Thursday, July 23, 2026

Trump says he is close to launching 'massive attack' on Iran, 'bigger than ever before' - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

"I am considering a massive attack. Bigger than ever before. I am close to making a decision. We are all set for it," the US president told Axios.

 

US President Donald Trump speaks at the Pennsylvania Defense and Innovation Summit at the United States Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, US, July 15, 2026.
US President Donald Trump speaks at the Pennsylvania Defense and Innovation Summit at the United States Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, US, July 15, 2026.
(photo credit: Reuters/Kylie Cooper)

US President Donald Trump is close to making a decision on whether to launch a new major combat operation against Iran, he told Axios on Thursday.

"I am considering a massive attack. Bigger than ever before. I am close to making a decision. We are all set for it," he said.

Trump added that Israel "would join in two minutes if I ask them to," but that there would be "consequences" to it joining the strikes, and that the United States didn't need any assistance.

His relationship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump said, was very good. "Relations with Bibi are very good. I would meet with him if he is here," he stated.

Motorists drive their vehicles past a political billboard featuring US President Donald Trump and the Strait of Hormuz along Valiasr Square in Tehran on May 26.
Motorists drive their vehicles past a political billboard featuring US President Donald Trump and the Strait of Hormuz along Valiasr Square in Tehran on May 26. (credit: Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

Iran wants to negotiate, Trump says

During the interview with Axios, Trump also said that Iran wants to negotiate, but that they "haven't received enough pain yet."

Two regional sources corroborated that the Iranian leadership was "not being helpful" in negotiations, and had not accepted the latest proposal. 


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-903482

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump: US-Saudi nuclear deal hinges on Riyadh normalizing ties with Israel - Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

Prime Minister Netanyahu supported Saudi Arabia's potential joining of the Abraham Accords, saying it would be "a historic leap forward for peace in the Middle East."

 

US President Donald Trump, Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia and Elon Musk pose with others for a family picture during the US-Saudi Investment Forum in Washington, November 19, 2025.
US President Donald Trump, Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia and Elon Musk pose with others for a family picture during the US-Saudi Investment Forum in Washington, November 19, 2025.
(photo credit: REUTERS/EVELYN HOCKSTEIN)

A US-Saudi civil nuclear agreement would be approved only if Saudi Arabia joins the Abraham Accords and accepts a ban on uranium enrichment, US President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Thursday. 

Trump said Washington does not oppose civilian nuclear facilities that do not enrich nuclear material, comparing the proposed arrangement to existing agreements involving Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and other countries.

Michael Ratney, a former US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and a senior advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told The Jerusalem Post that he thinks President Trump was trying to manage the criticism that emerged after the agreement was announced.  

"The Saudi view of normalization hasn’t changed - it still requires a credible pathway to a Palestinian state, and this nuclear deal won’t change their thinking on that, so it’s not clear where this leaves us," he said.

The US Energy Department said on Wednesday that the US had reached a nuclear cooperation agreement.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a vote at the plenum hall of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, on July 16, 2026.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a vote at the plenum hall of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, on July 16, 2026. (credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)

"US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright and Saudi Minister of Energy His Royal Highness (HRH) Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman signed a peaceful nuclear cooperation agreement, commonly known as a 123 agreement, alongside an accompanying bilateral safeguards agreement," the US Energy Department announced in a post on X/Twitter.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu released a statement saying that "Saudi Arabia's joining of the Abraham Accords would be a historic leap forward for peace in the Middle East."

Deal reportedly does not include normalization with Israel

The Trump administration submitted to Congress a pact with Saudi Arabia to share nuclear power technology that does not include a plan for normalization with Israel or safeguards the US has long said would stop materials from being used in nuclear weapons programs, the New York Times reported on Tuesday.

The long-discussed US-Saudi nuclear pact was once envisioned as one part of a broad deal that could lead to recognition of Israel, but Saudi Arabia pulled back from the possibility during the Israel-Hamas war.


Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-903447

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

US-Saudi civilian nuclear deal raises proliferation concerns in Middle East - Steven Richards

 

by Steven Richards

Analysts say the nuclear arrangement, without the most stringent safeguards, could weaken the United States’ longstanding nuclear nonproliferation policies in the region.

 

As Washington prosecutes a war to end Iran’s nuclear enrichment capabilities and clandestine weapons program, the U.S. decision to grant Saudi Arabia a deal to expand its civilian nuclear industry without strict safeguards could invite the proliferation of nuclear weapons, analysts say. 

Administration officials said Wednesday that President Donald Trump approved a nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia that will provide the country with a civilian nuclear program, built by U.S. companies. 

The deal, known as a 123 Agreement, reportedly leaves the door open to future enrichment of nuclear material in the kingdom under U.S. direction and supervision, but without the most stringent safeguards. 

The agreement will face a review from Congress where it may encounter opposition from lawmakers who have been skeptical in the past of Saudi Arabia’s nuclear ambitions. In 2019, GOP Sen. Marco Rubio—now secretary of State—raised concerns about the Trump administration’s decision to approve American companies sharing nuclear technology know-how with the kingdom. 

The Biden administration originally conditioned the deal for nuclear cooperation with Saudi Arabia on the kingdom normalizing relations with Israel. Progress on that front was interrupted after Hamas’ October 2023 attack against Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza. The Trump administration does not appear to be insisting on Israeli normalization before entering into a nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia. 

Andrea Stricker, deputy director of the Nonproliferation Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Just the News that the reported terms of the deal would likely weaken U.S. efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation in the Middle East.

She pointed specifically to the fact that the deal does not include the so-called “gold standard,” a promise from Saudi Arabia that it will not enrich uranium at home or reprocess the spent fuel from nuclear reactors. According to the reports, Saudi Arabia rejected such terms. 

Saudi Arabia also reportedly rejected the “Additional Protocol,” which would allow International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors broad access to a country’s nuclear sites and the ability to carry out snap inspections at an undisclosed location. 

“The reported deal weakens decades of U.S. nonproliferation standards against spreading uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing capabilities – processes that provide countries with the means to produce fuel for nuclear weapons,” Stricker said. 

“After successfully rolling back Iran's enrichment program via force, Washington should insist on the gold standard it has with the United Arab Emirates, which ruled out enrichment and reprocessing and signed the IAEA's enhanced inspection agreement.” 

When the United States signed a similar 123 Agreement in 2009 with Saudi Arabia’s neighbor, the United Arab Emirates, the country voluntarily agreed to that gold standard and swore off nuclear enrichment. 

Earlier this year, while the Trump administration was negotiating the nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia, Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts and a sponsor of the “No Nuclear Weapons for Saudi Arabia Act,” said that the United States should insist on the “gold standard” for any civilian cooperation with the kingdom. 

“Congress should use its authority to reject this agreement. Anything less risks transforming the Middle East into a nuclear Wild West and creating a devastating new nuclear arms race in the region,” Markey said in a statement

The White House directed Just the News to a statement from Energy Secretary Chris Wright. He said on Wednesday that the agreement will uphold the United States’ longstanding nuclear nonproliferation standards. 

“Rest assured, these agreements uphold the highest standards of nuclear safety and nonproliferation, while relying on the world’s best nuclear technology and scientists, designed right here in the United States,” Wright said. “Thanks to President Trump, the American nuclear renaissance is underway and will deliver long-term benefits to the American and Saudi people.”

However, complicating the picture further is the fact that Saudi leaders have said publicly that if Iran, the kingdom’s chief regional rival, obtains a nuclear weapon, that they would be forced to pursue one as well. 

“Saudi Arabia does not want to acquire any nuclear bomb, but without a doubt if Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible,” Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman told CBS News in a 2018 interview

Trump launched strikes alongside Israel in February aimed at crippling Iran’s military and preventing Tehran from ever obtaining a nuclear weapon. The two countries also conducted strikes on Iran’s suspected nuclear sites the prior summer. 

The American president insists that the strikes and subsequent conflict have destroyed Iran’s nuclear capabilities. It is not clear whether that assessment impacted the administration’s willingness to pursue the civilian agreement with Riyadh. 

As Secretary Wright said, the administration is relying on a bilateral agreement with Riyadh for verification measures that will prevent Saudi Arabia from using nuclear technology for a weapons program. 

The Trump administration notified Congress in March that the United States will sign a “Bilateral Safeguards Agreement,” which will include verification measures to “verify the absence of diversion of nuclear material,” the Arms Control Association reported.  

Stricker told Just the News that Washington could still assist Saudi Arabia with civilian nuclear uses if its rulers agree to the “gold standard” and rule out enrichment, thus still providing economic benefits without the proliferation risks.  

“The United States can assist Riyadh with other aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle, including reactors, without lighting off a new regional race for sensitive nuclear capabilities,” Stricker explained.  


Steven Richards

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/security/us-saudi-civilian-nuclear-deal-raises-proliferation-concerns-middle-east

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

AOC tops Democratic rivals in New Hampshire: Poll - Ben Whedon

 

by Ben Whedon

Her ascent in the primary field comes as democratic socialists increasingly gain prominence in the Democratic Party.

 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., currently stands at the top of the pack for the Democratic Party nomination in a key primary state, a recent survey has revealed.

Overall, AOC took 22% support in a recent Granite State poll. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg placed second with 21%, while Sen. Mark Kelly, R-Ariz., took 9% and Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., took 8%.

New Hampshire is one of the first states in the primary process and an early victory for the New York lawmaker could catapult her to success in the wider contest for the party nomination.

Her ascent in the primary field comes as democratic socialists increasingly gain prominence in the Democratic Party.


Ben Whedon is the Chief Political Correspondent for Just the News. Follow him on X.

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/aoc-tops-democratic-rivals-new-hampshire-poll

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Member of Vance's Secret Service detail subject of internal probe into alleged media leaks - Kevin Killough

 

by Kevin Killough

The administrative investigation could become a criminal inquiry, and the allegations involve compromising operational and information security.

 

A member of Vice President JD Vance's Secret Service detail is under investigation for allegedly leaking sensitive information, the agency confirmed Thursday. 

The administrative investigation could become a criminal inquiry, Anthony Guglielmi, the Secret Service's chief of communications, said, according to CBS News

"While we will not comment on the specifics of this matter, one principle is unequivocal: any conduct that potentially threatens the safety of a protectee will not be tolerated," Gugliemi said. 

The allegations, according to Gugliemi, involve compromising operational and information security. Gugliemi didn't provide specific allegations, nor did he name the person under suspicion. 

He also said the agent is the subject of an administrative investigation and a "potential criminal inquiry."

The agent has amid the investigtion been placed on administrative leave, according to CNN. 


Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/index%2Ephp/government/white-house/member-jd-vances-secret-service-detail-alleged-have-leaked-sensitive

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

House panel accuses Jack Smith of lying to Congress, urges DOJ to prosecute - Misty Severi

 

by Misty Severi

The referral accuses Smith of lying to Congress last year when he testified that the “toll records,” or telephone records, his team requested for members of Congress did not include the content of those messages.

 

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan referred former Special Counsel Jack Smith for criminal prosecution late Wednesday, alleging he lied to Congress about his team's  access to the contents of private text messages of over 40 lawmakers.

The referral accuses Smith of lying to Congress last year when he testified that the “toll records,” or telephone records, his team requested for members of Congress did not include the content of those messages. 

It also accuses Smith of lying when he was asked if he ever subpoenaed the text messages of members of Congress.

“This information calls into question the completeness and accuracy of statements that Mr. Smith made under oath to the Committee regarding his team’s access to the content of Members’ text messages,” Jordan wrote in the referral, which was obtained by The Hill.

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, an attorney and previously a law professor, accused Jordan of distorting the facts, stating that Smith compelled the National Archives to produce White House records, which included the text messages, but did not subpoena the phone records and, therefore, his testimony was accurate.

“With today’s referral of Jack Smith to DOJ, Chairman Jordan and the Republican Congress have embarrassed themselves again in this investigation," Raskin said. "Jack Smith was clear and consistent in his testimony, and he told the truth. When asked if his subpoena for Members’ toll records sought the content of either Member’s phone calls or messages, he truthfully replied that they did not. That statement was true when he said it, and it is true today."

Raskin claimed House Republicans never asked Smith about whether he had reviewed the text messages and accused Republicans of being upset that they did not think to ask different questions regarding the phone records of lawmakers.

“Wishing that you had asked different questions while you had the opportunity to examine a witness is not a proper basis for a referral of a witness for criminal prosecution," he said. 

"The Republicans fault Mr. Smith for not reading the minds of congressional investigators and for not volunteering information they didn't ask for," he added. "This is absurd. Mr. Smith may be telegenic but he is not telepathic."  

The referral was transmitted to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. 


Misty Severi
is a news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage. 

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/congress/jim-jordan-sends-jack-smith-criminal-referral-justice-department

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Mossad foils Iranian plot to infiltrate terror cell into Israel, target senior officials - Yonah Jeremy Bob

 

by Yonah Jeremy Bob

Israel's security agencies said the operation exposed a global Iranian recruitment network that used intermediaries to build terror cells targeting Israel.

 

Illustrative image of a Mossad agent standing in front of Mossad vs Iran concept flags on a wall with a crack.
Illustrative image of a Mossad agent standing in front of Mossad vs Iran concept flags on a wall with a crack.
(photo credit: Canva, DC Studio/Shutterstock, OnePixelStudio/Shutterstock)

 

The Mossad and Shin Bet on Thursday announced that they have busted a global Iranian terror network using a new proxy-by-proxy tactic.

According to a statement by the agencies, until recently, Iranian terror masterminds would try to directly recruit foreigners to perpetrate terror against Israel or Jews worldwide.

Using the new tactic, the Iranian Intelligence Ministry is trying to better cover its tracks by using a middleman to do the recruiting, to avoid a backlash directly on Tehran.

There was a hope that some of those foreigners recruited might be able to get into Israel more easily to carry out terror attacks and assassinations.

Four Iranian Intelligence Ministry officials, which the statement listed as involved in efforts in recent years, included: Adala Bahazada Uhsari, Vahid Maatzumi, Mahmoud-Hussein Duki, and Hamid Qasami. 


Yonah Jeremy Bob

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-903466

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hamas's New Leader, Same Old Jihad - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

Its election of Khalil al-Hayya demonstrates that the terrorist group remains sufficiently organized to manage internal political affairs while continuing to rule much of the Gaza Strip and dictate the lives of more than two million Palestinians.

 

  • The election is... evidence that efforts to remove Hamas from power have failed.

  • Instead of discussing disarmament, Hamas is discussing succession. Instead of preparing to relinquish power, it is choosing who will govern.

  • Terrorist organizations do not negotiate themselves out of existence.

  • Al-Hayya was Sinwar's closest associate. He served as Sinwar's deputy. He helped shape Hamas policy before and after October 7. After the massacre, al-Hayya praised October 7 as "a source of pride for our people... to be passed down from generation to generation."

  • The election sends a clear message throughout the Middle East: The Iran-led "Axis of Resistance" remains intact.

  • It also explains why al-Hayya's first public remarks as Hamas leader included thanks to Iran, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and the Iraqi Shiite militias. His loyalties are clear.

  • The continued protection afforded to Hamas leaders by terrorist-sponsoring "friends" of Trump, such as Qatar, Turkey and Pakistan, undermines international efforts to combat terrorism.

  • The people paying the highest price remain the Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip. Instead of rebuilding homes, reconstructing schools, restoring hospitals, and creating jobs, Hamas is holding leadership elections. Its priorities could not be clearer. Its leaders are busy securing their own political future while ordinary Palestinians continue living amid destruction.

  • The election of al-Hayya should finally end the fantasy that Hamas may evolve into a political movement willing to coexist peacefully with Israel. It should also end the illusion that negotiations alone will persuade Hamas to disarm.

  • Allowing Hamas to survive politically after October 7 would send a message to terrorist organizations and the Iranian regime: that committing mass murder carries no lasting consequences, and that even after one of this century's worst terrorist atrocities, its perpetrators can simply elect a new leader and carry on as before.

Hamas's election of Khalil al-Hayya demonstrates that the terrorist group remains sufficiently organized to manage internal political affairs while continuing to rule much of the Gaza Strip and dictate the lives of more than two million Palestinians. Pictured: Al-Hayya meets with Iran's then Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in Tehran on February 8, 2025. (Image source: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader)

Nearly three years after the October 7, 2023 massacre – the deadliest attack against Jews since the Holocaust – the Iran-backed terrorist group Hamas has calmly elected a new head of its "Political Bureau."

This simple fact should alarm everyone who believed that the terrorist organization had been defeated or dismantled.

Organizations that have been defeated do not hold orderly leadership elections. Organizations that have ceased to exist do not choose successors, debate candidates, and prepare for the future. Hamas does.

Its election of Khalil al-Hayya demonstrates that the terrorist group remains sufficiently organized to manage internal political affairs while continuing to rule much of the Gaza Strip and dictate the lives of more than two million Palestinians.

The election is therefore not merely an internal Hamas matter. It is evidence that efforts to remove Hamas from power have failed.

Instead of preparing to surrender its weapons or dissolve itself after the atrocities of October 7, Hamas is preparing for its future. Holding internal elections means that Hamas expects to remain a permanent player in Palestinian politics.

This completely contradicts any expectation that Hamas will eventually disappear from the Gaza Strip. More than seven months after US President Donald J. Trump's 20-point peace plan called for the demilitarization of the Gaza Strip, the terrorist group remains intact.

Instead of discussing disarmament, Hamas is discussing succession. Instead of preparing to relinquish power, it is choosing who will govern.

The election of al-Hayya also exposes the failure of current American strategy. For months, the Trump Administration and its "Board of Peace" have continued believing that negotiations could somehow persuade Hamas to disarm voluntarily. What has happened is the opposite.

Hamas never intended to disappear. It never intended to surrender its weapons. It never, as its internal election proves, intended to leave the Gaza Strip. Terrorist organizations do not negotiate themselves out of existence.

The assumption that al-Hayya is more pragmatic than his predecessor, the late Yahya Sinwar (the mastermind of the October 7 massacre) is dangerously misleading. Changing from military fatigues to a business suit does not transform a terrorist into a statesman.

Al-Hayya was Sinwar's closest associate. He served as Sinwar's deputy. He helped shape Hamas policy before and after October 7. After the massacre, al-Hayya praised October 7 as "a source of pride for our people... to be passed down from generation to generation."

Those are not the words of a moderate. Al-Hayya has never renounced Hamas's 1988 charter calling for Israel's elimination. He also never apologized for the murder, rape, torture and kidnapping of Israeli civilians – and he has consistently rejected demands that Hamas disarm.

His election signals not change but continuity.

Perhaps the biggest winner is Iran's regime. Al-Hayya has long maintained close relations with the Iranian regime and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). His victory over Khaled Mashaal consolidates the influence of Hamas's most pro-Iran faction.

Iran, despite repeated declarations that Hamas had been weakened, therefore retains one of its most valuable terrorist proxies. The election sends a clear message throughout the Middle East: The Iran-led "Axis of Resistance" remains intact.

It also explains why al-Hayya's first public remarks as Hamas leader included thanks to Iran, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and the Iraqi Shiite militias. His loyalties are clear.

Another troubling question: Why is al-Hayya still living safely in Qatar? Why do senior Hamas officials continue enjoying sanctuary in Qatar and Turkey? At least 43 American citizens were among those murdered on October 7, while another 12 were taken hostage to the Gaza Strip. Al-Hayya was one of the leaders of Hamas on October 7. Why has Washington not demanded his extradition? If Hamas leaders planned attacks that killed Americans, why are they still free?

The continued protection afforded to Hamas leaders by terrorist-supporting "friends" of Trump, such as Qatar, Turkey and Pakistan, undermines international efforts to combat terrorism.

The people paying the highest price remain the Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip. Instead of rebuilding homes, reconstructing schools, restoring hospitals, and creating jobs, Hamas is holding leadership elections. Its priorities could not be clearer. Its leaders are busy securing their own political future while ordinary Palestinians continue living amid destruction.

Hamas repeatedly insists that Palestinian suffering is a necessary sacrifice. Its leaders celebrate martyrdom while living comfortably abroad. This is precisely the mentality that Sinwar embraced. Al-Hayya has recently echoed the same rhetoric:

"We tell the occupiers that we are the owners of a cause. Neither the killing of our children nor the martyrdom of our leaders will frighten us or instill fear in our hearts."

The election of al-Hayya should finally end the fantasy that Hamas may evolve into a political movement willing to coexist peacefully with Israel. It should also end the illusion that negotiations alone will persuade Hamas to disarm.

Instead, the election confirms that Hamas remains committed to the same ideology, alliance with Iran, and strategy of perpetual jihad (holy war) that produced the October 7 massacre. A terrorist organization that can calmly elect a new leader nearly three years after committing one of the worst atrocities in modern history is not collapsing. It is adapting.

That is why Hamas has no place in Gaza's future – not as a government, not as a political party, and certainly not as an armed movement.

Allowing Hamas to survive politically after October 7 would send a message to terrorist organizations and the Iranian regime: that committing mass murder carries no lasting consequences, and that even after one of this century's worst terrorist atrocities, its perpetrators can simply elect a new leader and carry on as before.

 

Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22730/hamas-new-leader-same-jihad

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Netanyahu’s insistence offers a clear hint of what lies ahead - Amit Segal

 

by Amit Segal

For now, events in the Gulf are being treated as “foreign news,” with Israelis chiefly concerned about the impact on flights, but that appears likely to change soon.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a vote at the plenum hall of the Knesset in Jerusalem on July 16, 2026. Credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a vote at the plenum hall of the Knesset in Jerusalem on July 16, 2026. Credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

 

“Call us when you’re serious,” U.S. Secretary of State James Baker told the late Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir in the early 1990s.

Under the current Republican administration, with the current Likud prime minister, Washington is still answering the phone. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump are speaking, although no longer every day.

Something has been amiss in relations between the White House and the Prime Minister’s Office since the war with Iran became more complicated. The president’s inner circle is smaller and more closed than in previous administrations, and gaining access to it has become increasingly difficult. The Americans are making it clear to the Israelis that they are running the war and that everything is fine, thank you very much. But it is evident to everyone that Israel is moving into the back seat.

As a seasoned politician, Netanyahu presumably knows how to recognize deliberate distancing. One example came when Vice President JD Vance said, “Israel’s standing in America is not good, and I don’t think anyone can dispute that.” Last week, Vance had already made clear that he occupied the “sensible center,” between those who see Israel as a problem and those who see it as an asset. That is interesting, but the president’s silence is even more so.

And then there is Saudi Arabia. This week, Trump granted the kingdom the civilian nuclear program it had long sought, contrary to Israel’s position and without the broader package deal Israel had wanted. Former President Joe Biden held up a similar move in an effort to link that incentive to the Abraham Accords. His successor went ahead without tying the two together. Lindsey Graham must surely be turning in his grave.

This is already the second time that has happened. After all, lifting the sanctions on Syria also eliminated the possibility of securing a peace agreement with Israel. And all this is unfolding while the departure of Wing of Zion, Israel’s official aircraft for the prime minister and president, is delayed again and again.

The situation also has implications for the election.

I once heard a campaign strategist say that as far as Israelis are concerned, everything happening in the Middle East is foreign news until missiles begin landing here.

Strangely enough, that is what is happening now: The United States is attacking Iran, Jordan is being bombarded along with every Gulf state, yet Israel’s public agenda is focused on July and August vacations and the Haredim. The main way the fighting is being felt is in the question of whether aircraft refueling at Ben-Gurion International Airport will lead to flight cancellations.

A security-focused public agenda is known to benefit Likud, while a civilian agenda hurts it. But the indifferent shrugging probably stems from the understanding that Israel is currently in a relatively passive position.

All that, one may assume, is about to change. Netanyahu did not insist for nothing on retaining the option of canceling the Likud primaries in the event of security incidents. Anyone paying attention understands that his insistence was no accident, and that the provision will not remain theoretical.

This article was originally published by Israel Hayom.


Amit Segal is an Israeli journalist, radio and television personality. He serves as the political commentator of Israel’s Channel 12 news (N12 News company) and anchors Israel’s highly watched “Meet the Press” show on Channel 12.

Source: https://www.jns.org/opinion/amit-segal/netanyahus-insistence-offers-a-clear-hint-of-what-lies-ahead

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Federal court upholds Tennessee's redraw of House maps in win for GOP - Ben Whedon

 

by Ben Whedon

Opponents of the redraw had argued that the maps violated the 14th Amendment and constituted illegal racial gerrymandering and sought an injunction to block the maps from taking effect.

 

A three-judge panel of the Middle District of Tennessee on Thursday upheld the state's redraw of its House maps to eliminate the sole Democratic-leaning seat around Memphis.

Opponents of the redraw had argued that the maps violated the 14th Amendment and constituted illegal racial gerrymandering and sought an injunction to block the maps from taking effect.

The judges denied the motion, saying the plaintiffs were unlikely to succeed on the merits.

Tennessee's redraw was one of several that occurred across the South in the wake of a landmark ruling at the Supreme Court that narrowed the scope of the Voting Rights Act and eliminated race-based congressional districts.


Ben Whedon
is the Chief Political Correspondent for Just the News. Follow him on X.

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/federal-court-upholds-tennessees-redraw-house-maps-win-gop

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter