by Yaakov Lappin
The virus is the latest in a succession of blows to the Iranian regime’s domestic status, fractured economy, and already low credibility level at home.
BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 1,507, March 27, 2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The
coronavirus pandemic has hit Iran hard, and not only on the health
front. The virus is the latest in a succession of blows to the Iranian
regime’s domestic status, fractured economy, and already low credibility
level at home. The virus also appears to be slowing down the regime’s
malign activities across the Middle East.
The Iranian regime has, in recent months, taken
one uppercut after another. The setbacks include a deteriorating
economic crisis fueled by US sanctions—a crisis with no clear resolution; the US drone strike that killed Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani; the fiasco of the downing of the Ukrainian aircraft that followed soon after; and growing anti-regime demonstrations driven by an Iranian public demanding a better quality of life.
An ongoing oil war, which has seen prices decrease sharply, has also struck a damaging blow to Iran,
which still relies in part on oil exports to generate income. And the
coronavirus pandemic is unlikely to help quell Iran’s domestic
instability.
Even before the virus hit, leaving an estimated 2,000 Iranians dead and 25,000 infected according to official figures at the time of this writing, the regime had hit its lowest point since the 1979 revolution.
Iran’s consumer price index and the cost of basic commodities indicate runaway inflation.
Protesters demanding a better economic life had, until the pandemic
struck, been out in the streets on a regular basis since November, and
the fact that the protests reappeared within days of Soleimani’s mass
funeral procession indicates that public anger is deeply entrenched.
In its attempt to suppress the unrest, the
regime’s security forces have killed more than 300 of their own people,
wounded 3,500, and imprisoned more than 700. Internet access is
routinely cut off. These developments signal massive public
disappointment in the Islamic Republic’s leadership and a domestic
challenge that is shaking the Iranian leadership to its core.
The fact that Iran had to cut fuel subsidies last year,
sparking the initial wave of protests, reflects an understanding by
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei that the Trump administration’s
maximum pressure campaign of sanctions isn’t going anywhere.
At first, Iran responded by stepping up both its
malign regional activity and its nuclear program activities. Now, while
the nuclear program continues to make alarming progress, Iran’s subversive and terrorist activities in the region are decreasing due to the domestic strain.
Earlier this month, an IDF spokesperson said the Israeli military was seeing a reduction in the level of activity by Iran and other adversaries against Israel. With more than 30% of Iranians living below the poverty line
and struggling for basic goods even before the coronavirus lockdown,
Iran may be unable to fund and organize large-scale regional
entrenchment and terrorism as aggressively as it could before.
Large scale domestic unrest—the scenario that most
frightens the leadership—is unlikely to happen immediately, as the
population is practicing social distancing and staying at home. But the
shock wave created by the coronavirus and the regime’s mishandling of
the crisis will be felt acutely after the pandemic passes, and will hold
the potential to contribute to the regime’s destabilization.
In recent days, the Iranian military has cleared the streets of citizens to enforce isolation.
Recent statements by Khamenei in which he peddles baseless anti-American conspiracy theories about
the virus’s origins indicate how disconnected the Iranian leadership is
from the extreme predicament of its people. Khamenei has rejected an American offer of a medical assistance program.
Khamenei’s worldview and radical Shiite Islamist
ideology appear to be wearing thin among many Iranians, whose main goal
these days is economic survival and achieving a reasonable standard of
living. Responding to Khamenei’s statements, US Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo noted Monday
that the regime allowed many flights from China to land in Iran during
the virus outbreak, ignored “repeated warnings from its own health
officials, and denied its first death from the coronavirus for at least
nine days.”
“It is important to note that since 2012, Iran has
spent over $16 billion on terror abroad, and used sanctions relief from
the JCPOA to fill up its proxies’ coffers. Regime officials stole over a
billion Euros intended for medical supplies, and continue to hoard
desperately needed masks, gloves, and other medical equipment for sale
on the black market,” Pompeo said.
Not long ago, Iran was sending around $1 billion a year to Hezbollah, Hamas, and other terror organizations while spending tens of billions of dollars on its military and terror activities in Syria.
Current Iranian overseas military and terror financing figures are not
immediately available, but it is difficult to imagine how Tehran can
keep up this level of funding for its foreign destabilization projects.
The Iranian regime recently took the unprecedented step of
asking the IMF for a $5 billion loan, revealing the extent of its
economic crisis. Iran’s request for help from an international financial
institution marks a complete break with past policy and reflects the
urgency its decision-makers feel regarding the country’s economic
problems.
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps is estimated to control between 20% and 40% of the Iranian economy, a factor that likely further drives resentment among sections of the public.
As James M. Dorsey, a non-resident senior associate at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, recently noted,
“Iran has become the poster child of what happens when the public
distrusts a government that has a track record of being untransparent
from the outset of a crisis, limits freedom of expression that often
creates early warning systems that could have enabled authorities to
take timely, preemptive measures to avert or limit the damage, and is
perceived as corrupt.”
In the long term, it remains unclear whether these
dire conditions will force the regime to cut back on its long-term
terrorist sponsorship and armament program for its network of radical
proxies, but if it fails to do this, that failure might accelerate
unrest at home.
In the meantime, a mysterious airstrike on
Sunday targeted Iran’s Albukamal military base on the Syrian-Iraqi
border, a site reportedly used by the Quds Force to traffic weapons and
personnel from Iraq into Syria. Pro-Iranian militias have been active in recent weeks in Iraq, launching a deadly rocket attack on a US base, absorbing American air strikes, and still continuing attacks afterwards.
While these incidents reflect an Iranian
determination to continue to use its proxies against the US and its
allies in the region, they do not conceal the extreme position in which
Tehran finds itself—a position that may yet worsen once the coronavirus
crisis passes.
This is an edited version of an article published by Algemeiner on March 25, 2020.
Yaakov Lappin is a Research Associate at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies and a military and strategic affairs correspondent. He conducts research and analysis for defense think tanks and is the military correspondent for JNS. His book The Virtual Caliphate explores the online jihadist presence.
Source: https://besacenter.org/perspectives-papers/coronavirus-iran-regime/
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment