Saturday, November 5, 2022

Taiwan scrambles jets, missile systems after detecting 11 Chinese aircraft, vessels near island - Caitlin McFall

 

by Caitlin McFall

Taiwan readies missile system as Chinese aircraft cross Air Defense Identification Zone

Taiwan on Saturday scrambled jets, naval responses and its missile systems after it detected 11 Chinese aircraft and naval vessels near the island.

Taipei’s defense ministry announced that two naval vessels and nine aircraft from the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) were found in and around the Taiwan Strait, including one which crossed the Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ).

Taiwan Air Force Mirage fighter jets taxi on a runway at an airbase in Hsinchu, Taiwan, Friday, Aug. 5, 2022.

Taiwan Air Force Mirage fighter jets taxi on a runway at an airbase in Hsinchu, Taiwan, Friday, Aug. 5, 2022. (AP Photo/Johnson Lai)

G7 TAKES AIM AT CHIEF ADVERSARIES AND URGES PEACE FROM UN LEADERS RUSSIA, CHINA

China has conducted wargames in the region for months though its latest deployment of military forces to the area comes just days after senior PLA officers said the military was "on full-time standby" for war in the Strait, first reported the South China Morning Post Saturday.

The ominous message followed orders by Chinese President Xi Jinping last month to "fully enhance training and preparation for war."

"We must be fully prepared to respond to external interference and major incidents relating to Taiwan independence through non-peaceful means and other necessary measures, always maintain a high state of readiness, and be ready for war at all times," the head of the Central Military Commission’s research bureau, Major General Liu Yantong, wrote in a report issued to the Chinese Communist Party’s congress.

Another top official reportedly said China’s forces would be "resolute" in squashing any attempts from Taipei to seek independence or from foreign interference.

In this photo provided by China’s Xinhua News Agency, a People's Liberation Army member looks through binoculars during military exercises as Taiwan’s frigate Lan Yang is seen at the rear, on Friday, Aug. 5, 2022.

In this photo provided by China’s Xinhua News Agency, a People's Liberation Army member looks through binoculars during military exercises as Taiwan’s frigate Lan Yang is seen at the rear, on Friday, Aug. 5, 2022. (Lin Jian/Xinhua via AP)


US TO SEND B-52 BOMBERS TO AUSTRALIA IN MOVE CHINA WARNS COULD 'TRIGGER' ARMS RACE

Top Democratic leaders on Friday from the G7 issued a joint statement warning China against altering the regional "status quo."

"We remain seriously concerned about the situation in and around the East and South China Seas. We strongly oppose any moves that increase tensions and undermine regional stability," they said referring to China’s naval force posture.

Taiwan identifies as a sovereign nation with democratic values, but it is officially recognized by China, the United Nations and the U.S. as part of the one-China policy.

Chinese military helicopters fly past Pingtan island, one of mainland China's closest point from Taiwan, in Fujian province on Aug. 4, 2022, ahead of massive military drills off Taiwan following U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to the self-ruled island.

Chinese military helicopters fly past Pingtan island, one of mainland China's closest point from Taiwan, in Fujian province on Aug. 4, 2022, ahead of massive military drills off Taiwan following U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to the self-ruled island.  (HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images)

Top diplomats from the G7 pledged their commitment to the one-China policy but called on China to "abstain from threats, coercion, intimidation, or the use of force."

"We strongly oppose any unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force or coercion," they added.


Caitlin McFall is a Reporter at Fox News Digital covering Politics, U.S. and World news.

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/world/taiwan-scrambles-jets-missile-systems-detecting-11-chinese-aircraft-vessels-island

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

How Israel's elections will influence the US midterms - Douglas Altabef

 

by Douglas Altabef

Israel has just shown the West that its citizens were more than capable of expressing themselves clearly and unambiguously. This is the message that needs to be internalized in America.

 

 VOTERS WAIT to cast their ballots Tuesday at a polling station in in Tel Aviv. (photo credit: CORINNA KERN/REUTERS)
VOTERS WAIT to cast their ballots Tuesday at a polling station in in Tel Aviv.
(photo credit: CORINNA KERN/REUTERS)

It is hard to overstate the significance of the just completed Israeli election. We can debate the merit of the political choices made but we must, one and all, express our appreciation to the true heroes and winners of the election: Israel’s citizens.

Against all expectation, the percentage of citizens voting rose to more than 70%, the second highest level since 2015. The number is especially impressive given the fact that this was the fifth election in three years and the potential for cynical avoidance was all too high.

The fear of even lower turnout motivated Im Tirtzu to conduct an unusual and likely unprecedented door-to-door research project this past summer, asking thousands of citizens in peripheral areas with historically low turnout rates whether they had voted, whether they would vote in the upcoming election and if not, why. The responses focused mostly on the sense that my vote does not matter and will not change anything.

The pushback against this torpor, this pessimism, was immense and widespread, and the results speak for them themselves. Israelis were heroic in this election for their civility and, again, for showing up. And they showed up to send a very powerful message to themselves and, I would suggest, to the democratic world. The message was clear and simple: we embrace Zionism; we embrace tradition; we are not afraid to assert our individuality as a nation; and we are not interested in the swan song of Progressivism, post-Zionism or any other ism that would lead us away from a focus of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.

Another message delivered was that it is time to take care of business here; issues that have been ignored or minimized must be tackled head-on.

 Israelis cast their ballots in the Israeli general elections, at a voting station in Jerusalem, on November 1, 2022. (credit: OLIVIER FITOUSSI/FLASH90) Israelis cast their ballots in the Israeli general elections, at a voting station in Jerusalem, on November 1, 2022. (credit: OLIVIER FITOUSSI/FLASH90)

Above all, voters reiterated their love of Zion, their attachment to the mission of the Jewish People in their Land, and their great enthusiasm for the ongoing saga of the Israel that lives apart and yet thereby serves as a light unto the nations.

My prediction is that our election will have a subliminal but important impact on those in the United States that will take place exactly a week after ours. The impact will be that there can be a positive response to feelings of displacement and alienation.

Inspiring and impacting a divided and frustrated American electorate in the US midterms

THE AMERICAN electorate is more divided and frustrated than ours. There has been a significant departure from the values of Americanism: tolerance, free expression and a core sense of underlying unity.

Simultaneously, there has been a lingering fear that nothing can be done, that society is going down a self-destructive rabbit hole and that a beneficial change of direction is not in sight.

Here is where the Israeli example can be a helpful, eye-opening tonic. Above all, our election was about self-empowerment, and the decision to assert ourselves as participatory citizens in a sovereign and benign state. Ironically, the message in Israel was captured by Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign slogan, “Yes we can!” Sadly, that is not the mood in much of America but it is the mood that needs to and can prevail.

Israel showed America and all other countries that will choose to study it, that the Tocqueville effect of the citizenry is alive, well and capable of moving civic mountains.

How important and necessary is this message right now, when the global axis of authoritarian regimes is feeling its oats and the West is staring at its navel, worrying about identity politics and how to get as many benefits as possible out of their governments?

At the end of the day, the test presented and passed here was about empowerment. It is the same test that is on the ballot, as it were, in America. The ability of the West to maintain its vitality and project its values must ultimately be a bottom-up, grassroots expression of the will of its citizens.

Israel has just shown the West that its citizens were more than capable of expressing themselves clearly and unambiguously. This is the message that needs to be internalized in America and, by extension, in all nations that see themselves as democratic expressions of the will of their citizenry.

In the meantime, kudos to us. Once again, little Israel is hitting way over its weight.

 
Douglas Altabef is the chairman of the board of Im Tirtzu, and a director of B’yadenu and the Israel Independence Fund. He can be reached at dougaltabef@gmail.com.

Source: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-721426

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Following rocket fire: IDF attacks Hamas rocket development complex in central Gaza Strip - Elad Benari

 

by Elad Benari

Fighter jets strike underground military site used by Hamas as rocket development and production complex.

 

IDF fighter jets targeted overnight Thursday an underground military site in the Gaza Strip used as a rocket developing and manufacturing complex belonging to the Hamas terrorist organization in the Gaza Strip.

The strike came in response to the rockets launched from the Gaza Strip into Israel on Thursday evening.

“This strike will significantly impede the rocket intensification and armament attempts of the Hamas terrorist organization,” the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit said in a statement.

“The IDF holds the Hamas terrorist organization responsible for all terror activity emanating from the Gaza Strip and it will face the consequences of the security violations against Israel,” it added.

On Thursday evening, after three months of quiet, red color sirens were heard in Israeli communities near the Gaza Strip border.

The IDF said the sirens were reported in the towns of Nirim, Ein HaShlosha, and Kissufim, all of which are located near the Gaza frontier in the western Negev.

One rocket was fired towards the area and was intercepted by the Iron Dome system. There were no injuries. In addition, there were three other failed launches of rockets that exploded in Gazan territory.

The rocket firing is believed to have been a response by the Islamic Jihad to the elimination of one of its terrorists, Farouk Salameh, in Jenin on Thursday afternoon.


Elad Benari

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/362228

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

House Republicans release 1,000-page report alleging politicization in the FBI, DOJ - Chris Pandolfo

 

by Chris Pandolfo

Whistleblowers say FBI is 'rotted at its core' in Republican report on alleged misconduct

House Republicans released a new report on Friday detailing whistleblower allegations of FBI misconduct and politicization at the highest levels of the Department of Justice. 

"The Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the stewardship of Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland, is broken," the GOP report states. "The problem lies not with the majority of front-line agents who serve our country, but with the FBI's politicized bureaucracy."

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee say this report is "the first comprehensive accounting of the FBI's problems to date, which undermine the FBI's fundamental law-enforcement mission.

The report features testimony from whistleblowers who describe FBI leadership in Washington, D.C., as "rotted at its core." They allege a "systemic culture of unaccountability" and say the bureau is beset by "rampant corruption, manipulation, and abuse." 

OPINION: GOP NEEDS NEW ‘CHURCH COMMITTEE’ TO HOLD FBI, JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR MANY ABUSES 

The FBI responded to the report in a statement Friday night. 

"The FBI has testified to Congress and responded to letters from legislators on numerous occasions to provide an accurate accounting of how we do our work. The men and women of the FBI devote themselves to protecting the American people from terrorism, violent crime, cyber threats and other dangers. Put quite simply: we follow the facts without regard for politics. While outside opinions and criticism often come with the job, we will continue to follow the facts wherever they lead, do things by the book, and speak through our work," the statement read.

Read the Republican report:

Broadly, the report alleges systemic political bias against conservatives

Some allegations were previously disclosed, such as accusations that the FBI is artificially inflating statistics about domestic violent extremism to fit the White House narrative on supposed dangers to democracy, or that counterterrorism authorities were instructed to investigate parents who spoke out at school board meetings.

DOJ RAMPS UP CHARGES AGAINST PRO-LIFE ACTIVISTS: 4 LAST YEAR, 26 THIS YEAR

Attorney General Merrick Garland, center, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco hold a press conference at the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 24, 2022.

Attorney General Merrick Garland, center, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco hold a press conference at the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 24, 2022. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Other allegations suggest that the FBI is actively seeking to "purge" employees with conservative views and those who dissent from "woke" diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. 

Additionally, whistleblowers say "political meddling" by the FBI "is dragging the criminal side [of the Bureau] down" as resources are "pulled away" from investigating crimes. One whistleblower alleged he was "told that child sexual abuse material investigations were no longer an FBI priority and should be referred to local law enforcement agencies." 

FBI MISCATEGORIZING CASES RELATED TO JAN. 6 TO BOLSTER CLAIMS OF DOMESTIC EXTREMISM CRISIS IN US: WHISTLEBLOWER

FBI Director Christopher Wray testifies during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing titled "Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation" in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 4, 2022.

FBI Director Christopher Wray testifies during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing titled "Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation" in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 4, 2022. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

House Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, has spoken about several of these allegations for months. He and Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, have sent letters to the Justice Department and FBI leadership demanding answers on the whistleblower allegations they have received, and those letters are contained within the report.  

THE ‘SCARY STUFF’ BIDEN'S WHITE HOUSE AND DOJ MIGHT HAVE DONE TO ATTACK PARENTS: JIM JORDAN

Ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, right, and Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., are seen during the House Judiciary Committee hearing titled "Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cyber Division," in Washington, D.C., on March 29, 2022.

Ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, right, and Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., are seen during the House Judiciary Committee hearing titled "Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cyber Division," in Washington, D.C., on March 29, 2022. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

"Americans deserve to have confidence that the enormous power and reach of federal law enforcement will be used fairly and free of any indication of politicization.The FBI has the power, quite literally, to ruin a person’s life — to invade their residence, to take their property, and even to deprive them of their liberty," the report says. 

"The potential abuse of this power, or even the appearance of abuse, erodes the fundamental principle of equality under the law and confidence in the rule of law. The FBI’s tremendous power is precisely why the people’s elected representatives in Congress must conduct vigorous oversight, particularly in light of allegations of abuse and misconduct made to date."


Chris Pandolfo is a writer for Fox News Digital. Send tips to chris.pandolfo@fox.com and follow him on Twitter @ChrisCPandolfo.

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-release-1000-page-report-alleging-politicization-fbi-doj

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Big Lie about 'The Big Lie' - William Sullivan

 

by William Sullivan

[I]f a shadowy cabal of wealthy and powerful people working covertly to change laws and manipulate the flow of information provided to the public in order to elect those elites' preferred candidate isn't "rigging an election" and "a subversion of democracy," then those phrases have no meaning at all.

With only a few days left until the 2022 midterms, Newsweek laments a new poll by Redfield and Wilton Strategies showing that 40 percent of Americans still believe that the 2020 presidential election was "rigged or stolen."

This is presented as a shocking revelation about the number of Americans who still buy into the "Big Lie," despite its "being proven false," according to the article.

Newsweek buries this particular poll's more interesting observations.  For example, only 36 percent of respondents disagree that the 2020 election was rigged or stolen.  Of that group, more than one in three find it "understandable" that others might believe that the election was rigged or stolen.  Another 15 percent of respondents neither agreed nor disagreed, and 8 percent signified that they "didn't know."

One way to characterize these data is the manner in which Newsweek does, which is to suggest that a horrifying 40 percent of Americans believe in what a bipartisan mainstream media blitz has promoted as "the Big Lie" for nearly two years. 

A far more accurate way to characterize these data, though, is to recognize that there are more Americans confident that the election was rigged than there are Americans who are confident that it was all on the up and up. 

That already paints a different picture of the prevalence of these supposedly fringe "election deniers."  And when we factor in those who believe that the election was not rigged, but understand why Americans are skeptical based upon the facts they've observed, we find that over three in four Americans (or 75.2 percent, given Newsweek's numbers) think the election was rigged, understand why other Americans think the election was rigged, don't know whether or not the election was rigged, or refused to take a position on the subject of a rigged election while talking to a pollster.

In other words, fewer than one in four Americans is confident that the election was legitimate and is completely flummoxed as to how anyone could question its integrity.  That's a remarkable figure, standing athwart the message being delivered by the senile occupant of the Oval Office, who routinely argues that anyone who questions that election's integrity is not only a fringe radical, but an enemy of democracy and a potential insurrectionist.

We Americans aren't buying that narrative because it's obviously not true.  We saw it with our own eyes.  And in case we didn't see it, we were told by the conspirators who bragged about rigging the election while they did their victory lap.

Molly Ball, writing for Time, told readers all about the "secret history" (that was not so secret for Americans who paid any attention at all in 2020) of the "shadow campaign that saved the 2020 election."

She writes:

[T]he participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a fever dream — a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.

Presuming the gullibility and stupidity of her readership, she goes on to claim that this doesn't actually amount to "rigging" the election, but "fortifying" it. 

But if a shadowy cabal of wealthy and powerful people working covertly to change laws and manipulate the flow of information provided to the public in order to elect those elites' preferred candidate isn't "rigging an election" and "a subversion of democracy," then those phrases have no meaning at all. 

You're not crazy for recognizing that very simple fact instinctively, or that it matches up perfectly with what we all witnessed in 2020. 

We were told in the days leading up to the election by this "well-funded cabal of powerful people," for example, that voters would experience a "red mirage."  Sure, it'll look as though Trump is winning on the night of the election, they told us, but that's only because it's easier to count ballots that were cast in established voting locations on Election Day than it is to find, certify, and tally all of those mail-in ballots that may happen to be at some undefined relay point in USPS transit.

After a lifetime of being accustomed to, except in very rare and localized instances, elections being decided on Election Day, it was demanded that we accept, without question, the unprecedented circuit breaker that we witnessed on Election Night in several key states.  We watched helplessly as the outcome shifted to conform with the presaged and oft-parroted notion of a "red mirage," with each new batch of undiscovered-and-uncounted-on-election-night ballots that became newly-discovered-and-totally-legitimate votes in the Democrat cities of crucial swing states, like Philadelphia, Atlanta, Milwaukee, and Detroit, in the days following. 

They wanted us all to feel alone and ostracized in questioning, if not the outcome of the election itself, whether what we had just witnessed was anything close to the securest and fairest election in modern American history, as Democrats began insisting that it was. 

But this is the true revelation of that Newsweek poll: though a "well funded cabal of powerful people" still desperately wants you to be ostracized, you are certainly not alone.  Three in four Americans are either incapable of saying they are confident that the 2020 election wasn't rigged or are, at the very least, understanding of how one might question its legitimacy.  Only one in four Americans is confident that the election was totally secure and cannot understand how anyone might question its legitimacy.

The campaign we've witnessed for two years to present the former group as fringe radicals and the latter group as an incontrovertible consensus is nothing more than gaslighting on a national scale, conducted by that very same "well funded cabal of powerful people" in order to delegitimize, discourage, and destroy its political enemies.

Image: cagdesign via Pixabay, Pixabay License.


William Sullivan

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/11/the_big_lie_about_the_big_lie.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel joins the West’s culture wars - Melanie Phillips

 

by Melanie Phillips

Those clutching their pearls over the “fascists” poised to join Israel’s new government should look in the mirror. 

 

With the result of its election this week, Israel has joined other Western countries in a notable current trend: A revolt by the public against the political establishment.

The Religious Zionist Party has now become the third-largest party in the Knesset. This is likely to mean cabinet posts for the perceived rabble-rouser Itamar Ben-Gvir and the ultra-conservative Bezalel Smotrich in a new government led by the Likud Party’s Benjamin Netanyahu.

Just as happened in Hungary, Italy, the U.S. and Sweden, the once-fringe Religious Zionist Party has come to power because a significant proportion of the public has become profoundly disillusioned with a political establishment that it felt was ignoring and betraying its interests and values.

Before the election, a number of mainstream conservative-minded Israeli voters said they would be voting for Ben-Gvir. So too did a surprising number of the secular young in Tel Aviv. For the latter, Ben-Gvir’s authenticity and directness made him an unlikely political rock star. In addition, among some conservatives, there was a weariness with Netanyahu.

Others who had previously voted for the Yamina Party’s Naftali Bennett felt a deep sense of betrayal when he tore up his previous promises and principles and formed a governing coalition with the left-of-center Yair Lapid that depended upon the anti-Zionist Islamist Ra’am Party.

As this coalition staggered along, there was further disillusionment. Bennett and Lapid seemed to be groveling to the Biden administration, only for Israel to get kicked in the teeth in response.

The government failed to tackle rapidly increasing domestic threats. Illegal Arab settlements in the Negev and the Galilee expanded exponentially, posing a potential threat to Israel’s territorial integrity. Islamist radicalization took increasingly widespread hold. Terrorism and violence rose. Many areas that had been safe for Israeli Jews became unsafe.

On election day, a Jewish young woman in Tiberias narrowly escaped an attempted kidnapping by an Arab man. Last weekend, five Israeli soldiers were wounded in a terror attack in the Jordan Valley. Last week, an Israeli was murdered in Kiryat Arba.

Ben-Gvir’s pitch was restoring public security. “We shall act against those who throw Molotov cocktails or stones and put at risk prison guards, women and do everything to jeopardize the system,” he said. “It’s about time that the soldiers of the IDF and the policemen get support and backing.”

This resonated. But it doesn’t mean Israelis have become extreme. It means they were angry at a political and security establishment that appeared sluggish, incompetent and in thrall to liberal activist judges.

In different contexts, similar “populist” insurgencies have taken place in other Western countries. They have all been based on defending the integrity of the nation and upholding its culture against threats to destroy it from left-wing ideologues, Islamist radicals or a combination of the two.

In the United States, former President Donald Trump was brought to power as a pushback against the attempt by the liberal elite—aided by fellow-travelling “Republicans in Name Only”—to destroy America’s national identity and core values.

In Britain, a similar insurgency delivered Brexit, though the continued failure to uphold the country’s integrity as a nation and defend its borders against illegal immigration still threatens to destroy the ruling Conservative Party.

The Western left’s principal bogeyman, Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, proclaims that he runs an “illiberal democracy” that upholds socially conservative values and keeps the country safe from Islamist entryism.

Last month, Sweden formed a new government dependent on support from the ultra-nationalist Sweden Democrats after the public finally revolted against increasing Islamist violence.

Italy’s new Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who has pledged to fight illegal immigration and Islamization, says the political philosophy of her Brothers of Italy Party is: “Yes to universal Christian values, no to Islamist violence. Yes to safe borders, no to mass migration. Yes to our civilization and no to those who want to destroy it.”

The Brothers of Italy Party was founded in 2012 by Meloni and others who had previously belonged to a party with roots in Mussolini-style fascism. Meloni insists she disavows fascism completely.

But to Western liberals, every part of her “center-right” platform of defending Western civilization is fascism. For such people, the West’s historic culture and values are themselves extremist, cruel, oppressive, racist, xenophobic, Islamophobic and neo-Nazi.

It is precisely that demonization that has driven so many mainstream voters into supporting leaders whose agenda may indeed be authoritarian or illiberal.

But the left has shifted the needle on the ideological compass. What was previously regarded as a left-wing threat to a civilized and self-disciplined social order is now deemed the center ground, while what was previously considered the center is now denounced as right-wing or far-right.

The hypocrisy from those now having a fit of the vapors over the rise of Ben-Gvir is truly epic. They shout that he is a threat to democracy. Yet they made no complaint when Bennett and Lapid governed courtesy of Arabs whose agenda is to destroy Israel.

Despite the careful declaration by Ra’am’s leader Mansour Abbas that Israel would always be a Jewish state, his party remains avowedly anti-Zionist and committed to replacing the State of Israel with a Muslim theocracy.

Ra’am, like Israel’s other Arab parties, is also implacably hostile to the LGBTQ agenda. Yet no Western liberals ever accused it of “homophobia,” a slur they now hurl at Ben-Gvir and Smotrich.

Those screaming about the threat to Israeli democracy are the same people who utter not a peep of protest when the despotic Palestinian Authority cancels elections, forces journalists under pain of death to write only the approved line and routinely jails and even kills dissidents.

They are the same people who have remained utterly silent over the supremely anti-democratic, two-year attempt to lever Trump out of office through dirty tricks involving elements in the FBI, the administrative class and the Democratic Party.

Above all, these liberals fail to acknowledge their own profound illiberalism. They try to coerce acceptance of their ideological dogma through intimidation, character assassination and suppression of dissent.

A graphic example of a society that has passed through the moral and political looking-glass arose in Britain a few years back, when under the administration of a Conservative government, the education regulator tried to force haredi Jewish schools to teach homosexuality.

Ignoring its own reports that these schools were exemplary in instilling tolerant values, the regulator refused to acknowledge that they never taught sexuality of any kind because of their religious beliefs.

The haredi said privately that if they lost this battle, they would leave Britain for a country that would grant them religious freedom. The country they had in mind, where they believed they would be safe because it was defending biblical values, was Orban’s Hungary.

The mainstream cultural and political establishment has long been warned that, if it fails to uphold core cultural values, the resulting vacuum may be filled by objectionable characters. The “populist” leaders who have duly arisen are the creation of the liberals who are now clutching their pearls.

We have yet to see from Ben-Gvir’s actions whether he has indehed renounced his youthful support for Kahanist extremism. But even if he has, Western liberals will cut him no slack whatsoever. Anything that departs in any way from any part of left-wing dogma will be resisted with everything they can throw at it.

In addition to the physical threats to its existence, Israel has now joined the West’s culture wars.

 

Melanie Phillips, a British journalist, broadcaster and author, writes a weekly column for JNS. Currently a columnist for The Times of London, her personal and political memoir Guardian Angel has been published by Bombardier, which also published her first novel, The Legacy. Go tomelaniephillips.substack.comto access her work.

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/362246

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Problematic Israel-Lebanon Maritime Deal - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

It's unclear why a country would sign a maritime deal under the shadow of a threat of war if the deal wasn't signed. Israel, nevertheless, went forward and signed.

Published originally under the title "How Hezbollah Can Use Maritime Deal as Excuse for War."

Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah claimed that Hezbollah's threats prevented Israel from extracting gas from the Karish field until the deal was signed. He also said Lebanon got almost everything it wanted in the deal.

In the wake of the maritime deal between Israel and Lebanon, there remain key questions about Hezbollah's role and its future actions.

Israel agreed to a deal on the eve of the election, and it also appeared to back down from its earlier claims, agreeing to a line off the coast that gives in to most of Lebanon's demands. Although the deal has been praised by the US, it leaves questions about whether it will bring stability or whether Hezbollah can use it as a pretext to create tensions in the future and lay claim to areas off the coast.

Hezbollah, which appeared to be closely consulted by the Lebanese side about the deal, has claimed that it is some kind of a victory. At the same time, the terrorist group has also reserved for itself the right to "defend" Lebanon's maritime claims, meaning that it dictated the deal without being a signatory.

This puts Israel in a complex position because Hezbollah can claim at any point in the future a need to start a war over the deal, while Lebanon can never be held to account for Hezbollah's actions.

The privilege Hezbollah always enjoys is unprecedented in the world. It controls Lebanon and basically controls who will be appointed the country's president; it controls a swath of southern Lebanon through militia checkpoints; it stockpiles a massive, illegal arsenal of missiles that threaten the region. Yet it is never held to account for any of these actions.

For instance, Lebanon can fire rockets at Israel or launch drones at gas platforms off the coast, and it can pretend that it isn't responsible, so any Israeli actions against Hezbollah are a "violation" of Lebanon's sovereignty.

Israel-Lebanon talks show dangers of negotiating with a state that doesn't control its own territory

Throughout its recent history, the goal of the Iranian regime has been to create numerous Hezbollah-like organizations around the Middle East – cutting up countries, hollowing them out and then filling them with extrajudicial militias. It has done this in Yemen, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.

The recent maritime negotiations between Israel and Lebanon show the pitfalls of negotiating with a state that doesn't control most of its own territory.

Outgoing Lebanese President Michel Aoun has said the maritime deal was partly driven by Hezbollah, which launched drones targeting Israel's offshore gas rigs. This was a "deterrent," he claimed.

"It wasn't coordinated [with the government]. It was an initiative taken by Hezbollah and it was useful," Aoun said, adding that the Lebanese army "had no role," Reuters reported.

This means Hezbollah basically runs Lebanon's foreign and military policy.

"Hezbollah's military power, including its drone power, caused Israel to fear a war with Lebanon, and this led to the agreement to draw maritime border," retired Lebanese Army general Hashem Jaber was quoted by Iranian regime media as saying.

This means Lebanon credits Hezbollah with helping create the maritime deal.

That Hezbollah claimed it was on "alert" for a possible conflict with Israel in the days leading up to the deal means an illegal terrorist group was able to influence the deal. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah could then claim a victory when the deal was signed.

It's unclear why a country would sign a maritime deal under the shadow of a threat of war if the deal wasn't signed. Israel, nevertheless, went forward and signed. Hezbollah then took credit for having "deterred" the Jewish state and having forced the deal to go through.

ON THE one hand, this rhetoric by Hezbollah could be seen as propaganda. Some voices have portrayed the deal as recognition of Israel by Lebanon, as if it needs recognition by its chaotic and almost bankrupt neighbor, which doesn't even control most of its own territory.

Nevertheless, these voices argue that the deal makes it seem that Hezbollah recognized Israel because the terrorist group had to agree to the Lebanese government agreeing to the deal. These voices make it seem Israel needs recognition from Hezbollah, as if they are not only on equal terms, but that Hezbollah is actually the stronger party, and Israel needs to beg both Lebanon and Hezbollah for recognition.

According to these voices, any mention of "Israel" in Lebanese media, as opposed to "Zionist entity," is a major accomplishment. It's unclear whether this will mean that Hezbollah will feel it needs to work toward more peace on the northern border or whether it will feel empowered by this deal to import more weapons and continue to act as an independent army within Lebanon, dictating its foreign and military policy.

That leads to more questions, including whether Lebanon has outsourced all its foreign and military policy to Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and whether Hezbollah will use the deal as a pretext to raise tensions in the future.

While Hezbollah may be celebrating the deal merely to save face and make it seem like a victory, it may also believe that it is actually victorious and can now dictate policies to Israel. For instance, Nasrallah claimed that Hezbollah's threats prevented Israel from extracting gas from the Karish field until the deal was signed. Nasrallah also said Lebanon got almost everything it wanted in the deal.

Is it possible that Hezbollah will create some new pretext for tensions along the maritime border in the future, some kind of maritime version of the Mount Dov (Shaba Farms) dispute along the northern border? The terrorist group could decide that there are still new areas that Lebanon claims, such as close to the shoreline, and then claim that it needs to "resist" along the maritime border.

Hezbollah thrives on this fake need to "resist." After 2000, when Israel withdrew from Lebanon, many people believed there would be peace in the North. But Hezbollah created new reasons to claim it needed to "resist" and immediately began increasing its threats to Israel. Hezbollah profits from these threats, so it's entirely plausible that the maritime deal could lead to new threats.

The group could also use the deal as a way to hide behind gas exploration off the coast to threaten Israel. This means that if large companies are brought in by Lebanon to explore for gas, such as firms linked to Qatar or France or other countries, Hezbollah could use them as cover to build up threats to Israel. Then, if Hezbollah provokes the Jewish state through attacks, any Israeli response would be portrayed as violating the maritime deal and harming Lebanon's sovereignty.

This is how Hezbollah manages Lebanon's military and foreign policy while not being held to account.

Hezbollah claims to have driven the details behind the maritime agreement while not being a party to it, not being bound by it and not recognizing Israel. This could set Jerusalem up for difficult policy choices in the future. If a different government after the election wants to change any parts of the deal, then Israel will be seen as violating it, which would give Hezbollah a pretext for war against the Jewish state.

This means that although Israel is bound by the deal, Hezbollah, which dictated it, has carved out a "right" to decide if the deal is being followed and a "right" to go to war with Israel, which has no similar right and flexibility on its side.


Seth J. Frantzman is a Ginsburg-Milstein Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum and senior Middle East correspondent at The Jerusalem Post.

Source: https://www.meforum.org/63755/the-problematic-israel-lebanon-maritime-deal

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The reasons the right-religious bloc won the Israeli election - Lenny Ben David

 

by Lenny Ben David

American Jewish liberals and progressives should stop saying that the sky is falling

Even before the final votes were counted in the latest Israeli election or the coalition negotiations begin, some American Jews and politicians were predicting disaster for the U.S.-Israel relationship.

The doomsayers point to the victorious Likud, led by Benjamin Netanyahu, and the Religious Zionist Party, led by Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, who won a combined 46 Knesset seats. Together with the 18 seats won by the haredi parties Shas and United Torah Judaism, this gives Netanyahu’s right-religious bloc a commanding 64-seat majority.

In response to the results, Susie Gelman, chairwoman of the leftist Israel Policy Forum, issued a jeremiad endorsed by Jeremy Ben-Ami, president of the left-wing lobby J Street.

“For the overwhelming majority of American Jews,” it said, “Ben-Gvir is indefensible, as are the trends that he personifies. His increasing influence and the prospect of his attaining a measure of formal governmental power will make it easier for many American Jews not only to disavow him in disgust but to apathetically turn away from Israel altogether.”

Ben-Ami added his two cents, thanking Gelman in a tweet for “this strong statement regarding Itamar Ben-Gvir and the need to reject racism as loudly in Israel as we do here.”

Why did Israel vote in favor of the right-religious bloc?

Israelis are distressed by the upsurge in Palestinian Arab terrorism inside pre-1967 Israel, as well as in Judea and Samaria. For example, on election day, a street camera filmed an Arab man attempting to abduct an Israeli woman and force her into his car in the city of Tiberias. She broke away and escaped.

Barely a day goes by without an attack, and the Palestinian Authority security forces do nothing to stop the terrorists. The outgoing Lapid government, including Defense Minister Benny Gantz, lost the public’s confidence because they were unable to suppress the bloody terror surge.

The elections were also a vote of no confidence in the police, who have been unable to stem the rise of crime and spousal abuse in the Israeli-Arab community.

Moreover, as traumatic as the May 2021 Hamas rocket attacks were for the Israeli public huddled in shelters, they didn’t compare to the large-scale rioting and mayhem conducted by Israeli Arabs in “mixed” population cities like Ramla, Lod and Haifa.

After the election, polls showed that many Israelis do not trust their Arab fellow citizens or the Arab political parties, one of which was a member of Lapid’s coalition.

The American reaction has ignored all of this in favor of either condemnation or concern.

Officially, U.S. State Department Spokesman Ned Price expressed hope that the new Israeli government would continue to uphold the two countries’ shared values of an “open, democratic society, including tolerance and respect for all in civil society, particularly for minority groups.” Some commentators and prominent Jewish leaders were not so sanguine.

Frankly, most Israeli voters don’t care about how American Jews or politicians feel about their political choices. Indeed, some American policies and demands may have pushed voters towards the right.

For example, the U.S. dalliance with Iran is considered a threat to Israel. The administration, progressive Democrats and J Street still push for diplomacy with Iran and the restoration of the JCPOA—the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Benjamin Netanyahu has earned his reputation as a staunch opponent of the ayatollahs.

The Israeli press often sensationalizes the political situation in the U.S. and suggests that Congress is full of Democrats hostile to Israel, making Israelis more amenable to right-wing politicians who pledge to stand up to American pressure.

Moreover, the Biden administration’s rush to conclude the Lebanon-Hezbollah-Israel maritime border dispute on the eve of Israel’s election, followed by the resignation of Lebanon’s President Michel Aoun, smells of a fix. The Lapid government did not take the agreement to a Knesset vote, and Israelis do not trust what’s left of Lebanon’s government or Hezbollah.

Few Israelis feel protected by the American security guarantees underpinning the maritime accords. But, of course, J Street said, “This agreement is a great example of the kind of proactive, engaged diplomatic role that the United States can and should play in the region—putting forward its own concrete proposals to help build common ground toward resolution of complex matters … between parties.”

This shouldn’t be surprising, given J Street’s 2022 legislative agenda, which includes lobbying for “$225 million in Economic Support Funds (ESF) for assistance to the West Bank and Gaza,” more funding for UNRWA, a U.S. government investigation into the death of an elderly Palestinian and State Department intervention “in order to immediately halt potential demolitions in the East Jerusalem village of al-Walaja.”

J Street president Jeremy Ben-Ami embraces Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas following his statements at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Midtown Manhattan on Feb. 11, 2020. Source: Screenshot.

The Biden administration also restored funding to the P.A. and UNRWA despite Palestinian Arab terrorism and incitement. They did so partially at the urging of left-wing American Jewish organizations. Little, if anything, has been done to halt the P.A.’s murderous “pay to slay” policy. U.S. spokespersons make “even-handed” judgments on any issue in Judea and Samaria, even when Palestinian Arabs violate the Oslo Accords’ conditions, such as building in Israeli-controlled Area C. To Israelis, American concerns about terrorist attacks against Israeli citizens are tame compared to official U.S. reactions to the deaths, even accidental, of Palestinian Arab individuals such as journalist Shireen Abu Akleh.

Furthermore, the haredi parties, who will be pillars of the new Netanyahu government, consider some of American Jewry’s demands blasphemous, such as an egalitarian prayer area at the Western Wall or non-Orthodox conversions. The pride American Jewish liberals take in the fact that “the largest gay parade in the world” takes place in Tel Aviv is an abomination to them. Many who voted for the Religious Zionist party can be classified as “haredi-lite” and share those views.

Israel took a big step in the fight against “climate change” when it heavily taxed plastic disposable utensils, but while this measure may have been praised in the West, haredi Jews in Israel felt differently. They saw it as a painful and deliberate slap in the face from Finance Minister Avigdor Liberman, long an opponent of theirs. Orthodox families are large and Sabbath meals require many dishes and utensils. Few own expensive dishwashers—or even have room for the appliance—so effectively banning plastics puts a strain on them. Yeshivas, too, rely on disposable dishes to save manpower.

As for national-religious voters, they are part of the 21st century, but many aren’t ready to have their sons fighting in the same foxholes as female soldiers (for halakhic reasons). There is little doubt that Israeli women taking on more of the defense burden gives pride to feminists in New York, Los Angeles and Israel’s own “left coast.” Still, it conflicts with the national-religious “Hesder” program, in which young men combine Torah studies with combat training and service.

Unlike previous Israeli government coalitions, the solid majority won by Likud, the Religious Zionists and the haredi parties means that Netanyahu will not be compelled to assemble a patchwork of competing political parties. Theoretically, he could invite other parties in, so as to create a heterogenous government. Still, the chances are not high, considering that many parties—and American Jewish groups—pushed an agenda of “anyone but Bibi.”

 

Lenny Ben-David served for 25 years in senior posts in AIPAC in Washington and Jerusalem. In 1997, he was appointed as Israel’s deputy chief of mission in the embassy in Washington, D.C., where he served until 2000 under three ambassadors and two prime ministers. He is the author of the book American Interests in the Holy Land Revealed in Early Photographs and editor of The Gaza War 2021: Hamas and Iran Attack Israel.

Lenny Ben David

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/362240

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Ahead in the polls, Kari Lake tests new theme: Don't let America become California - Charlotte Hazard

 

by Charlotte Hazard

"We're not interested in those liberal, leftist California-style policies in Arizona," said the state's GOP candidate for governor.


Ahead in the polls and garnering national attention, Arizona GOP gubernatorial nominee Kari Lake is teasing a new message that could catch on for conservatives in 2024: California is the evil empire for freedom-loving Americans.

"We're not interested in those liberal, leftist California-style policies in Arizona," Lake said on Friday during an interview on the "Just the News, No Noise" television show.

According to Lake, her Democrat opponent, current Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, wants to transform Arizona into California by adopting the failing policies of the Golden State.

"This is why Katie Hobbs is losing," Lake said. "It's one of the reasons. We also know that she looks to California in those dead-end policies where they're actually raising taxes on people at the worst time, when they're already suffering under Joe Biden's inflation. They're actually forcing businesses to remain shut down due to COVID restrictions.

"Katie Hobbs has the Secretary of State's office still shut down because of COVID. These are the kinds of policies she'll bring to Arizona."

A big issue that seems to be driving voters to the polls in Arizona in a few days is the border crisis. Current GOP Gov. Doug Ducey stacked containers to fill gaps in the border wall that had started to be built under former President Donald Trump. Hobbs referred to these stacked containers as a "publicity stunt" by the current governor. 

"We knew that she wants open borders because we saw her voting record," Lake said in response to Hobbs' remarks about the containers. "She just verified it to the millions of Americans who are concerned about this wide open border, and and worse is the fentanyl that's killing our young generation. I've talked to so many moms and dads on the campaign trail, who told me they lost a 17-year-old daughter or a 19-year-old son, and they are horrified that our border is wide open. I want to finish President Trump's wall." 

Something that gives her hope, Lake said, is that the younger generation seems to be moving in the direction of conservatism and the Republican Party. According to a recent Trafalgar poll, the demographic of 18-24 year-olds are dissatisfied with the Democrat Party and the current leadership. 

"That is the biggest thing I'm most excited about," Lake said. "The new Republican Party is a young Republican Party."

According to Lake, the younger generation had school, social events with friends, and  coming-of-age milestones like prom stolen from them by elected officials and bureaucrats during COVID. 

"What the elected officials and some non-elected officials in this country did to our children is unforgivable, and we will not forget what they did," she said. "And these children are now growing up. They are of voting age, and they remember who did what, and they know who's going to be there and stand for them and stand up for them."

Arizona GOP Chairwoman Dr. Kelli Ward says that it is important that Republican candidates have a "soul and a spine" in order to stand up for the American people. 

"I think Arizona is the tip of the spear to be a model for the rest of the nation," Ward said on the "Just the News, No Noise" TV show. "Here we have people who have a spine and a soul. Believe me, as the chairman of this party it has been one of my major goals is to make sure that our candidates have a spine and a soul and a brain and a heart and that they have the skills, talents and abilities that are needed to do the jobs."

Ward said seeing the state's GOP ticket of Kari Lake, Blake Masters, Mark Finchem, and Abe Hamadeh doing so well on messaging is satisfying. 

"To see them working together already is simply amazing," Ward said. "They are a group of people that has solutions, that stays on messaging, and understands each one's role in putting our state and our nation back on track. It is unheard of. It's unseen before, and I think that it will be the model in states going forward."


Charlotte Hazard

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wkd-ahead-polls-kari-lake-launches-new-theme-dont-let-arizona-become

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Can Netanyahu manage Ben-Gvir and the far Right? - Yaakov Katz

 

by Yaakov Katz

The government that Netanyahu will have the easiest time forming – with the Religious Zionist Party, Shas and UTJ – will be the most religious and extreme government in Israeli history.

 

 ITAMAR BEN-GVIR will not make Benjamin Netanyahu’s life easy in a government they form together. (photo credit: CORINNA KERN/REUTERS)
ITAMAR BEN-GVIR will not make Benjamin Netanyahu’s life easy in a government they form together.
(photo credit: CORINNA KERN/REUTERS)

Israel, it seems, will finally have a government and one that has the potential to remain in power for a full parliamentary term.

Is it the government everyone dreamed of? No. Is it what all of the people hoped for? Also, no. But even with its flaws there is a silver lining – hopefully, the country will not be thrown back into political turmoil for a bit of time. That itself has got to be worth something.

There is something more – the people have spoken. A majority of this country voted for this exact government. When someone cast a ballot for Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday, they knew they were getting Itamar Ben-Gvir. No one thought that a vote for Netanyahu meant a unity government with Yair Lapid. And if they did, well, they should have paid closer attention to what has been going on here over the last three years.

This is what the majority of the country chose and that is how a democracy works. It is now their time to govern.

The question, of course, is what the price will be and what damage will be done by the time the next election rolls along. The government that Netanyahu will have the easiest time forming – with the Religious Zionist Party, Shas and UTJ – will be the most religious and extreme government in Israeli history.

 Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu addresses his supporters at his party headquarters during Israel's general election in Jerusalem, November 2, 2022.  (credit: AMMAR AWAD/REUTERS) Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu addresses his supporters at his party headquarters during Israel's general election in Jerusalem, November 2, 2022. (credit: AMMAR AWAD/REUTERS)

Not only will any dream of religious freedom in this country need to be buried, the expected new government will be the final step in normalizing the racist far Right in Israel. We might not like it, but soon Itamar Ben-Gvir will be a top minister in the Israeli government. That is how elections work.

Netanyahu knows this all and it makes him uncomfortable. People close to the Likud leader speak openly about the debates they have been having over how they will keep this government somewhere in the normative Right and from falling over the edge. It is, to say the least, not the government Netanyahu had prayed he would come back to.

Historically, when looking at Netanyahu’s previous governments, he always brought in someone to the right of him and someone to his left who was perceived as more moderate. In 2009, there was Ehud Barak on the Left and Avigdor Liberman on the Right; in 2013, there was Tzipi Livni on the Left and Naftali Bennett on the Right; and in 2015, there was Moshe Kahlon in the Center and Bennett again on the Right.

This government is only to Netanyahu’s right. Shas and UTJ are religious extremists who believe in little freedom for the secular. Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich are part of the far Right. Their vision of coexistence is very different than what this country – including Netanyahu – have been promoting for the last 30 years.

But this is also the government that won the election. People who voted for Netanyahu and Likud knew that the government on the horizon was one that would include Ben-Gvir. The same was for people who voted for the Religious Zionist Party. They can’t now claim they didn’t know.

For the supporters, this is also the exact government that will be able to potentially deliver on what the right wing has long claimed it seeks to do – annex West Bank settlements, dismantle the Palestinian Authority, legalize illegal West Bank outposts, reform the rule of law, split the role of the attorney-general and more.

What will be interesting to see is whether any of this happens and, if it doesn’t, who Netanyahu will blame. With this coalition, Netanyahu could bring legislation to the Knesset at its first session to annex the West Bank or at least the Israeli settlements that are there. Will he do it and, if not, why?

Until now, there was always a convenient answer. When he promised to annex the West Bank in 2020 and then stopped, he blamed Jared Kushner. Before that, it was Tzipi Livni and Barack Obama. When he didn’t attack Iran back in 2012 it was because of Benny Gantz, who was the IDF chief of staff at the time. It was never him; it was always someone else.

The reality is that Netanyahu will have someone to blame but this time it will be himself. The real reason he did not do any of those things until now was because he did not want to. He had multiple opportunities over the years to annex the West Bank, as an example, but he always stopped short. He had no problem or hesitation holding a press conference to announce the intention but then when he received the power, he never followed through.

Which Netanyahu is taking office in Israel?

Which leads to the question on a lot of people’s minds – who is the Netanyahu who will be taking office in the next few weeks? Is it the Netanyahu who was always careful to use force and hesitant to take controversial diplomatic steps? Or, is it a new Netanyahu, one who changed after 18 months in the opposition and who is determined at all costs to change the country.

If the former, then we are about to get the Netanyahu who was prime minister in the past. This will be a Netanyahu who will do everything possible to keep his government intact while not doing anything that cannot be changed in the future. If it is the latter, then it will be a different kind of prime minister, one who could end up being controlled by the more right-wing elements in his coalition.

As things look now, Netanyahu has two options. He could try and sway Benny Gantz to enter the coalition instead of the Religious Zionist Party. The problem is that this is not as simple as it seems.

While on paper, Gantz has 12 seats and RZP has 14, in reality, Gantz only has six seats. Two belong to Gadi Eisenkot and Matan Kahana, who are free agents and will not necessarily enter a Netanyahu government even if Gantz wanted, and the other four belong to Gideon Sa’ar. Would Gantz be able to convince everyone to come with him? Unclear.

On the other hand, he might not need to. If Smotrich and Ben-Gvir split, Netanyahu could use Gantz just to replace Ben-Gvir. Would Smotrich go for that? Also, not certain.

On the other hand, Gantz is the easiest target for Netanyahu if he wants to try to avoid Ben-Gvir. There is little doubt that the Americans are putting pressure on Gantz and trying to get him to ease his veto a bit and consider joining Netanyahu for the “sake of the country.”

This tactic worked in the past on Gantz (during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic) and might work again. Even if Gantz’s patriotism sometimes leads to foolish political decisions, it is undoubtedly sincere.

On the other hand, it is not even clear that Netanyahu would want Gantz in the government with him. Doing so, and keeping Ben-Gvir out, would basically mean that Netanyahu does not plan on passing legislation that would cancel his trial and keep him out of jail. That would be too much for Gantz.

What Netanyahu might prefer, is to first establish the right-wing government, pass the legislation that he wants, see if it stands up in the High Court and if it does and the trial is done, then invite Gantz into his government. At that point, Gantz would not have a real reason to veto the Likud leader.


Yaakov Katz

Source: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-721420

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Thursday, November 3, 2022

New Jersey synagogues are under 'credible' threat: FBI - Greg Wehner

 

by Greg Wehner

The FBI announced it received credible information on Thursday regarding a threat to synagogues in New Jersey.

New Jersey synagogues are under threat, according to the FBI, which said it received a credible threat to the areas of worship on Thursday.

"The FBI has received credible information of a broad threat to synagogues in NJ," the federal agency said on Twitter. "We ask at this time that you take all security precautions to protect your community and facility.  We will share more information as soon as we can. Stay alert. In case of emergency call police."

The FBI seal is displayed on a podium before a news conference at the agency's headquarters in Washington. 

The FBI seal is displayed on a podium before a news conference at the agency's headquarters in Washington.  (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy acknowledged he is aware of the threat, saying he has been in touch with Attorney General Matt Platkin, New Jersey Homeland Security, and FBI Newark.

Gov. Murphy made the statement on Twitter as well.

"We are closely monitoring the situation and are working with local law enforcement to ensure that all houses of worship are protected," he tweeted.

 

Greg Wehner is a breaking news reporter for Fox News Digital.

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-jersey-synagogues-credible-threat-fbi

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Russian army discussed when, how to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine -report - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

Dmitry Medvedev said that Kyiv's objectives threatened the existence of Russia and so allows for the use of nuclear weapons.

 

 A deactivated Soviet-era SS-4 medium range nuclear capable ballistic missile is displayed at La Cabana fortress in Havana October 15, 2012. (photo credit: REUTERS/DESMOND BOYLAN)
A deactivated Soviet-era SS-4 medium range nuclear capable ballistic missile is displayed at La Cabana fortress in Havana October 15, 2012.
(photo credit: REUTERS/DESMOND BOYLAN)

Senior Russian military commanders recently discussed how and when the Kremlin would use tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs) in Ukraine, The New York Times reported on Wednesday. 

According to the report, President Vladimir Putin was not part of the conversation. Pentagon Press Secretary Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder said on Tuesday that there were no indications that the Russian leader "has made a decision at this time to employ nuclear weapons."

Also on Tuesday, Security Council of the Russian Federation deputy chairman Dmitry Medvedev said on Telegram that Kyiv's objectives to return all occupied territories to its control constituted an existential threat to Russia and would allow for the use of nuclear weapons. 

"New, troubling developments" 

According to the Times, intelligence reports about the nuclear weapons conversations were shared within the US government in mid-October.

On October 25, A senior US official told the Times that there were "new, troubling developments" involving Russia's nuclear arsenal, but did not provide additional information.

 A geiger counter measures a radiation level at a site of fire burning in the exclusion zone around the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, outside the village of Rahivka. (credit: YAROSLAV YEMELIANENKO/REUTERS) A geiger counter measures a radiation level at a site of fire burning in the exclusion zone around the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, outside the village of Rahivka. (credit: YAROSLAV YEMELIANENKO/REUTERS)

Dirty bombs and tactical nukes

The report came as Russia was claiming that Ukrainian forces were preparing to use a dirty bomb or even a nuclear bomb.

According to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a dirty bomb is "a type of 'radiological dispersal device' that combines a conventional explosive, such as dynamite, with radioactive material... Most RDDs would not release enough radiation to kill people or cause severe illness – the conventional explosive itself would be more harmful to people than the radioactive material... A dirty bomb is not a "weapon of mass destruction" but a "weapon of mass disruption," where contamination and anxiety are the major objectives."

Ukraine responded at the time that the persistent Russian claims that Kyiv planned to detonate a dirty bomb made it appear as though Moscow itself planned to conduct a false flag operation, and that Ukraine has never had any plans to develop a dirty bomb.

Tactical nuclear weapons are lower-yield bombs that would allow the destruction of enemies on the battlefield, rather than strategic weapons launched to cause mass destruction to an enemy. TNWs have never been used in combat.


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/international/article-721264

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter