by Aviva Slomich
Will the social justice warriors who scream against cultural appropriation come to the defense of their Jewish classmates?
What should be considered hateful behavior on American university campuses? Using ethnic or religious slurs, as are heard on many campuses across the U.S.?
Intimidating students 
who don't agree with you to such a degree that they are afraid to attend
 classes, as happened at the University of Michigan, or feel the need 
to transfer to another university, as happened to former Graduate 
Students Association president Milan Chatterjee at UCLA?
Creating videos that portray a particular ethnic group as monsters?
Supporting restarting 
the intifadas that have murdered hundreds of innocent men, women, and 
children from various ethnic groups?
Sharing Nazi propaganda
 on a student organization's website, and selling shirts with the 
terrorist Leila Khaled emblazoned on them, as happened at Vassar 
College?
Hijacking every liberal cause on campus to target one ethnic group?
If you've answered yes 
to any or all of the above questions, then it should be clear: Students 
for Justice in Palestine is a hate group. All the above examples have 
been orchestrated on U.S. campuses by that group or its affiliated 
organizations.
Does this mean every 
member of SJP is a hateful extremist? No. Does it mean every 
organization that sponsors an event with SJP or co-signs a petition with
 SJP is a hate group? No.
What it does mean is 
that every university that permits an SJP chapter to register as a 
recognized student organization is abetting hate speech. Every group 
that sponsors an event with SJP or co-signs a petition with the 
organization is legitimizing its hateful messages. Every professor who 
serves as a faculty adviser, officially permitting SJP to spread its 
hateful rhetoric on campus, is responsible for the manipulation of the 
naive students who join SJP, thinking they are fighting for a just 
cause and against hate.
At the university 
level, we assume that students receive information from various 
sources, and that their professors are guiding them to ask the right 
questions, to  follow no one blindly, and to try their best to get an 
even-handed account on all issues that matter to them by looking to 
differing perspectives.
That's not happening.
Instead, professors are
 taking advantage of their impressionable students, who look to them as
 omnipotent mentors. With social media and Google filtering content by 
popularity, and with most millennials tending to follow those who share
 the same opinions, it's almost absurd to think that university students
 are getting a well-balanced and unbiased education. 
One result of this is a spike in campus anti-Semitism.
At Brown University, 
Janet Mock, a transgender, black, native Hawaiian activist, was 
pressured to cancel an event because Hillel, a Jewish institution, was 
sponsoring her talk.
Stanford alumna Molly 
Horwitz didn't receive a bid for Student Senate from the Students of 
Color Association because she was Jewish and was thus suspected of 
having "duel loyalties."
At the University of 
California, Santa Cruz, Daniel Bernstein was told that he must abstain 
on a BDS resolution because he was "elected to the student government 
with a Jewish agenda." 
Recently, after a class
 at the University of California, Berkeley was suspended for a short 
period of time due to its extreme bias on the Palestinian-Israeli 
conflict, the campus saw an outbreak of anti-Jewish literature.
The cases spark many questions. 
Will the social justice
 warriors who scream against cultural appropriation come to the defense
 of their Jewish classmates? Will those who chant for lower tuition fees
 stamp out anti-Semitic absurd claims that Jews and Zionists are the 
reason for the high costs? Will feminists jump to the side of the 
future Molly Horwitzes and Janet Mocks? Will those who battle 
Islamophobia protest until anti-Semites are kicked off campus? Will 
LGBT activists support the only country in the Middle East where gays 
feel safe? 
Lastly, will those who 
honestly want to help find a peaceful resolution to the Arab-Israeli 
conflict denounce those who support the murder of innocents or will they
 trample on those who speak for the peace of all peoples: Israelis, 
Palestinians, Arabs and Jews?
Aviva Slomich is international campus director for the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America.
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment