by Elliott Abrams
The
news of the last few weeks has been filled with complaints that the
United States is electronically spying not only on enemies but on allies
as well. As I wrote in a previous blog post,
if we have in fact targeted the cell phones of leaders of friends and
allies, such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel, we should stop. Yes,
the world is a dangerous place and gentlemen do read each others' mail,
but deliberately targeting the leader of an ally such as Germany is
wrong and stupid. And especially so given the risk these days that such
conduct will leak and damage important allied relationships.
Spying this way on
allies is bad enough. Revealing their secrets to the press is even
worse. Yet we have a pattern of doing this when it comes to Israel, and
the most recent example came on October 31.
Earlier this past week a
Syrian military base in Latakia was hit, and apparently an important
quantity of missiles meant for delivery to Hezbollah were destroyed.
There was speculation about the attack, including suggestions that
Israel rather than Syrian rebels conducted it. But Israel remained mum,
as it always does. It believes that its security is greatly enhanced by
such silence, in part because bragging about these attacks might well
humiliate Hezbollah or Syrian President Bashar Assad and push them into
some kind of retaliation. It is for this reason that Israel sought
absolute American and Israeli official silence after its attack on the
Syrian nuclear reactor in 2007. Indeed Israel still to this day, six
years later, does not officially acknowledge that it conducted that
attack. The United States remained silent about that attack until the
danger of retaliation was thought to be gone.
But once again this
week American officials told the press that Israel was responsible for
an attack on Syria as soon as it occurred.
Here is the CNN story:
"Israeli warplanes struck a military base near the Syrian port city of
Latakia this week, an Obama administration official told CNN on
Thursday. An explosion at a missile storage site in the area was
reported in the Middle Eastern press, but an attack has not been
confirmed by the Israeli government. The target, according to the Obama
administration official, was missiles and related equipment the Israelis
felt might be transferred to the Lebanon-based militant group
Hezbollah. The official declined to be identified because of the
sensitive nature of the information."
U.S. officials did this as recently as July, as a New York Times storyreported:
"Israel carried out an air attack in Syria this month that targeted
advanced antiship cruise missiles sold to the Syria government by
Russia, American officials said Saturday. The officials, who declined to
be identified because they were discussing intelligence reports, said
the attack occurred July 5 near Latakia, Syria's principal port city."
And we did it in May:
"A series of powerful explosions rocked the outskirts of Damascus early
Sunday morning, which Syrian state television said was the result of
Israeli missile attacks on a Syrian military installation. If true, it
would be the second Israeli airstrike in Syria in two days and the third
this year. ... An American official, who asked not to be identified
because he was discussing intelligence reports, said the targeted
shipment consisted of Iranian-made Fateh-110s."
There is a pernicious pattern
here, and other examples could be cited. Add this to the National
Security Agency revelations, and the United States seems to be
aggressive in stealing the secrets of some close allies and aggressive
in ignoring the interests of allies by conveying intelligence
information to the press. The continuing leaks about what Israel has
been doing are dangerous and damaging. Israel is acting where we are
not, enforcing red lines when we have failed to do so, and assuming
risks we have refused to take. We act as a poor ally if we repeatedly
and indeed recklessly increase the risk to Israel by treating sensitive
information as fodder for the press.
Elliott Abrams is a
senior fellow for Middle East Studies at the Council on Foreign
Relations.
Source:
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment