Thursday, February 19, 2026

US thwarted near-catastrophic prison break of 6,000 ISIS fighters in Syria - Efrat Lachter

 

by Efrat Lachter

CENTCOM helicopters and diplomatic efforts moved detainees to facility near Baghdad as Syrian chaos threatened jailbreak


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE: This was the kind of prison break officials say could have changed the region, and perhaps even the world, overnight.

Nearly 6,000 ISIS detainees, described by a senior U.S. intelligence official as "the worst of the worst," were being held in northern Syria as clashes and instability threatened the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, the guards responsible for keeping the militants locked away and preventing a feared ISIS resurgence. U.S. officials believed that if the prisons collapsed in the chaos, the consequences would have been immediate.

"If these 6,000 or so got out and returned to the battlefield, that would basically be the instant reconstitution of ISIS," the senior intelligence official told Fox News Digital.

In an exclusive interview, the official walked Fox News Digital step by step through the behind-the-scenes operation that moved thousands of ISIS detainees out of Syria and into Iraqi custody, describing a multi-agency scramble that unfolded over weeks, with intelligence warnings, rapid diplomacy and a swift military lift.

US MILITARY LAUNCHES AIRSTRIKES AGAINST ISIS TARGETS IN SYRIA, OFFICIALS SAY

Syria detention camp

ISIS wives and children remain in "fragile" Syrian detention camps under Damascus control while male fighters transfer to Iraq, leaving detention crisis unresolved. (Santiago Montag/Anadolu via Getty Image)

The risk, the official explained, had been building for months. In late October, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard began to assess that Syria’s transition could tip into disorder and create the conditions for a catastrophic jailbreak.

The ODNI sent representatives to Syria and Iraq at that time to begin early discussions with both the SDF and the Iraqi government about how to remove what the official repeatedly described as the most dangerous detainees before events overtook them.

Those fears sharpened in early January as fighting erupted in Aleppo and began spreading eastward. Time was running out to prevent catastrophe. "We saw this severe crisis situation," the official said.

U.S. ANNOUNCES MORE MILITARY ACTIONS AGAINST ISIS: 'WE WILL NOT RELENT'

ISIS militant, Syria, U.S. military

A fighter of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) holds an ISIL flag and a weapon on a street in the city of Mosul, June 23, 2014. (Reuters Photo)

According to the source, the ODNI oversaw daily coordination calls across agencies as the situation escalated. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was "managing the day to day" on policy considerations, while the ODNI drove a working group that kept CENTCOM, diplomats and intelligence officials aligned on the urgent question: how to keep nearly 6,000 ISIS fighters from slipping into the fog of war.

The Iraqi government, the official said, understood the stakes. Baghdad had its own reasons to move quickly, fearing that if thousands of detainees escaped, they would spill across the border and revive a threat Iraq still remembers in visceral terms.

The official described Iraq’s motivation bluntly: leaders recognized that a massive breakout could force Iraq back into a "2014 ISIS is on our border situation once more."

The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, the official said, played a pivotal role in smoothing the diplomatic runway for what would become a major logistical undertaking.

Then came the physical lift. The official credited CENTCOM’s surge of resources to make the plan real on the ground, saying that "moving in helicopters" and other assets enabled detainees to be removed in a compressed timeframe.

"Thanks to the efforts… moving in helicopters, moving in more resources, and then just logistically making this happen, we were able to get these nearly 6,000 out in the course of just a few weeks," the official said.

ISIS FIGHTERS STILL AT LARGE AFTER SYRIAN PRISON BREAK, CONTRIBUTING TO VOLATILE SECURITY SITUATION

A wide encampment of tents shelters displaced families in a remote area.

A view of Hol Camp, where families linked to the Islamic State group are being held, in Hasakah province, Syria, Jan. 21, 2026. (Izz Aldien Alqasem/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The SDF, had been securing the prisons, but its attention was strained by fighting elsewhere, fueling U.S. fears that a single breach could spiral into a mass escape. Ultimately, detainees were transported into Iraq, where they are now held at a facility near Baghdad International Airport under Iraqi authority.

The next phase, the official said, is focused on identification and accountability. FBI teams are in Iraq enrolling detainees biometrically, while U.S. and Iraqi officials examine what intelligence can be declassified and used in prosecutions.

"What they were asking us for, basically, is giving them as much intelligence and information that we have on these individuals," the official said. "So right now, the priority is on biometrically identifying these individuals."

The State Department is also pushing countries of origin to take responsibility for their citizens held among the detainees.

State Department is doing outreach right now and encouraging all these different countries to come and pick up their fighters, Fox News has learned.

While the transfer focused strictly on ISIS fighters, the senior intelligence official said families held in camps such as al-Hol were not part of the operation, leaving a major unresolved security and humanitarian challenge.

ISIS EXPLOITING SYRIA’S CHAOS AS US STRIKES EXPOSE GROWING THREAT

Syrian Democratic Forces fighters pose for a photo with the American flag after a victory ceremony announcing the defeat of ISIL on March 23, 2019, in Baghouz, Syria.

Syrian Democratic Forces fighters pose for a photo with the American flag after a victory ceremony announcing the defeat of ISIL on March 23, 2019, in Baghouz, Syria. (Chris McGrath/Getty Images)

The camps themselves were under separate arrangements, the official said, and responsibility shifted as control on the ground evolved. 

According to the official, the Syrian Democratic Forces and the Syrian government reached an understanding that Damascus would take over the al-Hol camp, which holds thousands of ISIS-affiliated women and children.

"As you can see from social media, the al-Hol camp is pretty much being emptied out," the official said, adding that it "appears the Syrian government has decided to let them go free," a scenario the official described as deeply troubling for regional security. "That is very concerning."

The fate of the families has long been viewed by counterterrorism officials as one of the most complicated, unresolved elements of the ISIS detention system. Many of the children have grown up in camps after ISIS lost territorial control, and some are now approaching fighting age, raising fears about future radicalization and recruitment.


Iraqi security forces pose with ISIS flag which they pulled from University of Anbar on July 26, 2015. Forces clashed with ISIS militants inside the compound.

Iraqi security forces pose with ISIS flag, which they pulled from University of Anbar on July 26, 2015. Forces clashed with ISIS militants inside the compound. (Reuters)

For now, the official said, intelligence agencies are closely tracking developments after a rapid operation that, in their view, prevented thousands of experienced ISIS militants from reentering the battlefield at once and potentially reigniting the group’s fighting force. 

"This is a rare good news story coming out of Syria," the official concluded.

 

Efrat Lachter

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-thwarted-near-catastrophic-prison-break-6000-isis-fighters-syria

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Al-Qaeda still under 'patronage' of Taliban as UN team warns of 'multipolar' global jihad threat - Jerry Dunleavy

 

by Jerry Dunleavy 

 

Al Qaeda remains resilient — and is still under the decades-long protection of the Taliban — as the United Nations warns about the continued strength of jihadist terrorist groups. 

 

Al-Qaeda continues to enjoy the “patronage” of the Taliban despite the theocratic group's claims that there are no terrorist groups in Afghanistan, a specialized United Nations team assessed, with the new UN report warning about a “multipolar” threat posed by jihadist groups worldwide.

The UN ​​Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team released a new February report on Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State, and other jihadist groups. The UN sanctions monitoring team said that “the Afghan de facto authorities” — the Taliban — “claimed that there were no terrorist groups within its borders,” but the UN experts stressed that “no Member State supported this view.”

Al-Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people on U.S. soil, as well as a host of other murderous attacks worldwide.

Safe haven for terrorists

The Taliban gave al-Qaeda safe haven in Afghanistan before 9/11 and continued to protect al-Qaeda and fight alongside it for two decades after the U.S. invasion. The Taliban, the Taliban’s Haqqani Network, and al-Qaeda remain deeply intertwined in Afghanistan.

“Regional countries remained concerned about the number of terrorist groups in Afghanistan and its spillover effects, including cross-border attacks and the radicalization of vulnerable domestic communities,” the U.N. team said in its new report.

The Taliban conducted a lightning-fast takeover of Afghanistan in 2021 and swept into the Afghan capital of Kabul in mid-August of that year. President Biden's haphazard, chaotic and deadly evacuation operation was conducted through Hamid Karzai International Airport while the U.S. military naively relied upon the hostile Taliban – including the Haqqani Network – to provide security outside the airport.

Watchdog reports have shown the U.S. government continued to send billions to Afghanistan after the Taliban takeover, with the Taliban skimming millions in taxes. Just the News recently reported on how Congress is moving toward banning all U.S. funding for the Taliban.

The U.N. team also warned in its new report that the threat from Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State (abbreviated as ISIL in the U.N. report) is “multipolar and increasingly complex” and that “it intensified in multiple theaters, notably in West Africa and the Sahel, and in South Asia.” The report also warned that “there were growing concerns about the exploitation of commercial satellite communications by terrorist groups and their increasing proficiency in using artificial intelligence.”

Al-Qaeda acts as a “service provider” for other Afghan terrorist groups

The U.N. team said that “Al-Qaeda's status and strength remained unchanged from that reported in the previous report of the Monitoring Team” — meaning the terrorist group remained under the radar but resilient — “and its appetite for external operations undiminished.”

“Al-Qaeda continued to enjoy the patronage of the de facto authorities,” the U.N. team said. “It acted as a service provider and multiplier for other terrorist groups in Afghanistan in terms of training and advice, principally to” the Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan — dubbed the TTP or Pakistani Taliban.

The report also said that Al-Qaeda’s “focus was on ‘spectacular’ attacks aimed at attracting notoriety and global media coverage, rather than the lower sophistication attacks favored by” the Islamic State and its ISIS-K branch in Afghanistan.

The Taliban “continues to host and support the group,” the UN team also said of al-Qaeda late last year, and “senior al-Qaeda commanders are reported to be living in Kabul.”

The U.N. experts said in the new report that Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) — the terrorist group’s main node in South Asia — “remained active in south-eastern Afghanistan, where the Haqqani Network exerts considerable influence.” The report said that AQIS Emir Osama Mahmoud and AQIS deputy Yahya Ghauri “were reported to be in Kabul” while the media cell of AQIS was based in the Afghan city of Herat.

“There were concerns that AQIS was increasingly focused on external operations,” the UN team said. “Such operations would likely be unclaimed or deniable operations, perhaps as part of the umbrella group Ittihad-ul-Mujahideen Pakistan (which declared itself in April) so as not to create difficulties for the Taliban as hosts of AQIS.”

Sayf al-Adel is believed by the FBI to be the current de-facto head of al-Qaeda, and the UN team previously assessed his “strategy to reorganize Al-Qaeda’s presence in Afghanistan and reactivate sleeper cells in Iraq, Libya, the Syrian Arab Republic, and Europe to be indicative of the group’s longer-term intent to carry out external operations.”

He is currently believed to be based in Iran, and the UN monitoring team assessed in 2024 that “several Member States noted individuals travelling to provide liaison between” al-Adel in Iran “and senior al-Qaeda figures in Afghanistan.”

Sayf al-Adel called upon terrorists and al-Qaeda members in the summer of 2024 to travel to the safe haven of Afghanistan to have their terror skills honed by the Taliban: “The loyal people of the Ummah [worldwide Islamic community] interested in change must go to Afghanistan, learn from its conditions, and benefit from their [the Taliban’s] experience.”

The U.N. monitoring team said in a prior report that at least three key leaders in the Taliban’s ruling government were “affiliated” or “associated” with al-Qaeda, stating that two Taliban provincial governors were “affiliated” with al-Qaeda while the Taliban’s deputy director of intelligence was also “associated” with al-Qaeda.

The U.N. team had also previously assessed that “Al-Qaeda members have received appointments and advisory roles in the Taliban security and administrative structures” because of the Taliban, and that “interlocutors confirmed that the Taliban provided al-Qaeda with monthly ‘welfare payments,’ with portions of those payments filtered down to fighters of al-Qaeda affiliated groups.”

Taliban interior minister Sirajuddin Haqqani is also closely linked to al-Qaeda. The U.N. report also said that Sirajuddin’s ministry “continued its distribution of Afghan passports and tazkiras (national identity cards) to al-Qaeda members with advisory roles in main Afghan cities.”

Just the News previously reported on how the Trump administration has lifted bounties on a number of key Haqqani Taliban leaders. Sirajuddin remains on the FBI’s “Most Wanted” List.

Pakistani Taliban given “permissive environment” by Afghan Taliban

The Taliban also “continued to provide a permissive environment for a range of terrorist groups, notably Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan,” according to the new UN report, which said that “the presence of terrorist groups in Afghanistan remained a source of concern.” 

The report said that the Taliban “continued to act against” ISIS-K and to “control the external activities of some other groups,” but that the Pakistani Taliban — “was accorded greater liberty and support from the de facto authorities, and consequently TTP attacks against Pakistan increased, amplifying regional tensions.”

The U.N. team said that “there was an increase in attacks in Pakistan launched by TTP in Afghanistan, which led to military exchanges” and that “regional relations remained fragile.”

“TTP operates as one of the largest terrorist groups in Afghanistan and its attacks on Pakistani security forces and State structures led to military confrontation,” the UN team assessed. “Attacks were increasingly complex and, at times, involved large numbers of fighters.”

The U.N. report also said that “some Member States expressed concern that TTP may deepen its cooperation with Al-Qaeda-aligned groups in order to attack a wider range of targets, potentially resulting in an extraregional threat.”

A report from the UN team also stated late last year that the TTP “has conducted numerous high-profile attacks in Pakistan from Afghan soil” and that “continued Taliban harboring of TTP leadership in Afghanistan and its ongoing facilitation of TTP operations have brought relations to a critical point.”

ISIS-K remains a threat in Afghanistan despite “significant pressure”

The UN team also warned that ISIS-K remained resilient in Afghanistan and elsewhere in the region.

“ISIL-K was under significant pressure, mostly from security operations of regional States and military actions by the Taliban,” the UN report found. “While there were fewer attacks, it retained significant operational and combat capability and the ability to rapidly replace fighters, including through online recruitment. The pressure campaign pushed ISIL-K to search for alliances with other armed factions in different areas in Afghanistan.”

The UN team argued that “ISIL-K was active mainly in northern Afghanistan, particularly Badakhshan, and areas close to the Pakistani border. It continued to develop its network of cells to project a threat regionally and beyond.”

The report said that “aggressive propaganda by ISIL-K in Central Asian languages expanded its target audience” and that “it sought to exploit issues such as the Gaza and Israel conflict to promote recruitment and financing,” and that late last year that the Taliban has "suppressed – although not eliminated – the threat from” ISIS-K, noting that ISIS-K “continues to pose serious threats within Afghanistan, regionally and beyond.”

The analytic team added that some member states believe that ISIS-K “maintains opportunistic links to TTP, as well as to disillusioned elements within the Taliban” and that the level of ISIS-K “infiltration” into the Taliban structure is “considered to be extensive.”

The jihad makes gains in Africa, Middle East, cyberspace, and elsewhere

The U.N. team also examined the broader jihadist picture across the globe. The report found that “the leadership of Al-Qaeda remained cohesive, though isolated” and that “dissatisfaction among the rank-and-file with the de facto leadership of Sayf al-Adl continued.” Yet the U.N. said that “nevertheless, Al-Qaeda retained the ambition to carry out 'spectacular' external attacks.”

“Partly as a result of the Al-Qaeda senior leadership’s isolation, Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula – under its leader, Saad ben Atef al-Awlaki – appeared to be increasingly asserting its ideological and operational leadership of the global Al-Qaeda network,” the U.N. team found. “The external threat AQAP posed was assessed to be increasing, though it remained opportunistic. It was bolstered by support from Al-Shabaab and facilitated, to a lesser extent, by opportunistic collaboration with the Houthis.”

The report said that Jama’a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin — al-Qaeda’s branch in Mali — “continued to expand the territory under its control and instituted a fuel blockade” around Mali’s capital of Bamako. The U.N. said that the al-Qaeda affiliate “carried out its first attack in Nigeria” and that “its coffers were said to have been swollen by proceeds from kidnapping for ransom, including reports of a single ransom payment of around $50 million.”

The U.N.report also said that “elements from Al-Qaeda-aligned Hurras al-Din were active” in Syria and “their allegiance to the global agenda of Al-Qaeda remained undiminished.” The U.N. report said that the Islamic State’s “focus on parts of Africa continued to increase.” The team said that ISIS activities in Somalia “were constrained by sustained counter-terrorism pressure” but that “nevertheless, it remained resilient.”

The report said that ISIS-K also “continued to seek to undermine the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic.” 

“ISIL cells remained active across the Syrian Arab Republic. Attacks targeted security forces, particularly in the north-east,” the U.N. team found. “ISIL attempted to provoke sectarian tensions in order to undermine the Government. The President of the Syrian Arab Republic, Ahmad Al-Sharaa, was also a priority target.”

The U.N. report also warned about jihadist groups seeking to expand their abilities in cyberspace.

“Both ISIL and Al-Qaeda continued their efforts to build cybercapabilities, including by appealing to cyberexperts to join their ranks,” the report found. “In August, Cyber Jihad Movement, an established hacker group, pledged its allegiance to Sayf al-Adl, thereby potentially increasing Al-Qaeda cybercapabilities.”

The U.N. added: “There was a discernible increase in the effective use of new technology. Terrorist groups exploited commercial satellite communication systems, which enabled cheap, fast and relatively secure communication in remote areas. They also demonstrated greater proficiency in the use of artificial intelligence, primarily in propaganda; they were increasingly adept at seamlessly integrating artificial intelligence tools and visual effects into their efforts to radicalize and recruit.”

“The Taliban use detainees as leverage in negotiations”

Ambassador Tammy Bruce, the U.S. Deputy Representative to the U.N., spoke in New York City last week about “the vital role of the Monitoring Team and the role that it plays in promoting peace and stability in Afghanistan.” Bruce highlighted that the U.N. Security Council “also strongly condemned hostage taking, which the Taliban continue to use as an insurgent tactic of hostage diplomacy” and noted that “the Taliban use detainees as leverage in negotiations, against the United States and other countries.”

The U.S. diplomat said that “in exchange for the Americans currently detained, the Taliban have openly sought the release of an al-Qaida operative detained in Guantánamo Bay, while paradoxically promising to uphold their counterterrorism commitments.”

The Taliban continues to hold multiple Americans hostage in Afghanistan. CBS News reported last month that “Monday marks one year since Dennis Coyle, a 64-year-old academic from Colorado, was taken by force from his Kabul apartment by the Taliban” and that “his abduction came just six days after another American, Ryan Corbett, was released at the start of President Trump's second term.”

The New York Times further reported last month that “the Taliban say they have only two” U.S. hostages — “identified by U.S. officials” as Coyle “and Polynesis Jackson, a former U.S. Army soldier whose reasons for being in the country remain murky.”

The news outlet also reported that Taliban officials “say they do not know the whereabouts of a third U.S. citizen, Mahmood Habibi, who the FBI says was arrested in Afghanistan in 2022 shortly after the CIA killed Ayman al-Zawahri, Al Qaeda’s leader, in Kabul.” The Times said the men who seized Habibi “said they were from the Taliban’s intelligence services.”

“The Taliban must end all forms of hostage-taking and wrongful detentions,” Bruce said last week. “The U.N. 1988 sanctions regime and its Monitoring Team remain critical tools for the international community to hold the Taliban accountable, including for these deplorable tactics.”

Abbey Gate bombing co-conspirator slated for trial

An ISIS-K bomber named Abdul Rahman al-Logari — who had been freed by the Taliban from a prison at Bagram Air Base in mid-August 2021 only weeks after the U.S. abandoned the base — has been identified as having carried out a partially successful suicide attack at Abbey Gate. That murder spree killed 13 U.S. service members and an estimated 170 Afghan civilians while wounding dozens of other U.S. troops and scores of Afghans in the crowd, on August 26, 2021.

President Donald Trump announced in March last year that the U.S. had extradited one of the ISIS-K terrorists responsible for the Abbey Gate attack at the Karzai airport. Mohammad Sharifullah, captured with the help of Pakistani intelligence, was extradited to the U.S. last month. The FBI said that Sharifullah confessed to being involved in “route reconnaissance” in the lead-up to the attack.

The U.N. monitoring team said in 2020 that some countries noted that most ISIS-K attacks include “involvement, facilitation, or the provision of technical assistance” by the Haqqani Network, and that ISIS-K “lacked the capability to launch complex attacks in Kabul on its own” without Haqqani help. The team also said it had “viewed communication intercepts in the wake of attacks that were claimed by ISIS-K that were traceable to known members of the Haqqani Network.”

The team also said that “some countries “have reported tactical or commander-level collaboration between ISIL-K and the Haqqani Network.” According to Arab News, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said that “we strongly reject this propaganda” and that “we have nothing in common (and don’t operate cells) with Daesh [ISIS-K].”

Sanaullah Ghafari, the head of ISIS-K, still has a $10 million U.S. bounty on his head. West Point’s Counterterrorism Center published an article in 2022 stating that Ghafari had joined “Taliban factions affiliated with the Haqqani network” and “had close links to the Haqqani network’s senior commanders.”

The U.N. monitoring team said in 2021 that one nation said that Ghafari was “previously a mid-level commander in the Haqqani Network” and that he continued to maintain cooperation with the Haqqanis. One U.N. member state said in June 2021 that ISIS-K leader Ghafari’s ongoing relationship with the Haqqanis provided ISIS-K with “key expertise and access to [attack] networks.” 

Gen. Austin Scott Miller, the commander of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan through July 2021, told Congress in 2024 that “I could never verify a Haqqani-ISIS nexus.” 

Major General Buck Elton and Captain Joshua Fruth assessed in late 2021 that “the Taliban may have leveraged ISIS–K as a proxy strawman layer of separation to oversee and/or facilitate the attack on U.S. service members and Afghan civilians” at the airport.

The trial for Sharifullah, the alleged co-conspirator in the Abbey Gate attack, is scheduled for April.


Jerry Dunleavy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/security/al-qaeda-still-enjoys-patronage-taliban-un-team-warns-multipolar-global-jihad

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

It Is Time To Listen To What Hamas Says in Arabic - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

Recent statements in Arabic by two of the terror group's senior officials, Khaled Mashaal and Mahmoud Mardawi, show that Hamas remains vehemently opposed to Trump's plan, specifically the provisions concerning disarmament, the involvement of foreigners in the governance of the Gaza Strip, and the deployment of an international security force there.

 

  • When addressing Arab audiences in Arabic, however, Hamas leaders and senior officials have been saying the exact opposite.

  • Anyone who believes that Hamas would "keep their word" is grotesquely misguided. Before the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, many people seemed to believe Hamas when its leaders used to say that they were interested in maintaining their ceasefire with Israel.

  • Moreover, the assumption that pro-Hamas members of the "Board of Peace" such as Qatar, Turkey, and Pakistan would participate in any effort to disarm the terror group is clueless and misinformed.

  • Recent statements in Arabic by two of the terror group's senior officials, Khaled Mashaal and Mahmoud Mardawi, show that Hamas remains vehemently opposed to Trump's plan, specifically the provisions concerning disarmament, the involvement of foreigners in the governance of the Gaza Strip, and the deployment of an international security force there.

  • According to Trump's plan: "There will be a process of demilitarization of Gaza under the supervision of independent monitors, which will include placing weapons permanently beyond use through an agreed process of decommissioning..." [Emphasis added.]

  • Hamas does not recognize Israel's right to exist in any borders and understandably wants to keep its weapons to pursue its Jihad (holy war) to destroy Israel and replace it with an Islamist state.

  • "We do not accept the logic of guardianship, external intervention, or a return of the mandate. Palestinians govern Palestinians." — Khaled Mashaal, head of Hamas's political bureau abroad, manassa.news, February 8, 2026.

  • It is crucial that the Trump administration and the rest of the international community start paying attention to what Hamas says in its own language, Arabic, not what some of its leaders or friends in Qatar and Turkey tell foreign officials in English and behind closed doors.

  • Disarmament would undermine Hamas's core identity, reduce its political influence within Palestinian politics, and deprive it of what it claims to view as deterrence against Israel. Historically, however, Israel does not attack anyone unless it is attacked first.

  • The only way to ensure the success of Trump's plan is by insisting that Hamas cease to exist, both as a political and as a military entity, and vanish from the Palestinian universe. Failure to do so will only encourage Hamas and other Islamists to pursue their Jihad to kill more Jews, eliminate Israel, and defy Trump.

Recent statements in Arabic by two senior Hamas officials, Khaled Mashaal (pictured) and Mahmoud Mardawi, show that Hamas remains vehemently opposed to Trump's plan, specifically the provisions concerning disarmament, the involvement of foreigners in the governance of the Gaza Strip, and the deployment of an international security force there. (Photo by Mohammed Saber/AFP via Getty Images)

As the US is preoccupied with the crisis in Iran, the Palestinian terror group Hamas has again announced its rejection of President Donald J. Trump's 20-point plan for ending the war in the Gaza Strip.

Hamas leaders may have told US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner during secret meetings that the terror group does not rule out the possibility of laying down its weapons. "Hamas has always indicated that they would disarm," Witkoff said in November 2025.

"They've said so – they said it to us directly during the famous meeting that Jared [Kushner] had with them. I hope they keep their word because if they do, they'll understand that the development plan we have for Gaza is really terrific – a lot better than anyone has ever discussed before."

When addressing Arab audiences in Arabic, however, Hamas leaders and senior officials have been saying the exact opposite.

Anyone who believes that Hamas would "keep their word" is grotesquely misguided. Before the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, many people seemed to believe Hamas when its leaders used to say that they were interested in maintaining their ceasefire with Israel.

Moreover, the assumption that pro-Hamas members of the "Board of Peace" such as Qatar, Turkey, and Pakistan would participate in any effort to disarm the terror group is clueless and misinformed.

Recent statements in Arabic by two of the terror group's senior officials, Khaled Mashaal and Mahmoud Mardawi, show that Hamas remains vehemently opposed to Trump's plan, specifically the provisions concerning disarmament, the involvement of foreigners in the governance of the Gaza Strip, and the deployment of an international security force there.

Reminder: Trump's plan, announced in October 2025, calls for the establishment of a Palestinian technocratic committee that would be responsible for "delivering the day-to-day running of public services and municipalities, with oversight and supervision by a new international transitional body, the 'Board of Peace,' which will be headed and chaired by President Donald J. Trump."

According to Trump's plan:

"There will be a process of demilitarization of Gaza under the supervision of independent monitors, which will include placing weapons permanently beyond use through an agreed process of decommissioning..." [Emphasis added.]

The plan, in addition, calls for the establishment of "a temporary International Stabilization Force (ISF) to immediately deploy in Gaza"

In early February, Mashaal, head of Hamas's political bureau abroad, told the 17th Al-Jazeera Forum:

"Talk about disarmament is an attempt to make the Palestinian people an easy victim that Israel can eliminate. If we return to the big question about the root of the conflict, that it is a matter of occupation, and a people resisting occupation, with the right to self-determination, then the question of resistance, and its weapons, becomes natural."

Resistance, Mashaal clarified, takes various forms, including "a revolution, sometimes an uprising, and sometimes armed resistance."

It is important to note that "resistance" is a sanitization for terrorism and violence against Israelis.

When Hamas talks about "occupation," it is referring to Israel's existence, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. Hamas does not recognize Israel's right to within any borders and understandably wants to keep its weapons to pursue its Jihad (holy war) to destroy Israel and replace it with an Islamist state.

Hamas's 1988 charter quotes the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan al-Banna, as saying: "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it."

Mashaal said his group would be prepared to discuss the issue of disarmament only after the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip begins and as part of a long-term ceasefire with Israel.

He also said that Hamas, backed by Egypt, Qatar and Turkey, is willing to accept a truce lasting five to 10 years, but without handing over its weapons.

Regarding Trump's International Stabilization Force, Mashaal has stated that the troops should be deployed only "on the borders" of the Gaza Strip (with Egypt and Israel) to prevent any clashes or renewed fighting. This stipulation means that the ISF should have no role in destroying the terror infrastructure or disarming the terror groups in the Gaza Strip.

Finally, the Hamas leader repeated his group's unequivocal rejection of Trump's "Board of Peace."

"We do not accept the logic of guardianship, external intervention, or a return of the mandate. Palestinians govern Palestinians," Mashaal stressed.

"This requires great effort, not a simple approach of disarmament," he concluded.

Mardawi, the other senior Hamas official, also declared that his group "will not give up its weapons."

Hamas, he added, might consider surrendering its weapons only after a Palestinian state is established. "The issue of the resistance weapons is linked to the political goals of the Palestinian people," he emphasized.

It is crucial that the Trump administration and the rest of the international community start paying attention to what Hamas says in its own language, Arabic, not what some of its leaders or friends in Qatar and Turkey tell foreign officials in English and behind closed doors.

More than four months have passed since the ceasefire in the Gaza Strip went into effect, and all indications are that Hamas is working hard to rearm, regroup, and maintain its presence both as a political and military entity in violation of Trump's plan. Hamas evidently does not take seriously Trump's repeated warnings that it must disarm and relinquish control of the Gaza Strip.

Even if Hamas does hand over some of its weapons, it will only be as part of a façade to appease the Trump administration and facilitate the entry of aid and the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.

Hamas will never actually lay down all its weapons: they are central to its ideology, which requires all Muslims to take part in the Jihad to liberate all of Palestine, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.

"The liberation of Palestine is an individual duty for every Muslim wherever he may be. It is necessary to instill the spirit of Jihad in the heart of the nation so that they would confront the enemies and join the ranks of the fighters." (Articles 14 and 15, Hamas Charter)

The chances that Hamas will voluntarily disarm or abandon its Jihad against Israel are pitifully low, if not zero. Disarmament would undermine Hamas's core identity, reduce its political influence within Palestinian politics, and deprive it of what it claims to view as deterrence against Israel. Historically, however, Israel does not attack anyone unless it is attacked first.

The only way to ensure the success of Trump's plan is by insisting that Hamas cease to exist, both as a political and as a military entity, and vanish from the Palestinian universe. Failure to do so will only encourage Hamas and other Islamists to pursue their Jihad to kill more Jews, eliminate Israel, and defy Trump.

 

Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22286/what-hamas-says-in-arabic

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iranians to N12: People 'on edge,' awaiting US launch of 'decisive' war to topple the regime - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

As 40 days of mourning end and US forces mass in the region, voices from Tehran and Mashhad speak of anger, fear and hope for change.

 

Iranians living in Greece chant slogans during a rally, marking the Global Day of Action for Iran, to support Iran's Lion and Sun Revolution, in Athens, Greece, February 14, 2026
Iranians living in Greece chant slogans during a rally, marking the Global Day of Action for Iran, to support Iran's Lion and Sun Revolution, in Athens, Greece, February 14, 2026
(photo credit: REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki)

 

As tensions mount in the Middle East and US President Donald Trump is said to be nearing a decision on a major military move against the Islamic Republic, three Iranian citizens told N12 News that they believe American action may be their only opportunity to return to the streets and challenge the regime in Tehran.

The interviews, published on Wednesday, come as 40 days of mourning conclude for protesters killed in the recent unrest, and US military reinforcements continue to arrive in the region by land and sea.

In Tehran and Mashhad, anticipation is running high. While Iran’s leadership has warned of military retaliation in the event of escalation, ordinary citizens told the Israeli outlet that they are closely following what they describe as an unprecedented US force buildup.

Sona, a Tehran local, described a mixture of grief, rage, and cautious optimism.

“For a long time now, I have been impatiently waiting for the start of military action against the Islamic Republic, and I hope that this time it will be an attack that ends the matter once and for all,” she told N12.

Yet her anxiety, she said, stems not from the prospect of war but from diplomacy.

Amnesty International Greek activists and Iranians living in Athens hold candles and placards in front of the Greek Parliament to support the people of Iran, in Athens, Greece, January 30, 2026.
Amnesty International Greek activists and Iranians living in Athens hold candles and placards in front of the Greek Parliament to support the people of Iran, in Athens, Greece, January 30, 2026. (credit: REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki)

Memories of the crackdown remain fresh

“Naturally, I am also tense right now, but not because of war, rather because of the possibility that an agreement will be signed that prevents this attack,” Sona said.

Asked what might drive people back into the streets, she replied, “I don’t think Iran and the Iranian people have a more dangerous war than the continued existence of the Islamic Republic in power. The people are very angry. They are in mourning and in pain. Each of these factors alone could increase the likelihood that people will go out into the streets.”

Still, she acknowledged that memories of the regime’s violent crackdown remain fresh.

“Forty days ago, we witnessed a complete massacre in the streets. You cannot expect people to go out again and willingly place themselves in front of the bullets of the Islamic Republic,” she said. “But whenever there is a call to return to the streets, I will certainly participate and support it.”

In Mashhad, another citizen, Alireza, told N12 that scattered protests are continuing in several cities, even amid arrests and reported fatalities.

“We are still waiting for Trump’s promise when he said ‘Our finger is on the trigger,’” Alireza said. “Yesterday, there were protests in Mashhad, Abdanan, Malekshahi, and many other cities.”

He added that reports indicated five more people had been killed in Abdanan and that more than 400 people were arrested in the village of Chenar in the Hamadan province during a 40-day memorial ceremony where anti-regime slogans were chanted.

A woman with tears of blood demonstrates in Paris on January 18 in support of the Iranian uprising against the Islamic Republic. Despite years of indoctrination, Iranians in the country and beyond are pushing back against the regime.
A woman with tears of blood demonstrates in Paris on January 18 in support of the Iranian uprising against the Islamic Republic. Despite years of indoctrination, Iranians in the country and beyond are pushing back against the regime. (credit: Daniel Perron/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images)

'Be the voice of the Iranian people'

“We, the Iranian people, are in mourning and waiting for the opportunity to return to the streets, to complete the unfinished work of tens of thousands of young people who were killed and to topple the mullahs,” Alireza said.

He argued that US military backing could be decisive.

“The military support that the US president promised us could help us achieve this goal. I hope he keeps his promise,” he said.

Addressing Israelis directly, Alireza added, “I ask the people of Israel to be the voice of the Iranian people. We are at war against radical Islam, which you have been fighting for years. Our victory is your victory. Pray for us. Long live Iran.”

Hamid, also from Tehran, described a society on edge, battered by economic hardship and distrustful of negotiations.

“The tension and fear of war still exist,” he said. “On the one hand, there is talk of negotiations, which many believe are not serious and will not yield results.”

According to Hamid, both Washington and Tehran are using diplomacy tactically.

“The Islamic Republic is buying time and playing for time, and the US, it seems, wants to present this as justification and grounds to attack Iran,” he said.

A man shows a sign mentioning US President Donald Trump during a rally in support of nationwide protests in Iran, in Rome, Italy, January 13, 2026.
A man shows a sign mentioning US President Donald Trump during a rally in support of nationwide protests in Iran, in Rome, Italy, January 13, 2026. (credit: REUTERS/Francesco Fotia/File Photo)

'No one is doing well'

Meanwhile, he painted a grim economic picture.

“Everyone is on edge. The economic situation is terrible, and everyone is certain that next year will be even worse. There will be higher inflation. The market is not functioning logically or reasonably. For example, in raw materials and food products, the costs are extremely high,” he said.

Even government assistance cards, he noted, offer only minimal relief.

“The only thing that perhaps helps a little is the government aid cards, and even that is in a very limited and meager amount, to the point that even more established segments of society are using them. In practice, no one is doing well.”

Despite his fears, Hamid said that if war does come, he hopes it is swift and decisive.

“My opinion, and that of many of my relatives, is that if there is a war, we hope it will be a decisive and final war, without harming too many ordinary civilians and without damaging essential infrastructure like water, electricity, and gas,” he said. “In other words, that in the short term it will lead to the elimination of the heads of the Islamic Republic and the surrender of the regime.”

Tobias Siegal contributed to this report. 


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-887204

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

US embassy, Israel refute Carlson’s airport harassment claim - David Isaac

 

by David Isaac

“Mr. Carlson and his party were politely asked a few routine questions, in accordance with standard procedures,” the Israeli Airports Authority said.

 

Far-right podcaster Tucker Carlson speaking with attendees at the 2023 AmericaFest at the Phoenix Convention Center in Arizona. Credit: Greg Skidmore via Wikimedia Commons.
Far-right podcaster Tucker Carlson speaking with attendees at the 2023 AmericaFest at the Phoenix Convention Center in Arizona. Credit: Greg Skidmore via Wikimedia Commons.

 

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee and the Israel Airports Authority refuted conservative podcaster Tucker Carlson’s claim that he received “bizarre” treatment at the hands of Israeli security during his recent visit to the Jewish state.

Carlson complained that he was questioned by security staff on Wednesday following his interview with Huckabee at Ben-Gurion International Airport, which came about after the ambassador had challenged him to an interview.

“Men who identified themselves as airport security took our passports, hauled our executive producer into a side room and then demanded to know what we spoke to Ambassador Huckabee about,” Carlson told Britain’s Daily Mail, which ran the story under the sensationalist headline: “Tucker Carlson ‘DETAINED’ in Israel: Journalist ‘dragged into interrogation room’ as explosive interview sparks diplomatic firestorm.”

The Israeli Airports Authority tweeted a response on Wednesday: “Contrary to the reports, Tucker Carlson and his entourage were not detained, delayed or interrogated.

“Mr. Carlson and his party were politely asked a few routine questions, in accordance with standard procedures applied to many travelers. The conversation took place in a separate room within the VIP lounge solely to protect their privacy and to avoid conducting such a discussion in public. No unusual incident occurred, and the Israel Airports Authority firmly rejects any other claims.”

Huckabee also weighed in, pointing out that Carlson was treated exactly like every visitor to Israel. “EVERYONE who comes in/out of Israel (every country for that matter) has passports checked & routinely asked security questions. Even ME going in/out with Diplomatic Passport & Diplomatic Visa,” the ambassador tweeted.

Carlson never left the airport during his brief visit. Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman posted to X that Carlson had missed a golden opportunity to see important historic sites by restricting himself to Ben-Gurion Airport.

“Too bad Tucker stayed in the airport in the face of so many invitations to see so many wonderful places. A huge and obviously intentional missed opportunity,” Friedman wrote.

Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett blasted Carlson as a coward for staying at the airport while claiming to visit Israel, saying, “[He] didn’t even step foot in country, then made up a story that he’s being supposedly harassed by our security (didn’t happen), whined about it, got back into the private jet and flew off.”


David Isaac

Source: https://www.jns.org/us-embassy-israel-refute-carlsons-airport-harassment-claim/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Anti-Hamas Gaza militia leader says group readying for next phase after dismantling tunnels - Sam Halpern

 

by Sam Halpern

“The first phase is that we are depriving Hamas of one of its most important means: the tunnels," Duhine told N12 News.

 

Ghassan Duhine and members of the Abu Shabab anti-Hamas Gaza militia.
Ghassan Duhine and members of the Abu Shabab anti-Hamas Gaza militia.
(photo credit: Screenshot/Facebook/Ghassan Duhine)

 

The anti-Hamas Abu Shabab militia in Gaza is nearing completion of its mission to dismantle Hamas tunnels in the Rafah area of Gaza and is gearing up for the second phase of its operations, the group’s leader, Ghassan Duhine, told N12 News on Sunday.

“The first phase is that we are depriving Hamas of one of its most important means: the tunnels," Duhine told the Israeli outlet. "The first phase is about to end.”

Duhine's comments come as the IDF continues to work to destroy Hamas tunnel infrastructure east of Gaza’s Yellow Line. Last year, IDF officials estimated that around 75% of the terror tunnels in the Strip remained intact. In October, Defense Minister Israel Katz told US Vice President JD Vance that over 60% of Gaza’s tunnels remained operational.

Nevertheless, following the Abu Shabab militia’s work in dismantling tunnel infrastructure, the group intends to begin efforts surrounding the “dismantling of weapons production facilities,” Duhine said.

After that, the final phase of the militia’s work pertains to collecting the terrorists’ “personal weapons,” he added. “We still have a lot of work ahead of us. Only pressure works. By choice and without enough pressure, they will not give up their weapons."

Ghassan Duhine (center) with members of the anti-Hamas Abu Shabab militia in the Gaza Strip, September 2025.
Ghassan Duhine (center) with members of the anti-Hamas Abu Shabab militia in the Gaza Strip, September 2025. (credit: Screenshot/Facebook/Ghassan Duhine)

Duhine continued, saying the militia, along with the IDF, “have achieved great results” in Rafah because the group is operating as the Israeli military applies pressure to Hamas.

“They only understand the language of force," he asserted. "The language of dialogue with terrorists should be forbidden and boycotted. Hamas is the one who should be afraid of us, because we are sparing no effort to eliminate it. The people in Gaza are with us, even if they say different things."

Abu Shabab begins dismantling Rafah tunnels 

Last Thursday, Duhine announced on Facebook that the Abu Shabab militia had begun “gradually dismantling the tunnels,” writing that they were terrorists’ “most important weapons.”

He has previously stated that following the dismantling of weapon production sites, the group would go after the “missiles” in the Strip before pursuing personal weapons.

“In the future, no weapons will enter Rafah outside the framework of the law, and smuggling operations will be dealt with forcefully,” Duhine wrote at the time.

Duhine was appointed to lead the Abu Shabab militia in early December of last year after the previous leader, Yasser Abu Shabab, was killed during a conflict between armed groups in the Strip. Duhine was wounded in the same incident.

This week, IDF statements have noted that troops have continued efforts to clear out and destroy Hamas’s tunnel infrastructure.

On Monday, the military confirmed that during searches of a tunnel shaft, it had successfully killed three terrorists it had struck the week prior.

The following day, the IDF confirmed that during activities to destroy a tunnel near the Yellow Line in southern Gaza, soldiers had uncovered a Hamas weapons cache, including a “large amount of guns, an RPG rocket, and an explosive device.”


Sam Halpern

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-887192

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why Exactly Did They Destroy the Border? - Victor Davis Hanson

 

by Victor Davis Hanson

Biden’s border chaos wasn’t accidental—it was a political strategy to reshape America’s electorate and expand left-wing power.

 

 

Why would any president destroy the U.S. southern border?

The Left typically “pounces” on anyone daring to suggest that the Biden administration had green-lighted illegal immigration to gain new constituents for agendas that otherwise were without broad public support.

The Left smears critics of open borders as racist conspiracists spreading the “Great Replacement Theory.”

Yet for years, Democrats and leftists themselves had written triumphalist books with titles like “The Emerging Democratic Majority.” And often they crowed that “Demography is Destiny.”

A few left-wing globalists even boasted of a new borderless world, in which anyone could live anywhere he wished.

Not too long ago, Texas State Representative Gene Wu (D-Houston), chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, jumped the shark to say out loud what is usually left unsaid about the Democrat agenda:

The day the Latino, African American, Asian, and other communities realize that they share the same oppressor is the day we start winning, because we are the majority in this country now. We have the ability to take over this country and to do what is needed for everyone.

The same unapologetic left-wing weaponization of illegal immigration is occurring in Europe. Sheer numbers there have already radically changed the demography—and political constituencies—of the continent.

Recently, the former Spanish “Minister of Equality,” an energized Irene Montero, offered an unambiguous rant: “I hope for ‘replacement theory.’ I hope we can sweep this country of fascists and racists with immigrants. Whatever their skin color, whether ‘Chinese, Black, or Brown.’”

The culmination of the new hubris in the U.S. was the Biden administration’s destruction of the southern border and enforcement of federal immigration law.

On some days, the Biden influx exceeded anyone’s wildest imagination, at a rate of 10,000 illegal entrants per day. The Homeland “Security” Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, in Baghdad Bob style, occasionally pontificated that the border was “secure”—as thousands in the background illegally swarmed the border, without health or even rudimentary background checks.

The Left’s political agenda for illegal immigration was to be realized either immediately through compromised ballot integrity or soon enough by warping the census-based reapportionment of congressional districts.

No wonder there is now near-hysterical Democratic opposition to even basic national requirements of a photo ID to vote. Yet, traditionally liberal polls like Gallup and Pew show that 83 to 84 percent of Americans support mandatory presentation of a voter photo ID.

Usually, the Left fawns over European protocols. But it now grows quiet when reminded that 46 of 47 European nations, even those governed by the Left, require IDs to vote.

Apparently, Democrats assumed that once 10 million more of the world’s poorest had illegally crossed the southern border, without audit or English proficiency, they would filter throughout American society and become impossible to repatriate.

Soon, open borders would flip more states blue, as well as increase their congressional seats. Illegals were to be redefined as mere “residents” and often recipients of mail-in ballots.

The reality that millions of new poor through their needs would grow the welfare state, expand government at all levels, require far more taxes, and fuel the DEI binary of oppressed/oppressors were added benefits.

The nexus between the nine-billion-dollar Somali welfare fraud and Minnesota Democratic officials offers a sharp reminder of how the immigration/welfare/DEI exemption industry was created and protected by authorities.

Biden’s new 10 million unlawful entrants may have increased the existing pool of illegal aliens (20 million?) to 30 million.

That total, in turn, radically grew the existing group of 20 million legal foreign-born citizens and legal residents of various categories.

So when Trump took office in January 2025, the U.S. had admitted a record high of foreign-born residents. They now made up some 16 percent of the population and perhaps 53 million in actual numbers.

The influxes came at a time when too often the melting-pot tradition of integration, assimilation, and acculturation was reviled and superseded by salad-bowl ethnic chauvinism and separatism.

Yet the triumphant Left never imagined a Trump reelection.

Nor could it grasp fully Trump’s counterrevolutionary effort to secure the border and undo the Biden nihilism.

Even more surreal to Democrats were his efforts to reinstate the integrity and supremacy of federal immigration law.

No one really believed Trump would seek to find and deport millions who had filtered through fifty states. Most were enjoying de facto immunity via hundreds of left-wing lower district court judges and blue-state officials of the Tim Walz/Gavin Newsom sort.

There is only one way that the left would ever oppose a return to legal, measured, and diverse immigration. Namely, if any of its immigrant constituencies in the future—such as the 55 percent of Hispanic males who voted for Trump in 2024—dared to vote on criteria other than federal entitlements, ethnic solidarity, and Democratic coercion.

Do that, and the Left would close the border quickly. 


Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness and the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He is an American military historian, columnist, a former classics professor, and scholar of ancient warfare. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004, and is the 2023 Giles O'Malley Distinguished Visiting Professor at the School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush, and the Bradley Prize in 2008. Hanson is also a farmer (growing almonds on a family farm in Selma, California) and a critic of social trends related to farming and agrarianism. He is the author of the just released New York Times best seller, The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation, published by Basic Books on May 7, 2024, as well as the recent  The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won, The Case for Trump, and The Dying Citizen.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/02/19/why-exactly-did-they-destroy-the-border/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter