by Barry Rubin
The best thing to read about Western Middle East policy is Richard Dowden writing about some of the anti-AIDS campaigns in Africa, in his book
“It is these vital cultural perceptions that outsiders miss when they rush to save
That's precisely the point. The cultural and intellectual arrogance of ignoring the way local people think and act, what they want and say, substituting for it a made-in-London or
Well, there are some differences, of course, between the big mistakes made in Africa and those in the
And the amazing thing is that they never learn. Here is President Obama’s Middle East envoy, as quoted in the New York Times:
“George J. Mitchell likes to remind people that he labored for 700 days before reaching the Good Friday accord that brought peace to
True, the length of time alone does not prove failure, though it can be an indication. For the record,
You can keep doing the wrong thing as long as you like, the wise person starts to understand why it's wrong; the merely smart person simply recalls that tough tasks sometimes take a long time.
Oh, yes, and there’s that little thing about using political analysis to understand the motivations, goals, and limits in the policy of those involved in the conflict.
“One of the public misimpressions is that it’s all been about settlements. It is completely inaccurate to portray this as, ‘We’re only asking the Israelis to do things.’ We are asking everybody to do things.”
Problem here: this has only been really true for about one month out of the six the administration has been in office, and even that came about only due to the obviousness of its failure. In addition, the administration wasn’t “asking”
He also says it isn’t true Arabs have refused to make any concessions. “We’ve gotten, over all, a very good response, a desire to act, some public statements to that effect from the crown prince of Bahrain, the president of Egypt,”
I think that totals about one op-ed piece. If I were him, I’d cite
But have no fear for we are coming to the main point. The White House is about to begin a public-relations’ campaign in the region. According to the New York Times:
“To better explain Mr. Obama’s plans for a comprehensive peace agreement….”
My older readers might remember that the newspaper once offered to pay anyone who found a typo. Now it deals in obvious split infinitives along with splintered logic. Imagine the bizarre idea that what the region has lacked is the voice of Obama explaining things to them. What hubris! What chutzpah! What a joke.
To his credit, the Times reporter notes that there is “little evidence” of any Arab change regarding
No, there isn’t any trick. There is reality, all the bits left out. All the politics is simply not there for Obama Middle East policy, as if Arab states and societies had absolutely nothing keeping them from peace except some trick or encouragement needed. Substitute the word “democracy” for “peace” and you have everything wrong with Bush Middle East policy.
Almost everything the administration says about the Arab states is wrong. The fact is that relatively moderate Arab regimes believe very radical things and benefit by using the conflict for demagogic purposes. They fear the radicalization of their population, Iranian-Syrian aggression, and radical Islamist groups at home. They do not desperately need formal peace with
And, no, the Arab-Israeli or Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not the key to regional politics.
Then there are the Palestinians. Where does one begin? Hamas running the Gaza Strip and subverting the
Underlying all of this is the reality that the vast majority of Palestinian leaders and masses prefer trying to wipe
The huge problem is that none of these factors—and many more which are listed—are taken into account by the Obama administration. It is assumed that Israeli-Palestinian peace is central, that everyone in the region wants it, and that it can be quickly achieved.
It is the equivalent logic of that in my favorite Peanuts cartoon, which goes roughly like this:
Lucy: "Look! A giant butterfly that's flown up here from
Linus: "That's not a butterfly. That's a potato chip."
Lucy: "I wonder how a potato chip got up here all the way from
Nothing, nothing, nothing has been learned from all the experience accumulated in the region for decades. No deep thought has resulted from the failure of the 1990s’ peace process. Everything is superficial, tactical, on a quicksand basis. This is truly pathetic.
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.