by Rafael Medoff
JNS.org – Secretary of State John Kerry’s remark last week that it is a “mistake” to insist that the Palestinian Authority recognize Israel as a Jewish state brings to mind a little-known episode in the early 1950s, when the Eisenhower administration briefly embraced the notion that Israel should stop identifying itself as a Jewish state.
The key figure in this unusual
chapter in U.S.-Israel relations was a young U.S. Army officer named
Henry A. Byroade, who in 1952 was picked by President Harry Truman to be
Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, although he had
no Middle East-related experience or education.
According to a previously
unpublished interview with Byroade in the files of the Truman
Presidential Library, in Missouri, the president summoned Byroade for a
discussion in late 1952, shortly before he left office. “I was very
critical of both the policies of Israel and our policy towards Israel,”
Byroade recalled. “And he outlined his view[s] for me, which really were
very surprisingly similar my own. I left there extremely encouraged
that we would get White House backing for what I called an even-handed,
balanced policy position between both Arabs and Israel.”
Bryoade reasoned that if
Truman, who had received considerable Jewish support, was ready to back
away from Israel, then his successor Dwight Eisenhower, who had much
weaker ties to American Jewry, would be even less supportive of Israel.
And he was right.
In April 1953, Israeli Foreign
Minister Moshe Sharett visited Washington and got a first-hand taste of
how Byroade was reshaping U.S. policy. Byroade demanded that Israel
make territorial concessions to the Arabs, and threatened Sharett that
the Eisenhower administration would present “our own peace plan,” which
Israel might not like.
On the same day Byroade met
with Sharett, two leaders of the anti-Zionist American Council for
Judaism (ACJ) met with President Dwight Eisenhower. The Council had
provoked tremendous controversy with its lobbying in the 1940s against
creation of a Jewish state. What is not widely realized is that even
after Israel was established, the Council continued its activities and,
in fact, had even more impact on U.S. policy than previously.
ACJ officials Lessing Rosenwald and George Levison urged the president to consider American Jews a purely religious group with no obligations to Israel. They also denounced the idea of American Jewish immigration to Israel and said the Israelis should become “Middle Eastern” like their neighbors. Levison came away from the meeting convinced that Eisenhower was “in general agreement with our views.”
Afterwards, they visited the State Department and delivered a memorandum making the same points. Assistant Secretary Byroade took the memo with him when he accompanied Secretary of State John Foster Dulles to Israel in May. Parts of the ACJ memo found their way into a landmark Mideast policy speech, ghostwritten by Byroade, that Dulles delivered in June.
Dulles vowed to improve
relations with the Arabs, said the U.S. would not become “a backer of
expansionist Zionism,” and proposed that Jerusalem be ruled by “the
world religious community,” and not be Israel’s capital. Challenging
Israel’s identity, Dulles declared that Israel “should become a part of
the Near East community and cease to look upon itself… as alien to this
community.”
Jewish leaders hoped the
speech did not represent a shift in U.S. policy, but those hopes were
soon dashed. When the Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Abba Eban met with
Dulles in October, the secretary ticked off a lift of demands that
Byroade had prepared for him: Israel must “re-examine its policy of
encouraging large-scale immigration,” refrain from counter-terror raids,
and “bear her share of the Arab refugee burden.”
By the spring of 1954, Byroade
was ready to go public. Sixty years ago next month (on April 19, 1954),
in an address to the World Affairs Council, in Dayton, he called on
Israelis to “look upon yourselves as a Middle Eastern state, rather than
as a headquarters… of a world-wide grouping of people of a particular
religious faith.” He also demanded that Israel “drop the attitude of the
conqueror” and halt what he called “retaliatory killings.”
Then, with the approval of
Secretary Dulles, Byroade delivered the keynote address at the ACJ’s
annual convention, in Philadelphia on May 1. His public association with
the anti-Zionist group appalled Jewish leaders. And what he said at
the conference was even worse.
Byroade repeated his demand
that Israel become “a Middle Eastern state.” He targeted Jewish
immigration to Israel as a central obstacle to peace, asserting that
Israel’s calls for “greatly expanded immigration” convinced the Arabs
that it was planning “a future attempt at territorial expansion.”
The Israeli government filed
an official protest against the “unjustified interference in matters
which are purely Israel’s own concern.” American Zionist leader Emanuel
Neumann blasted “Byroadeism” for “negating the hopes and dreams and the
religious emotions of countless generations.” In a dramatic
demonstration of Israel’s commitment to aliyah, keynote speakers at 19
different government-sponsored Israel Independence Day events throughout
Israel the following week focused their remarks on the need for
increased immigration.
The Eisenhower administration
stood by Byroade and his comments. But the controversial policy he was
shaping soon withered in the face of Arab intransigence. As Byroade
discovered during his subsequent stint as U.S. ambassador in Cairo, Arab
leaders such as Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser could not be appeased by
Israeli concessions on immigration, territory, or refugees. Their
unflinching refusal to accept Israel’s existence made it impossible for
the Byroade line to be maintained as America’s Mideast policy in the
years to follow.
Source: http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/03/20/the-state-department%E2%80%99s-campaign-against-the-%E2%80%98jewish-state%E2%80%99-idea%E2%80%94in-1954/
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment