by Rebecca Smith
SAN JOSE, Calif.—The attack began
just before 1 a.m. on April 16 last year, when someone slipped into an
underground vault not far from a busy freeway and cut telephone cables.
Within
half an hour, snipers opened fire on a nearby electrical substation.
Shooting for 19 minutes, they surgically knocked out 17 giant
transformers that funnel power to Silicon Valley. A minute before a
police car arrived, the shooters disappeared into the night.
A sniper attack on a power substation raised fears that
the country's power grid is vulnerable to terrorism. Net-A-Porter
launches a fashion magazine. Why airlines can change plans but customers
can't. Photo: Talia Herman for The Wall Street Journal
With over 160,000 miles of transmission lines, the U.S.
power grid is designed to handle natural and man-made disasters, as well
as fluctuations in demand. How does the system work? WSJ's Jason
Bellini has #TheShortAnswer.
To avoid a blackout, electric-grid
officials rerouted power around the site and asked power plants in
Silicon Valley to produce more electricity. But it took utility workers
27 days to make repairs and bring the substation back to life.
Nobody has been arrested or charged in the attack at
PG&E Corp.'s
PCG -0.23%
Metcalf transmission substation. It is an incident of which few
Americans are aware. But one former federal regulator is calling it a
terrorist act that, if it were widely replicated across the country,
could take down the U.S. electric grid and black out much of the
country.
The attack was "the most
significant incident of domestic terrorism involving the grid that has
ever occurred" in the U.S., said
Jon Wellinghoff,
who was chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at
the time.
The Wall Street Journal
assembled a chronology of the Metcalf attack from filings PG&E made
to state and federal regulators; from other documents including a video
released by the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department; and from
interviews, including with Mr. Wellinghoff.
The 64-year-old Nevadan, who was appointed to FERC in 2006 by President
George W. Bush
and stepped down in November, said he gave closed-door,
high-level briefings to federal agencies, Congress and the White House
last year. As months have passed without arrests, he said, he has grown
increasingly concerned that an even larger attack could be in the works.
He said he was going public about the incident out of concern that
national security is at risk and critical electric-grid sites aren't
adequately protected.
The Federal Bureau
of Investigation doesn't think a terrorist organization caused the
Metcalf attack, said a spokesman for the FBI in San Francisco.
Investigators are "continuing to sift through the evidence," he said.
Some
people in the utility industry share Mr. Wellinghoff's concerns,
including a former official at PG&E, Metcalf's owner, who told an
industry gathering in November he feared the incident could have been a
dress rehearsal for a larger event.
"This
wasn't an incident where Billy-Bob and Joe decided, after a few
brewskis, to come in and shoot up a substation,"
Mark Johnson,
retired vice president of transmission for PG&E, told the
utility security conference, according to a video of his presentation.
"This was an event that was well thought out, well planned and they
targeted certain components." When reached, Mr. Johnson declined to
comment further.
A spokesman for
PG&E said the company takes all incidents seriously but declined to
discuss the Metcalf event in detail for fear of giving information to
potential copycats. "We won't speculate about the motives" of the
attackers, added the spokesman, Brian Swanson. He said PG&E has
increased security measures.
Utility executives and federal energy
officials have long worried that the electric grid is vulnerable to
sabotage. That is in part because the grid, which is really three
systems serving different areas of the U.S., has failed when small
problems such as trees hitting transmission lines created cascading
blackouts. One in 2003 knocked out power to 50 million people in the
Eastern U.S. and Canada for days.
Many
of the system's most important components sit out in the open, often in
remote locations, protected by little more than cameras and chain-link
fences.
Transmission substations are
critical links in the grid. They make it possible for electricity to
move long distances, and serve as hubs for intersecting power lines.
Within
a substation, transformers raise the voltage of electricity so it can
travel hundreds of miles on high-voltage lines, or reduce voltages when
electricity approaches its destination. The Metcalf substation functions
as an off-ramp from power lines for electricity heading to homes and
businesses in Silicon Valley.
The
country's roughly 2,000 very large transformers are expensive to build,
often costing millions of dollars each, and hard to replace. Each is
custom made and weighs up to 500,000 pounds, and "I can only build 10
units a month," said
Dennis Blake,
general manager of Pennsylvania Transformer in Pittsburgh, one of
seven U.S. manufacturers. The utility industry keeps some spares on
hand.
A 2009 Energy Department report
said that "physical damage of certain system components (e.g.
extra-high-voltage transformers) on a large scale…could result in
prolonged outages, as procurement cycles for these components range from
months to years."
Mr. Wellinghoff said a
FERC analysis found that if a surprisingly small number of U.S.
substations were knocked out at once, that could destabilize the system
enough to cause a blackout that could encompass most of the U.S.
Not
everyone is so pessimistic.
Gerry Cauley,
chief executive of the North America Electric Reliability Corp., a
standards-setting group that reports to FERC, said he thinks the grid
is more resilient than Mr. Wellinghoff fears.
"I
don't want to downplay the scenario he describes," Mr. Cauley said.
"I'll agree it's possible from a technical assessment." But he said that
even if several substations went down, the vast majority of people
would have their power back in a few hours.
The
utility industry has been focused on Internet attacks, worrying that
hackers could take down the grid by disabling communications and
important pieces of equipment. Companies have reported 13 cyber
incidents in the past three years, according to a Wall Street Journal
analysis of emergency reports utilities file with the federal
government. There have been no reports of major outages linked to these
events, although companies have generally declined to provide details.
"A
lot of people in the electric industry have been distracted by
cybersecurity threats," said
Stephen Berberich,
chief executive of the California Independent System Operator,
which runs much of the high-voltage transmission system for the
utilities. He said that physical attacks pose a "big, if not bigger"
menace.
There were 274 significant
instances of vandalism or deliberate damage in the three years, and more
than 700 weather-related problems, according to the Journal's analysis.
Until
the Metcalf incident, attacks on U.S. utility equipment were mostly
linked to metal thieves, disgruntled employees or bored hunters, who
sometimes took potshots at small transformers on utility poles to see
what happens. (Answer: a small explosion followed by an outage.)
Last
year, an Arkansas man was charged with multiple attacks on the power
grid, including setting fire to a switching station. He has pleaded not
guilty and is undergoing a psychiatric evaluation, according to federal
court records.
Overseas, terrorist
organizations were linked to 2,500 attacks on transmission lines or
towers and at least 500 on substations from 1996 to 2006, according to a
January report from the Electric Power Research Institute, an
industry-funded research group, which cited State Department data.
An attack on a PG&E substation near San Jose,
Calif., in April knocked out 17 transformers like this one.
Talia Herman for The Wall Street Journal
To some, the Metcalf incident has
lifted the discussion of serious U.S. grid attacks beyond the
theoretical. "The breadth and depth of the attack was unprecedented" in
the U.S., said
Rich Lordan,
senior technical executive for the Electric Power Research
Institute. The motivation, he said, "appears to be preparation for an
act of war."
The attack lasted slightly less than an hour, according to the chronology assembled by the Journal.
At
12:58 a.m., AT&T fiber-optic telecommunications cables were cut—in a
way that made them hard to repair—in an underground vault near the
substation, not far from U.S. Highway 101 just outside south San Jose.
It would have taken more than one person to lift the metal vault cover,
said people who visited the site.
Nine minutes later, some customers of
Level 3 Communications,
LVLT +10.70%
an Internet service provider, lost service. Cables in its vault near the Metcalf substation were also cut.
At
1:31 a.m., a surveillance camera pointed along a chain-link fence
around the substation recorded a streak of light that investigators from
the Santa Clara County Sheriff's office think was a signal from a waved
flashlight. It was followed by the muzzle flash of rifles and sparks
from bullets hitting the fence.
The
substation's cameras weren't aimed outside its perimeter, where the
attackers were. They shooters appear to have aimed at the transformers'
oil-filled cooling systems. These began to bleed oil, but didn't
explode, as the transformers probably would have done if hit in other
areas.
About six minutes after the
shooting started, PG&E confirms, it got an alarm from motion sensors
at the substation, possibly from bullets grazing the fence, which is
shown on video.
Four minutes later, at
1:41 a.m., the sheriff's department received a 911 call about gunfire,
sent by an engineer at a nearby power plant that still had phone
service.
Riddled with bullet holes, the
transformers leaked 52,000 gallons of oil, then overheated. The first
bank of them crashed at 1:45 a.m., at which time PG&E's control
center about 90 miles north received an equipment-failure alarm.
Five
minutes later, another apparent flashlight signal, caught on film,
marked the end of the attack. More than 100 shell casings of the sort
ejected by AK-47s were later found at the site.
At
1:51 a.m., law-enforcement officers arrived, but found everything
quiet. Unable to get past the locked fence and seeing nothing
suspicious, they left.
A PG&E worker, awakened by the utility's control center at 2:03 a.m., arrived at 3:15 a.m. to survey the damage.
Grid
officials routed some power around the substation to keep the system
stable and asked customers in Silicon Valley to conserve electricity.
In
a news release, PG&E said the substation had been hit by vandals.
It has since confirmed 17 transformers were knocked out.
Mr.
Wellinghoff, then chairman of FERC, said that after he heard about the
scope of the attack, he flew to California, bringing with him experts
from the U.S. Navy's Dahlgren Surface Warfare Center in Virginia, which
trains Navy SEALs. After walking the site with PG&E officials and
FBI agents, Mr. Wellinghoff said, the military experts told him it
looked like a professional job.
In
addition to fingerprint-free shell casings, they pointed out small piles
of rocks, which they said could have been left by an advance scout to
tell the attackers where to get the best shots.
"They said it was a targeting package just like they would put together for an attack," Mr. Wellinghoff said.
Mr.
Wellinghoff, now a law partner at Stoel Rives LLP in San Francisco,
said he arranged a series of meetings in the following weeks to let
other federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security,
know what happened and to enlist their help. He held a closed-door
meeting with utility executives in San Francisco in June and has
distributed lists of things utilities should do to strengthen their
defenses.
A spokesman for Homeland
Security said it is up to utilities to protect the grid. The
department's role in an emergency is to connect federal agencies and
local police and facilitate information sharing, the spokesman said.
As
word of the attack spread through the utility industry, some companies
moved swiftly to review their security efforts. "We're looking at things
differently now," said
Michelle Campanella,
an FBI veteran who is director of security for
Consolidated Edison Inc.
ED -0.16%
in New York. For example, she said, Con Ed changed the angles of
some of its 1,200 security cameras "so we don't have any blind spots."
Some of the legislators Mr. Wellinghoff briefed are calling for action. Rep.
Henry Waxman
(D., Calif.) mentioned the incident at a FERC oversight hearing
in December, saying he was concerned that no one in government can order
utilities to improve grid protections or to take charge in an
emergency.
As for Mr. Wellinghoff, he
said he has made something of a hobby of visiting big substations to
look over defenses and see whether he is questioned by security details
or local police. He said he typically finds easy access to fence lines
that are often close to important equipment.
"What keeps me awake at night is a physical attack that could take down the grid," he said. "This is a huge problem."
—Tom McGinty contributed to this article.
Rebecca Smith at rebecca.smith@wsj.com
Source: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304851104579359141941621778
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment