Monday, April 7, 2025

Europe tries to organize united response to Trump tariffs, but consensus appears challenging - Eric Lyman

 

by Eric Lyman

Trump appointed Elon Musk, meanwhile, says he's hoping for a “zero tariff situation” between the US and Europe.

 

The European Union will try this week to present a united front against President Donald Trump's tariffs, with the European Commission planning to present to members Monday a list of U.S. products on which to impose extra duties.

The plan by the commission, which coordinates EU trade policy, is in specific response to Trump's earlier steel and aluminum tariffs rather than the broader, more-recently announced reciprocal levies, according to Reuters. But the consensus among the countries appears challenging, considering the leaders each have their own domestic considerations.

Among the EU leaders who appear most eager to retaliate are French President Emmanuel Macron, who is calling Trump's tariffs “brutal and unfounded.” 

Macron wants, in response, to suspend billions in French investments in the U.S. until the tariffs are removed. He has called on other European Union member states to do the same

Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, said European countries were “prepared to respond” to the new policies, but afterward said “There seems to be no order in the disorder."

In Germany and Italy, the European Union’s largest and third-largest economies, respectively, the situations are more complicated. 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz criticized the measures as “an attack on the global trade order.” But he’s a lame duck after a humiliating defeat in February’s general election. And Friedrich Merz, Scholz’s likely successor, is trying to cobble together a viable coalition, adding the U.S. levies to an already long list of obstacles he faces. 

Italy’s Giorgia Meloni is probably the European leader closest to Trump. Ahead of his tariff announcement, she had been a steady voice urging “prudence” when it came to Europe’s debate over potentially aggressive countermeasures.

But afterward, Meloni finds herself trying to walk the same delicate line other European leaders have traversed in recent weeks, calling the tariffs “a mistake but not a catastrophe” and vowing to defend Italy’s interests while still calling for talks to avert a trade war

Meanwhile, Meloni’s lieutenant, Trump devotee and Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, has said Europe should not even consider countermeasures. 

Taking revenge for tariffs? Opening trade wars with the U.S. would be an unfortunate choice,” said Salvini, who in February said Trump could deserve a Nobel Peace Prize this year. 

The result? The trade issue, along with differences of opinion about Ukraine and the debate over European rearmament, has left Meloni straining to prevent what was once Europe’s most stable major coalition from collapse

Against that backdrop, billionaire entrepreneur and Trump administration appointee Elon Musk this weekend appeared to split from the administration on European tariffs, saying he hoped for a “zero tariff situation” between the US and Europe.

As is often the case in Europe, the challenge is getting enough consensus among 27 member states to put action behind words. 

In recent years, Europe has fallen short when it comes to migrantssecurityforeign economic developmentanti-democratic developments in neighboring Turkeyuniversal basic incomeanti-racism laws, and any number of other areas. 

When Trump first announced a 25% tariff on imported steel and aluminum, Europe unveiled its own package of around $30 billion in targeted retaliatory tariffs that were scheduled to enter into force last Tuesday. 

In response, Trump threatened 200% tariffs on wine and other alcohol from Europe, so leaders quickly voted to delay implementing their tax package for two weeks

That April 15 deadline remains on the books, and one test of European unity in this area will be to monitor whether the European tariffs are allowed to enter into force – or perhaps even strengthened. 

Meanwhile, European markets are tanking. The Stoxx 600 index of European companies shed more than 15% of its value in the two weeks ending Friday (more than double the damage to the Dow Jones average over the same span), with carmakers, financial institution and transport companies hit especially hard.

In several European markets, losses on Friday alone were the largest since the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the World Trade Center in New York.

The euro currency has also weakened against the U.S. dollar, bond yields have spiked, and economists warn it wouldn’t take much to push slow-growing European economies into recession territory.

 
Eric Lyman

Source: https://justthenews.com/world/europe/europe-reacts-tariffs

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Netanyahu's US visit: From Biden's cold shoulder to Trump's open door – analysis - Herb Keinon

 

by Herb Keinon

Netanyahu meets Trump at the White House for the second time in two months, displaying a shift from cold relations with Biden to an open door policy with the current administration.

 

U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hold a joint press conference in the East Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., February 4, 2025. (photo credit:  REUTERS/Leah Millis )
U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hold a joint press conference in the East Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., February 4, 2025.
(photo credit: REUTERS/Leah Millis )

In the 29 months that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s term as prime minister overlapped with former US president Joe Biden, he met with the president once in the White House. On Monday, Netanyahu is scheduled to hold his second meeting in the White House with President Donald Trump in just two and a half months.

That contrast speaks volumes. During the Biden years, access was rationed, tensions surfaced regularly, and there was often a sense of a crisis always lurking around the corner. Under Trump, the rhythm is entirely different: open doors, close coordination, and the sense of a looming crisis has been replaced by a working assumption of close alignment.

This hastily arranged visit differs from Netanyahu’s first one in early February, just two weeks after Trump’s inauguration. Netanyahu was the first foreign leader to meet Trump in the White House. That meeting was widely seen as symbolic – a way to publicly close the door on the tense Biden years when it took months for Biden to call Netanyahu, let alone invite him for a meeting.

JPost Videos

That Trump invited Netanyahu so soon after the inauguration sent a signal that the relationship was now on an entirely different footing. If that meeting was largely symbolic – though there was also content, most significantly Trump’s surprise announcement of a vision to relocate Gazans – this meeting suggests something else: not only a relationship restored, but one moving in a distinctly different direction.

US PRESIDENT Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speak to reporters before meeting at the White House this month. Their talks marked the return to the US-Israel relationship of deep respect, friendship, and trust that had been missing during the previous four years, say the writer. (credit: Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters)Enlrage image
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speak to reporters before meeting at the White House this month. Their talks marked the return to the US-Israel relationship of deep respect, friendship, and trust that had been missing during the previous four years, say the writer. (credit: Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters)

What is the meeting focusing on?

The meeting with Trump is expected to focus on several key issues: Israel’s renewed offensive in Gaza, the hostage crisis, Iran, growing tensions between Israel and Turkey, and Trump’s decision to slap 17% tariffs on Israeli products. In announcing his trip, Netanyahu said he would be the first foreign leader to meet face-to-face with the president about the new US tariffs, which, if they remain at 17% on Israel, will further burden an economy already strained by 18 months of war.

But beyond the issues, the very existence of the meeting itself is a signal that the relationship is on a different trajectory. That is a signal that Netanyahu is keen to send both to the Israeli public and the region.

As far as the region is concerned, the visit – taking place as Israel is extending its offensive in Gaza – will, unless Trump suddenly puts the brakes on the operation (something unlikely), be seen as a US endorsement of the new Israeli tactics. The two are expected to discuss the hostage situation and what further leverage can be applied on Hamas.

What is likely to be glaring is the lack of public declarations from the administration regarding the humanitarian situation in Gaza, a constant feature of discussion with the Biden administration and often a source of public friction.

The Biden administration, while providing support for Israel, made it a point to publicly place guardrails on the IDF’s operations. Trump has not added those guardrails, and it would come as a surprise if he did so this time either – instead, likely continuing to give Netanyahu the green light to do what he deems necessary in Gaza to destroy Hamas and free the hostages.

The visit is also coming as Washington is paying increased attention to Iran. With Trump having warned the Iranians that they will either have to give up the bomb through negotiations or lose it through military action, this visit – where Iran, as always, will undoubtedly be a central topic of discussion – creates the impression that the US and Israel are coordinating on this issue.

The matter has taken on more urgency given the US military buildup in the region and its attacks on the Houthis in Yemen.

And a new issue, less prominent in previous meetings but one that has suddenly moved to the forefront – especially given Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s increasingly bellicose rhetoric toward Israel (last week he said he hoped Allah would destroy Israel) – is the matter of Israeli-Turkish relations.

With Turkey a US NATO ally, Washington is in a position to cool tensions between the countries that have risen as Ankara is eyeing increasing influence in Syria.

Last week, the IAF struck key Syrian airbases, reportedly to prevent Turkey from taking control of them. While Turkey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan sought to lower the temperature, saying at a NATO meeting on Friday that Ankara is not looking for confrontation with Israel in Syria, Defense Minister Yisrael Katz made clear the strikes were also a message to Turkey – even if he didn’t mention the country by name. In a warning to Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa, he said Syria would pay a heavy price if it allowed “forces hostile to Israel to enter Syria and threaten Israeli security interests.”

Netanyahu is likely to raise the issue in Washington as part of a broader effort to ensure continued US understanding of Israel’s red lines in Syria, particularly at a time when Ankara is probing for openings. His meeting with Trump sends a signal to the Turks that Israel retains strong American backing.

As far as the Israeli public is concerned, the politics of the visit should not be overlooked. For Netanyahu, showing that he can pick up the phone, fly to Washington, and walk into the Oval Office without diplomatic turbulence is a reminder to voters, allies, and critics alike that when it comes to managing Israel’s most important foreign relationship, he still has no peer.

With this visit, Netanyahu is essentially saying: “Qatargate, schmatergate. While the Israeli media obsesses over Jonathan Urich and Eli Feldstein, I am navigating at the highest levels of diplomacy.” His message to the domestic audience: “You are dealing with distractions; I have an open door to the White House.”

There’s also political value in this meeting for Trump. Having a foreign leader come to Washington to discuss tariffs – and not just security – reinforces the message that his economic policies are working and that “America First” is not just a slogan but a framework foreign leaders must take seriously.

For Trump, Netanyahu’s visit can be presented as proof that his tough tariff talk is bringing world leaders to the table. It sends a signal to others: if you want favorable terms or to avoid penalties, you come to Washington and deal directly with the man in charge.

This plays directly into Trump’s preferred image – not just as a global power broker, but as a president whose economic leverage delivers results. With the stock markets sliding, it provides an opportunity to shift the narrative and highlight the international relevance of his trade agenda. In that sense, the meeting is mutually beneficial: both leaders are looking to score domestic points as criticism is mounting at home.

 
Herb Keinon

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-849116

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hamas fires ten rockets at South, one wounded in Ashkelon - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

The police said it was operating in an area of Ashkelon where an impact had been reported.

 

A man in his 30s sustained light wounds from rocket shrapnel following Hamas's rocket barrage in Israel's South, Israel's emergency response service, Magen David Adom (MDA), reported on Sunday.

Starting at 9:01 p.m. local time, rocket sirens sounded in the areas of Ashdod and Ashkelon. 

The military said some 10 rockets were fired at Israeli territory from the Gaza Strip, half of which were intercepted. Several impacts had been reported in various area, the IDF added.   

After being briefed on the situation, Prime Minister Netanyahu, who was on his way to Washington, told Defense Minister Israel Katz to respond with force. He also approved the continued increase of Israeli military operations in the Gaza Strip. 

Katz responded: "I instructed the IDF to carry out a powerful blow against Hamas. We will not accept rocket fire at Israel." Shortly after this statement, the IDF reported that an air force jet had attacked the launcher from which the launch was detected.

Scenes of an impact from a Hamas rocket in Ashkelon, April 6, 2025. (credit: MDA SPOKESPERSON)Enlrage image
Scenes of an impact from a Hamas rocket in Ashkelon, April 6, 2025. (credit: MDA SPOKESPERSON)

MDA said its paramedics transferred to the Barzilai Medical Center in Ashkelon the man who was in light condition. Paramedics also treated a number of individuals who were suffering from anxiety and who had been injured while running to shelter. 

The police said it was operating in an area of Ashkelon where an impact had been reported, while the Ashkelon Municipality noted a rocket that had crashed in the city had caused damage to property.  

Hamas's military wing, the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, subsequently claimed responsibility for the rocket barrage.

Responses to the rockets

"If anyone needed a reminder of why we must not stop just before the destruction of Hamas, they received it this evening in the form of rocket launches from Gaza to the cities of the South," Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich shared on X/Twitter shortly after.

 

"We promised the citizens of Israel that Hamas will be destroyed and the residents of the South will be able to live in peace and security for many years," Smotrich added, noting, "we will stand by that." 

National Unity head Benny Gantz wrote on Twitter/X following the barrage, "Hamas is the enemy, which, after a year and a half of war, is still firing missiles at Israeli citizens." 

"Israeli citizens didn't really need a reminder, but apparently, the Prime Minister and coalition members did," Gantz asserted, adding the enemy was "not the head of the Shin Bet, not the attorney-general, not the High Court of Justice.

"The State of Israel deserves leadership that focuses on defeating our enemies," Gantz added, rather than one that concentrated on "internal strife and division."

This is a developing story.


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-849115

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Poverty of the Criticism of Trump’s Agenda - Victor Davis Hanson

 

by Victor Davis Hanson

The left rages against Trump but offers no real alternatives on debt, trade, or immigration—just noise, while results quietly pile up.

 

Two strange phenomena now characterize the political landscape.

One, opposition to the Trump administration’s initiatives has reached a near-unprecedented fever pitch.

The frenzy is manifested in strange ways. At the bottom end, there is an epidemic of street terrorism, including the keying of Teslas, bullying their owners, firebombing dealerships, or vandalizing charging stations.

All that is mostly the logical but dirty reification of those in the media and the Democrats who brand Elon Musk as a foreign-born counterfeit citizen and a disloyal un-American foreigner, thus deserving to be “taken down,” in the words of Rep. Jasmine Crockett. Or is he to be ostracized as an “ass-h*le” in the invective of Sen. Mark Kelly and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz? The latter cheered a downturn in Tesla stock prices, contrary to the interests of his own state’s public portfolio.

Sometimes, the impotent Democrat Congress issues kickboxing/ninja videos of its feistier female representatives. At other moments, senators race to the bottom, echoing each other’s pottymouth expressions of “sh*t.”

Rep. Al Green could neither disrupt nor end Trump’s speech to a joint session of Congress by shaking his cane and screaming epithets. Nor, as he damned Trump on the floor of the Senate for 25 hours in a filibuster to nowhere, could Sen. Cory Booker offer a single word that might offer his supposedly better way to address crushing debt and deficits.

Two, there is a second common denominator to all this frenzy and fury: there is so far no alternate agenda on trade deficits, budget deficits, and debt.

That is, no one on the left—or, for that matter, the libertarian right or the now inert Republican establishment—can outline an alternate pathway to Trump’s remedies for America’s dire problems. Just as the left used to worship Tesla’s breakthrough EV cars and now tries to destroy them, so too it once lectured the country on the merits of tariff-enforced symmetrical trade—until Donald Trump made that his signature issue.

So in lieu of serious counter-proposals, we get from the left vulgarity, the smash-mouth of Rep. Crockett, and street terror against fellow Americans. All this inanity is the natural bookend to the prior four years of lawfare, the efforts to remove Trump from state ballots, the Mar-a-Lago raid, and two assassination attempts.

Most of the organs of Wall Street, the free-market think tanks, and the few liberation university economics departments likewise issue virulent denunciations of tariffs, of even massive DOGE cuts in the federal workforce and budget, and, strangely, of the deportation of Tren de Arugula, a terrorist-designated violent foreign gang whose members entered and now reside illegally in the United States.

So why does the left not simply claim that its prior support of tariffs was wrongheaded? (See the now-ancient denunciations by Nancy Pelosi and Bernie Sanders of Bush-era “free trade,” deindustrialization, globalization, and lost jobs.) Now, the left supports… what exactly? Mini-tariffs? No tariffs? Reciprocal tariffs?

Absent is concern about the ticking time bomb of $3 billion in interest payments on the debt per day, in addition to the monstrous $37 trillion in debt itself. Did Cory Booker spend a single minute of his 25-hour address to outline ways to reduce our 125% debt to annual GDP?

Per year, the interest cost on the debt is larger than the defense budget; does AOC ever note that? The current Biden vestigial budget is nominally $1.7 trillion in the red. Is there a Democrat agenda to head us toward balanced budgets?

So, what does the left propose as its financial remedies?

Is it to raise taxes on those who should “pay their fair share?” That is, do they want the top rates to rise from 37% to 40%, 45%, 50%, so that their own constituent “affluent” in blue states like high-tax California, Illinois, and New York should properly and deservedly pay the IRS 50% to 60% of their earnings in income tax alone?

Does the tax-and-spend left prefer instead a value-added tax or some sort of federal sales tax? Or do they think current levels of spending are just fine?

Is there really no waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal budget, but instead too few federal workers?

Or are they modern monetary theorists, who believe money is but a construct, one that the government can do with in whatever manner it wishes? Thus, debt is simply remedied by printing more of the construct, or finding ways to expropriate private wealth, or inflating our way out of debt?

But again, please tell us how the left has a superior agenda to Trump’s that will get us more quickly and efficiently to a balanced budget, if not a reduced national debt.

Or is debt itself not supposed to be a problem? Does the left believe interest rates are the real crux? As in the recent past, if interest rates are no more than the rate of inflation, then essentially, the government can borrow all it wants at zero interest—and literally did so at times over the last half century. Is that their remedy?

Can the Republican establishment help out and pause a moment from their napalming of the Trump initiatives? Can it issue briefs that outline how to take us to either a balanced budget and reduced debt or convince us that debt in all manifestations is no big deal?

Then we turn to trade deficit. Again, there is utter silence about solutions from most critics. No counter-proposals, no alternate agenda, just fury and hysteria—or denials that deficits and debt are a problem at all.

So, does the left or right believe that 50 years of continuous trade deficits do not matter? Who cares if we are running a near $1 trillion annual outflow in the gap between what we export and import?

Please make the argument that the real losers are the recent economies of India, China, or Mexico, which supposedly foolishly tax imports and yet demand tariff-free exports, all to run up surpluses. Are they suicidal and we, the masters of trade deficits, the real geniuses?

Does it matter that almost all of the proposed Trump tariffs are in some way responsive? In that sense, they are calibrated on autopilot, leaving the proverbial ball in the court of those with high tariffs and huge surpluses to set new shared reciprocal rates.

So, if it was wrong for Trump to level reciprocal tariffs, was it right for others to initiate asymmetrical tariffs on us?

Is it more logical to damn those who object to $1 trillion in annual trade deficits rather than those whose tariffs resulted in their warped surpluses?

Or is it wiser to blame the victim? The U.S. deserves its trade deficit because it is too affluent, too naïve to object, or too profligate to be saved?

Or is the argument one of the Sermon on the Mount: we must turn the other cheek as we have for a half century? Or, as an affluent sort of good Samaritan, can we afford to stay forbearing and take the hit for the global team?

The final problem with the notion of Trump as the 80-day destroyer of America is not just the poverty of economic counterproposals from the left or right. It is also the complete news blackout of what Trump has already accomplished in 10 weeks.

Does anyone notice that, almost overnight, America’s southern border is now magically secure, with virtually no illegal immigration—and without the much-ballyhooed need for “comprehensive immigration reform?”

How did we go from 10,000 illegal aliens a day to near zero? What was so bad about identifying hundreds of billions of budgetary dollars in fraud and waste in a mere two months?

Why are we now talking about ways to end the Ukraine war rather than boasting “as long as it takes” to feed the new Stalingrad?

Why are the Houthis now being abandoned by the Iranians, who, in a matter of weeks, no longer seem to be the feared bully of the Middle East? Were not their terrorist tentacles just months ago considered unstoppable and sacrosanct?

Was it wrong finally and dramatically to reflect the wishes of 80 percent of the American people, who do not want biological males to overturn a half-century’s worth of hard work to obtain parity for women’s sports?

We, as a nation, need to calm down.

Either acknowledge, however reluctantly, the good that has already been done in the first ten weeks. Or, if one feels the border should be open, or the war should be accelerated in Ukraine, or the campuses were just fine until 2025, or women just need to get over losing to transgendered men, then just say so.

Or if one believes huge trade and budget deficits and unsustainable national debt are no big deal, then argue just that.

Or, if the rub is that Trump is addressing these existential and long-neglected crises in the wrong way, then please present alternate plans for quicker and better resolutions or better messaging.

Should he limit tariffs only to those nations with deficits and asymmetrical tariffs? Should he speak more quietly and mention more frequently that he was moved to act only by a half-century of neglect? Could he emphasize more that the $3-4 trillion in promised foreign investment will ignite job growth within a year?

But if there is no alternate agenda, no constructive criticism, then why would anyone listen to those who either helped to get us into this mess or have no clue about its solutions?


Victor Davis Hanson

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/04/07/the-poverty-of-the-criticism-of-trumps-agenda/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IAF pilot to 'Post': How Israel established air supremacy over Middle East - Yonah Jeremy Bob

 

by Yonah Jeremy Bob

Fighter pilots told the "Post" that they estimated some 70% of Syria's firepower was destroyed during the IAF's December strikes on Damascus.

 

An air traffic controller stands waiting for action.  (photo credit: IDF SPOKESMAN’S UNIT)
An air traffic controller stands waiting for action.
(photo credit: IDF SPOKESMAN’S UNIT)

In December, the IDF’s F-16 squadrons, along with other combat aircraft, carried out devastating attacks against the Syrian military’s capabilities to threaten Israel, including flying low over the palace in Damascus, one of the pilots involved has told The Jerusalem Post in a recent interview.

In fact, Lt. “Y.” has been involved in critical and historic airstrikes not only against Syria, but also against Lebanon and Gaza, and it can be assumed have been involved in the latest air force strikes against Israeli adversaries.

To complete the picture, the Post also interviewed Lt. “T.,” who piloted an F-16 in key strikes on Yemen and Lebanon, while in addition, the Post has spoken to IDF sources involved in striking Iran.

JPost Videos

Until 2017, the F-16 squadrons were Israel’s preeminent lead aircraft for all combat missions, though the F-15 fighter also often played an important component.

Even since 2017, when the F-35 emerged as Israel’s most cutting-edge fighter jet, the F-16 remains extremely formidable and involved in just about every critical Israeli attack on all fronts.

Enlrage image

In January, the Defense Ministry announced an $80 million purchase of more advanced self-protection systems for its fourth-generation F-16I fighter aircraft, just as top Israeli and IDF officials had increased in recent months their discussion of striking Iran’s nuclear program.

Complex operation in Syria

Describing his airstrikes in Syria, Lt. Y. told the Post, “Operations in Syria used to be a major challenge and complex. After the revolution by the rebels, the air defense systems stopped operating, which allowed the Israeli air force to act freely. We could map out [more aggressive and risky] plans with much less concern about our planes getting hit” by Syrian air defense.

“We achieved supremacy in so many places where we normally would not have operated” because of dangers posed by the Syrian air defense, said Y.

Y. stated, “The first attack was at night and I was part of a large fleet of aircraft going after military targets around Damascus. I looked around me and saw a powerful convoy. Anything would be possible,” in terms of the potential impact of the attack on Syria.

IDF sources said that since Syria and Damascus were free of anti-aircraft defenses, the F-16 squadrons and other attack aircraft were able to fly over the palace and the international airport.

Many of the flights during that period also broke through new areas of Syria to find new levels of physical intelligence and surveillance.

Estimates from IDF sources are that around 70% of Syrian firepower and quality weapons were destroyed during that period, and even in recent days, the air force has destroyed new major targets, such as Syrian aircraft runways, to try to stop Turkey from taking over those positions.

Next, Y. said that there could be a variety of different fighter jet strategies and formations for different attacks, saying, “Everything depends on the specific scenario and how many aircraft are involved. Sometimes there are more and sometimes less, which in turn depends on the kind of quantity of targets.”

Enlrage image

Regarding Iran, IDF sources have said there is a special level of threat from their air defenses.

Further, sources have indicated that going up against and destroying Iranian S-300 air defense systems was an incredible first for the air force.

One thing that is unique about attacking, but that is even worse for F-16s and other aircraft attacking Yemen, is the extreme distance, with the Islamic Republic coming in at around 1,500 km. and Yemen coming in at around 1,800 km.

Lt. T. noted to the Post that attacking the Houthis in Yemen is “even farther than Iran. A very long flight of five hours. We need to refuel to get there. This is not simple and requires lots of attention and focus. It proves our capabilities in the air force. We know how to ‘close’ [against enemy targets]. We did it several times. This is all to defend our country’s citizens.”

Describing one attack, he said, “We struck all of the Yemen infrastructure that we needed to strike.”

Also, T. stated, “It’s been published that we struck critical economic targets that will cost the Houthis lots of money to rebuild. And targets that will stop their arms transfers and movement.”

Going into more detail about the challenges of midair refueling, he noted, “We learn these skills during training after the initial pilots’ course. There are different scenarios for how high and far we need to fly, which impact how long and what kind of refueling takes place.” IDF sources said different procedures are used for refueling both during the day and night, but that the air force is ready for both.

“It was a very long flight. There is no way to fully train for it – it is a different level of difficulty. You make mental and psychological preparations and try to get lots of sleep beforehand,” said T.

Moreover, T.’s experience was special as he was “the first to do this at such a young age – it is a truly special moment. The feeling afterward, after landing from such a long flight, was tremendous.”

IDF sources said that they made sure there was extra fuel for the F-16s when they attacked Yemen in case any exceptional issues came up, given how long the flights were.

In fact, the IDF has different technical pre-flight procedures for such long-distance attacks.

Further, sources indicated that while Yemen’s anti-aircraft defenses are weaker than Iran, Syria, and Lebanon, they should not be disparaged.

Moving on to Lebanon, T. said that when he flew his F-16 during attacks against Hezbollah, “It was a powerful experience to see the capabilities of the air force destroy large portions of Hezbollah’s capabilities. Anyone who threatens us must take note. And it was at such a fast pace from the start of the operation until we destroyed their capabilities. We had trained so extensively and then got to see the fantastic results.”

“We struck rocket firing platforms and weapons storage locations – anything that could be used to fire on Israel and force people to run for their safe rooms,” said T.

Returning to F-16 pilot Y., he said the airstrikes on Hezbollah were “very substantial, especially to attack from the air in parallel to our invading forces and having received targets from our forces that were threatening them on the ground, so we could help them in real time. I had many of my friends fighting on the ground.”

Y. added, “We helped remove a threat [to Israeli forces]... by cooperating with other IDF forces.”

Also, Y. said that he has flown F-16 attack missions in all areas of Gaza, from northern Gaza to Khan Yunis to Rafah, including “a few operations where we helped provide air support for returning hostages to Israel. Every operation can be different.”

IDF sources also said that, as much as the F-16 and other fighter jet attacks weakened Hezbollah, it remains a threat. Moreover, the sources indicated that there are both similarities between an attack in Gaza and Lebanon as well as qualitative regional and intelligence differences.

Part of what has been so remarkable has been the young age of these ace F-16 fighter pilots, with T. being only 22 and having only served five and a half years in the military.

T. said the above-mentioned attacks have left him “very fulfilled” in helping defend Israel from threats.

“This was a very unusual war. People our age never dreamed of such events: the volume of attacks we joined in on, the level of intelligence, the special operations, the targeted killings, and crucial missions were beyond crazy. To accomplish this at our age was a major jump in levels,” said T.

Y. was one of the next youngest fighter jet pilots and added, “Personally, it was very special and important for me and made me very happy.”

He has served in the air force for five years in the IDF, and is currently 23.

Not that there are no complex moral questions for these young pilots.

Regarding avoiding striking civilians, Y. stated, “We completely stopped attacks anytime there were innocent civilians in the vicinity. Many times we stopped attacks because of civilians, and we only attacked later if the area was clear of them.”

T. added, “I don’t see the ground well. Drones can see better. They zoom in. But the control tower and targeting command will say ‘abort, abort.’ Sometimes we work with drones, which are giving us intelligence, and sometimes with other forces [on the ground], who will warn us if there are women or children near a terror target.”

Discussing the F-16 versus other combat aircraft, IDF sources noted that each one is an important part of the air force, and every platform has its different advantages, with the air force trying to maximize the synergy between them.

Regarding real-time changes to the plan when unexpected challenges arise mid-operation, sources indicated that they communicate with the control tower and with the command center at military headquarters. They described a process of giving feedback to the control tower as well as some communications in the air between the pilots.

The pilots said that some threats are close and some far, but that the F-16s can get anywhere they need to. “No matter the distance, we strategize versus the threat, and then we can deal with them all.”


Yonah Jeremy Bob

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-849112

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Will Iranian-backed militias in Iraq disarm over fear of Trump? - analysis - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

The militias suffered a setback when the Assad regime fell in Syria. There is now pressure on them to disarm or become more regularized within the Iraqi state.

 

Supporters of the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces offer condolences over the deaths of Iran’s president Ebrahim Raisi and others, outside the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad on May 20, 2024.  (photo credit: THAIER AL-SUDANI/REUTERS)
Supporters of the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces offer condolences over the deaths of Iran’s president Ebrahim Raisi and others, outside the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad on May 20, 2024.
(photo credit: THAIER AL-SUDANI/REUTERS)

A report from Reuters on April 7 indicates that the Iranian-backed militias in Iraq could disarm due to their fear of the Trump administration. This is a significant development. However, it is crucial to examine this issue more closely to fully understand it.

The Iranian-backed militias in Iraq are called the Hashd al-Shaabi or Popular Mobilization Forces. These consist of up to thirty different militias, many of them linked to Iran. Some of the militias have deep roots in Iraq and are very close to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. For instance, the Badr Organization, which has a number of militias within the PMF, was once a proxy force of the Iranians back in the 1980s. Kataib Hezbollah is an Iranian proxy as well. These represent Iran’s attempt to replicate what it did with Hezbollah in Lebanon, except doing the same thing in Iraq.

In the 1980s, Iraq was run by the Saddam regime, so the groups that became militias lived in exile. Men like Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, who came to lead Kataib Hezbollah, were known terrorists working for the Iranians in the 1980s. These were young Shi’ite men at the time, from Iraq, and they lived in exile in places like Iran, working to promote Tehran’s “revolution.” Some of them went to Lebanon and became close with Hezbollah.

When the Saddam regime fell in 2003, these nascent militia leaders returned to Iraq. Soon, they found themselves close to the center of power in Baghdad. Having come in from the cold, they could now lead the new Iraq. In the period of the US occupation, these militias often were involved in sectarian killing, such as kidnapping Sunni Arabs and murdering them.

In 2014, when ISIS invaded Iraq and took over Mosul and other cities, the militias were mobilized under the banner of the PMF. This was because Grant Ayatollah Sisitani, a key cleric in Iraq, put out a fatwa encouraging young men to go fight ISIS. The men joined the militias. 

 Members of the Iran-backed Iraqi militias al-Nujaba and Kataib Hezbollah appear in Baghdad on December 4, 2023.  (credit: Ahmad al-Rubaye/AFP via Getty Images)Enlrage image
Members of the Iran-backed Iraqi militias al-Nujaba and Kataib Hezbollah appear in Baghdad on December 4, 2023. (credit: Ahmad al-Rubaye/AFP via Getty Images)

Within months in 2014, the ranks of these militias, and newly formed militias, grew to tens of thousands. Soon, the PMF likely numbered 100,000. They helped defeat ISIS, but by 2017, they had less to do, and they began to harass civilian Iraqis.

Iraq also used them as a kind of Praetorian Guard to put down riots and enact policy. They attacked Kurds after the Kuristan referendum on independence in 2017. They worked with Iran. They began to threaten Israel and attack US forces. In response, the US killed Qasem Soleimani, a key IRGC leader, and also Abu Mahdi in a drone strike in January 2020.

By this time, the militias had become an official paramilitary force of Iraq. Integrated under the Interior ministry, they began to get state salaries. Their brigades were supposed to become normalized. However, many militias continued to operate outside state control. They carried out assassinations and murdered protesters. They went to Syria to help the Assad regime.

Beginning in 2021, they began drone attacks on Israel. After October 7, they carried out dozens of attacks on US forces in Iraq and Syria. In January 2024, they killed they Americans in a drone attack in Jordan.

Pressure to disarm

The militias suffered a setback when the Assad regime fell in Syria. There is now pressure on them to disarm or become more regularized within the Iraqi state. The militias want money, and they want more power. They are unlikely to lay down their arms without a fight.

This is a state within a state of more than 100,000 men who are veterans of the war on ISIS. They have the equivalent of several divisions' worth of small arms and some artillery and improvised armored vehicles. The groups are close to the centers of power. History shows that such groups, whether it is the Janissaries of the Ottoman Empire or a Praetorian Guard, don’t give up power easily. They won’t go quietly into the night.  


Seth J. Frantzman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-849223

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Qatar's Muslim 'Scholars' Call For Death And Destruction - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

If these Muslim "scholars" really want to help their Palestinian brothers, they should be calling on Hamas to release all the Israeli hostages they kidnapped, then to disarm, and then to stop pursuing the disastrous path of terrorism and jihad.

 

  • The last thing the Palestinians need are more calls from Qatar-based extremist for terrorism and jihad. If these Muslim "scholars" really want to help their Palestinian brothers, they should be calling on Hamas to release all the Israeli hostages they kidnapped, then to disarm, and then to stop pursuing the disastrous path of terrorism and jihad.

  • The "scholars" leading the IUMS live safely in Qatar, not in the Gaza Strip, and they are therefore not directly affected by the war that Hamas launched.

  • That such a call by an influential Islamic group comes from an organization based in Doha illustrates why Qatar cannot be trusted as an honest mediator in the Hamas-Israel war....

  • Since then, Qatar's royal family -- who amusingly seem to imagine that they are doing the US a favor by hosting the largest US Air Force base in the Middle East -- have smoothly persuaded the Americans and other Westerners that they are neutral, trustworthy mediators in the Hamas-Israel war. In reality, they are doing their utmost to protect their long-term client, Hamas, and keep it in power, just as they protected their other client, the Taliban, in Afghanistan to make sure it remained in power. If the US were to transfer its air base to a real ally, such as the United Arab Emirates, Qatar would probably not survive a week.

  • It is time for the US to understand that Qatar continues to serve as a base and platform for jihad and Islamist terrorism. Qatar is not an ally in the war on terrorism. Qatar is the predominant sponsor and leading voice that promotes Islamist terrorism. Qatar is also, perilously, the towering donor to universities in America.

  • To American voters, it must look as if Qatar's sham-negotiations to keep Hamas in power are being conducted by US President Donald J. Trump's envoys primarily with an eye to avoid disrupting any future real estate deals with the emirate, rather than actually to stop the Hamas-Israel war and free the hostages.

  • At the very least, the US might threaten to withdraw its military assets from Qatar's Al-Udeid Air Base, just to put the most minimal pressure on the Doha to stop supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and other questionable Islamist organizations. The US might also designate the Muslim Brotherhood and IUMS as Foreign Terrorist Organizations.

The Qatar-based International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), an association of extremist Islamic theologians affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, has issued a fatwa (Islamic ruling) calling for jihad (holy war) against Israel. The fatwa, shared by IUMS Secretary-General Ali al-Qaradaghi, calls for "urgent, widespread action by Muslim countries and peoples, including military action [against Israel]." Pictured: Al-Qaradaghi (L) speaks with Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal at an IUMS conference in Doha, Qatar on September 21, 2014. (Photo by Faisal Al-Tamimi/AFP via Getty Images)

While Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are facing death and destruction as a result of the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel, the Qatar-based International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), an association of extremist Islamic theologians affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, has issued a fatwa (Islamic ruling) calling for jihad (holy war) against Israel.

The IUMS, a largely Sunni group founded in 2004, consists of some 95,000 Muslim "scholars" globally and 67 Islamic organizations. It included among its members the late Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, killed by Israel in an explosion last year in Iran.

These Muslim "scholars" also called for "urgent, widespread action by Muslim countries and peoples, including military action [against Israel]."

The fatwa, shared by the secretary-general of the IUMS, Ali al-Qaradaghi, emphasized the obligation of "armed jihad against the occupying entity [Israel] for every capable Muslim." This "duty," he added, "extends to all parts of the Islamic world."

The fatwa also calls for "immediate military intervention" by Arab and Islamic countries to halt Israel's military operations against the Iran-backed Hamas terrorist group in the Gaza Strip.

According to the Tunisian newspaper Al-Shorouq:

"The fatwa stressed as well the necessity of supporting the Palestinian resistance [Hamas] militarily, financially, politically and legally, and deemed that a 'religious duty.' It also called for the formation of an Islamic military alliance to defend the ummah [Muslim nation], and... prohibited any form of normalization with the occupation [Israel]."

If this is what the Muslim "scholars" have to offer the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, the Palestinians are in deep trouble. They are already paying a heavy price there for Hamas's jihad against Israel.

The last thing the Palestinians need are more calls from Qatar-based extremist for terrorism and jihad. If these Muslim "scholars" really want to help their Palestinian brothers, they should be calling on Hamas to release all the Israeli hostages they kidnapped, then to disarm, and then to stop pursuing the disastrous path of terrorism and jihad.

If the "scholars" really want to help the Palestinians, they should be sending them food and tents, not calling for military, financial and political support to the "resistance" (armed groups such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad).

Sadly, we rarely hear moderate and pragmatic Islamic voices from Qatar denouncing Hamas's October 7 massacre, jihad and terrorism.

The "scholars" leading the IUMS live safely in Qatar, not in the Gaza Strip, and they are therefore not directly affected by the war that Hamas launched.

There is no personal cost to them when they issue calls for jihad and violence from their homes and offices in Qatar or other countries around the world.

Meanwhile, as a result of Hamas waging jihad and its fantasies of obliterating Israel, many Palestinians in the Gaza Strip have lost everything.

That such a call by an influential Islamic group comes from an organization based in Doha illustrates why Qatar cannot be trusted as an honest mediator in the Hamas-Israel war, started after October 7, 2023 massacre, in which Hamas-led terrorists murdered 1,200 Israelis and wounded thousands, as well as kidnapping 251 people who were taken to Gaza as hostages -- 59 of whom (alive and dead) are still being held there in captivity.

Since then, Qatar's royal family -- who amusingly seem to imagine that they are doing the US a favor by hosting the largest US Air Force base in the Middle East -- have smoothly persuaded the Americans and other Westerners that they are neutral, trustworthy mediators in the Hamas-Israel war. In reality, they are doing their utmost to protect their long-term client, Hamas, and keep it in power, just as they protected their other client, the Taliban, in Afghanistan to make sure it remained in power. If the US were to transfer its air base to a real ally, such as the United Arab Emirates, Qatar would probably not survive a week.

Qatar has long been providing political and financial backing to various Islamist and terrorist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Al Nusra Front, Al Shabaab, Islamic Stare (ISIS), al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Moreover, Qatar has, for the past three decades, used its Al-Jazeera television network to promote radical Islam and terrorism, to praise terrorist operations against Israel, and to broadcast anti-American propaganda.

To this day, Qatar continues to host several leaders of Hamas, even after they proudly took responsibility for the atrocities on October 7. Shortly after the October 7 invasion, Hamas leaders in Qatar, such as Khaled Mashaal, came out in support of the massacre and vowed that there would be more attacks against Israelis.

On the same day as the October 7 invasion, a video of Hamas leaders watching the coverage of their group's invasion of southern Israel on Al-Jazeera was posted on social media. The Hamas leaders also reportedly bowed their heads to the ground in appreciation. "This is a prostration of gratitude for this victory," declared the late Ismail Haniyeh, a Hamas leader who was assassinated by Israel last year. "Allah, please bestow your support and glory on our people and nation. Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Allah be praised."

In 2023, the IUMS also come out in support of the carnage. It issued a statement expressing "unprecedented support" for Hamas and its terrorism against Israel. The organization called on Islamic governments and armed groups to back up Hamas with military force as part of a "religious obligation" to wage jihad against Israel. The IUMS praised the October 7 massacre as an "effective and mandatory development of legitimate resistance" and said that Muslims have a religious duty to support their brothers and sisters "throughout all of Palestine, especially in Al-Aqsa [Mosque], Jerusalem, and Gaza."

The former head of the IUMS, the late Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, was often described as the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. He was barred from entering the US as well as other countries, and was notable for supporting suicide bombers targeting Israelis, and encouraging violence against US troops in Iraq.

Al-Qaradaghi, the current IUMS chairman, has stated that his organization views Hamas "from the perspective of the Palestinian cause, which must remain the pre-eminent cause not just for the union, but for all Arabs, Muslims and free humanitarians of the world."

In 2017, the IUMS was banned and listed as a terrorist organization by a number of Arab countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. The countries accused the IUMS of "working to promote terrorism through the exploitation of Islamic discourse, which they use as cover to carry out various terrorist activities."

It is time for the US to understand that Qatar continues to serve as a base and platform for jihad and Islamist terrorism. Qatar is not an ally in the war on terrorism. Qatar is the predominant sponsor and leading voice that promotes Islamist terrorism. Qatar is also, perilously, the towering donor to universities in America.

To American voters, it must look as if Qatar's sham-negotiations to keep Hamas in power are being conducted by US President Donald J. Trump's envoys primarily with an eye to avoid disrupting any future real estate deals with the emirate, rather than actually to stop the Hamas-Israel war and free the hostages.

At the very least, the US might threaten to withdraw its military assets from Qatar's Al-Udeid Air Base, just to put the most minimal pressure on the Doha to stop supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and other questionable Islamist organizations. The US might also designate the Muslim Brotherhood and IUMS as Foreign Terrorist Organizations.

As for the Palestinians, it is time for them to wake up and realize that many of their Arab and Muslim brothers are prepared to continue their jihad against Israel down to the last Palestinian.


Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21530/qatar-muslim-brotherhood

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Australia: Heading for Jihadist Conflict - Nils A. Haug

 

by Nils A. Haug

Egyptian journalist Mouna Al-Hilmi explains that Islamic jihadist ideology exists for the precise purpose of eradicating Western civilization through world-wide "jihad to establish a global Islamic caliphate." Why, therefore, should Western nations be shocked when it becomes active and causes social chaos?

 

  • The apparent normalization of jihadist-Islamist radicals, such as Hamas and Hezbollah, became frighteningly real when a video revealed that two Muslim immigrant nurses working in a Sydney hospital boasted that one of them had "killed Israeli patients" and the other had sworn to "let them die."

  • After local Sheikh Wesam Charkawi declared his support for the two nurses, "Pro-Palestinian teachers led dozens of schoolchildren in chants of 'Allahu Akbar' outside a western Sydney public school" in support. Charkawi, who is employed by the New South Wales Department of Education, was "ordered to work from home after defending the two nurses in an Instagram post."

  • As has occurred in Scandinavian countries such as Sweden, or in many other countries in Europe, Islamic extremism in Australia is becoming brazen. When Salwan Momika, a Christian Iraqi immigrant who criticized jihad, was murdered in Sweden, the event was met online with applause.

  • Egyptian journalist Mouna Al-Hilmi explains that Islamic jihadist ideology exists for the precise purpose of eradicating Western civilization through world-wide "jihad to establish a global Islamic caliphate." Why, therefore, should Western nations be shocked when it becomes active and causes social chaos?

  • Perhaps Australia's Labour Party leaders might take cognizance of Netanyahu's explanation of why the dangerous ideology of Palestinianism should be rejected, and act to protect their citizens from Islamist terror for generations to come?

An undercurrent of extremist Islam exists within Australia's Middle Eastern community. Anti-Semitic acts have become common in Australia, with more than 2,000 incidents in 2024 alone. They included 65 physical assaults and 600 cases of verbal abuse. Pictured: The damaged front entrance of the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne, on December 6, 2024, after a firebomb attack forced congregants to flee as flames engulfed the building. (Photo by Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images)

The happy-go-lucky country of Australia, located at the far-end of the globe, away from the geopolitical turmoil in Europe and the Middle East, is a peaceful and pleasant place to live – or should be.

Most of the immigrants seem to have assimilated comfortably, enjoying generous benefits such as state-sponsored medical care, welfare packages, high wages, vast open spaces and low crime. Life is good in Australia, with thousands of applicants from all over the world keenly seeking a better life in the sun. Although with a relatively small population of some 25 million, four of its cities are currently rated among the world's top 20 most livable.

However, an undercurrent of extremist Islam exists within Australia's Middle Eastern community. This development exploded into the headlines when, in January 2025, a serious firebomb attack on a Jewish childcare facility in Sydney took place, not surprisingly causing horror among the peaceful community. When innocent children are threatened with death, it can be said that the jihadist-Islamist crisis in the country has finally arrived.

Anti-Semitic acts had, in fact, become common in Australia before January, with more than 2,000 incidents in 2024 alone. They included 65 physical assaults and 600 cases of verbal abuse. According to Mike Burgess, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation's director-general for security, "Jewish Australians, are increasingly conflated with the state of Israel, leading to an increase in anti-Semitic incidents."

"[T]he Israel-Gaza conflict has exacerbated antisemitic incidents in Australia" Burgess also said, thereby "giving extremists an excuse to escalate threats and violence.... communal violence is expected to rise over the next five years, further straining social cohesion."

According to Deborah Stone, editor-in-chief of The Jewish Independent news website:

"There are clearly extremists within the Islamic community and it is upon the broader Islamic community to do something about them and it is upon the multicultural authorities and the people who fund them to make sure that those extremists are not allowed to influence the broader attitude of their communities."

It seems rather naïve of Stone to expect the "broader Islamic community" to assist in erasing this view from within their community.

The Australian government, led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of the leftist Labour Party, called an emergency cabinet meeting in January to address the crisis. At the time, the Federal Police taskforce was "investigating at least 105 anti-Semitic attacks." To date, no convictions have resulted for these offenses, including the firebombing of a major synagogue, causing its destruction.

It is understandable that the Jewish community in Australia is highly distressed by the support given by "Muslim and pro-Palestinian groups to the actions of Hamas, which openly desires to destroy the Israeli state." This support has become clear from the vociferous pro-Hamas protests such as the one that took place at the iconic Sydney Opera House on October 9, 2023.

The murderous jihadist ideology of Jew-hatred regrettably seems to know no bounds. The apparent normalization of jihadist-Islamist radicals, such as Hamas and Hezbollah, became frighteningly real when a video revealed that two Muslim immigrant nurses working in a Sydney hospital boasted that one of them had "killed Israeli patients" and the other had sworn to "let them die." The male nurse is recorded as saying, "you have no idea how many Israeli dogs came to this hospital and sent them to jahannam (hell)." The nurses were suspended pending an investigation.

At the end of February, nurse Sarah Abu Lebdeh was eventually charged with "three very, very serious offences" and awaits trial. The male nurse, Ahmad Rashad Nadir was arrested and charged in early March and awaits a court appearance date.

After local Sheikh Wesam Charkawi declared his support for the two nurses, "Pro-Palestinian teachers led dozens of schoolchildren in chants of 'Allahu Akbar' outside a western Sydney public school" in support. Charkawi, who is employed by the New South Wales Department of Education, was "ordered to work from home after defending the two nurses in an Instagram post."

Islamist indoctrination certainly starts at a young age. Activists such as the Teachers and School Staff for Palestine group actually encourage schoolchildren to get involved. The pro-Palestine cohort is active at the far-end of the world as well as in the northern arena, as their openly stated objective is a worldwide Islamic Caliphate based in Jerusalem.

As usual, the issue harkens back to Israel. According to The Jewish Independent:

"In his Instagram video, Sheik Charkawi... criticised the 'hypocrisy' of Anthony Albanese and NSW Health Minister Ryan Park for remaining silent 'when confronted with the most egregious acts of violence committed by Israel.'"

As has occurred in Scandinavian countries such as Sweden, or in many other countries in Europe, Islamic extremism in Australia is becoming brazen. When Salwan Momika, a Christian Iraqi immigrant who criticized jihad, was murdered in Sweden, the event was met online with applause. Sofie Löwenmark, an Arabic-speaking journalist and expert in Islamist extremism, "told media that the celebrations of Momika's murder are indescribable; there are 'tens of thousands of comments with shouts of joy.'"

Fortunately, Australia has not (yet) experienced the cold-blooded murder of a member of the Jewish community and hopefully the authorities can maintain control of the situation, as they have pledged to do.

None of Australia's jihadist Jew-hatred occurrences should come as a surprise. Official opposition leader Peter Dutton noted that the present Labour government irrationally brought in 3,000 migrants from Gaza, "without security checks."

"If you bring in people from a war zone controlled by a listed terror organisation and on tourist visas without checks, it's negligent at best.... This is an attack on civilisation."

Egyptian journalist Mouna Al-Hilmi explains that Islamic jihadist ideology exists for the precise purpose of eradicating Western civilization through world-wide "jihad to establish a global Islamic caliphate." Why, therefore, should Western nations be shocked when it becomes active and causes social chaos?

Australia's Islamist problem, sadly, can be laid squarely at the door of Albanese and his Foreign Minister Penny Wong, both of whom irrationally backed the recognition of a Palestinian state. Hence the relocation of 3,000 unvetted Gazans into Australia.

As Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded to the suggestion of an independent Palestinian state:

"There was a Palestinian state, it was called Gaza. Gaza, led by Hamas, was a Palestinian state and look what we got – the biggest massacre since the Holocaust."

Perhaps Australia's Labour Party leaders might take cognizance of Netanyahu's explanation of why the dangerous ideology of Palestinianism should be rejected, and act to protect their citizens from Islamist terror for generations to come?


Nils A. Haug is an author and columnist. A Lawyer by profession, he is member of the International Bar Association, the National Association of Scholars, the Academy of Philosophy and Letters. Dr. Haug holds a Ph.D. in Apologetical Theology and is author of 'Politics, Law, and Disorder in the Garden of Eden – the Quest for Identity'; and 'Enemies of the Innocent – Life, Truth, and Meaning in a Dark Age.' His work has been published by First Things Journal, The American Mind, Quadrant, Minding the Campus, Gatestone Institute, National Association of Scholars, Jewish Journal, James Wilson Institute (Anchoring Truths), Jewish News Syndicate, Document Danmark, and others.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21520/australia-jihadist-conflict

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter