III. ORAL CRIMINALS
About Gideon Levi, Robert Fisk and the far left as the propoganda depatment of HAMAS and AL-KAIDA
by Ben Dror Yemini
3rd part of 4
On December 28th 2008, a few days after Hamas violated the cease fire agreement with
The Israeli operation is postponing the implementation, but very soon new punishment measures ranging from chopping of hands, lashings and executions, will be introduced in Gaza. The Taliban has made a comeback in
The big question is however, what are the likes of Robert Fisk, Naomi Klein and Gideon Levi doing with this crowd. “We are against Sharia law” they will tell us. That’s true – they are against it. “The disagreement with Hamas should have been solved in another way” they will excuse themselves. “
They add that “if only
Global opinion seems to think in the same way, the West as a whole and especially the Zionists are the oppressors.
These are the main claims of the lie industry and they should be exposed.
ROCKET FIRE WAS NOT A REACTION TO THE BLOCKADE OR EMBARGO
This happened after Hamas massacred and executed scores of Fatah loyalists. Al Jazeera chose not show those pictures. The crossings were closed because Hamas proclaimed that it doesn’t recognise the cease fire or
Amira Haas tried again to justify Hamas’ behaviour. She wrote in Haaretz that the blockade on
By the way, throughout the period that
HAMAS DOESN’T WANT A
Secondly, the Palestinians had their chances at building a state of their own. The option was there and if they would have seized the opportunity, their struggle would be justified. But, they kept saying no. They said No to the Peel commission in 1936, No to the UN proposal of 1947 to divide the land, No after the Six Day War (the three "no"s of the Khartoum declaration) and No to the Clinton proposal in 2000.
This pattern of refusal was intensified by Hamas. They rejected any agreement, past or future. If Hamas was interested in lifting the blockade, it would have happened by now, but they are not. They want something else: war, rockets and the destruction of
MUSLIMS PAY THE PRICE OF MURDEROUS ISLAM
Thirdly, lose of innocent lives doesn’t really matter to those protesting against
They also didn’t propose a boycott on
Therefore, the question shouldn’t be “can the progressive world protect Hamas from
POLITICAL ISLAM IS A DISASTER
Fourthly, Hamas’ actions are not a response to
Everywhere political Islam was established it entailed oppression, destruction, poverty and death. Like in Afghanistan where the Taliban murdered close to one million Muslims or Algeria where the Islamic Front slaughtered two hundred thousand people. Another example is
THE RADICAL LEFT AND RADICAL ISLAM MEET
So what are Annie Lennox and her likes doing there? Why are they trying to justify the instigators of destruction and not those who defend themselves from it? Why did Naomi Klein publish an article calling for a boycott on Israel?
One of the popular signs in the protests against
NAOMI KLEIN WOULD CONDEMN THE
Following the war in
Did you read an article by Naomi Klein about boycotting Hamas or the Islamic University? Where did she get the nerve to write her article about
Klein and her kind are not moral beacons but moral criminals. The problem is that the majority of public opinion is subjected to their distorted propaganda. This majority still doesn’t realize that
Ben Dror Yemini