by Boaz Bismuth
Seeing as how some people have chosen (through their political campaign and through our media) to turn the emerging deal with Iran into a political matter, we have witnessed in recent weeks a debate that is entirely black or white. However, only days before Netanyahu's arrival in Washington, it has become clear that the reality is different.
"There are few national
 security priorities for our country more important than preventing Iran
 from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and any agreement that seeks to do 
this must include Congress having a say on the front end." Those words 
were uttered by Republican Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, but his 
sentiments are shared by a significant group of senators -- from both 
parties -- who have proposed a new bill aimed at preventing the emerging
 deal with Iran from bypassing Congress.
Could it be that some 
people in the U.S. are also worried about a bad deal being signed? Could
 it be that on Capitol Hill there are Democratic senators who agree with
 Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu? Could it be that in Washington, too,
 there are those who do not particularly trust the administration on the
 nuclear issue?
Seeing as how some 
people have chosen (through their political campaign and through our 
media) to turn the emerging deal with Iran into a political matter, we 
have witnessed in recent weeks a debate that is entirely black or white.
 However, only days before Netanyahu's arrival in Washington, it has 
become clear that the reality is different.
Senators Robert 
Menendez (New Jersey), Tim Kaine (Virginia), Joe Donnelly (Indiana), 
Heidi Heitkamp (North Dakota) and Bill Nelson (Florida) are all 
Democrats. This didn't stop them, over the past few days, from joining 
their Republican colleagues Bob Corker, Marco Rubio (Florida), John 
McCain (Arizona) and Jim Risch (Idaho) in the goal of obligating Obama 
to pass his Iran deal through Congress and allow for a timeframe of 60 
days to examine the administration's request to lift the economic 
sanctions imposed on Iran, voted for by the Senate in an overwhelming 
majority of 99 senators in 2010.
Even the Independent 
representative in the group, Sen. Angus King of Maine, is a former 
Democrat. The initiative only proves that across the ocean as well, 
folks are nervous about a bad deal. Perhaps it is time for us to 
understand that making the Iran issue a political flashpoint merely 
plays into Iran's hands.
It would have been 
preferable for the U.S. president and Israeli prime minister to share 
the same worldview about events currently transpiring in the Middle 
East. This is not the case, but we need to remember that the United 
States and Israel have not only differences, but share mutual interests 
as well -- and that Israel-U.S. ties are not only governmental, but also
 predicated on the warm relationship between peoples and lawmakers. 
"The American people 
and both parties in Congress have always stood with Israel and nothing, 
and no one, could get in the way," House Speaker John Boehner said last 
week.
Yes, in Washington 
there are also those who see Netanyahu's upcoming visit to Capitol Hill 
in a negative light, including President Barack Obama and his deputy, 
Vice President Joe Biden, who will not attend the speech. It's a shame 
it has come to this, but we must remind the Israel-friendly American 
administration that Netanyahu's speech is not "destructive," as National
 Security Adviser Susan Rice was quoted as saying. What is "destructive"
 is a bad deal with Iran. And this time it is not only destructive to 
diplomatic relations, is it simply destructive to Israel.
The time has come, 
perhaps, to go back to the essentials of this story: Tomorrow the same 
Susan Rice, along with U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power, is 
expected to address the AIPAC Conference and lay out the 
administration's principles on the deal. Meanwhile, Democratic senators 
are joining the initiative to force Obama to consider the views of 
Congress, which now has some teeth.
This is perhaps the time to 
return to sanity on this issue and understand, like those Democratic 
senators, that the danger does not lie in Netanyahu's speech but in a 
bad deal with the ayatollahs.
                    Boaz Bismuth
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=11749
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment