Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Europe’s moral inversion on Israel - Fiamma Nirenstein

 

by Fiamma Nirenstein

The language used against the Jewish state recasts its defensive war as aggression while ignoring the forces that perpetuate suffering.

 

A demonstrator holding a smoke bomb and an upside-down portrait of Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni takes part in a protest against the Middle East war in Rome, March 28, 2026. Photo by Tiziana Fabi/AFP via Getty Images.
A demonstrator holding a smoke bomb and an upside-down portrait of Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni takes part in a protest against the Middle East war in Rome on March 28, 2026. Photo by Tiziana Fabi/AFP via Getty Images.
TIZIANA FABI/AFP via Getty Images

 

Take a war of survival, and call it “genocide.” Observe a third-world population trapped in conflict, subjugated by a clique of terrorists that extorts it while stealing its food, and describe the resulting hardship as a famine engineered by Israel. Civilians die in a war while terror leaders hide in tunnels, and the blame is placed squarely on the Jewish state.

This is the terrible panorama confronting Israel today, not only on the battlefield but also in the court of global opinion.

Across much of Europe, moral reasoning appears to have been inverted. The terminology once reserved for the most egregious crimes in history is now deployed casually, stripped of its meaning and weaponized against a democracy defending itself against organizations openly dedicated to its destruction. The result is not merely a misreading of events but a systematic distortion that rewards propaganda while punishing reality.

Israel did not choose this war. It is a war forced upon it by terrorist organizations that embed themselves within civilian populations, weaponize humanitarian suffering and exploit the very moral standards that Western democracies strive to uphold. Hamas and its allies have long perfected this cynical strategy: to transform the inevitable human cost of conflict into a public relations instrument aimed at delegitimizing Israel’s right to self-defense.

The reaction to the Israeli soldier who damaged a cross in a Lebanese village illustrates this distortion particularly clearly. The international outcry ignored the broader reality of Israel’s relationship with Christian communities, which in fact reflects the opposite dynamic. The episode became yet another example of how isolated images are used to reinforce preconceived narratives, rather than to illuminate the truth. This inversion of reality deserves far greater scrutiny than it has received.

Yet much of the European discourse now accepts this narrative with alarming ease. Words like “genocide” are invoked despite the absence of evidence and despite the clear intention of Israel to dismantle terrorist infrastructures while minimizing civilian casualties. Such accusations ignore both the legal definition of the term and the reality that Israel repeatedly facilitates humanitarian aid, even as its own population remains under threat.

The consequences of this rhetorical distortion are serious. When language loses precision, justice loses clarity. If every war becomes a “genocide,” the word itself becomes meaningless—and genuine genocides risk being trivialized. Equally troubling, the willingness to assign collective blame to Israel alone erases the responsibility of terrorist leaders who deliberately operate among civilians and deprive their own people of safety.

Europe, which rightly prides itself on its commitment to human rights and historical memory, should recognize the danger of such moral confusion. The lessons of the 20th century demand careful use of language and rigorous attention to truth. Instead, we see an environment in which Israel is judged by standards applied to no other nation confronting comparable threats.

The paradox is stark: Israel is condemned not for violating democratic norms but for attempting to uphold them under conditions few other democracies have ever faced. It warns civilians, opens humanitarian corridors, and continues to operate under judicial and media scrutiny, even as it defends itself against enemies that reject any legal or moral constraints.

None of this denies the suffering endured by civilians in conflict zones. Their plight is real and tragic. But compassion must not be manipulated into a tool for political warfare. To attribute famine or deliberate cruelty to Israel without acknowledging the role of terrorist organizations is not only inaccurate; it ultimately prolongs the suffering of the very populations whose welfare is invoked.

Europe must decide whether it seeks truth or merely affirmation of ideological predispositions. Honest analysis requires acknowledging both the complexity of war and the responsibility of those who initiate and perpetuate it. A democracy fighting for survival deserves scrutiny, but it also deserves fairness.

Until moral clarity is restored, the terrible panorama will persist: a world in which language is inverted, responsibility is obscured, and Israel is judged not by facts, but by a narrative crafted to deny its legitimacy.


Fiamma Nirenstein is an Italian-Israeli journalist, author and senior research fellow at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA). An adviser on antisemitism to Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, she served in the Italian Parliament (2008-2013) as vice president of the Foreign Affairs Committee. A founding member of the Friends of Israel Initiative, she has written 15 books, including October 7, Antisemitism and the War on the West, and is a leading voice on Israel, the Middle East, Europe and the fight against antisemitism.

Source: https://www.jns.org/opinion/column/europes-moral-inversion-on-israel

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'Victory will be complete': Herzog’s powerful message at memorial - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

At Mount Herzl, President Herzog honors terror victims, links generations of loss, and says Israel’s true victory lies in rebuilding life.

 

The state memorial ceremony for victims of terror was held on Tuesday at the monument on Mount Herzl in Jerusalem.

President Isaac Herzog, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana, and Supreme Court President Itzhak Amit participated in the ceremony.

President Herzog addressed the ceremony and stated that "this year as well, with great pain, beautiful and beloved faces and names have joined the too-long list which we remember here today. With great sorrow, more and more fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, sons and daughters, grandsons and granddaughters, and loved ones joined the family of bereavement, entire families, broken-hearted."

According to Herzog, "The Zionist enterprise built the country, with tremendous strengths of growth and fulfillment. And for the 78 years that this state has been here. And when we look upon this place, we can not recognize nearly anything that was, except one thing that burns the heart, again and again: that our enemies who seek our destruction continue to use the same cruel terrorist methods, in attempts to prevent the house from being built."

Isaac Herzog presented what he described as a story of closure within Israeli bereavement, recounting the history of the “Red House" in Jerusalem’s Motza neighborhood, built more than a century ago by his great-grandfather Yechiel Michel Steinberg and his brother Yerachmiel. Herzog said the home and its brick factory became part of Jerusalem’s renewal, before recalling the 1929 riots, when residents of nearby Kalunya attacked Motza, killing 11 people, while children from the neighboring Maklef family survived by hiding in the Steinberg factory.

Herzog said the survivors rebuilt Motza “brick by brick on the road to building the state," drawing a line from those events to the October 7 massacre and arguing that the methods of terror have repeated across generations.

The president then recounted a more recent encounter with the Wolansky family, whom he visited after the death of IDF Sgt. Aviad Elchanan Volansky in combat in southern Lebanon. He said the family had already endured previous losses, including relatives killed in terror attacks, and that he was struck to learn their lineage traces back to Rabbi Abraham Shlomo Zalman Zoref, whom Herzog described as the first victim of hostile acts 175 years ago.

According to Herzog, the family’s story reflects not only a continuity of bloodshed but also a continuity of life, construction, and hope. He said that despite generations of attacks, including missile strikes from Iran and Lebanon, Israel has continued to build, grow, and transform loss into resilience.

Herzog concluded that after two and a half years of war, Israel stands at a new historic chapter, having endured hardship while defeating enemies and strengthening alliances. “Our victory is not measured only by defeating the enemy," he said. “Victory will be complete when life is restored to its course," adding that true victory will be the ability to keep creating, growing, learning, and building. 


Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/425853

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran: Complete Regime Change for Permanent Peace - Con Coughlin

 

by Con Coughlin

Operation Epic Fury has certainly dealt the ayatollahs a devastating blow, one that might still enable the oppressed Iranian people to achieve their ultimate objective of regime change in Tehran, but only if the US administration does not foolishly exchange a ruthless religious tyranny for a ruthless military one.

 

  • The enduring barbarity of the clerical regime's attempts to subjugate the Iranian people to its will demonstrates why the Trump administration's decision to launch fresh military action was justified.

  • It also exposes the moral bankruptcy of the opponents -- both left and right wing -- of Trump's military intervention who fail to grasp how ordinary Iranians are suffering at the hands of Iran's brutal clerical dictatorship.

  • Operation Epic Fury has certainly dealt the ayatollahs a devastating blow, one that might still enable the oppressed Iranian people to achieve their ultimate objective of regime change in Tehran, but only if the US administration does not foolishly exchange a ruthless religious tyranny for a ruthless military one.

  • If both Iran's ruthless Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the former Shah's army -- now strictly supervised by the IRGC and downgraded to border control -- have guns while the citizens of Iran, held hostage by their own government, do not, the regime's ferocity and disregard for due process will undoubtedly continue.

  • Trump's promise to the Iranian people that "Help is on its way" will appear, instead, as a betrayal -– and no doubt be extensively used to harm the chances of Republicans in America's upcoming midterm election this November.

  • Similarly, it is difficult to see how impoverishing the present government in Iran -- through the naval blockade, sanctions and secondary sanctions -- will somehow automatically cause its "collapse." A change of regime, where the government have weapons and the citizenry do not, could "take years."

  • The self-defeating tendency of the US -- failing successfully to resolve the final stretch of conflicts, from North Korea to Iraq to Afghanistan -- has repeatedly caused the US to "pull defeat from the jaws of victory." Wars were won, often brilliantly, but quickly lost just after.

  • It is understandable that the Iranian people, much as they loathe their regime, are reluctant to submit themselves to another such mass slaughter again.

  • The time has come for the US administration to work with the Iranian public-- not just its intolerable leadership -- to find a better alternative, even if other countries along the Gulf might prefer a "weak Iran" to a "strong democracy" to protect their own hold on power.

The enduring barbarity of the clerical regime's attempts to subjugate the Iranian people to its will demonstrates why the Trump administration's decision to launch fresh military action was justified. Pictured: A public execution in Mashhad, Iran on December 12, 2022. (Photo by Mizan News/AFP via Getty Images)

While the world's attention has been focused on diplomatic efforts to end the Iran war, the Iranian regime -- whatever is left of it, that is -- has been busy doing what it does best: brutalising its own people.

At the same time that the Trump administration has been repeatedly offering Tehran the possibility of a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, the Islamic hardliners still running the country are seeking to reassert their stranglehold over the Iranian people by embarking on a fresh round of executions.

Despite giving US President Donald Trump assurances in January that Tehran would not carry out the planned executions of around 800 protesters detained during the wave of anti-government protests that erupted at the start of the year, the Islamic regime has now resumed its barbaric execution programme, with most of the accused first being subjected to torture before being led to the gallows.

At least 14 Iranians are reported to have been executed since Trump launched Operation Epic Fury at the end of February, including an 18-year-old protester who took part in the anti-government protests in January, which resulted in the deaths of an estimated 30,000 Iranian civilians.

In one of the more controversial demonstrations of the regime's determination to crush anti-government activity, Iran executed Kouroush Keyvani, a dual Iranian-Swedish national, on charges of spying for Israel.

The execution took place despite official protests from the Swedish government, which claimed that Keyvani, who had been arrested during the 12-day war between Iran and Israel last year for allegedly photographing sensitive areas, had not received a fair trial and proper legal representation.

"It is clear to us," said Sweden's Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard, "that the legal process that led to the Swedish citizen being executed has not been fair."

Other Iranians executed during the past month include several people who were hanged on charges of rebellion over membership in the People's Mujahedin of Iran (MEK), a banned opposition group, as well as the country's 19-year-old wrestling champion, Saleh Mohammadi, with two others. The regime has announced that it will also carry out this year's first execution of a female demonstrator, Bita Hammati, accused of having thrown concrete blocks at the Basij.

Additionally, the deliberate targeting of opposition groups such as the MEK, which is said to have close ties with the West, is being seen as an attempt by the regime to persuade ordinary Iranians that the country is facing a Western-inspired plot to effect regime change in Iran.

Other executions have involved three young men accused of involvement in mass protests in January, the first hangings Iran carried out directly related to the nationwide demonstrations that ended in a bloody clampdown. Among those executed was 18-year-old Amirhossein Hatami, detained during the ⁠nationwide unrest in January.

Iranian security forces have still not returned Hatami's body, in what may be an unwillingness to disclose signs of torture, or what informed sources described as further pressure on relatives already reeling from his death.

Human rights experts believe that only seven percent of executions in Iran are officially announced, with the real number likely much higher. Some opposition groups claim that more than 300 people have been executed in Iran so far this year.

Charges such as "waging war against God", "armed rebellion", "corruption on Earth", espionage and "acting against national security" are frequently brought without sufficient evidence in courts that lack transparency and fair trial standards.

There are now fears that Iran's executioners will be kept busy implementing the regime's brutal tactics of repression after Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei, Iran's judiciary chief, called for the current rate of executions in Iran to be expedited.

Sentences involving "confiscation of property and execution" for those linked to enemy groups should be carried out more quickly, Ejei said in a recent statement. "A full-scale war is under way against us".

The Iranian regime's decision to resume executions represents a complete reversal of its pledge to the Trump administration back in January to halt the planned execution of an estimated 800 protesters accused of participating in some of the biggest anti-government protests in the history of the Islamic Republic.

The upsurge in executions, together with other tactics such as rounding up those accused of opposing the Islamic Republic, is part of the regime's desperate bid to cling to power after the devastating losses it has suffered at the hands of the US and Israel.

The enduring barbarity of the clerical regime's attempts to subjugate the Iranian people to its will demonstrates why the Trump administration's decision to launch fresh military action was justified.

It also exposes the moral bankruptcy of the opponents -- both left and right wing -- of Trump's military intervention who fail to grasp how ordinary Iranians are suffering at the hands of Iran's brutal clerical dictatorship.

Operation Epic Fury has certainly dealt the ayatollahs a devastating blow, one that might still enable the oppressed Iranian people to achieve their ultimate objective of regime change in Tehran, but only if the US administration does not foolishly exchange a ruthless religious tyranny for a ruthless military one.

If both Iran's ruthless Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the former Shah's army -- now strictly supervised by the IRGC and downgraded to border control -- have guns while the citizens of Iran, held hostage by their own government, do not, the regime's ferocity and disregard for due process will undoubtedly continue.

Trump's promise to the Iranian people that "Help is on its way" will appear, instead, as a betrayal -– and no doubt be extensively used to harm the chances of Republicans in America's upcoming midterm election this November.

Similarly, it is difficult to see how impoverishing the present government in Iran -- through the naval blockade, sanctions and secondary sanctions -- will somehow automatically cause its "collapse." A change of regime, where the government have weapons and the citizenry do not, could "take years."

The self-defeating tendency of the US -- failing successfully to resolve the final stretch of conflicts, from North Korea to Iraq to Afghanistan -- has repeatedly caused the US to "pull defeat from the jaws of victory." Wars were won, often brilliantly, but quickly lost just after.

In an attempt to prevent any further outbreaks of anti-government protests, members of Iran's Basij militia, the paramilitary group responsible for safeguarding the regime, have been patrolling the streets at night, putting up checkpoints across cities in what is widely seen as a way to deter citizens from gathering in a repeat of the unrest in January, when thousands of people took to the streets and more than 35,600 unarmed civilians were slaughtered.

It is understandable that the Iranian people, much as they loathe their regime, are reluctant to submit themselves to another such mass slaughter again.

The time has come for the US administration to work with the Iranian public-- not just its intolerable leadership -- to find a better alternative, even if other countries along the Gulf might prefer a "weak Iran" to a "strong democracy" to protect their own hold on power.

It is for this reason that the Israelis, in particular, have been deliberately targeting Basij bases, as well as other institutions, such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, whose primary function is to ensure the survival of Iran's Islamic autocracy at any cost.


Con Coughlin is the Telegraph's Defence and Foreign Affairs Editor and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22461/iran-regime-change-peace

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran violated truce ‘multiple times,’ Trump says ahead of Islamabad talks - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

U.S. Vice President JD Vance was expected to fly to Pakistan after Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei approved a second round of talks, Axios reported.

 

Trump
U.S. President Donald Trump accepts a DoorDash delivery outside of the Oval Office, Monday, April 13, 2026. Credit: Daniel Torok/White House.

U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday accused the Islamic Republic of Iran of violating the temporary ceasefire “numerous times.”

The president’s Truth Social post came as a Pakistani diplomatic source told Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera and Saudi outlet Al Hadath that initial members of the Iranian and U.S. delegations had arrived in Islamabad for renewed talks.

However, Iranian state media denied the report, saying no delegation had departed Tehran as of Tuesday morning.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance was expected to fly to Pakistan after Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei approved a second round of talks, Axios reported earlier on Tuesday, citing three U.S. sources.

U.S. Middle East special envoy Steve Witkoff and senior White House adviser Jared Kushner were also expected to join the negotiations, according to the report.

The two-week ceasefire between Washington and Tehran, agreed to on April 7, was supposed to expire on Tuesday evening. In an interview with Bloomberg on Monday, Trump appeared to extend the deadline.

The president told the outlet that it is highly unlikely that he would agree to extend the temporary truce beyond Wednesday night, as his administration aims to reach a comprehensive agreement with the Islamic Republic in the upcoming talks. 


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/u-s-news/iran-violated-truce-multiple-times-trump-says-ahead-of-expected-talks-in-islamabad

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Mossad agent fell in action after laying groundwork for Iran war, agency director reveals - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

The operative was killed “outside of Israel,” the Jewish state’s top spy said.

 

Netanyahu, Barnea
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Mossad Director david David Barnea attended the award ceremony for the Prime Minister’s Prize for Mossad operations, Sept. 17, 2025. Photo by Amos Ben Gershom/GPO.


A Mossad agent who laid the groundwork for Israel’s “Operation Roaring Lion” against Iran fell in the line of duty “outside of Israel,” the agency’s director, David Barnea, revealed on Tuesday.

“During ‘Operation Roaring Lion,’ my thoughts and heart were filled with pride in the character and actions of M., who fell outside Israel while carrying out his duty,” Barnea said at a Yom Hazikaron (Memorial Day) ceremony for members of the intelligence agency, according to the Kan News public broadcaster.

“The operations led by M. combined creativity and ingenuity alongside technology, and had a significant impact on the success of the campaign against Iran,” the Jewish state’s top spy added.

The Jewish state’s Channel 12 News broadcaster identified M. as the former Mossad agent who was killed when a tourist boat overturned on Lake Maggiore in northern Italy on May 28, 2023. Israeli media at the time identified the deceased as 50-year-old Erez Shimoni, but the Prime Minister’s Office said that no additional details would be forthcoming due to the individual’s past service to the country.

“The Mossad has lost a dear, dedicated and professional colleague who, for decades, devoted his life to the security of the State of Israel, even after his retirement. The Mossad mourns the loss and shares in the grief of the family, which it will continue to support and embrace,” said the PMO statement.

The other fatalities among the 22 passengers and two crew members were two Italians who worked for the country’s intelligence service and the Russian wife of the boat captain. The rest of those aboard managed to swim to shore or were rescued by other boats, although five of them were injured in the incident.

According to reports, 18 of the 20 survivors were also either active or former intelligence agents. Like the Israelis, the Italians were quickly evacuated from emergency rooms and hotels “so as not to leave a trace.”

Following “Operation Rising Lion” against Tehran in June 2025, Barnea said that the Mossad would continue to conduct covert operations inside the Islamic Republic for the foreseeable future.

In a rare video message released by the agency, Barnea emphasized that the Jewish state’s intelligence reach inside Iran was extensive and ongoing.

“We will be there, like we have been there,” he said. “We worked for months and years to do all the right actions to get to the right moment.”

Hebrew outlets and international media have attributed many high-level targeted killings and sabotage efforts to Mossad operatives.

Earlier this month, U.S. ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said that the Israel Defense Forces and the Mossad were “helpful partners” in the rescue mission of an American colonel from deep Iranian territory.

The diplomat tweeted on April 6 that he had met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and thanked Jerusalem on behalf of the American people for its “unprecedented assistance” to U.S. military and intelligence agencies to conduct the rescue of the U.S. air crew.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/israel-news/mossad-agent-fell-in-action-after-laying-groundwork-for-iran-war-agency-director-reveals

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

All the Dream Houses of the Left - Victor Davis Hanson

 

by Victor Davis Hanson

The Left’s political imagination builds heroes, villains, and entire histories untethered from reality, substituting narrative for fact until it collapses under scrutiny.

 

 

Pseudo-Heroes

It is difficult to determine whether the bizarro worldview of the current Democrat-media nexus can simply be attributed to either its generic Trump Derangement Syndrome or the attendant Wile E. Coyote/Roadrunner obsessive/compulsive disorder. But the crazy world of the Left increasingly bears scant resemblance to reality.

In this alternate universe, Eric Swalwell was a liberal icon and invaluable asset for years, though admittedly a bit randy and occasionally a serial sexual predator—a fact that the man himself made little effort to hide.

Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner was, at last, the Left’s “real thing,” the white working-class liberal stiff who could win back the hoi polloi—although he couldn’t get his story straight on whether his Nazi tattoo was an accident or supposed proof that he was brainwashed into Nazism by the toxic US military.

Tim Walz was also hailed as the Left’s Mr. Everyman, a truck-driving street fighter, although he is now in anti-American socialist Spain, at a time of war, libeling his own country and American soldiers as being in the service of a fascist cause.

Jeffrey Epstein was allegedly a mere eccentric autodidact, wannabe insider, and generous party host, though a bit too eager to use his girls to buy his way into liberal academic and intellectual circles.

Sam Bankman-Fried was a lovable genius gadfly, a billionaire slob, but with a big and timely checkbook for radical causes.

Jussie Smollett was to be the next George Floyd rallying cry, if only his ridiculous lies were not so ridiculous.

And George Floyd—multi-felon, ex-convict, past home invader who once stuck a pistol in a woman’s stomach, arrested while passing counterfeit bills, high on drugs, and resisting arrest—became the innocent martyr who died at the hands of diabolical, murderous police and set America afire.

Erasing Joe Biden

Along with such a pantheon, somehow the Democrat borg also fantasizes that the historic legacy of the Biden years has been squandered by Trump—as if the country suffers from collective amnesia.

But any sane person knows that Biden served as a waxen effigy, puppeteered by the radical Left to serve as a moderate veneer over the most radical agenda in modern memory.

In just four years, Biden’s handlers obliterated the southern border, admitting 10–12 million unvetted aliens, including an estimated 500,000 criminals, apparently as a demographic booster shot for their otherwise unpopular agendas.

Almost daily, we read of Americans assaulted, raped, and murdered by illegal aliens—stories almost always smothered in the left-wing media.

Rampant multibillion-dollar theft of US entitlement money by foreign nationals or recently naturalized citizens from Minneapolis to Los Angeles is also daily fare. The nihilistic Biden years of open borders have cost the nation untold amounts in blood and treasure. Yet the Left’s answer is to attack ICE officers attempting to enforce federal immigration law.

Stranger still is the contrast between protesters who seem to be mostly affluent, suburban white women. The latter, for some reason, seem to be free between 9 and 5 on workdays, to spit on, scream at, and obstruct ICE officers—whose ranks are working-class and 45 percent non-white.

All this is called progressivism: impeding the deportation of violent criminals who prey on poor neighborhoods, lacking the security that the protesters take for granted in their own protected enclaves.

The Biden puppeteers enriched and empowered theocratic Iran by lifting sanctions. They did little to nothing when Iranian proxies in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen serially attacked US installations and ships.

The Biden years saw near-record gas prices, 9 percent hyperinflation, all-time high crime spikes, and a president who even Democrats now admit was non compos mentis. He was toppled as a candidate for reelection by a coup of Democrat backroom politicos, but only after a disastrous debate. In his place, they and donors appointed a mostly inert Kamala Harris as nominee, who, as a 2020 presidential candidate, had failed to win a single delegate.

Iran Fantasies

The Left has created another fantasy world out of the current six-week Iran war.

When Trump warned on a Monday that the Iranian regime might face terrible punishment for its continued drone and missile attacks, he was libeled as a modern Nazi exterminator, hellbent on mass death. When on Tuesday Iran relented and asked for negotiations, Trump suddenly became smeared as a TACO naif, apparently too eager for peace. Each day, the Left tries to think up a new argument for American defeat, even as Iran suffers more one-sided damage. Their idea is to embolden Iran to hold out, in hopes that Trump—under constant left-wing assault, international pressure to lower gas prices, and his own restive Congressional allies—will fold and then be trashed by the Left as a TACO again.

More preposterously, the Left has peddled the fantasy that Trump’s demands for Iran to surrender its nuclear material (mostly hyper-enriched during the Biden administration) copied the Obama Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the so-called Iran deal.

But who could deny that, under Obama, the deal empowered Iran to rearm even more rapidly with lifted sanctions, nocturnal cash transfers, and the unfreezing of its assets?

The frenzied armament and empowerment of Iran either terrified or impressed the Obama administration enough to hatch the wacky idea of envisioning a Shiite crescent of Tehran, Damascus, Beirut, and Gaza. Such terrorist regimes would “balance” the moderate Arab states and democratic Israel in “creative tension.”

And the message to Iran was not nuclear disarmament, but slow, graduated nuclear armament, albeit of the sort to be completed during an administration to come.

In contrast, Trump’s deal was with an obliterated, prostrate Iranian military. The US fleet was in charge of the Strait of Hormuz and the blockade of Iran. More than 300 US combat aircraft could render Iran a medieval mess with impunity, should it persist in its terrorist agendas.

Begging a fully armed and defiant Iran merely to postpone its acquisition of a bomb is not the equivalent of dictating to a flattened Iran a series of demands that, if unmet, will lead to its veritable destruction—after it had already suffered the loss of a half-century investment in a half-trillion-dollar arsenal and military infrastructure.

In the surreal left-wing narrative, the more Iran lost its air force, navy, most of its missiles and drones, its command and control, its subterranean arsenals, its nuclear production facilities, and its factories that turn out weapons of war, the more the Democrat-media nexus declared the war lost and the Americans—after six weeks and 13 lost lives—to be trapped in a quagmire analogous to the war in Vietnam (eight years of war with 58,000 dead, 150,000 wounded).

Impeaching Pete Hegseth?

Examine another fantasy: the charade of a Democrat effort to impeach Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on silly charges of supposedly aiding an unauthorized war against Iran, war crimes, reckless handling of classified information, obstruction of Congressional oversight, abuse of power, politicization of the military, and conduct bringing disrepute to the US and its armed forces.

Each of these writs is either false or more aptly applies to the Biden and prior Democrat administrations.

Note that Hegseth, in a single year, fixed the years-long crisis of falling enlistment that he inherited. He has now even exceeded recruitment targets by emphasizing that soldiers should concentrate on combat effectiveness and not fixate on race, sex, or sexual orientation.

His Pentagon oversaw the summer 2025 destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities (with no fatalities), the military extradition of Nicolás Maduro and the recalibration of a once-rogue Venezuela (with no casualties), and the current six-week war that had destroyed the military capability of a once-feared, 93 million-person theocratic Iran (with 13 fatalities so far).

Hegseth has rebooted procurement with emphasis on far more excellent weapons rather than too few superb ones. Compare that to the prior secretary, Lloyd Austin, who went medically AWOL without informing the White House that he was incapacitated for 3–4 days in the ICU. He oversaw the Pentagon’s historic misadventure in Afghanistan and the constant attacks on US soldiers in the Middle East that went unanswered and emboldened Iran’s terrorist proxies. No Republican called for his impeachment.

The war in Iran is not “unauthorized”; it has not exceeded the 90-day limit under the War Powers Act. However, Barack Obama’s seven-month unauthorized bombing of Libya, under the Democrats’ current logic, really was a “war crime,” as was his “unauthorized,” months-long predator assassination campaign on the Afghan border that killed 500, including four US citizens.

The Congress that wants to impeach Hegseth should extend its gaze to Joe Biden’s 30-year unlawful possession of unsecured and classified documents and his use of them with an unauthorized ghostwriter who subsequently destroyed subpoenaed tapes with impunity.

The military has been depoliticized. That is, it no longer serves as a fast-track laboratory for the Left to try out its radical theories—transgenderism, racial tribalism, and unconstitutional racial prejudiced preferences.

Resuscitating Lawfare?

Finally, for over a decade, the Left has waged a coordinated, often extralegal effort to destroy the campaigns and presidency of Donald Trump. What lawfare did the Left not sanction?

The first impeachment hinging on the hearsay evidence on an unnamed pseudo-whistleblower who connived with the prevaricator Adam Schiff—with the acquiescence of a partisan inspector general?

The Russian collusion hoax orchestrated by the past and present Obama FBI and CIA?

The laptop disinformation campaign, to use the government to censor the news and promulgate the lie of a Russian-concocted Hunter Biden laptop on the eve of an election?

The unconstitutional effort to de-ballot Trump in 25 blue states?

The SWAT-like, staged raid on the then-ex-president’s home at Mar-a-Lago to find some 100 classified documents from more than 11,000 confiscated?

The pervasion of the legal system to wage four years of lawfare in five civil and criminal courtrooms?

Despite all that, we are now warned by Democrats like Susan Rice that when the Left regains power, they are going to restart their vendettas to punish their enemies.

An unbalanced politico, James Carville, advises the Democrats to keep quiet about their real plans upon returning to power: to pack the court to destroy the 157-year, nine-justice Supreme Court; to end the 66-year, 50-state Union with two new blue “states,” Puerto Rico and Washington, DC—all to obtain in an instant four new left-wing senators; and to kill off the 220-year-old Senate filibuster.

Carville is upset that the decade-long lawfare against Trump failed. So now he advocates expanding the warping of the justice system to charge Trump’s family and friends.

What is the one constant theme in this alternate left-wing universe?

No Democrat outlines an immigration agenda, a way to round up Biden’s criminal illegal alien entrants, an energy plan, a way to balance the budget, an anti-corruption agenda to stop the multibillion-dollar looting of the federal and state welfare systems, or a new strategic plan abroad. Instead, the party creates alternate realities that demand changing the system itself rather than working within it to appeal to the American voter.

Living with daily delusions and shrieking at Trump demons raging in their collective heads is no way to run a country. 


Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness and the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He is an American military historian, columnist, a former classics professor, and scholar of ancient warfare. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004, and is the 2023 Giles O'Malley Distinguished Visiting Professor at the School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush, and the Bradley Prize in 2008. Hanson is also a farmer (growing almonds on a family farm in Selma, California) and a critic of social trends related to farming and agrarianism. He is the author of the just released New York Times best seller, The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation, published by Basic Books on May 7, 2024, as well as the recent  The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won, The Case for Trump, and The Dying Citizen.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/04/21/all-the-dream-houses-of-the-left/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Sen. Rick Scott introduces legislation to repudiate 2019 Trump impeachment: 'Lacks legitimacy' - John Solomon

 

by John Solomon

Scott's move came after DNI Gabbard revealed Congress and Trump's legal team were kept from evidence showing the whistleblower whose allegations about Ukraine policy prompted the impeachment had the "potential for bias," misled investigators in his first report and only had hearsay evidence to back up his allegations.

 

Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., on Monday became the first member of Congress to introduce legislation to repudiate the 2019 Democrat-led House vote to impeach Donald Trump, declaring evidence newly declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard showed the vote to remove the president more than six years ago "lacks legitimacy."

Scott's move came after Just the News reported a week ago that documents declassified by Gabbard showed Congress and Trump's legal team were kept from evidence showing the whistleblower whose allegations about Ukraine policy prompted the impeachment had the "potential for bias," misled investigators in his first report and only had hearsay evidence to back up his allegations.

Scott's resolution asks the Senate to consider "condemning the handling of the 2019 Ukraine Whistleblower Complaint, calling for the Department of Justice to initiate an investigation and possible prosecution of the matter, and declaring the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump by the House of Representatives lacks legitimacy."

The resolution also stated that the House vote to impeach Trump in December 2019 "was predicated on a concealed and deficient complaint, lacks legitimacy and the facts and circumstances upon which Articles of Impeachment were based neither met the burden of proving that President Trump committed 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors' nor established that President Trump engaged in 'insurrection of rebellion against the United States.'"

You can read the full resolution here.

In an interview with the John Solomon Reports podcast, Scott said he considered the 2019 impeachment trial of Trump to be "complete BS" but that the new evidence showed the president, his legal team and the public were all denied a fair proceeding because exculpatory evidence that undercut his chief accuser was withheld.

"It was a complete abuse of process," Scott told Just the News. "And I want, if there's any fraud found, any wrongdoing found, I want, I want these people prosecuted to the full extent of the law."

The resolution urges the Justice Department to:

  • "promptly initiate a thorough, independent investigation into the handling of the 2019 Ukraine whistleblower complaint, including potential violations related to false statements, improper redactions, abuse of the whistleblower process, and coordination with congressional staff;"
  • "pursue appropriate criminal prosecutions to the extent warranted by the evidence, consistent with the rule of law and without regard to political affiliation, to restore public confidence in the integrity of the intelligence community and congressional oversight."

The resolution also praised Gabbard for granting Just the News' request to release the long secret memos and creating "transparency and accountability in declassifying these materials and sharing the truth with the American people."

The president thanked Scott for introducing the resolution in a post on Truth Social, stating "Hopefully, Justice will finally prevail!" 


John Solomon

Source: https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/sen-rick-scott-introduces-legislation-repudiate-2019-trump

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

US intel secretly flagged major 2020 election vulnerabilities, including voter data, memo shows - John Solomon and Steven Richards

 

by John Solomon and Steven Richards

Memo newly declassified by DNI Gabbard shows concerns about integrity of American voting were far greater than the public was told by previous administrations. Evidence emerged that China had gained access to voter registration data in multiple states and had even sent fake driver's licenses to the United States in a bid to help Joe Biden win the election, officials said.

 

Months before the 2020 presidential election, U.S. intelligence issued a secret but stark warning that foreign adversaries had the capability to “compromise" America's voting infrastructure and raised specific concerns about the vulnerability of voter registration databases that later would be penetrated by China and Iran, a newly declassified memo obtained by Just the News shows.

The National Intelligence Council's (NIC) concerns were so extensive that officials personally briefed President Donald Trump at the White House in February 2020, according to photos obtained by Just the News showing top CIA, FBI and Homeland Security officials joining with NIC analysts to inform the president.

But the American public was never fully alerted, even after evidence emerged that China had gained access to voter registration data in multiple states and had even sent fake driver's licenses to the United States in a bid to help Joe Biden win the election, officials said.

"We judge that US adversaries, including, at a minimum, Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, as well as non-state groups, have the capability to compromise US election infrastructure for the 2020 presidential election," the NIC wrote in the memo dated Jan. 15, 2020.

"Adversaries gaining access to US election-related systems could disrupt the voting process, steal sensitive data, or undermine confidence in the election results, but we do not know whether any of them have specific plans to manipulate election-related systems," the memo added.

The document was recently declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who continues to expose examples of the intelligence community suppressing or misusing intelligence. 

Though officials say that an ongoing second Trump administration investigation has found no evidence yet that vote-counting machines were directly compromised in the 2020 election, the memo shows how such machines could be vulnerable to intrusions in the future and made clear that the voter registration databases that were breached by China and Iran were easy targets. 

You can read that memo here.

American voting system more vulnerable to intrusion than acknowledged

The memo, prepared by then-NationaI Intelligence for Cyber Christopher Porter, has become part of a broader body of evidence showing America's election systems are more vulnerable to hacks, breaches and manipulations than previously acknowledged.

After the 2020 election, many senior Intelligence Community officials insisted on the historical security of the 2020 election and downplayed concerns about such vulnerabilities.

Krebs: "The 2020 election was the most secure in U.S. history.”

For example, the members of the Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council Executive Committee released a mid-November 2020 joint statement declaring that “the November 3rd election was the most secure in American history.” 

One of the officials who sat on that committee, Chris Krebs, the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, testified to the Senate after the election that he "approved CISA’s publication of a joint statement from the election security community, reflecting that community’s consensus that the 2020 election was the most secure in U.S. history.” 

Krebs has been accused by the Trump White House of being "a significant bad-faith actor who weaponized and abused his government authority. Krebs’ misconduct involved the censorship of disfavored speech implicating the 2020 election and COVID-19 pandemic." 

Porter: "It is no secret that China and Iran compromise election equipment for a variety of intelligence purposes"

But Porter told Just the News those assurances did not reflect the government's assessment of just how vulnerable America's election infrastructure was. Iran and China did gain access eventually to voter registration data, but those breaches were suppressed until November 2021, when Iranian hackers were indicted, and March 2026 when Just the News obtained the first declassified documents acknowledging Beijing's penetration of voter registration data.

"What is shocking is how uncontroversial some of these findings are to professionals—it is no secret that China and Iran compromise election equipment for a variety of intelligence purposes, nor was it controversial at the time that these systems had technical vulnerabilities," Porter told Just the News. "Every agency concurred on these findings, but because it was seen as potentially aiding the President’s reelection campaign there was an active effort to damage him politically by refusing to share the declassified report with the public."

He continued, "It is important for people to recognize that this is not normal behavior by the Intelligence Community—most officers would never do something like this. In my over 20 years of public service, the politicized efforts by [the] CIA and others to conceal the truth about the threats to the 2020 US Presidential Election are unprecedented and even today shock me when I retrace everything that happened."

Porter said much of this information was ordered declassified by then-President Trump, but that CIA leaders refused to publicly release a report on the suspected Chinese threats to election infrastructure. 

"The President of the United States personally ordered this information declassified and shared with the public because he thought election integrity was so important to our country. Despite this, CIA leaders at the time refused to release the declassified report," Porter told Just the News

Punished for demanding the CIA follow Presidential orders

"Years later, when he was reelected, CIA went so far as to claim that the report had never been declassified. Even the record of its declassification had been removed from the system," he said. "Following the President’s lawful orders is necessary for the proper functioning of our democracy—when I raised these concerns at the time, the CIA, ODNI, other agencies and even the Inspector General retaliated against me and removed my ability to communicate with Congress on election issues." 

Porter added, "I am so thankful for DNI Gabbard getting the truth of these matters out which for years have been kept hidden from the public and even from President Trump." 

Last week, the Intelligence Community's new inspector general, Christopher Fox, decided to open a full investigation into whether Porter's concerns were internally squashed and whether he was mistreated as a whistleblower.

Well before the China and Iran hacks, the January 2020 NIC assessment warned clearly that voter registration databases—along with poll books that keep a list of authorized voters—were among the most vulnerable to hacking and manipulation by foreign powers. "We assess that centralized election-related data repositories, such as voter registration databases, pollbooks, and official election websites, are most vulnerable to exploitation, and adversaries could use access to these systems to disrupt election processes," it warned.  

"States house their voter registration databases predominantly on Internet-connected systems that are designed for easy access because maintaining up-to-date voter registration records is a nearly continuous process. Adversaries could alter data to potentially prevent individual voters or groups of voters from voting, causing delays on election day or forcing voters to use provisional ballots," the officer wrote. "Adversaries could also use the registration data—which in some cases is also available publicly or for purchase—to tailor other interference or influence efforts."

Wouldn't affect election outcome, but harms public confidence in electoral system

Though the intelligence agencies concluded that vote tabulators or systems that displayed results were locally vulnerable, they ultimately assessed that it would be difficult for adversaries to “manipulate on a wide enough scale to alter the election outcome.” However, they warned that such intrusions could undermine public confidence in the election. 

The January 2020 memo, which was recently declassified by Gabbard, shortly preceded intelligence reports that spring which showed China successfully gained access to American voter registration data spanning several states, Just the News previously reported. 

The intelligence about Chinese intrusions eventually found its way into a few finished intelligence products, including at least one presidential daily brief, current and former U.S. officials told Just the News last month. The January intelligence memo shows how the data gained by China from those reported hacks could be exploited. The agencies focused on the assessed vulnerabilities of voter databases, pollbooks, and local election websites to such foreign intrusions. 

Machines that record or count votes, especially those with no paper backups, are "particularly vulnerable” to instructions, the agencies assessed in the memo. “Adversaries who obtained physical access to voting machines could alter how they function, manipulate the data in them, or install malware,” the memo warns, citing the results of both state and academic investigations into such vulnerabilities. 

Ultimately, the Intelligence Community did not believe that successful intrusions into these systems would present a threat to certified election results, even if reporting of election results was disrupted. “Tabulated results are stored independently of copies displayed on results websites, although investigations of malicious activity could delay results and introduce public uncertainty about the validity of vote counts,” the council concluded. 

Intelligence community had disdain for the “vulgarian” Trump

In January 2021, the Intelligence Community analytic ombudsman — tasked with ensuring objectivity in intelligence products — conducted a review of the spy community’s handling of Russian and Chinese meddling efforts during the 2020 election. He concluded that intelligence analysts downplayed China’s actions because they had disdain for the “vulgarian” Trump and did not want to support the policies and priorities of the Trump administration toward China with which they “personally disagree,” Just the News reported last month. 

Other Chinese efforts to influence the 2020 election were buried by intelligence community leaders and Iranian efforts to meddle in that election were also downplayed, Just the News previously reported.  

A confidential human source told FBI counter-intelligence in the summer of 2020 that China’s communist government was seeking to meddle in the impending election to help then-candidate Joe Biden, according to a raw intelligence report distributed to federal agencies that was reviewed and made public by Just the News last year. This report was soon recalled, with spy agencies told to delete the information before they had a chance to properly investigate its claims.

But, China was not the only example. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a March 2021 assessment where agencies unanimously agreed Russia sought to hurt then-candidate Biden while Iran worked to harm then-President Trump in 2020 — but the agencies did not reach unanimity on China. 


John Solomon and Steven Richards

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/us-intel-flagged-major-2020-election-vulnerabilities-including-voter

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

2026 Jewish demographic momentum in Israel - Yoram Ettinger

 

by Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger

An optimistic demographic vector

 

Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger, “Second Thought: a US-Israel Initiative” April 12, 2026

In 2025, the number of Israel’s Jewish births was 139,676 – 74% higher than 1995 (80,400), compared to 44,029 Arab births – 21% higher than 1995 (36,500).

In 2025, Jewish births were 76% of total births, compared to 69% in 1995. The surge of Jewish births has taken place due to the unprecedented rise of births (since 1995) in the secular sector, notwithstanding a rising level of education, income and wedding age and expanded urbanization. Since 1995, Israel’s ultra-orthodox sector has experienced a mild decrease of fertility, while the modern orthodox rate of fertility has been stable.

In 1969, Israel’s Arab fertility rate was six births higher than the Jewish fertility rate. In 2024, Jewish fertility rate – 3.09; Israeli Muslims – 2.51.

Muslim fertility rate has been Westernized: Jordan (similar to West Bank Arabs) – 2.5 births per woman, Iran – 2, Saudi Arabia – 2.1, Morocco – 2.3, Iraq – 3.4, Egypt – 3, Yemen – 3.3, the United Arab Emirates – 13, etc.

Israel’s robust Jewish fertility rate reflects upbeat optimism, patriotism, attachment to roots, communal solidarity, frontier-mentality, less abortions and a traditional joy of having children. Arab demographic Westernization is attributed to sweeping urbanization, enhanced status of women (education, employment, rising wedding age, shorter reproductive period) and expanding use of contraceptives.

More information on mywebsite and in my recent video.

Support Appreciated 


Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger

Source: https://theettingerreport.com/2026-jewish-demographic-momentum-in-israel/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Funding Has Not Closed the Gap: School Expenditure and the Persistence of Black–White Differences in Cognitive Performance - Lipton Matthews

 

by Lipton Matthews

Empirical record shows little relationship between school expenditure levels and convergence in black–white cognitive performance.

 

The Funding Argument and Its Limits

A long-standing argument in education policy holds that disparities in school funding between black and white students are a primary driver of the black–white gap in cognitive test performance. The logic is intuitively appealing: if black children attend under-resourced schools, then directing more money toward those schools should, over time, diminish the achievement and cognitive performance gap. Were this argument correct, we would expect to see sustained convergence in test scores as per-pupil spending became more equitable. The evidence, however, does not support this expectation.

Per-pupil expenditure figures tell an important story. In 1972, the average black student lived in a school district spending $3,261 per pupil (in 1992 dollars), compared to $3,397 for the average white student—a gap of $136. By 1992, those figures had converged almost entirely: $5,387 for the average black student versus $5,397 for the average white student—a difference of just $10. This near-perfect equalization of spending across racial lines represents a remarkable shift in resource allocation. If funding were the decisive variable, measurable convergence in cognitive performance should have followed. It did not.

The failure of increased and equalized funding to produce convergence is illustrated sharply by recent data from Illinois. A 2025 report found that 80 schools in the state scored below proficiency in mathematics despite spending above the state average per pupil. Many of these schools serve predominantly black student populations. However, the pattern is not unique to Illinois; it reflects a national picture in which the assumption that money is a primary driver of performance gaps has been repeatedly tested and found insufficient.

The Evidence from National Assessment Data

One of the most comprehensive and methodologically careful examinations of trends in the black–white cognitive gap uses data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the large-scale national assessment administered to representative samples of American schoolchildren—often called “The Nation’s Report Card.” The NAEP long-term trend assessments for mathematics and reading, covering the period 1975 to 2008, show a potent test of whether the gap has narrowed over more than three decades of educational investment.

An analysis of combined NAEP mathematics and reading scores from 1975 to 2008 for white 13-year-olds and white, black, and Hispanic 17-year-olds found that the gap between black and white 17-year-olds had not closed over this period. For 17-year-old black students, the mean difference relative to white 17-year-olds remained at more than three years of educational attainment. The analysis further calculated IQ equivalents using the standard mental age formula across 54 years of educational achievement data. From 1954 to 2008, black 13- and 17-year-olds averaged an IQ equivalent of approximately 85—with values for specific years including 86 and 81 in 1954, 87 and 82 in 1966, 75 and 71 in 1975, and 85 and 77 in 2008. These results indicate no narrowing over 54 years in either educational achievement or IQ equivalent scores.

The same analysis reported that data from large investigations conducted in the 1950s and 1960s in Georgia and Virginia, as well as the Coleman Report of 1966—a nationally representative survey of nearly 600,000 schoolchildren from 4,000 schools—documented the same magnitude of black–white educational achievement gap. In the Coleman data, the gap stood at 2.4 years by Grade 9 and 3.3 years by Grade 12. The report also rendered the sober finding that there was not a strong link between schooling resources and student outcomes. The continuity of this gap from the mid-twentieth century through the early twenty-first century, across different datasets, testing instruments, and decades of increased investment, is an observation of considerable significance.

Longitudinal Evidence from the NLSY Children

Similarly, a major longitudinal study using data from the children of women in the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79) provides further evidence against convergence. The dataset is particularly valuable because it is longitudinal, uses large samples, tracks children regardless of school attendance, includes both achievement and cognitive measures, employs the same testing instruments over time, and contains extensive family background data, including maternal cognitive ability scores.

Across four tests—reading recognition, reading comprehension, mathematics, and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-R, a widely used measure of verbal IQ)—scores were examined for children born from the mid-1970s through the mid-1990s. After controlling for child’s age, maternal IQ, maternal education, family income, maternal age at birth, and family structure, the black–white difference did not decline on any of the tests. For reading comprehension, black scores fell over the period. For the PPVT-R, the implied increase in the black–white difference ranged from 0.13 to 0.19 standard deviations per decade, depending on model specification. The findings were consistent across alternative samples and model specifications.

The study acknowledged the existence of a vigorous debate in the literature and discussed findings from IQ test standardization samples that suggested some narrowing between the early 1970s and early 2000s. However, the author proposed a reconciling hypothesis: that any genuine narrowing in cognitive test scores was concentrated among cohorts born before the late 1970s and that what has been observed since amounts to a plateau—a period of no further convergence—precisely the period covered by the NLSY children data. This interpretation is consistent with the pattern observed in the NAEP and SAT data, in which the closest convergence occurred in the late 1980s and early 1990s, after which the gap stabilized or widened slightly. These results are genuinely eye-opening, considering that during these decades, funding gaps steadily closed, and by 1982, spending per pupil in several states actually favored nonwhite students. Interestingly, by 2002, pupil spending for black students was higher in even Southern states like Alabama and Georgia.

A Meta-Analytic Assessment: Estimated Mean IQ and Distributional Data

The most comprehensive recent synthesis of the evidence on racial differences in measured intelligence brings together 139 American studies spanning 1918 to 2017, with a combined sample of over 400,000 individuals. Studies were selected only if they relied on representative U.S. samples, delivered IQ tests with at least three subtests, reported white reference groups, and provided sufficient data to calculate effect sizes. Studies depending on scholastic achievement tests or unrepresentative samples (such as college-only, elite, or city-selected samples) or that lacked within-group standard deviations were omitted.

Using a random-effects meta-analytic model, the overall estimated mean IQ for black Americans was 85. However, the analysis identified strong evidence of small-study effects—a form of bias in which smaller studies, which are more likely to find larger group means for minority groups, disproportionately influence pooled estimates. After correcting for this bias, the estimated mean fell to 81.5. Critically, the largest, most nationally representative datasets produced the lowest black mean IQ estimates. The NLS, NLSY79, NLSY97, ABCD, Project Talent, US Department of Labor, and WW1 enlistee datasets returned black mean IQ values of 81.25, 81.80, 83.19, 79.81, 77.49, and 83.92, respectively. The average across these high-quality large national samples was 81.8—meaningfully lower than the conventionally cited figure of 85 and approximately 18 to 20 IQ points below the white mean.

A moderator analysis concluded that birth cohort, age at assessment, and number of subtests were not statistically associated with the size of the black–white difference, suggesting further evidence against convergence. The analysis found strong evidence against the hypothesis that the gap has receded for cohorts born after 1960. This directly contradicts the premise that equalized or increased school funding would be expected to produce measurable convergence in the cognitive performance of black Americans relative to whites.

The meta-analysis also estimated mean IQ scores for other racial groups: Hispanics at 88.9, Amerindians at approximately 89, Asian Americans at 103 (with a best estimate of 105 when weighted by Asian subgroup population), and Jewish Americans at approximately 107.4. For all groups, the distributions of cognitive scores were found to be approximately normal, with no statistically significant race differences in variance, skewness, or kurtosis once heterogeneity between studies was accounted for.

Table 1: IQ Score Percentiles by Racial Group in the United States

Observed percentile scores from meta-analytic estimates. Simulated scores based on group means and standard deviations (assuming normality) are shown in parentheses.The percentile data in Table 1 are particularly instructive because they reveal the distributional implications of the group mean differences across the full ability spectrum. At the 50th percentile within each group (the group median), the figures closely track the meta-analytic means. The gap between black and white medians—approximately 17 IQ points—is consistent across the observed and simulated values. At higher percentiles, where the selection of students for cognitively demanding academic programs and professional roles is concentrated, the differences become even more consequential in representational terms, though the size of the gap in absolute IQ points remains broadly similar.

Conclusion

The convergence of evidence from national longitudinal assessments, large-scale survey datasets, and comprehensive meta-analytic synthesis leads to a clear conclusion: the black–white gap in measured cognitive performance has not dwindled in the period during which school funding between black and white students has been most closely equalized. Per-pupil spending in black students’ districts reached near parity with that of white students’ districts by 1992. Interestingly, NAEP data spanning 1975 to 2008 showed no narrowing over this entire period. Likewise, longitudinal data from the NLSY79 showed no convergence among children born from the mid-1970s to the mid-1990s. And a meta-analysis covering nearly a century of studies found that the gap has remained persistent.

Hence, the continued below-average performance of predominantly black schools in states such as Illinois—even where per-pupil spending exceeds state averages—is therefore not anomalous. It is consistent with a body of evidence accumulated over decades showing that the relationship between school funding and the black–white cognitive performance gap is, at best, indirect and, at the scale of aggregate national data, effectively absent. The funding argument, while politically salient, is not well supported by the empirical record. If anything, these results only provide fodder for hereditarianism.

* * *

Lipton Matthews is a researcher and podcaster. His work has been featured in Mises, The Federalist, Chronicles, American Thinker, Epoch Times, and other publications. He is also author of Busting African Delusions: Institutions, Human Capital, and the Path to Progress.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/04/21/funding-has-not-closed-the-gap-school-expenditure-and-the-persistence-of-black-white-differences-in-cognitive-performance/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter