Wednesday, November 4, 2026

House Recap: A grim defeat for Republicans, but with Trump in White House, Dems will be hamstrung - Ashe Short

 

by Ashe Short

Democrats won multiple key races in their quest to retake the House of Representatives in a night projected to end in a Blue Wave. Although their options may be limited in legislating, they may reanimate investigations of Trump and his administration.

 

Democrats took control of the House of Representatives Tuesday night, in a Blue Wave that will place House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., in the speaker’s chair.

The Associated Press declared Democrats the House winners early Wednesday morning.

Democrats won multiple seats that were considered bellwethers of the night, including holding two seats in Florida, and flipping seats in New Jersey, North Carolina and Pennsylvania at the time of publication.

In Florida, Republicans redrew their district map in the hopes of unseating incumbent Democrats and replacing them with members of the GOP, but at least two of the three seats they were hoping to flip remained in Democrat hands. 

Democrats needed to gain just three net seats to gain control of the House

In New Jersey, Democrat challenger Rebecca Bennett defeated incumbent Republican Rep. Thomas Kean Jr. in the state’s 7th district. Kean lost in part due to historical midterm trends – where the party in power typically loses control of one or both chambers of Congress – but also due to his unexplained absence earlier this year. Kean missed more than 100 votes and when he finally re-emerged, he said he had been hospitalized for depression.

In North Carolina, Democratic challenger Jamie Ager defeated incumbent Republican Rep. Jennifer Balkcom in the state’s 11th district – a district President Trump won in 2024 by more than 9 percentage votes, NBC News reported. Democrat challenger Paige Cognetti also defeated incumbent Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan in Pennsylvania’s 8th Congressional district, Democrat Bob Brooks ousted incumbent Republican Rep. Ryan Mackenzie in the state’s 7th district, and Janelle Stelson unseated incumbent Republican Rep. Scott Perry in the 10th district.

Democrats needed to gain just three net seats to gain control of the House, which Republicans currently hold with a slim 220-215 majority with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., leading the chamber.

Democrats have said they would spend the majority of their time investigating the Trump administration

Even though Democrats flipped the chamber, it could be difficult to enact their agenda since they would have little room for defections when negotiating major pieces of legislation. Further, with Trump still in the White House, it is unlikely Democrats will be able to accomplish much of their agenda due to the president’s veto power. Further, it is unlikely that Democrats would want to work with Trump to pass any legislation that might be seen as a “win” for a president they despise.

Democrats have indicated that they would spend the majority of their time investigating the Trump administration, keeping Trump allies mired in investigations instead of doing their actual jobs.

“What we’ve seen from the Trump cartel is that they’re more focused on enriching themselves, their family members, their friends and their donors than they are with making life more affordable for the American people,” Jeffries said in early October.

While Jeffries didn’t say Democrats would try to impeach Trump, during his last administration, Democrats gleefully attempted two impeachments, with the Republican-controlled Senate acquitting the president. Democrats in the House also introduced multiple other articles and resolutions of impeachment, but those went nowhere when Republicans controlled the chamber. 

Now that Democrats control the House and the Senate, they may make another attempt.


Ashe Short

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/state-houses/house-recap-grim-defeat-republicans-trump-white-house-dems-will-be

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

El-Sayed wins fiercely contested Michigan race to become nation’s first Muslim senator - Just the News Staff

 

by Just the News Staff

El-Sayed was winning by a margin of about 52-46 over Republican Mike Rogers.

 

Democrat Abdul El-Sayed, a former public health official, won the U.S. Senate seat in Michigan early Wednesday, defeating Republican Mike Rogers to become the nation’s first Muslim senator.

El-Sayed was winning by a margin of about 52-46 when The Associated Press and multiple television networks declared him the winner at about 2:30 a.m. on Wednesday.  

It ended an improbable path for El-Sayed, who survived a bitter primary with a narrow win over Democrat Haley Stevens and faced questions about past statements about the Muslim Brotherhood and ties to the provocative influencer Hasan Piker. 


Just the News Staff

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/el-sayed-wins-fiercely-contested-michigan-race-become-nations-first

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump concedes Iran war, gas prices played role in election rout, vows to work with Democrats - Just the News Staff

 

by Just the News Staff

“I think we’ll work with the Democrats, and we’ll get along very well with them," the president told The Wall Street Journal. "If we don’t, we’ll be very tough on them, they’ll be very tough on us."

 

President Donald Trump acknowledged early Wednesday that the Iran war and its impact on gas prices played a role in the midterm election drubbing Republicans suffered but he vowed to try to work with the Democrats now poised to take control of Congress.

“I think we’ll work with the Democrats, and we’ll get along very well with them," the president told The Wall Street Journal. "If we don’t, we’ll be very tough on them, they’ll be very tough on us."

Republicans suffered historic losses in Tuesday's election, thristing the last two years of Trump’s second presidency into hostile territory, a painful reality for a president who held 29 rallies, 40-plus telephone rallies, spent $450 million of his own PAC money in a relentless bid to keep Republicans in control in the final month of the election. 

He acknowledged the Iran war was "a piece of" the election dynamic but that he had no regrets about his decision to bomb Tehran and eliminate its nuclear capablitiies.

“I don’t think about it. I did the right thing. I would have done it again,” he said. 


Just the News Staff

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/trump-concedes-iran-war-gas-prices-played-role-election-rout-vows

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Democrats win control of House and Senate in rout that reorders Washington power balance - Ben Whedon

 

by Ben Whedon

Democrat Roy Cooper won his North Carolina Senate race, picking up the GOP-held seat for the party in its bid to win control of the chamber.

 

The Democrats decidedly won the Senate on Tuesday evening, sweeping competitive contests and pulling off a string of upsets in formerly solid Republican bastions as they marched toward realigning the power structure in Washington by taking full control of Congress.

As of press time, the Associated Press projects the party to claim at least 53 seats in the upper chamber. The wire service early Wednesday declared Democrats won the House.

Democrats gained at least seven Senate seats, to give them a 53-41majority.

Those wins included flips in North Carolina, South Carolina, Ohio, Maine and Texas, while a Democratic incumbent held his ground in Georgia. The Democratic Party's wins in those states seem to suggest major cracks in the formerly solid Republican South. 

Maine marked the latest win for Democrats, with Troy Jackson denying incumbent GOP Sen. Susan Collins a sixth term. 

In Minnesota, Democratic Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan defeated Republican challenger Michelle Tafoya. Though the contest had been expected to be close, the Associated Press was able to call the race just after midnight and Flanagan boasted a 10.1% lead.

Iowa Democratic Senate nominee Josh Turek defeated GOP Rep. Ashley Hinson in a tight contest on Tuesday. The Associated Press called the race at 11:35 p.m., at which time Turek held 50.8% of the vote.

Democratic nominee Adam Hamilton became the latest Democrat to knock off a Republican senator, defeating Kansas GOP Sen. Roger Marshall in an upset.

The Associated Press called the race at 11:24 p.m.

Former Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, reclaimed a seat in the upper chamber on Tuesday, ousting Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, who had sought a full term after he was appointed to replace Vice President JD Vance.

The Associated Press called the race for Brown at 11:10 p.m.

Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico defeated state Attorney General Ken Paxton in the state's Senate race.

The Associated Press called the race for Talarico at 11:03 p.m.

Democratic Senate candidate Annie Andrews pulled off an upset against Sen. Darline Graham, R-S.C.

The Associated Press called the race at 10:39 p.m. at which time she led with 50.6% of the vote.

Gov. Henry McMaster, R-S.C., appointed Graham to complete the term of her late brother. She quickly opted to seek a full term and defeated Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., in a special primary.

GOP Rep. Andy Barr on Tuesday evening won election to Kentucky's open Senate seat and will replace the retiring Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

The Associated Press called the race at 9:16 p.m., at which time he led with 53.8% of the vote.

His win marked the fourth victory for a Republican in an upper chamber contest on Tuesday evening and followed those of Ashley Moody in Florida, Harriet Hageman in Wyoming, Shelley Moore Capito in West Virginia, and Kevin Hern in Oklahoma.

Democrats won at 11 contests, including Democrat Roy Cooper winning in North Carolina, picking up the first Senate seat for the party in their bid to win control of the chamber.

The Senate races in Alaska and Michigan were still undecided as of early Wednesday morning. 

Wyoming GOP Sen. Harriet Hageman easily won reelection on Tuesday, notching a clear win in a night that has seen Democrats put up fierce fights in red states.

The Associated Press called the race at 9 p.m., before any results came in.

West Virginia GOP Sen. Shelley Moore Capito won reelection on Tuesday, marking the second Republican win in an upper chamber contest of the night.

The Associated Press called the race in her favor at 8:52 p.m., at which time she boasted 55.9%. The result was hardly a surprise as West Virginia has been a Republican bastion for decades. 

But Capito's win may give Republicans some breathing room as the GOP struggles nationwide. As of press time, the GOP has only claimed victory in two of the Senate races, compared to 10 called for the Democrats.

Florida GOP Sen. Ashley Moody won a full term in the Senate on Tuesday evening, defeating progressive candidate Angie Nixon.

The Associated Press called the race for Moody at 8:34 p.m., at which time she led with 50.8% of the vote.

The Florida Republican received her appointment to the seat after now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio left the post to work in the administration.

Moody's win marked the first race call in favor of the Republicans in the battle for the upper chamber. Democrats had swept the earlier contests, notching clear wins in competitive seats like Georgia, New Hampshire, and North Carolina.

Earlier in the night, Cooper defeated Michael Whatley for the seat held by retiring GOP Sen. Thom Tillis, according to the Associated Press. Cooper is a former governor, and Whatley is a former Republican National Committee chairman. 

In New Hampshire, Democrat Rep. Chris Pappas defeated former GOP Sen. Jon Sununu in their race for the open seat of retiring Democrat Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, according to the Associated Press. Pappas will be Congress' first openly gay senator.

Democrats also won Senate contests in Georgia, Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Virginia.

Of the competitive contests, however, only Georgia broke quickly for the Democrats.

The Associated Press called the race for incumbent Democrat Sen. John Ossoff at 7:55 p.m.

Ossoff defeated GOP Rep. Mike Collins, in the battleground state, though he maintained a healthy lead throughout most of the campaign cycle. 

Virginia's Senate contest marked the first concluded race in that chamber of the evening. The Associated Press called the race for Democrat Sen. Mark Warner before any votes were counted.

Likewise, the Associated Press called Senate races for the Democrats in Delaware, Illinois, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Colorado before any results came in.

Tuesday evening will see voters decide control of the House and Senate. This is a developing story, check back for more updates as the Associated Press makes race calls.


Ben Whedon
is the Chief Political Correspondent at Just the News. Follow him on X.

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/polls-close-first-senate-contests-2026-midterms

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Eisenkot's Dilemma - Israel Update

 

by Israel Update

The election results are a complicated, messy tie. Netanyahu’s Likud is by far the biggest party. Eisenkot’s Yashar party is not even close. Yet Netanyahu’s bloc does not have a majority. But neither does the opposing bloc. And both now have to rechart their courses vis-à-vis the rising bloc of Arab parties. Can this mean that the rifts among the Jews will have to be transcended? Will that prospect be helped along by Trump and a possible escalation in the Gulf after the midterms? Mike and Gadi discuss.


 

 

Israel Update

Source: https://www.tabletmag.com/podcasts/israel-update/eisenkots-dilemma-2026#985797ed8fba

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

2026 Elections: Shin Bet warns of large-scale foreign funding against Israel - Uzi Baruch

 

by Uzi Baruch

According to information presented by the Shin Bet, funds are suspected of being channeled from foreign countries to influence events in Israel, potentially involving thousands of people.

 

Sohlberg and ISA director David Zini
Sohlberg and ISA director David Zini                                                    Yonatan Sindel/Flash90

Central Elections Committee Chairman Justice Noam Sohlberg presented committee members on Wednesday with intelligence from the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency - ISA) indicating that substantial sums of money had allegedly been transferred to Israel from foreign countries as part of efforts to exert foreign influence.

According to the intelligence assessment, the activity may involve thousands of people or more and could represent a widespread foreign funding operation.

The material presented by Sohlberg included an assessment by Shin Betprofessionals pointing to suspected extensive financial transfers originating from parties with undisclosed, and potentially hostile, interests.

"The intelligence presented by the agency's professionals appears to indicate widespread transfers of substantial funds to Israel from foreign countries, originating from parties with undisclosed and even hostile interests, intended to advance foreign influence," the statement said.

The information collected so far suggests that the phenomenon could involve thousands of individuals and enormous sums of money.

"The information collected so far indicates that funding and foreign influence activities involving enormous sums are a widespread phenomenon involving thousands of people and possibly more," the assessment stated.

However, the Shin Bet emphasized that the available intelligence was not yet sufficient to establish the full scope of the activity or determine who was involved.

"At this stage, we must complete additional intelligence-gathering and investigative activities to obtain intelligence that will allow us to connect the dots and establish the scope of the phenomenon with a high degree of certainty and confidence," the agency said.

The existence of foreign influence operations does not, in itself, establish that election results were manipulated or that interference occurred on a scale that would justify invalidating the results.

The disclosure comes amid controversy surrounding the results of the election for the 26th Knesset and allegations of attempts by foreign actors to influence the electoral process.

Earlier Wednesday, the presidium of the Central Elections Committee approved the election results, with opposition representatives voting in favor while Likud and Shas abstained.

The committee also announced that it had completed a review of 9,069 polling stations, finding no evidence that the integrity of the election had been compromised or that the results had been altered. 


Uzi Baruch

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/435645

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Election results approved despite fears of interference - Hezki Baruch

 

by Hezki Baruch

Following a discussion of suspicions of foreign influence, the Central Elections Committee approved the results by a vote of 15 in favor, two against and 14 abstentions.

 

The Elections Committee
The Elections Committee                                                                 Yonatan Sindel/Flash90

The Central Elections Committee's plenum on Wednesday approved the final results of the elections to the 26th Knesset and the allocation of parliamentary seats, following the completion of vote counting and a review of the results. The motion passed with 15 members voting in favor, two opposed and 14 abstaining.

During the meeting, Central Elections Committee Chairman and Supreme Court Justice Noam Sohlberg addressed suspicions surrounding the electoral process, clarifying that they did not warrant delaying approval of the results. Sohlberg emphasized that the allegations were still being examined by the relevant authorities and had not been substantiated. He said they did not currently justify questioning the integrity of the elections as a whole and urged all parties involved to cooperate with the investigation.

"As everyone knows, one of the central features of the democratic system is the possibility of a peaceful transfer of power. This has been the case since the establishment of the state and remains so today," Sohlberg said. "Political upheavals, surprises and fierce disagreements have never undermined the basic consensus that election results must be respected. This is a very precious asset for our country. We must treat it with great care. It is easy to break, but very difficult to repair."

According to the final allocation, Likud emerged as the largest party with 27 seats, followed by Yashar with 21 and Beyachad with 12. The Joint List won 11 seats, while the Democrats and UAL secured eight each. Yisrael Beytenu, Otzma Yehudit and United Torah Judaism each received seven seats, while Shas and the Religious Zionist Party won six apiece.

Earlier Wednesday, the Elections Committee announced that it had completed a review of records from 9,069 polling stations, representing approximately 75% of all regular polling stations. The review found no evidence that the integrity of the elections had been compromised or that the results had been altered.

The investigation into suspected foreign interference will nevertheless continue. Officials have stressed that the existence of suspicions does not necessarily mean that the election results were manipulated or that any interference occurred on a scale that would justify invalidating the vote.

The approval paves the way for the formal submission of the election results to President Isaac Herzog and the beginning of consultations with representatives of the Knesset factions. Following the consultations, President Herzog will decide whom to task with forming the next government. 


Hezki Baruch

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/435646

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Eisenkot may get the mandate, but haredi parties hold key to Israel's next government - analysis - Anna Barsky

 

by Anna Barsky

Israel's haredi parties could determine the next government as Eisenkot seeks a coalition, Liberman rules out support from an Arab party, and Netanyahu weighs his options.

 

Shas leader MK Arye Deri (L) and United Torah Judaism leader MK Ya’akov Asher.
Shas leader MK Arye Deri (L) and United Torah Judaism leader MK Ya’akov Asher.
(photo credit: CHAIM GOLDBERG/FLASH90, YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)

 

The haredi parties hold much of the power to determine Israel's next government as President Isaac Herzog prepares to begin coalition consultations on Wednesday, with Yisrael Beytenu chairman Avigdor Liberman announcing on Monday that he would recommend Gadi Eisenkot for prime minister while ruling out a minority government dependent on Arab party support.

Liberman also reiterated that he would not serve in a government with Benjamin Netanyahu. His positions have narrowed the options available to Eisenkot, leaving the central question of whether Shas and United Torah Judaism would be willing to cross political lines and join a government under his leadership.

For now, the haredi parties are careful not to commit themselves. In briefings and public statements, their representatives have repeatedly stressed that no decision has been made and that their rabbinical leadership will make the final determination.

Rabbis Dov Landau and Moshe Hillel Hirsch are expected to return from abroad around the time consultations begin at the President's Residence. According to assessments, even after their return, United Torah Judaism may prefer not to recommend either Netanyahu or Eisenkot, preserving as much room as possible for maneuver in subsequent negotiations.

The battle over a rotation agreement

Even without recommendations from the haredi parties, the prevailing assessment in political circles is that Eisenkot will be the first candidate tasked with forming a government.

Yashar party chairman Gadi Eisenkot alongside members of his party at the party’s election headquarters in Tel Aviv, following the closing of polling stations and the release of exit poll results on Israel’s general election night, October 28, 2026.
Yashar party chairman Gadi Eisenkot alongside members of his party at the party’s election headquarters in Tel Aviv, following the closing of polling stations and the release of exit poll results on Israel’s general election night, October 28, 2026. (credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/FLASH90)

However, the number of parties recommending him does not guarantee that he can assemble a coalition, and the real struggle is expected to begin once he receives the mandate.

Political sources believe Eisenkot may offer the haredi parties generous arrangements on the military enlistment of yeshiva students, along with budget allocations and agreements on issues important to them, to bring them into the coalition.

If the haredi parties agree, the door could also open to Yisrael Beytenu joining the government.

However, according to assessments in political circles, even an agreement in principle by the haredi parties and Liberman would not necessarily conclude the negotiations.

Liberman has already served as defense minister, finance minister, and foreign minister, and political observers believe that returning to a senior ministerial position alone would not satisfy him.

Under such circumstances, he could demand a rotation agreement for the premiership with Eisenkot. If raised, such a demand could ignite another dispute within the bloc seeking to replace Netanyahu.

Potential premiership rotation deal could spark Bennett-Liberman dispute

Naftali Bennett, who has already served as prime minister and whose party won 12 Knesset seats in the election, may oppose an arrangement under which Liberman, whose party holds seven seats, would serve as prime minister in a rotation agreement while Bennett himself would have to settle for a ministerial position.

This could lead to demands for a three-way rotation agreement involving Eisenkot, Liberman, and Bennett.

It should be emphasized that, at this stage, this remains a possible scenario rather than a set of formal demands presented by either politician.

Such an arrangement would require complex negotiations over the order and length of each leader's term, as well as the division of powers, potentially making the formation of a government even more difficult.

'Better to keep everyone in suspense and uncertainty'

Haredi parties hold off on coalition decision

The entire scenario, however, depends on the haredi parties, which are showing no urgency to make a decision.

In closed-door conversations, haredi sources describe their political position as an exceptional opportunity: Both blocs need them, and the willingness to offer generous concessions, including on military enlistment, gives them considerable bargaining power.

"It is better for everyone to remain in suspense and uncertainty, and for each side to think that we have already reached an agreement with the other side," one haredi source said.

Behind this ambiguity, however, lies a more sober assessment among figures in the haredi political establishment.

"The chances that the rabbis will instruct us to join a government with the Left, headed by Eisenkot, are low," a well-informed haredi source argued.

According to haredi sources, this assessment also applies to United Torah Judaism, even though senior party officials are exploring dialogue with the bloc seeking to replace Netanyahu.

For Shas, the possibility is considered even more sensitive.

Party chairman Arye Deri has previously made clear that he does not want a return to the scenario in which the haredi parties participated in Yitzhak Rabin's government during the Oslo Accords period. The party continues to emphasize its commitment to the Right.

If the haredi parties decide against joining an Eisenkot-led government, the possibility of forming a government dependent on the support of Arab parties will return to the center of the debate.

However, Liberman has already announced that he would not support a minority government, even if it were presented as a temporary administration ahead of another election.

Without Yisrael Beytenu or the haredi parties, Eisenkot would struggle to assemble a stable majority that would allow him to swear in a government and govern effectively.

Netanyahu could receive mandate if Eisenkot fails to form coalition

If Eisenkot fails, the mandate to form a government could pass to Netanyahu.

Some in Netanyahu's circle believe that another election would not necessarily be a bad outcome for him.

They assume the high voter turnout among Arab Israelis would not be repeated, and that voters who traveled to Israel from abroad specifically to support the bloc seeking to replace Netanyahu might not do so again.

On the other hand, Netanyahu also faces a risk.

If attempts to form a government fail and the process reaches the 21-day period in which the Knesset can nominate a candidate, a majority of 61 MKs could emerge to request that the task of forming a government be assigned to an agreed-upon candidate.

Those close to Netanyahu fear that, at this stage, the bloc seeking to replace him could reach agreements that had previously proved elusive.

Against this backdrop, sources within the Likud bloc believe Netanyahu would agree to pursue a unity government with Eisenkot, even if that was not his initial preference.

But here, too, the decision would not be his alone.

Eisenkot would have to decide whether he was prepared to serve in a government alongside Netanyahu or whether he would prefer another election, despite the political risks involved.

As consultations at the President's Residence approach, the haredi parties find themselves in a particularly advantageous bargaining position.

They can refrain from recommending a candidate, examine proposals from both sides, and keep the question of the next governing coalition open.

The question is whether they will ultimately be content to use their leverage in negotiations or be prepared to pay the political price of joining a government led by Eisenkot. 


Anna Barsky

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-election-2026/article-913674

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

A Democratic-run Congress will target Israel as well as Trump - Jonathan S. Tobin

 

by Jonathan S. Tobin

The rout of the GOP by a party now dominated by “progressive” and antisemitic foes of the Jewish state will impact the alliance as well as American Jewish life for the worse.

 

El-Sayed
\Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed speaks to his supporters at his last rally at the Majestic Theater on Nov. 2, 2026, in Detroit. Credit: Salwan Georges/Getty Images.

It was a big night for the Democrats and a very, very bad night for U.S. President Donald Trump and the Republican Party. But amid the wreckage left by the blue wave that flipped control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, members of the GOP aren’t the only big losers. Supporters of the U.S.-Israel alliance and those who worry about the surge of antisemitism that has swept across the globe over the past three years should be equally worried about the implications of the Democrats’ midterm victory.

The consequences of the Democrats’ return to power on Capitol Hill will be primarily directed at the Trump administration. But whatever that will mean for Trump’s ability to govern effectively in his final two years in office, control of Congress by a party that is now largely dominated by its intersectional left-wing will have a serious impact on the U.S.-Israel relationship as well as the battle against Jew-hatred.

Jews in denial

That will not be the message we hear from most Jewish Democrats. They will point to the exit polls that show Democrats winning their usual two-thirds of the Jewish vote, though we don’t know for sure yet whether that was also true in states like Michigan where their candidate, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, is an open antisemite.

They will also say that the leadership of the Democratic Party in both the House and Senate will remain in the hands of relative moderates like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) who both speak of themselves as supporters of Israel. Though, especially in the case of Schumer, his longtime pose as the shomer or “guardian” of Israel in Congress has been largely conditional with the senator backing up efforts by his fellow Democrats to attack the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and hamstring its efforts to defeat Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran and even downplaying the threat of antisemitism.

But as we saw throughout 2026, the moderates are no longer in control of the Democratic Party, especially where Israel is concerned.

As a result of primary wins across the nation, the composition of both the House and Senate Democratic caucuses has been materially altered. Progressives, including members of the Democratic Socialists of America and their left-wing allies will now be sitting in seats that were once held by traditional liberals.

Progressives dominate

That doesn’t just mean that the ranks of the far-left congressional “Squad,” which had already grown since its first four members were elected in 2018, will be increased. The swing to the left is being felt across the country amid a midterm election where Democrats made gains at every level of government.

What will this mean?

During the campaign, the primary theme of the Democrats largely centered on the economy. The rise in gas prices as a result of the ongoing conflict with Iran has hit voters across the board, but most of the pain is felt by those working-class voters who largely supported Trump and the GOP in 2024. Their defection to the Democrats seems to have gone well beyond the usual backlash against the party in power two years after it won the presidency and Congress.

But while dissatisfaction with the economy as well as a sense that Trump had not improved the lives of voters during the past two years may have won them the midterms, the winners will have other priorities once they are sworn into office in January.

As the primaries demonstrated, the two issues that are the main motivating factors for the party’s activists and their candidates are only tangentially connected to what enabled them to win. The organizing principles of the Democratic Party and its base are now opposition to enforcement of immigration laws and hostility towards Israel.

Trump has effectively ended the flood of millions of illegal immigrants that entered the United States during the Biden administration. That will likely remain the case even with a Democratic Congress. But we can expect them to try to use their control of Congress and government funding to end the deportations of illegals.

And it’s equally true that their priority will be to confront Trump.

That will mean attempts at impeachment of the president and members of his cabinet that will likely fail. But it will tie the administration up in knots, as was the case during the Democrats’ efforts to undermine Trump during the last two years of his first term. Even more important, control of congressional committees will give the ability to launch investigations of every department as well as members of the president’s family. Yet whether any of it leads to any tangible consequences for those put in their crosshairs, it will materially influence Trump’s ability to govern effectively or get anything done.

Targeting Israel

But along with that, the large number of anti-Israel Democrats elected by voters who have accepted lies about the war in Gaza will be trying to sever the relationship with Israel.

Democrats who were long considered “moderates” or even pro-Israel have been signaling over the course of the last year that they can no longer be relied upon to back a Jewish state under assault by Iran and its terrorist proxies. The reason is that they can read the polls that indicate those who identify as Democrats have turned upon Israel as well as the primary results that are sending anti-Israel leftists to Washington.

Rather than try to resist the base of their party and find themselves out of power, figures like Schumer are going along with the progressives.

During the campaign, that meant backing an open antisemite like El-Sayed. They feared being targeted by angry leftists. And now that the Michigan Democrat with links to the Muslim Brotherhood appears poised to join Schumer on the Senate floor while others with similar views enter the House, the same dynamic will be in play.

We already know that will lead to measures that will fundamentally alter the alliance with the Jewish state. That will mean sanctions on Israelis in Judea and Samaria—an effort that will be driven by acceptance of the false narrative about “settler violence.”

Military aid to Israel will also be targeted by the Democrats.

Trump may have thought he could forestall such efforts by announcing this week that the aid will now wind down by the end of the year and be replaced with a partnership rooted in joint efforts to research and develop weaponry.

In the long run, that is, as Netanyahu has actually been saying for decades, exactly what Israel needs. Doing so will enable the Jewish state to be less dependent on the United States and remove a major talking point employed by Israel-bashers. That’s in spite of the fact that almost all of it was spent in the United States and was as much of an aid package for American arms manufacturers as the Israelis. It’s also true that the amount spent on assistance to Israel is actually dwarfed by the aid that Europe gets via American participation in NATO that is part of the Pentagon budget rather than called “aid.”

Still, making this change abruptly rather than gradually, as Israelis who desire this shift wanted, will create a strain on their military at a time of war when it is already hard-pressed.

Mainstreaming antisemitism

What Trump and whoever winds up leading the next Israeli government need to realize is that the anti-Israel progressives are not really focused so much on ending aid so much as they are interested in severing the relationship altogether.

For one thing, that will likely mean efforts to stop the transition from aid to partnership. But the impact of congressional majorities that are overwhelmingly hostile to Israel will transcend the ongoing debate about the aid package.

It’s been clear for years that the Democrats have not only rejected any idea of a bipartisan consensus about the alliance but have been transitioning to being an anti-Israel party. But the 2026 results have produced more than just majorities that don’t want to aid Israel’s efforts to defend itself.

With the victories of figures like El-Sayed and others who were willing to spread blood libels about Israel committing “genocide” in Gaza and who sought to anathematize the pro-Israel AIPAC lobby, we’ve gone well beyond arguments about military assistance.

A public square in which the sort of antisemitism that they spout is normalized is one that can fundamentally change the way that Jews interact with society. El-Sayed’s focus on AIPAC, which was echoed in other campaigns around the country, employed classic tropes of Jew-hatred. This will make it even harder for the dwindling numbers of pro-Israel Democrats to be heard or influence policy.

But it will also impact Republicans.

The majority of Republicans remain supportive of Israel and opposed to the left’s antisemitism that is driven by their acceptance of the toxic doctrines of the left about race such as critical race theory, intersectionality and settler-colonialism.

It won’t only be the antisemitic extremists of the far right who are influenced by podcasters like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens who will be speaking of the conflict with Iran as being the primary reason for the GOP defeat. There were other causes for the Republican catastrophe including Trump’s failure to adequately explain his decision to the American people, choosing terrible candidates in several states and general disillusionment with the administration.

But rather than just blaming Trump for his correct decision to go to war against an Islamist regime that is a threat to America, some will likely blame it on Israel.

That will likely undermine Republican efforts to resist the Democrats’ push to target the Jewish state. It will also make it more difficult for them to join in efforts to push back against a tsunami of antisemitism that is making itself felt in every sector of society including academia, popular culture and the arts, as Trump has attempted to do.

The pendulum swings

Nothing is permanent in politics and the Democrats celebrating now should remember that. In the 21st century, the two parties have exchanged control of both Capitol Hill and the White House with increasing frequency. There is no telling now which side will be in a better position to win in 2028. The more the currently triumphant Democrats overplay their hand with their harassment of Trump and even their measures against Israel, the less likely it will be that they will win the presidency, especially if they nominate one of the increasingly dominant progressives who will be running.

The one thing that is certain is that the pendulum of American politics is always swinging.

Some Jewish liberals who appear deaf, dumb and blind to the way they are being marginalized along with the rest of the community may try to deny this or focus solely on their hatred for Trump. But there can be no disguising the fact that the midterms have delivered a devastating blow to supporters of Israel and a victory to those who wish to eradicate the Jewish state. That will make it all the more necessary for decent persons, whether Republican or Democrat, Jewish or non-Jewish, to redouble their efforts to fight back against the growing volume of antisemitic invective that has insinuated itself into so much of public discourse. 


Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of JNS, a columnist for Newsweek and a contributor to other publications. He covers the American political scene, foreign policy, the U.S.-Israel relationship, Middle East diplomacy, the Jewish world and the arts. He hosts the JNS “Think Twice” podcast, both the weekly video program and the “Jonathan Tobin Daily” program, available on major audio platforms and YouTube. Previously, he was executive editor, then senior online editor and chief political blogger, for Commentary magazine. Before that, he was editor-in-chief of The Jewish Exponent in Philadelphia and editor of the Connecticut Jewish Ledger. He has won 60-plus awards for his columns, commentary, art criticism and other writing. He appears regularly on television, commenting on politics and foreign policy. Born in New York City, he studied history at Columbia University.

Source: https://www.jns.org/opinion/column/jonathan-s-tobin/a-democratic-run-congress-will-target-israel-as-well-as-trump

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Thrill Is Gone: But X Still Remains the World’s Digital Public Square and a Bulwark Against Tyranny - Raw Egg Nationalist

 

by Raw Egg Nationalist

“The thrill is gone,” crooned the late great bluesman BB King.

 

 

These days, I share that sentiment, but not about some cheating no-good ex. Well, not exactly. I feel that way about X or, rather, the website formerly known as Twitter.

I suppose it was always going to be this way, given how long I’ve been on the platform. I started posting anonymously in the fall of 2019, after hanging around—“lurking” as it’s known—for some time before that, thanks mainly to a poster by the name of “Bronze Age Pervert.”

My profile was initially called “Turning Point Gobëkli Tepe”—a reference to my firm belief that the Agricultural Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race—but soon morphed into the persona I still half-occupy today, “Raw Egg Nationalist,” when I’m not writing under my own equally silly real name.

For four and a half blissful years I posted anonymously and built up a huge following and a body of work that included a raw-egg cookbook and a health manifesto, The Eggs Benedict Option, described by a senior member of the Trump administration as the “blueprint for MAHA.”

I also featured—anonymously, thanks to a stunt double—in the 2022 Tucker Carlson documentary, The End of Men, which inspired my most recent book about the political consequences of testosterone decline.

My identity was revealed in June 2024 by an activist group in the UK called Hope Not Hate, which specializes in “doxxing” people on the right, probably in collusion with Britain’s security services. Two weeks before I was doxxed, a Business Insider journalist, Katherine Long, somehow located the farm where I buy raw milk and sent the owner an email asking him to reveal my identity, because obviously he should be concerned about an anonymous right-wing influencer buying his produce. She later went on to doxx Marko Elez and “Big Balls,” two young workers at DOGE, in the Wall Street Journal before disappearing to some deep-state black site in the Guatemalan jungle.

The frisson that came with anonymity, with disguising one’s identity because certain opinions really are dangerous, disappeared overnight, although it took maybe a couple of weeks to register. The fact that I wasn’t bundled off by Britain’s social-media police doesn’t mean my opinions are any less dangerous to hold in these benighted isles, just that the authorities tend to focus on people they think are likely to go out and do something like smash the windows of a migrant hostel or block rubber dinghies from landing at Dover. People are still persecuted for social media posts here: more than in Russia, in fact.

Maybe that’s when the excitement died—when I became “legit,” as gangsters like to say. It’s never quite the same as cracking skulls and pulling heists.

But it’s not just that my situation has changed. The platform has changed considerably since Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, acquired it on October 27, 2022, for the kingly sum of $44 billion. The X rebrand took about nine months, but otherwise the changes came thick and fast.

Verification policies changed. Out went the old legacy “blue-check” for libtards in the mainstream media and in came paid subscriptions. A new payment-for-posts system, the Creator Revenue Program, was brought in, offering posters a fat slice of the advertising revenue associated with their content. Of course, like any big pot of gold on offer for jumping through a set of clearly defined hoops, the Creator Revenue Program became subject to massive scamming. Instead of doing the one thing that would actually work—banning accounts from the subcontinent and Africa from applying—X just changed the goalposts. (One of my firm beliefs now is that a geogated internet—an internet that resembles the internet of 2006, when most users were in America and Europe—is the big product to sell. You’d make billions. I know I’d pay for it.)

Musk has never been quiet about his ambition to turn X into “the everything app,” and that means making it more like TikTok and Instagram. All the incentives now line up to promote “content” that looks less like the Twitter threads and posts of old, lovingly crafted and written, and more like the drivel that’s liquefying toddlers’ brains faster than a directed-energy weapon.

Some of the biggest changes took place to the platform’s moderation and censorship system. I’ve written about these changes already for American Greatness. Rather than just outright banning people for saying verboten things about Hunter Biden’s laptop and mRNA vaccines, as used to be the policy, Elon proclaimed “freedom of speech isn’t freedom of reach.” This wasn’t actually a middle finger to European governments that have spent years trying to censor their own citizens and impinge on Americans’ rights under the First Amendment. It actually turned out to be a sop. The algorithm now actively censors people from the get-go, before any do-gooder in Brussels or Berlin even has to file a report. They still do file reports, though, and X has to provide detailed compliance paperwork to the EU to show how it keeps track of “harmful” content.

In many respects, the new way is actually more insidious than the old, because you can easily end up trapped in digital limbo for reasons that are far from obvious. Although X now lets you look “under the hood” at labels attached to your account, that information doesn’t really mean much, as far as I can tell.

But still, the censored posts remain on the platform, which is a big difference from before. I guess that’s freedom of speech. I guess.

These algorithmic changes have been capped by the introduction of Musk’s signature xAI, which somehow or other ranks and sorts posts and has life-or-death power over them, over what goes viral and what doesn’t. It also decides what you should see on your timeline, but in a totally retarded way that only an experimental technology could. Milliseconds of attention can be the difference between a timeline that almost gives you what you want and one that’s completely unusable.

Just the other day, I spent perhaps one second too long laughing at a meme of Vivek Ramaswamy as Abraham Lincoln, and then for the next 24 hours that was the only thing I saw: Vivek Ramaswamy as George Washington, Vivek Ramaswamy as Dwight D. Eisenhower, and Vivek Ramaswamy as a whole multitude of film characters.

No Country for Indoor Plumbing was pretty good. But still, 24 hours of it was too much. I gave up.

Every time something goes wrong, it’s just customary to blame the algorithm now. But nobody really knows if that’s the case—and I suspect that includes the engineers at X too.

As a genre, “I quit Twitter and so should you” is a firmly liberal one. It’s mostly left-wing authors and commentators who have renounced X and written at length about it, as part of a wider exodus of left-wingers from the platform. Many of these people have migrated to Bluesky, where they’re free to fantasize about murdering prominent right-wing figures and to cannibalize one another for minor infractions of their increasingly recondite speech codes.

(I also think this, paradoxically, is another reason X isn’t what it used to be. Before, there were more clearly defined enemies, and we all knew who to attack. An external enemy inspires solidarity, every canny leader knows, which is why we’ve always been at war with East Asia. Now, however, like a body kept in a sterile environment, the immune system attacks itself for want of a genuine foe. I have no doubt the right-wing infighting we’ve seen online over the last 18 months would have been far less vicious if the demographics of X hadn’t changed so much.)

I know I’m not the only right-wing person to feel this way about the platform that helped me become the minor-minor internet celebrity I am today. I see it on the timeline, and people talk to me about it in private too. Many are frustrated; there doesn’t seem to be any decent alternative. Some talk about establishing an internet forum, maybe invite-only, where serious discussion can take place again. Nothing happens, though. They all just keep posting, including me.

And yet—there’s still something to be said for the platform. X remains, for better or for worse, the global digital public square and a bulwark against tyranny.

We get reminders of the platform’s enduring value every now and then, and last weekend was one of those occasions. In Poland, Prime Minister Donald Tusk attempted to purge the country’s Constitutional Court while the president was on a flight to Africa, and nobody would have been any the wiser if it hadn’t been for X.

Hermann Tertsch, a Spanish member of the European Parliament, put it nicely in a Xeet.

“Without X, no one in Europe would have found out about what happened in Poland tonight,” he wrote.

“The head of government Donald Tusk carried out an attempted coup d’état, taking advantage of the state head Karol Nawrocky’s trip abroad. He stormed the Constitutional Tribunal with the police and tried to remove the president and vice president of the Constitutional Tribunal with a loyal judge without competencies.”

Tertsch is right. It’s taken days for the mainstream media to catch up with events in Poland. While they were unfolding, in real time, the newsmen and -women might as well have been under anesthetic. But thanks to X, whether you were in Warsaw or Wisconsin, you could see live video of Prime Minister Tusk in the Constitutional Court with his henchmen. You could see President Nawrocki forcing his way into the court, despite the best attempts of Poland’s own Ruth Bader Ginsburg to stop him. You could see protesters using angle grinders to cut through chains on the gates of the court. Presumably, many of those protesters wouldn’t even have been there had it not been for the coverage on X.

The coup, as far as we can tell, failed—for now.

The Democrats are gunning for Elon Musk. He’s one of the principal targets in their plan for retribution that’s been dubbed “Project 2029.” That plan will be put into action as soon as the midterms are over if the Democrats win back the House and, with it, control over the powerful committees. As I noted recently for American Greatness, Democrat lawmakers have already been sending letters to partners of the Trump administration, including Elon Musk’s companies, warning them that “oversight” is coming.

The Democrats are targeting Musk because he’s Trump’s most powerful backer, indeed the most profligate political donor in American history, but also because he controls X, and that means he still has huge power over the flow of information and public opinion.

At the very least, if things have gone badly in the midterms for the Republicans, the Democrats will spend the next two years subjecting Musk and his companies to unceasing scrutiny, backed up by the force of legal threat.

In 2029, under a President Newsom or, God forbid, a President Harris or AOC, the Democrats would obviously go much further. Antitrust proceedings could be used to pry X and other companies from Musk’s grasp—and then what?

We may already have lost a platform where dudes with silly names can talk anonymously about the Count de Gobineau’s theories on race and rare Soviet steroids extracted from Arctic crustaceans. Soon we could be in real danger of losing something far more important than that.  

Photo: TOPSHOT - This video grab taken from a video posted on the Twitter account of billionaire Tesla chief Elon Musk on October 26, 2022 shows himself carrying a sink as he enters the Twitter headquarters in San Francisco. Elon Musk changed his Twitter profile to "Chief Twit" and posted video of himself walking into the social network's California headquarters carrying a sink, days before his contentious takeover of the company must be finalized. (Photo by various sources / AFP) (Photo by -/Twitter account of Elon Musk/AFP via Getty Images)


Raw Egg Nationalist is Dr. Charles Cornish-Dale, an Oxford- and Cambridge-educated historian and anthropologist. He rose to prominence as “Raw Egg Nationalist.” He has a large social media following, is a bestselling author, has appeared on national television, and has influenced debates on health, fitness, politics, and culture. His latest book is 'The Last Men: Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity.'

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/11/04/the-thrill-is-gone-but-x-still-remains-the-worlds-digital-public-square-and-a-bulwark-against-tyranny/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter