Sunday, February 23, 2025

Israel challenges Egypt on secret Sinai military buildup - Shirit Avitan Cohen

 

by Shirit Avitan Cohen

Jerusalem has officially protested the recent violations of the 1979 peace treaty, which prohibits Cairo from having a sizeable military presence in Sinai.

 

An Egyptian army M60 main battle tank and an infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) near the Egyptian side of the Rafah border crossing with the Gaza Strip on March 23, 2024. Photo by Khaled Desouki/AFP via Getty Images.
An Egyptian army M60 main battle tank and an infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) near the Egyptian side of the Rafah border crossing with the Gaza Strip on March 23, 2024. Photo by Khaled Desouki/AFP via Getty Images.

Senior Israeli officials have approached Egypt regarding serious violations of peace agreement terms following mounting evidence of Egyptian military buildup in Sinai that exceeds previously agreed limits.

Sources familiar with the matter said Egyptian officials proposed U.S. mediation to reduce growing tensions between the nations. The Israeli diplomatic messages were conveyed amid increasingly concerning social media posts showing the Egyptian army allegedly conducting exercises preparing for a potential invasion of Israel through Sinai.

In recent discussions between the sides, Egyptian officials expressed their own concerns, stating that “entities with foreign interests aiming to destabilize relations between the countries are responsible for distributing the videos, some edited and some fabricated.”

Egypt additionally proposed resolving its Sinai violations through accelerated bilateral dialogue to bridge gaps.

These diplomatic exchanges follow last month’s remarks by Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Yehiel Leiter, who characterized the situation as “intolerable” in a meeting with American Jewish organization leaders.

Cairo has constructed military bases in Sinai “that can only be used for offensive operations, for offensive weapons—that’s a clear violation,” Leiter said in the Jan. 28 briefing, a recording of which was shared by the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.

Egypt’s breach “is an issue that is going to come to the fore because it’s not tolerable,” the Israeli diplomatic envoy explained. “For a long time, it’s been shunted aside, and this continues. This is going to be an issue that we’re going to put on the table very soon and very emphatically.”

Satellite images indicating changes in Egyptian army deployment in the Sinai Peninsula have reportedly led security coordinators in Israeli border towns to paint a worrying picture of recent developments.

Security and diplomatic sources confirmed Egypt’s pattern of introducing forces into Sinai in violation of agreements over the years, only requesting Israeli approval after the fact—which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu consistently granted.

Yagil Henkin, a military affairs expert who first warned about concerning trends from the south in 2018, explained: “This happened through creeping annexation. First, they would bring in forces, then retroactively request Israeli approval, which was always given. Even after operational needs ended, forces were not withdrawn.”

In recent days, Cairo’s official rhetoric has escalated in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s plan for relocating Palestinians from Gaza. President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has made clear that he will not allow the move to happen, even postponing a planned visit to the White House.

In his speech to the Conference of Presidents, Leiter said el-Sisi “plays both sides of the equation, but he is threatened by the Muslim Brotherhood.”

If the Israeli military decisively defeats the Muslim Brotherhood branch in the Gaza Strip—Hamas—el-Sisi is “going to be more open to cooperate with us on the ‘day after’ Hamas,” he argued.

The Israeli envoy called it “unconscionable that Egypt wouldn’t entertain the possibility of at least temporarily housing some of the [Palestinian] refugees, particularly in light of the fact that members of Sisi’s family are running a travel agency in which they take tens of thousands of dollars from Gazans who want to get out of the area.”

This is an edited version of a story originally published by Israel Hayom.


Shirit Avitan Cohen

Source: https://www.jns.org/israel-challenges-egypt-on-secret-sinai-military-buildup/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump Must Abandon the Disastrous Ceasefire Deal with Hamas - Con Coughlin

 

by Con Coughlin

If Trump and Netanyahu are really serious about achieving lasting peace in Gaza, they must abandon the disastrous ceasefire deal -- and especially the well-intended but painfully out-of-his-depth U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, who has mindlessly promoted it.

 

  • Ever since Hamas launched its murderous assault on Israel in October 2023, Hamas leaders, together with their supporters in Qatar and Iran, have calculated that any outcome from the Gaza conflict that enables Hamas to remain in control of the enclave counts as a victory.

  • This agenda for its long-term-client, Hamas, explains why Qatar, which claimed to be a neutral player during the ceasefire negotiations in Doha, has been so keen to oversee a deal that favours Hamas at the expense of Israel's long-term security. This is the same country, after all, that helped to facilitate the deal with the first Trump administration that resulted in the return of the Taliban to power in Afghanistan.

  • If Trump and Netanyahu are really serious about achieving lasting peace in Gaza, they must abandon the disastrous ceasefire deal -- and especially the well-intended but painfully out-of-his-depth U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, who has mindlessly promoted it.

  • Regrettably, Witkoff is on his way to wrecking Trump's election triumph by equally disastrous negotiations in Ukraine, where the US is punishing the victim, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and rewarding the aggressor, Russian President Vladimir Putin. If Trump succeeds in torpedoing his month-old presidency, the blame goes to Witkoff.

If Trump and Netanyahu are really serious about achieving lasting peace in Gaza, they must abandon the disastrous ceasefire deal -- and especially the well-intended but painfully out-of-his-depth U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, who has mindlessly promoted it. Pictured: Trump meets with Netanyahu in the White House in Washington, DC, on February 4, 2025. (Photo by Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

Nothing better illustrates the dire shortcomings of the flawed ceasefire deal agreed between Israel and Iran-backed Hamas than the terrorist organisation's despicable mistreatment of the Israeli hostages it has so far agreed to set free.

By far the most grotesque exhibition of Hamas's contempt for the hostages was their handling of the handover of four Israelis murdered as a result of the October 7, 2023 attacks. Not only was the handover ceremony staged as a propaganda rally for Hamas, it later transpired that one of the slain hostage bodies was not that of Shiri Bibas, as had been agreed in the ceasefire deal. In addition, the Israeli authorities revealed that Bibas's two sons, Ariel (four years old at the time of his abduction) and Kfir (9 months old), whose bodies were returned at the same time, had been murdered by Hamas, and not killed in Israeli airstrikes as the terrorist group had claimed.

Hamas's shocking disrespect for the dead hostages prompted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to declare that Hamas would "pay the price for this cruel and wicked violation of the agreement."

Hamas's latest outrage is in keeping with their willingness to exploit the ceasefire agreement ever since the first Israeli hostages were freed following the implementation of the ceasefire deal last month. With every release, shocking details have emerged of the terrorist group's unspeakable treatment of the surviving hostages that were seized during the October 7 terrorist attack against Israel, during which 1,200 Israelis were murdered and another 250 taken hostage.

Under the first phase of the ceasefire deal originally negotiated by the Biden administration, but implemented as then President-elect Donald Trump prepared to commence his second term as president, Hamas has agreed to release 33 hostages held in Gaza in return for Israel releasing hundreds of convicted Palestinian prisoners, many who are imprisoned for committing acts of terrorism.

Fears that Hamas would simply use the ceasefire deal as a propaganda opportunity have now been confirmed both by the terror group's callous handling of the hostage releases, with many of the Israeli captives being forced to run the gauntlet of a baying Palestinian mob, as well as the chilling details that have emerged of their appalling treatment while in captivity.

In one of the more sickening episodes of Hamas's carefully-choreographed hostage releases, four young Israeli female captives were paraded through the streets of Gaza in late January before finally being released.

More Israelis were outraged by the gaunt appearance of three hostages released earlier this month after it was clear they were suffering from severe malnutrition and had suffered significant weight loss while in captivity.

A British family member of one of the released Israeli hostages remarked that "It looks as though he's been to Belsen," Nazi Germany's infamous concentration camp. Others denounced the "grotesque spectacle" of the hostage releases.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog posted on X shortly after the hostages' release: "This is what a crime against humanity looks like!"

Details have also emerged since the release of the last batch of hostages last week of how they were routinely tortured while in captivity, with one of the released captives confirming that he was "tortured during interrogations" by Hamas terrorists and had the scars on his body to show for it.

Hamas's cynical exploitation of the hostages' release for its own propaganda purposes, which included presenting one of the hostages with an hourglass menacingly depicting the fate of another hostage who still remains in captivity, has already come close to ending the ceasefire, with Israeli officials accusing Hamas of violating the agreement.

While Israel has reluctantly agreed -- for the moment -- to continue with the ceasefire process, the prospects of it surviving beyond the first phase look increasingly remote amid deepening Israeli anger both at Hamas's inhumane treatment of the hostages and its deliberate attempt to exploit the hostages' release for its own propaganda purposes.

With the first phase of the ceasefire, which began on January 19, due to come to an end in two weeks' time, the probability of it moving to the next phase looks increasingly unlikely the more the inherent flaws of the original agreement become apparent.

Netanyahu's reservations about continuing with the ceasefire process have increased after Hamas terrorists regained control of Gaza once the agreement came into force.

Netanyahu has warned he is prepared to resume military operations against Hamas if the terror group does not release all the remaining hostages, warning that the "gates of hell" will be opened if they are not freed.

Netanyahu's reluctance to persist with the ceasefire will have been boosted, moreover, by recent comments made by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio after meeting with the Israeli premier. Rubio declared that Hamas cannot be allowed to continue as either a military or political force in Gaza.

"As long as it stands as a force that can govern or as a force that can administer or as a force that can threaten by use of violence, peace becomes impossible," Rubio said after meeting with Netanyahu in Jerusalem. "It [Hamas] must be eradicated."

Rubio's comments follow Trump's recently-announced plan for Gaza, in which he called on neighbouring Arab states to allow Gaza's two million Palestinian inhabitants to relocate to their territory.

Rubio's open disdain for Hamas, together with the terrorist organisation's blatant disregard for the well-being of the Israeli hostages, must raise serious questions about whether the ceasefire in its current form is fit for purpose.

Any agreement that allows Hamas to reclaim control over Gaza, while at the same time being allowed to publicly humiliate the hostages when they are finally released, is clearly fundamentally flawed, and should not be allowed to proceed to the next stage.

A permanent ceasefire in Gaza would simply reward Hamas for carrying out the worst terrorist attack in Israel's history.

Ever since Hamas launched its murderous assault on Israel in October 2023, Hamas leaders, together with their supporters in Qatar and Iran, have calculated that any outcome from the Gaza conflict that enables Hamas to remain in control of the enclave counts as a victory.

This agenda for its long-term-client, Hamas, explains why Qatar, which claimed to be a neutral player during the ceasefire negotiations in Doha, has been so keen to oversee a deal that favours Hamas at the expense of Israel's long-term security. This is the same country, after all, that helped to facilitate the deal with the first Trump administration that resulted in the return of the Taliban to power in Afghanistan.

In such circumstances, Rubio and the rest of the Trump administration must accept that the ceasefire deal is deeply flawed and must not be allowed to continue.

If Trump and Netanyahu are really serious about achieving lasting peace in Gaza, they must abandon the disastrous ceasefire deal -- and especially the well-intended but painfully out-of-his-depth U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, who has mindlessly promoted it.

Regrettably, Witkoff is on his way to wrecking Trump's election triumph by equally disastrous negotiations in Ukraine, where the US is punishing the victim, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and rewarding the aggressor, Russian President Vladimir Putin. If Trump succeeds in torpedoing his month-old presidency, the blame goes to Witkoff.

Trump has graciously allowed Israel to achieve its stated objective to "open the gates of hell" if Hamas does not return all its hostages. Only then can the job of rebuilding Gaza really begin.


Con Coughlin is the Telegraph's Defence and Foreign Affairs Editor and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21421/disastrous-ceasefire-deal

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Netanyahu: Israel delays prisoners’ release until Hamas agrees to free more hostages - Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

"It has been decided to delay the release of the terrorists planned for yesterday until the release of the next hostages is ensured," the PMO announced.

 

Vehicles move outside the Israeli military Ofer Prison on the day Israel is expected to release Palestinian prisoners as part of a hostages-prisoners swap and a ceasefire deal in Gaza between Hamas and Israel, February 22, 2025. (photo credit: REUTERS/AMMAR AWAD)
Vehicles move outside the Israeli military Ofer Prison on the day Israel is expected to release Palestinian prisoners as part of a hostages-prisoners swap and a ceasefire deal in Gaza between Hamas and Israel, February 22, 2025.
(photo credit: REUTERS/AMMAR AWAD)

Israel will postpone the release of Palestinian prisoners until additional Israeli hostage releases are secured, the Prime Minister’s Office said late Saturday.

The PMO cited Hamas’s repeated violations of the ceasefire-hostage deal as the reason for the postponement.

Hamas on Sunday condemned Israel’s decision, saying its claim that the hostages’ handover ceremonies are “humiliating” was false and a pretext to evade Israel’s obligations under the agreement.

The release of prisoners is expected to take place when the next round of hostages are released.

The PMO announcement came after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened a meeting in Jerusalem with Defense Minister Israel Katz, Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, Shas chair Arye Deri, and senior Defense Ministry officials.

 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations in Jerusalem, on February 16, 2025. (credit: Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)Enlrage image
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations in Jerusalem, on February 16, 2025. (credit: Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)

Decision comes due to Hamas's 'repeated violations'

“Due to Hamas’s repeated violations – including ceremonies that disgrace our hostages’ dignity and the cynical use of hostages for propaganda purposes – it has been decided to delay the release of the terrorists planned for yesterday until the release of the next hostages is ensured, without the degrading ceremonies,” the PMO said.

Israel wants Hamas to release the bodies of the next four hostages earlier than Thursday, when they are set to be released, and the extension of the first phase of the hostage deal to include further releases of hostages.

Israel says that since Hamas violated the agreement when it didn’t return Shiri Bibas’s body, the four bodies of slain hostages should have been returned earlier.

Reuters contributed to this report.


Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-843283

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Rubio: Palestinian terrorists must free all hostages or be destroyed - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

U.S. Deputy Middle East Envoy Morgan Ortagus described Gaza as a “depraved society.”

 

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a meeting with Saudi and Russian officials at Diriyah Palace in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Feb. 18, 2025. Photo by Freddie Everett/U.S. State Department.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a meeting with Saudi and Russian officials at Diriyah Palace in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Feb. 18, 2025. Photo by Freddie Everett/U.S. State Department.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio demanded on Saturday that Hamas and other Palestinian terror groups in the Gaza Strip immediately free all remaining hostages, or else be eradicated.

“Hamas’s treatment of hostages, including its brutal murder of the Bibas family, further illustrates their savagery and is yet another reason why we are saying these terrorists must release all of the hostages immediately or be destroyed,” tweeted Rubio.

The Islamist terrorist group sparked outrage after handing over the wrong body for Shiri Bibas on Thursday. The bodies of her two sons, Kfir and Ariel Bibas, along with that of Oded Lifshitz, were confirmed to be theirs.

Following the outrage, on Friday night Hamas returned a second body to the Red Cross, which in turn delivered it to Israel for identification.

On Saturday, the National Institute of Forensic Medicine at Abu Kabir in Tel Aviv positively identified the remains as being those of Shiri.

“We share in the deep sorrow of the Bibas family and embrace them warmly. We will never forget and never forgive,” said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday night.

“So far, we have brought back 192 hostages—of them 147 alive and 45 deceased,” he said. “Hamas still holds 63 hostages. The Israeli government remains committed to acting decisively to bring all our hostages home—the living back to their families and the fallen to a proper burial in their homeland.”

Meanwhile, U.S. Deputy Middle East Envoy Morgan Ortagus on Friday described Gaza as a “depraved society.”

“You have … a society that has to not only be demilitarized, but has to be deradicalized,” Ortagus said in an interview with Fox News. She noted that Gazan civilians participated in the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, massacre, including the taking of hostages.

“President [Donald] Trump sent a very clear and strong signal about the deradicalization that has to happen to this population. … If you didn’t believe President Trump a few weeks ago, look at the image of the crowd clapping and cheering as babies go back in their coffins into Israel without their mother,” she said.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/rubio-palestinian-terrorists-must-free-all-hostages-or-be-destroyed/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israeli fighter jets fly low over Nasrallah’s funeral in Beirut - JNS

 

by JNS

"You will specialize in funerals—and we will specialize in victories," said Defense Minister Israel Katz.

 

Israeli Air Force fighter jets over Beirut, Feb. 23, 2025. Credit: Israel Defense Forces.
Israeli Air Force fighter jets over Beirut, Feb. 23, 2025. Credit: Israel Defense Forces.

Israeli Air Force fighter jets flew low over Beirut on Sunday afternoon as the funeral of slain Hezbollah terrorist leader Hassan Nasrallah got underway, Defense Minister Israel Katz confirmed in a statement.

“The IAF jets that are now circling in the skies over Beirut over Hassan Nasrallah’s funeral are conveying a clear message: Whoever threatens to destroy Israel and attacks Israel—that will be their end,” Katz said.

“You will specialize in funerals—and we will specialize in victories,” he added.

Nasrallah’s funeral, which took place nearly five months after he was killed in an Israeli airstrike on Sept. 27, saw tens of thousands gather at a stadium in Beirut’s Hezbollah-controlled southern suburb of Dahiyeh.

The Israeli Air Force flyover took place as mourners chanted, “Death to Israel, death to America, we respond to your call, Nasrallah.”

Ahead of the funeral, the Israeli military announced it had attacked several Hezbollah sites in Lebanon, targeting rocket launchers and other arms that it said posed an imminent threat to the territory of the Jewish state.

The military stressed that Hezbollah’s continued terrorist operations continue to violate the established ceasefire understandings between Jerusalem and Beirut and endanger the State of Israel and its citizens.


JNS

Source: https://www.jns.org/israeli-fighter-jets-fly-low-over-nasrallahs-funeral-in-beirut/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Abbas Lies! To the US: I’ll stop Pay-for-Slay; to PLO leaders: I won’t deduct a penny - Itamar Marcus

 

by Itamar Marcus

With great fanfare, Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas declared to the world that he had stopped the PA's terror rewards program known as Pay-for-Slay and that families of terrorists would receive welfare benefits like everyone else in need. Speaking to the Fatah Revolutionary Council last week, he contradicted that statement saying that he would not deduct even one penny from what the PA has been giving to the prisoners and Martyrs: "They must receive everything, as it was in the past."

 

PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas: "We again emphasize that we are proud of the sacrifices made by the Martyrs, prisoners, and wounded... I told you once and I stand by my word: Even if we have [only] one penny left, it is for the prisoners and Martyrs. I will not agree, and you will not agree, to reduce any obligation, any interest, or any penny given to them. They must receive everything, as it was in the past, and they are more precious than all of us! …Note, the number of Martyrs and wounded in the Gaza Strip is 160,000. Who is responsible for them? We are (i.e., the PA)... We have established a comprehensive protection and welfare system and have amended several laws to ensure the needs of all the groups that were harmed among the Palestinian families who need strengthening and assistance in Palestine. This system will work to maintain their dignity and material needs. We ask everyone to trust us."

[Mahmoud Abbas, YouTube channel, Feb. 21, 2025]

Palestinian Media Watch had already reported last week that the PA had not stopped the terror rewards payments and that it was merely paying them from a different account. Since this account also includes welfare recipients, the real amounts paid to terrorists will be harder to determine.

A statement by the head of the Board of Trustees of the Palestinian National Economic Empowerment Institution (PNEEI), the mechanism that will be making the payments, noted that the program is "identical," which seems to confirm what Abbas declared to his Fatah members, namely that the salaries will remain the same:

PNEEI Board of Trustees Director Ahmed Majdalani: "It's not true and not accurate that the financial, ethical, and moral obligations towards all the families who received aid are being abandoned. On the contrary, the new law also attempts to concentrate and institutionalize this aid in the framework of an identical and unified program on the Palestinian lands without discrimination and in accordance with the accepted international standards."

[Official PA TV News, Feb. 10, 2025]

It is clear that Mahmoud Abbas is lying to someone—either to the Western donor countries as he continues to pay high salaries as terror rewards, or to his own PLO/Fatah leaders by saying he will not cut the funds.

Palestinian Media Watch will be following and will continue updating.


Itamar Marcus

Source: https://palwatch.org/page/36977

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF deploys tanks near Jenin for first time since 2002 - Johua Marks

 

by Johua Marks

The Israeli military is intensifying counter-terror operations in northern Samaria following Thursday's failed bus bombings near Tel Aviv.

 

Israeli tanks amassing at the Lebanese border, Sept. 2024. Credit: IDF.
Israeli tanks amassing at the Lebanese border, Sept. 2024. Credit: IDF.

Israeli tanks have been spotted near Jenin in northern Samaria on Sunday for the first time since “Operation Defensive Shield” in 2002.

The Israel Defense Forces has confirmed that an armored division is being deployed in the Jenin area as part of expanded counter-terror operations in the area, according to Israel’s Channel 14.


Furthermore, forces from the IDF’s Nahal Infantry Brigade and the Duvdevan commando unit have initiated operations in additional villages within the Jenin area.

Three tanks from the 53rd Armored Battalion are now active in a neighborhood within Jenin, according to Channel 14, and security sources indicated to the outlet that the IDF is also considering the use of fighter jets to support the ongoing operation.

The military has been conducting an offensive in Samaria, dubbed “Operation Iron Wall,” since Jan. 21. The IDF said on Sunday that troops arrested 26 terrorists in Judea and Samaria over the weekend, adding to some 90 terrorism suspects the IDF said on Friday who were detained over the past week.

The IDF, Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) and Israel Police also confiscated three firearms along with other weapons, and interrogated suspects over Shabbat.

In northern Samaria, security forces continued operations in Jenin, Tulkarm, and Nur Shams, expanding activities to nearby towns on Sunday morning. Additional arrests were made in Nablus, Qabatiya and Deir Qaddis.

This escalation follows a sharp rise in terrorism in Judea and Samaria, notably last Thursday’s attempted mass bus bombing in central Israel.

Defense Minister Israel Katz announced on Sunday that the IDF will remain for the next year in Samaria refugee camps that have been cleared of terrorists and civilians, with no return allowed.

“Forty thousand Palestinians have so far evacuated from the Jenin, Tulkarem and Nur Shams refugee camps, and they are now empty of residents. UNRWA activity in the camps has also been stopped,” Katz said in a written statement.

Defense Minister Israel Katz visits IDF troops in the Tulkarem refugee camp in northern Samaria, Feb. 21, 2025. Photo by Ariel Hermoni/Defense Ministry.

“We are at war with Islamic terror in Judea and Samaria. I have instructed the IDF to prepare for a prolonged stay in the cleared camps for the coming year, and not to allow the return of residents and for terror to return and grow,” Katz continued.

He reiterated that Israel will not revert to previous realities and will keep up its efforts to eradicate terrorist infrastructure and terrorist groups in the area. The IDF will also consider establishing posts within the camps to prevent terrorists from returning, with the operation expected to expand as necessary.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said during a visit to the Tulkarem camp on Friday—hours after explosions on several buses in the Tel Aviv area that are being investigated as a coordinated terrorist attack—that Israeli troops “are doing a tremendous job.”

Netanyahu
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Tulkarm refugee camp in Samaria, Feb. 21, 2025. Photo by Ma’ayan Toaf/GPO.

“In the past year, we have greatly increased our activity. We are entering the strongholds of terrorism, leveling entire streets used by terrorists, and their homes, as well as eliminating terrorists and commanders,” said Netanyahu, according to an English translation provided by his office. “We are taking extremely important measures against Hamas and other terrorist entities who are attempting to harm us,” he added.

The Israeli premier called the events in Bat Yam and Holon on Thursday night “an attempt to perpetrate a series of terrorist attacks with mass casualties,” adding that it “is a very severe situation.”

In response, he said, Israel is launching “additional operations against hotbeds of terrorism.”

“I know that our heroic soldiers know how to do this job well,” he added.

Netanyahu on Thursday ordered the military to conduct a “massive” counter-terrorism operation in Judea and Samaria and instructed the Shin Bet and Israel Police to step up “preventive activities” against possible additional attacks across the country.

Following a situational assessment on Thursday, the IDF said its operations in Judea and Samaria were ongoing and announced the deployment of three additional battalions to reinforce security in the territories.

An Israeli soldier during a counter-terrorism operation in Judea and Samaria, February 2025. Credit: IDF.

All of the explosions on Thursday occurred in parked, empty buses across the central cities of Bat Yam and Holon, located south of Tel Aviv. There were no injuries in the attack. Two more devices were found by Israeli security forces.

At least one of the bombs bore a note, in Arabic and Hebrew, that stated, “Revenge from the Tulkarem refugee camp,” Channel 12 News reported.

All five explosive devices were intended to go off simultaneously in a “strategic terrorist attack,” Channel 12 cited security sources as saying.

On Friday, Katz toured the Tulkarem camp, where he vowed to vanquish the terrorists. “We are at war with extremist Islamic terror and we will win—here, in Gaza and everywhere,” he said.

Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana, during a tour of northern Samaria on Sunday, called for the annexation of Judea and Samaria, saying that Israeli communities there are the key to achieving peace. The member of the ruling Likud Party said:

“These biblical, original, parts of our land, which in the Bible tells the story of our people, are intended for us, for the people of Israel, need to be in the territory of the State of Israel, under the ownership of Israel, under full Israeli sovereignty, and I think that today this thing is clearer than ever.”


Johua Marks

Source: https://www.jns.org/idf-deploys-tanks-near-jenin-for-first-time-since-2002/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Democrats reject decades of policy as they fight against Hegseth’s Pentagon cuts - Ben Whedon

 

by Ben Whedon

Attempting to combat media narratives and obstructionism, Hegseth has insisted that he is merely moving money around in the Pentagon’s budget to other internal priorities and that does not constitute a cut at all. To critics, it doesn't matter.

 

Amid the war on terror and the many military conflicts of the past two decades, Democrats were often critics of foreign adventurism and military spending, pointing to the bloated Pentagon budget as an obvious target for cuts to balance the budget. 

Now that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered a sweeping budget review and the implementation of those cuts, Democrats -- determined to obstruct the Trump agenda -- are suddenly livid and sound like Bush-era Republicans warning of national security failures should the Defense Department lose funding.

The fiscal year 2025 National Defense Authorization Act approved $883.7 billion in funding for discretionary defense purposes. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, however, has reportedly ordered the Pentagon to plan for an 8% budget cut every year for five years, according to The Washington Post, which cited an internal memo and “officials familiar with the matter.”

“To achieve our mandate from President Trump, we are guided by his priorities including securing our borders, building the Iron Dome for America, and ending radical and wasteful government DEI programs and preferencing,” acting Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Salesses said Wednesday.

Hegseth: “It’s not a cut, it’s refocusing and reinvesting”

Attempting to combat media narratives, Hegseth has insisted that he is merely moving money in the Pentagon’s budget to other internal priorities and that such a move did not constitute a cut at all. As the Pentagon plans to allocate funding to other projects, it is unlikely that the shifts would directly impact the national budget. In a public video statement, Hegseth on Thursday urged the public to take media stories with a “grain of salt,” insisting that the media has a “different agenda.” 

Hegseth has sought to free up funds in the budget this year to instead invest in Trump-favored projects like an American Iron Dome. That money comes from the already-approved FY2026 budget and totals around $50 billion, roughly 8% of that budget. He did not directly address the reports of an 8% cut each year for five years, but merely the reallocation of the $50 billion within the existing budget.

Hegseth confirmed that the Department of Government Efficiency was working with the Pentagon and that he had afforded their staff “broad access” to review the department, with a focus on “headquarters, and fat, and redundancies, and topline stuff.”

“The media wants to call these exclusive cuts, but it’s completely the opposite,” he said. “It’s not a cut, it’s refocusing and reinvesting” existing funds toward Trump’s priorities and away from Biden-era social programs. Prior to the announcement, Hegseth highlighted the Pentagon’s inability to pass an audit and its history of financial vagueness.

“The fact that I have to commit to an audit being done in four years is bad enough. The Pentagon should be able to pass a budget right now,” he told Fox News earlier this month. “When we spend dollars, we need to know where they’re going and why. That’s simple accounting.”

Democrats livid

Mainline Democrats did an about face from their decades long opposition to military spending, and were quick to criticize the prospect of a reduced defense budget and now warn of national security failures as they wage war against DOGE and its sweeping cuts to the federal headcount.

“These types of hasty, indiscriminate budget cuts would betray our military forces and their families and make America less safe. I’m all for cutting programs that don’t work, but this proposal is deeply misguided. Secretary Hegseth’s rushed, arbitrary strategy would have negative impacts on our security, economy, and industrial base,” said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I.

The cuts “will have a dramatic, deleterious & damaging effect on our readiness & preparedness for the threats that are only increasing around the world,” Sen. Dick Blumenthal, D-Conn., said on CNN. Blumenthal is notorious for having been accused of "stolen valor": repeatedly claiming to have served in Vietnam. That story fell apart and in 2010 Blumenthal apologized for "misspeaking."

Retired Lt. Gen. and CNN analyst Mark Hertling fumed over the plans, calling them “exponentially worse than sequestration that crippled the military in 2011.”

That was then, this is now.

Social media erupted with comments on the irony of Democrats spending years advocating for defense cuts, only to balk when a Republican actually attempted to implement them. Some Democrats did attempt to force a 10% defense cut in 2020, with 93 of them backing the measure, but it did not succeed.

“A republican president moves to cut defense spending and democrats howl. Amazing,” tweeted the Bluesky Libs account. The about-face is particularly noteworthy in light of Democrats suggesting that DOGE look at the Pentagon instead of cutting other public programs, just weeks previously.

“The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which disburses funds to PBS and NPR stations, gets $535 million a year in federal funding,” posted CNN’s Brian Stelter in early February. “So any official who seriously wanted to achieve billions in cost savings would start elsewhere – like the $874 billion spent on national defense.”

Sanders: “Every once in awhile, I do agree with Trump" 

Despite the Democratic about-face, some die-hard progressives are on board with the plan to reduce the Pentagon’s budget.

“Every once in awhile, I DO agree with Trump. He's right: when the Pentagon cannot complete an independent audit, we should cut military spending by 8% a year over the next 5 years. These savings should go to increasing Social Security benefits & strengthening VA health care,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said.

Young Turks host Cenk Uygur, a stalwart progressive, also lent his limited support to the idea of Pentagon cuts and opined that Democrats would be unwise to oppose the move. “Hegseth says Pentagon needs to cut 8% per year for next five years. Great,” he posted

“Then he says we're going to redirect the savings to another Pentagon program. Not great. Redirect it to the taxpayers. Also, looks like Democrats might be stupid enough to fight AGAINST Pentagon cuts,” Uygur continued.

The Pentagon directed Just the News to the statement from Salesses and declined to provide comment on the reported 8% annual cuts.

 
Ben Whedon

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/wkddemocrats-upend-decades-policy-they-fight-hegseths-pentagon-cuts

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran: To Talk or Not to Talk, That is the Question - Amir Taheri

 

by Amir Taheri

All this does mean that the "Supreme Guide" isn't prepared to perform another of his "heroic flexibilities" by accepting a deal with the "Great Satan" to sit out Trump's four-year tenure, a game that led seven consecutive US presidents up the garden path, allowing the Islamic Republic of Iran to approach its golden jubilee.

 

  • The talk party suggests that Iran should offer to freeze its nuclear program for two to three years, at the end of which it would decide which direction it should take.

  • Those who market the above analysis assume that the US, and for that matter Israel, will stand by and see how the Iranian adversary bounces back from the edge of doom.

  • Khamenei, who controls law and order forces, has put them on partial alert to nip any revolt in the bud. This is accompanied by a massive crackdown against potential dissidents, especially in Tehran, with reports of arbitrary arrests.

  • All this does mean that the "Supreme Guide" isn't prepared to perform another of his "heroic flexibilities" by accepting a deal with the "Great Satan" to sit out Trump's four-year tenure, a game that led seven consecutive US presidents up the garden path, allowing the Islamic Republic of Iran to approach its golden jubilee.

Iran's "Supreme Leader" Ali Khamenei, who controls law and order forces, has put them on partial alert to nip any revolt in the bud. This is accompanied by a massive crackdown against potential dissidents, especially in Tehran, with reports of arbitrary arrests. Pictured: Khamenei meets with President Masoud Pezeshkian in Tehran on August 27, 2024. (Image source: khamenei.ir)

With the Trump administration sending conflicting signals about its intentions on dealing with Iran, the Iranian leadership is once again divided on how to respond.

One faction is trying to paint a grim picture in which the US will give Israel enough support to inflict a heavy defeat on Iran to complete the defeats already inflicted on Tehran's allies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. Such a humiliation will encourage the regime's opponents both inside and outside the country to take to the streets and seize power while a demoralized Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps will do what it did in Syria, that is to say, run for economic crisis cover to save its skin.

The same faction argues that the current economic crisis has sapped the will and energy of the regime's dwindling support base, making regime change a real possibility for the first time.

So, how to negotiate such a dangerous bend of the road?

The faction's luminaries, including President Masoud Pezeshkian, suggest opening talks aimed at preventing a war and allowing things to cool down.

But who should one talk to?

Talking to the US is supposed to be verboten according to "Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenei who cites a fatwa by the founder of the regime, Ruhollah Khomeini, to that effect, plus an act of the "Islamic Majlis," the ersatz parliament that endorses the ban.

The answer is: the European trio of France, Germany and Great Britain, which coincidentally have bumpy relations with Washington.

The theory goes that the trio will welcome a diplomatic coup to restore part of the prestige they have lost because of President Donald Trump's decision to exclude them from his Ukraine peace initiative and plans for the future of Gaza.

But what could one talk about without being forced to offer concessions that result in a massive loss of face?

The talk party suggests that Iran should offer to freeze its nuclear program for two to three years, at the end of which it would decide which direction it should take. Right now, Iran is spending vast resources on a program that has no obvious civilian or military use or justification.

In exchange, the European trio will use the mechanism provided by UN Security Council Resolution 3221 to avoid opening the path for taking military action against Iran. The above-mentioned resolution expires in October, making any unintended consequence a possibility. A deal with the Europeans could help ease pressure on Iran, inject some vitality in a moribund economy, and help prevent a massive popular revolt.

Those who market the above analysis assume that the US, and for that matter Israel, will stand by and see how the Iranian adversary bounces back from the edge of doom.

That analysis is opposed by the faction still totally loyal to Khamenei, who insists that any show of weakness could accelerate moves towards regime change. His advice is to stand firm and prepare for war. The first step is to build a war chest. This is done by reducing the supply of foreign currency to the market to allow the national currency to fall further. The currency which fetched $1 with 650,000 rials now needs 900,000.

This is a trick used by the Allies when they invaded and occupied Iran in World War II.

Because their expenditures in Iran were in the local currency, they forced a 50 percent devaluation of the rial.

Now used by Khamenei, that trick increases the state's purchasing power while reducing the purchasing power of Iranian families, including the state's military and civilian personnel. To partly compensate for that, the key personnel needed in a war are granted exceptional bonuses.

Khamenei, who controls law and order forces, has put them on partial alert to nip any revolt in the bud. This is accompanied by a massive crackdown against potential dissidents, especially in Tehran, with reports of arbitrary arrests.

All this does mean that the "Supreme Guide" isn't prepared to perform another of his "heroic flexibilities" by accepting a deal with the "Great Satan" to sit out Trump's four-year tenure, a game that led seven consecutive US presidents up the garden path, allowing the Islamic Republic of Iran to approach its golden jubilee.

Today, to talk or not to talk is a question not only for rival factions in Tehran but also for powers that, rightly or wrongly, are convinced that there could be no regional peace and stability without persuading or forcing what François Mitterrand called "le grand perturbateur" ("the big troublemaker") to change or to be changed.

Gatestone Institute would like to thank the author for his kind permission to reprint this article in slightly different form from Asharq Al-Awsat. He graciously serves as Chairman of Gatestone Europe.


Amir Taheri
was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21422/iran-to-talk-or-not-to-talk

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

A new front: Iran is turning Algeria into an IRGC outpost and the West should be afraid - opinion - Catherine Prerz-Shakdam, Aurele Tobelem

 

by Catherine Prerz-Shakdam, Aurele Tobelem

The IRGC, long the spearhead of Tehran’s expansionist ambitions and a state-within-a-state that thrives on destabilization, now finds in Algeria a new theater for its operations.

 

Members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attend an IRGC ground forces military drill in the Aras area, East Azerbaijan province, Iran, October 17, 2022. (photo credit: IRGC/WANA/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)
Members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attend an IRGC ground forces military drill in the Aras area, East Azerbaijan province, Iran, October 17, 2022.
(photo credit: IRGC/WANA/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

Algeria’s deepening entanglement with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) ought to send tremors through Western capitals, yet the response thus far has been one of strategic myopia.

The IRGC, long the spearhead of Tehran’s expansionist ambitions and a state-within-a-state that thrives on destabilization, now finds in Algeria a new theater for its operations.

This is not merely a matter of bilateral cooperation between Algiers and Tehran; it is the harbinger of a wider struggle that risks engulfing North Africa, destabilizing Europe’s doorstep, and shifting the geopolitical equilibrium of the Mediterranean in ways profoundly inimical to the interests of democracies.

For decades, Algeria has wrapped itself in the mantle of nonalignment, presenting itself as an unyielding champion of sovereignty and independence, a regional power beholden to none. But beneath this carefully maintained facade, its growing collusion with the IRGC is emblematic of a new and dangerous departure.

Intelligence reports, diplomatic briefings, and well-sourced analyses now converge on a singular reality: Algeria is poised to become Iran’s forward operating base in North Africa. Through it, Tehran seeks not only to exert ideological influence but to operationalize its wider vision of strategic dominance – one that threatens the security of Europe and beyond.

A demonstrator waves an Algerian flag (credit: REUTERS/CHRISTIAN HARTMANN)Enlrage image
A demonstrator waves an Algerian flag (credit: REUTERS/CHRISTIAN HARTMANN)

THE FIRST theater of this creeping entrenchment is, undoubtedly, the Sahel. A region already teetering on the edge due to jihadist insurgencies, criminal syndicates, and feeble state control, the Sahel provides fertile ground for Iranian proxies to embed themselves.

Algeria, long accused of tacitly supporting destabilizing actors when it suits its interests, now stands accused of allowing IRGC-linked networks to carve out a presence, training militants, channeling arms, and exporting Tehran’s doctrine of militant revolution.

How Iran is impacting the Polisario Front operations in Western Sahara

More worrying still, the IRGC’s fingerprints are increasingly visible in the Polisario Front’s operations in Western Sahara, an alarming echo of Iran’s well-worn strategy of leveraging non-state actors to expand its reach – whether Hezbollah in Lebanon or the Houthis in Yemen.

Of course, the IRGC is not alone in its maneuvering – it takes two to tango. Algeria’s clever use of subversion tactics, disguising military installations behind civilian infrastructure and weaponizing the language of liberation for imperialist objectives, stretches back decades. A declassified CIA report dated April 1967 sounded the alarm over Algeria’s military buildup in the Tindouf Airfield, located less than 25 km. from the disputed Western Sahara territory.

The Tindouf area has since become a Polisario stronghold, rebranded a “refugee camp” by Algerian authorities solely for the purposes of receiving humanitarian aid that the militia invariably exploits to support its grotesque human rights violations and terrorist activities.

The international community has conveniently chosen to ignore that Islamic State operations in the Sahel region were spearheaded by former Polisario fighters. With their shared love for jihad and chaos, Algiers and Tehran are a match made in heaven.

Yet this is not merely a matter of sub-state warfare or superficial memoranda. Iran’s ambitions in Algeria extend to the economic and strategic spheres, where control over vital trade arteries and access to natural resources form part of a broader strategy of leverage.

Algeria, rich in hydrocarbons, strategically perched along Mediterranean trade routes, and with direct access to sub-Saharan Africa, offers Iran the perfect bridgehead for exerting pressure on European markets.

If the IRGC gains a foothold in Algeria, it will not only be a question of exporting ideological radicalism but of seizing control over key supply chains, using energy politics as a cudgel against Europe, and embedding itself in the lifeblood of global commerce.

THE WEST cannot afford to sleepwalk into this geopolitical ambush. The danger does not end with Algeria becoming a mere client state of Tehran’s theocratic regime. The real nightmare scenario is the systemic weaponization of migration routes. Algeria, already a key transit hub for migrants seeking passage into Europe, could become a vector for radicalized operatives, funneling extremists into the heart of the continent under the guise of humanitarian exodus.

This is a playbook we have seen before – from the Syrian war to the corridors of Libya – where instability has been cynically exploited to shift the balance of power and disrupt European stability.

Algeria itself stands accused of leveraging the “Harraga” phenomenon to wreak havoc on already strained relations between Spain and Morocco. That Iran, via its IRGC tentacles, would utilize this route should not be doubted; that Europe remains largely blind to this looming threat is an indictment of its strategic inertia.

This is not paranoia; it is historical precedent repeating itself with alarming precision. Iran’s strategic doctrine has always been one of gradual encroachment, gaining footholds in regions of instability, fortifying its positions through proxies, and then wielding asymmetric power to exact geopolitical concessions.

Algeria, willingly or otherwise, is walking straight into this embrace. And if the West fails to act now – if it fails to counter this burgeoning alliance with economic, diplomatic, and strategic pressure – it will find itself confronting the consequences not in the distant deserts of North Africa, but on the streets of Paris, Berlin, and London.

The warning signs are there, flashing red, for all who care to look. Now that the IRGC is on the move in Algeria, the West can no longer afford to view the Western Sahara issue as a “forgotten conflict” whose resolution is left to fate.

The time to act is now. For if Algeria completes its transformation into an IRGC outpost, the costs will not be borne solely by North Africans but by Europe itself. And history will not be kind to those who saw the storm gathering and chose to do nothing.

Catherine Perez-Shakdam is the executive director of the Forum for Foreign Relations and Aurele Tobelem is the director of research at the Forum for Foreign Relations.

 
Catherine Prerz-Shakdam, Aurele Tobelem

Source: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-843358

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

As political, diplomatic losses pile up, Macron appears isolated, as his once-shining star flickers - Eric J. Lyman

 

by Eric J. Lyman

The French president's most recent attempt to reassert himself, by calling a summit on how EU could end Russia-Ukraine war, apparently only ended is disagreement.

 

With the approval of barely one-in-five of his fellow countrymen – and soon to see the other half of the once essential French-German alliance swing dramatically to the right – France’s Emmanuel Macron is increasingly isolated. 

Once seen as the rising star of European politics, the French president – who on Monday will be in Washington, D.C. – was humiliated in back-to-back elections last summer. First, in a June vote for France’s representatives in the European Parliament, in which the nationalist party National Rally more than doubled the votes earned by Macron’s coalition, then having his Ensemble party end snap elections a month later with just the third-largest block in parliament.

Though Macron was able to stay on as president, the election results obligated Macron to give a larger voice in his government to opposition figures, a development that is making governing difficult. Late last year, Macron said he was “ashamed” of the ministers he was forced to appoint. 

I did not choose this government,” the 47-year-old leader reportedly told a confidante. 

Now, when German voters go the polls Sunday, they will almost surely reject the government of center-left leader Olaf Scholz, Macron’s most important ally among European Union leaders.  

If it wasn’t already dead, the Franco-German bilateral alliance that helped found the European Union in the aftermath of World War II and defined the bloc for decades, a loss by Scholz' government would almost certainly come to an end. 

All this is taking place as Macron’s level of support among his compatriots has sunk to new all-time lows. 

Despite some high points last year – he oversaw the successful Summer Olympics and the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landing – a survey released in late January by French pollster IFOP showed that just 21% of French voters were happy with Macron’s government. Media reports said he was left feeling “sad and isolated” due to his recent troubles. 

I just don’t see how he can bounce back, there’s no clear path,” a former Macron aide told the U.K. newspaper The Telegraph. “The ambience in the Elysée [the French equivalent to the White House] is morose.”

But Macron hasn’t stepped back from promoting his views internationally, despite mixed reviews. 

In 2022, he was the last major Western leader to visit Russia President Vladimir Putin before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Less than three weeks before the start of the war, Macron said Putin had given him assurances he had no intentions to invade its southern neighbor

In an effort to curry favor with the new U.S. president, Macron was the first major world leader to congratulate Donald Trump on his election victory in November (beating Italy’s Giorgia Meloni by six minutes), and this week he will become the first European leader to visit Trump after his inauguration(beating the U.K.’s Keir Starmer by three days). 

More recently, Macron warned the war in Ukraine could expand into World War III (“There’s a conflict in Ukraine in which the Russians as a matter of fact, have made things global,” Macron said) and issuing a stern warning to Trump in his own dealings with Putin (“You can’t be weak in the face of Putin,” Macron said).

And just last week, Macron appeared to try to reassert his leadership within the Europe by calling EU leaders to an emergency summit in Paris on how the end the 3-year-long Russia Ukraine war. However, the leaders 

However, the Paris talks only exposed divisions between the countries and highlighted how they have so far failed to agree on a coherent plan for supporting Ukraine its now 3-year-long war with Russia , analysts have told the Kyiv Independent.

 
Eric J. Lyman

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/diplomacy/political-diplomatic-losses-pile-macron-appears-isolated-his-once-shining-star

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter