by Boaz Bismuth
In December, as the world was saying
its goodbyes to Nelson Mandela, I visited the Apartheid Museum in Johannesburg.
The visit helped me understand the conditions in which South Africa's first
black president lived.
The museum is constructed to give
visitors the personal sense of living under apartheid. It is an uneasy feeling,
thankfully alleviated upon leaving the building and seeing blacks, whites and
people of all colors walking together along the same paths.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry
has been the center of an uproar these past few days, after the Daily Beast
website quoted his warning that if a diplomatic agreement is not reached,
"Israel will become an apartheid state."
Israel? An apartheid state? What does
this mean? Separate lines for Jews, Arabs and blacks at the local bakery in
Jaffa if Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and his new partner,
Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, don't sign a deal?
"If I could rewind the tape, I would
have chosen a different word," a regretful Kerry said on Tuesday.
Perhaps the time has come for us to
understand just how different the reality in South Africa was in 1948-1994 from
the reality in Israel since 1948.
In South Africa, an apartheid regime
was created on the basis of racial separation between whites, blacks and other
people of color. The white minority ruled over the huge black majority, and had
more rights than anyone else. In 1948, Daniel Francois Malan's government
ratified a series of laws categorizing the population according to race.
Segregation was institutionalized and comprehensive.
The Israeli reality is not ideal. It
fosters inequality and sometimes, we need to admit, the rights of certain
citizens are infringed upon. However, this stems from a unique
diplomatic-security-legal situation, the goal of which is to usher in change one
day, with the help of our neighbors. In Israel, in contrast to South Africa
under apartheid, there is no law or regulation instituting race-based
separation.
Israel is not perfect, and, much like
the other countries of the world, may never be. But to accuse it of essentially
being an apartheid state -- something that has become quite fashionable -- is
ridiculous and incorrect.
This notion, however, has already seeped in
so deeply that it has touched the American secretary of state. It is good that
he expressed regret. We can be blamed of many things, but apartheid? Not in our
neck of the woods.
Boaz Bismuth
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=8225
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment