Saturday, May 4, 2024

The 'Palestinian State': Hamas Plays Westerners for Fools - Again - Bassam Tawil

 

by Bassam Tawil

[T]he Iran-backed Hamas terror group is again trying to dupe gullible Westerners, including the Biden administration and the European Union, into believing that it has accepted the "two-state solution."

 

  • [T]he Iran-backed Hamas terror group is again trying to dupe gullible Westerners, including the Biden administration and the European Union, into believing that it has accepted the "two-state solution."

  • The Hamas official would not have dared to utter similar nonsense to an Arab media outlet. He knows that here his lies are directed at English-speaking audiences, who tend to swallow whole the baloney spouted by Israel's enemies.

  • The Hamas official wants everyone to believe that his group is ready to stop killing Jews for a period of five years "or more" if it gets the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem. He just forgot to mention that there was an official truce between Israel and Hamas until October 7, when the terror group Hamas initiated the current war.

  • The Hamas official also forgot to mention that Hamas has repeatedly violated several truces and ceasefire agreements reached with Israel over the past 17 years. The truces and ceasefires were always used by Hamas to regroup and rearm in preparation for the next round of attacking Israel.

  • Hamas will never abandon its weapons or dismantle its armed group, especially after the establishment of a Palestinian state

  • The mere talk about a Palestinian state these days is regarded as a reward for Hamas's genocidal assault on Israel. It sends the message to Hamas that after you murdered so many Jews, the international community will reward you by giving you a state. It reaffirms that terrorism works. Where do we sign up?

  • The secret that the AP and the US administration do not want you to know is that Hamas does not actually want the Gaza Strip or the West Bank or east Jerusalem. Hamas wants to eliminate Israel and replace it with an Iran-backed Islamist terror state.

  • If Hamas and the Palestinian Authority are given a state next to Israel, they will absolutely continue to pursue their goal of killing Jews and obliterating Israel. Hamas official Ghazi Hamad has clearly said that the terror group will repeat the October 7 attack, time and again, until Israel is annihilated.

  • Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal has repeatedly clarified that his group's acceptance of a Palestinian state does not mean that it will abandon its goal of destroying Israel.

  • "The lines below are for the next person who comes to me with 'Hamas agreed to two state solution.' It DID NOT! Hamas outlines this scenario fully in its Charter as amended in 2017.... Hamas will likely then stock as much rockets and drones possible for the next round of war to destroy Israel.... Prophet Muhammad is said to have entered into a 10-year truce with the infidels. He conquered them a few years into the truce. Hamas imagines a similar scenario with Israel." — Hussain Abdul-Hussain, X, April 25, 2024.

  • Hamas is well aware of the credulity of the international community. It knows that it can engage in all forms of propaganda and win friends in the West. It also knows that the best vehicle to advance its goal of killing Jews and destroying Israel is a "two-state solution."

If Hamas and the Palestinian Authority are given a state next to Israel, they will absolutely continue to pursue their goal of killing Jews and obliterating Israel. Hamas official Ghazi Hamad has clearly said that the terror group will repeat the October 7 attack, time and again, until Israel is annihilated. Pictured: Hamad is interviewed on October 24, 2023 on LBC TV (Lebanon). (Image source: MEMRI)

After slaughtering 1,200 Israelis and kidnapping 240 others on October 7, 2023, the Iran-backed Hamas terror group is again trying to dupe gullible Westerners, including the Biden administration and the European Union, into believing that it has accepted the "two-state solution." The solution envisages the creation of a sovereign and independent Palestinian state next to Israel, on the entire lands of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem.

The latest Hamas deception came in the form of statements made by Khalil al-Hayya, a senior official of the group, in an interview with Associated Press (AP).

"A top Hamas political official told The Associated Press the Islamic militant group is willing to agree to a truce of five years or more with Israel and that it would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders," AP reported on April 25, 2024.

The Hamas official would not have dared to utter similar nonsense to an Arab media outlet. He knows that here his lies are directed at English-speaking audiences, who tend to swallow whole the baloney spouted by Israel's enemies.

The Hamas official wants everyone to believe that his group is ready to stop killing Jews for a period of five years "or more" if it gets the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem. He just forgot to mention that there was an official truce between Israel and Hamas until October 7, when the terror group Hamas initiated the current war.

The Hamas official also forgot to mention that Hamas has repeatedly violated several truces and ceasefire agreements reached with Israel over the past 17 years. The truces and ceasefires were always used by Hamas to regroup and rearm in preparation for the next round of attacking Israel.

The claim that Hamas will convert into a political party is also laughable. Hamas will never abandon its weapons or dismantle its armed group, especially after the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Hamas will not lay down its weapons; it is committed to continuing the Jihad (holy war) against Israel, regardless of whether Israel ever withdraws from the West Bank and east Jerusalem or not.

The political leadership of Hamas is also undoubtedly aware that without its weapons, other rival factions such as Fatah would instantly seize the opportunity to get rid of Hamas.

Al-Hayya said that Hamas would accept "a fully sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and the return of Palestinian refugees in accordance with the international resolutions." If that happens, he said, the group's military wing would dissolve. Hamas, he added, will then turn into a political party.

The "return of Palestinian refugees" means flooding Israel with more than five million Arabs, most of whom are currently living in "refugee camps" run by the United Nations Relief and Work Agency (UNRWA). This would turn the Jews living in Israel, which already has two million Arab citizens into a minority in their own country. Israel, in other words, will cease to exist as the homeland of the Jewish people.

What Hamas is actually saying is that it wants two Palestinian states – one inside Israel, and the second in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem.

The AP, which had been housed in the same building in Gaza as Hamas's military intelligence unit and which still helps Hamas spread its disinformation, smoothly described the suggestion that Hamas would disarm as "a significant concession by the militant group officially committed to Israel's destruction." The news agency then took a swipe at Israel by remarking:

"But it's unlikely Israel would consider such a scenario. It (Israel) has vowed to crush Hamas following the deadly Oct. 7 attacks, and its current leadership is adamantly opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state on lands Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast war."

For the AP, apparently, Hamas is making a credible statement when it claims that if given control of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and east Jerusalem, the terrorist group would dissolve its armed wing and lay down its weapons. Hamas, regrettably, when it comes to trust, has a rather poor track record. Before the official ceasefire that came to an end on October 7, Israel believed that if it eased security restrictions, allowed thousands of Palestinian laborers to come and work in Israel and improved the economic situation in the Gaza Strip, then Hamas would not attack Israel. So much for the trustworthiness of Hamas, and presumably other terrorist groups (see here , here and here) .

The Associated Press does not seem to comprehend why, after the atrocities committed on October 7 -- which included murder, rape, beheading, mutilation and burning people alive -- Israel might feel obligated for its national security to "crush" Hamas. Why on Earth would Israel want to destroy a terrorist organization that still seeks to destroy it and that committed the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. Unfathomable! Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that:

"October 7 massacre was equivalent to 29 9/11s in one day and the equivalent of 50,000 Americans slaughtered — burned, maimed, raped, beheaded — and 10,000 Americans taken hostage, including mothers and children."

The AP additionally does not seem to understand why Israel's current leadership is "adamantly opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state" at Israel's doorstep. After what happened on October 7, it would be hard to find many Israelis who support the idea of creating a Palestinian state next to their villages and homes. The mere talk about a Palestinian state these days is regarded as a reward for Hamas's genocidal assault on Israel. It sends the message to Hamas that after you murdered so many Jews, the international community will reward you by giving you a state. It reaffirms that terrorism works. Where do we sign up?

It is high time to remind AP and the rest of the world that Hamas had full and exclusive control of the Gaza Strip –as well as a blue-chip ceasefire -- when thousands of its members invaded Israel seven months ago. There were no Jews inside the Gaza Strip: Israel had totally pulled out of the coastal enclave in 2005. The Gaza Strip, where two million Palestinians live, was, in fact, an independent and sovereign Palestinian state -- with a judiciary system, security and police forces, and a government and parliament.

Hamas even had exclusive control over a border with the outside world – the one between the Gaza Strip and Egypt. All that still did not stop Hamas from launching its October 7 massacre against Israelis. The secret that the AP and the US administration do not want you to know is that Hamas does not actually want the Gaza Strip or the West Bank or east Jerusalem. Hamas wants to eliminate Israel and replace it with an Iran-backed Islamist terror state.

The same al-Hayya who is now pretending to be moderate and pragmatic recently boasted in an interview with The New York Times:

"Hamas' goal is not to run Gaza and to bring it water and electricity and such. This battle [the October 7 atrocities] was not because we wanted fuel or laborers. It did not seek to improve the situation in Gaza. This battle is to completely overthrow the situation."

In the eyes of Hamas leaders, "overthrowing the situation" means inflicting as much pain and suffering on the Israelis as possible by initiating a multi-front war to kill Jews and replace Israel.

If Hamas and the Palestinian Authority are given a state next to Israel, they will absolutely continue to pursue their goal of killing Jews and obliterating Israel.

Hamas official Ghazi Hamad has clearly said that the terror group will repeat the October 7 attack, time and again, until Israel is annihilated. He added that Palestinians are willing to pay the price and "proud to sacrifice martyrs."

"Israel is a country that has no place on our land. We must remove that country, because it constitutes a security, military, and political catastrophe to the Arab and Islamic nation, and must be finished. We are not ashamed to say this, with full force...

"The Al-Aqsa Flood is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth, because we have the determination, the resolve, and the capabilities to fight. Will we have to pay a price? Yes, and we are ready to pay it. We are called a nation of martyrs, and we are proud to sacrifice martyrs."

The AP's failure in comprehension is not the first time that Westerners have fallen for Hamas deceit. In 2017, Hamas also published a "policy document," falsely described by some Western analysts and reporters as a big concession and sign of moderation from the terror group.

The Guardian promoted the proposal back then:

"[S]ome influential diplomatic figures will seek to persuade Trump's Middle East advisers that the document at least shows there is the potential for a peace settlement based on the recent regional push led by Egypt. It may also open the way for international investors to start rebuilding basic services in Gaza, and end the blockade.

"In the biggest concession, the new document states that Hamas 'considers the establishment of a fully sovereign and independent Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital along the lines of 4 June 1967, with the return of the refugees and the displaced to their homes from which they were expelled, to be a formula of national consensus'".

The assumption, again, was that Hamas has finally recognized Israel's right to exist by accepting the "two-state solution." A careful read of the 2017 Hamas "policy document," however, revealed the group's real intention: to eliminate Israel.

Article 2 of the Hamas document, titled "The Land of Palestine," states:

"Palestine, which extends from the [Jordan River in the east to the Mediterranean [Sea] in the west, and from Ras al-Naqurah in the north to Umm al-Rashrash in the south, is an integral territorial unit. It is the land and the home of the Palestinian people."

Article 3 goes on to state: "Palestine is an Arab Islamic land. It is a blessed sacred land that has a special place in the heart of every Arab and every Muslim."

Finally, articles 19 and 20 of the document make it clear that Hamas will never recognize Israel's right to exist, even if it is given a Palestinian state next to Israel:

"There shall be no recognition of the legitimacy of the Zionist entity. Hamas believes that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the [Jordan] river to the [Mediterranean] sea."

Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal has repeatedly clarified that his group's acceptance of a Palestinian state does not mean that it will abandon its goal of destroying Israel.

Earlier this year, Mashaal said:

"I would like to say two things about the two-state solution. First, we have nothing to do with the two-state solution. We reject this notion, because it means you would get a promise for a [Palestinian] state, yet you are required to recognize the legitimacy of the other state, which is the Zionist entity. This is unacceptable. We demand to be liberated, to get rid of the occupation, and to have our independence, and our state. [Israel] is my enemy. It is not my concern...

"Obviously, the position of Hamas, and the position of the vast majority of the Palestinian people, especially following October 7, I believe that the dream and the hope for Palestine from the [Jordan] River to the [Mediterranean] Sea, and from the north to the south, has been renewed...

"Hamas agreed to a completely independent [Palestinian] state, with the 1967 borders, with Jerusalem as its capital, with the right of Return included – without recognizing the legitimacy of the Zionist entity."

Commenting on the false assumption that Hamas had agreed to a "two-state solution," Hussain Abdul-Hussain, a research fellow with The Foundation for Defense of Democracies, wrote:

"The lines below are for the next person who comes to me with "Hamas agreed to two state solution." It DID NOT!

"Hamas outlines this scenario fully in its Charter as amended in 2017. Israel hands over all of West Bank, East Jerusalem and West Bank (1967 land) to Palestinians and agrees to return of 5.9 million Palestinians to Israel (1948 land). A sovereign independent Palestinian state is declared, with a national unity cabinet (Hamas + PLO) and a platform for the liberation of the rest of Palestine. Since 1948 is still under occupation, the Palestinian state cannot recognize Israel.

"The Hamas militia then becomes "resistance" that enjoys national Palestinian consensus. i.e. Hamas in 1967 Palestine becomes like Hezbollah in Lebanon, its own statelet with its own army dominating a much weaker state. Hamas will likely then stock as much rockets and drones possible for the next round of war to destroy Israel, maybe after the truce with Israel (10 years) is over.

"Prophet Muhammad is said to have entered into a 10 year truce with the infidels. He conquered them a few years into the truce. Hamas imagines a similar scenario with Israel.

"Even better, with return of 6 million Palestinians to Israel, add 2 million Arabs to them, 8 million Arabs will eventually outnumber 8 million Jews. Palestinians in Israel can then take over Israel through elections. Jews become a minority. The two Palestines are unified as one. Israel is annihilated, Zionism is over, and "From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Free.""

Hamas is well aware of the credulity of the international community. It knows that it can engage in all forms of propaganda and win friends in the West. It also knows that the best vehicle to advance its goal of killing Jews and destroying Israel is a "two-state solution."


Bassam Tawil is an Arab Muslim based in the Middle East.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20611/palestinian-state-hamas

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Lawsuit accuses pro-Palestine groups of being ‘collaborators and propagandists’ for Hamas - Steven Richards

 

by Steven Richards

The allegations contained in the suit, backed with documents, show shocking rhetoric employed by Students for Justice in Palestine and suggest deeper coordination with Hamas.

 

In a landmark lawsuit filed Wednesday, the law firm representing several victims of the Oct. 7 terrorist attack in Israel laid out compelling evidence that National Students for Justice in Palestine and its affiliates were acting as “collaborators and propagandists” for Hamas in the United States.

Earlier in the week, Just the News reported on the formation of National SJP—an umbrella organization purportedly organized by American Muslims for Palestine to coordinate the efforts of the hundreds of Students for Justice in Palestine groups at universities across the country.

The reporting detailed the history of the group, linking it to one of the founders of the first SJP chapter at the University of California Berkeley, Dr. Hatem Bazian, a lecturer in the Department of Ethnic Studies.

Bazian, who has come under scrutiny for seemingly antisemitic social media posts in the past, is also credited with the founding of American Muslims for Palestine. He currently serves as that organization’s Chairman.

AMP specifically was caught up in a separate lawsuit and investigation by the Attorney General of the state of Virginia for alleged connections to a network of U.S.-based organizations previously found to have provided material support to Hamas, a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization, Just the News previously reported.

But, lawyers in the new lawsuit, filed on behalf of several Oct. 7 attack victims by law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP, argue that AMP and NSJP have more than just past connections to scrutinized organizations, but are actually continuing to act on behalf of Hamas through propaganda and protest efforts.

The lawsuit presents a cache of evidence in the form of the organizations’ own documents, statements, and previous court proceedings to show how the foundation and student-led group are operating, as they allege, according to Hamas’ “grand strategy” of “terror-by-propaganda.”

You can read the court filing below:

“It is deeply ironic that the same people carrying signs saying ‘Death to America’ and ‘Death to Jews’ claim they are protected by free speech. They are not. Free speech has never included the active support of terrorism, and it has never protected the destruction of private property or the brutalization of innocent men, women, and children of many faiths, not just Jews,” Vice Chair of Greenberg Traurig Richard Edlin said in a statement released by the firm.

“In the defendants, we confront an American problem, as well as a Jewish problem. We cannot—and through this lawsuit, we are saying we will not—allow the infiltration of Hamas-directed hatred, violence, and intimidation anywhere we can prevent it. If the defendants believe they can set up operations in America to create a mass culture of fear, threats, violence, and intimidation to undermine our cherished educational institutions, affect our governmental policies, and force Hamas’s evil ideology on American or Israeli soil, they are about to find out how mistaken they are,” he added.

American Muslims for Palestine strongly disputes the characterization of its organization presented in the lawsuit and claimed that it is an “entirely separate” entity from NSJP.

“American Muslims for Palestine has yet to be served with this lawsuit, as the plaintiffs went to the media before the process servers. Once properly served, AMP will gladly demonstrate in any jurisdiction that it operates fully within the laws of the United States,” the organization’s representatives, the Muslim Legal Fund of America, said in a statement to Just the News.

“While these plaintiffs cite to a seven-year-old civil lawsuit pending in federal court in Chicago throughout their complaint, the plaintiffs in the Chicago lawsuit have yet to legally prove a single one of their allegations against AMP,” said the spokesperson.

“Instead, they fling inflammatory rhetoric, and others cite to it, with no correlation to any actual facts.  No court has issued any finding that AMP supports anything improper, and we remain confident that based on all actual relevant facts no court will do so," the Muslim Legal Fund added.

“I extend my sympathies to these families for their losses. And they absolutely have a right to redress against the perpetrators. They do not, however, have any legal right to redress against law-abiding domestic nonprofits like AMP, that even their complaint fails to tie to terrorism,” the spokesperson added.

Bazian, the founder of AMP, is also the chairman of the Muslim Legal Fund of America.

AMP offered evidence contradictory to previous reporting that Bazian founded of the first SJP chapter at Berkeley. Instead the organization provided a registration document to show the first SJP group at Berkeley was founded in 1993 under a different name.

At the same time, public evidence shows Bazian was somehow associated with the group in its earliest stages. Bazian wrote an article describing the formation of SJP in detail and implying he was there in 1993 to witness it by referencing himself as part of the group. Bazian’s public LinkedIn shows that he attended Berkeley in that same year, likely at the beginning of his Ph.D. program.

The central allegation of the lawsuit is that both NSJP and AMP—grouped together because of their alleged affiliation under AJP Educational Foundation, Inc. according to the suit—aided and abetted Hamas by serving as its “propaganda division in the United States.”

Materials distributed by NSJP seem to indicate at the very least that the group is spreading messages that mirror those from Hamas.

The day after the October 7, 2023, terrorist attacks by Hamas on Israeli civilians and soldiers, NSJP disseminated a “Day of Resistance Toolkit,” which details the views of Students for Justice in Palestine network and called for a “national day of resistance.” The flyer contained information on how to organize a protest, provided resources for campus groups, and included a set of talking points.

Some of the rhetoric contained in the document appears to justify anti-Israeli violence.

“When people are occupied, resistance is justified — normalize the resistance,” one heading reads. This section described resistance—which the contents of the flyer make clear is not just peaceful resistance—as “both morally just and politically necessary.”

“[L]iberating colonized land is a real process that requires confrontation by any means necessary,” another section reads. What is included in this confrontation?

“Resistance comes in all forms— armed struggle, general strikes, and popular demonstrations. All of it is legitimate, and all of it is necessary,” NSJP declares.

Finally, NSJP directly connects its U.S.-based protest movement to a “Unity Intifada” with Hamas and declares itself not just a supporter but a part of the movement.

“We as Palestinian students in exile are PART of this movement, not in solidarity with this movement,” the group proudly declares. “This is a moment of mobilization for all Palestinians. We must act as part of this movement. All of our efforts continue the work and resistance of Palestinians on the ground,” the document concludes.

Below the talking points, the group attached two sample graphics for each SJP chapter to use to set up their protests. One includes an image that appears to depict Gazans standing atop a captured Israeli military tank while waving a Palestinian flag. The other includes the now-infamous graphic of a Hamas terrorist flying on paraglider—a reference one tactic used by the group in the Oct. 7 attack.

The toolkit is attached below: 

The lawsuit highlights that the Hamas charter—which governs the terrorist organization—specifically calls on its supporters to provide it with “strategic depth in all human material and informative spheres.” This can be achieved by “the convening of solidarity conferences, the issuing of explanatory bulletins, favorable articles and booklets, enlightening the masses regarding the Palestinian issue, clarifying what confronts it and the conspiracies woven around it,” according to the charter.

The Hamas Charter specifically calls for the death of all Jews, and demands that "jihad" is the only solution to the "Palestinian problem."

Immediately following the attack on Oct. 7, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said the movement started from the attack will spread to “the resistance and our Palestinian people abroad.”

"This is a call to our resistance, to our West Bank, to our people, to our resistance abroad, to our strategic allies, to all the sons of this nation: Today is your day. We are on the verge of victory. Let us be partners in creating this great victory, inshallah,” he added in a broadcast.

The toolkit referenced above was distributed to student chapters across the country and the rhetoric and graphics spread.

AMP said that it could not comment on any material contained in NSJP flyers or documents because it “neither created nor promoted it.”

The official relationship between NSJP and AMP remains murky despite reports from the Anti-Defamation League and others that there is an affiliation. The ADL specifically claims disparate SJP groups across the country were brought together under “a single umbrella” through Palestine Solidarity Movement, which was founded by AMP.

Additionally, despite claims of separation, AMP acknowledges on its website that it “work[s] in broad-based coalitions and support[s] campus activism through Students for Justice in Palestine and Muslim Student Associations.”

National Students for Justice in Palestine did not respond to an inquiry from Just the News.

The AJP Educational Foundation could not be reached for comment, however, the spokesperson for AMP told Just the News that AMP and AJP merged in 2015 and became the same organization.

In addition to the lawsuit, some Republican Representatives have vowed to move forward with an investigation into funding sources of these groups with specific concern about they may be violating nonprofit tax codes, Just the News previously reported.

These calls for investigation come as Just the News reported that many of the local SJP chapters receive—or have received in the past—funding directly from the universities they have now helped to disrupt through protest and "occupation."

Additionally, the Washington Free Beacon recently reported that a nonprofit founded by a China-based Marxist helped organize the encampments sweeping New York City. The People’s Forum reportedly organized a meeting for the city’s activists to help coordinate and plan the movement in order to "give Joe Biden a hot summer.”

Just the News this week identified the executive director of that organization, Manolo De Los Santos, at a pro-Palestine protest at Fordham University.

 
Steven Richards

Source: https://justthenews.com/nation/lawsuit-accuses-pro-palestine-groups-being-collaborators-and-propagandists-hamas

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Leaked Students for Justice in Palestine texts show support for massacres of Israelis - Jerusalem Post staff

 

by Jerusalem Post staff

National Students for Justice in Palestine and American Muslims for Palestine are currently getting sued by nine American and Israeli survivors and victims of the Oct. 7 Massacre.

 

PRO-HAMAS posters on campus.  (photo credit: JONATHAN TESLIN)
PRO-HAMAS posters on campus.
(photo credit: JONATHAN TESLIN)

Texts written by Boston University students belonging to the university's Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) organization chapter show them enthusiastically celebrating the October 7 massacre on the day it occurred, according to leaked texts obtained by N12.

During the discussion, some students called the Hamas terrorists "freedom fighters" and hoped that the situation would erupt into a genocidal war against Israel.

Several students voiced active support for violent Palestinian "resistance," saying slogans such as "Long live the intifada!"

"But btw (by the way), the freedom fighters have pushed the occupation forces back. They're so close to Tel Aviv," one student commented. Two people in the group "liked" his message.

Another student, named James, in the conversation said that he hopes for "the State of Israel to collapse and be replaced with something actually democratic." 

Graduating students hold up a sign reading ''Justice for Palestine'' during Harvard University's 371st Commencement Exercises in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, May 26, 2022 (credit: BRIAN SNYDER/REUTERS)Enlrage image
Graduating students hold up a sign reading ''Justice for Palestine'' during Harvard University's 371st Commencement Exercises in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, May 26, 2022 (credit: BRIAN SNYDER/REUTERS)

After the posters of hostages began appearing on campus, several students were outraged and said they would take down these "zionist posters."

Supporting an intifada since 2021

The correspondence between the students in the group indicate consistent positions that support the violent Palestinian "resistance," as early as 2021, the same year as Operation Guardian of the Walls. The group's members sent messages that read "Long live the intifada" and those that glorified the first intifada, according to N12. 

N12 also spoke to several pro-Israel students asking them about their life on campus and how they interacted with the pro-Palestine movement. 

One student mentioned that he had tried to create a dialogue with the leader of SJP on campus but was immediately blocked on all social media.

Another mentioned that he tried to talk to other people in SJP, and they all refused to speak to him because he was a "zionist," and it was, in fact, this incident that led him to join the pro-Israel group on campus.

National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) and American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) are currently getting sued by nine American and Israeli survivors and victims of the October 7 Massacre, the survivors announced Wednesday.

The survivors filed a lawsuit to the US District Court for the Eastern Division of Virginia, Alexandria Division against the two organizations, alleging that they collaborated with Hamas to legitimize the Hamas attacks and provide public relations services for the terrorist organization.


Jerusalem Post staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-799758

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Reconstructing Gaza: The International Community’s Cycle of Impotence - Thaddeus G. McCotter

 

by Thaddeus G. McCotter

The people of Gaza are not going to invite a bullet from Hamas by renouncing them in return for the fool’s gold of international aid.

 

If ever there was an example of the lethal, recurring consequences of the self-proclaimed “international community’s” inanity and impotence, it is their recurrent bouts of vows to reconstruct Gaza.

In their own version of the movie Groundhog Day (sans happy ending), the United Nations, the Biden administration, and other largely western nations have plans for rebuilding and revitalizing post-war Gaza. (Proximity to the Hamas terrorists makes neighboring Arab nations far more pragmatic in their planning.) The international community’s plans—much of them taxpayer subsidized—are expansive, expensive, and will ensure perpetuation of the Hamas terrorists’ cycle of violence against Israel.

And, tragically, this will happen regardless of whether the international community delivers on their promises.

To begin, the tragic recap:

Hamas launches a terrorist attack against Israel and murders, rapes, tortures, and kidnaps civilians;

Hamas holds the kidnapped civilians as an insurance policy and human shields against Israeli retaliation;

Hamas further uses Gaza’s civilians and critical infrastructure, such as hospitals, as human shields;

Hamas directs a propaganda operation through its supporters in the west, including leftists on college campuses, and in various international institutions demand a cease-fire to insulate Hamas against the consequences for their terrorism—as well as the large swath of the Gaza population that approves of their terrorist attack against Israeli civilians;

The international community rebuilds and revitalizes Gaza and insulates and rewards Hamas for its terrorist attack;

And reinforces among the Gaza population that they are correct in supporting Hamas’ hatred, terrorism, and genocidal aims, which are deemed justified, indoctrinated and celebrated throughout successive generations.

Rebuild, revitalize, repeat…

Now, take, for instance, this assessment by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), as reported in February by Reuters:

Speaking on the sidelines of a U.N. meeting in Geneva, Richard Kozul-Wright, a director at trade body UNCTAD, said the damage was already four times that endured in Gaza during the seven-week war in 2014.

“We are talking about around $20 billion if it stops now,” he said… The reconstruction will require a new “Marshall Plan,” he said, referring to the U.S. plan for Europe’s economic recovery after World War Two.

In light of the above recap of Hamas’ cycle of terrorist violence, one could be tempted to think refusing to rebuild and revitalize Gaza would compel its civilian population to reassess their support for and abetting of Hamas. Yet, this is not an option. Withholding post-war aid will give apparent credence to the propaganda and fuel the recruitment efforts of more terrorists by Hamas and other enemies of the United States and Israel.

Exacerbating the situation, the people of Gaza have learned to be deeply skeptical of the international community’s promises of aid and their subsequent failure to deliver. In consequence, even if the international community eventually honors its bruited commitment of reconstruction aid, it will likely be viewed as just a down payment on their fully honoring all their past commitments, if not viewed as the people of Gaza as merely a case of “too little, too late.” Obviously, just as the international community fully footing the bill for reconstructing Gaza will send the wrong message to Hamas and its abettors, not reconstructing or underdelivering will also send an equally unhelpful message.

Writing at the Arab Center in Washington DC in June 2021, Yara M. Asi assessed the international community’s past rebuilding promises and what they produced in her piece, “Rebuilding Gaza, Yet Again.” In discussing the aftermath of 2014 Israeli War in Gaza, it is instructive to consider the harm done by the international community’s overpromising and underdelivering.

First, the overpromising:

The 2014 war was utterly catastrophic, and the response for aid seemed to match the urgency. At a conference in Cairo months later, donors pledged $3.5 billion to rebuild Gaza over three years. Top pledges came from the United States ($277 million), the European Union ($348 million), Saudi Arabia ($500 million), and Qatar ($1 billion). Overall, donors pledged $5.4 billion….

Next, the underdelivering:

While the pledges were generous, the deliverables were meager. Months after the conference, less than 2 percent of the money had been transferred to the Palestinians. The Gulf states, which made the highest pledges, had the biggest shortfalls; by 2018, almost all the unfulfilled pledges were by these Arab states. Thus, much of what was destroyed in 2014 – and 2012, and 2008-2009 – remained destroyed at the onset of this latest bombing campaign in 2021.

The end result:

Donors may have even been reluctant to donate funds to rebuild infrastructure that was likely to be damaged again. At the Gaza conference, then-US Secretary of State John Kerry noted, ‘This is the third time in less than six years that together with the people of Gaza, we have been forced to confront a reconstruction effort.’ [Italics, mine.]

Mr. Kerry said this in 2014.

Many have thought that the path to a just and lasting peace for Gaza must begin with its civilian population renouncing terrorism; and, in addition to the obvious benefits of peace, a grateful international community would reward the people of Gaza with billions upon billions of dollars in economic assistance.

Yet, because the international community has overpromised and underperformed time and time again, the people of Gaza are not going to invite a bullet from Hamas by renouncing them in return for the fool’s gold of international aid.

Thus, Israel, Gaza, and the world confront the deadliest catch of all, the Catch-22 of the international community’s latest plans to reconstruct and revitalize Gaza: The peoples of Israel and Gaza will be damned if you do, damned if you don’t, and damned if you do it half-assed.

Given the international community, smart money is on half-assed.

An American Greatness contributor, the Hon. Thaddeus G. McCotter (M.C., Ret.) served Michigan’s 11th Congressional district from 2003-2012, and served as Chair of the Republican House Policy Committee. Not a lobbyist, he is a frequent public speaker and moderator for public policy seminars; and a Monday co-host of the “John Batchelor Radio Show,” among sundry media appearances.


Thaddeus G. McCotter

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/05/04/reconstructing-gaza-the-international-communitys-cycle-of-impotence/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran and the US Administration: Mocking US Sanctions - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

The Biden administration has provided a lifeline to the Iranian regime by providing it with much-needed financial relief to export more oil and terror.

 

  • Never before have sanctions been so ostentatiously disregarded without any seeming awareness by those violating them of the possible consequences.

  • The US administration, it appears, has actually been funding Iran to attack Israel and itself.

  • The Biden administration has provided a lifeline to the Iranian regime by providing it with much-needed financial relief to export more oil and terror.

The Biden administration has provided a lifeline to the Iranian regime by providing it with much-needed financial relief to export more oil and terror. (Image source: iStock)

The evasions of US sanctions by Iran and its allies – largely thanks to the Biden administrations' sanctions waivers -- mark a new chapter in America's history. Never before have sanctions been so ostentatiously disregarded without any seeming awareness by those violating them of the possible consequences.

Flouting international agreements not only undermines the integrity of the sanctions themselves but has also been demolishing the authority and credibility of the US administration. The problem is that such ostentatious flouting of sanctions has been producing a global lack of respect for the United States. Such derision has been transforming the once formidable reputation of the US into little more than a punchline, and, in the eyes of allies and adversaries alike, reducing America's stature to that of an attractive target.

Despite the sanctions, Iranian oil exports have continued to surge, funding Iran's October 7 war on Israel -- in addition to more than 150 attacks on US troops in the Middle East by Iran's militias and proxies. The US administration, it appears, has actually been funding Iran to attack Israel and itself.

In addition, Iran continues sending weapons to Russia, to help it crush Ukraine

March 2024 witnessed a notable spike in Iranian oil exports, that reached a staggering 1.82 million barrels per day, a figure not seen since October 2018, just prior to the Trump administration's decision to reinstate oil sanctions. This upward trajectory in export volumes represents a direct defiance of the sanctions regime. The sustained growth in exports carries profound implications for Tehran's fiscal landscape, as oil revenues traditionally constitute a substantial portion of Iran's total income, comprising nearly 80% of the nation's revenue stream.

During the tenure of President Donald Trump, the United States adopted a markedly stringent approach towards Iran, aiming to exert maximum pressure and curtail its economic activities, particularly in the realm of oil exports. The impact of this approach was evident in the decline of Iran's oil exports, plummeting to a mere fraction of their previous levels.

Under the weight of stringent sanctions and diplomatic pressure, Iran's oil exports dwindled to approximately 200,000 barrels per day, marking a decline of more than 90% from previous levels. This reduction in export volumes not only highlighted the severity of the measures imposed by the Trump administration but also reflected how effective the strategy was in disrupting Iran's economic lifelines and constraining its ability to generate vital revenue streams. The drop in oil exports served as a cornerstone of the previous US administration's broader strategy to isolate and weaken the Iranian regime, and signaled a departure from appeasement.

When the sanctions were rigorously enforced, the impact reverberated beyond Iran's borders by significantly disrupting the flow of funds to the Iranian regime and hampering its ability to support various proxies and agendas throughout the region. The reduction in Iran's oil revenues dealt a severe blow to the regime's financial capabilities, curbing its capacity to fund entities such as Bashar Assad's regime in Syria, and terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis.

An example of this financial strain surfaced through reports in Syrian-state-controlled media, indicating a reduction in Tehran's financial assistance to Damascus. Publications like Al-Watan highlighted Iran's decision to halt its credit line to the Syrian government, and the hobbling of its ability to ship oil to Syria, which subsequently causing fuel shortages there. These tangible consequences underscored the direct impact of sanctions on Iran's ability to extend its influence and support networks beyond its borders.

In addition, the stringent enforcement of sanctions and the Trump administration's uncompromising stance towards Iran also had an effect on Hezbollah, Iran's proxy in Lebanon. As a key ally and beneficiary of Iranian support, Hezbollah found itself under increasing financial strain as, due to the sanctions, the flow of funds from Tehran dwindled. A senior Hezbollah official, speaking anonymously to the Washington Post in 2019, candidly acknowledged the adverse impact of US sanctions on the group's financial operations. He admitted that the regime was forced to make significant cuts in expenses.

The admission exposed the tangible consequences faced by Hezbollah as a result of the economic pressure on Iran, its primary patron. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah also publicly addressed the financial challenges posed by the sanctions. He urged Hezbollah's fundraising arm to redouble its efforts to solicit financial support to sustain its military activities and further its jihadist agenda. This acknowledgment from within Hezbollah's ranks testified to the effectiveness of sanctions in curbing the ability of terrorist organizations to sow violence and destabilize the region.

By contrast, the Biden administration has provided a lifeline to the Iranian regime by providing it with much-needed financial relief to export more oil and terror.

 
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on Islam and US Foreign Policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20613/iran-us-sanctions

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hamas and Hezbollah: How Iran Is Secretly Infiltrating Europe - Robert Williams

 

by Robert Williams

"Hamas has been in Europe for about 30 years. It's an open secret. Of course, they don't call themselves Hamas... They will have names like Conference of Palestinians Abroad, Palestinians in (country name), Palestinian Students Abroad, and so on. But when you dig a bit, you find out who the people are behind these associations, and what their connections are back home. It's always the same cluster of 20-25 people. Their propaganda, their social media patterns, everything is Hamas." — Lorenzo Vidino, director of the program on extremism at George Washington University, April 12, 2024.

 

  • "Hamas sees Western countries such as Germany as a refuge in which the organization can concentrate on collecting donations, recruiting new supporters, and spreading its propaganda." — Germany's domestic intelligence service, apnews.com, November 23, 2023.

  • In February, Belgium's justice minister confirmed that Hamas operates in Brussels... through a network of front companies raising funds for the terrorist organization... Belgian authorities nevertheless continue to allow Hamas to operate there.

  • "Hamas has been in Europe for about 30 years. It's an open secret. Of course, they don't call themselves Hamas... They will have names like Conference of Palestinians Abroad, Palestinians in (country name), Palestinian Students Abroad, and so on. But when you dig a bit, you find out who the people are behind these associations, and what their connections are back home. It's always the same cluster of 20-25 people. Their propaganda, their social media patterns, everything is Hamas." — Lorenzo Vidino, director of the program on extremism at George Washington University, April 12, 2024.

  • "This is a typical Muslim Brotherhood tactic. They come up with a million different names for their organizations, for two reasons: Firstly, they want to give the impression that it's a broad movement, so that when they organize a public event, there will be 50 participating organizations, or if they publish a public letter, there will be 50 signatory groups. Secondly, if one of these groups is taken down by law enforcement, well, there's all the other ones." — Lorenzo Vidino, April 12, 2024.

  • In all of this, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is a central actor. As stated by the US Congress, the IRGC "trains, funds, arms, and shares intelligence with dangerous proxy forces throughout the Middle East and abroad" and has targeted both European and American civilians.

  • The US Congress, Israel and thousands of Iranians have urged the European Union to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization. Last year, by an overwhelming majority, the European Parliament passed a resolution to that effect, but the EU nevertheless refuses to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization. EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell claims there are legal obstacles; however, that claim has been refuted as a lie.

  • Iran has ballistic missiles that can reach Europe, and is one minute away from nuclear weapons capability, if not already there.

The terrorist threat to Europe from the Islamic Republic of Iran -- and Hamas and Hezbollah, its proxies -- is growing. In the past five years, Iran has been behind at least 33 terrorist plots in Europe. There are, it is estimated, 450 Hamas operatives in Germany alone. (Image source: iStock/Getty Images)

The terrorist threat to Europe from the Islamic Republic of Iran -- and Hamas and Hezbollah, its proxies -- is growing. European leaders, however, are absorbed with trying to prevent Israel from eliminating the military capabilities of Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, even though that would diminish the ability of these terrorists to operate in Europe.

Even before the October 7 massacre in Israel by Hamas, Mossad Director David Barnea said in September 2023 that Israel's intelligence services, in cooperation with their foreign partners, had prevented 27 terrorist attacks orchestrated by the Iran just over the last year, "all over the world, in Europe, Africa, the Far East and South America."

Only three months later, in December, terrorists from Hamas-affiliated cells in Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands were arrested after planning to attack Jewish targets in Europe. Weapons linked to the arrests in Germany and the Netherlands were found in Bulgaria. According to German prosecutors, the four men arrested in Germany had been gathering weapons to be "kept in a state of readiness in view of potential terrorist attacks against Jewish institutions in Europe."

There are, it is estimated, 450 Hamas operatives in Germany alone, according to 2023 numbers released by Germany's domestic intelligence service, the Federal Office for Protection of the Constitution. In 2022, the agency warned:

"Hamas sees Western countries such as Germany as a refuge in which the organization can concentrate on collecting donations, recruiting new supporters, and spreading its propaganda."

In addition, Germany is home to at least 1,900 members of the Muslim Brotherhood network. Qatar's Al Jazeera, the Muslim Brotherhood's main media sponsor and promotor, says of the movement: "Throughout they have always adhered to their ideal of a society governed by Islamic laws and morals." The motto of the Muslim Brotherhood is:

"Allah is our objective; the Prophet is our leader; the Quran is our law; Jihad is our way; dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope."

In February, Belgium's justice minister confirmed that Hamas operates in Brussels -- the de facto capital of the European Union -- through a network of front companies raising funds for the terrorist organization, along with activities aimed at improving Hamas's image in Europe. Belgian authorities nevertheless continue to allow Hamas to operate there.

Belgian MP Michael Freilich recently said:

"Why would you admit [that Hamas is active in the country], and then say, well, we're allowing them to operate, because in Belgium they are not doing anything extreme? You just said they are fundraising, and that is supposed to be illegal for such an organization. It doesn't make sense to me."

Hezbollah has its own organization in Europe. According to a 2022 report by Europol:

"The network of collaborators built by Hezbollah in the EU is suspected of managing the transportation and distribution of illegal drugs into the EU, dealing with firearms trafficking and running professional money laundering operations."

Hezbollah has been active in Europe for quite a while. In 2012, the terrorist network bombed a bus transporting Israeli tourists in Burgas, Bulgaria, killing six people and wounding dozens of others. In Germany, there are around 1,250 Hezbollah members.

Europe, according to experts, has simply been ignoring Iran's infiltration of the continent with terrorist proxies.

"Hamas has been in Europe for about 30 years. It's an open secret," commented Lorenzo Vidino, director of the program on extremism at George Washington University and an expert on the Muslim Brotherhood. "Of course, they don't call themselves Hamas," Vidino added. (Hamas has been banned in the European Union.)

"They will have names like Conference of Palestinians Abroad, Palestinians in (country name), Palestinian Students Abroad, and so on. But when you dig a bit, you find out who the people are behind these associations, and what their connections are back home. It's always the same cluster of 20-25 people.

"Their propaganda, their social media patterns, everything is Hamas. And it's very public and visible. This is a typical Muslim Brotherhood tactic. They come up with a million different names for their organizations, for two reasons: Firstly, they want to give the impression that it's a broad movement, so that when they organize a public event, there will be 50 participating organizations, or if they publish a public letter, there will be 50 signatory groups. Secondly, if one of these groups is taken down by law enforcement, well, there's all the other ones."

The European authorities' investigations of Hamas in Europe, Vidino added, have been a complete failure.

"We looked at investigations conducted against Hamas's funding networks in the West over the last 25-30 years, and we found that it's basically been a complete disaster. Investigations have been, for the most part, unsuccessful.

"Some of these key individuals have been investigated. At times, they get arrested, they get charged, but then it never sticks – with a few exceptions...

"The main issue is that Hamas has not really been a priority for European law enforcement. Security forces have limited resources. A country like Belgium would rather invest its resources in tracking down ISIS members, who pose a more direct security threat."

According to Danny Citrowicz, a research fellow at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies and a non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council:

"In Europe, the main terror threats are considered to be Sunni groups such as al-Qaeda and ISIS. You don't really see them acting against Shiite radicalism. They think they have bigger fish to fry."

In the past five years, Iran has been behind at least 33 terrorist plots in Europe alone, including against targets in Sweden and the UK, according to Matthew Levitt, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

In all of this, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is a central actor. As stated by the US Congress, the IRGC "trains, funds, arms, and shares intelligence with dangerous proxy forces throughout the Middle East and abroad" and has targeted both European and American civilians.

The IRGC, as described by the Wall Street Journal, prepared and trained Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorists for the October 7 massacre in Israel.:

"Officers of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had worked with Hamas since August to devise the air, land and sea incursions... Details of the operation were refined during several meetings in Beirut attended by IRGC officers and representatives of four Iran-backed militant groups, including Hamas, which holds power in Gaza, and Hezbollah, a Shiite militant group and political faction in Lebanon..."

The US Congress, Israel and thousands of Iranians have urged the European Union to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization. Last year, by an overwhelming majority, the European Parliament passed a resolution to that effect, but the EU nevertheless refuses to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization. EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell claims there are legal obstacles; however, that claim has been refuted as a lie.

In April 2023, a bipartisan group of more than 130 US Congress members signed a letter calling on the EU to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization. The IRGC, they wrote, "has freely and openly carried out plots targeting citizens in countries across the EU."

"Given the growing threat Iran poses to EU member states and their citizens, we urge you to treat this issue with the utmost urgency," the letter stated.

European leaders are clearly not treating the issue with any urgency, which is a disaster in the making for all Europeans. As Iran continues to supply Russia with military equipment, Iranian-made drones have been raining destruction on Ukraine. Iran has ballistic missiles that can reach Europe, and is one minute away from nuclear weapons capability, if not already there.

When will the EU start to take this threat seriously?

 

Robert Williams is a researcher based in the United States.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20612/hamas-hezbollah-europe

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

ICC prosecutor in veiled warning to Netanyahu: Stop intimidation tactics - Tovah Lazaroff

 

by Tovah Lazaroff

“The Office insists that all attempts to impede, intimidate or improperly influence its officials cease immediately,” the International Criminal Court’s Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan wrote on X.

 

International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan speaks during an interview with Reuters about the violence in Israel and Gaza in The Hague, Netherlands October 12, 2023 (photo credit: PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW/REUTERS)
International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan speaks during an interview with Reuters about the violence in Israel and Gaza in The Hague, Netherlands October 12, 2023
(photo credit: PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW/REUTERS)

The International Criminal Court’s Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan issued a veiled warning to Netanyahu to stop his intimidation tactics designed to prevent the issuance of arrest warrants against top Israeli leaders for war crimes, including in Gaza.

“The Office insists that all attempts to impede, intimidate or improperly influence its officials cease immediately,” he wrote in a post on X.

He spoke out after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other top Israeli leaders had issued statements against the issuance of such warrants and US politicians had threatened to reimpose sanctions the Trump administration had leveled against the court, but which were rescinded by US President Joe Biden.

Discussions between Israel and the United States 

Israeli President Isaac Herzog brought up the issue when he met with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Wednesday. 

Protesters gather outside of the ICC before the Hostage and Missing Families Forum files a complaint against Hamas leaders, February 14th, 2024 (credit: Eyal Radoshitzki)Enlrage image
Protesters gather outside of the ICC before the Hostage and Missing Families Forum files a complaint against Hamas leaders, February 14th, 2024 (credit: Eyal Radoshitzki)

There is a belief in the Prime Minister’s Office, that US intervention could be helpful. The ICC has not formally announced the issuance of such warrants, which are expected to target Netanyahu, Defense Minster Yoav Gallant and IDF Chief-of-Staff Herzl Halevi.

Khan in his post did not mention Israel, the US or Netanyahu, but his statement is broadly believed to be applicable to his investigation into war crimes committed in Gaza, the West Bank and east Jerusalem over the last decade.

The “independence and impartiality are undermined, however, when individuals threaten to retaliate against the Court or against Court personnel should the Office, in fulfilment of its mandate, make decisions about investigations or cases falling within its jurisdiction,” Khan wrote.

“Such threats, even when not acted upon, may also constitute an offense against the administration of justice under Art. 70 of the Rome Statute,” he waned.

That provision explicitly prohibits both “[r]etaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official” and “[I]mpeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform or to perform improperly, his or her duties,” Khan stressed.

Reactions to the warning

Representative Brian Mast heavily critiqued Khan's comments, posting on X "Let me translate for those that don’t speak legal gibberish:

"The International Kangaroo Court is saying don’t criticize or sanction us. If you do, we will come after you. The @IntlCrimCourt doesn’t respect the sovereignty of individual nations. It thinks it’s above them."


Tovah Lazaroff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-799727

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Prosecution witness Hope Hicks offers testimony benefiting Trump, backfiring on DA Bragg - Charlotte Hazard

 

by Charlotte Hazard

“President Trump really values Mrs. Trump’s opinion, and she doesn’t weigh in all the time, but when she does it’s really meaningful to him," Hicks said, arguing that Trump's main concern was Melania.

 

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg called former President Donald Trump’s then-communications aide, Hope Hicks, to the witness stand in the so-called hush money trial in which she offered testimony that may have actually benefited the 45th president. 

Trump's attorneys argued that his motivation to silence the accounts of former Playboy model Karen McDougal and porn star Stormy Daniels wasn't to help his 2016 campaign, but rather to protect his family, specifically former First Lady Melania Trump, according to Politico. 

Both women claimed that they have had sexual encounters with the former president. 

When Hicks took the stand, she took the position that while Trump preferred that the Stormy Daniels story came out after the election instead of before, his main interest in keeping these allegations buried was to shield Melania from hearing about it. 

"Absolutely…I don’t think he wanted anyone in his family to be hurt or embarrassed about anything on the campaign. He wanted them to be proud of him," she said, according to Fox News.

Bragg has claimed that Trump paid Daniels to be quiet to benefit his campaign, resulting in allegations that he was unlawfully attempting to influence the election. 

“President Trump really values Mrs. Trump’s opinion, and she doesn’t weigh in all the time, but when she does it’s really meaningful to him," Hicks said, arguing that Trump's main concern was Melania. 

 
Charlotte Hazard

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/alvin-bragg-witness-hope-hicks-offers-testimony-benefiting-trump-backfiring

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter