Thursday, October 11, 2012

Barack Obama, Pants on Fire

by William Sullivan

Now we have hard documented evidence that President Obama will go before an audience and lie to their faces.

Remember the video, released the night before last week's debate, from June 5, 2007?  The one where Obama alleged to a black audience that the federal government had not waived the Stafford Act requirements for New Orleans after Katrina like they did for New York after 9/11 or for Florida after Hurricane Andrew?  The implication was obviously that this was because the federal government doesn't care as much about New Orleans or its "predominantly black" inhabitants.

Thomas Sowell clears up a bit about the president's then, ahem, "confusion" on this matter in his latest piece at Townhall:
 If you want to know what community organizers do, this is it -- rub people's emotions raw to hype their resentments. And this was Barack Obama in his old community organizer role, a role that should have warned those who thought that he was someone who would bring us together, when he was all too well practiced in the arts of polarizing us apart.
Why is the date of this speech important? Because, less than two weeks earlier, on May 24, 2007, the United States Senate had in fact voted 80-14 to waive the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans, as it had waived that requirement for New York and Florida. More federal money was spent rebuilding New Orleans than was spent in New York after 9/11 and in Florida after hurricane Andrew, combined.
Truth is not a job requirement for a community organizer. Nor can Barack Obama claim that he wasn't present the day of that Senate vote, as he claimed he wasn't there when Jeremiah Wright unleashed his obscene attacks on America from the pulpit of the church that Obama attended for 20 years.
Unlike Jeremiah Wright's church, the U.S. Senate keeps a record of who was there on a given day. The Congressional Record for May 24, 2007 shows Senator Barack Obama present that day and voting on the bill that waived the Stafford Act requirement. Moreover, he was one of just 14 Senators who voted against -- repeat, AGAINST -- the legislation which included the waiver.
Not only was the Stafford Act waived by Congress two weeks before Barack Obama went all Kanye West in this speech in 2007, but Barack Obama voted against the bill that waived it.  It is impossible to think that Barack Obama "forgot" that he took part in the vote that waived the financing requirement for New Orleans, and it is equally impossible that he "forgot" that he voted against waiving that financial obligation for New Orleans.  In a manner of speaking, Obama was speaking of himself when warning the audience about the bad guy trying to take money from poor New Orleans.  So there can be no denying that it was an outright and particularly deceitful lie told for the sole purpose of rousing the rabble and fabricating the specter of racism. 

This is a bombshell.  It completely and utterly destroys whatever remnants of credibility remain that Barack Obama is an honest man -- and right before the election.  It proves that millions of sobbing fans in 2008 were duped by someone only too willing to lie to their faces if it would generate a feeling of social resentment and further his political ends.  But Sowell seems to know, as we all do, that the media at large will discount this damning revelation of dishonesty and this proof of Obama's sinister design -- and they have done so for nearly a week, as it has been reported many times in one way or another.  Sowell writes:
Some people in the media have tried to dismiss this and other revelations of Barack Obama's real character that have belatedly come to light as "old news." But the truth is one thing that never wears out. The Pythagorean Theorem is 2,000 years old, but it can still tell you the distance from home plate to second base (127 ft.) without measuring it. And what happened five years ago can tell a lot about Barack Obama's character -- or lack of character.
As we near the finish line on the 2012 election, it is clear that we cannot rely on the leftist shills in the media to relay this information.  Thankfully, however, we do have intellectual leaders like Thomas Sowell and others with an unshakable dedication to truth, and likewise, it is our responsibility to share this truth.  Do not be deterred by those who write off this information as right-wing fear-mongering before even observing the indestructible case you offer -- those people are beyond reason's grasp.  There are millions who can still see truth, so tell it to all who will listen.  "Truth is incontrovertible," Winston Churchill once said.  "Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

And that truth is, now unequivocally proven by facts that anyone with an ounce of sense can ably see, that Barack Obama is a liar.  And given the fear and anger that his lies stir in his target communities, he's a dangerous one.

William Sullivan blogs at and can be followed on Twitter.


Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

1 comment:

salubrius said...

If Obama is not meticulous in his facts, that is bad. But it is worse if he is unaware of the evidence of a conspiracy of the Muslim Brotherhood to infiltrate the government of the United States to engage in the "settlement process". If you want to know what that is, it is defined in a document obtained in an FBI raid on a house in suburban Virginia lived in by Mohamed Akram who had been found to have been photgraphing the bridge supports for the Annapolis Bay Bridge. One of the documents found was labeled "An Explanatory Memorandum On the General Strategic Goal for the [Muslim Brotherhood] Group In North America. The document showed a plan to engage in what it called a "grand Jihad" eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within, and "sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Akram sent the document to the Shura Council or Board of Directors of the Muslim Brotherhood of America with a note asking them to read it for approval. He said it was an update to restate the plan that they had adopted in 1987. A large number of mainstream Muslim organizations were included in the conspiracy and were labeled "unindicted co-conspirators". The document was admitted into evidence in the Holy Land Foundation case on terrorist financing. Its authenticity was not disputed One of these conspirators was CAIR, Council on American Islamic Relations that holds itself out as a civil rights organization for Muslims. It asked the court to remove it from the list of 15 or 20 organizations but the court reviewed the evidence and found there was ample evidence for it to remain on the list.
The DOJ under Obama, has dropped their investigation of these un-indicted co-conspirators so I guess they will never be indicted unless there is a change in Presidents soon. By then, however, I assume large magnets will pass over the hard drives of a lot of computers and a lot of papers will be burned.
Another document found by Swiss Authorities in 2005 shows a 100 year plan for world domination. It is called "The Project". Patrick Poole wrote an article about it in World Net Daily but whenever I try to list the link, it somehow gets changed. In that article you may also find a link to an English translation of the project document. The only article written about it before Poole's article was in French. Why it hasn't received greater publicity I don't know.
And if you search on the internet for Frank Gaffney's 10 part course on sharia law you will find examples of Muslim Brotherhood infiltrations in the White House, The State Department, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security and the Republican Party.
On Obama's first trip to Cairo, he told Mubarak that the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood Party should attend his talk and they were in the front row. Then, after the riots in Tahrir Square he quickly told Mubarak, he had to leave. Now Morsi is the Muslim Brotherhood head of government.
The Muslim Brotherhood seems to be taking the lead in several of the Arab Spring countries.
So is Obama, not just a "pants on fire" but a Manchurian Candidate?

Post a Comment