Tuesday, February 10, 2026

Iran says nuclear talks gauged 'seriousness' of US as Araghchi refuses to halt uranium enrichment - Reuters

 

by Reuters

This comes after the Trump administration told Iran that it expects the Iranian delegation to arrive at their next meeting “with meaningful substance," sources told the Post.

 

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi is welcomed by an Omani official upon his arrival in Muscat, Oman, in this handout image obtained on February 6, 2026.
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi is welcomed by an Omani official upon his arrival in Muscat, Oman, in this handout image obtained on February 6, 2026.
(photo credit: IRANIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY)/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

Nuclear talks with the United States last week were primarily meant to gauge Washington's "seriousness", Iran's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said on Tuesday, adding that the brief encounter showed enough understanding to pursue discussions despite distrust.

"The Muscat meeting was not a long meeting. In our view, it was to gauge the seriousness of the other side and how to continue this path," Baghaei said.

"After the talks, we felt there was understanding and consensus to continue the diplomatic process."

The spokesperson said that Ali Larijani, an advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader, planned a trip to Oman on Tuesday to follow up on regional consultations and that Larijani would then travel to Qatar.

Regarding the Israeli Prime Minister's expected trip to Washington on Wednesday, Baghaei said the US "must act independently of foreign pressures, especially Israeli pressures that ignore the interests of the region and even the US."

US special envoy Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, and US Central Command Chief Adm. Brad Cooper met with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and other Iranian senior officials in Oman on Friday.

The Trump administration has told Iran that it expects the Iranian delegation, led by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, to arrive at their next meeting “with meaningful substance,” two people familiar with the matter told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday.

After the talks, US President Donald Trump announced that another meeting would take place "early next week."

Pictures of Iranian military commanders, nuclear scientists and others killed in Israeli strikes are displayed in Behesht Zahra Cemetery in southern Tehran, Iran, July 11, 2025 (credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA
Pictures of Iranian military commanders, nuclear scientists and others killed in Israeli strikes are displayed in Behesht Zahra Cemetery in southern Tehran, Iran, July 11, 2025 (credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)

Iran nuclear talks to resume, Trump says 

"They want to make a deal," Trump said of Iran, adding that Tehran's leadership knows that "if they don’t make a deal, the consequences will be very steep."

The president stated that the two nations "are in no rush" to reach an understanding and that the US has to get "in position" for an agreement, but that he'd "love to see" a deal made.

While some Iranian officials have said that Iran could agree to dilute its stockpile of 60% enriched uranium in exchange for the lifting of all sanctions imposed against its nuclear program, Araghchi previously insisted that a complete halt to uranium enrichment is absolutely unacceptable to Iran. 

“The discussions should focus on scenarios in which uranium enrichment continues, alongside assurances that the enrichment is solely for peaceful purposes,” he said.

He also said that the missile issue and the “regional arena,” i.e., Iran’s proxies, were off the agenda for the negotiations.

“The subject of the negotiations is the nuclear issue, and that is how it will remain,” he said.

Amichai Stein, Shoshana Baker, and Goldie Katz contributed to this report.  


Reuters

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-886185

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'Project Vault': Trump's Latest 'Manhattan Project' in The Race with China for 21st Century Leadership - Lawrence Kadish

 

by Lawrence Kadish

The 21st Century has changed the concept of the types and amounts of strategic minerals that will be required to protect the nation's future --and few recognize that need more acutely than Trump.

 

With "Project Vault," President Donald Trump is looking to break China's stranglehold on the supply of critical rare earth elements. Pictured: A front-loader shifts soil containing rare earth elements, to be loaded on ships at a port in Lianyungang, China, on September 5, 2010. (Photo by STR/AFP via Getty Images)

President Donald Trump is taking an important page from World War II's Manhattan Project, when the United States raced to secure supplies of the rare element uranium needed to create the war-winning atomic bomb. When strategic amounts of the element were found in Africa, deep in mines in the Belgian Congo, a "cover" entity called the Combined Development Trust was created by the U.S. to purchase all supplies and thereby deny Nazi Germany access to the coveted uranium.

The 21st Century has changed the concept of the types and amounts of strategic minerals that will be required to protect the nation's future --and few recognize that need more acutely than Trump.

Today the strategic minerals needed are "rare earths," and Trump is about to launch a strategic stockpile campaign to ensure our national economy is not held hostage by China, which has significant deposits of these vital resources.

Called "Project Vault," his campaign for rare earth elements will combine $1.67 billion in private sector funds with a $10 billion loan from the US Export-Import Bank. Our defense companies currently have sufficient amounts of rare earths for our weapons and aircraft, but the president's campaign is designed to protect our consumer-driven economy beyond his term by stockpiling rare earths for automakers, technology firms and others who require these minerals for such products as smartphones, batteries, and commercial jet engines.

While our historic race for uranium comes to mind, the president's campaign also reflects the wisdom behind our current Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Instead of oil, however, Project Vault will look to acquire and stockpile minerals such as lithium, gallium and cobalt.

The purpose of this unprecedented effort is obvious if one looks at China's track record of holding hostage its vast supplies of rare earths. Trump is looking to break that stranglehold and strategically reduce our dependence on China's supply chain of these critical elements. This is but one step in Trump's responding to China's rare earth threat. He has also invested directly in American companies to boost their mining, production and processing of "rare earths" safely within our borders.

The White House also recognizes that Project Vault has the means to dampen volatile price swings for rare earth commodities. Published accounts of the proposed campaign report that companies that commit to buying a specified amount of minerals at a set price will contractually commit to purchasing the same amount at the same price in the future. This decision reflects Trump's appreciation of how market forces have the potential to derail a plan designed to protect both our nation's economy and national security.

It is expected that later this week will see Project Vault officially unveiled in Washington, D.C., with America's allies at the table to fully appreciate the scope of what is being proposed.

What will become obvious to all is that, once again, the lessons learned by studying America's past are applicable to protecting our future for generations to come.


Lawrence Kadish serves on the Board of Governors of Gatestone Institute.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22264/project-vault

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF readying new Gaza offensive to disarm Hamas by force - Emanuel Fabian

 

by Emanuel Fabian

Plans being drawn up for large-scale op, with terror group seen as unlikely to give up weapons otherwise; for now, IDF holding tight on Yellow Line, amid ‘endless’ tunnel demolition

 

A view of Gaza City's Shejaiya neighborhood from an Israeli army position in the Gaza Strip, February 9, 2026. (Emanuel Fabian/Times of Israel)
A view of Gaza City's Shejaiya neighborhood from an Israeli army position in the Gaza Strip, February 9, 2026. (Emanuel Fabian/Times of Israel)

 

SHEJAIYA, Gaza Strip — Four months into a ceasefire with Hamas, the Israeli military is drawing up plans for a renewed offensive in the Gaza Strip to disarm the terror group by force, The Times of Israel has learned.

The US-brokered ceasefire plan reached in October foresees the demilitarization of Gaza, including the disarmament of Hamas, along with a gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Strip. However, implementation of the plan has remained unclear, with Israeli officials increasingly believing that stripping Hamas of its weapons will be impossible without the Israel Defense Forces taking action.

Should hostilities renew, fighting is liable to be more intense and more widespread than previous rounds, as Israeli forces will no longer constrained by the presence of hostages on Gazan soil.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump have both insisted that the terror group must give up its weapons in the near future. Trump has repeatedly asserted that Hamas “promised” to lay down its arms, and has threatened the group over the issue.

However, at least publicly, Hamas has never agreed to lay down its arms.

Israel also believes that left unchecked, the terror group will remain in power in the Strip and try to rebuild its militarily strength while tightening its grip on areas under its control. The military this month said that since the start of the ceasefire, Hamas “has violated the agreement and focused its efforts on restoring its military capabilities.”

Last month, a senior Israeli security official said that it was looking increasingly likely that the Israel Defense Forces would have to act militarily against Hamas to disarm it, as the military believed the terrorist organization will not do so of its own accord.

The official said the goal of disarming Hamas would be attainable by force, but would likely take many years.

Hamas police forces deploy in Gaza City on October 11, 2025. (Ali Hassan/ Flash90)

In recent weeks, the IDF’s Southern Command has been building plans for a series of potential operations in the Strip should the political leadership instruct the military to disarm Hamas by force, The Times of Israel has learned.

Hinting at the military’s offensive plans, Defense Minister Israel Katz this month said that Israel was “determined” to disarm Hamas, threatening to “dismantle” the terror group if it doesn’t agree to lay down its arms.

“After we have completed the objective of bringing back all of our hostages, we are determined to complete the disarmament of Hamas and the full demilitarization of Gaza,” Katz said. “If Hamas does not disarm in accordance with the agreed framework, we will dismantle it and all of its capabilities.”

Such an offensive aimed at disarming Hamas — should it go ahead — could be far more intense than the IDF’s operations in the Strip throughout the two years of war that began on October 7, 2023. The military has stressed throughout the war that it planned its operations in Gaza with the hostages in mind, even though some were still harmed by Israeli actions.

Displaced Palestinians gather outside a tent at a temporary camp in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, January 17, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

The IDF would also be expected to operate in areas of Gaza where ground troops have not set foot amid the war, including Deir al-Balah in the Strip’s center and the Mawasi area on the southern coast.

The IDF did not operate in those areas mainly due to the potential risk to the hostages, as well as the large concentration of Palestinians there following Israeli evacuation orders from other areas of the Strip.

But Israel could still be constrained by the Trump administration, which has made the Gaza ceasefire a centerpiece of its Board of Peace initiative. Any renewal of large-scale fighting could upend Trump’s Gaza plan and threaten the support of its international backers.

In October, Trump indicated that he would allow Israel to resume fighting in Gaza if Hamas doesn’t uphold the terms of the hostage deal. However, with the return of all the hostages, it is unclear if Trump still holds this position and would allow Israel to carry out a full-scale offensive against Hamas.

Holding down the Yellow Line

Until Hamas disarms, Israel is not expected to withdraw its troops from the Strip or approve any rebuilding efforts in the war-torn territory, leaving the ceasefire agreement in limbo.

Israeli troops currently hold 53% percent of the Strip, with most of the approximately 2 million Gazans in the remaining 47% of the enclave under ostensible Hamas control.

During a visit to a forward army outpost in Gaza City’s Shejaiya neighborhood on Monday, commanders told The Times of Israel that Hamas was continuing to test the IDF by sending operatives across the ceasefire line to attack troops.

Since the start of the ceasefire in October, the IDF has said it has killed dozens of terror operatives and other suspects who have crossed the Yellow Line — demarcating where the military withdrew to in the Strip — and approached troops. Such incidents have taken place on a near-daily basis.

IDF soldiers are seen at an army position outside of Gaza City’s Shejaiya neighborhood, February 9, 2026. (Emanuel Fabian/Times of Israel)

Last week, a reservist officer was seriously wounded by gunfire carried out by Palestinian gunmen against troops who were operating near the Yellow Line in Shejaiya. In response, the military launched a series of strikes against Hamas.

“No one is allowed to cross the Yellow Line. Whoever crosses is destroyed or eliminated at that moment,” said a battalion commander in the Alexandroni Reserve Infantry Brigade during Monday’s visit.

The reservist forces stationed at the outpost seemed relatively relaxed, despite the recent attack by gunmen that left one of their company commanders wounded, though such incidents, including last week’s, have taken place during operations by troops closer to the Yellow Line, rather than at the outpost, which stood several hundred meters east of the ceasefire boundary.

A vast landscape of rubble could be seen stretching out toward Gaza City, and deeper in the Strip there was a skyline of partially crumbled but still-standing structures.

Lt. Col. ‘Yud,’ a battalion commander in the Alexandroni Brigade, is seen at an army position outside of Gaza City’s Shejaiya neighborhood, February 9, 2026. (Emanuel Fabian/Times of Israel)

The Yellow Line itself, marked by bright yellow concrete blocks placed inside the mangled urban landscape, was not visible to the naked eye due to overcast conditions.

According to the commander, the terror group had been forcibly sending civilians across the line to test the Israeli response.

Hamas “knows that we don’t shoot at women and children, even those who are unarmed,” he said.

“If they don’t pose a threat, they won’t die. So [Hamas] is trying to take advantage of that,” he added.

“A terrorist who crosses the Yellow Line will die. Will we kill children? Of course we won’t. But no one is [crossing the Yellow Line] for no reason.”

The view of Gaza City’s Shejaiya neighborhood from an Israeli army position in the Strip, February 9, 2026. (Emanuel Fabian/Times of Israel)

Within the IDF-held territory of the Strip, the military was continuing to work on demolishing Hamas’s tunnels, a task that some soldiers described as “endless.”

The military believes that at least 60% of Hamas’s tunnels in Gaza are still intact, though the percentage could be higher, as the army does not know how many underground routes it has not yet found.

“We have defensive lines that we are deployed along,” the battalion commander said, adding that he was “not concerned” about the fact that “most” of Hamas’s tunnels still exist in the territory.

“We are here on the defensive lines to monitor anyone advancing on the ground or underground,” he added. “We have several defensive lines that are meant to prevent any crossing of the fence, any crossing of this line of outposts.” 


Emanuel Fabian

Source: https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-readying-new-gaza-offensive-to-disarm-hamas-by-force/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Netanyahu, Trump to discuss 'principles' for Iran talks as Israeli PM departs for Washington - Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

Netanyahu: "I will present Trump with...important principles for everyone who wants peace and security in the Middle East" • Huckabee: No gaps between Israel, US on Iran

 

US Ambassador Mike Huckabee speaks ahead at Ben-Gurion Airport of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to the US, February 10, 2026 (AMICHAI STEIN)

 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will present US President Donald Trump with "principles" for the United States' nuclear negotiations when the two meet in the White House on Wednesday, he said as he departed Israel on Tuesday afternoon.

"I will present Trump with principles for negotiations with Iran that are important not only to Israel but to everyone who wants peace and security," Netanyahu said while boarding Wing of Zion, Israel's state aircraft. "In my opinion, these are important principles for everyone who wants peace and security in the Middle East."

Huckabee: No gaps between Israel, US on Iran

There are no significant gaps between Israel and the United States on negotiations with Iran, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday at Ben-Gurion Airport.

"I think there's an extraordinary alignment between Israel and the United States. Everyone would love to see something that would resolve without a war, but it will be up to Iran. If they insist on holding nuclear weaponry and enriched uranium, then I think the president made very clear that this is not acceptable," Huckabee said.

When asked by The Post if the US and Israel's stance on red lines for negotiations are the same, Huckabee said that he had not hear anything to the contrary. 

Huckabee's comments came as Netanyahu set off for Washington to discuss a course of action on Iran with the US president. The prime minister is slated to meet with Trump and senior members of his administration at 11 a.m. local time (6 p.m. Israel time) on Wednesday, and is expected to stay in Washington for around 42 hours.

US President Donald Trump points his finger towards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they shake hands during a press conference after meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, December 29, 2025.
US President Donald Trump points his finger towards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they shake hands during a press conference after meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, December 29, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/JONATHAN ERNST)

Israel, US meeting to shape Iran strategy

Israeli officials described the meeting as a “strategy-shaping session,” meaning it will focus not only on the US-Iran negotiations themselves but also on what could happen if the talks fail, including a potential US military strike.

The PM's military secretary, Maj.-Gen. Roman Gofman, the acting director of the National Security Council (NSC), and Gil Reich are accompanying Netanyahu on the visit.

In accordance with what Huckabee has said to the Post on Tuesday, US Vice President JD Vance said in Armenia on Monday that there were no redlines at this stage, but that Trump was seeking a broad and comprehensive agreement.

“If there are red lines in the talks with Iran, Trump will be the one to set them,” the vice president said. “He wants a meaningful deal. Reaching an agreement with Iran would benefit everyone.”


Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-886205

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Chinese scientists embraced by U.S. colleges worked with Chinese military-linked firms - Jerry Dunleavy

 

by Jerry Dunleavy

American colleges have admitted Chinese scientists who worked at blacklisted Chinese tech firms that serve the CCP's military and intelligence apparatus, often co-funded by U.S. taxpayers.

 

A recent watchdog report revealed that several top-ranked American universities have brought in Chinese academics who have links to Chinese military-linked technology firms like tech behemoth Huawei and other Chinese firms linked to the CCP’s state security endeavors.

A conservative non-profit watchdog group, the American Accountability Foundation, reported that it found nearly two dozen Chinese academics working at elite U.S. schools and labs “who, because of the dual-use threat of their research, close ties to the military research sector in China, and/or clear ties to the Chinese Communist Party" and as such "should be expelled from the United States or never be re-admitted."

The new AAF report pointed out that multiple Chinese students working at American universities had previously collaborated on projects with researchers at Huawei, including working with researchers at the Internal Cybersecurity Lab at Huawei.

"National champions" feed military programs

Just the News also found that at least one of the Chinese academics had also worked at iFlytek — a similarly blacklisted Chinese company which often collaborates with Huawei. The U.S. National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence stated in 2021 that “national champion” firms such as Huawei and iFlytek help “lead development of AI technologies at home” and “advance state-directed priorities that feed military and security programs.”

The Congressional Executive Commission on China said in 2019 that “Chinese security authorities continued to work with domestic companies” — including Huawei and iFlytek — “to expand the reach and analytical power of government surveillance systems.”

Just the News previously detailed the fact that a number of U.S. colleges and universities have brought on members of the Chinese Communist Party as well as participants in the infamous “Thousand Talents Program” which has historically been used to steal U.S. technological and scientific know-how for the benefit of China.

The AAF report also pointed out that a Chinese scientist now working at an American university had previously worked at the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, or AVIC, a CCP defense conglomerate blacklisted by the U.S. government. The Chinese state-owned military company is considered to be among the largest defense companies in the world.

The report by AAF also pointed out that a Chinese scientist working at an American school had previously worked at China’s Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research — also blacklisted by the U.S. government.

The new AAF research document — titled "Chinese Scientist Infiltration Threat Assessments" — says that Chinese students working at some of America’s top colleges, often receiving U.S. government funding to conduct research into advanced technologies, have troubling histories which could pose a risk to U.S. national security.

The U.S. colleges in question which have brought on the Chinese scientists linked to blacklisted CCP companies — Cornell University, Georgia Tech, the University of Southern California, and Purdue University — did not respond to emailed requests for comment from Just the News

None of the Chinese academics responded to requests for comment either.

The Huawei threat — now inside U.S. universities

The AAF report argued that Guangyao Chen “poses a high national-security and dual-use risk due to his expertise in adversarial machine learning” and that “this risk is amplified by his training at Peking University, PRC government funding, and collaborations with PRC universities and Huawei, placing his work squarely within China’s military-civil fusion ecosystem.”

Chen currently appears to be affiliated with Cornell. The ResearchGate page for Chen says that his “top co-authors” include Lin Du, a researcher at Huawei. Chen appears to have conducted multiple research projects with the Huawei researcher. The Huawei scientist’s ResearchGate profile lists Du’s skills and expertise as being “computer vision,” “object recognition,” and “machine learning.”

The House Intelligence Committee in 2012 assessed that “the risks associated with Huawei’s […] provision of equipment to U.S. critical infrastructure could undermine core U.S. national security interests” and said that Huawei poses “a security threat to the United States and to our systems.”

The heads of the FBI, CIA, NSA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency all warned in 2018 against using Huawei services or equipment. In addition, the Commerce Department concluded in 2020 that “Huawei is engaged in activities that are contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests and its non-U.S. affiliates pose a significant risk of involvement in activities contrary to the national security of the United States.” 

The FCC added Huawei to its blacklist as well, concluding in 2020 that Huawei “poses a national security threat to our nation’s communications networks and the communications supply chain.”

Meng Wanzhou, Huawei’s CFO and the daughter of the company’s founder, was arrested by Canadian authorities in December 2018 at the request of the U.S., indicted in the Eastern District of New York in January 2019, and charged with bank fraud and wire fraud as well as conspiracy to commit both, but was allowed to walk free by the Biden Administration in 2021 in a deferred prosecution agreement wherein she admitted violating U.S. law. 

The GitHub profile for Chen says that “I’m currently a Postdoctoral Researcher at AI for Science Institute, Cornell University” and that he received his PhD from Peking University and his undergraduate degree from Wuhan University.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) said that Peking University “is assessed as high risk for its high number of defense laboratories and defense research areas, strong relationship with the defense industry, supervision by SASTIND, secret-level security clearance, and links to China’s nuclear weapons program.”

Wuhan University the center of military research

The House Select Committee on the CCP assessed in 2025 that Wuhan University “conducts research in at least five designated defense research areas, trains People’s Liberation Army cyber warfare specialists, and plays a central role in China’s Beidou satellite system, which supports missile guidance and military intelligence operations.”

Chen is currently listed as a postdoctoral associate at Cornell’s school of chemical and biomolecular engineering through the Fengqui You Lab. Neither Chen nor Cornell responded to a request for comment.

Fengqui You, a Cornell professor, leads the Fengqui You Research Group at Cornell, which is “pushing the boundaries of systems engineering, artificial intelligence, and data science.”

Chen is listed as a member and Fengqui You is listed as the principal investigator for the lab. You attended Tsinghua University, which the House Select Committee on the CCP has warned about. You did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The House Select Committee on the CCP warned in 2024 that Tsinghua is “co-supervised by the State Administration for Science, Technology, and Industry for National Defense, an arm of the Chinese government … which seeks to leverage these universities for defense purposes” and that Tsinghua “has a documented history of serving the PRC’s national security and defense apparatus, including involvement in defense research and alleged cyberattacks targeting various international entities.”

“His technical focus and institutional ties create a credible pathway for transferring adversarial-AI knowledge that could be used to compromise or weaponize AI systems critical to U.S. national security,” the report by AAF says of Chen.

Chinese academic with links to Huawei and iFlytek wins DARPA award in U.S.

The report by AAF said that Cen Zhang’s “prior work with Chinese entities and his influential role at Georgia Tech is highly concerning given the nature of computer science’s impact on U.S. national security.”

Zhang co-authored a 2021 paper on “Practical Binary Fuzzing Framework for Programs of IoT and Mobile Devices” — related to security vulnerabilities for mobile phones and other smart devices — with co-authors Xiaoxing Luo and Miaohua Li from the Internal Cyber Security Lab at Huawei Technologies.

Zhang has also conducted research with Hongxu Chen, who now lists himself as a lead engineer at Huawei, and who also went to Nanyang Technological University.

Zhang’s personal curriculum vitae also says he was previously an algorithm and engine development engineer for iFlytek. Zhang says on his GitHub page that he won the “Best New Employee Award of Year” at iFlytek in 2017.

The firm has long received state support and recognition from China’s government. The company was named a national “AI champion” by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology in 2018.

The Commerce Department said in October 2019 that iFlytek was among more than two dozen Chinese entities added to a U.S. blacklist, saying they were “implicated in human rights violations and abuses in the implementation of China’s campaign of repression, mass arbitrary detention, and high-technology surveillance against Uighurs, Kazakhs, and other members of Muslim minority groups.” Liu Qingfeng, iFlytek’s founder and CEO, is also a deputy to the National People’s Congress, the CCP’s rubber-stamp national legislature.

Liu told the Chinese state-run Global Times in 2020 that the blacklist against it had not slowed it down and touted his partnership with Huawei. A 2018 magazine article shared by Huawei asserted that “iFlytek and Huawei have formed a strategic partnership to develop practical applications for voice and AI technology.”

The Washington Post revealed in 2021 that Huawei, as part of a pitch to assist Chinese authorities in analyzing voices for “national security” purposes, made slides showing that an “iFlytek Voiceprint Management Platform” (developed by both Huawei and iFlytek) could identify individuals through a massive “voiceprint” database.

Fu Liting, the marketing director of the Public Security Division at the Smart City Business Group of iFlytek, told the CCP-run China Daily in 2022 that “we work with the police by applying our artificial intelligence.”

Human Rights Watch said in 2017 that iFlytek says it helped China’s Ministry of Public Security build a national voice pattern database and set up a ministry laboratory in AI voice technology to “solve cases” in Xinjiang and Tibet. The watchdog group said the company “is also the designated supplier of voice pattern collection systems purchased by Xinjiang and Anhui police bureaus.”

U.S. gov't rewards Chinese agents

Zhang’s U.S.-based team appears to have won a recent Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency competition called the AI Cyber Challenge (AIxCC). The DARPA challenge said it was “excited to have Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, the Linux Foundation, the Open Source Security Foundation, Black Hat USA, and DEF CON as collaborators in this effort.” The competition website said Team Atlantic — which Zhang was on — came in first place and won $4 million.

Team Atlanta said that it “claimed victory in DARPA’s AI Cyber Challenge, showcasing the capabilities of our autonomous security technology.” The JAVA software team lead was Zhang. 

The Team Atlanta page for Zhang said that “Atlantis-Java is a specialized bug-finding subsystem … specifically designed for Java CPV [CertPathValidator] detection in the AIxCC competition. It integrates fuzzing, program analysis, and LLM capabilities” — similar topics to the ones he had researched alongside Huawei co-authors.

DARPA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Zhang’s Github says that he received his PhD at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. His curriculum vitae also says he received a master’s degree at the University of Science and Technology of China.

The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security said in 2024 that that Chinese school was added to its blacklist “for acquiring and attempting to acquire U.S.-origin items in support of advancing China's quantum technology capabilities, which has serious ramifications for U.S. national security given the military applications of quantum technologies” and for being “involved in advancing China's nuclear program development.”

A paper written by Zhang when he was still at the Singapore university included seven co-authors from the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Other prior papers written by Zhang were often co-authored by scientists from the Chinese Academy of Sciences as well as Chinese universities such as Peking University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, and Zhejiang University.

Zhang’s GitHub page says he is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the Systems Software and Security Lab at Georgia Tech.

This lab says that its “Funding Support” includes federal government sources such as DARPA, NSF, Office of Naval Research, and Sandia National Laboratories, as well as tech companies such as Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and OpenAI.

Neither Zhang nor Georgia Tech responded to a request for comment.

The AAF report assessed that Zheng’s “inside knowledge of leading defense collaborators and AI platforms is a significant threat in the race between China and the U.S. for AI superiority.” 

Chinese scientist at U.S. college worked for China’s largest military aircraft company

The AAF report claims that Xiaobin Zhao “presents a high national-security risk because his research in quantum sensing, metrology, and communications directly supports technologies critical to next generation military systems, including areas explicitly identified by the U.S. government as strategically sensitive” and that “the risk is heightened by his funding from PRC state programs operating under military-civil fusion and his prior work with AVIC, a PLA-controlled defense conglomerate.”

The Google Scholar page for Zhao lists him at USC. Neither Zhao nor USC responded to a request for comment.

Zhao’s online bio says he interned at the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, or AVIC, in 2013. The Chinese state-owned military company is considered to be among the largest defense companies in the world.

A key AVIC subsidiary known as the China National Aero-Technology Import and Export Corporation, or CATIC, has also been considered a U.S. national security threat since 1990. President George H.W. Bush issued an order in January 1990 that concluded CATIC “might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States of America.”

The House Select Committee on China warned in 1998 about AVIC and its subsidiary CATIC, and the Government Accountability Office in 1996 detailed a scheme by CATIC to get U.S.-based McDonnell Douglas to “co-produce 40 MD-80 and MD-90 aircraft in China for the country’s domestic ‘trunk’ routes.”

CATIC was charged by the Justice Department in 1999 with violating the Export Administration Act and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act “regarding details of a 1994 sale of American machining equipment, some of which was diverted to a Chinese military site.”

The Commerce Department said in 2001 that TAL Industries was allegedly part of the "conspiracy" to export machine tools from the U.S. to CATIC.

The State Department said in 2002 that most of the charges related to CATIC were dismissed, but that "TAL Industries Inc., however, was convicted of violating the EAA and was sentenced on May 11, 2001, to five years of corporate probation" and "payment of a $1 million fine."

The AVIC website in 2015 made it clear that its business units included “defense” as well as aviation. The “AVIC Evolution” section said the company was the successor to the Chinese government’s Ministry of Aerospace Industry. Now-former Chinese defense minister Li Shangfu had previously been a board member of AVIC Avionics Equipment.

AVIC and its subsidiaries were blacklisted by the Pentagon in 2020 for being “Chinese Military Companies Operating in the United States.” AVIC Avionics was also sanctioned by the Treasury Department in 2021 and placed on the “Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List.”

The blacklist added that the Chinese center is “operated by, or directly affiliated with, the Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics, which is the technology complex responsible for the research, development and testing of China's nuclear weapons.”

The House Select Committee on the CCP said in 2024 that AVIC is “the principal producer of military aircraft for the PLA.”

The House committee said that “major index providers and asset managers” in the U.S. “channel billions of dollars to PRC companies on U.S. government red-flag lists for advancing the PRC’s military and supporting the CCP’s human rights abuses” including $178 million from U.S. industry.

The committee also noted that AVIC sells aircraft to the Iranian regime’s Aerospace Force. AVIC has also supported Russia during its war with Ukraine.

Zhao previously attended Hong Kong University. He also attended Northwestern Polytechnical University according to his online biography. The latter university has long been on U.S. government blacklists, including being blacklisted by the Pentagon, and it has been dubbed one of the CCP’s “Seven Sons of National Defense.”

The Commerce Department in 2021 described the school as “a Chinese military university that is heavily involved in military research and works closely with the People’s Liberation Army on the advancement of its military capabilities.”

The USC lab is run by Quntao Zhuang, listed as the “Principal Investigator” at the lab, who graduated from Peking University. Zhuang did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

ASPI says that Peking University “is assessed as high risk for its high number of defence laboratories and defence research areas, strong relationship with the defense industry, supervision by SASTIND, secret-level security clearance, and links to China’s nuclear weapons program.”

The report by AAF said that “this combination of critical dual-use technical expertise, direct historical ties to PLA-aligned entities, and ongoing proximity to U.S. quantum research presents a credible pathway by which sensitive knowledge could be transferred to the PRC, materially enhancing China’s military modernization and undermining U.S. national security advantages.”

Another scientist from blacklisted Chinese tech research center comes to the U.S.

The report by AAF said that Bijuan Chen “is a leading researcher in an area of critical defense research who was trained at one of China’s leading military research institutes, which the U.S. government has labeled as a hostile actor who behaves in a way contrary to U.S. national security interests.”

The report alleged that “despite Bijuan Chen having the formative years of her career in an agency that the U.S. Government had declared acts in ways contrary to the national security interests of the United States, Chen still went to work with researchers working on defense-related research.”

Chen is now listed as working at Purdue University. Neither Chen nor Purdue responded to requests for comment.

Chen’s online profile at the Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, or HPSTAR, says that she received her PhD from the Institute of Physics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and obtained her undergraduate degree at Sichuan University.

Chen’s “alumni” profile at the Chinese center says that “her research interests in HPSTAR mainly focus on the studies of mixed valent behaviors, exotic magnetism, quantum phase transition and superconductivity in electron materials under extreme pressures using  X-ray spectroscopy and neutron scattering.”

The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security assessed in 2020 that HPSTAR had been “determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States … on the basis of their procurement of U.S.-origin items for activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States.”

The blacklist added that HPSTAR “operated by, or directly affiliated with, the Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics, which is the technology complex responsible for the research, development and testing of China's nuclear weapons.” HPSTAR is also on the Pentagon’s list of “foreign institutions engaging in problematic activity” with the Defense Department saying the list is “an important continuing effort in highlighting and countering mechanisms of unwanted technology transfer to foreign countries of concern.”

Yang Ding’s former team leader at HPSTAR appears to have been a part of the Thousand Talents Program, with HPSTAR saying that Ding had received the “1000-Talents Award.”

Chen was previously listed as a “postdoctoral researcher” working on the “X-ray Science Group” led by Ding at HPSTAR. Ding is listed as the “PI” — likely standing for “principal investigator” — for the Chinese science group at the center, and Chen is listed as an “alumni” of Ding’s group. The HPSTAR page lists Chen and Ding as co-authors on research projects at HPSTAR.

The House Select Committee on the CCP said in 2025 that Sichuan University was “affiliated” with SASTIND, saying that these SASTIND schools “maintain specialized labs, programs, and departments dedicated to military research” and “SASTIND plays a critical role in managing China’s defense R&D outside the PLA.”

A host of institutes and centers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences have been blacklisted by the Commerce Department, including the Institute of Physics (where Chen received her PhD).

Chen’s LinkedIn profile says she has been a postdoctoral research fellow at Purdue since July 2025, and had been a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard.

She is listed as working at the Tongcang Li Research Group at Purdue, a “Quantum Sensing and Optomechanics Laboratory.”

The research group appears to have received millions of dollars in funding from the U.S. Department of Energy. Purdue and Tongcang Li were selected in 2024 by the Department of Energy to help “lead the Quantum Photonics Integrated Design Center Energy Frontier Research Center” in collaboration with Los Alamos National Laboratory and other partners.

Chen’s Google Scholar page also says she worked at Harvard, where she was part of the Yao Group at Harvard, which says that “our research lies at the interface between atomic, molecular, and optical physics, condensed matter, and quantum information science.” The AAF report concluded that “Chen still has ties to HPSTAR, and her continued work in this critical area represents a significant threat for transfer of vital research information aiding the Chinese at the expense of the United States.”

FBI Director Kash Patel told Just the News on Friday that “this FBI, under this leadership, has prioritized the threat against it by the CCP against us, and we've taken swift action.” It remains to be seen the extent to which the bureau’s efforts against Beijing will extend to American colleges welcoming Chinese academics linked to Huawei and other blacklisted Chinese firms. 


Jerry Dunleavy

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/education/chinese-scientists-us-colleges-worked-huawei-and-other-chinese-military

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Federal appeals court hands Trump big win, ends protections for migrants from three nations - Misty Severi

 

by Misty Severi

The San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the federal government would succeed on the grounds that Noem's decision "was not arbitrary or capricious."

 

A liberal-leaning federal appeals court in California on Monday night unexpectedly sided with the Trump administration by allowing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to end Temporary Protected Status for migrants from three countries.

The San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order freezing a lower court ruling that would have vacated Noem's decision to end protections for immigrants from Nepal, Honduras and Nicaragua, according to Fox News.

The court ruled that the federal government would succeed on the grounds that Noem's decision "was not arbitrary or capricious." 

Noem had argued the grounds for the temporary protected status no longer existed because they were tied to specific events that happened years ago, and the DHS has argued that the designations were designed to be temporary. 

"This is a crucial legal win from Justice Department attorneys that helps clear the way for President Trump’s continued deportations," Attorney General Pam Bondi said on X. "As the court found, ‘the government is likely to prevail in its argument’ that ending Temporary Protected Status for some immigrants is sound and lawful policy. We are proud to represent the Trump Administration in court every day."

Temporary Protected Status is given to people from countries that are unsafe because of a natural disaster, political instability or other dangerous conditions. The protections are granted for six, 12 or 18 months and allow the recipient to work in the United States and prevents them from being deported.


Misty Severi is a news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage.

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/federal-appeals-court-california-allows-dhs-end-tps-migrants-three-countries

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump threatens to prevent opening of Canada-Michigan bridge over treatment of US, China friendship - Misty Severi

 

by Misty Severi

Trump said he would derail the plan for the bridge to open soon in a post on Truth Social, stating that Canada has not been treating the United States "fairly" for decades.

 

President Donald Trump threatened late Monday to block the opening of a new bridge on the border between Michigan and Canada, over Canada's treatment of the United States and its budding relationship with China.

The new bridge is expected to open early this year and is set to be the only bridge that allows for foot and bike traffic between Detroit, Michigan, and Windsor, Ontario, according to Politico. The bridge will be maintained by Canada. 

Trump said he would derail the plan for the Gordie Howe International Bridge to open soon in a post on Truth Social, stating that Canada has not been treating the United States "fairly" for decades. 

"I will not allow this bridge to open until the United States is fully compensated for everything we have given them, and also, importantly, Canada treats the United States with the Fairness and Respect that we deserve," Trump insisted. "We will start negotiations immediately."

Trump also slammed Canada's new friendship with China, who he claimed will "eat Canada alive." 

"Ontario won't even put U.S. spirits, beverages, and other alcoholic products, on their shelves, they are absolutely prohibited from doing so" Trump said. "Now, on top of everything else, Prime Minister Carney wants to make a deal with China — which will eat Canada alive. We’ll just get the leftovers! I don't think so."

The comment comes after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced last month that his country negotiated a new “strategic partnership” with the Communist regime in Beijing, that promised to expand trade and mutual investment, along with close cooperation on law enforcement that focuses on drug trafficking and cybercrime.


Misty Severi is a news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage.

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/trump-threatens-prevent-opening-canada-michigan-bridge-over

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

House overwhelmingly passes major housing package - Misty Severi

 

by Misty Severi

The lower chamber passed the Housing in the 21st Century Act in a 390-9 split under suspension of the rules, which allows noncontroversial bipartisan legislation to be approved quickly.

 

The House of Representatives on Monday night overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan housing package that is intended to make homeownership more affordable and modernize rural housing programs.

The lower chamber passed the Housing in the 21st Century Act in a 390-9 split under suspension of the rules, which allows noncontroversial bipartisan legislation to be approved quickly. 

The legislation will now go to the Senate, which passed its own housing bill late last year. Both bills are similar but have key differences that will need to be voted on before it can go to President Donald Trump's desk for his signature.

“We wanted to get [the housing bill and other committee priorities] through the House so that we could work with the Senate to find packages that the President could sign into law, long before the very active summer campaign season,” House Financial Services Chair French Hill told Politico. “So I would hope that we could work over the spring and find a way to have a bicameral, bipartisan set of bills.”

The House bill includes provisions that incentivize the construction of multifamily homes, which are things like duplexes that are between a single-family unit and apartment complexes, according to Fox News

It also includes provisions that protect borrowers and those utilizing federal housing programs and enhance oversight of housing providers.

“Housing costs have soared beyond the reach of millions of American families thanks to Bidenflation, while outdated and burdensome red tape has constrained our nation’s affordable housing supply and limited our ability to expand it,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said in a statement. “Today’s House passage of the Housing for the 21st Century Act is a critical step toward addressing this shortage by reducing unnecessary regulatory barriers, modernizing HUD programs, and giving banks flexibility to deploy capital to increase our housing supply."


Misty Severi is a news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage. 

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/congress/house-overwhelmingly-passes-major-housing-package

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran's Reza Pahlavi: Trump needs to act, end IRGC's genocide on Iranians - James Genn

 

by James Genn

"This is a genocide in the making," and Iranian protesters need help to neutralize elements the regime has used to brutalize its own citizenry, Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi told Hugh Hewitt.

 

Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi following a speech in Washington, January 16, 2026; illustrative.
Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi following a speech in Washington, January 16, 2026; illustrative.
(photo credit: REUTERS/JONATHAN ERNST)

 The Islamic Regime's clampdown on protesters, including the shooting of unarmed civilians, is a "genocide in the making," Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi told radio host Hugh Hewitt on Monday.

Hewitt notably served as the former president and CEO of the Richard Nixon Foundation and former deputy director of the Office of Personnel Management under the Reagan administration.

"What do you hope to see [US President Donald] Trump order our military and America to do right now?" Hewitt asked the prince.

"When you are fighting an occupying force that has taken a whole country hostage, and people are on the streets unarmed as civilians demanding liberation from this tyranny and hoping for freedom, and at the time they are being shot on the streets by military machine guns, and basically war instruments, this is no longer a fair fight. This is a genocide in the making," he responded.

The only thing that will "equalize the playing field" for protesters is "assistance that is needed to neutralize elements that the regime has used against its own citizenry to brutalize them the way they have," Pahlavi affirmed.

A statue of the bust of Qasem Soleimany, the IRGC-Quds Force arch-terrorist, killed in US airstrike in Baghdad in January 2020, pictured in Tehran on January 26, 2026; illustrative.
A statue of the bust of Qasem Soleimany, the IRGC-Quds Force arch-terrorist, killed in US airstrike in Baghdad in January 2020, pictured in Tehran on January 26, 2026; illustrative. (credit: Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images)

"This means targeting the regime's top apparatus of repression - the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps," he continued.

"Only a military intervention at this point could level the playing field. This is the reason why the Iranian people have been anxiously waiting for the action that [Trump] has promised he will do in support of the Iranian people," he stated, implicitly urging Trump to carry out military strikes against the regime, and the IRGC in particular.

Pahlavi hopes Trump will prove he is 'no Barack Obama'

The crown prince urged the Iranian people to "hang in there." He added that they hope Trump will stay true to his word, "and that he's no [former US president] Barack Obama...[that] he believes in what he says, and he's a man of peace, and ultimately will help the Iranian people get rebuilt," Pahlavi said.

The Islamic Regime has been "devastating not only to Iran and Iranians, but has been a source of chaos and instability since its inception... the most hostile regime against America as opposed to a country that was always with America, and certainly not at all on the same wavelength as [the Trump administration," he told Hewitt.

Hewitt to Pahlavi: How many Iranians have been killed during the anti-regime protests?

Hewitt asked Pahlavi how many Iranians he estimates have been killed during the recent weeks of anti-regime protests that erupted nationwide.

"The number [varies] between 36,500 [and] about 40,000 - that's the last estimate that we've had. It could be higher than that, because there's still ongoing arrests happening," Pahlavi replied.

"They are killing people in hospitals. They are finishing them off on their wounded beds. They are arresting doctors or anybody rendering assistance to the victims. Who knows how much the total numbers will be, but the most conservative figure so far has been over 36,000, unfortunately," he added.

Hewitt replied that he would adopt that number going forward.

Could the Iranian military launch successful retaliatory attacks against possible US, Israeli strikes?

Following these two questions, Hewitt queried the prince about the risks posed by the US and its allies if they conduct military strikes on Iran, referencing threatening propaganda videos published by the regime, including an AI video demonstrating how they would strike the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike force.

"First of all, we saw how the Iranians attempted to respond to the Israeli attack [in June] by targeting Israel with missiles and drones, and I don't think that was quite a successful campaign, if you look at the actual result of that," he affirmed.

"If this is the might of the Iranian forces, and if they hit before they [US and Israel] have a chance to strike, I very much doubt that... they actually have the capacity to do that," referring to the AI-generated video that showed the Iranian military destroying the USS Abraham Lincoln.

Iranian military is 'saber-rattling' in desperation

"There's no other military in this world that can neutralize that than the American military, [especially when receiving] help [from] some of its allies. I think that's just basically saber-rattling as a desperate regime that's on its last leg wants to create doubt as to whether or not they need to be intervened against," he added.

The "liberty of the Iranian people" is in the balance, Pahlavi continued, "but it's to put a complete end to a regime that has only raised havoc in the region. The best way to do that is to make sure that at this time, you don't just wound the beast, but go for the full kill," he emphasized.

This would mean that the regime would be left without the possibility of retaliation, he continued. "This deployment [of US forces] is not a simple target practice - it is clearly much more in-depth and much more complex than everything we've seen before outside of a full world war-level deployment - this is serious!" he added.

Hewitt asked Pahlavi how to respond to the isolationists within the American conservative establishment who are attempting to restrain the Trump administration from taking military action against any country.

Pahlavi compares Khamenei's nuclear goals to Adolf Hitler, Nazi regime

"If America had not gone to war during World War II, what would have been the outcome of the Nazi's victory, or Hitler getting his hand on the atom bomb? Who knows what history would look like right now?" Pahlavi queried, implying a link between the goals of Adolf Hitler and Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, particularly in seeking nuclear weapons capabilities.

"Americans have to realize that this is a regime that has been the root cause of instability in the region, has been the biggest enemy of America and its allies vs a nation that has proven time and again that it doesn't have any hostility vs its neighbors," he continued, noting that many of Iran's neighbors, particularly Israel, are US allies, and that Iran has threatened to wipe "an entire nation from the face of the earth," referencing the State of Israel.

"Iranians have not only a friendly attitude towards our neighbors, but particularly with Israel, because I think the two nations on this planet that can claim that they have a Biblical relationship happen to be the people of Iran and the people of Israel," he said, referencing comments he has also made previously about the ties between ancient Persian emperor Cyrus the Great and the Jews within the Persian empire at that time.

Pahlavi discusses political transition process, possible military defectors' support

Hewitt then asked Pahlavi about the practicalities of any transition away from the Islamic Regime's political system, particularly if any others within Iranian politics would be prepared to aid him in the transition toward "a dawn of freedom."

"All Iranian democratic secular forces" believe in four core principles, Pahlavi responded. These are "Iran's territorial integrity, a clear separation of religion from government as a prerequisite to democracy, the importance of individual liberties and equality of all citizens under the law, and the right for [the] Iranian people to determine their own future by means of free election at the ballot box," he elaborated.

Pahlavi noted that he has been asked to, and accepted, to lead a transitional movement, but states that he would not be doing this alone.

"I'm doing it with the broadest possible coalition of democratically-minded Iranians who may vote differently at the very end for the final outcome, but they believe that this is the only process that will take us to where we need to be. And in that, we have the broadest coalition ever of Iranian democratic forces within Iran, and of course, within the international community and Iranian ex-pats," he explained.

Hewitt then redirected the answer towards whether there might be members of the military who would be willing to aid Pahlavi in "establishing a monopoly of force so that there wasn't a civil war," noting that imperial air force generals met with Islamic Revolution leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomenei in 1979.

Pahlavi highlighted his campaign over the past year to provide potential defectors, including from the military, a secure means to communicate intentions, with a platform launched approximately six months ago.

"To this day, we have over 160,000 people who have applied. Many of them are members of the security forces, the military forces, the civilian bureaucracy that have reached out to us, that they're willing to play a role in making sure that we can all share in that transition - they want to be part of the solution," he clarified.

Hewitt pressed further, asking if Pahlavi and his sources have notices fissures within the regime, particularly between the IRGC and Iranian military, which operate separately from each other.

"This is nothing new. Remember that the IRGC was created as a parallel military or militia to contain the military that the revolutionary regime of Khomeini could never trust - that started in the early 80s," he answered.

"As a result, [the IRGC] became more and more of a parasitic mafia to control many aspects of Iran's economy... basically, they're in full control of most aspects of the nation," he added.

"The military, on the other hand, considers itself much more a professional army and a national army, so the divide between the IRGC and military was there from the beginning," he noted.

Pahlavi then further denounced the IRGC by commenting that it does not have the name "Iran" in the title, with the "I" standing for Islamic.

"That is an aberration," he emphasized.


James Genn

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-886178

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter