Thursday, June 18, 2026

Trump's 'Understanding' with Terrorists: Iran's Regime Remains in Place to Arrest, Torture and Kill - Uzay Bulut

 

by Uzay Bulut

Who is to enforce this fantasy agreement after Trump leaves office?

 

  • On June 17, US President Donald J. Trump signed the "Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding" (MOU) with the Islamic Republic of Iran. According to its text, the US undertakes to develop a plan "with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran," and appears to be a deal to talk about a deal -- one that appears potentially to provide Iran's regime with almost every concession it asked for.

  • No matter where the funds come from, they will still be used to reconstruct Iran's terror state. Who is to enforce this fantasy agreement after Trump leaves office? The US won the war; why is Iran dictating its terms to the US? Worse, Iranian citizens, after being told that "HELP IS ON ITS WAY," will continue to face arrests, abuse, and multi-year prison sentences for "offences" such as incorrect hair covering on a woman, requesting freedom or converting to Christianity.

  • In Iran, leaving Islam is a crime punishable by death. The legal system allows capital punishment for apostasy and blasphemy. While apostasy is not explicitly written as a capital crime in Iran's formal penal code, the judiciary is empowered to use Islamic law (sharia) in situations where statutory law is silent. Those who abandon Islam can face the death penalty or be sentenced to life imprisonment. Individuals can also face the death penalty for insulting Islam's prophet Mohammad, speaking against Islam, or promoting atheism or non-Muslim religions.

  • Christians are among the more than 6,000 Iranians randomly arrested and, in some instances, subjected to enforced disappearances, since the start of the war, according to a recent report by Amnesty International.

  • On January 13, Trump urged protesters in Iran to keep going and promised that "HELP IS ON ITS WAY".

  • Trump's new agreement with this terrorist regime is a massive betrayal. It condemns Iranians indefinitely to abuse, torture and death.

  • A deal that allows the Islamic Republic of Iran, a major source of terrorism and instability in the Middle East and beyond, to stay in power means that women, Christians, human rights lawyers and other innocents will continue to be arrested, tortured, languish in jail, and killed.

  • By signing this MOU, Trump is not only betraying millions of Iranians who trusted the US and sacrificed their lives for freedom, but also, in "snatching defeat from the jaws of victory," damaging both America's reputation and his own.

In Iran, leaving Islam is a crime punishable by death. Individuals can also face the death penalty for insulting Islam's prophet Mohammad, speaking against Islam, or promoting atheism or non-Muslim religions. Christians especially remain highly vulnerable to arrest and persecution in the country, and are, according to Amnesty International, among the more than 6,000 Iranians randomly arrested and, in some instances, subjected to enforced disappearances, since the start of the war. Pictured: The outer walls of Gohardasht Prison in Karaj, Iran. (Image source: Ensie and Matthias/Wikimedia Commons)

On June 17, US President Donald J. Trump signed the "Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding" (MOU) with the Islamic Republic of Iran. According to its text, the US undertakes to develop a plan "with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran," and appears to be a deal to talk about a deal -- one that appears potentially to provide Iran's regime with almost every concession it asked for.

No matter where the funds come from, they will still be used to reconstruct Iran's terror state. Who is to enforce this fantasy agreement after Trump leaves office? The US won the war; why is Iran dictating its terms to the US? Worse, Iranian citizens, after being told that "HELP IS ON ITS WAY," will continue to face arrests, abuse, and multi-year prison sentences for "offences" such as incorrect hair covering on a woman, requesting freedom or converting to Christianity.

Christians especially remain highly vulnerable to arrest and persecution in the country.

Ghazal Marzban, a Christian convert from Islam, was arrested at her home in Tehran in January 2026. Her Bible and other Christian literature were confiscated, and she was recently sentenced to nine years and eight months in prison by the notorious Revolutionary Court Judge Iman Afshari, on charges including "propaganda against the state by chanting slogans" and "gathering and collusion against national security".

Marzban had previously been arrested in November 2024 and spent two months in Evin Prison for protesting against the harassment she had endured since converting to Catholicism seven years earlier.

When she was arrested in January, she was then taken to an unknown location, with no explanation given. Two hours later, she called home to tell her husband that she was detained in a Ministry of Intelligence facility, and subsequently held incommunicado for the next month.

According to the UK-based human rights group Article18, Marzban, an Islamic law graduate, was pressured during interrogation to admit that her Bible and other Christian literature were used for missionary purposes. She denied this, saying they were for personal use only and that, as a Christian, she had the right to possess them.

After her conversion, she was prevented from taking the bar examination and pressured to leave the country. Her husband, a fellow convert, was subsequently unable to access the medication required to manage his Parkinson's disease.

Due to her husband's condition, Article18's executive director, Mansour Borji, said, Marzban's imprisonment was really "a sentence for both of them."

The human rights organization Open Doors reported that Marzban has been on a hunger strike since May 25.

Bahar Sahraian, a reputable lawyer known for defending Christians and other political prisoners in Iran, was arrested on May 16 in the city of Shiraz. Her arrest occurred while she was working on cases at a Revolutionary Court.

She was taken to the prosecutor's office that morning and charged with "assembly and collusion to act against national security", "propaganda activities against the Islamic system", and "publishing falsehoods" -- and then sent to Adel Abad Prison.

In 2022, Sahraian was one of more than 30 lawyers arrested in the wake of the nationwide protests on the death of Mahsa Amini while in custody. At that time, thousands of protesters were awaiting trial but with no legal advice, amid calls for them to be sentenced to death -- a trend that continues today.

Sahraian's clients include Sam Khosravi and Maryam Falahi. Their adopted daughter, Lydia, was ordered by a court to be removed from their care because they had converted to Christianity and Lydia was considered to have been born a Muslim. In a separate case, Sara Ahmadi and Homayoun Zhaveh were sentenced to a combined 10 years in prison. Homayoun, in his 60s, suffers from advanced Parkinson's disease.

In Khosravi and Falahi's case, Sahraian managed to obtain two fatwas from Grand Ayatollahs – the most senior Shia Islamic authority in Iran – declaring that, owing to the "critical nature" of the case, poor health of the child and undisputed emotional attachment with her parents, Lydia's adoption by Christian converts was "permissible."

She was also one of 120 lawyers to sign an open letter to the head of the judiciary at the time, Ebrahim Raisi. The letter asked him to overturn the decision, and he denied the request.

Another lawyer who defended Christians, Shima Ghosheh, was arrested in January this year. In March, he was released on a bail equivalent to nearly $40,000 dollars.

He has represented Christians including the Iranian-Assyrian Bet-Tamraz family and converts facing charges of "apostasy", which in the past has brought death sentences.

In Iran, leaving Islam is a crime punishable by death. The legal system allows capital punishment for apostasy and blasphemy. While apostasy is not explicitly written as a capital crime in Iran's formal penal code, the judiciary is empowered to use Islamic law (sharia) in situations where statutory law is silent. Those who abandon Islam can face the death penalty or be sentenced to life imprisonment. Individuals can also face the death penalty for insulting Islam's prophet Mohammad, speaking against Islam, or promoting atheism or non-Muslim religions.

In many instances, those who leave Islam and embrace the Christian faith lose their jobs, sources of income, educational framework, and even their freedom.

Fatemeh Mary Mohammadi, a Christian convert who works as a human rights defender and journalist, was recently arrested and her whereabouts are unknown.

Mohammadi has been arrested many times on trumped-up charges related to her protesting against Iran's regime. In 2021, she was arrested again allegedly for wearing an "improper" hijab. For the next year after her release, she was denied employment.

On January 18, 2026, she was arrested again by Iran's "morality police," who said her trousers were too tight, her headscarf not correctly adjusted, and that she should not be wearing an unbuttoned coat.

Mohammadi had already spent six months in prison for membership in a house-church. Those who attend are regularly labelled by the Iranian regime as "enemy groups" who belong to a "Zionist" cult. She was also given a suspended prison sentence for participating in a peaceful protest.

She said that despite good relations with her employer, she has been unable to return to her work as a gymnastics instructor since her release from prison in 2020.

It was "very clear," Mohammadi said, that her employer had been pressured by intelligence agents to prevent her return to work. The employer said that they could not afford to take any risks because they had a young child.

She had been cautioned about an improper hijab once before – after having initially gone to the police to complain of an assault. In December 2019, she was expelled from her university on the eve of her exams.

In October 2020, Mohammadi remarked that being denied an education was "like a life imprisonment or exile that has been issued in absentia".

"Everything is affected. Your work, income, social status, identity, mental health, satisfaction with yourself, your life, your place in society, your independence.

"And as a woman it's even harder to remain patient and endure, in a society so opposed to women and femininity, though crying out for them both."

Earlier this year, while travelling, Mohammadi suddenly disappeared. Her family had been in regular contact with her before all communication ceased at the end of February. Amnesty International reported that she had been detained in Ahvaz but then moved to an unknown location on April 2.

Amnesty warned that she and the other detainees are "at grave risk, amid reports of torture and other ill-treatment in detention and deaths in custody in suspicious circumstances".

Open Doors reports:

"Sadly, such an incident is not rare in Iran, nor is the authorities' refusal to offer more information. Voices of justice for Christians and other minorities are often targeted for exposing government injustices in Iran, and Mary Mohammadi is prominent amongst dissidents supporting Christians. In 2023, she was presented with the St Stephen's Award for persecuted Christians at a ceremony in Bonn for her 'outstanding courage' and 'extraordinary selflessness'."

Christians are among the more than 6,000 Iranians randomly arrested and, in some instances, subjected to enforced disappearances, since the start of the war, according to a recent report by Amnesty International.

"Authorities have arbitrarily arrested, threatened and/or summoned hundreds of protesters; human rights defenders; lawyers; journalists and other media workers; civil society activists; labour rights' activists; students; teachers; justice-seeking families of protesters and bystanders unlawfully killed or arbitrarily executed; ethnic minorities, including Ahwazi Arabs, Baluchis, and Kurds; and religious minorities, including Baha'is and Christians...

"Amnesty International has documented torture and other ill-treatment against detainees since 28 February 2026, including mock executions through simulated hangings and putting a gun in the mouth, beatings, suspension from hands and feet, prolonged solitary confinement, and denial of food and medical care," the report states. "Authorities have also used forced 'confessions' as a propaganda tool, broadcasting videos on state media prior to judicial proceedings."

The report cites mass arrests in at least 20 provinces across the country. This includes Yazd, where in May a prosecutor claimed to have arrested three leaders of "a Christian evangelistic network".

According to Amnesty's Erika Guevara Rosas:

"The international community must not allow the Iranian authorities to use the conflict as a smokescreen to deepen their machinery of repression and carry out crimes under international law with impunity. Iran's human rights and impunity crisis requires urgent and sustained diplomatic international action to prevent further atrocity crimes by the authorities, as well as establishing pathways for international justice including through the UN Security Council's referral of Iran's situation to the International Criminal Court."

As many as 30,000 people were killed in the streets of Iran on January 8 and 9 alone, two senior officials of the country's Ministry of Health told TIME. So many people were slaughtered by Iranian security services on that Thursday and Friday that the state's capacity to dispose of the dead was overwhelmed.

On January 13, Trump urged protesters in Iran to keep going and promised that "HELP IS ON ITS WAY".

Trump's new agreement with this terrorist regime is a massive betrayal. It condemns Iranians indefinitely to abuse, torture and death.

A deal that allows the Islamic Republic of Iran, a major source of terrorism and instability in the Middle East and beyond, to stay in power means that women, Christians, human rights lawyers and other innocents will continue to be arrested, tortured, languish in jail, and killed.

By signing this MOU, Trump is not only betraying millions of Iranians who trusted the US and sacrificed their lives for freedom, but also, in "snatching defeat from the jaws of victory," damaging both America's reputation and his own.


Uzay Bulut, a Turkish journalist, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22630/iran-regime-remains-to-arrest-torture-kill

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran and Its Proxies Have Been Burning Down the Middle East - Robert Williams

 

by Robert Williams

When Will the World Stop Pretending That the Problem Is Israel?

 

  • World leaders like Macron play a game of pretend, according to which the situation in the Middle East is an issue between Israel and the Palestinians; if only that is resolved through the establishment of a new Palestinian (terrorist) state, "peace" will descend upon the region. Nothing could be further from the truth -- a truth of which world leaders are well aware, but choose to ignore. They appear to be hoping that Israel's neighbors will finish off Israel for them so they can enjoy "plausible deniability." Meanwhile, they continue to fund organizations dedicated to delegitimizing and undermining Israel.

  • World leaders have not been demanding that Iran stop its proxy war, and the terms of the new Iran deal have yet to be determined.

  • Lately, Trump has been demanding that Israel refrain from protecting itself from attacks by Hezbollah in Lebanon on the excuse that no one was killed, while, when Iran shot down a US helicopter, even though no one was killed, the US retaliated quite strongly.

  • Israel cannot allow its hands to be tied while Hezbollah continues its attacks. It is crucial to decouple Lebanon from any agreement between the US and Iran. It is clearly a separate issue.

  • Trump deserves infinite thanks for being the only world leader to take on Iran in the first place, but if he thinks the story is over with General Ahmad Vahidi and the rest of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps still in charge there, a rude shock is on its way. Trump promised the Iranian people that "Help is on the way." It is deeply hoped that he will keep this promise. His legacy must be that of a job well done, not of a job half-done.

  • The north of Israel, and potentially the rest of this country, smaller than New Jersey (22,000 sq. km), is deliberately being made into a hell, ignored by the international community. This situation is being caused by an undeterred Hezbollah. Israel -- like any other country -- has to be able to do whatever it must to protect itself.

Israel cannot allow its hands to be tied while Hezbollah continues its attacks. It is crucial to decouple Lebanon from any agreement between the US and Iran. It is clearly a separate issue. Pictured: A house in Moreshet, Israel, which took a direct hit from a rocket fired by Hezbollah from Lebanon, on September 22, 2024. (Photo by Amir Levy/Getty Images)

For the past two years, a steady stream of world leaders has flocked to Israel to cajole and pressure the only democracy in the Middle East into stopping its self-defense against Iran's proxies in Gaza -- Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad -- who carried out the October 7 massacres and have launched more than 10,000 rockets into Israel, attempting to perpetrate mass slaughter. Let us hope that with US President Donald J. Trump's new "Iran deal," this abuse will stop. It is to be hoped that liberating Lebanon from Hezbollah will still be possible.

In June 2024, French President Emmanuel Macron came to Jerusalem, where he told Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he must end the war in Gaza. "The ordeal of the Palestinians in Gaza must end," Macron said. As most world leaders at that point, he did not even demand that Hamas release Israeli hostages as a precondition for a ceasefire.

World leaders like Macron play a game of pretend, according to which the situation in the Middle East is an issue between Israel and the Palestinians; if only that is resolved through the establishment of a new Palestinian (terrorist) state, "peace" will descend upon the region. Nothing could be further from the truth -- a truth of which world leaders are well aware, but choose to ignore. They appear to be hoping that Israel's neighbors will finish off Israel for them so they can enjoy "plausible deniability." Meanwhile, they continue to fund organizations dedicated to delegitimizing and undermining Israel.

The war in Gaza and the Middle East, broadly speaking, is a war on Israel launched by the Islamic Republic of Iran and fought by its web of proxies throughout the region: Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza and Israel, Shiite militias in Syria and Iraq, the Houthis in Yemen and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Iran launched its own direct war on Israel by launching an attack with more than 300 ballistic missiles and drones in April 2024.

World leaders have not been demanding that Iran stop its proxy war, and the terms of the new Iran deal have yet to be determined. Nobody is knocking on Iran's door, seeking to persuade its leadership to keep Hamas, Hezbollah or any of its other proxies in check. The same Macron who ordered Israel to lay down its weapons in Gaza has been curiously silent when it came to asking Iran the same thing. The same can be said about virtually every other leader, the UN, the EU, NGOs and the media, which suspiciously all keep drumming the same tune, namely that the main problem is Israel's self-defense against massacres and constant rocket and drone attacks.

The Biden administration, notably, did virtually nothing else after October 7, 2023 but put pressure on Israel to limit its military operations to raids and aerial bombings, while wholly discouraging Israel from eliminating the threat from Hezbollah on Israel's northern border.

Lately, Trump has been demanding that Israel refrain from protecting itself from attacks by Hezbollah in Lebanon on the excuse that no one was killed, while, when Iran shot down a US helicopter, even though no one was killed, the US retaliated quite strongly.

Israel cannot allow its hands to be tied while Hezbollah continues its attacks. It is crucial to decouple Lebanon from any agreement between the US and Iran. It is clearly a separate issue.

Trump deserves infinite thanks for being the only world leader to take on Iran in the first place, but if he thinks the story is over with General Ahmad Vahidi and the rest of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps still in charge there, a rude shock is on its way. Trump promised the Iranian people that "Help is on the way." It is deeply hoped that he will keep this promise. His legacy must be that of a job well done, not of a job half-done.

The results of the world's leniency when it comes to letting Iran's proxies run rampant have had severe consequences, including in Israel's north, where Hezbollah has been attacking since October 8, 2023 – a fact that appears to be ignored by most international policy makers and pundits. For over a year after Hezbollah began its attacks, around 100,000 residents of northern Israel were internal refugees in Israel, displaced and facing an uncertain future due to Hezbollah's cross-border missile and drone launches.

The fact that in November 2023 around 253,000 Israelis had been evacuated from their homes in Israel due to Iran's proxy attacks, has not been mentioned in mainstream reporting on the war. Hezbollah has since 2023 launched thousands of missiles and exploding drones into Israel, killing and wounding many people and causing large wildfires that have consumed thousands of acres.

While the world has been gripped by mass hysteria regarding the plight of Gazans -- a concern for victims of war that is curiously absent when it comes to other wars on the planet -- the north of Israel, and potentially the rest of this country, smaller than New Jersey (22,000 sq. km), is deliberately being made into a hell, ignored by the international community. This situation is being caused by an undeterred Hezbollah. Israel -- like any other country -- has to be able to do whatever it must to protect itself.


Robert Williams is based in the United States.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22594/iran-proxies-burning-down-middle-east

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran War Misconceptions - Victor Davis Hanson

 

by Victor Davis Hanson

The Iran war is already reshaping alliances and narratives, while fueling a deeper argument over U.S. power, limits, and long-term strategy.

 

 

The shooting portion of the Iran “War” lasted about 40 days—far shorter than Barack Obama’s 2011 congressionally unauthorized seven-month bombing campaign against Libya.

Bill Clinton’s unauthorized 78 days of bombing Serbia in 1999 hit bridges, schools, hospitals, monuments, and power plants—far more indiscriminate targeting than anything in the Iran War so far.

No one yet knows the ultimate verdict on the war, given all the economic, military, political, and strategic variables still in play. A memorandum of understanding released this week might end the war, or result in further American strikes—depending on the degree of Iranian concessions and compliance.

But in this confusing, ongoing drama, many fabrications and distortions still circulate.

The Strait of Hormuz was open before the war and is now closed, so the war was a failure.

The Strait was open because an appeased Iran had no reason to close it—given that no nation on earth dared to end its nuclear dreams of dominating the Middle East, funding anti-Western terrorists, and threatening Europe and the U.S.

So the rub was always disarming Iran and then dealing with its inevitable desperate strategy of closing the Strait.

Trump’s agreement will simply be a copy of Obama’s earlier Iran deal.

Obama dealt from a position of abject weakness. Iran assumed correctly that Obama would offer endless concessions and cash, while never considering force.

Does Obama really believe that Iran in 2015 was stronger than it is now after 40 days of intense American, Israeli, and Gulf state bombing?

Trump is dealing with a bankrupt Iran, a neutered military, a restive Iranian street, a wounded regime, and the specter that the U.S. can do whatever it wishes militarily to a shattered Iran for the foreseeable future.

The U.S. is bereft of allies and strategically isolated in the war.

During the war, the unthinkable occurred when Israel de facto became an ally of the Arab Gulf monarchies. Other than a few rogue nations and Arab terrorist clients—the weakened Hezbollah, the crushed Hamas, and the wary Houthis—Iran has zero friends.

Neither China nor Russia offered Iran much in the way of aid, other than satellite imagery and some smuggled supplies. Both lost their once-prominent positions among clients in the Middle East who deeply resented their siding with Persian Shiite theocrats over Arab oil suppliers and arms buyers.

Israel has more combat aircraft than the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. The Gulf monarchies do so as well. Both Israel and the Gulf states have been flying bombing missions against Iran. There is a far greater chance of Arab-Israeli rapprochement after the war than before it.

The war has torn apart the Republican Party, ensured a Democratic landslide in the midterms, and endangered a Republican victory in 2028.

Antisemitism, neo-isolationism, and conspiracy theories were already the mark of the apostate right. But almost all of the new MAGA critics have lost the trust of Republicans and increasingly are either mirror-imaging the Left in Never Trump fashion or drifting off into Nick Fuentes nihilism.

Trump may lose House and/or Senate seats in the midterms—as happened in 38 of the last 41 midterms since the Civil War.

Yet there are still well over four months before the elections. If Trump keeps the Strait open—ither by force, negotiations, or through a mixture of both—oil prices will likely drop before November, given increased production worldwide.

If Iran is rendered militarily incapable of posing a major threat to the region and the world and is forced to accept American terms, then Republicans may enter November quite competitively.

The Iran War was a betrayal of MAGA’s commitment to no “forever wars.”

The second Iran intervention, following up on the initial June 2025 bombing, was certainly an optional and preemptive action. In that sense, it was akin to Trump’s first-term Soleimani and Baghdadi hits, the destruction of ISIS, and the response to the Wagner Group attack.

Yet there still are no ground troops in Iran. The loss of 13 soldiers, while tragic, is less than the two-week fatal-accident rate of the military.

There is a good chance that less than six weeks of active bombing achieved far more than 20 years in Afghanistan and a decade in Iraq—at a fraction of the human and fiscal costs.

The key to negotiating an end to the war is to always remember that Iran’s regime—its theocrats, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, military leaders, and elected officials—has no history of telling the truth or abiding by any agreement it signs.

So the only means of enforcing concessions is to use disproportionate force each time Iran inevitably violates the terms of the armistice.

 Photo: An woman walks past a billboard displaying Iran’s national flag at Enghelab Square in Tehran on June 14, 2026. US President Donald Trump said that a deal with Iran to end the Middle East war could be signed on June 14, and that the strategic Strait of Hormuz would be "open to all" immediately after. But Iran's Fars news agency, citing "a well-informed source close to the Iranian negotiating team", reported that Tehran had "not yet taken or announced its final decision" on a deal. (Photo by AFP) /


Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness and the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He is an American military historian, columnist, a former classics professor, and scholar of ancient warfare. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004, and is the 2023 Giles O'Malley Distinguished Visiting Professor at the School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush, and the Bradley Prize in 2008. Hanson is also a farmer (growing almonds on a family farm in Selma, California) and a critic of social trends related to farming and agrarianism. He is the author of the just released New York Times best seller, The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation, published by Basic Books on May 7, 2024, as well as the recent  The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won, The Case for Trump, and The Dying Citizen.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/06/18/iran-war-misconceptions/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF official: Troops to stay in Lebanon as talks continue - Yoni Kempinski

 

by Yoni Kempinski

An IDF official said troops will remain in the Security Zone in southern Lebanon to eliminate threats as negotiations with Lebanon continue.

 

IDF soldiers in Lebanon
IDF soldiers in Lebanon                                                                                    IDF Spokesperson

The IDF on Thursday published an official map portraying the Security Zone in which IDF troops are operating in southern Lebanon.

According to the military, due to operational requirements, IDF forces are deployed in the Security Zone, approximately 10 kilometers inside Lebanese territory.

The published map shows that the IDF has not recently withdrawn from any territory in southern Lebanon.

The military stated that IDF soldiers remain stationed in the designated area of operation and will continue to remove threats and strengthen the defense of Israel’s northern residents.

An IDF official said the military will continue to maintain its presence in the Security Zone due to operational requirements, in order to remove threats to its soldiers and establish effective defense for Israel’s northern communities. The official added that the IDF will continue to act against threats to IDF soldiers and Israeli civilians that are identified beyond the Security Zone.

The official noted that further steps are still being discussed as part of direct negotiations between Israel and Lebanon, and that the representatives are expected to reconvene next week.

The security zone in Lebanon
The security zone in LebanonIDF Spokesperson

According to the official, the Naval Security Zone is a continuation of the land-based Security Zone and extends seaward on a bearing of 280 degrees, in accordance with operational requirements.

The IDF emphasized that operational activity is ongoing and warned that approaching the Security Zone is dangerous.

The military also called on the Lebanese Armed Forces to operate in coordination with the IDF and urged Lebanese civilians to avoid entering the area. 


Yoni Kempinski

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428828

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Antisemites, Iran shills, and isolationists celebrate Iran deal: 'Jews lose' - Yitz Goldberg

 

by Yitz Goldberg

Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, Trita Parsi, and Hasan Piker among those to praise the Trump-Iran memorandum, portraying it as a victory for Iran and a setback for Israel. 

While it appears to favor Iran heavily, not everyone is looking at the memorandum of understanding between the Islamic Republic and Israel.

Nick Fuentes, a media personality known for espousing antisemitic views and the leader of the "Groyper" movement, reacted to the deal in a post on X, reading: "IRAN WON, ISRAEL LOST. TOTAL GOYIM VICTORY 🫵😂"

In his show later in the evening, Fuentes cheerfully congratulated Iran. "You fought hard, you left it all on the field, and you won. G-d bless the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran won, Israel lost; so delicious!"

He also taunted pro-Israel right-wing activist Laura Loomer after she commented on his post that "Groypers are Islamists," "Jews are losers, Israel is losers, Zionists are losers. You lose, Iran won. Thank you, Supreme Leader. On behalf of all Goyim of the world, on behalf of all Gentiles, Americans, Christians, thank you, Supreme Leader and Iran, you did it. I love to see it".

Trump is done with Bibi     

Tucker Carlson also celebrated the deal. In Wednesday's episode of his show, the anti-Israel right-wing commentator showed a clip from President Trump's press conference earlier in the day in which the President says he sent a copy of the MOU to Israel and criticizes actions in Lebanon. Carlson gleefully reacted: "You sent them a copy? You BCCed them? You didn't consult Israel? They're a participant; they are our 'partner' in this war. This is a joint war we are waging with the government of Israel, somehow... We just reached an outline of a peace agreement with a country with which we are fighting with Israel, without consulting Israel."

He scoffed: "We sent them a copy. 'B‎‎*‎‎*‎‎*!' That's exactly what that means. 'Shh, adults are talking.' That's exactly what Trump is saying to Israel."

He also mocked Israel after Trump said that it should leave the fight against Hezbollah to the Syrian President and former Al Qaeda member, Ahmed al-Sharaa. "He's a good guy, let him handle it, he'll do it in a more measured way... he's just more humane than Benjamin Netanyahu... If you're looking for humane treatment of civilians, you gotta go to the Al Qaeda go, not the Israeli Prime Minister."

Trita Parsi, founder and executive vice president of the isolationist Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft and co-founder of the pro-regime National Iranian American Council, congratulated the deal, writing that he found himself "in support of Trump," arguing that questioning whether "the war was worth it" missed the point because "of course it wasn't." He contended that the conflict had failed to strengthen Washington's negotiating position and instead praised the decision to end the fighting rather than prolong it in pursuit of better terms.

Parsi, who, according to the Free Press, is under investigation over allegations that he acted as an Iranian agent, also commended the agreement as a rejection of what he described as the logic behind "endless wars," arguing that insisting a failed conflict continue until it yields more favorable negotiating terms would only increase the costs "in lives, treasure, regional stability, and strategic credibility." "This is how endless wars are born," he wrote, presenting the memorandum of understanding as the preferable alternative to extending the war.

Far-left-wing streamer Hasan Piker celebrated the MOU in a post reading: "Iran won. not yesterday. It won when it closed the Strait of Hormuz after we attacked. something they refused to do through decades of US sanctions and Israeli and American meddling. They were willing to do diplomacy the entire time. People should stop demanding more war."

 

Yitz Goldberg

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428817

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump's Iran 'Deal' Has Already Emboldened Hamas - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

To Hamas and the rest of Iran's "Axis of Resistance," the prospect of a "deal" between Washington and Tehran -- is being viewed as a sign of America's weakness and a victory for the Iranian regime -- and proof that the US is eager to end conflicts at virtually any price.

 

  • Hamas, the Iranian-backed group responsible for the October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel, is openly calling to escalate attacks against Israel and signaling its intention to shift the center of its jihad (holy war) from the Gaza Strip to the West Bank.

  • To Hamas and the rest of Iran's "Axis of Resistance," the prospect of a "deal" between Washington and Tehran is not being interpreted as a sign of American strength. It is being viewed as a sign of America's weakness and a victory for the Iranian regime -- which the US defeated -- and proof that the US is eager to end conflicts at virtually any price.

  • The world had been expecting to hear the US announce that unless Iran accepted all of America's terms unconditionally, the ceasefire was over. Instead, the US has agreed in principle to Iran's terms. America has deliberately chosen to lose a war -- again.

  • Unlike the Gaza Strip, the mountainous terrain of the West Bank is high ground. It overlooks the low broad plain along the Mediterranean coast that is home to Israel's most densely populated areas. Major Israeli cities, Ben-Gurion International Airport, and critical infrastructure are within easy range of terrorists operating from the hills: one can comfortably look down over all of central Israel.

  • Unlike in the Gaza Strip, there are hundreds of thousands of Israelis who live in the West Bank -- easy targets for the terrorists.

  • The reported MOU... does not address Iran's terrorist proxies: Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and various Shiite militias across the Middle East. This is not a minor detail. It is fundamental -- seen by these groups as a green light to step up their terrorism ever since Trump tried to stop Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from dismantling them.

  • The terrorists see the "daylight" that Iran's regime maneuvered Trump into creating between the US and Israel as a most welcome gift.

  • To Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran, public friction between Washington and Jerusalem signals that at last, the US may be distancing itself from its closest ally in the Middle East.

  • International agreements and diplomatic arrangements do not persuade terrorist organizations in the Middle East to abandon their jihadist ideology or their objective of destroying Israel.

  • Trump promised a new reality for the Gaza Strip – a "Riviera of the Middle East." More than six months after his much-publicized "Board of Peace" initiative and ceasefire plan, however, Hamas remains in power there, more brutal than ever. It still controls large parts of the territory, continues to recruit and train terrorists, retains substantial military capabilities, and openly rejects disarmament.

  • So long as this Iranian regime and its proxies remain intact, there will be no genuine peace or stability in the Middle East.

Hamas, the Iranian-backed group responsible for the October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel, is openly calling to escalate attacks against Israel and signaling its intention to shift the center of its jihad (holy war) from the Gaza Strip to the West Bank. Pictured: Hamas and Islamic Jihad members in the city of Jenin, on August 6, 2024. (Photo by Khadija Toufik/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

A first reaction to US President Donald J. Trump's "Memorandum of Understanding" (MOU) has already come from Tehran's terrorist proxy, Hamas. The Iranian-backed group responsible for the October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel is openly calling to escalate attacks against Israel and signaling its intention to shift the center of its jihad (holy war) from the Gaza Strip to the West Bank.

The timing is not a coincidence.

To Hamas and the rest of Iran's "Axis of Resistance," the prospect of a "deal" between Washington and Tehran is not being interpreted as a sign of American strength. It is being viewed as a sign of America's weakness and a victory for the Iranian regime -- which the US defeated -- and proof that the US is eager to end conflicts at virtually any price.

The world had been expecting to hear the US announce that unless Iran accepted all of America's terms unconditionally, the ceasefire was over. Instead, the US has agreed in principle to Iran's terms. America has deliberately chosen to lose a war -- again.

Hamas officials and spokesmen have therefore been intensifying their calls for Palestinians to increase what they call "all forms of resistance," and confront Israelis throughout the West Bank. Hamas also praised recent shooting and car-ramming attacks against Israelis, and have been describing the perpetrators as "heroic resistance fighters."

After a shooting attack near the Israeli town of Kochav Yair, Hamas military spokesman Abu Obeida hailed the operation and called on Palestinians in Jerusalem, the West Bank, and inside Israel to intensify attacks and join what Hamas calls the battle of "Al-Aqsa Flood" -- the name Hamas uses for the October 7 massacre.

Likewise, after another shooting attack near the West Bank city of Hebron, Hamas praised what it called the "pure hands that fight the occupier" and urged Palestinians to carry out more attacks.

Hamas-affiliated organizations have begun publishing detailed statistics highlighting terror-related activities in the West Bank and Jerusalem. According to figures released by Palestinian media outlets affiliated with Hamas, 243 acts of "resistance" were recorded during May alone, including shootings, car-ramming attacks, armed clashes, demonstrations, and confrontations with Israeli security forces. Other reports proudly documented dozens of incidents over just a few days.

The message is clear: Hamas wants Palestinians to believe that the next phase of the war against Israel, with the help of the Iranian regime, should be fought soon and from within.

This should deeply concern not only Israel but also the US.

Unlike the Gaza Strip, the mountainous terrain of the West Bank is high ground. It overlooks the low broad plain along the Mediterranean coast that is home to Israel's most densely populated areas. Major Israeli cities, Ben-Gurion International Airport, and critical infrastructure are within easy range of terrorists operating from the hills: one can comfortably look down over all of central Israel.

Unlike in the Gaza Strip, there are hundreds of thousands of Israelis who live in the West Bank -- easy targets for the terrorists.

October 7 demonstrated what happens when a terrorist army is allowed to establish itself along a border. Hamas now appears more determined than ever to create similar conditions to Gaza in the West Bank.

All this appears to have been inspired by the Trump Administration's preparations to implement a deal with a regime in Iran that funds, arms, trains, and directs Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorists. With the many billions of dollars Iran expects to receive just in the early stages of this agreement, the opportunity to escalate its "resistance" must look too tempting to pass up.

One of the most astonishing aspects of the reported MOU is that it does not address Iran's terrorist proxies: Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and various Shiite militias across the Middle East. This is not a minor detail. It is fundamental -- seen by these groups as a green light to step up their terrorism ever since Trump tried to stop Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from dismantling them.

The terrorists see the "daylight" that Iran's regime maneuvered Trump into creating between the US and Israel as a most welcome gift.

To Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran, public friction between Washington and Jerusalem signals that at last, the US may be distancing itself from its closest ally in the Middle East.

Such perceptions greatly encourage radicals, undermine American and Israeli deterrence, and strengthen the belief among jihadist groups that time is on their side and no one will stop them.

Iran's regional strategy does not rely solely on its nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Its greatest weapon is its network of proxies, which Tehran uses to continue waging war while claiming plausible deniability.

Ignoring Iran's proxies while negotiating with their terror-master is tantamount to treating the symptoms while ignoring the disease.

Hamas, of course, is not the only jihadist group drawing conclusions from Washington's current approach. Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen are watching developments closely.

While Hamas feels emboldened today, Hezbollah and the Houthis are sure to escalate their own attacks tomorrow.

The Iranian regime and its proxies are experts at waiting – what the West calls "strategic patience." Unlike many Western policymakers who seek immediate solutions and quick diplomatic victories, Iran's regime and its allies think in terms of decades. They have no problem signing agreements, waiting for political circumstances to change, then resuming their campaigns against their enemies.

Israel reached several ceasefire agreements with Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Hamas repeatedly violated them.

Israel reached understandings with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hezbollah violated them.

The US reached ceasefires with Iran. Iran violated them.

International agreements and diplomatic arrangements do not persuade terrorist organizations in the Middle East to abandon their jihadist ideology or their objective of destroying Israel.

Does anyone seriously believe that Iran and its proxies will behave differently now? Or that Iran will use the $300 billion it is promised in the MOU – or the other many billions from unfrozen assets or its neighbors -- to build shelters for abused women?

Trump promised a new reality for the Gaza Strip – a "Riviera of the Middle East." More than six months after his much-publicized "Board of Peace" initiative and ceasefire plan, however, Hamas remains in power there, more brutal than ever. It still controls large parts of the territory, continues to recruit and train terrorists, retains substantial military capabilities, and openly rejects disarmament.

If the US has so far been unable to compel Hamas to lay down its weapons, how can it guarantee that the Iranian regime will fully honor any new agreement?

So long as this Iranian regime and its proxies remain intact, there will be no genuine peace or stability in the Middle East.

Far from making the region safer, a deal that ignores Iran's proxy armies will only embolden them.

Hamas's latest calls for more attacks against Israel are just an early warning of what will likely come next.

Those celebrating an agreement with Iran, instead of dictating terms as a victor, should pay close attention to what Hamas is saying. Iran and the terrorists -- thanks to what appears to be Trump's capitulations -- clearly believe they are winning. That alone should set off alarm bells in Washington.

 

Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22629/iran-deal-emboldened-hamas

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Democratic socialist on verge of becoming DC mayor puts city on collision course with Trump - Steven Richards

 

by Steven Richards

The democratic socialist candidate Janeese Lewis George appears poised to sail to victory as D.C.’s new mayor later this year. She said that the people of the city wanted a mayor who would “stand up to Trump.”

 

A democratic socialist candidate in the mold of New York’s Zohran Mamdani is poised to win the Washington, D.C., mayoral election, setting the city on a collision course with the Trump administration’s plans to remake the nation’s capital city. 

After results began pouring in after the election on Tuesday night, the democratic socialist candidate Janeese Lewis George appeared poised to clinch the Democratic nomination, and thus secure the mayor’s seat in a general election with no opposition. D.C. is employing ranked-choice voting for the first time this year, and therefore the results are still not final as votes from the lagging candidates are reallocated. At the time of this writing, Lewis George leads her main opponent, Kenyan McDuffie, by about 53% to 37%. 

Under President Donald Trump, Washington has become ground zero for his administration’s efforts to boost immigration enforcement, reduce urban crime, and beautify federal buildings and parks. 

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who announced last year that she would not seek reelection, has been remarkably cooperative with the administration, especially when the federal government offered resources to bolster the city’s Metropolitan Police Department.

Progressives vs. centrists

Bowser’s departure after a more than two-decade tenure as mayor set up a battle that pit business-friendly centrists against progressive Democrats, creating uncertainty in the White House about what kind of leadership it will contend with when the dust settles.

Lewis George has been a vocal critic of Bowser’s more centrist leadership of the city, especially her approach toward Trump’s crime-fighting and immigration enforcement efforts in Washington. With her likely victory, she could very quickly move to make federal operations in the city very difficult for the Trump administration. 

President Donald Trump said last week that a Lewis George election victory would be bad for the city and warned that it may prompt him to take a more direct role in running the nation's capital. 

"I wouldn't like it," Trump said of a potential Lewis George victory. "And maybe we take back Washington, run it on the federal basis. We won't put up with it. We're not going to lose our businesses.” 

Back when Lewis George’s campaign for mayor was only speculation, Axios reported the D.C. council member’s closest advisers were prepping a campaign to mirror the successful effort by Mamdani in New York, who challenged the city’s Democratic Party establishment and shifted the city’s politics far to the left. Other “democratic socialist” candidates have also found success across the country in recent years, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan. 

Lewis George is undoubtedly one of them. She openly describes herself as a democratic socialist and has championed many policies shared with Mamdani from her seat on Washington, D.C.’s council. She has supported social housing, stripping “military equipment” from the police, and minimum wage increases. 

“Housing is too essential to leave solely to the private market,” Lewis George said in 2022, years before Mamdani launched his mayoral campaign. She introduced a bill that year called the “Green New Deal for Housing” that would authorize the D.C. government to buy properties and convert them into social housing. 

Public reversal of promise to defund police

Now, Lewis George contends that she will not defund the police, but earning the backing of the Democratic Socialists of America during her original D.C. council run meant vowing to defund the police, and she had a vocal history of promising to do just that, Just the News has extensively documented

Lewis George was first elected in 2020, at the height of the George Floyd and Black Lives Matter protests. During the campaign, Lewis George said that she believed in stripping funds and taking away military-style equipment from D.C.’s police department.

In her council campaign, she called for reducing police presence in schools and said she would reject endorsements from unions that represent police officers. Lewis George also said that she supported eliminating cash bail and spoke at the June 2020 “Fund Care, Not Cops!” rally sponsored by the DSA. 

Since launching her campaign for mayor last year, Lewis George has sought to downplay her past pledges to defund the police, Just the News reported last week. Lewis George’s current mayoral campaign platform makes no mention of her prior repeated pledges to Defund the Police, but instead claims she will support the police.

Trump has made a crackdown on crime in Washington, D.C., a centerpiece of his second-term effort to remake the nation’s capital city. Last August, the president announced a temporary federal takeover of the Washington Metropolitan Police Department and deployed National Guard troops to assist. He described the effort as “a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam, and squalor, and worse.” 

Though federal control of the police department eventually ended, National Guard troops still remain deployed in the capital. D.C.’s former Police Chief Pamela Smith last year praised the federal assistance that the Trump administration provided her department, helping make up for the chronic manpower shortage affecting the city’s police force. 

Mayor Bowser originally opposed Trump’s decision to assume emergency control of the Metropolitan Police Department this summer, but changed her mind after crime rates began to decline. By September, she had thanked the president for the extra resources.

President Trump also deployed Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in the capital city to make arrests during the takeover. The federal agency quickly ramped up the number of arrests and cooperated closely with both the Metropolitan Police Department and the U.S. Park Police. 

Unlike Bowser, who took a more practical position, Lewis George expressed firm opposition to President Trump’s federal takeover of the city’s police department and the ongoing National Guard deployment. If elected mayor, President Trump could face a city government more opposed to his plans for the capital. 

A mayor who would “stand up to Trump” 

Lewis George has strongly criticized the city’s cooperation with federal agents and the Trump administration takeover, making it likely she would strive to limit any collaboration if elected next year. 

"I have been horrified and outraged by the conduct perpetrated by federal law enforcement officers, including ICE agents, targeting our most vulnerable neighbors – especially unhoused and undocumented residents who are simply trying to live their lives,” Lewis George wrote in August

After President Trump threatened to again take over Washington, D.C., Lewis George responded by saying that the people of the city wanted a mayor who would “stand up to Trump.” 

“We are not going to get ICE off our streets or protect Home Rule by fearing this President,” Lewis George said in a post to X. “Threatening DC because you do not like how our residents vote is an attack on democracy itself.” 


Steven Richards

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/democratic-socialist-verge-becoming-dc-mayor-puts-city-collision-course

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

PA Supreme Court rules in favor of victims' families, AG must have oversight when DA overturns cases - Kevin Killough

 

by Kevin Killough

The ruling was a victory for the family members of a man murdered in 2004. Lavar Brown was found guilty of the murder of Michael Richardson in 2004, and he was found guilty of the murder of Robert Crawford in 2005.

 

A ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday will give oversight to the state's Office of Attorney General when Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner seeks to overturn cases. 

The ruling was a victory for the family members of a man murdered in 2004. Lavar Brown was found guilty of the murder of Michael Richardson in 2004, and he was found guilty of the murder of Robert Crawford in 2005. 

Brown sought relief under Pennsylvania's Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA). While his first attempt was denied, Krasner's office granted Brown a new trial on his second attempt. 

The family members of the victims asked the state Supreme Court to intervene and review Krasner's order. Tuesday's ruling reverses that order, WPVI reported

"The Court held that the DAO's concession was not reliable, as it had failed to disclose material evidence, submitted a false stipulation, misrepresented facts, and opposed a required evidentiary hearing," Pennsylvania Attorney General Dave Sunday said in a statement. 

The court also ruled that the attorney general's office will have oversight when the Philadelphia district attorney's office tries to overturn a conviction, saying that the office had made "unreliable concessions unsupported by the facts and law."  


Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/pa-supreme-court-rules-favor-victims-families-ag-must-have-oversight-when-da

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

‘Challenge in court': Two top senators urge Trump DOJ to prosecute Fauci despite Biden pardon - Katherine Pugh and Amanda Head

 

by Katherine Pugh and Amanda Head

Paul noted that Fauci's spin operation was not only necessary for political purposes, but for survival, because in Fauci's capacity as a health official, he funded research to humanize the virus and re-adapted it to make it more contagious to humans.

 

Two top U.S. senators are urging the Trump Justice Department to challenge the legality of President Joe Biden's pardon of Dr. Anthony Fauci and to pursue criminal charges against the nation's former top doc during the COVID-19 pandemic.

"I think we should challenge the pardon, because it's an extraordinary pardon. It's a pardon not for a specific crime, and it's a pardon over a 10 year period. It's the same that he got the same thing Hunter Biden got," Sen. Rand Paul told the Just the News, No Noise television show on Tuesday.

"I think that could be challenged in court, because it's not specific, it's vague, and it doesn't specify the crime, and it's such a large period of time. So, I think it could be challenged, and should be challenged," he said.

Paul, a longtime Fauci critic who accused the doctor of misleading Congress, added that the recent indictment of two Fauci deputies could give the DOJ leverage to secure their cooperation and testimony against their former boss.
 

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., echoed Paul's concerns on Wednesday, telling Just the News  that he's "pretty certain" what Fauci funded in terms of research caused the COVID pandemic.

"Anthony Fauci is a bad person, and he ought to be prosecuted, because I believe he did commit crimes," Johnson said.

How she has long denied wrongdoing and dismissed such criticisms in the past.

But Biden nonetheless infamously pardoned Fauci in 2024 by autopen before leaving office. Paul compared the pardon to Hunter Biden’s.

Referencing the autopen action, Paul added, "Was President Biden of sound mind? Did he understand who he was pardoning? Did he participate in it? Did he approve of each of the ones that were signed by autopen?"

Paul described some of the most alarming elements of a detailed timeline his committee released last week, and accused Fauci of launching a public relations campaign to deflect scrutiny from his agency’s funding of risky virus research in China as the COVID-19 pandemic emerged in early 2020.

Paul detailed a timeline of Fauci’s actions speaking exclusively to Just The News, citing emails and documents his office obtained. Paul highlighted from the timeline that Fauci was awake at 3 a.m. in late January 2020, emailing Dr. Robert Kadlec, who oversaw dangerous research, falsely asserting the virus originated in animals with “nothing to do with the lab.” Fauci also called on old friends within the intelligence community, according to Paul, to mislead them about what was really going on at the Wuhan, China laboratory.

“He (Fauci) already knows he’s going to have to defend this because he outsourced this dangerous research to China. There weren’t adequate safety controls, and now he's got to start the spin,” Paul said. Paul noted that Fauci's spin operation was not only necessary for political purposes, but for survival, because in Fauci's capacity as a health official, he funded research to humanize the virus and re-adapted it to make it more contagious to humans.

Within a week, according to Paul, on Feb. 1, 2020, a group of top virologists privately told Fauci the virus appeared engineered, citing its furin cleavage site. The furin cleavage site is a short, specific amino acid sequence that acts as a recognition signal for the host enzyme furin to cut and activate the protein. 

Days later, several of those same scientists published a prominent paper declaring it was “not a laboratory construct,” language Paul called “adamant language you rarely see in a scientific article, political type of language, PR type of language."

One author later received an $8 million grant approved by Fauci, Paul said. Fauci then cited the paper in White House briefings as independent evidence against a lab leak, despite having helped commission and edit it.

“It’s a big circle, but it’s all around Anthony Fauci,” Paul said.

Two of Fauci's underlings indicted

Encouraging developments, Paul said, include federal indictments of two Fauci lieutenants: David Morens, accused of destroying records and acting as Fauci’s intermediary, and Vincent Munster, a virologist, charged in connection with importing dangerous pathogens into the country without a permit, claiming they were "diagnostic equipment". 

Both were involved in research grants that proposed creating viruses with features similar to SARS-CoV-2.

Paul added that Morens and Munster might be willing to flip on the government's former top pandemic doctor and testify if offered leniency on their terms.

“My goodness, it would be worth it to see one or two of his lieutenants give up testimony that they would not have given up otherwise, but now that they've been indicted, might be inclined to tell the truth," Paul said. 

Amanda Head is White House Correspondent for Just The News. You can find her here

Katherine Pugh is a reporter for Just the News. Follow her on X for more coverage. 


Katherine Pugh and Amanda Head

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/sen-rand-paul-fauci-pardon-it-should-be-challenged-court

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Censored pro-life activists improbably win over Canadian court amid global wrongthink arrests - Greg Piper

 

by Greg Piper

"Very difficult if not impossible" to show that ban on aborted fetus signs at Canada's capitol is "reasonable and proportionate," judge says. Anti-gender ideology activist says he'll sue Spanish police for arrest, illegal recording ban.

 

Canada isn't known as even a lukewarm defender of free speech, using sweeping emergency powers to crack down on nonviolent Freedom Convoy protests against COVID-19 restrictions and investigating a nurse for praising gender-critical Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling, before suspending her license for saying men are men.

The former government of Justin Trudeau, now better known as pop singer Katy Perry's boyfriend, set aside $200 million on a new speech-policing office. Just last month, U.S. House committee leaders warned his successor, Prime Minister Mark Carney, against legislation that would mandate surveillance backdoors on American-made tech without judicial oversight.

Yet one of the Great North's courts just rebuked its version of the U.S. Capitol Police for censoring pro-life activists who sought to "convey the reality of abortion in Canada," finding the ban violated Canada's version of the Bill of Rights and dismissing the relevance of whether the gruesome abortion images were misleading, as the government argued.

The Ontario Superior Court's ruling stands in contrast to Madrid police arresting the Canadian anti-gender transition activist Chris Elston for engaging passers-by – Spain is a haven within Europe for medicalized transition for teens, without parental consent – and a U.S. appeals court immunizing Louisiana police for censoring a "Christian vegetarian" leafleteer.

"Billboard Chris," known for his globe-trotting street conversations while wearing sandwich boards and support from the U.S. State Department, said Monday he'll take legal action against Madrid police for allegedly violating local laws in his arrest. He was in Spain to receive an award from a pro-family group.

Lawyers for Richard Hershey petitioned the Supreme Court last week to review a ruling that granted qualified immunity to Bossier City, Louisiana, police officers who violated "clearly established First Amendment law" by threatening to arrest Hershey for handing out religious leaflets on the sidewalk, while ignoring a "commercial leafleteer" nearby.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals uniquely and "inexplicably" limits a SCOTUS precedent against qualified immunity for "obvious" constitutional violations to the Eighth Amendment, leaving censorship victims no recourse in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, the petition says.

The pro-life activism protected by the Ontario Superior Court is still routinely prohibited by U.S. municipalities through so-called buffer zones around abortion clinics, under a 26-year-old "zombie precedent" that SCOTUS has abandoned but not disavowed.

 

'A bit of a leap' to say signs are promoting 'hate'

The "graphic, bloody and disturbing" images of aborted fetuses, as Ontario Superior Court Justice Calum MacLeod described them, were set to be displayed by the Campaign Life Coalition at a press conference the day before the 2023 National March for Life in Ottawa and at the march itself, which starts and ends at Parliament Hill.

Sponsored by the Roman Catholic Church and other Catholic organizations, CLC has organized the annual event "for decades," MacLeod said. (While gruesome images also tend to appear at the annual March for Life in Washington, D.C., organizers don't use them.)

Parliamentary Protective Service officers told organizers the signs "were too graphic" under the General Rules for the Use of Parliament Hill, devised by a committee composed of Senate and House of Commons members and representatives from PPS, Royal Canadian Mounted Police and other public bodies.

The rules prohibit signs that are "obscene," "promote hatred or violence," or "display explicit graphic violence or blood," the latter taking effect the day of the presser, long after CLC got the march permit. CLC agreed not to display them at all, then sued.

While taking no position on abortion, PPS "led expert evidence and spent much time in argument in relation to the accuracy and truthfulness" of the signs, calling them "misleading, exaggerated and [used] out of context, misrepresenting the reality of abortions conducted in Canada and of doctoring images for maximum impact," the ruling said.

MacLeod dismissed "the scientific or medical accuracy of what the pictures display" as "not germane" to the legal issue of whether the restrictions are "reasonable" in this context. "A point of view need not be truthful or accurate to be protected speech" under Supreme Court of Canada precedent striking down a law against "spreading false news."

"Conceivably" the justice could consider whether the images are "deep fake[s]" if the rules were narrowly tailored, but they are in reality "a blanket ban," MacLeod said.

While PPS didn't bother invoking the brand-new, unpublished "graphic violence" provision, and MacLeod concluded it couldn't have enforced that rule on the organizers, it's "problematic" that PPS claimed the signs violated the obscene and hate provisions, he said.

They aren't criminally obscene, and letting an officer divine noncriminal obscenity is "both vague and arbitrary," according to MacLeod. "It is a bit of a leap" as well to say that the message linked from the sign's QR code, which "describes abortion as murder and those involved in abortion as murderers," promotes hate or violence "by that reason alone."

The prohibition violated CLC's Charter rights, the justice concluded. 

"Some might say" that exposure to such unpleasant protest images is "one of the risks, perhaps a feature, of a visit to Parliament Hill," he said, calling it "very difficult if not impossible" to show the censorship was a "reasonable and proportionate infringement of freedom of expression."

MacLeod rejected CLC's request to strike down the rules and the new graphic violence provision, however, because the rules committee isn't a party and CLC didn't ask its permission to display the graphic signs. He dismissed the idea that "there is some mythical status to Parliament Hill where no limits should apply."

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, which is funding CLC's representation, said lawyers are "considering next steps in light of the issues left unresolved."

As 'egregiously wrong' as judge-made federal abortion rights

Elston, the anti-gender ideology activist, said he'll upload video of his encounter with Madrid police after blurring out their faces, as Spanish law requires, which is "proving to be very difficult." Because police "kept illegally turning my [video] recording off," he must download the "uninterrupted audio and do some editing to give the complete picture."

He announced his arrest Sunday morning from the back of a police car, from a second phone officers hadn't yet seized, claiming he had been talking to people in the public square for just five minutes. About three hours later, Elston said he left the police station with lawyers from the group who gave him the award and that they were headed back to the square.

Elston posted the hand-written ticket police gave him, which he noted had no fine on it. "Their excuse is that I had a tripod," set up on a pole, with "50 yards of open space on either side of me, AND I OFFERED TO JUST HOLD IT IN MY HANDS."

Critics closely scrutinized the ticket. Spanish-language Mystery World News said he was "told he couldn't set up the tripod to record," "refused to identify himself" and went to the station "for identification purposes, not detained."

The SCOTUS petition by Christian vegetarian activist Hershey, submitted by First Liberty Institute, asked the high court to resolve whether its Hope precedent, a prisoner-restraint case, is limited to cruel-and-unusual-punishment claims or also covers free speech and free exercise claims so Hershey can overcome qualified immunity.

He called the 5th Circuit ruling "egregiously wrong," the language used by SCOTUS in Dobbs to overturn federal abortion rights and in an unsuccessful petition to get SCOTUS to repeal its Hill precedent upholding eight-foot abortion buffer zones.

"The right to evangelize in public, free of viewpoint-based government suppression, is as clearly established as any right in the firmament," the petition says. "No government official should need an on-point circuit precedent to illustrate what the Constitution itself and this Court’s cases make clear beyond cavil."

It emphasizes the deciding vote, Judge James Ho, voted to uphold qualified immunity "reluctantly" because of the 5th Circuit's "mistaken" precedent, as Ho called it, despite admitting the officers' actions “should have been amply sufficient" to defeat immunity.

Only the high court can confirm Hope "safeguards all our fundamental rights, not an anomalous Eighth Amendment rule that makes it easier for prisoners to sue than law-abiding, peaceful religious leafleteers," Hershey said.


Greg Piper

Source: https://justthenews.com/index%2Ephp/nation/free-speech/censored-pro-life-activists-improbably-win-over-canadian-court-amid-global

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter