Saturday, November 23, 2024

J Street defends ICC warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

Self-proclaimed 'pro-Israel, pro-peace' organization claims ICC decision to issue arrest warrants against Israeli leaders is not antisemitic, says move is sign Israel needs to change course and end war with Hamas.

 

Jeremy Ben-Ami, President, J Stree
Jeremy Ben-Ami, President, J Street               Michael Brochstein/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect

The J Street organization published a statement defending the International Criminal Court's decision to issue arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and claiming that accusations of antisemitism against the ICC are mistaken.

"J Street – the pro-Israel, pro-peace, pro-democracy movement – expressed deep sadness that we have now come to a point whereby the International Criminal Court feels it justified to issue arrest warrants for two top government officials, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and recently fired Defense Minister Yoav Gallant," the organization stated.

"There will be many in Israel and in the American Jewish community who will look at all these actions within one 24-hour period and blame them on antisemitism or inherent enmity for Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish people. This is the wrong response," it claimed.

"Israelis, instead, need to consider that many of its friends around the world are looking at the government of Israel’s actions in the wake of the barbaric terrorist attack of October 7, 2023, and are sending an unmistakable signal: You have gone too far. Change course. It is time for this war to end and to start creating a pathway out of this nightmare with the support of neighbors and partners all over the world," J Street stated.

J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami said, “It is unbearably painful for friends of Israel – particularly those who have lived there, have family and friends there and have been partners over decades in building the country – to read international justices hold that there are reasonable grounds to believe that leading Israeli officials have knowingly and intentionally violated international laws, including the use of starvation as a method of warfare and other horrific crimes against humanity."

“This deeply distressing ruling is one more clear sign of the lasting damage this extreme right-wing government is doing to the State of Israel, its place in the world and its long-term security," Ben-Ami added.

In Israel, the leftist opposition parties, President Herzog and the Attorney General joined in condemning the ICC decision to issue warrants, as opposed to J Street


Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/399599

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Empower the of People of Iran Who Seek Change and Freedom - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

In recent years, Iranians have launched countless uprisings, each filled with hope and courage, only to be met with violent repression from the regime, and mainly indifference from abroad.

 

  • European governments, rather than risking confrontation with Iran's regime, have preferred to maintain business relations and avoid taking any position that might upset the mullahs. Those countries are complicit in the suffering of the Iranian people. The unalleviated silence emboldens the regime, rather than holds it accountable.

  • After nearly four decades of maintaining diplomatic relationships with the Islamic Republic of Iran, the time is long overdue for Western nations to take a real stand. If these countries genuinely believe in the principles of "democracy" and "freedom" that they so often preach, they would look a lot more credible if they demonstrated this professed commitment by genuinely supporting Iranians yearning for freedom.

  • This would mean cutting diplomatic ties with Iran, imposing and enforcing serious primary and secondary sanctions on the regime, putting military options on the table, and fully supporting Israel and, one hopes, the incoming US administration, in putting a permanent end to Iran's nuclear program as well as to its brutal, expansionist regime.

  • Only then will the actions of these nations align with their suspect rhetoric about "human rights," and show that they are willing to deliver real backing to those risking their lives for change in one of the world's most repressive states.

In recent years, Iranians have launched countless uprisings, each filled with hope and courage, only to be met with violent repression from the regime, and mainly indifference from abroad. Each wave of protests saw security forces killing thousands of demonstrators, and imprisoning and torturing many more. The time is long overdue for Western nations to take a real stand. Pictured: Iranian policemen chase anti-regime protestors and beat them with batons in Tehran, on September 19, 2022. (Photo by AFP via Getty Images)

For decades, the brave people of Iran have arisen time and again, demanding a future free from oppression and authoritarian rule.

In recent years, Iranians have launched countless uprisings, each filled with hope and courage, only to be met with violent repression from the regime, and mainly indifference from abroad. Each wave of protests saw the regime's security forces killing thousands of demonstrators, and imprisoning and torturing many more. These movements have shown the strength of the Iranian people's resolve, but despite their cries for freedom, support from the West— usually merely vocal, about the ideals of democracy — has remained disappointingly muted.

In the eyes of many Iranians, this silence from democratic nations that supposedly champion human rights stands in intolerable contrast to their principles and has repeatedly left Iranian protesters feeling abandoned in their struggle.

During the 2022 nationwide protests, sparked by the hijab laws, many Iranians, especially young women, took to the streets to protest against mandatory veiling and other repressive policies. The movement represented not only a push against strict Islamic dress codes but also a broader rejection of the regime's authoritarian rule. Even as the crackdown unfolded— with the regime arresting, beating, and even murdering protesters — the Western response remained largely passive and inert, instead of offering robust support. Iranians risking their lives in the streets, emboldened by the hope of international solidarity, were left without any backing that many had expected from countries that profess to support freedom and human rights.

In 2009, the Green Movement had erupted in Iran after a questionable presidential election. Millions of Iranians filled the streets, while chanting slogans, waving banners, and denouncing what they to many appeared a fraudulent election outcome. Protesters sought recognition from world leaders, particularly from the Obama administration in the United States and European leaders, in the hopes that these democratic nations would support their call for a fair electoral process and an end to oppression.

Protesters chanted, "Obama, are you with us or the mullahs?" — a direct plea for then U.S. President Barack Obama to take a stand. Yet, to the disappointment of many Iranians, Western leaders remained largely silent, choosing not to intervene or offer any real backing. Obama later admitted that his administration's silence during this critical period was a "mistake," but even then, mentioned only ineffectual, verbal support:

"In retrospect, I think that was a mistake. Every time we see a flash, a glimmer of hope, of people longing for freedom, I think we have to point it out. We have to shine a spotlight on it. We have to express some solidarity about it."

While most democratic nations have hesitated to align themselves visibly with Iran's pro-democracy movements, one country has stood out as an unwavering ally of the Iranian people: Israel. Despite the longstanding enmity between Israel and Iran's regime, Israeli leaders have boldly supported the Iranian people's right to freedom and self-determination. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, called "The Churchill of the Middle East," has not only addressed Iran's nuclear threats -- when the US did not totally undermine Israel by leaking its plans beforehand -- but has reached out directly to Iranians through social media, encouraging them not to lose hope. "There's one thing Khamenei's regime fears more than Israel," Netanyahu declared in a message shared on X. "It's you – the people of Iran." He added:

"They spend so much time and money trying to crush your hopes and curb your dreams. Don't let your dreams die. Don't lose hope, and know that Israel and others in the free world stand with you."

Netanyahu went even further, envisioning a future in which a free Iran could unlock its full potential. He pointed out that, under a different government, Iran's children could access world-class education, the people could benefit from advanced healthcare, and the country's infrastructure could be rebuilt to provide clean water and essential services. Netanyahu even pledged Israel's assistance in reconstructing Iran's failing infrastructure, citing Israel's cutting-edge desalination technology as an example.

"Since I last spoke to you," Netanyahu continued, "the Khamenei regime launched hundreds of ballistic missiles at my country, Israel. That attack came at a cost of $2.3 billion." Indeed, these billions, instead of being spent on futile attacks, could have been directed towards the Iranian people's needs, strengthening their education and healthcare systems, or improving transportation. By framing the issue in terms of wasted resources, Netanyahu highlighted the regime's reckless spending at the expense of its citizens, emphasizing that the people of Iran deserve better.

Such messages have apparently resonated with many Iranians who see in another country a beacon of hope and a sign that they are not completely alone in their fight against the regime's repression:

"On October 8, the day after the [2023 Hamas] attacks... some pro-government figures tried to raise the Palestinian flag from the [soccer] stands. The backlash they faced was immediate. Thousands of fans started shouting a slogan formulated in the rowdy... tone of soccer fans everywhere: 'Shove the Palestinian flag up your a–.'"

Israel's stance stands in blinding contrast to that of many Western countries, particularly those in Europe. While Israel, a nation currently under attack on multiple fronts, has firmly stood with the people of Iran, many European countries have continued to prioritize economic ties with Tehran over human rights.

European governments, rather than risking confrontation with Iran's regime, have preferred to maintain business relations and avoid taking any position that might upset the mullahs. Those countries are complicit in the suffering of the Iranian people. The unalleviated silence emboldens the regime, rather than holds it accountable.

After nearly four decades of maintaining diplomatic relationships with the Islamic Republic of Iran, the time is long overdue for Western nations to take a real stand. If these countries genuinely believe in the principles of "democracy" and "freedom" that they so often preach, they would look a lot more credible if they demonstrated this professed commitment by genuinely supporting Iranians yearning for freedom.

This would mean cutting diplomatic ties with Iran, imposing and enforcing serious primary and secondary sanctions on the regime, putting military options on the table, and fully supporting Israel and, one hopes, the incoming US administration, in putting a permanent end to Iran's nuclear program as well as to its brutal, expansionist regime.

Only then will the actions of these nations align with their suspect rhetoric about "human rights," and show that they are willing to deliver real backing to those risking their lives for change in one of the world's most repressive states.


Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated scholar and political scientist. He has authored several books on the US Foreign Policy and Islam. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21123/people-of-iran-seek-change

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

House passes resolutions to combat Jew-hatred, strip funding from terror-linked nonprofits - Andrew Bernard

 

by Andrew Bernard

“The spiritual cancer of antisemitism is metastasizing—not only in our own country but in many others as well—at a rate that is both shocking and sickening,” said Rep. Chris Smith.

 

A view of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. Photo by Arie Leib Abrams/Flash90.

The U.S. House of Representatives passed resolutions this week condemning antisemitism and moving to strip the tax-exempt status from organizations that provide material support to designated terrorist organizations.

A resolution “Condemning the global rise of antisemitism and calling upon countries and international bodies to counter antisemitism” passed Wednesday by a vote 388-21.

The non-binding measure welcomes the decision by 40 countries, led by the United States, in July to adopt the Global Guidelines for Countering Antisemitism, which includes the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism.

“The spiritual cancer of antisemitism is metastasizing—not only in our own country but in many others as well—at a rate that is both shocking and sickening,” said Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), who co-sponsored the resolution with Rep. Kathy Manning (D-N.C.).

“The Global Guidelines for Countering Antisemitism constitute a program of best practices that can be adopted by countries and organizations to formulate policies that boldly and effectively respond to this pernicious hatred,” Smith said.

The 21 “nay” votes on the resolution came from three Democrats—Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Cori Bush (D-Mo.), all of whom are members of the so-called “Squad” of left-wing progressives—and 18 Republicans.

The group of Republicans who voted “nay” overlapped almost completely with the list of Republicans who voted against the Antisemitism Awareness Act in May, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), on the grounds, they said, that the IHRA definition is contrary to the principle of free speech or because it labels as antisemitic the claim that Jews killed Jesus.

On Thursday, the House passed the Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act, which strips the tax-exempt status of nonprofits that support terrorism and amends the tax code so that Americans taken hostage don’t face tax penalties from their time in captivity.

Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-N.Y.), one of the bill’s co-sponsors, said that included one of her own constituents, who is being held by the Taliban in Afghanistan, as well as the American hostages taken by Hamas in Gaza.

“The last thing these Americans should have to face when returning home is tax penalties from the government,” Tenney stated. “The Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act corrects this flaw in our tax code, ensuring that individuals returning home from unimaginable hardship are not penalized with back taxes by the IRS.”

The bill passed with bipartisan support, 219-184, with the 15 Democratic “yea” votes mostly coming from pro-Israel and Jewish members, including Reps. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) and Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). The lone Republican “nay” vote came from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), a libertarian who frequently votes against legislation relating to foreign policy issues.

Some opponents of the bill, including the Council on Islamic-American Relations, argued that it could be used arbitrarily to target groups that hold anti-Israel views.

Lawmakers and Jewish groups have raised questions about the funding links between antisemitic and anti-Israel protest groups—many of which have tax-exempt status and unknown funding sources—and foreign terrorist organizations.

In October, the United States and Canada designated the “sham charity” Samidoun, which has helped organize anti-Israel protests in both countries, as a front group for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization

In July, Avril Haines, the U.S. director of national intelligence, announced that Iran is also providing money to anti-Israel protesters, though she added that recipients of the money may not have been aware that they were receiving aid from a foreign power.


Andrew Bernard

Source: https://www.jns.org/house-passes-resolutions-to-combat-jew-hatred-strip-funding-from-terror-linked-nonprofits/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

China Puts Trump, Trade, and Foreign Business in the Crosshairs - Gordon G. Chang

 

by Gordon G. Chang

Xi Jinping... hits foreign companies whenever he can. He took down the U.S.-based Mintz Group in March of last year and has not let up since.

 

  • AstraZeneca confirmed this month that Chinese investigators had detained Leon Wang, president of the company's China business.

  • [I]t is highly unlikely that AstraZeneca is the only pharmaceutical company guilty of shenanigans. Selective prosecution of foreigners is a Communist Party specialty.

  • Xi Jinping... hits foreign companies whenever he can. He took down the U.S.-based Mintz Group in March of last year and has not let up since.

  • [F]oreign pharmaceutical businesses are at special risk because they occupy a sector that Xi Jinping is determined to control. He is, infamously, the driving force behind Made in China 2025, the predatory ten-year plan to achieve dominance in ten key technology areas. One of those ten sectors is medicine and medical devices.

  • He [Xi Jinping] does not really believe in free trade, however: He really wants China to have unfettered access to other markets while denying others access to China's.

  • So Trump, despite his tariff promises, is not the one attacking the rules-based trading order.

  • The real culprit is Xi Jinping.

China is both a predatory and criminal trader, and becoming even more so in recent months. President-elect Donald Trump, despite his tariff promises, is not the one attacking the rules-based trading order. The real culprit is Chinese President Xi Jinping. Pictured: Trump, on a state visit to China, takes part in a welcoming ceremony with Xi on November 9, 2017 in Beijing. (Photo by Thomas Peter-Pool/Getty Images)

"The attempt to block economic cooperation under all sorts of pretexts and break up the interdependence of the world is nothing but backpedaling," declared China's President Xi Jinping at the just concluded APEC summit in Peru.

"Stand up to protectionism and unilateralism," said Ren Hongbin, a former Commerce Ministry official and now chairman of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, also at APEC. "There is the rhetoric of the decoupling and derisking," he warned. "The artificial severance of the global supply chain is detrimental for everyone"

Beijing's campaign against the next president of the United States has just begun. China is trying to position itself as the defender of free trade and tar Donald Trump as the global disruptor.

The Chinese Communist Party narrative is far from the truth, however. China is both a predatory and criminal trader, and becoming even more so in recent months.

How do we know this? The regime, among other things, is stepping up attacks on foreign businesses. AstraZeneca confirmed this month that Chinese investigators had detained Leon Wang, president of the company's China business.

Wang is the subject of a corruption probe.

Business in China is riddled with corruption, and the pharmaceutical business is among the most corrupt. Among other reasons, Beijing has traditionally forced hospitals to fend for themselves, so doctors and administrators have devised devious ways to make up for the lack of support.

It is true that AstraZeneca's China's sales force has been investigated for doctoring genetic tests to make more patients eligible to receive Tagrisso, a lung cancer drug, and there have also been revelations about the illegal importation of drugs from Hong Kong. Nonetheless, it is highly unlikely that AstraZeneca is the only pharmaceutical company guilty of shenanigans. Selective prosecution of foreigners is a Communist Party specialty.

Several factors are at play at the moment. First, Xi Jinping is absolutely determined to reserve the Chinese market for China's state enterprises. He hits foreign companies whenever he can. He took down the U.S.-based Mintz Group in March of last year and has not let up since.

Second, foreign pharmaceutical businesses are at special risk because they occupy a sector that Xi Jinping is determined to control. He is, infamously, the driving force behind Made in China 2025, the predatory ten-year plan to achieve dominance in ten key technology areas. One of those ten sectors is medicine and medical devices. Moreover, his "Strategy Outline" seeks self-sufficiency in, among other things, high-end medical devices and patented pharmaceuticals.

Xi's assault on AstraZeneca, which has done well in China because of its portfolio of innovative pharmaceuticals, is a warning to foreign drug companies.

Third, Xi, while branding himself as the planet's leading champion of globalization, is in reality cutting China's links with the world, reversing the gaige kaifang — "reforming and opening up"— policies of Deng Xiaoping, Communist's China's "second generation" leader and Mao Zedong's successor.

Xi is leaving no aspect of society untouched, relentlessly trying to eliminate foreign influence. His continued attack on foreign business is just one part of this all-of-regime effort.

The paradox is that Xi now needs the world more than ever. He has, apparently for ideological reasons and his unwillingness to challenge core Communist Party constituencies, rejected the commonsense advice to make consumption the basis of the Chinese economy. Instead, he is trying to export his way out of a developing crisis, making China critically dependent on access to foreign markets.

Trump, in these circumstances, poses a direct threat to the Chinese regime. During his campaign for the presidency, he promised, in an interview with Fox News's Maria Bartiromo, across-the-board tariffs of at least 60% on China's products, which would shut off the American market to many Chinese goods.

To keep that market open, Beijing will have to absorb much of the cost of new tariffs, as it did in 2018 when Trump, using Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, imposed tariffs of up to 25% on Chinese goods. Then, Beijing and Chinese manufacturers, through various stratagems, picked up somewhere between 75% to 81% of the 2018 levies.

History is repeating itself. China this month, beginning immediately before the American elections, has been driving down the value of the renminbi and making Chinese products cheaper. This is "currency manipulation," and it is especially predatory.

Now, Xi apparently hopes that his propaganda offensive will help convince others to help him defend what he calls "free trade." He does not really believe in free trade, however: He really wants China to have unfettered access to other markets while denying others access to China's.

Xi should know that his mercantilist tactics are convincing others to protect their industries from China's onslaught. The United States is not the only market that will erect high tariff walls. The European Union is doing so too, and even countries in the "Global South" — China is trying to make itself the champion of the world's less developed regions — are putting up tariff walls against Chinese goods.

So Trump, despite his tariff promises, is not the one attacking the rules-based trading order.

The real culprit is Xi Jinping.

 
Gordon G. Chang is the author of Plan Red: China's Project to Destroy America and The Coming Collapse of China, a Gatestone Institute distinguished senior fellow, and a member of its Advisory Board.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21135/china-trump-trade

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

RFK Jr. vs WaPo marks first round in Trump's vow for a showdown with legacy media, censorship - Paul Bond

 

by Paul Bond

Many news outlets have published Robert F. Kennedy Jr. profiles in the past 18 months, but The Washington Post’s in June was the only one to warrant a 20-page response from the Trump HHS nominee

 

This story is the first in a four-part series this month by Just the News on self-described watchdogs who push for censorship.)

“If we don’t have free speech, then we just don’t have a free country,” President-elect Donald Trump said in a video posted to social media just day after winning reelection on Nov. 5. “Today, I’m announcing my plan to shatter the left-wing censorship regime.”

Not mentioned by name, though alluded to, are the various non-profit and for-profit groups that have sprung up to battle “fake news” but typically target outlets that lean right of center. Those group include the Trusted News Initiative (TNI), Media Matters for America (MMFA), the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and NewsGuard.

“When I am president, this whole rotten system of censorship and information control will be ripped out of the system at large,” Trump also announced.

With his bold pronouncements in mind, the following is Part 1 of a four-part series – a deep dive into some of the organizations to which he was likely referring. Critics of their work say it leads to censorship and loss of advertising for the media outlets that dare challenge the legacy media’s approved narrative. 

Trusted News Initiative

Multiple outlets have published profiles of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the past 18 months, though only The Washington Post’s in June warranted a 20-page response from Kennedy that includes 78 footnotes. The letter, reviewed by Just the News, includes the expected complaints: The writer referred to Kennedy’s claims as “conspiracy theories” or as having been “debunked,” though he says they hadn’t been.

Too many journalists do not “speak truth to power,” Kennedy wrote, but instead “serve as propagandists pouring concrete on official orthodoxies, and attacking dissent.” The Washington Post did not respond to a request for comment.

Peppered throughout the letter are references to something called the Trusted News Initiative, a global consortium of members founded in 2019 by the BBC that also includes the Associated Press, Reuters, Microsoft, Google, YouTube and The Washington Post. Its goal: combat disinformation. 

In the letter, Kennedy, nominated by Trump to run the Department of Health and Human Services, refers to TNI as a “clandestine industry partnership” and a “cabal” made up of  “conspirators” whose mission is to label as “misinformation” any assertion that departs from pronouncements made by the Biden-Harris administration, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and other bureaucracies.

Examples of "misinformation" that proved to be plausible, if not true, include early claims that COVID-19 may have originated in a lab in Wuhan, China; that mRNA vaccines might not prevent infection or transmission of COVID-19; that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin might be effective in treating the infectious disease; and that a laptop left at a repair shop belonged to first son Hunter Biden.

One of Kennedy’s footnotes includes a quote from TNI Director Jessica Cecil, who said last year: “We don’t fact check; but once we learn from a partner that something is unreliable, that’s when we alert each other.”

The TNI did not respond to a request for comment from Just The News, nor to its request that it reveal the names of outside donors or to clarify whether it gets – directly or indirectly – funds or directives from any government entity.

Trump, in the Nov. 9 video, alluded to the latter when he vowed to end censorship, saying, “We should also enact new laws laying out clear criminal penalties for federal bureaucrats who partner with private entities to do an end run around the Constitution.”

"Calamitous impact on public health"

One of Kennedy’s footnoted accusations reads: “By depriving the public of complete scientific information, TNI may have had a calamitous impact on public health. Nearly 100 studies of ivermectin and 400 studies of hydroxychloroquine revealed that the drugs are safe and effective against COVID-19. TNI social media platforms nevertheless took the official position that these repurposed drugs were unsafe and ineffective.”

He writes that TNI was doing the bidding of the pharmaceutical companies, given that “federal law prohibits the issuance of an Emergency Use Authorization for any vaccine if any approved drug is demonstrated effective against the target disease.”

Kennedy’s letter notes that The Post reported that 70% of calls to one state’s poison control center involved ivermectin, when the real number was 2% (the newspaper ran a correction). 

Another footnote in Kennedy’s letter includes a post from Facebook acknowledging it has taken down groups, pages and accounts that disproportionately promote sensationalized content, though it proved to be “often-true content.” In his letter, Kennedy writes: “TNI’s Big Tech Members Google, Microsoft, YouTube, and Facebook agreed to keep other, rival online news suppliers from reaching the market if they publish prohibited claims.”

Facebook is owned by Meta, also a TNI partner, and it routinely struck down conservative posts citing election interference. 

One example not in Kennedy’s letter is when it suspended a page that promoted “Reagan,” a movie about Ronald Reagan three months ago and also disallowed an ad featuring an image of star Dennis Quaid and a pro-America, inspirational quote from the 40th president.

Facebook’s actions in the name of election interference came despite Reagan, a Republican, having been dead for 20 years and the last time he ran for president was in 1984. On the other hand, there were no reports of the anti-Trump movie “The Apprentice,” released three weeks prior to the election, having similar issues regarding Facebook.

Facebook didn’t respond to a request for comment from Just the News, but Meta said in February it would to tamp down the amount of political posts that users see on their feeds.

Beyond censorship, some believe that since TNI is essentially a group of legacy media outlets and new-media giants that have banded together to stifle smaller media companies whose reporters they disagree with, putting them at risk of running afoul of antitrust laws.

Thus Kennedy, along with his nonprofit Children’s Health Defense and other plaintiffs, sued four primary members of TNI – the Associated Press, British Broadcasting Company, Reuters and The Post –  claiming their intent is to “choke off” accurate reporting if it doesn’t fit their approved narrative.

Shutting down online news publishers and antitrust

The lawsuit specifically mentions the Biden laptop and Covid information, like the lab-leak theory and possible vaccine injuries, as well as the efficacy of various treatments and of lockdowns and other mandated protocols.

“All of the above was and is true or, at a minimum, well within the ambit of legitimate reporting,” reads the lawsuit filed May 31, 2023. "The TNI did not only prevent Internet users from making these claims; it shut down online news publishers who simply reported that such claims were being made by potentially credible sources, such as scientists and physicians."

The lawsuit quotes a senior news controller for BBC News saying that TNI members have agreed to “club together” against “unchecked” outlets that pose an “existential threat” to the dominance of legacy news. “The TNI is thus a paradigmatic antitrust violation: a horizontal agreement among competitor firms to cut off from the market upstart rivals threatening their business model,” reads the lawsuit, which lists tens of millions in damages to a variety of defendants.

Beyond Kennedy, a few other liberals (and Kennedy describes himself as “real” liberal) have criticized TNI, though narrowing their scope to its work in favor of censoring Covid information. Two years ago while speaking to Bill Maher, for example, actor Woody Harrelson asked, “You know about the Trusted News Initiative, right?”

After Maher said the name "sounds familiar,” Harrelson said that it was “great” when focused on election misinformation in 2020, though not when it shifted to vaccine hesitancy. 

“They focused on anything that went against the narrative of Covid and how it’s caused,” Harrelson complained.

Kennedy didn’t respond to a request for comment, though in his letter to The Post he wrote: “TNI’s members collectively agreed to suppress prohibited claims online by publicly disparaging them as ‘misinformation’ and 'conspiracy theories.’ Your article about me illustrates, perfectly, those corporate diktats.”

In the second part of a four-part series on watchdogs who censor, Just the News explores the for-profit NewsGuard.

 
Paul Bond

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/state-houses/bond

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Washington trucking industry warns of Jan. 1 limit on new gas truck and RV sales - Carleen Johnson

 

by Carleen Johnson

Washington has agreed to be in lock step with the California mandates when the new changes to take effect Jan 1.

 

(The Center Square) - Washington state’s trucking industry is urging Gov. Jay Inslee to reconsider a first of the year commitment to align with California’s Advanced Clean Trucks (ACT) regulation, which requires a certain percentage of so called "zero emissions" (ZEV) trucks to be sold in the state.

This goes back to 2020, when Washington lawmakers committed to follow California’s strict emissions mandates.

It got more critical last month when on Oct. 23, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) amended its ACT standards to require manufacturers to gradually increase the percentage of zero-emission vehicles they sell with targets from 4% to 7%.

Washington has agreed to be in lock step with the California mandates when the new changes to take effect Jan 1.

“The bill that was passed in 2020 has permanently ceded our authority unless we decide to unlink ourselves from California,” said Washington State Truckers Association CEO Sheri Call in a Thursday interview with The Center Square.

The new rules apply to large trucks and RV’s that weigh more than 8,500 pounds, with a requirement that sellers first prove they have sold a certain percentage of zero-emission vehicles, before they can sell the traditional gas- and diesel-powered rigs.

“With zero emission vehicles, we have no infrastructure and no guaranteed timeline for installment of that infrastructure,” said Call. “Along with all of the other operational challenges with battery electric vehicles for the industry, along with loss of capacity and payload, we are concluding that we either keep our old trucks running or we purchase and operate trucks from outside the state,” said Call, who noted it’s a perverse effect because the same trucks purchased outside the state will be operating in Washington, or operators will delay making a new purchase and the trucks on the road will be older.

The new rules will impact RV and motorhome sales in Washington as well.

Middle ground in the RV world is considered the Class C RV. On average, a class C will come in around 10,000 to 12,000 lbs., according to RVShare.com. Any new rig over 8,500 lbs. is subject to the new rules.

Call explained the future of electrically charged freight haulers is anyone’s guess.

“Even at a fast charge, it’s an hour-and-a-half to charge a truck, versus stopping for 20 minutes to fuel up, so it’s a huge capacity loss and on top of that, the trucks are heavier so you lose payload capacity and it’s just a non-starter for the heavy freight industry,” said Call.

“The only hope that we have given the environment we’re in is that they put a pause on implementation,” said Call. “I know that’s what other states are talking about now for at least two years, but the same problems will exist in two years, because there’s no commitment at this point from anyone to build out public electric charging stations for the commercial truck industry.”

Meantime, Call says truck sales and operations are going across the state border.

“Idaho is not too far away, and they are not a CARB adopting state and subject to these policies, so a lot of our members unfortunately who still need to serve their customers at a price competitive point, are operating from Idaho as it’s more appealing to them,” said Call.

The Trucking Association sent a letter to Gov. Inslee over the summer urging a delay.

“We feel these issues will place constraints on the industry and reduce supply chain resiliency in Washington state -- one of the most trade-driven states in the nation,” Call wrote. “We don’t have to look back too far to understand the impact of shortages of goods and medical supplies during the pandemic as a result of trucking industry labor and equipment shortages. Imagine the negative impact to affordability in our state and to any environmental gains if trucks are dispatched to Washington from further away."

The Department of Ecology responded to a request for comment via email, which said in part:

"Manufacturers will have three years to meet the new zero emission sales targets, and they do not have to meet those targets before selling vehicles in Washington. Along with producing more zero emission or hybrid vehicles, manufacturers can also purchase credits from other companies, or pay a fine if they are unable to meet the requirements," said Deputy Communications Director Andrew Wineke via email.


Carleen Johnson

Source: https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/washington-trucking-industry-warns-jan-1-limit-new-gas-truck-and-rv

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Netherlands are lost: Dutch seek to blame Israeli victims of Amsterdam pogrom - opinion - David Ben-Basat

 

by David Ben-Basat

We grew up on the legend of the Dutch as “Righteous Among the Nations,” heroes who helped save Jews during World War II. However, the truth is starkly different.

 

PEOPLE WAVE Palestinian flags and a man wears a ‘Free Palestine’ shirt as students and employees of the University of Amsterdam protest, earlier this year.  (photo credit: REUTERS/PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW)
PEOPLE WAVE Palestinian flags and a man wears a ‘Free Palestine’ shirt as students and employees of the University of Amsterdam protest, earlier this year.
(photo credit: REUTERS/PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW)

As I write these words, a demonstration of hate is taking place in one of Amsterdam’s main streets, an unlawful protest by Muslims that signals, all too clearly, that the Netherlands, like other nations, has lost control of its own state to a fanatical Muslim mob. Just days after the antisemitic act carried out by Muslim rioters, it’s apparent that nothing has been learned. The Dutch authorities – including Amsterdam’s mayor and police, who banned the protest – did nothing to stop it.

On the same day that Muslims lay in wait outside hotels to target Jews, one’s thoughts traveled to an even darker period in Dutch history when, on a nearby street about 80 years ago, the Nazis captured Anne Frank and her family, leading to their eventual murder.

A Dutch friend recently sent me an image of the Star of David, writing, “Our thoughts and hearts are with you. This is no longer our Holland.” This message reminded me of the embrace and love Israel received worldwide after the Six-Day War, in which we triumphed over Arab states that sought our destruction. The times have indeed changed, yet the hatred remains the same. Antisemitism is reemerging globally and in the Netherlands, where Muslims and antisemitic Dutch citizens have joined forces, rallying with calls for Israel’s annihilation. Witnessing Dutch citizens shouting “Free Palestine” without grasping the implications of their words, while police stand by and allow blatant law-breaking, is deeply troubling.

A history lesson

We grew up on the legend of the Dutch as “Righteous Among the Nations,” heroes who helped save Jews during World War II. However, the truth is starkly different. Many Dutch citizens betrayed Jews to the Nazis, exposing their hiding places. 

Nevertheless, on my first visit to the Netherlands many years ago, I met one of the war’s most condecorated heroes, Maurice Kiek. He hosted my wife and me in the beautiful town of Wassenaar near Rotterdam, and over dinner, we heard about the Dutch who fought alongside Jews against the Nazi scourge.

 Dutch police patrol after riots in Amsterdam, Netherlands, November 11, 2024. (credit: Mizzle Media/Handout via REUTERS)Enlrage image
Dutch police patrol after riots in Amsterdam, Netherlands, November 11, 2024. (credit: Mizzle Media/Handout via REUTERS)

The Netherlands was different then. Amsterdam was, and perhaps still is, a cosmopolitan city that allowed for diverse beliefs and lifestyles. But with the arrival of hundreds of thousands of Muslim immigrants, crime and violence have surged. Some of them brought with them a culture that has begun to overshadow Dutch traditions.

Authorities fail Jews

Following this week’s attack on Israeli fans who came to watch a soccer game, and despite countless videos documenting the violence, Dutch police released all the detainees, who, it turns out, had already been arrested in unrelated events prior to the game. 

Meanwhile, Dutch media, which initially expressed “shock” at the pogrom, now shifts the narrative, unjustly blaming Israelis. The Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf, commenting on police failures, suggested that officers secured irrelevant areas, attributing the problem to misallocated police resources rather than a lack of personnel. This sums up Amsterdam police’s monumental security lapse.

Meanwhile, pro-Palestinians continue to stage demonstrations “for Palestine,” rejecting the notion that Jews are victims – a claim that defies belief. If this sounds familiar, it’s because Palestinians have turned victimhood into an art, duping the public with the media’s help, embedding their false narrative. 

While Amsterdam Mayor Femke Halsema banned protests after the violent events, no one seemed deterred, as a demonstration held two days later proved the police are either unwilling or unable to halt the rioters.

Though Dutch media criticized Galatasaray player Hakim Ziyech – a former Ajax player – for his comments about the violent incidents involving Maccabi Tel Aviv fans, his provocations continue unimpeded.

Olivier Dutil, the Netherlands’ chief of police, reports that random passersby are repeatedly asked by pro-Palestinians to show their passports to verify whether they are Jews. 

The chaos in Amsterdam persists.

The writer is CEO of Radios 100FM, honorary consul general of Nauru, deputy dean of the Diplomatic Consular Corps, vice president of the Ambassadors’ Club, and president of the Israeli Radio Communication Association.


David Ben-Basat

Source: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-830199

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Despite lackluster consumer interest, automakers are asking Trump to keep EV mandate in place - Kevin Killough

 

by Kevin Killough

John Bozzella, president of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, said in a letter to Trump that automakers’ success depends on “stability and predictability in auto-related emissions standards.”

 

While consumer interest in electric vehicles failed to keep pace with the Biden-Harris administration’s federal EV mandates, which led to huge losses, the Big Three U.S. automakers may pressure President-elect Donald Trump to keep the requirements in a quest for "stability and predictability." 

Ford, General Motors and Stellantis, the New York Times reports, citing unnamed “lobbyists and officials from several car companies,” want Trump to keep the EPA’s tailpipe emission standards, which restrict the amount of emissions their products can produce across fleets.

In a letter to Trump, the Times reported, John Bozzella, president of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents the manufactures of almost all new vehicles sold in the U.S., automakers’ success depends on “stability and predictability in auto-related emissions standards.”

In order to comply with the mandates, more than half of their vehicles sold, according to the EPA, will need to be electric by 2032. By some estimates, to comply with the federal mandate, automakers will need to make nearly 70% of their lines electric by 2032. 

EV's failing to meet sales targets

In the first half of this year, nearly 7% of new vehicle purchases were electric, or 454,670 vehicles, according to Edmunds sales data. Assuming that number doubles by the end of this year, it will not match or exceed the 1,077,138 EVs sold in 2023. To reach half of all car sales by 2032, EVs sales will need to grow by approximately 5.4% annually. With sales slowing, that’s not likely to happen. 

However, consumers haven’t gotten on board with that plan. Ford, which separates its EV business from other parts of the company, has lost $3.7 billion this year. Last year, the company lost $4.7 billion, and in 2022, it lost $2.2 billion. 

It’s unclear how much Stellantis and General Motors have lost on their EVs lines, but GM missed its EV production goals by half last year, Mackinac Center Research Analyst, Joshua Antonini reported on the group’s blog this week. According to the Morningstar report, the company had planned to produce 250,000 to 300,000 EVs this year, but it lowered that target to between 200,000 and 250,000. The company also delayed the launch of its first EV wearing its Buick badge. General Motors has also withdrawn a target of 1 million EVs produced in North America and China by the end of 2025.

Stellantis dealers recently told the Detroit News that monthly sales are down by half compared to previous years, but CEO Carlos Tavares said at the Paris Motor Show last month, he will stay the EV course so as to be “on the right side of history.” Over 5,000 dealers across all automakers launched a campaign last year asking the Biden-Harris administration to reconsider the EV mandates, claiming their suppliers were filling up their lots with EVs that their customers weren’t interested in. 

Tavares acknowledged that car buyers “may not be so excited about it.” Citing a Gallup poll from March showing nearly half of all survey respondents wouldn’t consider buying an EV: up from 7% the previous year. Antonini called Tavares acknowledgement “an understatement.” Likewise, a McKinsey poll showed that 46% of Americans who owned an EV were likely to switch back to gas with their next car purchase. 

Chasing subsidies

“What is actually happening seems plain. We don’t want to spend our money on electric vehicles, so the Biden-Harris and Whitmer administrations take our money and give it to motor companies to build them anyway. This is done in the name of saving the planet, when the actual climate impacts of these policies are too small to measure,” Antonini wrote. 

Jason Hayes, director of environmental policy at the Mackinac Center, argued on his “Forests, Fuels and Freedom” Substack Thursday that the automakers are chasing subsidies and “choosing this confused view of morality over the clear market signals being sent by their customers.” 

“Business can’t pretend that imposing woke, green ideology on unwilling customers will be a successful, long-term business strategy,” Hayes wrote. 

The Times article, citing data from the Center for Automotive Research, points to the automakers’ $146 million in investments in the design, engineering and manufacturing of their EV lines, and the years-long development process before new vehicles hit the showrooms, as a motivation for automakers wanting to maintain the regulatory environment that their EV visions – and investments – are based on. 

How much pull they’ll have with the next president isn’t certain. With Trump’s poor relationship with the automakers stemming from political disputes over emissions standards going back to his first term in office, the Times reports, they’re not likely to easily get Trump to reconsider the EV mandate rollback. 

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who has a close relationship with Trump and supported his campaign, will head Trump’s proposed Department of Government Efficiency, which aims to shrink the size of government. Musk, despite his company benefiting from the EV tax credits that were rolled out as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, said in a post on X, “In my view, we should end all government subsidies, including those for EVs, oil and gas.” 

While some things Trump has promised to do might not come to fruition, the EPA’s tailpipe standards appear to be among the most vulnerable targets of the coming administration. 

 
Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/despite-lackluster-consumer-interest-automakers-are-asking-trump-keep-ev

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Tearing the Leviathan Apart - Ned Ryun and Mark Corallo

 

by Ned Ryun and Mark Corallo

The good news is that President Trump has fully empowered Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which is a massive step in the right direction.

 


 

The time has come to end the Administrative State once and for all. 

This failed experiment launched a century ago by Progressive Statists like Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt is a deeply unconstitutional approach to government that is antithetical to the free, representative government founded by the American Republic. It is the polar opposite of what our founders envisioned with the unelected bureaucrats doing the governing of the country while not responsive to “We the People,” as the people didn’t elect them and, more importantly, don’t have any recourse to redress their grievances against the increasingly authoritarian tendencies of the Administrative State via its statutes and regulations that benefit the State and its allies.

The good news is that President Trump has fully empowered Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which is a massive step in the right direction. The fundamental reason for this is: Trump rejects the premise that the Administrative State is legitimate or that its unelected bureaucrats should be the final decision makers on anything, whether foreign or domestic policy. But Trump and DOGE should not settle for reducing government spending and the regulatory burden. 

Its goal should be to shatter the Administrative State into a million pieces. 

Everything that is wrong with our government and country today in many ways stems from the Administrative State: out of control bureaucracy, insane spending, and really the Swamp writ large. Understand that the foundation of the Swamp is the State. If you want to drain the Swamp you must break the State. Not only will it fix many of the ills facing America today, it will put the country back on the path of restoring the free American Republic and balancing out the three branches of government once more, which will lead to greater freedom and a Golden Age for this country.

But for this to happen, several fundamental, practical things must take place. First, on Day 1 of his second term, Trump must fire via his Reduction in Force authority 200,000 federal employees, preferably at the GS-12 and 13 levels. Of course the federal employee unions, which should cease to exist, will sue for a stay. That case will likely wind its way through the courts for 18 months or so (unless the Supreme Court fast tracks it). But once it reaches the SCOTUS, the fundamental question to be asked is: can the head of the Executive Branch, the duly elected President of the US, hire or fire whoever he pleases as per the Constitution? Or do the extra Constitutional statutes and regulations protecting the civil servants supersede the Constitution? With this SCOTUS, the odds are they will side with the originalism of the Constitution and give the President the right to hire and fire whoever he pleases inside the Executive Branch, where most of the Administrative State resides. 

Then Trump becomes the Demolition Man for at least the last two years of his Administration: firing large swaths of the federal government and shutting down departments and agencies. Most importantly in that process, removing those positions from the federal rolls and imploding the buildings he’s emptied and building a Freedom Park (or parks) over the top. Perhaps he even creates the monument he envisioned in July of 2020 and places the statues of our great American heroes over the remains of the Administrative State.

It’s imperative that the DOGE not be just be a cost cutting and regulatory slashing initiative, although that would be reason enough considering the massive bloat, waste, fraud and abuse in the system.  This is about reminding the career bureaucrats they answer to the people through their elected officials.  These bureaucrats have for too long usurped the power of the sovereign people and due to the government employee union contracts are not answerable to the elected officials from whom they derive their power.  They have become a de facto, independent, unaccountable, fourth branch of government that appears nowhere in the United States Constitution.  They are, in fact, the very top-down, authoritarian ruling elite our forefathers rejected in 1776 and replaced in the triumph of the American Revolution. 

Now as the entire process of answering the fundamental question of President Trump’s ability to hire and fire could take well over a year, what is to be done in the short term with the high level federal employees who plan on resisting Trump’s agenda? Trump should create the federal government equivalent of the New York City school system’s “rubber room.” On Day 1 of his Administration, the GS-15s and SES types, which by the way will likely include Biden political appointees who have “burrowed” into various departments and agencies as civil servants, will report to an empty government building dubbed the Department of Elimination, 30 minutes from Capitol Hill; far enough away to make it painful. They will report there promptly every day to sit at empty desks for 8 hours until SCOTUS addresses the fundamental question. Then, as the Administration proceeds, any high level bureaucrat caught resisting will be immediately reassigned to the Department of Elimination “rubber room.” They won’t be fired. They just get to sit there and not have the ability to resist inside the various departments and agencies.

It’s time to use the political power given to Trump by the American people to restore the Republic. In 1911 Woodrow Wilson, shortly before taking the White House and erecting the Administrative State, declared, “We are not bound to adhere to the doctrines of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence. We are as free as they were to make or unmake governments.” Trump should have that exact same mentality: we are not bound to adhere to the doctrines of the founders of the Administrative State. We are as free as they were to unmake governments and by God, we must do it: we must break the shackles of the bureaucratic statism holding us down — the future happiness and freedom of generations yet to come depend on it.

Break the State. Drain the Swamp. Restore the Republic.

 
Ned Ryun and Mark Corallo 

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/11/23/tearing-the-leviathan-apart/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The international system is broken beyond repair - Caroline B. Glick

 

by Caroline B. Glick

The Soviets were convinced that by laundering Palestinian terrorist propaganda through the U.N. system, the Palestinian cause would weaken and divide the Western alliance.

 

Exterior of the Peace Palace in The Hague, the seat since 1946 of the International Court of Justice, in February 2012. Credit: Jeroen Bouman/International Court of Justice.
Exterior of the Peace Palace in The Hague, the seat since 1946 of the International Court of Justice, in February 2012. Credit: Jeroen Bouman/International Court of Justice.

The announcement by the International Criminal Court on Thursday that it is issuing international arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant indicates that the bottom has fallen out of the international system. The institutions formed in the wake of World War II to create and preserve a liberal, international rules-based order never worked the way they were supposed to work. But today, they are no longer simply feckless, corrupt and dysfunctional. They are malign and dangerous. Rather than advance freedom, human rights and life, they serve tyranny, terror and murder. The system is beyond repair.

In the immediate aftermath of Oct. 7, 2023, Israelis and Jews around the world were stunned to see the international response to the atrocities of the day. They expected the nations of the world to stand with Israel in revulsion and rejection of the Palestinian’s quest to annihilate the Jews. Instead, millions took to the streets of the West’s major cities marching in support of the Palestinian murderers, rapists and kidnappers who tortured, raped mutilated, immolated and murdered 1,200 Israelis that day and kidnapped 251 more.

After a couple of weeks of crocodile tears and declarations of solidarity with Israel, Western leaders began warning Israel not to commit war crimes, and demanding that it feed and care for the very people who had just committed a one-day Holocaust.

Jews from Tel Aviv to Berkeley to Sydney wondered aloud, “How have things come to this?”

On the face of things, it made no sense. But if we had paid closer attention in the decades leading up to Oct. 7, we would have recognized the pattern. Palestinians massacre as many Jews as they can get their hands on because the more Jews they murder, the more richly the international system rewards them.

Most observers choose Nov. 10, 1975, as the date the worldwide system began its decline from mere fecklessness to malignity. That day, the U.N. General Assembly passed Resolution 3379 that designated Zionism—the Jewish national liberation movement, and the foundation of Jewish peoplehood and Judaism for the past 4,000 years—a form of racism. It didn’t happen in a vacuum though. It was the culmination of a years-long process that saw Palestinian murderousness reach what was until then unprecedented depths of depravity, followed by the beginning of the U.N. system’s embrace of the Palestinians, and their goal of annihilating the Jewish state and its citizens.

Following the PLO’s massacres of children in Kiryat Shmona and Ma’alot in 1974, the U.N. General Assembly passed a resolution legitimizing Palestinian terrorism. It then invited PLO terror chief Yasser Arafat to address the body. During his infamous “Gun and Olive Branch” speech in November 1974, Arafat threatened to continue his terror onslaught if the worldwide community failed to embrace his goal of destroying Israel. Shortly thereafter, the General Assembly passed a resolution giving the PLO observer status to the United Nations.

The following year, the PLO carried out two more sensational terrorist attacks. The U.N. General Assembly responded by passing Resolution 3379, and so declared Israel and its people illegitimate.

‘Anti-Americanism at heart of anti-Zionism’

Far from being a deviation from the norm, the international system’s decision to stand with Hamas and the Palestinians following Oct. 7 followed a half-century of precedent. The more Jews the Palestinians murder—and the more gruesomely they murder the Jews—the more support the Palestinians receive from the international system.

Arafat, his henchmen, heirs and state sponsors all understood two basic things. First, they understood that Europeans were tired of feeling guilty about their history of genocidal Jew-hatred. The Palestinians tapped into a deep-seated European desire for expiation for the crimes the continent committed against the Jews both during the Holocaust, as well as in the centuries of organized European persecution and murder of Jews that preceded it.

By accusing the Jews and their state of committing the crimes the Europeans had committed against the Jews (and that the Palestinians sought to continue committing against the Jews), the Palestinians permitted the Europeans to feel comfortable—even good—about their murderous past.

The second thing the Palestinians and their Soviet state sponsors realized was that by making Jew-hatred socially acceptable again, they would tear apart the West. The European embrace of the Palestinians against the Jews would drive a wedge between Europe and the United States. And that, in turn, would force the United States onto the defensive for its support for the Jewish state and its people.

In The Arc of a Covenant: The United States, Israel, and the Fate of the Jewish People, Walter Russell Mead documented how American support for the Jewish state preceded the establishment of the modern-day state of Israel by nearly 200 years. It was borne of the founding fathers’ desire to form a New Jerusalem. The “Liberty” in which the United States was “conceived” was the liberty of the laws of Moses that mandated the establishment of limited government of man ruled by God’s Divine laws.

For those Americans, the re-establishment of the Jewish commonwealth in the Promised Land would be a fulfillment not only of God’s promise to the Jewish people but proof of the justness of the United States of America, which was modeled on that commonwealth.

The Soviets were convinced that by laundering Palestinian terrorist propaganda through the U.N. system, the Palestinian cause would weaken and divide the Western alliance. Under pressure from Europeans and European-influenced American elite, anti-Zionism would undo America’s sense of its own morality and weaken its social cohesion to the point where Americans would be driven apart. Some would internalize the anti-Americanism at the heart of the anti-Zionism, and others would refuse to do so.

In short, Palestinian terrorism and its concomitant propaganda and political warfare made Jew-hatred socially acceptable again for Europeans; it engendered anti-Americanism in Europe and among the Eurocentric American elite, splitting American society apart.

From 1974 when the Palestinians were first rewarded for massacring Jews with observer status at the United Nations until 2024, when Israel’s war for survival against Palestinian mass murderers was declared a war crime and a crime against humanity by the ICC, the Palestinian cause of genocide gradually took over the U.N. system, and its associated agencies and satellite organizations like the U.N. Human Rights Council and the ICC. The only thing blocking its complete takeover and attendant moral and strategic destruction of the post-war system was America’s refusal to join in the fracas. In other words, the international system was perpetually just one change in U.S. policy away from being devoured completely by Jew-hatred.

Enter the Biden administration.

‘Hostile, unlawful acts against Israel’

Since Oct. 7, the outgoing Biden administration has been playing a game of footsie with the U.N. system. While paying lip service to Israel’s right to self-defense, President Joe Biden and his advisers have enabled and emboldened the world body and its agencies to side with Hamas by refusing at every turn to take any action against agencies siding with or aiding and abetting Hamas.

Consider UNRWA. On Oct. 7, UNRWA employees in Gaza participated in the atrocities. As the weeks and months passed, it became apparent that UNRWA was Hamas’s diplomatic and welfare arm. Its infrastructure was enmeshed in Hamas’s terror infrastructure. Its personnel were Hamas personnel. And this was by design.

UN Watch revealed this week that in 2017, then UNRWA head Pierre Krähenbühl met with Hamas and Islamic Jihad terror commanders in Beirut and pledged to work with them in full partnership. Krähenbühl , who now heads the International Committee for the Red Cross, emphasizes the “spirit of partnership” between UNRWA and the terrorist organizations. He urged them to keep the cooperation private to avoid angering UNRWA’s donors and endangering its funding.

Although the administration cut off funding to UNRWA after its employees’ involvement in the Oct. 7 atrocities was exposed, the U.S. State Department has repeatedly extolled UNRWA, promised to restore funding and threatened Israel with arms embargoes if it cuts off the U.N.’s in-house terror group. So the administration’s actual policy is to support UNRWA even as its terrorist activities have become undeniable.

Then there is the International Court of Justice. Two months after Oct. 7, the ICJ began to adjudicate South Africa’s allegation that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Despite the fact that there is no evidence whatsoever to support the scandalous allegation, the ICJ agreed to hear the case. So today, Israel is on trial for the crimes Hamas and its supporters carried out against the State of Israel.

While decrying the trial, the Biden administration did nothing to intervene on Israel’s behalf with the ICJ. It placed no pressure on South Africa to withdraw its case.

By taking no action against the ICJ or South Africa, the Biden administration indirectly but clearly supported their decision to place Israel on the dock.

Last week, the Institute for the Study of Global Anti-Semitism revealed that the South African government and African National Congress (ANC) governing party are bankrolled by Hamas, and its state sponsors Iran and Qatar. So in effect, South Africa is acting as their agent. The actual party accusing Israel of genocide is Hamas, which actually continues its war of genocide still today.

Finally, we come to the International Criminal Court. For the past 15 years, the ICC has been working with Palestinian terrorists to build a legal fiction where Israel, which is not a member of the ICC and over whom the ICC has no jurisdiction is a terrorist organization; and the terror-infused, PLO-controlled, and Hamas aligned-Palestinian Authority is a sovereign state empowered to give the ICC jurisdiction over Israel.

Recognizing the threat the ICC posed not only to Israel but to the United States itself, during his first term, President-elect Donald Trump issued an Executive Order that required sanctions be imposed on ICC staff in the event the institution issued arrest warrants against U.S. military personnel or U.S. allies, including Israel.

Upon entering office, Biden canceled the Executive Order. He refused to reissue it following ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan’s announcement last May that he intended to issue arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant. When the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill legislating the sanctions that appeared in Trump’s executive order, Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) blocked it from being launched in the Senate.

Through its actions, the administration actively protected the ICC—and indirectly encouraged the ICC in its hostile, unlawful acts against Israel. And, just to be clear, the act in question is kidnapping. Netanyahu and Gallant have committed no war crimes and no atrocities. The ICC is acting without legal authority, outside the bounds of international law, with no evidence of any crime save claims from terrorists who are themselves war criminals. Its decision to issue international arrest warrants under the circumstances renders the ICC nothing more than a kidnapping ring. And every ICC member nation that agrees to execute the warrants is a member of the ring.

By enabling the international system to escalate its war against Israel and its people, the Biden administration completed the process initiated 50 years ago at the United Nations. Although Biden and U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken have repeatedly protested their commitment to protecting the liberal world order, their actions in office have transformed the U.N.-based system into a mechanism for the advancement of the genocide of Jews and the destruction of the Judeo-Christian civilization.

These institutions are now beyond repair. They cannot be reformed, only dismantled. To this end, Israel, the Jews and the world are lucky that Trump has the courage to clean up the mess his predecessor is leaving and dismantle the now-broken international system that is Biden’s legacy.


Caroline B. Glick is the senior contributing editor of Jewish News Syndicate and host of the “Caroline Glick Show” on JNS. She is also the diplomatic commentator for Israel’s Channel 14, as well as a columnist for Newsweek. Glick is the senior fellow for Middle Eastern Affairs at the Center for Security Policy in Washington and a lecturer at Israel’s College of Statesmanship. She appears regularly on U.S., British, Australian and Indian television networks, including Fox, Newsmax and CBN. She appears, as well, on the BBC, Sky News Britain and Sky News Australia, and on India's WION News Network. She speaks regularly on nationally syndicated and major market radio shows across the English-speaking world. She is also a frequent guest on major podcasts, including the Dave Rubin Show and the Victor Davis Hanson Show.

Source: https://www.jns.org/the-international-system-is-broken-beyond-repair/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter