by Yoav Limor
The Syrian response was probably a test of the strength of the border against Israel
There is no doubt that the anti-aircraft missiles fired at
Israeli Air Force aircraft overnight Monday were neither random nor a
decision made locally. The launchers that fired them are located near
Damascus, and the use of them requires orders from high up, possibly
even from Syrian President Bashar Assad himself.
The timeline of the
incident leads to a similar conclusion. The missiles were fired a few
minutes after the Israeli strike, so as not to endanger the air force
aircraft, which were about to land, but not long enough after it to have
allowed for a series of consultations and green lights. Thus, we can
assume that the people manning the launcher had pre-approval to respond
"the next time" Israel were to strike in Syria. Early Tuesday morning
just such a strike was carried out, and the launcher fired back.
The Syrian response was
probably a test of the strength of the border against Israel. After
five and a half years of civil war, in which the Damascus regime has
been concerned about keeping itself in power and Israel enjoyed a
supposedly free hand to operate in Syria -- which according to foreign
news reports has been used to carry out a multitude of airstrikes and
operations, for which Israel did not take responsibility -- Assad now
feels relatively at ease. The liberation of territory held by the Syrian
rebels and the Islamic State group, along with the Russian-American
agreement that removed the immediate threat of his being ousted from
power, have given Assad enough confidence to send a signal to Israel.
At this state, it's
just a small sign that does not indicate that escalation is on the way.
Syria, like Israel, has no interest in a war or a violent clash, and it
is unlikely to up its responses in the foreseeable future so as to avoid
a miscalculation. Assad will direct his efforts toward retaking
territory, in the hope of (although the chances are slim) regaining full
power over the country.
The mortar strikes on
Israeli territory are part of that effort -- the mortars are fired over
the rebels on the Syrian Golan and cross the border fence. There were 69
such incidents in 2014. There were 12 in 2015, and as of Tuesday, there
were 15 cases of fire at Israel from Syria in 2016. Since Israel's
openly declared policy is to not let such incidents pass without
response, so as to maintain sovereignty, every such event is much more
volatile than either side wants.
In the next incident, Israel and
Syria will probably continue to operate in the same framework (on
Tuesday evening, the IAF once again carried out strikes on the Syrian
Golan), but Assad's continued return to power could also increase his
confidence and require Israel to rethink its tactics on the northern
border.
Yoav Limor
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=17185
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment