by Abraham Ben-Zvi
While rumors of the
impending doom of the American era are premature, signs of the erosion
of the country's superpower status will continue to be apparent in the
coming year. The long-term Chinese threat to America's military,
economic and scientific hegemony won't become an imminent one in 2013,
but there is an obvious contrast in the strategic conduct of the two
main axes of the international system and this will continue to shape
the actions of both countries in the next year.
While China continues
to demonstrate assertiveness and belligerence in its part of the world,
the U.S. is reducing its overseas commitments. It seems that after
nearly a decade of exhausting military action in Iraq, the American
pendulum has swung toward a focus on domestic affairs. At the same time,
American eyes are looking at the approaching deadline for the U.S.
military to end its presence in Afghanistan, as well as at other areas
of violent crisis. The U.S. is expected to maintain a "low-profile"
policy, characterized by extreme caution and an avoidance, as much as
possible, of initiating military operations.
Beyond economic
constraints and U.S. President Barack Obama's desire to break the legacy
of George W. Bush regarding the use of force, the issue of the
problematic management of America's power will be prominent in 2013.
This issue may overshadow American ability to flex its muscles in a
world rich with complex and intertwined relationships and give greater
leeway to other powers, including China and Russia. Essentially, the
weakness of American leadership can be attributed to Obama's
surroundings and it reflects a political and social situation rife with
division. How can we expect the White House to manage defense and
foreign affairs issues in an authoritative and effective manner at a
time when the president is being forced to conduct marathon discussions
with a recalcitrant House of Representatives as the danger of a grave
economic crisis prompted by the fiscal cliff looms?
Just like during the
debt ceiling crisis in the summer of 2011, Obama is once again
displaying complacency and indifference, as well as sluggish response
skills. With Obama's ongoing inability to enlist a majority of the House
of Representatives to pass basic legislative measures that are
necessary to maintain the recovery process from the recent economic
crisis, it will be difficult for the U.S. government to play a leading
role in dealing with the other strategic challenges that await it.
Obama is about to start
his second term bruised and scarred from an exhausting battle (whatever
the result may be) with his domestic rivals. Obama will find it very
difficult to lead the global ship to safe shores, as it is being
buffeted by violent storms (i.e., Syria), strategic threats (i.e., Iran)
and severe economic crises (i.e., Europe).
Abraham Ben-Zvi
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=3150
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
1 comment:
America will only be able to lead the world again, when we replace this anti-America, pro-Islam president with someone who actually LOVES America, and stands with God and not Allah! THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE!!
Post a Comment