Saturday, February 26, 2022

The Democrats will be buried at Kyiv - Steven Kopits

 

by Steven Kopits

The newly emerged Biden Doctrine is an unfolding disaster, both abroad and at home.

The U.S. continues to sit passively on the sidelines while the Russian army pounds Ukraine.  It is all too pathetic.

Nevertheless, President Biden has listed as a key priority the prevention of U.S. military deaths in armed conflicts.  In his August 16, 2021 speech at Arlington Cemetery, President Biden declared:

How many more generations of America's daughters and sons would you have me send to fight Afghans — Afghanistan's civil war when Afghan troops will not? How many more lives — American lives — is it worth? How many endless rows of headstones at Arlington National Cemetery?

With this speech, he laid out what may come to be known as the Biden Doctrine, that there would be no conflict so small that the U.S. would not run away, no act of cowardice too craven, no desertion of allies too treacherous, and no commitment to democracy or global security worth securing with military force beyond those agreed on paper.

On that day, his net approval rating (approval minus disapproval) stood at +6.2%, entirely acceptable for a U.S. president.  Three months later, on Election Day in November, it would fall to -8%, and the Democrats would take a historical shellacking at the polls.  Virtually all the damage resulted from the means by which the U.S. pulled out of Afghanistan, leaving chaos, the Taliban, and now famine in its wake.  Americans were appalled.

And here we are again, with the stakes predictably amplified.  Why has Russian president Putin chosen now to invade Ukraine?  The answer is simple: the Biden Doctrine of unilateral surrender.  What does U.S. military power matter if we lack the will to use it or cower before those who threaten us?  By pre-emptively foreswearing military intervention in Ukraine, President Biden all but sent an embossed invitation to President Putin to take Ukraine at his leisure.

The White House pinned its strategy on sanctions but clearly did not believe they would work.  Biden had taken to the podium multiple times in the last month declaring that Putin would invade.  Yet President Biden, on February 25, stated, "No one expected the sanctions to prevent anything from happening[.] ... Putin's not going to say 'Oh, my God, the sanctions are coming.'" The Biden White House has chained its credibility to a policy that, by the president's own statements, it did not believe to be credible.  Biden merely gift-wrapped Ukraine for Putin with meaningless sanctions that would deter nothing.

Were Ukraine in a part of the world far from the superpowers, certainly far from Europe or East Asia, the U.S. could afford to take a pass.  India and Pakistan regularly clash over Kashmir, but the U.S. would not ordinarily weigh in on the matter.  But Ukraine is different, for several reasons.


Image: Joe Biden.  YouTube screen grab.

Regardless of the outcome in Kashmir, neither India nor Pakistan will be wiped from the map and neither country's democracy, such as it is, is threatened by the other. In the case of Ukraine, however, both democracy and survival are at stake. We are seeing the brutal, unprovoked invasion of one country by another, one which seeks to both destroy not only the other's democracy but the very nation itself. The stakes are enormous.

Nor is the location of indifference. The US is intimately involved in European security through NATO and has been for nearly three-quarters of a century. Ukraine abuts four NATO members: Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, and Romania. What happens in Ukraine affects the security of these NATO members, not to mention possibly sending millions of refugees across their borders in the coming days.

Critically, the war is about more than Ukraine, certainly from the Russian side.  The intent is to roll back NATO and reassert Russia's Soviet-era sphere of influence over all Soviet Union states, as well as central Europe, notably the Baltics, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria, at a minimum.  This would rewrite the entirety of the European security order and resurrect the perilous conditions of the Cold War.  For Europe and, by extension, for the United States, this is an existential threat, just as it was during the Cold War.

Incredibly, for all the risks, Ukraine is not even the biggest threat.  Russia has one sixth the population of NATO and 1/25 of its GDP.  Russia is to NATO as Peru is to the United States — that is, not a peer.  Putin is the Punk in the Kremlin and can advance only as long as the U.S. sits on the sidelines.  As one seemingly knowledgeable, but admittedly unvetted, analyst assesses Russian fighting capability in the conflict:

The Russians cannot fight a modern war and their bullying capability is limited and would be ineffective against NATO's air power alone[.] ... A US-Russian war would look like Iraq '91, both by overwhelming asymmetry and by multilateral coalition backing.

The U.S. can beat Russia, perhaps handily.  Not so China.  China is a heavyweight, both economically and militarily, and it too is watching the Biden Doctrine unfold.  If Biden fails to protect Ukraine, how can he lift a finger to defend Taiwan?  Just as Afghanistan precipitated Ukraine, so Ukraine will precipitate Taiwan.

These are all strategic reasons to intervene in Ukraine, directly and with military force, right now.  Failure to act here may well trigger a world war a year from now.

For Democrats, however, the proximate danger is political.  Putin not only wants Ukraine, but also wants to humiliate the United States.  He wants to show the U.S. as a fading power, cowardly and unprincipled.  And it is working, because that is the essence of the Biden Doctrine: the avoidance of military casualties in the field at the price of national impotence and dishonor.

The American public, although rapidly having its fill of the Punk in the Kremlin, naturally has reservations about going to war with Russia.  Nevertheless, if Kyiv falls due to the impotence of sanctions — President Biden's stated expected outcome and the essence of his strategy — the Biden White House will own the failure.  It will own the humiliation of a loss, not to a great power, but to a punk who stole Ukraine on a bluff.  And everyone at home and abroad will know that America did not lose on the field, but because we were cowards and ran away.

Americans can forgive many things, but they will not forgive humiliation at the hands of the Russians.  The fall of Ukraine will be that humiliation, and it will bury the Democrats in its ashes.

 

Steven Kopits is the president of Princeton Policy Advisors.

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/02/the_democrats_will_be_buried_at_kyiv_.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Europe close to approving SWIFT, but Germany remains wary - Peter Aitken

 

by Peter Aitken

Only Germany remains wary, as its leaders say they remain open to the possibility but must "calculate the cost" to its own citizens, Reuters reported.

Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine Thursday local time. World leaders and diplomats widely condemned the attack and promised strong sanctions in response.

Foreign ministers of the Baltic States and Poland wanted to cut Russia from SWIFT as part of the initial wave of sanctions, but Germany, Italy, Hungary and Cyprus resisted the move. 

RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE: LIVE UPDATES

But after non-stop negotiations, Ukraine has managed to convince the leaders of Italy, Hungary and Cyprus to stand down and agree. Only Germany remains wary, as its leaders say they remain open to the possibility but must "calculate the cost" to its own citizens, Reuters reported. 

European Parliament President David Sassoli speaks prior to a signing ceremony of EU Legislative Priorities for 2022 on the sidelines of an EU Summit in Brussels, on Dec. 16, 2021. Sassoli has died at a hospital in Italy, his spokesman said in a tweet Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2022. (AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert, Pool, File) (AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert, Pool, File)

The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is the main global network that allows financial institutions to send and receive information on international bank transfers.

SWIFT is incorporated and headquartered in Belgium with 26 offices across the world, providing messaging services to banks in more than 200 countries. It is overseen by the central banks of the G-10, comprised of Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the United States, Switzerland and Sweden.

UKRAINE PHOTOS: KYIV RATTLED WITH EXPLOSIONS, STREET FIGHTING INTO THIRD DAY OF CONFLICT

Cutting access to SWIFT requires approval from the U.S., Japan and the European Union (EU), but EU decisions require universal approval, making the holdouts all the more frustrating for leaders who wanted to hit Putin and Russia with the most severe punishments. 

The impacts of such an action can be crippling, and the tool has been used before as an international response. SWIFT booted EU-sanctioned Iranian banks from its network in 2012 and again in 2018.

RUSSIA'S WAR ON UKRAINE: ‘BABIES AND CHILDREN PAY THE HIGHEST PRICE’

European leaders approved personal sanctions on Russian President Vladimir Putin and Foreign Affairs Minister Sergei Lavrov, but could now approve the action on SWIFT if Germany can agree. 

Germany has consistently acted a stumbling block due to its significant reliance on Russian oil. 

Germany resisted calls to sanction Nord Stream 2, which supplies gas from Russia to Europe, and only supplied 5,000 helmets to Ukraine when Zelenskyy requested weapons. 

Germany switched gears following the start of Putin’s invasion, agreeing to shut down approval of Nord Stream 2.

 

Peter Aitken is a Fox News Digital reporter with a focus on national and global news.

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/world/europe-close-to-approving-swift-germany-wary

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Germany OKs weapons delivery to Ukraine - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

Germany lifts ban on delivery of German-made weapons to Ukraine, prepares to absorb refugees.

 

A military vehicle on a street on the outskirts of the city of Donetsk, Ukraine
A military vehicle on a street on the outskirts of the city of Donetsk, Ukraine REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko

Germany has dropped its ban on the delivery of German-made lethal weapons to Ukraine via third parties, BBC News reported.

The decision will allow the Netherlands to send some 400 rocket-propelled grenade launchers, manufactured in Germany, to Ukraine.

The decision may also mean a change in how the war between Ukraine and Russia progresses, since many European weapons are manufactured at least partly in Germany, BBC added.

Meanwhile, Anadolu Agency quoted local media as saying that Germany is set to deliver 5,000 military helmets to Ukraine.

The site said that according to the German government, the helmets had been officially requested in a letter, but no specific number had been mentioned.

Politico said that the Netherlands had promised to send 200 Stinger anti-aircraft defense systems to Ukraine, while Belgium said it would provide Ukraine with 3,800 tons of fuel and 2,000 machine guns. 

 

Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/322931

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

US to sanction Putin and Lavrov - Elad Benari

 

by Elad Benari

White House confirms US will sanction Russian President, Foreign Minister and other members of the Russian National Security team.

 

Vladimir Putin and Sergei Lavrov
Vladimir Putin and Sergei Lavrov                 Sputnik/Alexei Nikolsky/Kremlin via REUTERS

White House press secretary Jen Psaki confirmed in a briefing on Friday that the US will join with European allies to impose sanctions on Russian President Vladimir Putin, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, and other members of the Russian National Security team.

The sanctions against Putin and Lavrov would include a travel ban, she said.

Earlier, two people familiar with the decision told CNN that the US is planning to impose sanctions on Putin as soon as Friday.

The European Union announced earlier on Friday it would freeze the assets of Putin and Lavrov.

EU ministers said that even further sanctions were still possible, including booting Russia off SWIFT, the dominant system for global financial transactions.

“The debate about SWIFT is not off the table, it will continue,” Luxembourg Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn said.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson followed the EU and also announced on Friday that the UK will be implementing sanctions against Putin and Lavrov effective immediately.

US President Joe Biden said on Thursday that sanctioning Putin had been an option under consideration, telling CNN's Kaitlan Collins it was "on the table."

Biden on Thursday announced sweeping sanctions targeting Russia, enacting penalties across industries, including asset freezes for the largest banks, debt and equity restrictions on critical mining, transportation and logistics firms and a large-scale effort to shut down access to critical technology for key Russian military and industrial sectors.

Psaki also warned in her remarks on Friday that “going after the head of state would be a significant, horrific act by Russian leadership,” as Moscow closes in on Kyiv where Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is holed up.

She added that Biden remains in contact with Zelensky, that the two had spoken earlier on Friday and that the Ukrainian President plans on remaining in the country.

Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova blasted the imposition of sanctions against Putin and Lavrov, saying the move reflect the West's "absolute impotence" when it comes to foreign policy.

She added that relations with the West "have reached the line after which the point of no return begins".

Zakharova spoke before the US announced sanctions against the two men.

 

Elad Benari

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/322924

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Ukraine invasion: Russia 'increasingly frustrated' by lack of momentum: US defense official - Caitlin McFall

 

by Caitlin McFall

More than 50% of assembled Russian forces have entered Ukraine

 

As Ukraine enters its third day of Russian bombardment following President Vladimir Putin’s invasion this week, a senior defense official said Saturday that Moscow has become "increasingly frustrated" by the lack of momentum.

"We have indications that the Russians are increasingly frustrated by their lack of momentum over the last 24 hours, particularly in the north parts of Ukraine," the senior defense official said. "We also continue to see indications of viable Ukrainian resistance."

RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE: LIVE UPDATES

Ukrainian soldiers take positions outside a military facility as two cars burn, in a street in Kyiv, Ukraine, Saturday, Feb. 26, 2022.
Ukrainian soldiers take positions outside a military facility as two cars burn, in a street in Kyiv, Ukraine, Saturday, Feb. 26, 2022. (AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti)

"We continue to believe, based on what we've observed, that this resistance is greater than what the Russians expected," the official added. 

Russian forces have entered Ukraine from the north, south and east, and defense officials believe Putin is attempting to encircle the capital city of Kyiv.

Russia launched a successful amphibious assault from the Sea of Azov Friday and its forces continue to make advancements, but the defense official said Russia has been unable to gain air superiority or take control over any Ukrainian cities.

Despite attempted advances, Russian forces have been unable to successfully penetrate Kyiv and remain approximately 20 miles outside the city.

UKRAINE-RUSSIA WAR: KYIV STILL STANDING ON DAY 3, ZELENSKYY REFUSES TO LEAVE COUNTRY

People take cover as an air-raid siren sounds, near an apartment building damaged by recent shelling in Kyiv, Ukraine February 26, 2022.
People take cover as an air-raid siren sounds, near an apartment building damaged by recent shelling in Kyiv, Ukraine February 26, 2022.  (REUTERS/Gleb Garanich )

Though the official noted the situation in Ukraine is a "battlefield" and remains "very dynamic and will change hour by hour."

The United Kingdom's defense ministry said Saturday that the capture of Kyiv remains Putin's primary objective, but said strong Ukrainian resistance and logistical difficulties have hindered Russian advancements. 

Overnight clashes that did occur in Kyiv are believed to have been carried out by small numbers of pre-positioned Russian sabotage groups. 

Intermittent internet outages persist in Ukraine and civilian housing has been hit largely by Russian shelling and explosives.

Russian troops are "bypassing" areas with large populations and are instead leaving forces behind to "encircle and isolate them," the U.K. defense ministry said. 

Defense officials estimate that of the 150,000 troops Russia amassed along Ukraine in the months leading up to the incursion that more than 50% of those forces have already entered Ukraine. 

President Biden approved the distribution of another $350 million in military aid to Ukraine to help its continued fight against the Russian incursion – pushing U.S. defensive aid for Kyiv over the last year to $1 billion.

Ukrainian service members are seen at the site of a fighting with Russian raiding group in the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv in the morning of February 26, 2022,
Ukrainian service members are seen at the site of a fighting with Russian raiding group in the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv in the morning of February 26, 2022, (SERGEI SUPINSKY/AFP via Getty Images)

Pentagon press secretary John Kirby told reporters Saturday this aid would come in the form of anti-armor, small arms, various munitions, body armor and "related equipment in support of Ukraine's frontline defenders."

"We, along with our allies and partners are standing together to continue to expedite security assistance to Ukraine," Kirby said. "Our commitments and deliveries continue as a sign of our unwavering support for Ukraine sovereignty and territorial integrity."

 

Caitlin McFall

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukraine-invasion-russia-increasingly-frustrated-lack-of-momentum-us-defense-official

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Here Is Why Iran's Mullahs Are Excited About Biden's Nuclear Deal - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

That the ruling mullahs of Iran seem to be so delighted with what the Biden team is apparently offering, that Iran even wants assurances from the administration that the US can never pull out of the deal, should blowtorch the US negotiators out of the room.

  • That the ruling mullahs are asking the Biden administration for guarantees that the US will never be able to leave the new nuclear deal, even after President Joe Biden leaves office, should signal that the mullahs want this deal badly and set off all sorts of alarms.

  • It is worth noting that Iran's ballistic missile capability is one of the most critical pillars of Tehran's national security policy -- the third-most important program of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), along with Iran's nuclear program and supporting the country's foreign proxies.

  • [A] nuclear deal will be a victory for Iran's foreign militias and terror groups. The 2015 nuclear deal allowed the flow of billions of dollars into the treasury of Iranian regime, thereby providing the revenues that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) needed to escalate their military adventurism in the region. That project included financing, arming and supporting their militias and terror groups in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Gaza and Yemen. After the nuclear agreement, Iran's meddling, interventions in the region, and funding militia groups immediately escalated.

  • Iran also increased deliveries of weapons and munitions to its foreign militias, and the number of ballistic missiles deployed by Iran's proxies rose to an unprecedented level. When the JCPOA nuclear deal was scuttled in 2018, some of Iran's authorities publicly announced that they did not have money to pay their mercenaries abroad.

  • That the ruling mullahs of Iran seem to be so delighted with what the Biden team is apparently offering, that Iran even wants assurances from the administration that the US can never pull out of the deal, should blowtorch the US negotiators out of the room.

  • Will the US and the international community reward yet another predatory, expansionist regime with nuclear capability and billions of dollars and the ability to have increased oil and missile production?

  • How much punishment to his legacy is Biden eager to take on?

Iran's ballistic missile capability is one of the most critical pillars of Tehran's national security policy -- the third-most important program of its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, along with the nuclear program and supporting the country's foreign proxies. (Image source: iStock)

When Iran's regime is ecstatic about a deal, it should send a warning signal to the US and its allies. That the ruling mullahs are asking the Biden administration for guarantees that the US will never be able to leave the new nuclear deal, even after President Joe Biden leaves office, should signal that the mullahs want this deal badly and set off all sorts of alarms.

A nuclear deal with the Iranian regime is a win for the Islamic Republic. A deal would have several advantages for Tehran's regime. First, a nuclear deal would boost Iran's ballistic missile program as it did right after the 2015 deal, when Tehran promptly accelerated its missile development and tests.

To keep the Islamic Republic in the nuclear deal, the world powers will most likely be reluctant to hold the theocratic establishment accountable for its ballistic missile violations. There is a precedent for such an argument. At the time, the United Nations Security Council disregarded Iran's advances despite the JCPOA's "restrictions on Iranian ballistic missile activities," which states:

"Paragraph 3 of Annex B of resolution 2231 (2015) calls upon Iran not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology.... these restrictions shall apply until the date eight years after the JCPOA Adoption Day (18 October 2015) or until the date on which the IAEA submits a report confirming the Broader Conclusion, whichever is earlier."

It is worth noting that Iran's ballistic missile capability is one of the most critical pillars of Tehran's national security policy -- the third-most important program of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), along with Iran's nuclear program and supporting the country's foreign proxies. Iran, surpassing Israel, possesses the largest ballistic missile program in the Middle East. Moreover no country other than Iran developed or acquired long-range ballistic missiles before obtaining nuclear weapons.

Second, as critical sanctions are removed on the Islamic Republic's energy, financial, and shipping sectors, a nuclear deal will lift the financial strain on the Iranian regime. Tehran's most recent economic woes began after the nuclear deal fell apart under the Trump administration. The regime is reportedly facing one of the worst budget deficits in its four-decade rule. Iran is running a deficit of almost a billion USD budget every month. This deficit, in return, has increased inflation and devalued the Iranian currency (rial) even further.

The Chinese Communist Party, however, is strengthening its ties with the Iranian regime and helping it violate US sanctions, conveniently without facing any repercussions from the Biden administration. China is ramping up its oil imports from Iran in spite of US sanctions, and it recently announced the launch of new 25-year strategic partnership with the Islamic Republic.

With a nuclear deal, however, Tehran will be able to take advantage of its energy resources. Iran has the second-largest natural gas reserves and the fourth-largest proven crude oil reserves in the world; the sale of these resources account for more than 80% of its export revenues.

Third, a nuclear deal will be a victory for Iran's foreign militias and terror groups. The 2015 nuclear deal allowed the flow of billions of dollars into the treasury of Iranian regime, thereby providing the revenues that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) needed to escalate their military adventurism in the region. That project included financing, arming and supporting their militias and terror groups in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Gaza and Yemen. After the nuclear agreement, Iran's meddling, interventions in the region, and funding militia groups immediately escalated.

Iran also increased deliveries of weapons and munitions to its foreign militias, and the number of ballistic missiles deployed by Iran's proxies rose to an unprecedented level. When the JCPOA nuclear deal was scuttled in 2018, some of Iran's authorities publicly announced that they did not have money to pay their mercenaries abroad. In an interview with the state-run Ofogh Television Network, Parviz Fattah, the head of Iran's Foundation for the Underprivileged (Mostazafan Foundation) stated:

"I was at the IRGC Cooperative Foundation. Haj Qassem [Soleimani, the IRGC Quds Force commander killed by a US drone strike] came and told me he did not have money to pay the salaries of the Fatemiyoun [Afghan mercenaries]. He said that these are our Afghan brothers, and he asked for help from people like us."

Finally, with a nuclear deal, the regime would gain global legitimacy, making it even more difficult to hold Iran's leaders accountable for any malign behavior or terror activity across the world.

Will the US and the international community reward yet another predatory, expansionist regime with nuclear capability and billions of dollars and the ability to have increased oil and missile production?

That the ruling mullahs of Iran seem to be so delighted with what the Biden team is apparently offering, that Iran even wants assurances from the administration that the US can never pull out of the deal, should blowtorch the US negotiators out of the room.

How much punishment to his legacy is Biden eager to take on?

 

Dרץ Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on Islam and US foreign policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18269/iran-excited-nuclear-deal

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Chinese Censorship on American Soil - Peter Schweizer

 

by Peter Schweizer

Everyone understands that the quid pro quo of taking Chinese cash is that you never criticize them." — David Sacks, The Megyn Kelly Show, February 8, 2022.

  • Americans are now familiar with the sad spectacle of their own countrymen bowing to Chinese pressure publicly. We see it done by captains of industry, Wall Street's largest firms, the most elite universities, sports heroes, cultural figures, and politicians alike. It has become so common that it is news when someone instead resists the pressure from Chinese communist regime and suffers financially because of it.

  • The latest example of that is professional basketball player Enes Kanter Freedom, who was recently traded by the Boston Celtics to the Houston Rockets, which then promptly waived him. The Rockets have offered no reason for this move, but it is no secret that the team has a devoted following in and makes a lot of money from China.

  • "People's willingness to speak out about these issues tends to be related to how much business they have in China.... Everyone understands that the quid pro quo of taking Chinese cash is that you never criticize them." — David Sacks, The Megyn Kelly Show, February 8, 2022.

  • My latest book, Red Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win, traces these themes.... It is surprising how little attention those chapters have received in mainstream news outlets....

  • Highlighted are detailed actions and pro-Beijing statements of financial giants such as Larry Fink and Ray Dalio, who run BlackRock and Bridgewater Associates, respectively. An entire chapter catalogs similar kowtowing from Big Tech by Silicon Valley's wealthiest CEOs, including Mark Zuckerberg, Tim Cooke, and Bill Gates. From political dynasties in the US and Canada to philanthropists and Harvard professors, from sports stars to movie actors, the Chinese money talks so loudly it drowns out every other sound.

  • "News conglomerates do not want to cover bad news about China. But it's not because of a grand conspiracy theory. It's simply because they make so much money." — Alex Marlow, editor-in-chief of Breitbart News and author of the book, Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media's Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption.

  • Even smaller media outlets such as The Atlantic Monthly and Axios aren't immune, [Marlow] notes in his book. Both are owned by Laurene Powell Jobs, Steve Jobs's widow, whose fortune came from Apple and Disney, two companies that owe a lot of their wealth to their business activities in China.

  • "Bloomberg News has to extend its contract every two years, so [Michael Bloomberg] goes over there to kiss the ring." — Alex Marlow, The Drill Down, February 10, 2022

  • How much longer will our large media outlets ignore the growing threat Chinese influence poses to their core principles of presenting the truth without fear or favor?

  • As Albert Camus, wrote, "The Welfare of the people... has always been the alibi of tyrants... giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience."

"The CCP is essentially depriving Americans of their free speech rights – not in China, but on American soil – as a condition of doing business over there." Billionaire tech investor David Sacks recently summed up the state of Communist Chinese intimidation of American business, sports leagues like the NBA, and anyone else with commercial interests in China. Pictured: Sacks speaks at a conference on September 13, 2016 in San Francisco. (Image source: TechCrunch/Flickr CC by 2.0)

Billionaire tech investor David Sacks recently summed up the present state of Communist Chinese intimidation of American business, sports leagues like the NBA, and anyone else with commercial interests in China. He sees it getting worse, not better.

Appearing on a podcast hosted by former Fox News anchor and NBC talk show host Megyn Kelly, Sacks was asked to address the backlash against his friend, Chamath Palihapitiya, for saying "no one cares" about repression and ethnic cleansing of the Uyghurs by China's communist regime. Sacks told Kelly he accepts his friend's later explanation that his words simply came out wrong. But Sacks's larger response to the question of Chinese intimidation really hit the nail on the head:

"The CCP is essentially depriving Americans of their free speech rights – not in China, but on American soil – as a condition of doing business over there."

Americans are now familiar with the sad spectacle of their own countrymen bowing to Chinese pressure publicly. We see it done by captains of industry, Wall Street's largest firms, the most elite universities, sports heroes, cultural figures, and politicians alike. It has become so common that it is news when someone instead resists the pressure from Chinese communist regime and suffers financially because of it.

The latest example of that is professional basketball player Enes Kanter Freedom, who was recently traded by the Boston Celtics to the Houston Rockets, which then promptly waived him. The Rockets have offered no reason for this move, but it is no secret that the team has a devoted following in and makes a lot of money from China. The Rockets were, you may remember, the team whose general manager, Daryl Morey, ran afoul of China's regime after he tweeted support for pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong in 2019. His public statement angered Beijing, which banned sales of all Rockets merchandise and took NBA shows off the air until the team and the league came to heel. Morey stepped down from his job with the team a year later.

Sacks is deeply concerned about China's malevolent influence in the world. Not just the regime's persecution of the Uyghurs, but their theft of American intellectual property and cyber espionage, their belligerent relations with their neighbors and treatment of dissidents, the "social credit system" they impose on their people and, of course, their actions related to the COVID pandemic.

Still, he understands the pressures Americans are subjected to by the regime. "People's willingness to speak out about these issues tends to be related to how much business they have in China. I have no business in China, so I feel fairly unencumbered in saying what I just said. But there are a lot of people who do business in China who just won't speak out. Everyone understands that the quid pro quo of taking Chinese cash is that you never criticize them."

My latest book, Red Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win, traces these themes across many areas of American life, and tracks with Sacks's observations. The best-selling book has received notice in the press for its revelation that Joe Biden's family made $31 million in deals with individuals connected directly to Chinese intelligence. That was in one chapter. Subsequent chapters investigate the actions and statements of powerful figures from Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and elite academia, among other targets. It is surprising how little attention those chapters have received in mainstream news outlets, apart from Fox News.

Highlighted are detailed actions and pro-Beijing statements of financial giants such as Larry Fink and Ray Dalio, who run BlackRock and Bridgewater Associates, respectively. An entire chapter catalogs similar kowtowing from Big Tech by Silicon Valley's wealthiest CEOs, including Mark Zuckerberg, Tim Cooke, and Bill Gates. From political dynasties in the US and Canada to philanthropists and Harvard professors, from sports stars to movie actors, the Chinese money talks so loudly it drowns out every other sound.

Alex Marlow of Breitbart News recently appeared on The Drill Down, and our topic quickly turned to how these same economic strings affect the largest media companies in this country as well. Marlow said he believes in "following the money," and he applied that lens to researching his own new book.

All of the large news outlets are part of corporations that owe large parts of their revenue streams to their business interests in China. "News conglomerates do not want to cover bad news about China. But it's not because of a grand conspiracy theory. It's simply because they make so much money," he said.

Indeed, it is hard to feel sorry for NBC's sports broadcasting business, which has seen viewership of its exclusive Beijing Olympics coverage plummet by 50 percent because of various boycotts and ill feelings against the Chinese Communist hosts, turncoat American athletes who are competing under the Chinese flag, and a visual spectacle that looks like something out of "The Hunger Games."

NBC, Marlow explained, is part of NBCUniversal, which is in turn owned by Comcast. Thus, they are not only the corporate sponsor of the "Genocide Games," but day to day make a lot of money in China from Universal Studios and its associated theme park there. ABC News is owned by Disney, which makes huge amounts of money in China through its theme parks and other entertainment businesses. CNN's parent is AT&T, which last year allegedly lobbied the US Commerce Department on behalf of China Telecom over a sanctions measure related to human rights violations by the Chinese.

Even smaller media outlets such as The Atlantic Monthly and Axios aren't immune, he notes in his book. Both are owned by Laurene Powell Jobs, Steve Jobs's widow, whose fortune came from Apple and Disney, two companies that owe a lot of their wealth to their business activities in China.

Michael Bloomberg, whose financial news empire has made him $50 billion, "has the most access [in China] of any major media conglomerate, and it's totally at the will of Beijing's propagandists," Marlow said. "Bloomberg News has to extend its contract every two years, so he goes over there to kiss the ring."

As Sacks noted, he has no business interests in China and can risk speaking out. NBC and others whose corporate paymasters owe massive percentages of their annual sales revenue to Chinese indulgences are not so free. What they can excuse for the sake of not offending their Chinese hosts and benefactors, they excuse or minimize. What they can ignore, they ignore.

How much longer will our large media outlets ignore the growing threat Chinese influence poses to their core principles of presenting the truth without fear or favor?

As Albert Camus, wrote, "The Welfare of the people... has always been the alibi of tyrants... giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience."

 

Peter Schweizer, President of the Governmental Accountability Institute, is a Gatestone Institute Distinguished Senior Fellow and author of the new book, Red Handed: How American Elites are Helping China Win.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18268/chinese-censorship-american-soil

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Democrats are using the 14th Amendment to threaten Republican candidates - Renee Parsons

 

by Renee Parsons

They’ve resurrected a little-remembered clause going back to the years after the Civil War to try to kick Republicans off the ballot.

As the midterm 2022 elections approach, the expectation is that, with thirty Democratic House retirements and the continued unraveling of the Biden Administration, the Dems are about to experience historic losses in both the House and Senate.

However, the evil geniuses within the Democratic party have identified the Fourteenth Amendment as a vehicle to thwart Republican dreams of achieving a massive political realignment. Therefore, it may be shortsighted to count the one-time party of Jefferson as down-and-out until the last glimmering frenzy has been extinguished.

In 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment was amended to add Section 3, also known as the Disqualification Clause. It holds that no member of Congress or a state legislature “shall have engaged in an insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” In other words, any such official who swore to uphold the US Constitution may be banned from holding public office if engaged in what might be defined as an “insurrection” or “rebellion.”

Soon after the 2016 election, one hundred senior government staffers with links to Never Trumpers, former Obama White House, and the Open Society Foundation were organized by Marc Elias, Democratic party Super Duper Fixer and top brain trust strategist. Elias is credited with the ultimately ineffective Russiagate scandal and establishing the Transition Integrity Project before the 2020 election, which now reads like a blueprint on how to remove Trump from the White House. Elias’ efforts concede that, if the Dems cannot win with public support on the issues, they must then resort to whatever nefarious deception they can concoct.

With the Fourteenth Amendment in his back pocket, Elias has now taken the lead, promising that

Before the midterm election, we will have a serious discussion about whether individual Republican House Members are disqualified by Section 3 of the 14th Amendment from serving in Congress.

While a joint session of Congress was to scrutinize and certify each state’s 2020 election results during the January 6 (J6) certification process, the “Stop the Steal” Capitol demonstration became the ideal vehicle for alleging that a violent assault was organized to stop Congress from declaring Joe Biden to be the 2020 winner.

With the 2022 election looming, the Democrats have begun a robust campaign to accuse certain House Members of Fourteenth Amendment violations. A recent mailing from the 315electionfund.org  states that “Nearly 70 Republicans who participated in the January 6 attack on our Capitol are currently HOLDING elected office throughout the country.”

More ominously, Rolling Stone magazine, which once had a good reputation as an investigative journal, relied on anonymous sources who provided no facts, no evidence, and no corroborating information to accuse seven Republican House members as “insurrectionists” who planned and participated in J6: Paul Gosar (AZ), Andy Biggs (AZ), Madison Cawthorn (NC), Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA), Lauren Boebert (CO), Mo Brooks (AL), and Louie Gohmert (TX). Former Trump Chief of Staff was also included in this insurrection charge. Of course, there is no evidence of an armed insurrection and not one person was charged with bringing a firearm to the Capitol.

Image: Madison Cawthorn (cropped) by Gage Skidmore. CC BY-SA 2.0.

Undeterred by facts, a purported independent nonprofit group, Free Speech for People, which claimed to act for North Carolina constituents, filed a complaint with the North Carolina Board of Election (“NCBE”) alleging that Rep. Cawthorn must be disqualified per the Fourteenth Amendment.

Cawthorn responded with a suit against the five-member NCBE, in which he challenged the North Carolina law under which Free Speech for People asserted its challenge. Cawthorn pointed out that the law improperly forces onto the candidate the burden of proving that he is qualified to run, forcing him to prove his innocence. This, alleges Cawthorn, is unconstitutional at multiple levels. He also alleged that Section 3 is unconstitutional because the U.S. House of Representatives has the exclusive power to determine its members’ qualifications.

Rep. Jim Banks (IN) was also hit with a legal challenge seeking to remove him from the ballot under the Fourteenth Amendment. Banks is Chair of the Republican Study Group and on J6 voted against Biden’s Electoral College win. Nancy Pelosi subsequently denied Banks a place on the Democratic House J6 Investigation, the Republicans boycotted the panel. All of this led a challenger to petition that he be kicked off the ballot under the Disqualification Clause.

Rep. Lauren Boebert (CO), who attended the J6 rally, has been identified as an “insurrectionist.” A well-funded former RINO state senator is planning to challenge her in a primary contest. He could well claim that he should win the primary because Boebert is vulnerable to a Disqualification Clause attack.

Although it’s not a formal legal attack, the “insurrection” charge has been levied against Colorado State Rep. Ron Hanks who is running currently one of the Republican primary candidates to challenge Michael Bennett, the Democrat incumbent in the U.S. Senate. Thus, Bennett sent out the following email:

Proud January 6th insurrectionist and Michael’s leading Republican opponent, State Rep. Ron Hanks won a straw poll following a Republican primary debate, beating out other Republican Senate candidates. This momentum is putting a spotlight on Hanks that is drawing supporters into his campaign, so we have to act fast. Ron Hanks rallied with rioters who attempted to overthrow our democracy. His views are extreme, and he doesn’t represent Colorado’s values. He is out to undermine Democracy.

As a reminder, according to both current and former federal law enforcement officials who were familiar with the investigation, the FBI found “scant evidence of an organized plot” to overthrow certifying the 2020 election. The sources also said that far-right Trump supporters had “not centrally coordinated” events at the Capitol and “there was no grand scheme… to storm the Capitol and take hostages.”

Tellingly, the improperly constituted Congressional J6 Oversight committee has yet to hold a public hearing with bona fide testimony or facts. RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel rightly says the committee represents a “Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse.”

While the Amnesty Act of 1872 reversed most of the office-holding disqualifications in Section 3, the Elias forces will continue to try to overthrow incumbent politicians as we head to the 2022 election.

 

Renee Parsons served on the ACLU’s Florida State Board of Directors and as president of the ACLU Treasure Coast Chapter. She has been an elected public official in Colorado, staff in the Office of the Colorado State Public Defender, an environmental lobbyist for Friends of the Earth and a staff member of the US House of Representatives in Washington DC. She can be found at reneedove3@yahoo.com

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/02/democrats_are_using_the_14th_amendment_to_threaten_republican_candidates.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Meretz Minister acknowledges: Land in Sheikh Jarrah belonged to Jews - Orli Harari

 

by Orli Harari

Regional Cooperation Minister Esawi Frej: There are three million Palestinians in the West Bank and 2.2 million residents in Gaza, what will happen in 50 years?

 

Esawi Frej
Esawi Frej                                                                                 Noam Revkin Fenton/Flash 90

Regional Cooperation Minister Esawi Frej (Meretz) believes in the stability of the government and claims that its policy is led by the right-wing parties in the coalition.

In an interview with the Yediot Aharonot newspaper, Frej was asked what should be done so as not to be dragged into a round of fighting in the wake of the riots in the Shimon Hatzadik neighborhood of Jerusalem.

"Courage and leadership," he replied. "The problem there is not because of real estate, but is political in nature. This is land that indeed belongs to the Jews, based on land registry records from before the establishment of the state, but it is an issue that is resolved politically."

"Arabs also have land in Jaffa and Haifa and Talbiya. I try to get into the head of every Zionist Jew right now and think about where they want to go. There are three million Palestinians in the West Bank and 2.2 million residents in Gaza, what will happen in 50 years?"

"Forget the two-state solution, but at least let them live with dignity. It is impossible to leave the situation as it is," the minister added.

Asked whether Meretz will be supportive from the government should the situation escalate into a military operation, Frej replied, "Every country has the right to defend itself, but why should I think about fighting now? I will find a solution to that when that happens. I want security no less than you, the State of Israel is my country no less than it is yours and I want it to be strong and secure."

 

Orli Harari

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/322881

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Raymond Ibrahim Video: Islam and Academic Myths - Raymond Ibrahim

 

by Raymond Ibrahim

Why do Western academics present Islam as an enlightened force for progress?

 


 

Western academics routinely present Islam as an enlightened force for progress unfortunately stymied by Western bigotry and aggression. Where did this image come from and how did it become ensconced in universities? What truths and falsehoods does it contain? What implications does it have?

Raymond Ibrahim, a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, was recently featured in a webinar hosted by the Middle East Forum, where he is the Judith Friedman Rosen Fellow. Ibrahim addressed these questions and more in a must-see video from the Middle East Forum. Check it out below:

 

Raymond Ibrahim

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/02/video-islam-and-academic-myths-raymond-ibrahim-raymond-ibrahim/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Thursday, February 24, 2022

US lobbying firms cut ties with Nord Stream 2 following Russia sanctions announcement - Ronn Blitzer

 

by Ronn Blitzer

Russia-backed company has paid millions to American lobbyists to support the project

 

Two American lobbying firms that had been hired by Nord Stream 2 to drum up U.S. support for the pipeline are ending their relationships with the project.

President Biden announced Wednesday that he was issuing sanctions against Nord Stream 2 – owned by Russian state-owned energy company Gazprom – and its CEO Matthis Warnig. The lobbyists made their plans known to FOX Business Thursday morning.

US LOBBYISTS, INCLUDING FORMER BIDEN ADVISER, RAKE IN MILLIONS FROM RUSSIA-BACKED NORD STREAM 2

"We are terminating our engagement on the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project in compliance with U.S. sanctions," a spokesperson for lobbying firm Roberti Global said in a statement.

The statement was nearly identical to that of BGR Group, another firm Nord Stream 2 had paid big money.

"BGR is ending its engagement with the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project in compliance with economic and trade sanctions announced by the U.S. government," the firm said.

Nord Stream 2

Pipes at the landfall facilities of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline are pictured in Lubmin, northern Germany, on Feb. 15, 2022. (AP Photo/Michael Sohn, File / AP Newsroom)

RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE: LIVE UPDATES

According to records reported by OpenSecrets.org, Nord Stream 2 paid American lobbying firm Roberti Global $5 million since 2020 for co-founder Vincent Roberti to lobby in support of the pipeline. 

Roberti is a Democratic donor and a former adviser to Joe Biden's 2008 run for president.

Nord Stream 2 has paid roughly $1.6 million to BGR Group for the services of Walker Roberts since 2020, according to OpenSecrets.org. Roberts worked in the Reagan White House and on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee under Chairman Richard Lugar.

Due to Russia deeming the pipeline a commercial project despite being run by a government-owned company, lobbyists have registered pursuant to the Lobbying Disclosure Act, which does not require that they disclose what government officials they have met with. Typically, lobbyists working on behalf of foreign governments have to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which would require that they publicize with whom they meet.

 

Ronn Blitzer

Source: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/american-lobbying-firms-cut-ties-nord-stream-2-russia-sanctions

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

There's still time for Biden, NATO to stop Russia's Putin in Ukraine - Rebecca Grant

 

by Rebecca Grant

America literally can’t afford to sit this out. Putin must be stopped now.

 

Here’s the dirty little secret about Ukraine. For the most part, nobody cared. Many policymakers in Washington, D.C. didn’t think Ukraine was worth defending. Ukraine was not a strategic interest for America, they said.  Especially Obama and Biden liberals, but plenty others, too. 

All that changed Wednesday night.

RUSSIA INVADED UKRAINE: LIVE UPDATES

Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting with members of the country's Paralympic team ahead of the Beijing 2022 Paralympic Winter Games via a video link in Moscow, Russia February 21, 2022. Sputnik/Alexey Nikolsky/Kremlin via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY.

Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting with members of the country's Paralympic team ahead of the Beijing 2022 Paralympic Winter Games via a video link in Moscow, Russia February 21, 2022. Sputnik/Alexey Nikolsky/Kremlin via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY.

Putin is far, far crazier than most Americans knew. He’s shocked the world by unleashing a war on 44 million people in Ukraine. Putin’s goal is to sweep in and wipe out Ukraine as a democracy in hours not days. To do this, Russia will strike Ukraine’s military command and control, causing chaos just when President Zelensky needs to reposition Ukraine’s forces.

Go sanction every Russian asset and kicking them out of all global business. But Russia will still have back-up from China and sanctions won’t affect Putin with the battle lust upon him. 

Putin’s Russia is truly a danger to America and our allies around the world. Don’t forget Putin controls over 6,000 nuclear weapons.

America literally can’t afford to sit this out. Putin must be stopped now.

Dan Hoffman: 'This is an utter failure of US strategy'

 

 

 

 

Video

Russia triumphant in Ukraine will doom America to years, even decades, of rearming and guarding Europe – at a time when we must focus on the economic and military threats from China. America’s military is already overstretched. Look ahead. A Russian sweep in Ukraine puts the Baltics, and even Poland, at risk.

Sadly, being Commander-in-Chief is clearly out of Biden’s comfort zone. Biden’s military response has been pathetic. I wager the a-ha moment for Putin in plotting his invasion of Ukraine started with the fall of Kabul, as the world watched Biden fumble the military response. Biden fired no one after the Afghanistan debacle so Putin realized he’d face a weak 

team. 

RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE IN LARGEST EUROPEAN ATTACK SINCE WWII

Biden had weeks to put US military deterrence in action using strong statements and crafted military deployments. Again he failed. 

Kyiv resident: Ukrainians ‘don’t know what to do’ amid Russian invasion

 

 

 

 

Video

Team Biden also cynically ignored the fact that President William J. Clinton gave Ukraine security guarantees in 1994 when Ukraine dismantled its nuclear arsenal.

Just to keep the record straight, there were plenty of military indications of Russia’s menace even before the massing of troops that began in late 2021. The U.S. watched Russia build up its military after 2014 and master large-force snap military exercises. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley refocused strategy on preparing to fight Russia starting back in 2016, when Milley was Army Chief of Staff. President Donald Trump’s 2017 America First national security strategy called out the threat from Russia and so did the defense strategy released by Secretary of Defense James Mattis. So it’s not like we didn’t know. 

Lawmakers call for tough response from Biden to Ukraine invasion

 

 

 

 

Video    

Here today, it’s not too late for the U.S. and NATO to help Ukraine fight off Russia and deny Putin the win. Specifically, the U.S. and NATO need to commit military assistance to Ukraine. Ukraine needs combat aircraft surveillance, position tracking of Russian forces, and cyber defense right now. Ukraine needs help striking Russian tanks and invasion forces while they come down the highways. With help, Ukraine can put up a tough fight as they did in 2014 and 2015. Remember Russia’s ongoing war in eastern Ukraine has already claimed 14,000 lives. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

If Biden doesn’t give fast assistance, the alternative is supporting a long, bloody struggle as Russian forces occupy Ukraine.   

Washington inertia may return. Already the talk is shifting toward just supporting Ukraine’s resistance in hopes Putin gets tired of a quagmire. That’s hope, not reality. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Don’t get me wrong.  Americans should think very carefully about using our military.  No one – except Putin – wanted this war. But America’s strategic priorities have changed literally overnight, and we must face this new reality and act on it. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM REBECCA GRANT

 

Rebecca Grant is a national security analyst based in Washington, D.C.  She earned her Ph.D. in International Relations from the London School of Economics at age 25 then worked for RAND and on the staff of the Secretary of the Air Force and Chief of Staff of the Air Force. Since founding IRIS Independent Research, she has specialized in research for government and aerospace industry clients ranging from analysis of military campaigns to projects on major technology acqusition such as the B-21 bomber. Follow her on Twitter at @rebeccagrantdc  

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/biden-nato-russia-putin-ukraine-invasion-rebecca-grant

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter