Saturday, April 5, 2025

Turkey wants no confrontation with Israel in Syria, foreign minister says - Reuters

 

by Reuters

The animosity between the regional powers has spilled over into Syria, with Israeli forces striking Syria.

 

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan attends an interview with Reuters, in Brussels, Belgium April 4, 2025. (photo credit: REUTERS/YVES HERMAN)
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan attends an interview with Reuters, in Brussels, Belgium April 4, 2025.
(photo credit: REUTERS/YVES HERMAN)

Turkey wants no confrontation with Israel in Syria after repeated Israeli attacks on military sites there undermined the new government's ability to deter threats, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan told Reuters on Friday.

In an interview on the sidelines of a meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Brussels, Fidan said Israel's actions in Syria - where the administration of President Ahmed al-Sharaa is a close Turkish ally - were paving the way for future regional instability.

If the new administration in Damascus wants to have "certain understandings" with Israel, which, like Turkey, is a neighbor of Syria, then that is their own business, he added.

NATO member Turkey has fiercely criticized Israel over its attacks on Gaza since the October 7 Hamas attacks in 2023, saying they amount to a genocide against the Palestinians, and has applied to join a case at the World Court against Israel while also halting all trade.

IDF soldiers gather near the ceasefire line between Syria and Israel, in the Golan Heights, December 9, 2024 (credit: REUTERS/AMMAR AWAD)Enlrage image
IDF soldiers gather near the ceasefire line between Syria and Israel, in the Golan Heights, December 9, 2024 (credit: REUTERS/AMMAR AWAD)

The animosity between the regional powers has spilled over into Syria, with Israeli forces striking Syria since a new administration took control in Damascus.

Turkey's response 

Turkey has called the Israeli strikes an encroachment on Syrian territories, while Israel has said it would not allow any hostile forces in Syria.

Asked about US President Donald Trump's threats of military strikes against Iran, Fidan said diplomacy was needed to resolve the dispute and that Ankara did not want to see any attack taking place against its neighbor Iran.


Reuters

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-848870

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Lebanon central bank must counter money laundering and terrorist financing, new governor says - Reuters

 

by Reuters

Terrorist financing and money laundering are top concerns for the United States, which wants to prevent Hezbollah from using the Lebanese financial system and cash flows.

 

Lebanon's newly appointed central bank governor Karim Souaid takes office in a handover ceremony in Beirut, Lebanon April 4, 2025. (photo credit: REUTERS/MOHAMED AZAKIR)
Lebanon's newly appointed central bank governor Karim Souaid takes office in a handover ceremony in Beirut, Lebanon April 4, 2025.
(photo credit: REUTERS/MOHAMED AZAKIR)

Lebanon's new central bank governor said on Friday commercial banks must recapitalize, merge or be closed as he outlined plans for reviving the paralysed financial system, saying that small depositors would be prioritised in recovering their funds.

Karim Souaid also said the central bank would counter terrorism financing and eliminate the parallel economy as it seeks to get Lebanon removed from a global financial watchdog's "grey list" of states requiring special scrutiny.

Souaid takes over Banque du Liban with Lebanon still suffering the repercussions of a financial crisis that began in 2019, when decades of profligate spending and corruption led the state to default on its huge debt, the currency to collapse, and the banking system to seize up.

His appointment is part of a major shake-up of Lebanese officialdom that followed last year's war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah, an armed group that long had major sway over state affairs but was badly weakened by the conflict.

Souaid said the central bank would work to reschedule the public debt and pay back depositors, while calling upon private banks to gradually raise their capital by injecting fresh funds.

 A person holds a flag as people gather to attend the public funeral ceremony of Hezbollah leaders Hassan Nasrallah and Hashem Safieddine, who were killed during Israeli airstrikes last year, on the outskirts of Beirut, Lebanon February 23, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/Ali Allouch)Enlrage image
A person holds a flag as people gather to attend the public funeral ceremony of Hezbollah leaders Hassan Nasrallah and Hashem Safieddine, who were killed during Israeli airstrikes last year, on the outskirts of Beirut, Lebanon February 23, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/Ali Allouch)

Those banks unable or unwilling to do so, should look to merge with other institutions. Otherwise, they would be liquidated in an orderly manner, with their licences revoked and depositors' rights protected, he said.

"The priority must be to pay the funds of the small depositors," he said. Commercial banks, BdL and the Lebanese state must bear their responsibilities in paying depositors, he added.

Losses in Lebanon's financial system as a result of the 2019 collapse are estimated at some $72 billion.

Successive governments made little to no progress in enacting reforms to revive the economy since the collapse, with vested interests widely blamed for blocking change. The World Bank in 2022 said the collapse had been orchestrated by the ruling elite that had long exploited state resources.

The new government, led by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, has requested a programme with the International Monetary Fund, which says Lebanon needs a comprehensive strategy for rebooting its economy.

Souaid pledged to safeguard the central bank's independence from political pressure and prevent conflicts of interest.

"I will ensure that this national institution remains independent in its decision-making, shielded from interference, and grounded in the core principles of transparency and integrity," he said.

Money laundering

Souaid, who was appointed last week, outlined his priorities during his official handover with the outgoing acting central bank governor, Wissam Mansouri.

"The most important of these are combating money laundering and terrorist financing, and identifying and disclosing politically and financially influential individuals, their relatives, and those associated with them," he said.

The Financial Action Task Force placed Lebanon on its list of countries requiring special scrutiny last year in a move many have worried could discourage the foreign investment it needs to recover from the financial crisis.

Terrorist financing and money laundering are top concerns for the United States, which wants to prevent Hezbollah from using the Lebanese financial system and cash flows through the country to re-establish itself.

Souaid said any activity counter to the monetary and credit law, either by accepting deposits in cash or in any other manner, or by issuing loans, is by definition illegal, illegitimate, and would be shut down.

Hezbollah has long operated its own financial institution - Al-Qard Al-Hassan - which provides loans to people according to Islamic principles. It operates under a licence granted by the Lebanese government, although the US Department of the Treasury has imposed sanctions on it since 2007.

Asked whether Souaid was referencing Al-Qard Al-Hassan in his comments, a central bank spokesperson declined to comment.

Souaid takes office nearly two years after long-serving governor Riad Salameh's tenure ended with his legacy stained by the financial collapse and graft charges at home and abroad, which he has denied.


Reuters

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-848853

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump overrides Biden, approves $24M assault rifle deal for Israel Police - Reuters

 

by Reuters

The State Department sent a notification to Congress on March 6 for the $24 million sale, saying the end user would be the Israeli National Police.

 

(Illustrative) US President Donald Trump over a backdrop of weapons. (photo credit: BRIAN SNYDER/REUTERS, Canva Pro, IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
(Illustrative) US President Donald Trump over a backdrop of weapons.
(photo credit: BRIAN SNYDER/REUTERS, Canva Pro, IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

The Trump administration moved forward with the sale of more than 20,000 US-made assault rifles to Israel last month, according to a document seen by Reuters and a source familiar with the matter, pushing ahead with a sale that the administration of former president Joe Biden had delayed over concerns they could be used by extremist Israeli settlers.

The State Department sent a notification to Congress on March 6 for the $24 million sale, saying the end user would be the Israeli National Police, according to the document.

The rifle sale is a small transaction next to the billions of dollars worth of weapons that Washington supplies to Israel. But it drew attention when the Biden administration delayed the sale over concerns that the weapons could end up in the hands of Israeli settlers, some of whom have carried out attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank.

The Biden administration has imposed sanctions on individuals and entities accused of committing violence in the West Bank, which has seen a rise in settler attacks on Palestinians.

On his first day in office on January 20, Trump issued an executive order rescinding US sanctions on Israeli settlers in a reversal of US policy. Since then, his administration has approved the sale of billions of dollars worth of weapons to Israel.

 IDF soldiers are seen operating in the Binyamin region of the West Bank, March 27, 2025 (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)Enlrage image
IDF soldiers are seen operating in the Binyamin region of the West Bank, March 27, 2025 (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

The March 6 congressional notification said the US government had taken into account "political, military, economic, human rights, and arms control considerations."

The State Department did not respond to a request for comment when asked if the administration sought assurances from Israel on the use of the weapons.

Close ties

Settler violence had been on the rise prior to the eruption of the Gaza war, and has worsened since the conflict began over a year ago.

Trump has forged close ties to Netanyahu, pledging to back Israel in its war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. His administration has in some cases pushed ahead with Israel arms sales despite requests from Democratic lawmakers that the sales be paused until they received more information.

The US Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly rejected a bid to block $8.8 billion in arms sales to Israel over human rights concerns, voting 82-15 and 83-15 to reject two resolutions of disapproval over sales of massive bombs and other offensive military equipment.

The resolutions were offered by Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, an independent who caucuses with Democrats.

The rifle sale had been put on hold after Democratic lawmakers objected and sought information on how Israel was going to use them. The congressional committees eventually cleared the sale but the Biden administration kept the hold in place.

The latest episode in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict began with a Hamas attack on Israeli communities on October 7, 2023 with gunmen killing 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages.

Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, a far-right member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government, oversees the Israeli police force. The Times of Israel newspaper in November 2023 reported that his ministry has put "a heavy emphasis on arming civilian security squads" in the aftermath of October 7 attacks.


Reuters

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-848877

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

‘I want to leave Gaza,’ Palestinians tell BBC Arabic - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

One Palestinian woman explained that her husband, a Jordanian citizen, was forced by Egypt to return to Gaza without his family.

 

Palestinians flee their in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, March 18, 2025 (photo credit: REUTERS/Hatem Khaled)
Palestinians flee their in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, March 18, 2025
(photo credit: REUTERS/Hatem Khaled)

Despite the proposed plans to relocate Palestinians from Gaza being met by international outrage, a number of Palestinians told BBC Arabic last week that they wanted to leave the enclave.

“I can't stand it anymore, especially now that the war is back. Our lives are threatened every day. I want to leave Gaza," Alaa told the BBC.

Ola, a Palestinian woman living in Jabalya, told the news site that most Gazans wanted to leave the Gaza Strip, citing "the lack of a decent life. There are no suitable places to live, no good food, no job opportunities. Everything is missing, even the most basic necessities of life."

Those who are willing and wanting to stay in Gaza, Ola said, often had good work “but they will leave as soon as they find a better opportunity.” 

She acknowledged that some people would want to stay and invest in Gaza’s future, but that the younger generation was increasingly looking to escape for better prospects abroad. 

Palestinians at the beach in Gaza City, April 3, 2025; illustrative. (credit: Ali Hassan/Flash90)Enlrage image
Palestinians at the beach in Gaza City, April 3, 2025; illustrative. (credit: Ali Hassan/Flash90)

The "youth's chances of leaving Gaza may be through scholarships, but job opportunities are difficult, and some may turn to illegal immigration if they can," she said, adding that the elderly wer

"Looking at the elderly in Gaza is heartbreaking. Their chances of leaving the Strip are slim, except for the sick and injured, who are hosted by some countries for treatment. The rest don't have money, food, or even a tent,” she stressed. “They just search for a safe place every day and try to meet some of their needs. So if they have a good opportunity, they will leave too,"e most likely to be trapped in unsafe situations within the Gaza Strip.”

Asked to name where she thought would be a good location for Palestinians to restart, she said that many looked toward Indonesia or surrounding Arab states but added that young people hoped for a future in Europe.

Another Palestinian, a man anonymized under the name “Mahdi,” was able to leave his home in Rafah with his daughter for medical treatment in Egypt. "I don't intend to return to Gaza unless I am forced to do so," he confirmed to the BBC.

“They say we fled Gaza, but the truth is different,” says Mahdi explained. “We didn’t flee, and we didn’t choose to live in suffering. Do you want us to die under the rubble and become nothing but remains? Do you like seeing us dead and torn apart? No, that’s not our goal.”

He added, “We’re not traitors if we want to leave. Every one of us has the capacity to endure, and many of us can’t bear it anymore.”

A third Palestinian, Ahmed, told the BBC that he yearned to move to a country “that will embrace me and my brother so we can work and live with dignity."

“I know people will misunderstand our exit from Gaza,” he repeated multiple times during the interview with the BBC. "I and many people I know want to leave Gaza, but without conditions being imposed on us about how we leave or return, or even not returning to Gaza, as is being rumored. Ultimately, this is our country, and we want to enter and leave it of our own free will."

While many Palestinians may desire to leave, some recounted how their legal efforts to emigrate had been thwarted by neigboring states.

Hadeel recounted from her new home in Jordan that her husband, who has Jordanian citizenship, was returned by Egypt to Gaza. She is now living with her daughters and waiting for the family to be reunited.

How many Palestinians want to leave?

"There are many people in Gaza who wish to travel to European countries like Belgium, Germany, and Greece, but the blockade, closure, and exorbitant costs of travel are what prevent them,” Hadeel explained. “On the other hand, there are also those who remain committed to Gaza and remain there despite the difficult conditions."

While BBC Arabic also reported statements from three individuals asserting they wanted to stay in Gaza, a Gallup International survey published in March indicated that the vast majority wanted to leave.

Conducted from March 2-13, the poll found that 38% of respondents would opt for temporary relocation, 14% would move permanently, and 4% would send family members abroad.


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-848942

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Here's what Trump is really up to with high-stakes tariff gambit - Tanvi Ratna

 

by Tanvi Ratna

The plan is more ambitious than many realize, but the question is, will it work?

 

 


 

Let us be honest: When most people hear "tariffs," they think about price hikes and trade wars. But the Trump administration’s latest tariff rollout is not merely a knee-jerk protectionist move—it is part of a far broader strategy.

What is actually in play here is a high-stakes effort to build up leverage and resources to manage America’s debt, reset its industrial base, and renegotiate its standing in the global order.

HOW WE GOT TO LIBERATION DAY: A LOOK AT TRUMP'S PAST COMMENTS ON TARIFFS

And it all begins with a problem most people have not been told enough about.

In 2025, the U.S. government must refinance $9.2 trillion in maturing debt. Some $6.5 trillion of that comes due by June. That is not a typo—that is a debt wall the size of a small continent.

Now, here is the math: According to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, each basis-point (one one-hundredth of a percent) drop in interest rates saves the government roughly $1 billion per year. Since the announcement of tariffs on April 2, 10-year Treasury yields have fallen from 4.2 percent to 3.9 percent—a 30 basis point drop. If that holds, it translates to $30 billion in savings.

Trump tariffs

US President Donald Trump holds a chart as he delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event in the Rose Garden entitled "Make America Wealthy Again" at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025. (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images) (Getty Images)

So, keeping yields low is not just sound policy—it is a fiscal necessity.

But we are in a difficult environment. Inflation has not fully cooled, and the Federal Reserve remains wary of cutting rates too quickly. So the question becomes: How does one bring yields down without the Fed’s help?

Here is where the strategy becomes interesting.

By introducing sweeping tariffs, the administration is creating precisely the kind of economic uncertainty that drives investors toward safer assets such as long-term U.S. Treasuries. When markets are spooked, capital exits risk and equity assets (as we see with the stock market collapse) and piles into safe assets, primarily the 10-year U.S. treasury bond. That demand pushes yields lower.

It is a counter-intuitive move, but a calculated one. Some have called it a "detox" for the overheated financial system. And it appears to be working.

However, even cheaper debt does not solve everything. The deficit remains massive—and that is where spending cuts come in.

elon musk wearing a Trump hat

Elon Musk's DOGE has promised $1 trillion in cuts to the deficit. (BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

Backed by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and Elon Musk, the administration is reportedly targeting $4 billion in daily spending cuts. If their recommendations translate to cuts and get ratified by Congress, that could amount to a trillion dollars off the deficit by late 2025.

At this point, we have two pillars: lower borrowing costs and tighter spending. But there remains a third—and arguably most important—pillar: growth.

Tariffs serve as the ignition switch. By making imports more expensive, they create space for American producers to step back in. The objective is not to punish trade partners—it is to make domestic industry viable again, even if only long enough to rebuild critical capacity.

Yes, prices will rise. But the administration is fully aware of that. In fact, it is front-loading the pain now, hoping to deliver visible job growth and factory activity before the November 2026 midterm elections.

 

In the meantime, tariffs themselves will generate revenue—an estimated $700 billion or more in the first year. That creates more fiscal room for the administration to enable tax cuts and keep spending on Social Security, Medicaid and other programs.

Where the picture becomes even more interesting is on the geopolitical front.

These tariffs do not exist in a vacuum. They are being deployed alongside a deliberate reshaping of global alliances. The U.S. is quietly distancing itself from NATO, recalibrating ties with Europe, and opening previously frozen diplomatic channels with the Gulf nations and Russia.

Why? Because the post-Cold War trade order no longer serves U.S. interests. It enabled deficits, offshoring, and strategic dependency. Now, tariffs become leverage. Allies who align with U.S. priorities receive relief; others face higher costs.

China, naturally, is the central player. For years, economists have argued that its artificially weak currency and industrial overcapacity have distorted global trade. Tariffs are one way to force a reckoning—and potentially, a revaluation of the yuan.

Other countries will not be spared. Europe could be asked for terms on Ukraine. India may be pressured for deep tariff cuts. Canada and Mexico will likely face demands related to fentanyl and border enforcement.

This is not random. It is trade policy as a means to force countries to the negotiating table.

Domestically, the political logic is equally clear. The sectors most likely to benefit—steel, automobiles, textiles—are concentrated in battleground states. The administration is betting that visible wins in those regions will outweigh short-term pain in sectors dependent on cheap imports.

There are serious risks here. If inflation returns or if the reshoring bet fails, the blowback could be severe. But make no mistake: This is not improvisation. It is disruption by design.

Whether one agrees with it or not, this is one of the most ambitious fiscal and industrial resets in a generation.

The only question that remains is—will it work?

 

Tanvi Ratna is a policy analyst and engineer with a decade of experience in statecraft at the intersection of geopolitics, economics, and technology. She has worked on Capitol Hill, at EY, at CoinDesk and others, shaping policy across sectors from manufacturing to AI. Follow her takes on statecraft on X and Substack.

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/heres-what-trump-really-up-high-stakes-tariff-gambit

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Palestinian Authority: Hamas is “holding more than two million Palestinians hostage… as human shields” - Nan Jacques Zilberdik

 

by Nan Jacques Zilberdik

Any disapproval of Hamas by the PA is NOT about expressing criticism over the Israelis who were murdered, raped, tortured, and kidnapped on October 7. It has only to do with internal competition for favor among the Palestinian population, as Hamas has grown in popularity tremendously since October 7.

 

Official PA daily:

  • "O Hamas politicians, close the gates of hell"

Former official spokesman of the PA Security Forces:

  • "O Allah, take revenge" on Hamas who "with their stupidity and adventures" have destroyed the Gaza Strip

The Palestinian Authority has never condemned the October 7 atrocities, and it even continues to defend them as "legitimate resistance."

Any disapproval of Hamas by the PA is NOT about expressing criticism over the Israelis who were murdered, raped, tortured, and kidnapped on October 7. It has only to do with internal competition for favor among the Palestinian population, as Hamas has grown in popularity tremendously since October 7. That is why the PA is currently lashing out at Hamas for continuing to fight at the expense of Palestinian civilians.

Through an article in its official daily, the PA complained that Hamas is using the Gazan civilian population as "human shields" and "holding more than 2 million Palestinians hostage."

The headline of the article called on Hamas politicians to "close the gates of hell":

Headline: "O Hamas politicians, close the gates of hell with rationality"

"None of us demands obedience and submission, as claimed by the Hamas politicians, but only a bit of rationality, realism, and an abandonment of the irresponsible behavior. This is because our people in the Gaza Strip is paying the price of the hopeless behavior of the Hamas politicians, their political ignorance, and the lack of courage to make the most appropriate decision to stop the destruction campaign. In reality, they are holding more than two million Palestinian residents hostage and using them as human shields to preserve their organization."

[Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, March 20, 2025]

Also in an editorial, the PA accused Hamas of being trapped in an "illusion," imagining that they are going to "safely" end the war and return to power through the Israeli hostages:

"Over 50,000 female and male Martyrs have not convinced Hamas to act wisely and escape the illusion that has overtaken it and still makes it imagine that the Israeli hostages in its possession are the way for its safe exit from this war and its return to the throne of power in the Gaza Strip!"

[Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, March 19, 2025]

Moreover, the editorial expressed the opinion that Hamas can't be part of the political plan to rebuild the Gaza Strip:

"[We should be] demanding from Hamas that the Gaza Strip be out of its political plan, and that it not remain part of its ideology and project… In short, there is no reconstruction with Hamas."

Former General Political Commissioner of the PLO Political and National Guidance Authority Adnan Al-Damiri criticized Hamas along the same lines, calling for Allah to take revenge not only on Israel but also on Hamas who "with their stupidity and adventures" have destroyed the Gaza Strip:

Posted text: "Hamas presents the residents of the Gaza Strip with an alleged victory even before the liberation of Rafah, Jabaliya, Gaza, and Khan Yunis from the occupation (i.e., Israel), at a time when the people is uprooted and homeless in tents.

Your gift has been returned to you. Delight in the illusion that you have created with the blood of the children of Gaza. You presented your alleged victory to Iran and its leaders before the people of Gaza, and it did not benefit them at all...

O Allah, take revenge on those who oppressed Gaza, destroyed it, orphaned its children, widowed its women, and destroyed its homes with their weapons (i.e., Israel) or with their stupidity and adventures (i.e., Hamas)."

[Former General Political Commissioner of the PLO Political and National Guidance Authority Adnan Al-Damiri, Facebook page, March 13, 2025]


Nan Jacques Zilberdik

Source: https://palwatch.org/page/37077

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Gazan revolt - Melanie Phillips

 

by Melanie Phillips

Hatred of Hamas doesn’t alter the endemic hatred of Israel and the Jews.

 

Palestinians move from the Shujaiya neighborhood in the Gaza Strip after the Israeli army ordered its evacuation due to Hamas rocket fire, April 3, 2025. Photo by Ali Hassan/Flash90.
Palestinians move from the Shujaiya neighborhood in the Gaza Strip after the Israeli army ordered its evacuation due to Hamas rocket fire, April 3, 2025. Photo by Ali Hassan/Flash90.

It is striking, if unsurprising, that the demonstrations against Hamas being mounted by thousands of Gazans have gone almost totally unremarked by the media and supposedly pro-Palestinian supporters in Britain and America.

The protests have been going on for several days. On Wednesday, hundreds of Palestinian Arabs rallied in Beit Lahiya in the northern Gaza Strip, chanting “Hamas out” and “Enough death.” This was despite some high-profile killings of protesters by Hamas designed to put the uprising down.

Abdulrahman Sha’aban Abu Samra was shot dead by Hamas while waiting in line for flour in Deir al-Balah. Uday Al-Raba’i had denounced Hamas on social media and in a coffee shop. According to Palestinian Media Watch, Hamas operatives dragged him alive through the streets tied to the back of a car and then dumped him on his family to die.

This uprising has been almost totally ignored in the West because—just as with the Hamas-led atrocities in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023—nothing can be allowed to challenge the “progressive” narrative that the bad guys are the Israelis, that the Palestinian Arabs are their victims and that Hamas is an understandable resistance movement.

Of course, this silence over the protests also illuminates the rank hypocrisy of Western liberals, whose purported concern for the oppressed of Gaza is thus shown to be bogus. What drives them isn’t compassion but hatred of Israel—a hatred so obsessional and unhinged that they blank out the reality that’s staring them in the face.

The reason for such willful blindness is that, for such liberals, their view of themselves as good people is wrapped up in supporting the Palestinian Arabs as a people fighting their Israeli oppressors. To acknowledge that the Gazans may actually be oppressed by their own people threatens to destroy their entire progressive identity. So these developments must be ignored.

What sparked the protests was fury and despair over the resumption of the war after the ceasefire ended and the Israel Defense Forces started pummeling Gaza with even greater ferocity.

As the protesters have repeatedly declared, they hold Hamas responsible for inflicting upon them the disaster of a war that has ruined their lives. They also accuse Hamas of stealing their food and foreign aid supplies, as well as using them to make millions of dollars on the black market.

There have long been signs that the Gazans were turning against Hamas over its corruption and repression. A large proportion of the population—some say as much as half—are desperate to emigrate.

Until now, they have been prevented from doing so by Egypt, which sealed its border with Gaza, and by Hamas itself, intent as it was upon its strategy of effectively holding the entire population hostage as cannon fodder and human shields.

Plans now being advanced by Israel, falsely characterized by its enemies in the West as forcible transfer, would enable those who wish to leave to do so.

Some people, however, are misinterpreting the revolt as demonstrating that the Gazans are people who have a range of attitudes that show they’re fit to produce an alternative form of self-government.

That’s a delusion. This is a population that—day in, day out and over many generations—has been indoctrinated not only with the myth that their national inheritance has been stolen from them but that their highest calling is to murder Israelis and appropriate all their land.

More profoundly still, they have been turned into fanatics in the cause of genocidal Islamic holy war by the unremitting transmission of Nazi-style propaganda that the Jews are a demonic conspiracy of blood-sucking parasites that must be eliminated from the world.

The fact that they hate Hamas doesn’t change any of that. The people protesting on the streets are the same people who, on Oct. 7, poured into Israel across the shattered border fence behind the Hamas stormtroopers and themselves took part in that barbaric orgy of rape, slaughter and kidnapping.

They are the same people who took to the same streets to jeer at, abuse and desecrate the bodies of the Israelis who were dragged into Gaza on that terrible day.

The hostages who have returned have said that they were shown no kindness by those ordinary Gazans who held them captive in their houses. Unlike the Holocaust, when there were righteous gentiles who hid Jews from the Nazis at enormous risk to themselves, not one Gazan shielded them or helped them escape.

After Hamas murdered the protester Abu Samra, his family members from one of Gaza’s most prominent clans killed the Hamas operative who they said had murdered him.

There are several powerful clans in Gaza. Might they not have taken similar action to free the Israeli hostages? They have not.

The endemic hatred of Israel and the Jews is not confined to the inhabitants of Gaza. The Arabs living in the disputed territories of Judea and Samaria are similarly indoctrinated.

Fatah, the ruling party in the Palestinian Authority led by the allegedly “moderate” Mahmoud Abbas, has repeatedly celebrated the Oct. 7 atrocities. Opinion polling has shown that the Palestinian Arabs in these territories overwhelmingly support further such attacks against Israeli Jews.

People in the West refuse to accept the implacable nature of Palestinian Arab rejectionism, and the murderous hatred of Israel and the Jews.

This is partly a refusal to face up to the reality of Islamic holy war. Partly, it’s due to widespread ignorance of the Middle East, Jewish history in the land and the spurious nature of Palestinian peoplehood—the fictitious identity that was cooked up in the 1960s to play the credulous West for the suckers they’ve turned out to be.

But what you hear over and over again in Western countries is that “something has to be done with all those Palestinians”—and what else could be done with them other than to give them their own state, which sounds so very reasonable?

This is a very strange attitude. There’s never been another conflict like this, where people who set out to exterminate another people and its homeland but lose that war then become the focus of global sympathy and can dictate the policies of the world.

In other conflicts, if aggressors lose the war of conquest they have waged, they are in no position to dictate to anyone. They may have to move or disperse. They may find themselves ruled in the same place by others. As aggressors, they have forfeited the right to have any say over their future.

Yet despite the fact that the Palestinian Arabs have waged a campaign of extermination against the Jewish homeland for the best part of a century, they’ve been treated with kid gloves and have dictated the global agenda.

Even more extraordinary, they’ve been treated as a discrete people on the basis of an utterly spurious designation as refugees that uniquely was passed down from generation to generation—a formula devised solely to turn them into a weapon against Israel’s existence.

They are indeed victims—not of Israel but of the lies with which their own Arab world has enslaved them to a cult of death and destruction.

We don’t know what the day after this war will look like on the ground. We hear reports that the Trump administration, Israel and Saudi Arabia are trying to broker a permanent settlement of the war against the Jewish state. We don’t know whether this is intended to result in a canton-style formula for the Palestinian Arabs in the disputed territories, their relocation to Egypt or Jordan, or some other kind of arrangement.

Whatever the outcome, however, if there is ever to be peace and justice in the Middle East, then it must be understood that the idea that there is such a thing as a Palestinian people and that they should have their own state of Palestine—the unthinking and unchallengeable orthodoxy in the West—is now over.


Melanie Phillips, a British journalist, broadcaster and author, writes a weekly column for JNS. Currently a columnist for The Times of London, her new book, The Builder’s Stone: How Jews and Christians Built the West and Why Only They Can Save It, is published by Wicked Son and can be purchased on Amazon. To access her work, go to: melaniephillips.substack.com.

Source: https://www.jns.org/the-gazan-revolt/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

AI: One Flew Into the Cuckoo’s Nest - Thaddeus G. McCotter

 

by Thaddeus G. McCotter

AI may promise efficiency, but as studies show, it’s quietly eroding our critical thinking—turning users into passive observers in their own cognitive decline.

 

 

In the 1975 cinematic classic One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Randle P. McMurphy (Jack Nicholson) is a rebellious thorn in the side of the institution’s administration, particularly the tyrannical Nurse Ratched (Louise Fletcher). After the suicide of a fellow patient, McMurphy finally had enough and attempted to strangle Nurse Ratched; however, the orderlies detained and removed him.

Later, Chief (Will Samson) sees the orderlies returning McMurphy to his room. Hoping to escape with McMurphy, Chief enters, expecting his friend had endured yet another round of painful “electroconvulsive” therapy as punishment. But Nurse Ratched had had enough, too.

Chief discovers that McMurphy had been lobotomized. Knowing his friend would not want to live this way, Chief suffocates McMurphy. Then, Chief rips a fountain off a wall, throws it through a window, and escapes the institution to the cheers of his fellow inmates.

Based upon Ken Kesey’s novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest is a tale of oppression, rebellion, repression, and—finally—liberation.

No, this is not an attempt to draw an analogy between the film’s climatic emancipation and the end of the execrable Biden administration and the triumphant return of the Trump administration (though it would be quite apt). I recalled the Oscar-showered flick due to a Breitbart article by Paul Bois regarding artificial intelligence (AI). The reason was simple, if venal: unfortunately, my American Greatness “Trilogy of Meditations on AI and Art” (imagination, works, audience) is being proven anything but alarmist.

The title of Mr. Bois’s article sums it all up: “Study: Relying on Artificial Intelligence Reduces Critical Thinking Skills.”

Conducted by Carnegie Mellon and Microsoft, the study examined “319 ‘knowledge workers’…who deal in problem-solving of some kind.” Mr. Bois cites the findings found in Futurism: “…overall, those who trusted the accuracy of the AI tools found themselves thinking less critically, while those who trusted the tech less used more critical thought when going back over AI outputs.”

So, how did this happen? Ponder how your handwriting has devolved since the advent of the laptop keyboard and smartphones or your math skills since the ubiquitous use of calculators.

“A key irony of automation is that by mechanising routine tasks and leaving exception-handling to the human user, you deprive the user of the routine opportunities to practice their judgement and strengthen their cognitive musculature, leaving them atrophied and unprepared when the exceptions do arise,” the researchers said.

In other words, when it comes to your brain, “Use it or lose it.”

“The data shows a shift in cognitive effort as knowledge workers increasingly move from task execution to oversight when using GenAI,” the researchers continued. “Surprisingly, while AI can improve efficiency, it may also reduce critical engagement, particularly in routine or lower-stakes tasks in which users simply rely on AI, raising concerns about long-term reliance and diminished independent problem-solving.”

The researchers found the results of the study both surprising and disturbing. First, they admitted how AI can lead to “the deterioration of cognitive faculties that ought to be preserved.” Then—uh, oh—realized all the areas that will be impacted by a loss of critical thinking skills: “Futurism noted that the decline in critical thinking skills has been observed in ‘many domains, from self-driving vehicles to scrutinizing news articles produced by AI.’”

As noted by my aforementioned “Trilogy of Meditations on AI and Art,” one finding particularly resonated with me: Futurism noted how “The use of AI also appeared to hinder creativity, the researchers found, with workers using AI tools producing a ‘less diverse set of outcomes for the same task’ compared to people relying on their own cognitive abilities.”

Yet, while AI will cause human creativity to diminish, ironically, some artists are embracing the advent of AI “art.” Award-winning screenwriter Paul Schrader is one who not only welcomes the rise of AI, he has prostrated himself before it—on Facebook, no less. Per Variety:

“I’M STUNNED,” Schrader wrote. “I just asked ChatGPT for ‘an idea for Paul Schrader film…’ Every idea ChatGPT came up with (in a few seconds) was good. And original. And fleshed out. Why should writers sit around for months searching for a good idea when AI can provide one in seconds?”

In a previous post, he also remarked that he’s “come to realize that AI is smarter than I am.”

While I cannot argue that point, I can follow the science to contest his assumption that AI will provide people with more leisure time and less stress.

Mr. Bois harkened back to a recent study from Uplevel that revealed “AI coding assistants like GitHub Copilot are not significantly improving developer productivity or preventing burnout, despite the hype surrounding these tools.” And, in what is becoming a pattern, the researchers were “surprised”:

“Surprisingly, the results showed no meaningful improvements in key metrics such as pull request cycle time and throughput for those using the AI coding assistants. This finding contradicts the claims made by GitHub and other proponents of AI coding tools, who have touted massive productivity gains.”

One can only imagine such researchers’ Casablanca-like “shock” when they are informed the left has been actively aiming to weaponize AI to suit their ideological and political agenda.

But let us not digress into AI alarmism à la Vlad “The Bad” Putin. We won’t be eaten by AI. But we very well may be lured into its enervating clutches. Promises of easier living have ever tempted folks into ignoring their better judgment. AI constitutes a peculiar new ruse, for as the science increasingly shows, it will destroy your ability to have better judgment. The result will be the inability to think critically and properly weigh the fact that AI has so far proven not to be a life-improving boon with nothing but upsides.

In One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, McMurphy struggles to assert his humanity in the face of institutional oppression; and, while through his rebellious example and sacrifice, he is destroyed, Chief is freed.

With AI, we are facing the very real prospect of our humanity being diminished by machines. And so many of our fellow human beings are heedlessly running headlong into its bloodless, calculating cuckoo’s nest. And, unlike “reel life,” should humanity be cast as the lead in One Flew Into the Cuckoo’s Nest, no Chief will escape.

***

An American Greatness contributor, the Hon. Thaddeus G. McCotter (M.C., Ret.) served Michigan’s 11th Congressional district from 2003-2012, He served as chair of the Republican House Policy Committee and as a member of the Financial Services, Joint Economic, Budget, Small Business, and International Relations Committees. Not a lobbyist, he is also a contributor to Chronicles; a frequent public speaker and moderator for public policy seminars; and a co-host of “John Batchelor: Eye on the World” on CBS radio, among sundry media appearances.


Thaddeus G. McCotter

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/04/05/ai-one-flew-into-the-cuckoos-nest/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Nicaragua quits ICJ suit against Israel - Canaan Lidor

 

by Canaan Lidor

Israel's advocates received the news with satisfaction as its critics speculated that it was the result of intense diplomatic pressure.

 

Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega attends a ceremony in Managua on Dec. 16, 2024. Credit: Consejo de Comunicación y Ciudadanía del Gobierno de Nicaragua.
Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega attends a ceremony in Managua on Dec. 16, 2024. Credit: Consejo de Comunicación y Ciudadanía del Gobierno de Nicaragua.

The Nicaraguan government withdrew this week from proceedings against Israel at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, triggering allegations of intense diplomatic pressure on Managua among Jerusalem’s critics and satisfaction among its advocates.

The ICJ, a United Nations tribunal that began investigating Israel in December 2023 for alleged genocide in Gaza at South Africa’s behest, said in a statement on Thursday that Nicaragua had informed the court on April 1 that it was withdrawing from the proceedings initiated by Pretoria.

Nicaragua was among 14 nations that announced their intention to intervene in the case, a procedure that technically does not mean they back the allegations but that, in practice, was widely seen as a means to bolster the case against Israel.

Other countries went further, announcing they would like to participate in the lawsuit alongside South Africa. Those states included Belgium, Cuba, Egypt and Ireland.

Neither the statement nor the dictatorship of Nicaragua’s co-President Daniel Ortega offered an explanation for the move by Managua, which had filed its intervention request on Feb. 8, 2024.

Israel has denied allegations of genocide and other war crimes in Gaza and beyond.

Gideon Sa’ar, Israel’s foreign minister, reacted to the development with a tweet.

Better late than never: Nicaragua has withdrawn its morally repugnant intervention in the baseless and outrageous case that was filed by South Africa against Israel at the ICJ. Others that made the same mistake should follow suit,” Sa’ar wrote.

Ortega’s move prompted speculation that it could be connected to the assertive policies that the United States under President Donald Trump has taken against hostile and rival regimes, especially in Latin America.

“Question is who and what pressure was placed on Nicaragua by the U.S. or Israel?” Heena Khaled, a London-based manager at the British Future think tank who is critical of Israel, wrote on X.

Earlier on Thursday, Hungary announced it was pulling out of the International Criminal Court, which is separate and unrelated to ICJ. The announcement was made on the first day of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Hungary. In November, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defense minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes in Gaza.

Budapest had previously said it would not honor those arrest warrants. During a joint press conference with Netanyahu, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said that the ICC had become a “political court.” He added the court’s decision to issue a warrant against the Israeli leader “clearly showed” this.


Canaan Lidor

Source: https://www.jns.org/nicaragua-quits-icj-suit-against-israel/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Harvard sanctions pro-Palestinian group after anti-Israel protest - Michael Starr

 

by Michael Starr

Harvard Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity said the university is silencing pro-Palestinian voices.

 

A graduate displays a Palestinian flag during the 373rd Commencement at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 23, 2024.  (photo credit: Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
A graduate displays a Palestinian flag during the 373rd Commencement at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 23, 2024.
(photo credit: Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

A Harvard anti-Israel student activist group was placed on probation, the Harvard Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity said on Wednesday, following a protest against the firing of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies leadership and scrutiny by the federal government of campus antisemitism and radicalism.

Harvard PSC said on Instagram that the university administration had been banned from holding public events until June 30, allegedly over a Tuesday protest that was co-sponsored with unrecognized organizations. PSC noted that the ban came the weekend before it was slated to install its annual Israeli Apartheid Wall exhibit.

"We call on all student organizations to stand with the movement for Palestine -- silence will not save us," said PSC.

The group urged supporters to contact Harvard president Alan Garber about the matter.

Harvard anti-Israel protests

Hundreds of students had protested on Tuesday at a Harvard Out of Occupied Palestine (HOOP) rally outside a faculty meeting, according to a HOOP social media video. PSC said the students were acting against "Harvard’s capitulation to the fascist [US President Donald] Trump administration" and its "purge in the Palestine Studies."

PSC highlighted the end of the roles of Center for Middle Eastern Studies Director Professor Cemal Kafadar and associate director Associate Professor Rosie Bsheer last Friday. Harvard American Association of University Professors (AAUP) issued a Monday statement rejecting the change in leadership of the center as voluntary, accusing the administration of dismissing them without proper process. The administration allegedly wished for more politically neutral programming on the Israeli-Arab conflict.

"These terminations violate the principle of academic freedom at the heart of our institutional mission and set a bleak precedent for free inquiry and expertise at the university," said AAUP. "At a minimum, the administration of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences should release any reports or evaluations of CMES’s alleged failure to meet its new standard."

PSC on Wednesday also noted Harvard's suspension of ties with Birzeit University, a Palestinian school, which has seen regular Hamas activism on its campus. The Harvard Crimson had reported the suspension of the research partnership last Thursday. JTA reported that since the October 7 Massacre there have been calls to end the partnership with the West Bank institution, backed by former Harvard President Larry Summers as well as alumna congresswoman Rep. Elise Stefanik.

On Monday the Task Force to Combat Antisemitism announced that it was reviewing  $255.6 million in contracts and more than $8.7 billion in multi-year grant commitments with Harvard to ensure its compliance with civil rights responsibilities. Education Department Secretary Linda McMahon said that Harvard had failed to protect students from antisemitic discrimination and promoted "divisive ideologies." Federal Acquisition Service commissioner Josh Gruenbaum said that the university had recently taken "long overdue" action to curb institutionalized antisemitism, but more needed to be done to "retain the privilege of receiving federal taxpayer's hard earned dollars."

Garber responded in a Monday statement by reminding of the institution's efforts thus far to discipline students and institute new programs against harassment, but acknowledged that the university had shortcomings and promised to address the critical problems of antisemitism.

"I have experienced antisemitism directly, even while serving as president, and I know how damaging it can be to a student who has come to learn and make friends at a college or university," said Garber. "We will engage with members of the federal government’s task force to combat antisemitism to ensure that they have a full account of the work we have done and the actions we will take going forward to combat antisemitism."


Michael Starr

Source: https://www.jpost.com/international/article-848809

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter