Sunday, September 28, 2025

In defiant UN speech, PM rips world leaders for turning backs on Israel, recognizing Palestine - Jacob Magid and Lazar Berman

 

by Jacob Magid and Lazar Berman

Netanyahu addresses largely empty General Assembly hall in speech filled with gimmicks, overtures toward unconvinced hostage families and a full-throttled defense of Israel’s war in Gaza

 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finishes his address to the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Friday, Sept. 26, 2025. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finishes his address to the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Friday, Sept. 26, 2025. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave a defiant speech to a largely empty UN General Assembly hall on Friday, aggressively defending Israel’s prosecution of the war in Gaza, while excoriating world leaders who have criticized Jerusalem and unilaterally recognized a Palestinian state in recent days.

“Giving the Palestinians a state one mile from Jerusalem after October 7 is like giving Al Qaeda a state one mile from New York City after September 11. This is sheer madness. It’s insane, and we won’t do it,” Netanyahu asserted during a roughly 40-minute address that was rife with gimmicks — even more than the regular handful that he is known to employ each year.

Walking onto the stage as hundreds of diplomats from dozens of countries around the world staged a walk-out that highlighted Israel’s unprecedented diplomatic isolation, Netanyahu donned a QR code on his lapel that he said provided those who scanned it with a link, not accessible in Israel, to footage from Hamas’s October 7 massacre, so they could “see why we fight and why we must win.”

He opened his remarks by acknowledging the handful of hostage families in the gallery and spoke to the hostages directly in Hebrew in a message Netanyahu said was played through massive loudspeakers that he ordered the Israel Defense Forces to install inside Gaza.

Delegates leave the General Assembly hall as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu steps up to the podium to speak at the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Friday, Sept. 26, 2025, at U.N. headquarters. (AP Photo/Stefan Jeremiah)

Netanyahu’s office claimed that the IDF also “took control of the phones” of Palestinians in Gaza to broadcast his UN speech “live via those devices.” Gaza residents reportedly received text messages with a link to Netanyahu’s speech, but there was no confirmation of devices being taken over.

Netanyahu insisted that Israel must continue the war, which will enter its third year in less than two weeks, as remnants of Hamas remain in Gaza. He said he was prepared to end the fighting if Hamas releases all the hostages and surrenders completely, holding onto a stance that could well clash with the plan being pushed by the Trump administration for ending the war.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York City on September 26, 2025. (ANGELA WEISS / AFP)

The plan envisions Hamas releasing all 48 remaining hostages, while the IDF gradually withdraws from Gaza and a transitional Palestinian governing body administers the Strip before it is ready to be handed over to a reformed Palestinian Authority, sources familiar with the US proposal told The Times of Israel this week.

An international force would be established to promote security and law and order, along with the disarmament of Hamas. But the latter process will likely be gradual, an Arab diplomat said, highlighting a part of the plan that Israel is likely to oppose.

Moreover, the transitional body’s planned ties to the PA and the plan to transfer authority to Ramallah are another red line for Jerusalem — one that Netanyahu reiterated in his speech on Friday.

Trump presented the plan to Arab and Muslim leaders earlier this week and told reporters outside the White House shortly after Netanyahu’s address that he thinks a deal has been reached. On Thursday, though, he indicated that any finalization will have to wait until after he meets with the Israeli premier on Monday at the White House.

Netanyahu made no mention of the US plan in his UN address and avoided presenting a vision of his own for ending the war and the so-called day after in Gaza.

While he didn’t budge from Israel’s internationally unpopular stances on Gaza, the prime minister expressed optimism regarding the possibility of expanding the Abraham Accords, arguing that peace with Syria and Lebanon was within reach thanks to Israel’s battlefield accomplishments against Iran and its proxies that once dominated both countries. 

PM reviews past year’s gains over Iran

Netanyahu began his speech by recalling the very different state Israel was in just a year ago, as Iran was rapidly advancing its ballistic missile and nuclear programs in order to destroy Israel.

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was still alive in Gaza, commanding Hamas fighters against Israel.

In Lebanon, Hezbollah was still firing rockets at Israeli civilians, and in Syria, then-President Bashar Assad was still hosting Iranian forces, “tightening the noose of deaths around our throats.”

The Houthis in Yemen launched ballistic missiles at Israel “while choking global trade at the mouth of the Red Sea.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during the General Debate of the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York City on September 26, 2025. (Photo by ANGELA WEISS / AFP)

Over the past year, however, things have changed, said Netanyahu. “We’ve hammered the Houthis, including Thursday. We’ve crushed the bulk of Hamas’s terror machine. We crippled Hezbollah, taking out most of its leaders and much of its weapons arsenal.”

“We paged Hezbollah and believe me, they got the message,” he said, referencing Israel’s covert operation that saw the mass detonation of Hezbollah communication devices in September 2024. “Thousands of terrorists dropped to the ground.”

Minutes after Netanyahu’s UN remarks a year ago, Israel assassinated Hezbollah’s longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut.

“We destroyed Assad’s armaments in Syria. We deterred Iran’s Shiite militias in Iraq. And most importantly… We devastated Iran’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles programs,” Netanyahu said Friday.

The premier then lifted up a map he used in his speech last year, showing the Middle East with Iran-dominated areas in red.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holds a map as he speaks during the General Debate of the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York City on September 26, 2025. (Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP)

He started using a black marker on the map, titled “The Curse” to tick off where Israel has taken out key enemy leaders in Iran, Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria. The same will happen to Iraqi militia leaders if they attack Israel, he warned.

Netanyahu lauded Israel’s pilots for their success in the 12-day war against Iran in June and thanked Trump for delivering on his promise to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon by signing off on a US strike on Tehran’s nuclear facilities.

“We lifted a dark cloud that could have claimed millions and millions of lives,” he claimed before arguing that the job is not yet done.

“We must not allow Iran to rebuild its military nuclear capacity,” he said, adding that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpiles must be eliminated and UN Security Council sanctions on Iran “must be snapped back.”

Fighting on in Gaza

In Gaza, too, Israel has more work to do, Netanyahu maintained, warning that stopping before Hamas is completely defeated risks allowing the terror group to make good on its pledge to carry out October 7-like attacks “again and again.”

“That is why we want to do so as fast as possible,” he said, apparently recognizing that even the US is not prepared for the war to drag on.

“The final remnants of Hamas are holed up in Gaza City,” he said, justifying Israel’s ongoing operation in the northern city where hundreds of thousands are still sheltering after an even greater number heeded IDF calls to evacuate.

While Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff has said he expects the war to wrap up by the end of 2025, IDF officials have warned the government that the Gaza City takeover operation could well require much more time.

People take part in a march against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he addresses the United Nations General Assembly in New York on September 26, 2025. (Kena Betancur/AFP)

Hamas fighters have repeatedly evacuated with the civilian population, and the terror group has managed to reconstitute in areas cleared by the IDF, as Israel has failed to advance a viable alternative to fill the vacuum.

As the death count has crossed 65,000 — according to the Hamas-run health ministry, which doesn’t differentiate between civilians and combatants — the international community has lost its patience with Israel, which was on display during the mass-walkout at the start of Netanyahu’s remarks.

Much of the world “no longer remembers October 7,” Netanyahu lamented. “But we remember. Israel remembers October 7.”

Netanyahu reaches out to hostages, whose families are unimpressed

Turning to the plight of the hostages, Netanyahu said that the 20 of them still believed to be alive are “starved, tortured, deprived of any daylight. Deprived of humanity.”

He read out the names of the 20 living hostages, but did not include Tamir Nimrodi or Bipin Joshi — neither of whom has been confirmed as dead, but for whom there are grave concerns for their well-being.

Addressing the hostages directly in Hebrew through the Gaza-placed loudspeakers that ostensibly could reach those in the tunnels below, Netanyahu said, “We have not forgotten you, not even for a second. The people of Israel are with you. We will not falter and we will not rest until we bring all of you home!”

“To the remaining Hamas leaders, and to the jailers of our hostages,” he said, “I now say – lay down your arms. Let my people go. Free the hostages. All of them. The whole 48. Free the hostages now.”

Hostage deal protesters rally outside the United Nations in New York City, September 26, 2025. (Luke Tress/Times of Israel)

“If you do, you will live. If you don’t, Israel will hunt you down,” he growled.

“If Hamas agrees to our demands, the war could end right now,” he said. “Gaza would be demilitarized. Israel would retain overriding security control. And a peaceful civilian authority would be established by Gazans and others committed to peace with Israel.”

Most hostage families appeared unmoved by Netanyahu’s overtures, though.

The father of hostage Bar Kuperstein twice shouted in agony from his wheelchair in the upper deck of the UN General Assembly hall gallery at Netanyahu, as the premier mentioned the plight of the captives.

Tal Kuperstein suffered a stroke following a serious car accident and has difficulty speaking.

Kuperstein briefly left the hall after his second interruption before returning to listen to the rest of the speech in silence.

Most of the hostage families have fumed at Netanyahu throughout the war, arguing that he has prioritized his government’s survival over the return of their loved ones, while cynically using their plight abroad to gain international sympathy.

Outside the UN, several hundred people led by the families of hostages in Gaza participated in a demonstration against Netanyahu, demanding that he bring them home before time runs out.

PM fumes at world leaders who turned on Israel

As much of the world has turned on Israel en masse as the war has dragged on, Netanyahu insisted that Israel is fighting for democracies everywhere.

He then conducted what he called a multiple-choice pop-quiz, holding up a placard that posed the question, “Who shouts ‘Death to America’?”

The answer is “All of the Above – Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Iran.”

The audience shouted out a similar answer for the question, “Who has murdered Americans and Europeans in cold blood?”

“You know deep down that Israel is fighting your fight,” he said.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holds a sign as he speaks during the General Debate of the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York City on September 26, 2025. (Photo by ANGELA WEISS / AFP)

While European leaders showed support for Israel after October 7, “that support quickly evaporated when Israel did what any self-respecting nation would do in the wake of such a savage attack: We fought back,” Netanyahu declared.

Many world leaders “buckled under the pressure of a biased media, radical Islamist constituencies, and antisemitic mobs,” he said. “When the going got tough, [they] caved.”

“As we fight the terrorists who murdered many of your citizens, you are fighting us,” he lamented. “You condemn us. You embargo us. And you wage political and legal warfare, lawfare, against us.”

“This is not an indictment of Israel. It’s an indictment of you!”

“When will you learn? You can’t appease your way out of jihad. And you won’t escape the Islamist storm by attacking Israel.”

Dozens of countries leave empty seats as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at the General Debate of the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York City on September 26, 2025. (Photo by ANGELA WEISS / AFP)

Netanyahu then worked to combat “the false charge of genocide,” insisting that Israel takes steps to avoid harming civilians, while Hamas fights among them.

Hamas “is given a pass…. while Israel, who does everything it can to get civilians out of harm’s way, Israel is put in the docket,” he said, referring to the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court cases against Israel and him personally. “What a joke.”

IDF trucks with loudspeakers prepare to enter the Gaza Strip to broadcast Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the UN to Palestinians, September 26, 2025. (Social media; used in accordance with Clause 27a of the Copyright Law)

He said the accusation that Israel is starving the people of Gaza is another falsehood, and that “Israel is deliberately feeding the people of Gaza.”

For 78 days in the spring, though, Israel blocked all aid from entering the Strip, hoping the drastic step would coax Hamas into releasing the hostages. It didn’t work and it brought Gaza to the brink of famine.

But Netanyahu said that those who “peddle blood libels and lies against Israel are no better than those who peddled blood libels against Jews in the Middle Ages.”

“These antisemitic lies, they have consequences,” he says, pointing to attacks on Jews in Canada, Australia, The Netherlands, France, the UK, and the US.

He praised the Trump administration for forcefully fighting antisemitism, while other leaders “reward the worst antisemites on earth.”

Rejection of Palestinian statehood

Turning to the decisions by nearly a dozen Western countries to recognize Palestine earlier this week, Netanyahu claimed they sent a message to the Palestinians that “Murdering Jews pays off.”

“When the most savage terrorists on earth are effusively praising your decision, you didn’t do something right; you did something wrong. Horribly wrong. Your disgraceful decision will encourage terrorism against Jews and against innocent people everywhere,” he said. “It will be a mark of shame on all of you.”

He derided world leaders’ talk of a two-state solution, insisting that the Palestinians aren’t interested in living alongside Israel in peace.

“Every time they were given territory, they used it to attack us,” Netanyahu charges.

He said the PA, and not just Hamas, rejects a Jewish state. “You should know that the Palestinian Authority pays terrorists to slay Jews,” he declared.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas addresses the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly via video at United Nations headquarters, September 25, 2025. (AP/Angelina Katsanis)

PA President Mahmoud Abbas signed a decree ending the controversial policy that conditioned payments to prisoners based on the length of their sentence. Israeli officials have continued employing talking points against the policy since, but have not provided evidence demonstrating that stipends have continued unchanged.

Stepping up his criticism of world leaders recognizing Palestine, Netanyahu charged that “what you’re doing is giving the ultimate reward to intolerant fanatics who perpetrated and supported the October 7 massacre.”

“Giving the Palestinians a state one mile from Jerusalem after October 7th is like giving Al-Qaeda a state one mile from New York City after September 11th,” he charged. “This is sheer madness. It’s insane, and we won’t do it.”

With blistering rage, Netanyahu said: “I want to give a message to those Western leaders. Israel will not allow you to shove a terror state down our throats. We will not commit national suicide because you don’t have the guts to face down a hostile media and antisemitic mobs demanding Israel’s blood.”

He also noted that his stance is shared by the vast majority of Jewish Israelis.

“It’s not a fringe. It’s not the prime minister who himself is extreme, or he’s held hostage by extreme parties to his right. It’s over 90% of Israelis. My opposition to a Palestinian state is not simply my policy or my government’s policy. It’s the policy of the state and people of the State of Israel,” Netanyahu said.

“Western leaders may have buckled under the pressure,” he says, concluding this passage of his remarks. “I guarantee you one thing, Israel won’t.”

Two Palestinian boys are seen amid rubble and tents in the southern Gaza Strip, amid mass displacement due to the ongoing fighting between Israel and Hamas, on September 25, 2025. (Ali Hassan/Flash90)

Abraham Accords expansion

In the final passages of his speech to the UN, Netanyahu moved away from the Palestinian issue to other regional matters.

He says Israel’s “victories over the Iranian terror axis have opened up possibilities for peace that were unthinkable two years ago.”

“The very idea of peace between Israel and Syria seemed unimaginable” for decades. But today, “we have begun serious negotiations with the new Syrian government.”

“I believe an agreement can be reached that respects Syria’s sovereignty and protects both Israeli security and the security of the minorities in the region, including the Druze minority.”

He said peace between Israel and Lebanon “is possible as well,” and called on the Lebanese government to also begin direct negotiations with Israel. “I commend it for its declared aim to disarm Hezbollah, but we need more than words.”

“If Lebanon takes genuine and sustained action to disarm Hezbollah, I’m sure we can achieve a sustainable peace,” Netanyahu said. “Of course, until that happens, we will take whatever action we need to defend ourselves and to maintain the conditions of the ceasefire which was established in Lebanon.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, right, and Syrian interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa arrive ahead of a meeting at the Lotte New York Palace Hotel, on the sidelines of the 80th United Nations General Assembly at the United Nations headquarters in Manhattan, September 22, 2025. (Bing Guan/Pool Photo via AP)

Israel has come under fire for regularly carrying out strikes against what it says are Iranian proxies and other foes trying to re-establish themselves in Syria and Lebanon. Even the US has quietly begun pushing back on the strikes, arguing that they undermine efforts to rebuild both countries under leaderships that are already committed to distancing themselves from Tehran.

Further afield, Netanyahu said that while “victory over Hezbollah has made peace possible with our two Arab neighbors in the north, victory over Hamas will make peace possible with nations throughout the Arab and Muslim world.”

On the docket is now “a dramatic extension and expansion of the historic Abraham Accords, which President Trump brokered between Arab leaders and myself five years ago,” he claimed.

He noted the “encouraging words spoken here by the president of Indonesia” earlier this week, highlighting the imperative for Israel to have security. “This is the country with the largest Muslim population of all nations, and it’s also a sign of what could come.”

Portraits of former Hezbollah leaders Hassan Nasrallah, right, and Hashem Safieddine, projected onto the landmark Raouche sea rock during an event commemorating their deaths in Israeli airstrikes nearly a year ago, in Beirut, Lebanon, September 25, 2025. (AP/Hussein Malla)

“Forward-looking Arabs and Muslim leaders know that cooperating with Israel will provide them with ground-breaking Israeli technologies, including in medicine and science, in agriculture and water, in defense, and AI, and so many other fields,” he said.

“I believe that in the coming years, the Middle East will look dramatically different. Many of those who wage war on Israel today will be gone tomorrow. Brave peacemakers will take their place. And nowhere, nowhere will this be more true than in Iran,” he argued.

“The long-suffering Iranian people will regain their freedom. They will make Iran great again. Our two ancient peoples, the people of Israel and the people of Iran, will restore a friendship that will benefit the entire world,” he predicted.


Jacob Magid and Lazar Berman

Source: https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-defiant-un-speech-pm-rips-world-leaders-for-turning-backs-on-israel-recognizing-palestine/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

‘Chance for greatness in Middle East,’ Trump says, hinting at Gaza deal - David Isaac

 

by David Isaac

“All are on board for something special, first time ever. We will get it done," the U.S. president said on Truth Social.

 

U.S. President Donald Trump boards Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House en route to Joint Base Andrews, Md., for a trip to New York City on Sept. 11, 2025. Photo by Molly Riley/White House.
U.S. President Donald Trump boards Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House en route to Joint Base Andrews, Md., for a trip to New York City on Sept. 11, 2025. Photo by Molly Riley/White House.

U.S. President Donald Trump held forth hope on Sunday for reaching a Gaza truce deal ahead of a meeting on Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“We have a real chance for greatness in the Middle East. All are on board for something special, first time ever. We will get it done,” Trump said in a Truth Social post.

Of the 21-point plan presented to Arab leaders by the Trump administration on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly, Netanyahu told U.S. TV channel Fox News on Sunday that Israel is looking at it, but it hasn’t been “finalized.”

“We’re working with President Trump’s team, actually, as we speak. And I hope we can make it a go, because we want to free our hostages. We want to get rid of Hamas rule,” Netanyahu said.

The 21-point plan includes an immediate end to the war, the release of the remaining hostages by Hamas, the release of thousands of Palestinian terrorists by Israel, the disarmament of the terror group, and a temporary international force to oversee civilian affairs in the Strip.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance told Fox News that he was “cautiously hopeful” as the Israelis and Arabs engage in a “complicated negotiation” led by Steve Witkoff, U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

“I feel more optimistic about where we are right now than where we have been at any point in the last few months, but let’s be realistic, these things can get derailed at the very last minute,” Vance said.

Responding to Trump’s Sept. 25 comments that he wouldn’t let Israel annex the Gaza Strip, Vance said the president wants the people of Gaza and Judea and Samaria to “be controlled by the people who live there.”

However, Netanyahu appears to be considering annexation. The Yediot Achronot daily reported in late August of a meeting of a select group of ministers led by the prime minister to discuss the possibility.

Trump confirmed on Friday night that negotiations with Arab states and Israel regarding the future of Gaza were underway.

“We are having very inspired and productive discussions with the Middle Eastern Community concerning Gaza,” Trump said. 


David Isaac

Source: https://www.jns.org/chance-for-greatness-in-middle-east-trump-says-hinting-at-gaza-deal/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hezbollah’s Qassem vows terrorist group won’t disarm - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

The Iranian proxy's leader defied the Lebanese army’s disarmament plan as he marked a year since predecessor Nasrallah’s killing.

 

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem addresses mourners via video during a ceremony in Deir Qanoun al-Nahr, near Tyre in Southern Lebanon, on the first anniversary of Israel's assassination of the group's longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah and other group leaders, Sept. 27, 2025. Photo by Mahmoud Zayyat/AFP via Getty Images.
Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem addresses mourners via video during a ceremony in Deir Qanoun al-Nahr, near Tyre in Southern Lebanon, on the first anniversary of Israel's assassination of the group's longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah and other group leaders, Sept. 27, 2025. Photo by Mahmoud Zayyat/AFP via Getty Images.

Hezbollah will not lay down its arms, Naim Qassem the secretary-general of the Iranian proxy, said on Saturday, in a public show of defiance of the Lebanon army’s plan to dismantle the terrorist group.

“We will never abandon our weapons, nor will we relinquish them,” Qassem declared, speaking in front of tens of thousands of supporters at the burial shrine of his predecessor Hassan Nasrallah near Beirut Airport to mark the first anniversary of his targeted killing by Israel.

“We are ready for martyrdom,” Qassem added.

Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, was also in attendance at the memorial, which also commemorated the killing weeks after Nasrallah of Hashem Safieddine, considered second in command of the terrorist group.

The remembrance events began on Thursday with the projection of Nasrallah’s and Safieddine’s images onto the iconic Raouche rock in Beirut, despite opposition from the government and no official authorization.

Nasrallah was killed in an Israeli airstrike in the southern suburbs of Beirut on Sept. 27, 2024. To mark the anniversary of his death, the pro-Hezbollah Al Mayadeen channel published the final photo of him, which shows Nasrallah sitting in a meeting room with maps of the Middle East spread on the wall. It was apparently taken hours before the Israeli bombing of his underground bunker in Dahiyeh.

“The last image published by Hezbollah’s media shows the ‘master terrorist of the nation’ in a meeting, with behind him a map of Israel—which has remained, and will remain, beyond his and his likes’ reach and their schemes,” wrote Col. Avichay Adraee, the head of the Arab Media Branch in the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit, in an X post on Saturday with the picture. 

In a statement on Saturday, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun expressed hope that “this painful anniversary will serve as a rallying point, reinforcing the belief that Lebanon’s salvation lies in having one unified state, one army and constitutional institutions that protect sovereignty and uphold dignity.”

Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Rajji said on Sept. 9 that the country’s armed forces will have fully disarmed Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon within three months.

“Peace between Israel and Lebanon is possible as well. I call on the Lebanese government to also begin direct negotiations with Israel. I commend it for its declared aim to disarm Hezbollah. But we need more than words. If Lebanon takes genuine and sustained action to disarm Hezbollah, I am sure we can achieve a sustainable peace,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday at the 80th annual session of the U.N. General Assembly in New York.

“Of course, until that happens, we will take whatever action we need to defend ourselves and to maintain the conditions of the ceasefire that was established in Lebanon,” the premier continued. “Our goal is not merely to monitor Hezbollah’s actions, but to prevent them from violating the ceasefire and attacking us at any time. I’m sure that if the Lebanese government persists in its goal of disarming Hezbollah, peace will come very speedily and very readily.”

Meanwhile, Israel continues to attack Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, on Friday striking a precision weapons manufacturing facility in the Beqaa Valley, located approximately 20 miles east of Beirut.

The situation in Lebanon remains volatile following the end of the truce with Beirut on Feb. 18. Hezbollah began launching missiles and drones at the Jewish state a day after the Hamas-led massacre on Oct. 7, 2023.

Although Jerusalem has withdrawn most of its ground forces since the war ended, it still controls five strategic sites in Southern Lebanon. Israeli officials have stated that the IDF will retain these positions until the Lebanese army demonstrates it can maintain security.


 JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/hezbollahs-qassem-vows-terrorist-group-wont-disarm/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran: Fear of Running Short of Water - Amir Taheri

 

by Amir Taheri

One obvious cause is a spell of drought that is heading into its fifth year. But here are other more important causes.

 

  • Lake Urmia, once the 18th largest in the world, seems to have gone for good.

  • The position of scores of rivers is no better.

  • One immediate effect is a steady drop in food production.

  • Another cause of the current crisis, as mentioned by Pezeshkian, is population increase.

Over 40 percent of Iran's estimated 300 lakes and wetlands have either dried up or are on the way to becoming patches of desert within a decade. Lake Urmia, once the 18th-largest in the world, seems to have disappeared for good. Pictured: Part of what is left of Lake Urmia, on November 1, 2023. (Photo by Hamed/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

It was with a sigh of relief that the Islamic Republic of Iran's President Massoud Pezeshkian welcomed the new academic year and the start of autumn the other day -- relief that what is dubbed "the thirstiest summer" in Iran's long history was over.

Only two months ago, he had warned that even Tehran, the capital city, may run out of water within weeks. The disaster he had predicted was avoided, but the factors that could have shaped it remain present.

Iran today is running short of water.

The latest figures published by the Ministry of Water and Power paint a grim picture.

Most of the 80 dams across the country contain only 36 percent of their water-holding capacity.

Of the nation's 31 provinces, only two have maintained the balance between water use and renewal of water resources.

Everywhere else, the story is one of fast-dwindling sources of water. In the "water year" ended September 1, 2025, Iran recorded rainfall of only 150 millimeters, a 39 percent drop compared to the average of the past 10 years and a 40 percent fall compared to 2024.

At the same time, water accumulation in the hydro-projects fell by 45 percent.

One of the driest countries in the world, Iran needs a minimum of 251 millimeters of annual rainfall to avoid rapid desertification.

Other official studies paint an even grimmer picture for the coming years.

Over 40 percent of the country's estimated 300 lakes and wetlands have either dried up or are on the way to becoming patches of desert within a decade.

Lake Urmia, once the 18th-largest in the world, seems to have disappeared for good.

Also gone is Lake Hamun in the east, on the Afghan border.

Next in line for desertification are Jaz-Murian in Baluchistan and Bakhtegan in Fars Province, a natural beauty spot frequented by pink flamingoes. The Hoveyzah marshland in the southwest, dubbed "a chunk of paradise on earth," is threatened with desertification as the flow of rivers feeding it declines.

The position of scores of rivers is no better.

Almost 40 percent of the nation's 200 rivers and rivulets have either totally dried up or are reduced to seasonal streams.

The once mighty Zayandehrud, the "Life-Giving" River, has dwindled to a narrow stream that appears for a few days each year. The Gav-Khuni marshland where it ended is already a patch of semi-humid desert. Zayandehrud's death threatens the very existence of Isfahan, one of the world's most beautiful historical cities and long a capital of Iran.

The county's largest, longest, and only navigable river, the Karun, which passes through three provinces, has lost 40 percent of its traditional water flow.

Iran's water crisis has also led to loss or salinization of topsoil and land subsidence in 25 provinces.

One immediate effect is a steady drop in food production.

The Food and Agricultural Organization, a UN body based in Rome, says Iran doesn't face an immediate threat of famine, but 25 percent of the population is threatened with "moderate to severe" food shortages.

What is the cause of this looming disaster?

One obvious cause is a spell of drought that is heading into its fifth year. But here are other more important causes.

In the 1990s, the government decided to seek complete self-sufficiency in food production, with the excuse that it must prepare to face sanctions that might affect food imports.

To be sure, food imports, along with medicinal drugs and equipment, were never part of UN or other sanctions. But the slogan "khod-kafa'i" (self-sufficiency) copied from the North Korean "juche," shaped agricultural policy.

The area under cultivation was increased by 40 percent, which necessitated the building of numerous dams, dikes, and canals that drained the rivers and necessitated numerous artesian wells that sucked up underground water resources.

By 2019, agriculture accounted for between 60 and 80 percent of Iran's water consumption but provided only 18 percent of the gross domestic product.

Self-sufficiency was achieved while Iran also became a major source of agricultural products for Russia and Iraq. Iran would have done better to import grains and other agricultural commodities that require high water use, and instead focus on high-value and exportable products such as the wide variety of fruit native to the country for thousands of years, in order to pay for imports.

The mass use of artesian wells and hastily-built dams also meant the neglect of the nation's system of underground water channels that avoided evaporation and regulated water use in a targeted way. Known as qanats, those channels are among the three major inventions credited to Iranians, the other two being windmills and wind-towers to cool buildings. The mother of all three inventions was the necessity of coping with a shortage of water.

Another cause of the current crisis, as mentioned by Pezeshkian, is population increase.

Iran's population has almost doubled three times since 1960, when the first scientific census was taken. Mass urbanization is another factor, as city-dwellers use 60 percent more water for personal needs than do those in rural areas.

Iranian civilization was built on a plateau with three centers, each fed from its distinct water sources.

One was in the east, in what are now Kerman and Sistan-Baluchistan provinces and Farah and Helmand walayahs in what is now Afghanistan, and was fed by rivers flowing from the Hindu Kush.

The other civilizational base was in the center, in Isfahan, Charmahal and Fars.

The third base was in the southwest, in Susa and parts of Mesopotamia, benefiting from the waters of the Euphrates, Tigris and a dozen rivers flowing from the Zagros range.

Many voices have been raised inside and outside Iran, warning that the very bases of one of the world's most ancient civilizations are threatened with extinction in the mid- to long-term.

The good news is that several serious studies, including a Japanese one, suggest that the foreseen demise isn't inevitable, and that new economic strategies and socio-cultural policies combined with massive investment of resources can stop and then reverse the deadly trend of desertification.

Over 25 centuries ago, the Achaemenid King Darius prayed to God to preserve Iran from two evils: lies and droughts.

Gatestone Institute would like to thank the author for his kind permission to reprint this article in slightly different form from Asharq Al-Awsat. He graciously serves as Chairman of Gatestone Europe. 


Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987.

Source:https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21925/iran-water-shortage

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Comey Indictment: Retribution or Justice? - Roger Kimball

 

by Roger Kimball

James Comey’s indictment marks a turning point, raising the question: is Trump seeking revenge on his foes—or finally delivering long-denied justice?

 

In the matter of James Brien Comey Jr., how finds the court? I do not mean a court of law. I mean the tribunal of history.

Granted, we will be hearing from a Virginia court of law about JBC quite soon. On Thursday, Comey became the first former FBI director in history to be indicted by a grand jury for a felony. The charges? Lying to Congress and obstructing justice. (For the legal eagles among you, the statutes in question are USC 18 §1001 and USC 18 §1505.)

Call it karma, irony, or just good old-fashioned just desserts: whatever your literary preference, there is a delicious symmetry in the fact that USC 18 §1001—which prohibits making “any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement” to a government official—was the statute under which Comey tormented and bankrupted General Mike Flynn, Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor for a few weeks in 2017.

Comey later entertained a live audience with an account of how that went down. It wasn’t typical, Comey admitted, but it was early days in an administration that looked disorganized. So he just called Flynn, said he wanted to send over a couple of agents, told him he needn’t bother having legal counsel around, and the rest was filed under “entrapment.”

Connoisseurs of narcissistically infused bathos will find much to savor in James Comey. No sooner was he indicted than the author of A Higher Loyalty, starring James Comey, took to Instagram to emit a moist declaration of his innocence, his defiance, his . . . well, his “higher loyalty.”

That bizarre clip is saturated with emetic, self-righteous sentimentality. Do not be disarmed. James Comey is an object lesson in the psychological truth that cloying sentimentality can easily cohabit with a malign vindictiveness. That aspect of Comey’s character was on view in 2023 when he sat down with Jen Psaki to talk about the hundreds upon hundreds of people rounded up in the aftermath of the January 6 outing at the Capitol. “Get them all,” Comey snarled. “Find everybody who went into that building. Find them all. . . . We will punish everyone who went in there. . . . We will hunt you to the end of the earth, even for a misdemeanor, and make you pay.” I wonder if it is true that Comey’s favorite reading is that sermon by Jonathan Edwards, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”?

Comey’s fantasies of exacting punishment for January 6 are particularly bizarre in light of the recent revelation that some 275 plainclothes FBI agents were salted in the crowd on January 6, thus lending support to those of us who have long thought that that spectacle was less an insurrection, as the establishment was desperate to claim, than a “fedsurrection,” orchestrated and guided by the FBI and other federal agencies bent on destroying the legacy of President Trump.

What is going to happen? Informed opinion is divided. Some think it might look bad for Comey. Others think the brief, hastily drafted indictment will be dismissed. Maybe it will be. For one thing, the case will be heard in deep blue Virginia, where the pool of eligible jurors is likely to be sympathetic toward Comey. Then, too, the randomly assigned judge turns out to be a Biden appointee. Naturally, all judges in our august judicial system are perfectly impartial. But some, let us say, are more perfectly impartial than others.

Two points. The indictment was brought with such haste because the statute of limitations runs out on Comey’s alleged wrongdoing in just a couple of days, on September 30. This has led some commentators to suggest that Thursday’s indictment was merely the opening salvo, the preliminary beachhead.

The investigative reporter Catherine Herridge, for example, speculates that Thursday’s indictment was “a holding charge with the potential of a more complex, superseding indictment that adds more charges.”

Herridge bases her speculation on revelations in a recently declassified FBI investigation called “Arctic Haze.” (Don’t you just love these silly FBI code names? “Arctic Haze,” “Crossfire Hurricane”—what will they think of next?) According to Herridge, the investigation shows that James Rybicki, former FBI Chief of Staff; James Baker, former FBI General Counsel; Andrew McCabe, former FBI Deputy Director; and Daniel Richman, a Columbia Law Professor, all said they “coordinated media leaks at Comey’s direction.”

Plot, meet thickener? Maybe. Steve Bannon suggested on his War Room podcast that “The short Comey indictment is just the preface. A full RICO case could follow: multiple crimes, broad penalties, and the power to bankrupt the financiers behind organized political violence.” It would be pretty to think so.

But the name of Steve Bannon, one of the many people incarcerated as political prisoners by the Biden administration, brings me to my second point. As Trump’s Department of Justice zeros in on rogue intelligence and FBI agents, financial sponsors of violent agitation, and other lawless malcontents, the media is ringing with anguished cries of “Revenge,” not as a desideratum but as an accusation. “Trump is going after his political opponents,” we are told ad nauseam. “He is politicizing justice” (hence Comey’s malodorous declaration on Instagram that his “heart was breaking” for the Department of Justice).

All this can be summed up in the urgent question: Is what Trump is doing a matter of retribution or of justice?

But that, I submit, is the wrong question. There is no doubt that Trump is going after his political opponents—or, to put it more accurately, he is going after those of his opponents who went after him and his associates.

But the point to appreciate is that Trump’s goal is not vengeance (though that might be a collateral benefit to him personally) but rather the righting of a wrong. For years, the deep state waged war against all things Trump. Its agents sought to bankrupt Trump, to jail him (Comey was especially keen on that prospect). Was anyone surprised when at least two gunmen took the hint and tried to assassinate this “fascist,” this “Hitler,” this extreme threat to “the very foundations of our republic”?  The political establishment was bent on destroying Trump. Moreover, they had every reason to believe that they would succeed. Hence, the unbridled nature of their fury. They would rid themselves of the bad orange man and all his works one way or the other, “by any means necessary.” They would never be called to account.

Or so they thought.

Against the odds, Trump not only survived but also triumphed. But in the course of their scorched-earth campaign against Trump, his opponents acted like Pandora when she unsealed her fateful jar. The usual rules and conventions, the mannerly behavior, and the gentleman’s largesse were suddenly set loose. Perhaps, someday, they can be rounded up, placed back where they belong, and reinstated as the norms of political conduct. Perhaps.

Let’s call that the hope that remains behind in Pandora’s jar. Students of Hesiod may object that, really, hope was not the redemptive blessing it is often taken for, but the final evil in that container. Let’s leave that mournful contingency to one side. For us now, the important point is that Trump’s retribution is not an alternative to justice. On the contrary, it is the very name of, and the prerequisite for, justice. 


Roger Kimball is editor and publisher of The New Criterion and the president and publisher of Encounter Books. He is the author and editor of many books, including The Fortunes of Permanence: Culture and Anarchy in an Age of Amnesia (St. Augustine's Press), The Rape of the Masters (Encounter), Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse (Ivan R. Dee), and Art's Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity (Ivan R. Dee). Most recently, he edited and contributed to Where Next? Western Civilization at the Crossroads (Encounter) and contributed to Against the Great Reset: Eighteen Theses Contra the New World Order (Bombardier).

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/28/comey-indictment-retribution-or-justice/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

NYC Mayor Eric Adams drops re-election bid - Nicholas Ballasy

 

by Nicholas Ballasy

Adam is currently serving his first term

 

New York City Mayor Eric Adams dropped his re-election on Sunday. 

Adam is currently serving his first term.

Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, are in the race to become the next mayor.  


Nicholas Ballasy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/local/nyc-mayor-eric-adams-drops-re-election-bid

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Gaza clans struck after refusing Israeli offers to govern Gaza, undermine Hamas - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

Israeli intelligence reportedly approached powerful Gaza clans with offers of support in exchange for turning against Hamas. Their refusal was followed by deadly airstrikes from Israel.

 

Destruction after an Israeli airstrike on a house in the Nuseirat refugee camp, west of Gaza City, September 27, 2025.
Destruction after an Israeli airstrike on a house in the Nuseirat refugee camp, west of Gaza City, September 27, 2025.
(photo credit: Ali Hassan/Flash90)

Israeli officials attempted to recruit major clans in the Gaza Strip to form local governing bodies in certain areas in an attempt to reduce Hamas’s grip on the territory, according to a report published in the Saudi-owned Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper and security officials in Gaza City.

The report, citing unnamed security officials and local sources in Gaza City, stated that Shin Bet operatives approached leaders of the Bakr and Durmush clans with proposals of support in exchange for cooperation.

The reported offers included intelligence sharing, taking up arms against Hamas, and assisting in political efforts intended to prevent a future Israeli withdrawal and hinder the formation of a Palestinian authority in Gaza.

Following the clans’ refusal to participate, airstrikes reportedly struck both occupied and evacuated homes belonging to members of the families. In one incident, 30 members of the Durmush clan were reported killed in an airstrike in Gaza City’s Sabra neighborhood, with another 20 said to be trapped under the rubble. A separate strike on a home in the southern part of the al-Shati refugee camp reportedly killed six members of the Bakr clan and wounded 11 others.

According to the report, this was not the first such attempt. Previous efforts to arm local elements collapsed after Hamas targeted and killed individuals who had engaged with Israel. An Israeli official at the time was quoted as calling the initiative a “Shin Bet scheme.

 Palestinians from clans hold guns and melee weapons to secure aid trucks in Beit Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip, June 25, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/DAWOUD ABU ALKAS)
Palestinians from clans hold guns and melee weapons to secure aid trucks in Beit Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip, June 25, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/DAWOUD ABU ALKAS)

Encouraging alternative local governance

In the early weeks of the current war, Israel again explored the possibility of working with tribal elements as part of a plan to establish what were referred to as “humanitarian bubbles” in Gaza. The proposal, promoted by then-defense minister Yoav Gallant, aimed to encourage alternative local governance.

In June 2024, The Telegraph cited an Israeli intelligence source as saying that Israel had tried to promote the Durmush clan as a potential replacement leadership.

According to that account, Hamas responded by entering the clan's compound and beheading its leader. The following day, all major clans in Gaza reportedly issued public statements backing Hamas. 


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-868810

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Palestinian Leaders, Gulf States Such as Qatar, Have No Interest in Real Peace with Israel - Con Coughlin

 

by Con Coughlin

Qatar, as well as other Gulf States, which reportedly are expected to pay for the reconstruction of Gaza, will doubtless demand a role in its future governance. Such a concession, even if Israel were to monitor security, would be a monumental recipe for disaster.

 

  • The main stumbling block to Trump's repeated efforts to end the conflict in Gaza, though, remains the fact that Palestinian leaders, and Qatar, have no genuine interest in negotiating a permanent peace deal with Israel.

  • Qatar, as well as other Gulf States, which reportedly are expected to pay for the reconstruction of Gaza, will doubtless demand a role in its future governance. Such a concession, even if Israel were to monitor security, would be a monumental recipe for disaster.

  • Qatar has a history of funding effectively all radical Islamic terrorist groups -- from ISIS to Al-Qaeda to Hamas to the Taliban --and appears solidly committed to furthering the policies of the Muslim Brotherhood.

  • Even if Hamas is not included in a future Gaza, there is always room theoretically for a clone of Hamas with a different name. As Egypt and Islamist groups continue smuggling weapons into the "new" Gaza, there will undoubtedly be endless friction with Israel, not to mention the Palestinians whom the current negotiators insist stay in place. With sufficient incentives, many countries might be glad to spare them years of living in rubble.

  • The best idea, and in the long run far less expensive militarily and diplomatically, would be if Trump would return to his original idea of Gaza as a kind of US-Israeli "Riviera" protectorate, preferably with a US military base. Then one would not even need any further Abraham Accords: a US military presence should be sufficient to deter aggression and keep peace -- as it has done so successfully in Qatar.

  • Not all Arab states might like this approach. It certainly would deprive them of the opportunity, should the winds change, of trying again to destroy Israel.

  • So even if, as Trump insists, Hamas is excluded from any future negotiations on the future of Gaza and the Palestinians, the likelihood of his administration having any positive talks with so-called "moderate" Palestinian leaders, such as Abbas -- or any prospects of a true, long-term peace if Arab countries are allowed to run Gaza -- sadly, the end to decades of hostility will continue to be non-existent.

The main stumbling block to President Donald Trump's repeated efforts to end the conflict in Gaza, though, remains the fact that Palestinian leaders, and Qatar, have no genuine interest in negotiating a permanent peace deal with Israel. Pictured: Qatar's then Emir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani holds hands with then Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh during their visit to the Islamic University in the Gaza Strip on October 23, 2012. (Photo by Wissam Nassar/AFP via Getty Images)

There is one major drawback to US President Donald Trump's latest effort to end the Gaza conflict: Palestinian leaders and some Gulf Arab states -- in particular Qatar (such as here, here, here, here and here) -- have absolutely no intention of agreeing to, or implementing, a lasting peace deal with Israel.

For nearly eight decades, Palestinian leaders have consistently rejected offers to end hostilities with Israel.

While Mahmoud Abbas, the so-called "moderate" leader of the Palestinian Authority, has said he is willing to work with the Trump administration on a peace plan for Gaza, the chances of any negotiations with the Palestinians reaching a successful conclusion are remote if their track record is anything to go by.

In his speech to the UN General Assembly in New York, Trump renewed his calls for an end to the violence, insisting that "we have to stop the war in Gaza immediately." At the same time, he revealed that his administration remained "deeply engaged" in efforts to secure a ceasefire.

As if to emphasise the point, details of the Trump administration's latest 21-point plan for ending the Gaza conflict have been published by the Times of Israel. It reports that the main objective is for Palestinians to remain in Gaza while efforts are undertaken for the creation of a pathway to a future Palestinian state.

The document, which was reportedly shared by the US with a handful of Arab and Muslim countries earlier this week on the sidelines of the UN summit, also contains clauses that have been the basis of previous ceasefire attempts by the Trump administration, such as linking the ceasefire to the release of all Israeli hostages held in Gaza and to Hamas's removal from power.

The suggestion, though, that the estimated two million Palestinians currently occupying the Gaza Strip should remain there would mark a significant shift in White House policy. Trump has previously encouraged the notion of relocating Gaza's entire population.

The proposals outlined in the document, which have been drawn up under the auspices of Trump's Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, certainly indicate a marked shift in Trump's position on the issue, raising fears that the US leader is moving in a different direction to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who remains committed to achieving the complete destruction of Hamas to prevent further attacks on Israel in the future.

Signs of deepening tensions between Trump and Netanyahu on the Gaza issue also emerged during the US summit, following reports that the US leader personally promised Arab and Muslim leaders that he would not allow Israel to annex the West Bank, a move that ostensibly would be an obstacle to advancing the Abraham Accords.

Of course, other excuses might surface, if "needed."

Trump's approach is certainly at odds with the position of the Israeli prime minister, who used his own speech to the UN to insist that Israel must "finish the job" in Gaza, a request also made by Trump. Netanyahu denounced moves by a number of countries, including the UK, France, Canada and Australia, to recognise a Palestinian state, telling them, "You didn't do something right. You did something wrong, horribly wrong."

Despite Netanyahu's determination to maintain Israel's military offensive against Hamas, Trump continues to insist that the negotiations to end the conflict have been intense and productive, posting on Truth Social that, "Intense negotiations have been going on for four days, and will continue for as long as necessary in order to get a Successfully Completed Agreement."

The main stumbling block to Trump's repeated efforts to end the conflict in Gaza, though, remains the fact that Palestinian leaders, and Qatar, have no genuine interest in negotiating a permanent peace deal with Israel. It is an attitude that has underpinned their attitude to all previous diplomatic efforts to achieve peace.

While both Trump and Netanyahu are insistent that Hamas's leadership can play no role in future negotiations on resolving the Gaza conflict, it is equally clear that the so-called moderate Palestinian politicians, such as Abbas, head of the Palestinian Authority, have no genuine interest in agreeing to any kind of lasting settlement with Israel.

Qatar, as well as other Gulf States, which reportedly are expected to pay for the reconstruction of Gaza, will doubtless demand a role in its future governance. Such a concession, even if Israel were to monitor security, would be a monumental recipe for disaster.

Qatar has a history of funding effectively all radical Islamic terrorist groups -- from ISIS to Al-Qaeda to Hamas to the Taliban --and appears solidly committed to furthering the policies of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Even if Hamas is not included in a future Gaza, there is always room theoretically for a clone of Hamas with a different name. As Egypt and Islamist groups continue smuggling weapons into the "new" Gaza, there will undoubtedly be endless friction with Israel, not to mention the Palestinians whom the current negotiators insist stay in place. With sufficient incentives, many countries might be glad to spare them years of living in rubble.

The best idea, and in the long run far less expensive militarily and diplomatically, would be if Trump would return to his original idea of Gaza as a kind of US-Israeli "Riviera" protectorate, preferably with a US military base. Then one would not even need any further Abraham Accords: a US military presence should be sufficient to deter aggression and keep peace -- as it has done so successfully in Qatar.

Not all Arab states might like this approach. It certainly would deprive them of the opportunity, should the winds change, of trying again to destroy Israel.

In addition, the rejectionism of successive generations of Palestinian leaders is well-documented, dating back to when the Nazi-collaborating Palestinian leader, Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Hajj Amin Husseini, rejected the UN's 1947 partition plan that included a two-state solution.

Palestinian leaders have maintained this rejectionist attitude ever since. Yasser Arafat, the head of the Palestine Liberation Organization, summarily rejected far-reaching concessions offered by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak at the Camp David summit organised by US President Bill Clinton in 2000, without even bothering to offer a counterproposal. Abbas proved to be equally intransigent when then Israeli premier Ehud Olmert offered the Palestinians even greater sweeping concessions.

Nor is there any likelihood that Abbas and other members of the Palestinian leadership will be prepared actually to engage positively, apart from elusive promises, with the Trump administration's latest peace proposals.

Abbas's refusal to engage with Trump during the latter's first term was the main reason that the Palestinians were overlooked during the groundbreaking negotiations that resulted in the Abraham Accords in 2020, which resulted in a number of Arab states normalising relations with Israel.

So even if, as Trump insists, Hamas is excluded from any future negotiations on the future of Gaza and the Palestinians, the likelihood of his administration having any positive talks with so-called "moderate" Palestinian leaders, such as Abbas -- or any prospects of a true, long-term peace if Arab countries are allowed to run Gaza -- sadly, the end to decades of hostility will continue to be non-existent.


Con Coughlin is the Telegraph's Defence and Foreign Affairs Editor and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21926/palestinians-qatar-israel-peace

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF kills senior Nukhba terrorist, destroys terrorist infrastructure in Gaza City high rise - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

The military also later announced that it killed dozens of terrorists, dismantled tunnel shafts and underground tunnel routes, and located concealed weapons in civilian areas.

 

The Israel Air Force killed Nukhba company commander Hasan Mahmoud Hasan Hussein in a strike in Gaza City on Sunday. 

The IDF stated that Hussein also took part in abducting Israeli citizens on October 7, 2023, and the massacre of several Israeli civilians when he threw a grenade into a bomb shelter in Re'im, near Route 232. 

As part of his role in the Bureij Battalion, he reportedly directed, led, and executed several terrorist attacks against IDF troops operating in the Gaza Strip. Hussein acted alongside Muhammad Abu Atiwi. The two invaded Israel together on October 7, the IDF noted. Atiwi was killed in October 2024.

Separately, the IDF struck a high-rise building in Gaza City on Sunday, the military announced in an earlier statement. 

The military reported that the building contained Hamas military infrastructure that was used to assist terror operations against IDF troops in the area. 

The IDF killed Nukhba terrorist Hasan Mahmoud Hasan Hussein on September 28, 2025.  (credit: IDF SPOKESMAN’S UNIT)
The IDF killed Nukhba terrorist Hasan Mahmoud Hasan Hussein on September 28, 2025. (credit: IDF SPOKESMAN’S UNIT)

IDF operates in Gaza City

"Prior to the strike, steps were taken in order to mitigate harm to civilians as much as possible, including advanced warnings to the population, the use of precise munitions, aerial surveillance, and additional intelligence," the IDF stated. It added that Gaza's terrorists regularly violate international law and exploit civilian structures to use the enclave's civilian population as a human shield.

Later, the military announced that in the past weeks, troops of the 188th Armored Brigade and the 828th Brigade operating in Gaza City had killed dozens of terrorists, dismantled tunnel shafts and underground tunnel routes, and located concealed weapons in civilian areas.

Also on Sunday, IDF troops eliminated a terror cell in Gaza. Prior to the event, soldiers identified a terrorist who attempted to plant an explosive device near an IDF tank.  Shortly afterwards, the troops identified a separate terror cell, and the Israel Air Force eliminated it. 

This comes as the IDF began Operation Gideon's Chariots II to invade Gaza City. Since the start of the operation in late August, the military has struck several high-rise buildings and occupied at least half of the city. 

Military estimates say more than 800,000 residents have already left Gaza City.

The IDF now controls several neighborhoods across Gaza City, including Tel al-Hawa, Al-Nadi, Zeitoun, Sheikh Ajleen, Shejaia, and Tuffah.

IAF airstrikes hit around 140 targets over the course of Saturday, including weapons storage sites, command structures, and operatives from various terrorist organizations.

In Gaza City, troops identified five terrorists who fired anti-tank missiles from a building at a patrol. No Israeli casualties were reported.

In coordination with ground forces and the brigade’s firepower unit, the IAF struck the site, eliminating the cell in what the IDF described as a rapid “closing of the circle.”

 

Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-868893

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter