Monday, May 18, 2026

Trump issues new warning to Iran regime: ‘Clock is ticking’ - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

The president was expected to talk with Netanyahu as he weighs restarting U.S. military action. he wrote on social media.

Attendees watch a pre-recorded video of U.S. President Donald Trump reading from the Bible during "Rededicate 250: A National Jubilee of Prayer, Praise and Thanksgiving" on the National Mall in Washington, DC, on May 17, 2026. Photo by Matthew Hatcher / AFP via Getty Images.
Attendees watch a pre-recorded video of U.S. President Donald Trump reading from the Bible during the “Rededicate 250: A National Jubilee of Prayer, Praise and Thanksgiving” event on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., May 17, 2026. Photo by Matthew Hatcher/AFP via Getty Images.

Time is running out for a deal, U.S. President Donald Trump warned the Iranian regime on Sunday.

“For Iran, the Clock is Ticking, and they better get moving, FAST, or there won’t be anything left of them. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE! President DJT,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

The president was expected to talk on the phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday, with the premier saying on Sunday morning that “our eyes are also open regarding Iran.”

Meanwhile, an Israeli source told Kan News on Sunday that with a green light from Trump, Washington and Jerusalem are expected to jointly attack Iran, with the country’s national energy infrastructure on the target list. The Israeli public broadcaster noted that the White House had requested it not be attacked in the previous round, the American “Operation Epic Fury” and Israeli “Operation Roaring Lion” launched jointly on Feb. 28 with a ceasefire holding since April 8.

Iran’s leaders increasingly believe Trump will resume military action, and they are pursuing a strategy of “deception and delay” to buy time and complicate any return to war, according to two regional intelligence officials cited by Fox News on Sunday.

Pakistan has shared a revised Iranian proposal with the United States aimed at ending the ongoing Middle East conflict, Reuters reported on Monday, citing a Pakistani source, as diplomatic efforts appeared to remain deadlocked.

“We don’t have much time,” the source said, adding that both sides “keep changing their goalposts” when asked whether gaps in negotiations could be bridged quickly.

Details of the proposal were not immediately disclosed.

 

JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/world/trump-warns-iran-time-running-out-on-deal

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

From ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ to ‘The New York Times’ - Stephen Soukup

 

by Stephen Soukup

Modern antisemitism thrives when ancient blood libels are repackaged as respectable journalism and smuggled into public life through elite institutions.

 

 

In this world, there are many, many things I don’t know. I don’t know New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, for example. Beyond the limited knowledge that he is a progressive who once wanted to be the governor of Oregon, I don’t know much about Kristof’s politics. I don’t know if he is antisemitic or if he is just naïve about what it means to support Palestinian “liberation” and the globalization of the Intifada. I don’t know if he really believes that dogs can be trained to rape people or if he thinks that might be implausible. I don’t know if he truly supposes that Hamas-connected sources can be trusted or if he has decided that sources don’t matter as much as the airing of allegations, no matter how unsubstantiated.

As I said, there’s a great deal I don’t know.

What I do know, however, is that none of the above really matters. Whether Kristof is a genuinely good person who thought he was doing a genuinely good thing and making a genuinely positive contribution to the world’s understanding of the Israel–Hamas conflict is entirely irrelevant.

For my part, I think that Kristof, like many progressives of his generation, largely has good intentions. I don’t think that he is an antisemite, at least not intentionally. I think he probably believes, deep down in his heart, that his Times column the other day—in which he accused Israeli prison guards of unspeakable sexual torture against Palestinians—was valid and legitimate and important.

But again, that doesn’t matter. Regardless of his intentions, when placed in proper historical and political contexts, Kristof’s column is an ancient and noxious libel in the same tradition as the infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The most prominent theories about how and why the Holocaust occurred and why the Nazis targeted Jews specifically are unsatisfactorily explanatorily—at least when considered in isolation. Two of the more prominent, however, when taken together, explain a great deal.

Hannah Arendt’s explanation for the Nazis’ antisemitism is highly controversial, mostly because some see it as blaming the victims. Her conclusions, which she drew in The Origins of Totalitarianism, are purely political. For the most part, Arendt blames the conditions that gave rise to totalitarianism in general: the disintegration of the nation-state’s 18th-century settlement, the emancipation paradox (formal equality without social belonging), and the rise of pan-ethnic movements that scorned the confines of the territorial state. She added some Jewish-specific conditions—i.e., the role of Jewish financiers in 18th- and 19th-century Europe and the collapse of that role in the 20th century—but kept the explanation purely political. She wanted, very clearly, to separate modern antisemitism from the medieval antisemitism that had plagued Europe for centuries before.

The most reasonable interpretation of Arendt’s insistence on a new and purely political antisemitism was her desire to avoid the continuity narrative, the belief that European antisemitism was the primeval and inevitable descendant of early Christian Jew-hatred. Not only did she want to explain the Holocaust in terms of totalitarianism, but she also wanted to forestall the argument that the Nazis and their collaborators were distinguished from their European ancestors in scale and efficiency only, that they were no different and, by extension, no more evil than the perpetrators of the York Massacre of 1190.

Unfortunately, Arendt’s explanation, while politically astute, was nevertheless incomplete. Although it did account for the rise of antisemitism during the tumultuous early decades of the twentieth century, it failed to explain how that antisemitism became so potent and how it came to legitimize the murder of two-thirds of the Jews in Europe. Enter the British historian Norman Cohn.

In his 1967 book Warrant for Genocide, Cohn filled in the gaps in Arendt’s theory, first by accepting her definition of political antisemitism and then by denying her principal historiographic claim. Cohn’s argument was that the specifically genocidal version of modern antisemitism—the version that produced the “Final Solution”—requires something more compelling, more intoxicating, than mere Jew-hatred. It required a fantasy of cosmic conspiracy. It required the conclusion that Jews were categorically alien and not merely different, not merely evil in an ordinary sense. In short, Cohn argued that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion set the stage for the Holocaust and for modern antisemitism by connecting Europe’s contemporary cultural and political trends to its medieval demonological imagination. For centuries, Cohn contended, Europeans had indulged fantasies of Jewish spiritual malevolence, from the “blood libel” in the William of Norwich case to the “well-poisoning” conspiracies during the Black Death to the Sandomierz blood libels of the 17th and 18th centuries. The Protocols, in turn, marked the secularized reinvention of this fantasy, not the political invention of a new conspiracy.

Between Arendt and Cohn, then, we arrive at a fairly complete explanation for the Holocaust. Arendt provides the means, the political upheaval of the era, and the specific conditions that made Europe’s Jewish population vulnerable, while Cohn provides the motive, the secularized version of the enduring fantasy that turned Jews from mere outsiders into literal demons.

In his follow-up to Warrant for Genocide, Cohn revisited the idea of a cosmic conspiracy, tracing its roots to antiquity and following it through the Middle Ages and early modern Europe. In the book, Europe’s Inner Demons, Cohn posits the existence of a recurrent fantasy, the belief “that there existed, somewhere in the midst of the great society, another society, small and clandestine, which not only threatened the existence of the great society but was also addicted to practices that were felt to be wholly abominable in the sense of anti-human.” He continues, noting that those “wholly abominable” practices generally take the form of a fairly consistent cluster: nocturnal assembly, infanticide, ritual cannibalism (often involving the consumption of children’s blood or flesh), incest or sexual orgy, and worship of an anti-god, frequently in animal-headed form. Interestingly, Cohn’s focus in the book is the application of this fantasy by Christians to other Christians, heretics, or other outsiders who had to be destroyed and eliminated. Indeed, his specific interest is in the “witch-sabbat” fantasies from the 15th century onward.

In Cohn’s reading of “the fantasy,” the Jewish blood libel is just one application of a perpetually transferable European cultural template. For centuries, Europeans turned their paranoia and insecurity on outsider sects, imagining the existence of small, clandestine, and strictly “anti-human” sub-societies, demonic in nature, which therefore had to be destroyed. It was only when this template was applied in the political context of the late 19th and early 20th centuries and was secularized in the form of The Protocols that it became the fantasy that enabled the Holocaust.

To return to where we started, what Nick Kristof wrote the other day is a textbook example of the “blood libel.” Whether he intended it to be or not, his column is a classic application of the fantasy of the cosmic conspiracy. Kristof does not allege that some Israeli guards have committed sexual abuse. If that happened, it would be a reportable, prosecutable offense, the likes of which Israel has previously pursued. Rather, he alleges that sexual violence against Palestinian prisoners is a systematic, organized, state-sanctioned practice. He shifts the charges from “individuals did wrong” to “this is the secret rite of the institution,” which is precisely the shift described by Cohn in Inner Demons. Medieval accusers did not allege that some Jews had killed some Christians; they said that there was a hidden Jewish council coordinating the practice as a perennial ritual. Kristof makes the fantastical but damning leap here, alleging misbehavior not by lone criminal individuals but by an organized demonological system.

In Kristof’s telling of the story, the dog-rape fantasy is critical. Gavin Langmuir, a historian who also studied the origins and repetition of the “blood libel,” used specific terms to distinguish mere prejudice from the descent into demonic fantasy. He distinguished xenophobic assertions, which exaggerate or unfairly generalize from some real feature of a group, from chimerical assertions, which describe practices no human group actually engages in. A claim that IDF guards have humiliated, beaten, or even sexually assaulted detainees is xenophobic in form, which is to say that even when those claims are wrong or overstated, they point to recognizable human behavior. By contrast, Kristof’s claim that Israeli forces have trained dogs to rape prisoners as institutional practice is chimerical in form: it describes a scene—choreographed bestiality, the animal as instrument, the victim as passive ritual object—that has no plausible institutional reality, the purpose of which is purely symbolic rather than evidential. Kristof’s charges function to depict the Israelis—and all Jews, by extension—as categorically alien, not merely different from “the rest of us,” but irredeemably so.

In the days since Kristof’s column was published, many observers have called for The New York Times to retract the piece or to issue a statement of correction. Either would be nice, but neither would be sufficient. Kristof’s column is part of the recurrent accumulation of cultural permission to view Jews as totally alien and, frankly, demonic. It incrementally renews the cultural availability of the “abominable and anti-human” template inside a respectable institution. That is what the template’s transmission has always required, and that is what makes this column so dangerous, regardless of its author’s intent.

While he may not have meant to do so, Nicholas Kristof signed a new “warrant” with his column last week, one that follows an old and treacherous pattern.


Stephen Soukup

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/05/18/from-the-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion-to-the-new-york-times/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

WATCH: Israel begins boarding Gaza-bound Turkish flotilla boats - Tobias Siegal, Amichai Stein

 

by Tobias Siegal, Amichai Stein

The Foreign Ministry called the flotilla a “provocation for the sake of provocation,” saying Israel would not allow a breach of the naval blockade on Gaza.

 

Screenshots from footage published on social media by activists aboard the flotilla as it was reportedly being intercepted by the Israeli Navy, May 18, 2026.
Screenshots from footage published on social media by activists aboard the flotilla as it was reportedly being intercepted by the Israeli Navy, May 18, 2026.
(photo credit: SECTION 27A COPYRIGHT ACT)

 

Israeli naval forces, including commandos from the elite Shayetet 13 unit, began taking control of boats participating in the latest Turkish Gaza-bound flotilla on Monday morning, according to videos and accounts posted to social media by activists aboard the vessels.

Footage and posts published by flotilla participants showed armed Israeli troops boarding the vessels and detaining activists on board. They were reportedly being transferred to a larger Israeli Navy vessel before being taken to Ashdod.

There was no immediate official Israeli military statement confirming the full scope of the operation or the number of vessels intercepted.

The Turkish flotilla, which includes 53 vessels and some 500 participants, was organized by the IHH, the same group behind the Mavi Marmara flotilla.In addition to the naval flotilla, a 30-vehicle land convoy set out from Libya to Gaza on Saturday as part of the GSF.

The flotilla is an element of the Global Sumud Flotilla (GSF), which departed Turkey for Gaza on Thursday on its second blockade run, the first of which occured in April and ended with 20 of its vessels intercepted by the Israeli Navy.

The group said 10 boats had been intercepted and contact lost with 23 of the 54 vessels in the flotilla, naming some two dozen Turks among those on the intercepted vessels, some 250 nautical miles (463 km) from Gaza. It said there were 426 people taking part in the flotilla from 39 countries.

Organizers claim the flotilla constitutes a peaceful and humanitarian mission, claims that Israel has repeatedly challenged.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held on Sunday a preliminary security consultation regarding the flotilla, which includes Hamas supporters, an Israeli official told The Jerusalem Post

Foreign Ministry: Flotilla is a ‘provocation’ serving Hamas

Earlier Monday, the Foreign Ministry dismissed the flotilla as “a provocation for the sake of provocation,” saying the convoy was not a genuine humanitarian mission and accusing its organizers of seeking to aid Hamas politically.

“Once again, a provocation for the sake of provocation: another so-called ‘humanitarian aid flotilla’ with no humanitarian aid,” the ministry said.

The ministry said two "violent" Turkish groups, Mavi Marmara and IHH, were involved in the flotilla, adding that IHH had been designated as a terrorist organization. It added that the purpose of the flotilla was “to serve Hamas, to divert attention from Hamas’s refusal to disarm, and to obstruct progress on President Trump’s peace plan.”

The ministry also cited the Board of Peace, which oversees humanitarian activities in Gaza under UN Security Council Resolution 2803, saying the body had made clear that the flotilla was “only about publicity.” Israel said that since October 2025, more than 1.58 million tons of humanitarian aid and thousands of tons of medical supplies had entered Gaza.

“Israel will not allow any breach of the lawful naval blockade on Gaza,” the ministry said, calling on participants “to change course and turn back immediately.”

This is a breaking story.

Miriam Sela-Eitam and Reuters contributed to this report.

 

Tobias Siegal, Amichai Stein

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-896533

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israeli Navy intercepts Turkish-led Gaza flotilla - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

Jerusalem will not allow “any breach of the lawful naval blockade on Gaza,” the Foreign Ministry said.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu observes an Israeli Navy operation from the Kirya military headquarters in Tel Aviv, May 18, 2026. Photo by Chaim Zach/GPO.
From left, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, Israel Navy commander Vice Adm. Eyal Harel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz observe an Israeli Navy operation from the Kirya military headquarters in Tel Aviv, May 18, 2026. Photo by Chaim Zach/GPO.

 

The Israeli Navy started intercepting a Turkish-led attempt to sail to Gaza, the Prime Minister’s Office confirmed on Monday.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu monitored the operation from the Kirya military headquarters in Tel Aviv as naval commandos boarded the vessels in international waters off Cyprus.

The premier “was briefed by Navy commander Vice Admiral Eyal Harel, and watched our forces take control of the terrorism-supporting flotilla boats that had left Turkey and which intended to break the naval blockade on the Gaza coast,” the Prime Minister’s Office stated.

“I think you are doing an outstanding job, both with the first flotilla and with this one, and effectively neutralizing a malicious plan designed to break the isolation we have imposed on Hamas terrorists in Gaza,” Netanyahu told the naval commandos over the radio.

“You are doing this with great success, and I must say also quietly, and certainly with less prominence than our enemies expected—so, heartfelt congratulations,” he added. “Keep going until the end.”

Organizers earlier confirmed on X that “military vessels are currently intercepting our fleet,” adding that Israel Defense Forces were “boarding the first of our boats in broad daylight.”

“Once again, a provocation for the sake of provocation: another so-called ‘humanitarian aid flotilla’ with no humanitarian aid,” Israel’s Foreign Ministry tweeted shortly before the interception. “This time, two violent Turkish groups—Mavi Marmara and IHH, the latter designated as a terrorist organization—are part of the provocation.

“The purpose of this provocation is to serve Hamas, to divert attention from Hamas’s refusal to disarm, and to obstruct progress on President Trump’s peace plan,” it continued.

The ministry noted that U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace, which oversees humanitarian aid to Gaza under U.N. Security Council Resolution 2803, previously said the flotillas were “only about publicity.”

More than 1.58 million tons of humanitarian aid and thousands of tons of medical supplies have entered Gaza since the start of the ceasefire on Oct. 10, 2025, the Foreign Ministry added.

“Israel calls on all participants in this provocation to change course and turn back immediately,” the ministry concluded.

The latest attempt to breach the Gaza maritime blockade is organized by the same Turkish group that was behind the 2010 MV Mavi Marmara flotilla. It is believed to be composed of more than 50 vessels, carrying 500 activists from 45 nations.

In May 2010, the MV Mavi Marmara participated in a Gaza protest flotilla organized by the Free Gaza Movement and the Turkish Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (İHH). Nine activists were killed when they attacked Israeli Navy commandos who boarded the vessel. Ten IDF servicemen were wounded, one seriously.

The incident sparked a diplomatic crisis between Israel and Turkey. Though relations began to improve in 2022, they again deteriorated after Israel retaliated for the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas massacre.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/israel-news/israeli-foreign-ministry-calls-on-turkish-led-gaza-flotilla-to-turn-around

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Mamdani releases ‘Nakba’ day video, gets angry reactions from Jewish leaders - Debra Nussbaum Cohen

 

by Debra Nussbaum Cohen

David Greenfield, CEO of Met Council, told JNS that the video “has strained relationships with a lot of us in the leadership, who have tried to work in good faith with the administration.”

 

Inea Mamdani video
Screen capture of a video that Zohran Mamdani, mayor of New York City, released on May 15, 2026, depicting Inea, described as Palestinian and a survivor of the “Nakba.” Source: Screen capture of video from the New York City mayor.

Zohran Mamdani, mayor of New York City, posted a video on Friday of a woman, who says that her family left its home in Jerusalem during Israel’s War of Independence.

“Today marks Nakba Day, an annual day of remembrance to commemorate the expulsion of more than 700,000 Palestinians between 1947 and 1949 during the creation of the State of Israel and the year that followed,” the mayor stated. “Inea is a New Yorker and a Nakba survivor. She shared her story with us—one of home, tradition and memory over generations.”

In the video, which has been viewed nearly 9.5 million times, Inea is seen leafing through faded family photos under a travel poster for “Palestine” hung on her wall in the video, which is reminiscent of Holocaust survivor testimonies.

“I was 9-years-old and it was nighttime, and my father came and told us to get on all fours and go to the staircase to the roof, because there were no windows and bullets had come through the wood shutters,” Inea says in the video. “The next day, we took what we could carry and went to my uncle Hussein’s house in Nablus,” she adds. “The Zionists were, you know, coming into Jerusalem.”

David Greenfield, CEO of Met Council, the nation’s largest Jewish poverty-fighting organization, stated that “I’ve been doing this a long time and have never seen this kind of anger from moderate Jewish New York City leaders, who tried working with Mayor Mamdani.”

Greenfield, a former member of the New York City Council, posted screen captures of responses from a Chabad spokesman, the government releations vice president at UJA-Federation of New York, a Jewish New York state representative and the CEO of the Jewish Community Relations Council-N.Y.

Greenfield told JNS on Sunday that the video that Mamdani posted “has strained relationships with a lot of us in the leadership, who have tried to work in good faith with the administration.”

“Last week, I sat down for a meeting with the Mayor’s Office to Combat Antisemitism to talk about issues of concern, believing there was an interest in working together in good faith,” he told JNS.

Mamdani
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani appears live on WNYC’s “Mamdani’s First 100 Days: Lessons from La Guardia” in Manhattan, April 20, 2026. Credit: Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office.

Now Greenfield has doubts that the good faith is reciprocated.

“We have seen that the mayor has been willing to compromise on a lot of issues but if anything, he’s become more strident on this one issue,” he said. “It is frustrating and disheartening at the same time in month five of a 48-month administration.”

Met Council, like UJA-Federation of New York, relies heavily on city funding to provide many of its social services to poor and marginalized New Yorkers, which includes Jews and others.

“If I have to pick between being a Jewish leader and a nonprofit leader, I will pick being a Jewish leader, and the chips will fall where they may,” Greenfield told JNS.

UJA-Federation posted an uncharacteristically pointed response to Mamdani’s video.

“You chose 5:40 p.m. on Friday to post it, as Jewish New Yorkers prepare to light Shabbat candles,” the Federation stated. “We noticed.”

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) wrote that “Nakba” is “Arabic for catastrophe” and that “the only catastrophe here is a mayor of New York who lets antisemitic mobs run wild to terrorize law-abiding Jewish New Yorkers while he spreads anti-Israel propaganda.”

Ari Fleischer, a former White House press secretary under President George W. Bush, stated that “my mother and her parents fled the Nazis to come to New York City in 1939. My grandfather kept hidden Swiss francs and gold coins in his apartment in case he ever had to flee again.”

“My heart breaks for New York City,” he wrote. “Mamdani is a menace. Pro-Hamas and Hezbollah mobs are harassing Jews. Mamdani has empowered them.”

Mamdani Passover
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani delivers remarks at City Winery Passover seder on March 30, 2026. Credit: Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office.

Some critics of the mayor’s posted noted on social media that the poster on a wall in Inea’s home is actually a 1936 Zionist advertisement encouraging people to move to what would become the modern Jewish state.

The media watchdog HonestReporting said that after Mamdani put out the “propaganda video,” it was “no surprise that the New York Times simply repeats the false narrative without scrutiny.”

“Because Inea Bushnaq is not a ‘Nakba survivor,’” it stated. “She is the descendant of Bosnian Muslims and was not forcibly displaced from her home. But facts don’t matter to the Times.”

Mamdani, New York City’s first Muslim mayor, is not of Palestinian or Arab descent. He was born in Uganda to an Indo-Ugandan family.

He has not posted a video about any other of New York City’s ethnic communities’ commemorations or observances. (JNS sought comment from the mayor.)

There are about 1 million Jewish New Yorkers in a city of 8.7 million residents, the largest population of Jews anywhere outside of Israel.

“It’s the obligation of any mayor, regardless of personal views, to try and bring people together. This is clearly divisive,” Greenfield, of Met Council, told JNS. “It’s obviously misinformation as well that really does concern the leaders of the community. When you put out disinformation like this it does tend to take people who are otherwise on the fence and push them toward an extremist view.”

“The reality is that for most non-Jewish New Yorkers, they are not able to separate between Israel and Jews,” he said. “It’s going to have a negative impact on how people treat and work with the Jewish community.” 


Debra Nussbaum Cohen

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/u-s-news/mamdani-releases-nakba-day-video-gets-angry-reactions-from-jewish-leaders

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Surprise arrest during Trump's border crackdown opens door to Cuba-shaking Raul Castro indictment - John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy

 

by John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy

Biden allowed a Cuban Air Force pilot to stay here and apply for permanent residency. It turns out that the pilot, Luis Raul Gonzalez-Pardo Rodriguez, served in the Cuban military at the same time that Fidel and Raul Castro ordered them to shoot down humanitarian rescue planes searching for people fleeing the communist regime. 

 

A few weeks into President Donald Trump's second term, his crackdown on illegal immigration netted an unexpected yield: a former Cuban fighter pilot who had been allowed into the United States under President Joe Biden and was trying to get permanent residency.

The 2025 arrest of Luis Raul Gonzalez-Pardo Rodriguez, officials told Just the News, set in motion an extraordinary set of events inside the U.S. intelligence community, the FBI, and the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami that could yield the unveiling of an indictment as early as Wednesday of former Cuban President Raul Castro on murder, conspiracy, and other charges in the 1996 downing of two American humanitarian supply and rescue planes in the skies near Cuba.

For 30 years, Cuban exiles in America and their representatives in Congress, like Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart and Carlos Gimenez, R-Fla., have pressured DOJ to seek charges such as conspiracy to kill Americans, destruction of aircraft, and murder against the 94-year-old Castro, his late brother Fidel, and others in connection with the shooting down of the Hermanos a la Rescate ("Brothers to the Rescue") humanitarian aircraft in 1996, which killed three American citizens and one legal permanent U.S. resident. 

Prosecutors and FBI agents for years demurred because they lacked key evidence or access to conspirators, and eventually, Fidel Castro, the island’s communist revolutionary leader who was given a great deal of leeway by Obama and Biden, died.

But the stalemate seems to have changed with the 2025 arrest of Gonzalez-Pardo, which gave U.S. authorities access to a Cuban Air Force insider who served during the same time of the shootdown. The November 2025 indictment against Gonzalez-Pardo for visa fraud and for lying to U.S. federal authorities even included a photo of him in the sort of Air Force jet used to shoot down the Cuban-American activist planes three decades ago,

Gonzalez-Pardo's defense lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Creation of a Cuban crimes task force

Months of investigation led the U.S. attorney's office in Miami last fall to pursue an indictment in the case. Early this year, the prosecution team led by Jason Reding Quinones escalated its efforts with the creation of a Cuban crimes task force, according to memos reviewed by Just the News

“This Working Group will focus on identifying and developing prosecutable violations of U.S. law connected to the Cuban regime or Communist Party apparatus,” the February 2026 memo said, pointing to “recent historic events in our hemisphere” and noting the Southern District of Florida’s “unique nexus to Cuba.”

The U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida issued a press release last November to “announce the unsealing of an indictment charging Luis Raul Gonzalez-Pardo Rodriguez with fraud and misuse of visa, permits, and other documents, and making a false statement to a federal agency.”

And last month, prosecutors began presenting the evidence necessary to secure a grand jury indictment against Raul Castro and the pilots who shot down the two Brothers to the Rescue planes. The aircraft were part of an organization which delivers humanitarian supplies and conducts searches for life rafts making their way from Cuba to Florida. That indictment is expected to be announced Wednesday when prosecutors have set a press conference.

Four activists from the Brothers to the Rescue organization were killed when Cuban MiG fighters shot down their two civilian planes in international skies and over international waters on February 24, 1996. The victims were Carlos Costa, Pablo Morales, Mario Manuel de la Peña, and Armando Alejandre, three of whom were American citizens and one of whom was a permanent resident of the U.S. A third Brothers aircraft managed to successfully evade the Cuban MiG fighters and land safely in Florida.

Raul Castro Ruz is the brother of the deceased longtime Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. Raul is also a former president of Cuba himself, having succeeded his brother in the role for a decade in the wake of his brother’s 2008 death, and he is also the former Director of the Cuban Secret Services, the former Commander-in-Chief of the Cuban Air Force, and the former President of the Ministry of the Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces.

He stepped down as Cuba’s president in 2018, where he was succeeded by Miguel Diaz-Canel, and Raul Castro also stepped down as first secretary of the Communist Party of Cuba in 2021.

Raul Castro: “Knock them down into the sea when they reappear."

Two decades ago, El Nuevo Herald and The Miami Herald published a 2006 tape in which Raul Castro allegedly acknowledged giving the shootdown order of the Brothers to the Rescue planes.

“I told them [the Cuban fighter pilots] to try to knock them down over [Cuban] territory,” Raul Castro allegedly said in the recording. “Knock them down into the sea when they reappear.”

Fidel Castro himself admitted to TIME in 1996 that “I take responsibility for what happened” but also confirmed that his brother, Raul, had been in the chain of command as the leader of the Cuban Air Defense Forces.

“We discussed it with Raul and the Joint Chiefs of Staff,” Fidel said, adding, “We gave the order to the head of the air force. On Saturday, [the Brothers to the Rescue planes] came twice. ... On the third pass, they scrambled and did their job. They shot the planes down. They are professionals. They did what they believe is the right thing.”

Gonzalez-Pardo was reportedly a Cuban MiG pilot who carried out an aerial pursuit of a third Brothers to the Rescue plane the day that the other two planes were shot down. He was allowed into the U.S. during the Biden Administration.

Marco Rubio — then a U.S. senator from Florida and now the U.S. Secretary of State — sent a letter with Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., to then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken and then-DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in 2024 condemning the Biden Administration for allowing him into the country.

Inadequate vetting of immigration applicants during Biden years 

“We write with serious concern about the Biden-Harris Administration’s decision to grant parole to Cuban Revolutionary Air Force Colonel Luis Raul Gonzalez-Pardo Rodríguez,” Rubio and Scott wrote. “As you are no doubt aware, Gonzalez-Pardo is notoriously linked to the international incident of February 24, 1996, when two planes belonging to the humanitarian organization, Brothers to the Rescue, were unconscionably shot down by Cuban MiG-29 fighter jets under orders of Raul Castro. This incident tragically resulted in the deaths of four innocent Cuban-American pilots.”

Rubio and Scott added: “The current process, by virtue of the unacceptable results annotated above, has demonstrated its woeful inadequateness to properly vet applicants and to protect U.S. national security.”

A number of Republican members of Congress also sent Blinken and Mayorkas a 2024 letter noting that “reports, as well as a letter from survivors, contend that Gonzalez-Pardo participated in the Brothers to the Rescue shootdown of 1996.”

“The families of these victims deserve justice. It was an insult to them and a disgraceful travesty of justice that the Obama Administration released the one person who had been held accountable for their murders, Gerardo Hernandez, in a concession to the regime in Cuba,” the congressmen wrote. “Now, the possibility that another person who may have participated in that heinous act was granted the extraordinary privilege of U.S. entry is yet another affront.”

Cuban pilot denied ever having military training

Telemundo 51 in Miami reported that Gonzalez-Pardo called the accusations of involvement with the Brothers to the Rescue shootdown "absolutely false.”

The DOJ’s press release on Gonzalez-Pardo late last year stated that, in April 2025, the Cuban pilot had submitted paperwork to the Department of Homeland Security as he pursued permanent residency inside the U.S., with the DOJ saying the Cuban “falsely stated he had never received any weapons or military training, never participated in any group of any kind that used weapons or threatened to use weapons, and never served in a military or police unit, when in reality, he received such training and served in the Cuban military as part of the Air Defense Force.”

The indictment even included a photograph depicting Gonzalez-Pardo in the Air Defense Force.

“This man’s past as a longtime military pilot for the evil Castro regime — which has wrought untold suffering on the Cuban people — should have been front and center in his immigration file,” then-Attorney General Pamela Bondi said last year. “This Department of Justice will vigorously prosecute anyone who lies about their past to take advantage of America’s immigration system.”

The indictment, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida but led by the prosecutors in Miami, hit Gonzalez-Pardo with two counts. The first was for “fraud and misuse of visa, permits, and other documents” while the second was for a “false statement to a federal agency.”

The arrest warrant shows he was arrested in early November 2025 in Jacksonville, Florida. Gonzalez-Pardo filed a notice of intent to plead guilty in early February 2026.

The plea agreement filed in early February 2026 showed he had pleaded guilty to the first count and the DOJ agreed to drop the second count.

The court docket in early February said that the criminal sentencing was originally set for Monday in front of a federal judge, but in late April the sentencing hearing was pushed back into late May.

The Miami Herald reported in 2024 that “activists and survivors of the incident suspect Gonzalez-Pardo was one of the pilots of two Cuban MiGs that chased three small civilian aircraft belonging to the Cuban exile organization Brothers to the Rescue.

A Biden State Department spokesperson told the outlet at the time that “visa records are confidential under U.S. law; therefore, we cannot discuss the details of individual visa cases.”

The outlet reported that Luis Dominguez — described as “a researcher who regularly tracks the whereabouts of former members of the Cuban government” — said that he “believes González-Pardo chased the aircraft piloted by Jose Basulto, the leader of Brothers to the Rescue, the only plane that escaped that day.”

It was also reported by the outlet that Orestes Lorenzo, a former Cuban military pilot, told the outlet that Gonzalez-Pardo was “a former classmate” and had “told him on a WhatsApp message earlier this month that he was one of the Cuban pilots involved in the incident.”

“I asked him if he was the one chasing Basulto, and he replied yes, that he was the one who had chased him that day,” Lorenzo told the outlet.

The Miami Herald also previously reported that “in 1998, two years after the attack, federal authorities arrested several members of a Cuban spy network operating in the U.S. The network’s leader, Gerardo Hernandez, was convicted of conspiring to kill the Brothers to the Rescue pilots. He was returned to Cuba in 2014 as part of a prisoner swap.”

“In 2003, a U.S. grand jury indicted Gen. Ruben Martínez Puente — who headed the Cuban air force at the time of the incident — and the two pilots of one of the Cuban MiGs, Lorenzo Alberto Perez-Perez and Francisco Perez-Perez, for the murder of the four men,” the outlet added.

Then-President Bill Clinton quickly condemned the attack at the time.

Havana's "appalling" desperation noted by Clinton

“Saturday’s attack is further evidence that Havana has become more desperate in its efforts to deny freedom to the people of Cuba,” Clinton said in February 1996, adding that “Saturday’s attack was an appalling reminder of the nature of the Cuban regime, repressive, violent, scornful of international law.”

The Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization conducted an investigation in 1996 which included a “condemnation of the use of weapons against civil aircraft in flight as being incompatible with elementary considerations of humanity and the rules of customary international law.”

The U.S. Congress quickly condemned the Cuban attack in 1996.

“The Congress strongly condemns the act of terrorism by the Castro regime in shooting down the Brothers to the Rescue aircraft on February 24, 1996,” the resolution stated. “The Congress extends its condolences to the families of Pablo Morales, Carlos Costa, Mario de la Pena, and Armando Alejandre, the victims of the attack. The Congress urges the President to seek, in the International Court of Justice, an indictment for this act of terrorism by Fidel Castro.”

While Fidel Castro died before facing justice for his role in the attack, it now seems quite likely that, three decades after that dark day, Raul Castro and other co-conspirators will soon be indicted for their own roles in the shootdown.


John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/unexpected-arrest-during-trumps-border-crackdown-opens-door-cuba-shaking-raul

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Orwell's Europe - Part I - Robert Williams

 

by Robert Williams

The European Commission's New, Chilling Censorship Initiative

 

  • Revealingly, while Belgium's Press Ethics Council did not trust readers with Vance's speech on the factual lack of freedom of speech in Europe, the Belgian courts had no issues with a magazine column that incited violence against Belgian Jews.

  • On one hand, the public cannot be trusted with information that has not been chewed up and curated for them beforehand, including an unfiltered speech by Vance. On the other hand, screeds inciting violence against Jews are perfectly acceptable, and all at once, out of the blue -- poof! -- suddenly the Belgian judicial system cares about "freedom of speech" if it is spoken by people whose votes are regarded as "necessary."

  • In Europe, the ruling elites demand that whatever information cannot be censored, removed or kept from the masses -- who need to be brainwashed at all costs -- must first be "sanitized" by their propaganda machines in the ostensibly "free press," then carefully airbrushed into "context" before the "masses" can be allowed to view it.

  • The European Commission, the EU's unelected, untransparent, unaccountable executive arm, with Ursula von der Leyen at its helm, is now repackaging this informal brainwashing into a more organized system to ensure that any dissenting opinions are rooted out.

  • "Brussels aims to build a closed, vertically controlled information space where seeing the reality of our sinking continent becomes impossible—and arguing for change is turned into a thought crime. They think this will keep them in their seats, and they think the peoples of Europe won't notice or care while their most elementary liberties are methodically taken away. They must be proven wrong." — Rafael Pinto Borges, chairman of Nova Portugalidade, a Lisbon-based, conservative think tank, The European Conservative, March 6, 2026.

Revealingly, while Belgium's Press Ethics Council did not trust readers with J.D. Vance's speech on the factual lack of freedom of speech in Europe, the Belgian courts had no issues with a magazine column by the author Herman Brusselmans that incited violence against Belgian Jews. Pictured: Brusselmans (L), with his lawyers Omar Souidi and Mounir Souidi, appears in Ghent Criminal Court on November 5, 2024, during his trial on charges of incitement to murder, incitement to hatred and violence, and Holocaust denial. (Photo by James Arthur Gekiere/Belga Mag/AFP via Getty Images)

In Europe, recently, it was found that a news outlet that had published a speech by US Vice President J.D. Vance has now been accused of journalistic misconduct. In February 2025, Vance gave his now famous speech at the Munich Security Conference, in which he sharply criticized Europe's heavy-handed censorship and its rapidly deteriorating democratic values. The next day, Belgian news website 21News published Vance's speech in full, without commentary.

Nearly a year later, in February 2026, after anonymous complaints, Belgium's press "ethics" body ruled that 21News had acted in breach of journalistic standards by publishing the speech without "context" or "correction" before publication, thereby risking that Vance's message would "circulate without sufficient critical distance."

Éric Dujardin, the director of 21News, in response, argued that publication does not equal endorsement and that "readers should be able to access primary sources without mandatory interpretation," according to The European Conservative.

Revealingly, while Belgium's Press Ethics Council did not trust readers with Vance's speech on the factual lack of freedom of speech in Europe, the Belgian courts had no issues with a magazine column that incited violence against Belgian Jews.

In August 2024, the Belgian author Herman Brusselmans wrote in the weekly magazine Humo that Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza made him "become so enraged that I want to ram a pointed knife straight into the throat of every Jew I meet."

The European Jewish Association, Belgium's Jewish Information and Documentation Centre and the Belgian anti-discrimination organization Unia took legal action against Brusselmans, leading to criminal charges of incitement to murder, incitement to hatred and violence, and Holocaust denial. In March 2025, the Ghent Criminal Court acquitted Brusselmans on all charges. The judge wrote:

"The court recognises that certain members of the Jewish community could possibly take offence at phrases used in some columns, but stresses that the author's expressing his opinion is protected by the right to freedom of expression.... He wished to express criticism in his well-known style, he wished to provoke, but he did not exceed the boundaries of what is punishable by law. The column does not show that he intended to incite hatred or violence against the Jewish community or to deny the Holocaust."

Get it? On one hand, the public cannot be trusted with information that has not been chewed up and curated for them beforehand, including an unfiltered speech by Vance. On the other hand, screeds inciting violence against Jews are perfectly acceptable, and all at once, out of the blue -- poof! -- suddenly the Belgian judicial system cares about "freedom of speech" if it is spoken by people whose votes are regarded as "necessary."

Israeli Ambassador to Belgium Idit Rosenzweig-Abu pointed out:

"What if someone said in Belgian press 'I'm so angry I want to stick a knife in the neck of every Muslim I meet'?

"Herman Brusselmans did...

"But relax! it wasn't about Muslims, it was just about Jews.

"In a country where Jews are attacked daily and 70% report fear for their lives. "

Belgium has plenty of company in "correcting" news outlets that report facts. In Sweden, the press watchdog, known as the Review Board, criticized Swedish state television for using the words "illegal migrants" in a news report about the protests against illegal migrants coming into the UK, some of whom had gone on to sexually assault British women and children. The television report even "contextualized" by calling the protesters "right-wing extremist groups," but that was not enough. According to one report:

"The Review Board ruled that describing individuals as 'illegal migrants' was 'both misleading in violation of the requirement for objectivity, and evaluative in violation of the requirement for impartiality.'"

Describing the protesters, many of them mothers fearing for their daughters' safety, as "right-wing extremist groups," however, did not violate the requirement for "impartiality."

In Europe, the ruling elites demand that whatever information cannot be censored, removed or kept from the masses -- who need to be brainwashed at all costs -- must first be "sanitized" by their propaganda machines in the ostensibly "free press," then carefully airbrushed into "context" before the "masses" can be allowed to view it.

The European Commission, the EU's unelected, untransparent, unaccountable executive arm, with Ursula von der Leyen at its helm, is now repackaging this informal brainwashing into a more organized system to ensure that any dissenting opinions are rooted out. At the end of February, the Commission launched its "Center for Democratic Resilience," which will ensure a forum where, among other "stakeholders", media representatives will participate. It is part of the Commission's broader, and chilling-sounding, "European Democracy Shield" initiative.

According to Michael McGrath, the EU Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, the Rule of Law and Consumer Protection:

"[W]ith the European Democracy Shield we will step up our collective capacity to monitor and detect information manipulation and disinformation... to support the capacity of Member States and neighbouring countries to monitor, detect and coordinate responses to combat information manipulation and disinformation... also to ensure an online space where reliable, accurate, and impartial information thrives.

In other words, Europeans should expect their media to report even more in line with whatever the EU thinks is "acceptable."

Also within the framework of the "European Democracy Shield," the EU is ramping up "support to local media in the Creative Europe programme and introduc[ing] a new action under Horizon Europe to further support the digital transformation of the media industry."

The EU has already "bought" a host of media outlets in Europe, literally paying them to publish pieces that further its own agendas. The EU appears to have spent as much as one billion euros during the past decade alone in the process, according to a 2025 report titled "Brussels's media machine: European media funding and the shaping of public discourse," published by the Hungary-based think tank MCC Brussels.

Framing the projects as "fighting disinformation" and "promoting European integration" the EU has been throwing taxpayer money, conservatively estimated at €80 million annually, to "media projects" -- not including indirect funding, such as advertising contracts. The report also shows that the EU runs a highly sophisticated "EU media complex" through which it gets to shape media narratives about itself and its agendas.

According to Rafael Pinto Borges, founder and chairman of Nova Portugalidade, a Lisbon-based, conservative think tank:

"Brussels aims to build a closed, vertically controlled information space where seeing the reality of our sinking continent becomes impossible—and arguing for change is turned into a thought crime. They think this will keep them in their seats, and they think the peoples of Europe won't notice or care while their most elementary liberties are methodically taken away. They must be proven wrong."


Robert Williams is based in the United States.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22493/europe-censorship

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The controversy over mixed-gender IDF units still ruffles Israeli society - opinion - Shuki Friedman

 

by Shuki Friedman

The deeper challenge lies in the clash between equality at any price and adherence to Jewish law.

 

IDF forces during the “Sulfur and Fire” readiness exercise on May 15, 2026.
IDF forces during the “Sulfur and Fire” readiness exercise on May 15, 2026.
(photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

 

After two-and-a-half years of unceasing war, the IDF is short thousands of combat soldiers. It cannot afford to forgo the service of women, whether on the home front or the front line. It cannot afford to forgo the service of religious soldiers in any combat unit. And yet, extremist rabbis are calling for women to be removed from the IDF, or at the very least reassigned to noncombatant roles.

On the other end of the ideological spectrum is the “Tel Aviv faction,” which demands that religious soldiers’ beliefs be ignored and that mixed service for men and women be imposed even in every tank and in every unit.

Both camps may tear the IDF and Israeli society apart. Extremism must not be allowed to win.

A transformation in the IDF

Since 1995, when Alice Miller petitioned the High Court of Justice to allow her to try out for the air force pilot training program, the IDF has undergone a dramatic transformation in women’s service. The reality of most military roles being closed to women is long gone. Today, the IDF is open to women serving in almost all positions, including in special units, the Armored Corps, and other tactical forces.

This worthy revolution, which gives women full and justified equal opportunity, is not self-evident in the IDF’s diverse landscape. In Home Front Command units, integrating women is generally easier to implement. In tactical and special forces units, the challenge is much greater. Sustained, physically intense service by men and women around the age of 20, involving stints of close and unavoidable contact or shared stays in small, enclosed spaces for days and weeks at a time, is not without challenges.

Women in the IDF (illustrative).
Women in the IDF (illustrative). (credit: IDF/Reuters)

Even apart from religious concerns, how many men would be pleased to know that their partner was spending long weeks of reserve duty with another man in the intimacy of some remote guard post, and vice versa?

But the deeper challenge lies in the clash between equality at any price and adherence to Jewish law. For observant soldiers, even those accustomed to women’s company in civilian life, serving with women in the same tank or infantry unit can mean a breach, sometimes stark, of halachic boundaries.

This challenge has vexed the IDF and its religious soldiers ever since meaningful integration of women began. As that integration reached combat formations, the challenge intensified. At times, it has resulted in confrontations with rabbis and religious servicemen threatening to refuse to serve in mixed units if the process advanced.

Solving the challenges

The solution the IDF crafted in 2016, through dialogue and cooperation with rabbis and women’s organizations, was the Joint Service Order, an attempt to shape a military space shared by men and women that does not devolve from an asset to a liability. But none of this prevented the latest explosion.

Several days ago, in its ruling in the Kliger case, the High Court elbowed the IDF in the ribs and demanded faster integration of women into the Armored Corps. In response, several rabbis announced that, if this were to happen, they would instruct their students not to serve there. The moderate Tzohar organization joined in, calling on the army and the rabbis to speak out – and was met with a torrent of criticism. Politicians and online influencers attacked it for siding with “benighted” rabbis and daring to oppose the “religion of equality.”

Once again, on the liberal side, too, it became clear that some refuse to acknowledge the other and their values. While every fair-minded jurist – and the court itself – understands that equality is never absolute, they demand equality to the bitter end. Like the extremist rabbis, the “Tel Aviv faction” will not rest until women serve in each and every IDF unit, whatever the cost.

One can only hope that, in this ongoing struggle, too, the IDF and Israel’s security will not fall victim to the extremists. As the past has shown, dialogue and the design of orders and spaces that allow everyone to serve are the solution that will enable women and religious soldiers alike to contribute as much as they can to Israel’s security, without violating their values.


Shuki Friedman
is director-general of the Jewish People Policy Institute and a senior lecturer in law at the Peres Academic Center.

Source: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-895764

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF fighters take control of Gaza-bound flotilla - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

Modern antisemitism thrives when ancient blood libels are repackaged as respectable journalism and smuggled into public life through elite institutions.

 

In this world, there are many, many things I don’t know. I don’t know New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, for example. Beyond the limited knowledge that he is a progressive who once wanted to be the governor of Oregon, I don’t know much about Kristof’s politics. I don’t know if he is antisemitic or if he is just naïve about what it means to support Palestinian “liberation” and the globalization of the Intifada. I don’t know if he really believes that dogs can be trained to rape people or if he thinks that might be implausible. I don’t know if he truly supposes that Hamas-connected sources can be trusted or if he has decided that sources don’t matter as much as the airing of allegations, no matter how unsubstantiated.

As I said, there’s a great deal I don’t know.

What I do know, however, is that none of the above really matters. Whether Kristof is a genuinely good person who thought he was doing a genuinely good thing and making a genuinely positive contribution to the world’s understanding of the Israel–Hamas conflict is entirely irrelevant.

For my part, I think that Kristof, like many progressives of his generation, largely has good intentions. I don’t think that he is an antisemite, at least not intentionally. I think he probably believes, deep down in his heart, that his Times column the other day—in which he accused Israeli prison guards of unspeakable sexual torture against Palestinians—was valid and legitimate and important.

But again, that doesn’t matter. Regardless of his intentions, when placed in proper historical and political contexts, Kristof’s column is an ancient and noxious libel in the same tradition as the infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The most prominent theories about how and why the Holocaust occurred and why the Nazis targeted Jews specifically are unsatisfactorily explanatorily—at least when considered in isolation. Two of the more prominent, however, when taken together, explain a great deal.

Hannah Arendt’s explanation for the Nazis’ antisemitism is highly controversial, mostly because some see it as blaming the victims. Her conclusions, which she drew in The Origins of Totalitarianism, are purely political. For the most part, Arendt blames the conditions that gave rise to totalitarianism in general: the disintegration of the nation-state’s 18th-century settlement, the emancipation paradox (formal equality without social belonging), and the rise of pan-ethnic movements that scorned the confines of the territorial state. She added some Jewish-specific conditions—i.e., the role of Jewish financiers in 18th- and 19th-century Europe and the collapse of that role in the 20th century—but kept the explanation purely political. She wanted, very clearly, to separate modern antisemitism from the medieval antisemitism that had plagued Europe for centuries before.

The most reasonable interpretation of Arendt’s insistence on a new and purely political antisemitism was her desire to avoid the continuity narrative, the belief that European antisemitism was the primeval and inevitable descendant of early Christian Jew-hatred. Not only did she want to explain the Holocaust in terms of totalitarianism, but she also wanted to forestall the argument that the Nazis and their collaborators were distinguished from their European ancestors in scale and efficiency only, that they were no different and, by extension, no more evil than the perpetrators of the York Massacre of 1190.

Unfortunately, Arendt’s explanation, while politically astute, was nevertheless incomplete. Although it did account for the rise of antisemitism during the tumultuous early decades of the twentieth century, it failed to explain how that antisemitism became so potent and how it came to legitimize the murder of two-thirds of the Jews in Europe. Enter the British historian Norman Cohn.

In his 1967 book Warrant for Genocide, Cohn filled in the gaps in Arendt’s theory, first by accepting her definition of political antisemitism and then by denying her principal historiographic claim. Cohn’s argument was that the specifically genocidal version of modern antisemitism—the version that produced the “Final Solution”—requires something more compelling, more intoxicating, than mere Jew-hatred. It required a fantasy of cosmic conspiracy. It required the conclusion that Jews were categorically alien and not merely different, not merely evil in an ordinary sense. In short, Cohn argued that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion set the stage for the Holocaust and for modern antisemitism by connecting Europe’s contemporary cultural and political trends to its medieval demonological imagination. For centuries, Cohn contended, Europeans had indulged fantasies of Jewish spiritual malevolence, from the “blood libel” in the William of Norwich case to the “well-poisoning” conspiracies during the Black Death to the Sandomierz blood libels of the 17th and 18th centuries. The Protocols, in turn, marked the secularized reinvention of this fantasy, not the political invention of a new conspiracy.

Between Arendt and Cohn, then, we arrive at a fairly complete explanation for the Holocaust. Arendt provides the means, the political upheaval of the era, and the specific conditions that made Europe’s Jewish population vulnerable, while Cohn provides the motive, the secularized version of the enduring fantasy that turned Jews from mere outsiders into literal demons.

In his follow-up to Warrant for Genocide, Cohn revisited the idea of a cosmic conspiracy, tracing its roots to antiquity and following it through the Middle Ages and early modern Europe. In the book, Europe’s Inner Demons, Cohn posits the existence of a recurrent fantasy, the belief “that there existed, somewhere in the midst of the great society, another society, small and clandestine, which not only threatened the existence of the great society but was also addicted to practices that were felt to be wholly abominable in the sense of anti-human.” He continues, noting that those “wholly abominable” practices generally take the form of a fairly consistent cluster: nocturnal assembly, infanticide, ritual cannibalism (often involving the consumption of children’s blood or flesh), incest or sexual orgy, and worship of an anti-god, frequently in animal-headed form. Interestingly, Cohn’s focus in the book is the application of this fantasy by Christians to other Christians, heretics, or other outsiders who had to be destroyed and eliminated. Indeed, his specific interest is in the “witch-sabbat” fantasies from the 15th century onward.

In Cohn’s reading of “the fantasy,” the Jewish blood libel is just one application of a perpetually transferable European cultural template. For centuries, Europeans turned their paranoia and insecurity on outsider sects, imagining the existence of small, clandestine, and strictly “anti-human” sub-societies, demonic in nature, which therefore had to be destroyed. It was only when this template was applied in the political context of the late 19th and early 20th centuries and was secularized in the form of The Protocols that it became the fantasy that enabled the Holocaust.

To return to where we started, what Nick Kristof wrote the other day is a textbook example of the “blood libel.” Whether he intended it to be or not, his column is a classic application of the fantasy of the cosmic conspiracy. Kristof does not allege that some Israeli guards have committed sexual abuse. If that happened, it would be a reportable, prosecutable offense, the likes of which Israel has previously pursued. Rather, he alleges that sexual violence against Palestinian prisoners is a systematic, organized, state-sanctioned practice. He shifts the charges from “individuals did wrong” to “this is the secret rite of the institution,” which is precisely the shift described by Cohn in Inner Demons. Medieval accusers did not allege that some Jews had killed some Christians; they said that there was a hidden Jewish council coordinating the practice as a perennial ritual. Kristof makes the fantastical but damning leap here, alleging misbehavior not by lone criminal individuals but by an organized demonological system.

In Kristof’s telling of the story, the dog-rape fantasy is critical. Gavin Langmuir, a historian who also studied the origins and repetition of the “blood libel,” used specific terms to distinguish mere prejudice from the descent into demonic fantasy. He distinguished xenophobic assertions, which exaggerate or unfairly generalize from some real feature of a group, from chimerical assertions, which describe practices no human group actually engages in. A claim that IDF guards have humiliated, beaten, or even sexually assaulted detainees is xenophobic in form, which is to say that even when those claims are wrong or overstated, they point to recognizable human behavior. By contrast, Kristof’s claim that Israeli forces have trained dogs to rape prisoners as institutional practice is chimerical in form: it describes a scene—choreographed bestiality, the animal as instrument, the victim as passive ritual object—that has no plausible institutional reality, the purpose of which is purely symbolic rather than evidential. Kristof’s charges function to depict the Israelis—and all Jews, by extension—as categorically alien, not merely different from “the rest of us,” but irredeemably so.

In the days since Kristof’s column was published, many observers have called for The New York Times to retract the piece or to issue a statement of correction. Either would be nice, but neither would be sufficient. Kristof’s column is part of the recurrent accumulation of cultural permission to view Jews as totally alien and, frankly, demonic. It incrementally renews the cultural availability of the “abominable and anti-human” template inside a respectable institution. That is what the template’s transmission has always required, and that is what makes this column so dangerous, regardless of its author’s intent.

While he may not have meant to do so, Nicholas Kristof signed a new “warrant” with his column last week, one that follows an old and treacherous pattern. 


Israel National News

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/05/18/from-the-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion-to-the-new-york-times/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter