Sunday, August 10, 2025

Religious Zionism mulls toppling gov’t as Smotrich says he’s ‘lost faith’ in PM - David Isaac, Amelie Botbol

 

by David Isaac, Amelie Botbol

The party is increasingly skeptical of Netanyahu's determination to finish Hamas once and for all.

 

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich says he "lost confidence" in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Aug. 9, 2025. Source: Bezalel Smotrich/X.
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich says he "lost confidence" in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Aug. 9, 2025. Source: Bezalel Smotrich/X.

 

The Religious Zionism Party, increasingly exasperated with the conduct of the war, is considering bringing down the Netanyahu government, sources told JNS on Sunday.

The development comes after the Security Cabinet overnight Thursday decided by a “decisive majority” to approve Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to expand the war effort by gaining control of Gaza City.

“The decision on Thursday was, in the party’s view, a severe mistake and a retreat from the government’s determination to truly achieve victory and defeat Hamas,” one source said. “If this decision is not changed, we are headed toward dissolving the government and going to elections.”

The party’s leader, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, issued a blistering denunciation of the prime minister on Saturday evening.

The breaking point appears to have come with the reversal, in Religious Zionism’s view, of Netanyahu’s determination to conquer all of the Gaza Strip and crush the Hamas terrorist group once and for all.

Although the prime minister continues to declare that Israel intends to conquer all of Gaza, including in an interview with Fox News on Thursday, Aug. 7, shortly before he entered a Security Cabinet meeting to seek approval for the decision, Smotrich, who attended the meeting, said the decision that was taken is not all it seems.

Instead of an operation to seize control of Gaza (roughly 25% of the Strip remains unconquered) and ensure victory, it is merely an attempt to pressure Hamas to return to the negotiating table over the release of the remaining 50 hostages, of whom 20 are estimated to still be alive, he said.

“The prime minister and the Cabinet succumbed to weakness, and let emotion win over common sense,” Smotrich said in a video post on X.

Religious Zionist Knesset member Tzvi Sukkot, in an X post on Sunday, seconded, “If we return to 10/6/23 and decide to abandon the war’s objectives, it is an existential danger to the State of Israel. If this is the situation, in my opinion, we need to go to elections.”

Religious Zionism MK Simcha Rothman, chairman of the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, agreed that the government’s failure to fully defeat Hamas could lead to early elections.

“I don’t know what will happen in the end. I am sure that if this lack of faith by Minister Smotrich in the ability of this government to end the war and eliminate Hamas continues, then the answer is probably ‘yes,'” Rothman told JNS on Sunday.

The government’s war aim

Smotrich has been warning for two years that the government had been making a “major mistake” by effectively swapping out as its war aim the elimination of Hamas with that of negotiating with the terror group to free the hostages, Rothman said.

Hamas has repeatedly rejected ceasefire-for-hostages proposals, Rothman noted. “Every time Netanyahu gets a negative response from Hamas—and the negotiators from this and the previous administration were very clear that Hamas does not want a deal—at some point, one should say that the deal is off the table and that we will go all in. As Trump said, ‘Open the gates of hell on Hamas.’”

But Netanyahu is unwilling to abandon negotiations and therein lies the problem, because Israel doesn’t have “endless time,” neither for the soldiers nor for the hostages, Rothman said.

“We have to push through. We have to take down Hamas. To keep this negotiating window open is the mistake that has kept the war stuck for so long. It’s not good for winning the war. It’s not good for Israel,” he said.

Sources close to the prime minister rejected the criticism, saying that there is currently no partial hostage deal on the horizon, nor a comprehensive deal that will lead to the release of all the hostages and an end to the war, Channel 14‘s diplomatic correspondent Tamir Morag reported on Sunday.

Israel is moving forward until the entire Gaza Strip is conquered and Hamas is eliminated, the sources told Morag.

Netanyahu on Friday reiterated that Israel has no intention of occupying Gaza, saying the expansion of the war is aimed at destroying Hamas and freeing the local population from its regime of terror.

“We are not going to occupy Gaza—we are going to free Gaza from Hamas,” said Netanyahu.

“Gaza will be demilitarized, and a peaceful civilian administration will be established, one that is not the Palestinian Authority, not Hamas, and not any other terrorist organization,” he continued. “This will help free our hostages and ensure Gaza does not pose a threat to Israel in the future.”

Emerging reports in the Hebrew press appeared to support Religious Zionism’s version. Israel Hayom reported on Sunday that the deal approved by the Security Cabinet was a compromise.

Due to attrition in IDF reserves, the opposition to the government’s plan by the IDF chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, and the U.S. administration’s desire to exhaust all diplomatic avenues, the Cabinet agreed to Zamir’s plan to maintain military pressure from the army’s current positions, “with limited advances in Gaza City’s Zeitoun neighborhood and along the Netzarim Corridor,” Israel Hayom reported.

Amit Segal, Channel 12‘s chief political correspondent, reported similarly that the Security Cabinet decision did not call for defeating Hamas, but only authorized “intensified action in Gaza City.”

After Zamir raised difficulties, the compromise included conquering Gaza City, but with the proviso that if Hamas agreed to a deal, a ceasefire would be called and “the operation will stop, and the IDF will withdraw,” Segal posted to X on Sunday. He added that the government didn’t rule out a partial hostage deal.

Religious Zionism lawmaker Michal Woldiger told JNS on Sunday that her party continues to back the objectives set by the government at the outset of the war.

“We want to eradicate Hamas on a political, civil and security level, so that we can truly restore peace to the State of Israel—not for a year, two or three years, but for the long term,” she said.

“One of the important goals is also considering the conditions for releasing the hostages, and all of them in one go, not in stages, in a final form, in a powerful manner. These things are not new—as long as the government and the Cabinet have these goals in sight, we are in,” she continued.

However, Woldiger warned that her faction would not support a shift away from those objectives. “When they deviate—and we do see the beginning of a deviation—we are raising a flag and saying we will not be able to continue to be in, because what matters to us is the State of Israel and the Israeli people, the present generation but certainly also the generations to come,” she said.

“We do not want another October 7. Of course, we believe this is the right way to return all the kidnapped, because any other way, including the way that is being proposed now, is a way that actually gives Hamas the ability to play us and to continue to hold hostages for many more years,” she added.

In his X post, Smotrich acknowledged Israel’s achievements thus far against Hezbollah, Iran and, to a degree, against Hamas, but said “the goals of the war haven’t yet been completed.”

For weeks, he revealed, he had been working “intensively” with Netanyahu on a plan for a speedy military victory followed by a diplomatic move that would exact “a painful price” of Hamas, “destroy its military and civilian capabilities, and overwhelm it with unprecedented pressure to release the hostages.

“The prime minister seemed to support the plan. He debated with me on the details and broadcast that he was striving for a victory and this time he intended to go all the way. But to my regret, he immediately made a U-turn,” Smotrich said.

If the purpose of the IDF’s next maneuver is only to bring Hamas back to negotiations, the army will not operate at full power, Smotrich warned. Worse still, it will give Hamas an out at the moment of its choosing. The second it senses it’s on the brink of defeat, it will green-light negotiations so it can regroup, he said.

“That’s how you don’t defeat [your enemy], that’s how you don’t return hostages, that’s how you don’t win a war,” Smotrich said.

“I have lost faith that the prime minister is capable of, or wants, to lead the IDF [to victory],” he said.

Smotrich noted that he had supported the government despite difficult decisions with which he didn’t agree, including the release of terrorists, who had murdered Israelis, for the release of hostages.

Signaling he had reached the end of the line, Smotrich said, “To send tens of thousands of soldiers to maneuver in Gaza City at the risk of their lives, to pay a heavy political and international price just to put pressure on Hamas to release the hostages, and then stepping back, is an immoral and illogical injustice.

“Unfortunately, for the first time since the beginning of the war, I feel that I simply cannot stand behind this decision and back it. My conscience won’t allow me,” he said.


David Isaac, Amelie Botbol

Source: https://www.jns.org/religious-zionism-mulls-toppling-govt-as-smotrich-says-hes-lost-faith-in-pm/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Netanyahu: ‘No choice’ but to complete defeat of Hamas - Etgar Lefkowitz

 

by Etgar Lefkowitz

“Our goal is not to occupy Gaza but to free Gaza,” says PM.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at a press conference, May 21, 2025. Photo by Haim Zach/GPO.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at a press conference, May 21, 2025. Photo by Haim Zach/GPO.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterated on Sunday that Israel does not seek to stay in Gaza, but to replace the Hamas regime with an expanded military operation, and insisted that was the best way to bring the war to a speedy conclusion.

“Our goal is not to occupy Gaza but to free Gaza,” Netanyahu said at a press conference for foreign media. “But no one is going to go in there unless we finish the job and finish Hamas.”

He noted that Hamas still has thousands of armed terrorists remaining in about a quarter of the coastal strip after nearly two years of war, and declared that Israel had “no choice” but to finish the job and complete the defeat of Hamas.

He argued that the best way to end the war was the recently approved military plan to take over Gaza City in order to clear the area of Hamas and make way for a civilian administration that is not connected to the Islamist regime, which led the Oct. 7, 2023 onslaught on southern Israel that triggered the war, or to the Palestinian Authority.

“Contrary to false claims, this is the best way to end the war and the best way to end it speedily,” Netanyahu said.

Describing his postwar vision for the Strip, Netanyahu said it had five principles: “Hamas will be disarmed. All hostages will be freed. Gaza will be demilitarized. Israel will have overriding security responsibility with a security zone to be established on Gaza’s border with Israel to prevent future terrorist incursions. A civilian administration will be established in Gaza that will seek to live in peace with Israel.”

Acknowledging “deprivations,” he said aid distribution would continue via safe corridors, larger number of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation sites and air drops.

No starvation

The Israeli premier again denied allegations of starvation in Gaza insisting that Israel allowed sufficient aid in throughout the war, while Hamas has disrupted aid flow and the United Nations has failed to properly distribute it. 

 “If we had a starvation policy, no one in Gaza would have survived after two years of war,” Netanyahu said.

He noted that Israel has provided two million tons of aid to Gaza since the outbreak of the war. 

Middle Ages blood libel redux

The Israeli leader said that the international press had bought Hamas lies and propaganda “hook line and sinker,” and was defaming the Jewish state in a similar way to how the Jewish people were maligned during the Middle Ages. Then Jews were accused of spreading vermin, poisoning wells and slaughtering Christian children for their blood, leading to pogroms and violence which ultimately culminated in the Holocaust.

Under a banner that read “open your eyes to Hamas’s lies,” he singled out the New York Times newspaper for running a front-page photo of a “starving” Gaza boy who suffers from cerebral palsy and said he was looking into filing an Israeli government suit against the newspaper which “buried” a correction.

Responding to a question, Netanyahu said that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz had “bucked under” a global campaign of lies which led him to freeze military exports to Israel but said that Jerusalem would win the war with or without foreign support. 

He said that he directed the IDF to bring more foreign journalists into Gaza which has mostly been a closed military zone.

Still, he conceded that Israel was losing the media war. “We will win the propaganda war by winning the war and winning the peace,” he said.  

 

Etgar Lefkowitz

Source: https://www.jns.org/netanyahu-no-choice-but-to-complete-defeat-of-hamas/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Netanyahu, Trump discuss Israel's Gaza plan, defeating Hamas - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

The two world leaders discussed Israel's plans to take over the remaining Hamas strongholds in Gaza with the goal of ending the war by freeing the remaining hostages and defeating Hamas.

 

US President Donald Trump (left) with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office at the White House in April, 2025.
US President Donald Trump (left) with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office at the White House in April, 2025.
(photo credit: KEVIN MOHATT/REUTERS)

 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke with US President Donald Trump on Sunday, the Prime Minister's Office announced. 

The two world leaders discussed Israel's plans to take over the remaining Hamas strongholds in Gaza with the goal of ending the war by freeing the remaining hostages and defeating Hamas. 

The remaining strongholds were identified by Netanyahu in a press conference on Sunday as being located in Gaza City and the central camps. 

Netanyahu further thanked Trump for his support of Israel since the beginning of the war.

Netanyahu's plan for Gaza

In his press conference, Netanyahu outlined the day-after plan for Gaza, which will include Israel maintaining overriding security responsibility and the establishment of a civilian administration.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks to international media on the Gaza war, in Jerusalem, August 10, 2025 (credit: CHAIM TZACH/GPO)
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks to international media on the Gaza war, in Jerusalem, August 10, 2025 (credit: CHAIM TZACH/GPO)
He did not elaborate on the role of the civilian administration or what Israel's security responsibilities would entail. 

These press conferences come amid Israeli and international criticism of the security cabinet's decision to approve a widened operation in Gaza City

Gaza will be demilitarized and a security zone will be established on Israel's border, the prime minister also said.  


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-863829

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Germany's halt to arms exports to Israel is response to Gaza expansion plans, chancellor says - Reuters

 

by Reuters

"We cannot deliver weapons into a conflict that is now being pursued exclusively by military means. We want to help diplomatically, and we are doing so," German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said.

 

File pictures shows the leader and top candidate for Chancellor of Germany's Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party Friedrich Merz (L, on February 24, 2025 in Berlin) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (on December 9, 2024 in Jerusalem.
File pictures shows the leader and top candidate for Chancellor of Germany's Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party Friedrich Merz (L, on February 24, 2025 in Berlin) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (on December 9, 2024 in Jerusalem.
(photo credit: INA FASSBENDER and Maya Alleruzzo / various sources / AFP, Photo by INA FASSBENDER,MAYA ALLERUZZO/AF)

 

Germany's decision to curb arms exports to Israel comes in response to Israel's plan to expand its operations in the Gaza Strip, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Sunday in an interview with public broadcaster ARD.

"We cannot deliver weapons into a conflict that is now being pursued exclusively by military means," Merz said. "We want to help diplomatically, and we are doing so."

The worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza and Israel's plans to expand military control over the enclave have pushed Germany to take this historically fraught step.

The chancellor said in the interview that the expansion of Israel's operations in Gaza could claim hundreds of thousands of civilian lives and would require the evacuation of the entire city of Gaza.

"Where are these people supposed to go?" Merz said. "We can't do that, we won't do that, and I will not do that."

Palestinians gather at the site of an Israeli strike in Gaza City on August 8, 2025. (credit: Mahmoud Issa/Reuters)
Palestinians gather at the site of an Israeli strike in Gaza City on August 8, 2025. (credit: Mahmoud Issa/Reuters)

Merz says Germany will continue to stand by Israel 

Nevertheless, the principles of Germany's Israel policy remain unchanged, the chancellor said.

"Germany has stood firmly by Israel's side for 80 years. That will not change," Merz said. 

Germany is Israel's second-biggest weapons supplier after the US and has long been one of its staunchest supporters, principally because of its historical guilt for the Nazi Holocaust - a policy known as the "Staatsraison."


Reuters

Source: https://www.jpost.com/international/article-863830

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel: Intelligence Bounty for the USA - Yoram Ettinger

 

by Yoram Ettinger

*The late Senator Daniel Inouye, who was the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Chairman of the Senate Full Appropriations Committee told me that the scope of Israeli intelligence shared with the US, was much more than the intelligence provided by all NATO countries combined."

 

Does the US extend to Israel an annual foreign aid of $3.8bn, or does the US make an annual $3.8bn investment in Israel, which yields to the US a Return-on-Investment that exceeds – exponentially – the annual investment?

*The US’ power projection – in the Middle East and in the face of Russia and China – has been substantially upgraded by Israel’s battle-proven military and technological capabilities and its surging posture of deterrence. Unlike NATO, South Korea and Japan, Israel has bolstered the US’ regional and global strategic posture without US bases/troops. Israel has done it due to its stability, effectiveness and reliability (irrespective of Left or Right government); and, its pro-active military action against anti-US Islamic terrorism. Israel has contributed to the US defense and economy by acting as a cost-effective battle-tested laboratory for US defense and aerospace industries, which has contributed mega billions of dollars to the saving in research and development costs – and increased exports – of advanced US military systems (combat aircraft, etc.), and sharing innovative battle tactics with the US Armed Forces.

*Israel’s recent military offensive against the Ayatollah regime and Hezbollah has contributed to the extension of the US’ strategic arm, as it has through its geo-strategic location and its unique sources of human (HUMINT) and Signal (SIGINT) intelligence.  Israel’s familiarity with the Middle East has provided the US with game-changing data on the cultural, linguistic, ethnic, ideological and religious nature of anti-US Sunni and Islamic terrorists. Through a sophisticated interception of Internet communications, Israel has shared with the US intelligence, which targeted missile sites, aborted anti-US Islamic terrorist action (on US soil, US airlines and worldwide US installations). Israel has shared with the US intelligence on enemies’ battle tactics and capabilities of advanced military systems, which are developed by enemies and by industrial competitors of the US (e.g., ground-to-air missiles, electronics and jamming and hacking devices). Recently, Israel has shared with the US vital intelligence on the advanced Iranian unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) technology, and North Korean and Chinese ballistic technologies, which were supplied to the Ayatollah regime.

*The uniquely productive US-Israeli intelligence cooperation was demonstrated during the June 13-June 21 Israeli Air Force offensive on the Ayatollah regime, which paved the way for the US Air Force bombing of three critical nuclear installations, unimpeded by the (demolished) Iranian Air Force and air defense systems.

*The late Senator Daniel Inouye, who was the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Chairman of the Senate Full Appropriations Committee told me that the scope of Israeli intelligence shared with the US, was much more than the intelligence provided by all NATO countries combined. He added that Soviet military hardware which was transferred by Israel to the US tilted the global balance of power in favor of the US, amounting to a mega-billion-dollar bonus.

*According to the late General George Keegan, who served as the Chief of US Air Force Intelligence: “If the US were to procure, on its own, the intelligence provided by Israel, it would have to establish 5 CIAs [the classified annual budget of one CIA is assessed to be well over $15bn!]…. The ability of the U.S. Air Force in particular, and the Army in general, to defend whatever position it has in NATO owes more to the Israeli intelligence input than it does to any other single source of intelligence, be it satellite reconnaissance, be it technology intercept, or what have you….”

For example:

<In 2017, Israel shared intelligence about an ISIS bomb plot – centered in Syria – involving explosives camouflaged as laptop batteries, designed to fool airports x-ray machines, leading to the tightening of US and global airport security. Israel has, also, provided the US crucial intelligence on ISIS activities, such as the identity of Westerners who joined ISIS and drone-gathered intelligence over ISIS-controlled area, which enhanced US airstrikes.

<Leading to the 2020 killing of Qassem Soleimani, the Commander of Iran’s Quds Force, which orchestrates global anti-US Iranian terrorism, Israel assisted in the profiling of Soleimani and tracking his cell phones, which facilitated the determination of his precise location in Baghdad.

<Israel has provided the U.S. with intelligence on Iran’s sophisticated ballistic and drone programs, which target every pro-US Arab regime, Western Europe and the US itself (through Iran’s Latin American foothold). Israeli intelligence tipped off the US about imminent Iranian drone and missile strikes on US installations in Syria, Jordan and Iraq.

<In July 2003, Brig. General Michael Vane, Deputy Chief of Staff at the US Army Training and Doctrine Command stated that Israel’s counter-terrorism experience shaped the US war on terrorism.

<In 1968-70, during the War of Attrition against Soviet-supported Egypt, Israel shared with the US its own aerial tactics – in the face of Soviet missiles – which saved the lives of gunship pilots during the Vietnam War

<During the Cold War era, Israel provided the U.S. with critical intelligence on Soviet strategic missiles capabilities – which bolstered the US defense against a non-conventional offensive – such as Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicle, warhead technology, and advantages and vulnerabilities of hundreds of tons of Soviet military systems, which were captured/hit during Israel-Arab wars and delivered by defecting Arab pilots (e.g., P-12 Soviet radar snatched from Egypt in 1969, MiG-21, MiG-17 and MiG-23 Soviet combat in 1966, 1968 and 1989 respectively, T-54, T-55, T-62 and T-72 Soviet tanks, SA-2 and SA-6 surface-to-air missile batteries and their radars, etc.).  The Israeli contribution was significant in terms of research and development, reverse-engineering, radar jamming, battle tactics, global industrial competitiveness and increased export.

The bottom line:

In 1923, Col. Richard Meinertzhagen, the Chief British Intelligence Officer in the western Middle East, stated: “I’ve always considered the Land of Israel to be the key to the defense of the Middle East…. When a Jewish State will be established, Britain shall benefit from air force, naval and land bases… as well as Jewish fighting capabilities… which will secure its long-term regional interests…. Unlike the Arabs, Jews are reliable and do comply with agreements…. The British policy in the Middle East bets on the wrong horse, when appeasing the Arabs….”

While Britain ignored Meinertzhgen’s assessment, and lost its power projection in the Middle East and beyond, the US has recognized Israel’s role as a unique force and dollar multipliernot a foreign aid recipient, but a beneficiary of a highly-appreciated US investment, which generates a staggering annual Return-on-Investment.

 

Yoram Ettinger

Source: https://theettingerreport.com/israel-intelligence-bounty-for-the-usa/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

“Palestinian holocaust" lie a "winning card” - for Palestinian Authority - Aharon David

 

by Aharon David

Hamas seeks to increase number of dead Gazans and steals aid to create "starvation" narrative against Israel, and PA joins in selling false victimhood to the world

 

  • Fatah Central Committee Secretary Jibril Rajoub: The Oct. 7 war "is the Palestinian holocaust, and this is the winning card"
  • Senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad: "The whole world has begun to act against Israel... Who [would have] imagined... that Israel is now accused of genocide and ethnic cleansing?"
  • Hamas seeks to increase number of dead Gazans and steals aid to create "starvation" narrative against Israel, and PA joins in selling false victimhood to the world

The Palestinian leadership is keenly aware that the strongest weapon in their arsenal against Israel in the Oct. 7 war is false victimhood, and that their challenge is to effectively play this "Palestinian holocaust Card "– "the winning card," as a senior Fatah official recently called it.

Both Hamas and the PA play a key role in this dirty tactic. Hamas actively seeks to increase the number of dead Gazans in order to "inflame public opinion" against Israel, as was exposed by Fatah TV. It also murders Gazans seeking food so as to maintain its monopoly over the vast quantities of humanitarian aid that it steals, thereby creating a narrative of "starvation." The PA then runs with this manufactured humanitarian crisis and sells this "Palestinian holocaust" to the world as being Israel's fault, in order to delegitimize Israel's defensive war through feigned victimhood.

One of the top Fatah leaders, Fatah Central Committee Secretary Jibril Rajoub, made this message very explicit on official PA TV when he called to exploit "the Palestinian holocaust... the winning card":

Click to play

 

Fatah Central Committee Secretary Jibril Rajoub: "We the Palestinians, what is happening to us and what has happened to us for two years [in the Gaza war], and in fact it has been happening for 77 years [since Israel's creation] – but today the world is convinced of it. This is the Palestinian holocaust, and this is the winning card that we need to know how to use."

[Official PA TV, Topic of the Day, Aug. 5, 2025]

Rajoub asserted that in the past two years of war the world has become "convinced" of Palestinian victimhood, and he emphasized the need to exploit this. Indeed, the PA has been trying to manipulate anti-Israel bias in various ways, including by pushing lawfare actions against Israel at the International Criminal Court (ICC). Palestinian Media Watch recently exposed these actions that violate American law in a report sent to the US State Department, and in response the US announced sanctions against PLO and PA members.

Aside from the PA led by Fatah, Hamas itself has been cynically pushing a narrative of victimhood. Hamas, which started the current war with a horrific massacre and continues to hold Israeli hostages in horrific conditions, also recognizes that the world has eagerly gobbled up the demonization against Israel's defensive war in Gaza.

The Oct. 7 massacre has brought various boons to the Palestinians, according to senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad. One of the main results listed by Hamad is the demonization of Israel on the world stage, which has come about through the extensive Palestinian victimhood campaign:

Click to play

Senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad: "The whole world believed that the occupation state (i.e., Israel) is a democratic, beautiful, oppressed, and persecuted state. Today I think that the whole world believes that this mask has fallen from Israel's face. The whole world has begun to act against Israel. The marches and rallies that are now in America, Britain, France, and Germany all speak of genocide. Who [would have] imagined that today occupation state [Israeli] Prime Minister [Benjamin Netanyahu] is wanted by the International Criminal Court? And that even its [Israeli Army] Chief of Staff (sic., former Israeli Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant) is wanted by the ICC? And that Israel is now accused of genocide and ethnic cleansing? All these things have exposed Israel."

[Al-Jazeera TV Live website, Aug. 2, 2025; Al-Jazeera TV Live, YouTube channel, Aug. 3, 2025]

In celebrating the so-called achievements of the Oct. 7 massacre, Hamad singled out the false accusations of "genocide and ethnic cleansing." These accusations are part of the Palestinian victimhood narrative – a narrative that has no basis in fact of course, as the population of Gaza has actually grown during the alleged "genocide."

But according to Hamad, by playing the victim card in the current war, the Palestinians have started the "collapse" of Israel, as he asserted in the same interview:

Ghazi Hamad: "In this war against the occupation on Oct. 7, the countdown to the collapse of the occupation state began, and I believe it has already entered a stage of collapse."

[Al-Jazeera TV Live website, Aug. 2, 2025; Al-Jazeera TV Live, YouTube channel, Aug. 3, 2025]

Given the number of Western states pledging to recognize "Palestine" as a state following Oct. 7, and the arms embargo on Israel recently announced by Germany, it seems the Palestinian strategy of playing the "winning" holocaust card has indeed been working. It remains to be seen if and when the world will stop being a tool of Palestinian terror organizations.

The following are longer excerpts of the items above and additional information:

Senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad: "I want to tell you, look now at [PA] President Mahmoud Abbas. For more than 10 years no one has talked with him about the two-state solution, nor about the one-state solution, and not even about supporting the PA. They only talk about humanitarian aid to the PA. I want to say clearly: The weapons and resistance have sown in the Palestinian land and among the Palestinian people a kind of freedom and a sense of essence and human value. The weapons have also caused great damage to the occupation (i.e., Israel). I tell you now that Oct. 7, [2023] (i.e., Hamas' invasion and massacre to launch its terror war on Israel; see note below), this strong blow that was dealt to Israel, I believe it brought about three very great historic achievements. First, it brought back the Palestinian cause. Let me just give you an example: Why do all the states now recognize Palestine? Before Oct. 7, was there a state that dared to recognize the State of Palestine? ...Now the results of Oct. 7 are what caused the whole world to open its eyes to the Palestinian cause and to act on it with strength. The Palestinian people deserve a state and yearn for freedom. Secondly, the whole world believed that the occupation state is a democratic, beautiful, oppressed, and persecuted state. Today I think that the whole world believes that this mask has fallen from Israel's face. The whole world has begun to act against Israel. The marches and rallies that are now in America, Britain, France, and Germany all speak of genocide. Who [would have] imagined that today occupation state [Israeli] Prime Minister [Benjamin Netanyahu] is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC; see note below -Ed.)? And that even its [Israeli Army] Chief of Staff (sic., former Israeli Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant) is wanted by the ICC? And that Israel is now accused of genocide and ethnic cleansing? All these things have exposed Israel. Thirdly, I clearly think that those who thought it was difficult to defeat Israel, [see that] today it has become the easiest thing…

In this war against the occupation on Oct. 7, the countdown to the collapse of the occupation state began, and I believe it has already entered a stage of collapse."

[Al-Jazeera TV Live website, Aug. 2, 2025; Al-Jazeera TV Live, YouTube channel, Aug. 3, 2025]

                                                        ***

Hamas October 7 War on Israel:

Over 1,100 Israelis, including over 800 civilians, were murdered and over 5,000 wounded, in addition to approximately 251 who were abducted into the Gaza Strip (including 154 later released or liberated - among them 37 whose bodies were retrieved - and at least 41 who were killed on Oct. 7 whose bodies were abducted to Gaza), in a Hamas terror war that began when approximately 3,000 Hamas terrorists and thousands of Gazan civilians broke through Israel's security fence at the Gaza Strip border and launched a surprise attack, taking control of several Israeli towns and attacking a music festival on the Jewish holiday of Simchat Torah, which fell on the Sabbath, Oct. 7, 2023. During the massacre the terrorists tortured, raped, shot, beheaded, and burned their victims alive, murdering entire families and leaving at least 21 children without parents. Hamas terrorists also fired at least 5,000 rockets at Israeli population centers. In response, Israel launched Operation Iron Swords to counter the Hamas terror threat. Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon joined Hamas' terror war starting from the following day, attacking Israel from the north. Frequent rocket launches, drone attacks, and shootings continued from Lebanon throughout the war, causing Israel to respond with a ground invasion of southern Lebanon on Oct. 1, 2024, after taking out Hezbollah's leadership. In this conflict with Hezbollah over 40 Israeli civilians and over 70 Israeli soldiers were killed and nearly 200 Israelis were wounded. As a result of the attacks from Gaza and Lebanon, roughly 200,000 Israeli residents of the north and south were internally displaced during the war. A ceasefire and prisoner exchange deal began on Nov. 24, 2023, in which Israel agreed to release 150 terrorist prisoners, pause drone surveillance in the Gaza Strip, and allow movement between the northern and southern Gaza Strip, in return for 50 Israeli female and child hostages held by Hamas. The deal was subsequently extended with additional releases, until Hamas violated the agreement and resumed attacking on Dec. 1, 2023. A second ceasefire and prisoner exchange deal began to be implemented on Jan. 19, 2025. Hamas was to gradually release 23 hostages and 10 bodies of hostages, out of the remaining 98 hostages. In return, Israel was to gradually release around 1,900 terrorist prisoners including at least 250 terrorist murderers, withdraw its forces from central Gaza and various other strategic areas, increase humanitarian aid entry to Gaza, and allow Arab residents to return to northern Gaza. The first stage of the deal ended on March 1, and after Hamas rejected an Israeli proposal to extend the deal, the fighting resumed.

Jibril Rajoub also serves as Head of the PLO Supreme Council for Youth and Sports, Chairman of the Palestinian Football Association, Chairman of the Palestine Olympic Committee, and Chairman of the Palestinian Scout Association (PSA).
 

ICC arrest warrants against Israeli leaders: 

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants on Nov. 21, 2024 against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant, after ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan filed applications for the warrants on May 20, 2024, accusing them of "criminal responsibility for... war crimes and crimes against humanity committed on the territory of the State of Palestine (in the Gaza Strip)" during the 2023 Gaza war. In the same announcement, Khan had said he was filing applications for warrants against Hamas terror leaders Yahya Sinwar, Muhammad Deif, and Ismail Haniyeh for "war crimes and crimes against humanity." The arrest warrant against Israeli PM Netanyahu constituted the first time the ICC had moved towards an arrest warrant against a Western-backed head of state. Israel rejected the announcement, noting not only the baseless nature of the charges against the Israeli army's conduct and the absurdity of the ICC's comparison between it and Hamas' atrocities in the Oct. 7, 2023 massacre, but also the fact that the ICC has no jurisdiction over Israel because Israel is not a signatory to the Rome Statute that established the ICC. Several European states responded to the announcement by expressing support for or intent of compliance with the ICC position against Israel, including France, Ireland, Germany, Spain, Belgium, and Slovenia. Statement on ICC issuing arrest warrants: https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-state-palestine-icc-pre-trial-chamber-i-rejects-state-israels-challenges Khan's announcement: https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-prosecutor-karim-aa-khan-kc-applications-arrest-warrants-situation-state

 

Aharon David

Source: https://palwatch.org/page/41396

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why Derek Chauvin Will Languish in Prison—Regardless of the Facts - Roger Kimball

 

by Roger Kimball

The George Floyd case shows how America traded the rule of law for the rule of narrative—leaving Derek Chauvin to serve the sentence the storyline demanded.

 

I missed Rachel K. Paulose’s column about George Floyd—sorry, Saint George Floyd—when it appeared in The Spectator World at the end of May. Knowing of my interest in the case, a public-spirited individual brought the column to my attention. I thought it was an appalling regurgitation of the established, but erroneous, narrative about the larcenous, drug-and-woman-abusing miscreant George Floyd and the former police officer primarily involved in his arrest.

Paulose is worried that President Trump might pardon Derek Chauvin, the former policeman who is now rotting away in prison for a long list of federal and state crimes, including multiple counts of murder, manslaughter, and “civil rights deprivation.”

Paulose pretends to be concerned about Donald Trump’s legacy among blacks. He has made such impressive inroads with black voters, she notes. Pity to throw it all away by pardoning someone like Derek Chauvin, a brute who all the world knows callously murdered the noble George Floyd in cold blood by kneeling on his neck and depriving him of oxygen. “President Trump,” she writes, “should respect the verdict of the people and protect his own legacy by rejecting the ignoble calls to absolve the fired officer of his guilt.”

Paulose notes with satisfaction that Trump’s pardon power extends only to federal crimes. To be released from prison, Chauvin would also need to secure a pardon or commutation from the governor of Minnesota. Yes, the governor’s office is overdue for a serious upgrade. Currently, however, the position is held by the great hunter and dispenser of feminine hygiene products in boys’ bathrooms, Tim “Nimrod” Walz. The contingency of Walz granting Chauvin a pardon is, as Jeeves might put it, remote.

I wonder whether Derek Chauvin ran over Paulose’s bicycle when she was a little girl? In her column, she hauls out gigantic hairballs of evidence from Chauvin’s trial to remind readers of what a despicable chap he is. Her most prized evidence comes from Dr. Martin J. Tobin, “an internationally renowned doctor, pulmonologist, and academic” (well then!) who testified that “the cause of Floyd’s death was the position in which Chauvin detained him.” “A healthy person subjected to what Mr. Floyd was subjected to,” quotes Dr. Tobin, “would have died.”

Case closed? Not quite. As I noted in The Spectator in 2021,

Although Chauvin’s restraint looks brutal, it was actually part of the standard Minneapolis police protocol for dealing with persons exhibiting ‘excited delirium,’ a dangerous, often fatal, condition brought about by too much fentanyl with one’s afternoon tea. According to the medical examiner, Chauvin did not appear to have obstructed Floyd’s airway—Floyd would not have been able to speak if he had [and so his famous cries of “I can’t breathe, I can’t breathe” would have been impossible]—and Floyd did not die from strangulation. Bottom line, George Floyd died from the effects of a self-administered drug overdose, effects that might have been exacerbated by his interactions with the police, i.e., his exertions in resisting arrest. For their part, the police were trying to help Floyd. It was they who called the ambulance because they recognized that Floyd was in extremis.

And that’s not all. As I noted here at American Greatness in 2023, Amy Sweasy, a former prosecutor in Hennepin County, Minnesota, where Chauvin and his unfortunate colleagues were tried, threw a large wrench into the narrative Paulose attempted to salvage. You didn’t read about it in The New York Times or The Washington Post. Neither CNN nor MSNBC devoted airtime to the story. But other, less establishment outlets carried the story. Here, for example, is Alpha News, with the eyebrow-raising headline “Court docs reveal ‘extreme’ public pressure on prosecutors in George Floyd case.”

“New court documents,” the story begins, “expose the ‘extreme pressure’ prosecutors faced in Hennepin County to charge Derek Chauvin and three other former Minneapolis police officers in the death of George Floyd. Several attorneys opposed charging the ‘other three’ officers and withdrew from the case due to ‘professional and ethical rules.’”

I’d wager Derek Chauvin found that interesting. But not as interesting as what followed. During her deposition, Sweasy also discussed a revealing conversation she said she had the day after Floyd’s death, when she asked Hennepin County Medical Examiner Dr. Andrew Baker about the autopsy.

“I called Dr. Baker early that morning to tell him about the case and to ask him if he would perform the autopsy on Mr. Floyd,” she explained.

“He called me later in the day on that Tuesday, and he told me that there were no medical findings that showed any injury to the vital structures of Mr. Floyd’s neck. There were no medical indications of asphyxia or strangulation,” Sweasy said, according to the transcript.

“He said to me, ‘Amy, what happens when the actual evidence doesn’t match up with the public narrative that everyone’s already decided on?’ And then he said, ‘This is the kind of case that ends careers.’”

It is worth noting that when he was testifying in court, Andrew Baker told a different tale, opining that Floyd’s death was a homicide.

Which version is true? “No medical indications of asphyxia or strangulation” or “homicide?” There is a difference.

What happens if the whole George Floyd story was a lie and the truth gets out? Nothing. The truth will be ignored, swept under the rug, and discounted utterly. Derek Chauvin, meanwhile, will languish in jail. Floyd’s death required a scapegoat, and Derek Chauvin got the part.

Many people, myself included, like to prattle on about the importance of “the rule of law” and other such nostrums. The case of George Floyd’s demise reminds us that we have been living in a country governed by the rule of narrative, an entirely different dispensation. Rachel Paulose is herself a lawyer, a former U.S. Attorney, in fact. You might think that she would grasp that distinction. But that would be to discount the mesmerizing spell that The Narrative exerts over susceptible spirits. 


Roger Kimball is editor and publisher of The New Criterion and the president and publisher of Encounter Books. He is the author and editor of many books, including The Fortunes of Permanence: Culture and Anarchy in an Age of Amnesia (St. Augustine's Press), The Rape of the Masters (Encounter), Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse (Ivan R. Dee), and Art's Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity (Ivan R. Dee). Most recently, he edited and contributed to Where Next? Western Civilization at the Crossroads (Encounter) and contributed to Against the Great Reset: Eighteen Theses Contra the New World Order (Bombardier).

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/08/10/why-derek-chauvin-will-languish-in-prison-regardless-of-the-facts/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The EU 'Elites', Part I - Robert Williams

 

by Robert Williams

Corruption and Foreign Influence Operations

 

  • [T]he EU organization itself... -- once again –- is at the center of a new corruption scandal....

  • While Huawei has been effectively banned in the US – and has closed all its official and direct lobbying operations in Washington in early 2024 – the company has been free to do its influence peddling in the EU, where it is not banned. China's influence in Europe in a multitude of areas is already highly present...

  • The Belgian raid came roughly two years after the so-called Qatargate: In December 2022, Belgian authorities uncovered the bribery of Members of European Parliament by Qatar...

  • Politico reported on the leaked files, dubbed "the Qatargate files" in December 2023: "The actions recorded in the documents include some with a significant impact on the workings of the European Union — such as scheming to kill off six parliamentary resolutions condemning Qatar's human rights record..."

  • Qatargate is far from over. Trials are only scheduled to begin in late 2025. The EU, therefore, currently has not just one, but two huge corruption scandals on its hands.

  • The president of the unelected European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, in her second term in the position, having first maneuvered her way into this post after serving as a scandal-ridden minister of defense in Germany for many years, is herself under scrutiny in what has become known as "Pfizer-gate"...

  • Qatar has not only bought and invested in large swathes of European real estate, it is also a huge contributing factor to the Islamization of Europe. Qatar funneled -- at an extremely conservative estimate -- at least €71 million (approximately $78 million) to build 140 mosques and Islamic centers in Europe just as of 2014, according to the latest authoritative report on the issue, the 2019 book Qatar Papers by French journalists Christian Chesnot and Georges Malbrunot.

Belgian police raided more than 20 locations in Belgium and Portugal in March in an investigation of alleged "active corruption within the European Parliament," for the benefit of China's tech giant Huawei, according to Belgium's federal prosecutor's office. Huawei's main lobbying office in Brussels was raided, alongside European Parliament offices. (Image source: iStock/Getty Images)

"The European Union is one of the least corrupt regions in the world," boasts the European Commission on its website.

Oh really? Let us take a look at the EU organization itself, which -- once again –- is at the center of a new corruption scandal.

Belgian police raided more than 20 locations in Belgium and Portugal in March in an investigation of alleged "active corruption within the European Parliament," for the benefit of China's tech giant Huawei, according to Belgium's federal prosecutor's office. Huawei's main lobbying office in Brussels was raided, alongside European Parliament offices.

The Chinese company, reportedly tied to China's Communist regime, "allegedly paid bribes to politicians to support its 5G expansion in Europe," according to Euractiv. The investigation has apparently been underway for more than two years. It is not the first place in Europe where authorities have investigated offices and politicians linked to Huawei. In February last year, French authorities raided Huawei's offices in France over alleged accusations of corruption and influence-peddling.

While Huawei has been effectively banned in the US – and has closed all its official and direct lobbying operations in Washington in early 2024 – the company has been free to do its influence peddling in the EU, where it is not banned. China's influence in Europe in a multitude of areas is already highly present, having influenced or co-opted elites all over Europe, according to an October 2021 report by the Strategic Research Institute of France's renowned Military College:

"The Chinese Communist Party has always forged links with politicians from countries whose positions, or at least, whose representations of China, they wished to influence. These practices were also part of the Soviet repertoire of active measures and are among United Front activities."

The recent corruption is all the more remarkable as a top EU official in the European Commission – the unelected executive body of the EU – has unequivocally warned the EU against Chinese influence-peddling. Politico reported in May 2023:

"Beijing has long aimed propaganda at the European Union, seeking to undermine transatlantic unity and promote Beijing's outlook on world affairs, said Ivana Karásková, a Czech academic and foreign influence specialist who's advising European Commission Vice President Věra Jourová.

"Asked what parts of the Continent were most in the dark about Chinese influence, she added: 'The whole of Western Europe is not looking. And yet there are cases that are so blatant.'"

The Belgian raid came roughly two years after the so-called Qatargate: In December 2022, Belgian authorities uncovered the bribery of Members of European Parliament by Qatar – and to some extent Morocco and Mauritania – when they raided 20 addresses in Belgium and Italy, and found €1.5 million cash in suitcases and elsewhere, leading to the arrest of several senior EU officials: Eva Kaili, who was then-vice president of the European Parliament from Greece, and Antonio Panzeri, a former Italian member of the European Parliament who, ironically, heads an NGO by the name Fight Impunity, as well as Niccolò Figà-Talamanca, head of the NGO No Peace Without Justice.

Qatar, it turned out, had been bribing these officials to influence EU legislation and policies in its favor by manipulating decisions in the European Parliament. Panzeri had been receiving bribes from Qatar since 2019 and admitted that he had been pursuing visa-free travel for Qataris in Europe, while Panzeri reportedly received €200,000 from Mauritania's then President Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz to improve the poor image of the country, where slavery is still deeply entrenched.

This is how European Parliament Vice President Eva Kaili lied for Qatar in exchange for the millions in cash to boost the country's image in the face of criticism over letting it host the 2022 FIFA World Cup: "I alone said that Qatar is a front-runner in labor rights, abolishing kafala, introducing minimum wage."

Politico reported on the leaked files, dubbed "the Qatargate files" in December 2023:

"The actions recorded in the documents include some with a significant impact on the workings of the European Union — such as scheming to kill off six parliamentary resolutions condemning Qatar's human rights record, and working to deliver a visa-free travel deal between Doha and the EU.

"But the operations could also be petty... every copy of an unflattering book on Qatar that could be found within the Parliament had been diligently 'destroyed'....

"[M]ore than 300 pieces of work for which the suspects received handsome fees. They allegedly achieved their ends using a network of associates working inside the Parliament, whom they called their 'soldiers,' according to the files."

Qatargate is far from over. Trials are only scheduled to begin in late 2025. The EU, therefore, currently has not just one, but two huge corruption scandals on its hands.

The rot goes straight to the top. The president of the unelected European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, in her second term in the position, having first maneuvered her way into this post after serving as a scandal-ridden minister of defense in Germany for many years, is herself under scrutiny in what has become known as "Pfizer-gate":

During the COVID-19 pandemic, von der Leyen personally negotiated a €20 billion deal with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, paid for with EU taxpayer money, for 1.8 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses. She did this in a rather irregular way, via text messages, but refused to subject these text messages either to parliamentary or public scrutiny, and later claimed they had been lost.

Alexander Fanta, a New York Times reporter to whom the European Commission refused access to the text messages, wrote:

"As an investigative reporter, I filed an access request under the EU's freedom of information law to the messages shared between von der Leyen and Bourla. These messages, if we had them, might provide important insights into how the controversial life-saving vaccines deal came together. They might also help to answer questions such as why the EU became Pfizer's single biggest customer but reportedly paid a much steeper price for this batch of vaccines compared with the first tranche of Covid shots it had bought.

"There is a bigger principle at stake here, too: EU citizens have a right to know what was being negotiated on their behalf during a public health emergency. Did the contract involve too many doses of the vaccine bought at a fixed price, with no scope for a review as the pandemic developed? Did millions of expensive jabs go to waste because of the terms that Bourla secured from a panic-buying Von der Leyen?

"But the commission refused the request to share the messages, claiming that the texts were 'by [their] nature short-lived' and were not covered by the EU's freedom of information law. The commission's secrecy around its communications is so fiercely guarded that it is now defending its refusal to make the texts available in the EU court."

According to Politico, investigators from the European Public Prosecutor's Office are investigating von der Leyen over "interference in public functions, destruction of SMS, corruption and conflict of interest." One European judge called the European Commission's secrecy "bizarre."

These are just the cases of corruption we have heard about.

The corruption, obviously, is apparently not limited to the undemocratic institutions of the EU. Large parts of Europe's elites, including political, academic, media and others, have reportedly also been "bought" by state actors such as China and Qatar. According to Clive Hamilton and Mareike Ohlberg -- authors of Hidden Hand: Exposing How the Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping the World -- China "grooms" elites to do its bidding, especially in places such as the UK (albeit no longer a member of the EU following Brexit) where the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has used the networking group the "48 Group Club" to influence elites, including former government ministers, former British ambassadors to China, leading business people, directors of large cultural institutions and professors:

"No group in Britain enjoys more intimacy and trust with the CCP leadership than the 48 Group Club... [It] has built itself into the most powerful instrument of Beijing's influence and intelligence gathering in the United Kingdom. Reaching into the highest ranks of Britain's political, business, media and university elites, the club plays a decisive role in shaping British attitudes to China... enthusiastically fostering the interests of the CCP in the United Kingdom."

Qatar has not only bought and invested in large swathes of European real estate, it is also a huge contributing factor to the Islamization of Europe. Qatar funneled -- at an extremely conservative estimate -- at least €71 million (approximately $78 million) to build 140 mosques and Islamic centers in Europe just as of 2014, according to the latest authoritative report on the issue, the 2019 book Qatar Papers by French journalists Christian Chesnot and Georges Malbrunot. More than a decade later, that figure is likely to be far higher. How much have European politicians, who do not cease to pander to Islam, received in briberies from Qatar? Are we ever likely to find out?


Robert Williams is based in the United States.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21823/eu-corruption-foreign-influence

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Frenchman Who Challenged Marx - Amir Taheri

 

by Amir Taheri

The current war of tariffs pits Trump as a protectionist inspired by David Ricardo, not to say Marx, against Xi, who has discovered Smith via Bastiat. The duel shows that ideas, too, have a free market and could spread in different directions with different time-spans.

 

  • Chinese President Xi Jinping has introduced a new letter, C for consumer.

  • Twenty years ago, the Chinese were producers, supplying the world with inexpensive products that most citizens of the People's Republic couldn't afford. Today, however, China has the second-largest consumer market after the United States and is set to surpass it in consumer purchasing power parity.

  • Bastiat was not familiar with the modern state structures that have transformed Hobbes's "Leviathan" into a regulating machine in the service of special interests, fashionable ideologies and the cult of the imaginary victim.

  • The current war of tariffs pits Trump as a protectionist inspired by David Ricardo, not to say Marx, against Xi, who has discovered Smith via Bastiat. The duel shows that ideas, too, have a free market and could spread in different directions with different time-spans.

Pictured: A lithograph of a portrait of Frédéric Bastiat from 1848, by Auguste-Hilaire Léveillé. (Image source: National Library of France)

Even long after Deng Xiaoping had led China out of the Marxist impasse created by Mao Zedong, official discourse was always centered on the letter P for Proletariat. The leadership emphasized its legitimacy with reference to the working class, that is to say producer in supply-side economics. From that angle, the producer of surplus value was the focus of economic policy.

In his latest interventions in public debate, however, Chinese President Xi Jinping has introduced a new letter, C for consumer. He has emphasized the need to prioritize the interests of the consumer in shaping the economic strategy of the People's Republic of China.

The switch from P to C reflects the dramatic changes China has experienced in its emergence as a modern global economic powder.

Twenty years ago, the Chinese were producers, supplying the world with inexpensive products that most citizens of the People's Republic couldn't afford. Today, however, China has the second-largest consumer market after the United States and is set to surpass it in consumer purchasing power parity.

While the producer was the focus of policy, it was assumed that improvements in living standards could come only with rising wages and salaries. But taking that route was bound to deprive China of one of its comparative advantages, cheap labor. Rising wages and salaries would make Chinese goods and services more expensive and thus lead to loss or shrinkage of its export markets.

It seems that while Chinese economists were looking for other options, they run into a semi-forgotten 19th century French economist who challenged the rising tide of Marxist economics in his time and its emphasis on the producer of surplus value, that is to say the working class.

The rediscovered French challenger to Karl Marx is Frédéric Bastiat, whose essay "That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Not Seen," was translated into Chinese in 2014 and, according to best information, was read by millions. That was followed by the translation of a collection of speeches that Bastiat had made in his stint as member of France's National Assembly.

It is likely that Xi got hold of Bastiat's writings a decade earlier than he and other Chinese leaders had discovered German Carl Schmitt's treatise on politics.

Schmitt taught Xi about how a state wins legitimacy through success in imposing discipline, ensuring security, offering prosperity and curbing corruption.

For his part, Bastiat taught three things: reducing the state machinery to its smallest size possible, thus allowing the energies of so-called civil society to play a bigger part.

While Marxist economists preached centralized planning and greater state expenditure, Bastiat showed most states that benefitted from the industrial revolution managed to keep the share of the gross domestic product (GDP) controlled by the state to a minimum.

The next thesis Bastiat advanced was that improving the living standards of citizens cannot come only from rising wages and salaries, because that could lead to rising prices through inflation and produce the opposite result. He showed that more than 60 percent of improvements in living standards in Western European industrialized nations in the 19th century came through lowering prices rather than rising wages.

That suggestion led to Bastiat's biggest thesis: the surest way to better lives for all mankind is free trade in a free market economy.

If lower prices are the key to prosperity, producers would need more consumers, that is to say expanding markets, which can foster mass production that brings down costs. In other words, expand the demand and Bob's your uncle.

In his signature satirical manner, in which he argued his theses, Bastiat suggested that the government of the time, concerned with mass unemployment, should, instead of adopting protectionism, burn Paris down and then rebuild it by employing hundreds of thousands and creating an economic boom.

In its most radical form, that thesis would translate into a no-tariffs policy. US President Donald Trump, obviously no fan of Bastiat, says he regards tariffs as the sweetest word in English vocabulary and is determined to dismantle as much of the structure erected by four decades of globalization as possible.

So we are witnessing an unusual spectacle, one in which the leader of a nation that first raised the flag of global free trade for decades, facing the leader of another nation based on Marxist theories of command economics as opponent and supporter of Bastiat's no-tariffs doctrine.

Needless to say, the Bastiat system, though he would have ejected such a phrase, is anti-protectionist.

That the Chinese leaders have discovered Bastiat, the opposite of their former idol Marx, is good news for both China and the world. However, it would be wrong to transform Bastiatism, if one could coin such a shibboleth, into a dogma would be wrong.

Much of what Bastiat asserts in support of free markets, comparative advantage, low tariffs, no protectionism and putting the consumer before the producer is present in Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" and Richard Cobden's "The Big Loaf".

More importantly, Bastiat was not familiar with the modern state structures that have transformed Hobbes's "Leviathan" into a regulating machine in the service of special interests, fashionable ideologies and the cult of the imaginary victim.

Bastiat didn't win the debate even in mid-19th century France, when the Leviathan was certainly not as all-controlling a machine as Chinese state apparatus is today.

The current war of tariffs pits Trump as a protectionist inspired by David Ricardo, not to say Marx, against Xi, who has discovered Smith via Bastiat. The duel shows that ideas, too, have a free market and could spread in different directions with different time-spans.

Gatestone Institute would like to thank the author for his kind permission to reprint this article in slightly different form from Asharq Al-Awsat. He graciously serves as Chairman of Gatestone Europe. 


Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21822/bastiat-marx-challenge

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter