by Nadav Shragai
Is the High
Commissioner of Palestine returning to the land of Israel? While the
British left the land a long time ago, European Union foreign policy
chief Catherine Ashton, who is British, hasn't ceased to worry over,
keep an eye on, and condemn us — all because of the decision to renew
construction in Jerusalem.
For years Ashton and
her associates pressured us to accept reality, to face the facts and to
recognize the Palestinians' right to a state. Ultimately, and to the
chagrin of many Israelis, even Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu came to
terms with the idea.
Now, Miss Ashton, it is
your turn. It's about time that you and your colleagues face reality.
The Jerusalem you are talking about today is much different than that of
45 years ago, which seems to still be stuck in your heads. This city,
part of the Jewish genome, is not up for debate, first and foremost
because of the continuous Jewish connection to it throughout the ages
and our rights of primogeniture over the city (which has never been an
Arab political or cultural capital).
Beyond these factors,
though, you should take a few other facts into account: The area you are
accustomed to calling "east Jerusalem," in other words, the area north
and south and east of the Green Line that split the city in half during
the Jordanian occupation, is home today to some 200,000 Jews comprising
41 percent of all the residents living in this area. Eighty-five percent
of the 295,000 Arabs in east Jerusalem were born after 1967 into the
reality of a united Jerusalem under Israeli governance, and were never
exposed to the reality of a divided city.
They are extremely
fearful of Palestinian Authority rule and the division of the city. Tens
of thousands of them voted with their feet by crossing the security
barrier in north Jerusalem over to the Israeli side, to remain inside
the united city. Additional tens of thousands have said in surveys that
they will do the same thing if the city is once again divided.
Israel has made
mistakes in Jerusalem, but it has also done many good things: The health
care system in Jerusalem serves both populations, as does Hebrew
University, the Roads Authority, public transportation, shopping malls,
electricity grids, telephone wires and the sewage system. The
neighborhoods themselves are also intertwined. Even the barriers between
the different quarters in the Old City are increasingly blurred. Jews
live in the Muslim Quarter; Muslims live in the Christian Quarter. In
contrast to the period under Jordanian rule, the holy sites are open to
everyone. The only such restriction is against Jews — on the Temple
Mount.
When you mention
neighborhoods in Jerusalem, you must be accurate: In Beit Tzafafa, a
village divided by fences and walls that separated Jordan and Israel,
residents today say thanks on a daily basis that the walls have come
down, despite the discrimination they suffer. Isawiya, which your
spokespeople occasionally refer to as "east Jerusalem," was part of the
Israeli Mount Scopus enclave until 1967.
But aside from "little" details
such as these, you should write this down for yourselves: Dividing
Jerusalem is not only impossible, it also contradicts the wills of the
majority of the city's residents, Jewish and Arab alike.
Nadav Shragai
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=3092
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
2 comments:
Wonderful post!
Excellent: It's important that Israel statesmen & diplomats reiterate the same message.
Anyway, the whole idea was ridiculous. I remember the joy & celebrations when the Berlin Wall came down & the city was re-united. Has v'Shalom would there be a time of celebration over DIVIDING a living city. Unfortunately, the Barrrrrrennnness Ashgrove & her fellow dimwits believe their own mantras thru' reciting them so often.
Post a Comment