Tuesday, September 1, 2026

US, Iranian regime trade strikes after weeks-long lull - JNS Staff

 

​ by JNS Staff

“It’s not a decisive shift to a new phase of the war,” Jason Brodsky, policy director at United Against Nuclear Iran, told JNS. “Rather it is a reminder that the U.S. has the will to police the Strait of Hormuz.”

 

US Navy jet
A U.S. Navy T-45C Goshawk jet trainer aircraft approaches the flight deck of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, June 27, 2026. Credit: Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Miguel Santiago/U.S. Navy.

The U.S. military said that it attacked Iranian rocket launchers at the Strait of Hormuz in its “first military action in a month on Sunday, breaking a lull in fighting during an intermittent war that has lasted more than six months,” the Associated Press reported.

According to Navy Capt. Tim Hawkins, spokesman for U.S. Central Command, Iranian regime forces were seen readying to launch “rockets with sea mines into the strait,” the wire agency reported.

“U.S. forces took limited, precise action against IRGC minelaying forces posing an imminent threat in the Strait of Hormuz,” CENTCOM wrote on X. “In essence, Iran created the threat and the U.S. military eliminated it to protect civilian mariners, commercial shipping, and the free flow of global commerce.”

In response to the strikes, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps fired ballistic missiles at U.S. bases in Jordan.

A Jordanian source told Amman’s official Petra News Agency that the military “successfully intercepted and destroyed” eight missiles that entered the kingdom’s airspace.

On Sunday night, U.S. President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated video depicting the destruction of Iran’s Kharg Island, writing, “Kharg Island being blown to smithereens!!!”

In peacetime, Kharg Island provides a port for the export of up to 90% of Iran’s oil.

In recent weeks, Trump has launched what said will be crippling economic sanctions on the regime. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last week announced “Operation Economic Outcast,” an expanded sanctions campaign aimed at cutting off what he called Iran’s remaining financial lifelines.

Bessent said Sunday that the Trump administration plans to sanction another bank this week as part of its campaign to clamp down on transactions involving Iran.

“This is going to be financial violence if we have to,” Bessent told AP. He said Washington would press its counterparts at G20 finance meetings in Asheville, N.C., to cooperate in isolating Iran.

Jason Brodsky, policy director at United Against Nuclear Iran, told JNS on Sunday that “today’s strike is a signal from the U.S. that it is not going to allow Iran to reverse the American gains in recent weeks over ensuring freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.

“It’s not a decisive shift to a new phase of the war,” he said. “Rather it is a reminder that the U.S. has the will to police the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranian retaliation was likely factored into U.S. planning.”

JNS asked whether the strikes surprised him. “I don’t think there were any true surprises,” he said.

Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei on Sunday called the United States and Israel the “sworn enemies” of Muslim unity, accusing both countries of hostility toward the broader Muslim world.

“The criminal rulers of the U.S. and the illegitimate Zionist regime are the sworn enemies of this unity and friendship,” Khamenei said in a message marking Islamic Unity Week. He added that even rulers of Muslim countries considered allies of Washington and Jerusalem were not exempt from what he described as their hostility.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, meanwhile, said on Saturday that Tehran would not compromise on national security and warned that Iranian forces would “fight fire with fire,” reiterating that U.S. bases in the region could be targeted in response to attacks on the Islamic Republic, according to state propaganda outlet Press TV.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/u-s-news/us-iranian-regime-reportedly-trading-strikes-after-weeks-long-lull

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

CENTCOM: US forces have started striking IRGC targets in Iran - JNS Staff

 

​ by JNS Staff

"The strikes follow recent attempted attacks by the IRGC against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and against American service members deployed to the region." - CENTCOM

 

American forces began striking Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targets in Iran at noon Eastern Time, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced on Tuesday.

The strikes follow recent attempted attacks by the IRGC against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and against American service members deployed to the region, CENTCOM said in a post to X.

U.S. President Donald Trump told Fox News on Monday, “We’re going to hit them very hard,” following Iran’s attack on two U.S. bases in Jordan. U.S. air defenses intercepted all but one of the missiles, which was not targeted as its trajectory was deemed non-threatening, Trump said. 


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/live/breaking-news#000001a0-5df2-dbfb-a9a0-fdfae8d50000

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Chinese Dragon Lurks Beneath the Pacific - Lawrence Kadish

 

​ by Lawrence Kadish

China's Atomic-Powered Submarines, With Nuclear-Tipped Missiles, Can Reach US Cities, Pacific Rim

 

Pictured: China's Long March 10, a Jin-class nuclear submarine, participates in a naval show in Shandong province on April 23, 2019. (Photo by Mark Schiefelbein/AFP via Getty Images)

In an era when artificial intelligence is guiding drones in deadly attacks in Ukraine, it would be understandable to focus exclusively on what that now means on the battlefield.

This would be a grave mistake.

Few in the West have noticed that China just test-launched an intercontinental ballistic missile from a nuclear-powered submarine, using the waters of the South Pacific as their testing site.

The Chinese were quick to announce that the missile carried a dummy warhead, but the implications were clear for everyone who appreciates the enormous strategic threat implied from this underwater weapons test. The timing was also instructive: naval authorities reported that the Chinese had not conducted a similar test in decades.

Press reports say the test came on the same day China and Russia were holding joint naval exercises off the Chinese coast. A coincidence? Not likely.

The message from China is clear. They have the means to sail nuclear-powered submarines anywhere in the Pacific, armed with nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles that are easily capable of reaching American cities or any nation around the Pacific Rim. The threat greatly complicates the US Navy's role of finding and destroying those submarines in the event of conflict, for there is nothing more threatening than a deeply submerged submarine capable of wiping out entire cities just 20 minutes after the launch of its missiles.

President Donald Trump fully appreciates the threat. In response to the Chinese test, the US State Department issued the following:

"At a time when the United States is working harder than ever to prevent nuclear proliferation, China is doing the opposite. Beijing's rapid and opaque nuclear weapons buildup is of great concern to the region and the world. We continue to urge China to engage in meaningful arms control discussions and commit to a regularized notification arrangement for all intercontinental-range ballistic missile and space launches consistent with commitments made by all other P5 members [permanent members of the UN Security Council]."

And so there would be doubt as to the president's resolve, the State Department reminded, "The United States remains steadfast in our defense commitments to our allies and partners."

We need to pay attention to the revolution taking place in conventional warfare now that drones and AI are creating havoc in Ukraine and the Middle East, but we also need to appreciate the strategic weapons China is deliberately testing as an ominous reminder of their intent to dominate the rest of this century – one way or another.


Lawrence Kadish
serves on the Board of Governors of Gatestone Institute.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22816/china-nuclear-submarines

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Democrats grapple with candidate 9/11 controversies as anniversary approaches - Steven Richards

 

​ by Steven Richards

Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is facing scrutiny over his association with a prominent left-wing streamer who said America “deserved” 9/11. But, El-Sayed is not the first Democrat to generate controversy over the terrorist attack.

 

As the nation prepares to remember the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the Democratic Party is finding itself in hot water over its surging left-wing candidates who have given controversial statements about the attacks. 

The Democrats’ Senate nominee in Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed, has generated the most recent controversy. 

He has spent months fielding questions about his relationship with left-wing Twitch streamer Hasan Piker, who previously told his audience that the United States “deserved” the 9/11 attack. During the primary, El-Sayed repeatedly campaigned alongside Piker and, at first, declined to condemn his remarks. In August, El-Sayed dismissed Piker’s comment as “a dumb statement.” 

Most recently, El-Sayed apologized to Michigan’s Jewish Democrats for controversial comments he made earlier this year following a March attack against a synagogue in the Detroit area. In that attack on Temple Israel, in West Bloomfield Township, a gunman rammed the synagogue with his vehicle and opened fire. The suspect, who was originally from Lebanon, was motivated to carry out the attack after some of his relatives were killed in an Israeli airstrike during the country’s war against the terrorist group Hezbollah.

At the time, El-Sayed condemned the synagogue attack, saying there was “never a justification for attacking innocent people” but added that “violence is a cycle” and “hurt people hurt people.” 

After facing pushback for the comments, even from members of his own political party, El-Sayed apologized to Jewish Democrats in the state. 

“I made a mistake,” El-Sayed told the Michigan Democratic Jewish Caucus in Lansing this past weekend. “I should have issued a statement, of course, condemning it, and it just should have been the full stop.” 

The nominee argued he wanted to “offer broader context” but did not properly acknowledge the dignity that fear and that pain should have been afforded.” He also said: “If my statement caused pain, I’m sorry. That was not what I intended.” 

El-Sayed’s past statements about the attacks, however, have continued to surface. In one post from April 2020, he compared the number of victims on 9/11 to the death toll of the COVID-19 pandemic, CBS News reported on Monday. 

In another, El-Sayed suggested that because more Americans died from COVID-19 than 9/11, he hoped “that means we'll spend the next ten years fighting a war for public health & against poverty ... like we launched a global #WaronTerror after 9/11. We could save lives rather than take them.” 

His comments and association with Piker have prompted some state Democrats to refuse to endorse or campaign alongside El-Sayed after he narrowly defeated the more centrist Rep. Haley Stevens in the state party primary last month. 

Michigan Rep. Hillary Scholten is one of the more vocal holdouts among several Democrats who are wary of El-Sayed’s associates and views on Israel, The Washington Post reported this week. 

El-Sayed has tried to distance himself from Piker without breaking with him completely. 

“I want to be crystal clear, nobody speaks for this campaign besides me and my campaign spokespeople,” he has said several times after the latest controversy in which Piker said Jews who support Israel could face backlash or violence in the United States. 

The pattern predates the current cycle. Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota set off a firestorm back in 2019 when she told an audience at the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) that the group was founded “because they recognized that some people did something” on 9/11 and American Muslims faced discrimination as a result. 

“Here's the truth. For far too long we have lived with the discomfort of being a second-class citizen and, frankly, I'm tired of it, and every single Muslim in this country should be tired of it,” Omar, who is Muslim, said. “CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.”

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., defended Omar, describing the backlash against her statement as a “pure racist act” and suggested she was being targeted for speaking “truth to power.” 

“They do this all the time to us, especially women of color. They do that. They take our words out of context because they are afraid because we speak truth, we speak truth to power," Tlaib said. "My sister, Ilhan Omar, what she was talking about was uplifting people by supporting their civil liberties and their civil rights.”

Democratic Socialists of America-aligned candidates outside Congress have generated similar controversy this year. 

Former Maine Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner, a Marine veteran who ran against Sen. Susan Collins, before he was forced to drop out, co-wrote a 2002 op-ed in the Bangor Daily News as a high-schooler arguing “one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter” and said “every terrorist is portrayed as evil.” 

The op-ed, which resurfaced during the campaign this year, also argued that media outlets ignored the terrorists' motivations “to appease the nation’s newfound sense of patriotism.”

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist elected last year, has faced a different kind of scrutiny. 

He has repeatedly condemned the 9/11 attacks, but victims’ families have urged the mayor not to attend the 25th anniversary commemorations, arguing that he has associated with people and ideas antithetical to the memory of the victims’ sacrifices. 

For example, Mamdani has faced criticism for his endorsement of Aber Kawas, the Democratic nominee for New York's 12th state Senate District. 

During Kawas's campaign, a clip resurfaced of him saying that requiring an apology for “a terror attack that a couple of people did” while ignoring “genocides and for slavery” was “reprehensible.” 

Kawas later told Fox News Digital she was speaking about “the wrongful scapegoating of Muslim Americans,” not defending the attacks.

“I will proudly honor the families, the survivors, the first responders forever impacted by that horrific terror attack by standing alongside them at this year's 9/11 commemoration, reaffirming that we will never forget the solemn day felt by all of us who call this city home and, frankly, by all of us who called this country home," Mamdani said in a statement in response to a petition signed by thousands, including several 9/11 victims’ families.  


Steven Richards

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/democrats-grapple-candidate-911-controversies-anniversary-approaches

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Cheaper drugs, cheaper beef, cheaper gas. Trump lines up fall affordability before Labor Day - Amanda Head

 

​ by Amanda Head

The lower prices puts Republicans in a better position to motivate voters going into the midterm elections in November.

 

A little over two months out from November's midterm elections, Americans are enjoying lower prices to stay healthy, eat and travel.

"TrumpRx.gov is what came out of all the most favored nation drug pricing negotiations, and 80% of the drugs you pick up at a drugstore, they're right there on TrumpRx.gov... These are huge opportunities for us to get the American people empowered. And no longer will one in three people walk out of the pharmacy empty-handed because they couldn't afford the medication," Dr. Mehmet Oz, Administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, told Just The News

On Monday, President Donald Trump announced a new round of voluntary Most Favored Nation (MFN) drug-pricing agreements as part of efforts to improve healthcare affordability, with a focus on lowering prescription drug costs, especially for Medicaid and cash-paying patients via TrumpRx.

The efforts build on the administration’s existing MFN framework and TrumpRx platform. Under MFN, participating manufacturers agree to offer U.S. prices aligned with the lowest prices charged in other high-income countries such as Canada, European nations, Japan and others. 

This latest batch is expected to involve companies such as Bayer, Takeda, CSL, and several mid-size biotech companies. The agreements typically include lower prices for federal/state programs and direct patient access (often via TrumpRx), sometimes in exchange for tariff relief or exemptions from other pricing mandates.

Prior deals covered 17 major drugmakers (representing a large share of the branded market), which the White House has credited with contributing to the steepest annual drop in U.S. prescription drug prices in over 60 years (roughly 3.1% year-over-year) and hundreds of millions in savings via TrumpRx, including big cuts on popular drugs like GLP-1s. 

Gas prices take a refreshing dip

Pain at the pump is another crucial issue for the Trump administration as the midterms approach. Gas is a frequent reminder of the economy's impact and with gas prices hitting a peak this summer, they are finally starting to fall. 

Gas prices edged lower over the past weekend, offering drivers a bit of relief after weeks of elevated costs. 

The national average for regular gasoline dipped about 3 cents over the last week to roughly $4.01–$4.08 per gallon, according to recent data from GasBuddy and AAA. 

Although prices remain elevated because of ongoing disruptions tied to the Iran conflict and related pressures on global oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz—which have kept crude markets volatile and pushed pump prices well above pre-conflict levels—they are still well below the peaks seen under Joe Biden, when the national average briefly surpassed $5 per gallon in 2022.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Eat more beef...for less

Trump recently took two actions addressing high U.S. beef prices, a hot commodity during summer cookouts and heading into fall tailgates and barbecues. On August 21, the 47th president signed a proclamation temporarily expanding the in-quota quantity of lean beef trimmings eligible for lower tariffs by 300,000 metric tons over 90 days starting September 1. This targets ground beef production and encourages sales at a 25% discount to boost supply and ease consumer costs amid low domestic cattle herds.

Days later and following rancher backlash over the imports, Trump announced that he is authorizing measures to allow farmers and ranchers to process their own meat. The move is in the wheelhouse of Trump administration deregulation, to reduce reliance on the dominant large processors (often called a monopoly) and ease related regulations. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins indicated follow-up initiatives, including waiving red tape and supporting smaller processors.  ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Amanda Head is White House Correspondent for Just The News. You can follow her here.  


Amanda Head

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/cheaper-drugs-cheaper-beef-cheaper-gas-trump-lines-his-fall-affordability

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Doctor accused of facilitating 'birth tourism' invokes Fifth during testimony before House Oversight - Kevin Killough

 

​ by Kevin Killough

Lorentz had initially refused to appear voluntarily, stating his attorney argued he could not speak with the committee due to a pending criminal probe being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida.

 

Dr. Wladimir Lorentz, who is accused of delivering 2,000 babies to immigrant mothers, invoked the Fifth Amendment in response to every question during his appearance before the House Oversight Committee on Tuesday. 

Lorentz is the founder and Chief Medical Officer at Have My Baby in Miami, a South Florida business that’s aimed at helping immigrant mothers give birth in the United States — what's often referred to as birth tourism. 

Lorentz had initially refused to appear voluntarily, stating his attorney advised him not speak with the committee due to a pending criminal probe being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, WFMD reported. Chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., subpoenaed him earlier this month. 

“As the Founder and Chief Medical Officer of a company doing business as ‘Have My Baby in Miami,’ your knowledge regarding the company’s marketing practices and direct observations relevant to the birth tourism industry is vital to the immediate investigation,” Comer’s subpoena letter read.

Steven Camota, who testified at the hearing, explained that the goal of immigrants who come to the U.S. to give birth to their children is so they can be granted citizenship and then, in turn, sponsor their parents and other family members to immigrate to the U.S. when those children grow up.  


Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/congress/doctor-accused-facilitating-birth-tourism-invokes-fifth-during-testimony-house

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Latest Big Lie About Israel Is ‘Settler Violence’ - Adam Turner

 

​ by Adam Turner

The UN has admitted that it does not always independently confirm every detail before publication of its reports.

 

There is a saying that “a lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.” In other words, false information can spread much faster than hard facts, and sometimes, by the time the most accurate details or corrections are shared, the wrong story has already reached many people and caused great confusion.

There is absolutely no question in my mind that the Israel-haters rely on this dictum to support their war against the Jewish state.

Let’s count some of the dumbest big lies that have been pushed over the years by these dishonest critics of Israel. “Genocide” is the grandest of them all. The term first appeared in Soviet sources, although it has found new life since October 7, 2023. This itself is ironic—Hamas invaded Israel on that day because they sought to, and indeed did, slaughter Jews, following the dictates of their radical religious beliefs, yet many of their supporters now seek to project their own genocidal crime onto Israel. Needless to say, Israel has not, and never has, committed genocide.

Then there is the “apartheid” slur. This charge is especially stupid because “apartheid” involves race, and there are no racial divides in this struggle. Further, it ignores the fact that Israel is a democracy where its Druze, Jewish, Muslim, and Christian Arab citizens are all fully equal under the law, including the right to vote. Israeli Arabs disproportionately work in the high-status medical and pharmaceutical fields in Israel, which could never happen under an apartheid system. Another defamatory claim that was shattered recently was that Israel was “starving” the Arabs of Gaza, which was exposed by, of all things, a UN survey.

This means, of course, that it is time for the haters to move on and level their next fake claim—that Palestinian Arabs are suffering from a vast eruption of Israeli “settler violence.”

The “settlers” in question here are Israeli Jews who live beyond the green armistice line of 1949, in the lands known as Samaria, Judea, and/or Jerusalem. Once again, this labeling is ironic and another example of projection, because the Palestinian Arabs—who originated in Arabia before conquering the entire Middle East—are slandering the Jews—who originated in Judea, hence the name—as “settlers” for wanting to move back into Judea after being exiled from it by the Arabs.

Like all the prior big lies being promoted, the Israel-haters rely on rigged statistics to make their case for increasing Israeli “settler violence.” In this case, these statistics are collected by the UN—never known as a pro-Israel entity—which claims that from 2016 through 2021, there were 6,285 incidents of “settler violence” against Palestinian Arabs. The UN defines “settler-related violence” as incidents involving violence, intimidation, or property damage carried out by “settlers,” or against “settlers,” as well as incidents involving other Israeli civilians in Judea and Samaria. Of course, this means that these numbers include incidents where a Palestinian Arab attacked a Jew or his property, which makes little sense considering what we are supposed to be measuring.

The UN has also admitted that it does not always independently confirm every detail before publication, which makes the numbers even more unreliable.

As it turns out, multiple studies by the Regavim Movement and the Kohelet Policy Forum have demonstrated that the UN statistics are biased. They have found that while there are some instances of Jewish violence directed towards Palestinian Arabs, these incidents are dwarfed by the number of acts of violence coming from Palestinian Arabs against Jews. They have also found that the number of Jewish violent attacks is not particularly large. So, once again, fake news peddled by the Israel-haters about Israel is shown to be defamatory.

But based on history alone, we already should have known this.

The “settler violence” smear against the Jewish state has traveled halfway around the world, to the U.S., where prominent U.S. politicians are already staking out their positions against this imaginary problem. Unfortunately, however, as is always the case, the truth of the matter is still putting on its shoes, so full acceptance that this big lie is false will have to wait for a later date.

And by then, the Israel-haters will have moved on to their next big lie.


Adam Turner
is the Deputy Director of Government Relations & Columnist for the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA)

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/09/01/the-latest-big-lie-about-israel-is-settler-violence/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Progressive Regression and the New Medievalism - Victor Davis Hanson

 

​ by Victor Davis Hanson

The West has mastered the technology of civilization but embraced the politics of barbarism, creating a modern medieval world where progress and regression coexist.

 

 

For most people, the story of the medieval world was one of cramped cities, constant violent crime, and episodic outbreaks of deadly plagues—the dividends of unclean urban conditions, rotting food, fouled water, open sewage, and unchecked rats, fleas, and lice. Most of each day was spent simply trying to survive until the next.

Castles and walls dotted the landscape to protect kingdoms from marauding tribes and foreign invaders. City gates were usually closed at dusk to keep out nocturnal marauders. Public executions drew massive crowds. And religious schisms and conflicts often turned deadly.

In other words, it was not altogether unfamiliar to the world we are becoming today.

Yet meanwhile, science advanced quietly among true elites at universities, courts, and monasteries, producing windmills, mechanical clocks, and eyeglasses. Sophisticated crossbows were manufactured in great numbers. Large, multi-sail warships were built that could cross narrow seas.

Some of history’s greatest literature—Dante’s Divine Comedy, Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, and St. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae—was the product of the medieval mind.

We still gaze dumbfounded at the architectural genius and beauty of the colossal cathedrals of Cologne, Florence, Milan, Paris, Rome, and Seville. The Byzantine cathedral Hagia Sophia may have risen near the beginning of the medieval period and for a millennium, nothing rivaled its majesty. All these medieval architectural masterpieces were built without computers, porta-potties, overtime, or building permits.

Yet after the collapse of the classical world (circa A.D. 500), Western civilization still needed a millennium to recover even a modicum of its lost knowledge and technology. Centuries passed before the Renaissance saw hygienic principles of sewage systems, aqueducts, and waste disposal—not to mention the medical expertise of classically trained doctors and scientists.

Modern Medievalism

Yet our progressive-regressive modern West is now suddenly beginning to resemble the medieval age—with one important caveat: after centuries of so-called “progress,” we should know better.

Our mounting urban filth, dangerous streets, and resurgent diseases are juxtaposed with brilliant revolutions in artificial intelligence, bioengineering, robotics, satellite technology, spaceflight, and cancer research.

Unlike their counterparts in the medieval fiefdom, our officials know how to stop disease, crime, and filth but apparently choose not to. Their neglect grows out of a sick ideology that divides the world into the blameworthy “oppressors” and the blameless “oppressed.” The victim is always right and must be championed—at least from a distance or as long as he does not show up smelly on your doorstep.

We have just experienced a tribal invasion of millions of impoverished foreigners swarming across our southern border—until the belated resumption of border-wall construction, medieval-style, and the deployment of detested patrols who try bravely to stop them.

Western urban street crime seems to require the army to restore calm yet often grows unchecked when troops are barred from helping police.

It is technically illegal for people to camp out on public sidewalks or someone else’s property—unless they do so in such numbers that paralyzed city officials look the other way.

Defecation, urination, fornication, and drug injection are now routine spectacles for hurried sidewalk passersby. If Los Angeles or Berkeley allows its streets and sidewalks to become medieval, should we be surprised by outbreaks there of deadly medieval diseases like typhus and leptospirosis—or that our storm drains now double as sewage gutters?

Today’s mayors will not stop rats from breeding, while officials—most recently in Los Angeles, for example—consider proposals for taxpayer-funded “hygienic sexual-relief clinics” offering homeless people “private sexual relief through masturbation.”

In New York, some of the richest people in the world sidestep rancid piles of rat-infested trash. In San Francisco and Chicago, some of the world’s greatest cancer researchers check their shoe soles for human feces before entering their space-age labs.

Weirder still, the Western world has become both the most regulated and the most lawless civilization on the planet. Our state environmental detectives visit industries to ensure that their effluvia do not contain one part per billion of a particular toxic substance. And state and federal regulators, with dozens of letters after their names, examine daily microscopic traces of dangerous toxins in the bubbling pools of sewage at treatment plants.

Yet under cover of darkness, masked city workers decked out in hazmat suits, rubber boots, and gloves use high-pressure hoses to blast politically correct feces, urine, blood, and drug detritus into storm drains. These modern marvels carry the mess out to pollute supposedly pristine ocean waters—where a fisherman can be fined a small fortune for tossing an inert, empty soda can into the smelly water. In the modern West, one-billionth of Roundup is a threat to civilization; tons of feces on city sidewalks are not. The theory? The more the law-abiding are monitored to the nth degree, the more society can withstand exempting the lawless to do as they wish.

How strange is our postmodern medieval intersection between barbarity and civilization?

The Oppressive Oppressed

In California, a century of traffic science and public-safety research had established strict licensing rules for truck drivers navigating fully loaded 80,000-pound, double-trailer behemoths amid tiny subcompacts on our busy freeways.

Our legal system has insisted that drivers of such interstate semis must be highly skilled and certified before stepping into the potentially dangerous T. Rex of a big rig. They must be 21, possess a valid California driver’s license, pass a Department of Transportation physical, and undergo background and drug screening—all before scoring 80 percent on a required 50-question technical exam, followed by a thorough two-hour, in-person test of their driving skills. Sounds great—in theory.

But not in fact. For fear that someone, somewhere, somehow at some time might be inconvenienced by these rules to protect the public, nearly 20,000 illegal aliens obtained commercial driver’s licenses from a compliant state of California without even proving rudimentary knowledge of English. They were free to exploit loopholes, leverage exemptions, and avoid background checks.

The result?

Our new leftist apparat empowered thousands of incompetent drivers. Many cannot distinguish a yield sign from a stop sign, and most cannot read a word of English. They drive as they please—racing, swerving, and veering, with a 40-ton trailer wagging behind them.

They now own our Wild West freeways so that our elite can feel morally superior to the mere lab-rat drivers on whom they experiment. The architects of these laws are often chauffeured in large limousines, SUVs, and motorcades or prefer to fly in private jets.

Western civilization mostly phased out public executions nearly a century ago. But before it congratulates itself on its distance from the medieval world, consider that the therapeutic Left now canonizes, rather than hangs, murderers. (Which is more medieval: to hang a murderer or to romanticize a known assassin?)

Luigi Mangione assassinated Brian Robert Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, in a December 2024 ambush and pleaded guilty to federal charges stemming from the killing this month. He has been deified by scores of young leftist women who swoon over the trust-fund scion’s good looks and politically correct violence. Indeed, admirers even produced a musical about his supposedly heroic murder of the health care executive.

Charlie Kirk was grotesquely murdered during a livestreamed public event, after which, for months on end, some on the Left celebrated his shooting and mocked those who mourned him. When Lindsay Clancy brutally strangled her three small children with an exercise band, women on the Left did not merely cite her supposedly extenuating postpartum depression but deified her as a victimized “everywoman”—with scarcely a voice for the three young lives snuffed out before they had a chance to grow up by the person who, until recently, everyone understood was supposed to care for them most: their mother.

The new secular revolutionaries know that their city upon a hill won’t work—and will crash and burn—if conservatives likewise deify the murderer of a populist Marxist podcaster. What would they do if conservatives, in tit-for-tat fashion, were to join in to gush over the handsome killer of a popular socialist activist? What if a returning combat veteran slew all his children and then developed a cult of admirers demanding his PTSD guaranteed him an exemption from the law? What if the Secret Service, on four separate occasions, had to shoot at would-be right-wing assassins of Obama?

Modern, sophisticated, humane science now has the technology to save most premature babies at 23–24 weeks. But in pre-civilizational fashion, Massachusetts—to the cheers of “enlightened” feminists—has enacted laws to allow abortion (involving the collapse of the infant’s skull and the siphoning out of its contents) right up to the moment of birth. The media hailed this license to kill a viable infant as “strengthening abortion care.”

In this brutal juxtaposition of life and death, modern and ancient, we invest millions to save one premature infant of six months, only to allot a few dollars to kill a baby as it looks out the birth canal and almost reaches a new life.

Chic Barbarity

These contradictions and alternate universes of the modern medieval West are still quite different from their counterparts in the medieval world of 500–1400.

At least the medieval age believed that it was incrementally gaining knowledge to fight age-old terrors of the human and natural worlds. And such progress would eventually lead to the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and the current affluence and freedom of the West.

In contrast, our retrograde contemporary world knows how to prevent ancient diseases. We have mastered the science of sewage control and treatment. We have sought to regulate away most of the dangers posed by life-giving machines. A hundred years of penal science has established that police visibility and law enforcement deter crime.

Yet reactionary Marxism, socialist-mandated equality, and authoritarian, heaven-on-earth utopianism—going beyond even the excesses of the medieval Church—war against the progress of civilization. These ideologies arise not from fear of God or of violating ancient customs and traditions, but from smug moral narcissism—with the addendum that our atheist saints must never suffer the consequences of their destructive ideology.

After all, there are no homeless people on the lawns of the humanitarian Malibu celebrities, but plenty of security for the very progressives who defunded the police in crime-ridden cities.

Martha’s Vineyard humanitarians blasted ICE as Gestapo thugs, even as they readied care packages for illegal aliens dropped off at their community center—but only after they had ordered buses to transfer the “Other” far away.

Redistributionist gasbag and socialist Hasan Piker—channeling medieval pogroms—warns Jews that their future is bleak in America, then whizzes off in his $200,000 EV Porsche Taycan Turbo S people’s wagon.

So again, what is this plague of modern medievalism?

It is a disease of the 21st-century West, where hundreds of millions have transcended the age-old struggle to live one more day and now enjoy the unchecked freedom and affluence of democratic market capitalism.

In a world where we deem it our birthright to die in our sleep at 90, we do not worry about who struggles to produce our food, build our homes, provide our fuel, or conquer our diseases. We care only that they do so on demand. And thus, on autopilot, we are free to get tatted and pierced, remain glued to our iPhones, and perhaps even consider transitioning as we worry about cosmic things—like the need to celebrate the murderer or torch a police precinct.

Regressive Progressives

So the progressives, socialists, and Marxists gave us universal “caring.” They birthed a puritanical holiness, a narcissistic sanctimoniousness that decrees the rape victim of an illegal alien acceptable collateral damage—allowable to ensure that the illegal alien remains free to enter the country unaudited and unquestioned.

The poor typhus-bearing rats that scurry along the public sidewalk shall not be denied their breeding grounds among the sanctified but soiled and infectious blankets of the homeless.

The modern medievalist demands that the 30-year veteran of our wars be drummed out of the military as an enemy of the people for refusing the experimental mRNA vaccine—but not the COVID-infected, unvaccinated illegal alien who, amid lockdowns, strolls across the Rio Grande without a word from our secular saints.

Virtue-signaling concern for the nihilist—at someone else’s expense—is the new national creed.

And the “victim” and racist killer Decarlos Brown—now deemed “too incompetent to stand trial”—readying his knife to slice open the throat of the innocent, doomed, 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska, in the seat ahead of him, is the poster child of our modern medievalism.

Photo: Los Angeles, CA - September 12: A homeless encampment on a closed off lot on S Manhattan Pl. in Koreatown on Friday, Sept. 12, 2025 in Los Angeles, CA. (Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times) 


Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness and the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He is an American military historian, columnist, a former classics professor, and scholar of ancient warfare. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004, and is the 2023 Giles O'Malley Distinguished Visiting Professor at the School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush, and the Bradley Prize in 2008. Hanson is also a farmer (growing almonds on a family farm in Selma, California) and a critic of social trends related to farming and agrarianism. He is the author of the just released New York Times best seller, The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation, published by Basic Books on May 7, 2024, as well as the recent  The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won, The Case for Trump, and The Dying Citizen.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/09/01/progressive-regression-and-the-new-medievalism/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Cyber’s New Problem: Robots Are Finding Bugs Faster Than We Can Fix Them - Julio Rivera

 

​ by Julio Rivera

The objective should be to make American defenders faster and better without making American innovation unnecessarily slow.

 

For years, cybersecurity professionals have complained that there were too many vulnerabilities to patch. Now artificial intelligence is arriving with the helpful suggestion that perhaps we were not finding them quickly enough.

That is the basic challenge behind Gold Eagle, the Trump administration’s new vulnerability coordination initiative. The program is intended to bring government agencies, security researchers, software companies, and critical infrastructure operators into a more coordinated process for finding, prioritizing, and fixing serious vulnerabilities. VINCE, the Vulnerability Information and Coordination Environment, provides part of the technical foundation.

The idea makes sense. If AI can scan software and identify potential vulnerabilities faster than humans can, someone needs to make sure the resulting flood of information does not simply become another giant inbox marked “urgent.”

A vulnerability report is not the same thing as a vulnerability fix. Somebody has to verify the finding, determine its severity, contact the developer, develop the patch, test it, distribute it, and convince somebody’s IT department that installing the patch really is more important than whatever meeting they have scheduled for Tuesday afternoon.

That last part is where cybersecurity gets complicated.

There are already private-sector efforts attempting to solve pieces of this problem. The Linux Foundation’s Akrites project is focused on vulnerability discovery and coordination around open-source software, while Athena represents another industry effort involving major technology companies. Gold Eagle does not need to become the only game in town. Its real value could be in connecting systems that are already doing useful work.

The need for better coordination is obvious when you look at what attackers are doing. A recent WhatsApp campaign used malicious Visual Basic Script files to begin a multi-stage infection process. Kaspersky also reported a campaign in which malicious VBS files were used to install ManageEngine RMM Central, a legitimate remote-management platform. The attackers essentially took software that administrators use to help businesses manage computers and turned it into an unauthorized remote-access mechanism.

This is one of the less glamorous truths of modern cybersecurity: sometimes the attacker does not need to invent anything. He can simply borrow something that already works.

The same principle applies to the sign-in scams. A fake security warning appears, the computer is supposedly infected, the account is supposedly under attack, and the user is given a convenient opportunity to purchase some supposed security product.

The criminals do not need a zero-day vulnerability. They need a convincing webpage and five minutes of your attention. It is basically the cybersecurity equivalent of a guy in a reflective vest standing outside your house announcing that your roof is about to collapse and that he happens to have a roofing company.

The really serious attackers, however, have moved well beyond fake pop-ups. North Korean hackers have been using fake cryptocurrency companies and job interviews to target technology professionals. The campaigns can involve convincing recruiters, fake companies, and technical assessments that ultimately expose the victim to malware. One documented campaign targeted at least 230 people.

That is a useful reminder that the attack surface is not just software. It is trust. It is identity. It is the person sitting in front of the computer deciding whether an email, recruiter, WhatsApp message, or security warning is legitimate.

And AI is about to make that problem considerably more interesting.

The United States should not respond by assuming that the answer to every technological risk is another regulation. The Trump administration’s emphasis on maintaining American leadership in artificial intelligence is strategically sensible. America has no interest in slowing its own technological development while China and other competitors continue advancing.

But technological optimism does not require technological naivety. AI will help defenders find vulnerabilities, analyze threats, and automate portions of security operations. It will also help attackers improve phishing, impersonation, reconnaissance, and malware development. The objective should be to make American defenders faster and better without making American innovation unnecessarily slow.

That is where Gold Eagle deserves a serious look.

The initiative could help address one of cybersecurity’s most persistent problems: the gap between knowing something is wrong and actually getting it fixed. If a researcher discovers a vulnerability on Monday, the ideal outcome is not that three government agencies, five companies, and fourteen researchers each create their own report about it. The ideal outcome is that everyone agrees on what the vulnerability is, how dangerous it is, who needs to fix it, and how quickly that needs to happen.

That sounds obvious until you remember that cybersecurity is an industry capable of creating three acronyms for the same problem before lunch.

Gold Eagle will have to prove that it can reduce that friction rather than add another layer to it. Its success should be measured by practical outcomes: how quickly vulnerabilities are validated, how quickly developers are notified, how many duplicate reports are eliminated and, ultimately, how many vulnerable systems are actually patched.

That is the part that matters.

Because the cyber threat is not waiting for the government, private industry, or artificial intelligence to finish figuring out the organizational chart. Criminal groups are using trusted platforms, legitimate software, and increasingly convincing social engineering. Nation-state actors are pretending to be recruiters. Scammers are pretending to be security software. Attackers are looking for vulnerabilities while defenders are still deciding which vulnerabilities deserve the biggest meeting.

There is plenty of reason to be concerned. There is also reason to be optimistic. The technology available to defenders is becoming more capable, and the United States has the resources, companies, and technical talent to remain ahead if those resources are coordinated effectively.

Gold Eagle will not eliminate cybercrime. Nothing will. But if it can help turn vulnerability discovery into faster remediation, it will be doing something much more valuable than producing another cybersecurity initiative with a memorable name.

It will be buying defenders something they can never have enough of.

Time


Julio Rivera

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/09/01/cybers-new-problem-robots-are-finding-bugs-faster-than-we-can-fix-them/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

U.S. officials defend deal with controversial Venezuelan oil baron - Ben Geman, Marc Caputo

 

​ by Ben Geman, Marc Caputo

At a briefing with reporters Tuesday, a U.S. official talked up Betancourt as a "proven operator" in the country's oil sector that has been vetted by the administration.

 

Photo illustration of President Trump, Alejandro Betancourt Lopez, and Alejandro Betancourt Lopez with an overlay of oil barrels
Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photos: Saul Loeb, Juan Barreto/AFP via Getty Images and Wikimedia Commons

 

Ben Geman, Marc Caputo

Source: https://www.axios.com/2026/09/01/us-officials-defend-deal-venezuelan-oil-baron

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter