by Isi Leibler
       The Iranians have mocked 
Secretary of State Kerry’s overtures, including his secret appeals to 
them to coordinate with the U.S. in opposing ISIS. Speaking from a 
podium bedecked with banners blazing “America cannot do a damn thing,” 
Ayatollah Khomeini boasted that the “Great Satan’s” efforts to bring 
Iran to its knees had failed, and that President Obama lacked the 
courage for a military confrontation. Ali Younesi, senior advisor to 
“moderate” President Rouhani, referred to Obama as “the weakest of US 
presidents” whose six years in office were “humiliating”.
       Nevertheless, the administration
 continues to grovel in an effort to appease the Iranians. It is widely 
believed that the unprecedented hostility recently directed against 
Israel, especially the statement that Israel had lost the opportunity of
 exploiting the military option to prevent Iran becoming a nuclear 
power, were primarily for the benefit of the Ayatollah.
       The London Times claimed that 
American and Iranian officials have even been discussing the opening of 
the US trade office in Tehran.
       The frenzied, initially covert, 
efforts to engage the support of Iran in the struggle against ISIS - 
despite Iran being designated by the U.S. as a terrorist state - has 
further undermined the little credibility the US retains with the 
moderate Sunni states, considered until recently as staunch allies.
      
       Obama’s deception of his allies 
was exemplified when it was disclosed that he had written a secret 
letter to Ayatollah Khomeini pleading with him to reach to an 
accommodation. This, the fourth letter he had written to the Ayatollah –
 all of which were ignored - was an explicit breach of undertaking to 
his allies that any independent initiatives would be preceded by 
consultations.
       Even one of Obama’s favorite 
in-house journalists, Jeffrey Goldberg, felt impelled to remark that the
 “most recent letter was delivered at an unfortunate moment in the 
run-up to the putatively climactic negotiations between Iran and the 
world powers” when the Obama administration had already conceded to many
 of the demands of Iran. Goldberg concluded his column by stating “the 
Iranians originally came to the negotiating table because US-led 
sanctions were hurting them badly. I understand the need for give and 
take negotiations, but I’m getting worried that the US is focused too 
much on the first half of that equation”.
       The U.S. administration has 
already given approval to Iran to enrich uranium, effectively making 
them a nuclear threshold state. While the global powers agreed to enable
 the Iranians to have1000 centrifuges to process material required to 
create nuclear fuel, the Iranians have outrightly refused to dismantle 
any of the 19,000 centrifuges they have already accumulated. It is 
understood that Iran is already in the position to accrue sufficient 
enriched fissile material to become a nuclear power within a few months,
 if it so desired. The US has indicated that it would be willing to sign
 off on a deal which would extend this breakout phase to one year, 
hardly reassuring to the region.
       The Iranians also displayed 
utter contempt towards the U.S. by violating the interim accord, and 
failing to disclose an enrichment facility in Qom and even denying 
access to inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency to 
military sites and nuclear scientists engaged in research. Clearly, the 
duplicitous Islamist regime would continue to circumvent any agreement 
which is not rigorously monitored and enforced – a procedure that the 
Iranians have already made clear they will never accept.
       While the outcome of this issue 
will have immense global implications, especially in the Middle East, 
Israel is the country most affected. The Iranian regime’s hatred of 
Israel is Messianic. It openly proclaims its commitment to destroy the 
Jewish state. Coinciding with Obama’s groveling letter to him, Ayatollah
 Khomeini posted a Twitter stating that the only way to stop the 
“Israeli crimes”, was to annihilate” the “barbaric, wolf like and 
infanticidal regime of Israel”. Israel cannot accept the prospect of 
such a fanatical terrorist regime becoming a nuclear threshold state.
       Under pressure, following the 
release of his letter to the Ayatollah, Present Obama has stepped back, 
stating that there is still a big gap and that “we may not be able to 
get there”. He added “our number one priority with respect to Iran is 
making sure they don’t get a nuclear weapon”. Even his closest 
associates would question their President’s credibility when he 
expresses such views.
       The question is whether at this 
advanced stage, the P1+5 nations, desperate to appease and reach an 
accord with the terrorist state at any price, can still be deterred from
 capitulating.
       The key rests with the United 
States. The extraordinary landslide victory by the Republicans at the 
midterm elections – clearly a vote of non-confidence in Obama - provides
 some hope.
       Yet it should be noted that 
within the American political system, the president assumes the primary 
control of foreign relations. The Republican controlled Congress and 
Senate can certainly pass resolutions, but that will not necessarily 
limit the White House in this arena of foreign policy. In addition, 
realizing that on the domestic scene his hands will be restricted by 
Congress, Obama might even decide to intensify his foreign policy 
activities. The principal areas are likely to include the embrace of the
 Iranians and possibly trying to impose a settlement on the Israelis 
with the Palestinians.
       However in relation to Iran, the
 president must persuade Congress to rescind the sanctions it originally
 legislated. Obama may constitutionally override the congressional 
sanctions and unilaterally suspend enforcement, but that could lead to a
 major confrontation with Congress.
       Needless to say, if a reasonable
 agreement was achieved it would be endorsed by Congress. But all 
indications suggest that Obama is promoting an Alice in Wonderland deal 
with the Iranians which Congress would reject.
       The potential incoming Senate 
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has already stated unequivocally that 
the Senate will review any deal with Iran and ensure that “any 
comprehensive agreement concerning the Iranian nuclear program, both 
protects the national security of the United States and recognizes 
Israel’s own defense as a security partner of our country.”
       At this critical time, American 
Jews and friends of Israel should exert all their influence to convince 
the administration and a bipartisan Congress that appeasing the Iranian 
mullahs will have horrific long-term consequences and must be avoided. 
They should mount a powerful public campaign to demonstrate the 
catastrophic blunder the government would make should it appease this 
evil terrorist regime, which in the absence of becoming a nuclear state,
 is likely in time to implode internally because of the growing 
opposition from own its young people and the middle class.
Isi Leibler may be contacted at ileibler@leibler.com His website can be viewed at www.wordfromjerusalem.com.
Source: http://wordfromjerusalem.com/?p=5385
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment