by Richard Z. Chesnoff
Maybe it's time to inscribe it high on the walls of
Here's Israel's right-wing prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, admittedly responding to pressure from Washington but finally admitting in public that he believes the best solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict lies in establishing two independent states in the Holy Land: the existing Jewish one and a new, sovereign but demilitarized Palestinian Arab state on the West Bank, eventually joined to the Gaza Strip. Let's sit down and negotiate, says Bibi. Let's co-exist in peace.
So what do the Palestinians do? They rant and rave and summarily reject his proposals. . "Netanyahu's speech was very clear" insists chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erekat . "He rejects the two-state solution."
As they say on Saturday Night Live, "Really? Did he? I don't think so!"
So just what do the Palestinians — who have rejected every Palestinian partition/peace plan ever offered them since the 1920s — object to now?
For starters, like the vast majority of the Mideast's Arabs, the Palestinians still steadfastly refuse to accept the very idea of a Jewish state in the
Excuse me — what do Mubarek and the rest of the Arabs think
It was dreamed of, conceived of and built to be a Jewish state. "The right to establish our sovereign state here…", Netanyahu said in his speech, "arises from one simple fact: the
What's more, it's not a new idea. It was clearly defined by
That's what it says in black and white (or blue and white). Since then, more than 160 nations in the world (including
Palestinians will argue that their adamant refusal to admit the obvious is more than just stubborn ideology. As they see it, by recognizing a "Jewish state" the Palestinians negate any "right of return" for the families of 600,000 or so Palestinian refugees who fled from what is now
Yes and no. Fact is, most of the Palestinian Arabs who actually fled 62 years ago are either old or deceased. And clearly
That doesn't mean that many of these remaining refugees and their descendants can't be repatriated to the future Palestinian state — just as most of the 800,000 Jews who fled Arab lands between 1947 and 1967, leaving everything they owned behind, have been resettled in the Jewish state. Nor is there any reason why mutual compensation agreements can not be worked out for lands and property lost by both sides.
The bottom line is that the Arab world must settle the bulk of this nagging refugee problem within the Arab world — not in
Let's face it. Why has every major post war refugee problem in the world been settled except for the Palestinian one? You know the reason: the Arab states have never wanted to settle it. With the exception of
The other excuse the Palestinians give for their refusal to recognize
Here's something else to mull over. Arab Christian populations are rapidly shrinking throughout the region — the Christian population of
Palestinian naysayers also complain that Netanyahu's insistence that
President Obama twisted Netanyah's arm enough to produce Sunday's two-state acceptance speech. Now's the time for the administration to start twisting Palestinian arms — before they and we miss another opportunity.
Richard Z. Chesnoff was Senior Correspondent at US News & World Report, and is now a columnist at the NY Daily News and the Huffington Post. A two-time winner of the Overseas Press Club Award and a recipient of the National Press Club Award, he was formerly executive editor of Newsweek International.
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment