Saturday, October 19, 2024

Will Israel lock out UNRWA over Oct. 7 complicity? - Canaan Lidor

 

by Canaan Lidor

Jerusalem is taking a harsher line than ever before against the compromised U.N. agency, which some Israeli officials still believe is the lesser evil.

 

Israelis protest against the U.N. Relief and Works Agency outside one of its offices in Jerusalem, March 20, 2024. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.
Israelis protest against the U.N. Relief and Works Agency outside one of its offices in Jerusalem, March 20, 2024. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

Like many others, Yonatan Samerano was murdered during Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023 massacre and his body abducted to Gaza, where it remains to this day.

According to Israel, his killers were employees of UNRWA, the United Nations aid agency for Palestinians.

Hundreds of UNRWA workers are believed to have engaged in terrorism in recent years. Unusually, though, UNRWA social worker Faisal Ali Mussalem al Naami and a colleague were caught on film, providing evidence that’s helped focus attention on UNRWA and its well-documented, yearslong record of complicity in terrorism and incitement.

Following Oct. 7 this record has put UNRWA under unprecedented scrutiny and pressure, including through proposed Israeli legislation that experts say would make it difficult for it to even operate in Judea and Samaria, as well as complicate its work in Gaza and eastern Jerusalem.

The bill, which last week passed committee toward its first reading in the Knesset this year, would make it illegal for any Israeli official or a state entity to engage in contact with UNRWA, making it impossible to issue UNRWA staff visas. This bill would also ban UNRWA from operating in Israeli territory.

Ayelet Samerano, speaking into a microphone, eulogizes her son Yonatan in Tel Aviv, on December 4, 2023. Photo by Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90.

The bill is the most robust legislative move on UNRWA to date, according to Einat Wilf, a former Knesset lawmaker, Middle East analyst and expert on the refugee agency. Its passing and enforcement, she added, will be a major test for a conceptual change within the defense and political establishments following the Oct. 7 national trauma.

Ayelet Samerano, Yonatan’s mother, told JNS: “UNRWA, who kidnapped my child, should have been outlawed by Israel years ago.” She cited UNRWA employees’ long track record of glorifying terrorism and the rejection of Israel in UNRWA textbooks and schools—some of which have been used as rocket storage and launch sites by Hamas.

In August, she confronted UNRWA’s chief officer while he was giving a speech in Lausanne, Switzerland. She has also protested the candidacy of the group for the Nobel Peace Prize (which it ultimately did not get).

The onslaught of Oct. 7, 2023, in which thousands of Hamas terrorists murdered some 1,200 Israelis and abducted another 251, exposed new levels of complicity by multiple employees of UNRWA, the full name of which is the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.

According to Israel, over 450 terrorists belonging to terrorist organizations in Gaza, mainly Hamas, are also employed by UNRWA.

UNRWA’s chief officer, Philippe Lazzarini, has flatly denied these allegations.

“This is totally untrue. There is no Hamas operative in U.N. schools and U.N. warehouses,” he told the BBC in November. “If there were a Hamas operative at a U.N. school, the State of Israel would inform UNRWA. This has not been the case so there is no proof.”

A child wields a machine gun in a clip from ‘UNRWA at War’. Screenshot.

In August, UNRWA admitted that nine of its employees were suspected of ties to terrorists and said it had fired them. Previously after Oct. 7, UNRWA had fired 12 employees for similar reasons. Israeli officials called this action unsatisfactory and symptomatic of the organization’s refusal to address Hamas’s penetration of its ranks.

On Sept. 29, Hamas admitted that Fatah Sharif Abu al-Amin, a chairman of UNRWA’s Teachers’ Association, was its commander in Lebanon. UNRWA suspended  Abu al-Amin in March as a teacher following reports that he was a terrorist, yet after his death denied knowing he was involved in terrorism.

UNRWA-employed Arabic teacher Yusef Zidan Suleiman al-Hawajara was recorded bragging to a friend about capturing a female hostage. (“We have female hostages, I captured one!” he said in a recording released by the IDF.)

In July, Israel’s foreign ministry published a list of names and ID numbers of 108 UNRWA employees that Israel said were also Hamas terrorists. It was a “small fraction,” a Foreign Ministry official wrote, of a much larger list including hundreds of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad members who also worked for UNRWA. The wider list could not be released due to security considerations.

Following these revelations, the Israel Land Authority last week announced that it was re-zoning the land currently being used to house UNRWA’s Jerusalem complex. It will be turned into an apartment complex—an action that Israel can take because it’s not obligated by any international treaty to facilitate UNRWA’s work.

Philippe Lazzarini
Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, addresses the United Nations Security Council meeting on the situation in the Middle East, on Oct. 9, 2024. Credit: Loey Felipe/U.N. Photo.

Israeli officials have also begun using harsher language regarding UNRWA than prior to Oct. 7.

Gilad Erdan, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, in August said that it was “proven that the U.N. agency is not only an accomplice of terrorism but that it also employs despicable terrorists.” He called for UNRWA’s dismantling.

UNRWA, which had a budget of about $1.1 billion in 2023, has about 30,000 employees working in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Gaza and Judea and Samaria. It also has three offices in eastern Jerusalem, one of which is located on about nine acres of land that Israel says the group is using without permission. Last week, the Israel Land Authority allocated the land to a residential building project and issued UNRWA with a zoning and eviction notice.

UNRWA has several schools in eastern Jerusalem, with a combined student population of about 600, according to research by Yulia Malinovsky, a Knesset lawmaker from Yisrael Beiteinu’s opposition party. Her bill was merged with a similar one by Boaz Bismuth of the Likud Party.

Eighteen countries suspended funding to UNRWA following the Oct. 7 attack, including the United States, which provides roughly a third of the organization’s budget. The U.S. froze its donations to UNRWA until March 2025. Only it and New Zealand have not yet reinstated their funding.

The change in Israel’s tone on UNRWA after Oct. 7 helped focus public attention on Israel’s own relationship with the agency, whose work it facilitates in Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem in multiple ways, including letting in personnel and materials through Israeli-controlled borders.

Separately, Israeli firms have won tenders and signed deals with UNRWA. At least 25 Israeli firms—including the Paz energy corporation, the Tadiran electrical appliances giant and Champion Motors—have benefitted from UNRWA’s funds in 2020-2023, receiving $60 million in revenues overall from the agency, according to research by Malinovsky that was published in Calcalist.

Ayeket Samerano repeated to JNS remarks she had previously made in Israeli media, suggesting there’s a link between the benefits some Israelis are deriving from UNRWA to its ability to avoid serious Israeli limitations on its work so far.

“When you’re pushing and pushing to achieve a no-brainer, you have to stop for a second and ask: Who benefits from the status quo?” she said. On X, Malinovsky named and shamed Israeli firms that do business with UNRWA, vowing to follow up at every quarterly report by the agency. “Despite the horrors we’ve seen, some Israeli enterprises find that money has no smell. As long as there’s profit to be made, the client doesn’t matter—so they provide services to UNRWA,” she wrote in March.

UNRWA has often been treated as an asset also by Israel’s defense establishment, for which “it’s convenient to have an address in UNRWA for day-to-day humanitarian issues,” said Wilf, reflecting a view shared by multiple observers of UNRWA, including Hillel Neuer, the founder of the U.N. Watch group.

For decades that establishment has insisted that “as bad as UNRWA may be, the alternative is worse,” Wilf added.

But Oct. 7 has proven the opposite, she said. “UNRWA simultaneously relieves Hamas of responsibility for the local population and provides a mantle of legitimacy for its terrorists, operating under UNRWA’s auspices. It’s the worst of all worlds, really,” she said.

Einat Wilf
Einat Wilf in the Knesset, 2012. Photo by Miriam Alster/Flash90.

JNS queried the National Security Council, an official arm of the Defense Ministry in charge of strategic issues. A NSC spokesperson referred JNS to the ministry’s spokesperson, who has not replied to requests for a comment on the matter.

Foreign leaders and U.N. officials have often warned over the years that a major humanitarian crisis would break out if UNRWA were prevented from administering its services, which include food, medicine and education, to millions of Palestinians.

U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres repeated those warnings in a letter he sent last week to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the proposed legislation, the passage of which “would be a catastrophe in what is already an unmitigated disaster,” he wrote.

U.N. Watch’s Neuer disputed these assertions. The services provided by UNRWA can be easily taken over by other international agencies, he said.

Palestinian supporters of Hamas protest against the U.S. Middle East peace plan in front of the main headquarters of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in Gaza City on February 20, 2020. Photo by Ali Ahmed/ Flash90.

“The World Food Program, or UNICEF, or WHO, or UNDP are all able to give out boxes of food and other aid to millions of refugees in Sudan, in Syria, in all kinds of countries. The idea that they can’t do it in a few square kilometers in Gaza is absurd,” he argued.

The reason the United Nations insists on doing this through UNRWA, he added, is because “the whole point of UNRWA,” which was established in 1949, “is to continue the war of 1948 and to dismantle Israel.”

Through UNRWA, the United Nations employs a unique refugee definition to Palestinians. UNRWA defines as refugees not only those who fled war in 1948, but their descendants in perpetuity until a “just solution” emerges for their status. The United Nations has a different definition for all other refugees, who cannot give the title to their descendants and often lose it when they are naturalized elsewhere.

Hillel Neuer
Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch. Credit: Courtesy.

This means that the number of people defined as Palestinian refugees— about 5 million at present—grows continuously. Under UNRWA’s education system, children in five regions are taught to aspire to “return” to Haifa, Jaffa and Jerusalem, or “Palestine” in general.

The events of Oct. 7 have refocused attention on this aspect of UNRWA, too, Neuer said, leading a growing number of Western leaders to view their countries’ donations to the agency as an undesired contribution to the perpetuation of Palestinian nationalist agenda. But UNRWA’s supposed leadership is powerless to stop it, he said.

UNRWA commissioners-general, including incumbent Lazzarini, are the organization’s titular heads only, according to Neuer. “Lazzarini is the spokesman. In reality, the leading figures at UNRWA, 99% and more, are Palestinian. And certainly in Gaza and in Lebanon, we know that they’re Hamas,” he said.

 
Canaan Lidor is an award-winning journalist and news correspondent at JNS. A former fighter and counterintelligence analyst in the IDF, he has over a decade of field experience covering world events, including several conflicts and terrorist attacks, as a Europe correspondent based in the Netherlands. Canaan now lives in his native Haifa, Israel, with his wife and two children.

Source: https://www.jns.org/will-israel-lock-out-unrwa-over-oct-7-complicity/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel drops leaflets over Gaza showing Sinwar's body and message to Hamas - report - Reuters Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Reuters Jerusalem Post Staff

The leaflet's wording was from a statement by Netanyahu on Thursday after Sinwar was killed by Israeli soldiers operating in Rafah.

 

An alleged leaflet dropped by the IDF into the Gaza Strip, urging Gazans to lay down their weapons and returning the hostages. (photo credit: SCREENSHOT/X, SECTION 27A COPYRIGHT ACT)
An alleged leaflet dropped by the IDF into the Gaza Strip, urging Gazans to lay down their weapons and returning the hostages.
(photo credit: SCREENSHOT/X, SECTION 27A COPYRIGHT ACT)

Israeli planes dropped leaflets over southern Gaza on Saturday showing a picture of the dead Hamas chief Yahya Sinwar with the message that "Hamas will no longer rule Gaza," echoing language used by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The move came as Israeli military strikes reportedly killed at least 32 people across the Gaza Strip and tightened a siege around hospitals in Jabalya in the north of the enclave, Palestinian health officials said. The statement did not differentiate how many of those were civilians and how many were Hamas terrorists. The IDF said it was unaware of the incident.

“Whoever drops the weapon and hands over the hostages will be allowed to leave and live in peace," the leaflet, written in Arabic, read, according to residents of the southern city of Khan Yunis and images circulating online.

The leaflet's wording was from a statement by Netanyahu on Thursday after Sinwar was killed by Israeli soldiers operating in Rafah, in the south near the Egyptian border, on Wednesday.

Residents and medics said Israeli forces had tightened their siege on Jabalya, the largest of the enclave's eight historic camps, which it encircled by also sending tanks to nearby towns of Beit Hanoun and Beit Lahiya and issuing evacuation orders to residents.

 Photo of a wounded Yahya Sinwar in the Gaza Strip after the building he was in was hit by an IDF tank. (credit: SCREENSHOT/X, SECTION 27A COPYRIGHT ACT)Enlrage image
Photo of a wounded Yahya Sinwar in the Gaza Strip after the building he was in was hit by an IDF tank. (credit: SCREENSHOT/X, SECTION 27A COPYRIGHT ACT)

Israeli officials said evacuation orders were aimed at separating Hamas fighters from civilians and denied that there was any systematic plan to clear civilians out of Jabalia or other northern areas.

Killing Sinwar

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was killed by the IDF in Tel Sultan in Rafah on Wednesday in an unplanned operation.

IDF troops suspected there were Hamas terrorists in the building area which they eventually fired on. Afterward, they found Sinwar’s body inside.

One of the terrorists targeted in the IDF strike in Gaza was Hamas's Khan Yunis division commander, who has been in close proximity to Sinwar since the start of the war.

The IDF also believes that Sinwar stayed in the same tunnel complex a few hundred meters away from the six slain hostages, Hersh Goldberg-Polin, Eden Yerushalmi, Carmel Gat, Almog Sarusi, Alexander Lobanov, and Ori Danino, who were being held in Rafah. According to the IDF, after the hostages were executed in late August, he started to move without other hostages as human shields.

The Oct. 7 attack Sinwar planned on Israeli communities a year ago killed around 1,200 people, with another 253 dragged back to Gaza as hostages. 101 hostages remain in Hamas captivity until today.

Yonah Jeremy Bob contributed to this report.

 
Reuters Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-825221

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hezbollah ushers in ‘escalatory phase’ in war against Israel - JNS

 

by JNS

The Lebanese terrorist organization said it will use precision-guided missiles to attack IDF soldiers.

 

Wildfires following a missile attack by Hezbollah in Lebanon near Korazim in northern Israel on Oct. 9, 2024. Photo by Michael Giladi/Flash90.
Wildfires following a missile attack by Hezbollah in Lebanon near Korazim in northern Israel on Oct. 9, 2024. Photo by Michael Giladi/Flash90.

Hezbollah on Thursday night introduced changes to its war against the Jewish state that include using precision-guided missiles to target IDF troops, Agence France-Presse reported.

The Iranian terrorist proxy in Lebanon announced the “transition to a new and escalatory phase in the confrontation with the Israeli enemy,” according to the report.

The move came after Israel Defense Forces soldiers killed Hamas terror master Yahya Sinwar in a firefight in the southern Gaza city of Rafah.

Last month, Hezbollah upped its anti-Israel rhetoric, saying it is fighting Israel not just in solidarity with Hamas but also “in defense of Lebanon and its people.”

A statement released by the terrorist group opened with, “Permission to fight has been granted to those for they have been wronged. And indeed, Allah is competent to give them victory,” citing a verse from the Koran.

The statement went on to claim Hezbollah’s attacks on Israel were “in support of our steadfast Palestinian people in Gaza and in support of their valiant and honorable resistance and in defense of Lebanon and its people.”

Hezbollah has attacked Israel nearly daily in support of Hamas since Oct. 8, 2023, firing some 10,000 rockets, missiles and drones. Jerusalem has escalated attacks on Hezbollah since adding the return home of its displaced citizens in northern Israel to its official war goals on Sept. 17, 2024.

On Thursday night, the IDF announced that five soldiers were killed fighting Hezbollah terrorists in Southern Lebanon. The slain men were named as Maj. Ofek Bachar, 24, from Ness Ziona; Capt. Elad Siman Tov, 23, from Tzofim; Staff Sgt. Elyashiv Eitan Wieder, 22, from Jerusalem; Staff Sgt. Yakov Hillel, 21, from Jerusalem; and Staff Sgt. Yehudah Dror Yahalom, 21, from Hebron.


JNS

Source: https://www.jns.org/hezbollah-ushers-in-escalatory-phase-in-war-against-israel/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'Sinwar's barrier of fear is broken': Hundreds of civilians safely evacuate from Jabalya, Gaza - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

During the operations, the IDF allowed civilians to safely evacuate from the area via organized routes, and hundreds of people left the area.

 

Gazans evacuate from Jabalya after IDF operations in the area. (photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
Gazans evacuate from Jabalya after IDF operations in the area.
(photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

Hundreds of Gazan civilians have evacuated Jabalya as the IDF continues to operate against terrorists in the area, IDF Arabic Spokesperson Avichay Adraee wrote in a post to X/Twitter on Saturday. 

As part of a joint IDF and Shin Bet (ISA) operation on Friday evening, after the 162nd Division operated against terrorists and terror infrastructure in Jabalya, hundreds of civilians evacuated from the area. 

During the operations, the IDF allowed civilians to safely evacuate from the area via organized routes, and hundreds of people left the area. 

Additionally, the IDF and Shin Bet arrested a number of terrorists and detained them for further investigation. Ammunition was found on one of the terrorists. 

The 162nd Division eliminated dozens of terrorists and found combat equipment in operations conducted over the past day. 

The IDF also reiterated that it is working in coordination with COGAT and communicating to the international community that it is working to maintain the operation of emergency systems in hospitals by transferring medical equipment and a fuel stockpile, along with evacuating crews and patients. 

On Saturday, COGAT announced that an airdrop operation of 81 food packages was completed  in the area of Khan Yunis.

Killing Sinwar

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was killed by the IDF in Tel Sultan in Rafah on Wednesday in an unplanned operation.

IDF troops suspected there were Hamas terrorists in the building area which they eventually fired on. Afterward, they found Sinwar’s body inside.

One of the terrorists targeted in the IDF strike in Gaza was Hamas's Khan Yunis division commander, who has been in close proximity to Sinwar since the start of the war.

Yonah Jeremy Bob contributed to this report.


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel Fights Alone, Carrying by Itself a Catatonically Suicidal West - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

The West has left Israel to fight a war that should never have been Israel's alone.

 

  • Little Israel is showing the world how to win again – and saving civilization and a free way of life into the bargain .... let Israel keep winning!

  • The problem with the JCPOA was, of course, its "sunset clauses." They assured Iran that it could legitimately have as many nuclear weapons as it can produce in just a few short years.

  • The West has left Israel to fight a war that should never have been Israel's alone. The Western nations, through diplomatic miscalculations, the need for votes, cowardice and a fear of conflict, have essentially outsourced their responsibilities for maintaining global peace to Israel, watching from the sidelines as the conflict ramps up.

  • If the West is too fearful or reluctant to engage directly in the fight against injustice, terror, and tyranny, the very least it can do is stand with Israel and stop trying to sabotage it at every turn. Support should not be limited to words but include political, diplomatic and military backing. By failing to support Israel fully, the West is empowering exactly those countries working to revise the world order -- from one of freedom to one of tyranny -- by displacing the West.

  • It is a grotesque reflection on the international community, particularly the Biden-Harris administration and the European Union, not to be offering unequivocal support. Israel's struggle is not just for its own survival but for the security and peace of the Free World. The West, through its passivity, is failing not only Israel, it is hollowing out its own survival.

The West has left Israel to fight a war that should never have been Israel's alone. The Western nations, through diplomatic miscalculations, the need for votes, cowardice and a fear of conflict, have essentially outsourced their responsibilities for maintaining global peace to Israel, watching from the sidelines as the conflict ramps up. Pictured: Sayad 4-B missile at a military parade in Tehran, Iran on April 17, 2024. (Photo by Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

Culminating with the dispatch of arch-terrorist Yahya Sinwar this week, how many of the world's most vicious terrorists has Israel liberated the world from in a few short weeks? Little Israel is showing the world how to win again -- and saving civilization and a free way of life into the bargain. For those of us fortunate enough to live in a free society rather than in a society of fear, as the former Soviet dissident Natan Sharansky calls them, let Israel keep winning!

The multi-front war that Israel is currently waging against the Iranian regime and its numerous terrorist proxies is a battle that actually the West should have taken on -- and long ago at that. Yet from the presidency of Barack Obama on, the Biden-Harris administration and European governments, rather than confronting the threats presented by Iran, they appeased and bankrolled it. The leadership of the West opted for a path of inaction, appeasement, ignoring sanctions and eschewing secondary sanctions -- meaning countries that do business with Iran may not do business with the US -- and providing billions of dollars to terrorists to enable them to attack Israel, US troops, and for Iran to put the finishing touches on their its weapons program.

Obama's totally illegitimate but much-touted Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which he claimed "achieved a detailed arrangement that permanently prohibits Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. It cuts off all of Iran's pathways to a bomb," was no such thing. The statement was a deception, just as much as, "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" was -- based on the "stupidity of the American voter," as his associate Jonathan Gruber said. The problem with the JCPOA was, of course, its "sunset clauses." They assured Iran that it could legitimately have as many nuclear weapons as it can produce in just a few short years.

This approach, apparently aimed at avoiding confrontation, has only strengthened Iran and its terror networks by allowing them to expand their influence and aggressions unchecked. The West has indeed been feeding the crocodile in hopes it will eat it last, as Winston Churchill noted. It is a suicidal strategy -- but it is exactly what the West has done. To avoid confronting the threat, the West appears to have chosen, instead, trying to bribe its enemies into postponing their assault, presumably in the hope that it will fall on someone else's watch.

Meanwhile, Iran and other countries that seemingly wish America nothing but ill, have used that bribe money to enlarge the threat. The West has left Israel to fight a war that should never have been Israel's alone. The Western nations, through diplomatic miscalculations, the need for votes, cowardice and a fear of conflict, have essentially outsourced their responsibilities for maintaining global peace to Israel, watching from the sidelines as the conflict ramps up.

Instead, Europe, the United Nations and their institutions have been trying to undermine Israel at every turn (for instance here, here, here, here and here).

Israel, smaller than New Jersey, is left grappling with the world's top state sponsor of terrorism, Iran, as well as the well-armed and proxies that the Iranian regime uses to protect itself from retaliation. Iran's reach extends far beyond its borders. Its fingerprints are visible in acts of terrorism across the globe from Argentina to Europe, to trying to assassinate a Saudi, a dissident, and American heads of state on American soil.

Domestically, Iran's regime systematically suppresses dissent and commits human rights abuses on a massive scale -- from imprisoning and executing political opponents -- even children -- to violently crushing protests. Its foreign terror activities include funding and arming militias, rebel groups, and terrorist organizations across the Middle East, Africa and South America. The West's failure to neutralize these threats has given Iran the space and financing to flourish, while at the same time abandoning Israel to confront this monstrous regime alone. Instead of helping Israel defeat Iran's terrorism and towering abuses of human rights, or even just thanking it, the West goes out of its way to defame, sabotage and attack Israel.

Meanwhile, Iran -- which is reportedly in the final stages of producing what the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan 26 years ago called "an Islamic Bomb" -- is arming Russia in its war on Ukraine, and arming terrorist groups in countries such as Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, where its influence perpetuates conflict and chaos, and is deeply intertwined with other enemies of the West – Russia, China and North Korea.

Even more troubling, perhaps, is Iran's budding military alliances with authoritarian regimes in Latin America, the backyard of the United States. These alliances present a dangerous escalation in Iran's strategy to extend its reach into the Western Hemisphere, far beyond the Middle East. Israel, by confronting Iran, is doing more than defending itself -- it is confronting a global network of malign actors that threaten peace and stability worldwide.

Israel's primary adversaries include Iran's proxies, such as Hezbollah, a well-armed and well-financed terrorist organization that has long operated as Iran's cat's paw in Lebanon. Israel has also been contending with another Iranian-backed terrorist organization, Hamas, whose history of violence and terror is long, brutal, and characterized by suicide bombings, rocket attacks, and targeting Israeli civilians.

On October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched a terrorist jihad on Israel, it murdered 1,200 people, including infants, torturing, beheading, raping and burning alive many of the victims, and kidnapped more than 250 others. This atrocity was just one in a long series of gruesome acts committed by Hamas. The Palestinian Authority and terrorist groups have, with US encouragement, seemed to assume, that they will be able to resume ruling the Gaza Strip so it can continue to attack the people of Israel.

In addition to Hezbollah and Hamas, Israel is battling the Iran-backed Houthi rebel group in Yemen, which the Biden-Harris administration removed from the list of the Foreign Terrorist Organizations after less than a month in office. In gratitude, the Houthis attacked not only Israel, but also Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi and US troops in the region. The Houthis also destabilized the Red Sea and blocked virtually all shipping through the Suez Canal. Vessels are now forced to detour around the continent of Africa, increasing the cost of each round-trip voyage by up to an extra million dollars just for fuel. Despite the Houthis' violations of international law and their wrecking-ball influence throughout the region, the international community has failed to take any serious action against them.

It is the West's responsibility to confront these forces, yet it is Israel that is doing the job. The Western powers, which should be at the forefront of the fight against terrorism, have abdicated their role, leaving Israel to bear the burden. This should not be Israel's fight alone-- it is one that the West should have taken on with full force. Israel has been stepping in where others have hesitated or even enabled its aggression -- an indictment of the West's inability to take up its own responsibilities.

If the West is too fearful or reluctant to engage directly in the fight against injustice, terror, and tyranny, the very least it can do is stand with Israel and stop trying to sabotage it at every turn (for instance here, here, here, here and here). Support should not be limited to words but include political, diplomatic and military backing. By failing to support Israel fully, the West is empowering exactly those countries working to revise the world order -- from one of freedom to one of tyranny -- by displacing the West.

Israel is single-handedly carrying the weight of multiple fronts in the battle against terrorism. The Free Word, with its vast resources and influence, all currently under threat in at least three theaters -- Eastern Europe, the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific -- should be at the forefront of this fight. Instead, Israel is left to do the work that the Western democracies should have undertaken long ago. It is a grotesque reflection on the international community, particularly the Biden-Harris administration and the European Union, not to be offering unequivocal support. Israel's struggle is not just for its own survival but for the security and peace of the Free World. The West, through its passivity, is failing not only Israel, it is hollowing out its own survival.

 
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on Islam and US Foreign Policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21031/israel-fights-alone-carrying-by-itself

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Adam Schiff’s conflicting 'principal' residences in mortgage, election papers raise fraud concerns - Seamus Bruner

 

by Seamus Bruner

California congressman’s behavior – filing contradictory statements about his "principal residence" – looks like "serious, documented allegations which carry significant criminal penalties," ex-FBI supervisor says.

 

In the two decades before he became the Democrats' U.S. Senate nominee in California, former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff repeatedly declared in mortgage and election filings that both of his homes – one in California and the other in Maryland – were his "principal residence." The claims have now prompted an ethics complaint and could be prosecutable as fraud, experts said.

Americans are allowed to claim just one home as their primary residence: the one they live in the majority of the year, according to the federally backed lender Freddie Mac. But Schiff alternately declared both of his properties in the two different states as “principal” on multiple mortgage and election forms dating to 2003 and reviewed by Just the News.

Those declarations over the years won him financial and political benefits like lower mortgage interest rates, tax advantages and the ability to run for election in a California House district.

Schiff and his office did not respond to multiple requests seeking comment by phone or email.

"Principal" residences in two states

In at least three instances, documents show that in 2009 and again in 2011 and 2013, Schiff refinanced his Maryland home and declared it was his “principal residence” at the same time he had declared his principal residence was in the California, according to 2009 and 2011 financing docs for his Burbank condo.

The pattern was first detected by Sacramento-based real estate investigator Christine Bish, who also is running for Congress as a Republican this year. She filed an ethics complaint against Schiff in Congress. The accompanying documents were then confirmed independently by Just the News.

The conflicting declarations were not resolved until 2020 when Schiff suddenly changed the notations on his Maryland mortgage to be a secondary residence. Bish alleges this change constitutes an admission by Schiff that the prior conflicting declarations may amount to a pattern and practice of mortgage fraud.

Law enforcement experts said the documents could form the basis for prosecution. “These are serious, documented allegations which carry significant criminal penalties if substantiated,” retired FBI supervisory special agent Jeff Danik said after reviewing the documents at Just the News’ request.

The FBI veteran noted the Justice Department “maintains a robust fraud enforcement section that routinely investigates similar allegations” and “the 10-year statute of limitations available in bank fraud investigations would allow for an expansive inquiry.”

Pushed debunked Russian conspiracy theories

Schiff has long been a target of Republican critics, who seethed over his efforts to portray Donald Trump and his supporters as compromised by Vladimir Putin in the now widely debunked Russia collusion case and to pursue two impeachments against the former president.

Schiff’s insistent claims of a Trump-Russia conspiracy – fueled by debunked Hillary Clinton campaign research during the 2016 election – were rebuked by DOJ Special Counsel John Durham, who concluded there was no evidence to support such allegations or the FBI probe that ensued. 

Schiff's record of credibility on such big issues could be a factor if the FBI began examining his mortgage claims, a former federal prosecutor told Just the News.

Schiff “has lied to the American people more times than I can count, so it would come as no surprise to learn he misled his bank,” retired Little Rock, Ark., U.S. Attorney Bud Cummins said. Cummins, who prosecuted many financial fraud cases during his tenure, said Schiff's mortgage claims merit “a fair and neutral investigation by both Congress and DOJ, but fair and neutral investigations seem nearly extinct.” 

Statute of Limitations

While some of the mortgage and election declarations are more than 10 years old, experts said prosecutors could still pursue charges on an ongoing pattern and practice of fraud because the behavior continued until at least 2020. Also, Maryland starts its statute of limitations on mortgage fraud upon date of discovery and not necessarily when the fraud began, according to Bish.

“Depending on tax history and statements or misstatements made,” Bish alleges in her complaint, “Adam Schiff may also be guilty of tax fraud” including federal crimes stemming from his residency discrepancies. Congressional subpoenas are needed, Bish says, to determine the extent of Schiff’s alleged criminal behavior.

With assistance from Bish and conservative talk show host John Stubbins, Just the News gathered Schiff’s certified California voter records and sworn affidavits from Schiff’s mortgage company dating to when the Democrat was first elected to the U.S House in November 2000. 

At the time, Schiff and his wife Eva owned a home in Burbank, Calif., that they purchased several years prior. In May 2003, the Schiffs sold their Burbank home and purchased a home in Potomac, Maryland, a wealthy suburb of Washington, D.C., shortly after the Burbank sale.

According to their mortgage documents, the Schiffs affirmed in writing that the Potomac home would be their “principal residence.” Yet, the following month, in July 2003 (and again in July 2004 and September 2006), Schiff registered to vote as an eligible Californian, according to his voter registration. He used a furnished Burbank rental apartment address for these voter registrations.

In February 2009, the Schiffs refinanced their Maryland home and reaffirmed in writing that it would remain their “principal residence.” That same year, the Schiffs purchased a new Burbank condo and claimed it was their residence, according to a July 2009 voter registration. Both of these statements from the Schiffs can't be accurate at the same time, leading legal experts to query whether mortgage fraud is in play. 

Precedents for investigation

One month after the Schiffs bought the Burbank condo, the U.S. House Ethics Committee investigated multiple other representatives for taking the homestead exemption in Maryland while claiming residence in their home districts, including California’s Rep. Doris Matsui who, the committee noted, faced allegations that she “received a Maryland homestead tax credit…and as a result violated Maryland state law and House Rule 23.” 

At the time of the Matsui investigation, Schiff’s office was asked about his similar situation and his staff confirmed that the Maryland property “was incorrectly listed” but downplayed it as a clerical error.

Bish alleges that was a coverup and demonstrates “the appearance of possible mortgage fraud,” according to the ethics complaint she filed with the House Ethics, Oversight, & Judiciary Committees. When Schiff was recently asked by television station KCRA about the discrepancy, he replied “our principal residence, our primary residence, has always been in California and always will be.”

The Schiffs refinanced the Burbank condo in 2011 and swore in writing that it would be their principal residence for at least one year. The Schiffs proceeded to refinance their Maryland home two additional times, both in 2011 and in 2013, identifying that home as the “principal residence” in the official mortgage affidavits.

While fudging mortgage and voter registration documents may seem a relatively minor clerical issue (at least two other Democratic representatives from California have claimed residency in Maryland), several public officials have been charged and convicted for similar issues. 

Earlier this year, former State Attorney Marilyn Mosby in Baltimore pled guilty to mortgage fraud, among other crimes, involving false declarations on official mortgage documents and financial disclosures. Mosby is a Democrat and now a convicted felon. While she served no jail time and was put on probation for perjury and false claims convictions, she has vowed to appeal the convictions to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 

Republicans have been convicted for similar white-collar fraud crimes too. 

Last year, then-Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., was charged with numerous crimes that relied upon “repeated dishonesty and deception to ascend to the halls of Congress and enrich himself.” Santos allegedly used “political contributions to line his pockets, unlawfully applied for unemployment benefits that should have gone to New Yorkers who had lost their jobs due to the pandemic and lied to the House of Representatives.” Evidence against Santos was found in his mortgage documents.

In 2020, Oklahoma state representative Steven Watkins was charged with multiple felonies including unlawful advance voting, providing false information, and voting without being qualified after he registered to vote at an address that was not his primary residence. Watkins was also charged with failing to notify the DMV of change of address, a misdemeanor, and was swiftly unseated before taking a deal to avoid prosecution.

Last month, the New York Supreme Court ruled that presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. must be struck from the ballot after a lower court found that Kennedy was guilty of using a “sham” residential address in Westchester County to gather petitions. A principal residence discrepancy like Schiff’s disqualified Kennedy from appearing on ballots in New York state. 

“Using a friend’s address for political and voting purposes, while barely stepping foot on the premises, does not equate to residency under the Election Law,” the New York judge declared. “To hold otherwise would establish a dangerous precedent and open the door to the fraud and political mischief that the Election Law residency rules were designed to prevent.” Kennedy sought a direct appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on September 27. The court denied his appeal

The issue has also come up in recent weeks against another Democrat, U.S. Senate nominee Angela Alsobrooks in Maryland.

CNN reported – and her GOP rival Larry Hogan has blasted on the airwaves – that Alsobrooks improperly took advantage of tax breaks, including one meant for low-income senior citizens. CNN reported her claims of primary residences saved thousands of dollars in taxes on two properties she owned in Washington, D.C., and in Maryland.


Seamus Bruner is the author of Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life and Peter Schweizer’s Head of Research at the Government Accountability Institute. Follow him @SeamusBruner.

Source: https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/hkdadam-schiffs-primary-residence-claims-mortgage-election

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Phillips 66 closes LA refinery due to state’s ‘hostility’ toward oil and gas: analysts say - Kevin Killough

 

by Kevin Killough

Phillips 66 denies its decision to close the L.A. refinery was related to the passing of the controversial refinery supply law, which passed Monday, and the company will continue to operate elsewhere in the state.

 

Phillips 66 announced Wednesday it was shutting down its Los Angeles-area refinery in the last quarter of next year. The news comes two days after California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a controversial law that requires refineries to maintain a certain amount of product so that when supplies are low, California residents don’t get hit with price spikes at the pump. But experts say that maintaining a reserve may not depress prices.

The industry has been warning the law would have the opposite effect. Catherine Reheis-Boyd, CEO of Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA), an industry group, warned in August that the refinery supply mandate would create artificial shortages by forcing refiners to withhold fuels from the market. 

Arizona Gov. Kathie Hobbs, a Democrat, and Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, a Republican, wrote a letter to Newsom in September, warning that the refinery regulations would drive up costs for consumers, contradicting Newsom’s narrative that his regulations would bring costs down. 

“With both of our states reliant on California pipelines for significant amounts of our fuel, these looming cost increases and supply shortages are of tremendous concern to Arizona and Nevada,” the governors said in their letter. 

War on oil industry

Phillips 66 claims that the decision to close the refinery was unrelated to the new law, and it will continue to operate in the state. 

“We want to continue to be a trusted and deliberate partner with the state. This announcement is based on consideration of multiple factors, including future options for the site as part of Phillips 66’s ongoing review of its portfolio of assets,” the company said in a statement. 

Experts tell Just the News that despite what the company claims, the company is responding to a hostile regulatory environment that California lawmakers and Newsom have created. “They've essentially declared war against their oil industry, and they treat the oil industry out there as a terrible thing in the state,” Robert Rapier, a chemical engineer and editor in chief of Shale Magazine, told Just the News.

Steve Milloy, a senior legal fellow with the Energy and Environmental Legal Institute and publisher of “JunkScience.com,” said Phillips 66’s decision follows that of Chevron, which announced in August it was moving its headquarters to Texas, and it represents a shift in how oil companies are dealing with regulations aimed at harming them. 

“California is hostile to oil, and now the oil industry is — and it's sort of a new phenomenon — the oil industry is standing up for themselves,” Milloy said. 

Rapier said that in the early 1900's, California became the largest producer of oil in the U.S. As more and more burdensome regulations fell upon the industry in the past few decades, it’s fallen to seventh place. This is at a time when oil production has reached record highs as a result of the “Shale Revolution,” which passed California over entirely, Rapier said. The state also has more proven oil reserves than any other state. 

This has also created a national security issue, Rapier said, because the state has to import so much of its crude from foreign countries. Last year, the state’s refineries imported more than 60% of their oil from foreign countries for the first time, and most of that comes from Iraq.  Five House Republicans have initiated an investigation into the possibility that officials in Iraq are helping Iran skirt U.S. sanctions, and some of the profits may be ending up with terrorist groups. 

Gasoline island

California’s laws governing refineries require blends in gasoline that aren’t used anywhere else, which Rapier said makes the state a “gasoline island.” 

“It means that when there's a supply interruption, refiners from neighboring states can't send their gasoline into California to alleviate any supply crunches, and that's really the problem they've caused,” he said. 

The law takes effect next year, and it grants the California Energy Commission the authority to determine how much storage each refiner must have on hand for each type of fuel and each blending requirement. The agency can adjust the requirements and determine when refiners can tap the reserves or add to them. 

Newsom proposed the regulations in August, arguing that the price spikes at California’s gas stations have nothing to do with California’s regulations, but rather they’re due to the greed of oil companies. The governor claimed that if the law had been in effect in 2023, Californians would have saved as much as $650 million at the pump. 

“Price spikes at the pump are profit spikes for Big Oil. Refiners should be required to plan ahead and backfill supplies to keep prices stable, instead of playing games to earn even more profits,” Newsom said in a statement announcing the proposal. 

Data from AAA on Wednesday, show California as having the highest gas prices in the country, slightly higher than Hawaii. According to a study by the Energy Policy Research Foundation, all of California’s gasoline regulations add as much as $1 per gallon of gasoline on average during 2022 and 2023, and $0.90 per gallon this year. On Oct. 3, 2022, the regulations added $1.91 per gallon. 

Dwindling number of refineries

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, California had 43 operating refineries in 1982. That’s dwindled down to 14 this year. One of those is Phillips 66’s Rodeo San Francisco Refinery in San Francisco, but it produces renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel. 

“The Rodeo Renewable Energy Complex is on track to increase production rates to more than 800 million gallons per year (50,000 BPD) of renewable fuels by the end of the second quarter, positioning Phillips 66 as a leader in renewable fuels,” the company stated in an April press release announcing the refinery’s conversion. 

Phillips’ decision to shut down one of the 14 refineries will exacerbate an issue the state has been foreseeing in which it no longer has enough refineries to supply its unique fuel blends. The California Energy Commission even proposed in August that the state should purchase and operate its remaining refineries

In Wednesday’s announcement, Phillips 66 said that besides the Rodeo Renewable Energy Complex, the company would also operate midstream assets, which are activities between production of the raw product and the processing and distribution activities. Approximately 600 employees and 300 contractors currently operate at the Los Angeles-area refinery, according to the company’s announcement. 

“We understand this decision has an impact on our employees, contractors and the broader community. “We will work to help and support them through this transition,” Mark Lashier, chairman and CEO of Phillips 66, said. 

Rapier said that the company’s decision would not be the last, and California should prepare for other oil companies to shut down more facilities or leave the state entirely. 

"You've painted us as an enemy. You've got people hating us, and now you're passing very punitive legislation against us. And so, yeah, we're out of here. We're not going to do business here anymore. Those sorts of things have consequences,” Rapier said. 

 
Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/phillips-66-close-refinery-and-analysts-say-due-states-hostility-toward-oil

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Trump Campaign Courts Hispanics: An Appeal of Understanding and Empathy - Thaddeus G. McCotter

 

by Thaddeus G. McCotter

In the home stretch of the campaign, the former president and his team remain focused on courting a critical electoral population—Hispanics, the largest minority in America.

 

 

The 2024 Trump campaign is the best he has run: professional, detail-oriented, and resonant. Still, much work remains to be done in the election’s closing days to secure a victory.

The best basketball players dribble with both hands—right and left. On the issue of the economy, the candidate and his campaign have done an exceptional job dribbling with both hands, showing Mr. Trump’s understanding of a policy’s intricacies (right hand) and empathy for the people impacted (left hand)—i.e., making the case how VP Harris was a blank check for Bidenomics that is destroying your American Dream.

The strongest evidence for this is the Harris campaign response of lying about a “Trump Tax,” pretending to be right-of-center tax cutters, and hoping voters refuse to believe the patent fact that V.P. Harris has been, well, V.P. for this disastrous administration. Yes, it is election season, and, once again, the Progressives are so proud of their radical, extreme, and dangerous agenda that they deny they are… progressive. Go figure.

Building upon this success, in the home stretch of the campaign, on their part, the former president and his team remain focused on courting a critical electoral population—Hispanics, the largest minority in America.

In appealing to Hispanic voters, the Trump campaign has made a dedicated, effective effort. Indeed, overall, Mr. Trump is on the cusp of again earning more minority votes than any Republican presidential nominee in decades (including himself). This is in no small part a testament to the creativity and competency of his campaign team and, of course, to the political instincts and skills of the former president. Again, however, there are more inroads to be trod and votes to earn.

On illegal immigration, Mr. Trump dribbles exceptionally well with his right hand by addressing the issue and, in general, its impact. He has long condemned the Biden-Harris administration’s open border policies and the overall devastation of illegal immigration—including the increasing instances of America’s enemies cruelly weaponizing mass migration to imperil our national security. He has made the case that V.P. Harris is a rubber stamp for open borders and its calamitous impacts.

Once again, Mr. Trump’s success is evinced by the Democrats’ calumnies on the issue. The left claims that opponents of open borders are xenophobic haters who want to stop all immigration to our nation. This is a lie. The opponents of open borders support orderly immigration, assimilation, and integration of legal migrants into the fabric of our nation. What is most damaging to immigrants who play by the rules and to the entire nation is the left’s open borders policy.

Thus, what is needed to further cut through the Democrat media complex’s distortions and smears on the issue and connect with Hispanic voters is an empathetic recognition that they often bear the first and worst brunt of Biden-Harris’s open border’s illegal immigration.

Recently, the Trump campaign has done exactly that at the Coachella, California, rally with a major assist from the Hon. Gloria Romero, a former Democrat and California state Senate Majority Leader. Per The Wall Street Journal:

‘The Democratic Party has taken all of us—and especially we Latinos and Latinas—for granted,’ Ms. Romero said on stage. ‘Inflation, lawlessness, and an open border, highest unemployment rate—[California is] second in the nation—groceries, gas, you name it…’

Her exasperation grew as the administration waved masses of migrants across the border, whom she says have especially burdened the communities of second- and third-generation Latino families. ‘Latinos are a very patriotic people,’ she says. ‘We believe that this is the greatest nation on earth. And citizenship matters…’

‘We are going to return America to its rightful place as the greatest nation on the earth…for all of our citizens.’

Importantly, Ms. Romero is well aware the left will attack Hispanics who dare stop toeing the progressive party line. But she is undaunted and defiant, and her words deserve to be heard in full:

The other side is going to try to scare you in the coming days because they are losing and fear is the only tool they can use. They are going to tell we are going to take things away from you. That we are not going to respect your rights. If anyone would know about not respecting others, it’s Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. No, we’re not going to do any of that. And we aren’t going to use fear to gain your vote. We’re going to make [you a] promise. We will work harder for you, your families, your friends and neighbors, for everyone, because the only way we make America great again is by us all working together. That is my solemn promise to you.

Ms. Romero knows the pain the Hispanic community is on the front line of suffering due to Biden-Harris’s “American Dream destroying” open borders: their wages are being depressed as they try to climb up the ladder of success; their schools and hospitals are being overcrowded; their social services are being depleted; their children and neighborhoods are being endangered and overrun by foreign criminal cartels and gangs.

Her appeal is one of understanding, empathy, and credibility. Consequently, in stark contrast to V.P. Harris, the Honorable Gloria Romero’s promise is an earnest, honest, and solemn appeal to her fellow Hispanics and, indeed, to all Americans. It is nothing less than a vow to redeem the American Dream, one the Honorable Gloria Romero and her candidate for president—Donald J. Trump—will fulfill for the Hispanic community and all Americans.

***

An American Greatness contributor, the Hon. Thaddeus G. McCotter (M.C., Ret.) served Michigan’s 11th Congressional District from 2003-2012 and served as Chair of the Republican House Policy Committee. Not a lobbyist, he is a frequent public speaker and moderator for public policy seminars and a Monday co-host of the “John Batchelor Radio Show,” among sundry media appearances.


Thaddeus G. McCotter

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/10/19/the-trump-campaign-courts-hispanics-an-appeal-of-understanding-and-empathy/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'Pure Genocide': Christians Slaughtered in Nigeria and the Great Press Cover-Up - Raymond Ibrahim

 

by Raymond Ibrahim

[I]n 2014, there were 1.1 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Nigeria; as of 2023, there are 3.4 million. — "NO ROAD HOME: Christian IDPs displaced by extremist violence in Nigeria," Open Doors, September 1, 2024.

 

  • Muslim militants slaughtered 16,769 Christians [in Nigeria] in just the four years between 2019 and 2023. That comes out to 4,192 Christians killed on average per year—or one Christian murdered for his/her faith every two hours. — Report, Observatory for Religious Freedom in Africa, August 29, 2024.

  • The violence has reached the point, the report says, that many traumatized Christian children sleep in trees to try to avoid being butchered during the night, when Fulani are most prone to attack.

  • [I]n 2014, there were 1.1 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Nigeria; as of 2023, there are 3.4 million. — "NO ROAD HOME: Christian IDPs displaced by extremist violence in Nigeria," Open Doors, September 1, 2024.

  • Behind all these misleading euphemisms, the facts remain: the murderers are Muslim and their victims are overwhelmingly Christian.

  • When Muslim terrorists slaughtered nearly 200 Christians last Christmas, the Associated Press failed to mention the identities of the assailants and their victims. Rather, it presented the atrocity, as so many now do, as a regrettable byproduct of climate change — which is, ostensibly, forcing "herders" (Muslims) to encroach on the lands of "farmers" (Christians).

  • In another AP report on the 2022 Pentecost Sunday church bombing that left 50 Christian worshippers dead, the words "Muslim" and "Islam" — even "Islamist" — never appear. Rather, readers were told, "It was not immediately clear who was behind the attack on the church."

  • "Muslim" and "Islam" — even "Islamist" — never appear. Rather, readers were told, "It was not immediately clear who was behind the attack on the church." To maintain this ambiguity, the AP failed to mention that Islamic terrorists have stormed hundreds of churches and slaughtered thousands of Christians "for sport" over the years in Nigeria....

  • "It's tough to tell Nigerian Christians this isn't a religious conflict since what they see are Fulani fighters clad entirely in black [like ISIS], chanting 'Allahu Akbar!' and screaming 'Death to Christians.'" — Sister Monica Chikwe, cruxnow.com, August 4, 2019.

  • "Removing Country of Particular Concern status for Nigeria will only embolden the increasingly authoritarian government there." — Sean Nelson, Legal Counsel for Global Religious Freedom for Alliance Defending Freedom International, catholicnewsagency.com, November 23, 2021.

  • For the mainstream media and politicians, Christian lives taken by Muslims apparently do not matter.

Muslim militants slaughtered 16,769 Christians in Nigeria in just the four years between 2019 and 2023. For the mainstream media and politicians, Christian lives taken by Muslims apparently do not matter. Pictured: The Church of Christ in Nations building in Mangu, Nigeria, photographed on February 2, 2024, after it was torched by Islamic terrorists. (Photo by Kola Sulaimon/AFP via Getty Images) (Image source: iStock)

The "pure genocide" of Christians in Nigeria, as it has been characterized by several international observers, is reaching unprecedented levels, according to two separate reports.

"Countering the myth of religious indifference in Nigerian terror (10/2019 – 9/2023)," a comprehensive, 136-page report published by the Observatory for Religious Freedom in Africa on August 29, 2024, found that Muslim militants slaughtered 16,769 Christians in just the four years between 2019 and 2023. That comes out to 4,192 Christians killed on average per year — or one Christian murdered for his/her faith every two hours.

More than half of these killings (55%) were committed by radicalized Muslim Fulani herdsmen, who over the last decade have become greater persecutors of Christians than more internationally recognizable terror groups, such as Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) — although the ISWAP, too, are playing their part in the genocide: Fulani killed 9,153 Christians between 2019 and 2023; all other terrorist groups killed 4,895.

The second report, "NO ROAD HOME: Christian IDPs displaced by extremist violence in Nigeria," published by Open Doors on September 1, 2024, states that the persecution, slaughter, and displacement of Christians in Nigeria is "unrelenting" and "a time bomb." Because "militant Fulani groups have deliberately targeted Christians or Christian communities, their livelihood, faith leaders and places of worship," Christians are becoming "an endangered species" in Nigeria, where they once amounted for more than half of the West African nation's population (the other half being Muslim).

The violence has reached the point, the report says, that many traumatized Christian children sleep in trees to try to avoid being butchered during the night, when Fulani are most prone to attack. "My children," a parent is quoted, "each time they hear anything, they panic or go into hiding because it triggers the trauma. The terror of the attacks has not stopped, rather it has increased."

In just the last decade, the amount of people to be displaced by the havoc and chaos caused by the Islamic groups has tripled: in 2014, there were 1.1 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Nigeria; as of 2023, there are 3.4 million.

One of these displaced persons, a Christian Pastor, Benjamin Barnabas, who has been living in a tiny tent for five years, shared his story. He and his family were working on their farm when Fulani militants "came with guns, machetes and sticks," thrashing the pastor and his family:

"We lost everything that I had. Everything in my home and village was burnt, I was left with nothing... We are displaced because of violence. The news doesn't care about it, we are remaining in darkness—being forgotten, being disregarded."

That the media is indifferent, or worse, concerning the plight of Christians — and that it obfuscates the identity of their tormentors — was emphasized by the Observatory:

"For over a decade atrocities against civilians in Nigeria have been downplayed or minimized. This has proved a major obstacle for those seeking to understand the violence. Misleading euphemisms, such as 'armed herdsmen' and 'cattle grazers' are used to describe continual waves of invasion, torture and killing in rural communities. Descriptions of attacks as 'ethnic clashes', 'farmers-herders clashes' or retaliatory attacks are seriously misleading. The use of the phrase 'bandits' to refer to militias carrying out mass kidnaps, and enforcement of serfdom on communities, is another case in point. And a policy of concealing the religious [Christian] identity of victims also serves to distort the true picture."

Behind all these misleading euphemisms, the facts remain: the murderers are Muslim and their victims are overwhelmingly Christian. Although the Observatory report focuses mostly on Nigerian media's distortion of events, Western mainstream media has also been devoutly refusing to use the most obvious, bottom-level identifiers of both the attackers (Muslims) and the attacked (Christians).

When Muslim terrorists slaughtered nearly 200 Christians last Christmas, the Associated Press failed to mention the identities of the assailants and their victims. Rather, it presented the atrocity, as so many now do, as a regrettable byproduct of climate change—which is, ostensibly, forcing "herders" (Muslims) to encroach on the lands of "farmers" (Christians).

In another AP report, on the 2022 Pentecost Sunday church bombing that left 50 Christian worshippers dead, the words "Muslim" and "Islam" — even "Islamist" — never appear. Rather, readers were told, "It was not immediately clear who was behind the attack on the church." To maintain this ambiguity, the AP failed to mention that Islamic terrorists have stormed hundreds of churches and slaughtered thousands of Christians "for sport" over the years in Nigeria—a fact that just might have offered a hint as to "who was behind the attack."

Or consider the words of President Barack Obama's then-Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Johnnie Carson, after Muslim terrorists slaughtered 50 Christian church worshippers on Easter Sunday, 2012: "I want to take this opportunity to stress one key point and that is that religion is not driving extremist violence [in Nigeria]."

Instead, "inequality" and "poverty"— to quote former US President William J. Clinton — are "what's fueling all this stuff" ("this stuff" being the Muslim genocide of Christians).

Back on the ground in Nigeria, most Christians see these ongoing attacks for what they are. As the nun, Sister Monica Chikwe, once observed:

"It's tough to tell Nigerian Christians this isn't a religious conflict since what they see are Fulani fighters clad entirely in black [like ISIS], chanting 'Allahu Akbar!' and screaming 'Death to Christians.'"

The recent reports also include quotes and anecdotes that underscore the true source of the hostility. According to one survivor:

"When the Fulani gunmen came to attack, they could be heard shouting 'Allahu Akbar (Allah is the greatest), we will destroy all Christians.'.... The Fulani started to shoot, burning houses. They burnt our animals and maize plants."

As the Christian Association of Nigeria once rhetorically asked:

"How can it be a [secular or economic] clash when one group [Muslims] is persistently attacking, killing, maiming, destroying, and the other group [Christians] is persistently being killed, maimed and their places of worship destroyed?"

In 2018, when the attacks were nowhere near as bad as they are now, the National Christian Elders Forum of Nigeria succinctly summarized the ultimate source behind the genocide of Christians in Nigeria:

"JIHAD has been launched in Nigeria by the Islamists of northern Nigeria led by the Fulani ethnic group. This Jihad is based on the Doctrine of Hate taught in Mosques and Islamic Madrasas in northern Nigeria as well as the supremacist ideology of the Fulani. Using both conventional (violent) Jihad, and stealth (civilization) Jihad, the Islamists of northern Nigeria seem determined to turn Nigeria into an Islamic Sultanate and replace Liberal Democracy with Sharia as the National Ideology.... We want a Nigeria, where citizens are treated equally before the law at all levels...."

Both reports agree that every day, often nominal Muslims — whom the terrorists see as little better than apostates — are also suffering and being displaced by the chaos, Christians "have been singled out for violence, face harsh living conditions and experience faith-based challenges throughout their displacement journey." The Observatory points out that "Since 2015, there have been consistent reports of disparate treatment meted out to Christian and Muslim captives by members of Terror Groups":

  • Forced Labor: Christian captives, including men, women, and children, are routinely subjected to forced labor and grueling physical tasks, often under inhumane conditions. By contrast, their Muslim counterparts are typically spared from such treatment.
  • Sexual Violence: Christian women and girls are frequently subjected to rape, sexual abuse, and other forms of sexual violence inflicted by their captors. Muslim women, on the other hand, are generally not subjected to such atrocities.
  • Ransom Demands and Release: Muslim captives who cannot afford to pay ransoms are sometimes released without payment -- a form of preferential treatment. Christian captives, however are rarely granted such leniency.
  • Execution Risks: According to media reports and research conducted over the past 10 years, Christian captives are more likely to be executed than Muslim captives held by the same terror groups. There are numerous instances where Christian captives were brutally murdered by their abductors, even after ransoms were paid.

The "radicalization" in Nigeria is such that even local officials discriminate against and persecute Christians: "some efforts to pressure, coerce or force conversion to Islam by the local government and members of public were described." For example, "to gain access to critical support" in Borno State camps, "some have felt compelled to convert to Islam or deliberately hide their faith... [and] in some places of education they could not gain access with Christian names."

Unfortunately, the persecution continues. Below are a few headlines to appear in August and September of 2024, right around the publication times of these two reports and therefore not included in them:

In 2020, President Donald J. Trump placed Nigeria on the State Department's List of Countries of Particular Concern — meaning nations which engage in, or tolerate violations of, religious freedom. Trump, moreover and with characteristic bluntness, went on to ask the then Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari, "Why are you killing Christians?"

During the term of President Joseph R. Biden, on the other hand, the State Department inexplicably removed Nigeria — where one Christian is butchered every two hours — from the list. Secretary of State Antony Blinken apparently made this concession three days before meeting with Muhammadu Buhari.

At the time, many observers responded by slamming the Biden administration. As Sean Nelson, Legal Counsel for Global Religious Freedom for Alliance Defending Freedom International (ADF), noted:

"Outcry over the State Department's removal of Country of Particular Concern status for Nigeria's religious freedom violations is entirely warranted. No explanations have been given that could justify this decision. If anything, the situation in Nigeria has grown worse over the last year. Thousands of Christians, as well as Muslims who oppose the goals of terrorist and militia groups, are targeted, killed, and kidnapped, and the government is simply unwilling to stop these atrocities.... Removing Country of Particular Concern status for Nigeria will only embolden the increasingly authoritarian government there."

That is the current state of affairs: for many years now, a jihad of genocidal proportions has been declared on the Christian population of Nigeria — even as American media and government bizarrely present Nigeria's problems in purely economic terms.

For the mainstream media and politicians, Christian lives taken by Muslims apparently do not matter.


Raymond Ibrahim, author of Defenders of the West, Sword and Scimitar, Crucified Again, and The Al Qaeda Reader, is the Distinguished Senior Shillman Fellow at the Gatestone Institute and the Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21033/christians-slaughtered-in-nigeria

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter