by Sam Westrop
Please click here to sign a Change.org petition calling on the Silicon Valley Community Foundation (SVCF) to end its financial support for Islamic Relief and other Islamist hate groups.Islamic Relief officials openly promote extremist ideas.
An Islamic Relief event in London in 2012, image via Wikimedia Commons.
|
Islamic
Relief (IR) and a number of prominent Islamic voices, including Linda
Sarsour, did not attribute the withdrawal of the amendment to an Act of
God, but rather claimed its failure was due to the advocacy and mobilization of its supporters, which included Oxfam, American Jewish World Service, Catholic Relief Services, among others.
IR's claims are patently untrue. Representative DeSantis explains: "Due to Hurricane Irma, I left Washington on Thursday
to help my family and community prepare for the storm. I was thus
unable to offer my amendment, but remain committed to blocking taxpayer
funds for organizations with ties to terrorist groups such as Hamas."
Recent
expressions of support for IR from politicians, charities and various
online personalities are sorely misguided. For its entire history, IR
has been managed by prominent Islamist operatives closely linked to the international Muslim Brotherhood. In 2015, the United Arab Emirates, following a similar ban in Israel, designated
IR as a terrorist organization because of its links to Hamas and the
Muslim Brotherhood. And in the last few years, both UBS and HSBC have closed IR bank accounts over concerns about terrorism financing.
IR officials openly promote extremist ideas. Khalid Lamada, the chairman of IR's U.S. branch, has published text praising the "jihad" of the "Mujahidin of Egypt" for "causing the Jews many defeats," as well as posts that praise
Hamas for inflicting a "huge defeat" against the "Zionist entity." One
recent trustee of Islamic Relief Worldwide (IRW), the charity's
headquarters in Britain, was Ahmed Al Rawi, who signed a declaration in
2004 supporting jihad against British and American forces in Iraq.
An
amendment banning grants of government money to Islamist groups is an
important and necessary step in the fight against extremism and terror.
IR has spent decades insuring itself against such actions by soliciting
the support of politicians, journalists, various faith groups and other
charities. IR's response to the planned amendment on September 7 was a
test of its decade-long effort to deceive its well-meaning but naive
public partners.
To
preserve this deception, IR turned to Congressman Keith Ellison, who
wrote a letter to all members of the House urging that they vote against
the amendment. Ellison informed his colleagues that "IRW has never been
affiliated with Hamas or the Muslim Brotherhood." Again, this is simply
untrue. Key IRW officials have been named
as top Muslim Brotherhood officials by the German government and
British media. IRW's co-founder, Essam El Haddad, even served as the
foreign policy representative of the short-lived Muslim Brotherhood
government in Egypt. Once that government fell, Haddad was convicted on
terrorism charges, including his collaboration with Hamas.
Nevertheless,
Rep. Ellison continues: "This amendment singles out IRW for its
religious affiliation. This is another attempt to criminalize and
demonize organizations that are affiliated with the Muslim community."
This
particular deception is IR's most efficient argument. By claiming to
represent all American Muslims, and thus to be a victim of anti-Muslim
bigotry, charities such as IR can hide the fact they belong to a
dangerous Islamist network that has little mandate from ordinary
Muslims. IR relies on claims of 'Islamophobia' to amass further support
from non-Muslims keen to show off their progressive credentials.
IR
has been able to build such an enormous franchise of charities around
the world not, in fact, because of support from Western Muslims, but
because of the legitimacy and millions of dollars of funding it has
received from Western governments, non-Muslim charities and faith
groups. IR officials have spent decades building these partnerships --
seeking endorsement from credulous politicians, puff-pieces by incurious
journalists and interfaith falafels with naive faith leaders. These
connections have served to sanitize IR's history of extremism and
safeguard it against future criticism.
Islamic Relief is a dangerous organization. In America and Europe, it brings extremist preachers
to speak before Muslim youth; and overseas, it is financially connected
with violent Islamist movements. There are plenty of Islamic charities,
worthy of support, whose officials and guest speakers do not advocate
killing Jews and American troops. Islamic Relief is not one of them.
Islamist duplicity must be revealed, and the taxpayer must stop
subsidising this global charity's extremism.
Sam Westrop is the Director of Islamist Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum.
Source: http://www.islamist-watch.org/27266/terror-linked-charity-islamic-relief-escapes-ban
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment