Saturday, April 25, 2026

Trump's Iran Doctrine: A Strategy for the History Books - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

The narratives often suggest that the US campaign has failed and that Tehran remains firmly in control. In reality, however, US President Donald J. Trump has pursued a strategy that departs radically from decades of precedent — one that has left the Iranian regime cornered in ways not previously seen.

 

  • Rather than adhering to the usual norms of the international system, Trump redefined them — combining military force, economic coercion, serious deadlines and diplomatic "off-ramps" in rapid succession — denying Iran the ability to settle into its familiar pattern of adaptation and delay.

  • Trump met Iran's moves with countermoves that were even stronger, instead of with restraint.

  • "Trump Time" has transformed warfare. In just two sets of days, in June 2025 then again in February 2026, Iran's core military infrastructure was almost totally obliterated, allowing the focus to shift to sustained economic pressure. Trump's "little excursion" has been one of the fastest, most effective, least costly military operations in modern history.

  • "Trump Time" also brought negotiation techniques that departed from past practice. Historically, diplomatic engagements with Iran have been lengthy, baroque, often stretching over years to provide Iran with opportunities for delay and recalibration. Trump instituted shorter timelines sown with threats of escalation, evidently to prevent Tehran from using its favorite stalling tactic: forever-talks.

  • A regime accustomed to orchestrating prolonged cycles of pressure and relief, now finds itself encountering a series of uncowardly, high-impact shocks.

  • Through his unconventional statecraft, and his breaking from a long run of US failures, Trump – in a blend of military assertiveness, economic pressure and strategic unpredictability – decided to win.

US President Donald Trump's dual approach of rapid degradation of Iranian military capabilities combined with sustained economic pressure has reduced Iran's ability to project power abroad and limited its options internally by forcing it to react rather than dictate terms. Pictured: Trump sits between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at a cabinet meeting in the White House in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2026. (Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)

If you listen to the mainstream media, you might come away with the impression that Iran is somehow prevailing — resilient, defiant, and still shaping events across the Middle East. The narratives often suggest that the US campaign has failed and that Tehran remains firmly in control. In reality, however, US President Donald J. Trump has pursued a strategy that departs radically from decades of precedent — one that has left the Iranian regime cornered in ways not previously seen.

Trump is attempting something that should have been done long ago. Seven U.S. presidents — both Democratic and Republican — along with the European Union and much of the international community, avoided taking such a decisive course. Whether out of caution, strategic calculation, fear of escalation, or simply cowardice, prior leaders stopped short of confronting the leadership of Iran. Then came a leader finally unwilling to appease, bribe or concede. Trump, with his businessman's grounding in reality, broke from established, failed patterns, and he forced confrontation on different terms.

Since Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution, its regime has mastered the art of "strategic patience." It learned how to navigate and exploit the rules of the international system and the United Nations. It adapted to the politics of the West, where leadership changes frequently, while its own system — anchored by a long-term Supreme Leader — remains stable and constant.

When Democrats occupied the White House, Tehran pursued negotiations. During the presidency of Barack H. Obama, with his JCPOA "nuclear deal," Iran extracted unprecedented concessions and sanctions relief, receiving $1.7 billion in cash from the US, in addition to billions more allegedly owed it, without having to give up anything for it – not even its nuclear program, which, due to the JCPOA's "sunset clauses," was due to become fully unrestricted in October 2025. That money helped accelerate Iran's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs, as well as being used to fund Tehran's proxy terrorist groups, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

Under earlier Republican administrations, Iran's regime may have braced for sanctions but assumed, correctly, that impediments would stop short of military action.

The Iranian regime built a formidable arsenal and a dependable network of proxy terrorist organizations across the Middle East. Behind them, for optimal safety and plausible deniability, Iran's regime not only "exported the revolution" to Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip; it also attacked Argentina, United States assets and officials (such as here, here and here), and was ordered by US courts to pay $6 billion for participating in the September 11, 2001 attacks. Iran advanced its military capabilities, edged closer to acquiring nuclear weapons, and bought time.

Trump's strategy not only applied pressure, but also used unpredictability, escalating beyond the reassuring playbook when required. Rather than adhering to the usual norms of the international system, Trump redefined them — combining military force, economic coercion, serious deadlines and diplomatic "off-ramps" in rapid succession — denying Iran the ability to settle into its familiar pattern of adaptation and delay.

Trump met Iran's moves with countermoves that were even stronger, instead of with restraint. Iran, for instance, has historically relied on the threat of disruption in the Strait of Hormuz as leverage over global energy markets. Trump, in a reversal of roles, turned that pressure back onto Iran's mullahs, economically and strategically, by blockading them.

In the economic realm, Iran remains dependent on oil, which makes up nearly 80% of its exports, making it very vulnerable to sustained maritime shipping disruptions. When revenues decline sharply, government budgets tighten, public sector salaries come under strain, and internal dissatisfaction could grow. Unlike larger and more diversified economies, Iran has only a limited capacity to absorb a prolonged blockade without consequences for the stability of its regime.

Trump's dual approach of rapid degradation of Iranian military capabilities combined with sustained economic pressure has reduced Iran's ability to project power abroad and limited its options internally by forcing it to react rather than dictate terms.

The success of Trump's approach can also be attributed to speed. Wars that the US fought in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan dragged on for years and even decades, consuming vast resources and countless lives. Even ongoing conflicts such as Russia's war on Ukraine have stretched over years with no conclusion. In Iran – and Venezuela – by contrast, "Trump Time" has transformed warfare. In just two sets of days, in June 2025 then again in February 2026, Iran's core military infrastructure was almost totally obliterated, allowing the focus to shift to sustained economic pressure. Trump's "little excursion" has been one of the fastest, most effective, least costly military operations in modern history.

"Trump Time" also brought negotiation techniques that departed from past practice. Historically, diplomatic engagements with Iran have been lengthy, baroque, often stretching over years to provide Iran with opportunities for delay and recalibration. Trump instituted shorter timelines sown with threats of escalation, evidently to prevent Tehran from using its favorite stalling tactic: forever-talks.

Trump's strategy presents an ever-broader transformation in facing adversaries. Rather than operating as a passive actor within the frameworks of the so-called "established" global rules, such as the corrupt, feckless United Nations, he rewrote the rules. He rejected the role of a compliant participant and instead has shaped his actions to suit the goals he wishes to achieve.

If critics question whether this strategy is sustainable, its effectiveness lies precisely in its departure from predictability. By refusing to operate within the established "rules," it disrupts the very framework that Iran has counted on and been comfortable with for decades. A regime accustomed to orchestrating prolonged cycles of pressure and relief, now finds itself encountering a series of uncowardly, high-impact shocks.

Other US presidents said that Iran must never be allowed to have nuclear weapons, but none of them would ever do anything about it. They failed to confront Iran. The European Union failed. Aside from Israel, all the rest of the world failed. After nearly half a century, only Trump chose to take a stand against the "top state sponsor of terrorism for 39th year in a row."

Through his unconventional statecraft, and his breaking from a long run of US failures, Trump – in a blend of military assertiveness, economic pressure and strategic unpredictability – decided to win.


Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22470/trump-iran-doctrine

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump cancels envoys’ trip to Islamabad after Iranian delegation leaves - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

The Islamic Republic’s president calls on citizens to reduce the use of electricity in the wake of the war’s devastation.

 

Guided-missile destroyer USS Rafael Peralta (DDG 115) enforces the U.S. blockade against an Iranian-flagged oil tanker attempting to sail to a port in Iran, on April 24, 2026. Credit: U.S. Central Command.
Guided-missile destroyer USS Rafael Peralta (foreground) enforces the U.S. blockade on Iranian ports against an Iranian-flagged oil tanker attempting to sail to a port in the Islamic Republic, on April 24, 2026. Credit: U.S. Central Command.

 

U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday said he canceled the trip of the American delegation to Islamabad for talks on an agreement with Tehran as the Iranian representatives had already left Pakistan.

Explaining his decision on Truth Social, Trump wrote, “Too much time wasted on traveling, too much work! Besides which, there is tremendous infighting and confusion within their ‘leadership.’

“Nobody knows who is in charge, including them. Also, we have all the cards, they have none! If they want to talk, all they have to do is call!!!” the president added.

U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner were expected to touch down in Islamabad to continue the indirect negotiations with Tehran through Pakistani mediators, but the Iranian delegation has reportedly left the country.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi arrived in Pakistan on Friday and met with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Pakistan’s Chief of the Army Staff Asim Munir, according to the Associated Press.

Araghchi said on his Telegram account that he is currently on a trip to Islamabad, Muscat and Moscow “to coordinate closely with [Iran’s] partners on bilateral issues and consultations on regional developments.”

He emphasized “Pakistan’s special position in Iran’s foreign policy and relations and Iran’s will to further develop relations between the two countries.”

He did not disclose Tehran’s demands but said that his country’s “principled positions” were conveyed to Islamabad.

Trump spoke with Axios on Saturday, saying that “I see no point of sending [Witkoff and Kushner] on an 18-hour flight in the current situation. ... We are not gonna travel just to sit there.”

Asked whether the breakdown in talks means the war was to resume, the president said, “No. It doesn’t mean that. We haven’t thought about it yet. We have all the cards. We are not going to go there to sit around talking about nothing.”

On Thursday, Iranian officials presented a unified front after reports surfaced that Tehran’s leadership was fractured.

“In Iran there are no ‘hardliners’ or ‘moderates,’ President Masoud Pezeshkian tweeted.

“We are all Iranians and revolutionaries. With ironclad unity of nation and state and obedience to the Supreme Leader, we will make the aggressor regret. One God, one nation, one leader, one path; victory for Iran, dearer than life,” he wrote.

U.S. beefing up forces in the Middle East

U.S. Central Command said on Friday it had prevented 34 vessels from passing through the Strait of Hormuz as part of a blockade on Iranian ports amid a stalemate in U.S.-Iranian negotiations.

In a separate tweet, CENTCOM relayed that the destroyer USS Rafael Peralta had redirected an Iranian-flagged ship from its route toward a port in Iran.  

Iran’s judiciary chief Gholam-Hossein Mohseni Ejei dismissed on Saturday the United States’ ability to impose an effective blockade.

“Americans should know that they ... lack the capability to impose a naval blockade on Iran; Isfahan and Tabas will be repeated once again in the waters of the Persian Gulf,” he tweeted, referencing two Iranian cities in which U.S. forces were allegedly defeated by the Islamic Republic.

However, addressing the Iranian people on Saturday through Tehran’s state-run broadcaster IRIB, Pezeshkian urged citizens to cut back on electricity consumption.

“Instead of turning on 10 lights at home, turn on two lights. What is wrong with that?” AP quoted him as saying.

He cited the destruction of infrastructure by the U.S. and Israeli militaries, coupled with the ongoing naval blockade, as the reason to downsize electricity usage.

The USS George H.W. Bush has in the meantime arrived in the Middle East, joining two other aircraft carriers for “Operation Epic Fury,” U.S. Central Command said on April 23.

“For the first time in decades, three aircraft carriers are operating in the Middle East at the same time,” CENTCOM stated. “Accompanied by their carrier air wings, the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72), USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) and USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) include over 200 aircraft and 15,000 Sailors and Marines.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday played down the significance of an Iranian seizure of two ships in the Strait of Hormuz.

“These were not U.S. ships. These were not Israeli ships. These were two international vessels,” Leavitt replied when asked by Fox News’ Martha McCallum whether Trump considered this a violation of the truce.

“And for the American media, who are sort of blowing this out of proportion to discredit the president’s facts that he has completely obliterated Iran’s conventional navy, these two ships were taken by speedy gunboats. Iran has gone from having the most lethal navy in the Middle East to now acting like a bunch of pirates. They don’t have control over the strait,” she said.

 

JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/u-s-news/us-blockade-of-iran-continues-as-islamabad-talks-show-no-breakthrough

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why the US Must Deliver Full US Nuclear Propulsion and Fuel Cycle Technology to South Korea Now - Fred Fleitz

 

by Fred Fleitz

Washington’s hesitation to empower Seoul’s nuclear capabilities isn’t prudence—it’s strategic self-sabotage as adversaries surge ahead.

 

In December 2025, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un toured a shipyard and inspected the completed hull of a supposed 8,700-ton nuclear-powered “strategic guided-missile submarine.” North Korea’s state-controlled media hailed this sub as a breakthrough in Pyongyang’s naval nuclear ambitions.

Just weeks earlier, President Trump announced that the United States would share closely held nuclear propulsion technology with Seoul, clearing the way for South Korea to build its own nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs).

Trump’s announcement was a long-overdue recognition of a strategic reality: in an era of nuclear-armed adversaries on the Korean Peninsula and a rapidly modernizing Chinese navy, South Korea cannot deter aggression with diesel-electric submarines alone.

For decades, Seoul has operated some of the world’s most sophisticated conventional submarines. South Korea’s KSS-III-class subs are quiet, heavily armed with vertical-launch cruise and ballistic missiles, and equipped with advanced air-independent propulsion. They represent a remarkable indigenous achievement.

However, diesel-electric submarines have significant limitations. Range and time at sea are limited by their diesel fuel. These subs must periodically surface to recharge their batteries, limiting their time submerged to days or weeks at best. In the shallow, confined waters around the Korean Peninsula—and in any broader Indo-Pacific contingency—the KSS-III subs are vulnerable to detection and cannot sustain the persistent, high-speed patrols required for naval deterrence today.

South Korean nuclear-powered submarines can change that equation. An SSN can remain submerged for months, travel at sustained high speeds, and operate across vast distances without fuel constraints. For South Korea, this capability is a necessity. North Korea’s growing fleet of ballistic-missile submarines already threatens to complicate Seoul’s defense planning. Beijing’s expanding submarine force, designed to project power far beyond the first island chain, poses an even larger challenge.

The good news is that South Korea is ready. Its “Big Three” shipbuilders—HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, Samsung Heavy Industries, and Hanwha Ocean—are global leaders in the shipbuilding industry. They already produce world-class conventional submarines and have invested heavily in US shipyards, including the Philadelphia facility acquired by Hanwha. Transferring US naval nuclear propulsion technology would help bring South Korea’s advanced shipbuilding industry to the next level.

However, building and sustaining a nuclear submarine fleet requires far more than hulls and reactors. South Korea must gain access to the full nuclear fuel cycle: the ability to enrich uranium to produce nuclear fuel and to reprocess spent fuel rods into advanced nuclear fuel. Without this, both its submarine program and civilian nuclear industry would remain dependent on foreign suppliers.

Access to the full nuclear fuel cycle would also be a boon to South Korea’s broader civilian nuclear ambitions. South Korea relies on nuclear power for about 30 percent of its electricity. It is also a leading producer of advanced nuclear reactors. Granting South Korea access to enrichment and reprocessing would boost its efforts in next-generation nuclear power technology, such as the production of high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) and advanced nuclear fuel needed for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and new reactor designs.

Moreover, providing South Korea with access to the full nuclear fuel cycle is not only a strategic imperative but also a matter of basic fairness and logic.

South Korea operates one of the world’s most advanced civilian nuclear industries. Yet it cannot enrich uranium to make nuclear fuel rods or reprocess spent fuel. This makes little sense when other non-nuclear weapon states—including Japan, the Netherlands, Germany, Brazil, and Argentina—already possess these capabilities under IAEA safeguards. Meanwhile, North Korea has secretly developed both enrichment and reprocessing technologies in flagrant violation of international law.

It is both illogical and counterproductive to withhold full nuclear fuel cycle rights from a model NPT member and steadfast US ally like South Korea while granting or tolerating them for so many other nations.

Access to the full nuclear fuel cycle also would allow Seoul to sharply reduce its growing spent fuel stockpiles, extract vastly more energy from existing uranium resources, cut waste volumes by up to 90 percent through closed-fuel-cycle technologies like pyroprocessing, and establish itself as a premier exporter of complete nuclear solutions—including SMRs—to allies around the world. Recent US–South Korea agreements already support this peaceful pathway, but likely will require revisions to the US–South Korea “123 agreement” on sharing peaceful nuclear technology.

Transferring US naval nuclear propulsion technology would be an improvement on Australia’s AUKUS agreement, which focuses on building new submarines from scratch. By contrast, under the US–South Korea submarine agreement, Seoul can quickly and cost-effectively build a nuclear-powered variant of its proven KSS-III design. Joint production or technology-sharing arrangements also would strengthen America’s own submarine industry, which is years behind in production and maintenance.

Naturally, critics have raised nonproliferation concerns. These concerns are unwarranted. South Korea is a model member of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). North Korea, by contrast, has blatantly violated its nuclear treaty obligations, has constructed an estimated 50 nuclear weapons, and is now reportedly building nuclear-powered submarines.

Denying South Korea the nuclear technology it needs to defend itself while North Korea races ahead is not responsible nonproliferation; it is strategic malpractice. The Trump administration’s October 2025 decision correctly recognized this fact by supporting South Korea’s pursuit of civil uranium enrichment and spent fuel reprocessing for peaceful uses as well as the production of nuclear submarines.

South Korea’s efforts to acquire enriched uranium fuel from the US, to receive technical assistance to enrich uranium domestically, and to obtain the right to reprocess spent fuel rods will also greatly benefit America’s nuclear power industry.

An AUKUS-style framework with updates to the US–South Korea 123 agreement is the best way forward to provide Seoul with critical nuclear technology while ensuring safety, security, and non-proliferation standards.

South Korea has the industrial capability, the strategic need, and the alliance commitment to make this new nuclear technology cooperation work. The US has taken the first step. The only remaining question is speed. The Trump administration, in consultation with Congress, should move ASAP to provide South Korea with the full suite of naval nuclear technology, reactor design support, fuel-cycle cooperation, and pathways for advanced reactors, including SMRs.

Security threats from China and North Korea are growing in the waters of the Asia-Pacific. A comprehensive US–South Korea nuclear partnership is one of the best ways both nations can promote peace, security, and prosperity in this region.

* * *


Fred Fleitz previously served as Chief of Staff of the Trump National Security Council. He is vice chair of the America First Policy Institute and an advisory board member of Curio, a Washington, DC-based startup specializing in advanced nuclear power technologies. He is the author of North Korea, Nuclear Brinkmanship, and the Oval Office, which was just released by Texas A&M Press.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/04/24/why-the-us-must-deliver-full-us-nuclear-propulsion-and-fuel-cycle-technology-to-south-korea-now/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Abbey Gate defendant confessed to recon, denied foreknowledge, raised concerns about Pakistani ISI - Jerry Dunleavy

 

by Jerry Dunleavy

It remains to be seen whether the Virginia trial will provide some justice for the victims of the Abbey Gate attack nearly five years ago.

 

The recorded words of the alleged co-conspirator in the deadly Abbey Gate bombing were played for hours during his federal trial this week in northern Virginia, with the jury hearing the ISIS-K terrorist confess to conducting reconnaissance ahead of the Kabul airport attack, denying foreknowledge of it occurring and raising concerns about his detention by the Pakistanis.

The defendant, Mohammad Sharifullah, also known as “Jafar," has been charged with a single count of providing and conspiring to provide material support and resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization – ISIS-K – which resulted in death. He has pleaded not guilty to the charge in the Monday through Thursday trial that also included a lengthy list of government witnesses testifying.  

The FBI has said that Sharifullah confessed to being involved in “route reconnaissance” in the lead-up to the Aug. 26, 2021, Abbey Gate attack, in which a suicide bomber detonated an explosive vest, killed 11 Marines, one Army soldier, one Navy corpsman, and an estimated 170 Afghan civilians, while wounding dozens of other U.S. troops and scores of Afghans in the crowd.

The FBI has also said Sharifullah also confessed to a role in facilitating a June 2016 suicide bombing attack that killed more than 10 guards tasked with protecting the Canadian embassy. The FBI has further said Sharifullah also claimed to have trained ISIS-K gunmen for a deadly attack on a concert hall in Moscow in 2024.

The Thursday testimony of FBI Special Agent Austin Price was especially critical, as he was one of the FBI agents who interviewed Sharifullah while he was in Pakistani custody and during the flight back to the United States. 

Price recounted Sharifullah’s confessions to involvement in prior ISIS-K attacks – including a recon role ahead of the Abbey Gate attack. He declined to say whether Sharifullah’s capture and detention in Pakistan had been carried out by that country’s controversial Inter-Services Intelligence, known as the ISI.

Price was questioned Thursday by Assistant U.S. Attorney John Gibbs and Federal public defender Lauren Rosen.

Sharifullah has said the Pakistanis tried to force him into a false confession of being a mastermind of the attack and said last year that his pregnant wife and kids had also been detained by the Pakistanis.

The trial began Monday with jury selection and opening arguments in which the Justice Department said Sharifullah confessed to his role while the defense team insisted the DOJ had the wrong guy – and that the Taliban may have been involved.

The Justice Department rested its case Thursday, which was followed by the defense lawyers pushing the judge to acquit their client before the jury could consider a verdict.

Many of Sharifullah’s confessions — made to FBI investigators while in Pakistan, while on an airplane on the way to the U.S., and at an FBI office in northern Virginia – were played in court Thursday morning and early afternoon. The quotations in this article are drawn from transcriptions displayed on the courthouse screens or translations provided in court testimony.

Sharifullah's capture by Pakistani intelligence, with alleged help from U.S. spy agencies, was announced by President Donald Trump at a joint session of Congress in March. Trump has thanked Pakistan for “helping arrest this monster.” Trump also called Sharifullah “the top terrorist responsible for that atrocity” at the Kabal airport in which 13 U.S. service members died.

An ISIS-K suicide bomber named Abdul Rahman al-Logari – who had been freed by the Taliban from a prison at Bagram Air Base in mid-August 2021 – mere weeks after the U.S. abandoned the base – has been identified as having carried out the suicide attack at Abbey Gate.

The Pentagon under President Joe Biden had argued that the attack was not preventable – going so far as to say it still would have occurred even if the bomber had remained behind bars rather than being freed by the Taliban – despite a host of evidence indicating that the attack did not have to happen the way it did.

The FBI has said Sharifullah was read his "Miranda rights" by the FBI in March and that he proceeded to tell them he was recruited into ISIS-K around 2016. The FBI said Sharifullah was imprisoned in Afghanistan from approximately 2019 until two weeks before the Kabul airport attack.

The bureau has said Sharifullah was contacted by another ISIS-K member upon being freed from prison and that the member connected him with the plot to attack U.S. forces at the airport. The bureau said ISIS-K members provided Sharifullah with a motorcycle, funds for a cell phone and instructions on using social media to communicate with them in the lead-up to the attack.

Sharifullah’s arrest by the Pakistanis

Sharifullah recounted last year that he had been arrested by Pakistani authorities days before the FBI showed up in Pakistan. He said that when the Pakistanis came to arrest him at his home in Balochistan, he sent a warning message to ISIS-K leaders, deleted his Telegram, and did a factory reset of his phone.

The Pakistanis eventually handed over Sharifullah’s seized phones to the FBI.

Price said, in early March last year, the FBI conducted two interviews of Sharifullah in Pakistan, two FBI interviews on the plane ride to the U.S., and one interview with the bureau in northern Virginia. The FBI repeatedly Mirandized the terrorist and stressed that it did not matter what the Pakistanis had told him, but rather that all the U.S. cared about was the truth.

Price also told the defense lawyer during questioning that, during their first interview in Pakistan, his bureau partner told Sharifullah that the FBI was working at the behest of the “detaining service” – presumably the Pakistani ISI. Price told the defense attorney that, during the second interview, his partner told Sharifullah that that had been incorrect.

The FBI stayed at a hotel near a Pakistani air base and Sharifullah appears to have been held at another nearby Pakistani military base.

The FBI agent told the defense lawyer that he did not review any statements Sharifullah gave to the Pakistanis, and that he does not know what the Pakistanis told the ISIS-K member.

While in Pakistan, Sharifullah asked the FBI for a safe place for his family. The FBI agent said Shairrifullah passed a note to the FBI agents about two hours into his first interview in Pakistan. 

The note said that “these guys want to make me confess” that when he was freed by the Taliban from Pul-e-Charkhi prison in Kabul he linked up with ISIS-K leaders and “designed the attack on the Kabul airport.” 

Sharifullah’s note added that “this is not true” and asked the FBI to “please help.”

He claimed the Pakistani ISI made him make a videotape and told him to say that he and Logari had drafted a suicide bombing plan in jail. But Sharifullah said Logari had previously been arrested for attempting a suicide bombing plot in India, and so he didn’t need him to come up with a suicide bombing idea.

“I’m glad I’m away from those guys … They’re not humans,” Sharifullah told the FBI of the Pakistanis on the plane ride to the U.S.

The FBI agent said Sharifullah seemed “very smart” and “very quick” during the interviews, and that “he seemed very street smart.”

“He was always trying to stay one step ahead of me regarding questions on HKIA,” Price said.

The FBI agent would not answer the defense team’s questions about whether the Pakistani ISI was involved in arresting Sharifullah. The judge told the jury that the agent could refuse to disclose classified information, but that that could give rise to an “inference” that the answer would be favorable to the defendant.

When asked by the defense lawyer if Sharifullah’s wife is still in ISI custody, Price said that the answer was both classified and that he didn’t know.

When asked whether he learned in October that Sharifullah’s wife is in ISI custody, the agent again said the answer was classified, and the judge again repeated that the jury could infer that the answer might help the defendant.

The agent told the defense lawyer that the FBI had sent requests to Pakistan in April 2025, July 2025 and October 2025, asking the Pakistani government to provide a witness to testify about Sharifullah’s confinement and treatment and that the Pakistanis had not done so.

Price said that “I have no idea” if Sharifullah’s family is still detained by the Pakistanis.

The agent also told the defense team that, while in Pakistan, Sharifullah had told the FBI agents to “help me for Allah’s sake” but that this request was never interpreted for Price, so he didn’t know Sharifullah had said that. Sharifullah had also told the FBI agents in Pakistan that he had been “hit,” but again, that was not translated for Price at the time and thus he had not been aware of it.

Sharifullah and the killing of thirteen Americans at Abbey Gate

Sharifullah admitted to a limited role in the lead up to ISIS-K’s deadly Abbey Gate attack.

“They just told me to observe and make sure there were no Taliban checkpoints,” Sharifullah said of his taking from ISIS-K.

The FBI agent asked Sharifullah to say which one, between the Americans or the Taliban, that ISIS-K would rather attack.

“Allah knows,” Sharifullah said, though likely knowing that ISIS-K would target the U.S. Marines at Abbey Gate rather than the Taliban.

Sharifullah said that “the decision is not in my hand” but rather in the hands of ISIS-K leadership, and that “both of them [the U.S. and the Talibs] to my leadership are the same.”

Sharifullah claimed his leadership did not tell him where the exact target at the Kabul airport was, who the exact target was, or how the attack would be conducted, whether a suicide vest, mines, or another method.

He claimed he was unaware of whom the target might be, suggesting he thought it might be the Taliban or the Afghan Zero Units.

“The gathering of the Taliban were there” and so he supposedly thought the Taliban might be a target, and not the Americans – which was not the case. He also claimed he didn’t think about the possibility that Americans would be killed in an ISIS-K attack.

Sharifullah was shown an aerial photo of HKIA and the surrounding neighborhood, and he described what he allegedly did for ISIS-K near the Kabul airport in the lead-up to the attack.

Sharifullah said he was on a motorcycle and drove on a road somewhat parallel to the airport until he came to a traffic circle. If he had turned left and headed north, he would have run into the Taliban and the crowds surrounding the Kabul airfield, but he says he turned right and headed south into the city instead.

He said his job was to look for checkpoints up to that traffic circle and then leave. He said that once he reached the traffic circle he talked on his phone to his boss, who told him to head away from the airport. Sharifullah said he wasn’t aware of another ISIS-K member carrying on the recon up to the gate after him.

Sharifullah acknowledged that he gave up info on fellow ISIS-K members to the Afghan National Directorate of Security while in prison at Pul-e-Charkhi near Kabul years before, and so ISIS-K leadership in 2021 was not happy with him and did not trust him much.

He said that even if ISIS-K leadership had trusted him, they would not have given him a big important job because he had just gotten out of prison. However, ISIS-K selected Logari, who had just been freed from Bagram, as the suicide bomber who struck Abbey Gate.

Sharifullah swore to Allah that he was only tasked to surveil a road near the airport, but that he didn’t know there would be an attack.

He also said that when doing recon and making sure a path is clear, an attacker often follows right behind you. He said that when making sure that there was no Taliban checkpoint, an attack should have occurred twenty minutes or so later, and so he was surprised when the bombing didn’t happen until hours later.

He suspected maybe ISIS-K had been testing him, or that ISIS-K did another follow-up recon mission after he had done his and prior to the attack.

Sharifullah also first tried to claim that he had family members killed by Marines after the Abbey Gate attack, but then claimed that it was unspecified neighbors of his who had been killed.

Sharifullah said the “emirs in Kabul” – the ISIS-K leaders in the Afghan capital – make decisions about what to strike and claimed he didn’t know who carried out the attack.

He pointed to “Engineer Shahab” and “Nawab” – ISIS-K top leader Sanaullah Ghafari and Kabul area ISIS-K commander Qari Nawab – as the men who likely made the Abbey Gate decision, saying those two “must have been aware.”

Sharifullah said in the recordings that he had met with Ghafari, also known as Shahab al-Muhajir, in the lead up to a terrorist attack back in 2016.

The State Department’s Rewards for Justice lists a reward of $10 million for information on Ghafari.

“In June 2020, ISIS core leadership appointed al-Muhajir, also known as Sanaullah Ghafari, to be the leader of ISIS-K, a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization,” the rewards page says. “An ISIS communiqué announcing his appointment described al-Muhajir as an experienced military leader and one of ISIS-K’s ‘urban lions’ in Kabul who has been involved in guerrilla operations and the planning of suicide and complex attacks.”

The State Department adds that Ghafari “is responsible for approving all ISIS-K operations throughout Afghanistan and arranging funding to conduct operations.”

Sharifullah also said that in the past he had transported multiple suicide bombers, and that he could see the bombs under their clothes and the detonators in their hands. He also acknowledged being at Pul-e-Charkhi prison at the same time as Logari, but claimed Logari was in the first ring and that he was in the second.

The defense lawyer later asked Price whether it was true that there was “no evidence presented [during the trial] that Mr. Sharifullah was a mastermind” of the Abbey Gate attack, and the agent replied, “Correct.”

The possibility of Taliban involvement in the Abbey Gate attack

Gibbs, the DOJ attorney, asked Price what credible information the FBI agent had seen that the Taliban was behind the Abbey Gate attack.

Rosen immediately objected, and Judge Anthony Trenga sustained the objection, so the agent was not able to answer.

The UN Sanctions Monitoring Team said in 2020 that some countries noted that most ISIS-K attacks include “involvement, facilitation, or the provision of technical assistance” by the Haqqani Network, and that ISIS-K “lacked the capability to launch complex attacks in Kabul on its own” without Haqqani help. The UN team also said it had “viewed communication intercepts in the wake of attacks that were claimed by ISIS-K that were traceable to known members of the Haqqani Network.”

The UN team said that “some countries have reported tactical or commander-level collaboration between ISIL-K and the Haqqani Network.” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said that “we strongly reject this propaganda” and that “we have nothing in common (and don’t operate cells) with Daesh [ISIS-K].”

The UN monitoring team said in 2021 that one nation said that Ghafari was “previously a mid-level commander in the Haqqani Network” and that he continued to maintain cooperation with the Haqqanis. One UN member state said in June 2021 that ISIS-K leader Ghafari’s ongoing relationship with the Haqqanis provided ISIS-K with “key expertise and access to [attack] networks.” 

Gen. Austin Scott Miller, the commander of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan through July 2021, told Congress in 2024 that “I could never verify a Haqqani-ISIS nexus.” 

West Point’s Counterterrorism Center published an article in 2022 stating that Ghafari had joined “Taliban factions affiliated with the Haqqani network” and “had close links to the Haqqani network’s senior commanders.”

Canadian embassy attack and Moscow concert hall mass shooting

Sharifullah said he had helped transport the suicide bomber Irfan or Irfanullah to help him target the Canadian embassy guards in 2016.

“The final decision is made by our superiors," he said. "They give us the final target."

Sharifullah said that the bus was not armored, and “when we saw that it was a soft target. ... We said that it would be effective and said let’s do it.” His ISIS-K superiors then allegedly approved it.

Sharifullah said that when he joined ISIS-K, he pledged allegiance to ISIS’s alleged caliph Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, who has since been killed by U.S. special forces, and to ISIS-K leader Dr. Naqib or Dr. Naqibullah, who “brought me under his influence.”

Sharifullah said he met with Ghafari, Naqib, and others when he and other ISIS-K members were present at a strategy meeting on targeting the bus.

“Dr. Naqib” and others in ISIS-K “leadership” had approved the bus attack, he said. Naqib was an ISIS-K deputy leader who was later eventually killed in a U.S. air strike in 2019.

Sharifullah also told FBI agents in northern Virginia that he was tasked to help with the Moscow attack in 2024. He said this included recruiting a friend to record a video firing an AK-47 on a mountain.

He said ISIS-K member Abu Manzar lived in Moscow and prepared four gunmen for the attack, and despite Sharifullah saying he helped with the attack planning, he also said he didn’t know the specifics of the attack beforehand.

DOJ called a long string of witnesses to testify against Sharifullah

The DOJ called two former Nepalese guards for the Canadian embassy to the stand, where they recounted the suicide attack against their bus in 2016.

Georgetown University professor and terrorism expert Bruce Hoffman also testified for the government and discussed the history of ISIS-K.

British Warrant Officer Benjamin Wright also testified this week, where he testified about ferrying wire twists from the Afghan National Directorate of Security to a U.S. lab at Bagram.

Luke Biggs, a longtime veteran of U.S. Special Operations Command who works on an evidence exploitation team, also testified about Sharifullah.

Marine Cpl. Kelsee Lainhart, who served at HKIA and who was friends with and worked alongside Marine Sgt. Nicole Gee — one of the thirteen Americans killed at Abbey Gate – also testified about her experiences at HKIA. Lainhart received serious spinal cord injuries from the blast, and was treated at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Other U.S. service members at Abbey Gate, along with U.S. government investigators who looked into the bombing also testified.

It was also revealed in court that Sharifullah’s business card was also found on a hard drive during a raid of an ISIS-K safehouse in 2019.

Freelance journalist Agnieszka Pikulicka-Wilczewska also testified about an interview she conducted with Sharifullah in 2020 when he was imprisoned in Afghanistan.

“As a Muslim, I was outraged when Americans were shooting the Quran in Bagram. In France, the Quran was burned many times. This is our right to fight against these people. From the very first day, I wanted to kill the Americans and the infidels,” Sharifullah told Al Jazeera in 2020.

Sharifullah had told the outlet that one of his jobs inside ISIS-K was to “transport explosives for suicide bombers on motorcycles and planting them in different places [within Kabul].”

A number of Abbey Gate Gold Star family members were present in the courtroom gallery all week to watch the trial proceedings. 


Jerry Dunleavy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/sharifullah-confessed-abbey-gate-recon-denied-foreknowledge-raised-concerns

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF: Hezbollah rocket fire violates ceasefire - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

Military says launcher struck after attack on troops in Southern Lebanon.

 

An Israel Defense Forces soldier during operations against Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorists in Southern Lebanon, April 2026. Credit: IDF Spokesperson's Unit.
An Israel Defense Forces soldier during operations against Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorists in Southern Lebanon, April 2026. Credit: IDF Spokesperson’s Unit.

 

The Hezbollah terrorist organization launched several rockets on Tuesday night toward Israel Defense Forces soldiers operating south of the “Forward Defense Line” in the area of Rab Thalathin in Southern Lebanon, the military said late Tuesday. There were no casualties.

In response, the IDF said it struck the launcher used in the attack.

According to an additional inquiry, sirens sounded in the areas of Kfar Yuval and Ma’ayan Baruch in northern Israel on Tuesday night were most likely triggered by the interception of an unmanned aerial vehicle launched from Lebanon before it crossed into Israeli territory.

The IDF said the launches “constitute a blatant violation of the ceasefire agreement.”

Jerusalem and Beirut agreed on April 16 to a 10-day ceasefire following mediation by U.S. President Donald Trump.

On Tuesday, IDF soldiers operating in the Saluki area of Southern Lebanon identified two terrorists who violated the truce by crossing the Forward Defense Line, posing an immediate threat.

The Israeli Air Force subsequently struck and killed the suspects to neutralize the danger, the military said.

Separately, IDF forces continued operations to dismantle Hezbollah infrastructure and locate weapons.

The military said Monday that troops from the 98th and 36th divisions killed several Hezbollah terrorists in Southern Lebanon after they violated ceasefire understandings and approached Israeli soldiers.

In one incident in the Bint Jbeil area, the Paratrooper Brigade identified a group of operatives who crossed the truce line and advanced toward IDF forces. The Israeli Air Force, acting on the direction of ground troops, struck and eliminated the terrorists, the military said.

In a separate incident, the Golani Brigade called in an airstrike against additional operatives in the Litani River area after they breached the ceasefire and threatened Israeli troops.

“The IDF will continue to operate to clear the area under its control and to remove any threat to the citizens of the State of Israel and its forces,” the military said.

Hezbollah began launching rockets, missiles and drones at Israel on March 2 following Israel’s Feb. 28 opening strikes against Iran in Operation Roaring Lion/Epic Fury.

In response to continued violations of the U.S.-brokered Nov. 27, 2024 ceasefire framework, Israel launched an aerial campaign against Hezbollah targets and advanced forces into additional areas of Southern Lebanon aimed at preventing cross-border attacks on northern Israeli communities.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/israel-news/idf-hezbollah-rocket-fire-violates-ceasefire

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Gazans cast votes in local election for first time in 20 years - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

Despite contrary reports, Hamas spokesman denies candidates linked to the terror group are taking part.

 

Palestinians vote for municipal elections
Palestinians vote for municipal elections in Deir al Balah, the Gaza Strip, on April 25, 2026. Photo by Ali Hassan/Flash90.

Gazan residents participated on Saturday for the first time in two decades in municipal elections organized by the Palestinian Authority.

The elections were held in Judea, Samaria and Deir al-Balah, a city in the center of the Gaza Strip, from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.

The 70,000 residents of Deir al-Balah were chosen as eligible for voting by the P.A.’s Palestinian Central Elections Commission because it had suffered less damage during the war, according to Israeli broadcaster Channel 13.

In addition, more than a million Palestinians in Judea and Samaria were eligible to vote, the report said. Results are expected later on Saturday or on Sunday.

In Deir al-Balah, four electoral lists competed, each with 15 candidates.

Although Hamas boycotted the election, it pledged to honor its results and deployed personnel from its police force to the polling stations, the report continued.

The report added that despite the terrorist group not officially proposing candidates, independent candidates affiliated with Hamas took part.

Speaking over the phone with The New York Times, Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem denied any involvement of his organization in the elections.

Hamas has decided to turn over its authority to the winning list immediately after results are announced, he said, adding that the election in Deir al-Balah is a “pilot” that could be expanded to other cities in the Strip if it is successful.

For Palestinians in Judea and Samaria, these are the fifth local elections since 2005, according to Ynet.

The Hebrew outlet cited a Palestinian Authority official saying under condition of anonymity that the election in Gaza has a profound political implication.

“This is a kind of experiment for the P.A. to establish its agenda in the Gaza Strip, contrary to Hamas’s conduct in recent years when it appointed municipal heads according to its own standards,” the official told Ynet


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/israel-news/gazans-cast-votes-in-local-election-for-first-time-in-20-years

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Europe's Energy Suicide: The EU Admits the World Runs on Fossil Fuels — While Deliberately Destroying Its Own - Drieu Godefridi

 

by Drieu Godefridi

Fossil fuels are not opposed merely for their emissions; they are opposed because they underwrite prosperity, independence, and power — attributes the cultural Marxist worldview seeks to delegitimize. An affluent, independent public is harder to control.

 

Translations of this item:

Drieu Godefridi is a jurist (University Saint-Louis, University of Louvain), philosopher (University Saint-Louis, University of Louvain) and PhD in legal theory (Paris IV-Sorbonne). He is an entrepreneur, CEO of a European private education group and director of PAN Medias Group. He is the author of The Green Reich (2020).

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22468/europe-energy-suicide

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Ceasefire with Lebanon? Launches from Lebanon ongoing - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

Rockets, UAVs, launched from Lebanon shot down over northern Israel; additional rocket explodes in open area while contact is lost with UAV.

 

מחבל משגר רקטה, ארכיון
Terrorist with Launcher                                                                 Ahmad Khateib/Flash90 

Siren sounded Saturday afternoon in Manara, Margaliot, and Misgav Am in the Galilee Panhandle, following the launch of rockets from Lebanon. One of the rockets exploded in an open area, and the second was intercepted.

No injuries were reported.

"This incident constitutes a blatant violation of the ceasefire understandings by the Hezbollah terrorist organization," the IDF warned.

About an hour later, at 5:17 p.m., alerts sounded warning of a hostile aircraft infiltration into the western Galilee area. Approximately ten minutes later, the Home Front Command announced that the incident had "concluded" and the IDF later confirmed that two aircraft entered Israeli territory.

"The Israeli Air Force successfully intercepted a suspicious aerial target that was launched from Lebanon toward Israeli territory," a statement read. "Contact with an additional suspicious aerial target was lost."

"No injuries were reported. This incident constitutes a blatant violation of the ceasefire understandings by the Hezbollah terrorist organization."

Shortly prior to the rocket launch towards the Galilee Panhandle, the IDF reported the interception of "a suspicious aerial target that was identified in the area in which IDF soldiers are operating in southern Lebanon, south of the Forward Defense Line."

"The target did not cross into Israeli territory. No sirens were sounded in accordance with protocol." 


Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/426047

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

With Supreme Court MIA on schools deceiving parents, Trump administration and red states plow ahead - Greg Piper

 

by Greg Piper

Justices reject case that "squarely raised the question" of schools hiding students' gender identity but can still take a similar "fully briefed" case, plaintiffs' lawyer says. Districts rebut feds' findings, blast process as bad faith.

 

As so-called gender secrecy lawsuits against school districts wind their way through the courts without guidance from the Supreme Court, the Trump administration is pushing ahead to force the disclosure of medically relevant information about students to their parents, at least for the duration of President Trump's second term.

The high court Tuesday declined to review a ruling by the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld a school district's willful deception of a couple about their daughter's identification as a boy, which the girl's middle school was actively facilitating against the explicit instructions of her parents, letting her use boys' intimate facilities and a new name.

That leaves in place a 4-1 split among federal appellate courts on whether "nonreligious parents’ rights are limited to the initial enrollment decision" in public school, according to the unsuccessful petition for review by the Child and Parental Rights Campaign (CPRC) and Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

Days earlier, two Department of Education offices accused four Kansas school districts of violating Title IX and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, alleging they let schools hide students' identification as the opposite sex from their parents, let students use intimate facilities based on gender identity and let males participate in girls' sports.

The Office for Civil Rights and Student Privacy Policy Office threatened enforcement action, including termination of federal funding, if the four districts don't sign resolution agreements that condition athletic participation, intimate facilities and overnight accommodations on sex and share documents related to "gender transition" with students' parents.

SPPO put state superintendents on notice a year ago in a "Dear Colleague" letter  that hiding students' gender identity from their parents was a "priority concern" for the office, and Education Secretary Linda McMahon's cover letter emphasized that "by natural right and moral authority, parents are the primary protectors of their children," the department's statement said.

The reticence of SCOTUS to review a case that could finally resolve outstanding questions about the extent of parental rights in public schools has given primacy to efforts by Republican-led states and the federal government to protect sex-based rights.

A South Carolina bill (H-4756) approved by both chambers last week would require public K-12 schools and colleges to designate restrooms, locker rooms and changing facilities by sex, and offer a "single-user restroom and changing facility," or lose 25% of their state funding. It would also subject them to lawsuits by anyone encountering the opposite sex in their facility.

ADF senior state government relations director Tonya Shellnut thanked state Rep. Travis Moore and Speaker Pro Tempore Tommy Pope for helping "carry it across and the many who fought for this moment."

The ACLU of South Carolina, which unsuccessfully lobbied to stop the bill in the Legislature, hasn't said whether it would sue to block it if signed by Gov. Henry McMaster, but its executive director Jace Woodrum, a woman who identifies as a man, told local TV station WRDW it would encourage bullying and harassment of transgender students.

SCOTUS 'procedural' ruling shortchanges parents

Four of nine justices must vote to grant a petition for the high court to review a case, but what's more telling about its unexplained refusal to review the decision by the 1st Circuit – which had no GOP-nominated judges until last fall – is that no justice publicly dissented.

Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh dissented from the court's refusal in 2024 to consider whether parents had legal standing to challenge a Wisconsin gender secrecy policy. Alito and Thomas warned that lower courts were using standing to avoid "particularly contentious constitutional questions" affecting over 1,000 districts.

The Boston-based 1st Circuit said Ludlow Public Schools did not violate the "substantive due process" of parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri because courts haven't recognized the duplicity of hidden gender transitions as such a violation.

CPRC President Vernadette Broyles said the justices passed on a case that "squarely raised the question of whether schools may withhold critical information from parents and override their judgment on matters of their child’s health, well-being, and upbringing," but that "it would not be productive to speculate" on the high court's reasoning.

She said SCOTUS has one more opportunity to "provide the nation with clear, final precedent on this issue," which is CPRC's challenge to gender secrecy policies by Florida's Leon County School Board on behalf of January and Jeffrey Littlejohn.

President Trump called the district's behavior "child abuse" and identified the Littlejohns by name a year ago in his joint address to Congress, where January was first lady Melania Trump's guest, a week before a divided, acrimonious 11th Circuit panel ruled the district's willful deception of the Littlejohns did not "shock the conscience" for liability purposes.

The case is "fully briefed on the merits and presents the ideal vehicle for the Court to confirm that parents—not schools—have the constitutionally protected right to direct the upbringing of their children, including decisions involving gender identity and whether their child will be affirmed and raised as their sex at school," Broyles said in a written statement.

It's not enough that SCOTUS reinstated a permanent injunction against California's gender secrecy policies on its emergency docket last month, according to Broyles, because "it was a procedural ruling" even though six justices said lower courts were ignoring a century of parental rights precedents and that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed.

'Complete lack of any meaningful investigation,' botched facts

The Department of Education's findings against the Kansas City, Kansas Public School District, Olathe Public Schools, Shawnee Mission School District and Topeka Public Schools came eight months after opening the investigations.

SPPO, which enforces FERPA, cited "lack of substantive documentation" from the districts as the basis for its determination that their policies "were likely to prevent schools from notifying parents" of a gender transition, "even if the parent requested their child’s records."

OCR, which enforces Title IX, distinguished between alleged violations among districts.

Kansas City and Topeka unlawfully let male students who identify as girls use female restrooms, locker rooms and changing rooms, while Olathe and Shawnee Mission let both sexes use single-sex facilities based on gender identity.

Kansas City and Topeka also let males who identify as girls participate in girls' sports, according to OCR.

All but Kansas City admitted to OCR that "male students have been allowed to use female restrooms and locker rooms" because they identify as girls, while Shawnee Mission's athletic participation policies "raise significant compliance concerns," OCR said.

"Schools should never subject girls to unsafe, uncomfortable, and unfair environments, nor should they abuse their authority by hiding the most sensitive information about a child’s health and wellbeing from that child’s parents," Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Kimberly Richey said in the Education Department's statement.

Except for Shawnee Mission, which didn't answer a query, the districts told Just the News they reject the findings, with two denouncing the feds for how the process was handled.

Kansas City said the findings are "not supported by the facts or law" and that it acts "in full good faith compliance" with Title IX and FERPA and with Kansas High School Athletic Association rules on "interscholastic and intramural athletic activities." 

It linked eight policies relevant to the investigation: transgender guidance, transgender athletic participation, student records release, discrimination complaints, sex harassment, prohibition of discrimination, harassment and retaliation, student activities and another on student records release.

"We are concerned with the manner in which this matter has been communicated publicly prior to a full and collaborative resolution process," Topeka said, claiming it has "cooperated fully throughout this process" and will "continue to work in good faith" with OCR to resolve this "through established processes."

Topeka has demonstrated its compliance with Title IX and FERPA and has always "honored parents' right to access education records and information regarding their student," it said. "The district does not withhold or hide any student educational records from parents."

Olathe took the most umbrage at the feds, claiming it has been "thrust into the midst of political theatre and forced to respond to allegations that are completely unfounded or being grossly misrepresented, all on taxpayer time and money."

Its effort to obtain a resolution agreement "has not been reciprocated" and has departed from "any other collaborative experience the district has had with the Department of Education and its staff," Olathe said, with no good-faith discussion by the feds, a "complete lack of any meaningful investigation" and "incorrect and predetermined decisions" behind the findings.

"OCR and SPPO have attempted to retroactively hold" the district accountable for laws and executive orders not in effect for the investigative period, and the offices falsely claimed its policies let students use intimate facilities based on gender identity, Olathe said.

It also published an April 17 letter to OCR's regional director and SPPO from its external lawyer, who said the "District was already in compliance with the law at the time of your 2025 letter" but has rescinded its prior guidance and adopted new guidance "to voluntarily comply and resolve all three issues" the feds identified last summer.

The letter argues the district is being pulled in multiple directions on what the law actually says.

"Despite the flux in national law notwithstanding (including a decision currently pending by the U.S. Supreme Court) and at OCR’s specific request, the District has updated its Guidance to add references to its intramural athletic programs for high school students," the letter says. 

"Despite federal appellate case law in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, and specifically at OCR’s request, the District updated its Guidance to confirm that it maintains restrooms, locker rooms and showers as well as overnight accommodations separately for boys and girls," it says.

Olathe is also ensuring that "its annual orientation training for staff will include the FERPA requirements regarding parent access to the student’s education record maintained by the District," which has never "maintained a separate education record regarding a student’s gender identity." 


Greg Piper

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/education/supreme-court-mia-schools-deceiving-parents-trump-administration-and-red

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter