Saturday, May 17, 2025

'Hamas delegation announced return to negotiations in Doha,' Katz says - Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff, Reuters

 

​ by Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff, Reuter

"This is in contrast to the uncooperative position they had taken up until this moment," he added.

 

An illustrative image of Defense Minister Israel Katz.  (photo credit: Khalil Kahlout/Flash90/Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
An illustrative image of Defense Minister Israel Katz.
(photo credit: Khalil Kahlout/Flash90/Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Saturday that as the IDF expands its operations in Gaza, the Hamas delegation in Doha has announced its intention to resume negotiations on a hostage deal.

"This is in contrast to the uncooperative position they had taken up until this moment," he added. 

Hamas confirmed this new round of talks with Israel was underway in Qatar's Doha, group official Taher al-Nono told Reuters.

He said both sides were discussing all issues without "pre-conditions."

"There is a certain change" in Hamas's conduct in the talks in Doha, an Israeli source told The Jerusalem Post.

Palestinian Hamas militants take part in an anti-Israel rally in Gaza City May 22, 2021 (credit: REUTERS/MOHAMMED SALEM)Enlrage image
Palestinian Hamas militants take part in an anti-Israel rally in Gaza City May 22, 2021 (credit: REUTERS/MOHAMMED SALEM)

 "It is still too early to know how the talks will end," he added. 

Another source added that there is a change, but still no agreements. 

In early May, Israel's security cabinet decided that if Hamas does not agree to Israel’s proposed outline by the time Trump concludes his Middle East visit, the military operation in Gaza will be significantly expanded.

US President Donald Trump left the region on Friday. 

The Israeli delegation is expected to remain in Qatar until Saturday night, according to Walla. The proposed deal includes the release of 10 hostages in exchange for a 45-day ceasefire.

Frustration with the talks

A foreign source familiar with the details noted that the Qatari mediators were very frustrated with the talks that took place recently in Doha, Walla reported.

There has been no progress in the first three days of the Gaza deal negotiations in Doha, Qatar, an Israeli source told The Jerusalem Post on Friday.


Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff, Reuter

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-854313

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

US developing plan to move one million Palestinians to Libya, NBC News reports - Jerusalem Post Staff, Reuters

 

​ by Jerusalem Post Staff, Reuters

Palestinians, according to one source, may be incentivised to leave with the promise of a stipend and housing.

 

Palestinians make their way with belongings as they fled their homes, after Israeli air strikes, in the northern Gaza Strip May 16, 2025.  (photo credit: REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa)
Palestinians make their way with belongings as they fled their homes, after Israeli air strikes, in the northern Gaza Strip May 16, 2025.
(photo credit: REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa)

The Trump administration is working on a plan to permanently relocate as many as one million Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Libya, NBC News reported on Friday, citing five people with knowledge of the matter.

NBC reported that the plan is under serious consideration, and the US has discussed it with Libya's leadership.

In exchange for resettling the Palestinians, the administration would release to Libya billions of dollars of funds the US froze more than a decade ago.

Palestinians may be incentivised to leave with the promise of a stipend and housing. 

 Hamas official Bassem Naim attends a news conference in Beirut, Lebanon November 8, 2023.  (credit: REUTERS/MOHAMED AZAKIR)Enlrage image
Hamas official Bassem Naim attends a news conference in Beirut, Lebanon November 8, 2023. (credit: REUTERS/MOHAMED AZAKIR)

Basem Naim, a senior Hamas official, claimed the terror group was unaware of plans to relocate Palestinians to Libya but condemned the rumored relocation plans nonetheless.

“Palestinians are very rooted in their homeland, very strongly committed to the homeland, and they are ready to fight up to the end and to sacrifice anything to defend their land, their homeland, their families, and the future of their children,” Naim said in response to questions from NBC News.

“[Palestinians] are exclusively the only party who have the right to decide for the Palestinians, including Gaza and Gazans, what to do and what not to do.”

The alleged plans come amid significant civil tensions in Libya, where protesters have demanded that members of the government resign.

Donald Trump's plans for Gaza

Trump said on Thursday that he would like to see the US take control of the Gaza Strip, deal with Hamas, and turn it into a freedom zone.

“If it’s necessary, I think I’d be proud to have the United States have it, take it, make it a freedom zone,” he said during a business roundtable.

“Let some good things happen, put people in homes where they can be safe, and Hamas is going to have to be dealt with,” Trump said.

“They’ve never solved the Gaza problem, and if you look at it, I have aerial shots,” he said. “I mean, there’s practically no building standing; there’s no building. People are living under the rubble of buildings that collapsed, which is not acceptable. It’s a tremendous death. And I want to see that be a freedom zone.”

Previous Trump plans for the relocation of Gaza civilians have included seeing Palestinians transferred to Egypt and Jordan.

Civil unrest in Libya amid Gaza relocation plans

Hundreds of Libyan protesters called on Friday for the ouster of the internationally recognised prime minister, Abdulhamid Dbeibah, and at least three ministers resigned in sympathy with the protesters.

The demonstrators gathered in Martyrs' Square in Tripoli, chanting slogans such as "The nation wants to topple the government” and “We want elections.”

They then marched to the main government building in the city center. "We won't leave until he leaves," one protester said.

The marchers carried pictures of Dbeibah, national security adviser Ibrahim Dbeibah, and Interior Minister Emad Tarbulsi, with their faces crossed out in red

Dbeibah, who leads the divided country's Government of National Unity, came to power through a UN-backed process in 2021. Planned elections failed to proceed that year because of disagreements among rival factions, and he has remained in power.

On Friday, businessman Wael Abdulhafed said, "We are (here) today to express our anger against Dbeibah and all those in power for years now and prevent elections. They must leave power."

Calls for Dbeibah to resign increased after two rival armed groups clashed in the capital this week in the heaviest fighting in years. Eight civilians were killed, according to the United Nations.

Violence flared after the prime minister on Tuesday ordered the armed groups to be dismantled. Demonstrators have accused Dbeibah of failing to restore stability and of being complicit in the growing power of armed groups.

Economy and Trade Minister Mohamed al-Hawij, Local Government Minister Badr Eddin al-Tumi, and Minister of Housing Abu Bakr al-Ghawi resigned on Friday.

Militia leader Abdulghani Kikli, widely known as Ghaniwa, died in the clashes, which calmed on Wednesday after the government announced a ceasefire.

Libya has had little stability since a 2011 NATO-backed uprising ousted longtime autocrat Muammar Gaddafi. The country split in 2014 between rival eastern and western factions, though an outbreak of major warfare paused with a truce in 2020.

While eastern Libya has been dominated for a decade by commander Khalifa Haftar and his Libyan National Army, control in Tripoli and western Libya has been splintered among numerous armed factions.

The main oil facilities in the major energy exporter are located in southern and eastern Libya, far from the fighting in Tripoli. Engineers at several oil fields and export terminals told Reuters output remained unaffected by the clashes.


Jerusalem Post Staff, Reuters

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-854284

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

New Syrian president told lawmakers he wants to move his country away from Iran, China and Russia - Charlotte Hazard

 

​ by Charlotte Hazard

Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., said he saw "Make Syria Great Again" signs around Damascus as Trump's popularity grows inside the war-torn country.

 

One of the few U.S. members of Congress to meet with Syria's new leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, says the former terrorist wants to pivot his country away from China, Iran and Russia and closer to the U.S. amid signs of President Donald Trump's growing popularity among the war-weary Syrian people.

"There's actually signs around Damascus to say, 'Make Syria Great Again.' So they're big fans of President Trump," Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., told the Just the News, No Noise television show. "I think this new president...I told him, 'the opportunity you have is incredible.' The Syrian people are remarkable."

Trump met with al-Sharaa this week in a sign that Syria is growing closer to the United States after years of ostracization over concerns about its human rights, terrorism and Iranian ties. The American president lifted sanctions against Syria as well.

Earlier, Stutzman and Florida GOP Rep. Cory Mills met for an hour during the Easter vacation with al-Sharaa in Damascus, walking away impressed that the former al-Qaeda member turned politician is moving Syria in a positive direction.

"I was impressed with the people that he's picking around him, the things that he's saying and the actions that he's been taking are showing that he seems to be wanting to move in a direction towards the West," Stutzman explained.

Stutzman said al-Sharaa told him he had refused an offer from Russia and doesn't have any interest in doing business with China. 

"They want to do business with the West," Stutzman said. "If they can move and stop any sort of jihad training [or] any sort of that jihadi mentality in the Middle East, there is a real opportunity for peace and prosperity there."

Trump told reporters that al-Sharra was a "tough guy" who had the opportunity to bring stability to Syria.

In December of last year, Islamist rebels stormed the Syrian capital of Damascus, resulting in dictator Bashar al-Assad fleeing the country. Al-Sharaa soon took over as president after Assad was ousted.

Stutzman said that regarding al-Sharaa's relationship with Iran, he was open to letting the country have an embassy, but its visas would be limited.

"He actually was very much to the point on Iran, especially," Stutzman said. "He said that he was open to letting Iran have an embassy, but he would limit their visas and the amount of traffic coming from Iran, and he didn't want to let them basically congregate in a certain part of the country."

While meeting with al-Sharaa, Trump delivered a stern warning to Iran that its only path to normalization is to abandon both terrorism and its pursuit of nuclear weapons.

 

Charlotte Hazard

Source: https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/indiana-congressman-who-met-syria-leader-al-sharaa-says-trump-popular-middle-east

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump Unveils “America First National Security 2.0” During Visit to the Arabian Gulf - Fred Fleitz

 

​ by Fred Fleitz

In Riyadh, Trump unveiled an "America First 2.0" doctrine—favoring trade over war, diplomacy over regime change, and peace through prosperity in a new world order.

 

President Trump’s trip this week to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) was a great success for many reasons. The trip was also historic due to a speech he gave in Saudi Arabia outlining his America First foreign policy, which could transform global security.

In this speech, delivered in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on May 13, Trump unveiled his second-term approach to foreign policy that might be called “America First National Security 2.0.”

Most of Trump’s America First approach to U.S. foreign affairs is well known. He has called for putting the interests of our country and the American people first in national security policies. Trump wants a strong military but has pledged to use military force prudently to keep our country out of new and unnecessary wars. He has condemned bad treaties favored by the foreign policy establishment, like the Paris Climate Accord, that will have no effect on the global climate but will do serious damage to the American economy.

In his Riyadh speech, President Trump doubled down on his previous America First national security policies with a revolutionary plan to promote stability and peace through economic prosperity in the Middle East and around the world. Deputy opinion editor of Newsweek Batya Ungar-Sargon explained the significance of this speech in a May 13 tweet.

“Anyone hoping to understand President Trump’s foreign policy should watch his whole speech, probably the most momentous foreign policy address of my lifetime. Trump is building a new world order. I would encourage our allies to watch it closely so as not to miss out on what could turn out to be a once in a lifetime opportunity.”

The central theme of Trump’s “new world order” is promoting global security through trade and prosperity. The president said he favored “commerce, not chaos” and a new Middle East that “exports technology, not terrorism, and where people of different nations, religions, and creeds are building cities together, not bombing each other out of existence.”

To facilitate this vision, President Trump noted that the sophisticated and gleaming cities of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi were built by visionary Arab leaders who developed their countries in their own ways and consistent with their heritages. He stressed that these countries succeeded due to the hard work of their citizens and not because of Western military intervention, nation-builders, neocons, or liberal nonprofits.

Trump demonstrated the incredible potential for economic prosperity instead of chaos in the Middle East with the $3 trillion in new trade deals with the U.S.  He also brought America’s top tech and financial CEOs with him to discuss trade deals, including Tesla President and CEO Elon Musk, President and CEO of Nvidia Jensen Huang, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

As part of this new approach, President Trump said it is time for America to cease lecturing other nations with different systems of government than the United States or trying to promote regime change against governments we oppose.

Trump also said U.S. presidents must stop looking “into the souls of foreign leaders and use U.S. policy to dispense justice for their sins.” Trump said it is God’s job to sit in judgment, not the United States.

On a related note, President Trump expanded on his willingness to talk to America’s friends and foes, stating he does not believe the U.S. should have permanent enemies and noted that “some of the closest friends of the United States of America are nations we fought wars against in generations past, and now they’re our friends and our allies.”

Trump said that although he is prepared to use military force to defend the security of our nation and our allies and is selling devastating weapons to our Gulf state allies for their defense, “my greatest hope is to be a peacemaker and to be a unifier. I don’t like war.”

Trump said, “We’ll never allow America and its allies to be threatened with terrorism or nuclear attack,” but stressed that he wants to make a deal with Iran to resolve concerns about its nuclear program peacefully. Trump also said he wants to make Gaza a “freedom zone” and agreed to give Syria’s struggling new government a chance by dropping U.S. sanctions.

Despite Russian President Putin’s refusal to show up for talks with Ukrainian President Zelensky on Thursday and his failure to honor his agreements with the U.S. to end the Ukraine War, Trump indicated he has not given up on his peace efforts and wants to meet with Putin to discuss how to end this conflict.

This “America First National Security 2.0” or “Trump Doctrine” is a sharp break from the foreign policy approaches of previous presidents and has the potential to actually implement a new world order.

Under Trump’s new approach, America will promote its interests abroad through commerce and diplomacy to end foreign conflicts, not seek regime change or intervene in foreign conflicts.

America will also practice tolerance with countries with different political systems.

Trump is offering the nations of the world, including current U.S. adversaries, opportunities to collaborate with the U.S. for mutual prosperity, rather than tension or military conflicts. Trump also pledged to engage in dialogue with any adversary to resolve our differences peacefully.

Trump said he wants to be a peacemaker and hopes the powerful weapons the United States is selling to our Arabian Gulf allies will never be used in battle. But he made clear that he will use military force decisively against nations that threaten our security or choose the path of war.

Finally, not only will Trump’s new approach resonate with many nations around the world, it will also counter China’s growing global influence and its efforts to create a new China-centered world order. Trump is aware that many countries have been critical of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which has ensnared Third World states in debt and enabled China to seize their infrastructure, such as ports. He also knows that most nations have no interest in a new world order or global economy dominated by the Chinese Communist Party.  They would much prefer doing deals with the United States.

Since he first became president in 2017, Donald Trump has been an unconventional leader who succeeded by breaking precedents and defying the establishment. The “America First National Security 2.0” ideas that Trump discussed in his Riyadh speech are not just the most unconventional proposals he has made as president; they are, to paraphrase Batya Ungar-Sargon, probably the most momentous foreign policy approach of our lifetimes with the potential to bring about unprecedented peace and global security.

Fred Fleitz previously served as National Security Council chief of staff, a CIA analyst, and a House Intelligence Committee staff member. He is the Vice Chair of the America First Policy Institute’s Center for American Security.

Photo: RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA - MAY 13: U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman during a “coffee ceremony” at the Saudi Royal Court on May 13, 2025, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Trump begins a multi-nation tour of the Gulf region focused on expanding economic ties and reinforcing security cooperation with key U.S. allies. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

 

Fred Fleitz

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/05/16/trump-unveils-america-first-national-security-2-0-during-visit-to-the-arabian-gulf/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump not frustrated with Netanyahu, says Gulf leaders to help rebuild Gaza - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

​ by Jerusalem Post Staff

Iran was "stone-cold broke, and they weren’t giving money to Hamas,” Trump said, arguing that Oct. 7 stemmed from this shift in US policy.

 

(L-R) US President Donald Trump, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu see on top of Saudi Arabian, US, and Israeli flags (illustrative) (photo credit: CHAIM GOLDBERG/POOL, REUTERS, SHUTTERSTOCK)
(L-R) US President Donald Trump, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu see on top of Saudi Arabian, US, and Israeli flags (illustrative)
(photo credit: CHAIM GOLDBERG/POOL, REUTERS, SHUTTERSTOCK)

US President Donald Trump stated on Friday that he is not frustrated with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, despite recent reports of tension between the two leaders.

His comments came during an interview with Fox News, following his visit to several Gulf states—a tour that notably did not include a stop in Israel.

Trump addressed the ongoing war in Gaza and emphasized the significance of the October 7 attacks, describing the day as "one of the most violent in the history of the world." He said Netanyahu is dealing with a difficult situation and referred to the prime minister as "an angry man" who has been "hurt badly" by the events of October 7. He added that Netanyahu has "fought hard and bravely."

Trump reiterated his longstanding claim that the October 7 attacks would not have occurred during his administration. He blamed the Biden administration’s decision to lift sanctions on Iran for enabling Tehran to financially support terrorist organizations, including Hamas.

“Iran had no money. They were stone-cold broke, and they weren’t giving money to Hamas,” Trump said, arguing that the current situation stems directly from this shift in US policy.

 US PRESIDENT Donald Trump holds a soccer ball as he attends an event with Qatar’s Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, also with the participation of FIFA president Gianni Infantino (not pictured), in Lusail, Qatar, on Wednesday. More than any other country, Israel was hit this week by Trumpian whiplash, (credit: BRIAN SNYDER/REUTERS)Enlrage image
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump holds a soccer ball as he attends an event with Qatar’s Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, also with the participation of FIFA president Gianni Infantino (not pictured), in Lusail, Qatar, on Wednesday. More than any other country, Israel was hit this week by Trumpian whiplash, (credit: BRIAN SNYDER/REUTERS)

Commenting on the future of the Gaza Strip, Trump repeated his view that the territory is dysfunctional and suggested it should become a “freedom zone,” citing the recurring cycles of violence and Hamas's continued presence.

Gulf states to likely play a role in shaping Gaza's future

Asked whether the Gulf states would be involved in Gaza’s rehabilitation, Trump said that all of the leaders he met during his regional tour would likely play a role in shaping Gaza’s future.

Trump met with Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Tuesday, as well as Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, and Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa.

Trump visited Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar on his Middle East tour.


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/international/article-854324

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hamas Celebrates “Heroic” Murder of Pregnant Woman on Way to Give Birth - Daniel Greenfield

 

​ by Daniel Greenfield

"Mr. Gez told them that his wife was about to give birth"

 


Just in case there was any ambiguity whatsoever, Hamas drops helpful reminders that it’s evil.

No qualifiers. Just evil.

Tze’ela Gez, a resident of Bruchin and mother of three who was nine months pregnant was murdered when a terrorist opened fire at a vehicle between Bruchin and the Peduel Junction in Samaria.

Gez’s husband was lightly wounded in the attack.

Tze’ela died. Her newborn baby, as of the most recent report, is still alive. This far from the first time Islamic terrorists inside Israel did something like that, but it might be the first time it became a Times headline.

Hamas Celebrates Shooting That Killed Israeli Mother en Route to Deliver Baby – New York Times

An Israeli woman on the way to a hospital to give birth was shot and killed in the West Bank on Wednesday, in an attack that Hamas applauded as a “heroic act.” …

The slain woman, Tzeela Gez, 30, a therapist and mother of three other children, set out from her home in the Israeli community of Bruchin on Wednesday night, ready to deliver. As she and her husband drove to the hospital, a Palestinian gunman opened fire on their car, according to the Israeli military.

Ms. Gez was fatally wounded. Her husband, Hananel Gez, who was driving, was injured. Still conscious when paramedics arrived at the scene, Mr. Gez told them that his wife was about to give birth, according to Dr. Asnat Walfisch, the director of the obstetrics and gynecology division at Beilinson Hospital in central Israel.

Ms. Gez arrived in the operating room of Beilinson Hospital about half an hour after the shooting, Dr. Walfisch said. Doctors quickly checked to see if the child had survived and found a pulse, she said.

Less than 60 seconds later, they had sliced open her womb and removed the child, said Dr. Walfisch. “The emergency removal of the child improves the chances of survival for both patients — for the woman as well as for the child,” she said.

Hamas, the Palestinian armed group that is fighting Israel in Gaza, praised Ms. Gez’s shooting as a “heroic act” and called on Palestinians to carry out “further painful operations against the occupation.”

Whatever anyone thinks about Israel, it should be rather obvious what Islamic terrorists, including Hamas, are, and what anyone who defends them and carries water for them is.

And yet college campuses are full of Hamas fans and the media and Democrats continue to cover for them.


Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/hamas-celebrates-heroic-murder-of-pregnant-woman-on-way-to-give-birth/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF strikes two Houthi-controlled ports in Yemen - Amichai Stein, Yonah Jeremy Bob, Darcie Grunblatt

 

​ by Amichai Stein, Yonah Jeremy Bob, Darcie Grunblatt

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz vowed further strikes after the series of Houthi missile attacks this week.

 

Smoke rises as the IDF strikes three Houthi-controlled Yemen ports, May 16, 2025. (photo credit: SCREENSHOT/X/VIA SECTION 27A OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT)
Smoke rises as the IDF strikes three Houthi-controlled Yemen ports, May 16, 2025.
(photo credit: SCREENSHOT/X/VIA SECTION 27A OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT)

The IDF struck the Hodeidah and Al-Salif ports in Yemen on Friday, an Israeli official told The Jerusalem Post.

The military said that these ports are used for transferring weapons and are "another example of the cynical use and exploitation of civilian infrastructure by the Houthi terrorist regime to advance terrorism." 

The strikes were carried out by 15 Israeli air force fighter jets, and over 35 munitions were dropped on the ports. 

The strikes will likely put these ports out of operational use for a month, according to IDF estimates. The targets that were hit were more international and more central for the Houthis than what the US hit when it was striking Houthi targets in Yemen. 

Strikes on the Hodeidah and Al-Salif ports in Yemen, May 16, 2025. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)Enlrage image
Strikes on the Hodeidah and Al-Salif ports in Yemen, May 16, 2025. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

Defense Minister Israel Katz said that the military "severely damaged" the ports it attacked in Yemen on X/Twitter shortly after the strikes.


"As we said: If the Houthis continue to fire missiles toward the State of Israel, they will suffer painful blows — and we will also target terror leaders as we have done with Deif and the Sinwars in Gaza, Nasrallah in Beirut, and Haniyeh in Tehran. We will hunt down and eliminate Abd al-Malik al-Houthi in Yemen as well." 

"We will defend ourselves by our own strength against any enemy," Katz concluded.

The IDF said it conducted the strikes after numerous prior warnings. "Given the Houthis’ use of these ports for terrorist purposes, the IDF again warns anyone present at the ports to evacuate and stay clear of the area," the IDF added. "Any hostile activity in these ports will continue to be prevented."

"The IDF is determined to continue operating and striking forcefully against anyone who poses a threat to the residents of the State of Israel, at any distance necessary," the military concluded.

“Our pilots have successfully struck two Houthi terrorist ports again, and this is just the beginning," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. "There will be more to come. We are not willing to sit idly by and allow the Houthis to harm us. We will strike them much harder, including their leadership and all the infrastructure that enables them to harm us.”

“The one behind them, that provides them support, guidance, and approval, is Iran. The Houthis will pay a very heavy price, and we will defend ourselves by all means necessary to ensure the security of the State of Israel,” the prime minister concluded.

Israel reportedly waited for US President Donald Trump's visit to the Middle East to conclude before attacking Yemen, a security source told Army Radio. 

Israel is allegedly seeking to impose a naval blockade on the Houthis, Sky News in Arabic reported, citing an Israeli source.

 A man and children join protesters, mainly Houthi supporters, in a rally in solidarity with Palestinians, in Sanaa, Yemen May 9, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/Adel Al Khader TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)Enlrage image
A man and children join protesters, mainly Houthi supporters, in a rally in solidarity with Palestinians, in Sanaa, Yemen May 9, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/Adel Al Khader TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Not the first time the IAF struck at the Yemeni ports

The Israeli air force reportedly conducted airstrikes at the same three Houthi-controlled Yemen ports on Sunday following a warning from the IDF’s Arabic spokesperson, Col. Avichay Adraee, that locals should evacuate until further notice.

“Due to the terrorist Houthi regime’s use of seaports for its terrorist activities, we urge all those present at these ports to evacuate and stay away from them for your own safety until further notice,” Adraee said before the strikes began.

Over the last week, the Houthis have fired four missiles, with one falling short and landing in Saudi Arabia. The IDF intercepted all of the remaining ones. 


Amichai Stein, Yonah Jeremy Bob, Darcie Grunblatt

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-854268

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump Lets China Win in Tariff War — First Round, Anyhow - Gordon G. Chang

 

​ by Gordon G. Chang

Xi cannot now admit that China needs the United States, and he certainly cannot be seen as giving in to American coercion. In fact, the Chinese regime since the tariff announcement has been crowing about its win over Trump.

 

  • [T]he arrangement is a win for China.

  • The main barrier to American goods in China, however, is not Chinese tariffs but China's many non-tariff barriers, which are untouched by the new deal. Therefore, the tariff rollbacks benefit Chinese exporters far more than America's.

  • The Chinese promise is unlikely to be worth anything. The only way Xi Jinping can honor his pledge is to give up most elements of communism, because non-tariff barriers, predatory trade practices, and even theft are inherent in that system.

  • Trump is still hoping for robust relations with the Communist Party, but unfortunately that is not possible.

  • Xi cannot now admit that China needs the United States, and he certainly cannot be seen as giving in to American coercion. In fact, the Chinese regime since the tariff announcement has been crowing about its win over Trump.

  • On May 12, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, speaking to CNBC's "Squawk Box," urged a "decoupling for strategic necessities."

  • Yes. And "a complete decoupling," which as Trump tweeted in 2020 would remain "a policy option," would be even better. Why should Americans shovel any cash to Communist Party's coffers?

The White House has termed the new trade arrangement with China "a historic trade win for the United States." No, the arrangement is a win for China. President Donald Trump effectively traded tangible relief from American tariffs for China's vague promise to open up its economy. Pictured: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (R) and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer hold a news conference in Geneva on May 12, 2025, to give details of trade talks between American and Chinese officials. (Photo by Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images)

On May 12, President Donald Trump announced a "total reset with China."

"The best part of the deal," he said, was that "China agreed to open itself up to American business." Beijing, Trump proclaimed, will "suspend and remove all of its non-monetary barriers."

In the meantime, both the U.S. and China agreed to drop tariffs by 115 percentage points. The general American tariff rate on China's goods is now 30%. The general Chinese rate is 10%. Both reductions will be in effect for 90 days.

China also agreed to reverse "all the non-tariff countermeasures taken against the United States since April 2, 2025."

American tariffs in place before April 2, such as the Section 232 and Section 301 levies, remain in effect.

These moves, in sum, undo American and Chinese measures that were put in place from April 2, what Trump has called "Liberation Day."

The White House termed the arrangement "a historic trade win for the United States."

No, the arrangement is a win for China.

The assorted U.S. tariffs are generally remedies for China's theft of U.S. intellectual property and its increasingly predatory trade practices. For the period of the pause, China will undoubtedly continue unacceptable practices without facing the penalty of the elevated tariffs.

The elevated tariffs, if left in place, would keep most Chinese goods out of the U.S. The main barrier to American goods in China, however, is not Chinese tariffs but China's many non-tariff barriers, which are untouched by the new deal. Therefore, the tariff rollbacks benefit Chinese exporters far more than America's.

The relief for China came at a crucial time. The 90-day pause covers the beginning of the Christmas season for China's export factories.

In short, Trump effectively traded tangible relief from American tariffs for China's vague promise to open up its economy.

The Chinese promise is unlikely to be worth anything. The only way China's President Xi Jinping can honor his pledge is to give up most elements of communism, because non-tariff barriers, predatory trade practices, and even theft are inherent in that system.

Xi will not relent because he has long believed in total state control and now is preparing for war. Therefore, he is trying to make China even more self-sufficient than it has been during the four-decade "reform era." That means he will not allow American business to have even more sway in China.

"The new U.S.-China trade deal shows that President Trump blinked," trade expert Alan Tonelson told Gatestone. "Even though the mutual tariff rollbacks are set to last only three months, Trump's actions restore a pre-Liberation Day status quo that he rightly has deemed unacceptable. In return, he received nothing of consequence."

Why did Trump agree to such an unfavorable arrangement?

The dominant narrative is that the president gave in to the fear of both bare shelves in big-box stores and of skyrocketing prices.

Reporting tells us White House advisors were worried about eroding political support, but a better explanation is that Trump was giving Xi, heading to a collision with a world unwilling to accept a new flood of Chinese goods, a final off-ramp.

Moreover, Trump was worried about the devastating effect of his tariffs on China. "We're not looking to hurt China," he said on May 12. That country, Trump noted, was "being hurt very badly." "They were closing up factories," he pointed out. "They were having a lot of unrest."

"Given the Chinese economy's mounting woes, the tariff reprieve granted by Trump is especially ill-timed," said Tonelson, who blogs on geopolitics and trade at RealityChek. "If the President is not willing to keep or increase the trade pressure on China now, when will he use the decisive leverage America enjoys as a crucial export market for the Chinese?"

"Trump's tariffs hit Xi and the Communist Party at the worst possible time for the regime," Blaine Holt, a retired U.S. Air Force brigadier general who has participated in numerous Sino-U.S. Track II dialogues and lectured at Chinese universities and think tanks, told Gatestone. "They were already at the 'End of Dynasty' moment. The tariffs were the final end."

Despite everything, Trump is still hoping for robust relations with the Communist Party, but unfortunately that is not possible. In addition to the inherent hostility of the regime to the United States, Xi for about a half decade has told the Chinese that their nation has already surpassed the U.S. and that America is in terminal decline.

Xi's favorite phrase, which highlights this bold view, is "new era." "Change is coming that hasn't happened in 100 years," he said in March 2022 to Vladimir Putin while bidding farewell after their 40th in-person meeting. "And we are driving this change together."

Xi cannot now admit that China needs the United States, and he certainly cannot be seen as giving in to American coercion. In fact, the Chinese regime since the tariff announcement has been crowing about its win over Trump.

Americans should not try to foster cooperation with a militant leader. Instead, they need to build resilience into supply chains.

Companies, however, will view Trump's pause in tariffs as a signal, a dog whistle that it is okay to keep factories in China.

Americans, however, should be trying to move factories out of China, because they can no longer rely on that hostile state to deliver the products they need. On May 12, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, speaking to CNBC's "Squawk Box," urged a "decoupling for strategic necessities."

Yes. And "a complete decoupling," which as Trump tweeted in 2020, would remain "a policy option," would be even better. Why should Americans shovel any cash to Communist Party's coffers?

When Trump forces all factories to move out of China and locate either to America or countries both friendly and nearby, Americans can truly celebrate "Liberation Day."

 


Gordon G. Chang is the author of Plan Red: China's Project to Destroy America, a Gatestone Institute distinguished senior fellow, and a member of its Advisory Board.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21626/china-win-tariff-war

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

A Golden Era in America: The First 100 Days of President Trump's Second Term - Lawrence Kadish

 

​ by Lawrence Kadish

While pundits and prognosticators dominate our attention during the next few weeks, in the end, it seems as if we look to the enormous future potential of a strong, dynamic and resilient America.

 

Pictured: President Donald Trump signs an executive order on prescription drug prices, in the White House, on May 12, 2025. (Photo by Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)

The first 115 days of the Trump Administration have been filled more remedial action than we have seen from most presidents in their entire terms.

Invariably, the forecasters focus on the next 12 short months while failing to appreciate the sweep of history that has brought us to this next chapter of American history. The pessimistic "bears" among us have warned that there are systematic threats to our economy, our nation, and the stability of the world. The optimistic "bulls" will tout the enormous advances in reducing the former administration's inflation and out-of-control illegal border crossings, the brimming new technology, foreign investments in the trillions that will bring many new jobs, Wall Street confidence, and a resilient American economy that continues to set the pace for the rest of the world.

In truth, they are both right, and the reality of America in the first half of 2025 is far more nuanced than any one side would have you believe.

With an appreciation of history, one needs to look at our nation as a democracy that has demonstrated time and time again an enormous resiliency to profound changes that would have fractured any other country -- and that has been so literally since our independence.

As president, George Washington had to send troops to put down the Whiskey Rebellion when a band of angry citizens of a new United States violently protested a tax on alcohol levied to pay off Revolutionary War debts. Without a strong response, America could have disintegrated at the start.

Economic cycles of boom and bust could have dismantled our democracy. Few Americans recognize how close our nation came to the political edge during the Great Depression of the 1930s, when massive unemployment led to despair among millions.

World War II propelled America into its role of a global superpower, which it continues to hold today. The war's legacy created a pathway for civil rights, the emergence of the middle class, an interstate highway system that connected us to all points of the compass, and a strong and resilient government that avoided nuclear war through strength, leading to our ultimate victory in the Cold War.

So as forecasters hope to peer into the next 12 months, our past reminds us that if we focus exclusively on the day-to-day ebb and flow of our nation's pulse, we miss seeing the incredible achievements of a country that remains a beacon of freedom and opportunity.

This week, President Donald Trump not only cut off the "noose of fire" with which Iran was trying to encircle the entire Middle East, he also tried to bring Russia, China, Syria and Iran in from the cold. Whether or not he will succeed remains to be seen, but the breadth and depth of his vision for a new Middle East -- filled with peace and prosperity rather than poverty and war -- appear so far to have given a whole new life to the idea of peace through commerce, and if the opportunities he has offered do not seem to be working out, he can always move to "Plan B."

While pundits and prognosticators dominate our attention during the next few weeks, in the end, it seems as if we look to the enormous future potential of a strong, dynamic and resilient America.


Lawrence Kadish serves on the Board of Governors of Gatestone Institute.

Source:https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21625/trump-golden-era-america

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

ICC prosecutor Karim Khan on leave from position amid sexual misconduct probe - Jerusalem Post Staff, Reuters

 

​ by Jerusalem Post Staff, Reuters

In a letter sent to his staff and seen by Reuters, the prosecutor said that he had been keeping his position under constant review. "I have made the considered decision to take leave, he said.

 

(Illustrative) ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan over a back drop of the ICC. (photo credit: Canva, REUTERS/PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW, WIKIMEDIA COMMONS/OSEVENO)
(Illustrative) ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan over a back drop of the ICC.
(photo credit: Canva, REUTERS/PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW, WIKIMEDIA COMMONS/OSEVENO)

The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Karim Khan, has stepped down temporarily as an investigation by the United Nations into alleged sexual misconduct by him nears its end, his office said on Friday.

The move is unprecedented, and there is no clear procedure for replacing Khan. The situation creates added uncertainty for the ICC, which is already facing an existential crisis due to US sanctions over its arrest warrants for Israeli officials.

Khan’s office said the prosecutor had taken leave until the end of the probe by the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services.

The ICC’s two deputy prosecutors would take over his duties in the meantime, it added.

 Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan talks while waiting for former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte to appear via video link before the International Criminal Court (ICC), in The Hague, Netherlands, Friday, March 14, 2025. (credit: Peter Dejong/Pool via REUTERS)Enlrage image
Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan talks while waiting for former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte to appear via video link before the International Criminal Court (ICC), in The Hague, Netherlands, Friday, March 14, 2025. (credit: Peter Dejong/Pool via REUTERS)

In a written statement, Khan’s attorneys rejected all allegations of wrongdoing. They said he said he had taken leave because media attention on the matter affected his ability to focus on his work, but he did not intend to resign.

“Our client remains the prosecutor, has not stepped down and has no intention of doing so,” law firm Carter-Ruck said.

The prosecutor has denied allegations of misconduct that were reported to the court’s governing body last October.In a letter sent to his staff and seen by Reuters, the prosecutor said that he had been keeping his position under constant review. “In light of escalating media reports, I have made the considered decision to take leave,” Khan said.

“My decision is driven by a deep and unwavering commitment to the credibility of our office and the court, and to safeguard the integrity of the process and fairness to all involved,” he said.

Khan had earlier ignored calls by NGOs and ICC staff to step down while the investigation was underway.

Several of those NGOs on Friday hailed his decision to temporarily step down as a sign that no one is above the law.

“Stepping aside helps protect the court’s credibility and the trust of victims, staff, and the public. For the alleged victim and whistleblowers, this is also a moment of recognition and dignity,” said Danya Chaikel of human rights watchdog FIDH.

Others said suspending Khan would not derail the ICC’s investigations as the office of the prosecutor is not a one-man show.

“In fact, removing an individual whose alleged behavior may have fueled a toxic work culture may strengthen the office’s ability to carry out its mandate with professionalism and public trust,” Alix Vuillemin of the Women’s Initiatives for Gender Justice told Reuters.

Sources who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter told Reuters that Khan had spoken to UN investigators last week in what is believed to be the final interview of the external investigation into the allegations, which started in December.

It is unclear when the probe will finish, what the outcome will be, and what it would mean.

Khan’s decision to step down came days after a Wall Street Journal report stated that the ICC decided to seek arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli officials only after Khan was accused of sexual assault.

Khan previously stated that he hoped warrants would turn West against Israel

A Malaysian lawyer who accompanied Khan on multiple overseas trips told UN investigators that he coerced her into non-consensual sexual encounters in New York, Paris, and The Hague, while she worked as a close aide to him.

Days after the WSJ report, a senior Western diplomat, close to the ICC case, told The Jerusalem Post in an exclusive interview that Khan issued these warrants in the hope that “it would make the West turn against Israel.”

The diplomat asked to remain anonymous and further stressed his belief that Khan’s decision to issue arrest warrants would also inspire public pressure from pro-Palestinian groups.

Late last month, the prosecutor was warned against publicizing new arrest warrant requests against Israeli officials, according to The Guardian, citing sources saying that Khan was readying to issue new requests for arrest warrants against alleged Israeli suspects.

Jotam Confino contributed to this report.


Jerusalem Post Staff, Reuters

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-854263

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Thursday, May 15, 2025

Trump to Remove US Sanctions on Syria in Major Policy Shift - Christine Williams

 

​ by Christine Williams

While Qatar mobilizes support for Syrian President Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa.

 


MEMRI article entitled, “Qatar Continues To Finance Terror With U.S. Consent: Will Fund Syria’s New Regime, Led By HTS Terror Organization, Just As It Funded Hamas,” examined the terrorist history of Syrian leader Abu Mohammad al-Julani, who reverted to his original name Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa, to create a false impression that he had changed, even though he remains dedicated to the jihadist cause, ie. to establish the Sharia.

Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) “was established in 2012 by Al-Sharaa (then known as Al-Joulani) at the behest of Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, who would soon become the founder of ISIS. In 2013 the group became the official branch of Al-Qaeda in Syria after Al-Joulani broke with Al-Baghdadi and swore allegiance to Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri.”

Al-Sharaa’s followers have slaughtered Christians, Alawites and Druze since toppling Al-Assad.

The MEMRI article also exposes the modus operandi of Qatar, “the world’s greatest financer of extremist Islamist elements such as the Muslims Brotherhood and jihadi terror organizations.”

Now comes a new development. “Trump to remove US sanctions on Syria in major policy shift,” by Gram Slattery, Pesha Magid, Nafisa Eltahir and Timour Azhari, Reuters, May 14, 2025:

RIYADH/DAMASCUS, May 13 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he would order the lifting of sanctions on Syria at the behest of Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, a major U.S. policy shift ahead of an expected meeting with Syria’s Islamist President Ahmed al-Sharaa.

Trump is set to say hello to Sharaa on Wednesday in Saudi Arabia, a White House official said, setting up an encounter between the president and the former al Qaeda commander who took power after Bashar al-Assad was toppled. Two Syrian presidential sources told Reuters they would meet on Wednesday morning.

“I will be ordering the cessation of sanctions against Syria in order to give them a chance at greatness,” Trump told an investment forum in Riyadh, at the start of a tour of Gulf Arab states. “It’s their time to shine. We’re taking them all off,” Trump said, “Good luck Syria, show us something very special.”

Trump said he made the decision after discussions with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, whose governments have both strongly urged the lifting of sanctions.

Removing U.S. sanctions that cut Syria off from the global financial system will clear the way for greater engagement by humanitarian organizations working in Syria, easing foreign investment and trade as the country rebuilds……

Recall a familiar story that backfired when America supported and supplied Afghanistan’s mujahideen with weapons, training, and financial resources from 1979 to 1992, to fight the Soviet invasion. The enemy of my enemy is not always a friend.

The fall of the al-Assad Syrian regime was bad news for its staunch ally, Iran, which was good news to America and Israel. But like the mujahideen of Afghanistan, Al-Sharaa is no friend to America and Israel, and neither is Qatar. In December, Qatar “rushed to position itself as a pivotal player in shaping Syria’s future” after the fall of al-Assad. Qatar was hand in hand with “its closest regional partner,” Turkey, which was responsible for facilitating and backing al-Sharaa before and after al-Assad’s fall.

Now al-Sharaa is making significant inroads, as his leadership is legitimized by Muslim Brotherhood-supporting Qatar (and Turkey), with new US support to boot.

Qatar has “considerable political influence over al-Sharaa’s administration,” given that four key Syrian  government ministers have close ties to Qatar. Also:

Qatar’s provision of funds to the new Syrian regime to pay public sector salaries is part of a familiar Qatari strategy: a strategy that involves supporting and funding terrorist elements hostile to the West in order to promote the country’s role as a provider of international aid and as a mediator with these elements. Another prominent example of this was Qatar’s funding of the regime of the Hamas terrorist organization with billions of dollars.

So what is the end game for America?

One thing for certain is that Trump inherited Joe Biden’s complete betrayal of American interests, both domestically and abroad. Biden left open borders, poured billions into the coffers of Iran, left billions of dollars worth of state-of-the-art military equipment in Afghanistan for free use by the Taliban, and virtually factored America out of the equation of any global influence. Biden left Trump to contend with a nuclear threshold Iran and a turbulent Middle East that saw America under the declining Biden as nothing more than a joke.

It’s also no secret that Qatar has been buying out American campuses, where pro-Hamas, intimidating protests proliferated, with little to no intervention by the campus administration.

The picture looks grim. But one needs to remember that Trump, not Biden, cracked down on campus antisemitism, which was disguised as “free speech” when it was really a promotion of jihad terror against Israel and Jews.

With many contradictions now presenting itself with Trump, how America intends to re-establish an American influence back in the Middle East and globally is a complicated task to say the least. It will not be an easy or straightforward one. In the meantime, Iran is the greatest imminent danger as the answers to many questions play out with time.

Five months ago, Iran International reported:

Amid rising tensions between Israel and Iran, Qatar has aligned itself closer to Tehran. This was evident during Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s visit to Doha in October 2024. The two countries discussed enhancing cooperation in economy, energy, culture, and education, with a particular focus on resolving the $6 billion in Iranian assets frozen in Qatar. The visit underscored Qatar’s role as a diplomatic mediator, as Pezeshkian met with regional leaders, including Hamas representatives, to address crises in Gaza and Lebanon.

To complicate matters even more, al-Sharaa made a strategic business pitch to Trump on Monday: “A Trump Tower in Damascus,” to “charm” him for sanctions relief, which apparently worked. And that followed a 400-million-dollar jet from Qatar to Trump, which raised eyebrows on both sides of the political spectrum.

So what’s really going on with Trump? It may be fair to present the question: who is really manipulating whom? Other questions: what might be the intended possible outcomes? For instance: could Trump be hoping for a new level of the Abraham Accords to be established as he pursues and accepts friendship from Arab countries? Could he be hoping for greater divisions between Arab countries and Iran as a result of America drawing closer to Arab countries? Whatever the reasons, Trump cares little about optics, but let’s hope he has contemplated the potential price of these new partnerships. He doesn’t seem to have mentioned “humanitarian aid” to Syria, which would involve stuffing the coffers of a jihadist regime that is seeking to expand Sharia dominance in the region.

In another development; this one aimed at “strengthening strategic partnerships for economic prosperity”:

Saudi Arabia, President Donald J. Trump announced Saudi Arabia’s $600-billion commitment to invest in the United States, building economic ties that will endure for generations to come.

Trump also “targeted Iran in his first major speech in Saudi Arabia, warning Tehran that it must choose between never having a nuclear weapon or dealing with his wrath.” Trump warned: “If Iran’s leadership rejects the olive branch and continues to attack their neighbors, then we will have no choice but to inflict massive maximum pressure.

Of course, the cautionary tale of the mujahideen in Afghanistan should be remembered. However, considering Trump’s past policies of protecting American borders from the worst criminals and jihadists, as well as his reinstatement of the travel ban on Muslim-majority countries of concern, it makes little sense to assume without further evidence that he would betray America to the jihadist cause. Let’s hope there is a method (and long-term results) to the madness — as appears to be the case even at this point. In the meantime, expect the inevitable media circus as America continues to emerge from disastrous, nightmarish Democrat rule.


Christine Douglass-Williams is Associate Editor of Frontpage, regular writer for Jihad Watch, a nine-time award-winning journalist, past Canadian government appointee to the Canadian Race Relations Foundation and the Office of Religious Freedom; author of "The Challenge of Modernizing Islam" and "Fired by the Canadian Government for Criticizing Islam".

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/trump-to-remove-us-sanctions-on-syria-in-major-policy-shift/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump Shocks the World — Again - Robert Spencer

 

​ by Robert Spencer

The peace and stability of the Middle East, and of the entire world, are riding upon the President's success.

 


Trump has done it again. That much is clear. He has outmaneuvered and out-thought everyone else, and did what many others assumed to be impossible.

But what exactly has he done?

On Wednesday morning, during his trip to Saudi Arabia, Trump met with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who from 2017 until January of this year, was known as Abu Mohammad al-Julani. Al-Sharaa was the leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the “Syrian Liberation Group,” a Sunni jihad group that had been linked to al-Qaeda and was working to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

In January 2025, HTS finally attained its goal. Assad fled to Russia. Al-Julani took control in Damascus and announced that he was establishing a regime that would respect the rights of all Syrians. He insisted that he had broken with al-Qaeda years before, and to signify that he was a new man, he shed his nom de guerre and reverted to his birth name. He trimmed his beard, took off his fatigues, and donned a suit.

Yet almost immediately, al-Sharaa’s attempts to construct a new image for himself foundered upon harsh reality. His forces were involved in mass killings of members of the Alawite sect. Since Bashar Assad was an Alawite, this sect was associated with the old regime. As recently as March 7, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz declared that al-Sharaa was behind it: “Al-Julani took off his galabiya, put on a suit, and presented a moderate facade. Now, he has removed the mask, revealing his true face: a jihadist terrorist from the Al-Qaeda school, committing atrocities against the Alawite civilian population.”

Al-Sharaa, however, condemned the killings and vowed to punish those responsible, even if they were his own men, saying: “Syria is a state of law. The law will take its course on all. We fought to defend the oppressed, and we won’t accept that any blood be shed unjustly, or goes without punishment or accountability, even among those closest to us.”

How since is al-Sharaa? Is he still a jihadist, practicing Muhammad’s dictum, “War is deceit”? Or does he genuinely wish to establish a regime in Syria that will ensure the rights of all people? Donald Trump is giving him a chance to put up or shut up.

Trump made it clear throughout the 2024 presidential campaign: he was determined to end the cycle of endless wars and establish a new era of peace. He repeatedly made it clear that this would involve challenging what the foreign policy establishment has long held to be unquestionable truths, and finding new ways to reach accords with previously hostile entities based on common interests.

In many ways, Trump’s meeting with al-Sharaa is as momentous, and could be more momentous, than his first-term overtures to Kim Jong Un. The two meetings come from the same wellsprings: Trump is attempting to break longstanding logjams and end the status quo that the foreign policy establishment, both inside the U.S. and elsewhere, had come to take for granted.

NBC News reported Wednesday that Trump announced: “We are currently exploring normalizing relations with Syria’s new government, as you know, beginning with my meeting with President Ahmed al-Sharaa.” Yet he is not proceeding without asking certain things of al-Sharaa as well. NBC reported that he “encouraged Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa to recognize Israel’s statehood.”

Trump explained to al-Sharaa that he had “a tremendous opportunity to do something historic in his country.” The president “urged the Syrian leader to sign on to the Abraham Accords.” He “also advised Sharaa to tell foreign terrorists to leave Syria, deport Palestinian terrorists, help the U.S. prevent the resurgence of the Islamic State and assume responsibility for Islamic State detention centers in Syria’s northeast.” Trump declared that he wanted to give Syria “a chance at greatness.”

So Trump wants to make peace with old foes based on mutual economic interests. He is giving al-Sharaa a chance to demonstrate that he really is no longer a jihadi and wants to build a stable and prosperous Syria. It could happen. The global jihad, although it is ignored everywhere, continues nevertheless. It never goes away. Individuals and states, however, can and do put it aside for considerable periods in order to pursue other interests.

A reminder of how difficult this will be, however, came in the fact that, as NBC noted, “Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was also present and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan joined by phone.” The presence of Erdogan on the phone was a reminder that al-Sharaa has been propped up by Turkish forces, and that many see his forces in Syria as a tool of Erdogan’s interests in restoring the Ottoman caliphate. This is a matter Trump may well have to deal with before too long. Whether or not al-Sharaa is sincere in renouncing jihad, Erdogan seems to be moving in the opposite direction.

Nevertheless, Trump’s attempt to create peace based on common interests and move beyond the present logjam is as welcome as it is audacious. Once again, Trump appears to be way ahead of everyone else, as he was when he established the Abraham Accords even as John Kerry was confidently telling the world that such a thing was impossible.

The establishment will howl at Trump’s meeting; that’s only to be expected. The president, meanwhile, is moving ahead with astonishing vision, immense confidence, and considerable imagination. The peace and stability of the Middle East, and of the entire world, are riding upon his success.


Robert Spencer

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/trump-shocks-the-world-again/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter