Sunday, November 17, 2024

Central Israel in danger: A look at the terror threat from the Palestinian-run West Bank - Atara Beck

 

by Atara Beck

‘It’s a real danger’: Tour of the seam line barrier separating Israel from Judea and Samaria shows vulnerability to assault if preventive action isn’t taken.

 

A map of Palestinian settlements along the seam line separating Israel from the West Bank. (photo credit: REGAVIM)
A map of Palestinian settlements along the seam line separating Israel from the West Bank.
(photo credit: REGAVIM)

The terrorist threat in central Israel is much greater than most people realize.

According to its website, Regavim, a right-wing NGO, is “dedicated to the protection of Israel’s national lands and resources.” Last week, Regavim hosted a fact-finding media tour of the IDF’s seam line firing zone that separates Judea and Samaria (aka the West Bank) from sovereign Israel.

Naomi Kahn, director of Regavim’s International Division, said the security buffer zone includes close to 19,000 illegal Palestinian structures.

“Regavim has documented every single one, which is only a small portion of the illegal construction we have identified throughout Judea and Samaria,” she said, referring to the areas under Israeli jurisdiction.

Standing at a lookout from Rosh Ha’ayin, a city in central Israel, facing Samaria, the scene was alarming. As is the case all along the seam line, extending from Mount Gilboa in the North to Beersheba in the South, one could see the illegal Palestinian encroachment in the buffer zone.

 A LARGE illegal Palestinian home in Fire Zone 203, a buffer zone in Area C, under Israeli jurisdiction separating sovereign Israel from the West Bank (credit: Courtesy Atara Beck)Enlrage image
A LARGE illegal Palestinian home in Fire Zone 203, a buffer zone in Area C, under Israeli jurisdiction separating sovereign Israel from the West Bank (credit: Courtesy Atara Beck)

Notably, this illegal Palestinian construction and agriculture is in Area C, which, as stipulated in the Oslo Accords, is under Israeli control.

Residents of Rosh Ha’ayin and nearby communities, including the picturesque village of Nirit, located within a kilometer of the border with Samaria, have been suffering daily from the impact of the illegal Palestinian construction. Although the main issue is fear of terrorism, they have also experienced health problems due to the environmental hazards caused by uncontrolled and unregulated waste burning, toxic refuse, and other substandard industrial activity. 

One resident told the journalists that his wife suffered repeated miscarriages, and her doctor discovered they were due to the poisonous environment. Another resident reported seeing Palestinian Authority vehicles driving through the closed military zone, gradually approaching the Israeli side and inspecting the area.

The imminent threat of Palestinian terror attacks?

ITZIK TURGEMAN, who lives in Nirit, discussed the imminent threat. A retired electronic engineer, he had a long career in the IDF, after which he headed the Rashi Foundation, a leading private philanthropic entity. Now, besides working as a glass artist, he volunteers with the emergency standby squad, who are first responders to local terrorism.

“Twenty years ago, when we walked around this area, we didn’t see any of these [Palestinian] buildings that are here now, so close to the security barrier. Month after month, there’s new construction, and we hear the noise,” he said, explaining that Nirit is surrounded by two Palestinian villages and the Israeli town of Oranit.

“After Oct. 7, we had to strengthen our defense because when the terrorists see success, they try to repeat it. It’s a real danger. More and more illegal buildings are now close to the barrier – not just in this area but throughout the country.”

He emphasized that it’s a planned extension rather than a natural one. “My message is mainly to the army. The [Palestinian] construction should not have occurred 500 meters from the barrier. In certain areas, buildings are situated directly on the barrier. It’s a security problem that the government of Israel and the IDF must deal with,” he asserted.

Nirit, located within sovereign Israel, is far from being a right-wing “settler” community. Asked whether in the last election fellow residents of Nirit voted for Religious Zionism Party leader Bezalel Smotrich, one of the founders of Regavim, Turgeman said he didn’t know of anyone who did, but that 80% of them voted for parties that are in the opposition. As for Rosh Ha’ayin, one of its most prominent residents is National Unity Party chairman and former defense minister Benny Gantz.

“The strategy was always to live and let live, hoping that one day they [the Palestinians] would let us live in peace,” Turgeman said. “But you see that it’s a dream; it’s not reality.”

He believes that the continuation of illegal building and illegal agricultural activity are primarily due to foreign pressure. “They [foreign leaders] always blame Israel and don’t even try to understand” the situation. However, it’s not unusual to fear terrorist attacks after Oct. 7.

“What we observed in south Lebanon were Arab villages situated near the border,” he continued, noting the similar situation along the seam line. “We [in Israel] try to find a way to make life better for everyone,” including the Palestinians, “and they think about how to destroy us. We can no longer ignore it.”

Kahn said that the Palestinian construction is illegal not only under Israeli military rule but also according to international law. “The Oslo Accords specifically stipulate 20 buffer zones, or security zones, to separate these areas,” she explained. “Anything built in Israeli jurisdiction requires Israeli permits.

“Despite the abundance of empty space available for construction, the Palestinians have chosen to build near the seam line.

“Less than 1% of the territory of Judea and Samaria has a Jewish presence,” Kahn noted.

“Looking down, you can see the water tanker,” she continued. “That’s the key to this whole issue. Without water, you cannot exist. Again, this is all on the Israeli side.

“The intentions of the Palestinian Authority are very clear,” she stated, pointing to a Regavim map of what she terms the ‘Israel Envelope,’ which shows a heavy Palestinian presence along the seam line buffer zones from the North to the South.

“JUST YESTERDAY, the defense minister [Yoav Gallant; he has since been replaced by Israel Katz] said that all the armaments, all the weaponry, all the ‘personnel’ that Iran isn’t managing to smuggle to its proxies in Gaza or Lebanon is being transferred into Judea and Samaria,” Kahn told the journalists. 

“The route available to them now is the route that goes from Jordan into Judea and Samaria. This entire region is flooded with weapons and terrorists who are coming in, as we speak, from Jordan and from the areas under Palestinian Authority control. The Green Line is fiction; it doesn’t exist. There is terror inside the State of Israel.”

With special permission and escorts from the IDF, the journalists traveled through the firing zone.

“Just look out the window on your right,” Kahn said. “Most of the new mosques being built right here have gold domes. These domes are not just decoration.... They are all funded by Qatari money and built by the Muslim Brotherhood.

“This is not Gaza. The domes are not just a religious statement. It’s a political statement, and it’s physical, tangible, and observable proof of the extremism that is taking root inside Israeli Arab communities, and the Green Line is not functional.... The Green Line is being physically erased, and it’s not by Israel, as you might read in the international press. It’s being erased by all the illegal [Palestinian] construction up to and beyond the Green Line and in areas under Israeli jurisdiction by clearly hostile, extremist, antisemitic, and anti-Israel elements. 

“And it’s not coincidental because, as I said earlier, there are other options for construction for the [Palestinian] civilian population. The Palestinian Authority was created so that there would be less and less contact between the two populations and not more and more as there is now.”

Furthermore, she added, “In this part of Area C, the Palestinians walk around like the owners. All sorts of illegal activity are taking place in front of our eyes,” she said, pointing to the beautiful homes and paved roads. 

“The Arabs there didn’t ask permission to go inside, like we did. They simply are taking over the land, building on it, planting on it, and establishing ownership through land seizure and expropriation.

“Israel has every right and responsibility to maintain law and order in the area, to enforce the law, and to protect its national interests – the land resources themselves and the security of the Israeli communities that lie behind the firing zone.”

Barak Werker, CEO of the Green Now organization, elaborated on the complaints about the lethal environment, noting that it harms the Palestinians as well. When it comes to environmental issues, such as polluting the water source that both sides drink from and dumping garbage into the valley, “there are no boundaries.” 

The only solution, he said, is for the Israelis and the Palestinians to work together, but it won’t happen in one day. The situation is that of a first-world country vs a third-world entity, where the leadership has no interest in improving the lives of civilians.

EITAN MELET established the Avichai Farm on a hill in Samaria and moved there with his wife and three daughters a year ago, just a week before Sukkot. Then Oct. 7 happened, and he fought in Gaza for five months, leaving his wife and daughters at home.

“There was nothing, just a generator and a tent,” he said. “The reason we came here is to protect the Israeli homeland. From here, you can see Rosh Ha’ayin, Leshem, Elkana, and the Azrieli towers in Tel Aviv. There’s an understanding with the IDF and the government that we need to protect these lands, but nothing has been done. 

“There is widespread illegal construction all over, as is the case in south Hebron. We need to bring an Israeli presence to protect the land.

“Wherever the Jewish plow plows its last furrow, that is where the border will run,” he said, quoting a famous line by early Zionist hero Joseph Trumpeldor. “It’s been understood since before the state’s founding, not just in recent years, that civilian life on the land sets the border. When no one inhabited the area, illegal construction took place.”

Melet, who studied law after serving four years in the military and worked with Regavim, sees it as his “national duty” to protect the land. “It’s hard work, from 5 a.m. to 5 p.m., and guarding at night, but we see progress. It’s meaningful work for the state. We have youth helping us, and they’re very motivated. It’s Zionism, as well as educational work, helping these youth who have left the school system.”

Kahn added, “It’s all legal, but that won’t stop Peace Now, B’Tselem, and all our good friends from the Left from saying this is illegal expansion on Palestinian land. There are no Palestinians here on this land, and there never have been. This is not the site of a village or any other type of population center that has ever been used, and the state is fully within its rights to use it as it sees fit and to encourage use of the land so that it is not overtaken by illegal construction.”

Asked whether he has been harassed by Palestinians in the area, Melet said that only recently, when he was called again to serve in the IDF reserves in Lebanon, they stole seven cows that were worth tens of thousands of shekels in damage, and there is no way to recoup that money.

“Our existence here doesn’t necessitate conflict or confrontation, as the Arabs know very well where the border is,” he said. “The problem is that when no one is here, they take over; but once people live here, that doesn’t happen. It’s land protection via an Israeli presence.”

The Magazine asked Kahn if defeating Iran, the “head of the snake,” would help solve the problem on the seam line.

“I think it would, in some ways,” she replied. “First, the State of Israel has been living under the threat of attack from Lebanon for years. If that threat is gone, it means Israel will be much more at liberty to do what needs to be done to protect itself both in the North and the South. The situation in Judea and Samaria is not really any different. Once we can physically control what goes in and out of all these places, the threats that we’re facing will be reduced – if we act.”

MORIYA MICHAELI, who lives in the community of Ofra in Samaria, is among a group of women who began observing the border along the seam line after Oct. 7 – like the young women who observed the border with the Gaza Strip and warned of terrorist activity ahead of Oct. 7 but were ignored. 

Michaeli and the other spotters began their task after the war started. “It’s the women doing it because the men were called up to fight,” she explained.

“We understand that the potential for an Oct. 7 scenario in all these Jewish communities along the Green Line has become a very serious and possible reality.

“The conceptzia [Israel’s underlying concept of government policy] remains unchanged; they [policy-makers] prefer to focus on the current calm, without considering the possibility of a change at any time. So rather than taking the initiative to prevent, they prefer to slide along as if nothing has changed,” she lamented.

“We women observers have a job. We must protect our children so that what happened to children in Kfar Aza won’t happen here.”

 
Atara Beck

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-829124

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Huckabee: ‘Sovereignty over Judea and Samaria is Israel’s decision to make’ - David Isaac

 

by David Isaac

There is "no such thing" as the West Bank and "there is no 'occupation,'" said the former Arkansas governor.

 

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee speaks during a press conference at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Jerusalem, August 19, 2015. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.
Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee speaks during a press conference at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Jerusalem, August 19, 2015. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

The decision to extend Israeli sovereignty to Judea and Samaria is one “for Israel to make,” according to Mike Huckabee, who was tapped by President-elect Donald Trump last week for the post of U.S. ambassador to Israel.

Speaking to Israel National News on Nov. 15, the former Arkansas governor said that the decision is not one the United States will impose. 

“I don’t think Donald Trump is the kind of president that wants to tell other countries what to do and how to do it. He wants to accommodate, help, encourage peaceful endeavors, strengthen alliances,” said Huckabee.

His remarks echoed those he made during an interview with Israel’s Army Radio last week, when he said that “of course” annexation was a possibility during Trump’s second term.

However, Huckabee, a Southern Baptist pastor whose pro-Israel bon fides go back decades, emphasized during the INN interview that he doesn’t set policy.

“As an ambassador, you don’t get to do what you want. You carry out the wishes and the directions of the president, and it will be his policies, not mine, that we will implement,” he said. “But I’m very pleased that his policies have been the most pro-Israel policies of any president in my lifetime,” he added.

The U.S.-Israel relationship needs to be consistent and strong, with both nations benefiting from the alliance, he continued.

The current White House has sent mixed messages, declaring it will stand behind Israel one day and then the next day telling Israel how to prosecute its war with Hamas, said Huckabee. “I can’t imagine how confusing and frustrating that must’ve been to not just the leadership of Israel, but to the people of Israel,” he added.

“With Donald Trump there is a certainty in the sound of his voice and in the meaning of his message, and I think it’s going to be a very different approach, and one that will show that alliances and having a friend truly mean something, and it’s not inconsistent,” he said.

Iran, he continued, will be “held accountable” for funding terror in the region.

“President Trump has strength. He’s got a strong history of making it clear to foreign countries that want to do evil things that they’ll pay a price for it,” he said.

At the same time, he continued, the United States can help expand the 2020 Abraham Accords, the normalization agreements between Israel and four Muslim states brokered by Trump in his first term.

“I want to be a part of making sure that the Abraham Accords that he launched continue to grow—bring more people into those agreements and create a more stable, more peaceful climate in the Middle East, but also a much better and more hopeful future for everyone,” he said.

“[E]verybody wins when there are agreements that foster trade, tourism, business relationships and diplomatic relationships,” he added.

With regard to his nomination for the post of envoy to Israel, Huckabee said he hadn’t lobbied for the position and was surprised when he received the call from the president-elect.

In announcing the move on Nov. 12, Trump said Huckabee “loves Israel and the people of Israel and likewise, the people of Israel love him. Mike will work tirelessly to bring about peace in the Middle East.”

The job is “the only thing that President Trump could have asked me to do that I probably would’ve said yes to,” he added. “I wasn’t looking for a federal job. I wasn’t even looking for this one. The president asked me to do it and it was the one thing I could say to, like Isaiah, ‘Here am I.’”

Huckabee described the U.S.-Israel relationship as “incredibly important” to him. “That’s why there is a great level of not only excitement but a deeply emotional reaction that I have had to this, because I see it as a calling. An opportunity to do something that I hope will be instrumental in helping to bring a greater level of security and certainty in policy for the people of Israel.”

He noted that he’s been “overwhelmed with positive responses” to his selection, with the only negative reaction coming from the “far left.”

On Trump’s building of a kind of pro-Israel “dream team” for his second term, Huckabee said that after the Hamas massacre of Oct. 7, 2023, there is a desire in America to make sure nothing like that happens again.

“[W]hen I came to Israel not too many weeks after that happened—to talk to people who had lived through it, to experience in those kibbutzim what they had gone through—I just asked myself how in the world could we do anything but stand with our Jewish friends in the State of Israel, to make sure they know they will never stand alone,” he said.

Asked by INN whether he intended to alter his language with regard to Judea and Samaria, referred to in much of the world as the West Bank, Huckabee said: “I can’t be what I’m not. I can’t say something I don’t believe. As you well know, I’ve never been willing to use the term ‘West Bank’. There is no such thing. I speak of Judea and Samaria. I tell people there is no ‘occupation.’ It is a land that is ‘occupied’ by the people who have had a rightful deed to the place for 3,500 years, since the time of Abraham.

“A lot of the terms that maybe the media would use, even the people who are against Israel would use, are not terms that I employ, because I want to use terms that live from time immemorial, and those are the terms like ‘Promised Land’ and ‘Judea and Samaria’. These are biblical terms, and those are important to me, and so I will continue to follow that nomenclature unless I’m instructed otherwise, but I don’t think that’ll happen.”

 
David Isaac

Source: https://www.jns.org/huckabee-sovereignty-over-judea-and-samaria-is-israels-decision-to-make/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump Would Be Wise To Deliver Regime Change in Iran - Con Coughlin

 

by Con Coughlin

Not only would many of Iran's neighbours be relieved, but its captive citizens could then be free to choose leaders better aligned with their aspirations. A liberated Iran might even join the Abraham Accords....

 

  • The October 7, 2023 attacks carried out against Israel by Iranian-backed Hamas terrorists.... was the direct result of Tehran's ability to fund the terrorist movement to the tune of $100 million a year, an operation that would not have been possible without Biden's lenient attitude towards the ayatollahs.

  • Trump may come to see as well that, unfortunately, due to the deep-seated commitment of Iran's regime in exporting its brand of Islam, as enshrined in its constitution, there can be no real long-term peace in the Middle East without regime change, especially if Iran has nuclear weapons -- not to mention the global arms race that would follow such an event.

  • Not only would many of Iran's neighbours be relieved, but its captive citizens could then be free to choose leaders better aligned with their aspirations. A liberated Iran might even join the Abraham Accords....

After the success Donald Trump enjoyed negotiating the Abraham Accords towards the end of his first term in office, which saw a number of leading Arab states normalise relations with Israel, it is widely expected that his new administration will want to pursue a similar policy of ending hostilities in the Middle East. Pictured from left to right: Bahrain Foreign Minister Abdullatif al-Zayani, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump, and UAE Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed Al-Nahyan participate in the signing of the Abraham Accords in Washington, DC on September 15, 2020. (Photo by Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

Now that Donald Trump has secured his remarkable victory in the US presidential election, supporting regime change in Iran could soon emerge as one of his new administration's top priorities after he takes office in January.

Trump's no-nonsense approach to confronting the ayatollahs' malign influence in the region was one of the defining characteristics during his first term in the White House.

One of his more laudable foreign policy initiatives was to withdraw from the flawed nuclear deal with Iran agreed by former President Barack Obama in 2015.

Denouncing the agreement as being "defective at its core", Trump declared in 2018 that his administration was unilaterally withdrawing from the deal while at the same time imposing a policy of "maximum pressure" against Tehran.

Trump also demonstrated during his first term that he was not afraid of a direct confrontation with Tehran. His decision to authorise the assassination of Qasem Soleimani, the master terrorist who headed the elite Quds Force of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, in a drone strike in January 2020 dealt a devastating blow to Tehran's terrorist infrastructure.

It was largely as a result of the first Trump administration's uncompromising approach to Iran that Tehran was forced to scale down its terrorist activities in the region, which were mainly confined to supporting Houthi rebels in the Yemeni conflict.

It was only after Joe Biden replaced Trump in the White House in 2021 that Tehran revived its terrorist network, a development that was greatly facilitated by Biden's policy of appeasement towards Tehran, which saw the ayatollahs gifted billions of dollars in a misguided attempt by the Biden administration to revive Obama's nuclear deal.

Far from persuading Tehran to curb its nuclear activities, which Western intelligence officials believe is ultimately aimed at producing nuclear weapons -- one does not need uranium enriched to 83.7% for peaceful nuclear energy -- Iran responded to Biden's largesse by intensifying its nuclear enrichment activities, while at the same strengthening its network of terrorist organisations in the region, including Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The October 7, 2023 attacks carried out against Israel by Iranian-backed Hamas terrorists, which resulted in the murder of 1,200 Israelis with another 250 taken hostage, was the direct result of Tehran's ability to fund the terrorist movement to the tune of $100 million a year, an operation that would not have been possible without Biden's lenient attitude towards the ayatollahs.

Today, thanks to the Israeli military's devastating offensive against both Hamas in Gaza, as well as Iranian-backed terrorists in Lebanon, Iran's terrorist infrastructure is on the point of collapse, raising questions about whether the Iranian regime itself can survive the current crisis.

While the first indications from the incoming Trump administration are that the president-elect does not view regime change in Tehran as one of his primary objectives, the existential threat facing both Iran and its proxies as a result of Israel's relentless military assault could make the removal of Tehran's reviled Islamist tyranny a distinct possibility once Trump has been installed as America's 47th president.

In Gaza, Hamas's terrorist infrastructure lies in ruins following Israel's year-long offensive against the architects of the October 7 attacks, while in Lebanon, Hezbollah is facing a similar fate after Israel launched its massive military offensive against the Iranian-backed terror group.

In one of his first major statements since being appointed Israel's new defence minister, Israel Katz, said his country had defeated Hezbollah, and that eliminating its leader Hassan Nasrallah had been the crowning achievement. "Now it is our job to continue to put pressure in order to bring about the fruits of that victory," Katz said.

Iran's inability to protect its key terrorist allies in Gaza and Lebanon, moreover, reflects Tehran's own fundamental weakness, which was graphically laid bare when Israeli warplanes launched their massive air assault against the Islamic Republic last month, which succeeded in destroying a number of key Iranian military installations.

A clear sign that Israel's relentless assault on Iran and its terrorist infrastructure is taking a heavy toll on the ayatollahs is evident from recent reports of a deep split developing in Tehran between Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's hardline supporters and the more moderate approach of the country's recently elected president, Masoud Pezeshkian.

The Iranian regime's desperate attempts to survive the series of disasters it has suffered on the battlefield can also be seen in the ayatollahs' efforts to repair relations with Saudi Arabia, its long-standing regional rival.

After the success Trump enjoyed negotiating the Abraham Accords towards the end of his first term in office, which saw a number of leading Arab states normalise relations with Israel, it is widely expected that his new administration will want to pursue a similar policy of ending hostilities in the Middle East.

Even though Trump supporters have so far indicated that the President-elect is not seeking regime change in Tehran, the inherent weakness evident within the Iranian regime suggests that such an outcome could be easily achievable once Trump is back in the White House.

Brian Hook, Donald Trump's special envoy for Iran during his first term in office, claims, his former boss has "no interest in regime change" in Tehran, but is instead focused on isolating and weakening the Islamic Republic, and that the administration's "deal of the century" peace plan for Israel's conflict with the Palestinians will likely be back on the table once Trump returns to the White House in January.

"President Trump understands that the chief driver of instability in today's Middle East is the Iranian regime," Hook said.

Trump may not be thinking about regime change in Iran as he prepares to take office, but it may become an option he simply cannot ignore if the dramatic collapse in the Islamic Republic's fortunes means that its survival can no longer be guaranteed.

Trump may come to see as well that, unfortunately, due to the deep-seated commitment of Iran's regime in exporting its brand of Islam, as enshrined in its constitution, there can be no real long-term peace in the Middle East without regime change, especially if Iran has nuclear weapons – not to mention the global arms race that would follow such an event.

Not only would many of Iran's neighbours be relieved, but Iran's captive citizens could then be free to choose leaders better aligned with their aspirations. A liberated Iran might even join the Abraham Accords....


Con Coughlin is the Telegraph's Defence and Foreign Affairs Editor and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21120/trump-iran-regime-change

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Oklahoma school boss prepares for a post-U.S. Education Department era that empowers parents - Charlotte Hazard

 

by Charlotte Hazard

"We're going to end education coming out of Washington, D.C.," Trump said in a policy video. "We're going to close up all those buildings all over the place.......we're going to send it all back to the states."

 

With President-elect Donald Trump getting another term next year, many school choice activists, including Oklahoma State Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters, are hopeful that the Department of Education will be abolished and education policy will return to the states.

Trump has come out and said that he wanted the Department of Education, however Republicans have been throwing around that idea since the 1980s and it hasn't been able to get done. 

"We're going to end education coming out of Washington, D.C.," Trump said in a policy video. "We're going to close up all those buildings all over the place.......we're going to send it all back to the states."

The Department of Education was founded in October 1979 under Democratic President Jimmy Carter. Many Republicans have argued that the department has done more damage to education than benefited it. 

"President Trump is going to deliver on this incredibly bold reform agenda that he's laid out....it's the best education agenda the country has ever seen," Walters said on the "Just the News, No Noise" TV show. "What we've seen is every educational statistic has gotten worse since Jimmy Carter brought us the Department of Education."

Walters discussed how many American families don't trust the Department of Education because of the overreach that happened during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Department of Education expanded the definition of sex discrimination to include gender identity and pregnancy earlier this year and rolled back Trump-era rules on student sexual misconduct cases. The finalization of the new rules came after months of delays and critics have already threatened legal challenges.

The department said public schools in states that opposed these changes would need to comply with the new regulations if they want to continue receiving federal funding.

"Those are the threats we face on a daily basis from the Federal Department of Education to push woke ideology," Walters said. "We fought back. We didn't comply. I was the first state to sue them here in Oklahoma."

One of Trump's plans for education is to empower homeschool families to be able to use the 529 Education Savings Accounts to spend up to $10,000 a year tax free on tuition for grades K-12.

"So to support the growing homeschool movement, in my next term, I will immediately fight to allow homeschool parents the same incredible benefit--$10,000 a year per child, completely tax free to spend on costs associated with homeschool education," Trump said in a policy video.

Walters applauded Trump for being a "champion" for families being in charge of their children's education

"The families should be directing educational choices [and] educational decision making for their children......that's what every state should be doing," he said.

School choice activist Erika Donalds said that Trump's presidency is great for parents who have been fighting bureaucracy for years, striving to bring education to a local level.

"We know it's going to take a lot of work," she said. "It's going to take cooperation from Congress. Thankfully, we now have both chambers in control by Republicans so we can start that dismantling right away. I think it's going to be at the top of the list for Elon and Vivek as they launch the DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency)."

She said that the government monopoly on education needs to be broken. 

"The solution is a free market in education," Donalds said. "We need to break the government monopoly. It's not public schools necessarily that are the problem. It's the monopoly that they enjoy and therefore they do not have to be as responsive to parents who are the consumers, and make sure that they are accountable for student performance."

She explained that the Department of Education at the federal level really only makes up seven percent of the budgets in education across the country.

"The vast majority of education policy and accountability takes place at the state and local level," Donalds said. "So nothing is going to happen when we eliminate this department except the elimination of that waste and the corresponding compliance that's taking place at the state level."


Charlotte Hazard

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/education/school-choice-activists-say-trump-will-scrap-department-education-return

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Pentagon fails 7th audit in a row, unable to fully account for $824B budget - Stephen Sorace

 

by Stephen Sorace

Pentagon audits received disclaimer of opinion

 

The Pentagon failed its seventh consecutive audit on Friday as the agency was unable to fully account for its massive $824 billion budget, though officials were confident the Department of Defense "has turned a corner" in understanding its budgetary challenges going forward.

The audits resulted in a disclaimer of opinion, which means auditors were provided with insufficient information to form an accurate opinion of the accounts.

Of the Department of Defense’s (DoD) 28 reporting entities that had standalone audits, 9 received an unmodified audit opinion, 1 received a qualified opinion, 15 received disclaimers, and 3 opinions remain pending, the Pentagon said.

But with the goal of achieving a clean audit by 2028, Michael McCord, Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and Chief Financial Officer, said the agency "has turned a corner in its understanding of the depth and breadth of its challenges." 

MILITARY SUICIDES WERE ON THE RISE LAST YEAR, DESPITE A MASSIVE INVESTMENT IN PREVENTION PROGRAMS

Pentagon briefing room

The agency's goal of earning an unmodified audit opinion by the end of 2028 is mandated by the National Defense Authorization Act. (Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images, File)

"Momentum is on our side, and throughout the Department there is strong commitment—and belief in our ability—to achieve an unmodified audit opinion," he said in a statement.

Michael McCord

Michael McCord, comptroller of the Pentagon, said that while much work remains ahead, he believes the Pentagon can achieve an unmodified audit by 2028. (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images, File)

The objective of earning an unmodified audit opinion is mandated by the National Defense Authorization Act.

McCord told reporters at a briefing on Friday that he would not say that the agency "failed" as it had "about half clean opinions."

"So if someone had a report card that is half good and half not good, I don’t know that you call the student or the report card a failure," he said.

Pentagon aerial view

The Pentagon failed to achieve clean audits for the seventh year in a row on Friday. (DANIEL SLIM/AFP via Getty Images, File)

US DEPLOYS ADDITIONAL MILITARY FORCES TO MIDDLE EAST AMID INTENSIFYING REGIONAL TENSIONS: PENTAGON

Independent public accountants and the DoD Office of Inspector General closely examined the financial statements for the audit.

McCord emphasized in a statement that the path to a clean audit is clear.

"Significant work remains and challenges lie ahead, but our annual audit continues to be a catalyst for Department-wide financial management reform, resulting in greater financial integrity, transparency, and better-supported warfighters," he said.


Stephen Sorace

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pentagon-fails-7th-audit-row-unable-fully-account-824b-budget

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Report: Hezbollah's propaganda chief eliminated in Israeli airstrike - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

Lebanese media reports that Mohammed Afif, the Media Relations Officer for the Hezbollah terrorist organization, was eliminated today (Sunday), in an Israeli airstrike in Lebanon

 

Mohammed Afif
Mohammed Afif                                                                                      Al Manar TV/Reuters TV

Mohammed Afif, the Media Relations Officer for the Hezbollah terrorist organization, was eliminated today (Sunday), in an Israeli airstrike in Lebanon, Lebanese media and Reuters reported.

There has been no official announcement from Israel.

Last week, Afif told Hezbollah fighters that they are "perhaps determining the fate of the Middle East," the Tehran Times reported.

"The enemy is still unable to occupy a single Lebanese village, and the epic of the al-Khiam Fortress stands as a living testament to heroism," he claimed.

He also stated that "The Israeli claims about our depleted missile stock are mere fabrications; our missiles will surprise."


Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/399313

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Kushner to serve as informal Trump Mideast adviser - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

“Friendships are forever in this region,” an Israeli source who dealt with the first Trump administration said.

 

Jared Kushner, then-senior adviser to President Donald Trump, and his wife, Ivanka Trump, in Jerusalem, ahead of the inauguration of the U.S. embassy in the city, May 13, 2018. Photo by Yossi Zamir/Flash90.
Jared Kushner, then-senior adviser to President Donald Trump, and his wife, Ivanka Trump, in Jerusalem, ahead of the inauguration of the U.S. embassy in the city, May 13, 2018. Photo by Yossi Zamir/Flash90.

President-elect Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner will reportedly play an important role in U.S. Middle East policy, even though he will not formally be part of the administration.

Regional diplomats and Trump allies recognize that Kushner—who has significant financial interests in the Gulf—has forged deep relationships from his position as a senior White House adviser during the first Trump administration, CNN reported on Friday.

“No one on the incoming team has what Jared has, and that is trust. Jared earned it, he didn’t have it at the beginning. He earned it. That takes time to build,” said a diplomat from a Middle Eastern nation.

“Friendships are forever in this region,” an Israeli source who dealt with the first Trump administration told CNN. “My assumption is that his role is much more in his hands than anybody else’s.”

After President Joe Biden took office four years ago, Kushner and his wife, Ivanka Trump, moved to Florida and largely avoided politics. He founded an investment fund shortly after leaving Washington with major backing from sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf, including $2 billion from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund.

Kushner’s close ties to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as well as to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could allow for more private contacts, the report noted.

The second Trump administration is certain to make the expansion of the landmark 2020 Abraham Accords, which Kushner spearheaded, a cornerstone of its Middle East program with a push toward reaching a historic normalization agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia expected to be front and center of U.S. foreign policy efforts next year.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/kushner-to-serve-as-informal-trump-mideast-adviser/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Yasser Arafat’s legacy: The death of Palestinian statehood - analysis - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

In many ways, the failure of the Palestinian cause in the last two decades is a result of the decisions of Arafat during the ten years he presided over the Palestinian Authority.

 

THEN-PALESTINIAN Authority head and PLO chairman Yasser Arafat gestures during a speech in Ramallah, 2004. (photo credit: AMMAR AWAD/REUTERS)
THEN-PALESTINIAN Authority head and PLO chairman Yasser Arafat gestures during a speech in Ramallah, 2004.
(photo credit: AMMAR AWAD/REUTERS)

Yasser Arafat died 20 years ago this month – November 11, 2004 – at the age of 75. He was born in 1929 in Cairo and was active in activism that led to the founding of the Fatah movement in 1959.

Fatah eventually became one of the major Palestinian factions that led to the formation of the Palestinian Authority in 1994.

The years since Arafat’s death have seen some major changes for the Palestinians. But in many ways, the failure of their cause over the last two decades is a result of the decisions of Arafat during the 10 years he presided over the PA.

This surely wasn’t the legacy he expected to have. Arafat likely thought he was leading the Palestinians toward statehood.

Spelling out Arafat's failures

In the wake of the October 7 massacre, it is unlikely they will have a state, and it is more likely the future will consist of an endless conflict that escalates and de-escalates every few years.

 BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, in his first term as prime minister, shakes hands with then-PA head Yasser Arafat at the Middle East peace summit at Wye River, Maryland, 1998. Netanyahu, with the aid of Palestinian terrorists, helped scuttle the Oslo Accords, says the writer. (credit: REUTERS)Enlrage image
BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, in his first term as prime minister, shakes hands with then-PA head Yasser Arafat at the Middle East peace summit at Wye River, Maryland, 1998. Netanyahu, with the aid of Palestinian terrorists, helped scuttle the Oslo Accords, says the writer. (credit: REUTERS)

What went wrong? First of all, many people probably forget it has been two decades since Arafat’s death, a testament to how much he has been obscured by current events.

Arafat once held court in this region, meeting with leaders, showing up at international meetings with his keffiyeh, sometimes in sunglasses even when it was daylight, or with a paramilitary uniform – all part of a style choice very much in line with the 1960s and 1970s that helped form him.

To spotlight that history, CNN’s Christiane Amanpour recently presented this segment: “20 years after Yasser Arafat’s death, we revisit his complex legacy, his impact on the Palestinian quest for statehood, how world leaders reacted to his passing and what it meant for peace.”

What can we conclude looking back at Arafat’s legacy? As noted above, his rise to prominence came against the backdrop of the 1960s and 1970s.

Arafat tried to channel the fervor for “revolution” and “armed struggle” in the region, hoping that the Algerian war that forced the French to leave that country by 1962 would also have headwinds for the Palestinians. Unlike French Algeria, though, the Palestinians were divided and occupied in 1962 by the Egyptians and Jordan.

Initially, the war waged by the Palestinians was against the existence of Israel, not against the “occupation,” because the Palestinian national movement was a tool of countries such as Egypt to destabilize Israel. It wasn’t designed to “liberate” Jerusalem, because Jordan ran eastern Jerusalem and controlled al-Aqsa Mosque at the time.

Only after 1967 did things shift, and Arafat and his movement took on a new look: It claimed to be conducting a struggle against Israel in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Arafat had founded Fatah through students and friends he met in Kuwait and other places among the Palestinian diaspora. The movement achieved more success after 1967 when it was actually fighting Israel, such as in clashes at Karameh, Jordan, in 1968.

Destablizing the Middle East

Arafat and his men tried to destabilize the Kingdom of Jordan, even threatening its existence in 1970 during fighting that led to the Jordanian Civil War.

During that era, Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Arafat emerged on the international stage. He appeared in photos with sunglasses on during the day, looking more like a cartel boss than a political leader. But this was the style of the time, however ridiculous, clownish, and thuggish it appears in retrospect.

By 1974, Arafat was speaking at the United Nations. On November 10, 1975, UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 determined that “Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.”

Arafat seemed to be winning, even though his movement had caused a war in Jordan and also carried out the brutal Munich Olympics massacre. Books lauding Arafat for his vision appeared, such as Alan Hart’s Arafat: Terrorist or Peacemaker. When I was in middle school, my social studies teacher, “Mr. P.,” was enthusiastic about the book. I read it a few years later.

By this time, Arafat and his movement hadn’t just destabilized Jordan; after they moved to Lebanon, they also helped destabilize and destroy that country, beginning in 1976 with the Lebanese Civil War.

They caused the Israeli invasions of 1978 and 1982, and Israel stayed in Lebanon until 2000. Arafat left Beirut in 1982 for Tunisia, coming to Gaza in 1994 for his triumphant return to what he thought would be a Palestinian state in the making.

If the 1960s milieu made Arafat into a paramilitary “icon” wearing sunglasses and a keffiyeh, it was the end of the Cold War that turned him into an actual leader who was legitimized by the international community.

Arafat returned to the Palestinian territories the same year that South Africa had its first full and free elections with the end of Apartheid. At the time, democracy was sweeping the world. The Berlin Wall was gone. Conflicts were ending around the world. The US was a global hegemon presiding over the new world order.

There were some inklings of the failure to come, such as the Black Hawk Down disaster in 1993, the Rwandan Genocide, the Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, and al-Qaeda’s attack on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

The 1990s, however, gave the Palestinians the chance to create a state in the making. In Gaza, an international airport was built. In Abu Dis, the Palestinians wanted to build a makeshift capital overlooking Jerusalem.

Everything was going well. In May 2000, Israel withdrew from Lebanon. Arafat had the chance to build a state. Instead, he chose war. He likely believed that Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon meant that if Israel was pushed a little more via violence, it would fold.

In September 2000, he gambled that Ariel Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount could be used as a spark. Clashes began in Gaza and spread. The Second Intifada began.

This wasn’t like the First Intifada, which helped bring Arafat from Tunisia to Gaza and helped create the PA. This was bloody, and like the October 7 massacre, it led to disaster for the Palestinians.

By 2002, Israel had reentered many Palestinian cities. The airport in Gaza was in ruins. Arafat died in 2004. He didn’t even get to live to see the Disengagement from the Gaza Strip in 2005.

Arafat left a chaotic and corrupt PA in the hands of Mahmoud Abbas. Handed a potential win through Disengagement, Abbas fumbled and let Hamas win Palestinian elections. He then let Hamas throw Fatah out of Gaza.

Backed by the US-trained PA Security Forces, Abbas hung on, but his regime was a slowly aging edifice. In Gaza, the UN and NGOs partnered with Hamas; by 2012, Hamas leaders were in Doha, Qatar, being groomed for higher things.

Several wars later, Hamas was ready to launch the October 7 massacre, the goal of which was to end the concept of two states forever and plunge Israel into endless wars so that Hamas could take over the West Bank.

Arafat’s failure to fulfill a vision for the Palestinians in that narrow window of opportunity in the 1990s has allowed Hamas to be a driver of the movement and lead them to disaster.


Seth J. Frantzman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-829462

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump II: Challenges Ahead - Amir Taheri

 

by Amir Taheri

In those 12 years of Obama and Biden, US leaders went around the world to apologize for imaginary injustices done by Americans to various segments of mankind, mused about "leading from behind" and presented the United States as a room service that doesn't even ask you to sign the bill let alone offer a tip.

 

  • The real question, therefore, is what could Trump II do to restore America's prestige across the globe and reassert itself as the indispensable power that it still is? The answer is: plenty.

  • In fact, Trump, even if he doesn't do anything, will repair some of the damage that the past three administrations shaped by Barack Obama have done to US standing and credibility as a world power.

  • In those 12 years of Obama and Biden, US leaders went around the world to apologize for imaginary injustices done by Americans to various segments of mankind, mused about "leading from behind" and presented the United States as a room service that doesn't even ask you to sign the bill let alone offer a tip.

  • Under the three Obama administrations, with Trump I as a brief interlude, the US saw Russia attack and occupy parts of Georgia and annex Crimea and eventually invade Ukraine, and the US did nothing.

  • Obama drew a red line against the use of chemical weapons to kill Syrian people, but when Bashar al-Assad, backed by Russia, did so, went into purdah.

  • To divert attention from the Middle East, Obama conjured the "pivot to Asia" slogan, while letting China grab a bigger chunk of the world, including US markets, in the name of free trade.

  • Also remember that regardless of what experts or even Trump himself say, the 47th president is likely to be as unpredictable as the 45th one, a feature that helped him in foreign policy last time and may do so again.

What could Donald Trump do in his second term to restore America's prestige across the globe and reassert itself as the indispensable power that it still is? The answer is: plenty. Trump, even if he doesn't do anything, will repair some of the damage that the past three administrations shaped by Barack Obama have done to US standing and credibility as a world power. Pictured: Trump in Palm Beach, Florida, on November 14, 2024. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

What will Donald Trump's foreign policy look like in his second term?

This is the question currently making the buzz in the commentariat around the world.

Western European pundits claim that Trump will abandon the Ukrainian lamb to the Russian wolf or, at least, force the European shepherd to foot the bill for keeping it half alive.

Indian oped-writers hope that Trump will cut China down to size, thus elevating India as Asia's new indispensable giant. Progressive Davos collectivists warn that unless checked, Trump will go through the globalist ideology like a bull in a china shop.

In the past few days, I have run into even more interesting speculations regarding Trump II foreign policy -- from Iran and Israel.

From Iran comes a lengthy editorial in the daily Kayhan claiming that, keen to maintain friendly ties with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump will also refrain from attempts at toppling the Islamic Republic of Iran, which Moscow has adopted as its "faithful Ruslan."

An even stranger reading of the tea-leaves came from an Israeli strategy "expert" who wanted Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Iran and destroy its infrastructures before Trump re-enters the White House. The rationale for this is that President Joe Biden's lame duck administration won't be able to do anything to stop such an event, while Trump would not have a sizzling potato on his hands so soon in his second term.

So, what will Trump do?

The honest answer is that nobody knows, perhaps not even Trump himself. In any case, the United States has never been a one-man show and its president can't be a modern version of Kublai Khan or Tsar Vladimir of the 40 daughters.

The real question, therefore, is what could Trump II do to restore America's prestige across the globe and reassert itself as the indispensable power that it still is? The answer is: plenty.

In fact, Trump, even if he doesn't do anything, will repair some of the damage that the past three administrations shaped by Barack Obama have done to US standing and credibility as a world power.

In those 12 years of Obama and Biden, US leaders went around the world to apologize for imaginary injustices done by Americans to various segments of mankind, mused about "leading from behind" and presented the United States as a room service that doesn't even ask you to sign the bill let alone offer a tip.

What Trump is seeking, however, is a restoration of the classical meaning of an alliance as a partnership in which pain and profit are shared proportionally.

Trump has also shown that the US should not give its word only to get a few good headlines or help incumbents collect votes in an election.

One example was Trump's decision to implement the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act, transferring the US Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in 2018. Another was the pledge to disengage from the Afghanistan imbroglio via an agreement with rival factions in that forlorn land -- a deal that turned into a fiasco because its execution came under Biden's presidency.

Under the three Obama administrations, with Trump I as a brief interlude, the US saw Russia attack and occupy parts of Georgia and annex Crimea and eventually invade Ukraine, and the US did nothing.

Obama drew a red line against the use of chemical weapons to kill Syrian people, but when Bashar al-Assad, backed by Russia, did so, went into purdah.

To divert attention from the Middle East, Obama conjured the "pivot to Asia" slogan, while letting China grab a bigger chunk of the world, including US markets, in the name of free trade.

However, for US to regain credibility, it won't be enough that Trump not be Obama or Biden. Trump left much unfinished business when he had to leave the White House in 2021.

One such piece of business is the Abraham Accords peace process, which altered the established pattern of politics in the Middle East but ended up as an unfinished symphony. Trying to finish it would be one of the challenges Trump II will face, albeit in a much less promising context.

Trump will also have to provide an alternative to the Paris Agreement on climate change, a deeply flawed if not fraudulent deal he courageously rejected almost eight years ago.

The pas-de-deux that Trump I performed with North Korea's Kim Jong Un across Asia led to a brief interlude in Pyongyang's nuclear game, which resumed with a vengeance as Biden entered the White House.

As for Iran, Trump's "maximum pressure" policy reined in the mullahs for almost four years, during which they didn't attack US forces in Iraq and kept their proxies in Lebanon and Gaza on a tight leash, thus allowing Israel a brief respite.

Trump II will have to decide whether the same result could be obtained with the same means, or something other than "maximum pressure" would be required.

The Trump II machine won't be in full gear before next spring. Trump has to complete his team, have its members approved by the Senate, and replace Senator Mitch McConnell as the Senate Republican Leader.

Then it has to organize goodbye and gold watch retirement parties for at least 30 US ambassadors and reorganize the State Department to free US diplomacy from deeply entrenched but misguided beliefs marketed by lobbies, think-tanks and peddlers of progressivism within the beltway.

Doing meaningful business with European allies will also have to wait until after Germany gets a new stable government, if it can, next spring and France's ramshackle coalition shows that it can go beyond grandstanding by just standing.

We must remember that Trump's current unassailable position produced by an unexpected victory may not last beyond the next midterm elections in two years' time. Nevertheless, he would have enough time to spell out his policy options and set up his shop-window, so to speak.

Also remember that regardless of what experts or even Trump himself say, the 47th president is likely to be as unpredictable as the 45th one, a feature that helped him in foreign policy last time and may do so again.

This article originally appeared in Asharq Al-Awsat


Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987. He is the Chairman of Gatestone Europe.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21119/trump-challenges

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Deb Haaland’s critics say Burgum’s leadership will be good for energy, Alaska Natives and hunters - Kevin Killough

 

by Kevin Killough

“Deb Haaland was one of the worst DEI [diversity, equity and inclusion] hires of the Biden-Harris administration, and she can’t become unemployed fast enough," Daniel Turner, executive director of Power the Future said.

 

Signaling that his “drill, baby drill” chant wasn’t just a campaign slogan, Trump Friday officially nominated North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum to head the Department of the Interior. Additionally, Burgum will chair the newly formed National Energy Council, making him nation’s de-facto “energy czar.”

If the Senate confirms him for Interior Secretary, Burgum will oversee 480 million acres of public lands, 700 million acres of minerals below the ground, and 1,7 billion acres of offshore area off America’s coasts. 

Tim Stewart, president of the U.S. Oil and Gas Association, said Burgum’s experience as governor will serve him well in the position. 

“Governors often make the best cabinet secretaries. The size of the departments require significant executive management experience. The Department of the Interior has a budget of $18 billion and 70,000 employees over 2,400 locations across the country. It is the nation's largest landlord. In other words, running the DOI is like running a state government,” Stewart said. 

Net zero proponent

North Dakota is the third largest producer of oil in the United States behind New Mexico and Texas. In 2023, 432.7 million barrels of oil. With only about 4% of its land in federal hands, much of North Dakota’s production occurs on state and private land. 

Having led a state gushing millions of barrels of oil every day, environmentalists criticized Trump’s choice. The Sierra Club called Burgum a “climate skeptic,” saying he advocated for rolling back environmental regulations. The Center for Biological Diversity said he’ll be a ““disastrous secretary of the interior who’ll sacrifice our public land.” 

While Burgum hasn’t been openly hostile to fossil fuels as environmentalists would like, as governor of North Dakota, he outlined plans to make the state carbon neutral by 2030. He’s also been supportive of carbon capture initiatives, arguing they have economic benefits. 

In 2021, he spoke favorably about ESG. “To grow and diversify North Dakota’s economy, we must be able to attract capital to our state. And currently, so-called ESG principles – short for Environment, Social and Governance – are being used on Wall Street to both guide and restrict investment decisions,” he told Future Farmer.

However, Burgum has stated that the Biden-Harris administration’s policies are much more destructive than climate change. “It’s not climate change we need to worry about. It’s about the Biden climate policies that are actually the existential threat to America’s future,” he said during the Republican primary presidential debate

Cowboys and Indians

About 25% of crude oil production happens on federal lands. Where Burgum could have the most influence on oil and gas production is in states like Wyoming. Nearly half of the state’s land is under federal control, meaning most oil and gas production in Wyoming is under the auspices of the Bureau of Land Management. 

Under the Biden administration, the state has seen a precipitous drop in the number of acres the BLM offers for oil and gas leases. The latest auction in September, Cowboy State Daily reported, offered just 159 acres. That netted $27,000. In June 2022, the federal government offered 100,000 acres for leases.

The Biden administration had similar impacts on Alaska. The federal government controls 61% of the state’s land, which is 223 million acres. 

Among dozens of actions directly impacting oil, gas and mineral development in Alaska, President Joe Biden announced in September 2023 that it was moving to limit future oil and gas leasing, as well as other industrial development, on 13 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve - Alaska. The rule, which was finalized in April, also established an outright prohibition on new leasing on 10.6 million acres — 40% of the reserve.

For Alaska Native communities on the state’s North Slope, the rules were limiting a huge source of revenue that has allowed them to develop modern amenities. Nagruk Harcharek, president of the Voice of the Arctic Iñupiattold Just the News after the rules were finalized that services like sewer systems, schools and health clinics arrived on the North Slope only within the last generation. 

The Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat represents 24 members in eight Alaskan Native communities spread out across 95,000 square miles of northern Alaska. Its members include local governments, Alaska Native Corporations, federally recognized tribes and tribal nonprofits. For years, the organization requested an audience with the Interior Secretary under Biden, Deb Haaland. These requests were declined or ignored until last summer when Haaland finally met with members of the Voice. 

In a statement to Just the News Friday, Harcharek said he’s hopeful that Burgum will be more receptive to the  Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat’s concerns. 

“We congratulate Gov. Burgum and encourage him to prioritize early and often meaningful engagement and consultation with Indigenous elected leaders when making decisions affecting their lands and communities. If Gov. Burgum is formally nominated and confirmed by the Senate, we look forward to working with him and educating other appointed officials in the incoming Trump-Vance administration, as well as new and returning congressional representatives, to advance North Slope Iñupiat self-determination in our ancestral homelands – as we have done with elected leaders on both sides of the aisle for a decade,” Harcharek said. 

Sharp contrast

Daniel Turner, executive director of Power the Future, an energy advocacy and education nonprofit, told Just the News that Haaland’s decisions weren’t limited to Alaska and negatively impacted the oil and gas industry across the U.S. 

“Deb Haaland was one of the worst DEI [diversity, equity and inclusion] hires of the Biden-Harris administration, and she can’t become unemployed fast enough. Under Haaland, the Interior Department leased the fewest acres of land since Truman and openly bragged about destroying offshore oil leases,” Turner said. 

In a statement on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump said the National Energy Council that Burgum will chair will “consist of all departments and agencies involved in the permitting, production, generation, distribution, regulation, [and] transportation of all forms of American energy. This council will oversee the path to U.S. energy dominance by cutting red tape, enhancing private sector investments across all sectors of the economy.” 

Turner said Burgum’s goals will be “in sharp contrast” to those of Haaland. “Burgum is a leader of a rural, energy rich state who always puts common sense first. While Haaland ignored the needs of Western states, Burgum understands the challenges and opportunities of the West where the federal government is a major landholder. We fully support President Trump’s nomination of Governor Burgum and only regret that he can’t start immediately,” Turner said. 

"Shares our lifestyle"

Outdoor recreation enthusiasts also expressed approval of Trump’s choice. Prior to Trump announcing Burgum for the positions, Gabriella Hoffman, director Center for Energy & Conservation Director at the Independent Women’s Forum and self-described avid outdoorswoman, said Thursday in a post on X that Trump’s pick for Interior secretary should support hunters and anglers. 

After the announcement, Hoffman praised Burgum. He “is an avid bowhunter. Very important to have an Interior secretary who shares our lifestyle, since hunters, gun owners, and anglers fund 60%-80% of conservation funding in the U.S.,” Hoffman said in a post on X, which included a photo of Burgum with a buck he’d successfully hunted with a bow. 

Burgum still must succeed in the confirmation hearings, but with a Republican-controlled Senate, he may not face much opposition. For the oil and gas industry and its supporters, Burgum’s leadership, they expect, will take the Interior Department in much better direction.

“Governor Burgum knows how to run a lean, efficient operation, and he knows how to hold public employees accountable. He's smart, successful and has a keen political sense. He knows our industry well and he is a great pick,” Stewart, with the U.S. Oil and Gas Association, said. 

 
Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/deb-haalands-critics-say-burgums-leadership-will-be-good-energy-alaska

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter