Saturday, October 24, 2026

Intelligence official warns Iranians preparing attacks on Americans - Nicholas Ballasy

 

by Nicholas Ballasy

The warning comes as the Trump administration considers whether to resume military action against Iran.

 

U.S. intelligence officials are warning that Iran has intensified efforts to target American personnel and citizens abroad.

There are also some alleged assassination plots reaching advanced stages, according to CBS News.

In an unclassified memo shared with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton warned that Iranian efforts to carry out lethal attacks against Americans have progressed significantly in the Middle East and other parts of the world.

The warning comes as the Trump administration considers whether to resume military action against Iran. 

In the meantime, U.S. diplomatic and military officials are adjusting staffing levels at facilities throughout the Middle East in response to growing security concerns of attacks from Iran.

The memo does not identify the specific countries or individuals allegedly being targeted. 

Clayton said the intelligence community is working to make sensitive intelligence available to a wider group of State Department personnel so they can better assess potential threats. 


Nicholas Ballasy

Source: https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/intelligence-official-warns-iranians-preparing-attacks-americans

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump admin pushes pipeline to bring down New England high energy costs, but NY may stand in way - Kevin Killough

 

by Kevin Killough

Residents of New England pay some of the highest energy costs in the nation, and the Trump administration says the Constitution Pipeline — a project New York successfully blocked once before — is the answer. New York, however, appears to remain stubbornly committed to stopping it.

 

New Englanders pay some of the highest energy costs in the nation, and the Trump administration says the Constitution Pipeline – a project New York successfully blocked once before – is the answer. New York, however, appears to remain stubbornly committed to stopping it. 

The administration announced Monday it’s putting up $42 million to advance the development of the Constitution Pipeline that will, if successfully brought online, transport natural gas from Pennsylvania to New York. 

All five New England states rank in the top 11 states in the country for high electricity rates. And except for New Hampshire, they all have policies that are restrictive or openly hostile to pipeline development, according to an analysis by Always On Energy Research and the Institute for Energy Research. 

New York, which is also among U.S. states with high electricity costs, has been fighting to stop the pipeline project since it was first proposed in 2012. And officials in the state are saying they remain committed to seeing it never happens. 

The administration’s strategy is to declare that pipeline infrastructure development is a national security issue, which may allow it to overcome hurdles from New England states’ anti-pipeline policies that have kept the project from being constructed. 

The opposition to pipelines is also running into an electorate increasingly keen on getting their utility bills to come down. These factors may give the second attempt to build the pipeline a fighting chance. 

Invoking the Defense Production Act

The $42 million in funding for the project falls under the 1950 Defense Production Act, which gives the president broad power to direct industry to prioritize and produce materials deemed essential for national defense, disaster response and energy security.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright said in a statement that the project is part of President Trump’s promise to lower energy costs and to reverse 17 years of “energy subtraction” policies that have driven up prices. 

“Despite America having an abundant supply of low-cost natural gas, tens of millions of Americans have limited access to this reliable energy source due to a lack of pipeline infrastructure,” Wright said. 

The 125-mile pipeline was originally proposed to transport natural gas from Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, to Wright, New York – about 30 miles west of Albany – where it could connect with other existing and new pipeline systems to transport gas throughout the five New England states. 

Federal regulators approved the project in 2014, but New York rejected it in 2016. A federal court upheld the rejection the following year. 

The Clean Water Act gives a state one year to act on a proposed project, but New York took two years and eight months to decide. In 2019, federal regulators ruled that New York had waited too long to make its decision. In 2020, Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC, a subsidiary of Williams Company, gave up on the project, and in 2021 a federal court erased the approvals. 

The company initiated the project again in 2025, and New York sued in 2026 to stop it. As New York stomped on this pipeline, the U.S. built about 8,100 miles of pipelines, according to the U.S. Oil and Gas Association. 

Wright told Fox News that the administration wants to see construction begin in spring next year and be completed in two years. 

Limited support from leadership

Despite the potential to bring down energy costs, New York Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul remains firmly opposed to the project. Ken Lovett, Hochul’s senior communications adviser on energy and the environment, said in a statement that the project is a ploy by the administration to draw attention away from the impact of the war in Iran on energy prices. 

“While the President continues to obsess over blocking renewable energy projects in order to focus on gas, oil and even coal, Governor Hochul is focused on driving an all-of-the-above energy strategy designed to keep the lights on and costs down for New Yorkers,” he said. 

Wright stated in the Fox interview that the administration had hoped to have the pipeline online by the winter of 2027, but Hochul remains a hurdle preventing the pipeline from getting approvals. He said the administration is in talks with her and believes she’ll get on board with the project after the midterm elections. 

It’s unclear how much support the pipeline will get from the leadership of other New England states, but Wright said the other states are on board. 

New Hampshire GOP Gov. Kelly Ayotte said Monday she supports the project to increase gas supplies to New Hampshire, WMUR reported. 

In June, E&E News reported that Democratic Govs. Ned Lamont, of Connecticut, Maura Healey, of Massachusetts, and Dan McKee, of Rhode Island, publicly expressed more support for natural gas pipelines, but they weren’t endorsing any specific projects. Many expressed skepticism that Healey would ever get behind the pipeline. 

In 2025, Healey bragged about killing two pipeline projects in her state. Her attitudes may have shifted somewhat since then as voters express more concern about high energy costs. 

She signed an executive order in March that directs the state to support development of 10 gigawatts of solar and energy-use reductions. The order also calls for a review of how a proposed liquefied natural gas terminal and other fuel storage assets may contribute to meeting energy supply and reliability needs in the region. 

But the pressure to lower costs as midterms approach is mounting. Earlier this month, she asked the administration to expedite its review of a pipeline project that involves installing wider pipes along sections of the Algonquin natural gas pipeline, which brings gas from New Jersey through southern New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island and into Massachusetts.

Healey stated in a letter to Wright it would lower costs for 600,000 consumers by reducing the need for imported LNG. How much she’ll apply that reasoning to the Constitution Pipeline remains to be seen. 

Opposition gearing up

State-level permitting for the pipeline ultimately rests with New York. There’s a bipartisan demand to lower energy costs, but influential climate groups, such as EarthJustice, the NRDC, and Food & Water Watch, will likely line up to block it again as they had in the past. 

New York state regulators in February were submitting filings with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to oppose the project, which was before the administration invoked the Defense Production Act to get it moving forward. 

Meanwhile, besides building pipelines from Pennsylvania, the Trump administration is seeking ways to circumnavigate the anti-fossil fuel interests that critics argue are keeping prices in New England high. 

Lacking natural gas supplies, many homes in the region rely on heating oil during the winter. The administration announced this week it is drawing on emergency reserves of heating oil reserves to help ensure supply and lower costs. 

“This is a temporary measure to solve a temporary supply disruption,” Wright said in a statement. 

For longer-term solutions to New England residents’ high energy costs, the Trump administration is looking at natural gas infrastructure. Unless it can get New York on board, the effort to build the Constitution Pipeline could be a repeat of the first attempt.  


Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/trump-admin-pushes-pipeline-bring-down-new-england-high-energy-costs-ny-may

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Paris in Flames: Disorder Spreads, France Clings to Its Taboos - Drieu Godefridi

 

by Drieu Godefridi

What gives these riots their strength is the role played by La France Insoumise (LFI), Jean-Luc Mélenchon's party, which has for years indulged in toxic pro-Islamist tirades with openly antisemitic undertones.

 

  • These events did not arise in a vacuum. France has long refused to confront three interlocking realities that its political class treats as taboos: mass uncontrolled immigration, the growing presence and separatism of Islam, and the unaffordable costs of the EU's "energy transition."

  • What gives these riots their strength is the role played by La France Insoumise (LFI), Jean-Luc Mélenchon's party, which has for years indulged in toxic pro-Islamist tirades with openly antisemitic undertones.

  • The party seems to know that it will never come to power. It has therefore decided to fully embrace the politics of revolution and disorder, relying on and openly aligning itself with the most extreme elements of France's Muslim population. In many respects, LFI is an openly Islamist party.

  • Not all Muslims, of course, are Islamist. Approximately 60% of young French Muslims, however, believe that Sharia law takes precedence over the laws of the French Republic, according to data from a 2020 official survey, with similar findings reported in subsequent surveys conducted in late 2025.

  • Immigration, Islam, and LFI are not the only factors involved. Insane energy costs compound the social and fiscal pressure. Fuel prices are high enough to revive Yellow Vest-style anger. The government has responded with releases from strategic diesel reserves, price caps, and targeted aid -- not the needed structural reform.

  • The reality is that the French state appears less capable than ever of putting its disastrous finances in order; there is a looming risk of a snowball effect regarding interest on the debt.

  • France has not run a budget surplus since 1974; the structural drivers — high spending, demographic pressures, and refusal to prioritize growth-oriented reforms — remain intact.

  • Meanwhile, France remains locked into its taboos. The demented "energy transition" continues despite the visible cost-of-living backlash. Serious discussion of migration selection, remigration, assimilation requirements, or the cultural and security implications of Islam is still heavily constrained by elite consensus and legal or media norms.

On the night of October 17-18, 2026, France saw some of its worst urban violence in years. The physical damage is extensive. Pictured: The city hall of Limoges, France burns after rioters torched it on October 17, 2026. (Photo by Pascal Lachenaud/AFP via Getty Images)

On the night of October 17-18, 2026, France saw some of its worst urban violence in years. What began as largely peaceful demonstrations over the cost of living, high fuel prices, and the state of public services—especially schools—descended into widespread rioting, arson, and looting across multiple cities. The most established media outlets acknowledge "scenes of war." Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez put the number of participants at roughly 550,000 nationwide (the communist union CGT claimed closer to 800,000), with about 110,000 in Paris. Police made approximately 1,800 arrests, including a record of more than 1,200 in the capital. More than 900 police officers were injured.

France's "mostly peaceful protests"

The physical damage is extensive. In Paris, shopfronts were smashed (luxury retailers but also many modest shops and private properties), cars and bicycles were torched, barricades of garbage dumpsters and bicycles were burned, and restaurants were gutted by fire. Whole streets were described by officials as "devastated." In Limoges, the 19th-century town hall was destroyed by arson; in Lyon the tourist office was set alight; city halls and public buildings were attacked or defaced, notably in Marseille, the second-largest city in France. Looting targeted hundreds of shops in Paris, Marseille, Lille, Bordeaux, Nice, and Strasbourg.

Authorities attributed the worst violence to "far-left" or "ultra-left" elements joined by opportunistic delinquents. Groups in black, masked and wearing balaclavas, clashed with police who deployed tear gas and water cannons. Yet, everywhere, the instructions and rules of engagement for law enforcement remained clear: above all, no violence. This means that the rioters will prevail over the security forces, who are mainly reduced to mere spectators. Such is the cowardice of the Macron regime. More than 3,000 businesses were damaged, with losses estimated at more than a billion euros. A synagogue on Rue Burnouf in Paris's 19th arrondissement was found vandalized and ransacked, with religious items scattered; reports differed on whether it was deliberate vandalism linked to the riots or an attempted robbery (Torah scrolls were reportedly left untouched.)

The causes

These events did not arise in a vacuum. France has long refused to confront three interlocking realities that its political class treats as taboos: mass uncontrolled immigration, the growing presence and separatism of Islam, and the unaffordable costs of the EU's "energy transition."

Immigrants and their descendants are disproportionately concentrated in certain banlieues and cities where public services are most strained and where earlier waves of unrest (including 2005) already originated. France's welfare system, housing, education, and security budgets have been under continuous pressure from high inflows, low assimilation rates in segments of the population, and the existence of areas where republican authority is contested. Crime statistics, the dynamics of France's 751 no-go zones, and repeated episodes of youth violence have been documented for years; the October looting and organized attacks proceeded according to established patterns.

The most recent riots are by no means an exception; they are rather another episode in a long series of events, with many more undoubtedly on the way.

What gives these riots their strength is the role played by La France Insoumise (LFI), Jean-Luc Mélenchon's party, which has for years indulged in toxic pro-Islamist tirades with openly antisemitic undertones.

The party seems to know that it will never come to power. It has therefore decided to fully embrace the politics of revolution and disorder, relying on and openly aligning itself with the most extreme elements of France's Muslim population. In many respects, LFI is an openly Islamist party. In the 2022 presidential election, according to polling institutes' estimates, 69% of Muslim voters cast a ballot for Jean-Luc Mélenchon in the first round.

Official statistics and surveys place the French Muslim population at roughly 9–10 percent of the total (around 6–7 million people), up from roughly 1 percent in the 1960s. The Institut national d'études démographiques (INSEE) data show Muslims as the second-largest declared religious group among younger adults, with far higher rates of practice and intergenerational transmission than Catholicism: 91 percent of second-generation immigrants raised in Muslim families retain the faith as adults, versus much lower retention among those from Christian backgrounds. Strong religiosity is markedly higher among Muslims.

Not all Muslims, of course, are Islamist. Approximately 60% of young French Muslims, however, believe that Sharia law takes precedence over the laws of the French Republic, according to data from a 2020 official survey, with similar findings reported in subsequent surveys conducted in late 2025.

In France, antisemitic incidents have risen sharply in recent years, often linked to Islamist networks or radicalized youths; synagogue incidents occur against that backdrop. Islamist influence in neighborhoods, schools, and associations has been repeatedly flagged by security services and interior ministry reports. The political left, particularly La France Insoumise (LFI), has cultivated alliances with Islamist-adjacent or "pro-Palestinian" currents and is regularly accused of legitimizing or instrumentalizing disorder.

Nicolas Sarkozy, in a private remark reported in September 2025, put it bluntly: "The Rassemblement National of Marine Le Pen wants power and will obtain it; LFI does not want power—what it wants is disorder, anarchy, and violence." These riots, and the driving role played by LFI, appear to prove him right. Sustained chaos seems to serve its revolutionary orientation better than ordinary governance.

Immigration, Islam, and LFI are not the only factors involved. Insane energy costs compound the social and fiscal pressure. Fuel prices are high enough to revive Yellow Vest-style anger. The government has responded with releases from strategic diesel reserves, price caps, and targeted aid -- not the needed structural reform. France's nuclear fleet remains a comparative advantage, yet years of green-transition policies, taxes, regulatory costs, and underinvestment have contributed to elevated prices and public resentment. Protesters explicitly cited fuel prices alongside school conditions.

Consequences

The plausible consequences of these riots are straightforward and already visible. Macron will not resign. He is in the final months of his second disastrous term ahead of the 2027 presidential elections next spring. His approval rate is low, but the institutional calendar and political incentives do not favor an early exit. The immediate fiscal outlook continues to worsen. France's public deficit is projected around 5.4 percent of GDP for 2026 (among the eurozone's highest), with debt near 120 percent of GDP. Prime minister Lecornu's 2027 budget aims for roughly 5 percent via some €54 billion in savings and freezes, yet the National Assembly remains fragmented after the 2024 snap elections. The reality is that the French state appears less capable than ever of putting its disastrous finances in order; there is a looming risk of a snowball effect regarding interest on the debt.

Previous budgets have required the 49.3 constitutional tool to bypass a vote (Article 49.3 of the French Constitution is a powerful mechanism that allows the prime minister to force the passage of a bill through the National Assembly without a vote). Markets have pushed French yields much higher. Further unrest and political paralysis make credible consolidation harder, not easier. Interest costs are again rising. France has not run a budget surplus since 1974; the structural drivers — high spending, demographic pressures, and refusal to prioritize growth-oriented reforms — remain intact.

Sarkozy's observation on LFI is being confirmed in real time. The party and its allies benefit from the perception of systemic failure while avoiding the responsibilities of office. Having spent years courting Muslims and engaging in antisemitic tropes with total impunity — often with the complicity of the Left — LFI (La France Insoumise) escalates its behavior further with each passing day.

Meanwhile, France remains locked into its taboos. The demented "energy transition" continues despite the visible cost-of-living backlash. Serious discussion of migration selection, remigration, assimilation requirements, or the cultural and security implications of Islam is still heavily constrained by elite consensus and legal or media norms. Marine Le Pen — a probable, though not certain, winner of the presidential election — has just declared that "Islam is compatible with the Republic." She reportedly intends to lower the retirement age to 62—in a country with an increasingly aging population where, it should be remembered, the state pays out pensions.

The truth is that if France fails to confront its taboos, the October riots will, in retrospect, look like a practice run.


Drieu Godefridi is a jurist (University Saint-Louis, University of Louvain), philosopher (University Saint-Louis, University of Louvain) and PhD in legal theory (Paris IV-Sorbonne). He is an entrepreneur, CEO of a European private education group and director of PAN Medias Group. He is the author of The Green Reich (2020).

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22937/paris-in-flames-disorder-spreads

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Are Lebanese Shi'ites abandoning Hezbollah? Poll shows majority favor disarming group - analysis - Seth J. Frantman

 

by Seth J. Frantman

A new poll shows 66% of Lebanese Shi'ites support transferring Hezbollah's weapons to the state, reflecting rising anger over war destruction and deep skepticism toward the terror group's leadership.

 

Supporters of Lebanese Shia movement Hezbollah wave flags of the group during a ceremony held to mark the second anniversary of the killing of leader Hassan Nasrallah in a strike by Israel, in Beirut's southern suburbs on September 27, 2026.
Supporters of Lebanese Shia movement Hezbollah wave flags of the group during a ceremony held to mark the second anniversary of the killing of leader Hassan Nasrallah in a strike by Israel, in Beirut's southern suburbs on September 27, 2026.
(photo credit: Anwar AMRO / AFP via Getty Images)

 

Hezbollah may face growing criticism from within Lebanon's Shi’ite community, which has formed the backbone of its support for decades, according to a report from KAN on Saturday.

A recent survey of Shi’ites got attention in regional media. As reported by Israel's KAN public broadcaster and the Lebanese Kataeb.org website, the survey, whose results emerged in mid-October, suggested that many Shi'ites are increasingly questioning the terrorist group.

The main question is whether Hezbollah should keep its arsenal. People also questioned Hezbollah’s conduct in the wars with Israel. However, this did not necessarily mean that Hezbollah is losing its influence over the community.

Respondents said decisions regarding war and peace should be left to the Lebanese state

The survey, conducted by Statistics Lebanon in September among 800 Lebanese Shi'ites, found that 66.4% supported transferring Hezbollah's weapons to the Lebanese state. Another 29.6% preferred that the terrorist organization retain its weapons. The results were significant because Hezbollah has argued that its arsenal is essential for defending Lebanon against Israel.

Roi Kais at Israel’s KAN noted, “A new survey has revealed that about 66 percent of Lebanese Shi'ites support Hezbollah's transfer of weapons to the state, and more than 40 percent express anger and disappointment with its leadership. Amid growing criticism, the support networks and status the terrorist organization has given the sect still maintain its power - as long as no other entity fills the vacuum.”

Women chant as they attend a demonstration organised by the Committee of Residents of Occupied and Affected Villages in southern Lebanon protesting the destruction of the villages and heritage sites by Israeli forces, outside the Supreme Islamic Shiite Council in Haret Hreik, in Beirut's southern su
Women chant as they attend a demonstration organised by the Committee of Residents of Occupied and Affected Villages in southern Lebanon protesting the destruction of the villages and heritage sites by Israeli forces, outside the Supreme Islamic Shiite Council in Haret Hreik, in Beirut's southern su (credit: Anwar AMRO / AFP via Getty Images)

Notably, Kataeb.org, the website of the Phalange Party (Kataeb Party), a political party in Lebanon, published details on the survey. The Christian Kataeb Party opposes Hezbollah. The website noted that 71.1% of respondents believed that decisions about war and peace should rest exclusively with the Lebanese state. Only 5.9% believed Hezbollah's leadership should have a greater role in determining Lebanon's future.

Only 16.5% of respondents had confidence in Hezbollah's ability to guarantee security

The survey also revealed considerable confidence in the Lebanese Armed Forces. Some 78.5% expressed trust in the army, while 51.1% identified it as the institution best suited to guarantee long-term security. Only 16.5% selected Hezbollah.

These findings raised questions about Hezbollah's traditional claim to represent the security interests of Lebanon's Shi'ites. They suggested that many within the community may prefer stronger state institutions, even if they continue to identify politically or socially with Hezbollah.

The survey also found that 67.4% believed Hezbollah had either failed to achieve its objectives in the war with Israel or had achieved only some of them. Another 42.1% expressed disappointment, anger or concern about Hezbollah's leadership and the consequences of the conflict. Nevertheless, 59.5% continued to express varying degrees of trust in Hezbollah, including 37.1% who reported a great deal of trust.

An earlier survey presented a very different picture. In a June 10 analysis published by Israel's Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), researchers Orna Mizrahi and Moran Levanoni cited a May 2026 survey by Lebanon's Information International in which 87.5% of Shiite respondents opposed disarming Hezbollah, while only 7.9% supported surrendering its weapons. More than 90% opposed ties with Israel.

The contrast with the September findings led to many questions. How can people hold such different views? Is it possible that some of the surveys are biased in their questions or agendas?

Mizrahi and Levanoni argued that Hezbollah's influence rests on its social and economic networks, political power, and the historical marginalization of Lebanon's Shi'ites.

They also noted that intimidation has discouraged opposition within the Shi’ite community. The researchers suggested that weakening Hezbollah's influence would require a stronger Lebanese army and Western and Gulf financial assistance to enable the state to replace Hezbollah's services.

This illustrated the complex relationship between Hezbollah and Lebanon's Shi'ites. Hezbollah is not just a terrorist group. It built networks of social services, financial institutions, and political influence to hedge its bets and take over the Lebanese state.

Now that it is so powerful, it is hard to uproot. Many people in Lebanon feared opposing Hezbollah over the years. For some Shi’ite families, it remains an important source of employment and assistance, even if they have to sacrifice their security due to the wars that Hezbollah has caused.

Lebanese fear Hezbollah-linked facilities could become Israeli targets

KAN highlighted an example from the southern Lebanese city of Tyre, where property owners reportedly opposed opening a branch of Hezbollah-linked financial institution Al-Qard Al-Hassan in their building. They feared the branch could become a target for Israeli strikes. The branches have been targeted in the past.

Hezbollah is attempting to regain support through reconstruction assistance. According to KAN, Hezbollah recently announced aid of up to $14,000 for eligible families in Beirut and its southern suburbs whose primary homes were destroyed, and up to $12,000 elsewhere.

The broader question is whether dissatisfaction will translate into political change. Hezbollah has suffered significant military and leadership losses since the war began, including the killing of Hassan Nasrallah in September 2024.

Yet its influence is rooted in decades of political and social organization. Lebanon did not jump at the opportunity to uproot the group in 2025. In March 2026, a new war broke out, leading to massive destruction of villages in southern Lebanon. Even today, Beirut moves at a snail’s pace.

The survey suggests that support for Hezbollah's terrorist role may be weakening even among its traditional constituency. However, unless the Lebanese state can provide security, reconstruction, and economic opportunities, the criticism won’t lead to major change. 


Seth J. Frantman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-912712

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Ukraine says Starlink speed restrictions lifted after disruptions to military drones - Nicholas Ballasy

 

by Nicholas Ballasy

Ukraine’s military has regained full access to Starlink satellite communications .. after restrictions disrupted operations on the battlefield for more than a week

 

Ukraine’s military has regained full access to Starlink satellite communications for drones and other fast-moving equipment after restrictions disrupted operations on the battlefield for more than a week, Ukrainian officials said.

Defense Minister Yevhenii Khmara said monitoring systems confirmed stable connections for equipment traveling faster than 250 mph. 

The speed restrictions affected Starshield, SpaceX’s military-grade satellite communications service, which Ukraine relies on for drone missions, military logistics and communications near the front lines.

Khmara cited direct negotiations and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s diplomatic efforts with Washington as instrumental in restoring access. 


Nicholas Ballasy

Source: https://justthenews.com/nation/technology/ukraine-says-starlink-speed-restrictions-lifted-after-disruptions-military-drones

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Green cards for sale: Feds bust another sham-marriage ring as prices hit $100,000 per arrangement - Ashe Short

 

by Ashe Short

Federal prosecutors say brokers charged foreign nationals up to $100,000 for staged weddings, coached couples for immigration interviews and arranged divorces once their green cards came through. In the past, convicted ringleaders have served less than two years. That may change.

 

Federal prosecutors in Boston on Wednesday charged six people with running an alleged decade-long sham-marriage ring, with illegal immigrants purportedly paying between $38,000 to $40,000 per wedding to gain legal status.

Jennifer Gonzalez, 43, of Fall River, Mass., allegedly ran the business, collecting money from illegal immigrants to arrange sham marriages so they could obtain immigration status, the U.S. District Attorney’s Office for Massachusetts announced this week. Court documents allege that Gonzalez paid four U.S. citizens – Erica Daniels, 29; Chreise Alejandro, 39; Jessica Tavares, 31; and Jaylin Hill, 26 – to marry one or more illegal immigrant “customers.” Amara Pugh, 31, another U.S. citizen, allegedly worked as the “secretary” for the sham-marriage business, federal officials said. Those arrested have not entered pleas, yet.

A local television station said Gonzalez's neighbors were shocked, and never suspected anything out of the ordinary. "You wonder why so many people come and go, I never thought it would be that," one neighbor told WJAR.

Prosecutors say Gonzalez caught on tape: "This state defends us very much" 

Gonzalez’s immigration status is unknown, but she allegedly has extensive ties to the Dominican Republic and the resources to flee, prosecutors said in court documents labeling her a flight risk. The alleged marriage-scam business allegedly brought hundreds of thousands of dollars a year for Gonzalez and her accomplices. She also applied for and received approximately $124,000 in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits during the time she allegedly ran the sham-marriage ring, according to the federal government.

Court documents also referred to video and audio recordings of Gonzalez discussing the sham marriages with clients and why Massachusetts is a good place to conduct the scam.

“…I believe that you can, okay, because this state is a sanctuary, like Trump doesn't like this state because the government from here, the state defends us very much,” she said in one recording, according to prosecutors.

“Massachusetts is the best place for you to be. That is a fact,” she said in another.

Gonzalez allegedly conducted around 20 sham marriages a year for 10 years.

Facing up to 30 years in prison, $1 million in fines

The individuals were charged with conspiracy to harbor illegal immigrants, harboring illegal immigrants, conspiracy to commit marriage fraud, and marriage fraud. They each face up to 30 years in prison, with years of supervised release after, and fines of up to $1 million if sentenced to the maximum on all four counts.

The case in Massachusetts is the latest in a run of federal marriage-fraud prosecutions. In August, New York prosecutors charged 11 people alleged to form a network that allegedly arranged more than 1,000 fake marriages, with some involving active-duty soldiers. Court records show a common playbook: A broker pairs clients with paid U.S. citizens, stages the ceremonies, coaches couples for immigration interviews, fills out fraudulent paperwork, and helps illegal immigrants file that paperwork with federal authorities.

These brokers can charge tens of thousands of dollars for their services and have historically received very little jail time. In the New York case, 11 individuals were charged with orchestrating more than 1,000 sham marriages over a decade, primarily for Chinese citizens, with some illegal immigrants paying up to $100,000 for one sham marriage, the Department of Justice announced at the time.

“This Department of Justice is rooting out fraud everywhere — including in our immigration system,” Attorney General Todd Blanche said when the charges were filed. “The individuals who were arrested today allegedly orchestrated elaborate schemes to illegally obtain citizenship for foreign nationals through sham marriages. Schemes like this are a deliberate affront to the United States and our laws and will not be tolerated under the Trump Administration.”

Like the Massachusetts ring, the New York sham-marriage organization provided fake wedding pictures, coached illegal immigrants on how to speak with immigration officials, and filed paperwork.

Despite arrests, little time served in sham-marriage cases

In Jacksonville, Fla., earlier this year, another 11 individuals were federally indicted for pairing Chinese nationals with U.S. Navy sailors for sham marriages to illegally obtain immigration status, Fox 13 News reported at the time. In that case, a Navy reservist is accused of trying to bribe a personnel office employee to issue unauthorized Department of Defense ID cards. Following the bribery attempt, a sting operation was launched in February 2025 and the reservist was arrested, along with other members of the Navy.

A sham-marriage ring in California broken up in 2022 only resulted in 22 months in prison for its ringleader, Marcialito Benitez. Benitez and 10 others were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit marriage fraud and immigration document fraud. The group is alleged to have charged $20,000 to $30,000 for each sham wedding, the DOJ announced. In March 2024, four of the conspirators, including Benitez, were sentenced.

Benitez received 22 months in jail, Juanita Pacson was sentenced to two years of supervised release, Engilbert Ulan received 14 months in prison, and Nino Valmeo was sentenced to three years of supervised release. All had pleaded guilty, Immigration and Customs Enforcement reported at the time.

Benitez and his ring would help some clients file for green cards by falsely claiming abuse at the hands of their spouse using the Violence Against Women Act, which permits noncitizens claiming spousal abuse to apply for lawful permanent resident status without their spouse knowing. That bill was sponsored by then-Senator Joe Biden, representing Delaware, and a reconciled version was signed into law on Sept. 13, 1994 by President Bill Clinton.

The U.S. government is currently investigating Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., for what appears to be her own marriage fraud scheme. Omar allegedly married her brother while still filing joint taxes with her first husband in order to get her brother a green card. 


Ashe Short

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/green-cards-sale-feds-bust-another-sham-marriage-ring-prices-hit-100000

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The war against the Jews in Judea and Samaria - Melanie Phillips

 

by Melanie Phillips

“Settler violence” is a malevolently distorted canard.

 

American photojournalist Heidi Levine receives medical treatment at a hospital in Ramallah after being injured in an attack by extremist Jewish settlers during the annual olive harvest in the village of Abu Falah near Ramallah, Oct. 16, 2026. Photo by Flash90.
American photojournalist Heidi Levine receives medical treatment at a hospital in Ramallah after being injured in an attack by extremist Jewish settlers during the annual olive harvest in the village of Abu Falah near Ramallah, Oct. 16, 2026. Photo by Flash90.

 

The complexity of “settler violence” received dramatic illustration over the past week.

Washington Post photojournalist Heidi Levine was injured on Oct. 16 during a violent confrontation between Jewish residents and local Arabs near Ramallah.

It was reported that dozens of masked Israeli settlers had attacked local Arabs harvesting their olives, during which the settlers knocked Levine to the ground, kicked her repeatedly, and seized her camera and phone.

The following day, a European delegation visited the area near the Arab town of Taybeh without coordinating the trip in advance with the Israel Defense Forces as required. The diplomats allegedly came under attack by masked Jewish settlers.

These incidents have attracted worldwide media attention and political condemnation.

On Sunday, a group of social-media influencers and others touring these “West Bank” areas of Judea and Samaria came under attack near the village of Turnus Ayaa when Arabs hurled rocks at their vehicles.

The attack was captured on video. One member of the group, former deputy mayor of Jerusalem Fleur Hassan-Nahoum, who is standing for the People of Israel party in the Israeli general election on Oct. 27, was filmed talking to other occupants of her car when a rock shattered the window and lightly wounded a woman sitting in the back.

At the time of writing, no Western outlet has reported this attack.

Israel’s president, Isaac Herzog, apologized to Levine. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office, however, said the facts of that incident “remain unclear and are under investigation,” with reports indicating that some 200 Arabs and far-left activists had confronted approximately 40 Israeli youths. “Footage shows masked individuals on both sides hurling objects amid reports of fireworks fired at Jewish youths,” it said.

Levine, however, denounced her attackers as “Jewish terrorists” and “not even humans.” Would she strip any other group of their very humanity?

As for the Europeans, Israeli TV’s Channel 14 reported claims from local Jewish residents that the diplomats had staged or faked the incident. Subsequently, the diplomats refused to co-operate with the Israeli investigation, failing to provide, as requested, detailed witness statements or video footage.

Yet Western media outlets have chosen not to report the doubts raised about these alleged “settler attacks” on Arabs and others, while also omitting to report the filmed attack by Arabs.

Even if the claims by Levine and the diplomats are true, the reporting of this “settler violence” issue is malevolently skewed.

No one denies there’s a problem, but it’s very small. There are about 500,000 Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria. Estimates of the number of young hoodlums carrying out unprovoked attacks on Arabs range from 95 to 300 youths.

The vast majority of “settlers” are law-abiding citizens. And they are under constant attack by local Arabs.

Dozens of such attacks—some clearly provoked, and filmed by foreign and Israeli activists—are being reported on social media almost every day.

On Monday, 10 Arabs and Israeli far-left activists ambushed a Jewish resident riding an ATV off-road and threw stones at him. When he dismounted, the attackers tried to run him over with a tractor.

On Tuesday, around 15 Israeli activists, photographers and Arabs blocked security roads with stones and boulders.

On Wednesday night, there were at least two Arab stone-throwing attacks on Israeli cars. On Thursday, Arabs and Israeli activists armed with clubs threw stones at Jewish shepherds.

Last Shabbat, multiple attacks were reported by the Judea and Samaria situation room. When a Jewish resident was out for a run, Arabs tried to hit him with their vehicle.

Two attacks with Molotov cocktails were reported, and one with pipe bombs. Sheep were stolen (a regular event) from a Jewish farm. Jewish shepherds were wounded by Arab gunfire; two more Jewish locals were fired at; and there was another attempted attack on Jews with guns and clubs.

On the same day, a Jewish resident reported on X that Arabs began hurling stones at a Jewish shepherd while anarchist activists at their side documented the incident.

“The shepherd called for IDF forces, but they, too, were attacked,” he wrote. “In footage from the event, masked Arabs are seen throwing stones at the soldiers and the shepherd, with anarchists spotted among them who ignore the Arab violence and wait with cameras for an opportune moment to capture a biased, one-sided image.”

Every year, the olive harvest attracts activists to “help the Palestinians pick their olives,” and every year there are confrontations.

Naomi Linder Kahn, director of the international division at the Judea and Samaria monitoring group Regavim, says some foreign-funded groups use the olive harvest to provoke confrontations.

“They don’t give activists buckets for harvesting olives,” she said. “What they give them is video cameras, and they give them lessons in social media and … how to provoke a confrontation, how to present yourself when you’re trying to get into Israel, to misrepresent what you’re coming for and where you’re going to be.”

Brad Lander, the Democratic nominee for a congressional seat in New York, was among a group of around 80 Americans and others detained for some hours by the IDF this week after the group arrived “to harvest olives” alongside Arab farmers without requesting Israeli permission.

“The plot in question requires only a small number of harvesters to collect its produce,” an Israeli military official told JNS. “The security establishment views the arrival of dozens of activists as an act intended solely to provoke, which undermines the harvesting process.”

Lander is Jewish, but he is no friend of Israel. He has accused the country of “genocide” and has called Israel’s occupation of the West Bank “a crime under international law.” These claims are lies designed to demonize and delegitimize the Jewish state in the eyes of the world.

Earlier this week, Lander said he was visiting to help Arab farmers harvest olives “in the face of state-sanctioned settler terrorism” and to “shed a light on the reality of the occupation.” If anyone thinks this group wasn’t there to foment trouble for the Israelis, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

It’s difficult to discover what truly happens in many of these incidents, so an open mind is necessary. There is indeed a problem of Jewish attacks on Arabs that have not been stopped; they are disgraceful, and the Israelis need to shut them down.

But there can be no justification for Western media and politicians failing to acknowledge this Arab terrorist war being waged against Jewish residents in Judea and Samaria. Such radically skewed reporting has turned half a million overwhelmingly upstanding and besieged Jews into enemies of humanity—just as Israel has been treated in its war against Iran.

However, in addition to failing to deal adequately with the problem of delinquent “hilltop youth” or the provocateurs, the Israelis themselves hardly ever mention this Arab onslaught in Judea and Samaria.

There are various possible reasons for this. First, the degree of truth in the “settler violence” claims puts them on the back foot.

Second, they are under huge pressure over this from the Trump administration and don’t want to irritate it further by introducing the inconvenient complexity of Jewish victimization.

Third, among the Israeli top brass, there are some who even now hanker for a “two-state solution” and view the settlers as the obstacle.

Last, but not least, the Israelis want to brush this issue away as of no real consequence. As ever, they dismiss Western public opinion as irredeemably hateful toward the Jewish people and so think myopically that trying to appease it is a waste of time.

They believe that they have more urgent issues to deal with, including the renewed threats from Iran, Gaza and Lebanon. They also fear that a third and even more terrible intifada is being plotted by the Arabs of Judea and Samaria, along with the Palestinian Authority’s force of 60,000 armed men.

If that fearsome threat were to be realized, the combination of Western malice toward the “settlers” and Israel’s negligence in how it presents itself to the world means that once again, the Jews of Israel would be blamed for their own destruction.


Melanie Phillips, a British journalist, broadcaster and author, writes a weekly column for JNS. Currently a columnist for The Times of London, her new book, Fighting the Hate: A Handbook for Jews Under Siege, has just been published by Wicked Son. Her previous book, The Builder’s Stone: How Jews and Christians Built the West and Why Only They Can Save It, was published in 2025. Access her work at: melaniephillips.substack.com.

Source: https://www.jns.org/opinion/column/melanie-phillips/the-war-against-the-jews-in-judea-and-samaria

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Europe's Settlement Boycotts Crush the Palestinians - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

As European governments increase economic pressure on Israel, Palestinians working in businesses in the settlements lose their jobs.

 

  • The governments said their objective [with the boycotts] is to protect the "two-state solution" and respond to -- presumably meaning prevent -- "settlement expansion." To many Palestinians, of course, all of Israel is one big settlement to be dismantled.

  • As European governments increase economic pressure on Israel, Palestinians working in businesses in the settlements lose their jobs.

  • "Instead of building economic bridges between Israelis and Palestinians, some are choosing to tear them down. Industry creates jobs, stability and hope, while the boycott creates exactly the opposite." — Avraham Novogrotcki, president of the Manufacturers Association of Israel, Ynet, October 18, 2026.

  • For many Palestinians, employment in Israel or Israeli businesses in the West Bank is an important source of income in the Palestinian Authority economy, where opportunities are limited.

  • Do the Canadian and European governments imposing restrictions on Israeli settlements intend to offer these Palestinian workers comparable jobs? Have they established programs to help Palestinian businesses absorb thousands of displaced employees? Have they pledged funds to replace the incomes that may disappear as a result of their policies? Not a bit.

  • There is a precedent for what can happen when an Israeli factory employing Palestinians closes due to a boycott... In 2016, Reuters reported that approximately 500 Palestinian workers had lost their jobs after the [SodaStream] factory's relocation. Nabil Basharat, a father of seven, said he had worked for SodaStream for six years and become a department manager. "I used to make $2,000 a month or more and today I have nothing," he said at the time.

  • Terrorist organizations exploit such grievances by portraying economic hardship as further proof that coexistence and cooperation have failed. The result is greater instability, not progress toward peace.

  • The Europeans at the moment have their own problems with hostile minorities. To garner the votes of these "mostly peaceful protesters," many European leaders are apparently content to trample the Palestinians so long as the Jews can be punished for refusing to accept an openly genocidal bloc into their midst, as the Europeans so foolishly have done.

  • If European leaders genuinely want to improve Palestinian lives, they should... ask whether their restrictions will create new Palestinian jobs, expand Palestinian access to markets, strengthen independent businesses, or improve workers' rights. They should also explain what assistance will be available if factories close and employees are dismissed. Palestinians should not have to pay for Europe's anti-Israel campaigns and policies with their livelihoods.

There is a precedent for what can happen when an Israeli factory employing Palestinians closes due to a boycott, when in 2015 SodaStream relocated its factory from the Mishor Adumim industrial zone, and approximately 500 Palestinian workers lost their jobs. Pictured: Jewish and Arab employees work side-by-side at the relocated SodaStream factory in Rahat, Israel, on February 18, 2019. (Photo by Gil Cohen-Magen/AFP via Getty Images)

On September 8, 2026, Canada, Britain, France, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden announced their intention to introduce national restrictions on trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank, support European-level measures, or consider similar action. The governments said their objective is to protect the "two-state solution" and respond to -- presumably meaning prevent -- "settlement expansion." To many Palestinians, of course, all of Israel is one big settlement to be dismantled.

Some restrictions are already in force. Ireland's prohibition on importing designated settlement goods took effect on September 15, followed by a Dutch ban on the import, purchase and sale of such goods on September 20. Other countries have announced plans or are considering additional restrictions.

These are not all components of one uniform import ban. The measures differ from country to country, and some remain proposals. The restrictions, in addition, do not generally prohibit all Israeli products: they target only goods originating in West Bank settlements where Jews live.

Nevertheless, the direction is clear. As European governments increase economic pressure on Israel, Palestinians working in businesses in the settlements lose their jobs.

According to a report by Israel's Ynet news website, Israeli industry representatives have already reported declining overseas orders and the cancellation of long-term distribution contracts. Industrial zones such as Barkan, Mishor Adumim, and Ariel, where Israeli-owned factories employ Palestinians from surrounding West Bank communities, are particularly vulnerable.

Avraham Novogrotcki, president of the Manufacturers Association of Israel, described the boycott of factories in the Israeli settlements as a measure that primarily harms Palestinian workers and their families.

"The boycott of factories in Judea and Samaria is a cynical measure that first and foremost harms Palestinian workers," Novogrotcki said.

"While various organizations present it as a moral step, in practice those paying the price are thousands of workers and their families who are losing a stable and dignified source of income. Instead of building economic bridges between Israelis and Palestinians, some are choosing to tear them down. Industry creates jobs, stability and hope, while the boycott creates exactly the opposite."

European politicians may see these restrictions as a statement of principle. For a Palestinian father who loses his job, however, the consequences will be measured in lost wages, unpaid bills, and difficulty supporting his family.

For many Palestinians, employment in Israel or Israeli businesses in the West Bank is an important source of income in the Palestinian Authority economy, where opportunities are limited.

The International Labor Organization (ILO) has documented the importance of this employment. In a 2017 report, the ILO said average wages earned by Palestinians working in Israel and Israeli West Bank settlements were more than twice those earned in the Palestinian Authority. It also reported that approximately one-quarter of the total wage income of Palestinians in the West Bank came from employment in Israel and Israeli settlements.

Earlier this year, the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics reported that about 48,000 Palestinians from the West Bank were employed in Israel and Israeli settlements in the first quarter of 2025. The number of workers in Israeli settlements reached 17,600 in the first quarter of 2026.

Do the Canadian and European governments imposing restrictions on Israeli settlements intend to offer these Palestinian workers comparable jobs? Have they established programs to help Palestinian businesses absorb thousands of displaced employees? Have they pledged funds to replace the incomes that may disappear as a result of their policies? Not a bit.

Their public announcements have concentrated on restricting trade from settlements. They have not set out a comprehensive replacement-employment plan for the Palestinians who could be affected.

There is a precedent for what can happen when an Israeli factory employing Palestinians closes due to a boycott.

SodaStream became a target of the international Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement because it operated a factory in the Mishor Adumim industrial zone.

In 2015, the company closed that factory and transferred production to a new plant in southern Israel. The relocation, together with subsequent disputes over work permits, resulted in hundreds of Palestinians losing their jobs.

In 2016, Reuters reported that approximately 500 Palestinian workers had lost their jobs after the factory's relocation. Nabil Basharat, a father of seven, said he had worked for SodaStream for six years and become a department manager. "I used to make $2,000 a month or more and today I have nothing," he said at the time.

Some BDS campaigners advocate economic isolation that goes well beyond the Israeli settlements. Their campaigns often present boycotts as an act of solidarity with Palestinians, yet the experience of Palestinian workers employed by targeted companies demonstrates that economic pressure falls on the very people they claim to support.

There is also a broader question about the relationship between employment and coexistence. In factories where Israelis and Palestinians work together, workers have practical reasons to cooperate: completing production, earning salaries, and keeping their businesses operating. These everyday relationships do not resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but neither should they be dismissed as irrelevant.

Removing economic opportunities can deepen frustration and insecurity, and contribute to radicalization and violence. It is irresponsible to ignore the danger of leaving families without income while offering no realistic alternative.

Terrorist organizations exploit such grievances by portraying economic hardship as further proof that coexistence and cooperation have failed. The result is greater instability, not progress toward peace.

A political declaration from EU governments may win applause at home. A boycott campaign may satisfy European activists. Yet neither pays a Palestinian worker's bills or feeds his children.

The Europeans at the moment have their own problems with hostile minorities. To garner the votes of these "mostly peaceful protesters," many European leaders are apparently content to trample the Palestinians so long as the Jews can be punished for refusing to accept an openly genocidal bloc into their midst, as the Europeans so foolishly have done.

If European leaders genuinely want to improve Palestinian lives, they should measure their policies by their practical results. They should ask whether their restrictions will create new Palestinian jobs, expand Palestinian access to markets, strengthen independent businesses, or improve workers' rights. They should also explain what assistance will be available if factories close and employees are dismissed. Palestinians should not have to pay for Europe's anti-Israel campaigns and policies with their livelihoods.


Khaled Abu Toameh
is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22935/settlement-boycotts-crush-palestinians

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Six killed in terrorist attack on Jordanian church - Andrew Bernard

 

by Andrew Bernard

“Attacks on Christians continue to escalate worldwide and must be stopped,” U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz wrote.

 

People gathering at the entrance of Prince Ali Bin al-Hussein hospital in Karak after gunmen opened fire on a funeral at a church in Hmoud, Jordan, on October 23, 2026. Photo by Salah Malkawi/Getty Images.
People gathering at the entrance of Prince Ali Bin al-Hussein hospital in Karak after gunmen opened fire on a funeral at a church in Hmoud, Jordan, on October 23, 2026. Photo by Salah Malkawi/Getty Images.

At least six people were killed and 28 injured on Friday after unidentified gunmen opened fire on a funeral at a Greek Orthodox Church in Hmoud, Jordan, government officials said.

Jordanian King Abdullah II said that those responsible for the terrorist attack near the city of Karak would meet “the harshest penalties.”

“Whoever imagines that the bullets of treachery can divide the ranks of Jordanians will fail in his endeavor before our steadfastness and unity,” Abdullah stated. “The blood of Jordanians is precious, and we will strike with an iron fist against anyone who attacks this country.”

The assailants reportedly remain at large. The BBC published video footage of the attack that appears to show at least three gunmen opening fire on the church.

The Jordanian prime minister declared three days of mourning in response to the attacks and said that flags would fly at half-mast throughout the country.

Christians make up about 2% of the population of Jordan, according to the 2025 edition of the CIA World Factbook.

Mohammad al-Momani, the Jordanian government spokesman, wrote on Friday that Christians are “an authentic and indivisible part of our national fabric” and “partners in Jordan’s history, present and future.”

Terrorist attacks in Jordan are rare. In 2016, ISIS claimed responsibility for an attack on the Crusader fortress in Karak that left 14 people dead, including a Canadian tourist.

Mike Waltz, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, called Friday’s news “devastating.”

“Praying for the victims, their families and all those affected by this depraved and brutal attack on a house of worship,” he wrote. “Attacks on Christians continue to escalate worldwide and must be stopped.” 


Andrew Bernard is the Washington correspondent for JNS.org.

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/world/six-killed-in-terrorist-attack-on-jordanian-church

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Is Hollywood Waking Up to the DSA Nightmare? - Christian Toto

 

by Christian Toto

Better late than never? Or is it already too late?

 

We may learn the answers early on November 4, but for now it appears that a few sane souls in La La Land are waking up to the DSA threat all around us.

The last few years have seen star after star hightail it out of Los Angeles, a city overrun with crime, homelessness, and one-party rule. Think Jonah Hill, Chrissy Metz, Diane Farr, Sylvester Stallone, and others.

Remember, the DSA manifesto is so soft on crime it wants to eliminate prisons. In the City of Angels, the bad guys get a slap on the wrist, if that. And DSA acolyte Nithya Raman is poised to defeat current Mayor Karen Bass in mere weeks.

Other liberal artists who have stuck around bemoan the one-party nightmare, including Entourage creator Doug Ellin. He’s no MAGA acolyte, just a middle-aged man who has seen enough of what happens when a beautiful city gets far-Left leadership.

Ellin even backed upstart candidate Spencer Pratt in the city’s recent mayoral race, citing the area’s shocking “collapse.” That effort failed.

No adult in the party is willing to stand up to their socialist rantings. Instead, they’re welcoming them into their “big tent,” their favorite new phrase. Yet two prominent liberal stars are speaking out against their own DSA-infused party.

TV producer Chuck Lorre may not be a household name, but his sitcoms are part of the American fabric: The Big Bang Theory, Two and a Half Men, Young Sheldon, Mike & Molly, Mom, Dharma & Greg, and so forth.

Lorre recently lashed out at woke overreach in a speech mostly dedicated to savaging President Donald Trump. He warned his fellow Democrats to “run from the suicidal insanity of the far-left woke culture in the coming election.”

That woke culture has been suffocating comedy, as well as Western society, for a decade. Why raise the alarm now? Lorre also cautioned that a society that fails to believe in God is ripe for a tyrannical takeover.

Has the ghost of Rush Limbaugh possessed one of Hollywood’s most loyal progressives?

Another far-Left artist, Larry David, burns plenty of calories smiting President Trump on the small screen—think his anti-MAGA Curb Your Enthusiasm narratives and his recent Life, Larry and the Pursuit of Unhappiness series.

David also satirically suggested Bill Maher had Nazi sympathies for breaking bread with President Trump.

That was then—last year, to be exact. Now, David is penning a column for Air Mail mocking the very DSA movement that’s consuming his beloved party.

“In our Socialist America…everyone will be so fulfilled spiritually and financially that the police department will be dramatically reduced to where an officer’s only job will be to adjudicate domestic disputes … stands will be set up at local farmers markets, where they will work to resolve marital issues in a folksy, farm-to-table manner.”

He also slammed DSA types for their not-so-hidden antisemitism. The Chosen People will now be called The Bagel People, he writes, tongue in cheek, and they’ll be forced to flee Israel for “Pitcairn Island in the South Pacific.”

We’re days away from DSA candidates possibly taking key roles in the U.S. government. This movement isn’t new, and David and Lorre could have said plenty after New Yorkers inexplicably picked Zohran Mamdani as their next mayor.

Their commentary may coax other progressive artists to speak out. Thanks, but no thanks. You’re too late to stop the DSA train, and the time to do so has already passed.  


Christian Toto g journalist and movie critic whose film reviews are heard on radio stations across the country. He co-hosts Denver's Mike Rosen at the Movies radio show on KOA NewsRadio as well as the weekly "Hollyweird" segment on The Michael Brown Show.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/10/23/is-hollywood-waking-up-to-the-dsa-nightmare/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter