Thursday, June 4, 2026

Israel, Lebanon agree to a full ceasefire if Hezbollah stops its attacks - Misty Severi

 

by Misty Severi

The latest ceasefire agreement comes after two days of U.S.-led negotiations at the State Department. The department said the ceasefire enables progress towards a more lasting comprehensive peace and security agreement.

 

The United States, Israel and Lebanon released a joint statement Wednesday declaring the two Middle Eastern countries have agreed to a ceasefire if Hezbollah stops firing and removes its forces from the area south of the Litani River.

The statement comes after President Donald Trump said Monday that Hezbollah had agreed it would end the fighting in Lebanon after Iran suspended talks with the U.S. over continued fighting in the country.

It was not clear if Hezbollah had agreed to the ceasefire terms laid out by Israel and Lebanon.

The latest ceasefire agreement comes after two days of U.S.-led negotiations at the State Department. The department said the ceasefire enables progress towards a more lasting comprehensive peace and security agreement.

"All countries reaffirmed that the future of the relationship between Israel and Lebanon must be decided by the two sovereign governments," the joint statement reads. "They rejected any attempt, by any state or non-state actor, to hold Lebanon’s future hostage."

The statement also said Israel and Lebanon have "reaffirmed that they have no hostile intent toward one another and committed to continuing direct negotiations to build confidence, resolve all outstanding issues, and work toward a comprehensive agreement between the two countries."

The parties have additionally agreed to meet for the next round of negotiations for the comprehensive agreement at the State Department on June 22.


Misty Severi is a news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage. 

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/diplomacy/israel-lebanon-agree-full-ceasefire-if-hezbollah-stops-its-attacks

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel, Lebanon agree on plan to drive Hezbollah north of the Litani River - Mike Wagenheim

 

by Mike Wagenheim

“We brought the people of Lebanon to the understanding that we’re not the enemy. Hezbollah is,” said Yechiel Leiter, Israel’s U.S. ambassador.

 

Rubio Israel Lebanon
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio joins working-level peace talks with Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yechiel Leiter and Lebanese Ambassador to the United States Nada Hamadeh Moawad at the Department of State in Washington, D.C., April 14, 2026. Credit: Freddie Everett/U.S. State Department.

After a marathon negotiating session of over eight and a half hours at the U.S. State Department, Israel and Lebanon announced an agreement to “swiftly advance the creation” of so-called pilot zones to gradually drive out the Hezbollah terror organization from south of the strategic Litani River in southern Lebanon, and immediately replace control of those positions with Lebanese Armed Forces troops.

The agreement, brokered by the United States, came at the conclusion of the second day of the fourth round of the historic direct talks between Jerusalem and Beirut in Washington.

A ceasefire agreed to by the two sides is contingent on a “complete cessation of Hezbollah fire and the evacuation of all Hezbollah operatives from the South Litani Sector,” according to a joint statement released by the trilateral participants.

The completed steps “will enable progress towards a comprehensive peace and security agreement,” the statement reads.

“I think we achieved something today which is relatively unprecedented,” Yechiel Leiter, Israel’s ambassador to the United States, told the press. “We brought the people of Lebanon to the understanding that we’re not the enemy. Hezbollah is, and now we’re going to work together to rid the country of this Iranian proxy on Israel’s border, which deprives Israel of its security and the Lebanese people of their freedom.”

Leiter again led talks on behalf of Israel. Simon Karam, a former Lebanese ambassador to Washington and now a special presidential envoy, headed up the Lebanese side, with Dan Holler, State Department counselor, serving as lead mediator and facilitator.

In response to a query from JNS about how the pilot zones would work, Leiter said the 2,000 or so Hezbollah terrorists operating south of the Litani will be guaranteed safe passage north.

“But after a certain amount of time, which is not very long, if they don’t make their way back to the north, then they know exactly what’s coming, and Lebanon understands what’s coming,” said Leiter.

The pilot zone project will be “guided” by the United States, said Leiter, with special units in the Lebanese army to take control of various areas and gradually spread out throughout the south, “so we don’t go into another pattern where Israel leaves, Hezbollah comes back, and we go through the same thing for the past 40 years.”

Leiter said those involved in the talks “are full of hope that this time it will succeed, because we see that the people of Lebanon are committed to freeing their country from this malign influence of Hezbollah and Iran,” adding that there may be “some ups and downs, but we are determined together with Lebanon to implement this ceasefire.”

Hezbollah, he said, is “on their knees and they will continue to be, if not on their knees, on the floor,” and the LAF’ expansion in the south will allow Israel and Lebanon to “slowly reach a state of normalization.”

All sides said the future of the Israel-Lebanese relationship is not to be dictated by outside actors who would “hold Lebanon’s future hostage,” and that Jerusalem and Beirut, who have technically been in a state of war since 1948, “have no hostile intent toward one another and committed to continuing direct negotiations to build confidence, resolve all outstanding issues and work toward a comprehensive agreement.” 

The three countries also condemned Iran’s attacks throughout the region and its ongoing destabilizing activities. Hezbollah serves as an Iranian proxy.

The statement said continued negotiations are not to run “through any separate track,” alluding to Iran’s demands that a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah be put in place as part of a potential deal between Washington and Tehran.

“The most important thing is to understand this: Iran is disconnected from what is happening in Lebanon,” said Leiter. “We insist on that. The United States insists on that, and we hope it stays that way.”

Israel and Lebanon are set to reconvene for a fifth round of U.S.-brokered talks on both the political and security tracks during the week of June 22, ”with a view toward reaching a comprehensive agreement.”

In response to a question from JNS, Leiter confirmed the next round of discussions will be held at the ambassadorial level. He added that a trilateral meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, which Trump teased weeks ago, but which was rejected by Aoun, is “something that we’re working on. We want to see it happen at the right time. We believe it’s going to happen. We want to have everything prepared and set the stage for it to succeed. So we’re working on it.”

Trump is “putting all his weight behind these attempts” to broker peace, said Leiter, dismissing comments Trump made this week expressing frustration at Netanyahu’s policies in Lebanon as a “lover’s spat” that doesn’t define their relationship.

“When we’re so close, we’re going to have conversations that sometimes are heated, but the bottom line is that America, Israel and Lebanon are united in keeping Iran out of the equation,” Leiter said. “We hope that we’re going to succeed, because we have this power when we operate together.” 


Mike Wagenheim

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/israel-news/israel-lebanon-agree-on-plan-to-drive-hezbollah-north-of-the-litani-river

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hezbollah leader appears to reject US-brokered Israel-Lebanon truce - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

Naim Qassem warns the terrorist group will keep fighting.

 

A woman holds pictures of Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem (left) and Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri on April 30, 2026. Photo by Anwar Amro/AFP via Getty Images.
A woman holds pictures of Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem (left) and Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri at Martyrs’ Square in central Beirut on April 30, 2026. Photo by Anwar Amro/AFP via Getty Images.

Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem on Thursday appeared to reject a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, warning that the Iran-backed terrorist group would continue attacking as long as Israeli operations persist.

“We have not given anyone a commitment not to resist aggression and respond to it,” Qassem said in remarks carried by Hezbollah-affiliated Al Manar, adding that “as long as the aggression continues, we will confront it with all the strength we possess.”

Qassem said any ceasefire must include a full halt to Israeli military activity across Lebanon and a withdrawal of Israeli forces, alongside the return of displaced residents and reconstruction efforts. He described Lebanese sovereignty as the “primary objective,” calling for “halting Israeli aggression in all its forms—air, land and sea,” and deploying the Lebanese army south of the Litani River, according to Al Manar.

He also denounced U.S.-led diplomacy and any efforts to disarm Hezbollah, calling direct negotiations a “farce” and the so-called Washington Declaration “a roadmap for the extermination of a segment of the Lebanese people.”

Qassem warned that “as long as the occupation exists, the resistance will continue,” rejecting any arrangement that would limit Hezbollah’s terrorist activity while Israeli strikes continue.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/israel-news/hezbollah-leader-appears-to-reject-us-brokered-israel-lebanon-truce

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Chief of Staff to northern leaders: We are creating a new security reality - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir meets northern local leaders, stresses military is working

 

IDF Chief of the General Staff LTG Eyal Zamir on Thursday held a situational assessment and discussion with a forum of northern local authority heads and the General Staff Forum at the Northern Command.

Zamir expressed his appreciation for IDF troops and Northern Command commanders for their achievements in the operation thus far, emphasizing that the IDF’s objectives are to protect the communities in northern Israel, create a new security reality, and deepen the damage inflicted on Hezbollah.

In addition, he expressed his appreciation to the local authority heads for their leadership, partnership, and support throughout the operation, stressing that the IDF will continue to stand by their side and work in close cooperation to ensure the residents' security.

"We chose to hold a joint situation assessment to deepen the dialogue and strengthen the partnership," Zamir said. "We have a shared goal - protecting the residents of the north and restoring lasting peace and security. We are working together, shoulder to shoulder, toward that goal."

He added "We are maintaining a multi-front state of readiness and are looking at the broader picture across the entire Middle East, while remaining focused on the northern border."

"My directive is to concentrate our efforts here - the majority of the IDF’s troops and capabilities are deployed in the northern arena. Even at this hour, our troops continue to operate on the ground and with firepower to dismantle terrorist infrastructure and remove threats. Just this week, IDF troops operated in the Beaufort Ridge area, dismantling significant and critical Hezbollah terrorist infrastructure that had been built over many years, while advancing defensive operations."

Zamir also noted that Israel has "weakened Iran and its axis to an unprecedented degree, significantly damaging and weakening Hezbollah as well, which serves as a key pillar of Iran’s influence. We have created a new security reality. We are standing between the communities and the threats they face, removing those threats."

"During Operation Roaring Lion, when we identified Hezbollah’s entry into the the attack against Israel, we acted swiftly and decisively to eliminate the threat of infiltration raids and anti-tank attacks against the communities. This is our policy - there is no containment. We act with initiative and defensive action against every emerging threat.

"I am aware of the difficulties and the price you are paying. This is a time for leadership, determination, and perseverance. We are engaged in a prolonged operation, we have achieved significant accomplishments, and we hold the upper hand. Our mission is your security and your protection - restoring lasting peace and security. Together, we are committed to creating a better security reality here for the long term." 


Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428131

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran's Mafia State Understands Only Law Backed by Power - Ahmed Charai

 

by Ahmed Charai

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is no longer merely the guardian of doctrine; it has become the armed protector of an economic empire.... The men who command repression at home and escalation abroad are defending privileges and fortunes accumulated over decades.

 

  • [Iran] is not a normal state pursuing normal interests. It is a mafia state hiding its aggression behind ideology, proxies, negotiations, and delay. It respects neither international law nor the sovereignty of its neighbors — not even the Gulf states that tried to preserve "mediation" channels.

  • The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is no longer merely the guardian of doctrine; it has become the armed protector of an economic empire.... The men who command repression at home and escalation abroad are defending privileges and fortunes accumulated over decades.

  • Tehran's maneuver is... trying to shift attention from the central danger — its nuclear program — toward a parallel crisis over Hormuz. By multiplying fronts and threatening energy markets, Tehran believes it can confuse Washington, divide allies, and buy time.

  • Alliances have tensions. Leaders disagree. But no one should confuse a moment of frustration with the depth of the American-Israeli relationship. That bond is stronger than any single president, prime minister, or political season

  • Tehran is linking regional de-escalation to the survival of its terrorist infrastructure. It is telling the world: if Israel acts against Hezbollah, Iran will escalate elsewhere. That is not diplomacy. That is blackmail.... To let Tehran connect a ceasefire with protection for Hezbollah is to accept that a terrorist organization can veto regional order.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is no longer merely the guardian of doctrine; it has become the armed protector of an economic empire.... The men who command repression at home and escalation abroad are defending privileges and fortunes accumulated over decades. Pictured: Iran's then Supreme Leader, the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, prepares to award a medal to the late General Amir Ali Hajizadeh (L), then commander of the Aerospace Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), in the presence of the senior IRGC leadership, in Tehran on October 6, 2024. (Image source: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader)

President Donald Trump has given Iran a chance for peace. By attacking Kuwait and Bahrain, Iran has given him its answer.

A passenger terminal is not a battlefield. An airport is not a military front. A civilian killed in Kuwait is not a statistic. It is a warning.

Iran's strike on facilities in Kuwait, including Kuwait International Airport, and its missile launches toward Bahrain — intercepted by US and Bahraini forces — must be understood in context. They came while Trump was still giving Tehran an opportunity to step back from escalation and return to the framework of international law. The regime's answer was not compromise, but escalation.

The Kuwait and Bahrain Strikes Underscore Iranian Duplicity

This is not a normal state pursuing normal interests. It is a mafia state hiding its aggression behind ideology, proxies, negotiations, and delay. It respects neither international law nor the sovereignty of its neighbors — not even the Gulf states that tried to preserve "mediation" channels.

The moniker of "mafia state" is not rhetorical excess. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is no longer merely the guardian of doctrine; it has become the armed protector of an economic empire. Through energy contracts, shadow finance, oil sales, ports, and sanctions-evasion networks, the regime's military elite has tied its survival to power and wealth. Its struggle is no longer only ideological. It is personal. The men who command repression at home and escalation abroad are defending privileges and fortunes accumulated over decades. Like every mafia, they confuse the survival of the organization with the survival of the nation.

The regime now threatens the Gulf, Israel, American forces, maritime commerce, and the principle that civilian life must never become leverage. When drones and missiles are launched toward Kuwait and Bahrain, when Hormuz becomes an arena of coercion, and when Hezbollah's survival is folded into Tehran's bargaining position, the world is witnessing Iran's architecture of intimidation.

America and Its Allies Must Stay United

Tehran's maneuver is transparent: it is trying to shift attention from the central danger — its nuclear program — toward a parallel crisis over Hormuz. By multiplying fronts and threatening energy markets, Tehran believes it can confuse Washington, divide allies, and buy time.

The United States is not a reactive power shaped by a single news cycle. It is a democratic nation with enduring institutions, intelligence capabilities, military reach, diplomatic alliances, and economic leverage.

Tehran may hide behind proxies, denials, and manufactured crises, but Washington can see the pattern clearly: nuclear coercion, regional destabilization, terrorist sponsorship, and maritime extortion.

Yet too much commentary has drifted toward a secondary drama: a reportedly heated exchange between Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. But gossip about personalities will not protect Kuwait's civilians, reopen Hormuz, disarm Hezbollah, or reassure America's allies.

Alliances have tensions. Leaders disagree. But no one should confuse a moment of frustration with the depth of the American-Israeli relationship. That bond is stronger than any single president, prime minister, or political season. Fairness also requires clarity about Trump: warm, direct, sometimes harsh, but undeniably important to Israel through Jerusalem, the US embassy, the Golan Heights, and the Abraham Accords.

Tehran is linking regional de-escalation to the survival of its terrorist infrastructure. It is telling the world: if Israel acts against Hezbollah, Iran will escalate elsewhere. That is not diplomacy. That is blackmail. Hezbollah is not simply a Lebanese faction; it is an armed ideological instrument tied to Iran's regional strategy. To let Tehran connect a ceasefire with protection for Hezbollah is to accept that a terrorist organization can veto regional order.

This editorial originally appeared in the National Interest  


Ahmed Charai
is the Chairman and CEO of World Herald Tribune, Inc., and the publisher of the Jerusalem Strategic Tribune, TV Abraham, and Radio Abraham. He serves on the boards of several prominent institutions, including the Atlantic Council, the Center for the National Interest, the Foreign Policy Research Institute, and the International Crisis Group. He is also an International Councilor and a member of the Advisory Board at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22583/iran-mafia-state

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

High Court & Red Cross: How funds will again flow to Nukhba terrorists - Shimon Cohen

 

by Shimon Cohen

Attorney Maurice Hirsch tells Arutz Sheva that visits by the Red Cross enable the Palestinian Authority to transfer money to terrorists.

 

Nukhba force terrorists
Nukhba force terrorists                                                                   Haim Goldberg / Flash 90

The Supreme Court of Israel ruled yesterday (Wednesday) that representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross must be allowed to visit Nukhba terrorists imprisoned in Israel. However, according to attorney Maurice Hirsch, the practical meaning of the decision is that it opens the way for the Palestinian Authority to transfer salaries to terrorists.

“An integral part of the PA’s mechanism for paying salaries to terrorists is that the terrorist appoints someone who will receive the money on his behalf while he is in prison," Hirsch explained.

According to him, in order for the PA to transfer the funds to the terrorist’s family members, the prisoner must sign a power of attorney.

“And this is what the Red Cross does when it meets the prisoners and has them sign the PA’s forms. This is how the continued payment of salaries to terrorists is effectively made possible."

According to Hirsch, the Red Cross is well aware of its role in the process.

“I brought this to their attention several years ago, but they said it did not concern them. They continue doing it because the State of Israel has not objected," he claimed.

Hirsch noted that most of the prisoners jailed since October 7 have not yet received the funds allocated to them by the PA because the bureaucratic process has not yet been completed.

“This is a mechanism that is well organized in PA legislation and regulations. There is a list of documents and actions that the family must complete, and because this is the terrorist’s own salary, he is the one who must determine to whom it should be transferred. As long as he does not do so, the funds accumulate within the PA and are not transferred," he said.

Attorney Hirsch also sharply criticized Israeli officials, who he says have failed to act on the issue over the years, even while he was active in the Palestinian Media Watch organization.

“There is no attention from the authorities in Israel. I have correspondence with the Red Cross in which they acknowledge that all the services they provide to prisoners are voluntary, and there is no obligation for Israel to approve them. I brought these matters to the attention of the relevant officials seven years ago, but nothing was done," he said.

According to Hirsch, alongside his criticism of the High Court ruling, responsibility also lies with government ministries.

“I have harsh criticism of the court’s decision, but the basic responsibility belongs to the Foreign Ministry, the National Security Ministry, and the Prime Minister’s Office. They could have made it clear that they oppose the Red Cross carrying out these actions, but no one is taking up the issue. There is inaction here on the part of government officials," he said. 


Shimon Cohen

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428134

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

EPA sparing animals in new testing methods results in crickets from major animal rights group - Amanda Head

 

by Amanda Head

While PETA has fought for actions like these for decades, they’ve yet to comment on the animal-friendly moves.

 

The Environmental Protection Agency announced steps this week to speed up efforts to replace animal testing with so-called "New Approach Methods" for chemical and pesticide safety checks, a historic move that would appear praiseworthy by groups such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), but the animal rights organization has so far been silent. 

Another prominent animal rights group, however, praised the move.

Justin Goodman, senior vice president for White Coat Waste, told Just The News exclusively that one of the top priorities for his group was to get the Trump administration to reinstate the president's EPA’s landmark plan to eliminate animal testing and retire lab survivors that the Biden EPA quietly scrapped – a move his group exposed – while legacy animal rights groups gave them a pass.

"We're thrilled that under [EPA] Administrator Lee Zeldin's leadership, the agency is now moving full speed ahead to cut wasteful and cruel animal testing and send survivors to loving homes," he said after the EPA's announced changes Tuesday. 

The move keeps pace with the agency's goal of completely terminating all mammalian animal testing by 2035 and is a continuation of plans launched during President Donald Trump’s first term that the Biden administration had put on hold. 

Among the updates: The EPA added 13 new NAMs for testing – including human cell models for eye irritation, 3D human tissue tests for light sensitivity and validated lab-based methods for skin allergies – to its official list for TSCA and FIFRA reviews. 

The agency also created an easier way for scientists and companies to suggest fresh alternatives. Just last year, such methods saved roughly 1,600 mice and rats during phthalate testing, and the agency started its first lab animal adoption program back in April 2025. 

100 years of animal testing

Animal testing in the U.S. gained prominence in the 20th Century for drug safety. The 1937 Elixir Sulfanilamide disaster, which killed over 100 people due to untested toxic solvent, prompted the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, mandating animal safety testing for drugs.

The Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (amended multiple times) first regulated the treatment, sale, and handling of certain animals in research, covering dogs, cats, and primates but excluding rats and mice (the majority used.)

Opposition of animal testing dates back a century as well, with groups such as the ASPCA and American Anti-Vivisection Society. The “Three Rs” (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) concept from 1959 influenced later policies. 

By the late 20th Century, millions of animals, primarily rodents, were used annually for biomedical, toxicity and product testing, though regulations and alternatives grew. 

Animal-loving in the Trump administration

During Trump's first administration, the EPA set a 2019 goal to reduce mammalian testing by 30% by 2025 and eliminate it by 2035, a date to which the administration has again committed.  

The FDA announced in April 2025 a plan to phase out mandatory animal testing for monoclonal antibodies and other drugs, promoting human-relevant methods like organoids, organ-on-chip, and AI models under the FDA Modernization Act 2.0. 

The National Institutes of Health has also prioritized human-based technologies, reduced animal use in funded research, and cut roughly $28 million in animal testing grants.

EPA officials say human cell and computer-based NAMs are quicker, more human-relevant, cheaper, and often more accurate than animal studies, ultimately helping regulators work smarter while protecting public health and sparking innovation. 

White Coat Waste is also working on two appropriations amendments, on dog and cat testing, with Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., which passed through the House Rules committee on Tuesday night.  


Amanda Head

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/peta-praise-epa-spares-animals-another-series-new-testing-methods

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Can California Still Be Saved? - Victor Davis Hanson

 

by Victor Davis Hanson

California’s decline is no mystery: decades of one-party rule have turned America’s golden state into a warning about the costs of ideological governance.

 

 

The recent California gubernatorial and Los Angeles mayoral elections—where, remarkably, Steve Hilton and Spencer Pratt both appear to have advanced to the general election in November—offer a glimmer of hope.

Could it be that some on the Left, along with a number of Independents, have finally realized that neither wealth nor an upscale ZIP code can protect them from the Left’s vindictive socialist madness?

California gas prices, even prior to the Iran war, had reached the highest levels in the continental United States.

The cause is self-evident: left-wing policies that forbid most new gas and oil exploration, impose radical green-fuel mandates and levy the highest gas taxes in the U.S. and drive out oil refineries.

Illegal immigration has soared. Currently, some 11 million Californians—28 percent of the resident population—were not born in the U.S. This foreign-born demographic exploded at precisely the time that civic education and melting-pot assimilation and integration were denigrated in the public schools and replaced by ethnic chauvinism and pre-civilizational DEI tribalism.

A third of the nation’s welfare recipients and nearly a third of the homeless live in California. Almost a quarter of the state’s population lives below the poverty line.

California has the highest electricity rates in the mainland United States and the steepest income taxes in the nation. And yet it annually runs the highest budget deficits of the 50 states.

Despite massive unfunded pension debts of $265 billion, the state has spent billions of dollars on illegal-alien subsidies, from free health care to solar panels.

The state has wasted between $15 billion and $20 billion on its Bakersfield-to-Merced high-speed rail line since the project was approved in 2008. Not a single foot of track has yet been laid in the past 18 years.

Less than a third of California public school students read at proficient levels.

Gavin Newsom’s first budget as governor in 2019–20 was $214 billion. His newest 2026 budget is $350 billion—a 63 percent increase in spending in just six years.

About 12 million Californians have fled the state since Newsom began his uninterrupted three-decade political career in 1997. And it seems that the more Californians have left, the greater the yearly exodus grows, with a likely 400,000 to 500,000 leaving in 2026–27.

Mass flight from the most beautiful state in the Union is the greatest indictment of the Democrat monopoly—supermajorities in both houses of the legislature, overwhelming numbers of liberal-appointed state judges, and no statewide Republican executive officeholders.

Only 13 percent of California’s 52-member congressional delegation is Republican. Yet Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump won 38 percent of the state’s vote in 2024—nearly triple the percentage of its paltry seven congressional seats.

In the most recent Reason Foundation 50-state ranking of roads and highway infrastructure, California (with its temperate weather) ranked 49th in the nation, only ahead of frigid Alaska.

We know the cause of these California disasters—one-party rule for nearly two decades and the rise of Silicon Valley-funded, powerful left-wing Bay Area politicians (Barbara Boxer, Willie Brown, Jerry Brown, Dianne Feinstein, Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, Nancy Pelosi).

The neo-socialist new Democratic Party is strongest in California and has pushed through a slate of disastrous radical-green policies, sanctuary-city madness, harebrained schemes to deal with homelessness, critical race and legal theories, and solar and high-speed-rail boondoggles.

Left-wing Bay Area politicians rely on Silicon Valley’s $11 trillion in market capitalization and on public unions like the SEIU and the CTA. Election Day in California is a mere construct, since winners often mysteriously do not emerge for weeks.

Add it up: massive legal and illegal immigration, an unprecedented exodus of the upper middle class, and an enormous influx of new wealth have created a medieval society of the well-off and the very poor—with increasingly few in between.

We know the medicine to save California, but the Left feels it is worse than the disease.

Sane leaders would create humane, drug-free relocation shelters for the treatment of the homeless far from downtowns, coupled with strict enforcement of vagrancy laws.

They would push vast new investment in infrastructure and roads.

They would end no cash bail and return to three-strikes-and-you’re-out sentencing.

Californians require the restoration of their oil, timber, and mining industries.

We must finally end the divisive and nihilist tribal chauvinism of DEI hiring and admissions.

Closed borders and an end to sanctuary-state and sanctuary-city status would lead to a return to diverse, legal, meritocratic, measured, melting-pot immigration.

Across-the-board tax reductions and deregulation could win back fleeing wealth and investment.

Stiff penalties for welfare and entitlement fraud would deter the chronic looting of state programs.

Sane water policies would end the vast outflow of scarce water into the ocean.

Finally, the schools will either reject failing therapeutic curricula and embrace a return to traditional classical education or ensure an illiterate population unable to maintain even the basic infrastructure and institutions they inherited from far better-educated previous generations.

Photo: A homeless person stands next to an encampment in Skid Row, downtown Los Angeles, California, on July 26, 2024. California Governor Gavin Newsom on July 25, 2024, ordered the dismantling of homeless encampments on state land, one month after the US Supreme Court overturned protections for unhoused residents sleeping outdoors. (Photo by Apu GOMES / AFP) 


Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness and the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He is an American military historian, columnist, a former classics professor, and scholar of ancient warfare. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004, and is the 2023 Giles O'Malley Distinguished Visiting Professor at the School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush, and the Bradley Prize in 2008. Hanson is also a farmer (growing almonds on a family farm in Selma, California) and a critic of social trends related to farming and agrarianism. He is the author of the just released New York Times best seller, The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation, published by Basic Books on May 7, 2024, as well as the recent  The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won, The Case for Trump, and The Dying Citizen.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/06/04/can-california-still-be-saved/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

‘Defund the Police’ champ who says police rooted in ‘white supremacy’ may be socialist mayor of DC - Jerry Dunleavy

 

by Jerry Dunleavy

Janeese Lewis George rode to power into the D.C. Council in 2020 on a wave of "Defund the Police" promises and with the backing of the DSA. As their latest poster child, she could be mayor of America's capital city.

 

A longtime “Defund the Police” advocate who could be the next mayor of the nation’s capital has argued that American policing is “rooted in white supremacy” — and she, like NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, is also a member of Democratic Socialists of America.

Janeese Lewis George, who won her D.C. City Council seat in 2020 with the backing of the DSA and on a “Defund the Police” platform following the George Floyd protests and riots, is now a leading contender to replace outgoing multi-term Mayor Muriel Bowser. The Democratic mayoral primary will be based on ranked choice voting for the first time this year. Lewis George has a lead in the primary according to a City Cast poll, as well as according to a GBAO Strategies poll sponsored by her own campaign.

Prior to winning the DSA endorsement and the Democratic primary in 2020 and becoming a member of the D.C. City Council, Lewis George had been an assistant attorney general in Philadelphia as well as an assistant attorney general in Washington, D.C.

Lewis George backtracks on defunding the police

Crime is a key issue in the race, where Lewis George’s top opponent, Kenyan McDuffie, has hammered the DSA candidate over her Defund the Police stances. Lewis George now contends that she will not defund the police, but getting DSA’s backing during her original D.C. council run meant vowing to defund the police, and she had a vocal history of promising to do just that.

Mamdani, as mayor of the country’s biggest city, could soon have a fellow DSA member as mayor of the nation’s capital, if Lewis George wins on June 16.

Lewis George’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

DSA endorsement and Defund the Police stance are inextricably linked

Lewis George’s endorsement by and membership in the DSA is inextricably linked to her long history of calling to defund the police, because it is a litmus test for DSA support. When she was making her first primary bid for a D.C. council seat in 2019, Lewis George filled out the standard endorsement questionnaire put together by the DSA of Metro D.C.

She said “yes” when asked if she identified as a democratic socialist, writing, “Because democratic socialists believe that our political and economic systems are fundamentally flawed, and that a better system is one that shifts more resources and power into the hands of working families. My campaign is built on this foundation, which is why I’m fighting to decrease the influence of money in politics; raise wages; beat back racism, sexism, and other forms of cultural and gender bias; expand healthcare; and make housing affordable again.”

Lewis George’s timing for joining the DSA and then seeking the DSA endorsement seemed strategic, as she wrote that “I was admittedly late to the game, signing up only in October 2019.” The DSA questionnaire asked whether she supported “efforts to demilitarize and disarm our police departments” and she answered “yes.”

“We’re told the institution of policing is intended to protect all of us from some suspicious menace, but the fact is that crime is a public health problem, not a battle of military opponents,” Lewis George wrote. “The transformation of American police departments, especially the MPD, into military units trained to occupy the very communities promised protection is one of the greatest dangers to the future of urban life.”

She also said “yes” when asked if she recognized “the increased police presence in our schools as the start of a school-to-prison pipeline” and thus supported "removing police officers from schools, instead providing free mental healthcare as an alternative means to provide for the safety of our children.”

“I don’t think we should have guns in our schools no matter who is carrying them,” Lewis George wrote. “We should be expanding funding to ensure mental health services and staff are available in all Ward 4 schools, not just but especially those with a high rate of mental health-related needs.”

She also said “yes” when asked if she was committed to “rejecting any political endorsement by labor groups whose mission is primarily to organize and represent police officers.” The DSA-backed mayoral candidate — who was then running in the Democratic primary to join the D.C. council — tweeted in October 2019 that “I will absolutely divest from MPD and put that money into violence interruption programs” and expounded upon that by saying that “what I mean is that I would redirect some of the $550 million in funding that is currently allocated for policing toward violence prevention and violence interruption programs that are run by agencies other than MPD.”

Lewis George doubled down on this in December 2019, arguing that “I'm tired of throwing failed solutions at this problem. More policing doesn't work, we can't enforce our way to safer communities.”

She won the Democratic nomination for the D.C. City Council seat in Ward 4 in early June 2020.

The Minneapolis City Council announced a few days later that it was in support of disbanding or dismantling the Minneapolis Police Department. ABC News soon reported that Lewis George — now the nominee for D.C. city council — was in favor of that.

"It's no longer sounding like a radical idea. It's sounding like a logical idea for many," Lewis-George reportedly said, adding that “just like the 1968 Civil Rights Act had to be passed in order to see the protests die down, I think this is a moment where our legislators are going to have to do the same thing."

Long list of "soft on crime positions"

Lewis George also took a number of soft-on-crime stances when seeking the DSA endorsement in 2019.

She said “yes” when asked if she supported “eliminating cash bail” and wrote that “cash bail keeps low-income people with limited cash liquidity behind bars.” The candidate also said “yes” that she did “recognize sex work as work” and did “support the decriminalization of sex work.” Lewis George added, “This isn’t complicated. Just because many might find it unsavory does not mean that those employed in the sale of sex should be denied the rights afforded all workers.”

Lewis George also said “yes” when asked if she was in favor of “the decriminalization of all drugs” — including the hardest and most addictive.

“Yes, though probably it'd be most practical to do it in phases,” she told the DSA. “Like most crime, drug use is a public health problem whose solution is a public health approach, not punitive law enforcement and incarceration."

The DSA’s D.C. chapter held a “Fund Care, Not Cops!” rally in mid-June 2020, which Lewis George spoke at.

Lewis George endorsed the “Defund the Police” slogan during the rally. “A lot of people have said to me, ‘oh, don’t use the word defund because it makes a lot of people uncomfortable,’ and I said, ‘were people as uncomfortable when they defunded education?’ What we’re saying to you is that you have had too much of continuing to divest from our communities and to take from our communities and continue to do it and we are tired,” she said according to Street Sense Media.

Lewis George tweeted in June 2020 that “Juneteenth recognizes Black freedom and Black resistance, a powerful opportunity to proclaim in one voice that BLACK LIVES MATTER. To honor our ancestors and create a path toward freedom for future generations.”

The candidate was asked whether, back when she was a prosecutor, she had ever thought to herself that she was working within a racist system.

“Absolutely,” she said. “All the time.”

Introduced the “White Supremacy in Policing Prevention Act”

NPR said that that experience “informed her proposals to divert some of the police budget to community improvements and violence reduction programs.”

“You know, I've seen, you know, how much we just lean on doing the same thing and expecting a different result, which is like — let's just put more officers there, and that'll [solve] the problem, which is not the only solution,” Lewis George said. “You've got to put more resources into the community to do that.”

Once in office, Lewis George quickly continued her critiques of the police, including introducing the “White Supremacy in Policing Prevention Act” in February 2021.

Her office announced that this was “a bill to investigate any ties between members of MPD and hate groups that could prevent fair enforcement of the law, and to recommend preventive and detection safeguards for the Department” and contended that “in the wake of rising extremism, police departments nationwide are grappling with the threat of white supremacist and hate group ties among law enforcement.”

Lewis George said on Instagram at the time that “this legislation is a critical step to ensure that our laws are enforced fairly, improve officer and community safety, and increase public trust in the Department without setting aside additional funding for policing.”

She also introduced legislation in 2021 to restrict police chases in D.C.

The councilwoman appeared on Zoom for a hearing in May 2021 where she praised proposed police reforms which “fundamentally reimagine what the role of policing is in D.C.” She said she was in favor of “decriminalizing poverty and low-level offenses” and wanted to create “police-free schools.”

DSA candidate said Jacob Blake case shows black people “not safe in our own bodies”

Lewis George also suggested that Wisconsin police not being charged for the shooting of Jacob Blake meant that black people are not safe in America.

In August 2020, Kenosha Police Officer Rusten Sheskey shot Jacob Blake in the back and left side seven times after Blake repeatedly managed to evade being detained by the responding officers and as Blake turned toward the officer while holding a knife.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley released a January 2021 report saying the facts established that Sheskey and two other responding officers knew Blake had a felony warrant involved with domestic violence and sexual assault charges. The report said they also knew: that Laquisha Booker flagged them down and indicated Blake was trying to take her car while her kids were in it; that Blake physically resisted arrest while armed with a knife; that Sheskey and another officer repeatedly tried to subdue Blake with a taser to no avail; that Blake was walking to the car with a knife; and that Sheskey, another officer, and two citizen witnesses saw Blake turning toward Sheskey with the knife when Sheskey then shot him.

The district attorney concluded: “I do not believe the State could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Officer Sheskey was not acting lawfully in self-defense or defense of others.”

“Time and time again we see that deescalation, respect for our lives, and accountability for those who shoot us is not a privilege Black people get to have. We are not safe in our own bodies. #JacobBlake,” Lewis-George tweeted the day of this announcement.

The Biden Justice Department announced in October 2021 that the Kenosha police officer who shot and partially paralyzed Blake would not be prosecuted, due to “insufficient evidence.”

The DOJ said “it will not pursue federal criminal civil rights charges” against the officer, saying it had told Blake’s family and that prosecutors made the decision “because the evidence obtained is insufficient to prove that the KPD officer willfully used excessive force.”

Lewis George tries to downplay Defund the Police stance as she runs for mayor

Lewis George’s current mayoral campaign platform makes no mention of her prior repeated pledges to Defund the Police, but instead claims she will support the police.

“Janeese will implement a comprehensive public safety strategy that addresses prevention, intervention, and enforcement. It’s an approach she took as Ward 4 Councilmember when addressing crime on Kennedy Street and in Petworth,” the platform contends. “And it’s the approach she took when she was a prosecutor at the D.C. Office of the Attorney General. As Mayor, the entirety of her government will play a role in public safety, not just one agency.”

Lewis George has attempted to somewhat walk back her prior demands for defunding the police.

The DSA candidate’s current campaign platform further claims that “to make D.C. safer” she will “enforce our laws and support law enforcement agencies” by “strengthening and expanding resources to detectives to aid in solving more crimes” and by “addressing MPD’s vacancy and retention crisis by expanding the police cadet program, reducing forced overtime, renovating aging facilities, and providing child care benefits that make the District competitive with other local and federal police departments.”

The Washington Post noted in May that “the DSA’s platform calls for substantially defunding police departments and ultimately abolishing them.” The outlet said that Lewis George was asked if she agreed with that view, and replied that she “does not always agree with what the DSA does” and argued that the “defund” attacks by her opponents are “cheap shots.”

“I stood up in the moment, just like every generation before me has stood up, and made a loud, resounding call for investment in our community,” Lewis George told the outlet, reportedly “adding that years of police brutality cases that did not result in justice informed her earlier calls” and “that she would hire more police to alleviate overtime burdens straining the department.”

Lewis George has allowed clear indications of her softer-on-crime stances to be made well known during the campaign, including attacking federal law enforcement as well as opposing late-night curfews for juveniles in the wake of youthful and often predominantly black teenaged crowds committing spates of violence in the nation’s capital in recent weeks, including a viral brawl at a Chipotle in a Navy Yard Chipotle in May.

WUSA9 reported in May that the D.C. Council had approved a curfew measure which “would give police the authority to establish curfew zones across the District.” The outlet added that “under the measure, the Metropolitan Police Department would be allowed to designate areas where children and teenagers are prohibited from gathering in groups of eight or more starting at 8 p.m. as a way to prevent teen takeovers in places like the U Street Corridor and Navy Yard that have sometimes become violent.”

The measure was passed by an 8 to 5 vote, with Lewis George as one of the nays.

Lewis George also called the curfew “dangerous” during debates in May.

"Right now, using the curfew as a tool for our young people is dangerous. It is dangerous because we have federal troops who are in our city, masked ICE agents who are in our city, and these are the people enforcing this law and our young people, and these are not individuals who are trained in de-escalation, they are not accountable to D.C. residents,” Lewis George said as reported by Fox News.

"As mayor, I think it's important that we use the right tools, and we don't put the risk of our youth being harmed or killed without the real oversight that's necessary,” the DSA candidate added.

U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro argued in May, "Teen takeovers have disrupted neighborhoods, forced businesses to close temporarily, and diverted valuable law enforcement resources from the residents of the District. These incidents have become increasingly common in areas such as Navy Yard and NoMa and are often accompanied by criminal conduct, including assaults, robberies, fights, and other disorderly behavior."

McDuffie’s campaign put out another new ad in June which went after Lewis George on the issue of crime.

“D.C. is at a crossroads. The next mayor must tackle crime. But Janeese Lewis George will make it worse. She routinely stands in the way of critical safety laws like youth curfews. It’s common sense,” the ad said. “What’s really dangerous for our kids is violence. … Janeese Lewis George is a risk we just can’t take.”

The would-be socialist mayor also laid out the importance of the DSA to her electoral bids — and crowed about the DSA’s growing power.

“I’m running to be the first Democratic Socialist mayor of D.C. I’m a proud democratic socialist. I’m proud of how far we’ve come. … D.C. was one of the first to be building democratic socialism in our country,” Lewis George said. “Our Metro D.C. DSA was the first to say we’re going to build global power here in our cities. And when we decided that in 2020, people were like, it will never happen, you’ll never do it. And we said: watch us do it.” 


Jerry Dunleavy

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/defund-police-champ-who-says-policing-rooted-white-supremacy-may-be

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Botched ruling on pregnancy 'fairness' law opens floodgates to abortion, pro-life coalition warns - Greg Piper

 

by Greg Piper

Democrats, atheists, Jewish and Christian groups back Catholic bishops' challenge to EEOC regulation, court ruling on Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, saying they obliterate First Amendment rights of religious and pro-life groups.

 

The Biden administration read abortion mandates into federal laws on emergency stabilization of hospital patients and accommodations for pregnant women in the workplace, seeking to override state abortion restrictions and religious employers' objections to facilitating abortions for employees, respectively.

With federal appellate courts reaching opposite conclusions on whether the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act requires any specific procedure and the Supreme Court refusing to get involved in either case – leading Maryland to set its own rules last week — a wide coalition is now fighting to block sweeping abortion access under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.

Pro-life Democrats and atheists joined Jews, Seventh-day Adventists, evangelicals, 50 members of Congress, Texas and a conservative think tank to support the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and Catholic University of America at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which previously blocked the abortion-friendly reading of EMTALA.

Under the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's regulation interpreting PWFA to require abortion accommodation, finalized two years ago, "qualifying medical conditions include many that are universal to pregnancy, such as minor hormonal changes," said the Catholic plaintiffs, represented by religious liberty law firm Becket.

A district court "recast" that mandate with "the same severe ramifications for religious objectors, the same lack of support in statutory text, and the same regulatory overreach," their opening brief says.

By ruling that PWFA itself requires accommodations for "abortions stemming from the underlying treatment of a medical condition related to pregnancy," the court set the threshold so low that it implicates Catholic employers in abortions deemed related to even "minor" cases of "anxiety" and other mild health conditions, the brief says.

The brief also refers to "unsuccessful negotiations" last summer with EEOC to "obtain protection during the pendency of the case." The plaintiffs told the 5th Circuit in a July 21 injunction motion that EEOC reiterated that very day "it would not agree to the full requested relief."

The same issue arose in the PWFA case as in Louisiana's challenge to the Food and Drug Administration's repeated relaxation of prescribing rules for the abortion pill mifepristone, which functionally neutered its abortion restrictions: The Trump administration wanted to revisit the regulation by its Democratic predecessors but not tie its hands in court.

The plaintiffs have shown "no harm, let alone the type of imminent, irreparable injury necessary to justify" the injunction pending appeal they were seeking, the EEOC responded July 31. The commission has "never even received any charges" against any employer for failure to accommodate an abortion under PWFA.

The bishops and university emphasized that the administration recently acknowledged, in the Justice Department's Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias report, that the abortion-accommodation reading of PWFA "twisted this commonsense statute to reach radical ends infringing on religious liberty."

Law gives women options beyond abortion, not intended to 'muzzle' pro-life groups

Democrats for Life of America and Secular Pro-Life appeared on a friend-of-the-court brief with another nonreligious group, 55-year-old Americans United for Life, and several religious pro-life groups, including the National Association of Evangelicals and Christian Legal Society.

A recent Free Press article on pro-life disillusionment with President Trump quoted DFLA and AUL as calling for a bigger tent for the pro-life movement.

During notice and comment on the EEOC's proposed regulation, DFLA had warned that the abortion-expansive reading will harm its hiring and advocacy, "potentially" forcing it to "support actions by its employees that it actively campaigns against," the joint brief notes.

Secular Pro-Life said it supported PWFA out of hope it would "address unjust employment practices that lead mothers to feel that abortion is their only option," but the regulation ended up censoring its freedom of speech and association under the First Amendment. 

The brief, written by the Christian Legal Society, elaborates on the regulation's chilling effects and the "wide muzzle" it imposes on pro-life organizations through an "anti-coercion" provision that could hold them liable if any staff "counsel their coworkers against an abortion accommodation or criticize the choice of an elective abortion."

"As with media organizations and parades, government cannot compel other expressive organizations to give access to views that contradict their message," the brief says, citing precedents for the Miami Herald and organizers of Boston's St. Patrick's Day parade.

Usurping 'major questions' reserved for Congress by citing different law

Led by Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Sens. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Pro-Life Caucus Co-Chair Chris Smith, R-N.J., 50 federal lawmakers said in a brief that Congress "intentionally withheld" the power to mandate abortion accommodations, "especially upon religious employers," from EEOC in the law, which Cassidy cosponsored.

"The bipartisan PWFA was designed to accomplish a simple, uncontroversial goal: ensuring that pregnant and postpartum women receive the accommodations they need at work," the brief said. "It was not designed to take sides in controversial abortion policy debates."

EEOC relied on three court decisions interpreting the Civil Rights Act, before SCOTUS invalidated federal abortion rights in Dobbs, to conclude that PWFA, a separate law, required abortion accommodations, the brief also says.

The commission trampled the "major questions" SCOTUS doctrine by "interpreting the religious exemption [in the law] narrowly and medical justifications for abortion broadly," part of the Biden administration's campaign to resurrect federal abortion rights invalidated by SCOTUS "by wrongfully reinterpreting federal laws that have nothing to do with abortion."

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose Senate fortunes rose with Trump's endorsement as Cassidy lost his seat after Trump's rebuke, drills down on the application of the "religious-organization exemption" in the PWFA in the Lone Star State's brief

"The exemption prohibits application of the entirety" of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and PWFA when a religious organization "acts because of an individual’s religious observance, practice, or beliefs," said Paxton, who will try to keep Cassidy's seat for the GOP in the November elections.  

Title VII "offers a mirror-image set of protections," for religious employees "against discrimination from a nonreligious employer" and for religious employers against "governmental interference" in their employment decisions "animated by religious belief," he also said.

When SCOTUS ruled that Title VII protects transgender employees from discrimination on the basis of sex, it emphasized that the statute preserves constitutional free exercise of religion, the brief says. This "strongly suggests" Title VII's religious-organization exemption "will protect from any claim brought under Title VII."

Narrowly defining church autonomy 'in terms of co-religionists by label alone' 

A joint brief by the Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty and General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists said the district court's ruling "undermines the critical protections of the church autonomy doctrine," threatening them both in different ways.

While "Judaism includes a long tradition of treating abortion as a profound moral issue implicating the sanctity of life," most American Jews today support the legality of abortion in "many cases," the brief says. 

"A rule that defines the church autonomy doctrine in terms of co-religionists by label alone, without regard to actual beliefs and practices, fails to respect the diversity of sincerely-held religious convictions that exist within broader faith traditions," the groups said, noting U.S. Lutheran denominations also disagree with each other on abortion.

Seventh-day Adventists' requirements for employees are "not incidental personnel preferences" but "integral" to its identity, requiring baptism, tithing, "regular standing" with the denomination and "exemplary commitment" to its teachings, the brief says.

"Questions concerning the sanctity of life, the theological permissibility of abortion, and the obligations of religious witness are quintessentially theological questions beyond the competence and power of civil authorities," the Jews and Christians said.

The Manhattan Institute's brief focuses on the major-questions doctrine and church autonomy as well, saying the former applies to "rules that burden" the latter. 


Greg Piper

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/abortion/botched-ruling-pregnancy-fairness-law-opens-floodgates-abortion-pro-life

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter