Monday, February 9, 2026

Hamas's Secret Plan to Maintain Control of Gaza - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

Hamas wants Trump's Board of Peace and the technocratic committee to focus on reconstruction, economic projects, and paying salaries to Palestinian civil servants while it continues, through a shadow government, to effectively rule the Gaza Strip, manufacture stockpile weaponry and prepare for a new attack on Israel, similar to its October 7, 2023 invasion of Israel's southern communities.

 

  • "[T]he document outlines an operational framework in which the technocratic government appears to function, while the actual management of systems, the flow of information, and control over the civil administration remain in Hamas's hands." – Elior Levy, Channel 11 Kan News, February 2, 2026.

  • Hamas wants Trump's Board of Peace and the technocratic committee to focus on reconstruction, economic projects, and paying salaries to Palestinian civil servants while it continues, through a shadow government, to effectively rule the Gaza Strip, manufacture stockpile weaponry and prepare for a new attack on Israel, similar to its October 7, 2023 invasion of Israel's southern communities.

  • There can be no peace, security or stability in the Gaza Strip if the same terrorists who murdered, tortured, and mutilated thousands of Israelis and foreign nationals on October 7 are given new uniforms, rearmed and allowed to serve as a paramilitary force. There also can be no peace, security, or stability in the Gaza Strip so long as Hamas is permitted to function as a shadow government in the Gaza Strip. The talk about allowing Hamas to "freeze" or "store" its weapons is misguided and falls short of the full disarmament (decommissioning weapons) required by the Trump plan.

  • With countries such as Qatar, Turkey and Pakistan sitting on Trump's Board of Peace, it is hard to see how Hamas could ever be forced to lay down its weapons and give up control of the Gaza Strip. These countries -- longtime sponsors and funders of Hamas -- will never take part in any effort to disarm Hamas or remove it from power. What we are witnessing is a clear attempt by Hamas and its Arab and Muslim sponsors to hoodwink the Trump administration and the rest of the international community.

  • Will Trump choose to fall for it and join the Legacy of Losers -- like British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain? Chamberlain will forever be recalled waving a fraudulent piece of paper and idiotically claiming that he had achieved "peace for our time." Is that how Trump would like to be remembered throughout history?

Hamas wants Trump's Board of Peace and the technocratic committee to focus on reconstruction, economic projects, and paying salaries to Palestinian civil servants while it continues, through a shadow government, to effectively rule the Gaza Strip, manufacture stockpile weaponry and prepare for a new attack on Israel, similar to its October 7, 2023 invasion of Israel's southern communities. Pictured: Hamas terrorists in Jabalia refugee camp, in the Gaza Strip, on December 1, 2025. (Photo by Omar Al-Qataa/AFP via Getty Images)

More than four months after the ceasefire in the Gaza Strip went into effect, Hamas has still not laid down its weapons despite repeated warnings by US President Donald J. Trump. Hamas, in fact, not only continues to rule large parts of the Gaza Strip that are still under its control but also seems to be working hard to rearm, regroup and reassert its control over areas of the Gaza Strip from which the Israel Defense Forces have withdrawn.

According to Israeli security sources:

"Hamas recently strengthened its control over the Gaza Strip by stealing humanitarian aid and selling it to local residents, recruiting young men in mosques, collecting taxes, and kidnapping and torturing anyone who dares to speak out against the terror group."

A secret document obtained by Israel's Channel 11 Kan News reveals how Hamas is planning to control and run the Gaza Strip under the nose of the newly established Palestinian technocratic committee:

"A confidential internal document sent by Hamas leadership to the organization's civil administration officials in the Gaza Strip, ahead of the arrival of the technocratic government, reveals how Hamas plans to continue controlling the management of the Strip even after the new government takes office."

"The document, obtained by Kan News, includes detailed instructions for Hamas's administrative officials regarding their day-to-day conduct vis-à-vis the technocratic government.

"According to the document, all officials are instructed to continue their regular work routine as if nothing has changed — thereby effectively preserving the existing mechanisms of control.

"The document further states that officials are strictly forbidden from attacking members of the technocratic government or its head on social media, in order to avoid overt friction or public confrontation.

"At the same time, officials are given a clear directive not to establish any personal contact with members of the government, nor to pass on any information or intelligence — except through the 'relevant authority,' which in practice is Hamas itself.

In this way, the document outlines an operational framework in which the technocratic government appears to function, while the actual management of systems, the flow of information, and control over the civil administration remain in Hamas's hands."

The document shows that Hamas is intent on preserving its role as a major actor in the Gaza Strip while ignoring Trump's new "Board of Peace" and the Palestinian technocratic committee. Hamas wants Trump's Board of Peace and the technocratic committee to focus on reconstruction, economic projects, and paying salaries to Palestinian civil servants while it continues, through a shadow government, to effectively rule the Gaza Strip, manufacture stockpile weaponry and prepare for a new attack on Israel, similar to its October 7, 2023 invasion of Israel's southern communities.

Commenting on the Hamas document outlining the terror group's plan to maintain control of the Gaza Strip, Palestinian political analyst Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib wrote:

"Hamas's police force in Gaza is going full throttle to demonstrate that it alone is in control of the Strip and cannot be replaced, producing slick propaganda videos and footage proving its continued presence. At least half of its officers are current terror operatives who participated in al-Qassam Brigades activities and are attempting to rebrand themselves as mere civil servants. The new technocratic committee, tasked with implementing President Trump's plan, must never allow these officers to be part of the new security architecture of the Gaza Strip. The US administration must not allow these terrorists to respawn and ensure that Hamas's grip on Gaza lives on."

He added:

"Hamas in Gaza is not going anywhere; it's 100 steps ahead of the US, Israel, the Arabs and the international community, ready to pounce on the newly established technocratic committee."

As part of its plan to maintain its security control over the Gaza Strip, Hamas is seeking to incorporate its 10,000 police officers into a new US-backed Palestinian administration, Palestinian sources told Reuters.

"In a letter to staff, seen by Reuters, Gaza's Hamas-run government urged its more than 40,000 civil servants and security personnel to cooperate with the technocratic committee but assured them it was working to incorporate them into the new government... The militant group is still believed to possess rockets, which several diplomats estimated to number in the hundreds."

If true, this means that Hamas is seeking to take advantage of Trump's 20-point plan for ending the Gaza war to rebrand and renew itself. There can be no peace, security or stability in the Gaza Strip if the same terrorists who murdered, tortured, and mutilated thousands of Israelis and foreign nationals on October 7 are given new uniforms, rearmed and allowed to serve as a paramilitary force. There also can be no peace, security, or stability in the Gaza Strip so long as Hamas is permitted to function as a shadow government in the Gaza Strip. The talk about allowing Hamas to "freeze" or "store" its weapons is misguided and falls short of the full disarmament (decommissioning weapons) required by the Trump plan.

With countries such as Qatar, Turkey and Pakistan sitting on Trump's Board of Peace, it is hard to see how Hamas could ever be forced to lay down its weapons and give up control of the Gaza Strip. These countries -- longtime sponsors and funders of Hamas -- will never take part in any effort to disarm Hamas or remove it from power. What we are witnessing is a clear attempt by Hamas and its Arab and Muslim sponsors to hoodwink the Trump administration and the rest of the international community.

Will Trump choose to fall for it and join the Legacy of Losers -- like British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain? Chamberlain will forever be recalled waving a fraudulent piece of paper and idiotically claiming that he had achieved "peace for our time." Is that how Trump would like to be remembered throughout history?

 

Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22263/hamas-secret-plan-to-maintain-control-of-gaza

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran expert: This is why Iran will never give up its ballistic missile program - 103FM

 

by 103FM

Iran is not seeking a military confrontation with the United States, but the key question is what Tehran is willing to concede to avoid one

 

A banner with a photo of a new hypersonic ballistic missile called "Fattah" and with text reading "400 seconds to Tel Aviv" is seen on a street in Tehran, Iran June 8, 2023
A banner with a photo of a new hypersonic ballistic missile called "Fattah" and with text reading "400 seconds to Tel Aviv" is seen on a street in Tehran, Iran June 8, 2023
(photo credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)

Iran is unlikely to relinquish its ballistic missile arsenal because the Islamic Republic views it as the last credible pillar of deterrence and a hedge against what it sees as unreliable US guarantees, Dr. Raz Zimmt, head of the Iran Program at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), told 103FM on Monday.

Zimmt said Iran is not seeking a military confrontation with the United States, but the key question is what Tehran is willing to concede to avoid one. He argued that Iran’s leadership has clear red lines, and missiles sit at the center of them.

From Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s perspective, Zimmt said, the missile program is the primary tool left to deter Iran’s enemies, and he does not trust US assurances.

If Iran were to make major concessions not only on the nuclear file but also on missiles, he said, Khamenei believes Washington could exploit Iran’s vulnerability within weeks or months.

Zimmt added that in Khamenei’s calculus, even the risk of a military strike is less significant than the risk of dismantling missile capabilities. He assessed that Iranian decision makers believe that even a significant US attack could end without toppling the regime.

“I am not convinced that Khamenei believes the Americans are truly capable of bringing down the regime,” Zimmt said.

Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei looks on during a meeting at the IRGC Aerospace Force achievements exhibition in Tehran, Iran November 19, 2023. (credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA
Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei looks on during a meeting at the IRGC Aerospace Force achievements exhibition in Tehran, Iran November 19, 2023. (credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS)

He added that Tehran is more concerned about strikes on command centers and regime symbols, and potentially on Khamenei personally, though he suggested the supreme leader may believe the regime could still survive a serious blow.

Zimmt described Iran’s missile array as a direct threat to Israel. For years, he said, Israeli strategic thinking focused primarily on Iran’s nuclear program, while missiles were often treated mainly as delivery platforms for a nuclear warhead.

Recent events, he said, again underscored how ballistic missiles can independently threaten Israel’s security and cause significant damage. He added that Israel and the United States have managed to push Iran further from nuclear capabilities, even if they have not eliminated them entirely.

As a result, Zimmt said, missiles are currently the more immediate threat in the short term. Over the longer term, he said, the nuclear issue still requires major attention, but for now Iran’s nuclear progress appears limited.

Iran’s learning curve and domestic crackdown

Zimmt said Iran demonstrated an ability to adapt quickly, drawing lessons early in the campaign and adjusting tactics. He pointed to attempts to target civilian areas and missile launches intended to increase the chance of penetrating air defenses.

Since the war, he said, Iran has continued improving its missile capabilities both in quantity and quality. While the nuclear file remains important, Zimmt said Iran is not currently enriching uranium, and there are no indications at present that Tehran intends to renew a weapons production program.

On Iranian society, Zimmt said the public remains traumatized, still coping with the aftermath of brutal protest suppression.

He said it is difficult to generalize about a country of roughly 93 million people, with some seeking a return to normal life even under the regime, and others hoping a US strike could shake its foundations.

Addressing internet disruptions, Zimmt said access has largely returned but significant blocks remain. He added that arrests are continuing, including detentions of senior reformist figures, reflecting what he described as a long-standing regime strategy of restricting civil liberties to prevent challenges to its rule. 


103FM

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-886048

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Anti-Herzog Australian newspaper ads under fire for allegedly false, non-consensual signatures - Mathilda Heller

 

by Mathilda Heller

The advertisement claims to list the names of over 1000 Jews who allegedly signed an open letter saying Herzog is not welcome in Australia.

 

Israeli President Isaac Herzog gestures after his speech at 'An Evening of Light & Solidarity' during his state visit to Australia, in Sydney, Australia, February 9, 2026.
Israeli President Isaac Herzog gestures after his speech at 'An Evening of Light & Solidarity' during his state visit to Australia, in Sydney, Australia, February 9, 2026.
(photo credit: REUTERS/HOLLIE ADAMS)

The Jewish Council of Australia has sparked outrage after it paid for two full-page newspaper advertisements criticizing President Isaac Herzog’s visit to the country.

The advertisement, which appeared in Monday's Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, lists the names of over 1,000 Jews who allegedly signed an open letter saying Herzog is not welcome in Australia.

Titled “Jews say no! Over 1,000 Jews have said no to Herzog,"  the ad states that “welcoming an alleged war criminal in the aftermath of the Bondi massacre betrays Jewish communities,  multicultural Australia, and everyone who stands for Palestinian human rights and international law.”

However, at least some of the names listed on the advertisement are not real people or are people who did not sign the letter. There are also under 700 names on the list.

David Slade, managing director of Slade Pharmacies and president of United Israel Appeal Victoria, is featured on the list. He wrote on LinkedIn that his name was used without his knowledge, consent, or approval.

People listen as Israeli President Isaac Herzog (not pictured) speaks at 'An Evening of Light & Solidarity' during his state visit to Australia, in Sydney, Australia, February 9, 2026. (credit: REUTERS/HOLLIE ADAMS)
People listen as Israeli President Isaac Herzog (not pictured) speaks at 'An Evening of Light & Solidarity' during his state visit to Australia, in Sydney, Australia, February 9, 2026. (credit: REUTERS/HOLLIE ADAMS)

Newspaper ad opposing Herzog's visit draws anger over false names

“Let me be absolutely clear: I did not sign, endorse, or authorize my name to be included in this publication,” he said.

Slade added that the fact that his name, as well as others, was added without his permission is a “gross ethical failure” of the person(s) who submitted his name, of the organization that authored the advertisement, and of the newspapers that published it.

“If there was real support for this advertisement, one must ask why would it include the names of those who have not consented and possibly fictitious names as well?” he added.

“To remove any doubt about where I stand: I am a proud Australian, a Zionist, and I stand in full solidarity with the Australian Jewish community and with Israel, including President Herzog’s visit to Australia.

“I am writing this message from Israel. The only thing I regret about being here is that it means I am missing President Herzog’s visit to Australia.”

A man named Jason Gluck responded by saying that his name was also falsely listed. Tammie Slade – a well-known Australian Zionist – is listed, most likely without her knowledge.

It is worth also noting that one name featured on the list is actually not a name at all and is, in fact, a transliterated Hebrew slur. “Milkek Tachat” translates to a** licker. Some have argued this is also the case for Robert Doublina, which is similar to the name of a fictional character in a Marvel comic.

There are also three names of kapos on the list: Josef Heiden, Eliezer Gruenbaum, and Carmen Mory. Kapos were Jews who aided the Nazi regime, suggesting these names were submitted by people who feel that the JCA is a kapo organization (a parallel drawn by numerous users on social media).

Heiden was a kapo at the Dachau concentration camp known for his cruelty toward fellow inmates. Gruenbaum was a kapo at Auschwitz, and Mory was one at the Ravensbrück concentration camp.

Additionally, while saying the ad is ‘Jews saying no,’ it has now been made clear that the petition was open to non-Jews. Before signing the petition, there is the option to click either ‘I am a Jewish Australian’ or ‘I am a non-Jewish ally.’

Even if the advertisement’s list is true, it would still only represent a tiny proportion of the country’s Jewish community. There are around 110,000-120,000 Jews in Australia, and so the list’s purported 1,000 would still constitute less than 1%.

Several Jewish Australians told The Jerusalem Post of their frustration that two major newspapers decided to platform fringe voices and not the mainstream Jewish bodies, which are overwhelmingly pro-Israel.

A June 2023 survey by Monash University found that 90% of Australian Jews deemed it important to maintain close ties with Israel. Some 88% felt a high level of personal connectedness with Israel, and 86% agreed the existence of Israel is essential for the future of the Jewish people.

“This myth that is being put out in the media is misleading; it is trying to elevate what is a micro opinion within the Jewish community as some substantial body of opinion,” said Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) CEO Peter Wertheim to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on Monday.

He referred to the JCA as an “outlier.”

“There are, of course, differing opinions in the Jewish community, but on the basic matter of Israel’s right to exist and to live in peace and security, it is near unanimous,” he said.

It is also worth noting that the JCA teamed up with a Hezbollah-linked group and a Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated network to demand that the Australian government deny Herzog a visa for his visit.

It co-signed a statement with the Australian National Imams Council (ANIC) and the Belgian-based Hind Rajab Foundation calling on Attorney-General Michelle Rowland, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, and the Australian Federal Police to refuse “entry for Israeli President Isaac Herzog and the commencement of a criminal investigation under Australian law.”

Ibrahim Abu Muhammed, the mufti of Australia, is the head of the ANIC. He is a member of the Qatar-based International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), which was founded by Yusuf al-Qaradawi, widely regarded as the Muslim Brotherhood’s spiritual leader.

The Post reached out to David Slade, Tammie Slade, the JCA, the ECAJ, and the Zionist Federation of Australia for comment but did not receive responses before press time. 


Mathilda Heller

Source: https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-886120

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Herzog condemns ‘Globalize the Intifada’ as anti-Israel chant rings out in Sydney - Herb Keinon

 

by Herb Keinon

President Herzog visits Bondi Beach to console victims of the massacre and address rising antisemitism amid protests and diplomatic tensions in Australia.

 

Israeli President Isaac Herzog speaks after laying a wreath for victims of the December 14, 2025 gun attack at the Bondi Pavilion, in Sydney on February 9, 2026.
Israeli President Isaac Herzog speaks after laying a wreath for victims of the December 14, 2025 gun attack at the Bondi Pavilion, in Sydney on February 9, 2026.
(photo credit: DAVID GRAY / AFP via Getty Images)

 

As President Isaac Herzog drew a straight line in the capital of New South Wales on Monday night connecting the antisemitism embodied in the chant “Globalize the Intifada” and the attack on Bondi Beach, police just a few kilometers away were battling anti-Israel protesters chanting that very slogan.

“The hatred that triggered the shooting at Bondi is the very same age-old plague of antisemitism endured by our parents and grandparents,” Herzog told an estimated crowd of 4,000 people at the TikTok Entertainment Center during a remembrance ceremony for the Bondi victims and solidarity with the Australian Jewish community.

Referring to the attack that killed 15 people in December, Herzog said, “The horrors in Israel, empowered by jihadi extremism, reared their ugly head here as well… This is what it means to ‘Globalize the Intifada.’”

Meanwhile, a few kilometers away at Town Hall, a crowd that local media put at “thousands” defied a court order and marched against Herzog’s visit. The News.com.au website reported that Grace Tame, a former “Australian of the Year,” led protesters in a “Globalize the Intifada” chant.

“We have to continue to mobilize, and we have to continue to globalize,” she said. “Say it with me, from Gadigal [Aboriginal land in Sydney] to Gaza, globalize the Intifada.”

Despite clashes between police and protestors, Herzog was shielded from the demonstrations, with participants kept well away from both his downtown hotel and the motorcade route he traveled. Some 3,500 police officers were deployed to protect the Israeli president.

Herzog had arrived in Australia earlier in the day for a four-day visit at the invitation of Governor-General Sam Mostyn, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, and the Australian Jewish community. On Monday morning, he attended a wreath-laying ceremony at the site of the Bondi Beach massacre, where he said he had come to embrace and console the bereaved families following the “horrific antisemitic terror attack.”

“We are one big family, and when one Jew is hurt, all Jews feel their pain,” Herzog said at the site.

He welcomed what he described as “positive steps already taken by the Australian government to tackle antisemitism since the Bondi attack,” but stressed that he, along with others, had warned leaders in Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States for years about the rising tide of antisemitism in their societies, long before the massacre.

Among the speakers at Sunday night’s solidarity event was Chris Minns, the governor of New South Wales and a member of the Labor Party, whose head – Albanese – has come under harsh criticism from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and many within the Australian Jewish community for steering a pro-Palestinian stance that included recognition of a Palestinian state over the summer.

Minns, who received a warm reception, began his remarks by quoting the famous speech made by Herzog’s father – Chaim Herzog – at the United Nations, denouncing the resolution equating Zionism with racism. A nation’s level of humanity, Herzog said at the time, could invariably be judged by its behavior toward its Jews.

“The murderous ideology of antisemitism is a test of every society, and it’s one that weighs heavily on me,” Minns said.

“We have to be able to say, openly and clearly and without excuse or reservation, that we failed that national test of human decency on December 14 at Bondi. And things must change in our state and our country.”

Herzog visit triggers massive Sydney security operation

Herzog is scheduled to meet Albanese on Wednesday, in a meeting seen as part of an effort to put bilateral relations back on firmer footing after a period of strain in the bilateral ties.

Following the Bondi attack, Netanyahu said that Australia’s recognition of a Palestinian state had “poured fuel on an antisemitic fire.”

After Australia denied a visa in August to Religious Zionist Party MK Simcha Rothman, Netanyahu wrote on X/Twitter: “History will remember Albanese for what he is: a weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews.”

Herzog said at the large community event that, in addition to wanting to underscore to the Australian Jewish community just how important it is to Israel, he also hoped to use his visit to reinvigorate ties between the two countries.

Nevertheless, much of the local media coverage surrounding the visit has focused less on its symbolic significance and more on the controversy it has sparked – including the protests, court challenges, and accusations that authorities are using excessive measures to keep demonstrators away from the president – often overshadowing the broader context of Israeli-Australian relations.

That strain surfaced even at the ceremony itself, during one of the questions posed by an Australian reporter.

“Standing here at this solemn site where 15 people were killed indiscriminately, there are protests planned today by people mourning 70,000 killed in Gaza, including 20,000 children. Can you reflect on what message you have, if any, for those protesters?” he asked.

Herzog, no stranger to hostile anti-Israel protests during visits abroad, responded that Israel and Australia have been close allies for decades and that support for Israel has traditionally been bipartisan in Australia.

In many cases, he said, what is heard at such demonstrations comes from people who seek nothing less than “to undermine and delegitimize” Israel’s right to exist.


Herb Keinon

Source: https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-886035

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why Lebanon's Mount Dov is key to securing Israel’s northern border - analysis - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

The formerly Syrian-administered area, conquered by Israel in 1967, has been the site of many Hezbollah-related incidents, which have reinforced its importance for national defense.

 

 Activity of the 810th Brigade on Mount Dov.
Activity of the 810th Brigade on Mount Dov.
(photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

 

On February 9, the IDF said that “following intelligence indications gathered in recent weeks, IDF soldiers conducted a targeted raid on a structure in the Mount Dov area and apprehended a senior terrorist from the Jamaa Islamiya terrorist organization.” This is an important development and sheds light on the continued importance of the Mount Dov area in northern Israel.

The area, known as Har Dov in Hebrew and also called Shebaa Farms, sits on the northern border of Israel, between Metula and the Golan Heights, near Mount Hermon. Prior to the 1967 Six Day War, the area was administered by Syria but is claimed by Lebanon.

History of the site

Israel took control of Mount Dov during the conquest of the Golan Heights in 1967. The area is around 22 square kilometers. It is a sliver of mountainous land along the border, west of the Druze town Majdal Shams and north of the Israeli kibbutzim Dan and Dafna, both founded in 1939.

When Israel left Lebanon in 2000, the area entered more of a spotlight as Lebanese Hezbollah claimed it was part of Lebanon. As such, Hezbollah insisted that one reason it needed to keeps its arms was to “resist” Israel in order to get back Shebaa Farms. This created a threat where none had existed before.

Over the years, Hezbollah has sought to exploit the situation along the border to create provocations in the area of Mount Dov. This has been enabled by the fact that the border was not well demarcated.

Mount Dov is also situated just above the village of Ghajar. This is an Alawite village that is divided by the border’s so-called Blue Line. After the Second Lebanon War with Hezbollah in 2006, Israel took control of the village and it became another point of contention. The area is also technically part of Syria but claimed by Lebanon.

Before and after October 7

Prior to the recent Israel-Hamas War, two different trends developed in this area. One was that Ghajar was opened to tourism, with several restaurants serving visitors, and the pretty village appeared peaceful and inviting.

Above Ghajar in the Mount Dov area, Hezbollah created provocations prior to October 7, 2023. It sought to set up a tent in the disputed area as a step to laying claim to it. It also erected flags and signs along the border, and from Metula, one could see Hezbollah flags and signs on the other side.

Anyone hiking Nahal Ayun, for instance, could see the Hezbollah presence along the border. Hezbollah’s tents became a point of contention but Israel was afraid to dismantle them. Articles discussed the tents for months in 2023. When the war broke out on October 7 and Hezbollah began its attacks on Israel on October 8, Israel was afforded the opportunity to finally confront the tents and Hezbollah meddling near Mount Dov.

The war on Hezbollah increased in September 2024 and by November Hezbollah was defeated and there was a ceasefire with Lebanon. Another development in 2024 was that Israel created a new Brigade called the Mountain Brigade.

The goal of the new unit was to control the area along the border between Mount Dov and Mount Hermon. It operates under the 210th Division, which defends the Golan. This bolstered the 210th and reduced pressure on the 91st Division which defends Galilee from Rosh Hanikra to Metulla.

A Hezbollah terrorist walks beside coffins at a funeral for assassinated military chief Haytham Ali Tabatabai, in Beirut, Lebanon, November 24, 2025
A Hezbollah terrorist walks beside coffins at a funeral for assassinated military chief Haytham Ali Tabatabai, in Beirut, Lebanon, November 24, 2025 (credit: Scott Peterson/Getty Images)

The new brigade's success

The 810th Mountain Brigade has done important work over the past year and a half.  The IDF noted in November 2025 that “since the ceasefire understandings between Israel and Lebanon came into effect (November 27, 2024), troops of the Northern Command and the 91st Division have been operating in Lebanon to prevent the Hezbollah terrorist organization from rebuilding. In addition, troops from the 810th Brigade under the command of the 210th Division are operating in the ‘Har Dov’ area in Lebanon, alongside their activity in Syria.”

On January 9, the IDF noted that “the Alpinist (reservist) Unit completed their annual series of unique training exercises designed to prepare the unit’s troops for operational activity in the extreme weather conditions of the Mount Hermon Summit in Syria. As part of the training exercises, the unit’s troops practiced operating in complex, mountainous terrain, using the unit’s specialized equipment for activity in extreme weather and snow conditions.”
It continued: “In recent days, the unit’s troops joined the 810th Brigade for a defensive mission on the Mount Hermon Summit, in parallel with their defensive activity in the Golan Heights arena, in order to enable the safe opening of the Mount Hermon site to visitors.”

This illustrates the importance of this brigade and of the area between the Hermon and Mount Dov. On February 9, the IDF added details about the operation to stop a terrorist threat near Mount Dov: “The terrorist was apprehended and then transferred for further questioning in Israeli territory. Additionally, weapons were located in the same structure in which the terrorist was apprehended. Throughout the war, the Jamaa Islamiya terrorist organization advanced terror attacks against the State of Israel and its civilians in the North.”

The incident near Mount Dov also came after Lebanon’s Prime Minister Nawaf Salam visited southern Lebanon and claimed the country wanted to increase its control over the area.

Despite Salam’s desire to return it to state control, Israel continues to carry out strikes targeting Hezbollah. This indicates that Hezbollah has not disarmed or relented in its attempts to continue to be a threat to the Jewish state.


Seth J. Frantzman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-886107

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Chinese academics at top U.S. schools and labs were part of CCP’s infamous Thousand Talents Program - Jerry Dunleavy

 

by Jerry Dunleavy

The CCP's notorious Thousand Talents Program is designed to acquire and U.S. proprietary information to China. A number of U.S. colleges have brought in Chinese academics linked to the program.

 

A recent oversight report highlighted significant worries that some of America’s most elite colleges and labs have been “infiltrated” by Chinese academics who are affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party’s infamous “Thousand Talents Program” which has historically been used to steal U.S. technological and scientific know-how for the benefit of China.

A conservative non-profit watchdog group, the American Accountability Foundation, reported that it found nearly two dozen Chinese academics working at elite U.S. schools and labs “who because of the dual-use threat of their research, close ties to the military research sector in China, and/or clear ties to the Chinese Communist Party should be expelled from the United States or never be re-admitted."

Multiple Chinese students with links to the CCP’s "talents programs" — the most prominent of which is the Thousand Talents — appeared in the AAF report as attending top U.S. colleges.

The Chinese government’s since-deleted website for its Thousand Talents Program said its leadership working group was “composed of” the Central Committee of the CCP, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Science and Technology, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, among other Chinese entities, all showing the CCP’s control over the program.

U.S. taxpayers funding projects that pose security risks to U.S.

The new AAF research document — titled "Chinese Scientist Infiltration Threat Assessments" — says that Chinese students working at some of America’s top colleges, often receiving U.S. federal funding (some of it from the Pentagon) to conduct research into advanced technologies have troubling backgrounds which could pose a risk to U.S. national security.

The American universities in question, which have brought on Chinese scientists with ties to the Thousand Talents Program — Cornell University, Purdue University, Penn State University, the University of Wisconsin, and Carnegie Mellon — did not respond to emailed requests for comment from Just the News. None of the Chinese academics responded to requests for comment either.

Xi calls CCP’s Thousand Talents Program part of United Front "magic weapon"

The Thousand Talents Program was also explicitly named as being part of the United Front Work Department by the program’s since-defunct website. Chinese leader Xi Jinping has said that “the United Front is an important magic weapon for the party to defeat the enemy.”

The DOJ in 2020 stated that “China’s Thousand Talents Plan is one of the most prominent Chinese talent recruitment plans that are designed to attract, recruit, and cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security” and that “these talent programs seek to lure Chinese overseas talent and foreign experts to bring their knowledge and experience to China and reward individuals for stealing proprietary information.”

Harvard professor Charles Lieber, who was found guilty in December 2021 on federal charges related to concealing his ties to the Wuhan University of Technology and the Chinese government’s Thousand Talents Program while receiving U.S. government funding. Lieber was sentenced to time served, along with two years of supervised release with six months of home confinement. The former Harvard professor went on to join Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School in 2025.

The House Select Committee on the CCP warned in its “CCP on the Quad” report in 2024 that “China’s Thousand Talents Plan is well known, but it is just one of hundreds of talent programs developed by the PRC to acquire cutting-edge technology and knowledge from abroad.”

“Talent recruitment is also a critical ingredient of the CCP’s Military-Civil Fusion strategy—a plan to redirect ostensibly civilian research into military applications. Military-Civil Fusion is a foundational component of Xi’s ongoing effort to transform the People’s Liberation Army into a ‘world-class military’ by 2049,” the House committee warned. “It includes a strategy to aggressively acquire intellectual property, leverage research in cutting edge technology from private industry, and systematically reorganize the PRC science and technology enterprise to advance military and other national strategic objectives.”

The AAF report also showed that a Chinese scientist had links to the CCP’s similarly named and closely linked Hundred Talents Program.

The Justice Department in 2020 charged Zhengdong Cheng, a Chinese national, for allegedly seeking to defraud NASA and “leverage NASA grant resources to further the research of Chinese institutions.” The DOJ specifically said the Chinese defendant “participated in the PRC’s Hundred Talents Plan.”

The DOJ added: “The Chinese Talent Plans are programs established by the Chinese government to recruit individuals with access to or knowledge of foreign technology or intellectual property. Through these plans the Chinese government has created a significant financial incentive for foreign, talented individuals to transfer international technology and intellectual property to China, licitly or otherwise.”

Cheng entered into a plea agreement with the DOJ and was sentenced to time served.

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission said in 2020 that the Hundred Talents Program was established by the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 1994, and highlighted “the program’s role in facilitating the eventual return of science and technology expertise to China.”

Military-civil fusion projects

The commission said that “the Hundred Talents Program seeks to attract researchers who can contribute to projects furthering military-civil fusion” and that a 2019 guidebook by the Chinese Academy of Sciences about the Hundred Talents Program “noted that priority funding would be available to researchers whose work concerned core technologies associated with China’s strategic priorities like deep space, deep sea, and military-civil fusion.”

The White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing said in 2018 that “China’s talent recruitment strategically complements China’s efforts to target emerging high technology industries” and that the CCP programs “include the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Hundred Talents Plan.”

The Pentagon’s red flag list warning about “Foreign Talent Recruitment Programs that Pose a Threat to National Security Interests” specifically notes both the “Thousand Talents Plan” and “Hundred Talents Plan” among other Chinese government talent programs.

The new report by AAF also pointed out that a Chinese student who had been here in the U.S. had a prior membership in the CCP’s “Chunhui Program.”

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission said in 2020 that “China’s government runs myriad programs to bring Chinese students and scholars living in the United States back to China temporarily to engage in scientific activities relevant to its economic and military modernization” and that “one prominent program” — the Chunhui Program — “targets high-profile Chinese scholars appointed to teaching positions at prominent universities.”

Yet another Chinese scientist working at an American university had been mentored by the now-former director of Chinese National Office of the Recruitment Program of Global Experts, the AAF report showed. This appears to be just another name for the Thousand Talents Program.

The Senate Permanent Subcommittee assessed in 2019 that “the Chinese government has refined its centrally organized foreign talent recruitment plans into a strategy to ‘use talent to strengthen the country’ by targeting the specific technology sectors” and said that the “Recruitment Program of Global Experts” was another name for the Thousand Talents Program.

From Thousand Talents member to Hundred Talents leader — with stint in U.S. in between

The AAF report alleged that “Dr. Yu Zhao posed a high national security risk because his research advances precision biological payload delivery systems that are widely recognized as strategically sensitive” and argued that “this risk is no longer theoretical: Zhao has returned to China and accepted a postdoctoral position under Zhejiang University’s Hundred Talents Program, effectively placing U.S.-derived expertise inside a PRC system designed to absorb and operationalize advanced foreign research.”

Zhao’s LinkedIn profile and Google Scholar page both say he was very recently at Cornell University but that he has since returned to China to work at Zhejiang University. Cornell until recently said Zhao was a postdoctoral associate there, now listing him as a “former member” of the Jiang Lab at Cornell, which says it is “Focusing on Biomaterials and Drug Delivery.” 

Zhejiang now lists Zhao as a “Doctoral Supervisor” and “Hundred Talents Program Researcher” at the school’s College of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Zhao’s current role as a Hundred Talents leader should come as little shock — while studying at a Chinese university years ago, he conducted research funded in part by the “Thousand Talents Program for Young Professionals.”

Neither Zhao nor Cornell responded to a request for comment.

Zhao had also previously worked on research projects funded in part by the National Key Research Development Programs of China and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Work on biological agents

Zhejiang University now says that Zhao is focused on “precision nano-hybrid biological agents” and “smart nano-vaccines” research there.

The House select committee on the CCP warned in 2025 that “Zhejiang University is not just any Chinese academic institution — it is co-administered by SASTIND, holds classified PRC research credentials, and operates several defense laboratories. It has a documented history of involvement in Military-Civil Fusion projects and has conducted cybersecurity research funded by the Ministry of State Security — China’s internal security and intelligence agency.”

Zhao’s Google Scholar and LinkedIn pages say that he received his PhD at Nankai University prior to his time at Cornell.

Nature Magazine assessed that Nankai University was among “the leading collaborators with People's Liberation Army” and among the “top five domestic collaborators with People's Liberation Army” — the Chinese Academy of Sciences was number one, Peking University was number two, and Nankai University was number three.

“Zhao’s move to Zhejiang University through the Hundred Talents Program, combined with his prior funding from Chinese national science agencies, places him directly within China’s military-civil fusion ecosystem, where such technologies are actively leveraged for state objectives,” the AAF report argued. “His skill set would materially strengthen China’s ability to develop next-generation genetic delivery systems at scale—capabilities the U.S. government explicitly identifies as critical to national security, making the risk of strategic technology transfer both credible and significant.”

Leader of CCP’s “Spring Sunshine” effort allowed to work at advanced U.S. lab

The report by AAF argued that “Peihao Geng’s involvement with the Los Alamos Laboratory, coupled with his current association with a SASTIND-affiliated University, and his role in Chinese overseas recruitment programs, is highly significant from a national security perspective.”

Geng’s online bio says that he is an assistant research professor at Penn State, and the Penn State website lists Geng as an “research associate alumni” at the school’s Materials Processing and Characterization Laboratory. This lab focuses on “thermodynamics and kinetics in materials modeling.” Geng’s research profile says he left Penn State in 2025.

Geng’s profile at the Chinese university says he was an “overseas project leader” for the Chinese Ministry of Education’s Chunhui Program — translated as the “Spring Sunshine” program.

Neither Geng nor Penn State responded to a request for comment.

The National Academies wrote that “the Spring Light Program, which brought Chinese researchers educated abroad back to visit China following the Tiananmen Square protests and massacre in 1989, became Ministry of Education policy in 1996.” The National Academies said that “the Chinese government and the CCP established and expanded part-time programs for overseas scholars once it became apparent that these would be more attractive than full-time programs” — leading to the Thousand Talents Program.

The House Select Committee on the CCP said in 2025 that the Chinhui Plan “emphasizes leveraging overseas expertise to support the technological transformation and upgrading of large and medium-sized state-owned enterprises — entities that often serve as pillars of China’s strategic industrial base and are closely tied to national defense, infrastructure, and advanced manufacturing sectors.”

The committee said “this objective underscores the Chunhui Plan’s role in accelerating domestic innovation through the targeted acquisition and application of foreign-developed technologies.”

Geng now appears to currently be an associate professor at the Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The chairman of the House CCP committee said in 2024 that “Shanghai Jiao Tong University has helped drive China’s military modernization and intelligence capabilities, including by contributing to the development of nuclear weapons, carrier rockets, nuclear submarines, and fighter jets.”

Bill Evanina, the former head of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, warned in 2025 that the Chinese school “has historically been tied to the CCP's intelligence and cyber hacking programs.”

Geng’s research involves advanced practical applications for machine learning.

Penn State touted Geng’s AI research work in 2025, noting it had been funded by the NSF and Energy Department.

Some of Geng’s work at Penn State “was conducted in part at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility” with the project noting that “Los Alamos National Laboratory” operates under an Energy Department contract.

One research project in 2025 on large language models was worked on by Geng and by Penn State professor Jingjing Li through the Penn State lab.

Jingjing Li still helps lead the Penn State lab. Prior versions of her Penn State biography noted that she had graduated from both Beihang University and Tsinghua University.

Li’s research appears to have been funded in part by the Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation, among others. Jingjing Li did not respond to a request for comment.

Beihang has been dubbed one of the “Seven Sons of National Defense” by the CCP. The House select committee on the CCP describes the Seven Sons as “leading universities with deep roots in military and defense industry, subordinate to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology” and that the ministry “drives the Party’s Military-Civil Fusion strategy and the integration of civilian industries and cutting-edge technologies into the PRC’s military and security ecosystems.”

The House CCP committee warned in 2025 that Beihang University “adheres to the principle of educating talents for the Party and the nation” and “is guided by the Party’s leadership” while Beihang “emphasizes the central role of the Party's political construction and adheres to Xi Jinping Thought.”

Beihang has been blacklisted by the Pentagon and the Commerce Department for many years.

The House Select Committee on China noted in 2024 that Tsinghua is “co-supervised by the State Administration for Science, Technology, and Industry for National Defense, an arm of the Chinese government … which seeks to leverage these universities for defense purposes.” 

The committee also said that Tsinghua “has a documented history of serving the PRC’s national security and defense apparatus, including involvement in defense research and alleged cyberattacks targeting various international entities.”

The AAF report assessed that “Geng’s research, with dual-use and defense applications, is funded by various military and federal agencies. These facts, along with his association with Shanghai Jiao Tong University, a high-risk institution in China, and China’s overseas scientist recruitment program, raise serious national security concerns.”

Cutting edge researcher previously funded by the Thousand Talents Program

The report by AAF warned that Zebin Li at the University of Wisconsin-Madison “is working on next-gen semiconductors and was a participant in China’s notorious Thousand Talents program focused on recruiting overseas scientific talent for the CCP.”

Li’s prior research received support from the CCP’s Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars and the Thousand Talents Program, as well as from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology, the Chinese Ministry of Education, the National Science Foundation of China, and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality.

The Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars appears to be a progenitor of the Thousand Talents Program that was established by the Chinese Ministry of Education.

The National Academies has said that the Recruitment Program of Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars and the Supporting Scheme for Returned Overseas Chinese Students’ Entrepreneurial Start-ups are amongst “Foreign Talent Programs That May Pose a Threat to the National Security Interests of the United States.”

Li’s Google Scholar page and LinkedIn page say that he is currently a postdoc researcher at the University of Wisconsin, focused on “data analytics for material science and advanced manufacturing.”

Neither Li nor the University of Wisconsin responded to a request for comment.

Li also attended the Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems through the Chinese Academy of Sciences as well as Sichuan University.

The House select committee on the CCP in 2024 said the Beijing Institute is a “problematic Chinese institution” and assessed in 2025 that Sichuan University is a “SASTIND-affiliated University.”

Li is currently listed as a postdoctoral researcher at the Mesoscale Computational Modeling Research Group at Wisconsin, and Li’s work at the school receives both U.S. federal funding and Chinese government funding.

“Dr. Li has participated in one of China’s talent programs which are notorious for espionage and intellectual property theft activities,” the AAF argued. “The U.S. cannot allow a high-risk researcher like Dr. Li into the country.”

“Director of Chinese National Office of the Recruitment Program of Global Experts” as a mentor

The report by AAF described Ge Chen as “a Purdue electrical engineering postdoc working on electrical grid technologies whose mentor is a leading CCP official in China and has ties to their defense industry.”

Chen’s GitHub page says that he is currently a postdoctoral research associate at Purdue University. His profile also says that “he completed his PhD in Electric and Computer Engineering in 2023 at the State Key Laboratory of Internet of Things for Smart City, University of Macau, under the supervision of Prof. Yonghua Song.”

Chen’s named mentor at the Chinese state-run lab — Yonghua Song — had been the “Director of Chinese National Office of the Recruitment Program of Global Experts” according to his biography at the University of Macau, where he is the “rector.”

Song did not respond to a request for comment.

Another biography specifically says that the Chinese recruitment program led by Song was the Thousand Talents Program. The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations also said that the name of the recruitment program led by Song is interchangeable with the Thousand Talents Program.

Song “submitted a letter to President Xi Jinping” in 2018, according to the University of Macau, and the university blared that “we’ve received a letter from President Xi!” The university said that Xi replied to Song’s letter “with important instructions through the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.” Song also won a “State Scientific and Technological Progress Award” in 2020 at an award ceremony attended by Xi.

As for the University of Macau itself — which Chen attended under the mentorship of Song — the school has repeatedly touted its role in the CCP’s Thousand Talents Program.

Chen’s biography also says that he received degrees from Xi’an Jiaotong University and Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

The House select committee on the CCP assessed in 2025 that Xi’an Jiaotong is “co-administered by the State Administration for Science, Technology, and Industry for National Defense” and that “SASTIND plays a critical role in managing China’s defense R&D outside the PLA, coordinating weapons development, setting technical standards for defense industries, and integrating efforts across provincial and national levels.”

Bethany Allen, ASPI’s head of China investigations and analysis, warned last year about the troubling joint venture between Xi’an Jiaotong University in China and Liverpool University in Britain, with ASPI saying the “findings raise serious questions about research collaboration into sensitive technologies, including those with military applications.”

Allen said that Xi’an Jiaotong is “a leading Chinese defence university that has supplied the Rocket Force of the People’s Liberation Army and is supervised by China’s defence-industry ministry.”

The House CCP committee has also said that Huazhong is a “SASTIND-affiliated University” as well.

The Pentagon has placed the “Defense S&T Key Laboratory of Multi-spectral Information Processing Technology” at Huazhong University on its “list of foreign institutions engaging in problematic activity” as part of the Defense Department’s “important continuing effort in highlighting and countering mechanisms of unwanted technology transfer to foreign countries of concern.”

Chen’s GitHub page says Chen is a “Postdoctoral Research Associate” at Purdue who is “working with Prof. Junjie Qin.”

Qin’s webpage at Purdue says that he is an assistant professor at Purdue’s school of electrical and chemical engineering, and that “I am also affiliated with” the Center for Innovation in Control, Optimization, and Networks” and with the “Advancing Sustainability through Powered Infrastructure for Roadway Electrification” — the latter of which is backed by the NSF.

Qin himself attended Tsinghua University. The House Select Committee on the CCP also warned about Tsinghua in a 2024 report. Neither Chen, Purdue, nor Qin responded to requests for comment.

The Purdue electrical and chemical engineering school where Chen works and which Qin helps lead counts among its partners such U.S. government funders as Naval Sea Systems Command, the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Sandia National Laboratories, and others.

The AAF report said that “Chen’s prior history with Chinese defense/intelligence gathering universities, as well as his mentor’s relationship with the CCP made him a high-risk U.S. visa holder” and that he “should never have been allowed access into the country.”

CCP member used U.S. college perch for Hong Kong recruitment

Just the News also previously reported on how Jingao Xu, an expert in drone research technology at Carnegie Mellon University, previously helped lead the CCP chapter on his campus at Tsinghua University in China.

Xu also used his perch at Carnegie Mellon to engage in recruitment efforts seemingly similar to those carried out by members of the Thousand Talents Program, with the Chinese scientist using his U.S. university spot to recruit PhD students to work at Hong Kong University.

“I’m joining the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering at the University of Hong Kong as a tenure-track Assistant Professor, starting in Spring 2026. I’m actively seeking highly motivated students to join our group at HKU,” Xu wrote.

Neither Xu nor Carnegie Mellon responded to requests for comment.

The Chinese scientist also said in his recruitment pitch that his followers would seek to answer “how can cutting-edge CV/AI advances empower running robots, flying drones, and soaring satellites (NOT just excel on datasets or in simulators)?”

“Note to Prospective Students. Thanks for your interest to join my group,” Xu also wrote in his effort to recruit students to come to Hong Kong. “Our group will work on building mobile systems, with a long-term focus on exploring how cutting-edge CV/AI advances can empower running robots, flying drones, and soaring satellites to operate in the real world, NOT just excel on datasets.”

FBI Director Kash Patel told Just the News on Friday that “this FBI, under this leadership, has prioritized the threat against it by the CCP against us, and we've taken swift action.” It remains to be seen to what extent the bureau’s anti-CCP crackdown will extend to U.S. colleges and universities. 


Jerry Dunleavy

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/education/chinese-academics-top-us-schools-and-labs-were-part-ccps-infamous

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter