by Odelia Azoulay
The U.N. and individual donor states would be wise to invest their energy and resources in finding a tenable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, rather than bolstering the humanitarian aid industry in the Palestinian territories.
On
Nov. 29, 1947, the United Nations voted in favor of a plan to split
Palestine into two states – one Jewish and one Arab. Arab leaders
immediately rejected the plan and have continued to do so throughout the
71 years of the Jewish state's existence.
All of the solutions that have since been
proposed have focused on the principle of partition, the most important
among them, and the one that could very well be responsible for the
current reality in which we live, was the 1993 Oslo Accords.
One of the less-discussed outcomes of the
agreement was the rise of the human rights and humanitarian aid industry
in the Palestinian territories.
The number of non-governmental
organizations with a vested interested in perpetuating the conflict has
multiplied ever since the Palestinian Authority was formed, creating a
new social status whose existence depends entirely on foreign aid.
Humanitarian aid and international funding mechanisms are no longer the
means to promoting a solution but the objective.
Throughout modern history, it was civil
society that laid the foundations for the creation of state institutions
and paved the way for governance. In Palestinian society, however, the
opposite is true. With the PA's founding, more aid organizations were
established at the expense of effective and official government
institutions. This reality has led to a deviation from the traditional
spheres of NGO activity to the point that these organizations now have
excessive control over many aspects of Palestinian life.
According to a 2016 report by the
Palestinian NonGovernmental Organizations Network of some 130 volunteer
associations following the PA's establishment, civil organizations are
responsible for the supply of 60% of medical services and health
insurance in the Palestinian territories. In other words, the majority
of Palestinian civil society organizations not only perpetuate the
conflict but significantly delay the development of the PA's own
institutions.
Furthermore, instead of promoting some type
of process for the resolution of the conflict, these organizations
consistently act to exacerbate it. A code of conduct published in 2008
and signed by over 200 Palestinian organizations obligates its members
to "align themselves with the national agenda that prohibits
normalization with the occupier, whether in the field of
diplomatic-security or development and culture." Let me repeat that:
Palestinian organizations cannot cooperate with Israel or promote joint
Israeli-Palestinian projects.
Last September, the Association of
International Development Agencies, which counts among its members 80
different aid organizations that operate inside the Palestinian
territories, published a report titled "25 Years to the Oslo Accords:
Time for a New Narrative." These ungrateful organizations callously
describe the international aid programs as "an attempt to cover up the
failures of the Oslo process and Israel's violations of international
law."
They claim the expensive and vital aid
programs should be accompanied by legal efforts and diplomatic pressure
directed not at the PA, of course, but Israel.
"Peace, development and security for
millions of Palestinians can only exist if their rights are at the
forefront of future peace talks and their protection is ensured," the
association contends. There is no mention of a need for a solution that
brings an end to the violence or the establishment of institutions, but
rather just another desperate attempt to preserve the aid industry
disguised as the defense of human rights.
The Oslo Accords, possibly the closest
thing to Palestinian agreement to a partition plan, is also the plan
that brought the rise of organizations that draw their strength from the
accords' weaknesses. A World Bank report from the beginning of 2018
found that aid funds do not help to improve quality of life for
residents in the territories, but rather contribute to the strengthening
of the NGO elite. On the anniversary of the end of the British Mandate
and the adoption of the partition plan and just over 25 years to the
Oslo Accords, the U.N. and individual donor states would be wise to
invest their energy and resources in finding a tenable solution to the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one that will be agreed upon by both sides
instead of just bolstering the aid industry.
Odelia
Azoulay is a researcher with NGO Monitor, a watchdog group that
promotes greater transparency among foreign-funded Israeli
nongovernmental organization.
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/palestinian-aid-groups-perpetuate-the-conflict/
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment