 2024. Fattah missiles were used in Iran's October 1, 2024 attack on Israel. (Photo by Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

An ally, a true friend, is someone upon whom you can depend in times of crisis, especially when under attack. Throughout history, alliances have been formed on the basis of mutual support and protection. Yet, one could strongly argue that no administration in the history of the United States has left its allies in such a vulnerable position as the Biden-Harris administration.

Iran, no longer content to merely act through its proxies, has taken direct and aggressive action against America's long-term ally, Israel, by attacking not only Israel but, through its proxies and militias, U.S. troops in the region more than 160 times just since October 2023 -- whenever it deems fit. Iran-backed Hamas terrorists murdered 43 Americans in their October 7, 2023 invasion of Israel.

The rapacity of Iran's regime, which apparently feels free to launch attacks on U.S. troops at will -- especially after enjoying massive amounts of US generosity -- is breathtaking.

This turn of events can be traced back to the very beginning of the Biden-Harris administration. The moment this administration took office, it made decisions that signaled weakness and appeasement, particularly toward the Taliban in Afghanistan, China and Iran. The Biden-Harris administration immediately removed Iran's proxy in Yemen, the Houthis, from the U.S. terrorist list, never fully to restore it there. The Houthis demonstrated their gratitude by attacking Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi.

The Biden-Harris administration also failed fully to enforce sanctions against Iran, instead allowing the regime to sell oil at the new high prices caused by President Joe Biden's crippling of U.S. oil exploration his first days in office. The Biden-Harris administration also infused the regime with "closer to $60 billion" -- which most likely funded its militias; its terrorist proxy organizations, such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis; its expansionist agenda as far away as Venezuela, and its oppressive domestic policies, to which, for decade, the U.S. has turned a blind eye. When widespread protests take place in Iran, citizens bravely rise up against the regime, only to be brutally crushed -- without so much as a glance from the U.S.

The Islamist regime of Iran not surprisingly interpreted the lack of any international response as a green light to pursue its regional ambitions without fear of U.S. retaliation. The tragic consequences of this became clear on October 7, 2023, when Hamas, a group openly supported by Qatar and Iran, launched an unprovoked, savage invasion of Israel, murdering 1,200 people, and kidnapping 241 more, including U.S. citizens.

Hamas committed many atrocities — acts which Human Rights Watch has labeled as crimes against humanity. Despite these brazen violations, the Biden-Harris administration's response was always disturbingly muted, offering little more than token condemnations. The only country in the Middle East consistently pressured to make concessions "to avoid escalation" was the victim of October 7, Israel.

The silence of the Biden-Harris administration, and its insistence on toothless "diplomacy," not only emboldened Iran but also encouraged it to activate its other proxies in the region against Israel. The Houthis, Hezbollah and Iraqi Shiite militia groups all ramped up their attacks on Israel, operating with the clear understanding that the U.S. would not intervene in any meaningful way. Israel, now under siege on multiple fronts, was left to fend for itself, with only wobbly and conditional support from its most powerful ally. Again, the Biden-Harris administration's cold shoulder to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu upon his visit to Washington in July, can only have been perceived by Iran as yet another green light to continue its aggression. Currently, the Red Sea is blocked, forcing vessels around the continent of Africa.

The Biden-Harris administration then went a step further and began publicly criticizing Israel's defensive actions by laying down conditions, red lines and withholding weapons. As Israel fought to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks, the administration's failure to provide necessary military or diplomatic support showed that not only would the U.S. not come to Israel's aid, but it would also question Israel's right to defend itself from terrorist groups and others backed by Iran.

Iran, taking its cue from the Biden-Harris administration's road-siding of Israel, proceeded, not surprisingly, to escalate its campaign against it. If there are no serious consequences, why stop? Emboldened by the absence of any significant pushback, Iran accelerated its long-held objective of wiping Israel off the map. On April 13, in an unprecedented move, Iran directly launched hundreds of its own missiles and attack drones at Israel -- a clear departure from previous engagements, where Iran operated through its proxy forces.

More disconcerting was the Biden-Harris administration's lack of response to these direct attacks. The regime in Tehran had not only launched an assault on Israel, but it had also committed an act of war against a key U.S. ally. Instead of rallying to Israel's defense, the administration took the incomprehensible step of demanding that Israel show restraint. The message was that the U.S. would not intervene, and that Israel was expected to hold back.

This, also not surprisingly, emboldened Iran to launch yet another direct attack on October 1, 2024— this time launching 180 ballistic missiles into Israel. If the Biden-Harris administration continues on its current path, these attacks are certain to escalate.

Israel now finds itself fighting for its survival on multiple fronts. Thanks to the seeming lack of support from the Biden administration, Israel alone must fend off Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, the UN, much of Europe, the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court, professionally whipped-up Western university campuses and Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The dangerous reality that unfolds when a once-reliable ally is abandoned, is that enemies can become increasingly aggressive so long as no one stops them.

The surge in attacks against Israel and the U.S. and the growing number of terrorist groups targeting them are direct consequences of weak and indecisive American leadership.

The message being sent is that allies will be left to fend for themselves, and enemies of freedom and democracy can go ahead and demolish them with impunity.

The Free World, once a beacon of security, is left vulnerable, isolated and under siege.


Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on Islam and US Foreign Policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21008/betraying-the-free-world

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Dozens of terrorists eliminated from the air and ground - Yoni Kempinski

 

​ by Yoni Kempinski

IAF strikes 280 terror targets, ground forces' operations continue in Gaza and Lebanon.

 

Swords_of_Iron

IDF forces are operating in a powerful and targeted fashion against Hezbollah terrorists and infrastructure in southern Lebanon.

The forces eliminated 50 terrorists in close-quarters combat, guided by the IAF. In air and artillery strikes, they destroyed over 200 Hezbollah terror targets.

The forces located underground tunnel shafts, dozens of terror infrastructure where weapons, rocket launchers, antitank missiles, and mortars were stored, many of which were aimed towards Israeli towns and the forces operating in the area.

Some of the weapons found Credit: IDF spokesperson
Some of the weapons found Credit: IDF spokesperson

The forces also located equipment, weapons, and ammunition belonging to Hezbollah terrorists.

The IAF struck in southern Lebanon, as well as deep within Lebanese territory, destroying dozens for rocket launchers and surface-to-surface missiles, most of which were used to fire towards Israeli territory over the weekend.

In addition, the IAF struck underground infrastructure on the Lebanon-Syria border, where Hezbollah weapons were stored.

Parallel to this, the IDF operated throughout Gaza, destroying terror infrastructure and eliminating dozens of terrorists.

In Jabaliya, forces from the IDF's 162nd Division eliminated over 20 terrorists in the past day, using tank fire and in close-quarters combat and IAF strikes. The forces have thus far eliminated around 200 terrorists in operations in the area.


Yoni Kempinski

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/397504

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Once home to Cronkite and Murrow, CBS News faces integrity crisis amid bias concerns, missteps - Paul Bond

 

​ by Paul Bond

A steady run of miscues and clashes in the era of Donald Trump and Middle East war has inflamed distrust to scandalous levels and left a cloud lingering over the entire CBS News franchise.

 

CBS News was once home to giants in the journalism industry.

Walter Cronkite known as “the most trusted man in America” broadcast from a bomber in WWII on a mission over Germany. Edward R. Murrow changed investigative reporting forever with a 1960 documentary that is still taught in journalism schools today. And Mike Wallace could stir fear in the hearts of interview subjects with a simple phone call from his "60 Minutes" office.

But today the news giant once heralded as the "Tiffany network" is blinking with crisis as the neutrality of its anchors is challenged and the integrity of editing at its most famous news magazine has been questioned.

Many believe the storm of credibility was born two decades ago when then-Anchor Dan Rather's supposed scoop on George W. Bush's Vietnam war service factually crumbled, a miscue so embarrassing it sunk the 60 Minutes II franchise for good.

But a steady run of miscues and clashes in the era of Donald Trump and Middle East war has only inflamed the distrust at least among conservatives to scandalous levels and left a cloud lingering over the entire CBS News franchise.

The most recent accusations of liberal bias exploded when CBS announced ahead of the vice presidential debate between Republican Sen. JD Vance and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic nominee, that its moderators would not “fact-check” the candidates’ answers. Instead, CBS moderators Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan pulled a fast one, and several times argued with him about assertions. At one point when Vance answered their questions pushing back, they interrupted him and cut his mic off.

In another event, The Free Press reported that a memo from Mark Memmott,  the network’s director of standards and practices, told CBS reporters not to refer to Jerusalem as being in Israel, though it is the nation’s capital city and home to the U.S. embassy.

But perhaps the most politically incendiary incident, and the one that has Trump calling for CBS to lose its broadcast license, involved "60 Minutes" on Monday, when the network’s flagship news show was caught subbing one rambling answer from Vice President Kamala Harris for a more coherent one.

"60 Minutes is a major part of the News Organization of CBS, which has just created the Greatest Fraud in Broadcast History,” Trump posted on social media after the Monday night show aired. “CBS should lose its license, and it should be bid out to the Highest Bidder, as should all other Broadcast Licenses, because they are just as corrupt as CBS — and maybe even WORSE!”

The Harris interview was conducted by Bill Whitaker at the Naval Observatory over the weekend and an edited portion aired on "Face the Nation," also a CBS show.

When Whittaker asked about U.S. diplomacy in Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s reaction to the Biden administration’s desire to scale down the war against Hamas, Harris responded with: “Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region.”

But when the question aired later on "60 Minutes," the response by Harris was different.  “We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end,” the presidential nominee said.

In an additional social-media post by Trump, he said: “With me, 60 Minutes does the exact opposite! They take everything I say, realize how totally BRILLIANT it is, and take it out. So, with Kamala they add, with ‘TRUMP’ they delete. Like the Democrat Party, THEY ARE A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY!”

While progressive pundits quickly came to the defense of CBS, saying that edits for the sake of time and “concision” are common in news media, Trump’s assertion that broadcast licenses ought to be in play due to media bias is gaining traction among conservatives.

“I want to hold these people responsible. We’re giving them FCC licenses. They don’t deserve them,” Arizona senatorial candidate Kari Lake said Thursday on the "Just the News, No Noise," TV show with host John Solomon. Broadcast licenses are considered a shared "public common" after the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, an obscenity case, that the federal government had jurisdiction to manage the airwaves.

Similarly, former Congressman Doug Collins, who has served as legal counsel for Trump, told co-host Amanda Head that some of Trump’s lawyers will be filing an FEC complaint claiming that CBS has been making in-kind political contributions to the Harris-Walz campaign. About the notion that broadcast licenses should be up for bidding anew, Collins said: “If it causes a conversation in the halls of New York, and panic, maybe I’m all for it.”

Michael Whatley, the chair of the Republican National Committee, called the behavior of CBS “appalling” during the "John Solomon Reports" podcast Thursday.

“CBS and 60 Minutes are lying to the American people about what was said and what was done in that interview,” Whatley said. “This is just the latest example that the media is absolutely not going to play it straight.”

Noting the rise of alternative media and falling ratings for broadcast news shows, he added: “There is a reckoning that is taking place with the mainstream, traditional media outlets that’s long overdue.”

Falling ratings are a long-term problem and has caused layoffs – and O’Donnell took a pay cut in 2022 to $3.8 million annually, down from $8 million previously – but as recently as four years ago the vice presidential debate between Harris and then-Vice President Mike Pence, scored 25 percent more viewers than did last month’s Vance-Walz debate.

Another problem faced by CBS is its decision in February to lay off senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge after she reported stories that irritated progressive activists, including some involving the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, has launched an investigation into Herridge’s termination.

Herridge went on to say that when she interviewed then-President Trump in 2020, CBS News posted the entire interview transcript. And on Wednesday, Herridge weighed in on the "60 Minutes" fiasco, posting on the X social-media platform: “As Trump campaign calls on @60Minutes to release ‘full, unedited transcript’ of Kamala Harris interview … there is precedent.” The New York Post quoted unnamed sources as saying that "Herridge had pushed for the publication of her full transcript at the time and that it was a “special case.”

“It’s about transparency and standing behind the integrity of the final edit,” Herridge posted Wednesday.

CBS News, which did not respond to a request from Just the News for comment, has posted a bowdlerized transcript of the "60 Minutes" interview with Harris, though it does not contain the "word salad" — as conservatives have called it — response to the Netanyahu question that was aired on "Face the Nation." 

CBS News ran into another issue recently, as well, this time simultaneously disturbing both sides of the political spectrum. During a "CBS Mornings" interview with pro-Palestine activist Ta-Nehisi Coates, host Gayle King reportedly supplied him questions beforehand, causing the right to complain, while the other host, Tony Dokoupil, was accused of a pro-Israel bias, angering the left. Employees at CBS were reportedly so upset at Dokoupil's committing an act of journalism that the network planned – and then cancelled after public humiliation – a group therapy session with a trauma specialist.

In sharp contrast to what CBS editorial leadership told staff on Monday, Shari Redstone, the chair of CBS parent company Paramount Global said that she did not believe Dokoupil had violated the network’s editorial standards when he grilled Coates over the contents of his new book, calling the network's response a "bad mistake."

 
Paul Bond is a veteran journalist. You can follow him on X @WriterPaulBond.

Source: https://justthenews.com/tv/once-walter-cronkites-kingdom-cbs-news-faces-integrity-crisis-amid-missteps

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Expanding censorship European Style –– arrests, dire warning 'Face the Consequences' - Sharyl Attkisson

 

​ by Sharyl Attkisson

In August, the government of the United Kingdom issued an ominous “Think before you post” statement, saying social media posts that some consider hateful are harmful could get you arrested.

 

It’s not just happening in the U.S. Europe is also seeing shocking battles over censorship of speech.

In August, the government of the United Kingdom issued an ominous “Think before you post” statement, saying social media posts that some consider hateful are harmful could get you arrested. 

“Remind those close to you to share responsibly or face the consequences,” the government warned. 

A new documentary titled “We Will Not Be Silenced” tells the true story of censorship of a UK-based podcast titled "London Real." Brian Rose hosts the podcast and he tells me what happened when a widely-viewed episode was deleted and banned by YouTube. 

Sharyl Attkisson: What was the episode about?

Rose: It was a conversation about Covid, asking questions about masks and distancing, and even talking about the "V" word – the vaccine. We were one of the very early people to be broadcast and then censored by YouTube.

Sharyl Attkisson: So those were rational questions to explore. And we later found a lot of people who were raising those questions were on the right track, whereas the government was on the wrong track. But you had an immediate backlash?

Brian Rose: Immediate. ...That was the first time I had ever heard or felt censorship. I thought it happened to the weirdos, until it happens to you. And my immediate reaction was to re-upload the video and to fight back.

Sharyl Attkisson: After that happened to you, what did you see happening on a broader scale?

Brian Rose: Well, it was weird, because I was subsequently de-platformed from Dropbox, LinkedIn, PayPal, all simultaneously. And when I started asking questions, you know, I almost felt silly to even imply there might be some type of coordination because it just didn't seem possible at the time ... We ended up having to create our own streaming platform ... just to prove that we could do it in the face of censorship by these trillion-dollar tech platforms.

Rose is, of course, far from the only one feeling the heavy hand of censorship. Elsewhere in England, police are arresting people in their own homes for posting social media content that allegedly hurts feelings or commits other supposed violations.

In one instance, a woman was repeatedly questioned by police and arrested for thinking silently about prayers in her head while in an exclusion zone outside an abortion clinic. 

"Are you praying?” asks a police officer while a bystander records the encounter.

"I might be praying in my head,” replies the woman, who is then told by police that she’s not allowed to silently think certain prohibited thoughts.

The woman took her case to court and recently won a $17,000 settlement and an apology from police after the multiple cases of harassment.

Rose's documentary on censorship can be seen on X, formerly Twitter, at the London Real TV account.

For the full report, watch “Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson” on Sundays. Attkisson is the NYT bestselling author of the new book, “Follow the $cience: How Big Pharma Misleads, Obscures, and Prevails."

 
Sharyl Attkisson

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/security/expanding-censorship-european-style

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

American Jews failed themselves and their children after Oct. 7 - Jonathan S. Tobin

 

​ by Jonathan S. Tobin

That only a few brave souls have stood up to antisemitic mobs tells us that something is very, very wrong. Are we capable of uniting and fighting back against anti-Zionists?

 

Jewish and pro-Israel supporters attend a vigil at Union Square in New York City to mark the one-year anniversary of the Hamas terrorist attacks in southern Israel, Oct. 7, 2024. Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images.
Jewish and pro-Israel supporters attend a vigil at Union Square in New York City to mark the one-year anniversary of the Hamas terrorist attacks in southern Israel, Oct. 7, 2024. Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images.

On Yom Kippur, there will, as there is every year, be a lot of collective breast-beating in the American Jewish community for all that we’ve done wrong. And, then, as usual, we generally go back to doing many of the same things as soon as the fast is broken and our stomachs full. That this will happen is human nature and no different from innumerable times in the past when we have made collective promises.

But this past year was different. So is the one that is about to unfold. As such, our willingness simply to move on from our failures is insufficient.

In the aftermath of the Oct. 7 massacre by Hamas and Palestinian terrorists in southern Israel, Jews in the United States witnessed an unprecedented surge in antisemitism. Mobs on the streets of major cities, and especially on the campuses of universities, made manifest the new intellectual and cultural orthodoxy in which woke ideology deems Jews and Israelis to be “white” oppressors who must be resisted “by any means necessary,” as goes the popular phrase on the political left.

Students were harassed and shunned if they weren’t willing to renounce their communal affiliations or join those chanting “from the river to the sea” and “globalize the intifada”—in effect, assenting to the idea of the genocide of the Jews of Israel. A generation of students and professors who had come to believe that “microaggressions” in which alleged slights towards minorities should be treated as the moral equivalent of violent crimes took part in activities whose only real purpose was to support those engaged in a campaign of the murder of Jews and the destruction of the one Jewish state on the planet.

Jews show fear and not outrage

Just as tragic is the fact that the reaction from most American Jews was shock and fear, rather than outrage and a willingness to confront those seeking to intimidate them.

While some believed that the new academic year would be different, what we’ve already seen, especially on the one-year anniversary of Oct. 7, was more of the same. The most memorable images from that day were not of ceremonies mourning for those lost in the Palestinian assault on Israeli communities but of lone Jewish students in places like Columbia University trying to stand their ground against mobs who—whether violating rules that would have forbidden their conduct or not—were brazenly chanting support for the murderous goals of Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists. Equally memorable were the images of pro-Hamas mobs assaulting a single man—a leader of a Democratic Party pro-Israel group—for having the temerity to hold up an Israeli flag in the face of their curses, physical harassment and anti-Jewish threats.

Why has none of this provoked mass outrage from American Jewry? Why have there been no comparable pro-Israel marches or organized counter-demonstrations that would attempt to show the antisemites that they—and not the Jews—were the isolated extremist minority?

The answer lies mostly in the fact that many American Jews have been happily swimming in the same cultural sea of hostility towards Zionism, and until recently, never suspected that its venom could drown them. They were sure that the hostility to the canon of Western civilization inherent in the myths of critical race theory and intersectionality had absolutely nothing to do with them. Their willingness to endorse the Black Lives Matter movement in 2020, despite its close ties to antisemitism—along with their liberal-leaning and cultural views as well as fealty to the woke catechism of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)—should have exempted them from any connection to the oppressor class that these toxic theories singled out for opprobrium.

But they were wrong about all of that. As much as many on the Jewish left considered concerns about these issues to be indications of racism or right-wing extremism on the part of those who raised them, it was, of course, the Jews who were the first and easiest targets for the woke left.

It’s true that most Jewish institutions rallied behind Israel in the first weeks after Oct. 7 and then helped organize a mass pro-Israel rally in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 14, 2023. But the facade of unity soon faded.

Why?

In no small measure, the problem was politics.

Support for Israel after the terror attacks became an issue that impacted President Joe Biden’s re-election campaign. Beset by the Democratic Party’s anti-Israel activist left-wing base, the president soon wavered on his position and spent the next year talking out of both sides of his mouth on the topic. Pressing him or Vice President Kamala Harris (who replaced him on the Democratic ticket in a party establishment coup three months before the election due to Biden’s incapacities) to resist the pro-Hamas and antisemitic activists within his own party and even administration was something many pro-Israel Democrats were reluctant to do. That’s because they viewed defeating his opponent—former President Donald Trump—to be a higher priority, despite the latter’s historic support for the Jewish state.

As much as they resented and feared the way how the mobs on campuses were targeting Jewish students, the notion of helping organize more counter-protests seemed beyond their capabilities and something they were inclined to avoid. The instincts of liberal Jewish Americans were very much in sync with those who urged Jews to “shelter in place” or to avoid confrontations with supporters of Hamas.

As a result, the message sent to the hard left organizing these outrages was that the Jews were as isolated and weak as they imagined. The message from the broader cultural milieu only reinforced the belief on the part of the anti-Zionists that they had the wind at their backs.

The fact that the week of the Oct. 7 anniversary was marked by the celebration of a new book by a literary celebrity calling for Israel’s destruction was no accident.

Celebrated African-American author Ta-Nehisi Coates was feted throughout the mainstream media for writing an ignorant book libeling Israel as a new version of the “Jim Crow” American South based on a 10-day tour, his first trip to the region. The one reporter from a mainstream outlet that challenged him was publicly shamed by his organization for doing so. Meanwhile, other outlets became his shameless collaborators, such as The New York Times, which provided him with new platforms from which to spew his libels against the Jews and his justifications for the atrocities of Oct. 7, and even immoral speculations about whether he would have the personal strength to have joined in the orgy of mass murder, rape, torture, kidnapping and wanton destruction carried out by the Palestinians.

While Coates’s disturbing speculations are of little importance, the fact that they are trumpeted by the very outlets that many liberal Jews still venerate is deeply troubling.

All of this requires a clear course correction on the part of American Jewish institutions, though it’s likely that such an effort is something that most national legacy groups, like the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee, are unlikely to accomplish.

Stand with other pro-Israel supporters

What’s needed most now is a new commitment to put aside partisanship or any inclination to rerun the same sterile debates about Israel that American Jews have been engaging in for decades. Instead of pretending that the possibility of liberals losing power in Washington will bring on a new reign of fascism or Nazism, the majority of the community must wake up to the reality that the mobs on campuses and in the streets—and more importantly, what they represent in terms of a new woke cultural orthodoxy that rules our educational system, cultural institutions and even the corporate world—is very much a clear and present danger to Jewish life in this country.

In the coming months, they must find the courage to put aside their partisan differences and inclinations, and unite to fight the anti-Zionists and antisemites, even if they thought of these groups as allies in the past. And they must do so in as loud and public a manner as possible. They must also be willing to call upon non-Jewish supporters of Israel, including evangelical Christians who have stood by Israel through this difficult year, even if their political opinions don’t always mesh with their own. They must act to send the message that Jew-haters are the ones who should be shamed and marginalized. And they must stop apologizing for Israel and openly support the Jewish state’s efforts to defend its borders and defeat its enemies.

Jews and Israel aren’t alone. But American Jews are isolating themselves with a communal consensus that sometimes seems to be based on false priorities and sheer cowardice. If they don’t change their ways, they will have more to account for next Yom Kippur.


Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of JNS (Jewish News Syndicate). Follow him @jonathans_tobin.

Source: https://www.jns.org/american-jews-failed-themselves-and-their-children-after-oct-7/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Lebanese army, UNIFIL must ‘step up,’ Israeli envoy says - Mike Wagenheim

 

​ by Mike Wagenheim

In an emergency U.N. Security Council session, ambassador Danny Danon said in Arabic that “the land of Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not the Iranians.”

 

Robert Wood, deputy permanent U.S. representative to the United Nations, addresses the 51st plenary meeting of the General Assembly on Jan. 9, 2024. Credit: Manuel Elías/U.N. Photo.
Robert Wood, deputy permanent U.S. representative to the United Nations, addresses the 51st plenary meeting of the General Assembly on Jan. 9, 2024. Credit: Manuel Elías/U.N. Photo.

The Biden administration favors a “diplomatic solution” to the conflict on Israel’s northern border, Robert Wood, the deputy U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said at an emergency session of the U.N. Security Council.

Wood did not call for a ceasefire in his remarks on Thursday during the session on increased hostilities between Israel and the Hezbollah terror group, which controls Southern Lebanon.

“The solution to this crisis is not a weaker Lebanon,” Wood said. “It’s a strong and truly sovereign Lebanon, protected by a legitimate security force, embodied in the Lebanese Armed Forces.”

Lebanon’s government and its army are supposed to enforce Security Council Resolution 1701, which was designed 18 years ago to bring permanent peace to the country after the 2006 Lebanon War. The resolution calls for disarming Hezbollah, an Iranian proxy, and restoring full Lebanese sovereignty in the south.

Despite the resolution being in effect for 18 years, Hezbollah has flourished.

The terror group has fired some 10,000 rockets at the Jewish state since Oct. 8, the day after Hamas’s terror attack on southern Israel. Hezbollah has proclaimed solidarity with Hamas. Both are U.S.-designated terror groups.

Israel has degraded Hezbollah’s capabilities severely over the past month, including sabotaging and donating pagers and other communications equipment belonging to Hezbollah terrorists en masse. “As an act of spy craft, it is without parallel, one of the most successful and inventive penetrations of an enemy by an intelligence service in recent history,” The Washington Post reported.

The Jewish state has also eliminated the terror group’s entire leadership structure.

The Israel Defense Forces requested earlier this week that troops from the U.N.’s Israel-Lebanon peacekeeping mission, UNIFIL, relocate out of certain areas near the border to allow the IDF to operate during its ground incursions in Lebanon without putting UNIFIL troops in harm’s way.

The U.N. force, which has regularly heeded Hezbollah’s demands to stay out of certain areas that the mission is mandated to patrol and investigate, for fear of drawing the terror group’s ire, opted not to listen to Israel’s request.

Nicolas de Rivière, the French U.N. ambassador, told the Security Council on Thursday that Paris still backs a three-week ceasefire that it and Washinton proposed last month.

Wood told the global body that the Biden administration is working toward a diplomatic solution without mentioning a ceasefire.

“Colleagues, the United States has been clear: a diplomatic solution between Israel and Lebanon along the Blue Line is the only path to restore lasting calm and allow residents in both Lebanon and Israel to return safely to their homes,” he said.

“Even as Israel has a right to protect its citizens from Hezbollah, which has fired thousands of missiles and rockets into Israel over the past year alone, it needs to minimize harm to civilians, particularly in the densely populated areas of Beirut,” he added.

Biden administration officials have suggested publicly that they support the IDF’s efforts to further degrade Hezbollah, after initial anger following Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s refusal to endorse a ceasefire and instead order the assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, then the terror group’s secretary-general.

Danny Danon
Danny Danon, Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, briefs reporters ahead of the Security Council meeting on the situation in the Middle East on Oct. 9, 2024. Credit: Mark Garten/U.N. Photo.

Danny Danon, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, stated on Thursday that Israel is “fulfilling our obligations to ensure” the enforcement of Security Council resolutions related to Israeli-Lebanese peace.

“The council must support us in our efforts,” he said.

Speaking in Arabic to the Lebanese people, Danon said that “the land of Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not the Iranians.”

The Israeli envoy implored the Lebanese army and UNIFIL to “step up” and fulfill their duties.

“The Lebanese people have been held hostage by an Iran-backed terror organization,” Danon told the council. “Hezbollah has established a terrorist state within a failed state.”


Mike Wagenheim

Source: https://www.jns.org/lebanese-army-unifil-must-step-up-israeli-envoy-says/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

DOJ sues Virginia over removing non-citizens from voter rolls ahead of November election - Natalia Mittelstadt

 

​ by Natalia Mittelstadt

"Virginians - and Americans - will see this for exactly what it is: a desperate attempt to attack the legitimacy of the elections in the Commonwealth, the very crucible of American Democracy," Gov. Glenn Youngkin said.

 

The Department of Justice has sued Virginia over removing non-citizens from its voter rolls ahead of the November election.

The DOJ announced the suit Friday against the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Virginia State Board of Elections, and the Virginia Commissioner of Elections for allegedly violating the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

The NVRA prevents states from using systematic programs to remove ineligible voters from voter rolls within 90 days of a federal election, according to the DOJ.

“As the National Voter Registration Act mandates, officials across the country should take heed of the law’s crystal clear and unequivocal restrictions on systematic list maintenance efforts that fall within 90 days of an election,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke said in a statement.

“By cancelling voter registrations within 90 days of Election Day, Virginia places qualified voters in jeopardy of being removed from the rolls and creates the risk of confusion for the electorate. Congress adopted the National Voter Registration Act’s quiet period restriction to prevent error-prone, eleventh hour efforts that all too often disenfranchise qualified voters," she added. "The right to vote is the cornerstone of our democracy and the Justice Department will continue to ensure that the rights of qualified voters are protected."

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) slammed the DOJ over the litigation.

"With less than 30 days until the election, the Biden-Harris Department of Justice is filing an unprecedented lawsuit against me and the Commonwealth of Virginia, for appropriately enforcing a 2006 law signed by Democrat Tim Kaine that requires Virginia to remove noncitizens from the voter rolls - a process that starts with someone declaring themselves a non-citizen and then registering to vote," Youngkin said in a statement Friday.

"Virginians - and Americans - will see this for exactly what it is: a desperate attempt to attack the legitimacy of the elections in the Commonwealth, the very crucible of American Democracy. With the support of our Attorney General, we will defend these commonsense steps, that we are legally required to take, with every resource available to us. Virginia’s election will be secure and fair, and I will not stand idly by as this politically motivated action tries to interfere in our elections, period."

The DOJ lawsuit come two weeks after the department sued Alabama for removing ineligible voters from its voter rolls.


Natalia Mittelstadt

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/doj-sues-virginia-over-removing-non-citizens-voter-rolls-ahead-november

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Energy nonprofit sues, accusing federal agencies of ‘infuriating’ effort to withhold information - Kevin Killough

 

​ by Kevin Killough

The group has filed 14 lawsuits related to the Biden-Harris' administration's non-compliance with Freedom of Information requests, involving several different agencies related to climate and energy.

 

Power the Future, an energy advocacy and education nonprofit, has for months attempted to get the names of the top staffers within the office of the Special Envoy for Climate (SPEC), which was headed by John Kerry at the time their original Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests were filed.

The request was just one in a long string of FOIA requests that the group says have been ignored, forcing them to file multiple lawsuits. When they file lawsuits to obtain the information they seek, the federal government continues a string of consistent stonewalling efforts, according to the complaints.

In February, Power the Future filed a lawsuit against the State Department for failing to disclose the names of its staffers. After eight months of failing to comply with the information requests, first by the State Department and then by the Department of Justice, the group has now filed a lawsuit against the DOJ.

Kerry’s office, which is now headed by John Podesta, has repeatedly resisted attempts to obtain the name of its staff. After FOIA requests by the Boston Herald yielded heavily redacted documents hiding the names and titles of the staff employed in the SPEC office, the House Oversight Committee launched an investigation in February seeking an unredacted list.

Delay tactics

At the same time, Power the Future filed requests for the same information and received the redacted list. The complaint filed last week details how the State Department wouldn’t comply with the requests and then, when Power The Future filed suit, the DOJ engaged in a lengthy series of delay tactics.

“It’s absolutely infuriating,” Daniel Turner, executive director of Power the Future, told Just the News.

The group has filed 14 lawsuits related to non-compliance with FOIA requests, involving several different agencies related to climate and energy. Turner said the basic pattern is the agency responds by saying it’s not disclosing the information. Then the agency will claim it needs 60 days. After 60 days, it requests another 60 days.

The latest 60-day delay will mean the records Power the Future seeks won’t be released until after the election.

“Well now you're just playing games. Now you're making it very clear you do not want any of this information released before the November election. The question is why,” Turner said.

"Pattern and practice" across federal agencies

The lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, is a “pattern and practice” suit. When federal agencies are sued regarding FOIA requests, the DOJ acts as the attorney for the agency. When Power the Future sued and the DOJ got involved, Turner said, they received the same stonewalling treatment from the DOJ.

“That's why this lawsuit is against the DOJ, because they are the ones who clearly are coordinating across agencies — block, block, block — we are not releasing this information, and that's why it's a ‘pattern and practice’ lawsuit,” Turner explained.

Power the Future had a similar experience when attempting to get “chat” logs and text messages of Dan Utech, chief of staff for the EPA. It filed a separate “pattern and practice” lawsuit regarding those unfulfilled requests.

Larry Behrens, communications director for Power the Future, told Just the News that one of the tactics the agency would use is to wait until a 30-day deadline to respond. The attorneys would then show up to court to ask for an extension and tell the judge that they had only been assigned the case the day before, which is outlined in the complaint.

“So the agency would wait, allegedly, to the very end of their deadline to assign an attorney and then use that as an excuse for more time to respond,” Behrens said.

Behrens said it’s possible that the attorneys were handed the case the day before, and they’re not accusing the individual attorneys of doing anything improper. The pattern and practice accusations are against the agencies for waiting until the last day to ask attorneys to request an extension in order to further delay fulfilling the FOIA requests.

“There is clearly someone coordinating this, and that's why this lawsuit is trying to determine what the coordinating factors are and who's making these decisions,” Turner said.

Turner points out that Power the Future isn’t requesting any sensitive information. They are not seeking military secrets, private or personal information of individuals or material related to ongoing law enforcement investigations, which are statutorily exempt from FOIA laws.

“We're not looking for anyone to violate or put the nation at risk. This is a climate office that is supposed to ostensibly find creative solutions to tackle the climate crisis. What could possibly be so secretive that the American people don't have a right to know not just what they're doing, but who they're meeting with, what their budget is and how they chose their personnel?” Turner said.

The Department of Justice did not respond to requests for comment.

Kerry joins green investing firm

This week, Kerry joined billionaire investor Tom Steyer's green-energy private-equity investing firm. He will be co-executive chairman of Galvanize Climate Solutions, co-founded by Steyer, according to a statement Monday.

Steyer, who made a reported $3.5 million in political contributions in the 2022 election cycle, writes on his LinkedIn page: "Sec. Kerry is joining Galvanize Climate Solutions because he shares the firm’s conviction that climate is good business and delivers something that the market demands - solutions, products, and services that are cheaper, better, and faster than those they replace."

Kerry himself has faced criticism for reportedly owning several high-priced energy guzzling homes, yachts and a Gulfstream private jet, although his defenders insist that because most of those assets are in his wife's name, they "don't count."


Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/pro-energy-nonprofit-sues-accusing-federal-agencies-infuriating-effort

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Islamization of Bangladesh by Muhammad Yunus - Backed by Obama, Soros, Clintons - Keya Mukherjee

 

​ by Keya Mukherjee

Since the ouster of former leader Hasina, orchestrated attacks on Hindus have been taking place, including murder, rape, abduction and arson targeting Hindu homes, businesses and temples, in addition to coerced religious conversions.

 

  • Meanwhile, it appears as if Yunus is waiting for the result of the November 5 presidential election in the US. A victory by Kamala Harris could pave the way for him to remain in power indefinitely and complete the process of Islamizing Bangladesh.

  • "New Delhi is getting increasingly concerned that banned militant outfits like Jamaat-e-Islami and even radical organisations like Hizb ut Tahrir may soon enter mainstream politics in Bangladesh, thereby posing security challenges not just for India but for the entire South Asian region..." – The Anandabazar Patrika, September 14, 2024.

  • Yunus is already under pressure to lift the ban imposed on Hizb ut Tahrir by Sheikh Hasina's previous government in 2009.

  • "Delighted to see an old friend of my father and the foundation, Nobel Prize winner @professormuhammadyunus, interim leader of Bangladesh, who stepped in to lead Bangladesh towards a peaceful future based on equity and fairness." — Alexander Soros, Instagram, October 2, 2024.

Bangladesh, a country being promptly being shifted towards Talibanization under Muhammad Yunus -- openly backed by Barack Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Soros and the U.S. Democratic Party -- is experiencing a total nightmare. Pictured: Yunus at a press conference in Dhaka on October 4, 2024. (Photo by Munir Uz Zaman/AFP via Getty Images)

Bangladesh, a country being promptly shifted towards Talibanization under Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus -- openly backed by Barack Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Soros and the U.S. Democratic Party -- is experiencing a total nightmare.

Bangladesh's former leader, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, was forced to flee on August 5, following a coup d'état. Now, Hindus in Bangladesh, who constitute a small minority of the population, are facing repeated threats and intimidation from Yunus's men – a thuggish gang of Islamists and jihadists from hardline Islamist groups such as Hizbut Tahrir and Hefazat-e-Islam. To the utter surprise of Hindus, Yunus's regime has asked them, during Muslim prayer times, to avoid playing musical instruments and refrain from activities that are a part of the Hindu Durga Puja festival celebrations, thereby interrupting the holiday.

Since the ouster of Hasina, orchestrated attacks on Hindus have been taking place, including murder, rape, abduction and arson targeting Hindu homes, businesses and temples, in addition to coerced religious conversions. According to the New Indian Express:

"... Yunus, has said the issue of attacks on minority Hindus in his country is 'exaggerated' and questioned the manner in which India projected it.

"In an interview with PTI at his official residence here, Yunus said the attacks on minorities in Bangladesh are more political than communal.

"He suggested that the attacks were not communal, but a fallout of a political upheaval as there is a perception that most Hindus supported the now-deposed Awami League regime."

Islamist followers of Yunus regime have also been targeting Hindus in the civil service and forcing them to resign. According to India Today:

"A letter from the Bangladesh President's office to various ministries and departments requesting details of Hindu officials holding posts such as secretaries and joint secretaries led to panic.

"However, sources said a clerical error caused the confusion..."

Also, as reported by The Times of India, Hindus are alleging that they have received multiple threatening calls from Islamists demanding protection money or to face death.

Since August 5, Hindus in Bangladesh, fearing persecution, have been trying to flee.

Yunus has been one of the major donors to Clinton Foundation. According to a cable leaked by Wikileaks, 2007, Hillary Clinton made frantic bids and exerted pressure on the Bangladeshi Army to make her friend Yunus head of the then military-backed interim government.

According to Bloomberg, militants gaining strength after the tumultuous change in government would create security concerns across Asia.

Meanwhile, a large segment of students, led by Yunus, are flexing their muscles -- chanting jihadist slogans and openly displaying Islamic State flags on various college and university campuses. Commenting on this situation, Kolkata's oldest Bengali daily, The Anandabazar Patrika, reported:

"New Delhi is getting increasingly concerned that banned militant outfits like Jamaat-e-Islami and even radical organisations like Hizb ut Tahrir may soon enter mainstream politics in Bangladesh, thereby posing security challenges not just for India but for the entire South Asian region..."

Yunus is already under pressure to lift the ban imposed on Hizb ut Tahrir by Hasina's previous government in 2009. Analysts fear that Bangladesh may be moving towards becoming another Pakistan. Today, the military-picked interim civilian-led regime is struggling to restore the rule of law and revive an economy pummeled by large-scale mob violence and destruction that preceded and followed Hasina's overthrow in the uprising. Her loss of support from the military, which has traditionally been a key player in Bangladesh politics, proved decisive.

Although it was anticipated that Yunus would hold an election by December this year and hand over power to an elected government, Bangladesh Army chief General Waker-uz-Zaman in an interview with Reuters said the country should return to electoral democracy within one-and-a-half years; that he will support the interim government in carrying out the reforms, and that the Bangladesh Army will be "professional" and stay away from politics.

Meanwhile, it appears as if Yunus is waiting for the result of the November 5 presidential election in the US. A victory by Kamala Harris could pave the way for him to remain in power indefinitely and complete the process of Islamizing Bangladesh.

This speculation became stronger when during his recent visit to the US to attend the UN General Assembly, Yunus attended an event organized by the Clinton Global Initiative, and met several leaders of the Democratic Party as well as Alexander Soros. After meeting with Yunus, Soros posted on Instagram:

"Delighted to see an old friend of my father and the foundation, Nobel Prize winner @professormuhammadyunus, interim leader of Bangladesh, who stepped in to lead Bangladesh towards a peaceful future based on equity and fairness."


Keya Mukherjee is a freelance journalist specializing in Asian and global affairs.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21007/islamization-of-bangladesh

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

‘Our Democracy’ Marks ‘Their Duplicity’ - Thaddeus G. McCotter

 

​ by Thaddeus G. McCotter

As they do, the left reveals how their clamor and connivance for “Our Democracy” merely marks “Their Duplicity.”

 

 

Presently, we are embroiled in a presidential campaign. It is the apex of political messaging, as both parties and their well-heeled allies bombard the electorate with varying promises, claims, smears, and deceits.

One of the Democrats’ and their “Never Trump” cohorts’ favorite narratives is that the GOP candidate, former president Trump, is divisive and that he must be defeated to allow the Democrat nominee, Vice President Harris, to unite the nation. To believe this, one must concur with the Democrats and Never Trumpers on two counts: first, Mr. Trump, his MAGA supporters, and the GOP are divisive; and, second, Ms. Harris and the Democrats are not divisive but rather a unifying political force.

For purposes of this piece, let us stipulate Mr. Trump and his MAGA and GOP supporters are “divisive,” if only for the simple reason they dissent from the Democrats radical, extreme, and dangerous agenda; and, moreover, unapologetically champion the populist and conservative principles and policies they believe will promote and protect the liberty, prosperity, and security of our free republic.

Nonetheless, even with this stipulation, it is impossible for an objective mind to conclude Ms. Harris and her Democrat supporters are a unifying force within our deeply divided nation. The Democrats are, by design, a divisive party that premises its campaigns and policies upon identity politics—race, gender, class, etc.; and, at root, offers the electorate varying and increasing levels of paranoia and dependence upon the Leviathan—i.e., the administrative state, which is controlled by their cohorts who are ensconced within the unaccountable and remunerative sinecures housed in the bowels of the federal bureaucracy.

Consider the Democrats’ demanding the citizenry’s obeisance to their DIE (“diversity, inclusivity, and equity”) secular religion, which one is compelled to believe above all else.

The left defines “diversity” with external traits, not internal thoughts. In sum, this inherently divides the entire population by physical traits and social castes into “manageable” political blocs—the “Balkanization” of the American electorate. Their root fallacy is that how you look determines how you think. The left purports it is using one’s “lived experience” to make this differentiation, but this experience is presumed to have occurred (even if it has not) based on your external appearance and/or economic status. Such a prejudicial pronouncement upon one’s fellow citizens is patronizing, demeaning, and—in its most heinous manifestations—racist. (Why do you think progressives have expended so much energy trying to redefine and dilute the definition of “racism” to weaponize it against, not racists, but non-leftists?)

Once an individual has been pigeonholed into one of the Democrats’ diversity classifications and it is marked with its “social credit” connotations, these leftist social engineers will cajole and coerce them into their “inclusive” collective, wherein what matters is not individual rights but one’s allegiance to the left’s ideological dictates. True, some individual rights and licenses are granted by the state, but they are in addition to our unalienable, God-given rights we already possess and that cannot be infringed by the state. The left disagrees, believing the state is the ultimate grantor of rights and that “Our Democracy” must not be impaired by the antiquated concept of unalienable, God-given constitutional rights. Consequently, the left believes a citizen’s rights are not God-given but rather government-given. As such, they constitute not unalienable rights; they are arbitrary and conditional licenses. This subordinates the citizens’ sovereignty to the supremacy of the state.

As the Supreme State doles its licenses, it will decide what is “equitable.” This is merely another of the left’s euphemisms for socialism—as is Ms. Harris’s “Opportunity Society.” But once citizens have been civically and economically diminished by the Democrats’ delineating and dividing them on basis of physical traits and economic status and by being subsumed into a leftist collective, Americans will have little recourse to dissent, let alone rid themselves of such a repressive, autocratic socialist regime.

Why would people subject themselves to this DIE agenda? This is where the left’s paranoia pimping enters stage left. The Democrats aver that they and their administrative state are needed to protect citizens from sundry conspiracies out to block Americans’ pursuit of happiness—or worse. Hence, the Greek chorus of Democrats wailing about “Systemic Racism,” “The Patriarchy,” “Threats to Democracy,” and so forth. This is literally a party that smears its opponents as existential threats to “Our Democracy” and demands these opponents be crushed so that they may never again threaten it. Such inherently divisive narratives are designed to lure people into the illusory “security” of the one extant entity capable of controlling Americans’ lives—“Their Government.”

So, how does a progressive manage to believe they are the champions of “Our Democracy,” even as they burn it to the ground to persecute their opponents? By reason of a simple intellectual sleight-of-hand. When Democrats bleat “Our Democracy,” it is a “prog whistle” that, translated, means “Our Party.” Conflating the fortunes of their party with those of the country, the Democrats have the capacity for enormous self-regard that allows them to engage in immense amounts of cognitive dissonance and self-justification as they attempt to foist their reckless, harmful agenda on Americans.

Yes, Republicans also believe their fortunes will save “Our Republic.” But there is a critical distinction. Democrats define “unity” as a uniformity of agreement. Republicans define “unity” as a uniformity of acceptance.

This explains why the Democrats are hellbent to force their DIE ideology on people and why Republicans oppose it. It is an overlooked irony that the left, which obsesses over the diversity of external traits, demands the conformity of internal thoughts. The Twentieth Century is replete with bitter instances of such an ideology’s failed attempts to dictate a rigid uniformity of ideological agreement in the vainglorious hopes of recreating and perfecting humanity.

The answer to such state coercion is still federalism and pluralism. A limited, divided government charged with protecting the unalienable God-given rights of sovereign citizens remains the surest path upon which to pursue one’s happiness. The acceptance required is of the ground rules of the nation—of the constitution, of the peaceable means of effectuating constructive change, of someone else’s thoughts and their right to hold and advocate them, and of your reciprocal right to disagree and oppose their ideas. E pluribus unum—“Out of many, one”—has well served and enriched our nation and must remain the abiding goal.

Again, the left deems federalism and pluralism as bars to the implementation of their autocratic, socialist state, which will determine and map your pursuit of happiness whether you like it or not. It is evinced in why the left crafted the word “diversity” to supplant “pluralism.” Ponder that the root of the word, “div-,” as is found in words such as “divisive,” “divest,” “divorce,” and so forth, that do not exactly scream “unity.”

Nor does their pushing of their “Our Democracy” narrative to supplant the reality we live in a constitutional republic with limits upon its enumerated and citizen-delegated powers; and the duty to serve as a guardian of our unalienable God-given rights and the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic—be they a dictator or a mob.

As they do, the left reveals how their clamor and connivance for “Our Democracy” merely mark “Their Duplicity.”

***

An American Greatness contributor, the Hon. Thaddeus G. McCotter (M.C., Ret.) served Michigan’s 11th Congressional District from 2003-2012 and served as Chair of the Republican House Policy Committee. Not a lobbyist, he is a frequent public speaker and moderator for public policy seminars and a Monday co-host of the “John Batchelor Radio Show,” among sundry media appearances.


Thaddeus G. McCotter

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/10/12/our-democracy-marks-their-duplicity/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

15 Medal of Honor recipients endorse Trump for president - Charlotte Hazard

 

​ by Charlotte Hazard

These recipients include military members who served overseas in Afghanistan, Vietnam and Iraq.

 

Fifteen recipients of the Medal of Honor have endorsed GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump for president in 2024. 

"We, 15 recipients of the Medal of Honor, having served this great nation in wars, support and endorse Donald J. Trump for President of the United States," the recipients wrote in a letter obtained by Fox News. 

The Medal of Honor is the United States’ highest military award for valor in combat, according to the Congressional Medal of Honor Society website. Recipients go through a significant vetting process that goes up the chain of command and they are ultimately approved and notified by the U.S. president.

These 15 recipients include military members who served overseas in Afghanistan, Vietnam and Iraq and who received their Medal of Honor from either President Johnson, Nixon, Obama, Trump or Biden.

"We believe that American citizenship is a revered privilege," the letter continued. "We believe that a patriotic nation is a strong nation. We believe that the sacrifices by the men and women in our armed forces preserves and protects American freedom."

They went on to say that they "believed in Donald Trump."

They also said that they supported fair elections where only American citizens could vote in elections. 

In September, the Harris-Walz campaign was endorsed by "a bipartisan group of more than 700 national security leaders and former military officials," according to Fox News Digital.

 
Charlotte Hazard

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/multiple-medal-honor-recipients-endorse-trump-president

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter