Saturday, August 30, 2025

The Famine That Wasn't: How the UN, Media and Hamas Waged a War of Disinformation - Pesach Wolicki

 

by Pesach Wolicki

Regardless of the consistent failure of the dire warnings of famine to come to fruition, the repetition of statements and headlines throughout 2024 set the narrative in the minds of the world: Famine in Gaza. Tellingly, the warnings were always couched in language that allowed for plausible deniability. There was always a "risk" of an "imminent" or "looming" famine -- a famine that just never arrived.

 

  • Behind this narrative lies a calculated strategy: the weaponization of humanitarian suffering, orchestrated by Hamas — the entity that controls Gaza and its distribution of aid — and amplified by willing accomplices in the United Nations system and global media. The goal is not to report the truth but to smear Israel, rally international condemnation, and shield Hamas from accountability.

  • In May 2024, Israeli government data directly contradicted the IPC's claims. In June and July 2024, media reports continued to cite a "high risk of famine," but none could point to actual data proving that famine had occurred. The famine never arrived, but the headlines kept coming.

  • [I]n late June 2024, the IPC issued a report titled, "Famine Review Committee: Gaza Strip, June 2024 – IPC's third review report." It showed that the previous famine predictions were not plausible, contradicted all available data, and were based on incorrect assumptions.... [T]he findings of the "Famine Review Committee" were barely covered by the media outside of Israel.

  • Regardless of the consistent failure of the dire warnings of famine to come to fruition, the repetition of statements and headlines throughout 2024 set the narrative in the minds of the world: Famine in Gaza. Tellingly, the warnings were always couched in language that allowed for plausible deniability. There was always a "risk" of an "imminent" or "looming" famine -- a famine that just never arrived.

  • According to the World Food Programme, sustaining Gaza's estimated population of 2.1 million people requires approximately 62,000 metric tons of food per month.

  • From March through December 2024, 788,216 tons of food aid entered Gaza — an average of 78,821 tons per month, more than 25% above the WFP's stated threshold.

  • Famously, on May 20, 2025, Tom Fletcher, head of the UN's Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, told BBC Radio that "there are 14,000 babies that will die in the next 48 hours unless we can reach them." While this claim was walked back by the UN, the narrative damage was done.

  • The food was entering Gaza — far above the minimum necessary — so why was there any hunger at all? The answer is straightforward: Hamas has weaponized food. The terrorist group that controls Gaza has systematically blocked, diverted, looted, hoarded, and resold humanitarian aid at exorbitant prices.

  • Operating four sites in the southern and central Gaza Strip, the GHF is an American project operating in close coordination with Israeli authorities. The purpose of the GHF is to deliver food aid directly to individual Gazan families while bypassing Hamas-controlled distribution networks. The GHF operates with a high level of logistical transparency, tracking aid deliveries with barcodes and GPS to ensure that food reaches its intended recipients.

  • "[S]o who's doing the killing? That's a good question. You honestly think it's some U.S. contractors, or it's the IDF just gunning people down. Or is it Hamas... because it's business to them. If they can keep people from getting the free food, then they can sell the food that was supposed to be given to them for free. That's what no one seems to be wanting to talk about. Why not?" — US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, August 8, 2025.

  • The daily claims of deaths at from IDF fire distribution sites always come from staff at Hamas-controlled hospitals or unverified eyewitness testimonies. There has yet to be even a single video clip of such an incident occurring, even as virtually every move anyone makes in Gaza is recorded on a smartphone and shared widely.

  • Macron's pledge to recognize a Palestinian state – quickly joined by the UK, Canada and Australia – and the most recent surge in aid into Hamas-controlled areas through airdrops and increases in trucks entering Gaza, together with the aggressive demonization of Israel in the media and diplomatic arena, have led Hamas to believe that time is on their side.

  • Hamas knows that it has no chance of beating the Israel militarily, but its propaganda war has been a smashing success. If all it takes is keeping Gaza's civilians hungry and desperate, that is a price Hamas is more than happy to pay.

Since the invasion of Israel by Hamas on October 7, 2023, the international media, humanitarian organizations, and UN-affiliated agencies have relentlessly pushed one of the most damaging blood libels in history: that Israel is deliberately starving the people of the Gaza Strip. In headline after headline, and through "official" UN reports and viral images, the world has been told that Gaza teeters on the edge of famine — or that famine has already taken hold. However, these warnings, loudly declared, have repeatedly failed to materialize. Pictured: Gazans cheer after receiving food parcels from a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distribution point on June 26, 2025, in central Gaza. (Photo by Moiz Salhi/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

Since the invasion of Israel by Hamas on October 7, 2023, the international media, humanitarian organizations, and UN-affiliated agencies have relentlessly pushed one of the most damaging blood libels in history: that Israel is deliberately starving the people of the Gaza Strip. In headline after headline, and through "official" UN reports and viral images, the world has been told that Gaza teeters on the edge of famine — or that famine has already taken hold. However, these warnings, loudly declared, have repeatedly failed to materialize.

Behind this narrative lies a calculated strategy: the weaponization of humanitarian suffering, orchestrated by Hamas — the entity that controls Gaza and its distribution of aid — and amplified by willing accomplices in the United Nations system and global media. The goal is not to report the truth but to smear Israel, rally international condemnation, and shield Hamas from accountability.

A Timeline of False Famine Warnings

Beginning in late 2023, various UN agencies, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), and the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) began issuing increasingly dire alerts about Gaza's food situation. In December 2023, the IPC issued a projection that Gaza faced a "Risk of Famine" if the conflict and access conditions did not improve.

According to that report, already at that point, "over 15 percent (378,000 people) of Gazans were in catastrophic IPC Phase 5," the food insecurity phase that qualifies as "famine" .

Phase 5 is the most severe phase of the IPC's classification system. One of the defining criteria for Phase 5 famine conditions is "one out of three children being acutely malnourished and two people dying per day for every 10,000 inhabitants," due to starvation. In other words, at this point there should have been 75 daily famine deaths in Gaza.

At the end of February 2024, the UN issued a press release declaring "Famine Imminent in Gaza, Humanitarian Officials Tell Security Council." This statement also declared an increase in the number of affected Gazans: "At least 576,000 people in Gaza – one-quarter of the population – are 'one step away from famine.'"

Then in March 2024, the IPC and FEWS NET again declared that famine was "imminent" in northern Gaza, upping the number of Gazans at risk yet again. CNN reported, "Famine in northern Gaza is imminent as more than 1 million people face 'catastrophic' levels of hunger, new report warns." Crucially, the March IPC report put the number of Gazans experiencing Phase 5 famine conditions as of February 15 at 677,000. Based on the criteria for this classification, this would have put daily starvation deaths at 135.

However, when follow-up data arrived, these warnings unraveled. According to Hamas' "Ministry of Health" figures, which are cited by the World Health Organization (WHO), in the nine months between October 7, 2023 and June 6, 2024 there were a total of 32 deaths from malnutrition in Gaza. A study by UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), published in February 2025, revealed that even those deaths were largely attributed to intestinal infections, not hunger.

In fact, despite media headlines to the contrary, the total number of starvation and malnutrition deaths reported by the Hamas "Ministry of Health" between October 2023 and the end of June 2025 was still under 100 — less than a single day's predicted total, had the IPC Phase 5 classification been accurate. If the IPC predictions had held, there would have been tens of thousands of starvation deaths in 2024 alone.

In April 2024, the UN and the World Food Programme (WFP) issued dire warnings. "We are getting closer by the day to a famine situation," said Gian Carlo Cirri, WFP Director in Geneva. "There is reasonable evidence that all three famine thresholds – food insecurity, malnutrition, mortality – will be passed in the next six weeks."

This pattern continued. In May 2024, Israeli government data directly contradicted the IPC's claims. In June and July 2024, media reports continued to cite a "high risk of famine," but none could point to actual data proving that famine had occurred. The famine never arrived, but the headlines kept coming.

After months of warnings of "imminent" and "looming" catastrophic famine, including official-sounding numbers attached to every prediction, in late June 2024, the IPC issued a report titled, "Famine Review Committee: Gaza Strip, June 2024 – IPC's third review report." It showed that the previous famine predictions were not plausible, contradicted all available data, and were based on incorrect assumptions. After months of worldwide media echoing the dire warnings of famine in Gaza, the findings of the "Famine Review Committee" were barely covered by the media outside of Israel.

In spite of this report, and simultaneous to it, were more shrill warnings. CNN reported at the time:

"Nearly half a million are projected to face catastrophic levels of hunger, the most severe level on the IPC scale ... according to the report 96% of the population of Gaza – more than 2 million people – will face crisis, emergency, or catastrophic levels of food insecurity through at least the end of September."

CNN conveniently left out the fact that the same report admitted that all the previous famine predictions came up empty.

Not to be deterred by the facts, the UN and its related agencies' warnings of impending famine continued hot and heavy. "Food supplies to Gaza dwindling as famine looms, warns UN," was the headline in the Financial Times on August 16, 2024.

In September, Víctor Aguayo, UNICEF Director of Child Nutrition, told journalists at the UN in New York that "The nutrition situation in Gaza is one of the most severe that we have ever seen". His statement was published by the UN with the accompanying headline, "Risk of Famine is Real."

Then on October 17, 2024, the WFP/IPC published another report which declared that "Hundreds of thousands of people in Gaza risk famine this winter."

The next month, the Guardian reported that "a committee of global food security experts" called the Famine Review Committee, declared that there was a "strong likelihood that famine is imminent in areas" of the northern Gaza Strip.

By December 2024, FEWS NET was forced to retract part of its similar predictions, due to flawed population estimates. Yet no equivalent retraction appeared in the media. Instead, the world was left with the impression of ongoing, deliberate Israeli starvation policies, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

After January and February 2025 saw unprecedented quantities of food entering Gaza, the WFP website declared that the "Surge in aid starts pulling people back from the brink of starvation." No starvation after all, once again.

Regardless of the consistent failure of the dire warnings of famine to come to fruition, the repetition of statements and headlines throughout 2024 set the narrative in the minds of the world: Famine in Gaza. Tellingly, the warnings were always couched in language that allowed for plausible deniability. There was always a "risk" of an "imminent" or "looming" famine -- a famine that just never arrived.

On July 29, 2025, the IPC quietly inserted a new asterisk into its "Gaza alert" that lowers the bar for a famine call — allowing a declaration of famine at 15% acute child malnutrition measured by mid-upper arm circumferences (MUAC) if there is "evidence of rapidly worsening underlying drivers," a vague measure that leaves open a range of possibilities to justify declaring famine conditions. That shift departs from the IPC's longstanding famine threshold of plus or minus 30% acute child malnutrition based on weight-for-height (WHZ) or oedema. The same alert leaned on non-public "internal" datasets to assert more than >20,000 child admissions for acute malnutrition and at least 16 hunger-related child deaths— numbers that outsiders cannot verify. To perpetuate the "famine in Gaza" narrative, they moved the goalposts and hid the evidence.

Data That Destroys the Famine Narrative

Considering the enormous quantities of food that have been entering Gaza, it should not be surprising that there was no actual famine. According to the World Food Programme, sustaining Gaza's estimated population of 2.1 million people requires approximately 62,000 metric tons of food per month. The Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), the Israeli body overseeing civilian affairs in Gaza, has meticulously tracked food aid volumes, and published transparent, detailed reports.

From March through December 2024, 788,216 tons of food aid entered Gaza — an average of 78,821 tons per month, more than 25% above the WFP's stated threshold.

On January 19, 2025, one day before the second hostage‐release ceasefire went into effect, humanitarian aid shipments surged. January saw 164,148 tons of food enter Gaza, more than twice the 2024 monthly average. February was even higher with a whopping 216,075 tons of food aid.

Together, this 380,223 tons over January and February 2025 was enough to provide five months' worth of food — through the end of May — at the levels of the previous ten months. Using the WFP requirement of 62,000 tons, the food from January and February was sufficient to last through June.

It is important to note that these figures are not estimates. They are publicly available, verifiable numbers released by COGAT and monitored by international agencies.

On March 2, 2025, with the ceasefire-hostage release deal falling apart, Israel stopped allowing aid into Gaza. Despite the massive quantities of food that had just entered Gaza in the previous two months, within days the starvation claims resumed. Already on March 19, Turkey's state-run Anadolu Agency ran the headline, "Gaza officially enters first stage of famine amid Israeli blockade."

The UN was not far behind. On April 25, UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini declared, "Children are starving in Gaza." And on April 28, the UN's official website stated, "Gazans face hunger crisis as aid blockade nears two months."

Then in May 2025, the BBC reported: "Gaza subjected to forced starvation, top UN official tells BBC."

Famously, on May 20, 2025, Tom Fletcher, head of the UN's Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, told BBC Radio that "there are 14,000 babies that will die in the next 48 hours unless we can reach them." While this claim was walked back by the UN, the narrative damage was done.

Hamas: The Real Obstruction

The food was entering Gaza — far above the minimum necessary — so why was there any hunger at all? The answer is straightforward: Hamas has weaponized food. The terrorist group that controls Gaza has systematically blocked, diverted, looted, hoarded, and resold humanitarian aid at exorbitant prices.

Multiple verified reports, including videos and testimonies from Gazan civilians, as well as admissions from UN agencies, show that Hamas and their affiliated vendors have seized the vast majority of aid shipments. Civilians have reported food being resold at inflated prices or being distributed only to Hamas loyalists. The UN has admitted that "nearly 90%" of the aid it sent to Gaza was " Intercepted' Before Reaching [its] Intended Recipients".

One Gazan mother told the BBC, "I swear I didn't see any part of the aid. It enters Gaza — but people steal it, and it disappears." This is not an isolated incident. It is the norm under Hamas rule. Yet, UN agencies and media outlets persist in blaming Israel, not the entity actively stealing the aid.

Hamas' incentives to steal and withhold food from the civilian population are manifold. Mainly, Hamas sold the food that was meant to be given to civilians at no charge, in order to fund its continued operations. It is estimated that Hamas has profited by roughly $500 million from sales of stolen humanitarian aid. Hoarding also keeps the prices high by limiting the supply available for purchase — a key aim of this tactic. High prices are also necessary for the success of Hamas' information warfare. Without scarcity on the street, prices would drop and undermine the starvation narrative.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation: Effective Aid Distribution that Hamas Will Not Tolerate

Late May 2025 saw the inauguration of a new system for distribution of aid: The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Operating four sites in the southern and central Gaza Strip, the GHF is an American project operating in close coordination with Israeli authorities. The purpose of the GHF is to deliver food aid directly to individual Gazan families while bypassing Hamas-controlled distribution networks. The GHF operates with a high level of logistical transparency, tracking aid deliveries with barcodes and GPS to ensure that food reaches its intended recipients.

According to a detailed report dated August 1, 2025, by Andrew Fox of the Henry Jackson Society, within a few weeks of starting operations on the ground in Gaza, the GHF was delivering up to 2.5 million meals per day directly to Gazan civilians:

"By mid-July, the cumulative meals delivered surpassed 52 million over approximately 5–6 weeks, and by the end of July, this figure was even higher (GHF reported over 100 million meals delivered by late July)."

The success of this model, circumventing Hamas's control, proved a threat not only to Hamas's grip on humanitarian aid but also to the UN agencies that had proven ineffective in ensuring safe, reliable distribution. "[S]o who's doing the killing?," asked US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, adding:

"That's a good question. You honestly think it's some U.S. contractors, or it's the IDF just gunning people down. Or is it Hamas... because it's business to them. If they can keep people from getting the free food, then they can sell the food that was supposed to be given to them for free. That's what no one seems to be wanting to talk about. Why not?"

The GHF exposed the falsity of the narrative that Israel was the cause of hunger in Gaza.

Hamas responded with threats and then violence. Hamas attacked distribution centers and intimidated aid recipients. The GHF has come under fire — literally — from Hamas and some local clans loyal to Hamas, even murdering Gazans who were working for GHF. At the same time, the UN and its agencies have launched an international pressure campaign on Israel to revert to delivery of aid only through UN-related groups. Notably, when Hamas rejected a recent ceasefire, they stated that one of their demands for a deal is that the GHF be completely dismantled.

At the same time, a disinformation campaign was launched, with near daily false claims in international media that the IDF is shooting Gazans coming to the GHF distribution sites, killing some. There is even a locked, uneditable Wikipedia page titled "2025 Gaza Strip aid distribution killings" which reports as fact:

"Since 27 May 2025, amid a famine in Gaza strip, more than 1,965 Palestinian civilians seeking aid have been killed and thousands more have been wounded in the Gaza Strip when being fired upon by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), armed gangs, and contractors hired by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF)."

In late June and July 2025, international media — including the BBC and PBS — amplified claims by former GHF contractor Anthony "Tony" Aguilar, who alleged he witnessed "war crimes" and indiscriminate use of force by the IDF soldiers contractors at aid sites in Gaza. However, the GHF swiftly pushed back, stating that Aguilar had been fired on June 13 for poor performance, erratic behavior and volatile conflicts with staff. The GHF also accused him of fabricating and backdating documents to support his claims. These charges were reported by outlets such as The Times of Israel, which described GHF's presentation of file metadata evidence as discrediting Aguilar's account. Regardless of Aguilar's questionable credibility, legacy media outlets uncritically reported his "testimony" as if it were an unbiased report by a courageous whistleblower.

The idea that the IDF would shoot civilians collecting aid from an apparatus the Israelis themselves helped to implement is laughable on its face. Israel's entire strategic goal in facilitating the GHF's aid delivery is to separate the daily needs of Gazans from Hamas and from areas under Hamas control. Why would the IDF attack Gazan civilians coming to the distribution sites?

The daily claims of deaths at from IDF fire distribution sites always come from staff at Hamas-controlled hospitals or unverified eyewitness testimonies. There has yet to be even a single video clip of such an incident occurring, even as virtually every move anyone makes in Gaza is recorded on a smartphone and shared widely. Were it the case that IDF soldiers actually killed a single civilian at an aid distribution site, there would be some visual evidence to support this claim.

The Weaponization of Hunger

Hamas exemplifies a tactic described by Colonel John Spencer, Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at West Point. "When a group causes starvation among its own population," he recently wrote of Hamas, "it is weaponizing that deprivation to gain political and moral leverage."

In late July 2025, it was widely reported that close to 1,000 truckloads of food aid that had already been allowed into Gaza were sitting untouched, waiting for UN-affiliated contractors to pick it up. The quantity of food sitting out in the sun was sufficient to feed Gaza for weeks. When the UN agencies claimed logistical and security problems picking up the aid, the GHF offered to help secure its delivery to the people at no charge. The UN refused the offer.

Hamas' tactic of starving the civilian population of Gaza for political gain should not surprise anyone. Just as Hamas places rocket launchers in schools and stores weapons in hospitals, it hoards food and obstructs aid — not in spite of the suffering it causes, but because of it. The reports of hungry children and the exorbitant prices of food in the Gaza markets are meant to incite international outrage — not against Hamas, but against Israel.

Exploiting Sick Children for Propaganda

Perhaps the most emotionally manipulative aspect of the starvation narrative is the use of sick children in media campaigns. Three high-profile cases reveal how misleading and staged these portrayals can be.

The first is the instance of Wateen Abu Amouna, featured by the BBC. Photos showed the infant wrapped in a garbage bag, with claims that no diapers or formula were available. Yet other videos show the same baby being bottle-fed and wearing diapers, and the mother appeared healthy. These contradictions were never addressed.

Then there is the instance of Osama al-Raqab. The Italian newspaper Il Fatto Quotidiano published a front-page photo of what looks like a severely malnourished child under the headline "If This is a Child?" The accompanying story included an interview with Francesca Albanese, the UN "Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories." Albanese accused the Italian government of being complicit in what she called Israel's "starvation policy." It turns out that the child suffers from cystic fibrosis and has been in Italy undergoing medical treatment since early June. The picture, taken in April, ran on the front page in late July.

The most celebrated case is that of Mohammed al-Ma'touq, featured in the New York Times. Portrayed as a victim of famine, the child actually suffers from a severe genetic disorder. A tightly-cropped photo of the emaciated boy lovingly held in his mother's arms — arranged to resemble classical artistic renditions of Christian "pietà" iconography — went viral and created the iconic visual of starvation in Gaza, even as the boy's condition had nothing to do with food shortages. Later, when the full, uncropped, photo leaked, Mohammed's obviously well-fed brother, appearing completely healthy, was seen standing next to him. While the New York Times ran the deceptive cropped photo on its front page, seen by tens of millions of people, the "retraction" admitting the error was posted only on the @NYTimesPR X account, which has fewer than 100,000 followers.

Dr. John Borowski, a humanitarian physician who has "worked in refeeding centers in refugee camps and rural hospitals in war and in peace -- in Kenya, Uganda, Zimbabwe and India," recently pointed out that real famine conditions look dramatically different from what is seen in Gaza. In his field experience, famines result "hundreds of malnourished children," not isolated cases. By contrast, images coming out of Gaza show individual sick children whose conditions are more consistent with chronic illness, such as cerebral palsy or cancer, than with starvation. Borowski adds:

"The regular photos of masses of children show kids that look miserable and dirty, but not at all malnourished. (You can look at their average MUAC - mid-upper arm circumference and see that it is OK). Many adults seem to even be overweight - when food is scarce everyone gets skinny. Also pictures of an individual child with an abnormal MUAC have been used to 'prove' malnutrition, but 3% of normal well fed kids have an abnormal MUAC... so this is deliberate disinformation...

The latest Hamas sourced "death toll" from malnutrition reports twice as many adults as children dying from malnutrition. This makes absolutely no sense. 2/3 of famine deaths "should" be children, especially in such a young population where 50% are under 18.

These distortions reinforce the conclusion that much of the famine "information" is built on false visuals and flawed data, deliberately constructed to inflame outrage against Israel .

A Deliberate Hoax

For nearly two years, the world has been bombarded with claims of looming starvation and then full-blown famine in Gaza. But the facts — mortality data, aid volumes, eyewitness accounts — tell a different story. There is no Israeli-caused famine in Gaza, and there never was.

This hoax has paid great dividends for Hamas, and is likely a reason – along with the announcement by French President Emmanuel Macron that he would recognize a Palestinian state, which gave Hamas renewed hope that they could win the war – that they recently walked away from a ceasefire–hostage release deal that looked all but complete.

Macron's pledge to recognize a Palestinian state – quickly joined by the UK, Canada and Australia – and the most recent surge in aid into Hamas-controlled areas through airdrops and increases in trucks entering Gaza, together with the aggressive demonization of Israel in the media and diplomatic arena, have led Hamas to believe that time is on their side.

Hamas knows that it has no chance of beating the Israel militarily, but its propaganda war has been a smashing success. If all it takes is keeping Gaza's civilians hungry and desperate, that is a price Hamas is more than happy to pay.


Pesach Wolicki is co-host of the "Shoulder to Shoulder" podcast.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21872/gaza-famine-hoax

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

US blocks Palestinian officials from attending UN General Assembly, denies visas - Reuters, Amichai Stein

 

by Reuters, Amichai Stein

A State Department official said Abbas and about 80 other Palestinians would be affected by the decision to deny and revoke visas from members of the umbrella PLO and the PA.

 

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas holds a leadership meeting in Ramallah, in the West Bank, April 23, 2025
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas holds a leadership meeting in Ramallah, in the West Bank, April 23, 2025
(photo credit: REUTERS/Mohammed Torokman)

The US will not allow Palestinian officials and diplomats, including Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, to attend next month’s United Nations General Assembly in New York.

A State Department official said Abbas and about 80 other Palestinians would be affected by the decision to deny and revoke visas from members of the PA and the umbrella Palestine Liberation Organization.

In a statement, the department reiterated longstanding US and Israeli allegations that the PA and PLO had failed to repudiate terrorism while pushing for “unilateral recognition” of a Palestinian state.

Palestinian officials reject such allegations and say that decades of US-mediated talks have failed to end Israeli occupation and secure an independent Palestinian state.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (R) and US President Donald Trump listen to anthems during a welcome ceremony at the Presidential Palace in Bethlehem on May 23, 2017 (credit: THOMAS COEX / AFP)
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (R) and US President Donald Trump listen to anthems during a welcome ceremony at the Presidential Palace in Bethlehem on May 23, 2017 (credit: THOMAS COEX / AFP)
Several European foreign ministers arriving at a European Union meeting in Copenhagen on Saturday criticized the US decision.

A UN General Assembly “cannot be subject to any restrictions on access,” French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told reporters. Irish Foreign Minister Simon Harris said the EU should protest the decision “in the strongest possible terms.”

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said in a statement on Saturday that he had spoken with Abbas to express Madrid’s support, and he called the visa decision “unjust.”

“Palestine has the right to make its voice heard at the United Nations and in all international forums,” he said on X/Twitter.

A Friday State Department release titled “Trump administration reaffirms commitment to not reward terrorism and revokes visas of Palestinian officials ahead of UNGA” said that the US is denying and revoking visas from members of the PLO and the PA ahead of the United Nations General Assembly meeting in September.

“The Trump administration has been clear: it is in our national security interests to hold the PLO and PA accountable for not complying with their commitments, and for undermining the prospects for peace,” the release noted.

“Before the PLO and PA can be considered partners for peace, they must consistently repudiate terrorism – including the October 7 massacre – and end incitement to terrorism in education, as required by US law and as promised by the PLO,” the release stated.

“The PA must also end its attempts to bypass negotiations through international lawfare campaigns, including appeals to the ICC and ICJ, and efforts to secure the unilateral recognition of a conjectural Palestinian state.”

The release said that the US administration believed that both the PA and the PLO’s actions “materially contributed to Hamas’s refusal to release its hostages, and to the breakdown of the Gaza ceasefire talks.”

Governments typically send large delegations to the assembly. The restrictions could lead to a depleted Palestinian presence at a summit where Britain, France, Australia, and Canada have pledged to formally recognize a state of Palestine.

Abbas to be barred from UNGA

The restrictions mean that Abbas would likely not be able to travel to New York to deliver an address to the annual gathering, as he typically does.

Abbas’s office said it was astonished by the visa decision and argued it violated the UN’s “headquarters agreement,” under which the US is generally required to allow access for foreign diplomats to the UN in New York. His office did not say whether his visa was revoked or denied.

The office called on the US administration to reconsider and reverse its decision, “reaffirming Palestine’s full commitment to international law, UN resolutions, and obligations toward peace,” adding that the American decision “stands in clear contradiction to international law and the UN Headquarters Agreement.”

The move follows the imposition of US sanctions on PA officials and members of the PLO in July, even as other Western powers moved toward recognition of Palestinian statehood.

In its statement, the State Department said that the PA’s mission to the UN would not be included in the restrictions. It did not elaborate further on what that meant.

Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar thanked President Donald Trump for the “bold step” and for “standing by Israel once again,” in a statement on social media.

 

Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon said that the move showed “the entire world what moral clarity and deep commitment to security and peace truly mean.”

“This firm stance is a model of leadership – one that the entire international community should embrace: zero tolerance for terror and zero rewards for violence,” he added.

Washington has said it can deny visas for security, terrorism, or foreign policy reasons. The State Department said that the Palestinian Authority’s mission to the UN, comprising officials who are permanently based there, would not be included in the restrictions.

Stephane Dujarric, the UN’s spokesperson, said the world body would discuss the visa issue with the State Department, “in line with the UN Headquarters agreement between the UN and the US.”

Washington also refused to issue a visa to PLO leader Yasser Arafat in 1988. The UN General Assembly met that year in Geneva instead of New York, so he could address it.

The State Department said it was demanding that the PA and PLO “consistently repudiate terrorism,” including the deadly October 2023 Hamas attack that sparked the war in Gaza.

  

Reuters, Amichai Stein

Source: https://www.jpost.com/international/article-865721

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Palestinian Authority urges US to reinstate Abbas’s visa ahead of key UN meetings - AP

 

by AP

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio rescinded the visas of Abbas and 80 other officials ahead of next month’s annual high-level meeting of the UN General Assembly, the State Department disclosed yesterday.

 

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas delivers a speech during the opening of the Istishsari cancer center in Ramallah on May 14, 2025. (Zain JAAFAR / AFP)
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas delivers a speech during the opening of the Istishsari cancer center in Ramallah on May 14, 2025. (Zain JAAFAR / AFP)

 

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s office urges the US government to reverse its unusual decision to revoke his visa, weeks before he was meant to appear at the UN’s main annual meeting and an international conference about creating a Palestinian state.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio rescinded the visas of Abbas and 80 other officials ahead of next month’s annual high-level meeting of the UN General Assembly, the State Department disclosed yesterday. Abbas has addressed the General Assembly for many years and generally leads the Palestinian delegation.

“We call upon the American administration to reverse its decision. This decision will only increase tension and escalation,” Palestinian presidential spokesperson Nabil Abu Rudeineh tells The Associated Press in Ramallah.

“We have been in contact since yesterday with Arab and foreign countries, especially those directly concerned with this issue. This effort will continue around the clock,” he says.

He urged other countries to put pressure on the Trump administration to reverse the decision, notably the countries that have organized a high-level conference on Sept. 22 about reviving efforts for a two-state solution for the Middle East. It is co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia.


AP

Source: https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/palestinian-authority-urges-us-to-reinstate-abbass-visa-ahead-of-key-un-meetings/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Houthi Prime Minister Ghalib al-Rahawi, eight ministers killed in IAF Thursday strike - Yonah Jeremy Bob, Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Yonah Jeremy Bob, Jerusalem Post Staff

The Houthis further announced that ministers who were present were seriously and moderately injured in the strike and are receiving medical treatment.

 

Houthi Prime Minister Ghalib al-Rahawi.
Houthi Prime Minister Ghalib al-Rahawi.
(photo credit: SCREENSHOT/X/VIA SECTION 27A OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT)

Houthi Prime Minister Ghalib al-Rahawi and several other ministers were killed in the IAF strike in Sanaa on Thursday, the news agency run by the terror group said on Saturday, citing a statement by the head of the Houthi Supreme Political Council, Mahdi al-Mashat.

The Houthis further announced that several other ministers who were present were seriously or moderately injured in the strike and are receiving medical treatment. However, the announcement did not specify who else was killed in the attack.

According to Army Radio, citing Israeli security sources, eight others killed in the attack were the Houthis’ political bureau director, the prime minister’s chief of staff, the group’s cabinet secretary, and its justice minister, economy and trade minister, foreign minister, agriculture minister, and public relations minister.

 Houthi Defense Minister Mohammad Nasser al-Athifi said that the terror group is ready to confront Israel’s airstrike on Sanaa shortly after their deaths were announced, according to the news agency. Mashat’s statement previously did not make clear whether he was among the casualties.

The IAF attacked a group of top Houthi military officials in Sanaa who were watching their leader give a nationally televised speech.

IAF pilots and crew prepare fighter jets for strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen, August 24, 2025 (credit: IDF Spokesperson’s Unit)
IAF pilots and crew prepare fighter jets for strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen, August 24, 2025 (credit: IDF Spokesperson’s Unit)
Yemen’s Al-Jumhuriya channel reported that Rahawi was in an apartment alongside several colleagues when he was killed.

Al-Hadath reported that the IAF targeted homes where senior Houthi officials were hiding in Yemen’s capital.

Rahawi became prime minister nearly a year ago, but the de facto leader of the government was his deputy, Mohamed Moftah, who was assigned on Saturday to carry out the prime minister’s duties.

Rahawi was seen largely as a figurehead who was not part of the inner circle of the Houthi leadership.

Arab media reported that there were some 10 attacks in Sanaa. KAN, citing Yemeni media, reported that several Houthi government leaders were killed in an attack inside the presidential palace.

IDF strikes in Yemen

Defense Minister Israel Katz and IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir monitored the attack from military headquarters, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following from a secure “red phone.”

The IDF confirmed that it struck targets in Sanna related to Houthi rule and governance.

The attacks come after the military shot down two drones earlier on Thursday, launched by the Houthis against Israel.

In addition, the army struck Sanaa, including ballistic missile sites and electricity sites, on Sunday.

Katz warned after the attacks that “after the strike of darkness, comes the strike on the firstborn,” referring to the last two biblical plagues against Egypt. “Anyone who raises a hand against Israel – their hand will be severed.”

At least two Houthi missile launches in past week

The Houthis have been attacking Israel with missiles and drones since October 19, 2023, less than two weeks after Hamas’s October 7 massacre, with Israel only starting counter strikes in July 2024.

None of Israel’s attacks to date have succeeded at stopping Houthi missiles and drones, but no Houthi weapon has killed an Israeli since July 2024.

Reuters contributed to this report. 


Yonah Jeremy Bob, Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-865760

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why Iran's Ideology and Missiles Endanger the West: If Hitler Had Nuclear Weapons, Do You Think He Would Not Have Used Them? - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

Western policymakers had been hoping for decades that engagement, dialogue and economic deals could temper Tehran's revolutionary zeal. The regime's latest statements, however, show that such hopes are illusory.

 

  • In his latest statement, Amir Hayat-Moqaddam [member of the Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission] openly declared that Iran is capable of striking all of Europe and even US cities such as Washington and New York with missiles launched from offshore Iranian ships.

  • Western policymakers had been hoping for decades that engagement, dialogue and economic deals could temper Tehran's revolutionary zeal. The regime's latest statements, however, show that such hopes are illusory: Iran is not guided by pragmatic statecraft but by an uncompromising ideology that explicitly calls for global expansion of its revolution.

  • Hayat-Moqaddam's words are not vague threats. They are a boast, a proclamation of a plan decades in the making. Such statements must be taken seriously: they reveal the true intentions of the regime: to extend its deterrent power by threatening both Europe and America, and to hold the West hostage to the fear of devastating missile strikes.

  • Iran's investment in its ballistic missile arsenal is not defensive; it reflects a doctrine of "deterrence by punishment," the idea that Iran can intimidate adversaries by holding their cities, infrastructure, and populations at risk of destruction. In this sense, Iran's missile arsenal is not just a tool of war — it is an instrument of political leverage, designed to project power far beyond Iran's borders.

  • [J]ust one missile tipped with a nuclear warhead hitting a European or American city would be catastrophic. Iran is estimated to still have thousands of ballistic missiles that can reach Europe when launched from Iranians soil. If launched from ships at sea, the continental United States is also within range of Iran's missiles, as Iran is now openly warning.

  • Iran's threat is not hypothetical; it is a proven capability paired with a proven willingness to use it.

  • Since 1979, Iran's leaders have always regarded the United States and Europe as enemies, even before the West imposed sanctions or intervened in regional conflicts. The hostility is not reactive; it is ideological. Like Nazism in the 20th century, the Iranian regime's ideology cannot be appeased with compromises.

  • The West must abandon the false hope that diplomacy alone will alter Tehran's course. Sanctions must be maintained and expanded, not lifted in exchange for empty promises. The United States must keep a military option on the table, making clear that if Iran crosses red lines, it will face devastating consequences.

  • Iranian diplomats who serve as spies or agents for the regime's ideological mission should be expelled, embassies shuttered, and Iran's international presence curtailed. Equally important is supporting the Iranian people, many of whom have repeatedly risked their lives in protests calling for an end to clerical rule. The collapse of the regime from within is the only real long-term solution to the threat Iran poses to the world.

  • Iran's leadership openly declares its intent to spread its revolution and to target Europe with missiles. To ignore such declarations would be an unforgivable mistake.

  • Unfortunately, the Iranian regime's threats are not empty rhetoric. They are a continuation of a consistent ideological vision that has driven its policies since its Islamic Revolution in 1979. Iran's leadership openly states that they seek not only the destruction of Israel but also the subjugation of the West. Iran's missile arsenal and naval drills show that it is actively preparing for this confrontation; its ambitions for nuclear weapons underscore the urgency.

  • The West must not turn a blind eye or entertain illusions of "moderation." Just as Europe once ignored Hitler's ideology at its peril, ignoring Iran's Islamist regime would be a historic mistake. The only path forward is to maintain relentless pressure, prepare militarily, support the Iranian people, and never allow this radical regime to realize its apocalyptic goals.

A senior Iranian official has openly declared that Iran is capable of striking all of Europe and even US cities, saying that Iranian ships could be moved within approximately 2,000 kilometers of the U.S. coastline, from where Washington, New York, and other American cities would be within striking range. Iran's threat is not hypothetical; it is a proven capability paired with a proven willingness to use it. During the 12-day war in June, Iran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles at Israel, dozens of which broke through Israeli defenses and wreaked destruction on both civilian and military targets. Pictured: Rescue workers search a residential building in Beersheba, Israel that was heavily damaged by an Iranian ballistic missile on June 24, 2025. Five civilians were killed in the missile strike, which destroyed multiple buildings. (Photo by Aldema Milstein/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

Recent remarks by a senior Iranian official, Amir Hayat-Moqaddam, a member of the Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, once again confirmed what many in the West have feared: the Islamic Republic of Iran's grand strategy has always included targeting not only Israel and its neighbors but also Europe and the United States.

In his latest statement, Hayat-Moqaddam openly declared that Iran is capable of striking all of Europe and even US cities such as Washington and New York with missiles launched from offshore Iranian ships.

His comments come at a time of heightened tension in the aftermath of the devastating 12-day war between Israel and Iran, which saw Israeli and US strikes take out significant portions of Iran's nuclear program and air defense systems. These developments, in retrospect, likely saved the Western world from a nightmare scenario — an ideologically driven regime equipped with nuclear warheads capable of striking European capitals and even American cities.

Western policymakers had been hoping for decades that engagement, dialogue and economic deals could temper Tehran's revolutionary zeal. The regime's latest statements, however, show that such hopes are illusory: Iran is not guided by pragmatic statecraft but by an uncompromising ideology that explicitly calls for global expansion of its revolution.

It may have been reasonable for analysts to assume that, after the humiliation and destruction inflicted on Iran during the 12-day war, the regime might reassess its regional and global ambitions. The opposite has proven true. Instead of retreating into a defensive posture, Iran's leaders are standing defiantly against the West, doubling down on their rhetoric, and reasserting their vision of exporting their Islamist revolution.

Iran is not operating as a conventional nation-state that weighs costs and benefits rationally. It is an ideological state that adheres to the principle, enshrined in its Islamist constitution, of exporting its revolution. As the Islamic Republic's founding Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, once declared:

"We shall export our revolution to the whole world. Until the cry 'There is no God but God' resounds over the whole world, there will be struggle."

This ideology places Iran's confrontation with the United States and Europe not in the realm of geopolitics but in the realm of existential religious struggle.

Hayat-Moqaddam went on to reveal that Iran has spent more than 20 years developing a capability for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' Aerospace Force to launch ballistic missiles from ships at sea. He stated that Iranian ships could be moved within approximately 2,000 kilometers of the U.S. coastline, from where Washington, New York, and other American cities would be within striking range. He further emphasized that every European country is already within Iran's missile envelope.

Hayat-Moqaddam's words are not vague threats. They are a boast, a proclamation of a plan decades in the making. Such statements must be taken seriously: they reveal the true intentions of the regime: to extend its deterrent power by threatening both Europe and America, and to hold the West hostage to the fear of devastating missile strikes.

His remarks must also be understood in the broader context of Iran's military posture. In recent weeks, Iran held its first major naval drills since the war with Israel. Iran launched new cruise missiles such as the Nasir and Qadir in the Gulf of Oman and the Indian Ocean. Coastal missile batteries were also activated during these exercises. Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Aziz Nasirzadeh confirmed that the exercises were meant to display Iran's growing missile capabilities. The message from Tehran was unmistakable: Iran seeks to demonstrate that its long-term military doctrine remains intact, and its missile arsenal remains central to its strategy of confrontation.

Iran's missile program is not a recent invention. It is the product of decades of determined development. Today, Iran possesses the largest arsenal of ballistic missiles in the Middle East. These include a range of short-, medium- and long-range missiles designed to strike adversaries near and far. Earlier this year, Iran unveiled the Qassem Bassir medium-range ballistic missile, capable of reaching roughly 1,200 kilometers, with advanced guidance systems, representing another leap forward in precision and range. Iran's investment in its ballistic missile arsenal is not defensive; it reflects a doctrine of "deterrence by punishment," the idea that Iran can intimidate adversaries by holding their cities, infrastructure, and populations at risk of destruction. In this sense, Iran's missile arsenal is not just a tool of war — it is an instrument of political leverage, designed to project power far beyond Iran's borders.

What might have been if Israel and the United States had not acted decisively during the 12-day war? President Donald Trump stated that Iran was just four weeks away from acquiring a nuclear weapon, and could quickly have mounted nuclear warheads on its ballistic missiles. The implications are chilling: just one missile tipped with a nuclear warhead hitting a European or American city would be catastrophic. Iran is estimated to still have thousands of ballistic missiles that can reach Europe when launched from Iranians soil. If launched from ships at sea, the continental United States is also within range of Iran's missiles, as Iran is now openly warning.

During the recent conflict, Iran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles at Israel, dozens of which broke through Israeli defenses and wreaked destruction on both civilian and military targets. Iran's threat is not hypothetical; it is a proven capability paired with a proven willingness to use it.

The West must now confront the sobering truth that for too long, policymakers have entertained the illusion that Iran can be moderated through engagement, economic incentives and international agreements. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), signed in 2015, was the most prominent example of this approach. Yet, even while this "nuclear deal" was in place, Iran continued to expand its ballistic missile and nuclear weapons programs, and to spread its influence across the Middle East through its proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Iraq and the Gaza Strip. This was not a deviation from its ideology but a direct application of it. Since 1979, Iran's leaders have always regarded the United States and Europe as enemies, even before the West imposed sanctions or intervened in regional conflicts. The hostility is not reactive; it is ideological. Like Nazism in the 20th century, the Iranian regime's ideology cannot be appeased with compromises.

The policy implications are clear. First, the West must abandon the false hope that diplomacy alone will alter Tehran's course. Sanctions must be maintained and expanded, not lifted in exchange for empty promises. The United States must keep a military option on the table, making clear that if Iran crosses red lines, it will face devastating consequences.

Diplomatic measures must also be tightened: Iranian diplomats who serve as spies or agents for the regime's ideological mission should be expelled, embassies shuttered, and Iran's international presence curtailed. Equally important is supporting the Iranian people, many of whom have repeatedly risked their lives in protests calling for an end to clerical rule. The collapse of the regime from within is the only real long-term solution to the threat Iran poses to the world.

Europe, in particular, must step up. Too often, European governments have clung to illusions of moderation, prioritizing business deals and short-term stability over long-term security. Yet history shows what happens when fanatic ideologies are underestimated. The failure to confront Nazism in its early stages led to disaster for the entire continent. Today, Iran's leadership openly declares its intent to spread its revolution and to target Europe with missiles. To ignore such declarations would be an unforgivable mistake. The European Union must join the United States in imposing snapback sanctions at the United Nations, tightening its own economic restrictions, and treating Iran's regime as the pariah that it is.

Unfortunately, the Iranian regime's threats are not empty rhetoric. They are a continuation of a consistent ideological vision that has driven its policies since its Islamic Revolution in 1979. Iran's leadership openly states that they seek not only the destruction of Israel but also the subjugation of the West (such as here and here). Iran's missile arsenal and naval drills show that it is actively preparing for this confrontation; its ambitions for nuclear weapons underscore the urgency.

The West must not turn a blind eye or entertain illusions of "moderation." Just as Europe once ignored Hitler's ideology at its peril, ignoring Iran's Islamist regime would be a historic mistake. The only path forward is to maintain relentless pressure, prepare militarily, support the Iranian people, and never allow this radical regime to realize its apocalyptic goals.

 

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21868/iran-missiles-ideology

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Macron’s diplomatic gambit—appeasing Islamists, isolating Israel - Shimon Sherman

 

by Shimon Sherman

"Wartime realities make France's anti-Israel stance a particularly harmful and aggressive manifestation of a long-standing strategy," researcher tells JNS.

 

Palestinian Authority chief Mahmoud Abbas welcomes French President Emmanuel Macron to Ramallah on Oct. 24, 2023. Photo by Christophe Ena/POOL/AFP via Getty Images.
Palestinian Authority chief Mahmoud Abbas welcomes French President Emmanuel Macron to Ramallah on Oct. 24, 2023. Photo by Christophe Ena/POOL/AFP via Getty Images.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has chastised French President Emmanuel Macron for inciting a wave of antisemitism across France via his calls to recognize a Palestinian state.

In a letter sent by Netanyahu to the Élysée Palace on Aug. 19, the prime minister wrote, “Your call for a Palestinian state pours fuel on this antisemitic fire. It is not diplomacy, it is appeasement.”

In a letter published on Aug. 26, Macron strongly rejected the premier’s criticism over French inaction in combating antisemitism.

The French president accused Netanyahu of misusing the issue of antisemitism for political purposes. “These accusations of inaction in the face of a scourge that we are fighting with everything in our power are unacceptable and are an offense to France as a whole,” Macron wrote.

Macron further emphasized Paris’s discontent over Jerusalem’s continued military action in Gaza. “I solemnly appeal to you to end the desperate race of a murderous and illegal permanent war in Gaza, causing indignity for your country and placing your people in a deadlock,” he wrote.

Over the course of the current war, France has time and again raised the banner of anti-Israel policy. As early as Oct. 27, 2023, the first day of Israel’s ground incursion into Gaza, France voted in favor of a “humanitarian truce” in the U.N. General Assembly.

France has voted in support of every ceasefire resolution brought to the U.N. since the beginning of the war. France has banned Israeli companies from participating in defense exhibitions, and Macron has publicly called on all nations to impose arms embargoes against Israel.

France has sanctioned Israeli citizens and has opened two judicial investigations for “complicity in genocide, incitement to genocide, and complicity in crimes against humanity” targeting French-Israeli activists.

France also exerted immense pressure on Israel during the Lebanon campaign, including condemnation of strikes against terror targets, attempts to limit Israeli anti-Hezbollah operations, and demands for Israeli withdrawal from strategic points in Southern Lebanon.

Finally, France became the first G7 country to announce its recognition of a Palestinian state, paving the way for others, including the U.K. and Canada, to follow suit, thereby tacitly endorsing Hamas’s strategy of leveraging terror to drive its political agenda.

The rise of antisemitic incidents

The recent spike in anti-Israel policy in France has coincided with a significant increase in antisemitic attacks.

In 2024, France recorded over 1,500 antisemitic incidents, making up more than 60% of all religion-based hate crimes in the country. In the first half of 2025, another 646 incidents were reported.

Cases include the assaults on rabbis, vandalism of synagogues and the Holocaust Memorial (the Mémorial de la Shoah museum in Paris’s Marais neighborhood), graffiti on El Al’s office in the city reading “genocideairline,” and “Free Palestine” spray-painted on Jewish tourists’ cars in the Alps. An outdoor adventure park manager was also detained for refusing entry to a group of Israeli children.

The French government has vehemently denied any link between its anti-Israel stance and the rise of antisemitic incidents, leading to a recent spat between the Élysée and U.S. Ambassador to France Charles Kushner.

“On the 81st anniversary of the Allied Liberation of Paris, which ended the deportation of Jews from French soil, I write out of deep concern over the dramatic rise of antisemitism in France and the lack of sufficient action by your government to confront it,” Kushner wrote in a public letter published this week in The Wall Street Journal.

While the recent wave of anti-Israel policy may seem out of place for a country that ostensibly is considered an Israeli ally, France has for many decades backed anti-Israel policies and has openly undermined Israel’s interests.

While the first decades of the revived state’s history were marked by close ties with Paris, including significant support during the 1948 War of Independence and close cooperation in the 1956 Sinai War, the relationship first turned cold in the late ’60s.

In 1967, Charles de Gaulle’s government established a policy of full military embargo just three days before the breakout of the Six-Day War, and refused to recognize Israeli sovereignty over even western Jerusalem at the war’s conclusion.

Paris has pursued a policy of rapprochement with much of the Arab world, which harbored strong anti-French sentiments due to French colonialist policies. To solidify the diplomatic strategy, Paris has consistently criticized Israel over a litany of issues and has backed many anti-Israel U.N. resolutions.

Emmanuel Navon, a scholar of international relations at Tel Aviv University and a senior fellow at the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS), explained that in this context, the recent moves by Paris are not a policy shift but rather a continuation of France’s approach to Mideast affairs.

“France has had a very hostile policy toward Israel since the late ’60s. Macron is merely reconnecting with the French tradition of hostility toward Israel,” Navon told JNS.

Tsilla Hershco, a senior research fellow and Israeli-French relations expert at Bar-Ilan University in Ramat Gan, said that while attacking Israel is a well-established French foreign policy, the wartime realities make the stance a particularly harmful and aggressive manifestation of a long-standing strategy.

“In a certain sense, Macron continues the traditional French policy of defining France’s core interest in its relations with the Arab-Muslim world. Throughout numerous debates in the U.N. Security Council on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, France has consistently taken a stance of condemnation and criticism toward Israel,” Hershco told JNS.

“It seems that, due to developments related to Israel’s current war, a more dangerous reality has emerged,” she added.

Domestic considerations

Experts agree that a constellation of political factors is driving France to challenge and instigate against the Jewish state. “France’s policy toward Israel is connected to both its foreign and domestic policies,” Hershco said.

“On the domestic front, the French government faces internal contradictions: On the one hand, a desire to appeal to its growing Muslim population; on the other hand, a need to appear as a strong government unwilling to compromise on its core principle of secularism and the separation between religion and state,” Hershco expanded.

Navon explicitly stated that a significant factor in France’s anti-Israel stance in general and its recognition of a Palestinian state in particular is related to the rising influence of Islam.

Navon further explained that France’s domestic coalition dynamics are also contributing to Macron’s increased interest in Middle Eastern affairs.

“Macron has a minority government, and so he essentially cannot govern. In this situation, the easiest thing to do is to stay away from domestic issues, which require consensus, and to focus on foreign policy to make yourself relevant,” Navon said.

Hershco added that the French government sees the Gaza war as a unique opportunity to bolster its ties with the Arab world while simultaneously setting itself up as a global moral arbiter and a separate base of Western leadership, distinct from Washington.

“For many years, France has defined its relationship with the Arab world as one of its central interests. At the same time, France aspires to present itself as a major uninvolved power that mediates in conflicts between other nations, including the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” Hershco said.

Frances’s climb to European leadership, partially on the back of anti-Israel policy, threatens to isolate Jerusalem not just from Paris but from Europe as a whole, as European countries are likely to prioritize intra-European unity over their Israeli ties.

Already, multiple organs in the E.U. and in Western Europe are taking similar positions to France, and major Western powers, including the U.K., Canada and Australia, have followed in pledging to recognize a Palestinian state.

However, there is still general agreement that Israel has a significant base of support in Europe and that there are still broad common interests that could serve as a basis for stable diplomatic ties.

“Europe has a strategic interest in maintaining its relationship with Israel, partly because of Israel’s military capabilities and the shared concern, particularly regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions,” Hershco said.

Navon added that there are still major centers of open support for Israel inside Europe.

“It is important to remember that there is no such thing as European foreign policy. Each country has its own position, and Israel has very strong ties with a lot of European countries, particularly in Eastern Europe,” Navon said.

“Even in Western Europe, it’s really a question of which government is in charge, and there are many strong parties in Western Europe that openly support Israel. Right now, many anti-Israel parties control governments, but that could change very quickly,” Navon added.

 

Shimon Sherman is a columnist covering global security, Middle Eastern affairs, and geopolitical developments. His reporting provides in-depth analysis on topics such as the resurgence of ISIS, Iran’s nuclear ambitions, judicial reforms in Israel, and the evolving landscape of militant groups in Syria and Iraq. With a focus on investigative journalism and expert interviews, his work offers critical insights into the most pressing issues shaping international relations and security.

Source: https://www.jns.org/macrons-diplomatic-gambit-appeasing-islamists-isolating-israel/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter