Sunday, October 11, 2026

Global anti-Israel protests coordinated in advance by international alliance, documents show - Mathilda Heller

 

by Mathilda Heller

Behind the protest’s preparation and framing is the London-based Global Alliance for Palestine (GAFP), a coalition of about 200 organizations focused on Palestine advocacy.

 

Protesters attend the "United for Palestine" demonstration in Berlin, Germany, October 10, 2026.
Protesters attend the "United for Palestine" demonstration in Berlin, Germany, October 10, 2026.
(photo credit: REUTERS/CHRISTIAN MANG)

 

Pro-Palestinian protests across the world last week were coordinated in advance by an international alliance that prepared campaign slogans, media messaging and protest tactics, including calls to shut down city squares, encircle government buildings and blockade corporate hubs, The Jerusalem Post's review of campaign documents found.

This was first reported on by Fox News Digital, which found that "long before the first demonstrators gathered, the messages for the protest's 'communications framing' and transnational action plan had already been written, the banners designed, the tactics circulated and the media strategy laid out."

Behind the protest preparation and framing is a London-based coalition called Global Alliance for Palestine (GAFP), an international alliance of around 200 organizations that are focused on Palestine advocacy.

Ahead of the week of October 7, which marked the third anniversary of the Hamas attacks, GAFP released press statements and media toolkits encouraging pro-Palestine movements, student groups, trade unions, and civil society organizations worldwide to unite under the banner ‘End the Genocide, Defend the Land’.

GAFP was behind the Global Day of Action on October 10, as well as a direct legislative pressure campaign asking parliamentarians to demand immediate arms embargoes, emergency debates, suspended trade agreements, and binding human rights sanctions against Israel.

Pro-Palestinian protesters hold a Hamas flag and a photo of Yahya Sinwar, the mastermind of the Oct. 7, 2023, attack as they march toward Union Square.
Pro-Palestinian protesters hold a Hamas flag and a photo of Yahya Sinwar, the mastermind of the Oct. 7, 2023, attack as they march toward Union Square. (credit: Joseph Strauss/JTA)

In the toolkit for October 10 protests, viewed by the Post, GAFP called for protesters to "shut down city squares, encircle government buildings, and blockade complicit corporate hubs."

Rather than a symbolic march, GAFP said the purpose of the global day of action was to interrupt business-as-usual.

Among the other suggested protest actions were walk-outs, sit-ins, and blockades.

Groups encouraged to use language 'impossible to ignore'

In a GAFP concept paper for the Global Alliance for Palestine, organizers share guidelines for 'Communications Framing' and 'Core Messages' about Israel. The document encourages groups to use language that is "disciplined, credible, urgent and impossible to ignore."

GAFP also published a list of slogans such as "From Every Street, One Demand: End Genocide, End Occupation" and "Israel Kills. The Media Justifies."

The Post identified 181 organizations in the coalition, with the organizations being spread out across the world.

Among the most high-profile participating organizations are CodePink, the Freedom Flotilla, and regional BDS chapters.

Israel's Foreign Ministry called out the "prewritten accusations, coordinated slogans," and "orchestrated disruptions."

"A calculated effort to hijack headlines, dominate the narrative and demonize Israel. The hatred is loud. The coordination is documented," it said.

While many of the hundreds of protests across the world may have appeared to be independent and unconnected, the understanding of GAFP's campaign indicates that this may not have been the case.


Mathilda Heller

Source: https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-911360

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Documentary explores how Israel was demonized after Oct. 7: ‘Didn't happen overnight' - Christian Toto

 

by Christian Toto

Documentary was inspired by Warren Kinsella's book, “The Hidden Hand: The Information War and the Rise of Antisemitic Propaganda."

 

Movie producer Kari Hollend didn’t immediately notice what she now calls a coordinated effort to demonize Israel following the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks.

But Warren Kinsella did.

“He understood very quickly on October 8,” Hollend says of Kinsella, a political strategist and cultural observer. “’I [now] know what a campaign looks like. No way you have a movement that big, organizing the people the next day.’”

Kinsella wrote “The Hidden Hand: The Information War and the Rise of Antisemitic Propaganda.” The book reveals what has come to be believed as an expansive plan to turn that horrible day into a weapon against the Jewish people.

In many ways, that disinformation effort proved alarmingly effective, Hollend argues in her new documentary inspired by Kinsella’s book.

“The Campaign,” which prominently features the author, explores why the world in many cases turned against Israel and Jewish people after Oct. 7, 2023 – when Hamas and several other Palestinian militant groups launched a series of coordinated armed attacks from Gaza into southern Israel, killing at least 1,195 people. 

In some ways, the titular “Campaign” began long before the latest Hamas atrocities.

“It didn’t happen overnight. it has been a longstanding strategy for 40 years,” says Hollend, a co-director on the film. She noted how the anti-Israel messaging worked its way through the educational system over the years. “This was a foundation laid a long time ago.”

Subtitled “Disinformation in a Time of War,” “The Campaign” even includes a copywriting guru to break down some of the sophisticated messaging shared by antisemitic forces.

“The Campaign” shares select footage captured by Hamas terrorists on Oct. 7, making some sequences not for the squeamish.

“It was definitely a choice and a difficult one,” Hollend says. “We went back and forth. How far do we go?” Including the footage, her team eventually decided, mattered in the big picture. 

“I do wonder what would have happened if some of these images were shown to the world early on,” she continues, while arguing that many people have already forgotten the atrocities or never connected the news reports to the horrors on the ground. 

“They never really saw or understood what happened on Oct. 7,” Hollend also said. “That was by design ... so many people still to this day have no idea what happened and how brutal it was. Some still refer to [Hamas] as freedom fighters, people who I’ve known for years. They never saw those images, of bodies beaten and burned and mutilated.”

“The Campaign” touches on content moderation, a practice that can start with good intentions but too often bleeds into viewpoint discrimination.

“I was the most left-leaning progressive," Hollend said. I’ve worked in the arts for 25 years. I come from that left side. I’m a big believer in freedom of speech.”

That said, she argues some filtering is appropriate and necessary.

“My kids can’t drive until they’re 16. ... Why are my children allowed to open their phones without any barriers or guardrails to some of the most violent images and hate?” she asks.

The film acknowledges the corrosive role social media can play, but it also skewers mainstream media malfeasance. Consider how some news outlets, like The New York Times, erroneously blamed a 2023 hospital bombing on IDF forces, not Hamas.

“Once these things get out, you don’t have the ability to pull them back in,” Hollend says. 

Michigan Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Muslim, swiftly weaponized the false report to attack Israel, and she wasn’t alone. The filmmaker also called out the Old Gray Lady for a columnist’s claim that Israeli forces trained dogs to rape Palestinians.

“Most younger people get their information from social media, but there’s still a huge generation, Gen X and up, that look to the mainstream media,” Hollend says. “None of these organizations have held any journalistic integrity … That’s a huge problem. Where do you go to find any semblance of truth?”

She also blasts The Associated Press for honoring an image of Shani Louk's desecrated body from the Oct. 7 attacks, saying, “That is so sick to me."

“The Campaign” will screen in select Laemmle theaters in Los Angeles from Oct. 9-15. Hollend and co-director Cristina Bishai will participate in Q&A moderated by investigative journalist and writer Jay Solomon following the Oct. 12 screening at the Town Center. More U.S. dates will follow.

The film is getting an unorthodox rollout. Hollend and co. are sharing the film not just in theaters but on college campuses, in embassies and law firms.

The former is designed to reach “young students entering into that phase of peak indoctrination,” she says. 

“It’s not a film about a side," Hollend continues. "It’s about the harm of what digital warfare and misinformation is doing to your city,” she says. “It’s getting worse by the day, and it’s the oldest play in the world – divide and conquer.” 


Christian Toto

Source: https://justthenews.com/index%2Ephp/nation/culture/movie-hidden-hand-information-war-and-rise-antisemitic-propaganda-book

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Netanyahu demands prosecution of 'NAZA' film participants over 'severe' security offenses - Sarah Moslowitz

 

by Sarah Moslowitz

The letter asked the Israeli officials to prosecute those involved with the documentary for security offenses, criminal defamation, and harm to Israel's diplomatic and security interests.

 

Graffiti depicting Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, the directors of the documentary film NAZA, and the word "traitors" in Hebrew, on a wall in Ashdod Tuesday, September 15, 2026.
Graffiti depicting Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, the directors of the documentary film NAZA, and the word "traitors" in Hebrew, on a wall in Ashdod Tuesday, September 15, 2026.
(photo credit: REUTERS/AMIR COHEN)

 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demanded on Sunday that the justice system prosecute the people who participated in the NAZA documentary for severe information security offenses, criminal defamation, and damage to Israel's diplomatic and security interests.

According to a letter released by the Prime Minister’s Office, the prime minister asked the IDF Chief of Staff, Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir, Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) Director David Zini, and Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara to launch a comprehensive investigation into the participants of the documentary.

"The film spins a false, misleading, and biased narrative that defames the State of Israel and the IDF globally and severely damages Israel's standing,” Netanyahu said at the beginning of the letter.

Israeli directors release documentary discrediting NAZA

Three Israeli creators have released a documentary designed to directly counter and discredit NAZA, the controversial, Venice Film Festival award-winning film that alleges systematic Israeli military misconduct in Gaza.

The counter-project, titled NAZA: The Real Story, dropped with English subtitles in an effort to immediately shape the global narrative.

Filmmakers Ariel Orbuch, Roy Danino, and Hagai Gutman, creators of NAZA, The True Story receive ertificates of appreciation from National Public Diplomacy Directorate head Tzipi Hotovely on Thursday, October 8, 2026.
Filmmakers Ariel Orbuch, Roy Danino, and Hagai Gutman, creators of NAZA, The True Story receive ertificates of appreciation from National Public Diplomacy Directorate head Tzipi Hotovely on Thursday, October 8, 2026. (credit: No credit)

Directed by Roy Danino, Hagai Gutman, and Ariel Orbuch, the documentary positions itself as an explicit rebuttal of the original film’s anonymous whistleblower claims.

The creators of NAZA, The True Story received certificates of appreciation from National Public Diplomacy Directorate head Tzipi Hotovely on Thursday, the Prime Minister's Office announced.

According to the PMO, NAZA, The True Story "features testimonies from soldiers, refutes the blood libels against IDF soldiers and commanders, thereby defending our soldiers and the State of Israel."

Maariv and Jerusalem Post Staff contributed to this report.


Sarah Moslowitz

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-911358

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The West at a Crossroads: Excellence or Mediocrity? - Roger Kimball

 

by Roger Kimball

This loss of spiritedness—what the Greeks called θυμός—has had a far-reaching and depressive effect on the civilizations of the West.

 

 

It would have been hard to improve the backdrop for Marco Rubio’s foreign policy address on October 7 in Athens, Greece. Standing on the Pnyx with the ruins of the Parthenon rising up behind him, the Secretary of State delivered a speech that won almost universal plaudits. Let me toss my vote in with the overwhelming majority and affirm that Rubio’s speech was simply splendid: robust, heartfelt, honest, masculine, and true.

Is it still permissible to praise such a public performance for being “masculine”? It was part of Rubio’s accomplishment to render that question moot. His speech was statesmanlike but also steely: confident both in manner and substance. Rubio was speaking on behalf of the greatest military and economic power on earth. He knew it. So did his audience. He did not swagger. But neither did he make any apologies for the potency he represented. Rather, he issued a series of clear-eyed affirmations. What he affirmed were the struggles—political, intellectual, martial—that defined Western civilization and made it a world-conquering and world-enriching force. That history made the spot upon which Rubio stood a sacred space. The Acropolis: that “high place” in whose shadow political liberty made its fledgling steps, where Plato and Aristotle taught, Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, and Aristophanes wrote their plays, where Pericles presided and Phidias built and sculpted.

Rubio is right: “The civilization that built what stands behind me has captivated the imagination of the Western world. Generations of our statesmen, artists, and philosophers have looked to it—they’ve looked to it with wonder, and they’ve looked to it with awe.” Most great historical events—the battles, the revolutions, the abdications, the conquests—tend to live on as historical data, facts, and figures to be read about and docketed. But the ancient Greeks, as Rubio says, “seem to have an almost mystical hold on our memory.” They were an essential part of the foundation of the West: our laws and political institutions, our science, our literature, our art. “The history of America,” Rubio said, “is covered with the fingerprints of antiquity. Greece is literally carved into the architecture of our government: in the towering columns, in the domes and the monuments across our capital city. The city where our Constitution was born—Philadelphia—is itself a Greek name.”

The influence of Athens goes far beyond civic architecture or even the rudiments of our political arrangements. “These institutions and ideas,” Rubio noted, were but the “outward expression of more fundamental qualities we see in the ancient Greeks—qualities that can’t be reduced to any particular political system or theory.”

[I]n Athens, we found the first full realization of all the essential traits that would come to define the West: fierce individuality and relentless ambition; daring exploration and invention; a yearning for discovery, for adventure, risk and glory. An insatiable curiosity about the world and the principles by which it operates, a hunger to know the mysteries of nature and grasp the secrets of the cosmos. An impatience with the notion of impossibility, chafing at all boundaries and limits, straining to peer into the depths of the unknown.

These were not just the formulas or precepts of a particular school of philosophy. They were the characteristic of a people—expressed in their traditions, their stories, their imagination; in the qualities they demanded of their citizens; in the things they lived and fought and died for.

In short, “What blossomed here in this place was the Western desire to uncover all that ignorance, darkness, and distance had kept hidden from the mind of man.”

Rubio went on to observe that Athens bequeathed to us not just a common culture but also a “common anthropology—a common view of man and his place in the universe. Its descendants would share not just the idea of a natural order, but a distinctive understanding of virtue; of destiny and fate; of truth, goodness, and beauty; of a code that dictates how men ought to live; of objective standards and ideals to strive towards.” It was not so long ago that this “common view of man and his place in the universe” was part of the common mental furniture of most Americans. Such a view stands behind the competitiveness that powers the free market and the general ambition to excel. “The classical Greek city,” Rubio reminded us, “was an arena for great men to test and prove themselves, to hone their potential through perpetual struggle—to be the best, the strongest, the most beautiful, straining to inch ever closer to perfection.”

In recent years, however, this energetic, competitive view of human nature has given way to the culture Lewis Carroll evoked in his description of the Dodo race in Through the Looking-Glass. “Everybody has won and all must have prizes.” What goes along with this attenuated view of life is the ethic of what has come to be called “safetyism.” “The ideal of many ideologies in our time,” Rubio pointed out, has

become a world of perfect safety, devoid of risk or failure, with neither the glory of victory nor the shame of defeat. Too often these days, we build downwards. We design our standards to ensure no one will lose; we preoccupy ourselves more with the comfort of the worst than the potential of the best. We hold the most exceptional things among us hostage to the average, the ordinary, the mediocre.

This loss of spiritedness—what the Greeks called θυμός—has had a far-reaching and depressive effect on the civilizations of the West. Rubio’s diagnosis will be familiar to anyone who has paid attention to what has happened to our schools and to our culture at large. The rise of political correctness and cancel culture goes hand in hand with the spiritual timidity that Nietzsche described in his portrait of “the Last Man.” “Over time,” Rubio noted, “we in the West came to feel ashamed of the very things that made us exceptional. We felt embarrassed that our achievements set us apart from the rest of the world. Our prosperity somehow became a source of guilt. We no longer believed we deserved and had earned our greatness.”

Remember when, just a few years ago, our cultural commissars celebrated the career criminal George Floyd and The 1619 Project? The unhappy anti-American beneficiaries of America took to the streets to desecrate our monuments and defile our heritage. It was in this context, Rubio observed, that “‘nationalism’ became a dirty word. . . . [W]e taught our children to be ashamed of the countries they would inherit. In the process, we opened our borders and outsourced our industry and allowed our militaries to wither and to decay.” At the same time, we began to outsource not only our industry but also our sovereignty, “transferring our decisions to global bureaucracies far beyond the reach of our control.”

It is here that Rubio’s speech reaches its denouement. Both the United States and Europe are at a crossroads. Do we endeavor to recover the values we have inherited from the Greeks or do we go quietly into the not-so-good night of spiritual flaccidness? Rubio’s answer caused panic among the low-testosterone denizens of academia and the media. “Under President Trump,” he said, “the United States has made its choice.”

We choose the unapologetic pursuit of national power: to take back control of our critical supply chains, to reindustrialize our economy, to rebuild our defense, to fight for dominance of the technologies and industries of the future.

We choose to reach for new frontiers: in advanced manufacturing and super intelligence; in drones, weapons, and warfare; in chips, minerals, cyber, and every other domain of human possibility. To unleash our energy, to rebuild our factories, to return our astronauts to the moon and launch a new age of exploration in space.

Has any modern statesman had the courage to be so politically incorrect? To note that statecraft requires not only “prudence and diplomacy” but also “the ability to wield force when prudence and diplomacy fail,” and to recognize that power requires “not only having the means to defend yourself” but also “the credibility that you are willing to use it”?

There is only one that I can think of: President Donald Trump. In 2017, in a rousing speech in Warsaw, Trump mounted a defense of the West very similar to Rubio’s speech in Athens. Writing about that speech in American Greatness, I argued that a plausible model for the speech was the Funeral Oration Pericles delivered near the beginning of the Peloponnesian War. “There is nothing like our community of nations,” Trump said at the time. “The world has never known anything like our community of nations.”

We write symphonies. We pursue innovation. We celebrate our ancient heroes, embrace our timeless traditions and customs, and always seek to explore and discover brand-new frontiers.

We reward brilliance. We strive for excellence, and cherish inspiring works of art that honor God. We treasure the rule of law and protect the right to free speech and free expression.

This is exactly the spirit that Marco Rubio celebrated in front of the Acropolis on October 7. We are, as Rubio warned, at a crossroads. Do we pursue excellence and take justified pride in the great things our civilization has accomplished? Or do we retreat to the tenebrous mediocrity and querulous ressentiment of the Last Man? C. S. Lewis drew a frightening portrait of “men without chests,” spiritually timid creatures who lack gumption (a plausible English equivalent of the Greek word θυμός). Marco Rubio, continuing in the president’s rhetorical footsteps, has called us to reaffirm the better, more spirited angels of our nature. I like to think that this rousing tocsin will help awaken a salutary and clear-eyed spiritual revival. 

Photo: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks at the Pnyx hill, where ancient Athenians held democratic assemblies, with the ancient Parthenon temple atop the Acropolis seen in the background, in Athens on October 7, 2026. (Photo by Mark Schiefelbein / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)


Roger Kimball is editor and publisher of The New Criterion and the president and publisher of Encounter Books. He is the author and editor of many books, including The Fortunes of Permanence: Culture and Anarchy in an Age of Amnesia (St. Augustine's Press), The Rape of the Masters (Encounter), Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse (Ivan R. Dee), and Art's Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity (Ivan R. Dee). Most recently, he edited and contributed to Where Next? Western Civilization at the Crossroads (Encounter) and contributed to Against the Great Reset: Eighteen Theses Contra the New World Order (Bombardier).

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/10/11/the-west-at-a-crossroads-excellence-or-mediocrity/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump announces ‘energy ceasefire’ in Ukraine war - Nicholas Ballasy

 

by Nicholas Ballasy

Trump: ‘Both parties have agreed. Do not break it!’

 

President Trump announced on Sunday that there will be an "energy ceasefire" in the war between Russia and Ukraine. 

Effective immediately, there is an ENERGY CEASEFIRE in the War between Russia and Ukraine. Both parties have agreed. Do not break it! Thank you for your attention to this matter.  


Nicholas Ballasy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/trump-announces-energy-ceasefire-ukraine-war

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Ethics complaint filed against NY Attorney General Letitia James in Cornell 7 case - Nicholas Ballasy

 

by Nicholas Ballasy

The complaint calls for James to recuse herself or be removed from the case.

 

New York Attorney General Letitia James is facing a bar ethics complaint over comments she made about the alleged sexual assault at Cornell University involving seven fraternity members, raising questions about her impartiality as special prosecutor.

According to the New York Post, the National Legal and Policy Center filed a nine-page complaint arguing that James’ public expression of support for the alleged victim, posted shortly before her appointment to the case, could undermine confidence in a fair investigation.

The complaint calls for James to recuse herself or be removed from the case.

Two of the accused men have also sought her removal, arguing that her remarks suggest she had prejudged the allegations.

James has defended her comments, saying she showed "empathy." 


Nicholas Ballasy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/ethics-complaint-filed-against-ny-attorney-general-letitia-james-cornell-7

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Famed lawyer Alan Dershowitz blasts Jack Smith, urges DOJ to rein in spying on phones - John Solomon

 

by John Solomon

Dershowitz said the use of a pen register device to track the phone calls between defense lawyers was “a clear violation of expectations of privacy.”

 

Famed Harvard University Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz says he believes ex-prosecutor Jack Smith trampled civil liberties during his pursuit of President Donald Trump by tracking the calls of Congress, defense lawyers and campaign aides, and he urged the Justice Department to impose new rules to rein in such phone surveillance.

“What we need are Justice Department rules that are enforceable, that indicate when you can do what investigative tasks,” Dershowitz told Just the News. “You can't leave it only up to the Constitution and the courts because something can be constitutional and still very very dangerous for civil liberties, like tracking people's phone calls, like tracking the children's phone calls, the wife's phone calls. All of that's extremely dangerous.

“This is a grave danger, and I would hope there'd be some congressional hearings … about what the Justice Department rules should be for when you can do this kind of surveillance of people's phone calls. Right now, it's just up to the Jack Smiths of the world, and we know from experience now that's not a good enough protection,” he added.

Dershowitz was reacting to recently released documents showing that Smith’s team obtained the long-distance phone records and text messages of members of Congress and tracked at least 21 defense lawyers’ calls to and from the phone of Trump‘s top advisor, Susie Wiles, while Smith was pursuing two separate criminal cases against the president.

Republicans and some legal experts described the taxes as excessive and intrusive, but Smith defended his conduct during a recent Senate hearing and said he would do it all over again if given the chance.

Dershowitz said the use of a pen register device to track the phone calls between defense lawyers and Wiles was deeply concerning and “a clear violation of expectations of privacy.”

“When you make a phone call, and you're a lawyer, you do not expect the fact that you made that phone call to say a wiretap expert or a lie detector expert, or a witness. You don't expect that the government will get access to that,” he said. “And yet the government has access to who the defense attorneys called, and that would give them a tremendous advantage in any case. It could give them the names of potential witnesses.”

Dershowitz said Smith could face civil lawsuits or actions against his bar license for the aggressive tactics he used to pursue Trump.

“In retrospect, it's clear that he had it in for Trump, and he was part of the Get Trump crowd along with Letitia James, the Attorney General of New York, (Manhattan District Attorney) Alvin Bragg, and others. They were out to get Trump, but they used mechanisms and techniques that can be used against anybody,” the famed legal scholar said.

“So if he's allowed to get away with this, then he is a dime a dozen, and then none of our civil liberties are protected,” he added.

A lifelong Democrat, Dershowitz also said he is now rooting for Republicans to win the 2026 election after leaving his old party, saying Democrats have become too extreme by indulging in antisemitism and anti-Americanism.

"The Democrat Party has become an extremist, radical, anti-American, anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish party and anti-Israel party,"  he said. "And I think a lot of Americans, regardless of their religious faith, say this is not the party for me. This is not our grandfather's Democratic Party. This is not our grandmother's Democratic Party. This is El Sayed's Democratic Party. This is Mamdani's political party, and we don't identify with those radical anti-American extremists." 


John Solomon

Source: https://justthenews.com/index%2ephp/government/courts-law/famed-lawyer-alan-dershowitz-blasts-jack-smith-urges-doj-rein-spying-phones

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Europe Is Missing the AI Train. Now It Is Banning the Tools - Drieu Godefridi

 

by Drieu Godefridi

For years, EU policymakers congratulated themselves on becoming a "regulatory superpower." They succeeded.

 

  • Europe... watches a technological revolution begin elsewhere, writes the rules for it, builds the authorities to supervise it, imposes the reporting — and only then wonders why so little of it is happening in Europe.

  • Meta AI launched in the United States in 2023. Europeans did not receive even a stripped-down chatbot until March 2025. Meta said the delay had lasted longer than it wanted because it had to navigate Europe's "complex regulatory system." The European version arrived without image generation, without multimodal features, and without training on European public content — the Irish Data Protection Commission having frozen that plan in 2024.

  • For years, EU policymakers congratulated themselves on becoming a "regulatory superpower." They succeeded. The question is whether this ambition is sane for a continent with weak productivity, poor technological scaling, shallow capital markets and a widening income gap with the United States.

  • The stack of regulations that a firm must clear is not one law. It is the General Data Protection Regulation, the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act, the AI Act, cybersecurity rules, consumer law, competition law, sustainability reporting, and then twenty-seven national implementations.

  • IMF analysis puts EU income per person, in purchasing-power terms, nearly 30 percent below the United States, with around three-quarters of the gap explained by lower productivity.

  • A fragmented capital market is less attractive when investment must finance compliance before it expands.... A technology sector is less competitive when the release of every model must be cleared through privacy law, platform law and an AI statute whose high-risk regime has already been postponed because the machine could not digest its own rules.

  • France's contribution is the burden on the innovator to prove safety before anything can be permitted to exist, and a conception of public power as the author of economic life rather than its referee. This principle was written into EU environmental law and has since migrated, in practice, into digital regulation.

  • A continent that measures success by the rules it writes for other people's inventions should not be surprised when the inventions keep being launched somewhere else.

  • [T]he IMF's tariff-equivalent barriers are.... the residue of twenty-seven national licensing regimes, professional cartels and administrative procedures that Paris and Berlin never seriously surrendered and that smaller states copy.

  • France and Germany did not become European. Europe became Franco-German in its treatment of data and risk.

Europe has developed an extraordinary economic talent: it watches a technological revolution begin elsewhere, writes the rules for it, builds the authorities to supervise it, imposes the reporting — and only then wonders why so little of it is happening in Europe. Pictured: A "family photo" during the "Summit on European Digital Sovereignty," on November 18, 2025 in Berlin, Germany. (Photo by Odd Andersen/AFP via Getty Images)

Europe has developed an extraordinary economic talent: it watches a technological revolution begin elsewhere, writes the rules for it, builds the authorities to supervise it, imposes the reporting — and only then wonders why so little of it is happening in Europe. Artificial intelligence (AI) has made the habit impossible to ignore. The habit is not an accident of Brussels. It is the Franco-German regulatory reflex, written into the treaties and then imposed on everyone else.

The train has left...

On September 8, 2026, Meta launched Muse, a personal agent with its own secure virtual computer. It does not merely answer questions. In Meta's own words, it "actually does the work": emails, travel plans, forms, customer service, tasks across applications. Within weeks it was available in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Europe was not on the list, and Meta offered no date for release there.

This failure is not a one-off. Meta AI launched in the United States in 2023. Europeans did not receive even a stripped-down chatbot until March 2025. Meta said the delay had lasted longer than it wanted because it had to navigate Europe's "complex regulatory system." The European version arrived without image generation, without multimodal features, and without training on European public content — the Irish Data Protection Commission having frozen that plan in 2024. Parity was postponed to a future that still has not arrived. Meta's own public-policy director put the result plainly: products "get delayed or get watered down and European citizens and consumers suffer."

Apple met the same wall. On June 8, 2026, it announced that the new AI-powered "voice," Siri would not ship on iPhones and iPads in the EU with the rest of the release, "due to the Digital Markets Act." Apple said it had offered technical alternatives but that the Commission had rejected them. There is no timetable for an EU launch on those devices. The European Commission replied that the decision was Apple's alone and that the company had asked for an 18-month exemption rather than offer a compliant design. The practical result for the European user is the same either way: the feature exists, but Europe does not have it. Delayed access to innovation has become normal.

The regulatory superpower

For years, EU policymakers congratulated themselves on becoming a "regulatory superpower." They succeeded. The question is whether this ambition is sane for a continent with weak productivity, poor technological scaling, shallow capital markets and a widening income gap with the United States.

The European Commission now admits that the costs are large enough to require a reversal. The Commission's target is to cut administrative burdens by 25 percent for companies generally and 35 percent for small and medium companies, worth an estimated €37.5 billion a year by 2029. This figure is not from a libertarian think tank. It is the Commission's own estimate of recurring costs it believes it can remove without abandoning its "other objectives" (which is the Commission's Newspeak for "energy transition"— the European Union's supreme goal in 2026.)

By early 2026, it had already tabled twelve "omnibus" simplification packages. Governments probably do not launch programs on that scale when paperwork is a marginal irritant. They do it when the paperwork has become the problem.

The stack of regulations that a firm must clear is not one law. It is the General Data Protection Regulation, the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act, the AI Act, cybersecurity rules, consumer law, competition law, sustainability reporting, and then twenty-seven national implementations. The Commission itself conceded the growth trap in 2025 when it proposed special treatment for "small mid-caps": companies that had crossed the small and medium enterprises threshold but suddenly faced a cliff of obligations that discouraged further growth. An innovative sector does not scale up when every new business model enters a maze.

The Single Market that is not one

The historic justification of the EU was a continental market that would give European firms the ability grow: scale. The market remains astonishingly incomplete, and the incompleteness is regulatory.

The IMF estimates that the barriers to selling goods across member states are equivalent, on average, to a tariff of about 45 percent. For services, the tariff equivalent is about 110 percent. Across American states, the equivalent barrier for goods is roughly 15 percent. Trade intensity between EU countries is less than half the trade intensity between US states. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has quoted the IMF figures herself: the Single Market's internal barriers are "equivalent to a 45% tariff on goods. And a 110% tariff on services."

Europe formally abolished tariffs between member countries decades ago. The accumulated burden of divergent rules, licences, standards, professional qualifications and national procedures has set them back -- at an extraordinary magnitude. The IMF calculates that bringing its internal barriers down toward American levels could raise European productivity by almost 7 percent in the long run. Governments spend entire decades chasing gains of that size.

The productivity gap

IMF analysis puts EU income per person, in purchasing-power terms, nearly 30 per cent below the United States, with around three-quarters of the gap explained by lower productivity. According to current projections, the gap is not closing. Europe largely missed the productivity acceleration of the information-technology revolution. It has fewer technology giants, thinner public equity markets, fewer high-growth firms and less corporate research at the frontier.

Regulation is not the only cause. Energy costs matter as well. Regulation, however, interacts with all of them. A fragmented capital market is less attractive when investment must finance compliance before it expands. A small company is less likely to scale up when crossing a size threshold triggers another layer of obligations. A technology sector is less competitive when the release of every model must be cleared through privacy law, platform law and an AI statute whose high-risk regime has already been postponed because the machine could not digest its own rules.

It is not a technocratic accident that emerged in the headquarters of the European Commission. France and Germany exported their domestic regulatory turns to the rest of Europe and the treaties made the export binding on everyone else.

France's contribution is the burden on the innovator to prove safety before anything can be permitted to exist, and a conception of public power as the author of economic life rather than its referee. This principle was written into EU environmental law and has since migrated, in practice, into digital regulation.

Germany's contribution is the "data-protection" state. The constitutional right of "informational self-determination," forged in the Federal Constitutional Court's 1983 census judgment and shaped by an entirely intelligible post-war fear of registries, became the template for the General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR. German data-protection authorities remain among the most aggressive enforcers in the Union.

The two traditions disagree on many things. They do agree that the default setting for a new technology consists of a rulebook, an authority and a reporting obligation.

As the largest two member states, they dominate the Council. What begins as a French or German domestic preference soon becomes the law of Portugal, Ireland and Estonia. National gold-plating then adds a second layer: the IMF's tariff-equivalent barriers are not Brussels tariffs; they are the residue of twenty-seven national licensing regimes, professional cartels and administrative procedures that Paris and Berlin never seriously surrendered and that smaller states copy.

The "regulatory superpower" is the external face of an internal fact: France and Germany did not become European. Europe became Franco-German in its treatment of data and risk.

The Commission's simplification drive is a confession, not a change of regime. Twelve omnibus packages and a promise of €37.5 billion in savings by 2029 leave the architecture intact. The AI Act is deferred, not repealed. The Digital Markets Act is still the reason Apple gives for withholding Siri, and Muse is still unavailable.

A continent that measures success by the rules it writes for other people's inventions should not be surprised when the inventions keep being launched somewhere else.

Europe is not being regulated into prosperity. It is being regulated out of the future — by a Franco-German reflex that was national, is now EU law, and that kills at both levels.

Europe is missing the AI train. By withholding the tools of artificial intelligence from its firms and its citizens, it is cementing the decline of the continent.


Drieu Godefridi is a jurist (University Saint-Louis, University of Louvain), philosopher (University Saint-Louis, University of Louvain) and PhD in legal theory (Paris IV-Sorbonne). He is an entrepreneur, CEO of a European private education group and director of PAN Medias Group. He is the author of The Green Reich (2020).

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22914/european-union-ai

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Texas Senate candidate Talarico’s public platform now disguises radical ideology - Amanda Head

 

by Amanda Head

Pandering or pushed by polling? Hit with controversies over comments regarding God, transsexuals, energy policies and more, Talarico’s long-standing positions appear to be very far-left, despite his recently moderate-sounding talk. His lead in the polls has dwindled, and his two-week absence from the public eye hasn't helped.

 

The Democratic Party's candidate for U.S. Senate in Texas, James Talarico, has a record that looks very different from the outward-facing moderation he now shows voters, with less than one month to go before November's midterm elections. 

The model is not atypical. Candidates on both sides of the aisle often espouse views further to the left and right fringes during primaries before moderating as the general election nears, attempting to appeal more to center-left, center-right voters or independent voters who may cross over and vote for them.

Talarico's radical -- and changing -- stances on sex, minors and LGBTQ issues

In May 2023, Talarico voted against Texas' SB 14, which banned puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries on minors for gender transition. The House passed the bill 87-56 and after it passed, he said the bill was about discriminating against transgender people rather than science or safety. 

Talarico pledged in writing at least twice—including on a Stonewall Democrats of Austin questionnaire and a Communications Workers of America survey—to support and sponsor the Equality Act if elected, legislation that would allow biological males into women’s bathrooms, locker rooms, and other sex-segregated spaces. 

According to Human Rights Watch, that act was reintroduced in the 119th Congress on April 29, 2025, in the House of Representatives by Rep. Mark Takano, D-Calif., and in the Senate by Sens. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., and Cory Booker, D-N.J. 

Despite his previous pledge of support, Talarico now claims he would merely "review it."

More "clarifications" of his positions

Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson has stated that Talarico "clarified" his earlier comments on transgender athletes, interpreting his opposition to boys competing in girls’ sports applied only when safety or fairness was at issue.

As for gender-transition care for minors, he later asserted that politicians should not interfere in decisions made in doctors’ offices. 

At the same time, however, in an interview with conservative Fox News, he said he opposes gender-reassignment surgeries for minors and would support a national ban on them, and that he opposes transgender athletes in girls’ sports when safety or fairness is compromised. 

Talarico's poll-driven switcheroos on other issues

Talarico may be paying the price of taking extreme positions popular with the extreme left, but he is losing ground in polling. USAToday reported that recent polls suggest a potential shift toward Republicans as early voting approaches, and an October 1 Fox News poll showed his lead dwindling to 2%: well within the poll's 6 to 8 point margin of error.  

In a 2021 House speech, he stated that Genesis shows God is “both masculine and feminine and everything in between. God is nonbinary,” and that modern science recognizes six biological sexes. 

By contrast, when pressed in May, ABC News reported he later walked back that statement, calling some of his earlier comments "cringey" and then claimed he believes that there are two sexes with only a small percentage of chromosomal abnormalities.

At a 2020 Sierra Club forum, he described climate change, white supremacy, and capitalism as interconnected “oppressive systems” that needed to be dismantled together, and compared Texas oil-and-gas leadership to cassette tapes that “is not gonna last.” 

Contrary to his socialist-sounding attacks on American business in the style of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, his campaign now calls him a "proud capitalist" who wants higher taxes on billionaires and corporations plus an all-of-the-above energy approach that partners with oil and gas. 

After the 2021 grid failure, he authored the Texas Climate Action Act requiring emissions cuts of at least 50% below 1990 levels by 2030 and 90 percent by 2050. That bill died in committee. 

His current platform still lists climate action and faster renewables while stressing all-of-the-above energy and partnership with the oil-and-gas industry. These accompany endorsing a $15 federal minimum wage, universal childcare so families pay no more than 7 percent of income for pre-K for 3 and 4-year-olds, paid family leave, canceling medical debt, and permanently expanding the child tax credit.

But where has he been for the last two weeks?

Talarico reemerged Friday at the Austin City Limits music festival, ending a roughly nine-to-thirteen-day absence from the campaign trail that began after he disclosed a supposed flu diagnosis on September 30 following an urgent-care visit in Dallas. 

His campaign attributed the gap to a “nasty case of the flu,” noting that his Type 1 diabetes can prolong recovery, and a spokesperson dismissed “conspiracy theorists” while posting video of him meeting voters. 

Unsubstantiated theories on social media claimed he had been at the Lindner Center of Hope mental-health facility in Mason, Ohio (linked to speculation based on private-jet tracking websites), suffered a nervous breakdown, or received other undisclosed treatment. Just the News was not able to confirm these statements. Meanwhile, his absence generated some pundits to float joking claims about pregnancy or menstrual issues. 

 

 Amanda Headd is White House Correspondent for Just the News. You can follow her here. 

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/texas-senate-candidate-talaricos-public-platform-disguises-radical-ideology-and

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Germany: A Fit of Nostalgia - Amir Taheri

 

by Amir Taheri

The latest electoral shock must be treated as a political electric shock that reignites the lethargic organs of the system.

 

  • For four decades, reunification was a unifying dream; now that it is reality, it feels like a hangover.

  • That millions of Germans, especially those from the former Communist East, feel unhappy cannot be denied. That, however, doesn't mean we are witnessing the return of the dark days either of Nazism or Communism, or a cocktail of both.

  • The latest electoral shock must be treated as a political electric shock that reignites the lethargic organs of the system. And remember: what doesn't kill you makes you stronger.

Pictured: Voters line up to cast their ballots at a polling station in Berlin, Germany during regional elections, on September 20, 2026. (Photo by Odd Andersen/AFP via Getty Images)

Whither Germany?

Even a year ago that question would have raised eyebrows in political circles round the globe. The Federal Republic was an economic miracle and a paragon of democratic stability. Its financial prudence and culture of hard work and innovation made it the guarantor of stability in Europe.

Today, however, clouds of doubt are gathering across Germany's once clear skies. An anemic economy, rising national debt, the shadow of war spreading from Ukraine and dicey relations with the United States under President Donald Trump shape some of those clouds.

But the darkest and perhaps most expanding cloud is what many observers see as the return of some of Germany's old demons in the shape of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party with significant victories in three state-level elections and emergence as the nation's third largest political force after the Christian Democratic and Social Democratic parties.

The AfD has built its narrative around three themes.

The first is the usual populist conceit according to which a malignant elite is sacrificing the interests of the people at the altar of its egotistic ideology.

Populism is often defined as a "thin-centered" ideology, moralistic rather than programmatic, which considers society to be divided into two homogeneous and antagonistic groups, "the pure people" versus "the corrupt elite." It argues that politics should be an expression of the "general will of the people," whatever it happens to be.

Populists reject democracy when they regard it as distorting the true popular will – such as established political parties and the media – rather than democracy itself, and they often argue for referenda as a means of expressing the will of the people against the elite.

Though never fully defined, that elite favors immigration because it provides cheap labor, advocates globalism because it ensures bigger markets and thus more profits for itself and perpetuates Germany's feeling of historic guilt because it justifies the political system imposed by the Allies after 1945.

The second theme is that membership of the European Union was created as a cordon sanitaire to isolate a Germany that the World War II allies saw as a perennial danger to peace. Over the decades, the EU has turned Germany into a milking cow for lazy Southern and Eastern Europeans always seeking a free ride.

The third theme in AfD's narrative is nostalgia for Germany as it was including under the Nazis and to a lesser extent during Communist rule in the East Zone.

Ignoring the prevalent view that Nazism and Communism are supposed to be mutually exclusive, some in the AfD hanker for what they did under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. That strange melange is dished out on a golden plate named nostalgia.

The word nostalgia sounds Greek but it isn't. It is made of the Greek nostos (return) with algia (sadness) to indicate a craving to go back both physically and metaphorically.

The word was coined in 1688 by Johannes Hofer -- a medical researcher who discovered it -- as an affliction among Louis XIV's Swiss mercenaries who missed the mountains of their homeland. Hofer wrote a treatise claiming nostalgia could be fatal if the afflicted were not returned to their previous way of life.

Longing for an imaginary Ithaca is of special appeal to Germans, whose history includes a melange of disquiet and nostalgia. We see that in the works of Schiller and von Kleist, in the Valhalla myths, Wagner's music and even Beethoven's fascination with Napoleon.

Today, we see it in the popularity of old German films, including those produced by the infamous Ufa studio of Joseph Goebbels. Household names in the 1930s, Zarah Leander and Marika Rökk, have returned from oblivion as shining stars of a supposedly golden age.

The political writings of Carl Schmitt and the works of Gerhart Hauptmann, Bruno Alfred Doblin and other chroniclers of the Weimar and Nazi eras have found a new readership. In the former East Germany, even Trabants, the Communist caricature of an automobile, are fetching high prices as collectors' items.

Günter Grass, who was unhappy about Germans being reduced to noting but producers of Volkswagen Beetles, may turn in his grave.

For four decades, reunification was a unifying dream; now that it is reality, it feels like a hangover.

In Saxony-Anhalt, where the AfD scored its highest win, a double nostalgia of life under Nazis and then under Communism was at work. Interestingly, the province's capital is Magdeburg, the site of the famous 1654 experiment which showed that, when deprived of atmospheric pressure, no force could separate two hemispheres with mating rings.

Speeches by AfD's rising star Ulrich Siegmund offer the two hemispheres of romantic nostalgia and the German level-headed almost militaristic discipline.

One example of that mélange is Goethe's novel The Sorrows of Young Werther, in which, smitten by unreciprocated love, the hero decided to commit suicide. Being a disciplined bureaucrat, Werther first completes his office tasks, then he pays his debts, and being careful with money, borrows a pair of pistols and finally composes a to-whom-it-may-concern deadpan adieu note before securing his ticket to Valhalla.

Had he been a Russian, or a Persian for that matter, he would have written a poem, gotten dead drunk, set the barn on fire and hanged himself from an old oak.

That millions of Germans, especially those from the former Communist East, feel unhappy cannot be denied. That, however, doesn't mean we are witnessing the return of the dark days either of Nazism or Communism, or a cocktail of both.

The latest electoral shock must be treated as a political electric shock that reignites the lethargic organs of the system. And remember: what doesn't kill you makes you stronger.

Gatestone Institute would like to thank the author for his kind permission to reprint this article in slightly different form from Asharq Al-Awsat.

 

Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987. He graciously serves as Chairman of Gatestone Europe.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22913/germany-a-fit-of-nostalgia

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter